Recall a few months ago that I wrote an article introducing Return Of Kings readers to that classic of Indian eroticism, the Kama Sutra, and enumerated four sexual positions contained within that text. The response to that article was, for the most part, positive, notwithstanding a few commenters questioning how I could possibly learn anything from a barely civilized nation of street soilers!
Yes, I’m being sarcastic.
Ignoring India’s massive and memetic problems with open defecation, the Kama Sutra is still a masterwork of erotica, and should be studied by all.
Indeed, Vatsyayana’s magnum opus was the first Indian literature to be studied by both myself and Harry Flashman, and likely many other Western rakes as well. And so, handing the torch to a new generation of cads, let us learn another five positions from this text.
1. The Belly to Belly
Each partner stands with their legs planted on the floor (or the woman can wrap one leg around the man’s thigh should she desire). This allows the woman to either thrust or move up and down as the man thrusts as well.
Personally, I prefer the supported congress I discussed in the last article (because of the psychological sense of feeling like a barbarian), but this position is alright if you want the woman to do more of the work.
2. The Top Position
Or, as I like to call it, the “literal spinner” position. Perhaps you’ve used the term “spinner” to refer to tiny, petite women, a term that refers to the potential for them to literally spin on the vertical axis represented by an erect penis.
Well, this is no longer mere hypothesis!
In this position, the woman gets on top and then “swivels 360 degrees.” And in case you were under the impression that this was merely a swiveling of the hips, the text continues to state that: “This position is for novelty only—the woman should be careful to avoid injury to herself or the man”.
3. The Swing Position
Another woman on top position, this one manages the dual feats of feeling good for both partners and conveying a pretty clear psychological implication.
The woman places her back to the man and straddles his waist, mounting the penis. It facilitates the female orgasm, as most woman-on-top positions do, and the fact that the two partners never see each other’s faces makes it clear to both partners that this arrangement is purely a physical relationship, and that there is no longer-lasting affection. Should that be the message you want to convey, I would recommend using this position, and thus it is a useful position in your repertoire.
4. The Snake Trap
The name comes from how, in this position, there is no escape.
Anyway, the woman mounts the man in the usual way, but with her legs on either side of the man’s hips while the man outstretches his legs. Holding onto each other’s feet, both begin to thrust. A bit less intimate than the standard cowgirl position, but fun once in a while.
5. The Bridge Position
And finally, we end with a position where the man gets on top, but with a bit of a twist. With the man on his knees, the woman does a back bridge, where the man then begins penetration.
This one is not one of my favorites, mainly because it’s apparently less pleasurable to the woman than a standard missionary—and yes, keyboard alpha males, I do concern myself with pleasing my women in bed. With all that being said, it does feel pretty good for the man, so I do not totally eschew it.
Reading my two Kama Sutra articles, you have a nice library of sexual positions. But there’s plenty more, and those will perhaps be another article some day in the future.
Read More: An Introduction To Kama Sutra Positions
That’s a travesty !
What about the well know posture “Open the wallet to see the pink ?”
I just flash some kratom. Instant panty dropper.
Did you mean Kratom Sutra?
nice
Kratom. the origin and the solution of all our problems.
this thread can now be closed. Amen.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5316dea9bcc7f006659beadd2a2e3ed14a7fce3e26d53f3691074ef2e35813d4.png
Totally off-topic but wtf is this? Can someone explain? Trump for LGBT!
https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/nintchdbpict000278683690-e1477918417109.jpg?w=960&strip=all
Tough to explain.
But, my best guess is that Trump is not a 100% conservative.
I voted for him to get rid of the illegals, lower taxes, and kick ass on the BLM thugs. I did this realizing he is a media guy, and will have some liberal beliefs. He is kind of like Rudy, who has dressed in drag(!) on more than one occasion. It’s a trade off. There is no such thing as a perfect candidate…unless Pat Buchanan decides to run again.
… or he’s finally showing his true colors. lol
Hope you are wrong…
He IS lowering taxes… on the wealthy, via the new health care proposal.
Let’s just call it for what it is: Another system to redistribute wealth to the top 1%.
Isn’t it funny that the guy who spent his entire life putting his name on things suddenly insists that the health care bill NOT be called Trumpcare?
Healthcare is not a right.
Why should I pay for pediatric dentistry and pre-natal care?
My insurance was $278/mo. until Hussein changed it. Was told if I liked it I could keep it. But Hussein was a liar. Can you believe it? A nog who lies? Amazing, I know…
I picked the cheapest insurance available to me. Was $383/mo. to start with. Now is $512/mo!!! For something I almost never use!!! All so little Jamal can get his baby teeth check by the dentist.
You’re not worth debating.
Hey, that’s your opinion and you’re certainly entitled to it. Thanks for the comment, though.
It made me come back and re-read what I posted. I made a mistake. Little Jamal doesn’t have teeth. “He gots teefus”!
POTUS can neither raise nor lower taxes. That’s the job of Congress.
If you’re going to try and engage in politics with your feminine, emotion based world view, at least make an effort to understand the system that you’re criticizing.
Lmao dont you guys have cheaper insurance?
I pay £10 a month for around 50,000 coverage, you guys love getting raped by jews? lmao …
No shit, health insurance is like a VIP pass in the NHS!
lol, I still dont understand why you guys pay over £500 a month for a lottery ticket to a hospital …
Cant you guys choose a different life insurance company, like any other sane country? Even hitler germany had better life insurance … lmao you guys are so getting raped by jews its hilarious …
His “tax-cut” will be tax neutral.
I live in London and I also have health insurance, mate!
Thats great lol, I was referring to the guy in the u.s who pays £500 a month for life insurance … lmao
Downside of nhs is the diversity … lol
African nurses are scary as fuck at nhs hospitals, I always manage to piss off nhs africans nurses for some reason, even though i treat them like white people …
lol
I don’t understand how probably the best country in the world has the worst healthcare system.
Europe, along with every 3rd world country I have ever lived in manage to provide free healthcare for all their citizens …….. so how come America (richest country in the world) can’t?
Because in European countries like the UK, 90% of your citizens are White Europeans who pay into the system. Try free healthcare with 30%+ of the “citizens” are blacks and mestizos who would not recognize a hard day’s work if it bit them in the ass. That is what we have over here in the US. It is not working. Because it was imposed upon us by a black commie POTUS.
Havent had to “lodge” in a hospital in a looooooong time so I won’t really know.
If you wanna die of aids by inhalation, nhs hospitals are great …
He’s not conservative at all. His policies have been assessed at centre-left. He’s all mouth.
This is old and Trump doesn’t give a fuck about race or gayness…he cares about his country. Basically…..the Art of the Deal…in rainbow colors!
The White House on Tuesday released a statement saying the protections would remain in place and that Donald Trump ‘continues to be respectful and supportive of LGBTQ rights’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4190082/Ivanka-Trump-Jared-Kushner-fought-Trump-s-LGBT-order.html#ixzz4bDP5Nj2H
shut up and suck some dick you bigot
The White House on Tuesday released a statement saying the protections would remain in place and that Donald Trump ‘continues to be respectful and supportive of LGBTQ rights’
Are you just now seeing this? This was from back in October at a rally in Colorado. Basically people were trying to say Trump is anti-gay, and he grabbed that flag from someone in the crowd to show he’s not anti-gay
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2085091/donald-trump-lgbt-rainbow-flag-rally/
The White House on Tuesday released a statement saying the protections would remain in place and that Donald Trump ‘continues to be respectful and supportive of LGBTQ rights’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4190082/Ivanka-Trump-Jared-Kushner-fought-Trump-s-LGBT-order.html#ixzz4bDP5Nj2H
It reads LGBTs for Trump. Not the other way around.
lettuce, guacamole, bacon and tomato? Sounds delicious.
One word – Orlando. Male queers (lesbians are politically noisy but marginal) are coming to realize that conservative Christians, not liberals, enable people to defend themselves. Even half a dozen gays with guns could have stopped the muslim zany. And, that brings me to the other reason – it’s finally gotten through to homosexuals that for them Islam is Death, that it is for them definitely not the religion of Peace. As he has done with Jews, Trump has found the political fault line in this formerly solid D-rat voting block and is breaking votes away from them and towards him. You see a similar phenomenon in France with Le Pen.
