Politics

Facebook CEO Promotes Subversive Globalist Views In His First Live Q&A

197 Comments

Last week via Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg hosted his first hour-long live Q&A from the company’s headquarters in Menlo Park, California. Intended as an open forum for any of Facebook’s 1.65 billion users to ask the company’s CEO their burning questions, Zuckerberg quickly used one of them to pitch his vision of the “global community”.

The naive viewer would find nothing strange or off-putting about Zuckerberg’s spiel. His voice had that giddy, effete inflection a lot of Millennial techies tend to use to lull their listeners into a passive state of glee and unthinking optimism about technology’s future (without us). It is worth noting that since cashing in on public figure status, Zuckerberg’s body language has improved–the confidence in his firm hand gestures chopping the air has helped reinforce the message behind his words, even when that message is a bad one. However, for the initiated viewer attuned to Facebook’s newfangled political agenda, you will detect what Zuckerberg is espousing is undeniably globalist in nature. 

After the opening pleasantries, Zuckerberg warmed viewers up with a broad and cozy premise: “We need to use social media to find solutions to humanity’s problems.” By solutions, of course, he doesn’t mean generating colourful banners for the site’s users to feign dedication toward a particular tragedy or cause? No, that is not his implication, per se.

He continues, while, on the way, stumbling over the acronym LGBT with “LGDP” (Lesbian-Gay-Double Penetration?), to propose his solution: By building technology, “people can come together and kind of level up humanity and start to see ourselves less as nations of people and more as a global community.” Did a nuke Dr. Strangelove-style just go off in your head? If it did, you should remove the words “Little Boy” from its shell and replace it with “Cultural Marxism”.

Zuckerberg’s so-called solution denotes the very definition of globalism: a socio-political system that strips nations of their traditions and replaces them with a globalized society run by a group of elites (who only serve to benefit) without a unified culture. Of course, Zuckerberg skirts that explanation, couching it in vague language like “new political systems” and “citizens of the world.”

By “technology,” Zuckerberg never clarifies what type of technology and who would control it. In a globalist society, the controllers would be private monopolies under the auspices of foreign banks and the Federal Reserve, but Zuckerberg avoids getting down to those specifics–or perhaps he is not even aware.

“A lot of the problems you’re talking about,” he adds, “whether it’s terrorism, the refugee crisis, or climate change, or global diseases spreading around the world, these are not things that can be solved by any one city or one nation or one small group of people.” Yet, Zuckerberg fails to point out that these issues are perpetuated by the globalist agenda itself.

For example, the influx of Syrian refugees into “generous” European countries like Germany, France, and Sweden has destabilized those regions, upsetting their social order and leading to increases in crime, namely the rape of its women (a subject Western feminists have chosen to stay silent on). Globalism is the very engine of this current calamity; it, by definition, requires a world with open borders for “diverse” cultures to mix and muddle up. Thus, globalism’s “multiculturalism” seeks to overwhelm nations and local communities with groups that will not (or cannot) assimilate to the national culture. 

Today, nationalism has become a faux pas (hence Donald Trump’s surging popularity amongst America’s traditionally patriotic base–and lack of popularity amongst globalist leftists and cuckservatives, in turn). With the proliferation of worldwide information sharing and virtual interconnectivity (due, in part, by Facebook), globalism has become the mainstay for which countries around the world are meant to participate. Zuckerberg is encouraging this gross idea, admitting “we have a lot of work to do”, without acknowledging that globalism itself is riding shotgun in exacerbating the world’s “problems”.

Throughout the Q&A, you can sense the hollowness behind Zuckerberg’s words. His overuse of “global infrastructure,” “organize everyone together,” and other platitudes imply the merry-go-round simplicity of his ideas. His arguments are the verbal equivalent of placing daisies in a rifle, if those carnations were sprayed down with DDT–and if Zuckerberg were wearing a turtleneck, but, alas, he’s sporting a bland grey crew neck. Zuckerberg’s bloodshot eyes–either from a lack of sleep or pure camera fright–remain lit open throughout most of the Q&A, giving off the strange feeling that he is scared of what he is saying, and not confident about it, either.

Comedians In Cars Getting Censored

Comedians In Cars Getting Censored

Fortunately, the Q&A gets enlivened by the arrival of comedian Jerry Seinfeld. At first, his appearance brought tremendous woe, thinking one of today’s great funny mans and leaders against political correctness had sold himself out to a billionaire yuccie who censors conservatives’s free speech.

Thankfully, that wasn’t the case. Stopping by Facebook’s headquarters to test drive an Oculus Rift demo, Seinfeld crashed Zuckerberg’s globalist party to playfully mock the CEO’s said views. Responding to the “global community,” Seinfeld scoffs, “what part would we play other than can I take a selfie with you?” Zuckerberg blushes, stifling his frustration that Seinfeld won’t nod along to his nonsense. Seinfeld goes so far as to reject a Q’ers invitation to a block party and dismiss Zuckerberg’s queue of questions as “not interesting at all”.

Here, Seinfeld’s pitch-perfect candour actually starts to disarm the nebbish CEO. Zuckerberg’s facial expressions become less stilted, his speech more uninhibited (“I wasn’t planning to talk about this publicly!”, Zuckerberg admits after Seinfeld prods him about his personal life), and his body language looser. The hilarity escalates as Seinfeld continues to poke fun at Zuckerberg’s philosophy: “Your goal was to take the social experience and put it online; I want to eliminate the entire social experience,” noting the irony that Zuckerberg’s social media website has effectively done just that.

With Seinfeld’s appearance, the Q&A veered from a globalist gymboree to a frank yet lighthearted exposé of Zuckerberg’s dubious political position. Once again, Seinfeld reminds us that humour–combined with decisive action and critical thinking–is the answer to taking the legs out from under the globalist’s stance.

