How A Small Cabal Is Using Socialism & Cultural Marxism To Consolidate World Power

ISBN: 1939438004

None Dare Call It Conspiracy details the overreaching “conspiracy” of elites pushing socialism and Cultural Marxism onto the masses while accumulating even greater centralized control over nations and their citizens. Feminists and social justice warriors are nothing more than the financed low-level soldiers in a vice to destroy the family unit and control human behavior while top-down pressure is being applied by forces who are above the law.

“There are no accidents in politics.” —Joseph P. Kennedy

History had a long line of power-hungry rulers and despots. We still have them, but they wear suits and ties and speak of “equality” and “human rights,” mere covers for them to increase their power by using various -isms to centralize governments that can then be commandeered by the puppets they insert.

Socialism is their favorite tool to increase government power because a socialist state requires massive centralization. When something is centralized and top heavy, it’s easy to control if you can put your man at its head.

What exactly is socialism? It’s 1% or less of individuals at the top controlling the wealth and distributing rations to the bottom 99%. It is nothing more than an operating system for a small group to take control over a nation’s resources while the sheep follow along, thinking they will have a better standard of living because of it.

The idea that socialism is a share-the-wealth program is strictly a confidence game to get the people to surrender their freedom to an all-powerful collectivist government. While the Insiders tell us we are building a paradise on earth, we are actually constructing a jail for ourselves.


…the policies of the government today, whether Republican or Democratic, are closer to the 1932 platform of the Communist Party than they are to either of their own party platforms in that critical year.


Every proposal by our political leaders… carries us further leftward to centralized government. This is not because socialism is inevitable. Is is no more inevitable than Pharaohism. Is it largely the result of clever planning and patient gradualism.


Doesn’t it strike you as strange that some of the individuals pushing hardest for socialism have their own personal wealth protected in family trusts and tax-free foundations? …if one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all.

What a brilliant scam for the filthy rich to push feminism, equality, and all that nonsense on us when they are rigging the game to protect their wealth and pay less taxes than the middle class. If you keep moving up the institutional ladder into the central banks, you’ll encounter men who control it all.


When banks loan to retail clients such as yourself, they usually get collateral through property or other assets. When bigger banks loan to governments, they get collateral in the form of gaining influence in policy decision making (e.g. having their officers being placed in influential government positions). If a government disobeys, they can simply finance that government’s enemy.

Your government is therefore controlled by those they get money from, so to understand who is truly ruling over you, you only have to identify those who run the biggest banks of your nation. They have more power than your elected rulers.

The book states that banking panics are caused by bankers with the intent to put certain competitors out of business while creating a “crisis” that allows for “reforms” that give them even more wealth and power. The globalists at the top run up debts, collect interest payments, rig the markets, steal wealth from the sheep, and then force us into wars as perverse “profit maximizers.” All major wars of the last 100 years were essentially get-rich-quick schemes of the globalists, which explains America’s perpetual wars in the Middle East. These men are parasites who view the rest of humanity as a mere device for them to rule and dominate.

The graduated income tax and a central bank are two of the ten planks of The Communism Manifesto.


The establishing of the Federal Reserve System provided the “conspiracy” with an instrument whereby the international bankers could run the national debt up to the sky, thereby collecting enormous amounts of interest and also gaining control over the borrower.


Since the keystone of the international banking empires has been government bonds, it has been in the interest of these international bankers to encourage government debt. The higher the debt the more the interest. Nothing drives government deeply into debt like a war; and it has not been an uncommon practice among international bankers to finance both sides of the bloodiest military conflicts. For example, during our Civil War the North was financed by the Rothschilds through their American agent, August Belmont, and the American South through the Erlangers, Rothschild relatives.

When it comes to politics and punditry, what’s important is finding out who funds the politician or the think tank commentator, because if you know the source of funding, you know the agenda and which strings are being pulled.

Radical movements are never successful unless they attract big money and/or outside support. The great historian of the 20th century, Oswald Spengler, was one of those who saw what American Liberals refuse to see—that the Left is controlled by its alleged enemy, the malefactors of great wealth.


…[the] Leftist ideology and platform were made to order for the elitist Insiders because it aimed at concentrating power in government.


Those who had a hand in creating the Federal Reserve—a privately owned bank—through meetings on Jekyll Island also played a part in financing the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. This is why so many forces in America were sympathetic to Communist Russia and even Stalin, and why the end result of World War 2 was less about defeating fascism but handing countries over to centralized communist control (just as many countries that were “liberated” from Hitler went over to Stalin). They hoped the result of WW2 could usher in a world government controlled by a socialist republic in the prototype of Russia, all created, financed, and controlled by globalist interests.

To add money to the pot, Russia was made to be the big bad “enemy” to justify billions in defense spending in the US that also went into globalist coffers. They control so many angles of the game that it’s hard for them to lose. Every time you use one of their bank notes, backed by nothing, you aid in justifying their power.

Does it make sense to spend $75 billion a year on national defense and then deliberately increase the war-making potential of an avowed enemy? It does to Mr. Rockefeller and the Insiders.


One of the primary reasons the Insiders worked behind the scenes to foment WW1 was to create in its aftermath a world government. If you wish to establish national monopolies, you must control national governments. If you wish to establish international monopolies and cartels, you must control a world government.


…the cartel capitalist uses the government to force the public to do business with him. [Sound like Obamacare?]

The conspiracy includes being able to control who is elected as US President “in order that no candidate might be nominated whose views were not in accord with theirs.” All information and ideas you consume from the establishment is controlled, along with the candidates you vote for.

Although there are philosophical differences between the grass roots Democrats and the grass roots Republicans, yet as you move up the party ladders these differences become less and less distinguishable until finally the ladders disappear behind the Establishment’s managed news curtain and come together at the apex under the control of the Council Of Foreign Relations.


The landscape painters focus your attention on the kids in the street while the real danger is from above.

One particular passage caught my eye because it seemed relevant to the European migrant crises that started in 2015 (the book was written in 1971):

…elite planners conduct exercises in what they call “the world game.” For example: There are too many people in Country A and not enough people in Country B. How do you move people from Country A to Country B? We need so many males, so many females, so many of this occupation and so many of that occupation. How do you get these people from Country A and settle them in Country B in the shortest possible time?

