A former student who sued Oxford University over its sexual assault complaints investigation policy has had her case thrown out by England’s High Court. Elizabeth Ramey was refused the right to a full judicial review of Oxford’s policy of only conducting internal inquiries into sexual assaults in certain limited circumstances.
Although Ramey has failed in her legal bid on a technicality, the litigation is being supported by progressive groups who will be sniffing around for another test case. The legal campaign is an attempt by British feminists to introduce draconian Title IX-style campus kangaroo courts onto UK campuses.
Ramey reported an alleged rape to police in 2011 while studying for a Masters in African Studies at Oxford. The case was discontinued due to insufficient evidence. She then pursued the University’s internal complaints procedure. Oxford failed to investigate the alleged rapist as Ramey had demanded.
She then took her case to the Independent Adjudicator of Higher Education, who partially upheld her complaint and advised Oxford to change their policies. Oxford implemented the changes to standards which, Ramey argued, did not put enough pressure on Oxford to investigate allegations.
In throwing out Ramey’s case, Justice Edis ruled that Ramey had never been subject to this policy, and so its application had no impact on her personally, which meant she lacked standing to bring the claim. Ramey had also unsuccessfully tried to bolster her case, in the customary fashion, by throwing in a claim of sex discrimination.
Her solicitor argued that Oxford was engaging in “indirect discrimination” against women by creating a “hostile environment” by not investigating claims of sexual assault.
What really happened to Elizabeth Ramey?
Before considering the story, readers might want to make use of the following advice for Rape Crisis England on “how to help someone who has been raped”:
Listen – To what she has to say and let her take her time. It might not be easy for her to start talking about an event that she has kept silent about for a long time. It may be difficult because she may have been told not to tell by the abuser at the time.
Believe – People rarely lie about rape or sexual abuse. Why would they? It is important to believe what they are saying.
So what actually happened to Elizabeth Ramey, the alleged victim? Ramey has waived her right to anonymity to bring publicity to the proceedings and the quangos advocating on her behalf. In January, however, she published an anonymized account of her alleged rape in the Telegraph, which she claims. She told then how, as a fresher, she met a man at a party who “pursued her all night”, before she agreed to go to his room.
In ambiguous language she claimed that the alleged attacker “kept pushing me until I said yes,” after which, “I was exhausted and kind of gave in.” She offers no clarification of whether the alleged attacker figuratively or literally “kept pushing” her. She also offers no clarification of what she means by “kind of gave in,” and whether she means to say she passively acquiesced in a way that would have been interpreted as consent by her alleged attacker.
They engaged in consensual kissing, after which the alleged attacker started to toucher her intimately. She claims she asked him to stop but he refused. She claims she was then overcome by “frozen fear.” Her account of the assault is: “I said stop and he didn’t. He was fingering me and he didn’t stop.” Ramey then says she “managed to get away,” giving no detail at all of what words were spoken or whether there was a struggle.
Unusually for a victim of an alleged rape, she eschewed immediately going to the police, and instead “spent the next six months trying to forget what had happened, suppressing all thoughts and feelings.” She finally reported the assault to college welfare officers at the end of the second term, once she’d heard allegations that her purported attacker had been “harassing” other students. The welfare officers failed to pass her concerns on to the college dean as promised, so she went directly to him.
In what amount to serious allegations of misconduct on the part of the dean, Ramey claims he brushed her concerns off. She also claims he said that the alleged rape was what happens when students drink too much. She says in her account that the dean “tried to explain the guy’s actions by saying he had a drinking problem.”
There are conflicting accounts as to what happened to Ramey’s alleged attacker. The anonymised account given in the Telegraph in January by a pseudonymous “Rachel” holds that no disciplinary action was taken against the alleged attacker, but that arrangements were made whereby he would me asked to avoid her.
Last week’s report in the Telegraph, however, reports that Ramey was told that the college would not take action against the alleged rapist unless Ramey made police report, which she did.
Last week’s pre-action Telegraph article reports that the Crown Prosecution Service dropped the case three months later because there was a low chance of conviction. This also seems to have been the view of the University according to the earlier write-up, which reported that a junior proctor investigating Ramey’s case noted “little tangible evidence.”
The proctor also raised concerns that if questioned before a panel, the man accused by Ramey would have to answer questions not tested before a criminal court.
It is easy to see why the criminal case against Ramey’s purported rapist got nowhere. Ramey is sheepish about admitting how readily she had given consent to her alleged attacker, and how competently she had communicated its withdrawal. She uses ambiguous language to describe what happened, admitting that she “kind of gave in.”
