Is Lauren Southern A Brave Culture Warrior Or Merely Profiting Off Male Thirst?

Female pundits, what my colleague Michael Sebastian describe as “pundithots,” have appeared recently in alternative media. By showcasing attractive women, men in charge of alternative news companies applied basic corporate logic: more cleavage = more viewers = more money. Examples of this strategy include Tomi Lahren and Faith Goldy, though none have gotten as much coverage in our neck of the woods as Lauren Southern.

Lauren and the migrant boat in Sicily

Before the event on the Sicilian Coast.

Southern is a live action reporter and was present during numerous feminist rallies and events such as the “Battle of Berkeley” and the Paris’ Mayday antifa protests. Her last video created a bit of a racket as she joined Génération Identitaire in their trip to Sicily where NGOs illegally bring in thousands of African migrants by boat.

Génération Identitaire used a smaller boat to approach one of those freighters and attempted to block their way in the port, lighting flares to be seen in the night.

The mainstream media and their allies were once more dishonest and attacked Southern by saying that because they used a flare at night, they tried to torch the boat (with its keel made of metal) and the “children” inside, when we all know that those migrants are almost entirely composed of military-age Muslim men.

Southern and members of G.I. were arrested by the Italian coast guards and quickly released. The migrant freighter still reached the port. My question is this: what was the goal of Lauren Southern apart from publicity?

The reason for her earlier success

Yes, that reason.

With her normal frame (not obese) and feminine body and face (would give her a high 7 with makeup), the Alt Right base was an untapped reservoir of male attention and profit for females like her. When you see what the average American woman looks like today, you can see why some betas would elevate Southern to the status of living goddess.

She started working for Ezra Levant’s The Rebel about two years ago. With the recruitment of Faith Goldy and Lauren Southern, Ezra Levant was aiming at bringing around more viewers from the general public in the alternative media spectrum.

Lauren left in March 2017 to go independent. She wanted her reporting to remain “unfiltered” (disagreement with her boss on how to report on certain questions and topics?), and continue to do what “she loves to do for her audience”.

She might also have noticed that showing a bit more flesh and receiving direct financial contribution through Patreon or Paypal by men on the Internet is more lucrative than working longer hours for the middle man Rebel Media.

Where the rubber hits the road

She has been able to garner so much male attention through her constant presence online, particularly on Twitter and on Instagram, gathering hundreds of thousands of male followers. She never misses an occasion to show herself in suggestive poses and revealing clothing.

She has been fairly candid about her enjoyment of the thirst and the attention her followers gave her.

If there was a moment in the 2016 U.S. election that epitomized this newfound hate for the young on the right, it was Republican consultant Rick Wilson’s infamous… declaration that Trump supporters were “childless, single losers who masturbate to anime.” Guilty as charged. Well, except I don’t masturbate to anime characters. I dress up like them and guys masturbate to me. (source)

But she stopped being tender with some of her viewers when the harder Alt Right saw past the attention-seeking and starting asking questions, especially on themes that revolved around race realism, white genocide, and Jews.

Once she saw the niche, she applied her female logic to it and marketed herself by surfing on her target audience’s specific references: cosplay pictures in tight clothing, anime enthusiasm, running in wheat fields, Deus Vult, Pepe, etc. She saw an opportunity to make money from the momentum and seized it.

While she has some fair arguments and has been honest about her own objectification, she is not as receptive as before when people point out that particular issue.

On ne peut pas tout avoir

I cannot blame her for making money out of male attention if she is honest about it. She has shown so far that she is on our side against the cultural decline—there is no question about that matter. But it must be seared in everyone’s mind that this struggle is a man’s world and change will be brought by men.

No matter how honest her heart and her intentions, Lauren is a woman and will therefore act as such. They are brought on board or invite themselves through their physical appeal and stay if there is a constant supply of attention. Adding my own two cents, I would encourage movements like Génération Identitaire to do a bit less Lauren Southern and more openings of identitarian fitness and boxing clubs like this awesome one in Lyon:

Read More: Stop Worshipping Women On The Internet

675 thoughts on “Is Lauren Southern A Brave Culture Warrior Or Merely Profiting Off Male Thirst?”

  1. I can’t stand that bitch.
    She’s like a young aspiring Ann Coulter: husband-less and childless but talking about muh conservative traditional values. She even has a little hedgehog she bathes. She’s like a cat lady in training.
    True conservative women don’t have instagram accounts or put themselves in situations where they have rank piss dumped on them. They’re in small towns pushing strollers by the time they are Lauren’s age (22) or younger.

    1. Absolutely agree. Every famous female in the rightwing movement is just there for male attention. They are adding no value whatsoever and while they are all screaming ‘Muh women have to have kids’ they are always childless and some of them are even mudsharks.
      All the great innovative content is created by men.
      ROK, Andrew Anglin, Murdoch Murdoch, 4chan, The Turd Flinging Monkey (or even european leaders of the identitarian movement like Martin Sellner who organized the blocking of the refugee boat event) – they are all adding something to the mix, but Lauren Southern, Brittany Pettibone, Tara McCarthy are just recycling the good old material with good looking faces.
      There will never be female leaders in our movement. Never ever. Because AWALT. Rightwing girls are rightwing for a) attention or b) because they have a rightwing boyfriend.
      Women are dropping the feminist label in 2017 in large numbers because they can see it is not attractive to men. Men are getting more and more redpilled and can see through the bullshit. But that doesn’t make females our new friends.
      What we really need is WHITE SHARIA.
      There is no alternative like Andrew Anglin pointed out.
      We need the total submission of white sluts under the rule of white shitlords.
      But we won’t get there because the amount of White Knights is too damn high – especially here in germany.
      The only possible alternative to WHITE SHARIA is ISLAMIC SHARIA.
      And guess what, we will have the last-mentioned in germany in ten years.
      Maybe we can establish WHITE SHARIA in the flyover land of the United States.

      1. “There will never be female leaders in our movement.”

        There never is, was, or will be any female “leadership” is a true patriarchy. The only handbook to patriarchy that exists has been consistent on this issue for thousands of years:
        “But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet.” – 1 Timothy 2:12

        1. Of course that same “handbook” says that in Christ there is no male or female. If you want to argue in favor of patriarchy, do the hard work of developing a cogent and persuasive postion. Anyone can cherry pick Bible verses.

        2. “Anyone can cherry pick Bible verses.”

          . . . and most people do. They definitely fall far short of any devoted personal study to the ancient scriptures. This is a favorite tactic among naysayers of the Bible and I’ve learned it is quickly apparent if a person’s take on the matter is bias or truth driven.
          Context is one of the most important things when studying anything, but especially ancient texts, and specifically the Bible. The context of “there is neither male nor female” does not contradict anything else the Bible states differentiating male and female in matters of human affairs. Paul is simply saying it is level ground at the foot of the cross. To all whom Paul was making that statement, male and female, were sinners. In the spiritual sense of salvation in Christ it does not matter if you are a male or a female.

        3. Here’s some nice Bible verses for you:
          Leviticus 25:44-46New International Version (NIV)
          44 “‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and
          members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites
          Ephesians 6:5-9New International Version (NIV)
          5 Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. 6 Obey them not only to win their favor when their eye is on you, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart. 7 Serve wholeheartedly, as if you were serving the Lord, not people, 8 because you know that the Lord will reward each one for whatever good they do, whether they are slave or free. 9 And masters, treat your slaves in the same way. Do not threaten them, since you know that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven, and there is no favoritism with him.

        4. Wrong Bible bro, try the KJV. The term slave comes from when Barbary pirates enslaved Slavs during the Barbary slave trade, which is completely different from the context of bondsmen and bondsmaids which were the ancient equivalent to an employee, except women’s jobs back then were to start families.
          Exodus 21:20 literally mentions that corporal punishment of servants is punishable by death, so clearly its not the slavery you’re thinking of, otherwise your boss at work would be beating you.

        5. So we have the No True Scotsman fallacy with different Bibles. What makes the KJV right and the NIV wrong?
          Why are you defending slavery?

        6. Its not a fallacy, wtf? Many companies have re written the Bible to cause disruption and division among Christians. The NIV says rape is okay, salvation is a process, and even tries to make Jesus and Lucifer sound the same. There is literally a gender neutral bible with a rainbow cover, so if its all the same to you, then you should be arguing that Christianity is “progressive”.
          Again, slavery in the biblical context is not the same as the Barbary slave trade or the African slave trade.
          Educate yourself:

        7. The Bible does not specifically condemn the
          practice of slavery. It gives instructions on how slaves should be
          treated (Deuteronomy 15:12-15; Ephesians 6:9; Colossians 4:1), but does
          not outlaw slavery altogether. Many see this as the Bible condoning all
          forms of slavery. What many fail to understand is that slavery in
          biblical times was very different from the slavery that was practiced in
          the past few centuries in many parts of the world. The slavery in the
          Bible was not based exclusively on race. People were not enslaved
          because of their nationality or the color of their skin. In Bible times,
          slavery was based more on economics; it was a matter of social status.
          People sold themselves as slaves when they could not pay their debts or
          provide for their families. In New Testament times, sometimes doctors,
          lawyers, and even politicians were slaves of someone else. Some people
          actually chose to be slaves so as to have all their needs provided for
          by their masters.
          The slavery of the past few centuries was often based exclusively on
          skin color. In the United States, many black people were considered
          slaves because of their nationality; many slave owners truly believed
          black people to be inferior human beings. The Bible condemns race-based
          slavery in that it teaches that all men are created by God and made in
          His image (Genesis 1:27). At the same time, the Old Testament did allow
          for economic-based slavery and regulated it. The key issue is that the
          slavery the Bible allowed for in no way resembled the racial slavery
          that plagued our world in the past few centuries.
          In addition, both the Old and New Testaments condemn the practice of
          “man-stealing,” which is what happened in Africa in the 19th century.
          Africans were rounded up by slave-hunters, who sold them to
          slave-traders, who brought them to the New World to work on plantations
          and farms. This practice is abhorrent to God. In fact, the penalty for
          such a crime in the Mosaic Law was death: “Anyone who kidnaps another
          and either sells him or still has him when he is caught must be put to
          death” (Exodus 21:16). Similarly, in the New Testament, slave-traders
          are listed among those who are “ungodly and sinful” and are in the same
          category as those who kill their fathers or mothers, murderers,
          adulterers and perverts, and liars and perjurers (1 Timothy 1:8–10).
          Another crucial point is that the purpose of the Bible is to point the
          way to salvation, not to reform society. The Bible often approaches
          issues from the inside out. If a person experiences the love, mercy, and
          grace of God by receiving His salvation, God will reform his soul,
          changing the way he thinks and acts. A person who has experienced God’s
          gift of salvation and freedom from the slavery of sin, as God reforms
          his soul, will realize that enslaving another human being is wrong. He
          will see, with Paul, that a slave can be “a brother in the Lord”
          (Philemon 1:16). A person who has truly experienced God’s grace will in
          turn be gracious towards others. That would be the Bible’s prescription
          for ending slavery.

        8. So right off the bat we have the “slavery was different” apologetic. It’s bullshit.
          Slaves were not seen as men.
          The Bible doesn’t end slavery. Paul wanting his slave friend set free isn’t the Bible ending slavey.

          Why are you defending slavery?

        9. You’re telling me it’s “the wrong Bible bro”. How do you know??? You’re saying I shouldn’t read that Bible because it’s not the true/real Bible. It’s a fallacy. Out of the hundreds of copies of the Bible this is the right one? How did you determine that?
          WHY ARE YOU DEFENDING SLAVERY??????????????

        10. They are nice verses. Except you quoted the NIV, which is a crap translation. I love it when Bible naysayers do their cherry picking and bring up their “smoking gun” verses. Usually they are the slavery ones.
          Slavery is a Biblically condoned practice. Biblical slavery is righteous and good. Most people, you included I have to assume, will never understand being so thoroughly brainwashed and confusing slavery with, “Muh black people in CHAINS!!”.
          What’s your point for bringing this up?

        11. 1) And again we have the No True Scotsman fallacy but with Bibles. How did you determine that the KJV is the right one?
          2)”Biblical slavery is righteous and good.”
          – So owning other people as property is good???? Beating them with rods is good (Exodus 21:20-21)??? Abducting them from their homes and keeping them as you slaves forever is good (Leviticus 25:44-46)?????
          3) You know, maybe if God didn’t confuse the language we wouldn’t have different languages, and there would be no mistranslations.
          – Ever think of that? So if the Bible is true, it’s God’s fault there’s mistranslations.