Obama’s campaign marketing for presidency was nothing more than the spamming an old socialist idea:

[Socialist and liberal] groups chant that if we don’t “change” America, we will lose it. “Change” is a word we hear over and over. By “changes” these groups mean Socialism. Virtually all members of these groups sincerely believe that they are fighting the Establishment. In reality they are an indispensable ally of the Establishment in fastening Socialism on all of us.


The book closes out by urging the reader to spread anti-socialist ideas further, similar to what I advise in the Global Information Warfare section of The Resistance Pyramid, since a bank robber isn’t going to rob a bank if he knows the police is already there waiting for him.

I wish I read this book before I started getting into battles with feminists and their enablers, the most intense of which I described in my book Free Speech Isn’t Free. For over ten years, I thought that feminism was more-or-less a grassroots movement propelled by uppity women to assert their superiority over men, and while that may be subjectively true for the useless idiot feminist who thinks she is fighting the patriarchy, she’s actually part of a top-down socialist movement that attempts to collectivize and centralize nations to allow for seamless control over global wealth, resources, and power that hapless citizens go along with in the name of “progress” and “equality.”

It’s great to know what the elite’s agenda is, but considering the powerful forces it stems from, the book doesn’t give me much hope in putting a stop to it. Nonetheless, I highly recommend this book because it clearly explains the acts of subversion that is grinding us down, and who knows, maybe knowledge is power, and from that we can gain the wisdom and tools to defeat our masters.

Read More: “None Dare Call It Conspiracy” on Amazon

160 thoughts on “How A Small Cabal Is Using Socialism & Cultural Marxism To Consolidate World Power”

    1. What I firmly believe will happen from our questioning the historical propaganda we have been taught, is the recognition that the official narrative regarding WW2 is a lie.
      The manner in that WW2 was fought and how it concluded has ushered in the global Marxist insanity we now live in. WW2 was the tipping point.

      1. Just think: which is the most (only?) forbidden ideology on Earth? What we say about the central banks is what NSDAP documentaries already said by then: search for the Der Ewige Jude on youtube.

        1. I usually get paid approximately $6k-$8k every month on the internet. For those of you who are prepared to work easy computer-based task for 2h-5h daily at your house and make good salary while doing it… Test this work

      2. Yes….. but its going to be rolled up and packaged so you think you won…… the evil USA is defeated….. Hillary / establishment defeated…. 911, WW2, NSA, evil USA, evil Israel… yippee all defeated…. freedom wins…..
        meanwhile Putin KGB and Red China take over…. one world currency….. one world govt. – USA bad guys smashed….. its all BS…. ALL of it. Stealth takeover and marketing hype / con.
        You put up a false enemy …. communism…. then you put a ‘real enemy’ Nazis….. then you defeat the real enemy … which is actually the fake enemy that reinforces Communism. Look at the result of WW2. Communism spread to half the planet.
        Now look at the result of the cold war……. the fake enemy communism is defeat….. but turns out the USA was the ‘real enemy’ ….. coming soon the evil USA, Israel, Saudi, USD hedgemony is smashed…….. the real enemy (which is actually a patsy to installing yet more communism) is defeated…….. communism wins….. last time it was 50% global… this time will be 100% global.
        The whole thing is so twisted and evil …. you think freedom wins and you realize you were supporting communism all along.
        The nazis were the counter weight to communism…. but they got ‘out of control’ and had to be defeated…… so communism won. The USA is the same story…’ll see in a bit outrageous truths being revealed to tear down the USA….. freedom wins….. but actually who wins is communism.

        1. Most sheep refuse to recognize this even after you shove the evidence in their stupid faces because it means their WWII vet grand daddy was a manipulated idiot instead of a war hero

      3. Agreed. We know ww1 was Anglo, French, and Russian fears of the rising German economic and military strength, we cannot forget the lust they had for the Habsburg’s of Austrias dectruction ad well.
        Now ww2 is more complicated although I am convinced Hitler was not evil like we’re told and the complete destruction at the end was majority of the allies making. It is hard to say for sure that it was not all along apart of this liberal Marxist conspiracy we see today.

    2. Whats missing from this article is the bait and switch…. right now we have a false narative being fed to us… in that brexit and trump as president makes it appear that the resistance has won….. hillary loses establishment loses…….. or so you think……..
      USA who was the good guy is now the bad guy…Putin ex KGB and Red China was the bad guys now the good guys …. WTF ?
      Trump is just the man to collapse the USA… break it into 4-5 smaller pieces….. the little guy has won… freedom wins the day…… break the EU into pieces…. again the little guy has won…. meanwhile Russia and China stealthily win the cold war after all…….
      Throw in a near nuclear confrontation and an economic collapse…. the whole world will be signing up for central rule and 1984 style smart phone monitoring / thought police…… hunger games anyone ? Its 3-4 years out.
      The evil USA and the banking / shadow Govt. all broken ……. freedom wins…. while the communists build exactly what they always wanted…. just not via the USA……. “WE create a vacuum, then WE fill that vacuum.”

  1. This book is a great read and far ahead of its time as it was printed in the 70’s and only just now are people starting to catch on.

    1. Today I reread the parts of Esther Vilars trilogy that I highlighted when I read it a year ago and I was just like ‘Wow, this is a bible of the modern redpill’ could she know all this stuff back in the 70s?
      It’s just insane how many great books were published back then.
      I always told myself that my father didn’t have any other chance and that he was destined to be bluepilled. But damn, if that lazy, alcoholic mofucka would have stopped watching TV and if he had ever picked up a book – he would be way better off now.
      But I would have never been born then.

      1. Very true in fact I feel like it’s only in the last couple generations that we’ve lost site of how the elite are trying to consolidate power for themselves. Go back to the 50’s and we had HUAC investigating communist infiltration in this country, in the 1920’s the Bolshevik movement was known as a Jewish movement go back even further and in the 1830’s and Andrew Jackson, one of our best presidents, was talking about how international banking was trying to control the country back then. While perhaps no one was able to put all the pieces together there certainly was an awareness of a global financial elite working towards taking control of nations.

