Culture

Google Forsakes Its Reputation By Firing Employee Who Dared Sharing Mundane Facts

377 Comments

A Google engineer has been fired after circulating a 10-page ‘Anti-Diversity’ memo. James Damore, a published Ivy League biologist, wrote the tract, Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber, which challenges the organization’s gender equity policies and political correctness. He currently plans to sue Google for wrongful termination.

This story’s frightening aspect is that Damore’s views are centrist, and hardly controversial. While acknowledging that ‘discrimination’ can cause gender disparities, Damore argues that biology also plays a role. Among other empirical findings, women display more agreeableness, and higher neuroticism, than men, and are thus better suited to certain careers. He then goes on, in his memo, to suggest methods to create gender parity, with these biologically-based traits in mind.

For this ignominy, he was chastised by Google’s senior brass. Vice President of Diversity, Danielle Brown, crafted an emotional diatribe against Damore, and Chief Executive (white knight) Sundar Pichai told employees that Damore had perpetrated ‘harmful gender stereotypes.’ If anything, Google’s actions only confirm Damore’s worst fears, that “Google’s left bias has created a politically correct monoculture,” in which free expression is punished.

Never mind that Google does not practice what it preaches – 20 percent of its technical workers are women, and 35 percent are Asian. This, of course, makes sense for a profit-maximizing company, but the SJW mantra must be ceaselessly chanted from the rooftops nonetheless. What is worrying is that a moderate and scientifically based memo can instigate a witch-hunt. Yet there is a silver lining to this: we, in the right, can cultivate centrist allies, as the left increasingly alienates people.

The Biological Evidence

Of course Instagram whores should fight in wars!

Testosterone is a fundamental male hormone, which is why ROK readers are encouraged to get blood flowing through their testicles: lifting weights, cold approaching girls, and training martial arts. Testosterone determines behaviour and choices. Low-T men turn into beta losers.

It is therefore unsurprising that testosterone determines career choices. For instance, in research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, scientists found that “individuals high in testosterone… were more likely to choose risky careers in finance.” It is easy to surmise, from this alone, that high-T men will easily out-earn women. Indeed, women born with abnormally high testosterone levels are more likely to choose traditionally male careers, like pilot or computer scientist.

Men are attracted to careers which require working with objects and ideas, while women want jobs which involve social interaction (wasting half their day on social media). The former, which involves hard skills like computer programming or woodworking, earns more than the latter.

When four psychologists were asked to respond to Damore’s assertions, they all agreed with him. Indeed, Debra W. Soh said:

As a woman who’s worked in academia and within STEM, I didn’t find the memo offensive or sexist in the least…

Within the field of neuroscience, sex differences between women and men—when it comes to brain structure and function and associated differences in personality and occupational preferences—are understood to be true, because the evidence for them (thousands of studies) is strong. This is not information that’s considered controversial or up for debate; if you tried to argue otherwise, or for purely social influences, you’d be laughed at.

That sexual differences cause differences in career choices should therefore come as no surprise. This is simply science. What is shocking is Google’s reaction.

The Narrative and Its Adherents

Women’s comparative advantage is to be mothers and homemakers. For 99% of women, their time is better spent raising healthy, balanced children, than engaging in cubicle-slavery, alcoholism, and promiscuity.

Yet the dominant globalist narrative is that women are equivalent to men, in every facet of their being. The purpose of this is threefold:

  1. To destroy the family. Doing so dissolves individuals’ support structures, and makes them depend on the government and corporations.
  2. To ensure that women compete against men, hence lowering everyone’s wages.
  3. To destroy Western culture, which is premised on appropriate gender roles. Destroying the culture encourages hedonism and rampant consumerism.

Whether or not the globalists actually believe these tenets is irrelevant, since it serves their purpose. The point is they have thus far been successful. Damore’s sin was to question the idea that we are separate from our genes.

Silver Lining

James Damore is not the only centrist to have suffered for his opinions. Homosexual liberal Dave Rubin’s views on Islam caused his YouTube revenues to drop by 60%. Other controversial YouTubers, like PewDiePie and Entrepreneurs in Cars, have suffered similar fates from YouTube’s demonetization. Jordan Peterson, the acclaimed Canadian psychologist, whose views are centre-right at most, was denied government research money. Popular UCLA law professor Keith Fink was fired for his supposedly conservative opinions. I could go on.

There is a silver lining: the left is persecuting moderates. We, as right-wing men, should therefore seek strategic alliances with useful centrists, especially those who have a large audience and/or are in positions of authority. Roosh wisely warned that we cannot win without parallel institutions; a possible tactic is to cautiously ally with moderates in creating separate universities, media, and think tanks.

377 thoughts on “Google Forsakes Its Reputation By Firing Employee Who Dared Sharing Mundane Facts”

  1. The best thing about this is that the guy, who has a PHd from Harvard, was smart enough to file a complaint with the NLRB prior to publishing his memo.
    Hence, Google has violated the law by firing him.
    get the pop-corn going.
    BTW- wikileaks and gab have already made job offers to him.

    1. Didn’t get his PhD. Dropped out beforehand. Rumours are that he didn’t like the politically correct culture there either.

    2. Ahhhh! Awesome, you answered the comment I just posted. Even better that it was an NLRB complaint – outside the Google organization – so they can;t just sweep it under the rug.

      1. Well, that’s assuming what I’ve read is correct. Could be wrong, we’ll have to wait and see as more news comes out.

    3. Somehow, I can’t see the NLRB siding against Google… birds of a feather, and all.

  2. Libtards are gradually turning western society into an Orwellian dystopia. That’s pretty terrifying. But what’s even more disturbing is that most people are ignorant/indifferent to this obvious trend.

    4. Don’t worry everybody. Google only controls 77% of all search traffic on earth, not including YouTube. That is like a whole 23% of the information environment that is not searched via their code! Incidentally, YouTube’s search bar is the most popular search engine in the world. But it’s cool, because Google is super committed to freedom of thought, speech, debate, and the marketplace of ideas. I trust them completely with information oversight for the planet. Don’t you?

        2. I use duckduckgo as much as possible, but I have to hand it to Google: their formula and design makes them much better at giving more relevant search results. That said, the second there’s a search engine as good as Google that doesn’t track you, I’m using it.

        3. If you really must use google’s algorithm, then use startpage. It serves up anonymous google results. It claims to be pro-privacy but suppose it makes money off us somehow, but at least it’s not a huge beast like google.

      2. Premium25f

        Google is paying 97$ always! Work for couple of hours and have longer with sidekicks and family! :!sq115d:
        On Tuesday I got an excellent new Land Rover vary Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewardful I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable however you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        :!sq115d:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash405BuzzLock/Pay$97/Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!sq115l..,.

    7. What’s funny is that Google is fighting a class action lawsuit by 60 women who claim they were not equally paid as their male counterparts. Google is nothing but a crap place to work where you are surrounded by the betas of all men, feminist purple haired fat women, and fresh off the boat H1b visa workers from India with bad body odor.