She then says she asked her attacker to stop, and claims he ignored her and carried on fingering her, after which she was overcome with fear. She claims to have “gotten away”, quite likely into the vicinity of a student halls where there would have been ample witnesses. She makes no mention of telling a friend on the night, and, crucially, eschews making a police report immediately after the event.
Listen and believe
Jackie Coakley, protagonist of the rape hoax perpetrated by feminist journalist Sabrina Rubin Erdely
Faced with the circumstances, the police were right to treat this as an unlikely case to succeed before a jury. Feminists boldly demand that we should “listen and believe” women who claim to have been raped. The accused, on the other hand, would have certainly said that the entire evening was consensual, raising the uncomfortable question that any sensible jury would ask: was this a false rape allegation based on a guilt-based, retroactive revocation of consent?
The University, to its credit, had admitted before the High Court hearing that it would be unlikely to open an investigation into a serious allegation of assault that has already been the subject of an unsuccessful police investigation.
Ramey’s case was disputing precisely this. Case papers outlined her argument that: “[t]he more serious an assault upon a woman, the less likely the university will take action to investigate and potentially take disciplinary action.” And rightly so. University pastoral staff are entirely ill-equipped for handling serious allegations of rape.
This has been amply demonstrated in America with Obama’s Title IX reforms. Academics an inadequate grasp of due process and intellectual loyalty to poisonous ideologies such as radical feminism (all penis in vagina sex is rape) and post-modern epistemology (truth and logic are social constructs, there is no such thing as absolute truth), have been put in charge of campus sexual complaints adjudication on campus.
This has resulted in growing case law generated by male students suing for redress after being subjected to banana-state procedures and having their academic careers ruined.
Title IX-style kangaroo courts, coming to a British campus near you
Elizabeth Ramey’s case is the first salvo fired in the campaign to impose the same US-style approach in British universities. Title IX reforms were imposed on a top-down basis by the Obama regime. Compliance was enforced at financial gunpoint, colleges were threatened with defunding unless they implemented reforms to the letter.
This inlcuded expressly requiring that campus investigations not be contingent on a police report and that the standard of proof be lowered to “preponderance of the evidence” from the stricter “beyond reasonable doubt.”
The same end is being sought in England by way of litigation. Judicial Review is a means by which aggrieved citizens can challenge state decisions they disagree with. Judges can order any state institution to change a policy which falls afoul of administrative law.
Universities are not public institutions in the UK, but since when they are adjudicating sexual assault complaints they are acting in a quasi-judicial capacity, they fall within reach of the long arm of the High Court, which may in future force them to adopt a more draconian position.
The usual suspects
A look at the profiles of Elizabeth Ramey’s legal team reveals who exactly is pushing this attack on the due process rights of male students. Ramey’s case was funded by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, a quango set up by the Blair administration, tasked with enforcing equality laws on Britain. Its former chairman, Trevor Philips, is renowned for having kept a bust of Vladimir Lenin on his desk during his tenure.
Ramey is also supported by Sarah Green, acting director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, a feminist quango given an inordinate amount of column space in British newspapers to push policies like “consent lessons” for schoolchildren and the denial anonymity for rape suspects. “EVAW” also tried to bully the BBC for including a case study of a false rape accusation in one of the reports.
Ramey’s counsel in the High Court, Karon Monaghan QC, is a tenant at the radical left-wing Matrix Chambers, where Cherie Blair, wife of Tony, and international feminist plied her trade before leaving to concentrate on the Cherie Blair Women’s Foundation.
Monaghan has litigated high-profile progressive legal actions, defending the council that sacked a Christian registrar for asking to abstain from officiating gay civil partnerships, and also suing the Bed and Breakfast owners who refused, on the basis of their Christian beliefs, to let double rooms to homosexuals.
Whether Elizabeth Ramey is a real victim of a bona-fide sexual assault, or simply another woman making a false rape allegation after having a sexual encounter she came to regret is irrelevant. The real relevance of her case is that it is the thin end of the wedge being used by progressive quangos like the EHRC and the End Violence Against Women coalition, and activist lawyers like Karon Monaghan to introduce a Title IX-style campus adjudication policy into British universities and colleges.
This will mean that flimsy cases like that of Ms. Ramey, where no police report has been made and where it is one person’s word against another, may soon be adjudicated, Title IX-style, by academic feminists with a burning hatred of due process and men in general.