Read More: Mark Zuckerberg Announces Plan To Censor Discussion Of Europe’s Refugee Crisis On Facebook

197 thoughts on “Facebook CEO Promotes Subversive Globalist Views In His First Live Q&A”

  1. Woe to this time and place where people like this effete snob are considered part of the ‘elite,’ when the legion returns they will put these eunuchs in their place.

  2. If we had a sane nation Cuckerberg would have been promptly shot for treason.

      1. Someone beat me to it. Here’s the T if you care to share your feelings with the world, which is très vogue these days.

    2. We all need to work together to Cuck Zuck!
      ….I just realized that means fucking an Asian 4.

      1. Of course, you could just find a willing bull to do the dirty work for ya.

  3. They’re both Jews. They see the humor in each others sweet little eyes. Still, I like most Jews as they’re generally trouble makers of some sort, and a bit of mischief keeps us all interested.

    1. At the very least, Seinfeld has openly expressed opposition to the SJW phenomenon. He was one of the first (and loudest) comedians to publicly stop performing stand-up on campus, because there was no way the dumbass kids wouldn’t find something to bitch about.
      Whether he’s actually been harmed by our enemies or is just saying it, I’ll take allies where I can find them.

      1. He could just have called them anti-semites if they started criticising him. Or maybe thats only reserved for people, his tribe actually doesn’t like. But what would I know…

    2. Zuckerberg loosens up a bit, because Seinfeld is his typical droll self, but beyond that I didn’t get the impression Seinfeld cared for him much. It really doesn’t come across as a pairing of equals

    3. You know it’s something when leftist comedians start to push back on this nonsense. They can usually make fun of anything and everything. It’s to the point where Seinfeld (and others) won’t perform on college campus any longer because of the SJW nonsense.
      That’s a good sign…some on the left are turning on their own (or the bullshit).

    1. Maybe it is because I don’t know enough, but I just don’t get this. Anyone want to explain?

      1. It’s got to be about the slavery to Facebook. You “Like” other people’s content and “Share” it to everyone who follows your profile.
        All I really know is that it made me quite mad. I stopped using the service years ago because I didn’t like what it did to the people around me, and that’s pretty much exactly how they act.

        1. Oh so “share” is a feature. Cool. Makes sense. No Facebook here

        2. I kicked out almost everybody I know in real life and now I only share smart-ass quotes, music videos, tasteless memes and political rants.

        4. Ha. Nah. I buy when people say it’s a tool and can be used well or misused. Sometimes I use my moms log in to see pics of my nieces if there has been an event or something.
          Honestly it just never interested me. It always seemed like confession in a world where God was dead.
          Pass.

  5. The other day hollywood reporter, I think it was, outlined the 8 men that basically control all of media. Wouldn’t you know they were all billionaires and jeff bezos, ceo of amazon, was one of the eight. zuckerburg, is also another recently minted billionaire too, although I thought he gave it away? Either way, fuckerbury is stupid rich. Here’s what I’m getting at. There has been a significant sea change in the wealthy over the years and practically all the new entrants are these techie geeks. The significance – they’re all sickening globalists leftist liberal progressives. This explains why our culture is in such a fucked up condition. Just look at the politics of these people. bezo’s influence in the media explains why we keep seeing certain agenda’s being pushed on shows and tv, i.e., the homosexual agenda where something like 40% of characters are portrayed as homosexual. There is no mystery here, the super wealthy always hold tremendous sway over society. These are the “elites” we keep harping on, and they are the same elites that fucking piss us off. One last point and perhaps the most important – yes, history shows us that the wealthy always have the power…okay fair enough, but NOT in the American Constitutional Republic system. In other words, per our system it is entirely inappropriate and illegitimate for a small group of people, bezos and zuckerburg, to impose their personal “world view” on us and, worse, to alter our culture and way of life, period. The issue of homosexual marriage is front and center here, because, both of these two fucktards supported this with obnoxious enthusiasm. Oh and that smug and trite disdain for non-supporters comes right from the top…right from these dickheads (even though they depend on those people nonetheless to use their products). Simply put, marriage is a tradition. Think about it, how could it ever be a right? Club a women over the head and take her as a wife? What? Its a tradition and people like bezos and zuckerburg fucking hate our traditions, but, so fucking what they have NO business changing them. All the cultural changes we have seen over the past 10-15 years have been illegitimate. Remember that.

    1. Anyone preaching “globalism” should be seen as preaching “communism” at this point…because that’s all it is, communism, the next generation.
      They are trying to wrap it up in a nice bow but it’s the same old thing. These people (if they live in the United States or they are Americans) should be considered traitors (we don’t do communism here).

    1. Good news: I have the rulebooks
      Bad news: Pathfinder/3.5 and previous only
      I just can’t bring myself to play the newer versions. I read the books, but the system is just too far from the wargame roots.

      1. I have a few older books on spirit summoning and demon summoning. Granted the book on spirit summoning states fasting on bread and water for seven days while avoiding human contact before the ritual. Then there is the latin prayer chanting which probably can’t be messed up without consequences.
        But that’s an option for socialization if you think otherworldly entities exist out there.

        1. I haven’t played much in the past few years. Built a Dragons of Tarkir deck, but I’m pretty sure that’s out of standard by now.
          And no, I never took the time to build a decent EDH deck. Kind of wish I had, but in college I was surrounded by people much more willing to go into debt for the best cards.

    1. I think that honor belongs to Chuck Todd. But Zuck is real real close to the top of that list.

      1. <<“my room mate Lori Is getting paid on the internet $98/hr”…..!tq247n:
        two days ago grey McLaren. P1 I bought after earning 18,512 Dollars..it was my previous month’s payout..just a little over.17k Dollars Last month..3-5 hours job a day…with weekly payouts..it’s realy the simplest. job I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months. ago. and now making over hourly. 87 Dollars…Learn. More right Here
        !tq247n:
        ➽:➽:.
        ➽.➽.➽.➽         http://GlobalSuperJobsReportsEmploymentsCareGetPay$98Hour…..
        ★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹::::::!tq247n….,….