        12. The problem I have is that whenever the bible says something factual or inspirational, then it’s ok to interpret the bible exactly as it’s written on the page. But when it says something blatantly wrong such as church elders can heal people by laying on of hands and prayer, suddenly, context is conjured up .
          There’s a reason why you dont hear any modern day churches advocating slavery despite what the bible says. Because if they did, that pastor would have his pews as members.Churches tend to interpret the bible exactly what’s in line with the social doctrine of their day. But why is that if the bible is God’s word?

        13. Yes, if you actually study ancient history, specifically Israel, then you will clearly see it was not the same. You’re just trying to demagogue the issue by using the same tired old emotional rhetoric of comparing it to the African slave trade which is completely different.
          Exodus 21:20–21 is certainly troubling to people with modern
          sensitivities. Modern people in the free world have come to view
          autonomous personal freedom as the highest form of good and anything
          that curtails personal freedom as the ultimate evil. People may be
          tempted to read a passage like Exodus 21:20–21 and charge God with moral
          evil. Such charges need to be challenged, for slavery is not the only
          area where modern sensitivities and biblical guidelines clash—abortion
          and homosexuality are two other flashpoints. The danger on this issue is
          that most Christians would agree that slavery is morally reprehensible.
          Earlier in the same chapter, kidnapping for the purpose of slavery is
          condemned and the death penalty enjoined: “Anyone who kidnaps someone is
          to be put to death, whether the victim has been sold or is still in the
          kidnapper’s possession” (Exodus 21:16). (Ironically, the death penalty
          is another area where modern people assume their moral sensitivity is
          superior to God’s!) Furthermore, we must not make the mistake of
          equating slavery in ancient Israel with antebellum slavery in the United
          States. If the biblical dictates regarding slavery, including the
          regulations found in Exodus 21:16, 20–21, had been enforced in Western
          nations in the 1800s, then slavery in the United States would have been
          very different.
          The regulations regarding slaves in Exodus 21, far from being inhumane,
          would have been far more humane and protective of the slave in Israel
          than in any of the surrounding nations.

        14. I know because the KJV is the only version that is accurately translated from the original hebrew texts and greek textus receptus, the NIV and every other version is from the 20th century, and the original version didn’t have the word slave since I already told you the word slave comes from the Barbary slave trade meaning Slavs. If you actually watched the documentary i sent explaining this instead of just talking out of your ass, then you would know this.

        15. Watching Ben-Hur is the new foundation of all theological research it seems, right after Googling “violent Bible verses”.

        16. In the biblical sense we technically are if we have jobs.
          The form of slavery you’re thinking of is what Pharaoh did to the Jews.

        17. So those slaves could quit at any time and work for a new master? Or start their own business?

        18. Basically yeah, the Bible condemns slavery against peoples will, that’s a reason why Moses freed the Jews from Egypt.
          A lot of the slavery in ancient Israel was voluntary in order to sustain the economy. Poor parents would give up their sons and daughters to it because the owners would feed them, clothe them, and raise them until the men were old enough to own their own land, and when the women were old enough to marry.

        19. A man can act like a woman (fags) but never “act like a female. They can only change themselves physically to look/resemble a female visually.Female denotes the biology as in breasts and vagina. “Woman” denotes the behavior of women, the display of the responsibilities traditionaly associated with the fairer sex like motherhood. The Bible does not contradict itself. The Bible must always be read in Context. The gender roles and meaning of terms as applied in THEIR time and in their customs.

        20. When God says “slave” his intention and most accurate (KJV) Biblical translation is SERVANT. As Easily supported with the detail provided in the scripture following use of the word each time. Mankinds use of the word slave is degradation and cruel bondage, Big Difference. Other versions are very faulty on purpose, it even says in the kjv Bible the Devil will bring other versions of the Bible out to deceive, Please be careful!!!!!

        21. Bondsmen and bondsmaids are the correct terms, not slaves. Slave comes from the word Slav during the Barbary Slave Trade when Northern Africans enslaved Europeans.
          People just anachronistically use the word slave when talking about old testament laws under the guise of it being the same as the African or Barbary slave trade in or to rhetorically sway people, despite having no biblical or historical context to substantiate it.

        22. If I had no skills, no money, no roof over my head, no prospects for a future, and there was a successful, Christian man looking for a hand with his land, sure. I’d get a roof over my head, learn a trade, save up money, work hard in return, then leave a better man than when I went in.
          In fact I already was a slave and did exactly that. I enlisted in the Navy for a term. Like my RDC told us in boot camp, “Your soul may belong to God, but your ass belongs to the US Navy!”

        23. Ok right but there have been slaves according to the modern definition throughout history. Nobody would want that arrangement.

        24. Well, yeah. I wouldn’t want to work against my own will without any food, shelter, and education. But this was not the circumstances Israelites lived under in terms of biblical slavery, unless were talking Egypt.

        25. OK but I didn’t specify Israelites. I was responding to the assertion that slavery was righteous and good. Sure as a slave you can be relatively better off than the next but by the strict definition slavery is an unmitigated crime.

        26. I was only talking about the Israelites which was never classified as the same as slavery anyways. Bondsmen and masters is the ancient equivalent to employees and employers.
          I work against my own will to help another man’s business succeed in exchange for some income. That wouldn’t be the same as my boss kidnapping me and forcing me to do his bidding for free.

        27. No, we just prefer to call it employment when the reality is you are being used in your entirety.
          This is similar to how we pretend the marriage isnt a lifetime prostitution contract.

        28. No being a bondsman is not equivalent. Its very different. There is no bond holding me to my current employer for any period of time. I can leave today if I want and he can’t do anything about it.
          Why are you working against your will? Why don’t you alert the authorities? Its illegal to make someone work against their own will no matter what they give you.

        29. Slavery is being forced to work against your will. It is a violation of your property rights in your person.
          This is not the case with employment no matter how much you hate it.

        30. The Bible says bondsmen, and the context is very clear of that. Like I said, if you want something similar to the African slave trade, then look up the jews in egypt, or look up slavery in the Quran which goes as far as to describe blacks as subhuman.
          I don’t like the act of work itself, but i need to do it in order to have an income. The same goes with the ancient Israelites who willfully worked as bondsmen in order to sustain the economy and ensure the future of their children.

        31. If you did like it then you would have to pay them. There are no free lunches. To live is to work.
          The Bible is not an objective study of the ancient world. Slavery was probably even more brutal in those days than in the United States.

        32. Yeah, now you conveniently ditch the Bible because it doesn’t back up your rhetoric, typical.
          There is more historical evidence proving Jesus existed than Alexander The Great or Plato, and the Bible didn’t just invent Ancient Israel, so not much grounds to doubt its historical accuracy. So, care to show me how bondsmen in Israel were the same as the African slave trade?

        33. You been bringing up apologetics that were lies and I dismantled them. That’s what you call winning?
          Why are you defending slavery?

        34. Calling them lies doesn’t dismantle anything. Show me Biblical (from the KJV) and historical proof that ancient Israelites suffered the exact same way as the African or Barbary slave trade.

        35. I didn’t bring up the Bible or bondsmen, nor did I assert that bondsmen and African slaves in the US were the same. You are getting confused. For the second time, I was responding to the assertion that slavery was righteous and good.
          In any case, you seem to be suggesting that an ancient bondsman is the same as an indentured servant and also the same as employment. This is contradictory and false.
          As I said, you can’t rely on the Bible for historical fact. That doesn’t mean that everything in the Bible is false but it is demonstrably inaccurate as a record of the ancient world and indeed the natural world.

        36. So showing that the Bible, which millions of people belong to a religion it started is virtue siganling?

        37. So then what was your original point? Ancient Israeli economics is obviously not compatible with modern day conveniences, but that doesnt mean its the same as slavery.
          There are far more parallels with bondsmen and modern day workers than there are with African slaves.
          Okay sweet, I’m not here to debate on whether or not you believe in the bible. My main point is that nowhere in the bible does it support slavery against a man’s will in the similar fashion to the african slave trade.

        38. My point is that there is nothing righteous and good about violating someone’s natural rights no matter which book its written in.
          You’ll have to explain those parallels to me. I don’t see any.

        39. Israel was prohibited from territorial gains beyond what God had promised to Abraham (Deuteronomy 2:1-23). Moreover, Israel was prohibited the practice of “forced slavery” as seen in Exodus 21:16 ” And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.”
          In another passage Moses declares, ” If a man be found stealing any of his brethren of the children of Israel, and maketh merchandise of him, or selleth him; then that thief shall die; and thou shalt put evil away from among you.” – Deuteronomy 24:7. In the first one, there is a general prohibition against slavery of anyone and in the second, a specific order against slavery of Israelites.
          Voluntary labor is completely different from your critera of slavery. Voluntary labor arises when a person becomes so poor that they cannot make a living, cannot provide for themselves, and sell themselves into a relationship with a person who has money and can provide for the poor person. The Hebrew word for this is “ebed.” meaning servant, or bondman. The Bible describes Israel as the Lord’s bondsmen, or the same word ebed.
          You have distorted these verses out of context but we will look at the whole context. You quoted Leviticus 25:44-46, but let’s quote it from verse 39-40:
          “And if thy brother that dwelleth by thee be waxen poor, and be sold unto thee; thou shalt not compel him to serve as a bondservant: But as an hired servant, and as a sojourner, he shall be with thee, and shall serve thee unto the year of jubile” – Leviticus 25:39-40.
          The issue of poverty was one of the reasons that people sold themselves as servants. There were also provisions for freedom. They could be bought back by a relative, or by their own money. Working for someone else did not mean that they received nothing. Leviticus 25:49 blatantly states that a relative or anyone close to a bondsmen can bail them out whenever they want, as opposed to african or barbary slaves who were worked to death.
          We have no reason to believe that the same was not true for the foreigners in the land. The verse says, “Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession.” – Leviticus 25:45, and these were probably people like the Hebrews who fell on hard times and were poor. Being a servant in another household was better than starving. The rights are spelled out for the Hebrews but they would also apply to the foreigners who were welcomed into the land. The people were commanded: “Thou shalt neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt. Ye shall not afflict any widow, or fatherless child.” – Exodus 22:21-22
          “And if a sojourner or stranger wax rich by thee, and thy brother that dwelleth by him wax poor, and sell himself unto the stranger or sojourner by thee, or to the stock of the stranger’s family: After that he is sold he may be redeemed again; one of his brethren may redeem him: After that he is sold he may be redeemed again; one of his brethren may redeem him: And he shall reckon with him that bought him from the year that he was sold to him unto the year of jubile: and the price of his sale shall be according unto the number of years, according to the time of an hired servant shall it be with him. If there be yet many years behind, according unto them he shall give again the price of his redemption out of the money that he was bought for. If there be yet many years behind, according unto them he shall give again the price of his redemption out of the money that he was bought for. And as a yearly hired servant shall he be with him: and the other shall not rule with rigour over him in thy sight. And if he be not redeemed in these years, then he shall go out in the year of jubile, both he, and his children with him. For unto me the children of Israel are servants; they are my servants whom I brought forth out of the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.” – Leviticus 25: 47-55
          In conclusion. The so called “biblical slavery” isn’t the kind of slavery we all aware of. The Bible condemns “forced slavery” (Exodus 21:16), but condones voluntary labor for a period of time because of poverty, unless the slaves do not want to be freed (Exodus 21:5).

