How We Can Use Sun Tzu’s Strategies To Implement Neomasculine Principles

A solution of neomasculinity has been proposed by Roosh V to the problems that ail our society. It is a comprehensive work backed by credible citations, and as one commenter quipped, “required reading for the modern man.”

Although neomasculinity is perhaps morally and scientifically sound, we are still left wondering if it is even possible to implement within our lifetimes to help ensure the happiness and security of our offspring. It perhaps is, but it would be a monumental task requiring massive organization, time, planning, and balls.

I propose that rather than relying on anecdotal tactics, let’s turn to the master of war tactics himself, Sun Tzu. Sun Tzu’s The Art of War could serve as a practical guide to legal and nonviolent policy implementation. It is required reading for military generals and businessmen alike. Because of the enormity of this task, for now I’d like to examine only the first of thirteen chapters, called “Laying Plans.” This is a pre-battle assessment of the playing field. It gives us an idea of whether or not we are a force to be reckoned with, and if not how we can improve our station.

In the meantime I’d recommend all readers get their hands on a hard copy of The Art of War. Due to the excellent commentary and nice formatting, I’ve greatly benefited from the specific referenced book in this article. However, this related ROK article by Quintus Curtius is definitely worth considering before you make any purchases.

Sun Tzu 1

Sun Tzu’s The Art of War is believed to be at least 2,500 years old.

The art of war is of vital importance to the State. It is a matter of life and death, a road either to safety or to ruin. Hence it is a subject of inquiry which can on no account be neglected.

This is a very straightforward introduction. No sugar coated bullshit, but rather a nugget of golden advice. We in the manosphere can no longer neglect the fact that the cultural decline will continue with exponential decay unless we begin laying plans for a nonviolent counteroffensive. With neomasculinity comes safety; with the current mainstream rhetoric and policymaking comes ruin.

Sun Tzu next moves on to describe five constant factors to be taken into account when laying plans for battle. I’ll examine three of these factors that I find the most practical in this context:

1. “The Moral Law causes the people to be in complete accord with their ruler, so that they will follow him regardless of their lives, undismayed by any danger.”

The beauty of Sun Tzu’s writing is that it can be applied in many different ways and still be feasible in just about any situation. As such, I’d like to replace the words “their ruler” with “neomasculine principles,” and “him” with “them.” Simply put, the moral law is our core foundation that assures harmony between all members of the movement. If we all believe neomasculine principles to be true and practical, then we are in harmony and can proceed forward. If not, we will simply collapse over relatively petty differences.

2. “The Commander stands for the virtues of wisdom, sincerity, benevolence, courage and strictness.”

This requires somewhat of a leap of faith for manosphere readers. Most of us may never personally meet Roosh V and other major contributors to ROK and other websites. It will be the responsibility of readers to band together and voice their opinions as to who can be most trusted to be the leading figures of the movement.

If a leader is lacking in even one of the above virtues, it could spell disaster for the movement, unless other safeguards are put into place. Remember, as long as we are all in accordance with the Moral Law stated above, many of us would be capable leaders by following the above virtues.

3. “By Method and discipline are to be understood the marshaling of the army in its proper subdivisions, the graduations of rank among the officers, the maintenance of roads by which supplies may reach the army, and control of military expenditure.”

Let’s put the concept of “officers” into a little bit different context, the internet. Each manosphere website specializes in its own brand of material and advice. One of the issues I see now is that MRAs, PUAs, the Gamergate community, red pill conservatives, libertarians, MGTOWs, and neomasculinists are simultaneously offering up many different viewpoints, complaints, and occasional solutions to the problems we face.

I propose we all take a step back for a moment. We all share common enemies and I propose that it’s perhaps time to hash out our specific differences in writing and find ways to either compromise certain viewpoints in favor of movement building or convince others through rational discussion and debate.

Either way, having a wedge between these different manosphere and conservative leaning groups is what a smart enemy would do to us! Separating an opponent’s forces is in fact a tactic of Sun Tzu. Let’s not let our enemies get away with this (if indeed it’s even a conscious attack). Let’s step up and hopefully unite more men from different camps under the same Moral Law mentioned above.

Secondly, let’s put the “maintenance of roads” into the context of the internet. In this nonviolent campaign, information and educational materials are the supplies that we rely on. This is yet another reason to try to unite the several “factions” of the manosphere. We need people with internet and networking experience (overall computer and web knowledge) to help protect this valuable supply route. I’ll make the assumption that in the gaming and MGTOW communities there are some brilliant men with very valuable technological skills that could help our cause, if they choose to do so by their own free will.

The Core Principles

Sun Tzu 3

Here we only examine Chapter 1, Laying Plans. But 12 more chapters of tactics and strategies may be later utilized.

Sun Tzu continues the chapter by listing seven factors which he examines before doing battle, and he claims that By means of these seven considerations I can forecast victory or defeat. Considering that Sun Tzu is to this day required reading by military generals and businessmen alike, I sincerely believe in his claim. The seven considerations are as follows:

1. Which of the two sovereigns is imbued with the Moral Law?

This may currently be a toss-up, as the manosphere is currently divided into “factions” and the enemies of liberty in higher established positions seem to be united under their twisted methodology. Democrats and Republicans (mostly made up of Liberals, Progressives, RINOs, and Cuckservatives), the Supreme Court, and the Executive Branch seem to have no problem implementing culturally destructive policies. This is indeed chilling, as the destructive system and institutions in this country have become a juggernaut.

2. Which of the two generals has the most ability?

I’d like to reframe this in the context of “camps” rather than “generals,” mainly because we won’t be suiting up in armor and charging the battlefield under the ultimate command of one man. I would argue that we might just have this factor in our favor. Masculine men with strong principles who are continually seeking self-improvement may indeed be able to turn the tide, as many of our male opponents are becoming more effeminate by the day.

Also, most feminist “leaders” are simply a joke; they’re only taken seriously because the system backs them, not because they actually have leadership ability.

3. With whom lie the advantages derived from Heaven and Earth?

This is a bit more abstract, and of course was written in a time before many major scientific discoveries, theories, and scientific laws were in place. One interpretation is that Heaven and Earth represent polarities such as hot and cold, night and day, etc. But in my opinion, I think that this ties in with the Chinese philosophy of yin and yang, in which polar opposites are actually complementary and flow into one another.

With this interpretation, the neomasculine principle of sexual polarity seems to align quite nicely, and believers of yin and yang philosophy would most likely appreciate the neomasculine perspective of the sexes being complementary rather than being in a futile competition.

4. On which side is discipline most rigorously enforced?

We may be able to draw parallels between “discipline” and our current legal system, which is becoming more and more toxic to men. Through changing the definitions of words such as “rape” and “harassment,” our enemy is able to enforce discipline on the male population. As of this moment, the enemy has the power to enforce discipline upon the masses, and “open season” could be declared on our movement by SJWs and their ilk.

As such, it seems a necessity that a legal aspect of neomasculinity be proposed in writing. In other words we need lawyers, law clerks, and anybody else with experience in the legal realm to help guide our cause. We must protect ourselves legally by studying the laws and examining loopholes. It is also perhaps wise to discuss the process by which we can change laws in our favor, or change the interpretation of those laws by legally resetting healthy precedents in the justice system.

