Why Free Speech Isn’t Free

Free Speech Isn’t Free by Roosh is the firsthand account of a live education in what freedom of speech precisely entails, how to safeguard it, and where the threats to it will be coming from and why.

There are costs when one wishes to speak freely and he describes the price of admission, the grit and the conviction required in our collective pursuit of freedom of speech and its natural corollary—freedom.  We might be defamed, scandalized, and mobbed with an end towards frightening us back into submission, however through Roosh’s struggles we are provided hope that resistance is not pointless.

I can offer some preliminary words here and say that this book is an enthralling read, one that covers events that I was reading about and following in real-time last year through the Roosh V Forum and Return Of Kings.  Roosh’s candor is at times unexpected, moving and enlightening; and it is always appreciated.

The points that are driven home throughout the work are correspondingly informed by the events leading up to and incorporating Roosh’s World Tour in 2015.  This lecture tour (whereby Roosh attempted merely to speak to like-minded men and field their questions) actually turned out to be a life-changing experience for himself at every city he visited.

spreading-the-message

“The Idea”

In the first chapter, we see Roosh’s battle with a slight speech impediment that has been with him since childhood.  He describes himself as being more of a writer than a speaker.  Roosh seems to imply here that before speaking freely, one should first learn how to speak properly.

He takes a Toastmaster’s course to improve his public speaking and learn about the principles of creating a coherent and cohesive speech and how to deliver it in such a way that the audience is receptive to his ideas.  We not only see what Roosh has learned, but we’re shown what it takes to improve one’s self and ‘tend the fire;’ a fire, that is, which burns towards an ideal of perfectibility in spite of innate shortcomings.

“Berlin”

At the first stop on his tour, Roosh is confronted with a wide variety of men in attendance.  He witnesses the vastness in the range of demographics he speaks for and to—from younger men full of spunk who are mainly interested in attracting women, to older gentlemen who have had their lives turned upside down by divorce (sometimes multiple times).

Here Roosh learns that he speaks for a wider audience than he had previously imagined, and that his words may have consequences beyond some specific target he may have had in mind.  Indeed, what we say while exercising our right to free speech often has an effect beyond our initial reckoning.  In a touching moment of humility upon realizing the scope of his power, Roosh declares, “I vowed never to take the influence I have with these men for granted or use it in a way that leads them down the wrong path.”

“London”

sexy-london-girls-copy

Here Roosh allows the media (“Vice” with Reggie Yates) into his lecture and in addition he allows a seemingly sympathetic woman to work for him as a hostess for the event.  The media, it seems, would prove to be just as conniving as the hostess who later wrote a hit-piece for the Huffington Post about her experience at the lecture.

Any pretensions that the media might have towards an unbiased statement of fact or non-emotional reporting of events goes out the window with Vice’s slanted reporting here and the hostess’s unbecoming behavior during and after the lecture.  Reggie and the hostess both had one thing in mind: try to make Roosh look bad.  Roosh listened to the Vice’s reporter’s lies that concealed her background and the woman’s plea for a hostess gig, and he generously accepted.  Their attempts to ingratiate themselves and then backstab Roosh were seemingly successful, yet Roosh is quick on the turn.

What does Roosh learn?  “Don’t invite leftists who cause men to speak through a filter.  It’s pointless to have a private event where men can speak freely and then bring feminists and media who put the filter right back on.”  Roosh’s insight might seem facile, but what he is actually affirming is his preference for ingenuousness amongst his brothers at the cost of shunning potentially lucrative media exposure.  These events foreshadow the development of Roosh’s volcanic hatred and distrust of the media, something that fully blossoms later in Montreal and Toronto.

“Washington D.C.”

After a successful speech without incident, Roosh chats with all of the attendees but most notably Jeff.  Jeff “connects the dots” for Roosh on certain points that have been floating nebulously in his mind.

Roosh describes Jeff’s ideas as being the stuff of “conspiracy theories,” yet after hearing it, Roosh describes his “jaw hanging,” and states that “[Jeff] provided the missing link… Birth control, abortion, female education and employment, rape culture, sexual harassment, homosexual marriage, transsexual acceptance, open-borders immigration, welfare, and multiculturalism.”

