Culture

How The Legacy Media Polices Speech From Within

312 Comments

The recent dismissal of Bill O’Reilly from Fox News confirms that no man has a secure job in the media—especially if they don’t conform to leftist ideology. The fact that he had a long career in TV news, the highest rated news show on cable, bestselling books and was practically the face of a network wasn’t enough to protect him from allegations of sexual misconduct. O’Reilly’s name could be replaced with that of countless other media personalities targeted with negative coverage resulting in career damage. Both the means and the reasons for this targeting is a combination of snobbery, greed and an establishment trying to protect itself and its ideology.

Working in the media (journalism/Hollywood etc.) is like any corporate job. Many care more for the prestige of the position and the perks it brings rather than the actual job itself. As Nassim Taleb wrote, journalists, “worry considerably more about the opinion of other journalists than that of the general public.” Once in, they will do anything to protect their position, even it means sucking up to those in power and embracing its ideology (leftist/globalist). For those who have put in the time and made whatever compromise to ingratiate themselves, it is almost natural to want to discredit those trying to encroach on perceived territory or those refusing to comply with accepted practices and ideological dictates.

They Aren’t One Of “Us”

Hostility, suspicion, and condescension towards perceived outsiders are common in any field or social group and so it is with media. Before the 2016 Presidential election, Alex Jones was considered a curiosity to the mainstream. He hosted a niche independent radio show out of Austin, Texas, appealing to fans of Ron Paul and those interested in conspiracies—a slightly more political version of Art Bell. He even appeared in two movies directed by leftie (and fellow Austinite) Richard Linklater.

But with his support of Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential election he got more influential. His YouTube views surpassed many of the legacy media outlets and he even bragged about his personal conversations with then President-elect Trump. When Wikileaks released the CIA “Vault 7” documents, his some of his conspiracy theories became fact. He was now a rival of legacy media. And that meant they would use any opportunity to discredit him.

So, when a gunman fired shots at Comet Pizza in Washington DC, the center of the “Pizzagate” pedophile ring, Jones was one of those blamed for propagating the story and “Fake News” in general. Lawsuits were threatened and Jones had to denounce “Pizzagate” on air whilst firing some reporters.

His Infowars’ operation in general was also affected when YouTube demonetized all content they deemed “controversial”. Facebook went after sites propagating “Fake News” with Infowars’ as a clear target. Vendors for Google had them ranked as a “low-quality” site. And when a custody battle between him and his ex-wife went to court, the media pounced, reporting on every lurid detail—especially when he stated that he plays a “character” on his show.

Mike Cernovich, another person covering stories outside the system, is a current target. After tweets of support from both Donald Trump Jr. and Kellyanne Conway for breaking the story of Susan Rice ordering Trump associates wiretaps “unmasked”, it was only natural to arouse the establishment media’s jealousy. Immediately, articles appeared in mainstream publications (like The Washington Post and The New York Times) critical of him, publicizing his “misogynist” tweets. In The Weekly Standard, Eli Lake of Bloomberg called Cernovich a “fake news artist,”—even though Cernovich broke the Rice story before Lake “confirmed” it.

Headline From New York Magazine

Recently, Jack Posobiec, who works for The Rebel Media, came under fire for publicizing the release of leaked email documents of then French Presidential candidate Emmanuel Macron. Almost verbatim, news outlets cited the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab findings: “#MacronLeaks reached 47,000 tweets in three and a half hours after it was first used by Jack Posobiec, a writer in Washington for the far-right news organization The Rebel.” Did these articles mention that the Atlantic Council was a globalist think tank with donors like the European Commission, NATO, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates? No. The more important story was “far-right activists”—not journalists—were trying to influence an important election in France.

Jack Posobiec’s profile in The New Yorker stressed activism NOT journalism

In the legacy media’s eyes, the above can have their niche audiences but they can’t be stealing praise from those in power nor have influence. It’s why the whole “Fake News” meme was started: Only “real” journalists can report “real” news. If a story influences an election, a “real” journalist is just “reporting”. If it’s done by an “outsider”, it’s “activism” at best, “fake news” at worst. If an opportunity arises, if there is a third party with dirt or embarrassing anecdotes or tweets, an enterprising establishment reporter will exploit the opportunity to discredit an outsider.

What of the likes of Edgar Snow, Walter Duranty, Stephen Glass, Judith Miller and Dan Rather—those who pedaled actual fake news (writing apologia for mass murdering dictators and helping start wars on false premises no less)? They get a pass. Their legacies are kept intact; sometimes with a movie made sympathetic to their plight. Why? They’re “real” journalists. They’re one of US.

The New York Times pleads for donations while stressing they are the purveyors of “truth”

There’s Reputations (And Profits) At Stake

It’s attractive to write off legacy media companies as dinosaurs lumbering towards extinction. However, many of the companies still have deep pockets (with billionaire benefactors like Carlos Slim and Jeff Bezos) and the ear of the cultural and political establishment. And since there is a slight profit motive, there’s occasionally someone willing to try and make some money on opinion that might be a little dissenting.

This is especially the case in terrestrial radio, an industry that is desperately fighting for relevance in the digital age. Rush Limbaugh, the most successful conservative radio talk show host in the US, was credited with “saving” the AM Band when it was dying out in the late 80s. But this success did not ingratiate him to the media elite.

Rush Limbaugh on cover of Time magazine accompanied by hyperventilating headline

When Limbaugh tried to branch out in to other avenues, he was met with varying degrees of resistance. His first pass at television in 1990—guest hosting a late-night CBS talk show—resulted in disaster. In 2003, his stint on ESPN’s NFL Pre-game show ended quickly when he made a statement deemed “racist”. In 2006, when he was being investigated for prescription drug abuse by law enforcement, news outlet covered it sensationally like he was El Chapo. In 2009, his attempt at owning an NFL franchise was stillborn when dubious “racist” comments were publicized by the media. Outside of talk radio and publishing, media companies and sports organizations didn’t want to risk bad press for being associated with him.

Nationalist radio host Michael Savage met immediate backlash when he got a show on MSNBC in 2003. It was only on little more than a month when he made a comment that upset GLAAD. The network quickly canceled the program, not wanting bad press and decided to go in a full-on leftie direction.

Since then, Savage (who Donald Trump borrowed many talking points from) has been relegated to radio and publishing—rarely appearing on mainstream news shows. However, some of his criticisms towards Islam were publicized to such a degree and deemed so “hateful” he was banned from visiting Great Britain in 2009.

John Derbyshire wasn’t banned from his native Britain but in 2012 he lost his job as a columnist for National Review when wrote a frank politically incorrect piece on race relations for Takimag. Since it provoked outcry from the likes of Ta-Nehesi Coates and Forbes’ Josh Barro, Review editor Rich Lowry kowtowed to leftist outcry and said the piece, “lurches from the politically incorrect to the nasty and indefensible.” Derbyshire, who had both fiction and non-fiction books published by mainstream outlets (and even appeared in a Bruce Lee movie), found himself exiled from the establishment press.