Read Next: Student Accused Of Rape By Emma Sulkowicz To Sue Columbia University
So, the American University rape tribunals have not necessarily been exported throughout the Western World yet?
I assume Sweden has them though, unless you’re nonwhite then I bet you could get it waived.
Speaking of Trevor Phillips, he did a documentary on being honest about race in the UK. Cynical attempt to stride the changing political landscape or genuine change of heart?
Linked below.
It won’t happen in Sweden.
Because at the rate they are going, they will be castrating all men before puberty anyway. (if not surgically then mentally through conditioning and drugs)
Truth of the matter is most women are not like this and just want an alpha male (Daddy). I guess as a man you can’t be careful enough these days. You have to be selective in terms of who you fuck around with. It’s usually the girl you didn’t even really like that much who pulls this shit on you. Like I have said previously in other posts they do it to damage you as they realise you are not even that into them and sooner or later will leave. Look at most cases, it’s the strong males like the fraternity boys, alpha males like CEO’s and strong man who are usually falsely accused of rape after she has given it up. They sooner realise he will not wife and they seek to destroy.
I will say this like I said in a different post, if you are going to pump and dump remember she will want some sort of vengeance either emotional, physical, psychological or financial.
In Sweden they want to ban standing and pissing, they want men to sit to piss.
http://www.worldwideweirdnews.com/2013/06/n27680.html
That’s because they took out the urinals.
Toilets are piss poor for taking a standing piss in. Cumulatively a ring of hard crystalized piss will form on the floor around the toilet.
But notice these stories get to be somewhat popular in the west? Where every man is ALLOWED to freak out over something like that (while being beta-ized, while being feminized, while having their liberty and treasure stripped) but hey as long as we are allowed to pee standing up, we’re still men, right?
It’s like the flag burning. Freak out over burning the flag, but don’t freak out over the Bill of Rights being burned down.
I don’t use my own private toilet standing up. And my bathroom does not reek of piss. And when I have women over, they don’t get hit with the smell of my piss which is a turnoff. The smell of pee only works for dogs.
Now am I to be deemed a fag for that? I’d rather trade then: give all men back our rights and we won’t pee standing up? Should we freak out over that. No no no – deny me rights as a man only so long as I can pee like one! Bullshit.
Someday when I own my own place I will be installing a urinal in the bathroom because I use them everywhere else and they are efficient. Heck I’ll even put one on in my workshop or garage and out in the open too. Fuck anybody who wants to barge in without knocking say hello to the Cyclops.
My point is, the “pee standing up” shit is one of the “Allowed arguments” that the system and media allows us to have to detract from their covering up every other lie about our rights and their constant assault on masculinity. There is so much worse shit coming out of Sweden I’m not going to bother caring about pissing.
You actually sit down to pee?
Mind you, it has no impact on me or my life, but… I don’t sit to pee and my bathroom is spotless.
Just sayin.
I do get your point, though,
“I kind of gave in…”
How was the case not dismissed immediately after that?
My dear friend a girl will sleep with you with the sole intention of claiming rape after. It’s mad. You just need to be careful. I have refused to sleep with some girls for that reason. My ex was as fit as a butchers dog, big tits, size 8. Called me over to discuss our break up. I told her to stuff it. She threatened to kill herself if I don’t come. I called the police who paid her a visit. She messaged saying why would I do that. I told her it’s over.
Had I been foolish enough to go there I would have ended up being the one going to the police station accused of rape or she would have slashed me with a knife and then what? Sometimes as man we need to think carefully about what we are doing.
Wow, I wish we were all that damage control-savvy! Good going!
Kudos to you for not falling for the suicide bullshit.
best option card was played – let the cops deal with it and it is recorded in the police logs and referrals.
Because she was”coerced” into it. ..it’s not her fault.
Right, he put an AK-47 to her head, didn’t you hear??
women have become so empowered by feminism that they are not responsible for any of their own actions
You’re correct. They’re like over grown children who can’t be responsible for their — negative — actions now. Yet keep crying for “equality.” It’s absurd.
It’s fairly clear the majority of society sees what’s happening. Ever looked at the comment section on even CNN or PMSNBC when some feminist writes a piece essentially promoting special rights/ pussy pass for women? Even these comment threads — which tend to lean more to the left — are full of people calling out this absolute B.S.