      2. When you are fat, drunk, overpaid for your 40 hours of “work” per week, comfortable wth 2 cars in the driveway of your nice big house in the non diverse/vibrant suburbs, can afford to go on tropical vacations at least once a year and wifey still does the groceries, cooks, cleans, takes care of the kids plus brings in a smaller secondary salary from her part time job even though you barely have a high school education, you have no reason to question the narrative and educate yourself rather than to be “educated”. Bread and circuses became fast food and TV.
        The worst part is that generation are still so full of themselves, arrogant and superior even though they can see that the conspiracy they propped up, praise and make a pathetic, ignorant attempt to defend out of a sick misplaced loyalty because “it did right by them” is hurting their own kids who are twice as educated and work twice as many hours, yet have half as much as their parents did at the same age. You had your lazyboy and sports, who needs grandkids?

      1. I think they want the majority of people to be on the government dole, or in possession of a government job…everybody except the uber-rich.

  2. I can’t imagine this powerful elitists putting all their eggs in one basket. Surely with 100 arrows leading to the democratic party there are a few dozen going in to the republicans as well. Hell, the neocons are proof of this, if nothing else.

    1. Excellent point. I notice that the little diagram is missing any sort of controlled opposition, which the neocons surely must be.
      Jesus said, “By their fruits shall ye know them.” Looking at the fruits of the neocon platform, it is clear enough to me that they are a cadre of useful idiots (to be generous) serving to impotently fight the elitist social platforms while pushing their foreign platforms.

    2. Yes. Would make sense for the wolves to don different clothing to control different sheep. The whole single identifiable entity approach would only make sense in a James Bond film.

    3. They control both sides, they always have. The two party election is a puppet show forgive us the illusion of choice. True liberal and conservative parties would look nothing like this.

    4. the so called elite have owned both parties in the USA for a very long time. Ever notice that the republicans never undo what the democrats did even when they have the power to? They never roll back a thing. Instead they further the so-called elite’s control over the economy. More corporate welfare too. More military industrial complex. When republicans are in charge different facets of the program are advanced but the program still advances.