Forbes’ Josh Barro not being an activist, just “taking a stand”

This type of leftwing media outcry towards successful, established ideological opponents has a two-pronged effect: First, it creates a self-policing of speech. By knowing that certain speech can be punished, it forces non-leftists to act like controlled opposition. Secondly, it forces companies to terminate deals and contracts because they don’t want the bad press due to threat of losing advertisers and other revenue (as happened with O’Reilly).

Media corporations only stand on principle when they know it will earn them establishment brownie points and (maybe) increase advertiser revenue. There’s scant publicity of CNN’s racial discrimination lawsuit that has a potential 175 plaintiffs. Robert Downey Jr, had very public battles with cocaine addiction—even going to prison—but still got to play Iron Man. David Letterman had his sexual proclivities publicized but got to keep his job as talk show host. Bill Maher can allegedly pussy grab with the best of them and criticize Islam all he wants. Stephen Colbert can pejoratively accuse President Trump of giving Vladimir Putin fellatio without impunity. Why? Because they think “correctly.”

Shifting The Goal Posts

Publicly virtue signaling will only get one so far in this age of SJW’s becoming more like Mao’s Red Guards. The goal posts are continually shifting and no one seems to be free of scrutiny. In 2014, when chic feminism became all the rage, Bill Cosby, once a symbol of racial egalitarianism in the media, had his entire legacy besmirched due to a host of rape accusations. Story after story suddenly appeared with women making allegations—most from years before. Maybe he did the deeds, maybe he didn’t, but why didn’t those women press charges then? Why wasn’t that question even asked?

Nate Parker also experienced this media 180. His film Birth Of A Nation, about Nat Turner’s slave rebellion, was met with a standing ovation at the Sundance Film Festival (before the movie started no less!) and sold for a record sum. But the film’s release imploded due to a rape charge from years before—that Parker had been acquitted of. That didn’t stop public outcry from Hollywood celebs like Lena Dunham. All of the sudden, in 2016, rape hysteria trumped race.

Headline from “Variety” after Parker interviewed on “60 Minutes”

And what of convicted rapists like Roman Polanski, or Woody Allen’s sleeping with his adopted daughter and alleged molestation of another daughter? No punishment. Why? They aren’t (publicly) against feminism and globalism, right? They agree with US. They think like US. They are one of US, until the goalposts shift again and until a new accepted establishment cause reassessments of careers and personalities once thought untouchable (maybe being an alpha male will be a crime in itself).

For those “outside the system”, maybe negative media coverage will result in certain channels or platforms being shut down (as PayPal did to Roosh, Occidental Dissent and Bare Naked Islam). Maybe any dissenting opinion or (controlled) opposition won’t be tolerated inside corporate media at all. Or maybe the left will cannibalize itself; it’s uncertain at the moment. But until then, it’s best for outsiders to treat legacy media as a no-go zone and for those inside to move towards building their own platforms.

Read More: Talk Show Radio Host Michael Savage Attacked On Street, Mainstream Media Says Nothing

312 thoughts on “How The Legacy Media Polices Speech From Within”

  1. Roman Polanski isn’t a convicted rapist, he was convicted of having sex with an under age girl (13 years old). She would have been legal in Spain but not in the USA.
    Woody Allen didn’t sleep with his adopted daughter, she was Mia Farrow’s adopted daughter. He didn’t ever live with Mia Farrow, she was only ever his girlfriend. Woody Allen hasn’t been punished because he has never been convicted of doing anything against the law.
    These facts are easy to check ………….

    1. Sexual accusations are still the standard of leftist smear campaigns, though they may be losing force with reality still verifiable and the fact that conservatives aren’t the prudes leftists long believed. The decline in conventional religions also helps here.

    2. I will not allow propaganda to be spread in the comment section
      Roman Polanski raped 30 underaged girls and only got convicted for raping one, probably due to his (((connections))), basically got a slap on the wrist in his sentencing…didn’t even do hard time. Celebrated in Hollyweird circles till this day….theres nothing normal about a middle aged man sodomizing a 13 year old girl 5 times!!
      Woody Allen repeatedly sexually abused Mia Farrows adopted daughter, its just that the crimes of the Tribe are either always covered up or they get a slap on a wrist…

        1. Pedophiles have no interest in 13 year old girls.
          They want prepubescent …. hence the name pedophile.

      2. Don Henley (of the Eagles) did the same type of thing years ago (and he isn’t a Tribe member). Some underage girl he was banging had an overdose at his mansion. He walked, of course. Those Hollywood types get a free pass for all kinds of dirty things that would get the average guy about 30-plus years in prison…

      3. Roman Polanski is a Satanist, not just abuse of girls, ritually murderer to his pregnant woman, as an advance in his film a year before. Manson and his crazy court were invited to the house and it was a ritual murder. For now several statements are secret because they reveal this. Hollywood is a cave of degenerates who call themselves artists.

        1. Damn, who knew Roman Polanski would get the comment section so jacked up.

        2. “For now several statements are secret because they reveal this”
          I’ve heard the allegation before that he was a Satanist or was cahoots with Manson, but I’m not aware of any proof of this. Do you have a source re. these “several statements”?

        3. I read about this many years ago, I can not give you the sources. It is an interesting case by the cohencidences and personages in known one another and the direct relation with the film Rosmary’s Baby. The Spanish writer Rafael Palacios a few days ago argued in the same direction. It is a source in Spanish. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F69RCv8y04Q

        5. thanks. Unfortunately I can’t understand Spanish. The only thing I consider in Polanski’s favour is that he has always managed to behave in such a ridiculously incriminating way. Is he a satanist? Is that why he made Rosemary’s Baby? And even if so could he really do such a thing – to sacrifice his beautiful wife and unborn child? Who knows, we live in a strange world, but I think there needs to be pretty solid evidence before we do more than consider the possibility.
          I don’t remember for sure what was claimed, but I remember a book called The Ultimate Evil about the Son of Sam murders that touched on the subject of the Tate murders and suggested that Manson was a player in something much larger. It was a garish read though and I’m not sure I was entirely convinced

        6. Sure sick people exist, and some of them are paedophiles. That though I think is Jame’s Alefantis’ niece. The latter most definitely has a sick sense of humour and probably should be kept well away from kids, but even now I don’t think anything has been proven, and that photo is I think just a family photo. Go figure

      4. He wasn’t even convicted of raping one.
        I was merely pointing out factual errors in the opening post.

        1. As above, he fled the country to avoid trial. In fact he avoids going to countries that may extradite him back to the US.
          You seem way to empathetic to this shit bag. You too, eh?

        2. He was convicted of under age sex, i don’t think there is a trial when you plea bargain, and fled the country to avoid sentencing. This is all on record.