What’s the link?  “Depopulation And Human Control… The one common end goal, whether accidental or deliberate, is to reduce the reproductive rate of the native-born population as a means of controlling them.”  The entire chapter is an exploration of this revelation and something Roosh later elaborated on here:

The End Goal Of Western Progressivism Is Depopulation

In the end, Roosh states, “I used to seek out men who had high ability in meeting the opposite sex for the purpose of fornication, but lately I’ve been seeking out men for their intellectual ability in order to help me further my understanding of the world.  Because of this, I have surrounded myself with some of the smartest men in the West.”

Roosh is obliquely referring to his media creations, which he has learned to view as somewhat of a feedback loop (rather than megaphone) whereby information is freely shared and incorporated by commenters and contributors alike in symbiotic fashion: the students learn from the professors and vice versa.

“New York”

dc-spread

It’s not so much what Roosh learns here that is striking, but rather his uncanny ability to explicate the nature of his appeal to Western men.  Before the lecture he’s asked, “What do you think are the problems for men today?”  His answer:

Men have no voice.  The entire establishment is bending over to cater to the needs of women, gays, and immigrants, the latter of which don’t even want to assimilate or adopt Western ideals, and now they’ve started pushing transsexual acceptance.  Huge amounts of media air time, financial resources, university regulations, and social policies are now going to these groups… with the goal of making [Western men] subservient to every other identity group but his own… No one has the backs of men except a few lone voices like myself, and that’s shameful.

“Men have no voice.”  It’s simple and it gets right to the heart of the matter.  We feel robbed of our freedom to speak our minds and express our opinions.  The leftist bullies, the violent antifas, the overzealous forum moderators and the affected fragility of feminists in the workplace all have one aim in mind—to shut down the free speech of men and thereby paralyze us into subservience or run us out to the woods.  By fighting back, Roosh exemplifies a third-way.

Roosh goes on to give his prognosis of what the future has in store, a development that reflects the desperation of men who feel threatened and cornered at every turn.  “What I believe will end up happening is that a more white nationalist element will take hold, because they will speak to men who are actively being disenfranchised.  It becomes a matter of self-defense and self-preservation.  These men are getting angry and more determined to protect their rights and their race.  There will be dark times ahead.”  This is beautifully and tragically stated.  These leftists, feminists and multiculturalists are creating the very things they presume to oppose.

“Montreal”

montreal-flyer-604x270

Here Roosh’s lecture is canceled by the venue he had scheduled.  Roosh later makes a powerful statement about conviction and how it bolsters the passions that make life worth living.  “Some men will encounter a battle during their lifetimes where the decision to not fight will make him feel ashamed and weak for the rest of his days, and where the pain of defeat can’t be worse than the shame of not fighting at all.  When this battle comes, he will be ready to sacrifice everything… Before Canada, I had not encountered such a fight, but it finally arrived and I was not going to back down.”

This type of conviction and willingness to sacrifice is the stuff of leaders.  Roosh thus learns an important lesson about leadership: be willing to make personal sacrifices, especially for the men who follow you.  For any leader, all successes of a movement rightfully belong to them as the victor and all failures belong to them too.  Roosh comes to embrace the weight of this responsibility during the Battle of Montreal and he chooses to make his stand.  Against overwhelming odds, he took on a hostile media establishment with politicians and feminists in tow, and he seized a great victory.

At the end of his victory speech, Roosh says:

Here’s your movement… Here are the men who sacrificed their identities to come hear a talk that was trashed by the entire establishment.  Imagine if there were one million men like this in the country, men who are fearless, strong, masculine, and think for themselves.  This is why the ruling class is enabling those freaks outside who wish to emasculate men, to make them weak, because weak men are not strong enough to fight and not strong enough to stand up to authority.

While accepting personal responsibility for successes and failures, any true leader worth his slat ultimately empowers the men that follow him.  While I used to cringe when I read that Roosh’s contributors and readers were referred to as “followers of Roosh,” I think I get why now.  It’s because Roosh has become the spokesman, supporter, and inspiration for a movement of men who collectively pursue a life of their own choosing for themselves, their families, each other, and a future that seems at times too dim to imagine.

In the end, Roosh describes an important lesson he learned about the collusion that occurs between the various tendrils of a system when it is forced to confront the spread of an idea that is antithetical to its corrupt persistence.  “I needed to see this… I got to see how the media, government, and non-profit organizations collaborate when they want to neutralize an enemy, and how they enable the foot-soldier class of students and unemployed losers to do their bidding.”