        40. Okie doke
          Israel was prohibited from territorial gains beyond what God had promised to Abraham (Deuteronomy 2:1-23). Moreover, Israel was prohibited the practice of “forced slavery” as seen in Exodus 21:16 ” And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.”
          In another passage Moses declares, ” If a man be found stealing any of his brethren of the children of Israel, and maketh merchandise of him, or selleth him; then that thief shall die; and thou shalt put evil away from among you.” – Deuteronomy 24:7. In the first one, there is a general prohibition against slavery of anyone and in the second, a specific order against slavery of Israelites.
          Voluntary labor is completely different from your critera of slavery. Voluntary labor arises when a person becomes so poor that they cannot make a living, cannot provide for themselves, and sell themselves into a relationship with a person who has money and can provide for the poor person. The Hebrew word for this is “ebed.” meaning servant, or bondman. The Bible describes Israel as the Lord’s bondsmen, or the same word ebed.
          You have distorted these verses out of context but we will look at the whole context. You quoted Leviticus 25:44-46, but let’s quote it from verse 39-40:
          “And if thy brother that dwelleth by thee be waxen poor, and be sold unto thee; thou shalt not compel him to serve as a bondservant: But as an hired servant, and as a sojourner, he shall be with thee, and shall serve thee unto the year of jubile” – Leviticus 25:39-40.
          The issue of poverty was one of the reasons that people sold themselves as servants. There were also provisions for freedom. They could be bought back by a relative, or by their own money. Working for someone else did not mean that they received nothing. Leviticus 25:49 blatantly states that a relative or anyone close to a bondsmen can bail them out whenever they want, as opposed to african or barbary slaves who were worked to death.
          We have no reason to believe that the same was not true for the foreigners in the land. The verse says, “Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession.” – Leviticus 25:45, and these were probably people like the Hebrews who fell on hard times and were poor. Being a servant in another household was better than starving. The rights are spelled out for the Hebrews but they would also apply to the foreigners who were welcomed into the land. The people were commanded: “Thou shalt neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt. Ye shall not afflict any widow, or fatherless child.” – Exodus 22:21-22
          “And if a sojourner or stranger wax rich by thee, and thy brother that dwelleth by him wax poor, and sell himself unto the stranger or sojourner by thee, or to the stock of the stranger’s family: After that he is sold he may be redeemed again; one of his brethren may redeem him: After that he is sold he may be redeemed again; one of his brethren may redeem him: And he shall reckon with him that bought him from the year that he was sold to him unto the year of jubile: and the price of his sale shall be according unto the number of years, according to the time of an hired servant shall it be with him. If there be yet many years behind, according unto them he shall give again the price of his redemption out of the money that he was bought for. If there be yet many years behind, according unto them he shall give again the price of his redemption out of the money that he was bought for. And as a yearly hired servant shall he be with him: and the other shall not rule with rigour over him in thy sight. And if he be not redeemed in these years, then he shall go out in the year of jubile, both he, and his children with him. For unto me the children of Israel are servants; they are my servants whom I brought forth out of the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.” – Leviticus 25: 47-55
          In conclusion. The so called “biblical slavery” isn’t the kind of slavery we all aware of. The Bible condemns “forced slavery” (Exodus 21:16), but condones voluntary labor for a period of time because of poverty, unless the slaves do not want to be freed (Exodus 21:5).

          – It’s like comparing a red apple with a green apple. They’re still apples.
          Hebrews = man
          Non-hebrews =/= man. (Foreign) slaves were not seen as men.
          Leviticus 25:39-40 talks about a Hebrew selling himself for employment, which is different from indentured servitude.
          “The Bible condemns ‘forced slavery’”
          – Leviticus 25:44-46 clearly says you can buy slaves from the nations around you. That’s slave trade. That’s forced slavery.
          If anything in the Bible contradicts anything, then the Bible is flawed, and therefore not written by a flawless god.

        42. Do you just choose to ignore Leviticus 25:44-46?
          It’s still slavery.
          – Red apples and green apples are still apples.

        43. I just went over in great detail with biblical context how its not slavery, but voluntary labor. Those same verse you named too.
          You’re just going to keep looking at it through the lens of it being the same as the African slave trade, despite your lack of any biblical context to substantiate it.
          So far you’ve proved nothing besides demagoguery being a weak excuse for a “rational” argument.

        44. Already debunked your emotional rhetoric with mountains of biblical context and evidence. You’re in no position to act demanding and dismissive when you proved nothing I said wrong.
          I’ll continue this debate, if you can point by point explain how each verse I quoted is wrong, and if you can provide any biblical context from the KJV about the Bible support slavery forced against people’s will.

        45. Not entirely lol, I was arguing with another guy over the same thing and I felt the point was the same so I just copy pasted it.

        46. Already did, he cherry picked verses without explaining their context and conveniently ignored the verses that contradicted his arguments such as God punishing those who force people into slavery, or bondsmen willfully working to sustain the economy.
          I ask you again, explain how my argument is wrong with verses, while acknowledging the verses I presented 🙂

        47. Why are you defending slavery?
          You obviously didn’t watch the video. Do you really believe that slavery back then was really different than today. Are you that willfully ignorant?

        48. The criteria you set for this argument was what the Bible says about slavery. I give you what the Bible says, and because it doesn’t fit your narrative, you choose to keep parroting the word slave as a weak attempt to appeal to my emotions.
          Explain how the verses I provided are wrong.

        49. The verses aren’t wrong.
          Hebrews were seen as men, non-Hebrews were not.
          It was the same as American slavery.
          Why are you defending slavery?

        50. Except thats not the case, I provided the verse where non hebrews were treated with respect.
          Stop skimming and actually read it.

        51. Well then the Bible is flawed and therefore not worthy of worship.
          Congrats, you’ve pointed out one of many contradictions in the Bible. If it were written by an all-powerful all-knowing god there wouldn’t be any contradictions.

        52. So much anger. Are you realizing that Christianity is bullshit and you’re just angry because you don’t want to accept it and take the red pill?

        53. How is it not? You either work and pay taxes, or take welfare and be forced into voting patterns. They win, you lose, no matter what, and you own nothing. That is slavery.

        54. Key phrase “forced to work against your will”. You are not forced to work against your will in the US. Yes it sucks that they take taxes but while that is theft, it is not slavery.
          Try not to be hyperbolic.

        55. But I’m not. They throw you in prison if you refuse welfare slavery and working and then force you to work in prison. The US is a giant work camp where (((the top 1%))) make more money each year.

        56. Eh? Nobody goes to prison because they refuse welfare.
          Look mate, I hate to break it to you but in this world you have to work. Its all part of growing up.

        57. Exactly. The Biblical doctrine of slavery is not understood today. The (((wordsmiths))) have done a great brainwashing job to give everyone a knee jerk reaction to just the word “slavery”. To kidnap someone, then sell them into forced servitude, is a death penalty according to the Bible. It is “man stealing”; not slavery.
          True slavery is good and a cornerstone of any successful economy. Globalists have society engineered in such a way that only they can own slaves. Bad slavery, like (((usurious debt slavery))) is bad for an economy.

        58. That is only true if you accept the invalid assumption that being forced to serve in the army against your will.

        59. Then why is the world run by people who minimize the work they do and maximize profits?
          It’s about making money with no time investment. The alternative is on the same level as wifing up a bar slut.

        60. Forced servitude as kidnapping, according to the Bible, is “man stealing”. Except in cases where it is a judgment for crime, such as against a thief, to work off the cost of what he’s stolen.
          Your sentence structure is off in your last reply so I’m not 100% what you’re saying. Someone can be drafted against their will to serve in the army or volunteer. Both are actual things that happen in real life, so not “invalid assumptions”. Creeping away from the main point in any event. Biblical slavery is different than what the Jewish wordsmiths have brainwashed you to believe about slavery. Believe them if you like.

        61. Yeah I don’t understand what I wrote either. I must have had an off day. Doesn’t help that it was two months ago. Looks like I was missing some words. I think it should be:

          That is only true if you accept the invalid assumption that being forced to serve in the army against your will is a good thing.

          Slavery can be defined as “forced labour” which is essentially theft of your labour and a violation of your property rights within your own person. This is distinct to kidnapping which is done for other motivations (ransom normally or physical (sexual) abuse). Either way, I doubt anyone can seriously argue that being forced to do anything against your will is a good thing.

        62. If you are a wicked sinner and a righteous judge forces you to do what you don’t like against your will, tough shit.
          If you’re a fucked sinner with worldly power enslaving mankind, because you’re a fucked sinner, you lose a War of Northern Aggression. Because their is a God. Just my humble opinion, and I agree with the South on every other aspect of the war.

      2. You forgot to mention Blaire White. How sad that we have come to a point where american women are so fat, rude, uninteresting, as well as the increased thirst/desperation of young guys that a literal cross dressing dude who puts on make up, talks like a girl, and had a boobjob can garner a large male following who sends him money to talk conservative talking points, and be pleasant on the youtubes.

        1. There are plenty of heterosexual females for young men to choose from; any men frequenting Blaire White’s website are there because that’s what they like.

        2. “…large male following who sends HER money…”
          Who is “her” referring to? You never mentioned any woman in your comment. It’s confusing.

        3. “…Blaire White’s website are there because hat’s what THEY like.”
          “They” is the third-person plural, but you’re only talking about one guy (Blaire White).
          Learn English.
          Let’s use language correctly and not allow leftists to manipulate it to achieve their ends.

        4. Just because I think it’s tedious to interrupt the flow of ideas during casual speaking and written ‘conversations’, to correct another’s syntax, or spelling; doesn’t mean that everyone else finds being sidetracked in this manner dull.
          “There are plenty of heterosexual females for young men to choose from; any men frequenting Blaire White’s website are there because that’s what they like.”-AdvocateNurse
          I can only assume that a linguist, such as yourself, was skimming the material quickly; and you posted your correction without realizing that the ‘they’ in my sentence was in reference to the young men, which is, (of course), plural…
          (Inwardly sighing at the tedium; she tries to recall the original content of the discussion…jealously catching snippets of interesting conversations that the other guests are engaged in; she wonders how long it’ll take to back out of this quicksand. A lot longer than it would take one of those beautiful, bitchy, blondes…sometimes she wishes she could be like them; just roll her eyes and walk away…
          One thing’s for sure; tonight her polite deference may cost her a little stimulating conversation; but that’s all: She will NOT mercy-fuck this buffoon…).

      3. When the white man discovered this country Indians were running it. No taxes, no debt, women did all the work. White man thought he could improve on a system like this. – Cherokee proverb

      4. “Rightwing girls are rightwing for a) attention or b) because they have a rightwing boyfriend.”
        It’s my belief that liberalism is based on female values, while conservatism is based on male values. This is why male liberals tend to be very feminine. But a woman, no matter how conservative she claims to be, will always default to liberalism when the chips are down.
        And you’re right, most of them are just into right-wing politics (Or anything males are into) because they like the guys. The second a right-wing girl meets a liberal who gives her extra tingles, she’s suddenly about ending the wage gap and importing migrants.

        1. Wrong. Conservative values are based on true human nature (both male and female) while liberalism is based on fairy tales and feeeeeeeeeelings.
          If liberalism was really based on “female values” then I guess all women should become liberal SJW’s and sluts, since those are apparently appropriate values for a woman to have.
          “Female values” is being a mother, keeping your man happy, keeping yourself looking good, etc. Liberal values are precisely the opposite of that.

        2. I do agree that conservatism is based on human nature. But since liberalism is based on feeeeeeelings, who do you think is going to make up a large part of it?

        3. Well, when you meet a female libertarian you can usually rest assured she is truly believes in libertarian ideas. Few women are attracted to the autistic monomaniacal males who tend to frequent anarcho-cap soirees.

        4. You are right. Liberalism is legislative hypergamy with a focus on r selection sexual strategy. Women will ALWAYS default to it and screw men over. They can’t be trusted.

        5. I disagree. Women use liberalism to control mating/breeding strategies in our civil society.
          Women use the welfare state & no fault divorce rape for a supplemental forced sugar daddy.
          Abortion and “empowerment” is to encourage their short term mating strategy.
          Women live by a cycle of beta bucks/alpha fucks frame. Liberalism is the personification of the female neurological evolutionary design.
          How many women do you know that will stand up to divorce courts? How many women will not fuck Chad when she is in estrus? If it doesn’t work out she can abort his seed or get govt help for the bastards. Women are wickedly smart to always support liberalism. The belief structure releases them of ever having to take responsibility for their actions.

        6. There could be true libertarian women out there, for sure. But attention whores come in all flavors, and there’s no such thing as bad attention for them. So if they can get more attention talking about MUH ROADS and how taxation is theft, I’m assuming they’d go that way.

        7. Yeah, it is in every woman’s best interest to have bastard sons grow up in broken homes and broken societies, and are taught to be weak and submissive. Suuure.
          Conservatism is in every woman’s best interest. A lot of them may not know it, but that doesn’t make it any less true.

        8. Who said they’re looking out for their own best interests? They looking out for their immediate wants, to be “free” (and to get everything for free).

      5. I didn’t ditch it because men don’t find it attractive, I ditched it because I disagreed with it.

      6. I like what you say, but replace “white sharia” per Pater Potestas. No need to use foreign concepts if we have ours already.