  9. One of my favorite things to hate about Fakebook is their little cartoon doodles on the login page all feature fat people.

  11. When globalists and progressives say “organize” they mean “control”… as in, “organize everyone together” as they determine is best for themselves.

  12. “We need to use social media to find solutions to humanity’s problems.”
    “We need to use our narcissistic behavioral response programs to manipulate the huddled human masses into doing what we want.

    1. Find solutions to issues, ones that hurt the least amount of feelings and net most attention wins!

    2. Except, Arab Spring. G’head, you can use FB too to organize a mass meeting of the goons, see how it works out.

    3. Exactly. It’s not Jame Bond or super-secret people doing the work or the Plutocrats; it’s this guy. He’s lynch pin for the monied elite in their control of the population.

  13. Ha ha…… when I first saw Jerry and the Shitberg sitting side by side I thought “two Jews in a car”. So glad Jerry is everything I wanted him to be….. caustic ’til the last….. take no prisoners…..fuck globalism and Soros…..

  14. “(Lesbian-Gay-Double Penetration?)”
    A rug munching man hater hammered by two shirt lifting women haters?
    That would be more awkward to watch than dwarf porn

    1. One gay woman, one gay man, a double-ended dildo and a double-sided mirror bisecting (bisexting) the dildo: keeps everybody happy and qualifies as a very odd kind of heterosexuality

      1. Hmm…possibly
        Still think it will end violently
        Probably with Billy jean king fisting the two interior decorators to death before going home to shave her head & kick fuck out of her witches tits lover

        1. well in the spirit of bringing people together both gay men and gay women love fisting, so why should they fist each other. They could always dress up to please. Billie Jean must look like a mouldy apple core by now

        3. I see that you have accomplished the task of becoming a gentleman. Congratulations.

  16. It’s times like these when I pray for the Russians or chinese to invade us. Not because I want us to be invaded, but because our nation needs a cataclysmic event to occur for us to wake up and cast globalists out.

    1. I’d prefer our ancestral ancestors wake from the dead in Europe and begin a killing spree with their ghostly armies. Or we get the military to defect to our side and we just rise up that way.

      1. Our military is turning fast. Give it 5 more years, and all of the hardened Iraq/Afghanistan vets will be out…. leaving the females who can’t hack it and illegals to fill the ranks.
        Neither demographic is sympathetic to our cause, if we’re gonna be honest.

      2. Don’t count on it. The “soldiers” of today aren’t like the soldiers of past wars. The veterans before were nescient. They werent given full information about the bullshit “causes” they were fighting for or the psychopaths they were taking orders from.
        Today’s military personnel (notice I didnt say soldier) are willfully ignorant bureaucrats’ bitches. All the information is widely available that proves that the order givers are psychopaths and their orders are bullshit, yet people still sign up under the false auspices that they are fighting for ‘Merican moms and apple pies. These military people today are the domestic enemy the Constitutional Oath warns us about. They don’t deserve or thanks for their “service.” They deserve our scorn for their treason.

    2. couldn’t they just take down Facebook. For one thing it would upset more people

      1. Then it’s only a matter of time till Russia falls as well.
        At least instagram is useful for laughing at the stupid stuff that people post online.

    4. I look up toward the heavens and with a N.Y. Yiddish accent say:
      “Not to be pushy or anything, I’m sure you know what you’re doing, but – could you just … GET WITH THE SMITING ALREADY!

  18. Is it my imagination, or is Seinfeld slurring a few of his words just a tad in that presentation with Zuckerberg? Did he have a stroke, or perhaps slightly drugged out?

        5. I know the sun rises and sets everyday..but not all facts are known by what we see in the clear light of day.

        6. if he was an alien he’d be more of a class act, like Musk or someone. I am actually surprised how gormless he is. Maybe his wife is a reptile

        7. why would he be a class act, surely if there were aliens among us they would be gormless and uncomfortable in social settings as it could either be a natural reaction for an alien or a very sophisticated cover to appear like a normal human being.

        8. because people who rise from nothing to become billionaires overnight usually have something about them that make them exceptional, and since he didn’t even invent the technology himself for the most part, you’d expect that quality to lie in the realm of social charisma rather than expertise. Sounds like you’ve been consuming to much David Icke.

        9. sounds like your mind has finally atrophied…didn’t like your early comment about lesbians and dp…crude.

        11. really. Fair enough, but I thought crude was good. I don’t think lesbians or anyone else for that matter should get treated gently. Certainly not on ROK

        14. I’m actually a bit sad to hear that. I guess south park was right about bill gates

        15. play to the gallery and you get splinters in your ass….lesbians and gays, yeah they are attention seeking whores mostly, but, don’t mention fisting and DP as it degrade us all.

        16. pretty sure I’m not doing that. I enjoy crudeness, both the sacred and the profane. The night club joke was too soon, I admit, but there’s nothing wrong with a little scatology. Besides, there shouldn’t be any protected classes

  19. when zuckerberg’s globalist takeover is complete everyone will have unattractive wives and wear grey t-shirts the whole time

    1. Is it the douche bag haircut or the douche bag shirts that annoy me more?

      1. I know it’s a rhetorical question, but I think its the t-shirts which stand out. It would be great if he really only had one and never ever washed it. Maybe that’s how he measures how powerful he is: if you were that rich and influential you could probably get those around you to agree that you don’t smell like a down and out

        1. Case in point: Pavoratti fucked Italian fashion models two at a time

      2. I think his Walmart clothes are the worst. Simply because he’s trying to make himself look like he’s just an average American and understands us, instead of making himself look like the elitist prick he is.

      1. this is true. Everybody’s wife is unattractive these days, if not necessarily asian and unattractive. It is largely the institution of wifehood, and what it entails. Even Brad Pitt’s wife looks ropey these days.