“Toronto”

During his final stop on the tour, Roosh again must confront the threat of hysterical protests and a hostile media and political establishment (including a city councilman and the Toronto mayor).

After being backstabbed once again by a reporter who Roosh thought was at least somewhat sympathetic and willing to tell his side of the story, he truly earns his stripes when it comes to hating the media.  It’s not that he senses the affront of being lied to as most of us might, it’s that he has experienced the lies being told about himself.

Hatred is born of such things and the mainstream media is now a thing of scorn for Roosh.  If he ever again indulges their requests, it will most likely be to mock or berate them as he does after the ‘ROK Meetup Outrage’ in his D.C. press conference:

For the readers wondering what Roosh’s speeches were all about on his lecture tour, he sums it up pretty well later in the chapter:

I described the problems men were facing… I listed the sacrifices they must make to have a good woman in their lives.  I described why practicing game is so important, and how it serves as the gateway drug to greater truths.  I gave seven practical tips for getting laid that took me years to learn.  I told them what I believed was necessary to enjoy life.  I gave them tips on what to do when they’re at a down point of their lives… I had a right to give that speech and they had a right to hear it, and so it was done.

If you want to learn more, the full transcript of his lecture is included at the end of the book in addition to a number of other bonuses (viz. “Epilogue 1: The Aftermath,” “Epilogue 2: The Worldwide Meetup Outrage,” “Transcript 1: The State of Man Lecture,” “Transcript 2: Washington, D.C. Press Conference,” “Appendix 1: How To Survive An SJW Attack,” “Appendix 2: What is Neomasculinity?”)

At the end of the Toronto speech, Roosh and the audience are affected to the point of tears by another man’s speech about how Roosh had previously helped him.  Roosh comments, “A lot of people have an image of masculinity of a man killing bears with his bare hands, but for me it’s becoming more about brotherhood, a form of love that a man and woman can never feel for each other. It’s not based on emotional connection but mutual goals and compassion that make men feel as if they belong to the same unit—the same tribe.”

He later states, “Courage is contagious.”  This is the nut of it all, isn’t it?  This is why the book is so important and perhaps why Roosh wrote it in the first place.  We are inspired to become courageous after reading about Roosh’s stand and our courage in turn inspires Roosh to keep going, perhaps confirming for him that his courage and victories serve a higher purpose.  I wouldn’t doubt that Roosh’s sense of grandeur comes not from his personal victories but rather the thousands (if not millions) of victories he inspires every day within the lives of his readers.  Our own sense of rising towards great things is the ultimate testament to Roosh’s courage, his victories, and his life’s work.

“Homeward Bound”

Pondering his tour in the end, Roosh considers that none of it was without meaning.  He affirms his life’s ambition and his desire to lead others towards the truth.  It is this cascading sense of purpose that has driven him to write the book, “Not just as a monument to me and my supporters’ victory, but to educate men on how the system is actively working to harm them.  You have now experienced what I’ve experienced… If I am meant to accomplish something bigger in life than just getting laid and making money, Canada was the first step in finding out what that is.”

To get your copy of Free Speech Isn’t Free, click here for the PDF copy or click here to order directly from Amazon

Read More: SJWs Bomb Free Speech Isn’t Free With Fake Reviews Because It Hurts Their Feelings

72 thoughts on “Why Free Speech Isn’t Free”

  1. It’s never been free. If it goes against the elitists order of the time, countless tattlers and wannabes will see to it that the individual speaking his or her mind is penalized in some fashion.

    1. As stated in the article ‘courage is contagious’ and that is the key benefit of Trumps run for presidency.
      He is confronting the system and that will encourage others to do the same. If things continue like this, there will indeed be a million of men stepping up.
      And nice hat Roosh.

      1. Agreed, even if not elected the damage to the” Narrative” is done.
        People simply aren’t buying the shit put out there by the elites and their media mouthpieces telling us what to think.
        Telling us to tolerate things that are imorral and destructive to our socity like fags and feminism as, just to name a few,as well as uncortrolled immigration.
        The comments sections say it all. Without heavy moderation or simply shutting it down the comments against any SJW article piece of govenrment propaganda is a times commical..
        People are fed up the “Narrative” is dead..

        1. Probably more of the same bullshit…you “hate” gays, blacks, the troops, women, children or whatever the hell where there will always be some tattler or tough guy that believes you should lose your job or wife over it.
          Even if The Don loses, he’s helped loosen the shackles on The Great Silent Majority that’s been bound and gagged since that overrated outsourcing facilitator Reagan.

