Culture

Time Magazine’s Four Most Stupid And Insulting Covers

179 Comments

Saying that the MSM is biased is about like saying that water is wet. Time Magazine is a repeat offender, constantly insulting the public with their propaganda.

Meltdown

Hillary still lost, so suck it!

The symbolism on the 8/22/2016 cover was glaringly obvious, but for a fuller explanation, we have:

…Trump has continued to inflame audiences with controversial remarks this week — first, with his Second Amendment comment about his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton… and more recently, calling President Barack Obama the “founder of ISIS…

The illustration is simple and succinct, capturing the billionaire’s face oozing down like a lit candle, with the spare cover line: “Meltdown.”

It was created by Edel Rodriguez, a Cuban-born artist known for taking on tough topics such as gun control, racial relations in the U.S. and gender equality.

Golly jeepers, I’m quite certain that Time chose this picture because of its measured ideological balance, right?

Their 10/13/2016 cover was quite similar, “Total Meltdown”, showing The Donald reduced to a waxy puddle. This issue appeared shortly after the shocking revelation that he said “pussy” eleven years previously. However, their triumphant crowing was rather premature.

Better propaganda:

Now who’s having a meltdown?

Yo Decido

The 3/5/2012 cover, subtitled “Why Latinos will pick the next President”, was rather controversial. One of the twenty people pictured isn’t Hispanic: the guy in the center of the top row (under the “M”) is Eurasian. As he tells it, the photographers never explained what the pictures were going to be used for. That’s not exactly a great way to avoid misunderstandings.

At least it wasn’t as big a racial gaffe as eighteen years prior, when they digitally darkened OJ Simpson’s mugshot on their cover. That made for quite a contrast at the news stands, since Newsweek ran the unaltered version.

Hey, Time editors: “Yo mama!”

Anyway, “Yo decido”—the first Spanish title of theirs—seems rather sketchy. It kind of suggests that Latino voters don’t know English. (Imagine how a different cover would go over: “Wir wählen: Midwestern German-Americans might decide Romney’s election”.) Many are immigrants, but anyone eligible to vote passed a citizenship test which includes English proficiency. Given the contemporary nit-picky political climate, it’s surprising that SJWs didn’t have a meltdown about that.

On the other side of the coin, what’s truly irritating is their blatant celebration of the leftist endgame strategy. Time’s cover practically gloated about what their mass immigration policies have been doing. The Democratic Party has pushed population replacement policies ever since Ted Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act. Since the influx of cheap labor drives wages down, they sold out blue collar workers, their former major power base.

The real reason was to import tens of millions who would bloc-vote for Democrats. Basically, mass immigration amounts to stuffing the ballot box. (That’s exactly what politicians are doing in Europe too.) The Republicans have tried to horn in on the action—for example, consider Bush the Younger’s silly campaign speeches in Spanish. Courting votes from what Republicans called “natural conservatives” failed completely.

Some leftist talking heads have crowed about the double bind they’ve forced on the Republicans: either they continue enabling mass immigration (giving Democrats even more bloc voters) or curtail it and alienate Hispanics (not that they’ll switch parties anyway). If America’s founding population—what the Constitution’s preamble calls “our posterity”—falls below 50%, then electing candidates who will halt the demographic decline would become impossible. Further, Whites would lose control over the destiny of the country their forefathers built. Many leftists practically giggle like little girls about that one.

Better propaganda:

I’m sure MS13 is full of “natural conservatives”.

Are You Mom Enough?

The topic is attachment parenting. More traditional styles include “free range” parenting (everything up through the 1980s) and “helicopter parenting” (shaping the millennial generation). In this case, attachment parenting could be called “Apache attack helicopter parenting” or “Brazilian jiu-jitsu parenting”.

It’s hard to make breastfeeding cringe-worthy…

So the big deal is that it showed the model standing with a rather defiant-looking pose while nursing her child. The kid happened to be nearly four years old at the time and was standing on a step-stool. It seems a little odd to put such a photo on the cover of Time. After all, periodicals showing titty on the front cover are usually sold in “24 hour news stands“, or sometimes behind the counters of gas stations in opaque plastic.

