Canada Gives Up On Freedom And Passes Anti-Islamophobia Motion

In late March, Canada’s federal government decisively passed a controversial Liberal-backed motion “condemning Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination.” This motion, coined M-103, purports to “quell the increasing climate of hate and fear” in the country, yet neglects to define the broad terminology behind this supposed hatred. Nonetheless, the House of Commons approved M-103 by a staggering 201 votes against an opposition’s measly 91.

The motion was introduced in the wake of the Quebec mosque attack, which resulted in the deaths of six Muslims by a Dylann Roof-styled gunman. While the brazen event was horrific in itself and the alleged shooter has been duly brought to justice, Justin Trudeau and his sitting Liberals refused to let this crisis go to waste.

The feminist Prime Minister assured the citizenry to “make no mistake, this was an act of terror”, even though no charges of terrorism were laid against the assailant. Soon after, M-103, which had been tabled by Liberal MP Iqra Khalid last fall, entered the fold of parliamentary debate. Backing the motion was a petition of seventy thousand signatures postulating that “extremist individuals do not represent the religion of Islam”.

On the glossiest of surfaces and without a moment of faint scrutiny, the motion seems perfectly reasonable. A horrible attack occurred against a religious group, so the government wants to investigate the potential rise in hate crimes against that group to determine if there is a pattern of bigotry against that group to, finally, promote the rights of said group.

Liberal MP Iqra Khalid, who used to lead the anti-Semitic Muslim Student Association, is, fittingly, the standard-bearer of M-103.

But that is where any justification for this motion ends. Digging deeper, you immediately detect careless flaws in the motion, such as: What does it define as “Islamophobia” and how do you determine “all forms” of it and systemic racism without a comprehensive definition? Why prioritize the term “Islamophobia” and not other types of “religious discrimination”, especially when, as of 2016, most hate crimes in Canada are anti-Semitic in nature?

Why compel a committee to “contextualize hate crime reports” when the motion is already convinced of “an increasing climate of hate and fear” in the country? If hate crimes are on the rise (and without assuming many of them are hoaxes), what does the motion intend to solve when the Criminal Code already legislates against “public incitement of hatred” and the Canadian Human Rights Act prohibits such discrimination?

The reason: there is none. Like with Bill C-16 (the gender pronouns piece of legislation), M-103 uses vaguely defined verbiage that gets votes in parliament by seeming to uphold a protected group’s civil rights, while embellishing their victimhood in the whole of Canadian society. While not a proposed law, M-103 is undoubtedly an attempt to legitimize “Islamophobia” through gathering government-backed data on hate crimes in an effort to influence future public policies.

Beyond the politics, M-103 is also an apparent effort to mainstream “Islamophobia” into the culture—to not only legitimize the term for political impetus but for censuring public and private conversations on the hot and deeply relevant topic of Islamic extremism

The nebulousness of “Islamophobia” purposely makes it a catch-all term for ideologues to apply impulsively as a silencing tactic against both informed and uninformed dissent. As University of Toronto Professor Jordan B. Peterson observed, “manipulation is built into its structure” (or lack of structure, really). “Islamophobia” is only “defined” according to its utility, which is to say its meaning is produced from the intent of its usage. It means whatever its spokesperson says it means.

Is it “irrational” to hate or fear a politicized religious ideology that has carried out more than 30,000 terrorist attacks since 9/11?

We know this to be true based on the phrase’s arbitrary etymology: Islam is a religious doctrine; whereas, phobia is an actual anxiety disorder based on an irrational fear of something. For the two to correlate, all fear of Islam would have to be irrational and all of one’s criticisms of Islam would have to be motivated by that type of fear. Ultimately, “Islamophobia” is a postmodern, Orwellian definition that scrambles and distorts proper language use for political gain, which explains why the term collapses under basic rational examination.

Unlike agoraphobia or social phobias, “Islamophobia” has no prescribed treatment or method of self-help offered at diagnoses. According to M-103, the solution should be complete condemnation of the ailment; in Islamic theocracies like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Iran, “Islamophobia” comes in the form of blasphemy laws, where criticism of Islam or other recognized religions of the state result in penalties ranging from monetary fines to death.

Left-leaning publications Huff Post and Vice predictably dismissed this resemblance to theocratic blasphemy laws as a right-wing “attack” and “conspiracy theory” on the motion, emphasizing that M-103 is not a bill and bears no relationship to blasphemy laws or any form of Sharia.

An M-103 protester outside of Toronto’s City Hall.

However, none of these outlets mentioned that Canada already has a blasphemy law, one derived from English common law. Section 296 of the Criminal Code defines a “blasphemous libel” as “an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years”. This law includes a provision excluding published opinions on a religion that are “used in good faith and conveyed in decent language”.

But “libel” is not actionable toward an accused’s temperament of speech, but toward a false claim. Since Section 296 fails to define “blasphemous libel”, is it then legal to make a false claim about a religion calmly, but illegal to make a truthful claim angrily? Is it even possible to lie about someone or something’s character in good faith?

What he said.