        3. He fled because he was going to face a sentence for drugging and sodomizing a 13 years old girl as part of the plea bargain in order to avoid going to trial.
          Did he do it? Yes. Did he avoid his punshiment by fleeing (another crime) as part of the plea bargain? Yes.
          You can twist the words to avoid those facts and split all the hairs you want. You empathy lays with you are most likely a kiddy diddler yourself, yes?!

        5. Nothing irrational about what I stated. You seem transfixed on defending a convicted criminal who fled. Why the empathy?

    3. Your defending Roman Polanski? The little bitch who drugged and sodomized a 13 year old?

      3. Is pointing out that someone wasn’t convicted the same as defending a person now?

        1. You are playing just as fast and loose with the facts as the people you keep attacking.
          He was arrested and indicted on multiple counts, including rape. He was in the process of arranging a deal to plead guilty to statutory rape when he fled the country. He remains a fugitive to this deal.
          So, you are correct, he was “never convicted of rape.” But the fact that he fled the fucking country might have a little to do with why he was never convicted.

        2. He fled the country in 1978 to avoid trial.
          How convenient you left that out.

        3. ‘Fucked off to France’ would be the technical term.

        4. Poetically: after sodomizing a 13yo girl, he ran away like a 13yo girl to avoid getting repeatedly sodomized like a 13yo girl in jail.

        6. But he wasn’t convicted! That’s a fact!
          //sarc
          The little bitch will be hiding in Europe till he croaks.

    4. Polanski made some mistakes at a time when mistakes such as his were very commonly made many years ago and it was just as you say. Even the girl has come forward and basically said to leave him alone.
      Woody ought to be seen as a freaking hero and if he wasn’t a jew the vast majority of people on this site would be talking about how unfair a shake he got and how brave he was. Not only is everything you say true but woody also Married Soon Yi, has been with her for 23 years, has educated her at some of the finest universities in the world and by all accounts has been a devoted and loving husband. IN one article he says outright that he is attracted to the student-teacher relationship in his relationship because of his age and status difference. Ignoring the fact that the role of teacher to student is natural and desirable in men to women the media had a freaking field day and tore him to pieces. His response was that he didn’t give a fuck. He has never batted an eyelash at the media and lived his life the way he saw fit.
      The cognitive dissonance in the people on this site who hold him up as a child molester, pervert or some kind of criminal is batshit crazy and shows truly demented minds..
      Thanks for pointing out these very clear facts Kitty

        1. Polanski fucked an underage girl who was a model who was dropped off by her mother in the 70’s while he was on a shit fuck ton of dope. Yeah, he was fucked up. But celebrity and drugs and generally being the 70’s I think it is time we let it fucking go. Woody on the other hand is really unfairly attacked and his blatant I don’t give a fuck attitude makes me so happy. I usually go once or twice a year to see his Dixie land jazz band up at Café Carlyle. If I didn’t know how much he respected his privacy I would make a point of going up to him and shaking his hand.

        2. I’d even suggest the mother of Polanskis fukkee is equally guilty.
          But speaking of the musical proclivities of jewish actors, I heard Jeff Goldblum has styled himself quite a band leader these days. Any word?

        3. The mother perhaps more so. If you bring your kid to a photo shoot as a model and see roman Polanski and a bowl of ludes and are like “cool, ill just go suck some dicks over here and be back in a few hours” you are really to blame.
          I am not sure who Jeff Goldbloom is. I am usually better with character than actor though. I know woody plays a very competent clarinet though I don’t think anyone would say he is a genius and his Dixie Jazz band is excellent fun.

        8. It’s worth a look…here’s one of the best parts, it will save you some time:

        11. “What are three movies I have never seen?”
          (very subtle reference there can you pick it up?)

        17. Here’s Jeff in “Death Wish”; by the way, that movie is being remade and will star Bruce Willis as Frank Kersey –

        18. yeah, there’s nothing wrong with sodomizing over 30 underaged girls, give me a break

        23. Remember when one woman came out and accused Trump of molesting her and then all of a sudden a million others did? Remember that one month period where it seemed like Kobe Bryant brutally raped literally every woman in America. I trust women not at all…especially when there is attention up for grabs. Polanskis crime was a crime, but its time to let it fucking go. As for the other 29 girls…where are the accusations, police reports, trials, convictions?
          The paranoia about jews has created the creates case of cognitive dissonance here. “what about the 30 underage girls he sodomized” what are you a liberal mom complaining about trump here? What bullshit. Did Polanski get up to some wacky shit back in the 70’s, sure. Whatever. It’s over. The one thing he was publically accused and convicted of was sex with a minor. It’s been like 50 years. Time to let it go.

        25. side note, I have dated so many “girl # whatevers” from minor tv shows and movies its not funny. One of them finally got a named role in a movie but I still called her “corpse” as prior to that she played a corpse on a law and order.

        26. As a movie buff, I find it incredible that you have never seen a single movie that Jeff Goldblum stars in, but it’s highly likely that your his eskimo brother.

        27. wow just looked through his IMDB. He was on the larry sanders show which I used to like but I don’t remember him. He was a guest on the simpsons but I don’t remember him. He was in Annie Hall but I don’t remember him. He was on Crank Yankers but I don’t remember him. Did a few Law and Orders but I have only seen a few of those and I don’t remember him. Other than that I’ve seen nothing on his list.

        35. Unfortunately not eskimo brothers there. There should be an IMDB that thoroughly has all major and minor stars, like everyone, with lists of who they banged. I know for a fact I am an eskimo brother to Alec Baldwin

        39. I’ll bet the new “Death Wish”, starring Bruce Willis, will exclusively feature white-male antagonists…

        41. dude would have been your hero – rock-star (guitarist of course), neurosurgeon, scientist, model-fukker….

        43. wow! that is what my high school guidance counselor said my aptitude test suggested I go out for…either that or Astronaut, short stop, billionaire playboy

        44. Dennis Quaid filmed a movie in my hometown. He was here for several months, and it was well known that he would go through sometimes 2 or 3 girls a night. Literally walk one out of the hotel lobby, then go pick another one up out of the hotel bar, etc. The hotel bar became so packed with women that they started hanging out in the coffee shop next door and a different bar across the street. This was so out-in-the-open that they actually joked about it on the local evening news.
          As a result, pretty much the whole town is now eskimo brothers with Dennis Quaid

        45. And Kersey’s wife and daughter will be you-go-girl feminist Super Hero Women who order him around and are both nuclear physicists with black belts in karate…

        47. So you don’t recall the episode of Cheers where cliff is on Jeopardy and totally cleans house until final Jeopardy when the Answer was
          “Archibald Leach, Bernard Schwarz, and Lucille LeSueur”
          and he writes down “who are three people who have never been in my kitchen” and bets everything

        50. But wait..I thought all women merely wanted a guy with a basic job who has a good sense of humor and is a good listener?