      7. Absolutely agree. Every famous female in the rightwing movement is just there for male attention.

        And what’s the problem with that?
        One of the reasons that explains the success of anglo-saxon cultures is the relationship with success: when some people make something that benefits the community, but they benefit from it, those people are (or were) praised. That’s an incentive to work for the community. Everybody wins.
        In Latin-based societies, when somebody makes something that benefits the community and gets a personal benefit too, he or she is strongly criticized. Outcome? nobody gives a shit about the community.
        US is becoming more and more Latin. And this is a symptom of it.
        Lauren is doing something good. Does she get a benefit from it? Fine!!! That will be an incentive for other women to do the right thing! That’s the old Yankee mindset, the one that I heavily admire. If you lose it… well, then welcome to the Spanish Commonwealth.

        1. I’am freelancing on-the-web, completing normal things that solely demands from you computer desktop or simply laptop computer and additionally internet service access and I couldn’t be delighted… Half a year have passed by when i commenced this and i obtained up till now overall 36 thousand dollars… Basically i profit about $80 every hour and work for three to four h on daily basis.And superb thing about this job is that you can actually decide when to work by yourself and also for how long aand you get compensated by the end of each and every week.>>>> learn by clicking here how to do it right now

    2. True conservative women are blonde, voluptuous, have at least two children, are married, and live in the country with their 6’0 plus breadwinner husband, plus are avid participants at a Baptist or Orthodox Catholic Church. Anyone else is a poser there to capitalize on male thirst.

      1. Not true. My grandmother was a self-made millionaire who also raised family and spent her retirement teaching her offspring investing. She was also a devout Christian.
        She had six kids btw.

        1. Heh! It isn’t the potential I was addressing but the marketing. The American Dream for many was the white picket fence, 2 kids, buxom, religious and blonde, wife. Of course a conservative will not always be blonde. She might not always be white. It is debatable whether this makes the woman more patriarchal than conservative, but for marketing, the blonde woman is the ideal public image for conservative in America.
          For example, brunettes are viewed at as smarter and for conservatives who need a wife to be docile, this might undermine the man of the house image. A woman of another side of the race can be conservative as well but she is the invader syndrome. Also there are certain breasts sizes where a woman can either be viewed as smarter and more independent, or docile and more dependent.
          All can participate but only one sells the image publicly well enough to get a mass majority to think the same.

        2. For some reason I thought your comment was serious earlier but its funny now. Even though you were being facetious, I think something similar should be the goal of most men, with women of any races.
          Blondes are perceived to be smarter? I see a connection between women with large breasts (excluding fat women) to be more feminine and level headed. I don’t think its a coincidence that most athletic mannish girls are flat chested. I know they lose breast tissue with exercise but I doubt many had larger than a C cup to begin with. Not having tits messes with women’s heads.

    3. Assuming she does have kids, she’ll probably just hire a Mexican old lady as a nanny.

    4. The greatest amount of damage a woman like LS can do is to ….. crank out white babies sired by a white alpha male with high quality genetics.
      Yeah I said it.

    5. I know right? If she wants to help the cause so much she should be at home barefoot and pregnant. Males would stop falling for this if they’d put their dicks down for two seconds.

      1. Yeah, the last thing a pretty girl should do is use her looks to alert armies of beta males to the fact that they don’t have to accept their lot in life, causing them to seek us and our message out.
        End of the day, tits and ass will always outsell dudes doing logical videos. If that pair of tits and ass spouts our message and drives betas here to learn, I’m not sure I see that as a bad thing. As long as she is never made into a leader or “voice that represents us all” then it’s a net gain.

        1. I get what you’re saying but if they’re coming here for that reason they’re still beta and will turn on you in a second if that means pussy. I don’t want fair weather allies.

        2. I don’t know man, I think the times, they are a changin’. Do you think that fit dudes like being basically forced to date fatty clown hairs? I’d bet that they don’t, but you know, thirst. They get here and see articles on this mysterious “Game” and hey, wait, I should give that a try. I get thirst, but if you only drink polluted muddy water and somebody points you towards a water fountain with clear, clean, cold water, I’ll bet you’ll investigate because you probably don’t like drinking pollution.

        3. That’s exactly it. Is it good to have a female voice on our side? Yes of course. Does it stop there? No. It goes way too far. Every.single.time.
          I think people are distracted by the novelty of a Lauren Southern. They oooh and ahhhh. Let’s not get carried away. The betas will get carried away and we’ll have to hit the reset button.

        4. I think that the onus is on us to be prepared for their (beta male) entry. I say that because there’s really nothing we can do to stop her, she’s going to say what she wants.

        5. exactly, don’t see a point and attacking women on our side, I mean she is advocating for traditional women, why would I ever attack that. now bitches like maddow or anyother liberal can go fuck themselves with their progressive bs messgae

        6. I understand what you say, but, again, she belongs to the tribe. Am I jew? Are you jew? We don’t need those bastards. We know how they work already. The tides are turning, the left is too pro-islam, now kikes are getting closer to us, until we are not useful anymore for them and work against us again.

        7. She is advocating for traditional women while posting pictures of herself in tight yoga pants and a cameltoe, or showing lots of cleavage.

        8. I’m Jewish on my father’s side, and I’m proud of my heritage. Am I one of those “bastards” you “don’t need”?

        9. It is a shades of gray thing. A “traditional” gal likes attention and affirmative objectification as much as the most consumerist attention whore. The question is how discerning she is about where that attention comes from. If she assumes that the standard procedure for entering our space is, “Tits or GTFO,” well… “Tits!” is her answer.

        10. You should know by now that the Jews that are talked about in a negative light in red pill circles are the Zionists. Because they see their selves as God’s chosen people, they act like they’re the master race.

        11. I also would like to be proud of my heritage. Unfortunately, Jewish associations like ADL, SPLC and many others forbid me to do so.

        12. This zionist thing is not that relevant. In practice, kikes associate (lend money to each other and network) with other kikes regardless of these political nuances. Also, every kike has the Israel outside/exit option.

        13. She is not assuming anything, she is following the minimal path effort to success.

        14. A person who rents me a billboard to broadcast my message doesn’t need to agree with my message, he just decides to rent me a billboard or not.

        15. She’s a product of our culture. Most women choose wedding gowns with plunging necklines, open backs, and exposed shoulders for their church weddings and their pastor lets them.

        16. Agreed, They have infiltrated every natural social movement and corrupted it. The KKK, Black Panthers and feminism all started much like the manosphere and alt right movements. Once the Jews come in, the mission and perception of the group completely changes and it becomes a “hate group”. Keep them as far away as possible. Look at Ben Franklin and the founding fathers’ quotes about Jews. They knew who the real enemy was.

        17. What country am I putting ahead of the American people? I did not mention Israel anywhere in my post.

        18. I’m in the same boat- Jewish father, Lutheran mother. The anti-Semites hate me, and the Jews don’t want me. Sweet spot.

    6. Holyshit you are spot on on the unmarried cat woman thing. I’m dating a conservative girl who is east orthodox, and her facebook presence is small (less than 300 friends). No instagram.
      Also they aren’t fucking journalists on the tubes. They usually have some sort of job where they work with kids.

      1. My fiancée is the same way, but is tradcon and catholic, only has a few hundred friends on facebook, and no instagram.
        She does work in medicine, and thinks teaching is too easy, so there’s that.

    7. I saw her in an interview casually mention that she goes out bar hopping with her girlfriends. Not exactly wife material if you ask me.

    8. Ann Coulter has actually produced valuable work, though. Lauren Southern is just a “conservative” basic bitch. Not nearly as bad as Kat Timpf.

    9. On TRS and The War Room, we have a name for THOTs like Lauren Southern: Beta Farmer. That’s all this new crop of “right wing women” are. Nothing more than farming male thirst.

    10. She is just like Ann Coulter, an attention whore who claims “Conservative” values but her actual life is the opposite. By the way Coulter has dated Muslim men in the past, her current boyfriend is black for her to talk about white decline is nauseating.
      Traditional women in my mother’s day didn’t speak until needed. They also usually bowed out of politics and social matters when talking.

    11. She’s a stupid bitch.
      She needs a man to really show her ways, sort of the way a bratty child needs a really good spanking.

    12. Lauren has never really id’d as conservative, only semi so, modern center right – classical liberal, shes a libertarian and has id’d as a libertarian nationalist why cant a “true” conservative woman choose to have a career? Your sexism is the same as feminist sexism against men- just from the other extreme side. I dont think you even know what “conservative” means, origin and evolution and what it entails, you. Appear to have a very shallow understanding of political science.

  2. “If there was a moment in the 2016 U.S. election that epitomized this newfound hate for the young on the right, it was Republican consultant Rick Wilson’s infamous… declaration that Trump supporters were “childless, single losers who masturbate to anime.” Guilty as charged. Well, except I don’t masturbate to anime characters. I dress up like them and guys masturbate to me.”
    Straight from the horse’s mouth, and guys still think she’s some kind of conservative ideal. If these guys were masturbating to her pictures, then the original allegation is true. Anyone who takes women seriously (especially in regards to serious subjects like politics) needs to have their heads checked.

  3. It’s weird: if Lauren truly believed in the shit she talks about, she probably would have gotten into a relationship with one of her male friends and started working on a family. But …… no evidence of that … in fact it seems she eschews male companionship for hanging with heir female friends … just like most modern young women in the West.

  4. Is rain wet…?
    She’s an alt right version of Tami Loren (sp?). I watched her interview on The Rubin Report.. and while she came across much better spoken than I anticipated… they were still mostly self-centered replies to questions and a lot of reiteration of what the interviewer said.
    I was left disappointed.

  5. I am going to withhold judgment, and wait until more information is in. What she did in Berkeley was terrific, and left us with a nice document of that episode. What she’s doing now in Europe is pretty ballsy. Hanging around with identitarian activists has effectively annihilated any possibility she may ever have getting work with the legacy media. She has cut all ties. Right or wrong, that earns my objective respect.
    As for capitalizing on male thirst, there is a term for that: running game. The fact that she seems to be doing it in an intellectually honest and upfront way is… different, somehow.

    1. See, there are guesses that she’s a Jewish Masonic intelligence agency spook because it’s “unbelievable” that she would have “success” (mild internet fame) at 21.
      She’s done some brave stuff, kudos, and tries to look cute for attention, so sue her.
      She’s shooting the right direction broadly. Is she Ann Coulter level? Not by a long shot, not yet.
      Deserving of suspicion and condemnation? Says who?

  6. Lauren Southern is only 21 years old. She attended the University of the Fraser Valley in British Columbia, but dropped out after only two years, in order to “focus on her political activism”. Her bio has been scrubbed so hard at Wikipedia that it’s cleaner than a sterilized operating room in a hospital. Also, there is no mention of her parents at all, at Wikipedia, or anywhere else that I could find, which is a major red flag (Wikipedia almost always names a person’s parents, in the “Early life” section of their bios – unless there’s something to hide; in Southern’s case, they don’t have an “Early life” section for her, only an “Education and personal life” section).
    I’ll bet her father is either high up in the chain of command in the Canadian military, or he is extremely wealthy, or he is a spook. These types of females are everywhere these days, in the MSM and online. They are underwritten by intelligence agencies. It’s the only explanation that makes any sense at all. “Wow, this chick is SOOOOO smart that she EXPLODED on the international activism scene, at age 20 – what a genius!” They probably wrote her first book for her in a basement at Spook Central (she’s only 21 years old, and yet she allegedly penned “Barbarians: How Baby Boomers, Immigrants, and Islam Screwed My Generation”, published in December of 2016). Looks to me like she’s just another cartoon-cutout Pied Piper, leading the thirsty beta sheep down a blind alley…

    1. Interesting observation about her parents. More than anything, I’m curious how her operation is funded.

      1. Can’t find a thing about her mommy and daddy. Nobody rises that fast unless super-rich people want them to rise that fast…her operation is probably funded by tax dollars, via intel agencies.

        1. “Jewish people are still recovering from the holocaust” my ass!
          They have the wealthiest and most powerful nation in the Middle East and still command immense influence worldwide.

        2. I came up with that analogy…Jews are like wasps. From the distance they look like the hard working, friendly bees (goyim) but you notice they aren’t bees when they sting you.
          I also have a good sense of noticing jews because my great gradnparents were Nazis who died at the east front.

        3. Is there anyone who honesty has not strongly suspected this from the first moment they found out about her?

        4. With the Khazar “Jews” it can be tough. They make up the majority of modern “Jews”. The Sephardi “Jews” are the hooked nosed ones and those you can spot pretty much at a glance.