The danger here is that M-103 is a critically vague motion on religious discrimination that alludes to an equally vague blasphemy law that is currently a part of Canada’s legal code. Sure, few Canadians like M-103, but how far will their voices be heard?

With political correctness infesting the Canadian legislature, Islam creeping into its public schools, and the contemporary Islamification of Canada’s European counterparts, what is to say—with enough cultural accommodation and political capitulation—a blasphemy law targeting “Islamophobia” could come to pass, or an amendment to Section 296 that includes “Islamophobia” as grounds for prosecution.

Canadians must heed the late Christopher Hitchens warning on Islamification: “resist it while you can”. The now-passed motion of M-103 represents yet another example of the political correctness and national cuckoldry capturing the once-Great White North.

Read More: Islamophobia Is Perfectly Natural

288 thoughts on “Canada Gives Up On Freedom And Passes Anti-Islamophobia Motion”

  1. At the University of Texas at Dallas, some kids flushed a Quran in the library. Nobody has claimed the book, but police are investigating as a hate crime.
    Which is all to say, it ain’t just Canada running to their own executions.

    1. Outside of universities, I have not actually seen an actual “hate crime” law in the U.S. that I’m aware of. That shit seems ripe for Constitutional challenge.

  2. Critical of Shariah Law? Islamophobia.
    Critical of female genital mutilation? Islamophobia.
    Critical of gays being pushed of buildings? Islamophobia.
    Women should not be in politics, ’nuff said.

    1. Get enough flintstones in your country and women won’t be allowed into politics. That’s about the only thing flintstones get right. Their food isn’t bad either.

      1. You havent lived until some brontasaurus spare ribs have flipped your car on its side

        1. Damn we’re mind-melding these days….just had occasion to summon that imagery with respect to another matter on Thursday!

        1. Cave men, is what he’s saying. Basically that they’re stone age savages.

        2. In the military pretty much every combatant demographic group gets a pejorative term. Haji or flintstone was used to describe combatants in Iraq/Afghanistan.

        3. Yeah, I’ve heard Haji a lot. Started using it myself in polite comapany, heh.

    2. It really is frightening. A german woman, I think she trained as a dr before becoming a politician, smugly proclaimed “the future of Germany wont be German, and that is a good thing.”
      I have my reservations about homosexuals in politics too. A few weeks ago, an openly gay local pol had a rally outside a mosque, as if these guys really supported him. These people are so naive, as if they can cobble together an outlier voting bloc which will undermine the prevailing way of governing or thinking.

      1. I agree homosexuals shouldn’t be in politics either, only heterosexual men.
        That was Stefanie von Berg.
        Women in politics, law, etc. means something is seriously fucked up with the country and it’s just a matter of time until it implodes and gets overtaken by a more masculine one.

        1. some local pol was on tv a few weeks ago, standing in solidarity with muslims against the temporary ban. The hilarious thing is: once enough are in his district, he will be voted out of office, his career will be over. Talk about shortsightedness

        2. Yes, in a sane society the Green party leaders and its advocates would have been hanged for treason and perversion. Consider that von Berg’s speech was a moderate and sane one compared with the rest of her peers who proclaim openly their disdain for the German people and/or dream of a day in which they have freedom to “establish” healthy relationships with children…
          http://www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/paedophilie-fuer-den-erfolg-wie-die-gruenen-das-wohl-der-kinder-fuer-die-fuenf-prozent-huerde-opferten_id_4269610.html

        3. I just read the Google translation of that article and from what I gather, Germany is in an even more precarious situation than I thought.
          The fact that the Green party is even allowed to exist with openly pro-pedo rights agenda is disgusting and shocking.
          Just like you said, “in a sane society the Green party leaders and its advocates would have been hanged for treason and perversion.” Agreed 100%.

        4. what does a green agenda have to do with pedo rights? unless its just a marxist front…nah!

        5. Since the inception of the “green” parties in the 1980s sane people have known that they are Communists in disguise. So they refer to them as “watermelons” — green on the outside, red on the inside.

        6. “n a sane society the Green party leaders and its advocates would have been hanged for treason and perversion”
          THIS !!

        7. But MEN have ruled the world since the beginning of time. LOOK at the fucking mess it’s in. Please don’t tell me Satan made men destroy the world. That would be cowardly.

        8. But do tell, oh wise disciple, how is Trump performing for you? A nuke is probably headed for us right now. Thanks a lot stupid men!

        9. Yup. They vote themselves into office as soon as enough of them are in place. Look at London, for one. And various places around America that have voted in Muslims to state and local and even national offices. (Keith Ellison, for instance – he’s a Black Muslim and a US Congressman)

        10. Some people have more integrity than other people; it is unwise to assume higher moral character based solely on gender, sexual orientation or race.
          The mother that trusted this white, heterosexual man, near her 4-year old little girl, regrets her err in judgement.
          Former Ohio Mayor Richard Keenan, who recently plead guilty to 20 counts of sex crimes, including eight counts of rape:
          http://wkbn.com/2017/03/20/bond-revoked-for-former-hubbard-mayor-convicted-of-raping-child/

        11. “Federal and state laws (should) be changed to no longer make it a crime to possess marijuana for private use.”
          ― Richard M. Nixon

        12. Apparently banging underage kids leaves a low carbon footprint. Or something. 😮

        13. How’s your running water? Your Internet connection and your microchip embedded devices working just fine? Polio not fucking you up recently? How many stones did you consume trying to start a fire this morning? Did you get tormented by tsetse flies yesterday because the air ventilators in your mud hut weren’t invented?
          Yeah, things aren’t perfect to be sure. But get some perspective and save the improportionate screeching for the female sites.