        52. how on earth did you bide your time until the Dear John came on

        53. I almost went with Night Court, but Dear John seemed funnier.

        55. Actually, in the new Death Wish, the Paul Kersey character (played by Bruce Willis), is killed in the first 30 seconds of the film by global warming.
          Mrs. Kersey (played by Emma Watson) then proceeds to beat, rape, torture, castrate, and murder white male Republicans, conservatives, Trump supporters and ethnic Kekistanis for the rest of the movie.
          It has already won 17 Golden Globes, 42 Oscars and the Nobel Peace prize, despite the fact that it hasn’t been made yet.

        59. I also understand it was nominated for a Pulitzer, 207 AVN Awards, A Golden Buttplug and a Razzie for best screenplay.

    5. Hey (((Shlomo))), you wanna discuss (((Woody))) and (((Roman))) with us?

    6. Any sympathy i may have for lowering the age of consent is long gone once the “tolerant” society always ends up advocating for the systemic rape of native women and children with little consequence. Better safe than sorry.

  3. What a bullshit diagram the top one is. Even the outlets in the centre of it deemed as having ‘minimal partisan bias’ or some such are heavily globalist and leftist and are weaponised to disseminate propaganda. They can go and get cancer.

      1. Mad, no. Your bro, no. Stating facts doesn’t render one angry.

        1. “What a bullshit diagram.”
          “They can go and get cancer.”
          You’re mad, bro. I also don’t see any facts.
          Here, let me help you. A fact in a discussion about media would look like this:
          “American’s attitudes about the news media are deeply divided along partisan lines. Roughly nine-in-ten Democrats say that news media criticism keeps leaders in line (sometimes called the news media’s “watchdog role”), while only about four-in-ten Republicans (42%) say the same. That is a 47-percentage-point gap, according to a new online survey conducted March 13-27, 2017, among 4,151 U.S. adults who are members of Pew Research Center’s nationally representative American Trends Panel.”
          http://www.journalism.org/2017/05/10/americans-attitudes-about-the-news-media-deeply-divided-along-partisan-lines/
          That’s how you cite a fact. Wishing that everybody who works in an entire field would get cancer? That’s just venting spleen.

        2. Thanks for the tip but I don’t need no patronising. You can take that and shove it right up your ass.
          Now, Its a fact they peddle Leftist/globalist bullshit. And my desire for them to get cancer isn’t so much venting as it is more dismissing them as useless to society and their absence through dying would be a net good for Planet Earth

        3. I decided last year that the best way to maintain civil society, particularly on Internet comments sections, was to stick with facts. Just repeat facts. Facts ain’t got no viewpoint.
          Try it sometime.
          BTW you’re still mad, bro.

        4. “news media criticism keeps leaders in line”….only the right half. The leftist leaders get a free pass.

        5. How lovely. You displayed personal growth.
          I’m not your bro. And I’m dismissive more than anything raising an eyebrow in amusement like one does to a drooling imbecile.

        7. If you think Hillary Clinton got a free pass over her emails and Benghazi, you maybe should consume more media.

        8. Nah-settle it in the Octagon. I don’t do no touchy-queery crap of that nature 😛

        9. Yes, we get it, “Burning Hammer-God of hellfire” (lol at the name) … you’ve got anger issues.

        10. compared to what someone on the right who was running for president would have gotten? She got a free pass.
          They are still going after Sarah Palin….for what? A Saturday Night Live mockery of her?

        11. Let me educate you, ass. Burning Hammer is a reference to something and ‘God of Hellfire’ is a humorous tongue in cheek reference to Arthur Brown who was the progenitor of modern shock rock (with face paint, pyro/fire and so on that inspired Alice Cooper and others).

        12. Let’s not argue in the hypothetical. Stick with facts.
          BTW I knew that typing her name would bring out a horde of angry commenters here. Let’s see if it happens.

        14. You seemed to have consumed enough “media” for everyone.
          Hillary Clinton got the usual media tongue bath by the sychophants, committed felonies and then whined when her toxic personality didn’t win over enough votes in fly-over-country.

        16. Considering that there are people serving years in jail for doing a very small fraction of the same thing she did… yes, she got a “free pass” over her emails.
          And don’t even get me started on Benghazi.

        17. Might I recommend hyperbole and self-aggrandizement? It’s made me the most awesome everything in the universe EVER!

        20. An average military member would be positively crucified for a fraction of her crimes. Don’t try that excuse again.

        22. I was referring to her electoral losses. The media dutifully reported on her email scandal, which raised all sorts of doubts about a woman who we were inclined to dislike anyways. She actually could’ve put a stop to it, but she was somewhat politically tone deaf, and refused to take responsibility until the story got away from her. She got publicly dragged over the coals for Benghazi too, which cost her a lot of votes. I’ll let other people who understand the law better than me decide whether she deserved to go to prison or not.
          What’s more interesting to me is the very real prospect of a sitting president ending his life in prison. That’s looking more and more likely. The first arrests are going to be made by the NY AG office in the next few days; indictments are ready. Three federal grand juries are prepped.
          After giving Trump so many blowjobs, I hope that RoK reports on the treasonous disaster that his presidency is spiraling into.

        25. Follow @truefactsstated on Twitter. You’ll get the news on everything going on with Russiagate a couple days before it happens. He scoops MSM regularly; his sources are stellar. He hasn’t yet been wrong.
          In short: The gates are about to bust open; the system is fighting back. We’re going to learn just how treasonous and corrupt and beholden to Putin this current occupant of the Oval Office really is.

        28. Nothing. This is all a leftist fantasy that they can’t stop humping, because there’s no reason at all in the world why their Witch Queen lost, except “Russians!”.
          Literally makes no sense. The voting machines are not connected to the internet. How does one “hack” them, precisely? The electoral college is human beings, can’t be “hacked” by definition. So they didn’t tamper with the elections right out of the gate. They are now trying to convert “tampered with the election” to “influenced the election” but that’s a non-starter. Are they saying that we’re not allowed to see information that they don’t like, regardless of source? Are they saying that we’re too stupid to not tell facts from lies? And then, using their premise, what about Obama’s interfering in the Israeli election, and Brexit? They fall silent on that one.
          Last, add in that Comey three times said that Trump wasn’t under investigation, combined with the endless parade of their own people saying, nearly verbatim, “We don’t have any evidence yet, but…” and I can’t help but laugh at this nonsense.
          It’s all one big circle jerk masturbation festival on their end. Because they just can’t handle not being the popular kids.
          A literal non-starter.

        31. I think if the votes were counted fairly, Trump would have won by about 60% to 40%…I suspect they massaged the numbers to make it look like Hillary won the popular vote. Lots of dead Democrats and illegals took part in the festivities, I think.