A considerable number of them appear to only prefer equality when convenient. It is treated as a menu where only the positive aspects are chosen while the negative aspects of equality are discarded. In reality it is a package deal.
I’ve forever dubbed it “cafeteria equality.” The convenient picking n choosing ‘equality’ which is of benefit to them and not.
It’s, in fact, way more widespread that the newspapers will let you believe. Most “real” comments are censored, so if you read an anti-feminist comment on a news site it’s just because that particular article wasn’t censored, or it just momentarily got through the system unchecked.
>Even these comment threads are full of people calling out this absolute B.S.
Because it’s men who are posting them. Women have the opposite opinion, support feminism completely, but hardly ever post it because they are cowards who can’t stand counter arguments.
Yes. You can even find anti-feminism and manosphere-related thoughts all over CBC, which has historically been a feminist shithole
ALL Western courts are effectively kangaroo courts. Emotion and bias often win out over facts and evidence.
Well, the guy must have been really drunk to invite an ugly, obvious nutjob like her back to his room. He should file charges against her for taking advantage of him and his poor, drunken finger.
That is the problem right there. Once a girl has had a drink doesn’t matter if she is drunk or not I am not fucking her for the first time. If I have done her before within the couple of days I might do. Big might. Personally I think women are sloppy and underperform in bed when drunk. You will just get charged with rape over crap sex.
I want my women sober, we agree on a plan of action e.g going to a bar and going back to my place for the big D. I make it clear we are fucking that night. I make my point in an obvious but non awkward way. Trust me if she wants to fuck you and is being genuine she won’t have qualms with being open about it. That’s my experience. If she is unsure I am not wasting my time. I don’t go with the flow because the flow ends with you in prison with Big Boy telling you to go with the flow.
Yeah, I basically don’t fuck a girl unless she’s begging for it.
They will always have some qualms unless you are married and trying for a baby (and maybe even then). There are cases where the woman has sent messages saying how great the sex was and how in love she is…and then she reports it as rape.
When I was visiting Boulder, I was chatting with a bar tender at Old Chicago on Pearl Street. He spoke exactly of this.
One of his friends was out and ended up banging a random chick. Days later he was hit with a bogus rape allegation. Turns out the chick he banged apparently had a BF. Of course he didn’t know this. Yet for the slut to cover up her cheating, she claimed she was raped.
Well it just happens she sent him a few text messages which read, “I know you didn’t rape me, I just have to say this so my BF doesn’t dump me.”
He showed it to the COPS n was cleared. Of course NOTHING happened to the whore for filing a false rape report tho.
The problem is really for college age men who are naive to this.
I can share a personal story. When returning to campus at beginning of my Junior Year, I was at a party when a chick came up, grabbed my ass and was all over me.
We went back to my place n got it on. The following morning she had 0 recollection of her actions — being all over me, begging to get railed. Essentially she blacked out during the night courtesy of her own consumption.
At that time, how was I to be a mind reader and know this girl all over me the night before would awake the following morning unable to recall her actions?
I learned a big lesson at that moment. It was then I saw how easy an innocent male can face a bogus rape allegation courtesy of a female who ends up blacking out due to her own actions yet thinks she got rufied.
You my dear friend hit the nail on the head. I remember some years ago once a girl asking me if we had sex the previous night as she couldn’t remember. She had been on the wine all evening. I told her to go ask her doctor. Thank god I hadn’t touched her.
Women and alcohol mean disaster. You might get away with it once or twice but if you make it a habit of gaming drunk women it will catch up with you eventually.
I find alcohol dampens my orgasm.
Most women perform badly in bed when they are sober..let alone drunk. Some are fun when drinking but I only do that with the ones that I’ve been seeing for awhile.
You never know what you’re going to get once a woman has had a few. It could be very fun or it could get very ugly. Always be aware.
You need to start fucking chicks on drugs. They are the best. You can go for a chick on speed if you want a wild night, or a chick on ecstasy (the next morning) if you want really comfortable sex. Chicks on coke are awesome! Weed, not so much, depends on the girl.
We’re having reverse-Sharia law slowly imposed on us. I’ve often wondered how feminists can be so easy on radical Islam, but it’s making more sense now. They are both committed to bringing us into another Dark Age where irrationality, superstition, and magic spells like “People rarely lie about rape or sexual abuse. Why would they? It is important to believe what they are saying” rule the day. They are natural allies.
And much like Sharia (many members of my family are Muslim so I have first-hand experience with its effects), feminism is often impromptu molded and altered to be made to suit its proponents immediate needs and desires, logic and future ramifications be damned! Their pressing “issues” change from one day to the next, probably because they actively go shopping for them!
