Women Lag Far Behind Men In Tech Fields Despite Endless Girl Power Propaganda

I keep seeing a commercial that features a cartoon woman who works in some kind of factory. Displayed prominently in her work-space is a Rosie the Riveter propaganda print, emblazoned with the slogan “We can do it.” Some robotic contraption is introduced, and then there’s a quick montage of the robots replacing every human worker there, except for her. Two faceless, shadowy men sneak up behind her and she makes a sad face, because that means the robots have taken her job, too.

Then there’s a quick cut to the woman (of course she’s a mom) enrolling in an online I.T. college program. She studies day and night and eventually her kids bake her a cake and she graduates and what do you know, she finds herself working a cushy office job where she periodically strolls down long halls of giant computer servers.

The ad ends with her taking a red pen and scrawling “I.T.” over the “it” in her aforementioned propaganda poster, as the syrupy strings of the most saccharine cover of The Cranberries’ “Dreams” you’ve ever heard fades into a full-on advertising pitch for the online university.

Of course, it’s all shameless shekels-grabbing cloaked under the warm and fuzzy security blanket of identity politics. The reality is that the University of Phoenix’s enrollment is easily two-thirds female, with blacks, Hispanics, and Asians making up about 60 percent of the student body. On top of that, less than half of all enrollees make it past their first year, and on the whole the school posts an atrocious 17 percent graduation rate.

And the punchline to all of this? There’s at least a 50/50 chance that the diplomas of those who somehow do manage to graduate is totally unaccredited, making the degree about as valuable as something you churn out on M.S. Paint in five minutes.

You’ve got to be one dense piece of work to think that, in just four years’ time, you can go from being an assembly line worker with no knowledge of coding to an integrated systems manager making north of $200,000 every year. But that’s exactly the kind of people these ads are taking advantage of – women.

Do you think these two have any idea what “API” stands for? For that matter, do you think they can even spell “API?”

A high tech illusion

There’s been a nonstop barrage of gender-baiting propaganda encouraging women to get into STEM fields, but the data has remained largely unchanged for more than a decade. Females, after all, barely account for 18 percent of computer engineering degrees in the U.S., so why should anybody find it surprising women are outnumbered by men in virtually every STEM field out there?

Since I.T. is big money, naturally the feminist types were going to complain about the “overrepresentation” of men in such high-paying fields. Strangely, these same mentally menstruating naggers and complainers seem to have no qualms whatsoever about the vast overrepresentation of females in high-paying industries like healthcare, education and especially social work, nor the glorious underrepresentation of women in such lower-paying fields as sanitation and construction work.

All that matters to them is that men are making a lot of money and not a whole lot of women are capable of performing as well in those same careers, so now it’s become some sort of social justice necessity to get as many women into coding and engineering jobs as possible.

There’s just one teeny, tiny problem, though: not only do women not want to go into these careers, those who attempt it soon find out they have no earthly clue what they’re doing and inevitably realize they will never be able to adequately compete in the glutted, globalized I.T. marketplace.

Or, to put it another way – women just don’t have I.T.

Don’t worry, Becky. I’m sure you’ll figure out how C++ works … one day.

Hardwired to fail

I don’t know if it’s social conditioning or just the way their brains are wired, but 95 percent of all the women I’ve encountered in my life have been technologically retarded. I’ve spent half my career working in or around colleges, and I can’t tell you how less technologically-inclined the alleged “fairer sex” is when it comes to even the most rudimentary computer tasks.

I’ve had to work with students and colleagues that had no idea how to send an attachment in an email or even access a Wi-Fi connection. Most male students and colleagues have no problem getting the fundamentals of Final Cut down, but virtually all of the females are hopelessly lost less than five minutes in. EVERY single time I got a report about a student clicking on scareware and thinking they’ve activated the latent Y2K bug – every, single, time – it was a female.

These are people who can’t figure out how to use WordPress, or even debug simple HTML. And you expect them to all of a sudden flip off their Instagram feeds, drop their intersectional feminist degree track and become mechanical engineers and front-end developers and plug-in designers? Take it from somebody with mucho experience in the area: you’d have an easier time training a fish to ride a bicycle.

Well, Rachel, if we can’t figure out how this CMS stuff works, we can always Ask Jeeves!

It’s not about inequality, it’s about intelligence

There’s a reason why Forbes’ list of the 100 richest people in tech contains a grand total of five women. By and large, women aren’t analytical problem solvers. They don’t see things holistically and even their spatial skills are remarkably worse than men.

By and large, they simply don’t have the cognitive toolkit to iron down things like web design, coding and especially systems management. And even if they did, can you imagine Jack Shit getting accomplished in the office with all those broads chinwagging about totally unimportant aspects of their personal lives all day? With such detail-oriented tasks on the docket, I just can’t imagine gossip-obsessed I.T. workers managing to do an adequate job monitoring anything – that is, besides their own Pinterest feed during on the clock hours.

Maybe it’s cultural, maybe it’s biological, but the fact of the matter is that men are just plain better at all the technical skills necessary to be successful in I.T. careers. Hell, I’d assume a good 95 percent of all men on the planet lack the cranial wherewithal to succeed in computer engineering or software development. As much as the feminists may want to ignore it, the meat of the matter is that most people on the planet just don’t have what it takes to be successful in I.T. fields, regardless of their gender.

Sorry, gals, it looks like this is one area where possessing a vagina simply isn’t enough to overcome a lack of the only organ that really matters in such competitive, international markets – good, old-fashioned brains.

Read More: U.S. Government Goes Full Retard And Backs War Draft For Women

502 thoughts on “Women Lag Far Behind Men In Tech Fields Despite Endless Girl Power Propaganda”

  1. My GF has a degree in STEM – she pretty much hated every minute of it, if not for her parents push, she’d be 10 times happier being a daycare worker.

    1. My fiancee has a knack for STEM, particularly mathematics and that essential skill of translating between engineers and non-technical staff. You know what she’s doing, instead of training or working in management?
      She’s a nanny.

        1. That’s why my fiancee wanted to get engaged. She’s got a notion to raise children, and honestly I think between the two of us our kids could grow up well.

        2. For millions of years Motherhood has been the top priority for women.
          Then Feminism happened. Happy for you boys finding a good mate.

        3. Was about to say the same. At the very worst feminism annoys me but only if I go online and out of my way to look for things. Other than that it’s a total non issue and doesn’t make me even a tad miserable

        4. Consequences vary from place to place. In Canada for example, they passed a law where if you refuse to call some degenerate by their preferred pronoun (like Zie) – that would be consideted a hate crime, and your life would be ruined.

        5. the thing is there is a right way and a wrong way to do everything and if you do things the right way it shouldn’t matter where you are. That said, I don’t know what the fuck goes on in americas hat.

        6. “there’s the right way, the wrong way, the navy’s way, and MY way. we do things my way and everything will be fine.”
          -Cpt. ‘Ghandi’ Queeg, USS Caine

        7. Very few people know that Gandhi has executive producer and writing credits on many of Sinatra’s songs. Basically he would write the song, sinatra would remove all instances of the word “cunt” and change “mass genocide” to “love so fair” and bang, an instant hit.

      1. Reads like you need to have a “talk” with your fiancee. Hate those, but reads like she has you in her wannabe SAHM sights while you’re nonplussed because she holds the keys to a six figure salary yet isn’t going for it. My guess is your engagement will implode, but better now than after she gets a plus sign on the pee stick and expects you to make her SAHM dreams come true.

        1. There are three paths before me, as I see them. In the first, we get married and raise a half-dozen kids (which, to me, is a happy path – I’ve always been a family guy).
          In the second, I push her into a career she doesn’t want, which makes her miserable and brings that misery into my home. She may have an aptitude, but she’s just not the sort to be happy in a technical environment.
          In the third, we break up now and I have to look for another suitable woman to bear my children. After years of looking, I’ve found a grand total of two women who might make suitable wives and mothers, and one of them is fugly, so that’s not a promising route.

        2. Nothing wrong with SAHM so long as her husband is good with it. Nothing wrong with women working as nannies or daycare workers, either, so long as their boyfriends, fiancees, and husbands accept they’ll have to do the heavy financial lifting, plus they respect her choice to be the financial lightweight in their relationship.

      2. I take the orders from customers amd give them to the engineers.
        Engineers aren’t good with people.
        I have people skills Dammit!!!

        1. Few engineers have mastered the “single simple sentence” pattern. I learned that, if you can’t boil the problem down into a single simple sentence, you don’t truly understand it. This not only gives me a metric and pattern for comprehending tasks, but it also gives me the ability to explain the complex to those without the aptitude and experience required to handle all its details.

        2. I have this idea for a game.
          There’s a mat on the floor….with different…..conclusions….on it that you……jump to….
          ….
          ….
          ….
          Cereal, i get what youre saying. I’m like that. You uave to boil your problem down to the most basic level.

      3. The genuinely smart women I know want no part of the corporate world. Or academia.

    2. I think that’s probably mostly cultural. Most women in my culture relish the oppportunity to get a STEM degree so they can make lots of money and teach their family good skills.
      You’ll note the part about “family” being included. Their biological clock still exists.

        1. My mother is white Hispanic, my father is a Don River Cossack. Given my dad died in my childhood, my hispanic side dominates.
          Plenty of Latinas in STEM, most of whom, surprisingly, are very receptive to traditional gender roles.

        2. Wow, very intetesting to hear cause Im from a Cossack city myself, I’ve been to Don as well, and my GF is Latin. But when we have kids I plan on sticking around.
          Its a vary rare mix too – Latin and Slav that is. I havent personally met anyone of such background.

        3. I know. Tons of slavs tell me so. My mother is Basque-Spanish-Mexican and super-duper-Catholic and therefore met my father at a church camp for Catholics (he’s was a Ukrainian catholic).
          (Don’t let my last name fool you. Only idiots use real names on this forum. I don’t want my employers knowing I’m a hard-right nationalist.)
          My dad, though he was originally from Don, was basically a shipbuilder at Kherson during the Soviet era. He died in an industrial accident in the 90’s. My mum moved afterwards.
          Hispanic culture emphasizes the role of the woman not only of mother, but of educator and sustainer. Being uneducated does not allow you to spread your knowledge to your kin and moreover does not allow you to adequately manage a household. Do you think I want a woman in my life that’ll just sit there and then divorce-rape me up the ass later? No siree.
          The biggest thing I hate about this website is that, despite excellent political content, has a Jekyll and Hyde routine going on where Troy Francis promotes thot culture one week and where some hard-right nationalist or Aurelius Moner type promotes chastity, religiosity and family the next.
          My current girlfriend is El Salvadorian and has a degree in biochemistry. She also aspires to be a master vintner and run a winery and homestead with a very large family. She insists her entire family move in with us should that happen and that her abuelita (i.e the great-grandmother of my future children) run the household. She’s a retired teacher and former union boss who practically managed to get her and her fellow teachers massive pay hikes every time she’d negotiate. Hard as fucking rocks. Very kind and motherly though.
          The big assumption many men have here is that women can’t STEM, which is untrue, given that most of my Cossack female ancestors ran businesses and probably had engineering degrees in the Soviet era. My Basque and Medican female ancestors helped their husbands run their fishing and farming concerns by being accountants and financial managers.
          I hate feminism and the whole grrl-power garbage, but I still can’t tolerate having my female relatives insulted.
          Feminism is wrong in assuming that women, throughout history, were simply submissive skivvies that did whatever their husbands ordered them too. Most of my cossack side emphasizes this.

        4. In USSR women were doing manual jobs as much as men did, that was some true equality.
          I agree that this website has conflicting messages – on the one hand it teaches promiscuity and promotes lust, on the other hand it praises tradition and patriarchy.
          I think it reflects its creator’s, Roosh, general transitioning from his early years pick-up personna toward older, more mature thinker who’s less interested in sex and more in global, deeper questions of power and one’s purpose.
          Btw, I met my partner’s extended family when I travelled to South America- a lot of strong women – grandmother, mother, sisters, aunts. They all seemed having a firm inner core and decisiveness to me.

        5. Feminists don’t actually care about equality. Most are just individualistic, annoying thots that want productive men and women to pay for their garbage. Methinks its also a way the elites are using to pretend there’s equality while global capitalists rip us off.
          Most Latin women are that way. They have to be. My GF’s grandmother was gang raped by El Salvadorian soldiers (those soldiers were tried and convicted, so this isn’t some false rape accusation) and still had to raise her family and go to work. If you think for one minute that women outside of the west are weak and immoral, you’re wrong. Materialistic western culture has created a generation of pseudo-empowered bimbos that, in the end, will get slaughtered once the civil war starts and the nationalists start shooting at the Muzzies and the other way around. Most of them wouldn’t last an instant.
          Every feminist in the West I’ve met is a humanities major that repeats the cultural Marxist garbage she was taught in high school and brings nothing of use except maybe ad revenue for Google so it can produce better products.
          Roosh needs to start choosing one side or the other. His ridiculous pandering to white supremacists is fruitless; he’s brown and always will be. On the other hand, his promotion of sexual degeneracy is going to bite him in the ass again and again as he crosses people (even many nationalists I’ve spoken to) as a hypocrite who bangs white women and then talks about racial separatism and promiscuity being the devil. Pick one, god damn it.

  2. I would be willing to go a step farther and say that at least half of all I.T. employees don’t have the minds to succeed. I’m not just talking about aspiring programmers who are scared to learn more than one language (when they don’t even really understand that one), either.
    Here are a few stories. Once, I was in an advanced course surrounded by exchange students, mostly Indian. At the end of the lecture, one of the students stood up and asked a question that was so basic, so absolutely fundamental, that the professor never did figure out what she was asking. That’s not the scary part – all but three of us were nodding along to the question (me, the other white guy, and the Chinese student). All of those nodding students have advanced degrees, now, and are in charge of services you take for granted.
    And another. My mate showed me the stats from his job, where he closed twice as many tickets per quarter as the other ten members of his team…combined. He’s a bright guy, for sure, but surely he shouldn’t be THAT much better, should he?
    There’s a certain combination of curiosity, perseverance, daring, and intelligence required to master technical skills, and from what I’ve seen even many of the self-selected lack those qualities.

  3. “It’s the man, holding us down, giving us less pay, not acknowledging our brilliance…and….and…oh, fuck, my legs itch and I want pretzels and that girl who works with me is a cunt and John Legend makes my pussy wet.” – Average Workplace Twat

  4. Yeah telling a woman how to access her wifi settings over the phone is the highlight of my day at least 5 times a day and then they type it in the search bar.

    1. I don’t use facebook. However, my 80+ year old mother was on it to see the latest about her kids and grandkids.
      My kids all dreaded providing tech support to her when she couldn’t figure something out. Most dreaded thing they could hear from me for a while was, ‘Here, your grandmother wants to talk to you!’

      1. I ask if a younger person is available at this point when talking to the older ones.

        1. Don’t blame you. Although, my mom wasn’t all that bad. I could talk her through most things– I just didn’t know anything about FB.
          4 out of 6 siblings are pretty good technically. But only 1 sister would remote in to Mom’s computer for configuration management instead of all 4 of us changing things back and forth. Worked pretty well

        2. Thats nice of your sister. My mom and technology just don’t mix. I have her on apple products now which seems to cut down tech support from family. The others can pay me for it as far as I’m concerned.

        3. That was our mistake, I like Windows but I think Apple would have made things easier. More locked down. At one point the suggestion was made to move her, but she didn’t want to learn a new OS. (The config management issues were ensuring nobody changed things my sister had done that enabled older programs that my mom liked and was familiar with to run)

        4. I have preference for Windows as well but Apple really does suit some users better.

  5. A few decades of social engineering isn’t reversing thousands of years of evolution.

  6. Well, I’m a man and I don’t even know how to install Windows properly. I always call someone to do it. So, I don’t blame these women (and some men) who suck at tech. You have to be passionate as hell to be an ace at tech (intelligence is not enough, I’m not stupid, I just don’t have the necessary passion for this shit)

    1. I will say that a modern operating system installation is sufficiently simple that anyone should be able to do it. They pretty much railroad you through the process.
      There are basic things that everyone should be able to do, simply because so much depends on those skills. Primarily, everyone needs at least a basic understanding of tools like the Office suite and common-sense security (e.g. not clicking phishing links).
      Beyond that, though, there’s not much reason for most people to even think of developing their skills. A barber doesn’t need to be a tech wizard – he just needs someone with enough savvy to set up an online presence to attract customers. A surgeon doesn’t need to be a programmer. A businessman doesn’t have time to learn all the various scripting and shell commands required to do complex computations and data manipulation.

      1. They should understand a bit about their router from a security standpoint. MAC address filtering, capabilities it has for limiting specific computers access to specific times etc.

        1. Worthwhile information, but not absolutely necessary for casual use.
          However, if you are now or plan to run a business in the future, you’d better either know about these security options or hire someone who does. Compromises in security can absolutely destroy a business.

    2. That fits me exactly too. I agree with the general theme of the article, but in our home it’s my wife who looks after the IT. I could probably do it but being self-employed, just don’t have the patience.

  7. This is the problem with free will. Society isn’t following the correct path of development. The obvious solution is to convene a panel of elite leaders, possibly headed by Mark Zuckerberg, to determine who will attend which colleges and follow which career paths. This way, we can finally have true justice for oppressed minorities and wymyn.

    1. Somewhere, Google is already building the Matrix battery pods for us.

      1. Google Glass was a stepping stone. I find it reasonable to believe at least a battery pod prototype exists.

      2. I remember Roosh wrote a short story on this, it should be somewhere in the archives of ROK.
        This is why I will never do that VR thing.

        1. I just won’t do it, period… why need virtual VR sex when I can just go bang my fiancee till she screams my name?
          Authenticity matters.

        2. I still remember a max headroom ep about people being controlled via VR. Which look like the Microsoft hololens.

      1. It took a full 45 seconds of staring at cishet for my brain to resolve it. It’s like not practicing a second language, use it or lose it.

        1. I’m younger, so I got the full-retard college experience. Even I am likely far behind the acceptable terminology at this point.

        1. Asians don’t possess the ginger gene. That’s why zuck married an asian to save his future offspring the misfortune of being ginger and jewish.

        2. Who kicked over the stone? Why does RoK attract so many anti-semitic nutjobs?

        3. “kick over the stone” ???
          is that some kind of Yiddish folk expression?

        4. I didn’t say they shouldn’t exist(who would control banking if they didn’t). Learn how to read. Unfortunately I can’t teach you a sense of humor.

        5. That is a concern in I say “Oh boy the author going down that road.” I do support Israel, as a Christian.

        6. As a Christian, I support Israel’s right to exist. I have no reason to support them past that point, and if God were to wipe them out like Sodom I’d have no problems with it (the same goes, naturally, for if God makes them last a million years).

    2. Every time I drive by men out on the road laying hot tar in the burning sun I say, “there is male privilege”. I am so glad I do not have male privilege because I would last about 2 seconds doing that job.

    3. Sarcasm? The reason things are the way they are is because of “elite” meddling.

  8. If only we could celebrate motherhood…. Oh wait we can’t because it’s harder to brainwash a family with an Alpha Dad and Supportive Mom.

  9. Good, informative article, but good god, please find a way to never use/ overuse italics again!!!!! Oh yeah, and C+, Python, even Visual Basic are pretty goddamn difficult even for fairly smart guys, much less most pea-brained split tails.

  10. you know ladies there’s science behind making babies and sandwiches too

      1. googled that. Tasty looking sandwiches. Might be a bit technical for girls though

        1. I don’t know. My sisters learned a lot from Good Eats.
          They don’t cook as often as I, but I find that the food I cook matches my palate better than anything I can find in a restaurant.

        2. get your sisters a certificate of attendance for watching the show. Actually I like cookery shows, but I don’t have the patience to put them into practice

        3. My daddy raised me right. Cooked my first kill right after we cleaned it.
          I burned the crap out of it, but I still had to eat it. That was enough to convince me to learn.

        4. now you’ve got me wondering what it was you shot / strangled / run down in a limousine?
          Don’t worry I’ll use my imagination.

        5. Deer. Crawled out into the woods in a Texas blizzard (i.e. a 40-degree chill), waited patiently for the right deer to cross into the open, and dropped him with grandpa’s old 30-30. Clean through the spinal column, dropped in his tracks.
          Best meat from any deer we’ve had before or since. Except that first steak – it had an unpleasant charcoal smell and a boot-leather consistency.

        6. must have been an experience. Venison is a fine meat, no doubt more so if you’ve brought the animal down yourself. Brought up in London myself, so not such a good idea to eat anything you might kill.

      2. Man I loved freaking alton brown. I don’t blame him for selling out, i would in a heart beat, but the first 5 or so seasons of Good Eats were so interesting and entertaining and helpful at the same time.

  11. “You’ve got to be one
    dense piece of work to think that, in just four years’ time, you can go
    from being an assembly line worker with no knowledge of coding to an
    integrated systems manager making north of $200,000 every year. But
    that’s exactly the kind of people these ads are taking advantage of – women.”
    Let me tell you about this policy called Affirmative Action…

  12. At home, I’m the IT specialist – wife and daughter are totally clueless.
    And they wonder why I’ve segregated their computers from mine on the
    home network? Even after I’ve had to remove many, many repeated
    instances of malware they get from doing stupid shit that I’ve
    repetitively told them not to do.
    At work, one of the smartest women I used to work with in spacecraft telemetry was fussing about why the spacecraft designers didn’t use some easy and common protocol between space and ground. When I got my jaw off the floor, I managed to say – in total disbelief – that her favorite protocol wouldn’t fit in the data link. Then I had to sketch out for her how all the data packets wouldn’t fit. Her reply? “Oh, I didn’t think of that.” Just fucking Duh!
    And she was one of the brightest women on the project.

    1. You’re lying. The only reason we got to the moon was because some fat black women discovered new math stuff that dumb white men couldn’t figure out. I saw it all in a movie, so I know it’s true.
      EDIT: Actually, I only saw the trailer….

      1. I know the guys who DID that. The head of the NASA directorate that did all the ground systems and planning and trajectory read the draft of the book, then contacted all of the former worker-bees and collected IN HARD COPY all their data and memories. The book was pure self-aggrandizing bullshit, and I’ve had lunch with the guys who have told me what really happened. Needless to say, that book and film are very unpopular with the true veterans of the mission operations directorate. Of course, the feminized HR and PR departments pushed the PC version of things.

        1. That story was pure racist poppycock: “ooo look black people can do maf!!! I never knew!!!”

  13. This is a great article and really interesting too. The one thing I would take umbrage with is the idea that it is “about intelligence”
    The fact is that IT doesn’t require general intelligence. Similar to engineering IT requires a particular type of thinking. It is a type I don’t have and almost no women have. However, to equate that particular way of thinking to intelligence in general is a mistake I think. There are plenty of very talented engineers and IT people who are, in many other ways, fucking morons. But they have a way of solving problems which is helpful for this particular trait.
    The IT people I have met in the course of my business have been very good at what they do and many of them are bright and decent people but every single one of them would be a total fucking waste of oxygen trying to do the big picture multi-departmental shit I do or the creative manipulation of law and city ordinance or organizing large teams made up of diverse specialties to come together for a single purpose and have them all work together. …. in the same way that I would be a totally useless bag of food if I tried to work out the minutiae involved with writing computer programs. Both of these skills are important for different jobs, neither of them are ones that women are very good at and neither of them signal particular intelligence but rather a way of thinking conducive to particular tasks.
    So I think it is a mistake to say that this is intelligence. Women can be quite intelligent at things that women excel at and I don’t just mean making sammiches. Women have incredibly high social IQs by default, they are naturally excellent care takers and homemakers….women have their own ways of solving problems which are totally fucking useless in the business world but which will beat the male paradigm of thought in social or home settings 10 times out of 10.
    When we talk about intelligence I think it is a word we use far too loosely. Some of the best computer programmers would not make it through my intern program and I wouldn’t make it through theirs and neither of us probably keep a home and solve domestic problems as well as a woman.

      1. whaddaya mean “intelligent” like some kinda professor? is he here to amuse you?

    1. These problems happen when people are forced to do jobs they are not capable of. You never let a sniper do the job of a point man!

    2. IT correlates well with IQ, which is itself an imperfect measure. IQ relates directly to puzzle skills – the ability to identify, employ, adapt, and replace patterns. These are essential traits of IT and engineering, so I can understand why one might conflate intelligence with technical aptitude.
      Intelligence, to me, is a combination of IQ and other factors like reasoning and creativity. One who can distance himself from his own philosophies and create new hypotheses – a combination of reasoning and creativity – is intelligent even if he can’t quite grasp technology.

      1. that sounds about right. There are different types of puzzles though. Logic puzzles tend to be very neat and clean and IT folk can follow those things through forever in ways I find, frankly, impressive. On the other hand, take the math away and make the puzzle about how to get something done when the variables involve a few thousand people and the IT specific problem solving turns to mush as frequently as not. Some people have both, sure. The larger point is that a) thinking that basic logic problems = intelligence is wrong and b) don’t underestimate the great intelligence of women. Women only SEEM fucking stupid because they are doing shit they don’t have the aptitude for. If you put me in a computer science class I would see fucking stupid too. Likewise, take my IT guy and tell him how to figure out an issue in the field or even try to impress on him that he needs to be careful of unintended consequences when solving a problem and he drools all over himself….put 10 of both types of intelligent people into a 1 bedroom apartment and tell them to maximize space while creating a beautiful living area that makes one feel comfortable and peaceful when they come home from work and all 20 of us would sit there like monkeys

    3. “Women have their own ways of solving problems “, understanding that is the key to knowing women. They don’t think or look at things the same way men do, we get aggravated with them because they can’t figure out something that seems simple to us. We try to interpret them by projecting what/ how we think onto them and of course it doesn’t work. They aren’t all stupid, naturally their mind works entirely different from ours. At times when dealing with them, that’s hard to remember.

      1. A few of the smartest people I’ve ever known were women. That doesn’t mean they thought in any manner I could grasp, though.
        One girl can listen to a song, and in half an hour she has a unique arrangement for multiple parts/instruments. She can perform mathematic feats I long since forgot how to do, and she wasn’t even a math student. But don’t try to talk philosophy with her, because she’ll make Olympic-record leaps you’ll never follow.
        Another has this amazing ability to interpret psychology and medical research. Give her a few hours, and she’ll boil it down to a single page of plain English without sacrificing any accuracy. But don’t try to teach her to program, because her mind doesn’t quite grasp the little things essential to creating useful code.

        1. That opening line certainly didn’t work for me when addressing the city commission.

      2. exactly right! That is why a competent man and a competent woman in a healthy relationship knowing where their strengths are and sharing the burden make for a very powerful team.
        Women trying to run a company is like trying to use a hammer to strip a wire. Do it for long enough and do nothing else with it and you can be tricked into thinking the hammer is useless. But in the end the hammer has great value once you realize what you are supposed to use it for.

        1. I mean, I just envisioned a process for stripping wire with a hammer, but I don’t know why I’d use it when I at least have teeth available…

    4. “The IT people I have met in the course of my business have been very
      good at what they do and many of them are bright and decent people but
      every single one of them would be a total fucking waste of oxygen trying
      to do the big picture multi-departmental shit I do …”

    5. “The IT people I have met in the course of my business have been very
      good at what they do and many of them are bright and decent people but
      every single one of them would be a total fucking waste of oxygen trying
      to organiz[e] large teams made up
      of diverse specialties to come together for a single purpose and have
      them all work together”
      Come on people, let’s work together!

    6. I’d say that there are different kinds of intelligence more to the point. So correlating advanced logical problem solving and even more impressive, creating vast labyrinths of logic in such a way as to make your computer do things for you that, were it not for the programmer, would be impossible for you to figure out, is in fact an expression of a type of high intelligence (assuming a competent programmer here). So I do think it’s correct to say that IT/Engineering types are highly intelligent *in at least the specific methods of problem solving, analysis and logic creation*. They may suck at the socio-political stuff that you do, but that is also another type of intelligence. So I guess in a long winded way, I agree with you.
      Beware the person who can program competently in C++ who also has social skills and social intelligence. We’re smart enough to play dumb and manipulate the living hell out of people without them ever realizing it. Five steps ahead type logical chess thinking combined with the ability to sweet talk and charm; deadly.

      1. I beware anyone who can competently program in C++. I stick to C because those objects get all jumbled in my head and I can’t effectively debug mangled names and templates.
        Saints in heaven, if the one man I know in real life with a true understanding of C++ had social intelligence, he’d rule the world.

        1. You’re talking to one. I don’t rule the world because that would mean that I would become Overlord Babysitter for a planet of 5 billion whining losers (I’m going to assume the other 1.5 billion are competent adults that don’t need everything in their lives directed). But I have used it to basically become a meta alpha in the groups I run in and, of course, to be surrounded by a bevy of women. Some say this might be squandering a gift, but I see it more as applying it to my own ends instead of to trying to run other people’s silly little lives.

        2. Always. It’s one of my many great qualities. Heh.
          I have honestly been petitioned 3 times in my life to run for public office by the local GOP. No…fucking….thanks.

        3. Anything someone can do with ‘objects’ and crap I can do better and far more efficiently in C with standard old-fashioned design. One pioneer in programming saw all the hoopla on object-oriented design, snorted, and said “we tried that in the 50’s. wasn’t worth the trouble it caused.”

        4. I hear ya. Who wants that kind of hassle?
          In my youth, I imagined what I would do were I like unto a god. As I thought, I began to realize how much everything is interwoven, so much so that I’d easily be paralyzed by analyzing the ramifications of any minor thing I did.

        5. I still think you should consider it. Way better than just cycling through career politicians.

        6. Nah, I’ve plenty of C, Objective C and C++ under my belt. OO programming is childishly easy once you get it “in your bones” so to speak. Procedural programming and non-object model programming, while useful for some tasks, just seems like a lot of extra typing.
          All that being said, if given my preference, I’m going the lazy route and seeking out a C# or Java gig. Shit is easy, powerful and gives me 7 hours a day to fart around on ROK.

        7. Have you heard of the programming language developed just for the medical profession? It’s called HIV++

        8. It’s not the details that would bug me in the technical sense, those would be fascinating, it’s the constant line of whiners that make up the bulk of humanity that would get on my nerves, and I’m an extrovert yet. I chose long ago to be responsible for exactly one life on this planet, and that life is mine (excluding the time that I chose to dedicate to my children in raising them). I use my social intelligence combined with my analytical/logical skills to form circles of people and events around me that I enjoy, and only because I enjoy them. Babysitting a bunch of feuding idiots would get on my last nerve.

        9. I’ve found value in the concepts of OOP, but not so much in the languages designed around them. For example, you can essentially create objects in C through naming conventions, and you can make them functionally private through clever use of typedef.
          At the end of the day, I think very few have the ability to actually understand OO languages like C++. Personally, I find that polymorphism is the biggest danger, because I have to keep in active memory every definition for my functions in order to ensure the program executes as desired.
          In C, ‘c = a + b’ has very few definitions. With operator overloading, it can mean virtually anything, and that’s why it’s so difficult for most to master.

        10. Why you say that is C++ that powerful. I’m currently a computer science student and C++ is the main language I am studying

        11. It takes a very special mind to fully grasp C++. I know one person in real life who can be said to have mastered C++ (though, having learned from some excellent C programmers, he’s switching permanently), and GoJ would be the second I’ve known.
          If such a person can not only master C++, but also have powerful social skills, there’s little that can stop them.

        12. See that browser that you’re using to type messages? 99% chance it was coded in C++. Most of the DLL’s that drive your OS (assuming you use Winderz)? C++ (most of the time).

        13. Thanks. I thought of trying to master c++. It will be a painful journey filled with pointers and probably crashing my computer

        14. C++ is so named because it was designed as an improvement over C (hence the iteration operator).
          C was developed as a sort of portable assembler. What that means is that the language is designed to create code that works as close to the machine as possible without requiring you to write assembly. Using C, you can create everything from firmware (the code that controls physical devices) to operating systems (the code that ties all the devices together) to complex high-level code like browsers and games.
          C++ is exactly the same as C, only it has what I call “syntactic sugar.” Basically, it is C with a bunch of non-essential elements layered on top (sugar). You can create code without polymorphism, abstraction, and whathaveyou in C++, but when you do so you’re relying only on the essential elements that were already present in C. The addition of these and other similar elements is thus not essential to programming useful code, but can be useful for other things such as shortening code (not simplifying – these are different things).
          C++ has many more popular libraries than C, as well, which means that there are a lot of things people have done to shorten your work. You can do anything with the basic languages, but without these libraries it’s harder to, say, draw a bouncing sphere on your screen. There’s nothing inherent to C++ that makes this easier than in C – it’s the libraries that make the difference.
          Anyway, I hope that helps. At the end of the day, I’m a C programmer because it’s reliable and easy to use (providing you develop good programming practices and useful patterns). The syntactic sugar of C++ makes it harder for me to get my work done, because it’s hard for me to keep everything in mind while I’m working.

        15. Don’t start by learning pointers – only madness lies that way. Instead, learn the MIPS R2000 processor’s assembly language (you can find readily-available simulators online). It’s a Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC), which means it’s designed to be basically easy to learn and work with.
          All data is stored in memory. We can either keep that memory close at hand (say, in registers) or store just a pointer to where that data is. That’s why I recommend you learn assembly – you’ll learn what’s going on underneath the syntax, and then it’s much easier to learn how things like pointers work.
          EDIT: I felt like I should add something. Registers have very limited data storage – the MIPS R2000 had 32 registers which could each store 1 integer (and 16 float units, but they’re a different beast altogether). The heap and stack, on the other hand, had much more storage capacity, so you could fit much more data in there (e.g. You could store the KJV Bible in memory and only have 1 register holding the pointer to all that text).
          Pointers work in a similar manner in modern languages. In C++, for example, when you use a pointer in a function you’re giving the function access to the original data. When you pass the data without a pointer, you make a copy of that original data just for that function.
          So, you see, the principles at the lowest level are still found at higher levels. That’s why I suggested learning assembly before you strain too hard understanding things like pointers.

        16. Smart move. Take the easy work with the highest return. Now with your skills, why not come up with something that would raise a big middle finger to Google, FB, Apple and MS? Maybe crack the Win 10 code with all the spyware. Or better yet find a way to hack out the spyware in all of our tech products.

        17. Well it’s kinda too late for that. C++ seems to be the main language my school uses especially for my track( applied computer science). And yea I agree pointers are annoying.

        18. I’m going to learn assembly in computer organization 2 but it’s good idea to learn it ahead of time. Also what is your advice overall for a guy that is a computer science major as far as languages and skills to learn. Thank you for the the tips you have already given me

        19. It’s my pleasure. As to languages, it’s often better to know the basics of many languages than to master one, especially in school. There are times it’s better to pull out something like Python or Awk than a more hardcore language like C, and if you know at least a bit of those languages you’ll be able to identify which language suits your needs.
          I’m on the job hunt, so I know some of the languages and tools people are asking for. Here’s a smattering, in the order I think they’re valuable:
          – C/C++/Java (lots of demand for decent programmers, just none near my hard-to-break lease)
          – Python (AWK is sort of a subset of python useful for some school work, so maybe start there)
          – SQL (databases run the world these days)
          – CSS/PHP/HTML/Ruby (online front- and back-end development, nothing else)
          – Chef/Puppet (network automation, not worth learning while in school)
          I’d also learn to use Linux. Start with Lubuntu in a virtual machine – it’s very lightweight and full-featured Ubuntu. When you have time, learn what the LAMP stack is and how to work with it.

        20. The line of whiners leads to a giant pit in my realm.
          No room for that type.

        21. Because I’m wealthy enough to retire in 4 years and draw a 6 figure income from interest. My desire to contribute more to our tax base is minimal.

        22. Pointers are the catalyst for good programs. Properly employed, pointers let you do absolutely amazing things, things most programmers instinctively assume are impossible (though, as I pointed out to some of my classmates once, it’s not like their computers aren’t already doing those “impossible” things).
          There’s just no way to make sense of them until you know why they exist.

        23. Damn well played and you raised a family? Any advice on investing GOJ? I’ve been a conspiracy theorist and just saved my money for fear of collapse. I’m 34. Not sure who to trust .

        24. Yes, that I know. I worked for CompuServe back in the day, and wrote their little TCP/IP/PPP app that would allow the then *very young* Linux community to hook into CompuServe, in C. Good fun and I became the official support for basically anything that even had a whiff of POSIX about it, which was good job security.

        25. Hey, it’s all good fun man. There is Linux to work with for a free compiler, or if you must use Winderz, you can get a GCC port to Winderz of that compiler as well.

        26. Thanks David. Yep, I did just that. But it took some sacrifice.
          For newbies to the investment world I generally recommend learning the basics and the how and whys from a good text book. Ric Edelman’s “The Truth About Money” and some of his other books are a great place to start.
          If you really want to get far, try to avoid debt at all costs and instead invest all surplus cash that you can comfortably afford to invest, usually into some kind of high yield mutual fund (if you’re adverse to individual stock predicting, which you should be). Also max out any 401k contributions, as far as you comfortably can. If the employer matches the first 6%, then you at a minimum contribute 6% (I normally drop in 10-15% regardless), because that’s just free money that they’re giving you.
          I think that the advice about mortgages and keeping them is a bit silly (I pay down on principle monthly in addition to the normal mortgage payment) but otherwise he gives great advice.
          I’m not pimping for this site or this product, I just think that if you want a good start on the basics, then the book I recommended is a great place to begin. I advised my son the same on this.
          http://www.edelmanfinancial.com/
          I’ve advised before on how to buy cars for cash, since they are your second largest expense usually, but if you haven’t seen it I can repost it.

        27. It is used to write portable software using overly complicated abstractions and object models in order to ensure the software runs equally slowly on all platforms.

        28. Ghost, I could use some life advice from you regarding computers. I’m looking for a complete career change. I realize that the computer field, as a whole, is way too competitive, i.e., saturated with workers, not to mention the H1B visa problem. What skill set in the computer field would enable me to work either from home or for myself? I want to be able to set my own hours, work when I want, and take time off when I want. My line of work is a serious cock blocker. It pays for my mortgage and other bills, but good luck getting time off, let alone paid vacation to visit some friends overseas. I don’t expect to get rich, but I’d like to at least make a comportable living with much less time sucked from my life and soul. I don’t expect to be one of those digital nomads – that’s hyped up and many of them seem to be glorified bloggers. The money seems to be in work that industry needs or where there is a broad consumer demand, not someone’s opinion piece or tales of travel; those are small niches.

      2. I think that is about right. It isn’t a far cry from the world of physics and engineering. A lot of theory guys see applied physics and engineering and no different than plumbing and a lot of applied guys and engineers see theory guys as spaced out dreamers. In the end they are all in a symbiotic relationship where the whole requires various modes of thinking that are almost never resident in the same head. It is, however, funny to see Princeton, Chicago or Cal Tech theory guys talk about “the trade school” in reference to MIT’s engineering program.

        1. When people refer to engineering as trade school, I glow with pride. My degree taught me valuable skills and gave me hands-on experience that are worth money in the real world.

        2. I think it is more like army-marines friendly kind of rivalry than any real insult here. The theory guys know they need their theories proven by applied physicists and engineers just as much as the engineers know they need theoretical frame work on the design level that they either aren’t interested in or aren’t equiped to do. It is a very good symbiotic relationship as far as I have seen and one that comes with a lot of good natured teasing.

        3. engineers vs. theoretical physicists: who can make that pussy dry up faster?

        4. Asian women generally respect intelligence and academic achievement … white women not so much

        5. There is some genuine conflict between the two groups, though. Engineers usually hate theoretical physics because it’s recent history has produced very little for us to work with (how, for example, does a many-worlds theory help us develop a faster computer?). Theory guys hate engineers because we’re obsessed with testable and applicable concepts, while they are fascinated by the “could-be’s” and “what if’s.”
          Personally, I think it’s fascinating what theoreticians come up with, but I’m concerned that they don’t recognize it as philosophical. Science is in the repeated testing for falsehood, and most modern theory is untestable.

        6. Prob the theory guy….engineer might actually make money. Short of a nobel the theory guys aren’t ever buying a porche

        7. yeah nothing new in physics theory since what 1960’s. The theory guys in physics I have known were all PhD students while I was in grad school so I don’t know how it pans out with the relationship once they graduate…but I always saw a lot of good natured teasing and the theory guys generally did consider themselves philosophers — however, that might just be because I was in philosophy so the ones I met were inclined that way too. As for making work, I am sure the hundreds (thousands?) of engineers and applied physics guys over at the superconducting supercollider at CERN who are playing around with the oddball stuff that the quantum and string guys are coming up with are all very happy with the bajillion trillion zzazazaagillion hillion phillion dollars a year that gets dumped into that fucking huge slip and slide.

        8. I could have gone to Princeton but it’s in New Jersey.

        9. America and Europe should abandon particle physics. Only China deserves particle accelerators. Western Europe should focus on housing and feeding its Muslim migrants.

        10. awwww come on Pabst you were being so civil and mildly interesting. Don’t start in with you chink love today. No patience for it. Side note, I thought of you last weekend while i was dicking down the korean.

        11. Hey, don’t look at me. I am a man of God. Like St. Aquinas said “In order that the happiness of the saints may be more delightful to them and that they may render more copious thanks to God for it, they are allowed to see perfectly the sufferings of the damned”

        12. “seeing perfectly” and “being aroused by” are not quiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiite the same thing.

        13. you know Tommy A is sitting around right now with a harp in one hand and his hog in another watching some sinner get pitchforked and beating his beatified bishop

        14. Got no use for that Prideful Papist Psychopath….
          Though “beating his beatified bishop”…. poetry, m’man. Nice work.

        15. I agree with that last part. But what are we going to feed the Muslim migrants too?

        16. I have a tattoo on my schlong that now says m.I.t.

          But when I see sexy booty,
          Massachusetts institute of technology

        17. I have a Mechanical engineering B.S. with a specialization in heat transfer and fluid flow. And I tend to agree with you, folks hit their own plateaus.
          I’m good with math where I can relate it to something physical, but that’s it. Hit my limit with Fourier Analysis and LaPlace transforms. I got through the course but couldn’t tell you anything about them now.
          (but then, I only got a degree so I could be a military pilot, which annoyed a couple of my profs to no end…)

        18. That’s pretty awesome dude….
          Anyway, yeah, there is no shame in admiting you can’t do everything in the world. I have things I’m great at, things I’m on at, things I suck af and things I couldn’t dream of how to do.
          No one has every skill right?

      3. My hat’s off to anyone who actually understands C++. My CS professor once told us that all the people in the world who really understand C++ could be fit into one room. Me, I’d rather write x86 assembly than C++.

    7. Problem is you’re assuming people are somehow paired with a career that matches their innate traits and talents.
      People no longer rise to their level due to affirmative action and other social engineering initiatives.
      You increasingly have morons being appointed to very high levels due to their race or sex (see Carly Fiorina driving HP into the ground but it’s alright because she was the first female CEO). You will also have an increasing number of white men with legit genius level IQs who, seeing they will never make it to the top or get the position of professor or dean, drop out of society and stock shelves at Walmart.

      1. I am not assuming that…merely saying there is something that matches our innate traits and that we OUGHT to be paired with careers that use it.
        As for genius level IQ…many of them are totally fucking useless in a practical setting but your point is taken.

    8. The perfect example is Mr Zuckerberg. A genius with IT but rather less so when it comes to understanding society and reality.

      1. He’s no IT genius. The guy couldn’t program a Hello World program if he was given a VB In 21 Days book and detailed examples of how to write it in the book. He stole the code that became Facbook, and is nothing but a dirty little thieving liar who is smug and needs punched smack dab on his gormless mug.

        1. Most of the Giants of Business are not great inventors – they’re just apt salesmen and strategists. Henry Ford, Bill Gates…

        2. I don’t mind a Steve Jobs type. No problem with that at all. I do have a problem with somebody who steals other people’s hard work, claims it as his own, then goes on to fame and fortune with no merit behind it. I don’t care about the money part, it’s the thieving somebody else’s hard work that bugs the fuck out of me. He should be repeatedly punched in the face until aforementioned face is a bloody, shapeless pulp.

        3. Didn’t Steve Jobs make a fortune selling what was essentially Xerox’s technology, which they were too inept to value or market themselves?
          Similar with Zuck – he just marketed and capitalized on someone else’s invention.
          Salesmen all!

        4. No, you’re thinking of Bill Gates. Windows is rumored to have come from the original Xerox interface. I’m not sure if I buy it entirely, but if they purchased the rights I have no problem with that. My problem is with THEFT.

        5. I’m pretty sure Microsoft copied Apple who copied Xerox, but your point stands, at least Apple BOUGHT the rights.
          not so sure about Microsoft….

        6. Still a bit cheesed at Jobs for screwing over his associates in the early days. I don’t mind him being the face of the company – after all, he’s nothing if not a salesman – but the real geniuses behind Apple’s successes are largely unknown.
          And, lest we forget, there’s always Daniel Kottke.

        7. The early GUI stuff was kind of chaotic. It was a time when a lot of people all collectively came to independent conclusions that the monitor could be used for more than a dumb terminal AS400 input (think 1970’s green screens in movies). I’m not sure who ripped off who or even if anybody was really ripped off per se, but I do know that Zuckerberg is a weasely little smug thief, and even that wouldn’t bug me so much if he weren’t out right now trying to flood the nation with Hindudes.

        8. His dabbling in social engineering is proof that he is no engineer because he is disregarding reason, logic, and precedent.

        9. He was hired to complete a program for the winkelviss twins.
          And stole the idea..
          Proven in emails

        10. My understanding of the story is that Jobs visited Xerox PARC, and shortly thereafter he birthed the first commercial GUI. Gates stole the same idea, it just took him longer to bring it to market.
          Then again, so what? Fuck Xerox if they couldn’t market their technology. That’s just too bad.

        11. Yeah, seeing something and then designing it on your own is fine. You’re not actually copyright tresspassing because you will by needs make your own unique code with it’s own unique properties. Hence why we have more car companies than just Ford.

        12. Apple alleged that Microsoft lifted their Mac OS wholesale, which led to the protracted (and ill-fated) lawsuit during the 1990s, when John Sculley thought he could run Apple like Pepsi.

        13. Yeah, Apple was full of beans on that. A case can be made for Xerox, but Apple not only looked and functioned different (ok, it had windowed stuff, and folders, but that’s about it) and was written for an entirely different processor architecture that any kind of claim like that is laughable on its face.
          It’s like Ferarri suing Ford because Ford cars have key start ignitions and power steering.

        14. It was really transparent at the time. Sculley got Jobs fired, that was the end of their product development, and he tried to hamstring Microsoft with litigation to try to slow the damage.

        15. “Then again, so what? Fuck Xerox if they couldn’t market their technology.”
          Exactly right. If you are sitting on a gold mine and are too stupid, too weak or too incompetent to see it or do dick with it then don’t blame some young go getter who makes himself rich…blame yourself for being a fuck up. There is no participation award in business. There are winners and fucking losers.

        16. I thought Gates developed with DOS for IBM, and since they were only interested in selling the hardware end didn’t protect it as theirs? I vaguely remember someone telling me something along those lines…

      2. Right. If you put Zuckerberg in my job and told him to organize 30 different trades each with their own union plus engineers, architects, suppliers, advertisers, city call management, bla bla bla bla bla and all of them fucking nuts and some of them violent he would probably be as apoplectic as I would be if you showed me computer code.


        1. arr = [j.split(' ') for j in [i.strip().replace(' ', ' ') for i in b50]]
          return reduce(lambda a,b: dict(a.items() + b.items()), [{(arr[0][j],arr[i][0]): int(arr[i][j]) for j in xrange(1, len(arr[i]))} for i in xrange(1,len(arr))])
          p = lambda x: ( -13214 * x**11 + 956318 * x**10 - 30516585 * x**9 + 564961485 * x**8
          - 6717043212 * x**7 + 53614486464 * x**6 - 291627605005 * x**5
          + 1074222731065 * x**4 - 2606048429424 * x**3 + 3927289106268 * x**2
          - 3265905357360 * x + 1116073728000 ) / 19958400

          print bytearray(map(p, range(1, 13)))

        2. Ya know, if you split that second line into logical blocks on separate lines, it’d be a hell of a lot easier to read. Does Python (I assume) allow for whitespace inside of parens?

        3. I don’t write a lot of Python, so I don’t know. That’s just some random garbage copied from the web. I’m trying to trigger Hippo.

        4. Like Yogurt reading lone stars necklace. Chut Chummut Chummut Chut
          You can read it?
          No. I was just clearing my throat.

        5. My python allows for white space…..and black space….and mocha space…even some yellow space.

    9. My father had an undergraduate degree in physics and a graduate degree in mathematics. He had a disdain for engineers, other than his brother in law. I had a physics professor who thought that physicists could do anything an engineer could do. I met a Harvard grad with some computer-related degree who knew nothing of combinatorics or mathematical sequences and series. He could program in all the C-languages and web languages, but knew nothing of assembly language. I have an acquaintance with either a computer science or computer engineering degree and he knows little to nothing of cryptography.

  14. I agree with most of what the author says, but the bigger question seems to be this: Why do many of those women who actually do pursue STEM ultimately flee the field?
    I don’t know about IT, but this phenomenon is especially strong in engineering. 20% of engineering degrees go to women, but 13% of working engineers are women. Assuming the men stay constant, that means about 1/3 of female engineers leave the field.
    An MIT study gives a surprising answer: traditional gender roles drive them out. Basically a variation on, “The boys came in and took my toys and made me feel sad.” Not what I’d expect from MIT. I imagine that motherhood contributes too.
    I got no dog in this hunt, but this article is worth a quick read.
    http://news.mit.edu/2016/why-do-women-leave-engineering-0615

        1. I actually applied to Cooper Union. They sent me the take-home entrance exam. I puzzled over it for about a day, then threw it out and watched Tom and Jerry.

        2. I only applied to the one school that had the program I was looking for and a scholarship based on merit, not circumstances of birth. Never looked back.

        3. Fuk’em anyway. Their program is crap. Esoteric masturbation that does nothing but turn out more professors…

        4. now cooper union is like any other school. The test they send you home with is a credit score report. 700? you’re in. Sign these papers for the loan.

        5. Wasn’t Cooper Union where the tuition free policy was removed and the seemingly well off kids threw a tantrum because they couldn’t mooch off the system so they could study finger painting for free?

    1. “Education is a process of socialization,” sayeth the article.
      “Education is a process of socialization,” sayeth socialist extraordinaire John Dewey.
      Fundamentally, what I’ve seen is that women either do not possess the aptitude or the desire to do the kind of work engineers do. Those rare few who possess both are amazing at their jobs.
      I’ve conferred with a woman who has the desire without much aptitude. She’s happy in her job, but (bless her heart) she just doesn’t understand the simple solutions I present to her. If I say, “I can make it work if you give me root access for five minutes,” she says, “Let’s restore an old backup and rebuild.”

    2. From what I can tell, and this is only from experience in IT, the girls with IT degrees may come in as programmers but QUICKLY move into positions as analysts (business analyst) or management because “vagina”. So the number of degrees won’t reflect the actual feet on the floor numbers. Guys who come into IT generally stay in IT in the technical areas.

      1. This is what the armed forces are going to be like. Women can’t do the real job – front-line grunt – but get fast-tracked up the ladder to positions of authority. So all the men with the real war-winning know-how have to salute women who’ve never done the job.

        1. If you look at all of the defense ministers in Western Europe (except maybe one or two) they’re all dumpy broads.

      1. You know what cures itchiness?
        Kratom chips.
        Its the opposite of lays: You can only eat one per day

  15. What takes more skill and brainpower? Doing IT work, or doing integration by parts, trigonometric substitution, and solving differential equations? Methinks the latter.

    1. Oh yeah?
      Two words..
      Pointers. Polymorphism.
      You are now free to gibber in insanity contemplating dealing with them in a 100,000 lines of code program.

      1. I am proud to basically understand pointers (function pointers still confuse me a bit from time to time). That skill alone puts you in the top percentage of programmers.

        1. polymorphism sounds like some kind of new sexual identity that bruce jenner is trying out

        2. Dude, you of all people should have a frame of reference for Polymorphism, which is simply “shape changing” given your well read classical Greek philosophy background. Dem fuckin’ gawds were always shape changing in order to get laid or to just mess with people’s minds.

        3. cut me some slack it was the first picture i could find. I have 22 buildings ranging in size from 12 floor to 36 floors undergoing facade work because of local law 11. One thing i do know is if trump wants to build that wall out of bricks he is gonna need a lot of mexicans.

        4. hey if you are talking about Leda…remember, that weren’t no ordinary swan. That was Zeus.

      2. I see your point but it is not exactly the same thing. Programming does not have the same underlying principles than mathematical derivations.
        And yes, I am proud of my scientific computing in C++, but it is not comparable.

        1. The point wasn’t that the concepts in and of themselves rival quantum physics. The point was that the mindset needed to not just create, but *debug* these kind of things is very intensive and requires a hell of a lot of high level problem solving ability, that many times takes years to develop.

        2. “Everyone knows that debugging is twice as hard as writing a program in the first place. So if you’re as clever as you can be when you write it, how will you ever debug it?”
          — Brian W. Kernighan, The Elements of Programming Style

        3. God save me from debugging the code of others. It’s always…ALWAYS…undocumented, the database relationships are a big ?? that you have to comb through, and then you get to the actual code that is, 9 out of 10 times, spaghetti code with triple redundancy built in for no apparent reason, with so many references pointing in so many directions that it makes the head spin.

        4. In my previous employment, you were lucky to find a single comment in any code (outside the company mandated copyright comment). Apparently most teams actively discourage things I take for granted, like documenting as I go (a three-second flowerbox saves hours of debugging) and meaningful naming conventions.
          No wonder it took me a year to develop a complex system and they’re still plugging away at a system of similar complexity. I always knew where to go to make updates and corrections, and I always had a guide to how everything was supposed to work.

        5. I see what you mean, but the more you think a program beforehand, the least you have to debug.

        6. FORTRAN. 80 column cards. Run, debug, retype bad cards/add cards, Run.That’s how far back I go….

        1. At a minimum. I mean, it’s basically written into the requirements doc as an understood thing.

      3. Sometimes I point shoot from the hip, both literally and figuratively. I see your point, even though I was initially very broad in my statement and use of the term IT. I realize that those in the upper echelons of IT who do coding are a different breed from the general IT people who set up networks and servers, do the A+ type of work, or program in web-based languages, or one of the C-languages.
        Now take a man like Bruce Schneier, who I assume you’ve heard of. He definitely has a solid background in mathematics given his expertise in cryptography and computer security. And I’m sure that you have probably taken at least multivariable calc and difEQ and also have an understanding of discrete mathematics, number theory, as well as some combinatorics.
        What I should have done was exclude the computer science types from the Geek Squad types.

  16. I can do some mason and carpenter stuff. It’s not as if I can’t used a buzz saw. It’s just I’m not much interested in it

  17. Our brain is a sex gland. It has biologically prepared the ground for us to utilize our powers of discrimination. Sex means choice. Why else would the brain come in two flavors: male and female. We don’t have male lungs or female intestines. Something very deep is at work here.
    It is known that the right hemisphere of the brain is the region associated with imagery, music, imagination, art, pure math, creativity, insight, the spiritual realms, and INTUITION. The left hemisphere processes language, logic, applied mathematics, scientific skills, the physical world, and REASON. It has been shown that the right brain is bigger in men than in women. That is, men are naturally endowed with a greater physical brain capacity for embracing the spiritual and intuitive dimensions of life. Clearly this is the exact opposite of what we have been led to believe.
    Men’s brains are, on average, 15% larger than women’s – about twice the difference in average body size between the two.7 But male brains don’t start out bigger. A mature human brain is too big to pass through the mother’s birth canal. It gets as big as it can inside mom then BLAM!, it squirts out into the world with its spindly arms and legs attached. A deer can walk within hours of being born; we’re so undeveloped we can’t even open our eyes. Our brains (and bodies) are born prematurely and the parameters of this physical phenomenon necessitate extensive growth spurts and sexual differentiation after birth. The brains of human babies are the same size until two or three years. After that male brains grow faster and larger until age six when full brain size is reached. Many researchers agree that this pattern reflects the fact that the basic format of the brain is female, and that format is modified and enlarged when the male hormones kick in.
    This does not mean that men are “better” than women. It does mean that men are different than women, and that difference, it’s clear to me, is something that is being obscured in our materialistic society. It is possible that men’s brains can do most of the things that women’s brains do, plus do something else. This “something else” is precisely what I will be attempting to identify. This “something else”, or rather, the lack of it – in a society that is being increasingly defined by females and female values – is where I believe we will find the root cause of the malaise of modern man.

    1. Males always have bigger brains. and far more weight. Womb, after birth, puberty, adulthood.
      The reason why they report that they are “equal”, is because they don’t measure the brains as absolute size. They make “special corrections” to remove the differences……………
      African Blacks and whites brain size difference result in 2SDs(30 IQ points difference)
      If women have equal or smaller brains than blacks, then this “different but equal”, is…………..
      etc.etc.

  18. We’ve flashed back to the Garden of Eden. Corporations are the snake, whispering in our wives’ ears: buy more stuff, you have “rights”, don’t let God tell you what to do. Our women are lost. They’re hopeless. And they’re dragging us down with them. For shame if we don’t stand up to this Unbridled Femaleness – these servants of the corporate snake. Feminized Government has invaded religion and produced feminized religion. Separation of Church and State is a hoax. We did a good job keeping religion out of government but not a good job keeping government out of religion. Time to regenerate male-flavored spirituality. It’s the key to solving this whole mess.
    WW III has begun. It’s an electronic war being fought between corporate persons and human persons. And feminists are whoring for the enemy troops. They’re after a big piece of the corporate pie. They want official recognition that agriculture and industrialization was all about them – making life better for women – at the expense of men.

  19. University of Phoenix, lmao! It’s bad enough what’s happened to real colleges over the past 50 years.

      1. If he still has any money they will be. Fuck it, I am really pro OJ here.

        1. I still think he murdered Nicole Brown. Then again, the woman was a notorious slut. Even her best friend admitted it, along with some supposed almost lesbian thing they did before she died. And apparently Nicole Brown screwed Marcus Allen, OJ’s teammate and best friend. She even bragged about his dick. Notorious mudshark.
          No wonder the Kardashian sisters turned out the way they did. In fact, I’ve always entertained the idea that OJ was the one who gave his goddaughter Kim a present by uncorking that booty.

        2. And of course, when you’re rich and famous, nobody cares if you’re black or white. Corruption knows no race or gender. In fact, corruption is gender fluid. I don’t approve of premeditated murder, but I am envious of rich people. Makes me want to be rich myself.

    1. It was looking dicey there for a bit. A female guard filed a complaint against him because she allegedly caught him pulling the pork in his cell.
      Which doesn’t even begin to address the question of why the fuck they would have female guards in a men’s prison. Or vice-versa. Or why you can’t whip the lizard in your own cell.

  20. “Maybe it’s cultural, maybe it’s biological…”
    It is largely biological. I wrote about that in for instance the article “4 Pursuits Where Men Surprisingly Dominate” and in various other comments. Let me explain why:
    1. The male bell curve for intelligence has more variance. So more guys who have IQ 85 but also those who have 120 or higher, with a stronger mathematical-logical and spatial component. Females are more clustered in the middle, between let’s say 90-115 (although exceptions of course exist on all levels) and have a stronger verbal component.
    2. The male bell curve for personality is also different and more varied. So for example there are more guys who lack conscientiousness. On the other hand we have more guys who are super-industrious. On average they are slightly more industrious (a sub-trait of conscientiousness). Females are more orderly (ther second sub-trait of conscientiousness) but that does not help them to be successful computer engineers or scientists.
    Additionally, males are interested in things and ideas, whereas females are more interested in people, esthetics and feelings (linked to openness).
    Sources:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3149680/
    http://www2.uned.es/personal/rosuna/resources/papers/Nyborg%20sex%20differences.pdf

    1. Pft. That’s nothing. I can feel IP address conflicts just by touching the cable insulation.

      1. My middle finger has a built in Network Packet Analyzer.
        I’m the life of every LAN party.

      2. That’s nothing. I just found the elusive ANY key the screen is always telling me to press.

        1. I always remove the caps lock key so my baseball cap doesn’t get stuck to my head.

        2. And how about that hot chick with the FAT32 ass? Would not mind rebooting her software with my massive 3TB hard drive.

        3. Congratulations! You are now a l33t h4x0r. Your membership packet will be in the mail in 3 to 4 weeks. In the interim, please remember not to divulge the secret to anybody!

        4. This is making me thirsty.
          Ill have some tab.

          O no time for that, computer is working now

        5. Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !pc83d:
          On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
          !pc83d:
          ➽➽
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash393FinderForumPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!pc83l..,..

      3. In all seriousness, I can actually feel when the wifi isn’t active. I couldn’t tell you how I know, but when I walk into my home office I can feel whether my wifi is transmitting or not.

        1. I used* to be able to hear the horizontal scan refresh of the ‘Monochrome Monitor IIe’. Walking down the corridor containing the computer lab in middle school was annoying. Nobody else ever admitted to hearing it, if they could.
          *Possibly still can. Haven’t been near one in decades.

    2. Explain to me why there are so many H1b visa workers from India that are women?

      1. It’s a double Diversity hit, that’s why.

      2. I wish Trump would shut down the H-1 visa scam. I have international friends here in the US, but when it comes to jobs, Americans first.

      3. Because they’re educated, smart, hard working, and get a lot more respect here than they do in India.

        1. Is that what we’re playing? I thought we were playing “bring in lower paid foreign workers”.

  21. I’m working on my Masters in Electrical Engineering, and I can say, I don’t want women in my research lab, class, or even when I get a job (I would probably quit my job if I was working with a woman all day). Even if there are girls in my class (which there’s not), I would never hook up with them,I prefer getting a stay-at-home wife any day.

    1. Man, I’m a software developer. I hate office women ! Usually men do all programming and females are the bosses !

    2. Did you know you could work with women AND have a stay-at-home wife? Everybody wins!

  22. Call me ignorant, but haven’t some of these IT jobs been shipped overseas?

    1. Some have, but I will tell you I’m in the tech field and those fucks you get on the phone read off a list of about 15 questions before “transferring to level 2” which is usually someone who at least speaks good English but even then I’ve dealt with them and it’s painful.
      I have my job because I know it inside and out and my company would be royally fucked if I left. Trying to get in as a lvl 1 help desk guy is rough, but if you can specialize (sysadmin, network engineer, programmer whatever) you’ll be valuable.

      1. I’ve dealt with some of these guys before and they are a pain. Not surprisingly, even there, I have never encountered a woman.

        1. Never one. The only time it’s a “woman tech” it’s actually a sales person who sells technology

        2. my female boss can’t make the difference between a website and a database. Yet she’s the CTO.

        3. not much, she’s been in the company for 30 years, ended up at this position because of females in upper management. It’s a fucking disaster but I don’t give a shit, pay is good and I report what I want.

        4. But you know that working with female boss is emasculating (when woman makes more money than man)

        5. that’s why I lift 3x a week. An IT dude who doesn’t lift is fucked at 50.

        6. Thats why I want business to stay away from female bosses as much as possible. Females want to emasculate everything, including IT. IT workers are already female slaves

    2. They sure have.
      And they also bring the “overseas” people here to ship Americans out of work.

  23. One of the most brilliant IT workers to date I have met was a woman. With that one exception, all men. Most women can’t tech past a Facebook login or a iPhone filter.

    1. “Someone hacked my Facebook!”
      “Did you leave yourself logged in, leave your computer unlocked, and walk away for ten minutes?”
      “…shut up, asshole.”

      1. “How ugly she was?”
        Yup. Like Mr. Talbot, I once worked with a female (back in the 80s) who was considered one of the best programmers in a very large company. She was also extremely ugly. And weird as well.

        1. Best female programmers arent even female. I found out that many geeks, nerds in tech became transgenders

        2. I wouldn’t be surprised. This hag was over 6 feet tall. Claimed to have a husband, but no ever saw him.

    2. Maybe she’s a transgender ? I found out that some geeks, nerds become transgenders

    3. Huuum.
      Best Head I ever worked for was a woman.
      90% as usless as you’d expect them to be.
      There seems to be a pattern, the best are excellent, the not-best are terrible.

  24. No.
    The article is wrong.
    Reality is irrelevant.
    These people vote for ‘gay marriage’ and mass immigration from the third world, you think they WON’T put women into these positions just because it is stupid.
    When did you last see a woman Police Officer admit, ‘Well obviously, I can’t do everything a male officer can do’?
    See point?

  25. IT jobs will disappear to China/India faster than manufacturing did. It is SO portable.

  26. I work in IT, in a female-dominated industry, healthcare (hopefully not too much longer). 75% of the analysts are women. IT management is comprised of RNs, mostly. Everything is done on feelings, no logic involved. I feel like this…, I feel like that… A true hive-mind mentality. I swear to God, if I hear the phrase, “I Feel Like™” after I leave the industry, I will punch that person on the face.

    1. Are there any young ones?
      Maybe some young slutty 7s or 8s you can take out & get drunk & maybe bang once in a while?
      At least that would make it worth it.
      But if only sour faced middle aged bags, then that is just as bad as being stuck with the BO Foreigners like I am.

      1. Na, youngest is 28, I think. The most attractive is around a 4-5. I would never socialize with, let alone bang, a coworker. Just asking for trouble.

        1. 4s & 5s…
          Eeesh!
          That’s just as bad as being stuck with the “Stinky Sanjeevs”…

        2. “I would never socialize with, let alone bang, a coworker. Just asking for trouble.”
          Yeah, I can understand that. And especially with 4s & 5s!
          But if you read my above post…if that cute Chinese girl wanted me to bang her, I’d do it in a second.
          But, it will never happen.

        3. There’s one Asian consultant that’s probably a 7… She’s pretty cute, for 39. Never married, no kids. We talk once in a while, since she doesn’t work for the company, but I keep it pretty short. WNB.

    2. Is it possible to add “I Feel Like” to the hate speech registry? It’s a crime against people self-diagnosed with the ability to tell the difference between ideas and emotions.

    3. Did you fill out your annual performance review ? I feel like you need those soft skills god dammit.

      1. LOL. Yes, and approve my own timecard, and write my own monthly reviews. Not exactly sure what my manager does…

  27. When I first saw the above commercial, the cheese bout slid off my cracker. It hit every feminist cliche. The “you go gurrl” nonsense was too much. The strong “flash dance” and “officer and a gentleman” factory worker chick, the evil white male capitalist tycoons taking away her job for more sheckels, the obligatory “strong, empowered single mom”, the “I dont need no man” attitude, the I can do tech better than a man attitude, and finally—to top it all off—the cushy the high paid office gig that every feminist feels entitled to.
    That commercial is everything wrong with modern culture.

  28. Cute little 25 yo Chinese girl at my current contract.
    Doesn’t do too much programming. Mostly organizes the social & charity events, but does some bug fixes here and there when she is in the mood for it. She takes her shoes off when sitting at her desk. She has cute feet.

    1. BTW, she is the only cute female on the entire floor, which is 90% male and 80% Indian.
      The other females are mostly Indian and mostly hideous.
      Even though the floor (with hundreds of people on it) is 90% male, there are 2 mens rooms and 2 ladies rooms. 3 men’s rooms would make MUCH more sense, but no…

        1. Wouldn’t doubt it.
          The mens rooms are pretty disgusting, what with all the the curry & hing eaters working there.

        2. I worked at a t-shirt shop when was younger most staffed by Russians and Indians. That smell is beyond anything I’ve ever encountered. You just want to air drop glade all over India but even that wouldn’t get rid of it.

        3. same experience here, some indians regularly blow their noses in the sink, leaving it as it is.

        4. Yeah, I’ve seen that.
          And they have plenty of other strange bathroom habits too.
          Such as going to the can in bunches, like females do, and gabbing the whole time. And they often do not flush the toilet. Disgusting.

      1. “Mostly organizes the social & charity events”
        “She is the only cute female on the entire floor”
        not a coincidence.

        1. She is actually very upfront about the social stuff. We had “team drinks” on a Friday a few weeks ago and she told me they asked her on the interview if she would be willing to do that, and she was very happy about it. She really seems to enjoy that stuff.

      2. zero productivity as expected. In my experience, some girls are good at very specific skills in tech but they miss the big picture everytime. They are for the most part, incapable of taking good decisions concerning complex issues. Not a judgement on my part, just a 25 years first hand experience in IT.

  29. I work as a lecturer, teaching programming to both men and women. After each exam, for 4 years in a row, I draw the same conclusion: women are fun to be with, fun to have a chat with, but they are horrible when it comes to programming.
    I fully agree with this article.

    1. That is the key, actually – all men on strike for a week. FIX YOUR OWN TOILET!

  30. No doubt some of them can do the job, but the important point is whether or not they WANT to. Neurotic feminists with no talent other than screaming and bullying dupe women into giving up their own hopes and aspirations and doing what feminists demand they do. Yet another example of “choice” meaning following the orders of brain diseased leftists.

    1. Hahaha…you mean they all don’t look like that???
      But seriously, she probably thinks a “batch job” means cooking up a batch of pancakes.
      Mgr: LaKeisha, can you create a batch job for us?
      LaKeisha: You wants me to cook you up some pancakes? Dat be rayciss!!!

    2. What about the 3 super mathematicians at NASA ?? & they were black ??
      See “Hidden figures” ??

        1. Only the trailer ?? Only the trailer ?? Only the trailer ?? OMG ?? Only the trailer ?? About those 3 black women geniuses who outperformed the IBM Blue Gene computer ?? & you have only seen, the trailer ??

  31. Look at all these conservative programming experts in the comments. Hollywood would have us think all conservatives are tractor drivers. More Proud to be here every day.

    1. Quite so. Generally right wing types excel at hard sciences, and studies have shown that we’re actually far more scientifically literate than Leftists. The Left is about emotions and feelz, and that’s really about it.

  32. The big problem for women is that they have little logical abilities and that is paramount in programming. Thus, they are biologically unsuited for the field, and will never be able to do more than take down companies whereat they work with SJWism.

  33. If you can fix it remotely your job is going to vanish to the Third World shithole of the month.
    If your job requires your physical presence, like an HVAC technician, it is safe. Trades are one of the few things that can’t be outsourced.

  34. Blessed to work in Aerospace Engineering and IT. 99% guys and lots of machismo and military backgrounds. It’s why I’ve been in the job for 24 years!

    1. I envy you. I’m in enterprise software development and a lot of women here. Usually managers, analysts and QA. I hate it

  35. Oddly enough, the best engineer on my team is a female. She has asperger’s, I think. Crazy cat lady with no filter on what she utters, and a stream of consciousness style of speaking that drives me crazy. Really good at her job though, because she has that focus that crazy men like Van Gogh have… that almost pathological devotion to concentrating on something to the detriment of their health. Odd to see that in a woman. I have no problems with the other women on my team, however I do note that we are making some dodgy hires (1/5 or 2/5 on interviews across the board), and all of them are females.

  36. Computer screen .. “Press any key” ??
    Woman searching keyboard for anykey ??

  37. Useless women in tech?
    Huuum.
    What about absolutely useless, inferior women in politics taking their mediocrity to the top with disastrous results.
    Britain’s current Prime Minister should be a running a small hotel/guest house or maybe a Secretary in Bank branch office.
    Yet look.
    She’s in No.10 and everyone is too polite to say, ‘Please resign, any man would have done so by now as they have more self respect.’
    Utterly useless.

  38. my cousin refused to help her mom figure out her new smart phone becoz it wasnt an Iphone.

  39. When I started my college degree in software engineering, the class was split 50/50 in terms of sex. Second semester, it was 90/10. Also note that second semester, the total reduction in enrollment was 50%. So 45% of the initial women left, 5% of the initial men left.
    As for the spatial orientation issue, that’s due to our “gender rolls” when we were pre agrarian. Women HAD to take care of the infants (only had breast milk for the kiddies), so they were the gatherers, while men were the hunters. So, when you’re standing under an apple tree trying to decide which apples to pick, you only needed to keep track of a static situation. The most desirable apples you’d spotted so far didn’t move around. Then, once you’d looked at ALL the apples to determine which ones were the best to pick today, you picked them. The hunter, however, had to keep track of the prey animal he wanted to kill, where it was in the moving herd, where the lions and hyenas were, where the rest of the hunting party was, all while he was moving during the hunt. If he did it poorly, he starved, or became lion food.
    All this comes out today in two behaviors.
    Fighter pilots are one. Women have higher G tolerance, and much faster nerve condition speeds, which you’d think would mean they’d be better fighter pilots. But the spatial awareness disparity gets them killed. When a woman is in a dogfight, trying to get a shot on that enemy plane she’s chasing, and she does a quick scan of the sky to check for someone trying to get on her six, and there’s an enemy plane in the area, they’ve found that women don’t track it well. So, quick glance, there’s a bad guy, have to check on him in 5 seconds to see what he’s doing. When she goes to check on him, she puts her head into the same position as when she saw him last (because apples don’t move around). But he isn’t there. She fails to take account of his motion and her own. A male pilot WILL take this into account, and nearly always when he goes to look at the enemy again, he turns his head to where the enemy should be now in 3D space, whereas she turns her head to where she saw him last, relative to her body (so she turns her neck/head to the same position as before). This saves time reacquiring that other enemy, time that the woman has to spend trying to reacquire that enemy. Women get further and further behind what’s going on until they get dead (note: yes, some women ARE as good at this as the typical man, I’m speaking the general, random woman off the street compared to random man, case here).
    Shopping is the other. A woman will look at EVERY pair of black pants in the mall before she buys the one that is the best for her needs today (by whatever criteria “best” means). A man will take the first pair that he finds adequate, because that’s what you do in a hunt. You may have WANTED that zebra over there, but this gazelle that practically impaled itself on your spear will do just fine.
    These are innate differences in our genetics, and ignoring them, particularly when lives are on the line, is stupid.

  40. Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !pc83d:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !pc83d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash393FinderForumPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!pc83l..,…

  41. White women are so full of shit. I hear them whining and droning on about this mythical ‘wage gap’ and how oppressed they are. Out of a group of 5 of them, none of them had pursued any real education, only 1 actually had a job, part time at that. They had all pursued diplomas in social science, psychology, and early childhood education. I asked why they didn’t take engineering, IT, math, STEM fields, they got all upset and said they didn’t want to. Well too fucking bad princesses. Bunch of lazy twats these western women are. They want equal pay but on their own terms, they want to get paid $40/hr to play blocks with little kids, jesus christ, these white women are out of touch with reality.

    1. Mhm mhm interesting point except just wondering where your research comes from considering you’ve never been with a woman before

      1. Ironic comment from someone who’s not in IT and doesn’t have a background or education in STEM. You’re the typical half-wit of a simpleton.

  42. If it weren’t for men, their would be no internet, no computers, no cell phones and smartphones, no tablets, no way for women to disseminate their bullshit to the world. Makes you miss the pre-digital age, doesn’t it? Remember when people read real books with pages and not tablet downloads.
    Even the typical feminist, when push comes to shove will rely on a man’s skill, brains, and brawn when she needs something done.

    1. Very true.
      Want to know what’s really funny? Turn on your TV sometime and watch the endless parade of feminist,gynocentric talk shows discussing topics like “are men obsolete?” “do we really need men?” “why men are no longer relevant” etc. These shows all consist of a group of over made up bimbos with three hundred dollar manicures, designer dresses, and IQ’s that would make a goldfish look like Einstein.
      They honestly believe they could survive in a world with no men.
      I’ll bet you a million not one of these vacuous twits even knows how to check the oil in her car, much less repair it when it breaks down.
      I guess they all believed Barack when he gushed “anything men can do women can do better – and they can do it in high heels.”

  43. You can’t pee around on social media all day and then do 1 hour of work and leave at 4:30pm to get large projects in STEM out the door. The few women I know of in STEM (2%?) are mostly of Asian decent and hardwired to think more-so like men. They have a grasp of logic and even reason that is completely missing in their other female counterparts. When I hear women getting STEM jobs because of quotas or because “boobs” or “pretty” I just want to bring up my lunch. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3cc97e8fb0e908c0eff303fadabd4379537fdffedc358738ad243006f1045eb8.jpg

  44. “Since I.T. is big money, naturally the feminist types were going to complain about the “overrepresentation” of men in such high-paying fields.”
    These “feminist types” who bitch endlessly about lack of women in STEM invariably majored in gender studies or psychology or some worthless thing. Oh the irony.

Comments are closed.