  4. Speaking of emotional diatribes, such as the one issued by Google’s Vice President of Diversity, Danielle Brown (and trust me when I tell you that Google wants diversity of every damn thing under the sun, except diversity of thought and/or opinion), I wanted to pass along a bit of timely advice here, regarding game – not only as it pertains to bedding women, but for doing business as well.
    One thing I always try to do, in either arena, is to not let emotion knock me off course. I don’t ever want to let emotion enter into the equation, because it demonstrates a weakness which others can exploit. In addition, emotion makes a person irrational. And it’s all a war, isn’t it. You either win or you lose. Case in point: I have a client who has been with me for 16 years in my web design business. He’s slick. Very intelligent. Very articulate. But he’s also a snake. And I knew that from Day One.
    I’ve been starting to use leverage on this client, to get what I want out of our relationship. This included recently threatening him that I might one day take my websites down, and tell him to go take a leap off a building. He freaked out when I did this. He completely lost it. He wrote me this rambling screed, which expressed his sheer horror at the prospect of having his business decimated in such a way. In his own words, “I’m still reeling emotionally from this threat to my business!” And that was a really bad move on his part. Because now I know exactly what scares him. Now I know his ultimate weakness and I know how to manipulate him.
    The same rule applies when dealing with women. They are masters at trying to make men get emotional (angry, jealous, etc.). They hunt for those hot buttons like pigs hunt for truffles.
    If a guy looks at anything of this nature as a challenge, and nothing more, nothing personal, and if he constantly shoves his emotions aside and never, ever lets somebody know exactly what he is really thinking, that guy will have a leg up on virtually everybody in the arena. A woman who encounters an impregnable fortress of frame, will be fascinated by such an adversary. She will hunt and peck and keep trying to poke holes in it, but the longer a guy succeeds at rebuffing her attempts, the quicker she will become docile and eventually give up.
    I keep my mouth shut about vital things in the real world. What I know about people, most importantly. This makes people realize they can trust me with their secrets. So I invariably find out about everybody’s weaknesses.
    I used to work in this office year ago, and this older woman who worked there (in her mid-70s) had a candy bowl in her office. All of the people who worked in that office would come in for the free candy. Over time, they all started trusting her, because she kept her mouth shut about what they told her. She flat-out told me that this was her secret, and she suggested I do the same thing in every walk of life. “Keep your mouth shut, Bob, be accessible if you work in a group environment, and offer something of value – in my case, free candy for starters – be a good, unemotional, supportive listener, and eventually you’ll know everything about everybody.”
    I learned a hell of a lot from that old broad. And what I learned from her can be applied to any endeavor in life. But as it pertains to us red-pill men, and what we ultimately want the most, don’t get emotional when on the hunt for pussy or money. Not ever. And don’t talk about other people, don’t gossip. Maintain frame and everybody will unburden themselves and they will tell you their problems (everybody will reveal their own weaknesses), and everybody will talk shit about the people they hate, which will give you insight into those people’s true natures.
    The more you practice this, the more it will become second nature to you. Seize the freakin’ day…

        2. Some are. To deny this is to deny reality. Is to have “it’ll never happen here/to me” dumbass attitude.
          The paid truffles have insane word counts, will get into lengthy debates with nobodies over anything. They will attempt to tantalize with stories of greed and lust.
          They will claim anyone who cares about society level issues is a loser who should focus solely on greed and lust.
          They will steer the conversations quite well. They will project an image of themselves as an “ideal” that most men “should” aspire to be.
          Some truffles are paid

        3. Hey, as long as you have your tinfoil hat on while on the Internet, you’re totally safe, dude.

        5. You moron.
          My lucky Gumby slippers keep me safe on the internet.
          Tinfoil hats prevent the aliens from reading your thoughts.
          Don’t you feel stupid now?

    2. Good advice Bob. A poker face is a very good thing to master, emotion is a mans worst enemy. You’re spot on about the secrets too, folks have volunteered all kinds of things without my saying but 4 words during a conversation “you’re such a good listener” heh

      1. Oh yeah, the good listener thing will take a guy a long way. I like to use this one, when somebody starts to open up:
        “I’m an empty vessel with a trap door that opens to the universe – empty yourself into me and let it go, whoosh, out into the void it goes.” (Or words to that effect.) And then smile, in a way that says don’t take me seriously here, but you can tell me anything. Chicks are impressed by that for some reason. Probably because they’re little children, mentally.

        1. “Empty yourself into me and let it go”????
          …
          Bob, you should re-word that.

        2. Hmm. I think I will reword it. Thanks for pointing that out.
          Here’s another angle on this whole thing. I heartily recommend that guys try this little mindfuck out on their next female victim. You start talking a little bit, first, and you get to know each other a little bit. She knows who you are, you know who she is. But you don’t know each other that well yet. At some point, tell her that you have two things that a woman covets more than anything else. Don’t tell her what those two things are. When she asks you what they are, tell her, “I’m a great listener and I have a great sense of humor.” Say this a bit sarcastically, and smile a bit sarcastically. She’ll be thinking you were going to say, “I have a big dick and a shitload of money,” or something along those lines. What she didn’t expect you to say will immediately stick inside her conscious mind. Now, she’ll feel comfortable about spilling her guts to you. It might take until the next meeting, but she’ll eventually do it. Try it, you’ll see.

        3. If that’s what he wants can we not be supportive of his lifestyle choice. It’s 2017 after all

        4. Troy should be proud for coining a new manosphere term. Vinny Pringo just seems so much more Chadly that Chad Thundercock.

    3. In political indoctrination centers like google and facebook though, they’re looking to out the heretics. They will want you to virtue signal and may take stoicism or silent manliness as toxic masculinity. In that case do you lie? Feed them white lies about what they want to hear? Be vague enough that they just assume?

      1. I dunno. I have managed to stay away from indoctrination centers for the past couple of decades. It’s a bad habit, and I’m still trying to quit. One day at a time, my man, one day at a time…

      2. actually it is quite easy. A lot of men in those companies are socially inept. Just nod your head and mumble something unintelligible. Silence is not a sign of toxic masculinity rather than social awkwardness, which affects probably 50% of the workforce.
        on any topic, drop a comment or two that either addresses some politically neutral aspect of the discussion. Or you can merely follow up with a question to the most obnoxious know-it-all, who will be happy to enlighten you further.

    4. Perfect example of Law 33- Discover each man’s thumbscrew.
      If you ever feel you may react emotionally; calm down, take a step back and try to think rationally.

    5. Law 33
      Discover each man’s thumbscrew.
      If you ever feel you may react emotionally; calm down, take a step back and try to think rationally.

    7. Thanks Bob. I’ll be sure to keep this advice in mind. But I have to say even though I don’t agree with every single one of your view points I am glad that you have fully embraced the red pill and improvedyour life. So many guys on this site only restate and cry about the same problems over and over again which is annoying to look at. They never leave the red pill rage phase. But anyway thanks again and also when will your next article come out

  6. You can understand the Google fiasco by understanding what I call the Unified Theory of Diversity: What do our elites’ preferred client groups of blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, South Asians, feminists, gays and now transgenders have in common? Why the effort to gang up these outsiders, losers and misfits into a coalition that in other contexts wouldn’t cohere or make any sense?
    Answer: These groups have the job of making normal white people’s lives worse.
    As for the feminist component in this coalition, the preposterous fortunes piling up in Silicon Valley have reinvigorated the adventuress lifestyle. Our ancestors knew the adventuress sort of female personality well, the young woman on the make who uses her sexuality to seek rent from men. Hollywood even made films about such women, like Barbara Stanwyck’s pre-Code 1933 movie Baby Face. But feminists have tried to shame us from recognizing this behavior in women by calling the Noticing of it sexism or something, especially when feminists have engaged in it.
    The adventuress never went away, however.
    Now, our diversity ideology has given the adventuress a new angle for shaking down men that doesn’t involve the humiliation of sleeping with any of them she doesn’t find attractive. And the diversity weapon has the added advantage that even homely adventuresses can use it as well.
    This infiltration of adventuresses into Google and their attacks on the company’s effective men have predictably backfired. Why would these men allow a bunch of bitchy broads spoil the good thing they have going for them?