At some point though, Islam and feminism will clash, and clash HARD.
In fact, I’ll be laughing my ass off when it happens. They’re like oil and water.
Good thought. But I don’t have the time.
As I often say, nobody hates Caucasians more than Caucasian Liberals. I suspect that Feminists’ implied support of Islam, or at least their willful ignorance of Islam’s innate violence, is due to the perception of Islamic extremism as the collective Brown Man rising up against the collective evil, patriarchal White Man.
Very good observation. Privilege theory is screwing with people’s heads. There’s no thinking in terms of principles or standards, only “who is less privileged?”
I love how the haggard old bitch in the second picture is screaming at the top of her lungs while holding a Starbucks drink. How telling!
I thought it was Mr. Ed.
A horse is a horse, of course of course,
And no-one can talk to a horse of course
Unless of course, that horse who talks
…Is an ugly whinnying feminist who should have a nosebag over her face
it went something like that anyway
Great catch. “Here is your mocha latte whateverthehell”. 10 minutes later…..”FIGHT THE POWER!”. God I hope these people choke on their own bile.
“The minimum wage NEEDS to be raised!!!!………..what do you mean I have to pay more for my orange caramel mocha ice frappachino?!?!?”
Not that I don’t agree this is a problem but this has to be a record for consecutive articles on the subject of feminism. What is this now…10 in a row?
“was this a false rape allegation based on a guilt-based, retroactive revocation of consent?”
Duh.
The “I finally gave in after he pursued me all night” bit garners no sympathy from me. Was he just a charity fuck or something? And the “kind of gave in”, what the fuck is that? I hear “kind of” with sex acts all to often. Dick going into whichever hole is not a “kind of” scenario. Liking pineapple on your pizza only sometimes but not always in a “kind of” situation. See how that works?
Wow, her story sounds exactly what happened to my college roommate. He brought back home this ugly 3/10, and basically begged for the pussy and she finally just gave it up. She told my other roommate the following day that he raped her, when really she just caved into the pressure, instead of simply just leaving the room and going home. Her “traumatic” rape didn’t stop her from having sex with the other roommate the next day. This girl was seriously ugly as fuck but these dudes didn’t care lol she was a certified cum dumpster.
Yep, it’s an absolute double sword for men in that regard. The regret situation or the “I’m too stupid” situation would, legally, be an endless black hole if courts begin to go down that road.
Is this the real camel jockey?
I had a similar experience. This girl told me so and so raped her and a little later that day I had her melons out…
Actual rape victims find it very difficult to talk about their ordeal. 100% of the narcissistic tumblr feminists who try and take their so-called rape cases public, are outright lying for attention.
It’s called attention whoring (at least here in the manosphere). We witnessed it the other day when ROK published an article about the new Mad Max movie and how we thought it was a sham.
Attention whores would leap from tall buildings in a single bound to fight for the cause of justice on this one (what a fucking joke). Attention whoring is what these universities need to start calling the false rape claims.
Desiree Washington had no trouble telling all and sundry…
I’m starting to think that we should revert to all-male and all-female educational institutions. The men can study arts and sciences while the women study “African Studies…”
Yeah, but we also need to get away from a predominantly “oral” teaching structure which was specifically introduced to favour the female brain. Men, on average learn either visually or kinetically (via touch), and women favour audible learning.
I completely agree. I cannot stand watching someone talk. Show me.
I’m ok with women having a course called women’s studies. Men have their own class, it’s called history.
Go get a degree in it and then come back and tell me about your “career”.
History is a solid major. From it you can go into Law, Politics and even write bestsellers.. Women’s Major is another affair entirely
African Studies
IOW, the fruit that hangs low under the loin clothe.
African Studies are tough for these listless lazies. Let them learn Anthropology. Or “Visual Arts” as did Emma Sulkowicz of the mattress fame. Or some other really useless stuff.
And actually end up making the climate far worse for genuine rape victims.
Women playing the rape game is like them trying to play chicken with the train. Such dangerous experiment. It’s like the story of the boy who cried the wolf. When massive number of women play the rape card and yell rape for something ridiculous, the society will soon get used to the childish play of the women. It hurts the real rape victim because if the girl does get really raped and she tells with sobbing face, the society may not believe her because so many girls lied about rape. They are digging their own grave.