  3. Nice article, Roosh. I went ahead and put the following article by Taylor Caldwell, written in 1970, into my comment. Was going to link to it, but this is easier…
    “Feminism is the Real Enslavement of Women”
    by Taylor Caldwell (1900-1985)
    (Abridged from Caldwell’s prescient 1970 classic “Women’s Lib: They’re Spoiling Eve’s Great Con Game.” Reprinted from the 1970 issue of American Opinion.)
    The left, alas, is now running yet another “Liberation Movement,” this one championing females who believe that the male sex has somehow done the ladies wrong. The members of this Front say they want all the spoils the boys appear to be getting out of life.
    They’re quite mad, of course. What these “girls” are about to do is ruin the biggest Con Game, and the most ancient, which one section of humanity has ever imposed on another, since Eve invented it.
    I’m just jealous, myself, having been deprived by circumstances from getting into that Big Con Game…alas, alas, alas. But I’ve stood on the sidelines and seethed with envy, and now I hope – I say with a grin over clenched teeth – that the Liberation “girls” will get exactly what they want. It’s all they deserve.
    As for myself, I am … plenty happy that my two beautiful daughters are in on the Game and enjoying every minute of it, and wouldn’t even dream of Female Liberation. I brought them up to appreciate their blessings — and to shut their mouths around their husbands, for fear the boys would catch on and demand liberation for themselves, which is exactly the calamity these rampant females in the “Liberation Movement” are going to precipitate. God help the contented women who will be their victims!
    At eighteen, I fell desperately in love with a true man, a man of strength and masculine vitality and courage. He was attracted to me, too. But then one night he said to me, “Janet, you aren’t the gentle little woman my mother was. My father worshiped her, and no wonder. You are too strong, yourself, and too independent for me. There’d be conflict in the house. You wouldn’t be satisfied just to be taken care of; you’d want to do something on your own, and be a ‘partner’ to me. It’s just no use.” I was struck dumb at this horrifying statement. I wasn’t very articulate then. He gently picked up my hands and shook his head at the old callouses, and as gently put them down.
    I wanted to cry out to him, ” But I want to be like your mother! I want you to take care of me and deliver me from my hateful daily job! I want you to cherish me! I want only to be your wife and have your children and keep your house! I don’t want a career or anything else. I just want you.”
    But I couldn’t say it. I had no words. My rearing silenced me. And so I never saw him again. But I saw the creeps, all right! They hung on me like leeches. Charity prevents me from elaborating on the matter. After all, a girl has to marry someone, doesn’t she, when her yearning for love and protection overcomes her. And, believe me, unless she is a dyke or a Liberated Commie, that yearning is natural and heart-breaking…
    I fear that men are beginning to suspect that we women conned them through the centuries. I fear they are asking themselves — to women’s terrible hurt — why they should support an able-bodied woman who can earn a good living too, and why should they be responsible for providing a home for women.
    Why can’t women be architects and bricklayers and plumbers and stone-masons and lawyers and doctors and business women too, and pile up a fat bank account to be inherited by husbands?
    Why should a man give his ex-wife alimony and child-support checks, when she is just as capable, if not more so, of rolling up her sleeves and getting on the 8:00 bus of a morning for an arduous day in the factory or the office?
    After all, men whisper among themselves — I have heard — that women in Russia are treated exactly as men, and are farm-laborers plowing and seeding and harvesting, and they manhandle big machines in factories, empty garbage and shovel snow, learn to be bricklayers and steel-workers as well as doctors and lawyers, serve in the armies, drive trucks, wear felt pants, dig sewers and lay pipes, clean chimneys and work in the forests, and do the heaviest of manual labor.
    Men, in short, are licking their lips and, for the first itme in history, are readying themselves to be exploiters in their turn — to be the soft gentle creature in the house, the soother of exhaustion, the serene person who has nothing to worry about in his pleasant life. Mom’s out there, plugging and “fulfilling” herself, and why should Pop worry? He’s had it coming to him since Eve.
    It is a woman’s nature to make a sanctuary of love and delight in her home. That is the true “career” for women. Alas, alas, that so many multitudes of women are now forced — or choose — to abandon that career, and to become imitation men in society. The true men won’t marry them. The creeps will throng about them. They will reap the bitterness I have had to reap — though I never wanted a career, never wanted to be “stalwart.” I just wanted to be a woman.
    You really can’t change human nature, and the instincts of that nature, for good or evil. I know a prosperous young man in New York, in his early thirties, who has a “pad” in a penthouse, and is up-to-date on everything, including Ladies’ Liberation. He highly approves of it. It is time, he told me, that women “stopped being parasites” and worked to the day they dropped dead or retired, as men do, and not expect a man “to support them.”
    He is very enthusiastic, too, about women’s “sexual liberation,” and always manages to get a girl who, the dupe and dope, heartily agrees with him. “After all,” says the young man, “women get as much fun out of it as men do, so why should a man feel obligated to marry them, or give them more than a drink and a dinner in exchange? I’m all for this new freedom for the girls.”
    He belongs to the Key Club. You know the kind I mean. When I was in New York recently he invited me to meet his “newest girl” at the Club. The “girl” happened to be a member of an advertising agency, a smart, pretty cookie with swinging hair and bright cheeks and eyes, and good manners and an engaging way with her. Only her eyes were vulnerable, and soft and tender as she gazed at my young masculine friend. The lovelight shone in those eyes, deep and passionate and devoted.
    I thought those two hit it off wonderfully well, and I thought, too what a wonderful marriage they would make and what handsome and intelligent children they would have. After all, the girl came of a good family, had a master’s degree in publications and advertising, and money of her own. And I could palianly see that marriage was fixed in her own ardent wishes and hopes.
    When she went to the “powder room” I said to my sophisticated, progressive, and with-it young pal: “Are you going to marry Sally soon?” He looked absolutely shocked! Suddenly the primitive man was there and not a “modern” man in a dinner jacket and black tie, in a Key Club with bunnies running around and the smell of winey cooking in the air. He was aghast.
    He said “Excuse me, but you can’t be serious, can you? Sally’s all right. But, after all, she is a modern girl — she likes a romp as well as I do. No inhibition.” He paused. Then he said, “Playmates for play-time. But only maidens for marriage!” And he laughed.
    When I still stared at him cynically, he got a little mad. “Let’s face it,” he said. “The liberated girls have made their own public bed, and they can lie in it, and we men love it. but if they think we are going to marry them, they’re due for an awakening. No man wants a woman who’s been out on the town with every Tom, Dick, and Harry. When we marry, we don’t want a ‘modern’ woman.” He laughed again. “Oh, we encourage the women to be ‘liberated’! It’s cheap for us, and we get all the free sex we want before we settle down with a decent girl.”
    Sally came back, glowing at the boyfriend, her heart in her eyes. No one ever told Sally that she was being used, that her womanhood had been cheapened and degraded by her sister-women in the name of “liberation.”
    Sure, Sally had her “identity,” as they wickedly call it, and her “freedom,” and she was being fulfilled all right, all right! She had her good job and her independence and her nice little apartment…and she was twenty-seven years old and she would soon be middle-aged, and all she could marry then (and even now) would be some “Liberal” creep eager to live on her salary and permit her to support him.
    The young man now opposite her, with his urbane manner and excellent income and ambitions, would never marry Sally. He would marry some sweet, untouched creature who would not “stand shoulder to shoulder with him in the battle for life,” but who would make him a pleasant little wife of whose decency he would be proud, and who had never heard the phrase, “women’s liberation.” Well, I suppose, it serves Sally right and all her deluded and pathetic sisters who sprint off to work every morning and take care of themselves and are as “free as men.” But deep in their deprived hearts they know how tragic they are.
    Girls, the men are catching on — through your sister-women who have been “liberated — that they have been victims for ages of the Big Con Game, and the first thing you know they will be demanding Civil Rights and Equality for themselves, too! It’s up to you, in behalf of future generations, to lull them back and to again become superior. Who wants Equality with men? No woman in her right mind.
    Remember this: The strongest sign of the decay of a nation is the feminization of men and the masculinization of women. It is notable that in Communist nations women are exhorted, and compelled, to do what has traditionally been men’s work. American women, some of them, feel triumphant that they have broken down the “barricades” between the work of the sexes.
    I hope they will still feel triumphant when some commissar forces a shovel or an axe into their soft hands and compels them to pound and cut forests and dig ditches. I hope they will be “happy” when a husband deserts them and they must support their children and themselves alone. (After all, if a woman must be “free” she shouldn’t object to men being free too, should she?”)
    I hope they will feel “fulfilled” when they are given no more courtesies due to their sex, and no kindnesses, but are kicked aside on the subways and buses by men, and jostled out of the way by men on busy sidewalks and in elevators. I hope that no man will extend mercy to them because of obvious pregnancies, but will rudely tell them that that is no excuse to shirk a day’s heavy labor, and they should be like Russian women. I hope they will be proud when some court demands that they support “delicate” husbands for a lifetime, and pay alimony. I hope, when they look in their mirrors, that they will be pleased to see exhausted and embittered faces, and that they will be consoled by their paychecks.
    The decay and the ruin of a nation has always lain in the hands of its women. So does its life and strength, its reverence for beauty, its mercy and kindness. And, above all, its men.

    1. That’s a great one.
      Okay, let’s make this the 70s wisdom day, I’ll quote Esther Vilar:
      “Ein junger Mann, der eine Familie gründet und sich hinfort sein ganzes Leben lang, meist in stumpfsinnigen Tätigkeiten, der Ernährung von Frau und Kindern widmet, gilt als ehrenwert. Einer, der sich nicht bindet, keine Kinder zeugt, mal hier und mal dort lebt, mal dies und mal jenes tut – weil es ihn interessiert und um sich selbst und nur sich selbst zu ernähren -, und der einer Frau, wenn er sie trifft, als freier Mensch gegenübertritt und nicht in der Uniformität des Sklaven, wird von der Gesellschaft ausgestoßen und verachtet. ”
      Just googled the translation:
      “If a young man gets married, and starts a family and spends the rest of hise life working at a soul-destroying job, he is held up as an example of virtue and responsibility. The other type of man, living only for himself, working only for himself, doing first one thing and then another simply because he enjoys it and because he has to keep only himself, sleeping where and when he wants, and facing woman when he meets her on equal terms and not as one of a million slaves, is rejected by society.”

    1. “Propaganda is to a democracy what the bludgeon is to a totalitarian state.”
      – SJW Hero Noam Chomsky

    1. so what do the slave owners do about the slaves that come to the realisation that they are enslaved. and not only that, they are spreading information that could lead to other slaves coming to the same conclusion.

    2. “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falesly believe that they are free” – Goethe

  4. >The conspiracy includes being able to control who is elected as US President “in order that no candidate might be nominated whose views were not in accord with theirs.”
    … and (((they))) have never been so scared.