        5. Some would say that The Holocaust made them what they are today; you can’t pay for publicity like that…

        6. fuk you cant – I knew IMMEDIATELY. dont let the blond hair fool you – check the nose, the beady eyes, the thin, yet weak limbs. and of course the BIG FUKKIN MOUTH.

        7. True they usually do have “gypsy eyes” and the the hair is dyed (me ex gf was a Russian Jewess and she dyed her hair platinum blonde)

        8. What with all these kikes in the alt-right? Seriously, first it’s her pimp Ezra Levant, then its her.

        9. This is longtime proven hoax, Lauren is not jewish. These tweets and “proofs” were fabricated.

        10. What a cold shower. Few days ago I donated – I believe – generously after her Patreon was shut down. I need to rethink all of this…
          Deep in my heart I knew it (less deep actually) because you can actually tell from her face, but she’s in the field and that boosted by respect for her, along with her eloquence. Good thing a gave this website a go.

      2. Probably sleeping with a media mogul that she will accuse of sexual harassment later on for the lulz and the Jewgold.

        1. And you have evidence to back this defamation up? Why would a devout anti feminist who has spoken extensively against women falsely accusing men of such things falsely accuse a innocent man? …wow!

      3. Patreon donations and whatever she made when she worked for the rebel, and likely comes from a middle class background so has a little from that, former jobs, etc.

        1. Her recent stuff has been pretty fearless. Much respect, especially given her age.

    2. Excellent observation. It’s highly suspicious that even google can’t find anything on her parents. It is like she came out of nowhere.

      1. Invented in an intelligence think tank, most likely. Scripted biography, her books written for her, etc. She just has to show up and look hot…and play the role.

        1. Could be leftists. Or could just be your typical white American family. Don’t believe me, go to your nearest ballpark. Most look like they need a shower.

        2. The tricky part is…if the media lies about her background, or scrubs it…how can we believe anything they tell us about her actual parentage. This guy could have been hired to pose as her father, for all we know. The rabbit hole runs deep…

        3. Regardless, she’s just a prop. (((Controlled opposition)))
          There is no way some random good-looking nobody barges into journalism and poses like a honest, conservative ideal.

        4. Exactly. It stretches the boundaries of credibility to the breaking point. Add in the other umpteen “hot girls on TV and online political shows” and it’s all wrapped up in a bright pink ribbon.

        5. sister looks like a SJW and father looks like a simp.
          That could just be the Canadian seeping though.

        6. Kids do tend to rebel against their family though, keep that in mind.

        7. Oh, so if she wasn’t Jewish but still said and did the same stuff, then you’d be cool with it?

    3. Yep, just like how Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos fame had an extremely well connected father

      1. Not to mention Milo Yiannopoulos. Milo has admitted his father was in the mob – and his grandmother is closely related to British royalty. All coincidences, I’m quite sure…

        1. “and his grandmother is closely related to British royalty”
          maybe that is why he is such a queen

        2. If you think that the average Joe or Jane can start a political career like Milo did… Politics is either for wealthy connected kids or deadbeats.

        3. Milo hasn’t started a political career. He isn’t trying to get elected. He’s started a media career and anyone with a laptop and internet connection can do that, these days.

        4. Not all politicians run for office. It is not that simple to start a media career up to his levels, you can read Roosh articles about this.

        5. Milo is better at handling the media than most in terms of avoiding ambushes, of course that’s a very fragile game long term as we saw. But seriously, not every person is successful as the result of a conspiracy.

    4. You are right about these things. A few years back, I won a fairly significant tech award. The other awardees were all older except one who was actually a high school kid. At first I was pretty hurt: this kid seemed to be a lot more precocious than I was at his age. However, a little digging revealed that both his parents were university professors specializing in the exact field of his “innovation.” Of course, he wasn’t upfront about this. His parents also got him and his “startup” a lot of favorable press and coverage in the media.

      1. That’s a commonplace occurrence, unfortunately. And it’s pervasive, not restricted to politics or the media, as your story points out…it’s all about lineage and connections.

      2. We are the family we are born at, Waldemar. Sad, but true. Truly self-made millionaires (doing legal activities) are as scarce as water in the desert.

        1. The fuck? How stupid a question is this? It’s sad because it often dooms people who are born into shit families who will never reach their potential and it will push the undeserving into unearned success. Perhaps you’re a binary thinker and assume that means the person saying it’s sad thinks all success is unearned, but no. No one thinks that because they’re not as stupid as you.

      3. I’ve seen that before. I used to teach guitar lessons to a guy who was the brother of one of my classmates. She used to win prizes for writing. I went into their living room unannounced to see her parents at the computer, drafting up her latest work for her. Both were professors of literature at university. Take them away and she was mediocre at best.

      4. That’s one of those real puzzlers: do more people lie in search of sex or in search of money?

      1. Yep. All of these Spook Babies (I mean famous chicks) have that {{{privileged}}} look going on…

    5. “Wow this chick is SOOO smart.” And there it is. Elevating a woman for doing something hundreds of men have already done.

      1. Exactly. And the even more ironic thing is, the book was probably written for her. Waldemar mentioned his experience, going up against the Chosen Few, somewhere in this thread. Where the outcome was decided long before the actual “competition” started.
        I remember back in my acting days, I would go to auditions for various roles in film and television. Casting calls. You’d wait for hours for the chance to audition, all of it recorded on videotape, supposedly, so the director and the producer could decide which actors got which roles. I can’t tell you how many times I would do an audition, and the assistant director would yell, “Wait!” And then he’d stop, and put film in the camera.
        You see, they don’t even bother to put film in the camera for most taped auditions – even though the unsuspecting simp actors think their auditions are being taped – because all of the parts have already been decided way before the auditions…and all of the parts are already designated for the Chosen Few…or better said, the {{{Chosen Few}}}.

        1. “They suck…they are like leeches…I’m so tired of it…They start out, [make you] the most popular in the world, make a lot of money, big house, cars and everything – end up penniless. It’s conspiracy. The jews do it on purpose.”
          – Voice mail by Michael Jackson

        2. Well, if they are a big-name star, they are a member of the Chosen Few. A semi-decent actor could blow most of these Chosen Few actors away, in an honest audition, but it wouldn’t matter. Because there is a finite group of chosen people who fill all the major roles. Same in the music business. Look at the crap that the music companies peddle these days. There are so many talented musicians out there – but they have no shot. It’s all scripted and all the major players are handpicked, which explains why we only get crap to listen to on the radio stations, and we only get crap to watch at the movie theater. All of the arts were co-opted long ago. Speaking of art, look at “modern art”. Painters who splash paint on a canvas and smear it into the visage of a bloody tampon. Same kinda deal.

        3. …. or “feminist art” where the medium of choice is menstrual blood. Do you ever find yourself pondering the question of why is it that most pop music stars only reach their elevated celebrity status once they start pushing the boundaries of degeneracy? (((Who))) runs Bartertown?

        4. It reminds me of how the Jews dominated the media and entertainment industry in Germany before the Nazis took over.
          They said the stuff was full of vulgarity and degeneracy..

        5. It’s become over-the-top obvious, even to a casual observer, that this is all orchestrated to dumb people down and corrupt them. Books, movies, music, art – it’s as you said, once they start pushing the boundaries of degeneracy, they become really famous. What, is that an accident? There’s no way.

        6. How freaking sad is that. She was poised to be a gem among women and her handlers made her self destruct in the public square. smh.

        7. That reminds me of the South Park episode where they literally (((Hitler))) blew Brittany Spear’s head off “on TV” as a social commentary satirizing the exact phenomenon you describe. It is sad and sickening.

        8. She’s reverting back to previous form (somewhat, at least). Her fiance dumped her, and she did a big pivot essentially to get him back.

        9. Feminists have the patriarchy, blacks have whites, whites themselves have Jews as their oppressors.

    6. Thanks for digging up this stuff. I am no longer too surprised whenever I hear of the meteoric rise of someone. It often is a convergence of their wit, intellect, and friends in high places (usually attained from someone of say Masonic affiliation).

      1. Or whatever affiliation it might be. But there’s always an affiliation. And it’s always a meteoric rise, supposedly based on hard work and natural ability. It’s more like, “Gee, daddy, since we are super-rich and super-well-connected, I think i want to be…um…an ACTIVIST, daddy! Can you make that happen for me puh-leaaaaaze???”

        1. Kind of the same way both LeBron James and Steph Curry were born at the same hospital in Akron, Ohio and are now about to duel it out for the championship for the 3rd straight year. It’s crazy how many “coincidences” surround people who rise to prominence.

        2. No doubt. Matt Damon and Ben Affleck grew up together in Cambridge, MA, where they attended Ringe & Latin School together, and took drama classes together. Then they came up with the smash hit “Good Will Hunting”. Nothing to see here, move along…

        3. Dell was traded to Cleveland while his wife was pregnant. Only a select few hospitals in the area. Not exactly that crazy.

    7. ” These types of females are everywhere these days, in the MSM and online. They are underwritten by intelligence agencies. ”
      Well said. Hot chycks today are not going to put their beauty in danger by attending violent rallies – they’re too busy utilyzing their tits and ass to score free lines of coke, or other self serving things. Yeah, a hot chyck that cares about the consercative cause… gimme a break!
      You are also correct about the social media being infected with fake personalities. This reminds me a about another shill – a little imp that was all about anti-semitism. And just fyi, I do NOT endorse anti-semitism, I merely mention her as another example of a propped-up yt personality, most likely on someone’s payroll. She produced some rather bizarre videos about Hitler. It turns out apparently she is jewish, and she was given text to read and was paid. See link below.
      So much fakery out there in youtube land. I guess Shakespeare was correct when he said “All the World’s a stage, and the people merely players”

      1. Interesting that you mentioned the little imp who was all about anti-semitism. You could start a small library with all of the fake holocaust survivor books alone. Shakespeare was indeed correct. Everybody on the stage (whatever stage it might be) is an actor who is taking direction (otherwise, they don’t make it to the stage).

      2. The first moment I saw Evalion I knew she was jewish. You can see it from these head proportions…small heads, huge eyes. Just like Barbara Lerner Spectre.

        1. Much easier for me with males. Haven’t really found the trick to discerning females.

    8. I think you’re right Bob. I checked her out on Infogalactic which claims to be uncensored like Wikipedia is. It is also a very sterile bio, but claims she’s secretive about her actual birth date. What better way to infiltrate and derail the movement than with an attractive mole. The deep state has been at it for years and they know it works.

      1. An easy way to inoculate against that is to ensure that she’s never regarded as any kind of leader. If she’s just some bitch who later betrays the movement, we do a collective “Shut up Meg” and she goes away.
        End of the day though, it’s not like she’s asking our permission, nor does she need it, she’s doing it on her own. Not a lot can be done.

      2. Thanks for following up on my very cursory research. I’m not surprised to hear about her reluctance to give a date of birth. It’s amazing how many actors and actresses (especially actresses) have this meteoric rise at a very young age. They attend school for a brief time, next thing you know, they are starring in a major Hollywood film. If you check their bios out, at IMDB or Wikipedia, the same rules apply. No father or mother mentioned. No birth date. That’s just a little too convenient, as you pointed out…if there’s a birth date, a person could do some online genealogical research. If there isn’t a birth date, they can’t. Happens over and over with these rich and famous people.

      3. IG forks Wikipedia so it is as censored as Wikipedia until someone comes along to edit the pages.

    9. It is a possibility, yes, today you actually don’t know who’s who anymore.
      However, I don’t think this bimbo is a spook, daughter of spooks, or spook herself. She’s just an attention whore who’s capitalizing (literally and figuratively) the WN/AltRight scene. I’ve been involved in that scene for years and its weak spot is the oldest one: women. The WN’s/NS’s/Altrighters dream about finding that WN/NS/Altright blonde princess in order to breed healthy white children with her, and when some bimbo like this one (who’s not even WN/NS/Altright to begin with) appears they basically surrender like the most nauseating beta male.
      Incidentally, I would tap her all night long, but she’s not my NS blonde princess…..or a princess at all…..

      1. I totally agree. I have been in nationalist environments, and we have been stolen our women. As simple as it is. We cannot count on women at all. BTW, Lauren Southern is not even blonde.

    10. Southern was supposed to integrate military intelligence before Levant recruited her. Rumour has it that she confirmed on a Tim Pool video that has been since deleted.