Who on earth would want to bang that chick
Hey, welcome to Earth! Lots of sad, lonely, pathetic thirsties out there. ANY woman can find a market for herself without exerting a whole lot of effort!
Luckily, I’m cognizant of the fact that I’m a good looking young guy with a big dick and I’m quite selfish, so good luck to any ugly chick with an ugly personality.
There are plenty of humiliated, brainwashed, altruistic sheep out there who will beg some wookie for it. I myself can do better.
I’m too selfish to sleep with ugly chicks with bad personalities.
Please stop crying, I can’t interrogate you while you’re crying.
African studies?
Wow, such marketable skills!
Indeed.
(NSFW)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2012-01-08/1325903458564.jpg
http://img.chan4chan.com/img/2009-12-16/218c60657a80.jpg
http://x3.fap.to/images/full/48/163/163887187.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/U30q3TE.jpg
http://d16ao1gdhk6qlj.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/interracial-porn-european-knights-project.png
Fataess. Thanks for the pictures. These chicks are so fucked in the head.
Ahahahahahahahahahah
Dey luv her looong time…
Lots of brown sugah all ovah her boogawooga…
Jesus that is one ugly bitch. Dudes that want to fuck that slag must have subterranean levels of self esteem.
A lot of these Tumblr femtards are definitely not at risk of ever being raped. Even Viagra would not work with most of them.
If yes does not mean yes then you have no agency. You should not be allowed to sign contracts or vote.
#rapeculture
First, she does nothing for six months. Then she runs to the police. When the police don’t pursue it she runs to the university. When the university does not pursue it she runs to court to sue the university.
.
Last time I checked, sexual assault is a tort and can be pursued in in civil court against the alleged perpetrator. The standard of proof is “the preponderance of evidence”. The difference is that she would have to hire her own lawyer and fund the investigation herself (or by whatever fundraising means she has available) rather than having the state or the university pick up the tab in trying to nail the guy to the wall.
.
Women need to take more personal responsibility for themselves (as if you won’t read that opinion in the comments of almost EVERY FUCKING ARTICLE on ROK). But no, they can never fight their own battles (even to the extent of paying for their own hired gun attorney), they need to have someone else pay it, they need someone else – a crown attorney, DA, equity officer, etc. – to quarterback the campaign to go after their alleged rapist.
.
Aside from the desire to simply complain and then wait for other people to do their bidding, the other major limitation of the civil court system is that remedies are largely monetary. There may be certain jurisdictional issues, but small claims court in Ontario can award up to $25,000. Superior Courts have effectively unlimited jurisdiction of what cases they can hear and how much they can award, plus they can issue injunctions, restraining orders and the like.
.
That’s not good enough for a woman scorned/outraged/and-perhaps-actually-raped. They want blood. They don’t want to just bankrupt a guy, they want him in jail, fired from his job, tossed out of school, put on the sex offenders list, his whole life ruined with the state monitoring the remainder of it.
African studies eh? Bet she loves the ‘brothas.
What you do when you suck at anthropology.
She then proceeds to suck an anthropologist & collect data. It’s probably on page 12 of the Master’s Program Study Guide.
LOL!
The inevitable outcome of this trend of women accusing men of another heinous crime against women is that men will simply form institutions of higher learning open only to MEN where real education in relevant and useful pursuits occurs, completely excluding women and their silly nonsensical fill-in-the-blank “________ Studies”.
Women will go to women all-women universities where they will scream about being excluded from the newly formed all-male institutions of higher learning. Men at these universities will escape the false claims of physical rape, only to be accused by the feminists of rape-of-privilege.
At that point men will simply disconnect women from the Internet and all other networks thereby smashing the megaphone of their movements. The female-Internet kill switch can be developed and deployed within a matter of months, if not weeks, by real men tired of listening to woman’s drivel. Women, not even understanding the basics of electricity much less how the Internet works, will have no other option than to subject themselves to the Return of Kings and bow to their great power.
Gentlemen, I give you the challenge of implementing the female Internet kill-switch, shutting out all female communications across the internet, cellular networks, and public wired telephone systems, before the end of this decade. Man built the telephone, Internet, smartphones, and all forms of electronic communication. We can certainly use our power to control it and exclude females from using it against us.
bruh use your spellcheck
rape is when a shady looking guy grabs you, punches you, drags you into his van, then ties you up and fucks you.
Learn to use spell check, and get a fucking proofreader.
“studying for a Masters in African Studies at Oxford.”
Case dismissed