    1. Reclaiming the worlds powerful military and the worlds most powerful economy is first step in defeating them. Putin, Trump, Le Pen etc. Break the socialist machinery which is just a mechanism for the banksters.

  5. Andrew Jackson fought against the banks, which most likely fueled his assassination attempt. Both placing him on and removing him from the $20 bill were giant middle fingers directed at him. The US has had far too few presidents with the brass balls of that man.

    1. Jackson was great american like Washington and Jefferson. Tubman’s face can be stamped on a subway token.

      1. It’s quite laughable that any American would possibly criticize Jackson, considering that probably 90% of them are probably sitting in, have lived in, or were born in land that he freed up.

    2. What’s troubling is that if they put Tubman’s gormless mug on a $20.00 bill it will immediately devalue to $12.00.

        1. I’m going to wait a bit longer for the underlying joke to manifest itself….

      1. The fucked up part is that all the Underground railroad shit is hearsay. No proof she did any of it.

    1. I just wonder if I should read this book. Is it worth it? Is there any kind of new information?
      I still have a couple of books to read so if it’s not necessary I won’t pick it up.
      Another book I consider purchasing is ‘Antifragility’ by Nassim Taleb.
      Roosh made a very precise summary on this one and I find the topic highly interesting but others say that Taleb is beating around the bush for 600 pages.
      Did someone read Antifragility?

      1. I read it a couple years back. I would say just read it and decide for yourself. Mostly I find Taleb thought provoking at the very least and quite insightful on other accounts…

  6. This points out one thing that’s been on my mind lately: is Trump really committed to what he says he is or is he simply an opportunist trying to secure a spot for himself amongst the top teir of the financial elite?

    1. It wouldn’t surprise me if trump wins that he walks back half of his campaign promises. There is risk of one term president with him, like bush sr. and “no new taxes”.

      1. You pretend Trump can make good on any of his promises while the Jewish banking elite still completely controls the other 2/3rds of the Government process?
        His first two years can be nothing but lobbying against the congress in the hopes the voters remove all of them by ballot before we resort to bullet.
        It’s the same scenario an independant like Johnson would face. Both parties are owned by the same master, and neither of them are going to cooperate with an outsider.

    2. Opportunist. Clearly an opportunist. His actions (not words) have always trended left to hard left based on who he supports not just with money but, more importantly, time and friendship.
      That said, if you go in knowing he’s a flim flam man, and defeat Hillary, then we can at least expect him to attempt to fulfill some of his words out of desire to be re-elected.

      1. Ya he’s been an opportunist his whole life. I guess im just not sure how much he’s going to sell out or at what price

      2. I think Trump realizes the opportunity behind the legacy he might be able to achieve. In several decades no one will remember The Apprentice, before the end of my life Trump hotels will probably be named something else, and he’ll be one of a hundred billionaires that’s barely remembered. A two-term president who completely flipped the script in the world might be too much to pass up.

        1. I don’t discount that possibility. I think he’s pragmatic enough to go with what works whenever possible, to get what he wants. He’s a lot like other famous politicians like that, if the times call for him to be a right wing populist, he’ll be one. He may not believe it deep down in his soul, but I suspect he really doesn’t believe much deep down in his soul and works mostly on practicality and a cost/benefit figuring.

        2. I think where his money went before politics was based on who could best help him business wise. Based on the semblance of values he instilled in his kids, vs say Chelsea Clinton for instance shows he has a basic want at the very least for what we want for this country. We really will never know unless he is elected. The proof however shows in his actual life, not the life he had to pander to be as successful as possible. Still up to this day and however many opponents they have yet to dig up any dirt that sticks. The best thing the Dems have on him is the mantra that he is racist an a “Phobe” of every thing the left holds dear. lol.

        3. Eh, I dunno. I’ve heard that before. I’d buy it if he hadn’t contributed to anti-gun groups as well. And Ivanka is a dyed in the wool Democrat. Hot, but a Lefty. I don’t know what his son(s) is, I think he has a concealed carry (his oldest son) so he’s probably at least sympathetic to the right wing (if he’s not a hypocrite, I don’t know, I know little about him).

        4. hard to say but based on his choice in women and at least some appreciation for architecture, I think he has a soul. He would never toe the marxist anti-human line because he appreciates god’s (or nature’s if you don’t believe that) gifts way too much.

  7. Bankers definitely run the show. And it’s the golden rule – he who has the gold makes the rules. They print money out of thin air. It’s backed by nothing. You want to buy a house? The money magically appears on a computer screen – exactly as if it had been printed on a printing press at that very second. Then it’s loaned to you at interest. What a brilliant fucking scam.
    Basically, we’re talking about a few families here – that’s all. These are the people who create all of the controlled opposition groups. These are the people who create all of the latest fads, trends and opinions. (Tavistock is one of the think-tanks where they dream up shit like the LGBT movement, feminism, all of it.) They plan all of this shit out decades in advance. Their minions oversee myriad groups of controlled opposition lackeys, who are dutifully positioned underneath them, within a pyramidal structure. Each pyramid (each group) has a capstone, represented by a minion for the major bankers.
    Every single war that has ever been fought in modern times, came about as a result of the targeted country having the temerity to do things the old-fashioned way, by having a government-sponsored central bank that loaned money at zero interest. (And that was the way things used to be done in the United States.) The World Bank and the IMF are the twin spearheads in this modern art of war, and the United Nations is its “good guy” front organization. They target the country in question, whip up frenzied support by characterizing its leader as an insane despot, destroy its infrastructure, loan it money “to rebuild”, and then, they have them by the balls. I don’t think there are that many countries left to target these days…they have pretty much nailed every single one of them already.

    1. Kramer wanted to kill himself just because he could never become a banker

      1. What do you expect? You can’t become a banker when you publicly hate the Jews controlling the banks.

      2. Wasn’t there an episode in which unemployed George got the top job at the Federal Reserve? Mayhem and hilarity ensued

        1. (((They))) are rubbing it in your face.
          A show about nothing that was the most profitable is a metaphor for their global economic banking conspiracy

        2. I was actually joking about that – george got a job at the new york yankees There was something nihilist about the show, but I don’t think it had anything to with international finance

    1. Unlikely. Way too risky.
      Now did she disappear to her daughter’s non-apartment (her daughter sold it and it’s converted into a medical center now….cue ominous music…) and do some coke and come out totally wacked, which requires eye glasses so nobody sees her pin prick sized pupils? Probably.