  2. Pat yourself on the back Roosh. Some of these nations have put more effort into fighting you than they put into 90% of the wars they’re involved in. That’s an accomplishment sir.

      1. Good book Roosh, I just finished it. Trying to improve myself now by running and taking B12 which has made me a better worker…and lover!

  3. It seems every 15 to 20 years or so, there are new generations who think that “offensive” speech ends with them…we fight back..they retreat..rinse..repeat…but honestly it looks like this generation of useless, cowardly weaklings might get their way.
    All I have to say to that is that when Islam takes over…it’s the feminists trannies faggies, dykes,and pussy weak mean, and their children who will ironically be the first to be raped, burned, or beheaded by our future pedophilic overlords if they don’t submit.
    We at least have THAT to look forward to.

        1. True, but I am often impressed to the degree that these people are brainwashed.
          Ever read the story of Amanda Kijera? These women sound a lot like her.

        2. There was a Swedish feminist, similar story. Unfortunately, after being raped by the refugees she championed, she was left to die a cold, lonely death in a ditch.

        3. But come on, the mountains of Likes and Comments from Schmuckland are always worth it! Must show skin to prove you have any value, as you know!

        4. “Sadly most of these idiots will feel like they deserve it.”
          Or worse – many may fantasize about being gang raped in all of their orifices by black muzzie cock, all the while they are disgusted by the sight of their own native white german men.

        5. “No, she was found dead.”
          And yet the madness continues and the population allows their political elites bring this trash into their culture.

        6. Naked, half-buried in a pile of rocks and dirt, with her legs draped over her shoulders.

  4. Free speech, to me, is a euphemism for the promotion of error and protecting it from Truth. I prefer Free Truth, unfettered by Error. Freedom is Power, and Power corrupted by Error is the most dangerous thing in the universe.

  5. “Roosh describes his “jaw hanging,” and states that “[Jeff] provided the missing link… Birth control, abortion, female education and employment, rape culture, sexual harassment, homosexual marriage, transsexual acceptance, open-borders immigration, welfare, and multiculturalism.”
    Depopulation and eventual “human settlement zones” in countries like the States are the eventual game plan. The majority of US citizens will live in 6 or 7 giant suburban conurbations. The rest of the country (the majority) will be classified as “natural protection zones” where no (ordinary) humans will be allowed to live. This has all being thought out clearly, including the destruction of rural American life through ever greater environmental regulation, the destruction of the American nuclear family through a massive education and media campaign to normalized non reproducing sexuality.
    And its working http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/sex-millennials-study-young-people-turning-back-on-sexual-intercourse-in-record-numbers-a7167946.html
    This has all been planned by groups like Agenda 21 which hides under fluffy terms like “sustainability and smart co existence with nature”. However, this UN group was set up by some of the biggest players in global commerce who want a world (1) Depopulated (2) Divided into strict sectors (3) With children brought up by the State (4) With all people educated and indoctrinated to the level of “functional” obedience (5) With strict security controls. (6) Without Nations or any sense of history.
    This has been planned for a long time and they’re doing the talking over through “saving the planet” and the “equality” mantras which we all must acquiesce to. Obviously FREE SPEECH is inimical to these gaols.

    1. .”The majority of US citizens will live in 6 or 7 giant suburban conurbations”
      When will this be happening? Please avoid vague answers kike “soon” or “near future” etc, by what year do you see literally the majority of people getting rounded up and relocated?

        1. That’s a ways off for me – I’m in my late 40’s and definitely plan on dying before 60 – even if it means going out via the Smith & Wesson plan.
          I feel bad for my cousin’s son who is only 10 – he will spend his life having it slowly taken away from him.

        2. I’m around that vintage, a bit younger. Can I ask you a direct question (you can tell me to piss off) but why do you want to die before you hit 60? Is the future you envisage as you get older really that bad?

        3. Good question, but, on reading the plans these folks have (in organizations like Agenda 21 and Common Purpose) it will take around this period to accomplish.
          I was amazed when I started going through projects in my local community recently how many were funded by Agenda 21. I then researched other community projects in different countries and again they’re there at the grassroots. It’s the same with Common Purpose, who are gradually putting their type of people into management positions in both public and private companies around the world. If you ever examine the public records of so many organizations you’ll see the same “Common Purpose” training references in the training of their Managers. It’s kind of scary, a bit like the invasion of the body snatchers.