        1. Exactly what I was thinking. Brad Pitt: Mr “I’m not an alpha I just play one on TV”
          PS: excellent use of “ropey”

  20. “kind of level up humanity”
    That could mean a whole lot of things; anything from building a kinder, more gentle world to bio-chips insert directly into our nostrils to hook you up into a giant hive

    1. Or send everyone to the next stage in the cycle of life’s game and that would be death if I am not mistaken as well as whatever if anything comes after it.
      Sounds like a threat to me I would much rather take my chances in the wilderness or with the universe’s unpredictable fury.

  21. I, for one, applaud Mark’s brave support for Lesbian-Gay-Double Penetration. It is the first thing he’s ever said that makes sense to me.
    Seriously? Every day I wonder why I don’t delete my Facebook account. If I want to see cute cats doing silly things, all I have to do is look at our two cute cats doing silly things.
    And I find this spreading use of FB to log into sites and services ominous. We know who you are; we know your politics; we are tabulating and collating your posts, comments and visits for official review. Paranoid? Don’t think so.
    There’s nothing good about any of this. They’re creepy, they’re manipulative, and they have all the wrong items on their agenda.
    And as for discourse and sharing of feelings, log into your FB account, say something positive about Trump or negative about Hillary (or immigration, or limiting access to guns) and see where it gets you. My account is open and it happened just yesterday. Feel free to check it out. It’s like strolling into a volcano.

  22. So the stolen Austrian election might be thrown out. Wouldn’t that be a coup.

  23. What an idiot Zuck is. So much money, married to an over the hill Asian broad. But you wouldn’t expect differently from a Marxist.

      1. There’s parties there and in another few countries that are requesting a referendum
        And at the moment, Leave is leading.

        1. I see despite all the early smugness about about the remain people in the UK, the results that are rolling in now make it look like it will be really close, perhaps leave might actually win.
          The EU is run by unelected officials and it needs to be dismantled.

        2. The leave side seems to be doing better than I thought they would. When will we know the answer? The suspense is killing me.

        3. oh I’d say about 6 am, yes, it’s very tight and with Scottish and Northern Ireland vote down (very pro Europe) it’s looking like the UK could leave.

        4. The heavy rain affected Inner London which is heavily in support of remain. Good!

        5. Excellent, soft effete London Eurocrats can never stand a bit of bad weather…wreck the fancy hair do’s.

        6. Wait, Northern Ireland is pro Europe? I would have guessed the opposite.

        7. Looking at the map, the only places where Remain is strong is Scotland and London, with London itself being the only reason why the vote is even remotely close right now.

  24. Facebook has destroyed the masculine culture of story telling. In ancestral times, hunters would re-tell the story of the hunt in front of the campfire, in what was a primal form of theater. Today the male oratory role has been devalued to the point where a story’s glory is only as good as the: quality of the picture, the people tagged in it, and the number of comments and likes.

    1. Correction: Your story is only good if you’re a moderately fuckable woman.

  27. One of the chosen people is acting according to stereotype.
    Who could have predicted?

      1. Oh (((Sienfield))) played his role in this theatre well. I guess that’s Zionist globalism debunked then as far as the great unwashed are concerned. Ha.

    1. Holy Farage!:D
      We won! We motherfucking won!
      And I couldn’t be more proud of my northern England! We showed those treasonous Picts and foreigners who dwell in London how free is lady Britannia!

      2. And it will only cost 7% of your entire economy! But don’t worry there’s still a big global market for English steel. I mean cars. I mean high tech. I mean… David Beckham?

        3. Since I perceive you’ll require a fair explanation, have my honest view on this:
          Personally, I’ll loose a lot more than 6% of what I have. For starters, I don’t even work in the UK, but in the EU, and it will be a nightmare to change that (and things will get a lot more difficult now).
          Refraining from having built a family, being a highly skilled worker (and a workaholic) and being cautious about my financial safety, I gathered considerable wealth. What did I do? Invested it in properties (Portugal, because of its weather and landscape; France because that’s where I work most of the time; Germany, since I have family there, they have a good cultural offer and girls are pretty). Now, as I predict the £££ I have will depreciate, and it will be a lot more difficult to “easyJet” everywhere, I guess I’ll have to sell some estate, at least, to face the terrible fiscal storm an independent UK will be. So, job, lifestyle and (modest) life achievments are in jeopardy.
          I knew this whole “major danger” for me, before the referendum (we had months to reflect about it). I used my holidays, came back to Her Majesty’s Most Blessed Island and campaigned for Brexit as I never campaigned before. And we won.
          Now, we know we will all suffer because of this. But we also know who was benefitting from the current situation: an “elite” of billionaires like Mittal (which, hidding in the City, are working to make us all poorer everyday), the Tribe’s banksters, an army of miserable europeans from other nations (Poles, Greeks, Portuguese, Italians…) who make both the housing and labor markets severely imbalanced, and, of course, the countless eurocrats of Brussels, Strasbourg, Luxembourg and even here, in the UK, where small “cabinets” are abundant. Oh, and the “refugees”. And the pro-Chavez “venezuelists” of Greece, Spain and Portugal, who will ask for more taxpayers’ money to be delivered every year and a half.
          Yes, they want (economic and cultural) war and (financial) revenge because we didn’t accept our share of Globalization, our small corner in the vast desert the EU was turned into.
          Yet we are a strong nation, and always on the right side of History (at least in Europe). The future will prove us right and the price we’ll pay for our freedom will be washed away not by tears, but pride.

        4. Wow, somebody who actually wants to share information and not trade insults. How did they let you in here? It sounds like you do realize there will be short-term economic consequences to the UK, but you believe they will be outweighed by long-term good of not being in the EU. To that, I say: you were already not on the Euro and not in the Schengen Zone. You had under 100k immigrants last year. Yet you had all the preferential trade deals you could imagine. The only country in the world in such an advantageous position. And you scuttled it. Why? For fear of economic and immigration crises that, owing to smart negotiation by prior administrations, wouldn’t have touched you, from what I can see.
          And the instability costs will likely set both UK and EU back 5 years.
          I understand the initial sentiment — UK has always defined itself separately from Europe — but giving up the “catbird seat” seems like a bad business move to me. .