      1. So let’s get after Levant…
        From Wikipedia –
        (The parenthetical comments below are my own.)
        Early life and education:
        Born in Calgary, Levant holds a commerce degree from the University of Calgary and a law degree from the University of Alberta. His great-grandfather emigrated to Canada in 1903 from Russia to establish a homestead near Drumheller, Alberta.[4] Levant grew up in a suburb of Calgary. He attended a Jewish day school {{{surprise!}}} in his childhood before transferring to a public junior high school.
        Levant campaigned for the Reform Party of Canada as a teenager (yeah, that’s the kind of thing that typical teenagers do) and joined it as a university student.[4] From 1990 to 1993, while at the University of Calgary, his two-person team won the “best debating” category in the Inter-Collegiate Business Competition held at Queen’s University (gee, I wonder if the debate results were rigged?). The first two of those years, his debate partner was future Calgary mayor Naheed Nenshi. (Wow – what a coincidence, his debate partner becomes the mayor of Calgary!) [5][6] He has subsequently accused Nenshi, who is Ismaili, of “anti-Christian bigotry” as mayor. (A couple of rich, well-connected dudes, pretending they are enemies.)
        [7] In 1994, he was featured in a Globe and Mail article on young conservatives after accusing the University of Alberta of racism for instituting an affirmative action program of hiring women and aboriginal professors (another guy with a “meteoric rise out of nowhere”; only 22 years old and he’s featured in an article in the Globe and Mail). His actions outraged aboriginal law students, feminists, and a number of professors, and he was called to a meeting with the assistant dean who advised him of the university’s non-academic code of conduct and defamation laws. As head of the university’s speakers committee (well, of COURSE he was the head of the university’s speakers committee, he had to guard the gates, didn’t he, and be the gatekeeper; he undoubtedly wrote papers on nuclear physics during his lunch breaks, too), Levant organized a debate between Doug Christie, a lawyer known for his advocacy in defence of Holocaust deniers and accused Nazi war criminals, and Thomas Kuttner, a Jewish lawyer from the New Brunswick Human Rights Commission.[4]
        Levant was invited to write a guest column for the Edmonton Journal and interviewed on television (all at the ripe old age of 22).[8] He spent the summer of 1994 in Washington, D.C., in an internship arranged by the libertarian Koch Summer Fellow Program (the Koch Brothers, can you get any richer or well-connected than that?). He worked for the Fraser Institute in 1995 (The Fraser Institute is a Canadian public policy think tank and registered charity; I mentioned in this thread that all of this stuff is scripted in a think tank, and yep, here’s the smoking gun), writing Youthquake, which argued for smaller government, including privatization of the Canada Pension Plan (yeah, let’s privatize that Canadian pension fund; bet the Koch Brothers would love to get their paws on that).
        Levant saw “youthquake”, the term he used to describe what he identified as a conservative youth movement of the 1990s, as similar to the 1960s civil rights movement except that instead of being enslaved by racism, his generation was “enslaved by debt” and, in order to liberate itself, society needed to dismantle elements such as trade unions, the minimum wage, universal health care, subsidized tuition and public pension plans (undoubtedly so it could be replaced with illegal immigrant workers, privatized health care, and privatized pension plans).[9)

        1. I understand jews as corporatist mafia. Their existence serves no purpose to us. Their success boils down to their parasitic corporatism.

        2. I can make this shorter…Ezra promotes kosher conservatism and uses these topics of outrage to gain viewers and support which ultimately support his philo-semetism and the greatness of Israel.

        3. Really? I suppose thats why he features on his channel and himself routinely defends white ppeople. Because hes one of those kosher(mad at white people for the holocaust and pomgroms)- oh wait that kind of Jew would not so routinely defend white ppeople.

    11. “Wow, this chick is SOOOOO smart that she EXPLODED on the international activism scene, at age 20 – what a genius!”
      That’s not really what you are thinking, is it?

    12. Spot on, no way a 20 year old can work on this by herself. She has external/family support. We already know she belongs to the tribe.

        1. I did one of those stupid DNA tests and I came out at 1% Jewish.
          Does that mean I’m in the tribe? Fuck me! some of you people, sheeesh!!

    13. Uncle Bob dropping truth bombs like its Dresden in World War II all over again. It doesn’t add up and I get the sense it’s controlled opposition.

    14. She is jewish. Her grandparents escaped the NSDAP and fled Denmark (hence her fake/crypto surname), by her own account. Look at her course/ thick hair, the dirty blonde colour is the effect of bleeching black semetic hair….certainly not the thin blonde hair of native Danes.

    15. From wikipedia
      Ronald Donald Southern,[1] CC CBE AOE (July 25, 1930 – January 21, 2016) was a Canadian businessman. He was the founder and chairman of Calgary-based ATCO Group, and the founder of the Spruce Meadows equestrian centre.
      In 1947, Southern and his father each invested $2,000 in the original Alberta Trailer Hire Co., which later became ATCO. Southern received a bachelor of science degree from the University of Alberta in 1953 and began to work full-time for the company. As of 2007 the Southern family is still in control of ATCO. He passed the title of Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer to his daughter, Nancy Southern, in January 2000.
      I don’t know, but I suspect that she is from this family, maybe a grand daughter given his age. This guy was one of the most successful business men in Canada.

    16. Her family not being named in the wiki article, etc couldn’t possibly be because she demanded that her families privacy not be put at risk. Nope, she must be a intelligence agency psi-op. ~rolls eyes~. I’m a conspiratologist, but that is just over the top, to presume that because she wants her family to have privacy and safety. Give it time, if she gets famous enough that info will become avaliable one way or the other(which for any famous person this is unfair to expect their loved ones privacy to be put at risk cause they have a famous loved one). Shes gotten semi well known, but shes not THAT big yet.

    17. her name is Lauryn West, and there is no doubt she is an asset of some kind. The whole Lauren Southern thing is so unbelievably fake I can’t even believe a single real person believes this shit.

  7. Just another feminist in disguise. Chicks like this recognize the fowlness of typical leftist bullshit and they’re attracted to real men. That’s fine and dandy but let’s face it, she’s still elevated by quasi white knights who aren’t all in. When I hear and see these chicks, I’m thinkin it’s either “take your daughter to work day” or the sound of an empty kitchen. I get instantly nauseated when I hear guys on the right talking about how cool these chicks are.

    1. Encouraging/supporting more female voices on the alt right will aid us in attracting more women to our movement.
      Let’s face it – the alt right is heavily male dominated and the best way to influence someone is to have them speak to someone who is just like them. Ie: woman to woman or boomer to boomer.
      When I send my dad alt right YouTube videos I always send him videos of someone that is close to his age (ramzpaul, Jared Taylor) because it is the best way to influence someone. The book Influence by Robert Cialdini backs up this point.

      1. We don’t need womyn in the alt right. We need to put them in their place. Hint: WhiteSharia

      2. I’ll be happy just to get beta males converted to good thinking. A few women giving us cheerleading sessions is great, but we don’t need “members” per say from the female sex.

        1. If you want electoral success you will have to include women as they make up >50% of our population. It is foolish to think you will convert all men. It is reasonable to think you will get a majority (even a super majority) but you will still need some women on our side.

        2. If you convert all men, their women will a) be attracted and want to have sex with them and b) want to mirror the men’s belief. The second sex’s work is done through osmosis when the men convert over.
          As I said though I don’t mind girls like this cheerleading and driving men to sites like this.

        3. Agreed on that. Women will follow men.
          It wasn’t so long ago you “voted as a household”. Hopefully we can bring those days back in greater numbers than current

      3. I agree with everything you said in theory. But I don’t think that is what is happening here.
        This encourages impressionable young women to be the next Lauren Southern, not a modest traditional woman suitable to raise an intact family.

        1. Let’s be realistic here. Not every woman who sees a Lauren southern video is going to go out and be an alt lite youtuber. She will inspire a small handful sure but the vast majority will simply watch and maybe comment. Which is pretty much what I and possibly you do as well on RoK and other platforms.

  8. 1) let’s be weary about “punching right” and 2) let’s not make unnecessary adversaries – we need all the help and support we can muster.

  9. “Women should stay home and make babies, preferably man-child” –
    Chiun,Master Of Shenanju.

  10. Every time I see women like this, my reaction is always “Yeah Yeah, the Jews are evil, antifas are fags and Trump is the Messiah. Now tits or GTFO!”

  11. Well done analysis and conclusion. It’s not Lauren that needs to be reminded of her place, it’s the boys who lust after her that need to be pointed in the right direction.
    She saw an opportunity to make money from the momentum and seized it.
    This is it for me. P exploited Q for financial gain. There are only a few ways P and Q could be defined that would attract my objection. So long as it’s not unethical or illegal in the extreme, I congratulate P.

  12. Yes all these young hot white girls are popping up in conservative internet media because they are so politically savvy…..riigghhhttt.

  13. You should ask yourself instead – does she have a vagina?
    Affirmative answer eliminates all other doubts.

  14. I believe she is sincere in her beliefs, but no girl can remain unchanged after thousands of men online give her compliments. At some point I imagine she went from a “This is what I believe” proposition to one of “This is what will keep my male fans happy.” That’s not necessary wrong, but it may corrupt her work.

    1. That’s actually my thinking as well. She is quickly becoming a victim of her own success. Her public fame is starting to dictate her life, and more and more she will make decisions to placate her fans, not to actually make a change.

    2. “Sincere in her beliefs?”
      Roosh, after so many years you still don’t get women, do you?

      1. Actually, women can be sincere in their beliefs. The trick is, that their sincerity changes on a dime. Literally. When she believes XYZ she may truly, deep down in her soul, believe it and give you twenty reasons that she knows are right as to why she believes it. And then some Chad wanders in with an opposite idea who thrills her and she automatically sincerely believes everything that he says is right and can give you twenty reasons that she knows are right as to why she believes as he does.
        But yeah, she can believe sincerely, easily. For ten to twenty minutes at a time.

        1. I have observed that some of the “SJW Warlocks” that appeared during the GamerGate days had significant alpha energy about them.
          I have also in my experience as a shitlord at large “changed” women I have been with. I had a girlfriend whose previous boyfriends were democrats. By the time I was done with her she was building her own AR15.
          Ultimately you are correct: a woman’s political ideals are shaped by the men around her. You can mold them like putty.
          We can very easily take the field, if only men would stand up and take the field.

        2. What’s that old saying? It’s a women’s prerogative to change her mind. They do it on a routine basis and don’t like being called out on it one bit, IME.

        3. Absolutely, and that’s exactly right. I’m just noting that they really are sincere with whatever belief sets they have at that exact moment. If you can wait it out from lunch to supper though, she’ll move onto another belief set entirely, and sincerely believe that as Gospel truth as well.

        4. I have watched exactly what you describe with my own wife. Not three years ago she would still come unglued when I’d mention decriminalizing drugs, even pot. She’d argue with me ’til she was blue in the face when I presented logic and facts against the failed “war on drugs.” After many hours spent educating her on the costs and failures of enforcement versus the benefits of legalization she’s now 100% on board with me. That’s now her Gospel truth. ‘Tis a sight to behold at times.