        14. Women make up half the population, and we make our presence known wherever and whenever the hell we want. What IS your point? Are you so arrogant as to suggest women have have not made many important contributions? Blowhard.

        15. Read my comment again without your moron blinkers switched on and you might get to the central core of my comment. And remove that metaphorical chip off your shoulder while you’re at it.

        16. What exactly is your point? I read your comment. Yes, I’m aware of how technology and scientific research has enriched our lives. What was your POINT listing them? That’s a fairly straightforward question.

        17. Oh Frank I don’t give a metaphorical fuck what you have to say. Domineering prick.

      2. It goes beyond just inviting terrorists and rapefugees into their homeland. German culture is dying by diluting the population with third world immigrants, the majority being military aged men. Are the Germans not entitled to their own culture? Canada? The French being a minority in their own country?

      3. Slow infiltration.
        The Japanese Imperial Army pulled this off in Asia during the decades before the Second World War. Your local friendly and affordable barbers, grocers, dentists and doctors. Sleeper agent stuff.
        With greater communication technology and media outreach the current principles of infiltration are still in effect even if the mechanism of infiltration has been modified. Those who fail to learn from the lessons of history are condemned to come out on the arsehole end of it ….

        1. Lame. Mad because I opposed your peacenick shit on the other thread I see. Angry much, bro?

        2. Sure Grab That One, sure.
          You leftists really can’t stand not having your every word accepted uncritically.
          Your verbiage and syntax is the same between this and your other handle btw.
          Troll attempt 3/10. You can do better. Put some more effort into it next time.

        3. Actually I’m a National Socialist who’s clearly using Judaism satirically, but nice try. Seriously, all trolling aside.. Who do you even think I am? What thread etc? I haven’t said anything which could be interpreted as leftist my masculine friend who definitely has a wife.

      1. Hahaha I once met a Canadian feminist socialist girl who I jokingly accused of voting for Trudeau based on looks. The amount of disproportionate triggering that transpired from that comment was unreal. However, in her subsequent rant, she failed to produce an actual reason other than “he talks nice to women and muh oppressed ppl”. It was around this point I seriously began to question if women should be allowed to vote….

    3. I am gonna say it again, because it remains true. Women don’t like rapists and they don’t like manginas, but given the choice between the two, they come down in favor of the rapists.
      Contemporary feminism is now an extinction level threat to the West, because men have failed in thought, word, and deed to stand up for human dignity, progress, reason, freedom, and opportunity. Men’s leadership has been sorely lacking, and false versions of pro-human ideologies have filled the vacuum.
      Canada hasn’t demonstrated their commitment to human rights. They have demonstrated their abject cowardice to stand up for human rights. It is disgusting, but make no mistake: the men of the usa are no better. We’re just lucky that the first amendment makes oppressive speech laws impossible.

        1. That was actually photoshopped. Although it helps the manospherian narrative, it doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.
          Anyways, my wife is a 10 and I’m constantly getting hit on by chicks. Oh and by the way, I’m a very masculine guy who rides a Harley and also can lift very heavy weights due to my frame and natural physical prowess.

        2. He’s one of those special posters we get from time to time who is so thin skinned and juvenile that he can’t take opposition to his point, so he makes a troll account to sneer at me. He’s just another typical cowardly leftist, seen a couple like him in the past. Eventually they get bored when they don’t get their attention and run off to, I don’t know, masturbate to octopus porn or something. I put him on block on message 2.

        3. He’s “Grab That One” from another thread. He got all pissy because, while I’m against intervention in the middle east, I didn’t sit around apologizing for being American or voting for Trump. He’s one of those Leftists that doesn’t just want agreement on policy, but he wants you to be a religious convert to his world view. I don’t play that. Ended up telling him I was fucking proud of my service, and that I celebrate when muslim kids die and to put that in his pipe and smoke it. Less than five minutes later the troll account appeared, using the same type of syntax and meter that he used on his other handle.
          End of the day he’s just another thin skinned leftist who cannot handle criticism, so he defaults to the normal for his kind, which is mockery.
          I blocked him early on.

        4. It is very difficult for me to distinguish between a leftist male and a normal chick on the internet sometimes. I’m actually being serious, they have many of the same types of attacks and snarky responses that they blend together to me. Some leftists, more the union types, are obviously men, but the hipster faggot and your normal woman can look identical online.

