Feminists Are Fighting Masculinity With Masculinity

Over the past two weeks random crimes were weaved into an already established media narrative and a new social media campaign was born: #Men are Trash. It’s now shameful to be a man. We look like sex crazed maniacs, and we should feel bad. That’s the latest feminist siren song enslaving schools of South Africans.

#MenAreTrash has been gaining huge traction on local social media over the last few weeks, at one point it was even trending number 1 on South African twitter. So what is this #? “Men are Trash”, for some it’s easy to read that phrase and label it an “attack on all men”. But one has to then ask themselves, what is a personal attack and what’s a necessary wake-up call.

According to the idea motivating this movement, man is the manifestation of villainy and violence. But if we are all that this tag suggests, why does feminist identity and behaviour involve blatant attempts to enter the masculine sphere of identity? If their cause is so anti-male, why can they only express their ideas through borrowed masculine traits? Are they trying to become the men they are so averse to?

Answer: They are trying to look powerful. They are trying to display wisdom. They are trying to appear strong and aggressive. They they doing this because power, or their conception of  it, happens to be apprehended in masculine iconography. To understand their conception of power, I examined a few ancient figures who have become iconic vehicles for feminist cultural expression.

They Have A Phallocentric Conceptual Ideal

The revival of She who Consecrates a Phallus.

Their rhetoric bypasses Jesus’s ladylike mother in favour of her pagan predecessor, Horus’s mother, Isis. Today, this ancient goddess is synonymous with feminist branding and ideology. As an icon of girl-power, she is superficially inspiring but Isis has more influence on their identity than they would want to openly acknowledge.

It’s generally accepted that, unlike other cultures of the ancient near east, Egyptian women occupied a social role of complete equality with men. So it’s strange that the power of this mother goddess could only be imagined through a man’s role in a phallocentric myth.

Her story is this: her husband is emasculated through castration. Her intensely obsessive attachment to his manhood compels her to commit acts of fetishism and necrophilia. That is to say, she creates and magically animates a replica of his phallus which she proceeds to mount in order to conceive. Diodorus of Sicily (80-20 BC) wrote: “fashioning a likeness of it, she set it up in the temples, commanded that it be honoured, and made it the object of the highest regard and reverence in the mystic rites and sacrifices accorded to the gods.”

Having performed the sexual act on her own, Isis’s power is expressed by her playing the dominant role of a man in the sacred union. This, she proudly states in the Glorification of Osiris: “I have played the part of a man though I am a woman.”

Isis as a kite in union with a dead Osiris.

They Have A Masculine Historical Ideal

Nefertiti in her influential role as a wife and mother.

The queens of the 18th Dynasty — Tiye, Hatshepsut and Nefertiti — are the most frequently referenced in feminist rhetoric, especially when African heritage needs to be validated and profited from. These three women reigned during Egypt’s age of empire. The state was wealthy, cosmopolitan and characterized by the abandoning of its old ways.

Tiye and Nefertiti were women of influence and recent theories contend that they were co-regents. Hatshepsut did rule, spending most of her reign extracting resources from the soft target that was Nubia. All three derived their power and influence from their roles as the mothers and wives of kings. But at various points they decided to supplement their public image by representing themselves in masculine form and roles. This was done to legitimize their leadership capabilities.

So even though these feminist antecedents were among the wealthiest and most powerful people in their country’s most prosperous period, they still found their feminine form restrictive, most likely because an ancient ruler’s physical appearance would have to meet the public’s expectation of safety and security. Smiting the enemy or agents of chaos is the most familiar Egyptian iconographic motif. It’s a traditionally male military activity, thereby making the title of pharaoh a traditionally male title.

The Bearded form of Hatshepsut trying to placate national security concerns.

The mighty smiting queen is not just an idea of limited scope, it’s also based entirely on deception. These three had no significant military successes. They were basically imitations of a core foundational element of Egyptian culture. In the case of Tiye and Nefertiti, one would expect the mother and wife of the great religious and artistic revolutionary, Akhenaten, to at least be more creative with a lie than this heavy dependence on an established masculine tradition.

In resorting to masculine depictions and war motifs for the sake of a social equality that already existed, all three only reduced the inherent power they had as wives and mothers.

Conclusion

Men may be cast as the violent villain of the feminist narrative, but the reason why power seems inherent to masculine imagery is that significant cultural achievements exist to validate these symbols.

The image of a leader who took a small population to high culture in a short period of time.

Negative campaigns like Men are Trash, and the conveniently coincidental Hollywood release of Wonder Woman this summer are just dramatic overcompensations for a glaring lack of significant achievement, a fact that feminists are painfully aware of. This is not a value judgment, it’s just women’s history, where the best is always yet to come.

The image of having usurped Bombaata’s position in Conan the Destroyer.

In their effort to recreate the feminine form as a masculine phenotype, there is the sincere acknowledgment that power can only exist in broad-shouldered and warlike imagery. They are thoughtlessly going back in the direction of patriarchy while trying to cast themselves in their villain’s role.

A redundant accessory to her power, but wonder woman’s phallic symbol is required for her to usurp the Man of Steel’s position in the DC pantheon.

As it has before, the pendulum will swing back from its current extreme. In the meantime, display the confidence that only your original form can possess in a world that is now full of poor imitations.

Read More: 5 Huge Problems That 50 Years Of Feminism Created

230 thoughts on “Feminists Are Fighting Masculinity With Masculinity”

  1. I’ve posted this before…. but if women want their equality, let’s give it to them. No more chairs offered, no more ladies nights, no more $30 entry to Las Vegas Pool Parties while the men pay $150, and death sports for all ! YEAAHHHHH for equality!

      1. Oh that slicing action at the 7 second mark…. bitch be like….. “life really wasn’t so bad when I just had to stay at home, look after the kids, and have tea party with my friends while our husbands worked all day!” PLOP. Dead….

    1. Personally, I think the only way to defeat feminism (and gynocentrism when you get down to it) is to give women what they claim to want: total self-sufficiency. Active resistance is doomed to fail IMO because the current system is enforced by white knights who put women on pedestals. The failure of the MRA/MRM demonstrates this clearly. I think men should borrow a page from Taoism and use wei wu wei (i.e. effortless action).

      1. It’s like a professor of mine once said: in the Soviet Union, women were given the most brutal equality possible. “Oh you would like equality, Comrade Svetlana? Excellent! You can shovel ore for the next 12 hours just like men!”
        All the equality they could handle, plus change.