        5. “I would like to see every woman know how to handle guns as naturally as they know how to handle babies.”
          — Annie Oakley

        6. My favorite thing happens every once in a while; a few weeks, or months, later when my own logic is presented back to me As If He Is Introducing The Idea To Me!
          The older version of me wisely allows my husband to share his insight…I’m all rapt attention and well-placed questions…

        7. I try not to do that. I’ve seen it too many times from bosses on the job site. They will say “No” after you present an idea to them, wait a few days (or sometimes only hours) then come back with it as their own. I find that very annoying. My wife is excellent with interior design, landscaping, gardening, dealing with people and animals (she is a retired nurse). I usually defer to her strengths (unless I know something won’t work) and follow her plans when it comes to that sort of thing. When I have said, “No that won’t work. Here’s why…” I have received the same results you get from your husband. A couple of days later after she’s had time to think about it, the new plan is her idea, lol! I’m like you and just agree that it’s a good idea. It doesn’t matter how we got there. She has some limitations with structural design and spatial orientation. Sometimes she conceives of things that won’t work here in physical reality. I have been trained to design things and work with my hands since I was a child. Where we usually run into trouble is when she starts trying to tell me *how* to do the work. We’ve had more than one “Come to Jesus meeting” over that. She’s gotten a lot better about it lately. Maybe that’s her older version. 😉

    3. I’d say it’s wrong. It’s intellectually dishonest which is not useful political commentary.

    4. Estrogen corrupts a woman’s work. Unless it is motherhood or being a help meet to her dominant man.

    5. I have a sense that these alt-right/conservative “shield maidens” are all doing it for the one reason that any woman does anything that puts her in any spotlight: it’s all in the paradigm of getting the highest quality mate possible.
      I have seen over a lifetime countless scrappy dumb women doing “higher profile” things like play in a band or make some kind of name for herself somehow, on variable degrees of sphere (local, regional, national, etc.) and then drop it all when they get what they think is the right man. Usually she was wrong in her choice and ends up an “ex” whatever she was doing with stories to tell.
      But there may be a silver lining to this.
      Take for example this rumor that one of the Pettibones might have been tagged by Based Stick Man.
      Now, if things like that happen (rumor or reality or not) this will bring the thirsty hordes into the mix. The letists like Antifa members are on some strange nihilistic and sexless bent, as is the case with the cult of Marxism, devoid of life and sense of future.
      But try as we might, the world was built on and by thirsty betas, and the “system” of marriage and family and the 40 hour week worked well for them and that’s how civilization was built: the alpha captain of industry needs men who just want a home and a family to work for him.
      If the paradigm shifts to “Be like Based Stick Man and have a shot at someone like one of the Pettibones” and the hordes of thirsty betas join our side, that could be a game changer.
      Sure they are thirsty betas in need of red pill, but it’s still on the spectrum and an endeavor that involves a modicum of masculine energy and entirely antithetical to what is fueling the opposition.
      Wait and see, brother. Wait and see. These are indeed glorious times to be alive.

      1. Indeed. Let me speculate a bit further. If girls are doing this specifically for us, that is, not only learning the lingo but going out and dressing pretty and being clean and hygienic and spreading the word, that has to mean that we’re gaining some cultural traction. We’re the “bad boys” and as we all know, chicks dig jerks. Now that we’re starting to come out into the open as the cad bad boys of the internet, chicks start lining up. They are changing to meet our demands.

        1. Oh you have no idea how right you are.
          I think I once made a woman orgasm on the street during a protest against the Million Mom March. She gave me some anti-gun screed and instead of the cucked “I need a gun because criminals” routine (that even the NRA mistakenly pushes) I flatly said “I have guns because I can and I will not be subjugated”. She stood there wide-eyed and silent and I think I saw her body tremble for a few seconds. She went from hostile to nice.

        2. “I ain’t afraid to love a man. I ain’t afraid to shoot him either.”
          ― Annie Oakley

      2. 40-hour work weeks, industry, and millions of men with the ability to read, and think for themselves…that is a very small chapter describing a changing civilization; this is not ‘how civilization was built’, by a long-shot.

      3. Roosh… “That’s not necessary wrong, but it may corrupt her work.”
        Not only in may corrupt her work… IT CORRUPTS HER WORK.
        Anyone among us, with the same IQ and the same capacity Lauren Southern has, doing exactly what she does, would not get a quarter of the attention she gets… only because she has tits…

    6. Hopefully this will inspire other women to jump on board and swing social momentum in this direction. Her personal beliefs aren’t really of any concern (no woman’s opinion is that important truth be told) until she starts cucking out which there doesn’t seem to be any indication of yet. But if women see how easy it is, it might have an impact. It could appear bad at first with a bunch of untrustworthy fairweather friends but the downstream impact might more than negate any negatives.

  15. And btw, former FOX News CEO Roger Ailes just died. Probably had his face smothered by hot wannabe anchor pussy like hers.

    1. On the list of ways to go being smothered by hot wannabe anchor pussy has to be in the top 10

      1. Indeed. And now I wonder about all the interesting pussy stories this guy had. And in fact, this guy could confirm if Anne Coulter is really a chick down there. We will never know.

      2. I’m still intrigued by, and working towards achieving, your Romanian Twin murder scenario. Haha

    1. Quite the conundrum though. You can’t have women lead the sheep and the sheep won’t necessarily step up to lead themselves. Maybe waiving some titties in their face may pull them away from their computer screens……..
      You know I can’t finish that statement without laughing right? More conservative men need to step into the movement for any traction to occur.

      1. Ehhhh….I’m not so sure that she lead, as that she showed up on the battlefield and spouted a lot of crazy stuff that spooked the other side into saying “Damn, bitch be crazy an’ shit” and then packing up and going home. To my knowledge she never actually carried arms into battle or fought physically.

        1. I dunno. My wife is a big fan of hers. Something about the story seems a little fishy. I wonder how much of it is just feminist aggrandizement, like your Chief Seattle speech that never happened.

        2. I think that what I outlined is pretty close to the accepted historical version, give or take. She was like bringing along somebody so crazy to the battle that the other side said “Fuck, man, they crazy over there, we better not fuck with them!” In other words, she may be the first properly weaponized woman of medieval times. Unleash the clown shoes crazy girl! That’ll scare the shit out of’em!

        3. Some women are like that. I once dated this redneck girl that was into four wheeling. My friends and I loved to play in the mud, take the pickups out and play around a bit. This girl had a chip on her shoulder, and something to prove. She had this lifted late 70’s Chevy pickup. Whenever we went our she was bound and determined to do the craziest stuff. Going over jumps, just tearing up her pickup. Great in bed, but a nightmare otherwise. We were always fixing her crap. There is being a little wild, and there is being self destructive.

        4. I’ve long suspected, very strongly, that Joan d’Arc had some serious looney tunes mental issues. I know it’s wrong to look at her like that officially, but girl was just every definition of crazy eyes scary.

  16. J’utilise ici une expression typiquement québécoise : si Lauren Southern n’était pas une “pitoune” et qu’elle ressemblait plus à Margaret Thatcher, attirait-elle autant l’attention? J’en doute.
    A quick translation in English follows.
    If Lauren Southern did not look like a “pitoune” (an Quebec word that means “pretty chick”) and was looking like Margaret Thatcher, would she get so much attention? I don’t think so.

    1. I have my misgivings about the Iron Lady herself, but I will give her credit. She wasn’t attractive, but she sickest still had an air of class.

    2. Margaret Thatcher was a rare example of a rightist female that wasn’t there only for the looks. Marine Le Pen and Frauke Petry are other examples of this.

  17. She;s positive for the alt right in general.
    Fight north to south guys, not east to West.
    The enemy is THAT way!!

  18. If she’s remained consistent then I have no problem with her being one voice of many. Not a leader, but a voice. I’ve never been of the mind that we have to alienate voices who support us. Back in the day I was affiliated with a political party that was so much into “purity of ideology” that they imploded on a nearly monthly basis and never got anywhere as a result. It was stupid, futile and ultimately self defeating. If this chick stays on point, she’ll expose our message to more beta males than any video Roosh will put out (no offense, buddy) because, hey, tits and ass. And if that helps turn more guys to our cause, then that’s a net positive. Our only caution is to ensure that we don’t turn into those simpering White Nationalist types who pedestalize white blonde pussy like it was made of pure gold. That would be just stupid.

    1. “Muh Aryan Nordic Princess’s​ golden pussy must be protected for the pedestal” Christ. They sound just like some the Panthers protecting their Nubian Queen.

    1. All beta males are like that. Maybe some will look up some of the things that she’s saying and find their way to the manosphere.

      1. I’ve been in this game a long time. I think you are roughly the same age as I.
        You and I can both remember one thing, and maybe we even asked ourselves at one time “Why are women on our side so damned fat and ugly?”
        All we had “back then” was Anne Coulter.
        Now look at the movement.
        It all started with “Ron Paul Girl”. (I think)

        1. “Why are women on our side so damned fat and ugly?”

          I don’t think I’ve ever, ever wondered that. It must be where you are maybe? Plenty of hot right wing girls here, have been for as long as I remember, although at one time they weren’t considered right wing so much as “normal traditional girls”.

        2. I refer to the kinds of women you might have seen at rallies and gun shows. Many times my inner voice was saying “Oh why do you have to be fat too?”
          (Notably, in the shitlib zones you see “organic everywhere” but out in the sticks the supermarkets have nothing but shit to eat – high fructose “magic obesity potion” and other chemical laden junk – I start to think this is done on purpose: “Oh you’re a shitlib? Here eat healthy and live to 90 and keep voting. Oh you’re a conservative? Here eat shit and be diabetic in your 40s, and having a stroke in your 50s and be too jacked up to care about anything if you are lucky to make it to 70”)

        3. The dangers of MSG (“Fat Rat!”) and Corn Syrup are getting out…even Wal-Mart is selling plenty of higher-quality foods.
          The Farmer’s Market is back, lots of us actually teaching our kids how to garden enough to make a salad and a squash casserole from our home gardens.
          And this rebellious Dr. Hallberg, talking about ignoring what nutritionists and other MDs are saying, and actually reversing Diabetes…I’m surprised she hasn’t been shot by some FDA lobbyist…

  19. Can someone explain to me why more cleavage equals more views? I’ve never understood the mental retardation that compels men to gawk at women they have no chance of ever meeting, let alone bedding. It’s one step up from porn, and as I said, retarded, because at least porn can occasionally serve a functional purpose if you’re having a dry spell.

      1. Sure, in their hands. I’m right there with them. Leg crossers serve no purpose other than frustration, though.

        1. You’re railing against men’s hard wired programming. As porn, hell as photography, no, hell, as oil paintings from medieval times demonstrate, no, as freaking cave paintings demonstrate, dudes will look at titties they can’t touch all the live long day if they’re there and exposed. I’m not saying it’s a great idea or whatnot compared to the real thing, but men are going to look at any naked titty that they can look at, whenever and wherever they can look at it.

      1. Yep. Walk a beach in Florida with me and you’ll note my eyes making laser beam contact with every pretty girl’s jiggling set without hesitation.

    1. Devil’s advocate: What if said blonde chick is explaining all the ways in which you are welcome to violate her?

      1. You put your ear plugs in and ignore her! Look, if putting on a latex suit, a clown nose and wearing a tutu doesn’t turn her on, who the fuck cares, she’ll take it and like it!

        1. And I thought my idea of perversion was warped-rubber chicken, Batman costume, frozen turkey, tyre swing and colostomy bag…

        1. If a girl is talking like that, “show me” would be music to her ears, or you just called her bluff.

  20. So far she seems to have insight to what she sees of her generation’s downfall and misgivings, as well as a historical perspective on the meaning and outcome of feminist’s choices:

  21. This phenomenon happens in tons of other male-dominated spheres such as nerd culture and the tech industry. The entire scene is a sausage fest, then some woman shows up and connects with these guys, and suddenly she has way more popularity than anyone else because she stands out and is nice to look at. And chances are there are guys out there who have 100 times more informative content who are ignored because they’re guys, while a girl with cleavage does simple 101 rhetoric and gets tons of views.
    These scenes also attract tons of attention whores. Let’s face it, if you’re a 7 at a club then you’re nothing special. But if you’re a 7 at a comic con, or even better, a 7 who’s cosplaying at a comic con, then you’re basically a goddess. In fact, I find girls who do cosplay to be the ultimate attention whores who want attention in quantity, not quality. So it doesn’t surprise me at all that Lauren does cosplay.
    So while she’s nice to look at, I’d rather get my information from someone like Gavin McInnes. Because you know he’s focused more on his reporting than looking good for the camera.

    1. Same story as when there was that one chick who would get really into football and then all the guys would think she was cool….so much so that the NFL has become a sewing circle which caters exclusively to women.

      1. And isn’t viewership down because, when left to their own devices, women don’t even watch sports? And also because men are sick of the poz?

        1. It was more than chicks in the NFL, they also imported the entire DNC platform talking points and started spewing those day and night, male and female sportscaster alike. They’ve really screwed the pooch this time.

    2. A buddy of mine was returning from deployment and he told me a funny one. When they disembarked the plane and were walking across the tarmac he overheard a male solider call over to the only female soldier in their unit, “how does it feel to be ugly again?”
      LOL. Everybody understood the reference.

      1. God that is such the fucking truth isn’t it? And the commensurate attitude change when you get back to garrison and there are real women in town to go play with is huge. The foxhole fox turns right back into Meg.

        1. Yup. The ones I saw were all 2 baggers. A guy would have to put two bags over their heads in case the first one rips.

        2. Rodney Dangerfield at his finest. I use that bit and if they’re really offensive to the senses I call them a ‘multi-bagger’ where you have to put those on other peoples’ faces also to spare them the trauma.