        5. The whole economic reasoning is inadequate regarding these matters. We had 2 world wars (and the second was consequence of the first one, having British people made it loud and clear, we will not bow before the Germans [and we were both imperial monarchies, it wasn’t democracy vs nazism]; if we did, we could have stopped WW2 after France fell, with a simple agreement [Chamberlain’s way], while keeping our empire, in a more comfortable position than this one we have now).
          Apart from that, there is:
          a) the current situation of the UK within the EU, and
          b) the problem of where the EU is heading to.
          a)We understood very well how things are decided after 2009’s “economic crisis”. Germany imposed its stance on Spain, Greece, Portugal, even on France. Debilitated countries keep being punished and abdicating more and more of their sovereignty, as undemocratically as it could get. Was the United Kingdom ever heard about any of these decisions? No, we weren’t. These measures affected all the economies (the UK’s the second one, only after Germany, and above France), but they were considered a “financial matter”, regarding only the Eurozone. On the other hand, when we consider questions like the “refugees” or meddlesome regulations on production, consumption and financial, social or political process (which includes the “SJW agenda” pushed by Sweden, Germany and the leftists in the EU Parliament), we are again viewed as “full members”, who should “abide by the law”. In conclusion, we are treated as a rich colony, not as a free, equal partner.
          b1) Then, where is the EU heading to? Economically, you can’t see any new developments which allow you to safely hope a steady recover. Unemployment is reaching giant proportions outside the BeNeLux + Germany region, affecting primarily the younger generations and including the highly skilled, which indicates we are past beyond the point of getting over “structural deficits” or simple localized frailties. The problem is coming from the highly centralized structure of the Bloc itself.
          Politically, the EU is a disgrace, lacking any military, diplomatic or even cultural relevance. Russia, Lybia, Syria, the evidence is abundant. We are ever faced with more feminism, anti-family rhetoric, anti-demographic sentiment, and, of course, socialism.
          b2) Lastly, the “refugee” question, which is far from being solved. They are not refugees at all, but economic migrants from Asia, Africa and even South America that come in absolute disorder and gargantuan numbers and DEMAND that this small portion of the world gives them the lives they could not have in their independent countries (remember, they were colonized by europeans and demanded independence because they would have a better life “being free” – well, we are still waiting that they deliver with their promises). We are not available to be reversely colonized and I don’t know about other europeans, but I feel no complex of guilt (white guilt) about our colonies’ past.
          Meanwhile, we have entire “new towns” and ghettos (slums in both cases, and now even confiscated natives’ properties) being erected all over Europe, teaming with people who will never get integrated (and thank God they can’t, as Europe is overpopulated since at least the 19th century and there must be a defense of native populations and their unique identity), who are not available to learn a language, to curb their religious supremacist attitudes and who purposely ignore their host country’s laws. We need our borders, mass deportations and to deny this is simply to allow Europe to sink in social havoc and possibly even civil war in just a few years.

        6. That would appear to be the standard Tory argument, and it won the day. Nonetheless, I can’t see that you’ve contradicted my main point — not being part of the Schengen zone meant you could admit as few immigrants as you like, no being on the Euro meant you were insulated from and could even profit from EU’s instability. I am not surprised Germany’s lack of transparency on the refugee crisis was a factor, though. Very badly handled.

        7. “meant you could admit as few immigrants as you like” -> Germany would blackmail us into it “anyway, as we were already witnessing.
          “not being on the Euro meant you were insulated from and could even profit from EU’s instability.” yes, from a purely financial perspective, you are right. But you forget that we were also tied to things like the Common Agricultural Policy and other planned economy Brussels has been designing from day one (unparalleled in History, outside the USSR). It’s actually because of this overregulation (they go to the point of saying how many carrots you can plant, how many fish you are supposed to catch, etc) that our economies can’t compete with third world ones: there is a limit for everything, you simply can never scale up your business. -> even if £ is not €, economies are more than currency.

        8. But I’m sure whatever you were losing in flexibility, you were gaining by having preferential access to EU markets. And by having the power of a perennially looming Brexit as a negotiating bludgeon. But it was the best seat in the house for a show you didn’t want to see — you lacked faith in EU to get its shit together, which I don’t blame you for. But you have common cause with EU, fundamentally — the Channel has never allowed you to insulate yourself from their problems before, wouldn’t expect it to start now. I don’t think a fully independent UK will do that well competing by itself — the financial center of London is profitable but fundamentally unstable, and your global manufacturing has plummetted since the 60s. What does Britain make that the world buys? You’re going to need a big high-tech boom and soon.

        9. “your global manufacturing has plummetted since the 60s. What does
          Britain make that the world buys? You’re going to need a big high-tech
          boom and soon.”
          Couldn’t I say exactly the same about the entire EU? The fact is, our (western) economies are, at this point, an utter farce. Older generations retire and are replaced by 100% automatized production lines, or, even worse, companies simply close their plants and leave for cheaper labor/lighter taxation destinations. Younger people might not know a job (at all) in the years to come.
          Globalization is poison. It surely leads to more efficient economies (and beautiful gadgets, and huge profits for a few billionaires), but to the point humans are now expendable. And so is our time’s mentality: democracies avoid refendum (people’s will is “dangerous”, unnecessary); families avoid children; companies avoid to hire workers; you might cancel a meeting with your friends (social networks ARE NOT a substitute to real life).
          And so we live, or pretend to live, gathering £s, €s, $s, sitting at our small cubicles, hating (avoiding, at least) each other and fearing that this can be all there is, that all unknown is frightful. I think the leftist rambling protests against “hate speech” are actually none other than an irrational reflex of the horror they feel when this society they’ve built reveals to be a nightmare of hate, oppression and despair.
          The Brexit won’t solve, per se, these serious problems. However, it was a step in the right direction, and even if we’ll have to suffer because of it, we’ll know who we are and whose responsability it was (for success or failure).
          In the end, we wanted freedom:
          http://quoteonary.com/files/quotes/sigmund-freud.jpg