      1. Its not unlikely at all, and if she gets called out on it she will say it was for “security” reasons because presidential candidates get threats. This is the clintons they have done much more manipulative shit.

        1. Yes, but that’s not the same thing. If she were caught doing this, her campaign would literally implode. This isn’t a security thing (which is justifiable) this is a “lie about my true health” thing which would wipe her chances out once and for all if it was found out.
          It just seems like too much of a risk. They’re evil, but they’re shrewd too, the Clintons. Plus I’ve heard this thing a lot today and usually when everybody jumps on the same conspiracy theory I usually find out that it’s laughably wrong.

        2. It is the clintons and they have their “cover” story for everything, they can always claim it was for “security” when the real reason was hillary is just too sick to get out of bed that day.

        3. Well ok, I’ll cede it’s within the realm of possibilities then. I just don’t happen to think it’s what is happening.
          She had another spaz attack, which they’re trying to play off as “pneumonia” which is bullshit, she went to her private clinic, they swatted her butt and she got better, then she wandered outside, probably high on drugs. Just my take.

        4. I saw the Video GOJ and she came outta there like a Santa Claus… it was weird. ” Sec. Clinton how are you feeling?” Hillary yells – “Its a beautiful day in NY” with a shit eating grin on her face and then proceeds to call over a random young child to take a photo with. It was very ‘Aliens took over her body’ type of thing.. OR on Drugs of some kind. I was thinking the same exact thing as you until I saw the video.

        5. I saw the video. I suspect it was her brain attack, they fed her some cocaine once the spasms stopped, and she bounced out high as a kite.

        6. They are shooting her up with a cocktail of caffeine, vitamin B12, adrenaline, pain killer, antibiotics. This only goes so far with seriously ill people. It masks the symptoms but doesn’t cure them.

        7. I’ll bet she’s signing that petition to re-legalize Kratom now, right?

        8. Hillary is “evolving” on the kratom issue. She’s waiting for her gay male handlers to endorse it.

        9. Hmmm, that’s going to be a tough sell then. Gay men who take Kratom turn instantly straight and expel the gay out of their soul in corporeal form and then kick its ass.

    2. It would make sense after the 9/11 incident. If she was so ill from overheating or pneumonia that it caused her to collapse like that, she would’ve gone straight to the hospital, not to her daughter’s apartment for 90 minutes to cool off and she certainly wouldn’t have popped out afterwards looking so chipper.

      1. “This is the worst thing to happen in downtown manhattan on a September 11th ever”
        –Hilary (probably)

      2. She didn’t go to her daughter’s apartment. Her daughter sold that apartment. It’s been converted into a medical center, a private one.
        Do the math and stand in wonder at the ruse the MSM is pulling with this bullshit.

        1. Oh I know all that. I’m just pointing out the flaws with their own lie. I don’t believe for a second it was overheating or pneumonia, nor that she just went to her daughter’s apartment to cool off. Odds of her having an episode during a debate with Trump are now 7-1.

        2. I hope she gets a body double but they make it a black woman that looks absolutely nothing like her because it would be racist to say you can only have a white woman in the job and MSM never mentions that all of a sudden Hilary looks just like Esther Rolle

    3. I saw that somewhere but thought it was just click bait. I buy it though.

        1. But, when were both pictures taken? I look different in pictures taken at different times. Agree a bit on facial structure. That could be an imposter, or she could really be doped up on drugs or have some kind of nasty ass swelling going on (this woman is really, really physically ill, it wouldn’t surprise me if she’s starting to manifest that kind of swelling).

        2. Had to read twice. Got nasty ass-swelling the first time, instead of the intended nasty-ass swelling. Got very worried for a moment.

        3. Her camp claims they already have, via some little toady doctor that’s been following around Hillary for 20 years. Totally believable, right?

  8. Good article Roosh but the problem lies with people themselves. As soon as one freedom fighter successfully topples the system, it is he that becomes the slave master. The only thing that is going to cure this is when that doomsday meteor falls out of the sky and puts the entire human race back to that puddle of shit from which we arose.

    1. whether you believe it or not I think the suggestion in the article is that ‘the slave-masters’ don’t get toppled, because they are the ones organising the toppling. Otherwise valid point

    2. Some (((slave masters))) have college graduates working at Starbucks for minimum wage to pay off student “debts”
      Other “slave masters” hand out free vacations down by the shore to everybody.
      Kraft durch Freude

  9. Stuart: Well, it’s a well known fact, Sonny Jim, that there’s a secret society of the five wealthiest people in the world, known as The Pentavirate, who run everything in the world, including the newspapers, and meet tri-annually at a secret country mansion in Colorado, known as The Meadows.
    Tony: So who’s in this Pentavirate?
    Stuart: The Queen, The Vatican, The Gettys, The Rothschilds, *and* Colonel Sanders before he went tits up. Oh, I hated the Colonel with is wee *beady* eyes, and that smug look on his face. “Oh, you’re gonna buy my chicken! Ohhhhh!”

    1. Oh shit, I haven’t heard a quote from “So I Married An Axe Murderer” in a long time!

  10. Watch this play.. Trump is pushing 6 weeks govt paid leave for maternity. This will put a stake right in the heart of the equal pay bullshit. Your move feminism.

    1. More of my money for women so that they can stay in Career Land. Great. Thanks.
      I don’t like this guy, honestly. I’m voting for him, but damn….

      1. I agree but at the same time this could be done with savings from cutting back welfare and the less welfare that would theoretically saved by deporting illegals. We both know it would get passed unless there is some sort of caveat involved that cuts funding from something else. Long term its a kill shot in the equal pay bs. I don’t like it except for its duel blow to the feminist stance.
        Poison pill in a way.

        1. Here’s how it always works though. The Lefty program gets passed first with “We’ll get to the other parts, the cuts to welfare later, but we need to get this passed now, it’s urgent”. Then the Cuck GOP folds to the Lefties and pass the bill, and somehow, we never see them get around to trying to get the other shit done. The few times they try the Left will organize its hordes of unemployed Orcs and there will be cities burning.

        2. He did it a couple of times actually. No Fault Divorce when he was Governor of California. Illegals being given amnesty when President.

        3. I knew of the switch and bait the Dems played on him regarding amnesty and knew of them passing No Fault divorce but didn’t realize they played the same trick on him. What were they promising him in return on that one?