        33. Yep, dump the illegal votes and she wasn’t even in the ballpark.

        34. Hell, I heard hard-core liberals claiming they would either abstain from voting, or vote for Trump. That Chinese math they used on the final numbers was way out there…

        37. Who the Hell cares about her electoral losses? The fact that you describe her as only “somewhat” politically tone deaf kind of reveals your bias as well. The penalties for the level of fuckery and incompetence she displayed while handling highly sensitive information would be utterly damning to literally anyone besides her. A slap on the wrist and a pointless, impotent hearing hardly qualify as being “dragged over the coals”. A soldier, sailor or Airman would be blacklisted for life over that, or have you already forgotten about Snowden?
          Trump being arrested? That might the 5th time the Left has threatened that. Lemme guess, it’s the Russians again? I think that was meant to be unnerving but it wouldn’t actually upset me. A Pence Presidency could literally be the start of the 10th Holy Crusade. Deus Vult.

        39. ^^^^^^
          Liberals who post nonsense like this, clearly live in another version of earth, where the media wasn’t shilling for Hillary.

        41. One word for you. Patreus.
          One more:Pussy Pass. Ok, that’s two.

        42. They lost the election, so this is how they…”resist by using the system” …and “there are three co-equal branches of government”. LOOK at who is leading the charge. Hardcore leftists who I would not trust to mow my lawn.

        43. Well, he told Snowden to go ahead and release those emails, right? Of course it is. Oh, and he stole the election. Obviously he should be ousted because leftists FEEL so strongly that he should.

        44. If I had sent ONE email like she did-classified-knowingly when I was working for NAVAIR or USAF I would be in JAIL now. Her incompetence was just a fig leaf. What she did was dead wrong. And she knew it. Even if she did not know it, she was accountable since she was BRIEFED on what all this classified information IS and how is SHOULD BE HANDLED.

        46. First, Trump’s serious problems aren’t related to the election itself. That was conducted fairly, AFAWK. Trump’s problems lie in the pay-to-play that he or his circle conducted with the Russians, and with the decades of money laundering that his empire most likely did for Russian money. He entered the Oval Office utterly kompromised.
          I’ll remember your comment, and link to it in the next few days, after the first arrests re: Kremlingate are made. I’ll also continue to remind you of this comment during the massive legal shitshow and political crisis that’s coming. I’ll continue to remind you of it after he’s forced from office.

        47. at 53, her wall is starting to show. Most her age are not even considerable.

        48. Trump’s not going to be arrested, at least not this month. But the NY AG office has prepped several indictments to be released this week or next regarding his campaign’s ties to the Kremlin (mostly via pro-Russian entities in the Ukraine). Three federal grand juries have been assembled.
          The indictments are being reported by @truefactsstated, who has not yet been wrong. The federal grand juries are already public knowledge.
          Who’s in the firing line? My guess is Paul Manafort, first and foremost. He’s going to prison for sure.
          ****Breaking: FBI’s second in command, Rosenstein, who was forced to give legal cover to Trump to fire his boss James Comey, is meeting with Senate Intelligence Committee this morning. That probably points to the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate Kremlingate. At last.

        53. Yep, same here. And playing “I’m incompetent” doesn’t even cut it, the same regs exist regarding incompetence, as do regarding willful action. In either case, she would be charged and found guilty.

        54. We’re no longer discussing politics, at all, ever Jammy. I believe I may have mentioned this to you in the past, but if I neglected to, here’s your sign.

        55. lolz. You’re the one who implied that I was living in a leftist fantasy. Sorry, dude — this is what real people in the real world are discussing about this real, fucked-up presidency. Trump kicked the hornet’s nest when he attacked the intelligence community. They’re about to start stinging.
          Plug your ears all you want, but this is going to make Watergate look like small-town payola.
          Just to be clear, I will remind you of your comment in the future.

        56. “Trump being arrested? That might the 5th time the Left has threatened that. Lemme guess, it’s the Russians again?”
          See my comments further upthread.
          10th Holy Crusade? You do know that sounds nutty, right? Thanks for the comment though.

        57. “ties to the Kremlin” fuk does that even mean?
          ANY transnational corporation has “ties” to various foreign governments.

        59. what about the clinton’s pay to play with all them oil countries in the ME? Its all a sham at this point

        61. “..is meeting with Senate Intelligence Committee this morning. That probably points to the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate Kremlingate. At last.”
          Everyone remember Chip’s last paragraph. (Facts)

        64. I’ve seen them all, man. At this point all of their attacks sound the same to me.
          It’s supposed to sound crazy, the world we live in is crazy. You have children being sexualized and Muslims invading worldwide. The western world is collapsing under its own rotting weight. Moreover, knowing how much you frequent this site, references to the crusades shouldn’t be such a mystery to you. By all means keep living in your bubble where nothing has changed since 2002 and the Left is still considered relevant.

        65. You can read my disqus account, if you’d like to get a better sense of me. It’s public for a reason.
          I’ll save you some time, though, and let you know that I’m a centrist. I’m sure that everything looks “left” when you’re fifty miles out on the right.

        66. I was a centrist once. I was pushed out of that position by reality. I subjected the left and the right points of view to an interrogation and research based on my observations and facts grounded in history and logic. I found the Left sorely lacking. The right isn’t perfect, but it actually functions in reality.
          I also appreciate your challenging views and the ability that people on this site have to discuss with each other despite differing viewpoints.

        67. FBI raids GOP consulting office in Annapolis.
          Is this a non-starter? A liberal fantasy?

        68. If it’s not one thing it’s another. They cannot tolerate the thought that the world is not in luuurrv with them. Such a feminine, emotion based world view Leftists have.

        70. He apparently holds a moment of silence for them.

        72. “Are they saying that we’re not allowed to see information that they don’t like, regardless of source?”
          Now you’re getting it!

        74. The UCMJ has nothing to do with it. If you are briefed on a responsibility and then blatantly fail to uphold it despite what was briefed, it is your fault and you are held accountable.

        75. Those guys were defrauding republican donators.
          The GOP would probably have loved to see them go.

    3. HuffPo got way to much slack in that diagram…it is FIRMLY in the “do not read” ultra-liberal shit pen.

  4. The entire media is part of the Communist ideological subversion machine that Yuri Bezmenov warned us about. The enemy is waging an indirect war which cannot be countered by direct means. You cannot win by fighting them or by playing their game. The only way is to restore the ethnic, nationalistic, cultural and moral values they have eroded. Impart these values to the next generation and inoculate them against further ideological subversion.

    1. They infest the means of disseminating information and control the narrative twisting it to suit their ends. The Left have taken the ascendancy because McCarthy et. al did not go far enough in eradicating them and their perniciousness and pervasiveness. It was like an untreated cancer that has grown bigger and more malignant with every passing year.