5. Which army is stronger?

Unfortunately, although we may be morally and scientifically correct, right now a large chunk of the general population is under hypnosis from the mainstream agenda. Roosh has an article on some possible ways to begin educating the masses and seeding resistance. If we reach the third step of “culture war” in this article, then I believe we have a better chance of success, and as such the rest of Sun Tzu’s book may be utilized to the fullest extent to achieve our objectives.

6. On which side are officers and men more highly trained?

Our enemy has been at this for decades, perhaps centuries. He understands our weaknesses and has set up institutions to protect himself and defend against principled masculine men. While I agree that manosphere readers are one of the most educated groups of men in the country, until we further unite and peacefully organize I fear that we will be no match for the establishment.

7. In which army is there the greater constancy in both reward and punishment?

As for punishment, refer to point number (4). As for reward, our current system is interesting and somewhat frightening at the same time. Masculine men who “step out of line” risk punishment (see Roosh V in Canada and on The Dr. Oz Show). At the same time, women who act against their biological construct are rewarded with praise and adoration. Obese women and sluts are rewarded with positive attention and understanding (from the media, girlfriends, and of course “beta male orbiters”), instead of being educated and shamed for unhealthy behaviors.

Women are rewarded in divorce court through financial gain and are also awarded child custody in a majority of cases; not to mention single mothers are praised as being strong and independent, even though it’s well documented that single motherhood more often leads to negative child outcomes.

To summarize, the enemy has us by the balls when it comes to unity, strength, training programs, and constancy of reward and punishment; a system in which healthy masculinity is institutionally being shamed with greater frequency, and at the same time destructive female behaviors are being rewarded. Now folks, after reading these seven considerations, it would be very naive in my opinion to assume that the enemy is not well versed in Sun Tzu’s The Art of War!

More Insights

Sun Tzu concludes the first chapter in The Art of War with a few more valuable insights. We’ll address a few of those here today:

While heeding to the profit of my counsel, avail yourself also of any helpful circumstances over and beyond the ordinary rules.

I find this to be a noble gesture. In essence, if any man out there has great ideas or thoughtful insights, it would be best to fully disclose this knowledge to the manosphere and essentially go above and beyond the call of duty.

All warfare is based on deception

This is perhaps one of the most famous lines from the entire book. The possible tactics derived from this principle are seemingly limitless, and as such it is perhaps best to leave this point alone for now.

If he is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him.

Avoidance is perhaps our best bet under the current circumstances. It may be in our best interest to avoid direct confrontation with the enemy, and instead unite quietly amongst ourselves while we lay plans. If we lose our cool and attempt to butt heads with the establishment and SJWs through noisy protests, we may further alert our opponent and force him to crack down to an even greater extent.

If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.

It is well established in the manosphere that feminists and SJWs are not capable of controlling their tempers. As such, if the time comes to mount a swift, blinding, massive, nonviolent campaign we may be able to force their “feewings” and their ridiculous “hamsters” into overdrive.

While the elites behind the curtain may keep their cool, the public at large will be able to witness the massive childlike meltdown of typical feminists and SJWs on a nationwide scale. This may help gather even more support from the public (which was actually a useful tactic of Che Guevara in his book Guerrilla Warfare that he eventually ignored, leading to his death). It is essential that we take our opponent’s choleric temper into consideration while laying plans.

If he is taking ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected. These military devices, leading to victory, must not be divulged beforehand (meaning your strategy will be based upon what the enemy does)… The general who loses a battle makes but few calculations beforehand. Thus do many calculations lead to victory, and few calculations to defeat: how much more no calculation at all!

It is by attention to this point that I can foresee who is likely to win or lose.

Sun Tzu 2.png

We must lay our plans carefully gentlemen if neomasculinity is to be implemented.

Conclusions

There are indeed many positive conclusions that can be drawn about our camp and about our opponent’s camp as we lay our plans. That being said, it is also obvious that several factors are working against us; the main problem is that the enemies of neomasculinity and liberty are entrenched within a corrupted system and a large chunk of the general population is residing in a blue pill wonderland.

Until the negative aspects discovered while laying plans are deliberated and solved, it would be (in Sun Tzu’s expert opinion) a very bad decision to move further ahead in our campaign.

I propose we take things slowly for the time being and try not to create unnecessary waves in a corrupted system. This would only alert our opponents and cause them to react emotionally (as usual), possibly leading to further crackdowns on the Bill of Rights. It would be wise to step up recruiting efforts on the web and in our daily lives to unite the factions and begin quietly laying careful plans.

If and when the time comes, the nonviolent neomasculine onslaught should be so swift and stunning that the ensuing massive emotional meltdown may indeed be the enemy’s undoing.

Reference

(1) Sun Tzŭ. The Art of War Illustrated Edition. Translated by Lionel Giles. New York: Fall River Press, 2014.

Read More: The Ethical Principles Of Neomasculinity

118 thoughts on “How We Can Use Sun Tzu’s Strategies To Implement Neomasculine Principles”

  1. We are rapidly approaching the end game, and they have been in control of the narrative since the 1960’s at least (likely the 1910’s if we get down to brass tacks in these united States). Laying low and not making waves now, as we are at the breech, I’m not entirely certain makes sense. The Internet is a force multiplier and we seem to be using this tool to much greater effect than they are, and by us I mean the alt-right and normal right/libertarians. None of these discussions, none of this resistance, none of this “We need to get rid of this entire institution domineered by the Left” were around in any serious capacity prior to the mid 1990’s.
    Meaning, I’m not entirely certain what advantage we gain by laying back down and going silent/rigging for red. We’re never going to be stronger than we are right now, today.

    1. My question is HOW do we initiate the killing blow? We have a stronghold on the internet, but the mainstream media is still squarely gripped by the balls by the left. Sure, we dominate every discussion we take part in, but how do we translate that to the real world? Do we start jumping into the enemy’s domain and ruthlessly confronting their bullshit on their own blogs and forums? I see the progress and recognize the need to push forward but the question that springs to mind is “how?”

      1. Mainstream media? Who? Those ones growing more irrelevant and unheard every single day with every single cable television subscription cancellation? That mainstream media?
        Do we start jumping into the enemy’s domain and ruthlessly confronting their bullshit on their own blogs and forums?
        I worked for a large computer company back in the mid 1990’s. The level of anti-feminist comments was nearly zero back then, in fact it was the Golden Age for white knights. Today you find one anti-man article that allows un-moderated comments anywhere and guaranteed you’ll see push back at near parity levels or even higher. For example, Breitbart or even Yahoo (clearly left wing, but they tend to leave most comments alone, at least for a while). This didn’t used to happen.
        The coup de grace? Dunno, too early to say, but I’m not of the mind that easing back is the correct strategy, except insofar as to lead them into a trap. Even then, we’re not hierarchical and coordinated, so it will have to be individual big-name site owners collaborating together to make it happen.

        1. I think things will get scary for them as soon as the most determined of us begin meeting in persons.
          A few determined men can change the world.