  7. “Of course Instagram whores should fight in wars!”
    Did Bob write this?
    “There is a silver lining: the left is persecuting moderates” A lot of the far marxist left’s success has involved moving the overton window, particularly be re-framing far left and ‘revolutionary’ ideas as centrist and middle of the road. Hence elite sponsored social engineering of societies into a transhumanist nightmare in which nothing recognisable remains of yesterday is now just run of the mill ‘progress’ while holding a view that was mainstream and universal a couple of years ago (c.f. obama’s dismissal of SSM back in 2009) is the kind of extremism that can get you on the SPLCs list of top nazis to be hunted down by the Simon Wiesenthal centre. James Damore is clearly a pretty of the run of the mill classical liberal whose memo contains nothing at all that would have been controversial or other than common sense just a few years back, and for that reason he’s being made out as though he’s a misogynist woman hater, incapable of recruiting anyone without gender bias (he was in a position to hire people) and even as evidence of the serious problem of wrong-think blighting the white heterosexual male dominated tech industry.
    In other words the left will attempt to use Damore’s attack as an instantiation of the problem at hand, and as a spring board for Moar Mad Marxism, and an opportunity to move that window even further to the diabolical left. The problem though is that increasing numbers of people, including people firmly in the centre, or left of the centre, and indeed women, including not a few women engineers feel that he is absolutely right.
    If played right this is a controversy that could bust things right open, not least because Damore has gently poked his way into some entirely taboo areas. Think about the last time you heard any voice in the MSM say not merely that men and women might be constituted differently (you will hear that message from time to time) but that men might have both biological and cultural cause to seek success and status in a way that simply isn’t true for women. The way the marxist family destroying left gets round that obvious fact is through the pretence of gender neutrality vis a vis economic roles, and by promoting a gender neutral hetero / homo sexual equivalence: there is no such a thing as a man needing to be a bread winner because women perform exactly the same role and function as men, and are absolutely interchangeable in all ways except where culture oppresses them, and anything that acknowledges the expectation that men require status that women do not undermines homosexual couples who embody the principle of role inter-changeability.
    Of course the social engineers know all of this, but they’re not interested in being fair or reasonable. They want to change the world, and exploit and punish any part of it that hasn’t yet snapped into line with the great work of suiting everybody up in identical blue unisex tunics.
    They may have a harder time of it than they like though. Methinks James Damore has just lit a ciggy in a firework factory.

  8. So Google responds by doing precisely the thing he is suggesting is detrimental to the company. No real surprise. Had they fostered the conversation and explored the matter in an introspective and honest way, it might have tested their faith in ways too painful to endure.
    Worrisome prediction: With the attention this will get from the government and courts, there will be no shortage of heavyweight companies lending their support to Google’s position. The left has found a new way to silence and intimidate, and they won’t let go of it easily.

  9. “Vice President of Diversity”
    This means there is an entire department dedicated to combating alleged discrimination. How do they do this? By creating actual discrimination! What is really ironic is how the left is contradicting themselves by insinuating that women wouldn’t make it at Google if the hiring policy was exclusively based on ability and talent.

    1. Here’s what I’ve always wondered – if you really thought some place was filled with discriminatory assholes who hated you, why the fuck would you want to work there in the first place? It’s not like Google’s competitors can’t use great coders, etc…

      1. 1) H1Bs can’t transfer jobs easily.
        2) some people do transfer out
        3) prestige. Google has the benefit of extra prestige compared to others. That can make a difference in a few subtle ways (e.g., serving on international committees).

        1. I understand what you’re saying, but it still doesn’t compute to me.
          First, I think H1Bs are an entirely different subject, and these folks probably come from places where the idea of having a legitimate grievance based on discrimination is a fucking joke to begin with. Yeah, your boss hates your skin color. So did the boss in your old country, and his clan tried to kill your.
          Second – prestige, I understand on a facial level, but at the end of the day, which is an opportunity to serve on committees with these people who hate you and whom you hate. I don’t want to be on their committee, I want to start my own with people I don’t find insufferable.
          Third, I understand some people get out, but I’m saying why go in in the first place? If the crew from that diversity pic started their own company, it would take about 30 seconds of Twitter research to realize that I would be public enemy number one in such an organization. I just can’t conceive of ever wanting to go there. And I get that this is tied to your point about prestige, but to that I would say two things: 1) this kind of diversity stuff doesn’t only go down at prestigious companies – it’s everywhere – and I’m saying that it’s not a selling point to say “we were such bigots that we have to hire a permanent crew of people to keep our bigots in line; and 2) prestige is not necessarily all its cracked up to be. Take Google itself – the founders didn’t become who they are because they gave a shit about leveraging prestige to the next higher rung in someone else’s bureaucracy, they created a company from scratch. I understand the allure of prestige, but the older I get, the more I have come to see it as a trap for the unwary that can easily lock you into someone else’s plan, chasing someone else’s goals, hitting someone else’s wickets.

        2. Well, first remember that Google is 60,000 people. Not all departments or divisions are like that. Some areas are completely different. most of the SJW madness is in headquarters in MTV. The regional offices like Austin, Waterloo and the like don’t have this sort of politics. You can end up on a team with 100% Chinese who don’t have any SJW politics whatsoever. Yes, you’ll still get the emails and training sessions, but not everyone deals with this on a daily basis.
          Second, networking and serving on committees is absolutely mandatory for some career paths. If you want to be a well known nuclear scientist, genomics researcher (etc), you have to do this sort of thing. Same with some areas of software (e.g., sitting on the C++ standards committee). It is a whole lot easier to go in with Google’s name behind you than as an independent. Remember, not everyone wants to be an entrepreneur (nor has the skills for it).
          Third, it is way easier to secure venture capital funding if you have a history at a major company and some prestige. Sure, there are people who create a product from scratch. Page and Brin had some advantages, one being Jewish. Another coming from Stanford. Another was their network, which included investors like David Cheriton. These weren’t kids in Alaska or Murmansk who invented some great product in a vacuum… they were embedded in the Silicon Valley network.

        3. Yeah, I understand all of this, and don’t disagree with it. I think the disconnect here is that we’re talking past each other a bit. I think you’re focused on Google (and probably other prestigious), while I’m just talking about the concept of a diversity committee in general. You points are well taken, but practical, whereas mine are more philosophical.

        4. Agreed, I am focusing on Google because I have rather good knowledge of it.
          Also, many employees had no idea going in that the culture was like this. You are right, it is pervasive. I have interviewed Chinese students who said ‘thank good I work in engineering because I don’t want to deal with this nonsense politics’. They had no clue that engineering and STEM is now highly political in industry.
          Would I willingly sign up for a company that has a ‘diversity committee’? No. That’s why I avoided academia, even though I like the idea of getting paid to work on my own projects. Now that it is becoming obvious that industry is infested, you’ll see more people avoiding big companies like this.

        5. It also helps that Stanford did not prosecute them for stealing school property. Like the Obama Phone lady said: “They Suck!”

      2. One thing to note is that a lot of US colleges has Indian and Chinese international students filled in their comp sci departments. These students simply can’t just join a startup because startups can’t afford to sponsor H1Bs for these international students. This is where the big tech companies like Google come in and take in a lot of these talents and perpetuate their cycle of dominance in the tech market. Not to mention a lot of people would join Google early in their career regardless because of the name recognition on their resume. This is big in the finance/accounting and law industry as well. Where these firms have virtually built a pyramid scheme, filling their staff with top recent college grads who they work like slaves for a couple of years until the voluntary slave quits for greener pastures starting their own practice or going to industry (in house accountants, financial analysts, and counsel) with some work experience.

    2. One time I took on a VP of Diversity and his assistant… which talk about a waste of paychecks! All they did was push multiculturalism and go so far as to celebrate leftists. I had little to lose as they were headed into bankruptcy thanks to a very liberal CEO. Came down to it that they destroyed any sense of loyalty to anyone that didn’t blindly agree.

    3. The communists call them Political Commissars. The feminists can even make tyranny sound lame, emasculating and passive aggressive.