  5. Six corporations own 90-plus percent of the MSM. Which explains why so many shitty movies get glowing reviews; the parent companies own the movies and the news outlets and the critics…

    1. Fortunately they really are dying and it’s not even in slow motion any longer. Hence their scrambling to be as outrageously shocking as possible the last couple of years. We’re winning, and we just have to stick to it to the end so that we can bury their remains after burning them and spitting on the ashes.

  6. It’s hard for me to have any sympathy for Rush. I stopped listening to him in the 90’s since he was an establishment whore. Look at Rush’s contempt for Ron Paul despite claiming to be a Constitutionalist. I guess that only goes so far in reality.

    1. Better to read the media outlets listed at the top of that diagram. The Atlantic, for example, is 160 years old and is killing it lately. It will inform you far better than any self-loathing conservative talk radio host. Also, the Economist and the Hill.

      1. The Atlantic
        Pseudointellectual tripe unfit to wipe with. Post-rationalization queens.

        1. I used to read it occassionally when the articles were not affiliated with politics. Then after the re-ection of GWB, they went full ‘tard and dropped it completely.

        3. Yeah, I would sometimes buy a copy back in the 90’s. I wouldn’t have made the same criticism back then.

        5. The Atlantic was founded by Ralph Waldo Emerson, among others. It has published a lot of Mark Twain’s writings. More recently, it was named Magazine of the Year by the American Society of Magazine Editors (ASME) in 2016.
          Also, it doesn’t endorse presidential political candidates, with only three exceptions. It endorsed Abraham Lincoln in 1860, Lyndon Johnson in 1964, and Hillary Clinton in 2016 (to rebuke her opponent).
          You should really give it a try.

        7. The articles have been affiliated with politics for 160 years. Are you drunk?

        8. but not entertainment-based “spectator politics” the likes of which we’re drowning in now.

        9. Every article Chip?
          “Are you drunk?”
          No. Your hostility is boring though. Maybe you should drink up?

        10. Maybe you should get your facts straight. The Atlantic is a general interest magazine — economics, technology, politics, literature, etc. You would know that if you ever read it.

        11. My facts are in order, however my opinion on weather I want to continue reading a biased rag that condenscendingly wants to lecture me, as you have a bad habit of doing with posters here, at the expense of the truth is nothing I will tolerate.
          You like the mag. We get it. It feeds your worldview and gives you a safe space to snarl at “the other.”

        12. Correct. The Left is starting to get pretty desperate that they’re quickly losing the ability to set the narrative because of “lesser” people, their rage is palpable. Consider how internet memes had a huge influence this election, which were utterly outside of the media’s control. These people are spinning in circles at 3200 rpm in confusion and anger.

        13. That is the best bit. When you have them reduced to screeching about how a cartoon frog is ‘Nazi’ then you know they’re well and truly cracked and look totally insane.
          And on that, it is appropriate I praise Kek. Shadilay.

        14. Putting the demonstrably criminal Johnson and Clinton in the same category as Lincoln makes me want to take a shit on some kid.

      2. why is anyone reading or watching any of this shit. is this what people do when they don’t live near a beach or in a real city?

        3. Exactly Brother – there must be nothing else to do!… it’s an enormous waste of time. There’s just too much life to be lived and not a long enough lifetime to pursue all my interests – I won’t waste even 1 minute on any of that trash.

  7. Legacy media is at war with you tubers in particular
    The whole pew die pie thing was a good example of this. Where these people literally posted dozens of articles, all within a day or two, slandering this guy as a nazi for making a couple of Hitler jokes.
    It was bull shit of course. Hes not even a political youtube channel. It’s just comedy.
    Nah, the real reason they attacked him was because his following dwarfs their own. 60 million subscribers I think. And they can’t stand it.
    Basically, they are losing power quickly, and desperately trying to stay relevant.

  8. The moral of the story:
    If you put your Polanski where it shouldn’t go, Soon Yi will regret having a Woody…

      1. I thought it had a chance to get out of the park when I hit it…you never know for sure though, what with the wind blowing in lately.

        1. yup. Straight over centerfield wall at the green monster on that one.

        3. Bob you have to take into account, there are some guys here who haven’t laughed at a decent joke in ten years.

        4. Yep. If you stop laughing, pretty soon it’s hard to laugh at pretty much anything.

        5. Bob, what do you call a guy with no arms and no legs floating in the ocean?

        8. He who loses his passion for life is fucked, too. Which is probably why he stops laughing.

        11. You might have to make an announcement, “Gentlemen, I have prepared a joke for you, this is a joke.” And use the sarcasm alert.

        13. I’m the opposite, I often get questioned by my boss for snickering at the computer screen, when it should be AutoCAD.

        18. Because the homeless ARE the mystery meat!
          Do you know why Muslims are the best sprinters?

        20. Because they do a lot of suicides. I think I’d better stop, I’ve said some of em in class presentations and people looked at me weird.

  10. You didn’t mention the number of sources.
    Mainstream media newspapers are hogtied by their own insistence on having TWO sources for each piece of information. This makes their information “right” much more often, but much slower in release.
    Fringey or marginal media outlets require ONE or ZERO sources for each piece of information. This makes their information oftentimes more “wrong”, but much quicker in release. That gets them more eyeballs.
    W/r/t bias, come on. ALL media create narratives. Any time you set a story to paper, whether fiction or nonfiction, you’re creating a narrative, even if it’s just the story of a sewer commission meeting last Tuesday night published in your town’s local fishwrap.
    In 2017, we get to pick the narrative we want to hear. So now we’re all standing in our own little tribes of narratives, reinforcing the viewpoint to others in our group.

  11. Two mountain lions are eating a moose. One of them says to the other, “Why won’t you eat the legs?” To which the other mountain lion replies, “I hate all moose limbs.”

        1. Even if you explained it to a deaf person, they still would not get it.

  12. Whoever made that chart is smoking crack. CNN and ABC a centrist media outlet? give me a break.

    1. The chart was probably made by a Disney employee…which makes sense. Disseminating fairy tales and all.

      1. OT but regarding Disney and “fairy” tales a guy I work with who is a real straight arrow, married high school sweetheart, two kids, fiscally responsible, I just with him that he doesn’t need his PBA card because he has never gone a mile over the speed limit…….he took his kids to Disney back when they were younger. It turns out the fags all go to Disney to do like faggot day once a year. He obviously had no idea this was happening and for a weekend of his vacation was “basically in the middle of the gay pride parade”

        1. I have considered Disney-anything to be demonic since childhood.
          I’ve since revised this to exclude Star Wars.

        3. I tell you – if there was any single moment when I was certain about marrying my wife it was when I learned of her hatred of Disny and refusal to bring any potential offspring there.

        8. Why did all the male lions sing show tunes…because they lived in a gay pride.

        9. I have only been once and I actually had a pretty good time. I was the eldest grandkid of many many grandkids so I was like 22 but most of the kids were like 7. I had a blast getting drunk by pool side but missed out on my goal of fucking a princess.