        2. Agreed on the easing off strategy. A strategic retreat might work on a real battlefield but on the internet? I don’t see it being effective. I think the main tools at our disposal are spreading the truth (red pill) and disrupting the enemies.
          I have seen discussions about the troll (read-genius) that tricked the feminists into pissing their pants and taking pictures of themselves to support whatever cause. If they are too busy questioning their own “causes” and people, it allows us to go on the offensive along with showing all neutral parties just how incompetent and foolish they truly are.

        3. Depends on what the desired outcome is. For me, I don’t want to save the world any more than I want to save a slutty twat. I will pump it for all it’s worth and then leave it.
          My guess, by reading your comments, is that in principle you and I agree on a great many things. The one difference I think is that I am totally ready to tell these idiots: “you turned the world into a fucked to death pile of kaka, it’s yours….”
          I am going to find a nice balance between making and spending money, get as many thrills as I can in the manner I enjoy and, with any luck die while enjoying spending my last dime. In case that doesn’t work out I will leave a will saying that any money I am left with I want used to build a monument to me. Any family members can have directions to the monument.

        4. While we probably agree on many of our principles, I’m not quite ready to give up on the world if, for no other reason, than for my children. It may be idealistic, but I want to leave them a better world than it is now. To just get my thrills while I can is doing them a disservice and downright negligent on my part.

        5. Let me more specific about what I meant by “taking things slowly”. I do not think we should stop doing what we do on the net when it comes to red pill education. I believe we should in fact step up the recruiting efforts, as I mentioned in the conclusion.
          What I’m saying is that we should *first* lay organized plans as to *exactly* how we approach the situation. Now we can visit ROK and Roosh V every day for the next five years but nothing will change until we organize and actually come up with a plan to turn this thing around. Education first (which I believe we’re doing well), then planning, then victory (hopefully!).

        6. I understand your sentiments… Where I disagree (respectfully) is that I believe it is ALL of our faults for the world turning into a steaming pile of bullshit (myself included at times). I’d wager that 95-99% of folks in this world aren’t looking for world domination. They would be content to simply enjoy the pleasures of life and maybe even raise a family. But because this vast majority has sat on the sidelines and refused to peacefully organize to stop the decline, a slimy group of 1-5% has slipped in to power has taken most of us into oblivion
          “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing” -Edmund Burke

        7. I can understand your point of view and have no real argument against it. Maybe the difference is having kids (you) versus not (me).

        8. That is probably the primary reason why our viewpoints are different. If I wasn’t married with kids, I imagine you and I would have a very similar stance on life, even though I would still feel somewhat obliged towards leaving the world a better place (charities and such).

        9. I also agree with you here….I just don’t feel the impetus to help. It isn’t like I feel that the issue is so big and crushing and it is making me feel like why bother….I have no problem taking on difficult or even impossible tasks for their own sake and for your beliefs…..I have no desire to help because I honestly just don’t care. I have tried to care, really I have. It is not like the care was beaten out of me…it was disingenuous….it was a lie…I simply don’t give a shit.

        10. For what it is worth, I do hope you succeed….just not enough to help 🙂

        11. You live in the world too. Your’re not immune from it because you think it’s a pile of shit. That’s a cop out that says, “Well fuck you all, I’m here to the fuck what pleases me alone”.
          Posterity, family and descendants is a pile of crap too . One generation gone and nobody well be visiting your grave or whatever, wondering who great granddad was. I know this and it doesn’t bother me, not one iota. Yet, never could I live like you man, you’ve given up your spirit and soul for some hedonistic thrill on the conveyor belt. It will fuck you, even when you’re smiling and think you’re fucking it. Your’re much better than it, you’re a very smart, erudite man…..but don’t let your cynicism with the world, fuck you from other fruitful possibilities. You’re better than that, and you owe to yourself.

        12. Not saying I don’t see your point, but I don’t feel it. It’s not even just hedonistic. I would rather roast a chicken while listening to music, eat it with a bottle of wine and sleep peacefully then solve every problem in he world. As I’ve said before, I understand the arguments against this and respect them–even envy them. I just don’t care.

        13. Recognition of the ‘enemy’ & anticipation of the enemy’s habits & actions has to be part of the segment on laying plans.
          All true whether you’re looking to open a business in a new location, control & combat an infectious disease, pick up chicks in a club, win a game of chess, conquer a mountain or start a revolution.

        14. you don’t give fuck because you have been disapointed by the world, and you have been disappointed by the world because none of your predecessor have tryied to make the world a better place for the young ones.
          so! you can give a fuck and let another kid be disapointed by the world or try to do what no one have done for you, make a better world for the next generation.
          we can’t go back to the past to change thing but we can fight for the next generation. for us mortal who can’t change our future all we can do is changing the future of the next generation. in a way this is our immortality.

        15. It’s a nice pep talk but honestly that isn’t even close to my story. I have been given wonderful opportunities and have capitalized on them. I have a good life and am genuinely happy about it.
          I understand that some people fall into the category you mentioned but it ain’t me.

        16. Those freaky hair-colored scrappers were just the dressing, the pop up targets to distract from the real menace, the assemblages of official judiciary on down to the thugs that eviscerate families and order men from their homes at gunpoint. The rainbow haired’s are the new cheerleaders for the thug ocracy. The game will change. They cheer on every cracking blow against a man, every man trampled, but their whole game is like a bunch of disillusioned fanatics in a stadium blowing horns and having a tailgate party and they’re unaware that a massive earth changing storm is about to strike the place. They can’t see or hear the thunder for the trees. But it’s coming. I can almost hear the air sirens.

        17. Fair point. It’s your life. Nobody has the right to make other people do things “because they should care about x y and z”.

        18. That’s all I’m saying. I do respect your aspirations…its just that I don’t feel the same way.

        19. Best thing you can do for your kids and family is building a relationship with Jesus Christ.
          There is no advise better than this.

        20. “Nobody has the right to make other people do things”
          Apart from the government.
          Or so they say.

        21. “I assume nothing.”
          Apart from me being a creep.
          “It makes an ass of you.”
          A man needs the capacity for judgement and confidence in his judgement, and then the self respect to stand by his judgement.
          Without this what does he have left?

        22. Yes and a few determined men did – the Rothschild’s, Carnegie’s and Rockefella’s.
          In fact, they took over the world.
          Even Gaddafi – who was maybe one of the most impressive leaders of the modern age – couldn’t stand up to them.
          There is one who conquers all forms of tyranny.
          Jesus Christ.

        23. “you don’t give fuck because you have been disapointed by the world, and you have been disappointed by the world because none of your predecessor have tryied to make the world a better place for the young ones.”
          Well said.
          There is no greater thing we can do for the next generation but introduce them to God.
          We can do it now, or it can happen after lifetimes of confusion, pain and dissolution.

        24. Then you are about as useful to the species as a homo in SanFran at a a pride rally. A literal dead end. Don’t think you are going to be awarded points for just tuning out.