It is not too early to begin thinking of 2020. The margin of victory in 2016 was unambiguous but close. The minimum amount of trans formative work required to at least arrest the Republic’s decay is way beyond what can be done in four years. Even eight might not be enough. What Trump is doing is shaving away enough votes from D-art block votes of Jews, Blacks, Queers to guarantee the National Populist movement can continue in office. National Populism needs allies, and no one should be particular about their motives; people can have the most unedifying motives for doing the right thing. I don’t claim the coalition will be peaceful, but we don’t need peace: we need victory.
My favorite position?
Picking them up and banging them in midair.
I suppose this has something to do with my being 51.
I guess it proves I am still strong enough to do this.
But it takes cooperation. I hate when they lean back. Puts a lot of strain on my lower back. They should instinctively know that when we pick them up they should wrap their arms and legs around us and hold for dear life.
I don’t heed the advice or value the knowledge of Indian Hindu’s, especially when it comes to construction, quality assurance, or love-making.
This is more a ‘Woman magazine’ than RoK article.
What’s with all this feminist shit being posted here recently?
You write something better
Yeah, only feminists would want to know different sex positions.
Most guys are lucky to get some clumsy one-time drunken hookup sex. You have to be in a committed long-term relationship where you get to have sex dozens or hundreds of times with the same woman to start experimenting. Most guys have sex with all the frequency of a car accident so they don’t get to experiment.
I’m using talented Asian professionals that suggest all sorts of weird stuff.
Sometimes I hire them for a week. Once I hired one for 9 months, and she had an endless supply of suggestions.
But I agree white women are generally disappointing …… the one I was married to for 30 years hardly got beyond ‘missionary’.
I think probably white women are the worst sexual partners in the world (for entertainment). Japanese are probably the most experimental (no I don’t want to wee on you). Latino women always want to shove things in your arse while you bang them (too extreme for me)
sculpture depicting me when I read these sad sack comment from you pabst.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/23c7079f2b344e25cfaf10070e6ceae8fad0e8adb85d84e3d4aaa40c4708a53c.jpg
Then I’m a motherfucking stock car driver bitch!
The Swing Position just sounds like the Reverse Cowgirl. Granted, the authors of the Kama Sutra wouldn’t have called it that, but the author of the article should have clarified if it’s a modern semi frequent position, or something else.
Thy don’t specify squatting or kneeling either.
Most Asian ladies seem to prefer squatting on top so they can control penetration and skin contact (and can hold the position for 60 minutes or more). My English wife would be exhausted if kneeling on top for 5 minutes.
Looks it up,
he pretends to be a face up stool, she sits on him facing away.
So nothing like cowgirl or reverse cowgirl (him lying, her kneeling)
And nothing like crouching tiger (him lying, her squatting)
I prefer crouching tiger, it’s an Asian specialty with both Thai and Filipino girls.
“The Swing Position just sounds like the Reverse Cowgirl. Granted, the authors of the Kama Sutra wouldn’t have called it that”
Reverse Sacred Cow…….guuuurrrrrrlllllll
Larsen, this was pretty cool. I wonder if you might consider mixing your other field of expertise and talking about updated fitness culture “kama sutra” style positions.
I’m not entirely familiar with those, but if I were to learn about them, I’d be happy to discuss them.
I don’t think they exist…that is kind of the point. This would be a great place for you to create them.
Dont troll the mods … jeebus …
I bet there’s an app for this shit.
Wait! This will improve my bench…how?
🙂
“Massive and memetic problems with open defecation”.
…..
….
Hilarious
Kratom and Kama Sutra ? Now there is a book in the making !
3. Swing description sounds a lot like https://vndb.org/i1069
Which actually can be intimate.if the girl looks back at you like in the example photo.
So I gather all the scholars here of Vātsyāyana’s work are married to women who were virgins and of the same Varna as themselves, and study it to pursue the virtuous life. That is, after all, the subject of eighty percent of the book.