        10. Given as Disney purchased the Star Wars franchise, you didn’t even really need to amend your original policy.

        12. Disney really is fucked up. Star Wars existed as it’s own little adventure series in space, half of it good, the other half boring as watching flies fuck, but still, just Star Wars being Star Wars. Disney buys it and it immediately becomes a J.J. Abrams “There are too many white males in Star Wars!” (he said this, actually) Diversity Wars. Princess power, all minorities and the bad guy is, of course, some dude with a British accent. Disney is literally Hitler.

        15. yeah. he was really fucking traumatized. If you knew him it would be even funnier. This is really a guy who has never had a library fine in his life. He is as straight and narrow as it gets.

        18. The original Star Wars movie had a simple but compelling plot because it was basically the age-old, time tested story of the archetypical young squire going on a quest to save the princess from a dragon, and growing into a man/knight along the way. Han Solo was also the traditional masculine rogue with a heart of gold, bringing in another well known theme of masculine friendship and brotherhood, loyalty and honor.
          If you really break down what is going on in The Force Awakens, it is a deliberate attempt to destroy the traditional, fundamental archetypes and narratives in A New Hope and replace them with SJW themes. Even the father/son themes explored in Empire and Jedi are based on the traditional coming of age sagas that we have used as guides and lessons since before the written word. The super evil bad guy is a monstrous force of darkness in a New Hope, but he is later used as a foil to the protagonist’s development – a look at his own darker nature that helps him grow. These are basic human stories, the kinds of cross-civilization epic themes talked about by Joseph Campbell and others as central tenets that have been part of human story-telling for centuries.
          The Super Grrl lead character who is a better pilot than Han, better mechanic than Chewie, better “knight” than Luke, better at everything than all of the other characters with absolutely no weaknesses as all — and all innate, without any training. The bumbling, inept male side-kick/beta-orbiter. The father/son theme is not a coming of age story, but an emo twat rebelling against authority because he’s a huge pussy. He kills his father for absolutely no reason, and it does nothing to advance what little “plot” there is in the movie. It’s just an expression of his angst. The bad guy is just a whinny, fussy bitch who the audience is supposed to empathize with more than even the hero’s bumbling male sidekicks.
          The Force Awakens is more than just an SJW-infused travesty, its an active subversion and destruction of some of the most basic and fundamental concepts of human fiction.

    2. I guess who is in the center has to do with where the poles are….

        1. Exactly. Accordingly, we should only consume Portuguese and Cambodian media.

        1. left? right?
          Reminds me of uncle Italo. Italo Babbo Gallo was a great and terrible man of whom I can regale you with many a wonderful story. A first generation stone mason who savagely beat his wife who gladly accepted the beatings knowing his alcoholism would eventually lead to an early death ensuring her a nice pension he had a great way with children. It is important to remember that Italo spoke like an uneducated stone mason from Italy and if you don’t know the accent the humor is only about 70% as funny as it could be.
          One day Italo took some of the kids to the ice cream truck. One young kid ordered the ice cream cone that has the two sides, one chocolate and one vanilla. When it came time for Italo to order he pointed at the kid and said “I’ll-a have-a da same-a big”
          I have been saying that all my life with shit that is all the same.
          This one favors the left? this one favors the right? you know what it amounts to? The same-a big. I can’t see a reason anyone in the world is paying any attention to this shit…let alone a guy with 6 kids all of which are undoubtedly more intelligent and more fun than anything he may catch on the news.

        2. Nice story….I got burned out on politics a couple years ago. I still vote and stuff, but stressing about it gets old.

        3. getting burned out on politics is great. I have never voted or even registered and I certainly don’t intend to. I actually think that people who vote have no real right to comment on the issues.

        5. Too close to the issue. A jury member who has had a daughter who was murdered will be recused from serving on the murder case of a young girl. People who get involved with politics are too connected to the topic to think rationally on it…left or right they are all too obsessed with their own bullshit to make any valid points. The only people who should be commenting on politics are those who abstain entirely from the process and commentary (which is just the paid part of the process)

        6. makes sense….The whole “get out the vote” campaign is what ticks me off. You get all these uneducated masses who don’t own property, who pay no taxes having just as much say in our political system as the most involved people. Like if you went to a restaurant with your bum friends, you want to do something cheaper, but they vote on it to go to a fancy steakhouse. You buy their lunch, and the waitstaff (government workers) demand a place at the table.
          Those who pay the taxes should have the most valuable votes.

        7. Any form of social safety net acceptance should immediately disqualify you for a ballot during the election cycle in which you accepted it. So if you got Welfare or ADC anytime prior to the next election, you cannot vote in the next election, even if you discontinue receiving benefits just prior to the election. If you continue receiving them through the election, you are now disqualified from the election after this one that just passed. And so on.
          Also add in property ownership being a requirement, and not fake one inch “parcels”, but real property where you own a house or business as the primary owner.
          Hell, we could go one step further and just trash the whole unconstitutional socialist “safety net” altogether (phased out over 10 years, say). Then a lot of what people do or don’t vote for will be irrelevant.

        8. Yes on all points. Churches and other charities are there to take up the slack. Anyone who takes money from a distant source feels entitled and is unappreciative. If a close family member gives you something, you are grateful and most will try to pay it back. Charity should be done on a local level, not national.

        9. What’s funny is how many people are utterly conned into bullshit about welfare. “Private charity was failing!” they whine, “So we needed a safety net!”
          Actual truth of the matter is that private charity was doing just fine, however, the socialists/progressives seethed that the private entities would means test and/or require you to fulfill some kind of obligation, religious or otherwise, as a means to getting funds. Why this is wrong is never properly explained, they just snivel “It’s not fair!” Bullfeathers it isn’t.

        10. the obligation is one thing that makes it work
          Case in point: We used to have this neighbor junkie with a wife and kids who needed help to pay the rent. He goes to the local bishop and asks for help. The bishop pays the rent for him, but asks him to help out at a local cannery and attend classes sponsored by the church. Three months later, and the junkie only made a token effort to do the work. The help is dropped and he is left on his own.
          I have this neighbor who is a single mother with three kids, she works but can’t make ends meet. She gets help from the church and in return does regular work at a local church owned farm. For her, it works out good.
          After the 2008 housing collapse, there was a time that I was out of work for several months. The bishop pulled me aside and asked if we needed any financial help, I had savings we were living off of, so I told him. Regardless, I found an anonymous cashiers check for $1000 stuffed in my mailbox. Since then, I have really been generous in my contributions.

        12. Fortunately for you social safety net does not contain “library” in its definition.

        13. True, just like death and taxes is certain. “I’m from the government and I’m here to help” is also certain. Roads, emergency services, military protection and the like are also a given.