        25. But I don’t want points, nor do I care about being useful to the species.
          I have awarded my self all the points I need and have been successful in all the endeavors I have worked on making myself useful to me.
          I can’t stress enough that I had nothing but respect for people with a desire to be useful to their community, country, sports team, planet or whatever it is that people rally behind. I am just not on board. I will take care of me and my small group of people who matter to me. Other than that, society is welcome to the taxes they take from me so long as they keep the roads working and everyone else can either be interesting or go fuck off.

      2. Secession.
        The manosphere must eventually become secessionist.
        Pick a state (I recommend Utah), and call for an exodus.
        An attempt by a state to secede would force the hand of millions who are sitting on the sidelines.

        1. Did the North let the South go its own way? Did The US let Jim Jones and his People’s Temple go their own way? Did the ATF let David Koresh and the Branch Davidians go their own way? Just because they hate you, doesn’t mean they want to let you go. Strange that.

        2. Most of those are false analogies. I am speaking of state level declaration of secession only. A legitimate territorial government, renouncing the union though an act of its own legislative and executive processes.
          Which has been attempted once.
          The result would not be the same today. For this reason:
          The vast majority of the military hails from (and is based in) the sort of states that would be predisposed to leave.
          This was not the case in 1860. Most of the generals with experience in the Mexican war did go with the South, but when it came to infantry, the North’s advantage was quakers in the midwestern states. They made “ending slavery” into a quaker holy war. They enlisted (and died) in such numbers that the quaker faith largely vanished. Without them, Lincoln wouldn’t have had the numbers to win, because they were the only people who continued to volunteer willingly. People forget that the troops at Gettysburg had to be pulled back immediately after the battle to suppress the most violent riot in US history TO THIS DAY (the New York Draft Riot; 119 dead, 2000+ injured).
          Today, there would be no such advantage for the north. The people with the predisposition to want to fight at all, are the ones who want out.

        3. Utah!? F that! Have you even been to that wasteland?
          Your only hope of secession would be Texas and any state connected to it. And even with 1 of the only 2 mints, many many oil refineries. largest number of active duty and veterans, etc it would end up really bad. Read Tom Kratman’s A State of Disobedience for a very plausible example of how it would go down.

        4. I have been yes. I have friends there.
          It’s the one state where there isn’t a strong “blue urban / red rural” trend. Salt Lake City is nearly as red as the rest of the state is. Their legislature has 12 democrats in the 75 seat house and 5 in the 29 seat senate.
          For this experiment, it’s the cleanest petri dish in the filthy cabinet.
          Actual economic viability of the resulting state as an autonomous nation is immaterial. All that matters is getting a state level government to say “fuck you, we’re gone” to DC. The first domino.
          Utah is the easiest place to achieve that.
          The extent of my plan is:
          Step 1: Disrupt the status quo. That’s it.
          A lone gunman cannot disrupt the status quo. A mad bomber living in the woods cannot disrupt the status quo. A cult living in a compound cannot disrupt the status quo. A terrorist demolishing buildings with aircraft cannot disrupt the status quo.
          Only an official entity that is part of the status quo, spontaneously saying “fuck the status quo” can disrupt the status quo.

        5. But there is a lot of victimization nowadays. We can attempt it and use the “they’re genociding us” if there is resistance. “We are the new Palestinians” and other leftoid slop

        6. I guess I really didn’t make myself clear. No state, or conglomeration of states, is defensible from the US gov.
          And economic viability is essential. Do you really expect everyone to kill and grow their own food? Where you gonna get water in the middle of the desert for all those people without an infrastructure?

        7. It doesn’t have to be defensible.
          When I say, “we must secede”, I’m not expecting it to be successful. I’m just expecting that an official attempt be made by a state entity.
          That’s all that’s necessary. A state, showing sufficient disgust for the USG, to flip the bird on stationary.
          Success isn’t necessary. I simply expect it to place the progressives and politicians in panic “wtf do we do?!” mode where they start pushing buttons wildly.
          Causing others to secede. Or causing the military to execute a coup.
          But for that to happen, SOMEONE HAS TO TRY. There is a massive first mover disadvantage; I don’t pretend to deny there isn’t. But someone has to move first.

        8. It was the Wild West.
          The future belongs to women, gays and ‘disabled’ ethnic minorities.

        9. There is only one way to succeed at seceding: MAD. Yup, nothing short of nukes will deter the Feral Monster that is the U.S. Gov. Remember the War of Southern Independence ended with a declared policy of atrocities against civilian populations on a scale Churchill wouldn’t have used in WWII and he was fine with a little firebombing now and again. So go nuke or stay home.
          When I have brought this up in the past I’d mention the idea of Gov. Perry leading an elite team of Aggies….. If you can visualize that without howls of laughter then perhaps the idea has merit. Otherwise we can forget that path.

      3. We are not going to get anywhere by saying, the left this, the left that. First of because many left leaning people (atheist) are part of this community. Secondly, how would this make it any different from the GOP when they are equally corrupt.

    2. I don’t recommend going silent GOJ, I recommend that we begin to recruit more people for a *specific* cause and begin laying *organized plans* with each other. I agree that more people are on our side than many would give us credit for, but unless we actually come together and lay out an organized campaign, it would be in Sun Tzu’s expert opinion that we’re not ready for victory.
      On a related note, his next chapter “Waging War” stresses many times that a state never benefits from prolonged warfare. That’s why (IMO) after we lay plans, our onslaught needs to be rapid to be the most effective.

      1. I think one of the most effective steps we can take is forming local chapters, so to speak, of men who are interested in self-improvement. Basically, they regularly meet to work out, discuss business ventures, work on learning new skillsets, and hold each other accountable. When the group reaches critical mass and members start to lose the personal connection, it splinters off into smaller chapters.

        1. It sounds like the Freemasons. Maybe that’s the link you’ll need to make. Men only and hated by Feminists, I thought once about joining, but, I could never determine what their beliefs are about. Some seem very Fabian in their outlook, which I couldn’t approve of.

        2. Yeah, the Masons have a lot of antiquarian rituals for new men when joining a lodge. However, it provides a male only environment where heterosexual men can meet to build up contacts on a number of different areas. It’s a shame, it’s still so old boyish, as ordinary, traditional white Anglo Saxon guys if admitted, would I believe be the future vibrant life blood that would carry on the heritage and culture of western culture, free from the interference of Jews, Women and Homos.
          There is something great and noble about having a place in a city like London or Dublin on a winter’s night where you enter a Georgian building and have good conversations, a sound meal, a few whiskeys around a log fire into the small wee hours. Modern Anglo Saxon men need to re-establish their calling, their duty and their place in this world, before it’s gone.

        3. “There is something great and noble about having a place in a city like London or Dublin on a winter’s night”
          +++++++WARNING METRO SEXUAL ALERT+++++++
          “Modern Anglo Saxon men need to re-establish their calling, their duty and their place in this world, before it’s gone.”
          +++++++++WARNING HOMOSEXUAL ALERT+++++++++

        4. It’s old world. You wouldn’t understand it. And try not to be so dumb and attention seeking. You look like a nitwit.

      2. You inspired me to finally pick up this book.
        I wanna be on the same page as you guys… Seems like a timeless classic.