        1. Probably guaranteed she would never Question leaving the kitchen again.

      2. Sounds like “accelerationist” thinking: Just let bad trends run unhindered to completion and collapse the society, so that the survivors can rebuild with more sensible values.

      3. We should give them a state. Off the top of my head, let’s say…Delaware. Give them Delaware, let them run it as an autonomous state, and see what happens.

    2. Whereas I like to see women held to the same standards as men when it comes to obligations, the price disparity at parties seems to be inevitable to avoid sausage fests. Sad but true.

      1. This rationale proves that men and women are not equal. It means that feminism (if we are just talking about true “equality” of the sexes) is bogus and would never be fully realized.

        1. Different is what we are. Division of Labour. Comparative advantage. Let women focus on what they are good at and we will all be happier and more prosperous.

    3. They don’t want equality, they want preferential treatment. If there were true equality, men wouldn’t be so upset with the current societal double standards.

  2. Millennial Woes, the YouTube Alt Right personality and perhaps the wisest Scotsman in our generation, points out that men need self-confidence to thrive, but that women can do just fine in life without it:

  3. Speaking of Wonder Woman again, why has she become an icon of the sort of feminism which promotes democracy, equality and degeneracy in other contexts?
    WW comes from an aristocratic, hierarchical, all-female society ruled by a queen, but one which enforces chastity, physical fitness and subordination to legitimate authority. This social model contrasts sharply with feminists’ values of promiscuity, fat acceptance and bitchy defiance.
    The values of WW’s people have more in common with the Alt Right’s than with today’s progressive utopians’.

    1. Because she fights against World War 1 Germans aka. “The Warm Up Nazis”.
      She’s a microcosm for feminists and SJW’s wanting to put a stop to the Alt-Right or even just White Men who are proud of their histories in general.
      You gotta stop them before they go FULL “Nazi”!

      1. We can culture-jam this nonsense by having WW learn more about the Germans, for example, the fact that they revere her people’s classical Greek culture and its martial tradition, and she realizes that they don’t seem so bad after all.
        Just look at the chalkboard behind the school teacher, for example:

      2. Upvoted because “The Warm Up Nazis”.
        Now, besides the one you mentioned there are a number of reasons of the promotions of WW recently:
        1. The usual goggrrlll/feminist crap.
        2. The superhero movie fever, which brings a lot of shekels to the pockets of the (((chosen))) behind (((Hollywood))) and (((Marvel/DC))).
        3. The promotion of a beauty stereotype through that bitch (((Gal Gadot))). (((They))) are trying to replace the blonde stereotype to a more ‘inclusive’ and ‘multicultural’ one. Blonde is not beautiful these days.

        1. I wasn’t talking about the stereotype of beauty in WW but in movies as a whole. The most beautiful are the blonde ones, even (((Scarlett Johannsen))) is blonde.
          P.S. Lynda Carter was smoking hot.

        2. Everyone has their preferences. I prefer blondes as well. I know lots of guys that don’t for whatever reason. Hollywood is definitely looking to put a minority into every movie. Gal Gadot looks like a much more traditional beauty than a lot of the contrived female characters.

        3. Sorry the best ones are brunettes and red-heads 😉
          And the black haired pale skinned light coloured- eyed woman is not far behind.

        4. I really want to agree, but that lady who played “Samantha” in the original “Bewitched” sort of messes with my perspective. She was in her forties and fifties when the show ran (iirc), but damn was she cute.

        5. While I agree that Hollywood et al is trying to alter the beauty stereotype, using the Wonder Woman as a brunette for your example is probably a bad choice, as Wonder Women has always been drawn as a brunette for 50+ years.

        6. I’m only ‘diverse’ in woman: while I do love blondes (real, not bleached), redheads and brunettes are not bad….but yes, the Aryan princess is my type.
          Check out this redhead Deborah Ann Woll, and this brunette Rose Byrne.

        7. Hmmm interesting but wasn’t that show aired in black and white? By the way, for me the prettiest women are cast in the mold of Elizabeth Hurley, Jennifer Connelly or Emily Mortimer (the younger versions of them) or Sofía Vergara if they are Hispanics.

        8. The first season or two, but I think they invented colors by season 3 or so.
          Before that, of course, the world was black and white.

        9. Hollywood’s obsession with comic books makes me wonder if Jewish nerds read them disproportionately to the rest of the young male population. Only instead of setting this dumb literature aside when they grow up, the ones who seek careers in the film industry feel the need to produce exegetical movies about these stories, kind of like visual analogues to Talmudic commentary.

        10. Interestingly, if you go back before the current crazes you find that superheroes have been the source of modern myth for a long time. Instead of Heracles and Theseus, we had Superman and Batman to teach us the values of strength, compassion, wit, applied intelligence, and other virtues.
          From that perspective, it only makes sense for them to assault this former niche. Myth is how a culture learns basic philosophy.

        11. A few years ago I read a blog post by someone who observed that James Bond fans display a stronger reality-orientation than fans of comic books, fantasy and science fiction.
          Why? Because the Bond character goes to real places and displays real skills, like hand-to-hand fighting, evasive driving, proficiency in foreign languages and so forth. You could learn to do these things in real life.
          By contrast, you simply can’t acquire superpowers, study to become a wizard or get a commission on a starship after graduating from the space academy.

        12. Do you know Joseph Cambell’s works? If not I recommend to you The Hero With a Thousand Faces.

        13. Many of those Bond gadgets could work in real life, though. For example, the MythBusters built a working ejector seat into a car in one of their early episodes.

        14. I prefer the Jennifer Connelly from “Mulholland Falls” to the recent look she has.

        15. Blonde isn’t the feminine ideal it once was. I suspect the 90s wave of Latino everything changed that. I know natural blondes who color their hair brunette – one because her husband insists on it – and I’ve been asked to do the same by a dozen stylists. It’s really tempting. Natural blondes represent a white supremacist world apparently. We assume these personal preferences are natural born but I think they’re just as often media manipulated.
          In my experience the only group of men to dependably like blondes are middle eastern. I’d bet an rok poll would prove the dark haired preference.

        16. Speaking of homos, here at my work one of my colleagues was watching during break time an episode of a tv show(can’t remember which one). At one point some weak-ass looking male was sitting on a bed then all of a sudden a big, strong hairy guy comes up to him, undresses him and they start making out.
          I was eating at the time, but after that scene my appetite diminished. I’m surprised I didn’t vomit what I had already eaten.
          Even more nauseating is the fact that my colleague didn’t seem to have a problem with it. He is not gay, he is married, but his reasoning is that “we need to get used to these kinds of things” or “if they would’ve taken it even further I would agree it’s disgusting, but as it is it’s not that bad”.
          I was like “No, I don’t have to get used to this; it’s disgusting, and I refuse to watch shows that contain these kinds of things. Maybe it’s silly to go to such lengths for just one scene, but the way I see it, the world won’t end if I don’t watch the TV shows or movies that contain these kind of things that I dislike with a passion.”