        5. Plus, I keep my women away from ROK. Y’all bunch of pervs and shit.

        6. …. always a bag of candy on the passenger seat, and Starbucks Frappuccino’s in the cup holders. Just in case…

        7. TheRealGOJ here, reporting for duty. I can assure you I am far more right wing, and male than the fake GOJ.. Unfortunately he has blocked me so we cannot have a debate proving how far right I actually am.
          So I invite you Nihilist (Really? That’s sad) to quiz me on various topics to ascertain which wing I’m on in GhostieGirl’s Hegelian Dialectic.
          Also, this is my first and only account, I’ve been a lurker here at RoK for a while and I personally feel the fake GOJ is an imposter who continually lies about his lifestyle (hence the trolling, which the bitch can’t take).

        8. TheRealGOJ here, reporting for duty. I can assure you I am far more right wing, and male than the fake GOJ.. Unfortunately he has blocked me so we cannot have a debate proving how far right I actually am.
          So I invite you m a (Mother Africa? Filthy Nigger) to quiz me on various topics to ascertain which wing I’m on in GhostieGirl’s Hegelian Dialectic.
          Also, this is my first and only account, I’ve been a lurker here at RoK for a while and I personally feel the fake GOJ is an imposter who continually lies about his lifestyle (hence the trolling, which the bitch can’t take).

        9. He/she/it really does seem like a spurned chick now that you bring it up. Can you imagine being that butthurt over some guy you’ve never met before on the internet that you dedicate this much time and energy trying to trash him? It’s a wonder.
          Off for the day. Y’all have a good one.

        10. I noticed you used to term “male” instead of “men”. I make it a point of doing the same. These Leftist “you’re a white male!” pussy boys are pathetic.

        11. The Discus mod package is pretty powerful. I can ban by IP, by email, by user name, and delete all comments within the past month with about 4 clicks. I feel this is relevant to the current conversation.

        12. Anti-racism has become a code word for anti-white. What makes this white-hating whore think these “refugees” aren’t racist? Not to mention religious bigots.

        13. Yep. I recognize the sex of the person, but not the masculinity in using “male”.

        14. Clarification: An enemy female, as in, one that comes here to taunt and ridicule. Should have been more clear.

        15. Hasn’t slowed him down. He’s a very special kind of person.

        16. He reads like one of those Jewish trolls trying to make the alt right look like knuckle dragging skin head neo Nazi’s.
          Probably dresses in KKK outfits at gun meets and Trump rallies looking for camera’s.

        17. No kidding. There’s been a few times I’ve assumed the wrong gender.
          Also, you ever notice how these leftist males almost ALWAYS have some kind of weird ass comic book or anime picture on their profile? If they don’t have that then some kind of filter pic is guaranteed. Try clicking a few profiles of them on FB to see what I mean.

        18. “When people are free to do as they please, they usually imitate each other.” ― Eric Hoffer

        19. “To make clever people believe we are what we are not is in most instances harder than really to become what we want to seem to be.”― Georg Christoph Lichtenberg, The Waste Books

        20. I just love a braggart. So you can do a google search and up-vote yourself. I’m impressed. Let’s parse this out: “my wife is a 10” translates to “I’m unwillingly celibate” (there are no tens); “I’m a very masculine guy who rides a Harley” equates to “I’m an effeminate troll who gets to drive my mama’s Prius from time to time” (you probably couldn’t hold a Harley up); and finally “can lift very heavy weights due to my frame” means “I’m a couch potato who struggles and strains to get my fat ass off a chair” (moving 340 pounds of lard around doesn’t equate to lifting actual cast iron, sorry). There you go, corrected it for you. You’re welcome.

        21. Hah. You’ve got your very own vengeful supervillain obsessed with you now. You must be doing something right. Well played sir 🙂

      1. We’re just lucky that the first amendment makes oppressive speech laws impossible.

        And the 2nd Amendment protects the 1st (and the rest of the Bill of Rights) — provided we are willing to invoke it.

    4. Islamofascists have taken the top of the food chain as far as the PC Matrix goes. They trump women with the trans-bathroom rules, they trump gays with how the left reacted to the Pulse Nightclub massacre.
      The reason is that they are actively and violently opposed to western values, therefore make excellent allies against capitalistic liberty societies.

    5. I’m in favour of female genital mutilation and gays off buildings.
      Two out of Three ain’t bad!

    6. Well said.
      Critical of one-sided gender biased Law? FemiCuntoPhobia
      Critical of Male genital mutilation/circumcision? FemiCuntoPhobia.
      Critical of Lesbians not openly shamed/criticized? FemiCuntoPhobia.
      Women should only behave as women/feminine, enough said !

    7. Sorry Disciple, We must be rid of Islam, but women will not be held back by moronic ideas such as yours.

  3. O Cana-duh
    Our home and liberal land
    SJW love
    In all thy sons command
    With trolling hearts we see thee rise
    The Gay North’s dong swings free
    From far and wide…
    O Cana-duh, we went retard for thee
    God keep our land Islamophobia-free
    O Cana-duh, we went retard for thee
    O Cana-duh, we went retard for thee

    1. Verse 2
      O Canada,
      One nation in the world
      True tolerance
      To all thy many peoples and races and creeds extend
      With open doors we see thee rise
      The true north appropriated from native cultures, for which we self-flaggelate
      O Canada, we stand or sit or kneel in thee
      Long live this land
      No matter what people or government reigns ovee it
      O Canada, we picked Trudeau for thee
      O Canada, we picked Turdeau for thee

  4. If you guys think this is bad,you should check out Bill 89 that is getting passed in Ontario.
    If you deny your children the right to change their sex, the state will intervene and confiscate your children.