        1. Watched a documentary on the Vietnam War- supposedly, the top general used strategies and tactics from Art of War to defeat the American army..

        2. I think I might have seen that same documentary.
          What I remember from it is the guerrilla tactics (short unpredictable strikes), the whore spies, and ultimately that they demoralized the American army by sending propaganda back to the US where the citizenry decided the war was not worth fighting.

        3. Prolly the same show. And that propaganda lead americans to label returning soldiers “baby killers” – I honestly cant imagine how returning GIs felt returning to that shit…

        4. The US government had no intention of winning in Vietnam.
          They handed the victory to the Viet Kong.
          The soldiers may not have felt this way but it’s what happened.
          Nothing to do with what tactics the Viet Kong used or the Art of War.

        5. Well if your country isn’t behind you what are you fighting for?
          What was Vietnam about? It was all lies and a dead end.
          We have to highlight the stupidity of soldiers when we can because they MUST know how they are abused and sacrificed and then why when they come home they get hate. If your son was killing Vietnamese for no reason you would put him in line.
          When soldiers do not understand the law, the countries they are invading (US troops have only invaded in the last 100 years – there have never been hostile boots on US turf in that time) or the situation they are involving themselves in, well now we can expect Nazi Germany to arise at any moment.
          Military people who do this SHOULD be met with hatred by the country they ‘fight for’.
          They are the people who’s money they spend on illegal wars and war crimes.
          “I honestly cant imagine how returning GIs felt returning to that shit…”
          This is the pussy’s view of a soldier. Grow up and stop being so wet dude. They are paid to kill and die. Anything more is a bonus for a soldier.
          You don’t return from a war zone (especially one like Vietnam) and give a fuck about people calling you baby killers.
          This has always been government propaganda accompanied by a ‘fuck off and die on medications’ attitude towards these soldiers.
          I’m disappointed at how in awe the ‘manosphere’ is with soldiers. If you knew the reality your view would be different.

        6. Men were drafted into that war you clown- they werent “paid killers”. My uncle had no choice in the matter, and he died over there.
          You seem to have it ALLLLLL figured out, so why not clue us in as to what is really going on in the world.

        7. No you twat being drafted doesn’t mean you have to go – It means you go to prison if you don’t (why would you fight for a country that offers you this liberation, freedom and democracy?). For a man with a family what do you think serves his family best? Fuck you’re castrated and you don’t even realise.
          Many people choose this instead of going to fight and die in a war with people you have no idea about nor are any threat to you because you’re Govmint told you to. “No Viet Kong ever called me nigger” is about the smartest and most masculine thing I have ever heard with my own ears. Remember who Ali was saying it to – the same cunt’s you’re Uncle got himself killed for and who run the world this very day. If he was not a paid killer what the fuck was he – a peace envoy?
          A fucking pacifist?
          Are you telling me he took his arse to Vietnam in the middle of a war and he didn’t know how to kill with a rifle nor was he paid? How’d he eat?
          My grand father was Viet Kong – he was killed by some round eye coward being paid minimum wage for the day from the other side of the planet.
          Shall we have an emotions war now Alpha man?
          Only stupid worthless men go and fight other people’s wars.
          Who do you think your uncle would have been doing time with?
          Other objectors.
          Instead he got picked up by Uncle Sam and dropped into the middle of a Jungle to be killed by vastly superior warriors fighting at home for their homes.
          It’s a wonder anyone still pays tax in the US but then again the whole country is pretty gullible.

        8. God bless your heart. Dont you have to be at church soon?
          Say a prayer for my deceased uncle, he was only 20 when he passed away.

        9. More emotional arguments.
          If your uncle did it all without being payed it doesn’t make him any more heroic, sorry it’s a fact of life, it just makes it worse.
          We’ve all lost relatives to war it doesn’t make someone’s argument more righteous.
          Nor does it change the factual points of the draft NOT being compulsory.
          You can go and kill and die in a war you have no business in or understanding of with a load of guys you do not know and would likely spend much time disagreeing with at any other time.
          You can go and fight a war you believe in and when you die what’s the problem?
          Or you can have the state provide you with food, clothes, shelter and orders while not killing people who have done you no harm and pose no threat to you or you family neither risk depriving your family of it’s leader and sending them over to the state by just being a man and doing some time.
          Warriors and Soldiers are not the same. A red pill that is hard to swallow is the fact that at least Jihadis ARE fighting for their homes, home countries, standard of living and their twisted faith.
          The same cannot be said about any US soldiers since WW2 and even then it’s a bit of a stretch. British soldiers as well.
          “God bless your heart. Dont you have to be at church soon?
          Say a prayer for my deceased uncle, he was only 20 when he passed away.”
          huh?

        10. Ah, now should the citizenry decide whether a war is worth fighting or should the Government?

        11. Part of it intended to win. I’m with Moldbug on this, that every war in recent history has been a civil war between the Defense (forces of Reaction) and State Dept. (Cathedral) where over and over again State has demonstrated that there is no victory on the battlefield they can’t and won’t turn to ashes at the negotiating table.
          See Iraq for the latest example and for why I am pretty much anti-war so long as the current political situation holds. How many more bitter defeats can we endure before young men stop signing up to be humiliated?

        12. As far as I’m aware, many US military personnel are protesting pre-emptively against any action in Syria…
          So the anti-war feelings are becoming more mainstream which I’m glad to see.

    3. I am noticing a growing expressed discontent & awakening on even mainstream comment sites (UK & US) regarding the usual issues. My non quantitative assessment over a year. Amidst the usual white knighting & pussy pass gifting & homo acceptance from the sheep, there is an increase in voices going, ‘Hold on. Pay gap discrimination? Gay marriage? Feminism? Immigration?’ & so on. More sheep are getting tired of being sheep.
      The System’s capacity for accepting the above mentioned bullshit seems to be getting close to maximum.

      1. Not close enough to maximum, quickly enough. What the mainstream has yet to discover is the granulated specifics causing the problem the underground manosphere speaks of and is much better at disseminating. Mainstreamers are much quicker to just acknowledge there’s a problem(s), and that they have to stop or change it, yet remain mostly clueless about the most logical path personally to affect that change in their individual lives. They’re response?.. Simply reverse it. That never works for on-boarding the masses. That’s where the manosphere has a huge leg up.
        They’ll usually point everything at gov’t, bad legislation, etc. In that regard, the gov’t is the response to the SJW cause and patriarchal downfall, not always the driving force. The tolerance flood gates are being slammed open… one anti-masculine law passed, begets more exponentially. A republican in office sure as shit won’t reverse the torn social fabric, nor offset that balance, that would be up to people like us. Gay marriage will not be repealed. Women will still bitch inequality, just switch political parties and do so there.
        The first most damaging response will have to be refusal to cooperate, in larger numbers. Under the table income sources would be the first. Our taxes are literally funding our own demise. Don’t fuck BPD sluts, don’t get married, don’t impregnate US whores. Fat, Fag, & Feminist shame in public. Beat down a white knight who threatens you.
        “Change” doesn’t get mainstream attention unless its from the old way, to a new way. To revert back means non-progression to most progressives, and even many conservatives alike. The idea is, try something new, anything, because it must be better than life now… which is the source fucktarded mindset we’re battling.. and perfectly opposes the author’s referenced book. Neo-masculinity (or whatever you wanna call it), needs to be packaged as the new “progressiveness” to gain traction. That’s how you beat them at their own game, while simultaneously taking control of the game, thus changing the game itself.