        4. I wasn’t aware that the Agenda 21 had such far-reaching tentacles but certainly I’ve noticed how Common Purpose has infected public and professional life, allowing its generally lefty-liberal (Fabian? slightly Marxist?) graduates to march through the institutions to promote their particular understanding of change management. The same personnel seem to have been involved in the media standards trust that impacted on the Leveson Inquiry

        5. “but why do you want to die before you hit 60? Is the future you envisage as you get older really that bad?”
          It’s one thing to predict geopolitical events, then again it is difficult to predict what everyday life will be like when said dystopia arrives. People do have amazing ability and strength to survive crisis; for example today most of Americans are stupid, petty and fat, but if the people go to war with the elites all that stupidity and pettiness gets cleared out nicely – otherwise people die. There are indeed certain beneficial side effects of crisis.
          But as for me – my position to be the commander of my fate. And aside from politically correct horse-shit – the fact is that younger people do not like old people. I’m still able to get with pretty, mid-twenties-ish year old chicks despite my age, but I’m not delusional either – I know one day I will look my age and become invisible to them. It’s just the way it is. That plus reduced energy – less opportunities for aging men out there, barring of course some new niche that comes about as a result of new times (I doubt this considering globalization and automation).
          That said, I consider old age to be the same debilitating disease as leprosy. Old age destroys everything including but not limited to: loss of a mans sexual attractiveness to young women, loss of his energy, organ and muscle atrophy, his looks, as well as his mental faculties. And both my parents had Alzheimers in their 70’s.
          My Avatrar (Jim Morrison) represents a guy who was lucky enough to die before he got old (I’m sure he would look pretty horiible in his late 40’s) as well died before he became useless to the World.
          My health is excellent – I look 10 years younger – I work out at the gym, though I’m not some roided out guy, just in good shape. But the drawback here is that means I stand a good chance to grow very old – to experience myself slowly turn into the crypt keeper from Tales From The Crypt tv show.
          I’ll have none of that. Add in that (unless the elites plans are fully exposed and people take action against them and the elite bankers) with each passing year we have less and less rights, reduced quality of life, we get slowly get rounded up and relocated in the name of agenda 21 – it makes sense for me to call it quits before 60. I do understand for many others my position sounds extreme, but it works for me.
          Such a position about life is nothing new. Marcus Aurelius discusses the ‘rational suicide’ in his book Meditations. In fact, all the Stoics took the same position as well.
          My apologies for being longish here.

        6. Id rather die on my feet that lve on my knees.
          What a cuck way of looking at the world you have.
          It’s party time. Milwaukee is showing it

        7. Yes, I’m planning to submit an article at some point…but lack of time and work get in the way ..I’m on vacation in September, so I might try then.

    2. Interesting how urban architects always rhapsodize about “The City” and assume its the highest form of life on the planet.

  6. Roosh’s “speaking engagement” in Toronto, and the hoopla that ensued, is what first brought me to this site. Frankly I find his worldview skewed, to the point of paranoia. Occasionally he does have valid points though. Ugly truths. And while much of what he says is offensive, he does have the right to say it. I can’t decide whether he is really that angry and bitter, or he’s just really smart/manipulative. His business model relies on attention, and nothing brings more attention than left wing hysteria. Well played good Sir, you’re like a really hairy Kardashian, albeit significantly more articulate.

    1. “I can’t decide whether he is really that angry and bitter, or he’s just really smart/manipulative” Who knows, hey, although I never thought of him as angry and bitter, he doesn’t strike me in that way. Personally, I don’t need a leader or someone to follow as I make up my own mind about the world, but either way his forum serves a useful purpose by allowing free and largely robust debate about issues that mainstream society thinks everyday but dares not discuss because they’re either cowards or gullible idiots.
      I wouldn’t begrudge him from making money out of it, he has to live too, but, it’s doubtful if such sites will be around in ten years time? If there’s a future for such a movement it have to migrate at some point from the internet into the real world, but, look what happens when you try to do that!

      1. Yeah, how many times do we have to hear about Roosh “naively” trusting the media and then getting burned? Roosh is all about self- promotion, plain and simple. The men who attended the London speech should have demanded a refund from Roosh after he invited the BBC

      2. I agree with you there, his forum does allow for free and robust debates, and that is a good thing.

    2. Examples? You don’t have to like someone you don’t know, but if you have an actual disagreement with something they said, it’s kind of pointless to say “I don’t like this person” without describing what you are talking about.

      1. Well, there was some article as to the advantages of dating a woman with an eating disorder. Even if it was written tongue in cheek, the Onion he ain’t and thus I can only assume this was meant to stir up controversy=attention.
        Then there was the “piece de resistance”: some article where he took scientific studies of Microchimerism (mother’s bodies absorbing fetal DNA) and tried to compare this phenomenon with Telogony: the Aristotelian theory that offspring can inherit the traits of a woman’s past mates. He then went on to suggest this was clear scientific evidence of the “1000 cock stare” or “slut face” –which comparatively makes Aristotle’s theory look pretty scientific. All this from a man who claims to have a degree in microbiology or something??? From what school I must ask! Those are 2 examples, I’m sure I can find more if I dig deeper.

        1. Keep in mind there are multiple articles published every day. So you’re looking at 1,000 articles or more a year. There are only so many “Top 10 pickup line” articles one can run. Are there are a significant number of girls with eating disorders out there? Yup. Is that a niche you could consider doing something about? Sure. Are girls with eating disorders likely to be one of the few thin American women you can meet? Yessir.
          As to the Microchimerism, yeah that might be way out there, but there are a wide variety of subjects covered here. How to get laid a lot. How to be physically strong. How to develop your mind. How to be spiritually strong and shun the temptations and weaknesses of the modern world. There is a great amount of knowledge here. Absorb it, or criticize it. The choice is yours.
          Besides, the current article is about free speech. Why not think about free speech and the ramifications of it, instead of dredging up something like “Oh well, two years ago this same guy said something I didn’t like about a different topic so… I am going to disagree that free speech is good.”

        2. To be fair, my first post acknowledged that despite some material being offensive ( or downright stupid) he does have the right to say it. I questioned his motives, I never suggested he should be shut down. You asked for examples of articles I took issue with , and I gave you a couple. I didn’t realize you and I were debating the merits of free speech, nor would I ever dismiss its fundamental importance in a society .

  7. Roosh, unfortunately I was still living in Asia during your tour, but came back to Montreal in April. I’m sad that I didn’t get to attend your speech, but I bought your book, read it, lost it somewhere, bought ANOTHER one, read it again, and introduced it to my brother (who is now a fan).
    Please come back to Montreal someday!

  8. I say fuck these assholes and prepare for war, anti-material rifles and a willingness to cut the right criminals in half with them is a good start before they place so many technological barriers that we are all trapped and arguably that has already taken place.
    I argued about disclosure with a nasa engineer and got gangstalked for 2 years for my trouble.
    The blacks are not afraid to show some force and they hardly get a peepee slap for that and if whites or others did the same it would be FBI, Homeland security mounting up to murder some peasants.

  9. Thats what this all boils down to is control and we are all to afraid to fight back.
    All I can say is I will be equipping and preparing for ANY threat to me or my loved ones and I will fight back when the time comes.
    Thats one thing about these people we are faced with…they cry like bitches when you give them a taste of their own medicine but they execute people through any and every means available.

  10. Free speech should be monetized and sold in book form… oops sorry to blow your cover. The puns won’t stop with this one.

  11. If you have not noticed- the media is 100% corrupt. Its like Hillary versus Trump. Lib TV gets a billion dollars from Hillary to run negative ads. Trump, maybe 200 million.. who do you think is going to get a a fair shake? Who owns these companies? Look at the white house and who is working their and their relationship to the network- vps’… The american publics goose is cooked when it comes to reasonably unbiased news. I know in my town; the three liberal radio stations are owned by 1 company with the same press release all done at the top of the hour. The AP is full of leftist kooks. Now, Roosh thinks he is going to get a fair shake? There is no money in it for liberals to spew their biases so he doesn’t have a chance. Forget nuance -that isn’t going to happen-…
    If we want to take back our media and people; don’t listen to them, don’t play their games, don’t watch their cuckhold feminist movies. Opt out. I think they will find that when the olympics are done and NBC loses 25% of their audience; that their liberal bias is what is doing them in. If your male – you don’t watch that pile of kakka any more. Walk with your wallet- tell them all to f off. They are not going to make it on 3rd world getto wages and they shouldn’t get your cash.

  12. Zundel, Tobin, Irving, Faurisson, Sylvia Stolz can tell all of us a few things about free speech and how much it costs.
    In 2001- 02 when I first encountered the documents and ideas bout Agenda 21 – Depopulation, I thought it was the most insane laughable thing ever, stupider than aliens.
    But research laid it all out, it’s a council by council take over all over the world.
    Climate change is the method of control.
    Australia is right in the thick of it, a lot of land between cities and towns has been fenced off from the commoners.
    Just because you’re paranoid, don’t mean they’re not after you.

  13. Do you suffer for long time with illnesses, Stresses, Poverty, Financial difficulties, Bad debts, Court cases, Body & skin sicknesses, Evil witchcraft, Bad dreams, Lost lover& family, broken relationships, excessive alcohol and smoking problems, unemployment’s, Failing deals, Lost businesses, Sexual weakness, jealousy people, unpromoted at job, need a child? Lose weight, Sugar diabetes, Blood pressure, Overweight, Robberies, Broken relationship and so much more…. Friends your case is not too hard why don’t you give The GREAT ILLUOBE a try and let him work surprises because i know he will cure you of any kind of disease and also help bring back your EX WIFE or HUSBAND that has left you as the case may be. You can contact him via web (http://drilluobetemple.webs.com) email: [email protected] or call +2347036689034…..

  14. “We don’t have the freedom of speech to talk about the weather. We have the first amendment so we can say some very controversial things” -Ron Paul
    In the brave new world, free speech is getting killed by the term “hate speech” which is a term that has boundaries completely based on moral relevance, and if a man giving his fellow men advice on women and perseverance pisses some people off, then its “hate speech”. However, its perfectly okay for celebrities and useful idiots alike to constantly berate European Americans, Conservatives, and Christians on social media daily.

    1. Exactly, just as insulting as being lectured bu Kukerburg about how to live and think as he lives behind a pallisade with dozens of armed sceurity.
      Bonor from U2 is another example a cunt who dodges Irish taxes since the 80’s but tells us we have to pay them or better that Newfies can’t hunt seals and eat the meat which they’ve been doing for 3 centuries.
      The language of this cabal of socialist fags aims to brand differing points of views as “hate speech” is no different than the “old speak” Orwell created in 1984.

      1. Don’t forget Michael Moore saying that banning guns would allow people to live peacefully with their front doors left unlocked…all while he hangs out with his armed body guards in a gated community

        1. Does he actually say that? I saw Bowling for Columbine and from what I can recall he was a gun owner himself, and even went to Canada which has a high rate of gun ownership but much lower murder rate, to prove the point that you can own guns and still be peaceful, but that something in America was driving the violence. In other words Americans were killing people not because they owned guns, but in spite of it.
          But yeah he is a Phat Phuck.

        2. Yeah i remember him saying it in bowling for columbine. He goes to Canada and says everyone leaves their front door unlocked which i can personally confirm as bullshit, especially in Hamilton Ontario. He ignores the fact that we only have a lower violent crime/gun murder rate because the total Canadian population is barely a fraction of the America’s, not to mention 75% of gun murders are committed by gang bangers which are no where in Canada due to the lack of any major black or Hispanic communities in ghetto areas.

        3. No legal handguns in Canada and strict mag laws for semi autos.
          And FYI Moore is a crypto heeb

      2. Bono is a joo
        I’ve yet to hear him codemn Israeli apartheid, but boy he loves to lecture whites In South Africa about it.
        Meanwhile Gaza remains a concentration camp.

  15. Very true
    Dare speak the truth about negros, their under achievement or criminal predisposition, their collective failure to maintain a first world nation let alone build one, will not make you very popular at work.
    Or dare question That 6 million really died In A 2.5 car, garage sized vented room, by use of bug spray in 18 months, and forget your promotion.

  16. Fascinating to see Roosh’s journey of development and learning. Moving from pick up artistry to a deeper understanding of the realty of the toxic media and political environment and its anti-male effects.

  17. To turn the tide you must win the audience, the best bet is waking up more men on this and teaching younger men to take this path and not the path of the SJW. Then businesses, politics and media outlets have no choice but to adhere to our interests. Though this will be hard as women is the other 50% population and beta males will fill up the rest they need to win

Comments are closed.