    1. You know, while you may not have as many as us, there are plenty of armed Canadians. There’s one level of abstract liberty where we can discuss finer points that don’t really impact us much, but I’d think that by the time it got to the government confiscating our kids if we didn’t allow and finance them becoming freaks, that there would be lots of shooting going on.

      1. ” but I’d think that by the time it got to the government confiscating our kids if we didn’t allow and finance them becoming freaks, that there would be lots of shooting going on”
        I’ll believe it when I see it; the complacency is just… everywhere.

        1. Dude, we had armed rallies with 5,000 to 10,000 people per state capitol in 2012 when Obama started sniveling about gun control. Locked and loaded armed rallies. Across the nation. And while that’s important, it’s nowhere near as important as the government stealing your kids from you.

        2. I agree – I’m just saying that we are long overdue for a civil war. I also see many Trump supporters who are entering the relm of delusion by rationalizing his reverse stance on his campaign promises.

        3. Yeah they’re becoming zombies just like Obamabots were.

        4. Every new betrayal he does adds another D to his chess game, I’m starting to notice.

        5. I didn’t, and still don’t, expect anything out of him other than better SCOTUS justices than Hillary would have picked.

        6. Surely and clearly. That has always been my position with him. If he hadn’t pre-published that SCOTUS list I may well not have voted at all.

        7. Nah…
          More like 12344223442443233D Chess into 1122332343235523523D backgammon with a sprinkle of 12342344124241345564334656455662345665367545566D poker!
          Inceptive don’t you think?

        8. What kills me are the fanatics who are literally twisting reality beyond recognition in order to justify the betrayal. They know they’ve been had but their egos are too fragile to admit it.
          Me, I got the one thing I wanted out of him, Gorsuch, and at this point have no problem at all mocking the robotic idiots, just like I had fun mocking the Obamabots.

        9. TrueGhostOfJefferson ✓Zᶦᵒᶰᶦˢᵗ
          Love it mate, seems you are redpilled as fuck on these issues of international jewry and put that goy @ghostofjefferson:disqus in his place. people like him are pretenders, ignorant of the real problems and spend their time posting on sites like these. boasting of a bullshit life they do not live. and doing all they can to avoid talking about (((them))). you also find these idiots on r/thedonald. if he were a true alpha he would not be taking the time to reply to all your comments trying to explain the situation and would not be triggered by your obvious satirical trolling so easy. what a fake.

      2. Why do you think I’ve been sounding more and more like a fanatic the last while? These Canadian liberals just do not stop, they don’t even take a break. I don’t think this law has fully gone through legislation yet, but the wording is vague enough to allow government intervention into the home.
        I’m meeting with an ROK friend tonight to discuss some of this stuff kuz it’s getting out of hand.
        Here is more info on Bill 89 if Canadian cuckery interests you.

        1. ha! Alice knew her role- waiting patiently for Sam the butcher to deliver the salami

    2. Is there some sort of age threshold? can a 4 yr old demand this, or does it start after a certain age.
      this is way beyond fuct btw

      1. I think it’s elementary school age. I don’t know what the cut-off is.
        Regardless it’s fucking weird that you can’t drink til you’re 19 but the government will help you cut your own dick off as an adolescent.

        1. Which is complete garbage since people don’t really start to formulate their sexual identity until their mid to late teens.

        2. No serious psychologist would ever say that this is a good thing for kids to do.

        3. while mass importing men who wont allow their boys to do so…
          end of days..Imstarting to think vinny isnt so crazy after all

        4. The only way it would make sense is if our governments were full of roving packs of pedophilies.

      1. What is with Canada? When on the timeline did Canadians stop being rugged people of a wild land and start becoming castrati drones?

        1. When they rolled over for the metric system I think.
          Actually being kind of serious.

        2. I have saved that to my personal collection, lol!

        3. I use the metric system myself (British Commonwealth system) but this is hilarious.

    3. At this rate, the US will need to build a Great Northern Wall, and maybe dig a moat.
      Or just annex and purify Canada with a crusade (edit) a la the Fallout universe.

    4. I upvoted clark. Is that ok?
      ..
      Ha

      But seriously, that is insane. Just plain insane.
      ..
      How can anyone argue there is not a plot against normality, for lack of a bettef word?

      (((they))) want everyone(read white people) poisoned with food and “medicine” severely brainwashed by “education” and beset on all sides by mongrols determined to rape and pillage.
      …..
      …..
      ….
      One step at a time, the frog boils slowly.

    5. omg…what the fuck is going on in Canada…>> I’ll look it up …keep us posted…

  5. Well, there’s a win for the terrorists.
    One of the primary goals of terrorism is to intimidate folks from criticizing Islam. The deaths/destruction are a tool to achieve the goal of shutting folks up.

  6. Seems easy enough to beat. Get a huge rally with 5,000 plus people and have every single person there with anti-Islam signs and slogans. Make it in a small city. Dare them to arrest you all.

  7. You know, everytime I visit the city center and see all those white girls selling out I think there is nothing as shitty as germanistan.
    Then I read a story about Cuckada/Swedstan/United Femdom and I suddenly feel a lot better.

    1. Yeah, I hear a lot of uninformed germans who swallowed 10% of the redpill say things like ‘I will move to Canada when shit hits the fan.’ and I’m just left speechless shaking my head in disbelief.
      The only options in my opinion are: Argentina, Uruguay, Japan.
      Ukraine and Russia are no options for obvious reasons (conflict; migrant exporting hellholes are too close)

      1. Migrant exporting hellholes will be far more many in a fewer years stopping the “refugees” is what counts for me. This sadly leaves only Japan (don’t get me wrong a wonderful country with a remarkable people, still though non-white which means i wouldn’t want to live there) which in my mind leaves Russia the only probable choice.
        Ukraine? What Ukraine? It will be a collaboration I do not know of how many countries to keep that failed state in one piece in the next decade!
        Speaking to a man from South America, forget it, too many liberals were there are whites (Argentina) and an unstable continent that will give migrants in any time + plus far too many Africans in the continent, which makes parts of it an extension of Africa (Brazil’s the best example), also if you remove Russia from the equation on how many hellholes it has around it… South America is more than full of those… it is one with some isles of stability.
        The good thing for most people who want to become canucks here is that they are liberals or materialists morons. There were though many red-pilled people, TRULY RED-PILLED PEOPLE, who have NO idea of how things are in different countries! Honestly I remember some people who are red-pilled on Islam, immigration and women and were thinking of emigrating to SWEDEN!!! When I say that Greece is a cultural echo-chamber no one believes me… For example most people here think that the left is on the rise while looking on abroad it look like it is on decline….

        1. “Speaking to a man from South America, forget it, too many liberals were there are whites”
          That’s the reason Japan is my main option. No whites, no white guilt, no refugee bullshit.

        2. Yeah, they are total racists and I’d love to see them being racist against me because it’s still better than getting shot or stabbed by a muslim.

        3. Let Me tell you about something bud!! –>
          Listen carefully!:
          Before 2014 there were 386 seats in the Hungarian parliament!
          To the question only 7% replied… about their nationality!
          Which MEANS: 93% of them were DOUBLE CITIZENS from Tel Aviv! a.k.a The country was and STILL under fucking jew occupation!!!
          I don’t know about the exact numbers but Poland suffers the same!
          As Czech and Romania!
          ( All these parliaments were DEEEEPLY infested with jews! )
          We’ve got our own muzzie problem:
          These kikes are breeding the gypsies like crazy! The birth rate is 5-6 : 1 against native Hungarians!
          Romania: 3.5 mil gypsies..
          Bulgaria: approx. 4 mil…
          They are killing 70-80 years old people all over the countryside over 1 FUCKING chicken!! Every fucking day!
          And no media coverage!
          The jew started bringin’ their A game:
          -gay Olympic
          -gay parade
          -etc.
          If the police don’t keep harassing the natives and collect enough penalties over traffic or whatever they will lose their jobs!
          Plain and simple!
          They are NOT ALLOWED to show strength against hard core gypsy criminals, those will be out by the second day mostly!
          Sentences and penalties are a focken’ joke only applying to gypsies!!
          Natives are secondary citizens now!
          Same as here in UK / USA / Canada:
          Every fucking tv stations / radio / newspaper RUN by the kikes!
          99% of the tv presenters / main stream actors / the full Theatrical life consist jews only!
          And so on and on and on….
          Cut it short: same as UK / USA / whatnot country –> the left and right run by the jids!
          So these Eastern European countries are just as fucked up like the rest! Catching up quickly with Western Europe!
          End of tirade..

        4. And they’re with you. As weird as their culture sometimes is, they never apologize for it. They never do the ‘all cultures are equal’ even the ones pushing FGM and blaming the victims of terrorism.

        5. I went partying with a group of Chinese dudes and their girlfriends the other night. We drank and sang karaoke songs for hours.
          These guys were as racist as can be, and a few of them clearly resented that I was even there.
          I loved every minute of it… No PC liberal faggotry.

    2. I’d punch that guy on the face until every drop of life was gone from his stupid country-destrorying cuck face.

  8. Like the Hitchen’s quote, I’d never seen it. It’s going into my quotable quotes file, right below:
    Hate Speech (n) : The expression of ideas or information that pose a threat to
    existing power structures and that cannot be refuted or effectively denied.- TeaPartyLee

  9. The youtuber Black Pigeon Speaks was interviewed and he is himself a Canadian, and he sees Canada on equal par with Sweden with regards to its self destruction.

    1. We’ll have a Chinese or Muslim Prime-Minister within the next 100 years if things continue as they are.
      Black Pigeon Speaks, Stefan Molyneux, Karen Straughan, etc., are all Canadian thinkers who realize this.
      I like Dr. Jordan Peterson, but I don’t think he’s red-pilled enough on the migrant crisis or the JQ. The above authors don’t speak of it but I think they’re tuned-in by now.

  10. Indonesia is an Islamic country. The traditional family, sanctity of one’s home, and a strong heterosexual, male-dominated culture. Roughly 80% to 85% of the population is Muslim but the Constitution guarantees protections for Hinduism, Buddhism, Catholicism, and Protestantism, as well. The laws go so far as to forbid mixed-religion marriages. One of the partners will have to convert, at least on paper, or marry outside the country (not easy anywhere in Asia.)
    Though Indonesia is very egalitarian in many respects, the man is still very much in charge of his hearth and home. It is still traditional for a young woman to audition her housekeeping skills for prospective in-laws. Fathers are automatically considered to have the final word in their house.

  11. The most Islamophobic books I’ve ever read are the Koran and the Hadith. There’s a guy named Mohommed in those books who raids caravans, steals, kills, lies, commits mass murder, rape, marries a child, captures women and children and sells them into slavery, and generally acts like a crazy cult leader.
    I think Canada should ban both of these nasty books to prevent Islamophobia.

        1. I had a disintegrator gun once.
          It disintegrated.

    1. Read it…
      Those who believe it have problems. Those who support it’s believers have even more problems. Those who say that it is peaceful while not under al-taquiya are probably the most problematic people in the cosmos!

        1. In a country once I lived in, homosexuality was outlawed, but you were allowed to have sex with other men if you were married to a woman, because then it isn’t gay (and somehow not adultery either).

        2. I’ve heard in Islam the male on male sex is ok but being “gay ” is not. Women are for procreation and child raising but men can bugger other men as long as their not “gay” ( Elton John kinda gay). I think this is sanctioned in the Koran

  12. WTF is wrong with people? These animals are creating hell everywhere they go, even the beta male nation known as Sweden is waking up and yet, that Canadian imbecile they have the disgrace of calling prime minister and the other muslim dick lovers are doing exact the same stupid things. When does the insanity stop? It’s not like we don’t know what happens, it’s not like we haven’t seen what happens. Muslims will create problems, end of story. You can’t coexist with them, their putrid culture is antagonistic to everything the west has. I think people need to step the game, trying to use words and politics to stop this stupidity is not working. I really think that Trudeau should get shot.

  13. In other news, it turns out that about half of the Afro-Muslim asylum-seekers fleeing the US for Canada are criminals.

  14. What a worthless place. Americans can just go to Alaska for a piece of north & avoid the joke that is Canada. Sorry, Im just isolationist today & ready to give live in a cabin somewhere within 30 minutes of Costco.

  15. I have an announcement to make, you’ve had an imposter in your midst for a while now. He claims to be an alpha, tall, rugged, strong, lifts weights, attracts women, keeps his 11/10 wife interested et cetera, but this is all a mask, a lie lived vicariously.
    A tragedy. Well no more! We must free ourselves from Omegas such as this “man”, otherwise we will never free ourselves from the Jews! Who “he” is but a part.

  16. Man, I miss Hitchens.
    Around here I don’t see anyone with “phobia” against Islam at all. I do see ANTI-Islam sentiment and it is justified. Crooked, manipulating fucks.

    1. Somehow I don’t see the courts being that discriminating in such cases brought before them.

  17. The sole issue the Liberal Party will not compromise on is the urgent need to replace the Canadian population with the Third World.
    http://i.imgur.com/m7oPW6U.jpg
    Multiculturalism has always been animated by the left-wing resentment of, and hostility towards, the European inheritance.
    This talk about “oppressed minorities” dissimulates the very real disenfranchisement of the White majority, and serves to deny us from our rights to public empathy, to dignity, or to even basically survive in a world of our own.

  18. As a Canadian I can proudly state that I did not vote for the Liberals, and that they do not speak for me.

    1. No proper Canadian ever votes Liberal it’s the party for skirts, terrorists and faggots end of story..

  19. Anti Islamaphobia legislation? Wow, spiders really have a lot of pull in Canadia

      1. Hahahaha hahahahhahahaha
        See, this is what I’m talkin’ about. Quality trolling. Thank you sir! You brightened up my day

        1. Oh man, you are priceless. I hope they don’t ban you right away. This has legs. Run with it baby!

  20. Just read The Gulag Archipelago, that’s all you need to know to understand the ultimate direction of all this.

    1. Still have my 3 volume set from 20 years ago. Read them all in less than 3 weeks. Perhaps the greatest indictment of state oppression ever written.

  21. This will just drive “Islamophobia” underground. Which can be a very dangerous thing for all concerned.

    1. But the terrorists have succeeded in stifling legitimate criticism and concerns over Islam and the assimilation of immigrants.

      1. The Nazis also succeeded in stifling criticism, but underground movements were prolific and often quite effective throughout the war. Hitler was nearly assassinated. There are always ways to resist.

  22. Iqra Khalid was president of the Muslim Students Association (MSA) at York University. This was founded by the Muslim Brotherhood and is used for recruiting terrorists and for pushing a political Islamic agenda. Further, Iqra Khalid’s father was a preacher for some violent jihadist group.
    The Islamists have invaded the Canadian government.

  23. Islamic woman wear the equivalent of the Klan outfit and read a bible to destroy the infidels. No one says a word. Crazy.

  24. This is primarily (as all left wing laws generally are) directed against the white population of the nation which usually is also more stable than other families hence less prone to state control and direction. It is truly heartbreaking that Western society is committing suicide just because a few politicians ride the wave of conformity to be entrenched into their privileged positions.

    1. My belief is that that know deep down what is happening but they go along with it just so they make it to the end of their elected terms and then collect their fat taxpayer funded retirements. And then move as far away as possible from all the ‘diversity’ they let in.

      1. I suspect your right. They will build enclaves and surround themselves with private armed security details. That or they go out they way the Ceaușescus did. Put against the wall with expressions of shock on their faces.

  25. The Canadian government has joined the Jihad. Islam is a form of totalitarian rule, under the dictates of Sharia law. Canadians have a God given right to defend their freedoms in an open critique of Islam (submission). Those who criminalize free speech are the real scoundrals.

  26. I find it the height of irony that Hitchens was, and in death remains, the Leftist’s darling. If there’s a greater demonstration of the Left’s selective myopia, I don’t know what it is.

  27. After the Quebec mosque attack there was an article that showed a bunch of Canadian MPs crying and bawling their eyes out over the muslims that were killed. When was the last time you ever saw an image of a muslim crying for anyone killed in a terrorist attack by one of their own?

  28. It’s nice to see a beautiful young Muslim women without her hijab speaking openy in this country based on freedom of speech and democratic principles.

  29. God I miss Hitchens…He was so spot on about Islam . He hated all religions but he was fair in that the world doesn’t have a Presbyterian problem…

  30. You know what? With all the degeneracy of Canada and its manhating misandry caused by harpies…sharia law may do some good for them

    1. Let Canadistan come to be, I say. The patriots here in the states will find a good use for those goat fuckers when the time is ours. Look up the origins of Saudi and Wahhabism and you’ll see how easy the mongrels are to manipulate.

    2. Good Point I wonder how the feminists will react then – I doubt any real Canadian man will come to their aid after the suffering they have been through.

  31. Let Islam consume those Canadian pussies. The real men are welcome here in the states. When our time comes and we take back control we will manipulate those muzzies same as the Brits in the 19th when they brought the mongrels Wahhabism. No worry here, friends, white man has always used the browns for his own ends.

  32. This is why the West needs to separate from those eastern pieces of shit. Fuck Trudeau

  33. I know lots of Canadian men, the softest pussies out of all the nationalities I know.
    Second softest is the Nordic/Germanic types. They are both the Thai hookers first choice of ‘mark’
    I would never have guessed that.

    1. Wrong Canadians then dude….me and a lot of my buddies certainly won’t back down.

  34. So, the Canadian citizens are going to give up their country and freedom to be turned into a Muslim caliphate?
    I hope our snowflakes and liberals move there as they promised.
    But I’m afraid we will not accept any Canadian refugees, because we don’t want our country infected with the Muslim disease.
    Enjoy your Sharia country Canadians.
    You are getting what you want and deserve.
    I can’t imagine Canadian women accepting being sex slaves, but it’s their choice. They like the people in the EU, UK ME and turkey will never be free

  35. Re: “The motion was introduced in the wake of the Quebec mosque attack…”
    Not true. The motion was introduced well before the Quebec mosque attack took place.

    1. Read the article, UnicornThorn. It says the motion was tabled last fall, but was put forward or “introduced” in parliament after the mosque attacks.

      1. I read the article. You may want to read it yourself and then go read a dictionary. It says the motion was introduced “in the wake of the Quebec mosque attack.” “In the wake of” means AFTER something occurred and often “BECAUSE of it.” Not so. M-103 was being discussed a good two months before the mosque attack and it was already being assumed then it would pass.

        1. The motion was introduced, that is brought forward into the House of Commons, because of the attacks. You see these liberal politicians crying after the attacks. The reality is the timing couldn’t have been better for them to push out this un-Canadian motion.

        2. No, it was not brought forward BECAUSE of the attack. The motion was already slated to be brought forward to Commons before the attack occurred, and it was already assumed it would be passed due to the majority government, despite several protests in the preceding weeks. In other words, it would have been brought forward and passed around that time whether the attack occurred or not. But I agree with you — the tragedy could not have been more perfectly timed to add fuel to the liberals’ fire, and it is indeed a very un-Canadian motion.

  36. This is going to be an interesting disaster in the making. I kill my wife well using the
    honor code of Islam, how dare you charge me with a crime you Islamophobic racist
    cops and the city will predictable be hit with a million dollar lawsuit setting the ground work for other cities to be sued at will.

Comments are closed.