        15. With private charity, the recipient returns their gratitude to you. I alyays try to help someone out especially when they agree with me. If they’re an ideological adversary, they’re not seeng a dime. Nothing wrong with that. If someone is needy they need some ideology first before they need spoonfulls of help. Or ideology mixed in with the spoonfulls of assistance. It nourishes me to see them nourished to become more like me.
          Federal assistance panders to nanny state votes which they won’t get from me. They give enough negative assistance to their adversaries, disempowering trad male heads of households while enforcing state husbandry.
          I also like to be the judge if someone accidentally bumps my car for example. I’ll ask their views before I request insurarce info. If they’re shitlib/marxist, it’s gonna cost them. Otherwise we do a trade for stuff I like if the ding requires bondo which I do myself – no insurance schuysters involved. Fuck the insurance racket. We’re cool.
          Once I accidentally backed into this guy’s truck in a parking lot. Barely felt anything, just a bump. The dude was cool with it but his old lady got out and started saying “You’re not going to let this wreckless bastard go are you? Get his ins# and file a claim. Do it or else.” So it was the bitch pulling his chains even though his bumper was fine but had a smudge of my paint on it. I offered to rub out the paint at my place and do a spot of clearcoat but the bitch didn’t want her dude getting to know me I guess. She looked like a middle aged childless old bitter trailer park witch. So I got a few insurance letters in the mail but eventually no rate hike on me. I believe he separated from the bitch and that was it.
          Men have to openly control their bitches more and not let the bitch call the shots. Especially when they say “do it or else”. That’s not the woman’s place to make policy OR diplomacy or any other primary decision making. Women are to follow the words and dictates of their patriarch and master. “ON YOUR KNEES BITCH”. If the guy had said that to his woman in the parking lot, I would have bought HIM a brick of his choice of beer and given him a $20 for a drive thru carwash. More men than you know will laud seeing open correction of snappy mouthed women and surly and unruly kids.

      1. I really don’t know anything about Vox Day but that is the fucking gayest pseudonym ever

        2. Don’t know what he looks like. But “Vox Day” is like writing a book with a main character named “Joe Everyguy” who is in love with “Suzie Cheatsalot” I have no idea what he is about and have never read a single word he wrote and I am going to just assume he is a dipshit and leave that box closed

        8. It just means “voice” but it’s horribly pretentious

        9. Vox Day is a pun on the Latin Vox Dei (voice of God). A devout Christian, Vox Day is fully on the alt-right/redpill side, is friends with Roosh, and published the definitive guide to leftist with Social Justice Warriors Always Lie.
          His sites, voxpopuli and alphagame are both great resources and he manages a redpill sci-fi publishing label called Castalia House. He also wrote an alt-right manifesto of sorts called 16 points. He’s really worth knowing and he’s done a lot of valuable work for our side.
          Meanwhile, Vox the internet publication is condescending leftist garbage that seeks to “explain the news” to gullible millennials.

        10. I don’t care what they are or who they are friends with: all of them have been written off by the kneeman as pretentious little cunts and their “resources” sit right next to ass pimples. I tend to judge most books by their covers
          As for an “alt-right manifesto” that’s sounds pretty stupid to me.
          Seems like all of them are just garbage playing to gullinle millenials but you happen to like one team better then the other.
          Fine by me, makes no nevermind. But I don’t have patience for pretentious names and manifestos

      2. Makes my flesh crawl. One of my protein farts in the morning could tear this cuck’s face off.

  13. Soon-yi is not Allen’s daughter…she was adopted by Mia Farrow…

  14. Facts.
    “While secretary of state, Hillary Clinton made a personal call to pressure Bangladesh’s prime minister to aid a donor [Yunus] to her husband’s charitable foundation despite federal ethics laws that require government officials to recuse themselves from matters that could impact their spouse’s business.”
    http://circa.com/politics/clinton-pressured-bangladesh-prime-minister-personally-to-help-foundation-donor
    Why would she do that?
    “The bank’s nonprofit Grameen America, which Yunus chairs, has given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the Clinton Global Initiative. Grameen Research, which is chaired by Yunus, has donated between $25,000 and $50,000, according to the Clinton Foundation website.”
    More Facts.
    While Mrs. Clinton was at the State Department she also voted to approve 20 percent sale of U.S. uranium production capacity to the Russian Atomic Energy Agency. The company donated $2.5 million to the Clinton Foundation while the deal was ongoing and before the deal was finalized President Bill Clinton was invited to Moscow and given $500,000 for a speech.
    Russia-gate is a Clinton adventure being projected onto Trump. Don’t let the screeching harpies fool you.

    1. Uncle Elmer I see your work on the Chateau sometimes and I just wanted you to know Im still a big fan.
      The Encorpora picture with the dog is one of the best memes.

  17. That diagram : the BBC, NYT, Guardian etc are far more left than indicated …

  18. Rush Limbaugh’s program in the 90’s was a resounding success even though the network kept moving it around. Whoever wrote this is a moron.

  19. Natural News is right wing. Kind of like Alex Jones. I like both of them, but do not listen as much to Alex Jones. His info and guests are actually pretty good, I just am tired of his yelling.
    I recommend Natural News, ROK, Breitbart, Infowars, Daily Caller (which I read more and more as it is more civilized. Tucker has done a good job at safeguarding his image, but I still do not like the couple of cheap shots he has taken at Alex Jones. With all his flaws, he is a media pioneer and deserves credit.)
    People are entrenched in their opinions, and now, you cannot influence any liberals or moderates with any stories, no matter how true, if you have the reputation of being an Alex Jones listener as I do. My liberal brother and extended family family does not accept that there is no Trump-Russia criminal mafia rabbit hole, even when I point to the fact that even Diane Feinstein admits it it bogus.
    I love reading Rooosh, but keep it to myself. Never admit you read it to anybody ! But there is also a newly emerging cultural icon that is driving liberals crazy, perhaps as much as Alex Jones managed for years and Milo did during his run.
    The newest figure worth noticing is Jordan Peterson. I literally listen to his youtube hours every day. He is in the belly of the beast at Univ of Toronto. And is dangerous because he is smarter and has better manners than SJW’s.

  20. NYT et. al. (ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR) is credible w/ minimal bias. I need not read another word.

  21. Oh hell no! No fucking way I’m reading NYT, WashingPoo! No fucking way I’m watching ABC, NBC or CBS. BBC can suck my BBC.
    Like degenerate feminists say, I’m triggered!

  22. respect involves calling someone out on their bullshit and i’m calling bs on that chart, it would be more accurate with a big /sarc tag on it.

  23. Put Infowars, Breitbart and Natual News in the center, and the rest in the garbage bin.

  24. OT
    gotta give props to the new miss USA. Subtlety denouncing feminism. And while I don’t 100% agree with the healthcare is a privilege thing – I love it because it pisses of libtards

Comments are closed.