Nursing babies is natural, healthy, and quite tender (usually); that’s what sweater puppies are made for, right? However, that’s not quite the image conveyed by the photographers, who deliberately selected that pose. (Not pictured was her other kid, an adopted Ethiopian boy a year older who also got nursing privileges.) Anyway, I’m rather skeptical about it being a good idea to keep kids on the tit when they’re old enough to remember… paging Doctor Freud!

Attachment parenting is rather controversial. The mother indeed has strong convictions, such as doing volunteer work to assist Syrian refugees. However, again it was Time’s staff being aggressive about promoting the message. The title itself—“Are you mom enough?”—is equally as provocative as showing bare boobage on the cover of a MSM periodical. It’s insulting to imply that mothers not into Brazilian jiu-jitsu parenting are second-rate.

Anyway, surely it’ll make quite the conversation piece for when the kid is old enough to bring a girlfriend home: “Look at this! Your new boyfriend was on the cover of Time.”

Better propaganda:

How’s this oldie for propaganda? Best of all, it shows nursing done the right way.

The New Face of America

On November 18, 1993, Christmas came early for the globalists. Using a morphed image, Time’s “special issue” depicted what they believe future humanity should be, after the multicultural pressure cooker extinguishes genetic uniqueness. The picture doesn’t look White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian… it’s nothing at all. If that wasn’t enough, it’s unclear if the image depicts a soft butch woman or an effeminate man. This is what they think the future should be.

Leftists say races don’t exist, but they’re sure in a hurry to destroy every last one of them.

This issue is full of articles praising mass immigration and multiculturalism; for instance:

Intermarried…with Children
For all the talk of cultural separatism, the races that make up the U.S. are now crossbreeding at unprecedented rates.

Miami: the Capital of Latin America
A city that was once a languid resort town is now a pulsating center of international trade and pop culture

The Global Village Finally Arrives
The New World Order is a version of the New World writ large: a wide-open frontier of polyglot terms and post national trends

Could they possibly be any more blatant about their rotten agenda? This is what globalists have always wanted, be they flaming Communists like Leon Trotsky, ultra-wealthy shmucks like Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi (and the banksters who backed him), sickos in academia, or Eurocrats in Brussels.

As one very underappreciated former British MP put it way back in 1963:

They talked of what they called “multiracialism”, which was simply a universal mix-up: Take humanity, put it in a bag, shake it together, and heaven knows what would come out. They wanted to get rid of what existed, all the little grey people of the world who hate the beautiful diversity of human development. They always want to get rid of the natural, the noble and the beautiful. They wanted to get rid of it; they wanted to make all nature as grey as themselves. It was their deep instinct.

We were always opposed to that. We said, “No, it won’t work, and it’s undesirable that it should work!” We can live in peace and friendship, side by side, in separate nations and separate developments; but we cannot have the mix-up of peoples and races who are widely different and divergent. It will lead to nothing but trouble!

This policy of mixture, what does it really mean? It doesn’t mean “freedom”, it doesn’t mean “brotherhood”, or any of the cant and humbug which is taught. That is just a mask for some of the finest forces on earth to exploit the peoples in the future as they have done in the past…

Want to stick it to the globalists? Date your own people exclusively, have children who look like you, teach them about their heritage, and warn them about cultural Marxism and the lying media.

Better propaganda:

Leftists call images like this “hate”. They claim to support diversity, but really want to destroy the world’s diversity.

My books are available at Smashwords and Amazon.

Read More: How Mainstream TV Uses Emotional Triggers To Sway Political Opinion

179 thoughts on “Time Magazine’s Four Most Stupid And Insulting Covers”

    1. SHUT IT DOWN “MODS REPORT/DEPORT THIS MAN!”.
      The Jews did nothing wrong – r/The_Donald – 2016.

    2. Every. Single (((TIME))) I read a comment about every single time I honestly find myself wearing my larry david look of scepticism: is this genuine or hasbara anti-semitism?