        17. Gal Gadot isn’t traditional. She has a flat and narrow boyish figure and is not of Anglo-Saxon stock. Lynda Carter on the other hand had that hour glass figure that passes the boner test with flying colours. Gadot is too gender neutral and is not sexy.

        18. Yeah I wonder about guys like that. You definitely don’t have to get used to that. I turn away when that stuff comes on TV and avoid shows that have it. People have to remember that homos write a lot of TV.

        19. What fiction ?
          That scene where the dude is running on crocodiles is fucking REAL.
          Done by a stuntman but nonetheless…

        20. Paza buna tine primejdia rea.
          Baga-ti mintile-n cap.
          Creeaza-ti pseudonim daca mai stai pe site-uri de-astea.

        21. She was 31 when it started and 39 when it ended…her affair with the director ended her 3rd marriage…

        22. She’s got the standard western model appearance. She looks white with a thin leggy build. Wouldn’t be my first preference, but I wouldn’t be throwing her outta bed either. It’s a million times better than putting an old fat colored woman that the SJWs would love to prop up.

        23. True but the standard now is gender neutral (or something approaching it). I wouldn’t kick her out of bed either but I think most of us prefer “real” women (i.e. healthy women with an attractive hip to waist ratio) over the typical fashion model.
          More Raquel and less Gadot.

        24. Elizabeth Montgomery was in her 30s for the entire run of “Bewitched” which ran from 1964 thru 1972. She was born in 1933 and died at the age of 61 in 1995.

        1. Notice how the new Wonder Woman has a boyish no hip body, whereas Lynda Carter has an actual curvy body?

        2. Holy crap! This is beyond disgusting. And that little beta enabler Sid has some deep-seated psych issues of his own.
          You win, brah. That chick is impossible to top for a boner-killer.

      1. There’s really almost nothing wrong with her. Look at that perfect little waist!

        1. I know right. She has that beautiful circle around her narrow waist and wide hips that suggests strong fertility. Very sexy.

        2. Perfect waist to hip ratio is so damn powerful in our minds. A proof that “social constructs” are just bullshit. Sex is biology. Period.

    2. She was written originally as a feminist construct. Logic does not apply.

    1. Ummm yeah Gloria…. we’re not exactly going to get laid if we are raised to act like girls. Women aren’t going to find us going ape-shit when we see a spider or demanding that we be arm-carried over a small puddle of mud to be very sexually desirable characteristics.

      1. From Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloria_Steinem
        Early life
        Steinem was born on March 25, 1934, in Toledo, Ohio,[3] the daughter of Ruth (née Nuneviller) and Leo Steinem. Her mother was a Presbyterian of mostly German (including Prussian), and some Scottish, descent.[11][12] Her father was Jewish, the son of immigrants from Württemberg, Germany and Radziejów, Poland.[12][13][14][15] Her paternal grandmother, Pauline Perlmutter Steinem, was chairwoman of the educational committee of the National Woman Suffrage Association, a delegate to the 1908 International Council of Women, and the first woman to be elected to the Toledo Board of Education, as well as a leader in the movement for vocational education.[16] Pauline also rescued many members of her family from the Holocaust.[16]
        ==========
        What a shocker…

        1. You seen that video of the British/Irish guy with a bunch of newspapers from the very early 20th century talking about the “6 million Jews” in imminent danger?

        2. Ha! I’m about five minutes in, and it’s ridiculous what they have pulled on everybody with this bullshit…great vid (stick with it, anybody else who watches, it’s a little slow at first, but the point will become clear fairly quickly).

        3. So one old newspaper says that 6 million Jews lived in Russia, and another says that 6 million lived in Central Europe. That adds up to 12 million Jews. Unless someone can come up with censuses from the time to support these claims, these sound like figures Jewish propagandists just pulled out of their asses.

        4. Don’t be so tough on yourself, Bob. I mean, just think of all the hard work you’ve been doing to improve the state of white/Mexican relations, the amount of good will you’ve personally injected into that situation.

  4. So-called “3rd Wave Feminism” is actually much more destructive to anything feminine than the “toxic masculinity” they harp on about in men. 3rd Wave Feminism is also much, much more misogynistic than “the Patriarchy” or anything else they rail against.
    Even if you take the worse attributes of “the Patriarchy” or “toxic masculinity” as the feminists describe them, at the very least, the Patriarchy and toxic masculinity never wanted to destroy all things feminine like 3rd Wave Feminism does.
    Because, if you really look at it, that’s what 3rd Wave Feminism is about: destroying everything considered feminine or intrinsically female. All the positive female traits have been thrown overboard — they are not encouraged or preserved for women. No, quite the opposite: women are all but forced to adopt masculine traits. All the positive masculine traits that we have traditionally associated with men — men are supposed to stop displaying those traits because they are bad for men to have. However, those very same traits — 3rd Wave Feminism says women must have those traits or else they are weak and inferior.
    In other words, in order for a woman to be good and right and valuable to 3rd Wave Feminism, she must essentially *be a man.*

      1. Sometimes, I really try hard to be brief when drafting my thoughts and ideas into a fitting response in the comments section of an article such as this one. I really do make a fervent attempt, a lot of times. However, I seem unable to limit myself to short, and concise statements when commenting.
        I also have the unfortunate habit of repeating myself, or attempting to clarify what I just said in an example or a hypothetical.
        For example, if I was going to write a response to your response to my comment, it would probably be somewhat lengthy in an attempt to fully explain everything I felt was important to completely respond to your statement and clarify anything I didn’t entirely clarify in my original comment.
        You dig?

        1. Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subjects only in outline, but that he make every word tell.
          — ”Elementary Principles of Composition”, The Elements of Style, William Strunk, Jr.

        2. I understand. There are many occasions where I’d like to convey a deeper meaning by means of a long exposition, but as I am a slow typer, I greatly fear some random gentleman will beat me to the chase and make a comment that contains exactly the message I intended to expound, whereupon I will look like a bumbling neanderthal.
          I will most certainly ask you for advice the next time I wish to enlighten the masses with a well-thought out essay. It has been a pleasure communicating with you, my friend. And with that, I bid you farewell.

        3. To paraphrase Mark Twain, I didn’t have time to write a short comment, so I wrote a long one.
          Brevity in writing of any style is a lot harder than verbosity.

        4. Dont get grumpy your response is great…… my mother bless her soul was decades ahead of her time and frequently remarked at how frustrated she was that feminism did absolutely nothing for mothers wives and home makers -who are after all the main stay and the entire reason for human existence…. without mothers none of us would be here…. and without good mothers that create a happy home and a warm nurtured and nourished childhood….. well you get alcoholics, drug addicts, gambling addicts, waves of crime, gangsters, violence and all the rest of it…..
          Every oiece of technology men have created was designed to make life easier for women and children… either directly in their daily lives or indirectly by harnessing more energy and resources….. smash the patriarchy = go back to being cave dwelling neanderthals.

        5. I just skimmed and basically got a Milo Yiannopoulos lecture… so enlightening

        6. Heh . . I bet you prefer similarly long winded women . . heh. An ‘Air Force’ woman may be just what you need. That’s where AIR gets forced out of her oriface when an object such as your phalus gets forced in. A long winded pussyfarter. “phfffffp-pssthfft”. I’ll stop there. I once said that to a girl in a club who told me she was in the ‘Air Force’. “You’re in the Air Force? Does that mean air is forced out of you as an object is forced into you?” Her gf then stole me away to dance and the USAF she-brat then vanished somewhere. Basically you have to twist her masculinized ways down and help her redefine the ways in a feminine form.
          A funny sci-fi sitcom from the 70s that flopped after one season ‘Quark’ had an episode where the crew were all captivated by women who thought the same, a perfect matchmaking. It featured the Barnstable twins which were also the real Doublemint Twins from the commercial.The ‘professor’ also finds his brainy unicorn. Hilarious

        7. From time to time over the years, I see a comment saying ‘too long’.
          I’ve never understood it.
          Look, if it’s too long you can SEE THAT so just don’t READ IT!
          …the comment ‘too long’ is always redundant at best.
          If you have something to say, say it.
          If those thoughts are fully developed, then good!
          THE LONGER THE BETTER!
          Can you imagine a comments section with 100, 2 or 3 sentence comments?
          ….the discussion is human/female nature, society culture and the destiny of civilisation!
          You produce three paragraphs and that’s too long!
          Sheesh…
          Write away.

        8. ‘….my mother …..frequently remarked at how frustrated she was that feminism did absolutely nothing for mothers wives and home makers -‘
          Look, this is the issue.
          All the claims of feminism were obviously false to me at school in the early 1980.
          Obviously false to me and the intelligent girls as we discussed it at length.
          Yet.
          Yet wider female society was eager to consume these transparent lies.
          It’s not ‘figuring out’ the truth, instead it’s ‘not doing destructive things’.
          Who really thinks that rapidly importing millions of unskilled and backward people (men) into Europe will bring happiness wealth and peace?
          Yet that’s what Europe’s women are determined to do.
          True story.

        9. 3rd Wave feminists have the goal of tearing down traditional society and destroying the traditional family. That is why feminists view traditional women as an enemy as much as they view men as their enemies. Feminists have an axe to grind with traditional society.

      2. Because he is trying to express a complete thought and not a sound byte.
        Oh, wait …
        DAMMIT!

      3. Always putting others down and nothing positive to say. The telltale sign of the insecure beta.

    1. There’s nothing more attractive than a guy who can write concisely. It shows deep thought and a masculine turn of mind.

    2. All feminism is about trying to be men. From suffrage(1st wave) to having power and having sex like men(2nd wave). To what you list.
      The abolition of coverture is the 1st step of abolishing womanhood and erecting Hyenas in their place. Degrading mankind. For Patriarchy is one of the reasons which makes humanity Godlike in comparison with other species.
      All equality except just deserts is bullshit.

    3. AT, I can précis your response: third-wave feminists are insane. Whom the gods would destroy, first they make mad.

  5. About two years ago I broke up with my then-GF after I bluntly told her something along the lines of:
    “You act too mannish. The things that are gentle and feminine about you were what I was after, not you acting like a defensive tough guy for no reason whatsoever. You also came on like a would-be emasculator with that attitude, and I say ‘would-be’ because it never worked, because you’re not convincing when you pretend you’re a dude.”
    This girl also demanded cohabitation, babies and marriage after 7 months together, and the answer was no.
    What guy on Earth wants to be with a woman who prefers to come across as an inferior man? Not I.

    1. My ex pulled some of that crap too. We would get into wrestling matches so she could prove just how strong she was. And while she is significantly stronger than the average woman, she was still no match for me, as I easily overpowered her. I know she probably wanted that experience, but when the starting point is to prove that “I can do anything you can and perhaps even better!” you have to knock them down a few pegs and show them reality.
      Our last year together was on and off and quite frankly really bizarre. She started getting really feminist, like not shaving her legs and arm pits. Thats when I knew it was over for good.

      1. My girl is a former gymnast who, from time to time, drags me into a wrestling/BJJ match. The little thing has a lot of power and flexibility, but even with the very basic technique I have I can easily overpower her (and I hold back by default – it’s just how I am).
        I think it’s some kind of foreplay for her. Meh.

        1. Yeah that is the conclusion I drew as well. There were also times when she would resist and ask me to rip her clothes off but would make it really hard for me to do so. There are some things you miss more in life than others lol

        2. Have very briefly dated a couple gals who were into that BJJ stuff. I nexted them pretty quick after finding it out. No other girls on her team, wrestling with all dudes, calluses bigger than Paul Bunyan on her hands. Not sexy at all to me. I told them both I’d be more impressed if they were taking cooking classes.

        3. The only BJJ they should be doing is ‘Blowjobs Joyfully’ on me-they can take their laughable attempts at being masculine and shove them up their ass otherwise.

      2. The girl mentioned in my post — a 36-year-old who was once on the cover of Italian Vogue when she was a teen (braggin’ now) — actually took a drunken swing at me on a particularly unruly phase of her premenstrual cycle (the period, perennially among their favorite scapegoats for bad behavior), and she came full force. This is a woman who did a lot of Zoomba and martial arts-style workouts, but was losing some of her previously-stunning looks to middle age. I grabbed her fist in mid-air and surrounded it with my hand, then used her fist as a leverage point to push her down into a seated position on the couch. “You don’t actually want to see what it’s like when I defend myself by using your technique, do you? I can’t believe you just took a sucker-punch swing at my face.” It was all downhill after that and we split up about 3 weeks later. I couldn’t fully blame her — every thirsty guy she ever had before me let her get away with anything. I even said “I see now — you’ve been getting away with this shit your whole life…”
        With certain women, the moment of clarity comes only when they test your physical limit for BS and they catch an ugly glimpse of you **holding back** your violence — they know what would happen if you unleashed it. You never have to lay a finger on them, and can retain your composure, but the relationship is over at that point.

        1. not to defend her, but she was 36, that baby makin window was quickly slamming shut on her

        2. The hot ones always seem to be the craziest and when I say that, I am being generous. When I turned 21 I went to a section of the downtown area where I live that is notorious for nicer clubs. My buddy at the time had been a bouncer and knew a ton of people and we met up with this weird bro he knew. We got separated and I went to get a beer and the weird bro guy bumped into me and knocked my beer out of my hand. For whatever reason I got really mad and I was like hey fuckface buy me another beer. Surprisingly he did.
          Anyway right after that I got approached by the hottest blonde girl I’ve ever met and she asked me how I knew “brian” and im like I dont really know him, but he made me spill my beer and I got him to buy me another one. Next thing you know she was dancing with me out on the dance floor and took me back to her apartment, but didnt put out which was extremely lame.
          I eventually went out with her again, but she was out with a huge group of friends. The entire night was a complete disaster for me, as she shit tested me (I didnt realize it at the time) on several occasions throughout that night.
          One of her friends was talking really loud with her behind me as we walked to another bar and she was telling her she knew a bunch of guys she could hook her up with. I was furious, because I had no idea what I was doing with her and I was under the impression that she genuinely wanted to be out with me.
          Anyway at the end of the night, she ended up meeting up with the same weird bro from the beginning of the story (brian) and walked home with him, even leaving her friends behind. She then texted me later and asked if I was mad and I failed that shit test too because I said yes lol.
          The moral of this story is that she was extremely manipulative and very attractive and pulled a lot of crap to see what kind of guy I was. I’m glad I don’t know her anymore, but that was probably the worst night of going out that I’ve ever experienced.

        3. Sorry you had a shitty night bro. But lesson learned: NEVER go out with a girl and her ‘friends’. Even after you’ve laid down the meat sandwich. Total waste of a night.

        4. Let her go out with her friends and then meet up with you after at your place.

        5. Spot on. I once dated a hot broad who fucked half of my friends in a college club I founded. She was putting each other in competition for her. In the end, she ended up alone after dumping each one of us. Ridiculous.

        6. Yeah I mean the thing is that the testing and poking and prodding never stops….
          if there is one major error in the ‘game’ manual…. and a huge mistake men make is thinking that once you get your leg over you’ve conquered her……. in reality this is where the game begins……
          What then happens is your are living with a savage predator that will strike at every opportunity you lay your guard down…. when youare at your weakest…. tired from work… sick…. or in the longer term having a rough run……. she’ll amp it up and drag you down……
          Things go nice….. she can also get a vicious streak on and drag you backwards…. if you are too successful in life she might lose you…. the logic is terrifying….

        7. No, you don’t hit people. Even when you’re on your period. I expect someone to be emotional and even a little bitchy, but you don’t hit people.
          Girls like that will hit other girls and they’ll hit their kids. I’ve worked with girls and lived with girls who have tried to hit me. That’s just a bad person.

        8. I think that’s what she was doing. The other guy sounded like a gamma.

        9. Yeah man that was six years ago and after that I knew right and then there that I’d never put myself in that scenario ever again and I haven’t. There is never a drama filled night when it comes to cracking cold ones with the boys. Its usually just a good night with deep bar stool philosophy!

        10. Feminism is an excuse for crude, rude, vulgar, boorish behavior. I’ve seen footage of female SJWs taking a swing at a guy, and when the guy knocks her on her ass she cries “I’m a woman! You can’t hit me!”

    2. Yeah… LTRs verge into a competition so rapidly these days… and women are so great at amping up the emotional blackmail…. its practically a lost cause….
      What you end up with is a disfunctional high school bully for a room mate….. its no wonder men lash out and get physical sometimes……

      1. I don’t know what the use is of LTRs – either have casual sex or decide to get married. LTRs is basically rewarding the wrong kinds of girls for bad behavior. It also wastes other women’s time if you’re spending years playing house with some slut.
        And then, what are you getting out of an LTR that you can’t just get with FWBs? I feel like they’re completely unnecessary, but feel free to prove me wrong.

        1. I don’t advocate sex before marriage, but I just think that the lesser of the two evils would be for a guy to get it all out of his system right away than for one or two slutty girls to take up another woman’s fertility window.
          And the other thing that would solve is the ONS to LTR to marriage track that has the system so fucked-up. In the olden days, you had your goodtime girls and then you had your wife girls and there was no overlap.

        2. Absolutely. There are hints that men don’t understand that a woman does right ,

        3. sure, but you’re talking about a specific issue, and I’ve been in and out of the sphere for four years

        4. I guess I’m wondering what one thing ties a man to an LTR in the way you’re describing.
          My guesses are easy access to sex and a sense of being loved. The later is almost a love-masturbation, because women who enter into LTRs did not earn love. It’s an illusion. Easy access to sex would be the most difficult thing for a typical beta male. However, a lot of guys I’ve notice choose to hop from one “relationship” to the next successfully, even upgrading partners as they go along.
          All I’m saying is, hey, why not? I’d rather a guy did that than give any loyalty where it wasn’t earned. Sexual favors are not “earning” love. You don’t necessarily have to repay them to who gave them to you. They are used opportunistically by the woman, so it’s fair game to use them opportunistically as a man.

        5. It’s all of the rewards of a marriage without the legal ensnarement. That’s not really a difficult thing to understand.

        6. the rewards of marriage? yeah, but my question is why do it.

        7. Because marriage is an unacceptable legal entanglement however everyone is still a human being with needs. I don’t believe that any answer will satisfy you and I can’t help you.

        8. Sorry! I think I might be talking at a completely different level from where you’re coming from.

        9. You definitely have some preconceived ideas about things. We see things differently, it’s perhaps nothing to do with levels though.

        10. I probably do have some preconceived ideas. Ideas are inherently preconceived.

        11. Not usually pre explanation though. The idea of a normal healthy person wanting the company of a woman without the legal entanglements of a marriage are pretty self evident. It may not be for everyone, but considering the risks to guys it’s not really a mystery.

        12. This is a really easy to understand thing, you maybe just are unwilling to accept it for whatever reasons.

        13. I think an “easier to understand thing”, in your wording, would be going into a friends with benefits situation. I think a regular beta could pull that off.

    3. “This girl also demanded cohabitation, babies and marriage after 7 months together, and the answer was no.”
      L-O-L
      Women have always taken men for granted. And this is a clear example. Babies after… 7 months? Another idiot will do, not you. I think that women are slowly tasting the further effects of “gender equality”: men don’t pull shit that as we used to swallow in a “patriarchal” society anymore.

      1. “MEN don’t pull shit that as we used to swallow in a “patriarchal” society anymore.”
        …now I am getting first hand experience of the saying: “words worth of GOLD”.

        1. I mean the positive ! Yes, I really mean that what you said (especially the phrase I highlighted) is indeed “words worth of GOLD”.

      2. Traditionally, a woman might put out (after a while)–then GET KNOCKED UP and demand marriage. Even well within the first seven months of dating! Dude should be glad he wasn’t with a more “traditional” (conventionally “feminine”, i.e. sneaky) woman.

    4. Good on you! Well done! There are “men” out there who would just give in, and go along to get along. (golf clap and a tip of the cap)

    5. Boom. Connections being made…
      Among othe things, my last LTR challenged me to basketball. I thought it was cute at the time, a chance for me to demonstrate my physical dominance.
      But a woman who wants to compete with her man is:
      1) rejecting her feminity
      2) attempting to emasculate him
      In the end, I dropped her because there was not enough male-female, yin-yang in the relationship. She was trying so hard to be the man…

  6. This is topical.
    The other day I was watching Person of Interest when Shaw (the female bad-ass) is introduced. She had a bigger body-count than the main guy for the show to date, just in that one episode. She messed up the main guy twice and has less trouble taking down large armed men than he does, even though she weighs maybe 110 lbs and has no upper-body development.
    Also, I am currently reading book 5 of Game of Thrones. Reek and Ramsay make their first appearances. In the book Theon Greyjoy still has his cock, his sister is still at home and Brienne is not the all-slaying Thundercunt that she is in the show.
    The show is literally (Hitler) turning the book into a feminist polemic. Ironic then that feminists complain it is still making women look bad!

    1. Just saw Fast & Furious 6 last night. Tiny little Spanish chick strikes fear into 300llb steroid giant with a mere cocked eyebrow, implying previous conflict resolution in her favor. Said giant later takes on the Rock without hesitating and would have defeated him if it were not for help from miniRock Diesel.
      Different scene, stick thin French accent girl beats up several guys with assault rifle and barely breaks a sweat. Later almost loses in hand to hand fight with slightly thicker Russian-looking traitor chick.
      These days, anytime I see a girl getting beaten up, killed, or otherwise put in her place by a guy I look at the release date. It’s almost invariably pre 2005.

    2. she was a dallas cowbots cheerleader- THAT role was much more believable

    3. The books are incredible, just finished a Storm of Swords, got a Feast of Crows on the way

        1. I read GOT and a series by a countryman of yours, Joe Abercrombie, not long before I discovered ROK. These series and Bernard Cornwell are some of the last red pill authors I’ve read.

        2. Joe Abercrombie used to be great but the SJWs got to him. His latest series is either extraordinary irony or somebody kidnapped his family and made him write blue pill fiction. The main character is handicapped (which in itself is quite cleverly done) but some of the toughest characters are women. They are so tough that they just seem like men with women’s names and bodies (it is this fact which makes me wonder if he is actually just taking the piss).

        3. The “Half-” series. I started it but couldn’t keep going. I actually had forgotten about it, but I just reread the “Heroes” and “Red Country” and I love them. Really brutal and realistic as far as human nature is concerned.
          I seem to recall that the new series is geared more for teens or young adults or whatever the crap they’re calling it these days.

        4. That’s true but his view of “feminism” is very different to that of hard-core feminists who believe that “All Men Must Die”. He believes that men and women are “equal” rather than “women are superior to men” as most feminists believe now. In other words he has the old school Sixties view on it.
          The people running the show are clearly of the other sort.

    4. GOT season six has become near unwatchable due to the escalation of feminist stuff being rammed in your face. They don’t even try to be subtle about it anymore. The first bit of soft porn – the witch getting her kit off – they ruined by suddenly jumping to a shot revealing her true shriveled form. Just as I was getting my objectification on. What a bunch of “see you next Tuesdays!”

      1. Yes GOT 6 was shockingly bad. In part I think because GRRM has not finished the book yet. Gave them more scope for “artistic” license. It is interesting that the majority of the leadership and action roles are now filled by women but feminists still complain about the “poor portrayal of women”. Like all women, even feminists aren’t happy unless they have something to complain about.
        It was terrible. Dishonourable mentions go to Daenerys defeating all the Khals by knocking over a flaming brazier and Lady Sansa rides to the rescue of poor Jon Snow.

    5. It is true, that grrm is a fat beta cuck mangina – but even he is smart enough not to throw a bunch of unrealistic you go grrllism in his novels. One handed Jamie beats Brienne effortlessly, but of course hbo changed this

  7. In many ways, our world has not become “feminized” but has become more masculine. For one, there is MUCH more brutal economic competition today. Boomer bullshit and apple pie conservatism can’t deny that young people today have it MUCH harder to find employment, a good job, let alone afford a fucking HOUSE.
    Furthermore, while both left-wingers as well as right-wingers, both liberals as well as conservatives accept the female politician, the female pantsuit (just look at how many alt-right-ish parties are led or co-led by women while in the USA, Ivanka can easily be used as a tool to make her father bomb whole countries) but they don’t accept the feminine men.
    The masculine shitcunts of today do NOT suddenly accept the feminine men, quite the opposite: they become degenerate BDSM whores who need to be tortured by ghetto niggers and Syrian radicals to get off.

    1. The Daoists say there’s a natural balance to things. Yin and Yang, masculine and feminine, will naturally seek a balance.
      Feminism seeks to throw off the balance, but human nature is self-correcting to a large degree. As women became masculine, men became feminine to restore the balance (though this is, itself, unnatural).
      A masculine woman has a concentration of powers, while a feminine man has a dearth of them. Masculinity – itself the rawest expression of power in humanity – combined with the natural instinct to assist women is too much power, while femininity – a subtle expression of soft power – combined with the expendability of men creates a lack.
      Yet the elements are in balance.

  8. Feminism is toxic, no doubt. Despite the push from the contemporary psychiatric and psychological community to debunk serious conditions such as gender dysphoria and penis-envy, the reality is that both disorders are real and both require evaluation and treatment. The attack on what genuine femininity by queer sexual deviants an angry feminists is a true tragedy that is costing us all dearly.

  9. Never cared much for Macho Maids but looking at Hollywood and the left dominated by She-Males and Epsilon Mommy’s Boys I can see why they’re being shown off a lot, we really need to change our culture just remove the liberal elite and allow society to shift right.

  10. It’s hilarious how these fucking idiots harp on and on about how masculinity is toxic and evil but try so damn hard to develop masculine attributes by chopping off their air and being as loud and aggressive as humanly possible in order to get their batshit insane message across. This Doe nothing more than displaying more utter hypocrisy and lunacy on their part.

  11. It’s hilarious how these fucking idiots harp on and on about how masculinity is toxic and evil but try so damn hard to develop masculine attributes by chopping off their air and being as loud and aggressive as humanly possible in order to get their batshit insane message across. This does nothing more than displays more utter hypocrisy and lunacy on their part.

  12. Off topic.
    Please see the 5th image, captioned…
    ‘Nefertiti in her influential role as a wife and mother.’
    Notice the shape of the children’s heads.
    I’ve read the Egyptian Royals were attempting to bind their infant’s heads to make them grow into the same shape as their ‘gods’ heads.
    These were not the heads of their pantheon of ‘gods’, instead these ‘gods’….
    http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s–ISbiZfX8–/18zlrn743xrarjpg.jpg
    ….and these….
    http://proofofalien.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/alien-green-men-Egyptian-hieroglyphs.jpg
    Huum.
    Crazy Egyptians…

  13. I’ve always found it interesting that in the 200,000 years of modern human existence women have chosen our modern pushbutton, computerized era to finally assert their perceived superiorities. “Girl power” is directly proportional to the type of technology that men create and which females can exploit. Femininity is toxic because it is intrinsically parasitic and hateful.

  14. I am lucky enough to have a son (9) and a daughter (5). One of them is interested in NOTHING but football and living in the Bush and the other is all about babies and performing (dancing/ballet). No prizes for guessing which is which, but here’s the kicker, it’s INNATE within them. If my daughter showed the slightest interest in sports I’d be delighted but she’s not, so I am happy to let her paint my nails and watch her dancing ‘performance’ before I go out hunting with my son. If my son wanted to do dancing and ballet I wouldn’t care either because he’s my son and I love him. Feminazis are trying to screw up the rest of us because THEY are screw-ups who undoubtedly come from screwed up families.

  15. Awesome article. I really like this new author. ROK is constantly increasing its quality.

  16. This was wonderful! So far I’ve learned that some feminists instinctively understand the masculine archetype holds the superior position in this world, so they try to emulate the masculine while moving men into the inferior feminine position. But a Queen can’t hold the King’s throne any better than he can hold hers.
    Other feminists reject both archetypes. They’re drawing both sexes toward the androgynous center, where neither archetype is given expression.
    Both approaches are perverse, but I think the latter maybe is the worse of two.

    1. Also … “But one has to then ask themselves, what is a personal attack and what’s a necessary wake-up call.” ….I think someone just gave you all permission to call out the overweight ladies for reasons of poor physical health.

  17. They’re using the tactic that they think will demoralize the little guys: the omegas and lower betas and gammas so forth. It’s not powerful in the sense of rising to alphatude, but they’re just trying to make anyone they can look dumb.

    1. Feminism kind of collects little discarded pieces of power to become strong enough to be disruptive. Which is starting to fail in a lot of ways, but for example, they’ll claim the idea of chastity as their own virtue while ostracizing actual chaste people, because other women are easy to pick on.

      1. But that in itself shows its true purpose. I mean, what exactly does feminism hope to achieve? I am 100% for equal human rights for either gender but it strikes me as feminism is hell-bent on disrupting the family unit and for what purpose? Is it to gain ‘equality with men’ (bullsh*t-already exists at least in the West) or just vent anger at perceived social bias toward men who in actual fact get the raw end of the deal in modern society anyway? Feminazi’s need to stop talking sh*t and start applying for the dangerous jobs men do that women WON’T that make society function. Like sewerage plant workers, deep sea divers, high voltage electricians et cetera, but nope, they just want the rewards with none of the effort. How many soft sick days do you see women take off from work? Usually because of some perceived ‘slight’ or other bullsh*t ’emotional reason. One thing I agree with though, if you put women in charge of the world there would be no wars. Because nothing would get done and entire countries would stop talking to each other.

        1. What does feminism hope to achieve? The answer is nothing close to its stated goal of empowering women. Women can not be sensibly empowered any more by feminism than a toddler can be empowered by handing them an uzi. They will only cause chaos and damage.
          The end goal of feminism can be seen in the tangible results. The goal all along was to segue a coherent culture
          https://www.oldhousedreams.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/old-man-with-children-.jpg
          into an atomized culture.
          http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/imgLib/20121108_WELFARE_LINE.jpg
          https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-IoFk_qd_Jc/maxresdefault.jpg
          An atomized community by default becomes tactically a body easily managed by marxist style administrative management.

  18. Egyptians were the most effeminate men in history: only that can be the explanation. Low prenatal testosterone undoubtedly ran in their Y DNA passed on from father to son.

  19. “a glaring lack of significant achievement, a fact that feminists are painfully aware of. This is not a value judgment, it’s just women’s history, where the best is always yet to come.” – Well Said!
    Feminism and women constantly talk about how “amazing” they are and how “women can do anything” with little to no proof. But want us to accomodate them with language and behaviour policing at home, in public and in the workplace. As well a quota’s to help them in education, the workplace and everywhere else. The pendulum is swinging back and it won’t be pretty when it does.

  20. I find it interesting that the various tentacles of the leftist horde don’t seem to be interested in eradicating the ideas that they disapprove of, just simply switching them over to someone else.
    They don’t care about ending racism, they care about switching the power from white male to non-white male, racism is fine as long it’s against the “right” individual.
    They don’t want to end masculinity, they want to usurp it for themselves and simply switch all men to beta subservience mode. Sexism is fine as long as it’s against the “right” individuals.
    We can examine their entire playbook and apply the same logic. They don’t care that these things are going on. They simply want to cash in on them for political power, the acquisition of social status points, and the weakening of the traditional paradigm. Precisely why feminists couldn’t give a rat’s ass about treatment of women in muslim countries and race baiters couldn’t give a rat’s ass about anti-white racism in universities, the Middle East & Africa.
    Also interesting that educated scholars in every State U. are too stupid to see the double standards.