        10. There’s a lot of truth in what you’re saying re: how much of a shock it is to live in this changing world. But I don’t think a reversion to nationalism a) isn’t going to happen as it’s a process which has been happening, more or less unabated, since Sumeria and b) probably wouldn’t stave off most of the problems you’re talking about. Being a cog in a world machine isn’t a lot different or worse than being a cog in a nationalist machine. As far as EU economies, I think you’re going to take a bigger hit than you expect: In the great confidence-game of the markets, UK had a good seat in terms of projecting “stability”. That’s in jeopardy now. At least France/Spain/Italy have some luxury food products, France has Renault and some decent defense companies, Germany has a lot of auto and a decent high tech industry. All the Eastern bloc have lower standards of living and cheaper labor. As far as I know, to support your very high standard of living, the UK’s main export market is a handful of super-luxe cars like RR and some men’s fashion (both small niche markets), not a big exporter of food. At least Ireland was/is a tax haven under the EU, attracted some decent tech firms before its economy caved in. I think that’s where you should be looking. If Ireland/Scotland stick with EU you are, I think, royally fucked, no? Unless your internal economy is super-strong…

        11. All future projections are an exercise of guessing. We can be sure of 2 things:
          1. all serious projections (World Bank, IMF) at a mid or long term (50 to 100 years) put Europe (and the West) loosing relevance in the World, contrary to all other world regions (if things were ok, we would expect to watch absolute growth for all, but at least relative robustness from the more developed economies);
          2. the narrrative that while exporting production to the 3rd world, we could keep internal markets working simply by using services and higlhy qualified “intellectual economy” IS now proved wrong. We have the most qualified generation to have ever lived in Europe living on their parents’ alimony, unemployed (or underpaid in entry jobs, a few lucky). The US and the world, in general, turn a blind eye on this. Europe still maintains a good QOL, and the propaganda we export to arab countries, Africa and the wide America is that we all work in German factories, earning 1500€ or more, while having health and education subsidized by the government (Bernie Sanders’ wet dream 101). Well, that is completely false. Germany is ok (yet already sinking), but France, Italy, Spain and the UK are just keeping afloat. All the others, are miserable (most AVERAGE salaries are under 1000 € [I repeat, average as in the majority’s, not considering only the minimum wage workers], and europeans have high cost-of-living indexes, regardless of the country they live in, as Europe doesn’t produce the majority of the basic subsistence products of its citizens, like food or clothes).
          China and East Asia already have their own high tech companies (example: Huawei), that are focusing in developing cheaper and more marketable “local talent”, even if european design is that much valued. The EU will not keep 508 million people on “services”.
          This means… yes, the Brexit might bring new difficulties for the British people. But continuing in the EU was NOT the solution. The EU doesn’t work like an old european Empire, which could be seen as a fairly functional economic unit (the metropolis provided know-how, skilled workers and governance, as the colonies provided raw materials and cheaper labor). The EU, on the other hand, effectively taxes (and brings up the costs) of raw materials, while making all the skilled labor compete as a single identity (bad, bad policy: imagine Pepsi and Coca-Cola competing with the same brand and graphics, how would their sales evolve?). If you add to that planned economy, excessive regulations and uncompetitve notions of welfare state (subsidizing antidemographic and unproductive elements of Society)… you have a recipe for disaster. Since 2009, we’ve been tasting it.
          Yes, the British will become a little poorer now, as they will suffer financial revenge from those “markets”. But how much of that will turn into effective loss of competitiveness in a 10-15 years long term?

        12. I think you’ll find that a bloc like the EU has the bargaining power to get better deals on raw material (particularly oil, as Russia and Norway run out and OPEC stops playing games with Iran and resumes putting the screws to Europe). But more than that, yes, if/when China really has rule of law, and if/when India imposes a little bit of order, they could rise to outcompete us in high-tech. We like to say that capitalist innovation always beats Asian planned economies, but Asian societies have high cohesion and are able to live within their means to keep their QOL realistic. Japan beat the pants off the US in the 80’s and only got waylaid by a stagflation phenomenon that I don’t really understand; S. Korea has picked up where they left off. Like it or no, the west may have to acquaint itself with austerity. If you have the wisdom to see the West as a monolithic cultural bloc in competition with Asia for domination of global commerce (and of survival resources, in the inevitable demographic crunch as global population reaches carrying capacity and Westerners become a very small numerical minority), you may see how a separate UK doesn’t really help the team cause. But there will be many warning signs along the way.

  29. Why are so many millennial computer guys leftist effeminate wussies?
    Just looking at the guy makes me want to break things.
    He got lucky being in the right place at the right time, now he’s a billionaire that doesn’t really work and I suppose he thinks everyone else who has money got it the same way so they should give it up to make everything fair.
    I’m not the best at articulating my point but, this whole ” world citizen” thing just sounds like a bad idea.

    1. amen to your first comment “Why are so many millennial computer guys leftist effeminate wussies?”
      but to say he just got lucky is definitely untrue. as much as hes a fucker, hes still smart af to create FB when he was 19.
      nevertheless he created something we could have all been better without. technology and the point of no return… sad but its the way it is

      1. “..create FB when he was 19.”
        Am I mistaken or did he not simply take a platform from others and simply improved upon it?