      2. Thats why the mainstream sites will eventually do away with commenting on an article. Bernie Sanders, just a few days ago, claimed cnn was deleting comments supporting him….

        1. Most left-news sites already have shut down comments.
          Propaganda grows more powerful when no one is there to call you out on your lies.

    4. I would point out something else. This cannot be done without women.
      Stay with me.
      I know that many men are angry and they bitterly direct this rage at women, the proximate cause of their pain. The fact is this. We have met the enemy and they are us. In other words, it took men to allow universal suffrage which was the second major step towards the calamity we face today. Previously, if you had a problem with your woman, there were only two people who could sort it out. You and her.
      Today, the State steps in, reams the man and rewards the woman for bad behaviour. The modern woman is incentivized to slut around and take your shit. This incentive must be removed and the correct incentive made clear to women. That is, they must be shown that what they really want (a strong man to guide and lead her, to take the responsibility for putting food on the table so that she can focus on what she really wants to do) is the natural and right thing.
      It is men who put this infrastructure in place, not women. These men are the enemy. When winning a war identifying your target is key.
      And so, just as in the Matrix, women must take the red pill as well as men, because without women we cannot breed a new generation of red pill men. The red pill will die with us.

  2. Along with Lau Tzu and Chuang Tzu, Sun Tzu makes an important part of the triumpharant commonly known as the three Tzudges

    1. Yes.
      To call it ‘new’ masculinity is,
      a, gay
      b, suggest’s that there has been some improvement on the original which is Metro as fucking men blowdrying their pubes,
      c, transgender.
      To use the word ‘neo’ instead of ‘new’ just screams nerd’s attempting to be manly without being tough as nails and rough as shit even if it is detestable.

  3. According to Sun Tzu, self understanding is half the battle.
    In understanding ourselves we come to one startling conclusion: THE WEST IS ALREADY DEAD. It died on the battlefields of Europe. What we live isn’t the west. It is a kind of anti-west. It looks like the old west, but stands in opposition to all the things the west stood for. This anti-west isn’t our civilisation, it is our enemy, our would be destroyer. And so we must stand in opposition to it.
    Once you understand this you see the impossibility of conservatism. One cannot be a conservative when there is nothing left to conserve. All the institutions are corrupted. In this environment, to be a conservative rightist is to defend the very institutions that seek to destroy you. Purge yourself of Conservatism. then you are free to really fight. We on the right must become radicals, revolutionaries and experts in subversion.

    1. Nice insight into Sun Tzu’s observation.
      I agree that both Democrats and Republicans serve corporate interests and that we are not living in a true constitutional republic. Even supposed constitutional conservatives like Ted Cruz have their heads so far up Israel’s ass that I just can’t trust them!
      I am starting to believe that democracy is a system that’s meant to be corrupted, especially when they only give you two “choices” (left or right) when you go to “vote”. The third party never gets enough media coverage to get the message out.
      Who gives a damn if we have a democracy? If both parties are bought and paid for then you don’t have a real choice anyway. The heroes of the revolution and the founders gave us a constitutional republic, a specific type of democracy in which the elected actually serve the we the people within the confines of the constitution.

      1. Democracy never existed. We have a system where we elect a few clowns every now and again, while most of the real decisions that affect our day to day lives are made in the background by the technocrats. The technocrats are inherently left because that is the route which gives them the most power.
        And that is the trap conservatives fell into. They focused on the elected offices while the left gobbled up the real infrastructures of power. And now conservatives by their nature defend a system that actively works against them. They are defending a tradition that no longer exists.
        Our goal is not to preserve the west. The west is dead. Our focus should be on the complete and utter destruction of the anti-west. The system itself is our enemy. Once the Antiwest is dead then we build the New West with the bones of the old.

        1. “Democracy never existed. We have a system where we elect a few clowns every now and again, while most of the real decisions that affect our day to day lives are made in the background by the technocrats. ”
          Well said.
          And even when it does exist, it isn’t the freedom embracing system many think.
          The majority of people who voted win. Even if this is a minority of tax paying vote eligible people.
          Hey let’s export this great system to the middle east…
          …oh no look what happened when we exported democracy!

    2. Exactly. And people underestimate the dysgenic effect of two world wars. Often on ROK, I see it stated that war culls the weakest from the herd. Not so. At least not in WWI and WWII. The only males who didn’t see action and remained at the home front were the old, maimed, mentally ill, and criminal. Only the fittest went off to war. And witness the number of literary and scientific greats that served in WWI: Ernst Junger, Erich Maria Remarque, Karl Schwarzschild … not exactly the stereotypical “Jarhead.”
      The current West shares as much with the West of 100 years ago as the Special Olympics shares with the 1936 Olympic Games. Nominal only. And really just a mockery, a sad mockery.

    3. Self understanding is supreme. γνῶθι σεαυτόν (Knowledge of one’s self) was the state of becoming which the ancient Greeks purported was the royal route to the divine. In this state nothing across the torn face of this Earth can disturb and disrupt the man already THERE.

    4. “to be a conservative rightist is to defend the very institutions that seek to destroy you.”
      BANG. (I mean in the ‘you’re correct’ sense not in the Rooshian sense)
      As an unmarried, forty-plus non-tax paying expatriate, I can’t tell you how many times I have had supposed conservatives give me either obvious or inadvertent shit about;
      1. not being married
      2.not paying taxes.
      So these supposed conservatives basically are demanding that I;
      -waste my life as a mule for the gynocracy (marriage)
      -spend over half my working life to fund the very institutions that I hate and that have a pinpoint, laser beam guided focus on diminishing white males, paid for by white males oddly enough. (taxes)

        1. Federal Income Tax is not a law in the US.
          It’s all a big bluff and a bully on behalf of the Federal Government.
          Aaron Ruso did a film called America:Freedom to Fascism documenting the illegitimacy of Income Tax.
          The film interviews a number of IRS agents who no longer pay tax after wrongfully enforcing it for years.
          The US is very dumb. Even a monkey like G. W. Bush managed to take the piss don’t expect much from these morons.
          They are going to lead the developed world into a nightmare.

        2. Federal Income Tax is not a law in the US
          Tell that to Wesley Snipes.
          The only people who get away with this make very little money.
          How was church?

        3. It’s not about money it’s about freedom to choose.
          What you said was pathetic. So despite the fact it’s illegal, unconstitutional and a downright protection racket, fuck it because men in suits will lock you up. Coward. Luckily MLK Jnr didn’t get so shaken and deterred.
          This is why you are attempting to learn manhood from the internet.
          It’s also why you have basically expressed “I can’t do nothing to stop these people from stealing from me so I’ll just mock those who have had the guts I wish I had to stand up for what I believe regardless of the (minor in this case) consequences.
          Are you SO scared of being in prison you would fight a war you know nothing about, kill people you have nothing against and all the while pay the “jews’ who own you’re scared ass, an illegal, unconstitutional tithe for the audacity of being born in the US?
          “The only people who get away with this make very little money.”
          Yeah like Pablo Escobar and George Zoros….
          …or any other self made man in the West.
          Freedom has a price which you are evidently not willing to pay.
          “How was church?”
          How was school kid?

      1. Fully with you on not paying tax.
        Several IRS agents quit the job when they realised Federal Income Tax was un enforceable and all just a confidence scam.
        Americans are SO dumb.

    5. I think the best example for this is taking place in europe, europeans fought historically for hundreds of years to keep the islamists out, and now our own governments is rolling out the red carpet.

  4. A fine first article ‘Ex Convict’ 🙂 Time for me to refresh my reading of this work again.

  5. If this community wants to be successful it must be laser focused. Goals have to be specific and narrow. Think first Gulf War and not Operation Freedom. Secondly, enough of this blaming the left for everything. There are many people part of this community that lean left (atheist etc.). They right equally corrupt. This movement has to transcend party lines and not just be an extension of the GOP.

    1. “If this community wants to be successful it must be laser focused.”
      Stay on target.
      “Goals have to be specific and narrow.”
      I used to bullseye womp rats in my T-16 back home, they’re not much bigger than two meters.
      “This movement has to transcend party lines and not just be an extension of the GOP.”
      You don’t believe in the Force do you?

  6. I just noticed that ‘ex convict’s’ logo was of ‘Tupac’. Just on a hunch, I looked up the term ‘tupac’ numerological (life#22) meaning. Very interesting:
    ”Tupac Shakur was born under the most powerful and potentially the most successful of all Life Path numbers. It offers him the extremes of life’s possibilities: on one hand, Tupac has the potential to be the Master Builder, the person capable of perceiving something great in the archetypal world and manifesting it in the relative world; on the other hand, he can slip into the depths of obscurity, achieving little more than personal support.
    Shakur’s power is delicate. It exists by virtue of his ideals and vision, which he must use to inspire others to join him in his dream. Only by marshaling collective forces is Tupac Shakur able to bring together the necessary elements – people, ideas, resources – that will enable him to realize his goals.
    Consequently, Tupac’s Life Path is one requiring dramatic evolution. By being able to integrate seemingly conflicting characteristics within himself – Shakur’s inspiring vision and his natural tendency toward practicality, for example – he develops the talent to deal effectively with a great variety of people. This allows Tupac Shakur to understand and unite many differing people toward a single goal, melding them into a concerted whole. His task in life is to unite the dream with the bottom line. In short, Tupac Shakur is the visionary with his feet on the ground.
    Tupac is good at business and politics. He naturally understands large institutions, and has the ability to think and act on an international scale.
    He is gifted with uncommonly sound common sense. Shakur is able to see the beauty and potential in a given idea, but also the practical methods that will bring it to fruition. Somehow, Tupac Shakur understands the limitations of ideas – what will work and what will not. This is an intuitive gift that can evaluate possibilities on the basis of their practicality.
    While in many aspects the 22 is the most promising number, it is also the most difficult to live up to. Shakur has a great ambition, which can be a most difficult master, driving him to accomplish all that he is capable of.
    Tupac Shakur is a steady partner in any relationship. He offers sound advice and consistent emotional support. Shakur does not suffer from flights of fancy, and naturally resists the emotional heights. He is unconventional in thought and action, but tends to be traditional in appearance. Tupac avoids airs and pretension.
    Shakur’s challenge is to share his vision and allow others to make their personal contributions. That requires flexibility on his part, perhaps his weakest characteristic. Tupac Shakur often lacks faith in the ability of others. Therefore, he tends to control people and situations, sometimes tempted to manipulate.
    In the end, Tupac Shakur must learn to surrender to the larger cause that he serves. The final result may be quite different from his original vision, but with faith and commitment Tupac will make an enduring impact on the world.”
    Source:
    http://www.celebrities-galore.com/celebrities/tupac-shakur/life-path-number/
    .

    1. “I’m not saying I’m gonna change the world, but I guarantee that I will spark the brain that will change the world.”
      -Tupac Shakur

  7. I advocate a Longview – specifically a multi-generational one.
    My generation, that of millenials, has been thoroughly indoctrinated by the school system, and it’s very hard to reverse that.
    However, in time, we can help raise up a new generation that won’t be indoctrinated from a young age by SJW ran public schools.
    We have to out breed them and homeschool our kids in the principles of neo-masculinity

    1. My own childhood impressions lasted a lifetime. Opinions that rubbed off on me as a child became core for my hardwiring. I was set up to outmaneuver obstacles. Corrupt schooling breeds a pathogenic mind to attack good cells or consume the good and then excrete. The pathogens grow wild like weeds and then self destruct. The young in the schools must be reached. Schools are run much like prisons. You have to smuggle in contraban ideas.

      1. What you are saying goes against the idea of homeschooling. What’s the best way to smuggle in contraband ideas to public schools? Through our own children who are all hopefully being raised with red pill principles. However, many red pill parents, myself included, are seeking to protect our kids from the militant indoctrination provided at such institutions. Thus, we opt for homeschool. What’s the alternative to sending our kids into the fire?

        1. What I had more in mind was to homeschool yoor own kids definately and then go and visit your old public highschool for reunion say, or to order an old yearbook maybe, and between bells, stuff the lockers with cd’s, rippin’ red pill reads and maybe quickly unfurl some nice posters wherever appropriate, inside bathroom doors, bulletin boards. What can they do, crucify you? Have your new balances tied tight.

        2. How long has it been since you attended high school? It’s been 12 years for me and even back then they had that place locked down tight: All doors locked except for the main entrance, SRO office right by the front door, and cameras everywhere. There’s no way you could just waltz into a school and begin shoving papers into lockers. People aren’t kidding when they say they’re prisons for kids.

    2. Their world view will collapse under pressure. They’ve never been really challenged. They will be the first victims of the shitstorm they endorsed.

  8. First a compliment to the author’s writing style. It was a pleasure to read.
    The author’s words are a welcome addition to the ongoing discourse, to focus the energy of all men toward the defeat of the societal disease called feminism.
    Unfortunately, it won’t be enough.
    Sun Tzu speaks about defeating the enemy – which raises the question: Even if men worldwide banded together tomorrow to defeat the feminist forces, and won … then what? Any war strategy must include a disarmament directive, or the enemy will simply retreat and rise again another day.
    To this end, several points are offered to start the discussion, with the hope others will add to the list. Once men win the war, these directives should be issued:
    – immediate execution of all feminists and their female offspring
    – removal of the vote franchise for all women
    – removal of the female vocal chords at birth
    – male only access to education
    – please add to the list …
    Note to feminists: You started this war … men will finish it.

    1. Good questions, and I just happened to be online currently…
      To be honest I haven’t thought that far ahead! But I suppose that’s one of the purposes of Chapter 1: “Laying Plans”.
      I will offer these thoughts to you – First and foremost, I don’t consider women as the true enemy.
      I don’t even consider female feminists as the true enemy. I see them as pawns. Useful idiots. Women are like water, they’ll take the shape of whatever environment men allow them to operate in. Unfortunately, the environment is now toxic to men.
      I believe it goes deeper than a typical “slut walk”. I believe that *modern* feminism was in fact the creation of a relatively small group of dominant men with the intention to disrupt harmony between the sexes and ultimately destroy the nuclear family, especially in mostly white countries (US, Canada, Great Britain). I’m still in the process of researching the *true* origins of feminism, and as such I didn’t include specific sources in the article.
      This is where MGTOW and neomasculinity begin to squabble… While I do hold certain individual women accountable for silly slut walks, cheating, divorce rape, etc., I also understand that the reason this is happening is because over the last 100 years we’ve moved away from a patriarchy and toward gynocentrism, and some of the effects are discussed in this article (also see the links).
      But who allowed this to happen?
      Men.
      Elite men (with possible female involvement) brainstormed feminism and allowed women to carry it out. Average men then tolerated feminism and it’s growing problems. And now, many men are going their own way because of feminism and the toxic legal system.
      You couldn’t make this Sh*t up… So many men are perfectly playing into the plans of the elite. Destroy the family. Destroy masculinity. Society fails.

      1. Short version: Feminism is one prong of a bigger war on civilization by the Cultural Marxists / Frankfort School. And yes the leaders were men with women as a public face.

  9. Sun Tzu’s strategies won’t work because we’re dealing with an enemy which is feminine (Jewish) in its core. His strategies are valid against a masculine force.
    Simply remove the Jewish influence in society and everything falls back in place. It’s like tumor which needs to be removed surgically. The societies immune system is too weak to deal with it from within. Pass me the scalpel.

    1. We just need to make Squats, Deadlift’s, and Egg’s mandatory for school kids.
      Watch the two pronged assault on low T.
      Heavy Squats/Dead’s spike T and build muscle raising T levels over the longer run.
      Girls grow into women with round arses and heavy thighs which further spikes the T of the boys who are now men.
      Egg’s fuel all the T boosting going on.
      The next generation inherit higher T levels for the males and weightlifting secret beauty tips for the females.
      Humanity sorted.

      1. Eggs are good but I’ve never downed them raw. I’ve heard some superman shake recipies that call for 3 raw eggs but I eat my eggs cooked beforehand. My shake called ‘liquid fire’ will have honey, garlic and fish oil, 1000-1500mg niacin, multi vit pack and 1 spoon cayenne powder. Tequila for flavor. Add to either 1 can monster or tall glass of choc milk. If lifting, up the size of the protein omlette beforehand.

        1. Tequila in a pre/post workout shake?
          The kids can eat the eggs after cooking them. No need to go raw. (I tried, threw up in my mouth, swallowed both raw egg’s and vomit induced by raw egg’s, for a nutritious post workout ‘meal’).

    2. Крум Безстрашни is correct. The leaders of feminism have always been Jewish females. The Jewish men who use their corporations to spread feminism, are merely the puppets of the Jewish females.
      The Muslims are quite honest about their strategy to rid Jews from the planet. Their goal is simply to remove all Jewish women — the Jewish men will promptly melt into society.

      1. If three women, Steinem, Friedan and Abzug had been clitorectomized, the face of feminism would be much different. Perhaps it’s time to wage a campaign for the Jews to cease the circumcision of their uber beta men and begin whacking their females meaning cumpulsory cliterectomies for their women. No harm done. Dang if it ain’t time for the ‘yang’ to re-synch their ‘tang’. Fair is fair. As a non-jew myself I’ve always noticed from an outside third eye view what a bitch strain supercedes every endeavor of the Jewish man. Anything the jew does seems to requisite or require being answerable to the clan matriarch. An ‘elite’ tribe with some post meno club of biddies that migrate their tribe into heeburbia, anywhere rent rapists flourish and price jacked neighborhoods can be found. Or hi rises with triple locks on doors to give the sense of ‘cat box’ security from the sirens below. The biddies can’t even migrate their flock into any frontier, why not with unleavened dough balls for testacles. ”Shut up Magda and mak me a vitch” any jewish men catch my buzz??

  10. The Art of War was written by jesuits, as a figured story for anti-reformation attack.

  11. Learn how to play chess with pose, insight and elegance. It instructs a man in an abundance of useful masculine skills that can be applied in the game of life. Thinking three moves at a time is the key to outwit your opponents and women.
    The most important virtue it teaches you is the experience of loosing well, that allows you to learn the game from another man who’s at the top of his form. To lose to a brilliant player is sometimes the greatest blessing that can be bestowed on you.

  12. The strategies in The Art of War are meant for armies, which can be quickly commanded. We do not have that capability. It is more of a grass-roots movement and the same principles do not apply, apart from exceptions.
    And that is probably a good thing, because a leader without the protection of his soldiers around him would possibly be either compromised or dead/imprisoned.

  13. I’d like to propose a better, more practical reasoning to go with rule #3 “With whom lie the advantages derived from Heaven and Earth.”
    The Chinese are big on the whole “Mandate of Heaven” thing and it seems to tie into notions that the Universe has rules and that obeying them gives a ruler legitimacy, the Mandate. This is a useful concept, as our enemy is in the end acting against every law of nature one can imagine. They can talk about moral relativity until the cows come home but there IS right and wrong, even if we will likely debate the details until the Sun goes cold, and to keep doing wrong and believing it good is having visible effects on their sanity. On the other hand, to the extent we strive to seek Truth and work with it, embrace it, live the path of Righteousness we can expect to receive the Mandate of Heaven in our efforts. None of those ideas seem incompatible with any Western belief systems.

  14. MGTOW gets a rap as being butt hurt guys angery at women (and possibly gay) mom’s basement dwellers. That might be because they were early in the movement, and it took guys getting angery at the situation to wake up. Then the movement in general matured as more groups formed. But anyway, I think the “Going Your Own Way” part is important because the Red Pill is about not accepting the norms society has constructed that takes away our masculity and favors women, gays and misfits.
    This whole thing isn’t a war. Men who’ve woken up to all of it don’t necessarily NEED other men and to battle the media and SJW’s. It’s good to have sites like this to help people get their bearings, and in that sense we’re doing a justice for our brothers. But for society and the human race to survive, more and more men are needed who’ve taken the Red Pill and will work against social programming. But then I’m EXTREMELY wired on coffee right now, so take my comments with a grain of salt.

  15. Having a problem with a meddling sister. I have remained quiet and not responded. Awaiting her next move(s) before planning any response/attack.
    Great article. Applies AoW to every day situations. Awaiting RoK article on the 48 laws being applied to modern day situations.

  16. As a M.G.T.O.W I’m willing to work with you but I’m what you would call a moderate in the M.G.T.O.W community.

  17. I admit I haven’t read “The Art of War.” But other than some superficial analogies, there really isn’t a lot in common between a social movement and a, you know, actual *war,* where people kill each other. Can’t really see how Sun Tzu has a lot to say on that subject.

  18. I think a social network of ROK readers is needed. For any who wants to add me on Facebook, Blake Andrews is my name. <—That is my face.

Comments are closed.