  21. Never think that the working agenda and devastatingly negative consequences of feminism has anything to do with women whatsoever. A small group of powerful, yet psychotic, men continue to finance, implement and direct feminism’s course. The purpose is to weaken men, destroy families and make women miserable. It’s worked! And women actually think feminism is guided by their gender!! Preposterous.
    The elite still live very much in a patriarchy, but force us plebes to stumble around in a phony, contrived, temporary matriarchy because it makes the genders loath each other. Weak men / strong women is a recipe for disaster.

  22. Feminists Are Fighting Masculinity With Masculinity??
    Only in Joowood shitty movies !!

  23. I wonder if the creators of these female hero movies would have the guts to dress the woman in anything other than a sexy revealing outfit? I mean we’re talking equality here. The movie should stand on its own without anything to do with sex?

  24. This ranks as first order classical comedy…. it reminds me of Monty Pythons “Life of Brian” in which women attempting to enjoy the “laissez faire” violence of masculinity would purchase beards in order to participate in public stoning. But in the crucible of evil masculine humor it gets better…….it is obvious to me now that Hillary’s lost presidency resulted from not purchasing a beard and wearing it. The fact that the election was held in no-shave November might have served as a clue ………………the irony is Hillaryous. Bwahaha….bwa..hahahahaha……gasp!

  25. How about starting the following “Social” campaigns !:
    #females are Pile of Shit
    #females are Useless
    #females are Ungrateful
    #females are basking on efforts of MEN
    #females are Shameless
    #females are Worthless
    #females are Parasites
    #females are dependent on MEN
    …but hey, we are not females ! we are the MEN & we don’t have cunts !!. females will do this kind of shitty things “only” as long as they have the backing of Government & vested interests. And it doesn’t take much time to crush them & show their “real” place !!
    Remember, we are talking about only females who are femicunts and/or who think they are independent, empowered and strong & yet ignore the fact that 99.99% of whatever they are using is Invented, Innovated and Pioneered by MEN and shamelessly use those things; right from “ass wipes to tampons to microwave to transport to technology to ….” !!

    1. I hope you know that no one is going to take you seriously beyond this website, Ravi. It’s okay to cry, though. Opening up about your feelings will decrease the prevalence of mental illness in men

      1. You got it wrong mangina ! Opening up about your feelings will decrease the prevalence of “mental illness” in manginas and pussies !!
        manginas and femicunts said same thing when I commented about Donald Trump winning the elections. And you know the result, my dear mangina !!

        1. Do you not have emotions, Ravi? You seem to be quite emotive in your commenting. Can you perhaps predict the lottery numbers next?

  26. If misogyny is hatred of femaleness or womanhood, and feminists are trying to destroy femininity and replace it with masculinity, aren’t feminists misogynists?

  27. Eh HEM!
    I agree in general with the article…
    ‘Xcept the photo depicting Pericles… He near-singlehandedly destroyed the ancient Greek world to diminish oligarchies while enslaving his allies through debt… Then after his death Athens started following in his steps and hearing Dimosthenes… who basically said that we must spread democracy around the world (i.e. the easern meditteranean) so that no Oligarchy may exist to destroy us…
    He was Woodrow Wilson lacking in his lifetime his John Mackinder…
    besides that doesn’t that remind neocons a bit too much?

  28. Women love violence more than men, as long as they are not the ones getting their hands dirty. British queens started more wars than male kings…
    If men are trash, women are shit stains

  29. @
    Narmer Bull
    Thanks for this great article, it explain well the reasons behind many questions i used to ask myself once i realize all “womanhood” recent movies are nazifemminist remake of glorious male blockbusters, where male stars are emasculated and the femminist imperative rule everywhere, doing everythings better and faster than their male counterpart. Hylarious!
    Thanks for sharing!

  30. It’s ALL HeForShe. It’s ALL redistribution of wealth. Of course women are going to redefine masculinity – especially when it suits them financially and legally; hence Affirmative Consent. Social Security, No-Fault Divorce, Title IX, Affirmative Action, federal and state tax spending focusing on women when men pay the majority of taxes, ad nauseum. It’s ALL about redefining masculinity in women’s favor. Always has been; hence the male-only draft, men fighting and dying for the advancement of women and the state and men building all upon the Earth. Men’s only purpose is to be used, exploited, manipulated, trafficked and disposed of in what ever way reshapes masculinity for the betterment of women and the state.

  31. This is very simple: Freud was right. It’s penis envy, plain and simple. 🙂

  32. There is actually an article on the front page of today’s NYTimes website titled “How to raise a feminist son”…. this is what the world has come to.

  33. Third wave feminism is about lesbianism and the hatred of men. It is rather ironic that the leaders of the movement claim to disapprove of masculinity, yet they end up looking and acting like men. Feminists seem to believe that adopting the worst traits of men somehow makes them “strong women”. Women who try to become men end up being poor imitations of men.

  34. Third wave feminism is about lesbianism and the hatred of men. It is rather ironic that the leaders of 3rd wave feminism disapprove of masculinity, yet they look and act like men. Feminists have adopted the worst traits of men because it gives them an excuse to be rude, crude, boorish, ill-mannered, and power hungry. Women who try to be men will end up being poor imitations of men.

  35. The moment you wrote, “her pagan predecessor” in reference to Isis and Horus / Jesus and Mary – I rolled my eyes. Don’t be that dude who watches zeitgeist and reads Christopher hitchens – and now I’m woke brooooo. Good article nonetheless.

  36. Almost all the major movies these days, the main protagonist is a female. Alien movies were the first to show a woman in a “masculine” role, but that was a cult movie. Now all the mainstream films have a female “hero”. Even in the last Batman v Superman film, Wonder Woman saved Batman’s life. Batman was portrayed as mentally ill, and Superman was portrayed as impotent and winds up dead at the end. In the old days they were the main heroes. Seems right now only Marvel has some strong male characters like Thor and Captain America. No wonder Marvel is beating the pants out of DC. Nothing more wonderful than seeing Superman in a coffin at the end of a film (Sarcasm).

  37. I enjoyed watching Charlize Theron getting crushed to death in Prometheus by the Engineer Juggernaut. Actually like Noomi Rapace’s character, was totally angry they killed her off in the sequel. Alien Covenant was total garbage. Incidentally, from one small scene you can see that she was acting as David’s “mother”. David was weird in the first film, he is like Norman Bates and Hannibal Lector with a bit of the T800 in Covenant.
    Feminists were complaining that Gal Gadot had shaved underarms in her film. Also were complaining she was feature in ad for protein bars for people who want to lose weight. If they really wanted to drive down the message in that one, they should have picked a more “masculine” actress.

Comments are closed.