    4. I recently graduated from one of the most diverse colleges in the US where I worked in their tech support dept. There was mandatory diversity training, where I had to endure a minority therapy session and was generously informed of my privilege (I was 26 bc had been working full time through college to support myself). We are silenced and the historically resentful minorities do the bidding of the elite.

  10. From Vox Day’s blog yesterday:
    “It’s a bold move by Sundararajan. We’ll see how it works out for him. It was inevitable, because SJWs always double down, but the irony of Pichai Sundararajan, a high-caste Tamil Brahmin, firing an employee for expressing his belief in biological inequality, is practically off the charts.”
    Ya think?

  11. Maybe Google’s a dinosaur and they just don’t know it yet…speaking of which, holy shit, scientists have discovered the remains of a new dinosaur; and it’s not just any new dinosaur, it’s the largest dinosaur ever! – “It weighed 69 tons.”
    Man, that must have put some ungodly stress on its legs (see photo at the top of the article). And such slender legs, too, to support such a massive weight. I’ll be damned.
    I wonder what would happen if it fell over. It couldn’t possibly get up from the ground, could it. Same thing for a T-Rex, with those useless little arms. Or any other large, lumbering dinosaur, for that matter.
    But I know it’s true. You know why. Science told me so:
    https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/08/is-this-really-the-biggest-dinosaur-ever-discovered/536187/

    1. I recall one scientist claiming those giants with such tiny noses would have a hard time breathing…

      1. The weight would crush their legs. If they fell over, they’d never get up. But they were REAL.” I saw that movie, man, Jurassic Park, that shit is REAL, yo.” It’s just a coincidence that no actual bones exist in museums, all they show the customers are plaster casts, held together by wire. “We keep the real bones in back,” they tell you. Uh-huh. Tell me the story of Humpty-Dumpty while you’re at it, this is very entertaining.

        1. Cant tell if youre trolling or serious, but if you are serious, with all due respect I believe your information to be a couple paradigm shifts out of date.

        2. It’s an interesting topic.
          I say, put all the evidence on the table that supports the existence of those huge dinosaurs. And then I say, put all the evidence on the table that supports the notion of their complete and total fabrication.
          What would happen would be, most people would still believe in dinosaurs, but a certain percentage, would start to see a scam.
          That’s just how it goes.
          But here’s an interesting sidebar corollary. Fossil fuel, you know. There’s a limited supply. (Wink, wink.) It comes from the fossilized remains of dinosaurs. There’s only so much of it. Peak Oil, and all that stuff. Funny how that benefits the oil industry…but what do I know. I’m just a clown on this earth like everybody else.

        3. Nobody calls it fossil fuel any longer except the movies. It’s long been known that it’s not actually from fossils (so to speak).
          As to fossils, I own some fossils. Seem real enough to me.

        4. Fossil fuels come from the compressed remains of the giant fern forests from before the dinosaur epoch.

        5. lol, c’mon you are not a creationist. You know the more crazy conspiracy theories that get propagated the less people are inclined to look at those that might have some substance

        6. Oh. Funny how that changed, like Global Warming went to Climate Change. I missed the memo.

        7. how much lighter would the earth’s atmosphere need to be in order for these behemoths to able to walk on land? any science guys out there? if you put 4 legs on a blue whale, would it be able to walk on land?

        8. Gotcha. Used to be called fossil fuel. I learned that it came from dinosaur fossils when I was a wee lad. But I guess Al Gore took control of the curriculum…

        10. They did. It was rammed up my ass when I was a little kid. That Peak Oil scam is for the malleable. Dinosaurs were cover for Peak Oil.

        13. Only a couple years ago my dad was under the impression that carnivorous dinosaurs such as Rex and Raptors had extremely limited mobility on their arms. Would it make any sense for a predatory animal to have the mobility of a frankenstein/zombie caricature?
          Dinosaurs got a ton of wrong information peddled about them to baby boomer kids, I enjoyed being an indigo child when all the old wrong propaganda was being swept away.
          I’m still mad at Spielberg for not having the balls to put feathers on them.

        14. congrats- alot of weird images pop into my head w/o help, the four legged blue whale in red stilettos is an all time classic

        16. What’s interesting is when a guy starts Googling “dinosaur scam” or “dinosaur hoax”. And he really goes into it with an open mind, and starts reading the material. He will start finding example of fake plaster bones being buried in pits, and then, those same “bones” being discovered by “paleontologists”. It’s an interesting thread to pull…

        17. leaving aside it’s technically a mammal you could also visualise some sexy fishnets

        18. I was already taken by the idea of a whale with legs, found this, and was searching for the right opener to post it.

        19. didn’t think you could be that quick with a graphics pad, but one never knows

        20. this came up after searching “white men white women couples” right?

        21. No, I don’t think I could attempt drawing something like that at all, I’m more of a thief.

        22. i’m not sure you can be a “meme” thief to be honest. It’s redistribution not theft

        26. My only question is how do scientist accurately predict when and how long a dinosaur species lived. The further back in time you go the less accurate carbon dating becomes. Scientists then have to make assumptions about the initial amount of carbon and that the rate of decay has always been the same . So yea

        27. A better question is how the hell would they have been able to breathe. According to scientist there was a lower percentage of oxygen in the air then compared to now.

        28. Also that’s how you should be with any news or data. Have to supporting side in one hand then have the opposition in the other. Read through both of their research then come up with your own conclusion

        29. “Limited supply” There are qualified Russian scientists who believe oil is abiotic, continually produced within the Earth.
          “Abiotic” meaning not produced from long-ago decayed biological material.
          I suspect you are alluding to this.

    2. Dinosaurs were internally filled with air sacs exactly like birds to reduce their mass, circulate oxygen, regulate temperature. They were not built like big bulbous mammals ie Elephants, Rhinos, etc. Dinosaurs and Birds are one and the same, it might be hard to wrap one’s mind around it but think of them as physiologically the same as birds despite their wildly varied physical morphology.
      Also, Rexy’s arms were robust in strength despite their puny size. Theres a lot of outdated wrong information about Dinosaurs still circulating. Nature doesnt allow creatures that arent fit, to rule land sea and sky for 160 million years.

      1. how could you ever come to that determination with nothing but bones to go by? magic?

        1. No! They went back through a time-travel portal and they viewed it first hand. They even took photos. I hear those museums that house the dinosaurs keep those in the back room, too, along with the dino-bones…

        2. The bones themselves are often filled with air sacs, identical to birds’ bones. Their internal physiology is nearly identical to birds. In the past 66 million years birds have made a few improvements but other than that they are one and the same.

        5. A theory backed by the Rockefellers. That makes it the gospel, and if you don’t believe it, the Rockefellers have some meds they will insist you should be taking shortly…

        7. Yes Birds and Dinosaurs are one and the same.
          Dinosaurs aren’t reptiles any more than Birds are.

        9. “The class Dinosauria was originally defined by ‘Sir’ Richard Owen of the Royal Society, and Superintendent of the British Museum Natural History Department in 1842. In other words, the existence of dinosaurs was first speculatively hypothesized by a knighted museum-head ‘coincidentally’ in the mid-19th century, during the heyday of evolutionism, before a single dinosaur fossil had ever been found. The Masonic media and mainstream press worldwide got to work hyping stories of these supposed long-lost animals, and then lo and behold, 12 years later in 1854, Ferdinand Vandiveer Hayden, during his exploration of the upper Missouri River, found ‘proof’ of Owen’s theory! A few unidentified teeth he mailed to leading paleontologist Joseph Leidy, who several years later declared them to be from an ancient extinct ‘Trachodon,’ dinosaur (which beyond ironically means ‘rough tooth’).”
          http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/09/dinosaur-hoax-dinosaurs-never-existed.html

        10. In engineering think about structures that are lightweight but strong as fuck, like honeycomb style structures with hexagonal pockets with nothing in them.
          Again, nature does not allow creatures who aren’t fit, to rule land sea and sky for 160 million years. The swamp-dwelling dimwitted plodding antisocial loner sprawling cold blooded reptilian caricature of Dinosaurs has been long debunked, but I understand, if you werent a kid when these new discoveries were being unearthed it is difficult to get out of the old mindset about them.