  30. <<“my room mate Lori Is getting paid on the internet $98/hr”…..!tq247n:
    two days ago grey McLaren. P1 I bought after earning 18,512 Dollars..it was my previous month’s payout..just a little over.17k Dollars Last month..3-5 hours job a day…with weekly payouts..it’s realy the simplest. job I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months. ago. and now making over hourly. 87 Dollars…Learn. More right Here
    !tq247n:
    ➽:➽:.
    ➽.➽.➽.➽     http://GlobalSuperJobsReportsEmploymentsCareGetPay$98Hour…..
    ★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹:★✹::::::!tq247n….,…

  31. 1) Zuck is smarter than every single ROK reader put together. He found/created a niche based on human psychology and created the most popular website in the world where you provide all the content and give away all your valuable consumer info for free. Knock on him for mispronouncing a word all you like.
    2) What he’s saying happens to be true. Climate change (or global pollution in general if you’re with the .03 of scientists) etc is a supernational problem, and national governments are failing to do anything about it.
    You want to advocate for nationalism over globalism? There’s a perfectly fine argument to be made (traditional culture, natural human group cohesion, different values systems) but you haven’t made it. What’s your conjecture exactly? The West destabilized Syria on purpose so it could have… more Muslim refugees? Why not just up their immigration quotas? What you’re saying doesn’t even follow logically, much less persuade us of its truth value.
    Bad thinking.

    1. LGDP….henceforth the degenerates shall be known….I gather it would be more misspelled than mispronounced?
      Climate change…… cool……

      1. Stick your head out the window. All of the hottest days, in the last 10 years. Don’t worry, the adults will do something about it.

        1. False.
          “Don’t worry, the adults will do something about it.”
          No worries, it is a lie to begin with and the “adults” want to restrict rights, raise costs and redistribute income. It is a poltical lie to advance globalism.

        2. Wow, a complete thesis on ROK! Congrats sir that puts you in the top %1. However, consider the following:

        5. 3) 97% of scientists believe in it. As much as you might like to believe that’s a conspiracy, the fact is that scientists are, as a group, among the least corruptible in the world — they’re spread among disparate countries and languages, tend to be altrusitically motivated, and are intelligent enough to evade suppression. There has never been evidence of a scientific conspiracy, ever, in history.

        6. Again; stick your head out the window. It’s the hottest year on record. The 10 last hottest years have been within the last 25. There is an incredibly close correlation between C02 emission and global mean temperature. 97% of scientists agree. When was the last time you can remember a conspiracy among scientists?

        7. Not conspiracy – groupthink. If you can demonstrate knowledge of the opposition to the presumed solid evidence of global warming, then you would have credibility. Otherwise you are just regurgitating talking points. Still why is it the most pressing concern of our time when the fate of this nation, and western civilization is in question? You go to great lengths to prove everyone here wrong on this one single subject, which is a gamma tell.
          BTW China and India don’t give a s— about your Algore hysterics. I’d say a much more pressing concern is how China is arming and preparing for nuclear annihilation of the US. Where does that leave us?

        9. You really need to read and get the facts before regurgitating Algore’s talking points:
          “The USA temperature trend calculated from unadjusted Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN) data shows the 1930s as the warmest decade, around 0,2 K warmer than 2000-2009. The calculated temperature trend is based on data from 826 stations, and is virtually identical to that of Hansen et al. 1999 [1].
          The calculated temperature trend 1930-2010 is around 0,5 K colder than the updated 2011 GISS US temperature trend [2], and around 0,4 K Colder than temperature trend calculated from Hadcrut stations in USA. ”
          wattsupwiththat.com/2012/08/01/a-comparison-of-adjusted-vs-unadjusted-surface-data/

        10. What’s really funny is your link provides some great evidence AGAINST the correlation between CO2 and Temps.
          New paper – “absence of correlation between temperature changes … and CO2”
          wattsupwiththat.com/2011/01/01/new-peer-reviewed-paper-absence-of-correlation-between-temperature-changes-and-co2/

        11. How does my link to 50+ graphs with obvious correlations (ie lines/means going in the same direction ) provide evidence against correlation? Provide specific evidence or stop wasting time.
          The link you posted is interesting – that humidity rather than c02 is the culprit. Except, duh, C02 increases humidity. So thanks to you and him for a big fucking waste of time.

        12. Because, unlike yourself, the principle of MAD in nuclear geopolitics operates on a common sense principle, so your fears about China’s nuclear annihilation are simply not ever going to happen, and you reveal yourself as illogical by promoting them . That global temperatures will increase after spewing burned carbon into the atmosphere for 100+ years also appeals to my common sense, as I’ve spent time in a room with an oven. Have you? 97% isn’t an appeal to “authority”, which assumes the authority is wise simply because they’re an authority, but an appeal to legitimate expertise, inasmuch as climate scientist deal with equations that are literally the most complex known to science. Yes, groupthink is a risk. But because of the common sense and near-unanimity on the subject, the burden of proof is on you, and you’re failing. I’ve refuted the one article you’ve provided. I’m open to being convinced. You’re welcome to try but I don’t think you have the data.

        13. The conclusions could just as easily prove that temperature is highly dependent on your location on Earth. One of the many reasons that we should be leaving these questions to the experts.

        14. No, an “appeal to authority” is only a fallacy if the authority is false. Trusting your doctor to remove your appendix instead of your best friend isn’t an appeal to authority either.

        15. That’s the closest comment you’ve made to a plausible thesis – that scientists have been effected by groupthink. However, I have spent time in a room with an carbon-burning oven. Do you know what happens? It gets hotter.

        16. Do you really thinking China is preparing to nuke the US? How exactly does that make sense? Do you not know that the US has a missile shield? Automatic countermeasures? Many allies around the world who are obliged to return fire? God knows what else stashed away in DARPA for such a scenario? Have you never heard of mutually-assured destruction? Why now – as China moves away from communism and towards dependence on US spending – of all times? Who is feeding you this hysteria? This argument undercuts any pretense you have to being logical?

    2. Or we could just kill everybody in the world starting with you dear bongo but take heart I volunteer to go second.

      1. Possibly so. But at least I’m not writing articles about the greatest invader of privacy known to man and accusing him of globalism (after he supported it rather cogently). ROK is supposed to be about men becoming their best self. Love him or hate him Zuck did it, and anybody else is just bitching.