      1. It is relevant because it is so common to find (((them))) promoting and plotting this degeneracy on gentiles from such powerful influential positions.
        An uncomfortable truth for some, but something that needs to be brought out into the open from hiding in the shadows or punished for talking about.

        1. It’s most important for communicating with “Judeo-Christian” conservatives. Eventually they must notice the pattern and acknowledge that, as a general rule, Jews are not on their side (at least, not popular Jews). Hopefully they will then be able to ask themselves what other nonsense they received from Jews and reject some of that “All our money for Zion” stuff.

        2. sometimes the jewish identity of an individual is salient. In some cases that is because it may be the determining factor in some matter and where that might be invisible or misunderstood there may be a justification for the ‘echo’ device. The problem is not merely that it is designated as ‘hate’ by the ADL etc (that could have been anticipated) but that it is highly likely that as a means of countering the very real “crypto” aspect in the jewish world (i.e. where jewish interests can work invisibly as though jewishness was not salient when in fact it may be) it may not be very effective. At least when every jewish name is ‘echoed’ then it becomes pretty pointless. Likewise it is highly likely that hasbara etc use these devices themselves in order to ramp up the hate, thereby enabling them to designate the comments or the article to which they are attached as something that should be flagged as a matter of concern by the authorities or the ‘hate’ watchers.
          To give you an example there was another article a few days back which involved some jewish man who simply had liberal views (rather than being in some ways misrepresenting himself etc). The top comment was likewise ‘every single time’ and seemed to me to be completely unwarranted. I would say there was 30-40% chance that that comment – by some unknown – was actually posted by an antifa of some sort pretending to be an anti-semite
          So the problem here is a) the echo device suggests that jewish identity is always salient, which is unfair, and almost certainly untrue but equally distracts from the fact that there is a very real crypto tradition that probably should get some real scrutiny and b) when it become indiscriminate and demonstrably unfair this actually plays in to the hands of the system which – to the very real concern of many ordinary jews – actually depends on demonstrating and even perhaps ramping up the existence of anti-semitism.
          There is a strange symbiosis here where there probably shouldn’t be one

        3. The echo device is defined as ‘hate’ by the ADL and other such organizations because it is an effective way of exposing Jewish/Zionist subversion or waking people up.
          I don’t believe recognizing the over representation of Jewish people/interests is hateful. It’s an observation that warrants investigation.
          If we continue to play by their rules and narrative we lose. I agree there are hasbara like agent provocateur’s as you say, but the hasbara like users I have been following on these boards always get their panties in a twist over the echo comments and often try to undermine it jokingly. Hence they find it dangerous and threatening to their cause.

        4. I’m not suggesting playing by anyone’s rules. I referred to the ‘hate’ issue not because ordinarily I consider it to be ‘hate (although where it is indiscriminate it may be rather unfair) but because using it feeds into a system that not only manages it but may even be prepared to generate it – as possibly in the example I used – in order maintain a system that avoids addressing what might be legitimate issues. So I’m not necessarily saying it’s necessarily bad (or “anti-semitic” or whatever) but that if it’s use is indiscriminate rather than designed to specifically target invisible and strategic and unfair (group) influence (i.e. from activists) that would otherwise go unnoticed then it might not be achieving a purpose beyond venting.

    4. The only people who don’t believe that Time is a propaganda rag are those that already walk lock step with the magazine’s political bent.

  2. You are doing a dirty job, Beau. Nice to see you keeping your sense of humor.

  3. “The New Face of America”
    A woman with short hair and a man-jaw… yeah that’s pretty much what I expected

  4. The new face of America still looks white, she just has brown eyes. I don’t see the many races they speak of.
    Also, I feel sorry for that kid when he grows up, Momma’s boy in the making.

    1. That kid will be a puss when he grows up , but on the bright side he will have spent more minutes in his lifetime sucking tits than most men ever will.

  5. “time magazine. newsweek, they cant print the truth- they have too much to lose..”

    1. Eh, what I see here is just a stoned rock-star trying to sound edgy. He’s right about the media of course, but even a broken clock is right twice a day.

      1. What’s (((Dylan’s))) real name, before he changed it? I don’t recall. Probably Robert Goldsteinrosenberg or something similar.

  6. The breast-feeding one. That’s weird. Freud said it was [your first] sexual act (which I don’t buy). But when the mother’s child is that old, or older and not even hers, you have to wonder if it’s not a sexual thing for her, which is an abomination, or close to one. The Trump one is tacky, and the “yo noid” one is hilarious because that one schlub who was eurasian. WB future girl if she put on blood-red lipstick and thigh-length white stockings.

    1. I don’t buy into this mother-son thing , but the father-daughter thing is real and it’s creepy af. It used to be that daughters were quiet around their fathers and adressed them politely and in a reserved way. They would only consult their mothers about daily issues and it was the mothers who taught them the ways of a woman. Nowadays , when I see fathers spoiling their daughters , and the daughters being all at easy around their fathers and chatting them up about randon stuff like they would with an old buddy , I can spot the sexual tension. No wonder modern women have those daddy issues.

    2. Freud is over-rated, in my opinion. He was smart and very wise in with his early career, but it seems that he got stuck on sexual behavior for the answer to every psychological problem.
      Psychology is still a relatively ‘new’ field of medical and mental health, and it suffers from the reluctance of psychiatrists and psychologists to question the orthodoxy of psychological ‘science’.

      1. that probably reflects a world view that sees energy of all kinds, as fundamentally sexual or ‘generative’ in nature. The Freud / Jung divergence probably reflects the tensions between the more jewish and christian paradigms in that respect

      2. Oh, I hear you. The details have sifted out, but I remember researching Freud against Jung. I also remember prefering Jung’s dream theory to Freud’s. They were both only part right, though. I think dreams are practice for our instincts. But, yeah, Freud’s stubborn sexual interpretaions indicated ironic personal dilemmas.

      1. For women it’s easy to go full-on lower primate – they just need a “Time-ly” nudge…

        4. Yeah, he’s three going on nine. Photos like that one make me leery about every women I’ve ever fucked, and every woman I might fuck in the future.

        6. Couldn’t overlook her other tit’s up, but that could be airbrush.

        13. This just proves that women eagerly fuck dogs, apes, lamp posts, space aliens – anything they can cram in their cunts. The more disgusting it is, the better.

        14. Sure they have…during their nightly three-ways, mom tells the kid, “Oh, you’re such a bad boy!” (Because…women love bad boys.)

        15. The kid gets the milk when he becomes a bad boy. Dad masturbates in the corner.

        17. He looks like he’s 100 pounds when soaking wet and wearing boots.

        19. “Porn keeps me from throttling whores and getting venereal disease.” – Gandhi

        20. Yeah but he “keeps it real” (beats the crap out of them anytime they open their mouth).

        22. Seriously. I have a problem where I sometimes spastically twitch in my sleep. I almost seriously hurt bed partners that way. A small 110 lb girl getting elbowed by me could end badly.

        28. Haha the good ol’ Pabst is back. Take it easy this time man or they will ban your ass again.

        30. Those women undoubtedly also consider themselves “educated”, I’d bet (sorry, it’s probably “edumacated” nowadays).

        32. She probably threw dad out a few years back and now ‘lives it up’ on those monthly alimoney checks of his…

        34. The level of contempt I have for women who become coalburning mudsharks is very high. Like if she took ONE black dick I see and treat her like a shitstain on my carpet, and my respect for women is already extremely close to 0.
          Though, seeing a young girl become a mudshark out of the gate is kind of sad to me for some reason. It’s like when you’re picking apples in fall and find the PERFECT one, only to have it slip out of your hand and fall into a pile of cow shit. Makes a frown ya know?

        36. had to upvote for this golden saying…
          “it’s like when you’re picking apples in fall and find the PERFECT one, only to have it slip out of your hand and fall into a pile of cow shit.”
          thats magic.

        37. 1: you do realize humans are apes? Also a monkeys are short and have tails.
          2: it’s kind of cliche how racist people use the same old insult, with out understanding it. Lol

        38. 1: You do realize not alot of women could go to universities back then?
          2: so your biggest proof, is a random rapper?

        39. 1: not really, I mean if your major proof is s random rapper then you’re really lacking brain power here.
          2: do you guys have anything better to do than talk about race and woman? Lol

        40. That’s funny because women has always been treated poorly, especially by European men.
          It’s super silly to hear something like that, especially from guy like you.

        41. 1: but couldn’t you clean the Apple, or better yet peel the sling of the dirty apple?
          2: so now you’re comparing your women to food? Lol

        42. 1: well even smart people can have a relationship problems.
          2: really, red pill? That’s such a overused thing, now. I’ve been seeing alot people use that for everything. Lol

      2. 1: again humans are apes.
        2: you know I’m pretty sure people back in the old days said the same thing, especially when comes to thier kids.
        3: where did you get your education? Lol

        2. Well it’s a fun way to display my argument. Also yes, especially when you compare it to your comments. Lol

        4. 1: And how is that a try hard?
          2: Also is that all you have to say? Lol
          Anytrying else? 😉

        6. 1: to mock people like you guys, because you’re really easy to argue with. also I was looking at Georgia girls, and i stumble upon here.
          2: cliche reply. Lol

    3. If they really wanted to be edgy she would be breast feeding a 27 year old Syrian “refugee” who claims to be 5 years old

      1. This issue was a bit dated – I think a future cover might have just that very thing…

    5. comparing the 2 pictures in the article, this one definetly has a sexual charge and is a bad example of attachment. look at the pose of the woman and the boy and their eye contact. it looks more like the boy got caught sucking mom’s tit and he is suprised and scared while mom looks definetly at the camera with no shame. she has no bra, just that slim top she’ll just pull back every once in a while to feed the thing.
      contrast this to the German poster, where the mother and baby are facing each other not doing it for a camera but because of REAL attachment. real love. it is calming and beautiful. it is nurturing and soothing. what a mother shouod be. not some cold and hard sick with muh female empowerment

  10. Adolf Hitler was on a Time magazine. I guess he wasn’t socialist or hateful enough to make it on the list. To his credit, he threw the world into turmoil without as much snark.

    2. Stalin was Time’s Man of the Year twice. Very few have been bestowed with this “honor” more than once.
      “Uncle Joe”, indeed.

      2. And the strange thing is that Leftists throw the name “Hitler” at their opponents, when Stalin (their hero) was responsible for more deaths than Hitler and the Nazis.
        It’s estimated that Stalin was responsible for the deaths of 3 to eight million (at least) to 60 million (at most).
        Compared to Stalin, Hitler was a mere piker.

        1. The communist Bolshevik revolution was mainly a Jewish led hierarchy with gentile frontmen like Stalin who married his family off to Jews.
          Estimates of thirty million Russians slain and the impact this had on the geopolitical motives of Europe and Germany hidden from our history books.
          Not to mention the plaque at auswitz was original ordered to be reduced from 4 million to 1 million deaths. Intense Jewish lobbying it now stands at 6 million.

      3. Yes.
        I recalled it was twice but couldn’t locate a ref. so didn’t mention it.
        Omitting Hitler is either clever = the writer expects the comments to pick up the omission.
        ….or stupid= he didn’t know or didn’t think we knew.

  11. OT: Ahead of time, just want to congratulate all the men who are about to complete all 21 stages of the Tour de France. (A task that would destroy any woman).

      1. There isn’t a woman on this planet who can measure up to the amount of useful trades I have to offer. I can tell you, there have been many instances where a woman has said, “how did you know how to do that?” “How do you know that?” “How did you know how to fix that?”
        Fuck… you guys know what I’m talking about..
        A man is useful the moment he arrives on the scene.

        1. But…but…I just watched “Mad Max: Fury Road” last night, and the women kicked ass and fixed broken trucks and totally dominated the men, and…and…

        2. And….. and…….fail……. tears……. “I’m just a guuuuuuuuurl…..”

        3. “I just want people to take me seriously!” whines the girl who wears six coats of makeup, has fake tits, 12 piercings, and green hair. (Rolls eyes.)

        5. Said it before and I’ll say it again. Words of my ex girlfriend (sobbing in tears), “I’ll never know what it’s like to experience a shandshake between two men who have equal respect for one another.”
          Me: silent, head tilted upward, slight nod, (you’re goddamn right bitch).

        6. All the kids in the Middle East are doing a crazy new dance called “the Sand Shake”

        7. “And I’ll never know what it’s like to be a vindictive, petty, scheming wreck of a human being who’s only happy when everybody around them is more miserable than they are…”

        8. one point for Bob Smith. Burn it down. “If I can’t have it, nobody can.”

        10. Women also claim that they’re capable of creating working societies from scratch — so far, that has only existed in feminist fiction.
          Research the web for different ‘reality’ shows which had female and male teams on different islands. In every case, it was the men who started working together and created a working society, while the women teams wanted to get a ‘consensus’ before doing anything — and of course, they never got anything done.

        11. Men don’t even need to talk much to get things done. If a group of men have to do smth , everybody starts doings what he does best or feels like should be done first.

        12. On those ‘reality’ programs, that’s exactly what usually happened.

        15. “There isn’t a woman on this planet who can measure up to the amount of useful trades I have to offer.”
          You nailed it ! That’s the POWER of MASCULINITY.

  12. ‘Time’ magazine also had Adolph Hitler on it’s cover as Man of The Year.
    The writer chooses not to include this fact though he does include a generous quotation from Sir Oswald Mosely.
    I only hope the inclusion of Sir Oswald Mosley (‘..one very underappreciated former British MP…’) isn’t an indication that the writer is being a bit of a smart arse, as we say in England.

      1. Thank you for the correction.
        In my own defence, I would say that I am on a three week bender…….

        1. If you give up alcohol you can write polemics like the below “On Intra-Racial Miscegenation”

        2. Ex-pat.
          I’ve a very very very long holiday now I’m back home in the uk.
          Dry where I live and work, so let’s make up for lost time.

  13. If Big Media bombards a woman with messages and images that overtly imply that doing a particular thing makes her “hot” (no matter how disgusting it might be – fucking apes, fucking dogs, doing three-ways, getting gangbanged, etc.), she’ll do it. Women are open vessels, waiting to be filled by external forces. That’s all there is to it…

  14. Latin America and South Africa are perfect examples of the failures of multi-racialism; the White people end up forming an elite and hatred is formed between them and the Natives.
    If multi-racialism is to work all races within the nation must be equally intelligent, I don’t see why liberals can’t understand this.

  15. Do you have any scientific or qualified ‘basis’ for your post or are these simply your thoughts on the subject?

    1. Perhaps you should consider the argument as presented rather than demanding muh papers.
      Logical fallacy of the appeal to authority persuasion.

      1. What distinguishes the West from all other cultures (or at least used to distinguish it) was the willingness to consider the veracity of a claim or the logical consistency of an argument, regardless of who tendered it.
        All other cultures put emphasis on deferring to authority. This is why Chinese culture due to Confucianism to this day still stresses rote memorization rather than synthesis or critical thinking. To a Chinese mind, the answer is in a book somewhere.

        1. Yes. Discussed in depth in Ricardo Duchesne’s The Uniqueness of Western Civilization (2011).

      2. If you notice, when William Adams makes a claim/post/point/argument etc etc, he is good enough to reference it.
        It gives educated people the confidence they are not wasting their time in reading.

        1. Original ideas by definition have no precedent and hence no supporting references or citations.

  16. People still read and subscribe to this rag? It’s obvious, particularly in the last year, they have to push the envelope further to appease master Soros.

  18. White nationalists and race realists have much bigger problems atm than your “intra-racial miscegenation”.
    Although the idea of a slavic + porcelan skinned north-east asian mixed woman turns me on. I knew an Ukrainian woman with very fair skin , brown hair and eyes but oriental looking. Damn hot she was.

    1. I think quite a few Russians have mixed heritage. You could clearly see Asiatic features (the eyes) in people like General Zhukov and Leonid Brezhnev. i guess due to the Mongols centuries earlier.

      1. Southern and Eastern Europe is the place of strange populations and mixtures. My mother has a East-Asian like face minus the eyes.

    2. You can thank the Tatar/Mongol invasions of the 11th century for those oriental features.

  19. I’m old enough to remember when TIME was a reputable and informative magazine which was also a pleasure to read. I noticed that it became more Leftist in the mid-80’s (along with another contemporary, US NEWS AND WORLD REPORT), and soon degenerated into nothing more than a propaganda rag that was as bad as watching mainstream television news.

  20. Most Europeans probably heard about “that magazine” called “Time” from the US once or twice and think it’s the Perl of journalism. It might look like something important with that read stroke around the cover, but it’s old media. Gone. Even my cat wouldn’t want it in his litter box.

  21. Genetic diversity and kinship are indeed relative along a continuous scale. Although races (i.e. regional populations) certainly exist, one can always break them down into sub-groups and intermediate groups. The population geneticist Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza has asserted that one could divide humanity into millions of micro-races and identify their genetic constitutions. But those groups have lesser value from a socio-cultural and political point of view, of course, although some relevance from a medical perspective.
    A good book to understand this is Frank Salter’s On genetic interests.

    1. It has occurred to me that when you have a group of people who have lived in an area for thousands of years and kept to themselves mating wise, you have a group of people who are particularly well adapted genetically and culturally for the environment in which they live, particularly with regard to regional climate and diet. Perhaps some of America’s health problems can be traced to this, considering the majority of Americans are within a few generations of being immigrants to this land and are also genetically mixed, if not inter-racially then intra-racially as was said.

      1. BINGO!
        “you have a group of people who are particularly well adapted
        genetically and culturally for the environment in which they live,
        particularly with regard to regional climate and diet.”

        1. That is why I think people of mixed heritage are in fact the sickest not the healthiest.
          Small, isolated communities are doing just fine health wise. Many of these Old Order Amish live into their 90s.

        2. Why then do Jews and Amish have such high rates of birth defects?
          And there rest of us are ALL mixed heritage.

        3. Inbreeding is bad but as long as one marry clearly outside the family and nearest relatives, one can even mate within the extended family: about fifth cousins would be fine. And even if one will marry someone with 0% kinship there are still plenty of options within the same sub-race, even though this can change pretty fast due to migration.
          As for health problems in the U.S. nutrition plays a key role. Americans eat too much of inflammatory foodstuffs such as processed food and dairy products, and combined with too many calories and too little physical excercise it can lead to a lot of bad things. This can be compared to the blue zones of the world, like Okinawa and Sardinia, where the largest share of centenarians reside. Of course Americans too can become old and there are a lot of individual differences, but often it is medicine that masks health problems (if they are not already a part of the problem).

        4. Within 2nd cousin relationship inbreeding will unlock junk DNA that combines. Tay Sachs anyone? Humans must breed outside the 2nd cousin relationship to avoid the hairlip, cleft palate, club foot, heart/organ defects and 116 other junk DNA combination defects. To retain optimum haplogroup integrity, breeding within the 7th cousin relationship preserves refined traits of the branch tribe bloodline.
          “2-7” is easy to remember. Greek city states became sizeable but breeding was within these “2-7” boundaries. It was rare that a Spartan would mate with an Athenan. The separate city state groups each became very refined and unique, each with pureblooded exceptional traits of their own.

      2. The sickcle cell trait provides resistance against tropical diseases like malaria. White men often fall ill and never return out of the subtropical rainforest. The negroid with the sickle cell trait is a very important part of the delicate rainforest ecosystem. It is his home. The foraging negroid is king of the jungle, not the lion.
        As custodian of the rainforest which provides 80% of the Earth’s supply of fresh oxygen, the pure blooded Negroid has a job to do. And that job doesn’t include aping the Time magazine ethos, drifting north and piping every female out of their region to achieve parity of mongrel appearance with the semitic elites.
        THE JOB of foraging while keeping predatory mongrels out is too important. The naked spear chucking negroid in the rainforest is stealthier than a cheetah and he keeps the other species in balance. In numbers he can menace the mongrel mestizos in Amazonia who slash and burn rainforest for the gmo soy industry. WE NEED ALL THE NIGGAZ to report to the Brazillian rainforest. The rainforest topsoil is thinner than the platte and world’s major farming breadbaskets of the midwest USA, Ukraine and Paraguay/Uruguay, so it isn’t as resilient, meaning only a few turnovers of high yield crops are possible before the steady rainfalls wash the topsoil away resulting in desertification. NIGGAZ SHARPEN your spears and pump it uuup! This is our day!
        NIGGAZ IS NEEDED back in the rainforest and not in rust belt sweatshops producing shoddy products, eating processed shit, suffering miserable high blood pressure, occupying hellhole housing projects and bussed into gentile school districts to impregnate and mongrelize other groups for the semite quotas. You know the mudsharks are empowered to eat you alive. All the system wants are your niglet babies for their agenda.
        THE TOPSOIL is what it is all about. TRIM AND LEAN again. YOU ARE POWERFUL in the jungle. Niggaz have priceless value for us all in the jungle.

  22. On that last one, leftists would love it if the mother and baby were any race other than white.

      1. The funny thing is, that they think that they’re fooling anyone anymore; anyone with eyes to see and a brain to think with, knows their agenda.

  23. Albrecht–and many of the commenters here–are proof that snowflakes exist in the alt.right as well as the SJW left. The butthurt is strong here.

    1. can you explain what you mean because what you’ve written isn’t clear

  25. The “Are You Mom Enough” cover borders on child pornography. Point blank.
    And I remember when the “New Face of America” one was on the news stands. It really pissed me off. What kind of a world would it be if everyone looked the same? No more ethnicities. They talk about celebrating “diversity” but the globalist leftists are doing their level best to homogenize the entire human species. Of course the right wing corporate profiteers are every bit as guilty with their “efficiency” ethos. F*ck both of them.

    1. And the examples they use as the new ‘diverse’ uniform people of the worlds appearance is generally way off base. an insult to common sense for those with an inkling of critical thought. possibly presented this way to not alarm the great unwashed and ease the digestion of the bullshit.

    2. It also seem that to them, ‘diversity’ is a synonym for ‘nonwhite’ and increasingly, ‘non-heterosexual’.

  26. Let us not forget the number of dictators on the cover of TIME; Hitler, Stalin, for starters. Some American ones to as well.

  27. anyone eligible to vote passed a citizenship test which includes English proficiency.
    Not that lack of English proficiency, or even lack of citizenship, has proven to be an actual impediment to voting.

  29. I’m jealous of the kid suckin on that chick’s tiddy. I get how the multicultural agenda deal but the last three girls I’ve hooked up with haven’t been white, at this rate I’ll be part of the problem soon enough

  30. Time Magazine was also cheerleading the Iraq War, remember their Zarqawi cover? That whole thing lead to the country being taken over by ISIS.

  31. Remember, this is the magazine that once had both Adolf Hitler and Ayatollah Khomeini as “Man of the Year.”

  33. Time Magazine thought Latinos were going to pick the next President, Latino voter turnout was low, just like Black voter turnout and Asian voter turnout. It was white working class and middle class turnout that was high. They all started hitting themselves on the head on November 9th realizing the white working class are the only reliable voting bloc in America. In fact, its been that way forever.
    In the most key state, Latinos voted 29 percent for Trump, in Florida. And black voters also voted in smaller numbers for Hillary to swing Florida for Trump. In Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, just enough black voters stayed home to swing the states to Trump, about 80,000 people. If 80,000 Democrats showed up in those three states, Hillary would be President right now.
    Maybe Hillary could have used her head and picked some VP that would have offset her negative image. Bernie as VP would have netted her an extra 2-3 million votes, and mostly in the blue collar Rust Belt areas.

Comments are closed.