        14. I went to see the live animatronic “Walking With Dinosaurs” BBC show at a concert venue a few years ago, and I was even as an adult truly dazzled and imposed upon by their colossal immensity. The Rex had me a tad scared! Trying to evade a carnivorous beast of that magnitude would send you into a primal adrenaline rush! These fuckers were -simply YUGE- and you kind of forget that vs when you were a kid and they seemed so enormous.

        15. This is off topic of your topic but I am curious. What do you think of this guys flat earth theory especially his belief of what Antarctica is

        18. Is it because his arguments are so compelling that you agree or is it that they are so ridiculous that you have no idea how to argue against them. Or something in between

        19. There is no rationale for a ball earth, once a guy really looks into it. Only fake photos from NASA. Every “proof” of a ball earth falls flat on its face. I think that guy at the site to which I linked wrote a book about it. “200 Proofs Earth Not a Globe”, or something like that. I investigated many alleged proofs. They all fell flat. As in flat…earth. It makes sense that the earth is flat. Those in control have brainwashed the fuck out of people. Way beyond anything they can possibly fathom. Virtually everything people think is true, is a lie. This is just the biggest of all lies – one most people can’t accept. Most won’t even look into it.

        20. So do you agree with his views on what Antarctica really is. And what do you think of his website and beliefs overall. Sorry for all the questions I just find your viewpoints on a lot of things interesting.

        21. I think the earth, as it really is, from our perspective, is a flat, vast, virtually infinite expanse. There is no “outer space and galaxies” and all of that other stuff. And I think our world, is a designated area that describes the area of a circle, within a flat plane. I also think it’s likely that there are other worlds, along this vast, virtually infinite plane, that are circumscribed by a similar boundary. And the people who live in those worlds are as ignorant as we are about everything. They think they’re on a spinning globe as well; they think they are all alone as well.
          Elitist filmmaker M. Night Shyamalan hinted at this in the movie “The Village”. I don’t know if you’ve seen it but it’s worth a look. It’s about a group of Old School U.S. villagers (dressed in what appears to be 16th-century garb) who believe their designated living area is surrounded by mysterious woods which contain monsters. At the end of the film, some of them break out of the woods and they stumble upon a modern-day city, complete with cars and freeways…
          I think Shyamalan was tweaking his nose at the unsuspecting public there. For millennia it was known the earth was flat. What happened. Science happened. Scientists are useful tools. They sell notions and ideas to the public, on behalf of the elite, for purposes of social control and mind control. That’s my take on it. Opinions vary.

      2. Every generation thinks it’s smarter than previous generations. I felt the same way, back in the day. So did my father. And his father. Etc. “We know better, because theories and science have evolved and we have more data to back up the theories.”
        Maybe. But maybe it’s more like, “We’ve had time to add more intricate layers to our original bullshit theories which we force-feed to people in indoctrination centers.”
        It’s a great word – ‘maybe’. It opens up all kinds of possibilities.

        1. The thing is modern ideas about dinosaurs are much more closely in line with the original ideas, before a bunch of boring close-minded “scientists” propagated the idea that they were dimwitted plodding cold-blooded monsters. Fortunately I was a kid that grew up right as the Dinosaur renaissance was taking place.

        2. Nothing personal my friend, but it’s possible they make some seriously enhanced industrial-strength indoctrination blue pills these days…anything is possible.

        3. Nothing more red-pilled and godly than coming to understand the majesty of Nature.

        1. So, Bob, you legit think dinosaurs aren’t real? Like there was never such thing as a dinosaur, it’s all just some shit that P.T. Barnum made up to get suckers in the door?

        2. I don’t necessarily go that far. Maybe some dinosaurs were real. But those huge ones? No fuckin’ way…

        3. RoK’ers, some of you need to take a dinosaur-sized red pill about Nature and Science.

    1. mostly white women…the brainwashing worked…they hate their own men…

    2. third from the right – is that Zoe ‘suck n fuck the patriarchy to death’ Quinn?

      1. oh, & anita sarkesian. You can trust her not to be fair and balanced and fair about gender issues

        1. love the profile pic, and how that compares to the above. To think they’ve put some of the most obnoxious feminists on the planet in charge of what we can and cannot say

        2. Weird, build something up than actively go out to find and hire the lunatics to run it like an asylum.

        3. it’s like sim city: when you’re done you unleash some unholy force of destruction against what you’ve built.

        4. Well the third wave feminists are certainly following Burge’s observation about leftists:
          1. Identify a respected institution.
          2. kill it.
          3. gut it.
          4. wear its carcass as a skin suit, while demanding respect.

        5. hadn’t heard of that, but that seems about right. On the other hand google has always been about radical socially engineered change. Ray Kurzweil is one of their top guys

    3. Funny how they put the most normal looking chick in front.
      About 70% female too. What’s equality?
      The snark is dripping off that pic

      1. I just read your comment as though the “about 70% female” point referred to the chick in front. LOL! Funny because it’s also true. Her forehead screams male hunter-gatherer.

    4. The irony of placing a Censorship Team in front of a poster speaking about “Ideas!” is not lost on me.

      1. The guy on the left is into cuckoldry and being pegged by his occasional 5.0 friend with benefits

        1. Didn’t even notice there was guy in the group, lol. That’s how indistinguishable manginas are from feminists.

      2. Imagine what this picture actually WOULD say if you could hear it. On second thought, don’t or you’ll feel compelled to stab a pencil into your eardrums to stop the vapid idiotic screeching.

    9. Are they intentionally trying to hire the ugliest chicks they can find to fill some sort of unbangable diversity quota?
      For fuck’s sake, from right to lef, I see a cro-magnon, a hairlip, a dork-dyke, a terrestrial manatee, a gay dude, a devious crack whore, a female Bunsen muppet lookalike, an androgynous stork, a drugged out jihadi-hooker, a dough face riot grrl, a hidden fatty, a congealed set of geometric shapes without curves anywhere but her face, a drunken lizard, and another homo who looks quasi homeless.

      1. A long way from James Watt’s “A woman, a black, two Jews, and a cripple.”

        2. Yep! Tanner was the little shit I had to deal with all the time. I wonder if he is being tortured at the Molly Yard perceptual readjustment center in Wellesley MA.

        3. I often find myself missing the 1970s.
          Nice handle Rockfish, that’s actually a favorite of mine.

      3. And all way too young. No offense to younger guys, but this crew looks like petulant kids, waiting to have their feelings “triggered” so they can crush the very same freedom of information that Tim Berners Lee invented the internet to promote.
        If there was ever such a thing as the Information Revolution, this is now the counterrevolution, and those are it’s guerillas.

    12. There is an ideas group.
      Have met some IRL.
      Are you Sure this is a censorship team?
      In any case if i were a billionaire software company, I would have 2 departments:
      One made of competant software engineers.
      The other a diversity freak show (because you have to anyway).
      Both would be given the same specifications, and reality show camera crews.
      Popcorn

    19. Ya got ET with hair poking his/her/its head up in the back. Im going to have nightmares after seeing this picture.

    1. eminently sensible really. Especially the special physical examination dealing with female conditions. Whoever wrote this should be minister for women and equalities

    2. Those all seem reasonable and common sense really. I know it was printed to shock people, but to me that just seems like good policy.

    3. The real question is, under these standards, how many modern you-go-grrrrrrllll careerists would be unfit to hire? I’m guessing somewhere north of 95%.