      2. Your simultaneous displays of respect and disrespect are baffling. Criticizing the world’s biggest data thief for, of all things, globalism, is like blaming Hitler for spitting when he talks. Not the problem. And again; how’s that global pollution plan coming? Global immigration problem (though thanks to the EU for coming up with SOMETHING, even though that something is terrible)? Prove to me that nationalism is anything other than a disaster when a super-national problem comes up, and you can call me whatever names (and whater honorific) you want.

  32. It should be pointed out, irrespective of how obvious it may seem, that Fuckerberg is in no way interested in this utopian “let’s all get together and solve the world’s problems” circle jerk he’s blabbering on about. What he is interested in is expanding his own wealth at the expense of the useful idiots that still use his shitheap social media platform, Farcebook, providing him with nearly limitless amounts of personal information he can mine and sell to advertisers and alphabet government agencies. His concerns extend only to himself and his bank accounts and no further. To people like him, nothing else matters. He’ll happily sell out his users to the highest bidder if it means his own way of life is unchanged and he isn’t subservient to the globalist agenda he’s pushing. Like all mentally deranged Lefties, he’s only interested in ensuring that the socialist rules apply to everyone else EXCEPT himself and will only show up when it’s time to collect his piece of the proverbial cake, without ever having shown up to help make it in the first place. His understanding of the word “sacrifice” is that it’s something the “little people” have to make for his personal gain.
    That’s what makes him so punchable, in my mind.

  33. “The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship.
    In this New World Order, the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state.
    Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which it is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.”
    Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx, printed in La Revue de Paris, p. 574, June 1, 1928

      1. They cant all be, and there is plenty of documentation that go’s back centuries proclaiming this sort of thing as the end goal. Regardless, the results are there to see, Zuckerberg is certainly not the first of the chosen ones to enact such revolution.

        2. You need to learn the art of subtlety from michaelmobius1. You are far too obvious.

      2. Regardless of the authenticity of this statement. it is patently obvious that this is the intent and plan of Talmudic Jewry.

        1. it’s a well known fake quote just google it Goldberg. you’ll find all the info.

        2. Google it? Goldberg?
          I guess with so many ‘fires’ to put out on the internet of late they have been letting any lazy Zionist worshipping schmuck join the JIDF/Hasbara etc.
          Or you couldn’t actually find an untainted source that can discredit it.

        3. just google it – and i guarantee you you’ll find all the necessary info. ideally though you should do your homework before posting fake quotes – not after.

  34. What Zuckerberg is preaching is nothing but communism on a global scale. It’s the former Soviet Union (worldwide).
    It always looks good and sounds good (on paper) until you live the life (stand in bread lines for hours, have the KGB and your neighbors watching you at all times, can never leave it, are imprisoned with no due process, rights, etc…) – all for the good of the “motherland”.
    They brainwash you into thinking your working towards the greater good until you realize that your working, working and still working….and someone else (the small minority, not you or the country as a whole) is getting wealthy off of your work (now, go stand in your bread line). That’s why the United States railed against it in the 1980s (and before) because we believed in a better system….capitalism.
    He probably wouldn’t be preaching this nonsense if he didn’t become one of those few, wealthy members of the minority but he is now so he should be considered an enemy of the people at this point. He’s trying to push the new communism through Facebook and other social platforms.
    Don’t be fooled (young people)…this is nothing but communism wrapped in a new pretty bow.

  36. I haven’t found the car portion of the video yet and probably won’t. (Thanks for watching that creep so that I don’t have to.) The appearance of Seinfield is supposed to represent that diversity of opinion is welcome on Facebook, even though obviously Zuckerberg is incapable of dealing with any challenge to his own supremacy over thought itself.
    The portion of the linked video that I did find, casually, was Seinfield and Zuckerberg sitting on a couch with Zuckerberg’s knee attacking Seinfield’s thigh. Personally, I don’t even care if Seinfeld was OK with that dynamic. His Stockholm Syndrome would appear to be challenging his own sense of independent thought. Still funny but for how long?
    The conversation during this exchange–as much as I could stomach was about doors automatically opening for individuals (such as Mrs. Zuckerberg) in response to recognition–sort of an electronic velvet rope admitting a celebrity into the inner circle. Where my mind went, unfortunately, given my own experiences, was that simply holding a gun to Mrs. Zuckerberg would allow entirely automated entry into that inner circle, with no live witnesses. Paging ISIS. Surely there are safeguards, but they can be hacked. Piece of cake. However, should the situation go awry, Zuckerberg can simply order a new wife from Vietnam.
    Globalists by the way are allowed to dominate their wives completely never mind public appearances to the contrary. It is only ordinary men prohibited from such a practice. Feminism in a nutshell.
    Back to the clip. Seinfield gently rebuked the laziness of it all in terms of automatic door opening, while Zuckerberg essentially admitted that he likes to dominate all moving objects with his (or rather other people’s) code.
    Revolting.

    1. Zuckerberg is a Globalist Jew pushing open borders, multiculturalism, diversity and PC lies.

  40. Zucker-SPERG’s philosophy: “Your goal was to take the
    social experience and put it online; I want to eliminate the entire
    social experience,” noting the irony that Zucker-SPERG’s social media
    website has effectively done just that.

  41. young dude with coding skills gets propelled into creating a CIA data mining tool. then he gets fed ‘great ideas’ by his masters. the worst is he might actually really believe this bs he preaches about. technology won’t do shit about those problems. and puppets like zuckerberg are as brainwashed as the typical cnn watching american

  42. Lick my testicles you worthless spamming piece of shit. I hope you die of asshole cancer

  44. He’s only about money. And he got in the game when Bush Jr. and the Neo-Cons set the country up as their play-pen. If there’s dirty work going on against the public, this little Jew is in on it. FB is used for everything, and it knows exactly what’s going on on your computer. . .You have no privacy if you’ve ever had FB. And the only way to stop it’s spying on your internet use is to wipe your hard disc or get a new computer, and then change your e-mail.

Comments are closed.