        4. I really don’t remember, now I need to go look it up, heh. I just recall that he was the Right Wing darling in Cali and traditional in every respect, then comes out and signs on to the second (but most significant) No Fault Divorce law in the nation.

        5. lmao, I know I know. We will see. I like the possibilities of shutting up the feminists with this and shutting up the “higher min wage” people with tax cuts for the middle class. Its all in theory. The fact that the maternity leave thing will likely get shot down may just be a play for votes. Who knows. Im mainly in for the SCOTUS Noms.

        6. Actually I think I speculated instead of had facts regarding No Fault Divorce. He signed it, but I cannot recall the reason why, which makes me think that it hasn’t been actually written about or that I’ve not read it if it was. Retracted.

        7. and he repealed the Glass-Stegal act which allowed the financial weapons of mass distruction. None of it’s an accident. He was an actor, not the script writer.

        8. Glass – Stegal was repealed in 1999 under Clinton with a republican congress and mostly bi-partison support. That bill, plus the Riegle-Neal bill in 1994 were the main causes behind 2007-2009.

      2. Most companies already have a similar policy and the average # of kids per female is 1.9 and if you adjust for working women it’s probably closer to 1.5…don’t agree with it but cost would be negligible and it should play well with moderate females in votes.

    2. The only stake here will be put on out pockets. Feminism is not about equality: it is about as much free shit for women as possible.

      1. Read the proposal before you knock it. It has some good potential residual effects. Also if this pushes him over the hump by gaining voters to beat Hillary, she is proposing double the leave and leave to care for elderly parents and paternity leave as well. How much is that gonna cost? all the while upping welfare benefits and bringing in refugees to eat up more welfare and probably bring up more welfare programs. .. Its a good play on his part.

  11. The foundation of socialism is poor. For example, socialism’s notion that inequity is a curable ill. It isn’t. It’s a law similar to conservation of mass. You can do all sorts of things to change the way it looks, where it is, its form, how it feels, but it will always be there. It also abandons essentially murican things like: agency, hope, realism re: limited resources, and determination (never give up).

    1. Actually the foundation is quite rich. The human mind can easily be controlled. How else can you convince a bunch of obese Americans that they are poor because they don’t have an Iphone 7?
      Darwinistic poverty means ribs showing. Marxist poverty equals feelings.

      1. I tend to agree with you here. The reason we are all so fucked right now is because of just how well all this shit worked. You can say it is terrible, immoral, unethical, dangerous or evil if you like, but the fact that it has been such a unmitigated success (I like your example about obese Americans thinking they are poor because no iPhone 7) shows that there is something to it.

        1. To clarify: As a practical matter it is extremely successful, as a philosophy on its merits, logically…not so much. Similarly, a pyramid scheme is a logistic marvel; never underestimate mass stupidity. Then after a year all but a few people wind up burned. Perhaps I should have said “the logical foundation of socialism is poor.” In a la la fantasy world where we all have unlimited IQ, where kratom was still legal, and Marx married his maid and shut the hell up, everyone would realize that socialism was an untenable dead end.

  12. I don’t care who is in charge as long as it isn’t this shit-eating globalist 40% bodyfat cabal and their legions of ravenous swarthy hordes threatening the extinction of all white Christians.

  13. I still haven’t read this book, but it makes some interesting points. The points about socialism being a tool of the rich as a means of achieving centralisation recapitulates Anthony Sutton’s more careful and academic conclusions about the compatibility of capitalism and socialism to the extent that they are both centralist and collectivist in tendency. Obviously any centralising and collectivising force can be used for much the same purpose to the extent that the purpose if for the rich to dominate the state or potentially international politics (as in the NWO)
    There is one thing this misses potentially. The quote “What a brilliant scam for the filthy rich to push feminism, equality, and all that nonsense on us when they are rigging the game to protect their wealth” may not be the whole of the truth, though.
    It’s very common amongst those who labelled conspiracy theorist to argue along these lines, namely that the Rothschild & Rockefellers & all their minions are merely trying consolidate their power and wealth. Well they may be doing that, but all of this assumes that power and wealth is an end in itself, and moreover the relevant end in question. Deviations from this line of thinking tend to emphasise even worse qualities – namely that they are satanists, or purely evil etc.
    The problem with this is that it is wholly cynical, and I believe this to be – at least largely – psychologically naive. People can be incredibly cynical, and seek power and wealth in and for itself. It may be that the elites – all those people attending Bilderberg conferences or whatever – are purely psychopaths, or it may be that they are well-meaning but deluded as the article suggests – i.e. useful idiot as identified by Yuri Bezemov. There is no doubt that feminist, and the your garden variety socialist may fall into this naive category – and probably every guardian reader on the planet fails to appreciate that socialism is administered by the very people they most despise.
    But at some level this is unsatisfactory, and naivete aside, useful idiocy aside, the theorising thus far remains psychologically impoverished – it assumes at the very least that the mass of the foot soldiers are deceived but the people at the very, very top – the puppet-master – are absolutely, and psychopathically cynical.
    This is probably a mistake. I’ve mentioned that the only real requirement here is the promotion of centralisation and collectivism – as Anthony Sutton and this book identifies. But what this misses is that centralisation / collectivism is essential for the creation of that very ‘change’ that the article identifies as an essential component of socialism.
    Of course it could still be purely cynical – changing society, changing people could be purely an exercise in control: by changing people you are also controlling them, because by changing them you are directing them according to your whim or preference.
    Except there is good reason to think that control for controls sake – power for power’s sake – doesn’t quite satisfy the need for a psychologically believable motivation.
    There is also elitism in the form of paternalism – namely the masses can’t actually look after themselves, hence they need to be guided out of trouble, and towards the correct path. This probably accounts for the thinking of a great many amongst the technocratic elites today. The managerial revolution has produced an international managerial class that effectively administers society using skillsets absent from the majority population. By this reading socialism / collectivism is inevitable as a kind of technological management – the world needs to be governed, and this can only be achieved by experts: there is a moral argument for such thinking – in age of potential nuclear war there is a need to ensure the world powers work carefully with each other, otherwise disaster could beckon.
    Of course the elites haven’t done that well in this regard, and as the book reviewed suggests, the avoidance of war is not necessarily a primary aim of the elite system.
    So what remains?
    Religion, or rather the religion of progress. This has been in place since the enlightenment. Humanity was in the dark ages. In an age of pre-illumination. The ancien regime was backward and unfair. As many have commented in previous articles many amongst the elite believe quite passionately that they are creating a new and better society. The fact that they may be getting richer and more powerful for them will not dissuade them from this belief. Their riches and their power are means to an end. It is the goal, the great work, the communist, futurist, glorious transhuman future that represents the real end, the end that justifies the means.
    It is a mistake to misunderstand and therefore misidentify those you are critiquing or at odds with. It is my belief that the belief in progress, and in the betterment of humanity, of some kind of greater equality, is at least partially genuine. It may seem otherwise because such idealistic motives – towards creating a better world for err. everyone is combined with more self-serving motives of creating wealth and power for oneself. But the point here is that wealth and power is not a corruption for these men (and women) precisely because it serves a greater end. Unless you understand this you cannot hope to make an effective riposte to what for the last couple of hundred years has more or less been the inexorable path of human history

      1. “repair of the world” is a big part of this. There is a gentile and a jewish side, but tikkun olam is certainly an important part and has become a popular / populist concept amongst young progressive jews (who may or may not misunderstand it). Barack Obama has even referenced it

  14. So the Cultural Marxist global elite cabal made the Marxist Soviet Union Russians into enemies after WW II as a means of making the world into . . the Soviet Union?
    Occupation of Poland, Czechoslovakia had nothing to do with it? OK, makes sense.

  15. Also see “Rockefeller Medicine Men”. Medical care is another facet of sucking people’s wealth away and controlling them. Available free online with a little web searching ( or it can still be purchased as a book.

  16. I always question liberals on their views regarding wealth redistribution and they are always silenced. Its along the lines of…”ok if we are all equal, the FIRST ones we should be going after are the Warren Buffets, the George Soros’, the Koch Brothers, Bill Gates, et. etc.” They just malfunction at that point.

  17. Hope to see more on this. I’m doing everything I can to educate young men around me on these matters, even if its subliminally or subversively. Let them think and garner opinions on their own at first, but don’t explode with the whole red pill truth. It takes me about 3-4 average meetings / conversations to start leaving a breadcrumb trail to ROK or the forum or other truth sites.

  18. “the book doesn’t give me much hope in putting a stop to it” Ultimately you can’t because their idea is bigger and more appealing. Only they can fail themselves, especially if women fail to step up to ‘equality’.

  19. WITHOUT the current fraudulent debt based usury fiat international central banking system, the cabal cannot finance nor execute any of their marxist policies. That is the engine, the beast, that supports it. That’s even how the Bolshevik Revolution that murdered 100 million Christians and plunged Russia into Communism was financed. Once the Federal Reserve was established, it gave the j ews the additional financing to carry out their anti-christ plans for global dominance. J ewish agents out of New York back in 1913-1917 went straight over to Russia with millions in hand to finance the violent overthrow.
    The Bolshevik Revolution was a violent overthrow. Beyond that, it was decided that a violent revolt could not be accomplished in western countries including Europe, so something called Cultural Marxism was implemented to begin slowly step by step march countries towards pure socialism, but also going even further to reverse natural order from a patriarch society to a matriarch goddess society where females are protected and considered golden and are guaranteed just about any kind of life they desire in society at the expense of men via redistribution of wealth.
    Regardless, whether you think it’s all BS or not, one thing is for sure…..if the international banking system ever collapsed….. all of feminism, abortion, BLM, no-fault divorce, affirmative action, HR cunts, wall street, $100K+ management jobs for young females, child support, alimony, “domestic violence” propaganda, EEO, etc. will go away completely.
    Although a lot of men seem to fear an economic monetary collapse, wouldn’t it be bitter sweet to have a moment at work, at your job, where the entire system collapses while you are at work. That means, it’s over. No more law, no more money, etc. At that moment, your place of employment has evaporated and you might as well just go straight home. On your way out of the office, you can stop in HR and get into one of those HR cunts faces and tell them it’s over. Their power has ended and there is nothing they can do about it. At that point, you cannot be arrested or anything because during a collapse, no laws or society structure exist. You can grab one of those HR cunts, and drag them off to the break room and force them to make you a sandwich because that is going to be their new roles as females from that point on.

  20. Extraordinary R.V. totally agree with you.Over many years I had come to almost the same conclusions but you lay it all out in a way which makes such sense.The best thing I got from your words was we must not get caught up in the everyday battles they push us into to with their hapless pawns,we must always remember the evil is at the top.Thank you so much for this important work.God Bless you.

  21. NDCIC was the first “conspiracy” book i came across as a youngster, maybe 8 or 9 years old. It all seemed so fantastic back then; as i get older, i realize how accurate it was, and it’s cool that people are still reading it!

  22. Our elites don’t feel vulnerable through their fiat money, the income tax and central banks, Roosh. Ron Paul has spent his life denouncing these things, and the elites just ignore him. No one in or deployed by our elites goes around calling critics of the Federal Reserve System “deplorables.”
    By contrast, they feel extremely vulnerable when you attack their project of dispossessing white people in our own countries with the world’s diversity trash.
    What accounts for the radical difference here?

    1. Most white people are too stupid and lazy to understand or too unprincipled, shortsighted, cowardly therefore willfully ignorant to want to understand fiat money, the income tax and central banks but just smart and proud enough not to be chattel slaves. It’s why the draft doesn’t exist anymore.
      “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
      Upton Sinclair
      That’s why the globalist scam artists have to go to such convoluted lengths to trick them into being wage slaves. They need to be bred out to make the ruler’s lives easier.
      Midrasch Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855

  23. The United States Supreme court, at the turn of the century, was Protestant – just like our founders. Those Protestant justices worked to maintain “original intent” of the constitution. Over time, the court has become dominated by Catholics who are “inventing” new meanings from the constitution.
    Every speaker of the house from both sides of the isle have been Catholic – Nancy Pelosi, Tip O’Neil, John Boehner, Paul Ryan, etc. All of them have been open borders.
    The man that opened America’s border was the Catholic Ted Kennedy.
    The Pope wants open borders. Protestant Europe is being over-run by muslims, and so is America. But Catholic South America is not suffering from a muslim invasion.
    There is no better way to destroy a cdountry than by changing it’s demographic and the International Catholic Church of Rome is behind it.

Comments are closed.