  17. Try translating “Diversity Officer” into say Chinese or Russian – it’ll take you a while to find words that describe the meaning of it. And even then people will think its a bizzare type of job. Only in the West…

    1. Yeah, the Soviets and Red Chinese never had legions out censoring people.

      1. Race, gender and sexual orientation were not even part of the vocabulary in Soviet Russia. Censorship was based purely on communism vs. capitalism dichotomy.

        1. Still censorship. I do agree it’s bizarre, no question, but no more bizarre to me than throwing out 500 posters per square block with a finger pointing loon screaming about “Capitalist Running Dogs!”. All censors and censorship, with only very minor exceptions (child porn, etc), are insane and involve exactly the same mindset.

        2. you can get some idea of why James Damore pissed so many people off by reading one of the footnotes to his memo:
          7] Communism promised to be both morally and economically superior to capitalism, but every attempt became morally corrupt and an economic failure. As it became clear that the working class of the liberal democracies wasn’t going to overthrow their “capitalist oppressors,” the Marxist intellectuals transitioned from class warfare to gender and race politics. The core oppressor-oppressed dynamics remained, but now the oppressor is the “white, straight, cis-gendered patriarchy.”
          As you can see he’s both claiming that a) communism has mutated into feminism and race politics and b) that google by implication is functioning as a communist organisation in that sense

        3. Soviet censorship did not require importing of millions of third-world enrichers. Identity politics are very hard to reverse. What you gonna do with, say, 50 million + Muslims in Europe? They’re physically there. Whereas, belief system can be reversed.
          A commie could become a capitalist. A Somalian in Columbus, OH always will be a Somalian.

        5. That really has nothing to do with what we were talking about, but ok. I’m just saying, there were official Glorious Censor jobs and positions all over Russia and China. What they pushed or tried to cover up is irrelevant. It’s not only “in the West”.

        6. Oh wow… this is a good find. I bet this is the real reason old James Damore had to go…

        14. Vinny Pringo left a message for you. He said he’s finished with your girlfriend, so you can come pick her up now. He also said to bring towels. Lots of towels.

        20. yeah, I always missed it, but it gives you an idea of where he’s coming from. Not only is he saying that diversity / gender equality is directly derived from hardcore class warfare communism (something I believe is absolutely demonstrable) but he’s also implying that his employer ‘don’t be evil’ Google Inc / Alphabet is potentially practising the same. That is not a conversation they are likely to want to have, although it most certainly is a conversation they will find it difficult to avoid. The more I hear about James Damore the more I like about him

        22. yes GOJ they were called political Kommisars like the one on “Hunt for Red October” …you had to run all your decisions by that person to see if it was in line with the Commie party line…

        23. I meant “diversity” as it relates to promotion of identity politics, notably race, gender and gays are mostly unique to the West.
          Diversity department, in the Western sense of the word, simply do not exist outside of the West. In Russia, there are barely any HR departments, if any at all.

        24. “Getting real tan, getting good on guitar….come on and be my little komissar.
          We don’t wanna have no nuclear fight….we just wanna have a beach party tonight!”
          -Ray Stevens, Surfin’ USSR.

    2. Hmmm…l used to be able to speak Russian quite well years ago, not nearly as well nowadays after years without practice, so I typed “diversity officer” into Google Translate and got this: Сотрудник (Sotrudnik), which means nothing more than “employee” in English. So, you’re right about that, Nevsky!

    3. Diversity Office is no damn different than those political commissars that you see in China or Soviet Russia to enforce ideologic purity…Scary..

      1. It is very different in a sence that in Soviet Russia ideological purity did not require importing millions of third-world immigrants or undermining native birth rates. Quite the opposite – large families were desired and incentivized.

  19. I hope this guy had the foresight to go to HR prior to his termination and file a complaint that he was being discriminated against on the basis of his political beliefs, which I am pretty sure is illegal in California. If he did, the first thing he should do is go talk to his attorney and get himself a nice payday.
    Unfortunately, I suspect this dude was only quasi red-pill and believed that logical arguments would be taken and analyzed rationally and discussed honestly and openly. And so, he probably fucked himself. Although, who knows, maybe an enterprising CA attorney can still make a case out of it.

    2. discriminated against on the basis of his political beliefs, which I am pretty sure is illegal in California.
      I’m skeptical of this. I don’t know what CA law might be, but it occurs to me that if personal politics are protected (a very rare protection, to be sure), simply saying ‘basis of his political beliefs’ here might be insufficient to cover the precise aspects and manifestations of such a protection. In other words, I suspect such a complaint is a non-starter.
      At any rate, there is an unwritten but identifiable hierarchy involved. Remember, from their point of view, he was attempting to discriminate against women, which is a crime much worse than discriminating based on politics.

      1. Yeah, but this misses the point – virtually all of these lawsuits are complete bullshit. The hustle these malingerers play is to make just enough of an annoyance of themselves to get a decent payout to go away without having to make a complaint stick. This dude should just play their own game and beat them at it. It’s not like he couldn’t pull up a billion tweets from that dirty dozen of misfits to show that there is a hostile work environment toward men.
        If it was me, I would move to the reddest red state I could find in a deep red circuit, like the 5th. Then I would sue in federal court invoking diversity jurisdiction, and I would play their retarded games on a playing field not inclined to tolerate their bullshit.

        1. Mm. I think I’m subconsciously looking for a way that this actually ends in Google having to face reality, rather than making their problem go away with money and letting them continue with all the BS. But, I consciously know this will never happen.

        2. Well, the long game would be to continue to send a stream of infiltrators to file similar suits. Eventually, they’ll either get bled dry or take real corrective action. Either one of which would force them to face reality.

  20. A couple of things to remember:
    1) the term ‘white’ as used by Google in its diversity stats includes Persians, Arabs, Turks and other groups that are not European. Members of these groups probably can still claim minority status when applying to Google (particularly if they are Muslim religiously), but they show up in the same bucket as Scots and Irish for statistical purposes. Dodgy.
    2) the really shocking revelation was the fact that middle managers are creating blacklists of people who do not agree with their ideology. One female nutbar said that you would go on her list if you are ‘not sufficiently supportive of diversity’. She is an antifa supporter and communist.
    3) James Damore is no alt-right or libertarian hero. He has ingested an awful lot of the kool-aid about the benefits of diversity, for instance. Yes, he exposed Google’s left wing culture to the public. For that we can thank him, but he is isn’t really a dissident in a doctrinal sense. Absent the outrage brigade, his suggestions are actually milquetoast at best.

    2. I dont get how you can profess to be a commie and make $100k-plus a year…

      1. I wonder that as well. This woman was a high level manager, meaning she was making much more. I suspect as of 2015, at least 500k.

        1. oh higher up?
          yeah, I dont get it, they facilitate the sales of shit, and she despises capitalism…why would we need google w/o capitalism?

        2. maybe she thinks she is fighting the system from within. corrupting it from within. in which case, why the hell would google keep her onboard? it’s a weird mindset, and I don’t understand it either.

      3. C’mon comrade! They’ll be happy to donate it all to the all knowing all powerful state once the perfect system comes. They just have to wait forever for it to happen. But when it does, they’ll be lining up to donate all possessions. Bet on it.

      5. Maybe she donates the bulk of her salary to help the lowest-paid Google employees – the kitchen staff, janitors, etc. – because of course a Communist champions the poor, struggling working class, right? Call me a cynic, but for some reason I doubt that she practises her ideology in that regard.

    3. the really shocking revelation was the fact that middle managers are creating blacklists of people who do not agree with their ideology

      I think a much bigger deal needs to be made out of this. We’re at the point where they are making actual lists. I know there have been lists made before during GG and other things, but these are different groups of private citizens making their own lists of undesirables. That’s clear evidence that they have advanced to a different level in the so-called culture war.

      1. This is within the google plex- employees? Yes?
        Imagine what the googliematrix is collecting on the peasants…
        Same as soviet russia with the roundups of thought-crime peasants of to the concentration-camps/gulags

        1. Not only within Google, but also vendors that work with Google.
          And the difference is this: its not really the government doing it. It’s cultural groups and political organizations.

        3. Actually, Orwell proved to realize that already hence his other well known (albeit less so) Animal Farm, where it is the group that thinks it’s throwing off its oppressors to only have far harsher oppressors come to the fore from their own ranks. Oppressors who even go after one of their own who doesn’t kowtow properly to the new party line.

  21. Pringo
    Vinny Pringo
    He won at dice, he won at cards, he won at bingo
    He got more ass than John or Paul or Ringo
    Pringo
    Vinny Pringo

    2. “Who are you to deny the reality of a retarded life experience?” – Ghandi

  23. Lord knows it’s early, and it’s the NFL Preseason, but I really like Carolina -1 point tonight against the Houston Texans. Caveat emptor, as always. Good luck, take no prisoners, and make no excuses when you lose. (But always gloat when you win.)

    1. Do you do Draft Kings? I would like to pick your brain off forum some time if you do.

      1. Haven’t looked into the fantasy angle at all, sorry to say. If that changes, I will definitely let you know my friend…

        1. Ok….because if your good at picking games, then picking the players that win those games just adds another level to it.

        2. I figure eventually I’m gonna take a hard look at it…will definitely let you know when that happens, Mr. Rockford.

        1. I never understood how Larry and Coleman got swapped out. Tim Dorsey is like Carl Hiassen on Crystal meth.

        2. Gentlemen, start your search engines!
          Dorsey and Hiassen appear to be novelists I’m not familiar with. I meant Serge and Larry, top dogs at Google.

    4. “Google made headlines over the weekend after a 28-year-old male
      engineer, James Damore, wrote a _gender-based memo_ saying women are ‘biologically’ less likely to get to the top of the tech world.”
      What’s a gender-based memo?
      I heard the ‘Pangender’ aren’t making as much as the ‘Gender Nonconforming’, too. Their new Diversity Director hire needs to look into that.

      1. Yep.
        Ain’t we all bro?
        He’s a fine mind.
        Excellent vocal dexterity.

        3. Yeah….’we’ is me and the mouse….what did you think ‘we’ was?
          Honestly.

        8. ‘We ain’t heavvaaay!’
          ‘We ma mousaaaya….’
          So on weee goooha
          He’s welfare is miya concern’

        12. It’s from an old Steve Martin movie called The Jerk that somebody showed me a clip of once.

        13. This is now known as “Pabsting” … posting irrelevant and pointless youtube clips for no apparent reason other than some random SPERG connection from some SPERG neuron misfiring in your head.

        19. Thank you ‘rockfish’
          Good of you.
          The ref. escaped me.
          Brit not Yank.

        20. I, I’ve never been Pabstinging before Sir.
          Never.
          Some older boys said it would be fun and……

        22. Yes, I’m sure that ‘rockfish’ chap went to a ‘good school’.
          Could be an Old Harrovian.

        24. No problem. It’s also an 80’s movie. So only us old farts are gonna get it. hahaha

        25. Honestly I didn;t know where the quote was from I just remembered hearing someone say it.
          EDIT: I was born in the late 80s so it was before my time

        28. Well.
          No therin lies a tale…..
          Can’t say you are wrong but the countryside remains Forever England.
          I bloody well hope.

        33. Lolz! A good school? Hahaha I only graduated from shitty Haltom High School in Haltom City Texas because I made it abundantly clear that if they flunked me, I would be a major pain in their ass.
          I am as intelligent as I am because I watch Jeopardy instead of wheel of Fortune. I do crossword puzzles instead of word searches and I read the book instead of watch the movie. The fact that you would confuse me with and Old Harrovian, I’ll take as a compliment. I am smarter than average folks, despite my Publik Skool indoctrination not because of it. But considering how idiotic that average person is, that really isn’t saying much.

        34. Considering how much more freedom there was under king George,compared to today, I’d consider a regime change right about now.

    2. whoa what a menace this guy. Look out you guys it’s James Damore! Run for your lives!! What a monster…

      1. I think I heard that he’s an extra-terrestrial alien that eats babies, steals extra sugar packets at Tim-bucks and leaves toilet seats at a 45 degree angle. Oh, the unholy beast!!!

  27. OT but this is truly alarming…….
    ‘Men accused of rape will have more of their relationship history put under the microscope during trials in a bid to increase convictions rates.
    Alison Saunders, Britain’s top prosecutor, has told lawyers to focus on a man’s behaviour in the run up to the alleged sex attack rather than just the immediate moments before.’
    As of now, the Governmaent will NOT try men for ‘rape’ itself.
    Instead they will try you under the accusation that the woman, with whom you are in a sexual relation ship; ‘feels coerced’ over a PERIOD OF MONTHS to have sex on that occasion.
    ie ‘…..rather than just the immediate moments before.’
    So, the ‘rape’ is now months of behaviour that made the woman ‘feel coerced’ into the act.
    Try to disprove that.
    …..if we English men are prepared to live with this, we deserve to be crushed.
    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4774240/Alison-Saunders-says-alleged-rapists-s-past-trial.html#ixzz4pHjfWfSe
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    1. On the 100th anniversary of battle of Passchendaele…
      The British men are defeated by a snaggletooth dyke…
      Fix bayonets lads

      2. Why do I think that if Passchendaele were mainly contested by women, it would be fought on a 4-day-a-week schedule since there has to be a Life-Balance day every week. Also, in lieu of guns, bayonets and grenades, the fearsome weapons of shaming, silent treatment and being excluded from social circles will be used.
        Anyone suggesting that actual combat take place will be summarily ejected from the armed forces for not adhering to the Arm-“me” political policy.

    2. Alison Saunders is the UK’s feminazi Director of Public Prosecutions. Long known for her war against men, particularly in trying to get more innocent men convicted of rape. Hence the push to have men prove their innocence, rather than be innocent until proven guilty. Men’s history can be brought up, but of course women’s can’t. This is called ‘social justice’ as opposed to actual, individual justice where everyone is equal before the law, regardless of what ‘class’ you belong to. It is a sterling example of why feminists should never be allowed anywhere near power, particularly when it comes to justice (since they have no such concept).

      1. ‘It is a sterling example of why feminists should never be allowed anywhere near power, particularly when it comes to justice (since they have no such concept).’
        Exactly.
        They have zero concept of ‘justice’ and they have been running the Home Office for 20 years+.
        Where is the push back?
        This dangerous witch knows the men of England are scared, weak and utterly defenceless before the rapacious state.
        If no-one fights this, they deserve what they will get.

  28. Don’t forget guys to register for the possible meat grinder known as military service. Females need not apply.

    1. Can’t they have a safe version of the danger that is the military?
      Safe and warm?
      With all the same remuneration and benefits as those who get their legs and arms blown off?
      We could organise a show pony version of actual ‘fighting females’ to ensure the other females (about 99.99%) retain self esteem.
      Eh?

    2. I am not one for having women in the military, perhaps draft them for some sort of indentured servitude?

      1. Catering to “equal outcome” is like fueling a rocket to go halfway to Mars, and expecting that the Red Planet will magically adjust it’s orbit to meet you there. Heck, any armed enemy will immediately send it’s females to meet female soldiers because it’s politically correct. … The left is too funny some times.

  29. Here’s a good interview with Jordan Peterson. The trigger to the Googler writing the memo was having to attend a bullshit diversity seminar.

    1. I feel kind of bad for this kid. He’s obviously been born and raised in a blue pill environment, but he’s got that semi-autistic streak of natural intelligence that makes it hard for him to ignore the glaring, obvious red pill facts right in front of him. It doesn’t seem like he realizes the can of worms that he’s opened or the cultural war that he’s right in the middle of.

      1. ‘….that semi-autistic streak of natural intelligence that makes it hard for him to ignore the glaring, obvious red pill facts right in front of him. ‘
        It’s a very clear and specific subset of people.

  30. About two days ago, all over my yahoo news feed, there was a story about how women’s minds were more ‘active’ than men’s. Strangely, nobody complained a peep about it.

    1. I think that is the basis for the whole “Whatcha thinkin’ about?” phenomenon. If you’ll notice they always ask that when your mind is blank. So when you say, “nuthin’, they loose their shit. “How can you think about nothing?” It is impossible for them to comprehend the concept of “thinking about nothing”. They literally have no concept of a mind at rest.

      1. My “nothing” background noise is now replaced with the residual afterglow of Goog-ho’s idiotic “big bang”.

      2. Having an antagonistic exchange with someone is, literally, the opposite expression of ‘mind-at-rest’.

    2. It’s the ‘Althouse rule’:
      ” If you do scientific research into the differences between men and women, you must portray whatever you find to be true of women as superior.
      – And when you read reports about scientific research into the differences between men and women, use the hypothesis that the scientists are following that rule. It makes reading the reports quite humorous.”
      -Ann Althouse

  32. All this time I’ve been reading “G O O G L E” as “Go Ogle”… is it not supposed to be a directive to leer at something???

  33. The real silver lining is also that they are afraid of us and it shows.
    But I want to mention something here that I did on the forum. This is just the latest instance of a very dangerous phenomenon: free speech is increasingly becoming a commodity affordable only by a very few. If these giant corporations can out you and destroy you for wrongthink, to deny you future employment or even ban you from selling or soliciting donations (see the Patreon controversy) you have no free speech. The only way to escape this is if you have “fuck you money.”
    So what is supposedly a fundamental right is now becoming a commodity. This is unacceptable and Theodore Roosevelt would be aghast that these tech trusts aren’t being broken up for the monopolies they are.

  34. I’ve actually gone to meetings of entrepreneurs seeking VC funding in Silicon Valley. I was once in a room with literally 300 men and 0 women trying to start a business. Only one woman was in the room, a diversity hire at a VC firm. She made jokes about being the only woman in the room.
    Why? They can’t claim discrimination. If you’re a woman no one stops you from developing your product to show to VCs. Hell there are all kinds of funds available only if you have a vagina. Then later we’ll here how misogynist these companies are. Then lawsuits and boycotts against them. Stop the insanity! Women don’t want to build new technology, they just want money.
    The disparity is actually driven by female hypergamy. If women would start fucking homeless guys and guys that live in their mom’s basement instead of millionaires, men would stop trying so hard to be successful.

  35. Google’s hiring practices and preachiness scream diversity for thee, but not for me.

  36. Weepeedia: “Systems biology is the computational and mathematical modeling of complex biological systems. It is a biology-based interdisciplinary field of study that focuses on complex interactions within biological systems, using a holistic approach to biological research.”
    WTF does Google need one of these for??

    1. google’s business model is based on understanding people’s patterns in social interactions on order to market them to advertisers. Understanding human behavior is fundamental to their business.

      1. Right, but wouldn’t that be more in the realm of psychology?
        So maybe they want his skills in computational and mathematical modeling of complex systems.
        Hope that’s it. Google likes to have a finger in every pie and they seem to have their own ideas about shaping the future, and of course their intelligence agency ties.

  37. Chuck Palahniuk wrote the macho-man cult classic, Fight Club, during the early stages of his long-term relationship with his partner of over 20-years.

  38. Google’s reputation was already quite shitty before they outed themselves even further during this episode. But they’ve also done an amazing job worming their way into everyone’s daily lives. People will be hard-pressed to give up their convenient gmail/gcal whatever, even if top google staffers abort babies live on television.

  39. Actually, Katie Hopkins of the Daily Mail wrote a bang on article about this. Kudos still to RoK. Haven’t heard a word from mainstream media.

  41. Premium25f

    Google is paying 97$ always! Work for couple of hours and have longer with sidekicks and family! :!sq115d:
    On Tuesday I got an excellent new Land Rover vary Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewardful I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable however you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    :!sq115d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash405BuzzLock/Pay$97/Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!sq115l..,..

  42. I realized this fact will put feminists and transgenders at odds against each other. Hopefully they destroy each other

    1. The achilles heel of liberalism is that the Left attempts to bring together people who have nothing in common.
      Keep doing this and these disparate groups will turn against one another.

      1. The goal of diversity was the creating of political groups that could be turned on each other. The folks behind this assumed they would be able to control who turns on who.

  43. I hold a lot of respect for men/women who resist the seductive reward of playing along and risk throwing away comfortable lives protesting/fighting these ideological abominations.
    When its all said and done and their time draws close to an end they can look back on their lives and take some comfort knowing they rose above and did what was right.

  44. This was test for no other reason than hundreds of thousands of people (possibly millions) will hear about this and will become red pilled. We are continuously shifting the Overton window to our side. Each and every day we grow stronger!

  45. I am french and we have seen a similar case with an iconoclast amateur cartoonist called Marsault. He usually makes fun of all kinds of extremists. He has then been the victim of a witch hunt once he started to make fun of leftists and feminists.
    They have tried to shut down his +200k likes facebook page and kill him financially.
    Fortunately, an iconoclast editor, Ring, has hired him and edited his comics. They were all big successes and all that saved his ass.
    He became much more red pilled after this.
    I highly recommend him especially if you understand french.
    https://m.facebook.com/Marsault-635362616570764 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6f98aebfff7989b60f331600fb492468a02c3631625fb78492388df9a6be63bb.jpg

  49. Couple of thoughts here. First, I’ll admit that it does get to me when I have to hear about how women are doing well and, especially, when they compare women today to men. And I think we all do, because after all, we’re being told that we’re inferior. That said, what this memo reveals to us is that for all the rah rah rah crap about women doing better…well, its now undeniable that women are doing well because of diversity i.e. affirmative action, quotas etc i.e. the priority to, for instance, obtain a certain % of a certain group of people (always a special interest group) is paramount and supersedes merit. So, they’re really not earning it. Second, and building on the first item above, as women have, apparently, ascended into prominence it has perfectly coincided with the rise of automation and that is significant. For one thing, jobs are becoming easier, but, also consider this – for all these so called “gains” women have made its quite probable at this point that all these jobs will be automated quite soon. Now, I’m a huge believer in technology, as you all know, I think it is the key to our victory as we can decentralize the media and academia. That said, I’m not sure about this impending total automatized future the technocrats see happening. But, if it does, like I said, all these “proud” diversity hires who think themselves as otherwise worthy workers will be replaced and its Google leading this charge by the way.

  50. One thing gives me hope; upon seeing my feed flood with outlets covering this story, the comment section was cluttered with supporters of damore. The ever waking giant stirs again.

  51. James’ problem centers around his claim that women have agency and make choices. All of the misstatements by Google and the media are nothing but a distraction. The media doesn’t have to cover up James statement about female choices. They just have to misdirect, which is exactly what they are doing. Claims of media bias and google censorship misdirect away from James’ core claim that women have agency.
    Acknowledging female agency is our greatest social taboo. This is why “war on women” rhetoric works so well. Part of the reason for this social taboo is economics. Women as a demographic consume approximately $150K more in tax resources than they contribute. This provides a vested interest for anyone tapped into this money stream to keep the status quo. This includes women, neo-Marxists who push for social destruction through social programs, and all of the various organizations and nonprofits who benefit from increased female spending power. Add onto that our biological impulses to protect young women, and you get what James encountered.

Comments are closed.