      2. Same thing in heavy industry. We call them “power house pretty.” They look great walking around a power plant with no bench mark for comparison. But when you see them out amongst other women they typically aren’t much to look at. I’ve had panting male coworkers get pretty píssed at me for pointing this out to them. It seems that a little thirst can turn a 5 into a 9, lol.

      3. I believe it. In my deployed unit, we had a Supply chick who, I kid you not, looked like a tranny Luis Guzman and somehow she already had a kid. In Kuwait, she developed an ego flirting with the thirsty Security Forces guys and Soldiers on R and R she must have felt like J Lo.

  22. While I would certainly not kick her out of the bedroom, her activities are impressive. But she’s a stranger who does stories and some activism I like – I’ll leave it at that. What more is there? I like her material but I don’t have to wank to her.
    My biggest concern is that some dindu is going to acid-attack her. This is why I would prefer that the pretty ones to not frontline themselves.

  23. Please, if she was trying to ‘profit’ that much off of male thirst, she would be a full blown bimbo, and wouldn’t be a talking head. Cracking a joke about how shes ‘legally a man’ on her patreon is significant how? She’s been in the public eye for two years and you expect wiki to know her whole lifes story. She’s doing 10X the job of fighting SJW’s on the front lines that half these jerk offs on the internet. Y’all are salty. She may be acting a bit immodest, but you guys are acting like you’re a candidate for marriage. Good luck finding your Amish reporter girl who never shows her ankles, and gets the job done.

      1. I know literally nothing about her outside of what was mentioned in this article. How do we know she’s a feminist?

        1. I think this “war” is a little half assed. If we want to defeat SJW’s, we need to respond back with an equal amount of tyranny. The parasites are winning. Allowing women like Lauren Southern play her attention whoring games just causes the men on our side to become even more confused. It’s halfassed and it’s a step back in my opinion. If this becomes the new trend, we’ll be right back where we started with all these elevated women ass raping good men in frivorce court. A failure to recognize that is the same as having a little bit of feminist blood in our system. Right now, it looks ok, no big deal right? Hell I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t fooled too. Stinks like a new brand of feminist to me. No female leaders. Period.
          I can see her lyin’ back in her satin dress
          In a room where ya do what ya don’t confess
          Sundown you better take care
          If I find you beenn creepin’ ’round my back stairs
          Sundown ya better take care
          If I find you been creepin’ ’round my back stairs
          She’s been lookin’ like a queen in a sailor’s dream
          And she don’t always say what she really means
          Sometimes I think it’s a shame
          When I get feelin’ better when I’m feelin’ no pain
          Sometimes I think it’s a shame
          When I get feelin’ better when I’m feelin’ no pain
          I can picture every move that a man could make
          Getting lost in her lovin’ is your first mistake
          Sundown you better take care
          If I find you been creepin’ ’round my back stairs
          Sometimes I think it’s a sin
          When I feel like I’m winnin’ when I’m losin’ again

      2. Cause she had her libertarian candidacy revoked by feminist protesters after she trashed their slut walks, and had piss thrown on her by angry SJW’s when she said there was two genders: TOTAL feminist right there.

    1. Go on defending her, white knight, you’re doing a great job.
      Hint: She won’t read it anyways.

        1. I believe she has the right mindset. She looks better than any feminist and she does something. However:
          – She can be relevant without applying the instagram codes, the non-thirsty viewers will stay. But that makes less money for her.
          – Calling us salty for asking questions and investigating allies, a basic procedure when creating a group, shows me you have not studied the case and defend her because she is pretty.
          – She was about to join military intelligence before being recruited by Levant. My take is that she changed her line of thought to get closer to /pol/ (where she is revered) and get more followers. Levant, being Jewish, did not like that and told her to get back in line. She got angry and left.
          So she changed her beliefs to get more orbiters = money. Which would show a lack of honesty and acting on emotions and not reason = female standard.

    1. Looks like they tried an Ohio State on NYC.
      Our cop got there exactly two minutes after the call came in and plugged the little Hadji. I wonder how this one will turn out?

      1. 1 confirmed dead, 22 reported injured. Trying to get the live updates as I have a lot of family there.

        1. Thank you. Typically they’re all in offices until 6 pm but who is to say? Just waiting on word back which should come during the day.

      2. hard to say reaction times, this doofus crashed the car literally 20 yards from a mobile police station in the heaviest policed area in an incredibly heavily policed city. I don’t think he took 5 steps before being on the ground.

        1. So it is a confirmed guy now? At first it was a drunk 18 year old girl. Then she was 22. Now it is a guy?

        2. Well, it is The Current Year. All of those scenarios are possible, given modern medical science and social acceptance.

        3. oh I don’t know if it was a male or female…I just said guy. The local news people said “the driver” the rest was my assumption.

        4. Local news NY1 says the name of the driver is Richard Rojas so probably a dude.

    2. Fuckin’ white supremacists at it again.
      Whites should not have the right to buy cars.

      1. If anything this may push New York off the fence. New York is not a state the world wants angered.

    3. “Speeding car rams pedestrians”; that’s how they are currently spinning it in the articles I just looked at…

      1. Exactly….speeding….in Times Square… 1:30 pm…..peak Tourism and Lunch period. That makes a lot of sense. Especially to those who can’t think.

        1. There are only two spins New Yorkers will hear on this; inside job and terrorists. An accidental crowd plow doesn’t make any sense.

      2. Going the wrong way on a one way street, so it can’t be a heart attack and fall on the gas pedal thing either.

    4. Appears to be some Hispanic dude. May be a drunk after all.

  24. Nice post.
    Beauty is a thing good in itself and does also reflect upon one’s character – for both sexes. A man should at least be thin and well-groomed and not ugly, whereas a woman should likewise look good but in a different way, obviously, although there are some convergence. I also agree that girls can attract other girls into alt lite/right ideas. Hence there are potential net benefits, although she might very well be an attenzione puttana.
    Apart from that, soft porn and to be attached to a (social) media celebrity is for pathetic losers.

  25. This wouldn’t happen if these thirsty pussy boys would stop worshiping these cunts. Put your fucking dicks down and start thinking with the head on top of your shoulders for once.

  26. I’m going to go against the current here – I think we need more chicks like this. Hear me out.
    I’m not saying this chick is the leader of any movement, or that any man should treat her as such. That’s retarded. Women have the occasional decent observation or talking point that is useful, but Lauren Southern is more useful in a different capacity. The left obtained the cultural power it enjoys today by influencing women.
    Women will submit to strong male leaders, but let’s face it, the cultural pressures that encourage women to defer to Beta husbands are long gone these days. So that leaves only one other effective avenue to seize control of the female hamster – peer pressure.
    Chick like this are useful not because they have anything unique or interesting to say, but because they make it acceptable for other women to feel the same. And I understand she’s a female and doesn’t likely actually believe anything with conviction – it doesn’t matter. That’s just the nature of women. Lauren Southern needs to be locked down with an alpha she submits to. She can then broadcast the message to others, who will be encouraged to follow her lead as it becomes the trend to do so. What women actually believe is irrelevant. It is what they do that matters.
    And once they start to find the right to be in fashion, there will be a lot less male willingness to submit to leftism because they will chase the pussy wherever it goes.
    So, I say more Lauren Southern and the rest. And, BTW, thigh gap, WB.

    1. Yes, exactly, I said the same thing in different words on the thread too. Lots of guys are way to quick to yell “Girls! Ewwwwww! Cooties!” even when the girl can in fact help our cause. Not a lot of marketing savvy going on. Heh.

      1. Because they can and always fuck up the dynamics and forment dissension. There’s a reason why they shouldn’t be allowed on tour either if you’re in a band, you’re a wrestler and on the road or a professional athlete going to compete in a tournament; they ruin the esprit de corps and you waste time having to keep them entertained and happy instead of maintaining a good group dynamic and building towards achieving goals.

  27. Get used to it: being Alt-Right makes you SEXY if you are a White male.
    Hot White chicks will flock to the cause, if we provide them a tribe and a program to which they feel they belong in this alienated and individualistic world and age.
    All we have to do is fuck them silly. Get them pregnant. Bring back the Patriarchy to their benefit and ours.
    They are tired of having to fuck colored scum if they do not want beta boys, so naturally they will jump on the cocks of the Masculine White males of the Alt-Right persuasion.
    Nothing surprising, in fact pretty predictable.
    Just do not put them in leadership position, in the name of some fucking make-believe “equality” nonsense, because if you do, then we are screwed. Again. Learn from the lessons of the past.
    It is good to be alive these days…

  28. Of course her possibly being a crypto-jew and or funded by the CIA is important, but the real issue is of course: just a solid 7? She’s close to a 9 for me. What are some examples of 9s for you guys? Maybe I’m just more into the girl next door look.

    1. Your standards are too low. I was going to be generous and say 5 in a good day. Never judge woman’s look from a photo, women have been perfecting the art of deception for years. You never know what she looks like in real life unless you meet her. Never.

      1. Have you met LS in person? If not you’re doing what you told me not to do.
        That said, if LS is a 5 please give me an example of what a 9 is to you.

    2. when she stands next to SJW women to interview them about feminism, or triggering stuff, its typically a pretty flattering comparison.

        1. Not bad, but you better hit in now, before her ass develops the texture of a grapefruit.

        2. Big ass-ism is not my thing. That junk in the trunk thing has always struck me as extremely ghetto.

        3. I am not an ass man but that brazilian stuff is intriguing. Probably because I am used to pale blondes with tits but rarely any ass.

        1. Not a one of those is an 8. They are all professional (as in for real, not instagram) models. All you told me is that you like red heads (as do I, heh).

        2. And I’m going to tell both of you right now that we’ll get guys who will eventually rate every one of those girls a 9, one at a time, like you both did. They’re 9’s, it’s just a matter of your own preference. I chose one of each hair color/skin tone for a reason, and every man will chose his fave as the 9.

        3. All of those girls are 4`s.
          That`s how many clydesdales it would take to drag them off my face.

      1. I appreciate your throwing out a concrete example rather than just going “2 WNB” on very attractive women like many of the alpha supermen around here.
        That said, I would prefer LS to this one. Don’t get me wrong, she’s definitely attractive, just a bit too artificial and trashy looking to get a 9 from me.

      2. Take away the boob job, the liposuction, the nose job, the hair dye, the pancake makeup, and the whore outfit…then what is she?

  29. I don’t buy that an attractive young female really cares about conservatism or issues facing men at all. I haven’t seen an evidence for that in my real life so unless she’s a unicorn then She’s just doing what she has to to make money and is filling a niche. Where were all these true conservative women before recently, did they just now see the light?

    1. The fact that there is no trace of a boyfriend, some Instagram celebrity and traces of heavy drinking makes me wonder about her end game.

      1. Even just watching her seems off, she doesn’t really seem to have any emotion involved with the things that she says but sometimes and more like a parrot repeating conservative talking points.

      2. She found a niche to cater and profit from and a black boyfriend would totally throw her off the “Trump Train”.

  30. Aaaaaannnnnd….an airstrike in Syria. Christ, I may need to turn off everything for two months and go sit under a tree and read a book. Shit is just freaking more insane with every passing day.

      1. Make sure those blondes are either quick-witted or quiet…having to explain each sardonic statement to a woman that doesn’t get your subtle sense of humor can get tedious…(!).

    1. That’s about what I’ve done since the election, the only news I watch now is local. I turned to Fox News the other night, could only stand it a few minutes. I still listen to Rush a little but not a whole lot anymore. I’m just tired of hearing all the BS.

  31. Caveat: I am writing this from my boyfriend’s kitchen.
    The first I heard of Lauren was here at RoK a few months ago. I asked five female friends, all in their 20s (I’m 25), only one had “maybe” heard of her. That tells me I’m not her audience. You men are her audience. Is that suspect? If I woke up tomorrow with an unexpected urge to fire up the conservative cause via social media, I’d focus my energy on my fellow sisters … converting the wayward ones and supporting the believers. Although I’m not sure how I would find the time to do that what with getting married, getting pregnant, and baking this crostata. Lauren’s conservative political beliefs may be sincere, but she’s not living a traditional life. She looks feminine, she’s just basically a man. How does that dichotomy (if it is one) fit in the alt right, traditional world? Can it? I guess she’s useful for balancing your message? “Look, see, we’re not misogynists, women believe this stuff too!”
    Coulter 2.0
    (Please don’t scold me again, Mr Jefferson)

    1. I’d assume the crotch shot wasn’t to target you, but some ladies are into that sorta thing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *