Culture

How The Promotion Of Homosexual Culture Harms Straight Men

553 Comments

I am sure the majority of RoK readers will know how homosexuality and gay rights are harmful to men on the grand civilizational scale; but, I’m here to talk about how gay rights and the acceptance of gay culture in the mainstream is harming men on a personal level.

Since the late 1960’s, when the baby boomers erupted in misguided fury at the world their forefathers built, fought and died for, gay rights and, in turn, gay culture, has become intimately entwined with the mainstream. Today, with the Western world’s confusion over what it is, gay culture has become sacrosanct, an intrinsic component that is viewed as inviolable and august.

It Has Made Men More Vain

One of the most distinct aspects of gay culture’s grip on the contemporary West is how its influence has made ordinary men vainer. Of course, it’s important for a man to look good, to take care of his body and pay attention to how he dresses. I do it and most of my friends and family do it.

However, to adopt the daily rituals of moisturizing, waxing, applying fake tan, etc., is crossing the thin line between healthily enhancing one’s self-confidence and being consumed by vanity.

As the fashion industry is overly populated with women and gay men, this dangerous mix churns out ever more effeminate looking styles and grooming products for men. We’ve reached a point where some men will spend just as many hours preening themselves in the bathroom mirror as their girlfriends do.

It’s one reason why I think globalists and consumerist entities love to push gay culture wherever they can. The obsession with youth and vanity is the perfect tool to keep businesses coffers permanently overflowing.

It Has Destroyed Men’s Ability To Bond

Today, most men in the West have superficial friendships with other men. They will treat their friends as part of the furniture, and the topics of conversation will be limited to football and where they’re going on holiday. Why has this happened? Well, there are many reasons, with the usual suspects such as hyper-individualism, feminism, etc., playing a part, but the main aspect is Western acceptance of gay culture.

The increasing prominence of gays and the gay lifestyle in media and entertainment has, over many decades, secured in the minds of men what is and is not gay behaviour. For the most part, men, helped in their views by women who want to monopolise their time, will see any bonding or intimacy with other men as gay, thus putting a giant wedge in their ability to forge genuine friendships.

Gay culture has helped to all but destroyed men’s understanding of Platonic love, and it’s clear to me why we see so many men today suffering from various forms of depression and anxiety. For example, if you’re with a woman who’s an emotional drain, have a crappy job, and all your friendships are built on nothing, then wouldn’t you be depressed also?

For many of you reading this, male bonding is still an uncomfortable subject, because the influence of gay culture has informed your way of thinking so much, even without you knowing it.

Most of the friends who I would confidently call brothers are from Eastern/South Eastern Europe or the Middle East (mainly Iran and Turkey) for the simple reason that our bonds are so much greater than with most of my Western friends. This is because all of them were born and raised in countries where homosexuality is highly frowned upon, so the poisonous distortion of Platonic love doesn’t happen.

It Gives Men Unhealthy Sexual Appetites

A man having a bit of fun with a cute girl is healthy and natural. Men need to play the field to a degree, but today, men, from their teens onward, are becoming promiscuous to an unhealthy degree.

Again, there are myriad factors one can attribute to this, but with our elites in assault mode, trying desperately to make gay the new standard, from mainstream media talking about the benefits of “analingus” to anal sex. This rejection of morality and resisting anything but temptation, part and parcel of the gay psyche, is having an obvious and deleterious effect on men.

This obsession with constant sexual gratification, exploring ever more degenerate ways to get that gratification, is leading men down a seedy and perverse path. This has all come about through the promotion of the homosexual lifestyle.

Conclusion

In the words of Henry Makow, “I have no malice toward gays. I feel the same way about people who have the flu. I want them to get better, and I don’t want it to spread.” There are a few gay men out there who I greatly respect, writer Jack Donovan being one of them, but, ignoring the wider societal damage, the embracing of gay culture across the Western world has harmed, more than any other group, heterosexual men.

Read More: America Is Becoming A Homosexual Nation

553 thoughts on “How The Promotion Of Homosexual Culture Harms Straight Men”

  2. The lord of the ring was written by J RR Tolkien a Catholic.
    The new low for me was when gays was saying that Frodo and Sam where gays…
    They have a way to destroy everything… Really unhealthy and dirty

      1. Movie, too. He sees the cute barmaid he couldn’t muster courage to talk to in “Fellowship”, pounds back the dregs of his ale, and sweeps her off her feet.

        1. That’s a beautifully red pill moment. The chubby dork goes off on the adventure of a lifetime and comes back a man.

        2. He marched across the world and into hell. The lovable doofus dealt with physical and mental strain on a daily basis for…I think it was three or so years in the books. What’s approach anxiety compared to that?
          That’s why I would advocate every man go through a crucible. When you’ve overcome true adversity, you can more readily recognize petty concerns for what they are.

    2. Yeah, yeah. Frodo and Sam, Bert and Ernie, one of the Teletubbies, Hitler supposedly had gay dalliances, as did Abe Lincoln, etc., etc.
      Smart people aren’t buying any of it.
      Gays are very good at projecting their gayness onto cartoon characters and famous dead people, yet won’t say a word about their real-life, closeted fellow gays. You know.. like Tom Cruise, Hillary, Oprah, Richard Gere, Travolta, DiCaprio, Garth Brooks, and on and on.

        1. Yep. He and buddy Rahm Emmanuel (former ballet dancer, now politician) were both card-carrying members of Man Country gay club in Chi-town’s northshore area

      2. I wonder how fun it would be to start “shipping” homosexuals with homosexuals of the opposite sex.
        How mad do you reckon they’d get?

      3. I never liked Garth Brooks (somebody once perfectly described him as “the Vanilla Ice of country music”), so if you say he’s also a dicksucker, that ties a nice bow on the package.

      4. Cruise and Travolta are an interesting case since they are Scientologists. I understand that organization is against homosexuality and actually offer a cure for it.
        “Hubbard once stated that gays ‘should be taken from society as rapidly as possible’ because ‘no social order will survive which does not remove these people from its midst’ reported Rolling Stone.
        One former gay Scientologist even claimed that John Travolta was the proof that he was offered that ‘Scientology processing and courses would ‘handle’ [his] own homosexuality.’ He paid the church a bundle for the process, but later sued when it didn’t work.”
        If Cruise/Travolta came out it might discredit their processing methods as ineffectual, at least to Scientologists who are aware of an anti-gay stance.
        https://cultnews.com/2006/09/does-scientology-beard-gay-celebrities/

    3. I’ve read a piece by a “critic” talking about the “homoerotic feelings” Between Sherlock and Watson in the original stories by Conan Doyle. Ugh.

      1. When Dr. Watson says, “I was fascinated by my queer companion,” that doesn’t mean what they want it to mean.

        1. Haha! Yeah, queer had a different meaning back then. I mean sure, it sounds funny in modern times and you can make quite a few jokes out of the way they used to talk, but in no way was there any homo things happening between them.
          Even the modern Sherlock Holmes series with Cumberbatch cracked a joke about this.
          When him and Watson were talking to some lady the subject about them sharing their apartment came up, at which point she asked them “are you two… together?”
          They both look horrified at each other and say “no.”
          She responds “Oh my apologies, you can never tell these days.”

        1. Can you keep your love of poop scooping other dudes’ asses to yourself, please? It smells. Litteraly.

        2. You do know that a lot of gay men don’t actually penetrate, right? However, I hear your girlfriend’s twat smells like rancid snails especially on her period and you still drill that.

        3. No? You don’t penetrate? I suppose smelling farts is enough for you, then.
          Interesting you describe with such detail how a woman’s pussy smells bad. I think you’re confusing my girlfriend with your mother.

        4. It’s that your girlfriend smells so bad, I can actually smell the stank on your D from here.

    5. I didnt know they tried to hijack the lord of the rings.. what disgusted me most was when they wanted Bert and Ernie (the Sesame Street puppets) to get gay married.

    6. Oh, you poor snowflake. Is there anything those damn gays won’t ruin. How do you live? How do you get up in the morning knowing that two men somewhere in the world are engaging in mutually consensual sexual intercourse.
      I’ll pray for you.

  3. Then and now.
    Back then we had eunuchs, today we have gay.
    Both serve the same purpose.
    It is no threat, it is less competition.
    Or in other words: The more men are gay, the more pussy for us!

    1. No not the same at all can you expect eunuch clubs and culture ?
      Even seen an operated cat ?

        1. Family cat got fixed, now prefers playing and nuzzling men over women. Girls say, “he’s gay.” Men say, “Women took his gnads.”

        2. The younger (male) cat tries to hump the 3 nut wonder. Of course ol’ 3 nut doesn’t like that and gives him a punch to the snoot.
          The gay one also likes to bite ol 3 nut while they’re tumblin’ and chasin’ each other around, but ol 3 nut just licks him back and that pisses off the little fag to no end. The gay one likes to snuggle with my mother (and doesn’t particularly like me) while 3 nut (who I bottle fed bout 11 years ago) will just occasionally walk through a room to make sure someone is there. Seeing the cats interact is one of the entertaining things about visiting my parents.

        3. Yeah, I like cats too. The trouble is most people cook’em too long and they get tough… 😉

        5. I have found the crock pot works well for this. I also prefer the hairless variety since they are easier to dress out.

        9. I love that film. They managed to structure the classic “good vs. evil” in a way that pitted hope and faith against nihilistic authority, with excellent combat sequences and engaging dialogue.
          The twist was a bit weird to me (not to spoil, but it raises a few questions), but even that sort of worked.

    2. Not so. Gay men tag along with “their girls” and push degeneracy, alcoholism, and slut culture onto the ladies. It’s impossible to meet a pretty woman today who doesnt have brunch every sunday with fag hags. Every other wedding now has bridesmen trying to shove their way into everything.
      This is all unnatural barriers men now have to navigate in this f’d up dating market.

      2. there is this type of sub culture but defenitly not all gay men like it. Especially not the older ones. I know some gay men in their 40ies. All successfull in different areas, medicine for example. They take their job seriously and therefor don’t spend their nights at clubs smoking meth. They are very culturally interested, travel a lot, are well educated, broad general education and knowledge about music, history and art then most straight men I know and have a slightly different, more extravagant clothing style then the average straight man (I’m not talking about latex hotpants that leave the buttocks free). One for example likes to wear rings and bracelets and earrings.
        I still believe that gay men fulfill some (evolutionary) role in society, since it is normal that not all men procreate and the Y-chromosome is more drawn to “tryouts”. Autism is also more common among men and I’d bet that autists have a lower reproduction rate then other men.
        Humanity maybe also needs “monk-like” guys who have no problem sitting in a covent all their life and maybe not have offspring but invest all their energy in gaining, keeping and conserving human knowledge.

      3. Gay men are no threat to hit on women, for the most part, so that way they get the beta/(omega?) “male” attention they crave without having to shoot down unwelcome beta advances. Having said that, I totally agree with you: it sucks, the whole prevelance of cockblocking fags and fag hags togethet being so prevelant. Shit, I went on a first date with a HB8 some years back, and the bitch had the gall to bring two gay friends with her. I got out of there pretty quickly, needless to say.

        1. Best to back out of those situations. Every man has came home to his girl and his day was ruined cause his girlfrends female friend has drama issues. “Kelly is sad, i have to go see her.” Now imagine how many days will be ruined cause you want to do something with your chick, but she “has to go” and help her mentally unstable gay friend for the 6th time in the month.
          Dont put up with that shit. If a girls is meeting you on a date and wants to bring homos, tell her no. Or tell her, hang with your friends, i can find something else to do.

    4. Not exactly the case. I watching the homosexual community and women in general, I made an interesting observation. Whenever women, in particular feminists, make a statement or other kind of action, it is done to protect and enhance their own interests. For example, look at how they will fight any reform of divorce law, no matter how adverse it is to men. Also look and see how they will depict exploitation of young women and yet they will promote the sexualization and abuse of young men. The Gay Agenda is abetting the feminist agenda and no one has said anything about it. The reason why they are doing this is that it controls the male libido and gives them power over us.

      1. “that it controls the male libido and gives them power”
        Yes.
        BETA male libido.
        and “gives them power over BETA males”
        Gays are all (lower end) beta males.
        If you improve yourself to the point where you are top 10% of males in your country both in finance, body and MIND you have nothing to fear from feminism or gays.
        Same applies to laws. They only subjugate the weak. D. Trump himself has had several divorces and children with several women. He does not look broke to me, nor is his life “destroyed”.
        Be more like him and less like al bundy and you will be fine.

        1. This applies to the Alphas as well. Have you noticed how women will manipulate men no matter their status?

        2. They will TRY to manipulate even high status men. It’s up to us to keep an eye out for that kind of behavior and nip it in the bud.

  4. No one cares about people being gay. Just stop advertising homosexuality all the time.

  6. Two of my brothers-in-law are/were homosexuals (one of them died from AIDS). When my wife and I were still dating, we tried to reach out to her younger brother. He was quite frank about his lifestyle. We even went out to gay / mixed nightclubs with him and saw this “lifestyle” up close. We talked to pretty boys, queens, leather-men, flamers, the BS&D crowd and the occasional lesbian. I don’t like to make up my mind on a subject until I have examined it from more than one angle.
    The time frame was late eighties / early nineties. The location was a large Mid-Atlantic city. To say that I saw some freaky sh!t would be an understatement. This whole subculture has a whole host of problems that go way beyond sexual perversion. Perhaps I will expand on that later.
    But to stay on topic, one of the key elements of this community is vanity or even worse, narcissism. One of the first things I noticed at the first gay club we walked into (aside from the guys checking me out and the dykes eyeballing my fiance) was how well dressed and groomed these young men were. The majority of them looked like they stepped right off the pages of GQ. There were some freaks to be sure, but on the street you would have never known most of those guys were homosexuals.
    Their hair was perfect. Their clothes were very fashionable and overall, tasteful and I dare say even conservative. This is apparently what drove the metro sexual style of today. There is no question in my mind that the OP is correct in his observation that this form of vanity has bled over into the straight male community.
    I am also convinced that mainstreaming homosexuality has indeed damaged platonic relationships between men. Worse, it has damaged unit cohesion in the military and rendered the armed forces less effective. This, I fear, is all by design and is one more nail in the coffin of Western civilization.
    I believe good grooming and personal hygiene are an important part of being masculine, as well as dressing well and staying in shape. But we should not be fops (or slobs). All things in moderation.

    1. At least in America, I don’t see how vanity could be a major cultural factor with the obesity levels we have.

      1. Keep the time frame in mind when I studied this situation; nearly three decades ago. We did not have the obesity epidemic that we see in America today. And I have noticed that the metro / homosexuals I necessarily come in contact with in the course of business still tend to be height weight proportional if not very fit. I am sure there are fat ones as well, but I see more fat slobs in the MGTOW / Herbivore community.

        1. I agree with you. I’d much rather have gays than blacks or hispanics. I just disagree that their vanity is bleeding into mainstream US society otherwise we wouldn’t be turning into a nation of land whales.

      2. Vanity can be found wherever narcissism rears its head. Some are vain in their looks (even overweight and unattractive women fancy themselves). Some are vain in their possessions (as the welfare cases with their cars and phones, or the hipster with his Apple products and 100% hemp attire). Some are vain in their pursuits or conceited in their “wisdom”.
        Vanity can be defined as “foolish pride.” If nothing else, narcissistic people are rich in foolish pride.

      3. There is so many super obese women that think they’re at the same level as a Victorian supermodel

      4. Yeah, why don’t you straight people lose a few pounds. Put down the cake already, fat straight losers. 😉

    2. This would make an interesting article for RoK. A friend of mine recently observed that gays were disproportionately represented on the show “Canada’s Worst Driver”; I speculated that being a promiscuous gay requires “horse blinders” – imagine if you were in Africa, for instance, and all the women wanted to sleep with the White Giant – however a significant portion of these women are also HIV positive. Pursuing a hedonistic lifestyle there would require that you utterly ignore the danger you’re exposing yourself to.
      I suspect these horse blinders also apply to other activities, such as driving; it leads to an inability to acknowledge the danger of daily activities.

      1. An interesting thought. I also wonder whether effeminacy common among homosexual men plays a role. Studies have shown that men are generally more able to identify and react to dangers than women (e.g. show them a picture and see how long it takes to spot the snake baring its fangs at you).
        Perhaps a combination of factors makes them more likely to take risks but less likely to be able to react to dangers.

      2. Just put everything in your own male point of view. If an slightly above average girl just came up to you and said, want no strings attached sex…youd bang her.
        Now looks at it from the homos point of view. If it was a homo, hed bang the random dude approaching him. Difference is, it is very rare for a pretty girl to just walk up and act that way to a man. Whereas, homos hang with homos and get these offers 10 times a day.
        The gay lifestyle is far worse than hedonism. Its the unchecked hornyness of a man, with a womans level access to sex.

        1. “Sex isn’t about reproduction – it’s about pleasure.” Taken to its logical conclusion, gay butt sex is a practical outcome.
          Amazing how such little ideas can produce such wild results.

        2. One of my twenty something co-workers and I were discussing this very thing. He said the impression he got was a lot of these young guys aren’t as much queer as they are horny. Trying to hook up with girls on campus was either too difficult for them or too dangerous (think rape culture here) so they turned queer to have some way to get their rocks off. It’s the old “I’m not gay but my boyfriend is…” routine.

        3. Welcome to the Middle East. Villages are like this, a lack of access to breeding age women essentially makes them homos.

        5. No, that’s very real. That tends to happen in places that are so small that they don’t even have other men to fuck.

        6. Same as dudes in prison, I reckon. They’re not gay, but, they get their rocks when the needs arise. I’m sure if you can define gay just by describing the sexual behavior, can you?

        7. Pleasure from sex is necessary to ensure frequent reproduction. If sex is painful, you won’t have as many offspring, and the ones that have the same trait won’t produce as many either.

        8. Oh no… you would not believe how common gayness is in the muzzie countries.
          How they square it with their homophobic religion I will never know. But I guess a stiff prick has no conscience.
          And don’t even get me started on the Afghans and their thing for buggering young boys dressed and made up as young girls.

        9. The lack of available women makes it an accepted practice UNTIL a man gets married. There is certainly no wearing leather chaps and licking dicksicles in the local bazzar. It is kept quiet and not on parade.

        10. GURDS and LURDS. Straight till you hit the gate. Gay until release day. For some it is just a survival technique they learn from the streets. Whatever situation they are in they learn to adapt to.

        12. OK, I was gonna hold my tongue, but you people are disgusting. I had straight friends say this this crap to me before. “It must be so great to have as much sex as you want, whenever you want.” Are we f*cking animals? You think gay people only think about sex, just because your perverted men brains only think about sex?
          Ugh, no wonder women think you’re so gross.

        13. Whoa…touched a nerve did they? Calm down and dont be such a drama qu–
          …Oh. right.

        14. Calm down beta male. I mean I assume we so sissified you all, real alpha males wouldn’t take the time to whine on a thread like this. Hahaha

        16. Eww, look at the hot gay guys I’d have to choose from and you think I have any interest in some schlubby, messed up alt-right closet cases?

        18. They do, but you have to permit some things, some times, otherwise you’re gonna lose all your followers. Virtually everything in Dubai is forbidden by Islam, but for economic necessity, everyone looks the other way.

    3. I don’t think vanity and narcissism are exactly the same. Someone can be vain about their appearance, but, apart from this trait they’re not necessarily totally locked into self-love beyond the point of everyone else. A narcissistic person lacks any form of discernment with regard to the judgment or influence of other people, and, that’s what makes it dangerous both to the person or indeed in some cases to society.

      1. Quite right. Hence why I included both terms. To illustrate the point I noticed that there were those homosexuals, very well groomed and dressed, that interacted with their peers more. Then there were some leather-men (very impressive body builders) that spent most of their time dancing by themselves watching themselves in the mirrors around the dance floor. My takeaway was the latter were an exhibit of nearly total narcissism.

        1. I think narcissism is latent in most men. It’s weird as you say, to see these perfectly trimmed out guys, spending lots of time every week on their bodies and watching what they eat, end up dancing by themselves against the silhouettes of their own shadows in the mirrors. It’s really sad and lonely.

        2. Yes it is sad. My brother-in-law looked like a model. I told my wife if I looked like him, she’d have never met me, because I would have been too busy banging every hot chick in town with zero effort. He had gorgeous women trying to trip him so they could fall under him.
          The same thing with the leather-men. These were handsome men with sculpted bodies. I just couldn’t understand it. They could have had any and all of the attractive women they wanted and they’re playing “wide receiver” in a gay bar? Really?

        3. It’s like a form of perfect cosmic lonesomeness among a multitude of eyes where only the singular eyes of the dancer (himself) can satisfy him, but, paradoxically, never to consummate any type of relationship? How can you have an ideal, erotic/sensuous relationship with yourself alone?
          And yet, there is some odd recess in the male Psyche that kind of says that ideally I’d like to be alone with myself and no other, yet, the majority of men aren’t like this, but, there is an aspect of it in most men.

        5. Both of my brothers-in-law went to a high school where the guidance counselor was queer. Amazingly enough their were a number of young men who attended that school in that time frame that came out queer. I doubt that was a coincidence.

        7. I had a girlfriend years ago that said she worked with a gay guy at a department store. She said the gay guy told her that he was certain he was born gay because even at 5 years old, he enjoyed watching his father walk around with a towel on after taking a shower. LOL.
          Being gay is a disorder. But I think gays for the most part, are born with the disorder. There are a lot of gay guys that develop the “gay female-ish lispy” voice quite young, not on purpose. Females develop voices like that because it’s one of the female traits to attract men. There’s something backwards or miswired going on in a gay man’s brain that he develops the “gay voice”. It’s almost like they have a female brain in a man’s body or something.

    4. I had a couple of close gay friends in my twenties, when I lived close to a major gay area, and they showed me that community up close. The only word that comes to mind is **SHALLOW**. Most of those gayboys were living cartoons. They used a LOT of drugs and shrieked and overreacted a lot. They acted like twelve-year-old girls at a sleepover. We were the same age but we were worlds apart, mentally, intellectually, emotionally, and obviously sexually.
      Today, I have different gay friends, but they’re always older, and view that whole scene with distaste. Me, I’ve got this much patience (makes tiny shape with thumb and index finger) for the gayboy antics. I saw it up close and don’t like it. They’re wasting their lives, the same way that idiot twenty-year-old straight boys waste their lives in video games.

        2. It’s afternoon here. And what did you expect , bragging about your gay friends at RoK ?

        3. It’s the standard M.O. Write a comment guaranteed to elicit a particular, predictable response, then complain of abuse when the response is — surprise — elicited. No different from taunting someone on the playground, then telling the teacher when he finally hauls off and pops you one.

        4. That still drives me nuts. Running to the law to punish people you antagonized when they return the favor. Using powerful authorities as your weapons, not to apply justice but vengeance.
          What a horrible thing to teach the young.

        5. I wasn’t trying to elicit any response, I was just telling what I saw when I lived briefly near the gay community. Balkaner was just being a prick.

      2. Video games don’t give you sexually/needle transmitted disease nor a prolapsed asshole in later life.

  7. Transgenderism is a bigger threat as it fundamentally tries to reprogram a child’s innate sense of their masculinity or femininity by teaching kids that there’s no such things as male and female, there’s only a gender that you can chose.
    This unscientific and deeply corrosive drivel needs to be extinguished as it’s affront not just to commonsense but to the idea of that children should be allowed to have a carefree upbringing when they’re young. There is something nauseating about “educational and sexuality experts” who try to force their bent, left wing ideology on the minds of young children. It actually borders on child abuse. Here’s with the great feminist Germaine Greer had to say when she was attacked by neo-feminists when she said “Transgender Women are not real women”. Fuck them, let them get offended…I don’t care what they think!

      1. I am inclined to disagree…about the gays, anyway. I have seen evidence that one can be genetically predisposed to abnormal testosterone, but that alone does not make one gay. A combination of experiences and mindset is required to make that happen.
        Those experiences include abuse (whether sexual or just prolonged verbal abuse), denigration of all things masculine, borderline criminalization of normal male-female relations, and a discovery that acting effiminate is the only way to be close to women. Combined with anti-heterosexual, anti-male, anti-self-improvement mindsets, this can easily push one in a homosexual direction.
        To my thinking, homosexual men are victims of epigenetic factors stemming from abuse – cultural abuse and personal abuse.

        1. That’s my opinion on it as well, that 95% of the reason one becomes homosexual is due to the environment that he was raised in, and HOW he was raised in it.

        4. This has always been a subject of debate, as there have been many studies as well. I did come across one finding within a study that was rather interesting: researchers had found that there seemed to be a correlation between a homosexual son and promiscuous mothers. They had found a pattern in which gay men coincidentally had mothers that were very promiscuous.
          I thought this was interesting because I only personally know of one gay man that is in his early 50s, I’ve known him since I was a kid because he was part of an extended family on my great aunts side. He was the son from a previous marriage of the man my great aunt had married. Come to find out, this gay man’s mother had married 5 times. I saw a photo of her, and even though she was in her mid 70s at that point, she was still wearing very heavy makeup trying to look like a complete hussy. Seemed a little ironic between the research article I read and the revelation that the gay man’s mother had been married 5 times. Obviously she got around pretty well.

        5. There’s evidence that gay men are often the youngest in a line of brothers. It’s well known phenomenon in the gay community. Theory is that mother’s body senses that it’s given birth to too many males, and that they’ll be fighting for resources, so it bathes the newest embryo in a bath of female hormones for the duration of the pregnancy. Presto change-o: Boy’s brain turns into a female brain. And a flamer is born.
          Here’s an article about the structure of the gay brain:
          https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14146-gay-brains-structured-like-those-of-the-opposite-sex/

        6. Why do people who have a problem with homosexuality always forget that Lesbians exist? Is it because their existence doesn’t support their pathology argument? Or is it because straight men like Lesbian porn?

        7. If you had actually bothered reading more comments on this site, you’d notice that I(and other guys as well) are not that big lovers of lesbians, and hold them in the same regard as homos.

    2. just saw an article where a person in the UK is now on his/her third sex reassignment. but this is the behavior of someone who isnt mentally ill, right?

        1. boy thought he was a girl,started at 15, stopped, decided he as gay, was gay, then decided he was a girl after and all “wanted a family”….the mind boggles

        3. It would be male, female and intersex. Intersex is a real medical condition. Gay and tranny is mental disorders

      2. What about someone who believes that their gender is akin to that of a dolphin or a mushroom for example. Surely, we’d say these people are mentally right?

        1. Ill spare you the pics of the guy who is transforming himself into a dragon

      4. But we should still honor their gender orientation du jour, no? What if a 7 year old boy decides he wants to be a girl: new name, new pronoun, new wardrobe, big announcement at school, proud parents. Then next week, she wants to be a boy: repeat the same again. Etc.

    3. You have to look at what I call the Unified Theory of Diversity: Question: What do blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, South Asians, feminists, gays and now transgenders have in common? Why have our elites ganged up these groups into a coalition which in other contexts wouldn’t cohere or make any sense?
      Answer: All of these demographics have the job of making normal white people’s lives worse.
      Transgenders, especially, give normal white people the creeps, and that makes them especially effective at gaslighting us: Their forced presence in our lives make us question our understanding of reality, the evidence of our senses and even our sanity.

      1. That’s an interesting theory. Transgenders do actually “distort” more than any other phenomena one’s sense of reality. Is it a man, women, or something else, it’s got that weird sense of the uncanny about it, like those mannequins in a shop that you sometimes mistake for a real person.
        I suspect, there’s something more going on with this whole TG stuff, it’s like we’re all being primed up for the introduction of some type of AI in the very near future. Look at them very hard, and that’s what comes to mind, isn’t it?

        1. Did you ever see the South Park episode about Metrosexuals? The premise was that the CRAB PEOPLE are too weak to take out the surface dwellers, but by making them vain and effeminate they can take their ability and will to fight back.
          Consider the following scenario: a society focused on mental instabilities and weaknesses is assaulted by a war-like people. The former is breeding at below-replacement rates, physically unfit, and mentally unprepared for all forms of resistance. The latter rapes, pillages, and destroys, spreading their seed and power wherever they go.
          Which would win out?

        2. Sounds like the Vikings from ancient times who raided the British Islands and eventually settled and made us all stronger in the long run.

        3. Funny you should mention transgenderism and AI. The transgender “Martine” Rothblatt wants us to become digital “mind files,” and he has even written a book about it. And Ray Kurzweil fantasizes about becoming a female avatar he calls Ramona, so he probably shows latent transgenderism himself.
          At least Eliezer Yudkowsky seems like a sexually normal guy so far, as transhumanists go.
          Hmm. What do these transhumanists all have in (((common)))?

        4. How do explain the Brits and the Swedes lack of self respect, that they are willing to bend over backwards to those Masculine Parasites of Africa and Middle East?

        5. Hard men produce good times.
          Good times produce soft men.
          Soft men produce hard times.
          Hard times produce hard men.
          They’ve had it too good for too long.

        8. The Scandinavian races are a lost cause. It’s like Nietzsche said, those whom burn bright in the beginning (warriors) end up docile old grandfathers (slaves) smiling at anyone who’ll wipe their bums clean in their nation’s sunset years.

        12. That’s why a warrior should die in battle before deteriorating into an old fart who can’t even wipe h8mself

        13. Absolute control, that sounds the religious nut jobs agenda.
          They wish to be ” gods “, able to tell everyone else how to live and what to do in their own bedrooms.
          Once again, christians, liberals and muslims are all the same thing, self righteous control freaks.

        16. What comes to my mind is basically Halloween. A grown man in a dress with a bad wig or his own long hair, lipstick, heels/boots. There was one in Trader Joe’s the other day and it just looked like a man in women’s clothing. The dude was over six feet tall and overweight, just a giant wall. Everybody was looking like, “WTF!!”.

        17. The Vikings were expelled from England once and for all at Stamford Bridge. Harold went South where he lost to those French Norman whoopsies.

        18. Syphilis was not the cause of Nietzsche’s Madness. I had a private conversation with dr. Thomas Szas years back on this point. His opinion was that Nietzsche’s Simpsons we’re not consistent with the etiology of tertiary syphilis.

        19. I always thought it was just a case of Men Behaving Badly, like so many Caligulas.

        23. Nietzsche had Simpsons? I know, it was just a typo, but it made as much sense as a lot of the commentary here!

      2. And these groups dislike each other. They aren’t creating half Muslim half Mexican children, they are forming their own separate communities.

        1. Which is fine in and of itself. That’s what countries are supposed to be about, after all.
          Why bring them all into one place and try to force them together? It’s almost like someone thrives on the tension and violence that tends to result, or something.

        3. Uh…. Muslim isn’t an ethnicity, it’s a religion. Mexican isn’t a religion.

      3. A notion in business says that there are no new market shares. If you introduce a new product, you’re stealing buisiness from some other market. Phones replaced PC’s and landlines to a degree. Redbox killed the video store. Fast food is arriving in gangbusters and my stock in a grocery store dropped two dollars a share. If you introduce new varieties of men, you’re taking away from preexisting men. After the fact comes, “Why?” You replace what’s obsolete. American men became obsolete in their complacency. A little at first, and always an inch at a time. Weak morally, weak religiously, weak physically, weak socially, weak sexually. The last men left are going to have to resist this, one way or another.

        2. Rich42a

          Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !ai72d:
          On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
          !ai72d:
          ➽➽
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash372ShopForm/Pay$97/Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!ai72l..,..

        4. Action55a

          Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! :!ao145d:
          On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
          :!ao145d:
          ➽➽
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash435BuzzExperts/Pay$97/Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!ao145l..,..

        7. Sometimes but there are also desktop versions of smartphone apps. So if I’m on the move I use the smartphone or tablet. When I’m situated I transfer to the laptop. It’s just much easier with a laptop and mouse.

      4. Goddam man this is one of the deepest things ive read in a while.
        “Their forced presence in our lives makes us question our understanding of reality, the evidence of our senses and even our sanity”
        Fukking +9,000 and saved. Gentlemen, take note.
        Have i seen you over at Takis?

      5. My job isn’t making normal white people’s lives worse. What are you talking about?

        1. Ok you got me. She’s a massive and freaky feminist. But that’s not what Mr. S. Jacket meant

        2. nah, I dont got ya- never heard of her before. Are there any depressing subjects you arent well-versed in?

        1. She’s a smart but in many ways bog standard rad fem whose been wrong footed by post modern gender neutral identity politics. It’s a civil war that’s been going on since the early 90s and the fact that the rad fems seem sane by comparison shouldn’t blind us to the fact that they are still rabid foaming at the mouth harridans.

        2. You are right. She actually seems sane, doesn’t she?
          Harridans? Haven’t heard that one in a long time. Must add that back into my repertoire.

        3. I’ve seen her speak a couple of times. She’s charming on the telly mostly, a miserable banshee in the grizzled flesh

        4. “banshee” another great word I am adding to my insult annoying twats category.

    5. I remember when that interview first aired, i remember thinking it was more like an interrogation than an interview. It’s amazing how the Left will destroy their own when they don’t play along with the current narrative.

      1. The left are locust like when it comes to dissent within their own ranks. Obedience to Big Brother is sacrosanct and non-negotiable. Orwell was remarkably prescient in observing this crime, which is the hallmark of all leftist thinking, in 1984.
        Ideology is the great excuse for all original thinking and its unthinking stupidly is only equal to its force to silence through bullying and other forms of public shaming what it clearly knows it lacks in credibility. Is it any wonder it appeals to people who’ve never worked and toiled in the real world- namely students and academics!

      2. Hm. I think that’s called debate. The alternative looks like the current presidency where you have Republicans who despised Trump as a joke before the nomination, but are now on their knees praising him. Which is more honest?

    6. Germaine Greer is just as toxic as Gloria Steinem but here she finds the idea of transgenderism as false. How interesting, However people like her brought it to this point.

      1. What’s interesting is how quickly the sisterhood turned on her. The lipstick Taliban put out a hit on her. So much for sticking together, blah, blah, blah………

      1. Constant masculine influence and you’re good. Don’t forget to tell your kids the schemes of the devil, so they can stick to the path.

    9. Yes, didn’t take too long for the sisterhood, you go guuurrrrrrl, gotta stick together tribe to put a hit on the high priestess of feminism.
      Muh feelins!

    10. This is the easy fight. Everyone knows trannies are mentally ill and thus should be treated as such.
      Now try to fight against homossexuality itself, in all its forms. You will encounter far many resistence, as aceptance of homossexuality driven by individualism has become common even among ourselves.
      We must not condone any kind of homossexual behavior, as homossexuality is degenerate in itself.

    12. All this nonsense started in the Soviet Union. The other countries that copied them did similar things to their own peoples.

        1. I agree. But…you have to be careful with Gil. I have prior experience with him / her / it (in its various iterations). I’m not all hyped up on catnip about trolls like Chip, but I am pretty sure this one is the real deal. Early on it was pretty stupid and repetitive. But it seems to have learned over the past few years. I don’t know if it’s human or a heuristic bot, but it has improved over time. Do what you want, but I recommend that we not engage it.

        4. I actually new a guy back in the day that claimed he smoked catnip and it got him high (no joke). Never tried it myself.
          Oh yeah, the Kneeman is definitely a troll. I just don’t believe he’s a paid professional troll. He seems to do it purely for sport and entertainment and only part time to particular people. I’m originally from the east coast and had a lot of dealings with folks from the various burrows of NYC. They love to bust your balls and expect you to give it back to them as good as you get it.
          If they ever see they’re getting to you it’s like blood in the water to a shark. It’s a kind of hazing or even a male sh!t test. If you maintain frame, don’t lose your temper and play it cool you’re fine. But once they see you’re taking it seriously, they go for the jugular. A lot of guys do it (especially active military and vets). But in my experience New Yawkers seem to take particular pleasure in it.

  9. “but today, men, from their teens onward, are becoming promiscuous to an unhealthy degree.”
    Back this up. Data?

    1. I keep reading that Millennial men have less sex than their fathers at the same stage of their lives.

      1. That’s exactly what I was getting at. Data is showing the exact opposite of his claim.

      2. I think there’s an increased stratification effect going on. Those men who would have multiple partners and sexual encounters by 20 are having more of those encounters, while those who would have maybe one or two are having none.
        The result is that the average is decreasing – more men are experiencing a decrease than those experiencing an increase. I expect that a combination of the decrease in desirable women (thanks, SJWs) and unfettered hypergamy explains much of the difference – a decreasing number of desirable women are sleeping with the decreasing number of highly desirable men, and the remainder just aren’t having as much sex.

        1. Yeah, I think hypergamy and the sexual eviction of the less desirable men explain part of it, and degenerates want to rationalize their pockets of sexual abundance surrounded by sexual famine by calling it “polyamory.” When Leo DiCaprio takes 30 women with him on his yacht that he has all to himself, that means 29 other men will face some lonely nights.

      3. Once the iphone came out, women had access to instant validation 24/7. This changed everything. Men are having far less sex today, because women have egos that are not in check. Fat chicks think they are 9’s these days. Plain jane 6’s get on social media and are pumped and dumped by alpha male 10s. Then the plain janes ego validation kicks in and she thinks she is good enough for a 10, and would rather die a cat lady then settle for a male 7.
        Talk to anyone in their 50s, gen x. Even the average man banged lots of girls before social media.
        Me personally, im 34. Just barely considered a millenial. There is a huge difference in the quality at your local hotspot today, compared to 2003 when i first started going out. 2003-2007 was a bachelors dream.

        1. I’ve been to hotspots in big and small towns lately. I’m in my mid-twenties, so I didn’t get to see what it was like before the 2010’s.
          It’s a validation engine for women, now. Fat, skinny, ugly, attractive, all get hit on in almost processional form. Men spend absurd amounts of money getting in and buying drinks for women who don’t care whether they live or die, just for a few seconds of hope that maybe they’ll catch some attention (if they’re buying drinks for girls, they know they’re not actually getting laid that night).
          Now, I’ve seen people get lucky at these hotspots. We’re talking 8% bodyfat, 6’5 club manager types, not above-average bachelors and certainly not beta schmucks. If a girl goes out with any thought of getting laid, she leaves with a small cadre of groupies instead of a regular patron.
          This is not a gripe, though. There are lots of ways to find a woman, get laid, and maybe even start a relationship (though few women deserve a relationship with a quality man these days). Clubs, bars, and similar venues just aren’t reliably among those ways.

        2. I’ve been told that the entire 1970s was a bachelor’s dream. It was after the pill was invented but before AIDS arrived.

        3. As a 34 year old myself, i completely agree. What a dramatic and tragic change in such little time.

      4. I can comfirm it. Out of all the guys my age I know , nobody has a girlfriend or is having sex regularly.

        1. I concur, with caveat. I do know men with girlfriends and regular sex, but they’re a clear minority. Most of the guys I know are betas without hope.
          One guy is the biggest scumbag I’ve ever personally known – he’s massively in debt (personal and banking), mentally unstable, physically wimpy. But he’s got enough charisma to pull attractive women, emotionally fuck them up, and dump them on the streets several times a year. He’s a bit of a paradox, in that he’s mentally and physically beta but naturally charismatic enough to compensate.
          Another is a veteran who’s actually sick of easy lays. He’s very into a foreign lass who possesses a virginal innocence he’s almost never seen, and he’s happier than I’ve ever seen him.
          Another is a bit of a tub, but master of social proof. He all but runs his hangouts, plays brilliantly to the female ego, and has access to all sorts of drugs (drug relationships don’t last, but they’re pretty easy to get). He’s in an open marriage with a fat unattractive woman who helps him get laid, but never pulls any attention herself (a clever gambit, there).
          That’s it. Out of all the guys I know, those are the three (not counting some acquaintances from college – one was crazy but has mellowed with a nice girl, one just proposed to a bitchy fatass, many of the remainder are gay).

        2. Yeah I know 3-4 myself. They either fall into the scumbag category or are good looking metrosexuals.
          Now I don’t know if we should call the majority who is not having sex all betas. There is a myth in the manosphere , that the beta/omegas are fat fucks who play video games in their basement all day , and therefore women don’t want to have sex with them. I have have friends who lift , dress well , are masculine , have no debt in their early 20s , read the manosphere etc. They lack practical game form the lack of experience , but are not needy/clingly. Now these guys are invisible in the sexual market. They tried to get women at some point , got treated like shit by women they approached and by the society in general and said fuck it all. They refused to turn into entertaining clowns and fell back into their small private social circles instead.

        3. I didn’t mean to imply that all these men are betas because they can’t get laid. I’m saying they can’t get laid because they’re betas.
          They still clearly want it – you should hear how pathetic they sound sometimes – but they reject avenues of self-improvement and fear even mild rejection. They orbit, they pander, and they grovel like betas. To demonstrate how not-hard it is to sleep with these women, I’ve had my shot with every one of them (not every woman in the area – just the ones these guys orbit).

        5. I don’t doubt it. I’ve grown beyond pity of the guys I’m describing.
          I was the sort of guy you described. There’s still much hope for them, if only they can persevere.

    2. Why are fertility rates for 1st world men now at the lowest rate ever? Falling birth rates, falling fertility rates, promotion of transgenderism and homosexuality, wide scale immigration of people from the third world into 1st world countries. Looks like some force in the world wants to white race to die out. The new slaves from Africa and South America will be easier to control in a 100 years time. Thanks Hillary Clinton and George Soros et al of the reptilian overlords.

  10. Cowboys used face lotion. They glopped animal fat directly onto their face and neck. Would anybody say that they’ve been corrupted by gay values?
    (Incoming Brokeback Mountain joke in three…two…one…)

    1. Q: Why are there no more picnics on Brokeback Mountain???
      A: Because the weiners taste like shit.

  11. A gay insider talks about how he destroyed his colon:
    Surviving Gay…Barely
    http://josephsciambra.com/surviving-gaybarely/
    We really need to stomp on this nonsense that tries to characterize male homosexuality as just another kind of “love.” We men complain about women a lot, but in a healthy society they serve a legitimate function by putting some limits on our worst impulses. Gay men know this on some level, so they withdraw to their all-male enclaves where women can’t observe and scold them for their self-destructive behavior.

    1. Wow. Read the whole thing. Incredibly sad. And unspeakably infuriating how the “lgbt community” (god how i loathe that term) seeks out and grooms the young. And to see naive white families bringing their little kids to “pride parades” in my middle class whute neighborhood makes my stomach turn. My wife says im homophobic. i guess it’s true–i really am terrified of what is happening to our society wuth the normalization of homosexuality.

  12. Homosexuality became mainstream in America under the Obama Presidency. He did more for homosexual men and single women than he did for African Americans.
    Many of the gentrification projects in various American cities are pushing out poor blacks in favor of homosexual men and single white females. What do these social justice warriors make of this when one of the most vulnerable groups in America was screwed by one of its own?
    Meanwhile Trump is demonized even though he hasn’t done anything to black America. And blacks would benefit if jobs come back to America and immigration was controlled.
    That leads me to another point the Left thinks Trump wants to end all immigration. Wrong he wants to end uncontrolled illegal immigration.

  14. As long as they don’t touch me I alright with gays but once they open their mouths, then there’s a problem. They are quite dumb and annoying. Kinda like women
    It’s a result of having low testosterone.
    But to they can be quite funny and entertaining, betas on the other hand…
    We should focus on whipping them into shape.

  15. I’d also point to the normalisation of Anal sex with women. How did that become normal sex? At least it is with porn. Whatever you think of him Makow pushes an interesting if puritanical idea: there is a sense in which all promiscuity (outside of ‘spreading ones oats ‘?) is kind of gay. Effectively he is equating everything that isn’t reproductive with the masturbatory, the kind of thing you might do round the back of the v toilets. Bit extreme perhaps but its an interesting argument

    1. When I was a virgin and watched porn anal sex really aroused me. But when I have real sex I love her ass but I dont want to fuck it

      1. Because it isn’t a mans natural sexual aim. It’s a masturbatory porn substitute. Porn seeks to subvert our sexual objects

    1. big write up on espn.com concerning the eventual legalization of sports gambling a day or two ago. think it was written by fay vincent, ex-commissioner…so, he is in the know…good call uncle bob

      1. Grazie. Man, it’s gonna be beautiful. I am getting my ducks in a row to make bets all over this sweet land of ours beginning in late 2018. Which hopefully will include some drinking/betting/womanizing get-togethers with various ROK guys in their neck of the woods. Skol, my friend! To your health, and to the future!

        1. LOL! ya know, I need to reread the article, it didnt explain this in depth(of course), but the writer implied this was why the sellers of the Marlins were asking much more than book value for the team…

        2. I read something about that, too. Something like the new valuation for the Marlins franchise was over $1 billion, due to the expected increase in revenue via sports betting for the owners.
          Yep. We’ll soon see a gaggle of dipshits, in the stands, betting madly on their phones while their interest in the events goes up about 500%. Of course, the owners will benefit from increased interest (TV revenue and ticket sales), but they’ll figure out a way to get a cut out of all that betting action…
          Damn it’s going to be cool as fuck for red-pill guys. Legalized prostitution will be next, as we return to the days of the Wild West saloons and their gambling venues. Giddyup, fuckers, and yee-haw!

        3. I read an article a few years back, ex wall streeter was getting a legit 5-6% return on sports gambling- imagine how much higher it will be when gambling is legal? this might be the best investment opp for little guys who believe its all rigged- find money managers who create a fund for this. i wonder how small the return would need to be before someone smells a rat? 15%? more/less?
          its kinda sad, but i think at this point the best invesment opps are sports “gambling” and weed stocks

        4. “Legalized prostitution will be next,”
          Not in the Jesusland portion of America. Some parts here still have draconian and archaic alcohol laws FCOL.

        5. For pure monetary investment, you’re not wrong. I’ve been trying the whole “equity” thing – invest in a starting business, profit on returns type of thing – but businesses fail all the time.
          I’m thinking the best investment for me right now is magic paper. Buy some certifications attesting that I know what I know (not much in most certs I don’t already basically know, or can’t look up in a few seconds), get companies and individuals to pay me to do things they’re too lazy or ignorant to do for themselves.

        7. I agree, those two are excellent investment opportunities. It’s the Wild, Wild West my friend. Get in while the getting is good – and hang out with people who have a good angle on the whole thing.

        8. The legal positions of Christian communities ought, in my opinion, to follow the words of Paul: “All things are permissible, but not all things are expedient.”
          Legalize every vice – making them illegal doesn’t fix the problem, anyway. Do not rely on the law to protect your children from sin and vice, but rather raise them up to resist such things.

        2. “Go for it, man. She has a face like a porn starlet, and a body to match.”
          Whole new meaning, right here. Though, the girl on the left looks like someone I’d be willing to actually court, if her mind was right.

        3. She actually looks rather OK without makeup TBQH. No one to write home about, but no one to be embarrassed about either.

        9. And don’t forget the ink! Seems like every one in that industry has a splotch somewhere eventually.

        10. Holy shit, business venture proposition. Hire a team of animators and just one set of “actors” to get a motion map.
          Shoot a few different types of scene, CGI does the rest. Thousands of videos, almost no actual shooting.

        11. And if you give the end user some mod tools, the viewer can customize each scene to his or her liking.

        13. I know there are some 3D programs have that been nicknamed “hookerware” in some circles due to their possible sexual uses.

        14. I think she’s one of the very few porn sluts who has no tats…fake boobs, hell yeah, looks like she’s even had jawline-shaping, and maybe a slight nosejob. But no tattoos, I guess she’s somewhat religious or something (???)…

        15. You know, I don’t see why they don’t use temporary tats to try to sell the illusion that you haven’t seen this starlet a thousand times before. “No, the last time she had a butterfly on her ass. Now she has a heart above her mound – totally different.”

        17. Make up magic is scary. I remember looking up pornstars without makeup and man all the ones that look a 8+ with makeup are more of a 7- without makeup

        18. They look like something a virgin would draw in an anime or on DeviantArt. Her whole face does, too, come to think of it.
          What a shame.

        19. Yeah, it’s definitely a shame. These women feel like they need to replace everything, enhance everything, and reshape everything else, so they can get attention. That being said, proving that we’re all demented, hypocritical creatures – WB.

        23. Now you’ve done it! Somebody will be making money off that idea within twenty four hours…

        24. Definitely prefer her without the makeup. The fake, porn star, look doesn’t do anything for me.
          Without makeup she is a cute average girl with a nice smile(though with the emotional damage being a porn star comes with)

        25. It strikes me as a before-after sort of thing. The eyes on the right are the eyes of a whore, while the left looks damaged but redeemable.

        26. They can have it. I wouldn’t feel right selling voyeurism to apathetic losers unable or unwilling to live their lives.
          Not that I haven’t given it thought, mind you.

        29. She looks like someone took a photo of young Angelina Jolie and stretched it out in all directions.

        30. Hence why fawning over a woman’s looks is illogical. When you get beyond the layers of filler and make up they look terrible.
          I’m so happy to be a man-I look fantastic without the need for cosmetic enhancement. In fact, I compared a photo of myself at 18 to now and the only difference is my hair is longer and my gaze is hardened. Beyond that, no drugs, no smoking, rare late nights out and drinking restricted to twice a year or so has put me in good stead. That and longevity genes (ancestors who lived upwards of 90)-I won the genetic jackpot.

        32. Um she is naturally good looking without makeup. If humans were in the wild and in their natural settings she would be classified as higher in the reproduction charts. But we do not live in our natural settings.

  19. “However, to adopt the
    daily rituals of moisturizing, waxing, applying fake tan, etc., is
    crossing the thin line between healthily enhancing one’s self-confidence
    and being consumed by vanity.”
    Well, when you consider there was (IDK if it’s still there) an effort to get women to stop using makeup, the obvious next step for the cosmetics industry was to market makeup to men.

    1. I don’t mind moisturizer – sometimes the skin, she gets dry and itchy – but there’s no good reason for any of the rest of it.
      And, when I don’t take hot showers up to three times a day, my skin don’t itch, either.

  20. What’s the difference between a fag and a refrigerator?… The refrigerator doesn’t fart when you pull the meat out.

    2. Three fags were sitting in a hot tub when a blob of cum floated up. One of them looked at the other two and asked “Okay, who farted? “

    4. One day a straight guy dies and finds himself in hell. As he is wallowing
      in despair, he has his first meeting with the devil…
      Satan: “Why so glum?”
      Guy: “What do you think? I’m in hell!”
      Satan: “Hell’s not so bad. We actually have a lot of fun down here.
      You a drinking man?”
      Guy: “Sure, I love to drink.”
      Satan: “Well, you’re gonna love Mondays then. On Mondays, that’s
      all we do, drink. Whiskey, tequila, Guinness, wine coolers, Tab,
      and Fresca. We drink ’til we throw up, and then we drink some more!
      And you don’t have to worry about getting a hangover, because you’re
      dead anyway.”
      Guy: “Gee that sounds great!”
      Satan: “You a smoker?”
      Guy: “You better believe it!”
      Satan: “All right! You’re gonna love Tuesdays. We get the finest
      cigars from all over the world, and smoke our lungs out. If you get
      cancer – no biggie, you’re already dead, remember?”
      Guy: “Wow…that’s awesome!”
      Satan: “I bet you like to gamble.”
      Guy: “Why, yes, as a matter of fact I do.”
      Satan: “Good, ’cause Wednesdays you can gamble all you want.
      Craps,blackjack, roulette, poker, slots, whatever. If you go bankrupt,
      it doesn’t
      matter, you’re dead anyhow.”
      Guy: “Cool!”
      Satan: “What about Drugs?”
      Guy: “Are you kidding? Love drugs! You don’t mean…?”
      Satan: “That’s right! Thursday is drug day. Help yourself to a
      great bigbowl of crack or smack. Smoke a doobie the size of a
      submarine.You can do all the drugs you want. You’re dead so who cares.”
      Guy: “Wow! I never realized Hell was such a cool place!”
      Satan: “You gay?”
      Guy: “No…”
      Satan: “Ooooh, Fridays are gonna be tough…”

      1. Classic faq self-loathing. You admit that gay sex is a vice (like alc/smoke/gambling) and that normal men find it repulsive. Faqgots like you love imagining str8s getting gay-raped bc you both project your own sick desire onto the str8 men you cant have, as well as wish other men would suffer for the privilege of being normal.

        1. Well, obviously you’re too stupid to realize this was a joke. And if anyone thought of gay sex as a vice it would be you. I mean I just have regular old boring gay sex with my partner of 17 years. Every once in a while we get close to “do you think the neighbors heard” sex but definitely nowhere near the level of vice… anymore.
          And I’ve never had sex with a straight man, though I’ve had relations with guys who had wives and children. They seemed to engage in it willing and enjoyed it. You’re the one who seems a bit obsessed with these darker ideas.
          You may want to look a little deeper at yourself and consider why you’re so obsessed with it. Are you sure you’re not the “straight” guy who is secretly interested in being taken advantage of by another guy. I mean I didn’t bring any of that up.
          Pervert. 🙂
          P.S. is “faqgots” some sort of old English spelling of a bundle of sticks?

        3. I’m sure you stopped “reafing” when you were in 2nd grade. Wish you’d stopped “wrifing” too, because your “spelfing” is horrible.

  21. “A public service announcement…remember: the words homo, fairy and queer are totally unacceptable methods of referring to corn-holing, cocksucking, ass-bandit faggots. Always be politically correct. Always consider other people’s feelings. (And now, back to your regular programming.)”

    1. They’re opening up a new fag bar in Kansas City. It’s not going to have any bar stools. They’re going to call it “The Fruit Stand”

        2. Chip, I am within a 100 mile radius of KC. I am in your vicinity on a periodic basis. I would like to lay eyeballs and a handshake on you and maybe sit down over a cup of coffee sometime. If you want, drop me a line. My burner Email is jw dot boothe at mail dot com. I will leave this up until I see you have read it or the end of the day (whichever comes first). Any of you other guys that are in the vicinity feel free to contact me as well. Nothing follows.

    2. My father said that when he attended the University of Oklahoma circa 1950, the men he went to school with would call their football rivals from Nebraska the “Nebraska Cornholers.”

  22. According to our old Indian scriptures KAM-Satra..when man and women have sex with a LUST instead of love chances of child being homosexual is more !! Sex is the symbol of this exclusive divine bond meant to procreate rather than for pleasure . . .. . Orgasm from LOVE ( and not LUST ) electrically charges healthy sperm , and hence the off spring will NOT be a depraved homosexual .

  23. Another problem with open homosexuality is that it discourages straight men from taking care of themselves. I am not talking about extreme grooming but things like going to the gym or eating healthy because you might wind getting unwanted attention from gays.

    1. That neurosis belongs to the people who are experiencing it. Don’t blame gay people. And really, if you’re out of shape and unattractive, or if you have a small dick, you’re not going to get hit on by complete strangers in the shower. Oh, and don’t think the other straight guys in the locker room aren’t also checking out your package on the sly, because they are. We all like to compare ourselves to others to see how we stack up.

  24. Even if you don’t believe the Bible is the word of God and just take it at face value; the men who wrote it thousands of years ago knew that sexual degeneracy wasn’t good for people and society in general.

    1. Atheists will defend Jewish prohibitions against eating certain foods by arguing that the ancient Hebrews probably saw the connection between, say, pork consumption and trichinosis, even though other peoples ate pork regularly, including militarily successful ones like the Romans.
      Yet these same atheists dismiss biblical prohibitions against men lying with men as a product of ignorance and superstition, even though we can see in the here and now that this practice damages the human body immediately.

      1. Paul says of homosexuality, “They receive the compensation in their flesh.” What that means is anybody’s guess, but the smart money’s on STD’s of various kinds.
        It’s a form of Pascal’s wager. The teachings of Scripture are good and filled with much wisdom, earthly and spiritual. Given the choice to live as the Christian is commanded (which is the philosophy that presided over many of the West’s greatest achievements and eras) and modern philosophies that appear destructive, even if the spiritual be ultimately false, I know I choose the former.

      2. As an atheist, I do not consider these you speak of to be actual atheists. They are haughty left wingers who intellectualize(they think) their pseudo disbelief as part of their religion of liberalism. It’s not that they actually disbelieve, but active belief would require them to face their own hypocrisy(just like the example you gave) and guilt is not something they can handle.

        1. A true atheist is hard to find, partly because of a false equivocation. The ‘atheist’ in these cases clings to a belief that there is no god, and thus no moral authority higher than their replacement for him (that is, the state or party). They are exactly as those who hailed the Caesars as gods, only they refuse to see that truth.
          An agnostic who leans atheist has a much better chance of maintaining consistency and stability. There is no purely logical counter to, “I do not know if there is a god, but I tend to doubt it.” There is nowhere near the same rhetorical punch, either, as it does not attack bitterly but simply states an honest truth.
          Inconsistency erodes the stability of the mind and soul. These ‘atheists’ suffer from their religious sense of irreligion, from the gods they will not see as gods, from the doctrines they do not perceive as doctrines, from the fallacies they must cling to as truths.

        2. To paraphrase Heinlein, if you want to test the measure of an “atheist,” ask him how he feels about astrology.

        3. That is exactly what I have seen as well. The lack of religion becomes their religion. Their denial, their dogma. Some of them are as zealous(or more so) as the worst religious nuts I know.
          Society needs religion/deity because the majority of people need the moral framework to make society work.

        4. I always see these that claim atheism but follow astrology, or they have a personal dislike of Jesus but believe in a pantheon of other gods.

        5. If you would indulge me, allow me to make a case that the Christian religion has qualities that are exceedingly excellent for a society of even non-believers.
          – The Christian God “causes rain to fall on the just and the unjust”.
          – The Christian God dispenses justice and mercy – there is law, but also a way of atonement for violation that permits redemption
          – Virtue signalling does no good – God sees the heart. Thus, there is a focus not on acting good but fundamentally being good.
          – God is described as unmoving and unchanging. His standard remains whether you uphold it or not, and his will persists no matter how much you pray (though we are told to pray – perhaps it is more to keep us humble).
          – The religious elders are upheld as normal men, warts and all. Abraham gave his wife to lay with kings; Jacob lied and connived and wrestled with God; David had a man killed to bed his wife. Thus no man is fully good, but that doesn’t remove the compulsions to be good (that is, the quest for the Ideal).
          Such teachings are beneficial for a society in that they encourage focus on how you live with others and how you are inside. It’s inherently ethically focused, and thus beneficial for forming large societies of good people working together.

        6. “I don’t believe in God. I’m more of a spiritual person…”
          – opening line from a number of talks with folks around here

        7. I do agree with your premise. And I think other religions have similar qualities that can be useful. However the actual existence of a god…we should have evolved beyond that. But that is my naive optimism that humanity can evolve to a higher level of thought. We are animals that need control in our existence. A god is an easy way of accomplishing that.
          You bring up one point I had never thought of before. The purpose of prayer to keep one humble. Prayer has become so degenerate and distant from that concept from my personal observations.
          The unmoving and unchanging part actually frightens me. Nothing is totally constant and everything changes with time. We may not live long enough to see a change up close, but it does.
          Having a god being that never changes in an ever changing universe sends red flags up in my mind.
          But, yes I agree such teachings are beneficial for a society as you state. And Christianity is currently the most effective religion for basing a society on we have in the world right now.

        8. and,
          Thank you for a pleasant and enlightening conversation. It is a pleasure to have civil discourse.

        9. One valuable aspect of an unchanging God is a sense of constancy. When everything else is falling to shit, God is the same. When everything is going great, God is the same.
          Also has philosophical importance, as Aristotle’s God requires an unmoving mover to start the chain of causality.

        10. The thing about Aristotle’s God is that He’s not very appealing. He’s so detached and remote from human affairs, it seems difficult for any mere mortal to have a personal relationship with Him. I doubt one could pray to Him for example.
          The other problem with such a deity is His incapacity to account for Evil in the world and I mean Evil in the sense of say the atrocities that ISIS caused. Aristotle’s God would simply explain these aberrations as behaviors that were either irrational or less “good” than what should be. I find this explanation very weak, but, perhaps the problem was with the Greeks themselves who simply didn’t understand Evil in the sense we do. It’s hard to imagine that the world was any less cruel then, but, obviously these events were registered by them and their Gods in manner that seems really odd and remote to us.

        11. I concur, but the logical requirement makes sense. If causality, and if not infinite regress or causal loop (both logically weak concepts), then a prime mover is required.
          A consistent God who has the property of existing without other existences (that is, having an essential existence) meets the properties Aristotle described in his logical theorem. The remainder is largely conjecture on what such a God would look like, and it is imperfect.

        12. But, how could such a remote God exist in any ontological sense in our world (i.e in the manner that Christ and the pantheon of Saints can intervene in our everyday world). Yes, He may exist, but, we’ll never know in this particular world? You could describe this as the typical attitude of an agnostic, who believes “a God” may exist, but, has absolutely no visceral sense of His existence in the everyday world.

        13. Unchanging in essence does not necessarily imply unresponsiveness. I think of it like unto a programmer, who is not changed by his code but able to manipulate it. Such a programmer can make his presence known in many ways – through “miracles” (injection), design, and even through direct interface with his creation.
          This analogy has its limits, granted, but it allows me to demonstrate the possibility of an existence outside of its creation which serves as prime to its creation’s chain of causality and still can interact with it.

        14. God the creator- creates his creation- this holographic simulation/program- which He observes but cannot intervene in. Why, we may ask? The problem of eternity for a God? Something to “pass the time” with? Or perhaps, He doesn’t actually know the outcome of what He’s created?
          The inscrutable problem of eternity- no time- forverness- no causality- it’s impossible for us to comprehend how any divinity, let alone, human mind could experience such a conundrum.

        15. That’s one of the reasons I bound my analogy with temporal elements. Programmers exist in time alongside their creations, but they do not interact with quite the same time. Programs move at their pace and have a beginning and an end (even infinite loops end if you crash the machine), and the programmer watches it from his own perception of time.
          I, too, cannot fathom timelessness.

        16. I’m an atheist raised by atheist parents whose parents were themselves atheist. Astrology is bullshit, too. So is the “evil eye”. So is every other superstition.

        17. Atheism is not a “belief in no god.” It’s a lack of belief in gods. They’re two different things.

        18. If the Christian god causes the rain to fall, what makes it fall in non-Christian parts of the world?
          What made the rain fall before the Christian god was invented? What made the rain fall before any god was invented?
          Does it snow on the just and the unjust in the wintertime when it’s too cold to rain? How about hail? Does that count, too?
          Precipitation is a naturally occurring phenomenon caused by a mass of warm moist air coming into contact with a cooler air mass. Condensation follows and falls as rain… or snow.

        19. That would be “agnosis” – lack of knowledge or belief. The term atheism originated as a term meaning the belief in the absence of gods, and it still means that today.
          This is the false equivocation. If you do not know or do not believe, you are not an atheist but agnostic. If you believe that there is no god, or believe that you know that there is no god, you are an atheist. They are very different positions.

    2. Same goes for the Koran. Muhammad may have been ok with pedophilia, but he damn sure knew you’ve got to throw gays off buildings!

      2. We are not savages where I come from. You and your barbaric ways need to be civilized, by force if need be.

  25. A straight man might think it’s ok, live and let live, whatever, but like Muslims, Gays don’t return that same respect. Gays shove their agenda on everyone else.
    Sam and Frodo? Gay. Patroclus and Achilles? Gay. Expect a gay bakery to make you a cake honoring religion? Fuck no. Expect a christian bakery to back you a big black dick-cake? No? That’s a lawsuit!
    Fag Pride Parades march through your town as a glorious showcase of degeneracy. It’s not enough to drag their kids (who aren’t even pubescent, which means they don’t even have a concept of sexuality), but they want your kids to bear witness.

    2. The gay-pride parades usually don’t occur as a surprise “Flash Mob”-style, it has been easy for me to never attend a gay-pride parade, with or without children.

      1. They’re having “the parade” in a city not far from here on Yom Kippur this year. It’s amusing to see the victim classes try to one-up each other over it.

        1. Great, Yom Kippur, a perfect opportunity for straights to atone for all the fag-bashing!

    3. Oh life must be so hard for you, having to see actual gay people a single day every year.
      It’s not like us gay people have to see you straight people pushing your agenda all over the world 24/7… oh wait, I guess we do.

  26. Men have been having sex with one another throughout history. Many of the men, historically and currently, who decry homosexuality as a moral sin, are often caught engaging in sexual relations with men.

      1. What is false?
        This is true: The men that have made headlines over the past 10-years: The Wrestling Coaches, Republican Representatives, Catholic Priests, Religious Preachers that have been arrested for soliciting young men, intimidating young men, hiring prostitutes, etc…
        And this has the ring of truth to it also, especially when art and literature is reviewed, the massive amount of research on the subject of rampant homosexual behavior of the Romans, men in battles, churches (always with the religious guys!), politicians…
        Just because you don’t want it to be true, doesn’t mean it isn’t true; it’s not part of my experience, either, however, it has been a part of the human experience for many men, (and women).

        2. Define “many”. Homos make up 2% of the population, but you want to insinuate that it’s a common theme. As far as headlines are concerned, media loves queers, hence alot of men stopped watching entertainment altogether over the years as they don’t relate to the programming. How many normal every day straight Joes leading normal lives make the headlines? Yeah.

        3. There have always been murderers. There have always been thieves. There have always been liars.
          There have always been buggerers.
          So be it. Humankind is inherently pretty fucked up and prone to destructive acts, both toward others and ourselves.

        4. Well, there’s a Google employee making headlines for pissing off the higher-ups, even though most of the Google engineers apparently agree. So, I guess that’s one.

        5. Genuine gays in populations would I estimate be around 5% at most- meaning people who’d exclusively always relate sexually to members of their own sex. The other examples you state relate to exception cases where the availability for straight men to meet women is low i.e prison. The cases if this happening in war or battles is very low. There are hardly any examples of widespread homosexuality during the first or second world wars for example, because, the imperative in these cases is to survive and win the battle. You can’t have distractions like this during close combat as it would destroy the group cohesion when its most needed and gay men in the armed services will tell you this too. It’s only ill-informed propagandists who come out with this crap about wide-scale homosexuality in war zones, the reality is, that it just doesn’t occur.
          The other examples you state are those same old hoary tales about sexual orgies in the Vatican which do have an element of truth about them, but, most of the historic ones included women who were brought in from the streets of Rome. Sure, there was other stuff too, but, we all know that was the product of a diseased and degenerate church.
          From a biological viewpoint, having around 5% of the population as non-breeders makes sense at it prevents overpopulation and it allows for the development of groups in society that can perhaps provide for the greater good, while not being tied down by the absolute needs of providing for a family.

        6. The wrestling coaches, legislators, preachers are family men, most of them have wives and children.

        7. The figure is 2.8% across all countries.
          That’s male and female homosexuals combined.

        9. I can definitely appreciate the idea of teasing out societies definition’s of gay as encroaching on what has historically been just ‘two-dudes enjoying themselves in their own space’; however, it has been my experience that the men who share information on this site do not appreciate these abstract ideas, and instead think of gay sex as the physical act itself, without any qualifiers.
          That has been occurring for centuries, often among men who do indeed identify and live as heterosexual men, with wives and families. This has been memorialized in art and literature, since man has been capable of making art and literature; the majority of various historians seem to come up with similar interpretations, because much of it isn’t very circumspect.

        10. I know, and I am thankful for that fact!
          The world I have always lived in is very heterosexual.
          Television shows and gay-pride parades don’t dictate or encroach on my life-style.
          It’s easy for me to accept the existence of this lifestyle for others, though.

        11. Homos with professions, especially those that give them access to boys, and some with a cover. Still a small minority which the majority of men are repulsed by.

        12. Heh. Well the fact they make up 48% of the population, they will slip in at times.

        14. How do you think gay people have felt for years and years, always hearing about straight sex, reading about straight lovers, watching exclusively straight characters on TV? Deal with it, snowflake. It’s not as if we’re all begging to get inside your pants… although you Latino boys can be pretty hot when you take care of yourselves.

      2. By the convoluted “logic” that says if you fail to celebrate homosexuality, that means you are one. Only women and queers seem to understand how that works.

        1. Homos are a non-entity for most as they are so far on the societal peripheral they might as well not exist (despite they on the TV 24/7). I used to not give two figs about them, as I suspect many felt the same, but the attempt to force it down everyones throats is making me wish they would all drop dead. The more their “lifestyle” is exposed, the more one acknowledges what a pack of degenerate reprobates they are.

        2. I really hate this childish mentality that some people have. You talk about a subject that I don’t give a damn about(in this case homosexuality), and at first I don’t give a flying fuck about it.
          But then they keep bringing it up and bringing it up(in this case the media and Hollywood) to the point where you get fucking tired about it and one day snap, telling them to shut up about their faggots.
          The response you get?
          “Why do you hate gays, what have they ever done to you?!!!”
          “You are SO obsessed with gays man, you must be one yourself!”
          “They are people just like you, who are you to judge them?!!!”
          And they never bother to look that it is not us, but TV that keeps bringing it up, but I’m supposed to just shrug my shoulders and say nothing. Disgusting.
          (For the record, it is true that outside of TV I never encounter homos or people who give one fraction of a fuck about them. So there’s that.)

    2. But, does that make them gay? Men in prisons often have “gay sex” but they’re not gay. Gay is a whole ideology in western civilization, it’s not just two dudes or gals enjoying themselves for their own space anymore. It’s become a whole pseudo cult that’s become so sanitized and normalized through commercial endorsement by the likes of Facebook and Starbooks, that the so-called shocking displays on a typical parade are merely like objects one would simile at wryly at any old funfair.

      1. Reckon I’d get sued for opening a book store named “Starbooks” with a green, circular logo? Maybe replace the mermaid (or whatever that logo is supposed to be) with a minotaur?

      2. If they have gay sex….. they’re gay,even if they are in prison.

        3. They can get more prison time in Georgia as it’s a felony to have sex with someone who is incarcerated, no kidding

        4. Any engagement of cock, ass, and mouth by another man is gay regardless of the geographic location or circumstances. Now faggottry is a little different. I’ve known plenty of fags who were straight. Those prison cock suckers and booty snatchers may not act like women and be more masculine than most, but they are still gay as fuck.

  27. To address a behavioral obsession as grounds for identity politics, it is impossible to differentiate explicitly politicized homosexual speech or behavior from an implied misandry and misogyny and, indeed, from an overarching misanthropy, which makes open homosexuality an intrinsically corrupting force – essentially a politicized narcissism – even among its own ranks. One may say ” No one cares what or whom you do it with in private.” But what one does in private produces the need for a conflicted mask in public. It is that mask which distorts all levels of society in trying to accommodate its presence. Therefore covert, consenting homosexuality is the same in effect as open homosexuality. It is just the opposite flank of an invasion of culture by predators.

  28. Homosexual acts are meaningless.
    Promoting homosexuality as though it is normal also promoted non-procreative sex.

    1. That’s why western governments promote its wide spread dissemination- it reduces reproduction rates of typical white men and its culture, along with transgenderism, deliberately tries to cause confusion in teenagers heads about both their sexuality and gender. Another, pathway that reduces reproduction rates.
      The whole transgenderism debate is so false and predicated by so much propaganda. The reason young people never questioned their “gender” before was simply because this ideologically laden term, which means nothing, never existed in its current usage before 2003.
      Yes, teenagers had issues about their sexuality, which is something real as its biological in nature before 2003. Sure, 5% of the population are gay and this creates real issues with teenagers that are gay, but, the whole transgender issue, is a mendaciously orchestrated left wing ideology who’s true purpose is again to fundamentally undermine normal healthy kids by getting them to doubt something i,e their gender, that has no real substance. It’s a very cruel and dangerous bit of devilry.

  29. Well either the muslims are going to toss all the gays off tal buildings when they outbreed the civilized enough to take over, or the backlash against Muslims due to their gay tossing will be large enough to be rid of that death cult.

    1. That’s almost a win/win except for after the backlash, what to do with all the fanny bandits?

    2. they’ll just go back in the closet as required. Islam has typically permitted homosexuality as a discreet subculture. Not the oscar wilde or gay parade shit, but the dress boys up as a girl stuff while insisting on sharia law in every other respect

  30. The picture at the top of the article reminds of something I heard one time; some people crave attention whether it’s good or bad attention is irrelevant as long as they are getting it. The whole point of fag pride parades is getting attention, they know that it disgusts normal and most importantly religious people and that’s exactly why they do it, it’s just rabble rousing and attention whoring.
    Kind of the same way internet trolls work they know to go somewhere where and say things that those present probably won’t agree with so they can get attention. Either that or, they (internet trolls) are just morons that love to argue because they are incapable of carrying on a normal conversation so they just argue instead.
    Winning an argument on the internet is like being the smartest kid on the short bus, it doesn’t matter.

  31. I never realized the possible effect that gay culture has on platonic male friendships. It does make me sad that we cannot be more affectionate with each other as women do… but I just need to become better myself

  32. Making men have close relationships with other men get destroyed is a great observation. I have a few friends who I would consider close, and have some that I bro-hug. It’s so annoying to have all the fucking blue pillers around you prodding constantly, “ooooo look at you two, must be gay or sumthin’?” Ick. They are like children. The fear of being seen as gay prevents them from forging any real bonds with men who would be great allies. Instead, they sip wine and talk about sports and never have any conversations deeper than a puddle.

  33. The best friends I’ve always had were alphas. When I was a kid before girls were doable, the alpha kids were the cool ones to hang out with and do crazy shit. As an adult, a beta housewhipied by some fat bitch is impossible to befriend. When you see a neighbor man have his time crunched by some dominant bossy piece of shit, you can’t even approach them. Or they have excuses like “I have to do such and such bullshit for the lady”. You have no opportunity to meet them. They’re always busy redecorating the place for the sterile bitch.
    Sometimes I meet a neighbor who snaps his fingers and his woman happily brings a drink for you. He talks about her like she’s his property. That always attracts revelling and respectful friendship from surrounding males when it is shown that the man has his shebeast properly harnessed. Especially when she looks nice, it signalls that the man has mastered the conrol faculties where her service is willing. Part of her service too is to keep it tight and sexy looking. It puts value points on the man’s head too.
    If the woman comes out with black eyes and piss miserable, she’s not a willing servant and he’s not getting good service out of a stubborn mule. He lacks game to cap her and improve her or replace her with a capable woman that can show quality. Getting quality service from a woman shouldn’t be like pulling teeth.
    A big problem in the west is that many women are taught to put on a bitchy dominant face in public. Feminized women think it is shameful to be seen supplicating to their man in public or private. So they bark and bitch at their man in public to signal to other wild animal bitches that they dog on their man. This looks terrible for the man. It should be seen as proper and respectful that a woman abides her man especially in public. I see many young couples going about where the female is yapping her mouth all the time, showing her big teeth and the man responds back in the same yappity yap high pitch and tempo that sounds like metrosexual fag talk.
    WATCH YOUR TONGUE speaking to your woman in public. Don’t let her yap like a chicken and don’t be heard inadvertantly talking back to her in the chicken coop tone of fast meaningless emotive words.
    KEEP YOUR VOICE low and commanding. Clap your hands and say “BITCH would you please hand me the menu”. I call my woman ‘bitch’ ten times a day and she’s used to it. It is an affectionate posessive adjective. If anyone has a problem with it, stop and listen to their reasoning. Then put your hand over their mouth and request they please stop talking in the effeminate chicken gibberish tone. Being in public with a well disciplined woman is like taking a well behaved pedigree dog to a dog show or for a walk. It is prideful to have a well behaved woman under your arm. And it is equally A DISGRACE to have a rabid snapping turtle mouthed unkept bitch making unprompted noise at you in front of others. People look at you like “damn bro game a better piece than that already”. Or white knights look at you like “Ooh, she’s upset. I’ll make her happy. Maybe she’s abused. I must intervene.” Either way a loud obnoxious disrespectful woman invites trouble. An attractive obedient woman tit feeding with #2 in the oven earns the man a cigar.

    1. Mediocrity is the hallmark of our culturally diverse age. Even the 1980s in terms of music, literature and films was rich, exciting and innovative in terms of ideas. Sure, you might not have agreed with your adversaries, but, that lead to the richness of that decade, but, today’s entitled, precious little millennial snowflakes can’t comprehended the notion that society is a compromise in which no one can silence people by shouting dissenting voices down by using monosyllabic slogans.
      Today’s lefty voices are so pathetic,childish and mediocre. They’re a disgrace even to the cultural heritage of their 1960 hippy predecessors, who’d laugh these dull and banal voices of conformity out of town, Could you imagine the likes of Lou Reed, breaking bread with these cultural dullards?

      1. well I can’t improve on that. The truly sad thing is most of these colour by numbers zealots have actually had the benefit of an education, if it can be called such a thing. The only consolation to be had is the sure knowledge that history will piss on these automotons. As you imply it isn’t about left or right as such, but the fact that what once could be seen as at least a radical interrogation of culture and politics is now just the empty shadow of the same

        1. No one gets an “education” anymore. Even hard science Departments in Universities have been invaded by people with little talent or risk taking ability and its the latter that is critical in the field of innovation.
          If you instill through ideology and the moronic never to be questioned strictures of PC you’ll end up with an organisation that will produce second or even third rate products and will eventually go bust. If this happens systematically across a nation for a generation or two, then the nation becomes a non-entity soon. This might happen in the US over the next 10-20 years if it’s not corrected.
          In reality, these people that come into organisations with their ideological mantras are nothing more than failures who’s future lies in being administers and functionaries in these organisations. They are the like Charles Fort’s “Dammed”- souls without talent or substance- lacking any creativity themselves, they wander and roam the HR Departments of organisations were they play out the petty power they think they posses. It’s such a sad post-script to the achievements of western civilization that it ups end being destroyed not by the barbarians at the gates, but, rather by the walking dead and zombies falling off the university conveyor belt who’ve given up the ability to think and create.

        2. exactly right. Useful research no doubt still goes on, but it has to fit into approved paradigms and woe betide if it doesn’t. Perhaps academia has always been like that to an extent – there are always orthodoxies and penalties for deviation, but it seems to me that there is something different going on here. Academics used to at least be able to rely upon the idea of truth, that there might be something worth discovering or unmasking outside the constraints of orthodoxy, but today the overtly politicised nature of academia seems to disqualify anything that challenges power in advance: there is no truth, or discovery outside of the compensatory power structures put in place to challenge oppression etc. That politicised nature of truth and discourse means that increasingly knowledge is seen as constructed rather than something to be discovered. The result is whole swathes of the world are increasingly off limits to intellectual enquiry, while universities dedicated themselves to constructing knowledge space that is ideological safe and hampered by potential contradiction

        3. The disinterested pursuit of knowledge is not encouraged anymore (or unless it supports the political ideology of the university)

        4. Universities might as well pack it in then. We can all go to the local madrassah

      2. “Childish”
        Just look at the language they use, especially their penchant for the toddler-scolding “Not OK” instead “Wrong”.

        1. And Jewish! When you listen or look at former great works of art you don’t get bothered by the ethnicity or sexuality of the creator. That would be ridiculous self-policing- having your mind dictated to by your own ideology. You give people a fair hearing and then you see what’s what.

        2. So you’re saying you abide his bisexuality and Jewish religion because he seems straight and non-religious? What a broad mind you have.

        3. He wrote good tunes. I don’t give a shit about what God he does/doesn’t pray to or whichever way he takes it. It’s immaterial to what you’re experiencing, that’s why the soviets and Nazis created banal art. Politics and the arts don’t mix.

      4. If it weren’t for homosexuals, we wouldn’t have any culture at all, starting from the Renaissance. It takes a beautiful soul to create art.

        1. Thats about the most faqgy thing I’ve ever read in these pages. Full of repressed envy for straights, who’ve produced the vast majority of all art in human history by virtue of being the vast majority period. You faqgots are a cancer.

        2. I guess “faqgy” and “faqgot” are the Anglo-Saxon spellings.
          If art were left to straights, the Louvre would be filled with velvet paintings of Elvis, and you know it. If fashion were dominated by heterosexuals, all men would dress like lumberjacks and all women would dress like hookers.

      1. If a man has sex with women, probable the result is the birth of children..
        If a man has sex with men, the probable result is AIDS or other diseases.
        Therefore homosexuality is a behavioral disease, which leads to physiological disease and societal devolution.

        2. The probability of a white heterosexual male who is not an intravenous drug user getting AIDS is about the same as the probability that he will be struck by lightning. In other words the probability rounds to ZERO.
          (According to CDC, about 500 cases diagnosed per year out of a population of more than 100 million adult white heterosexual non-needle using males.)
          (Lightning strikes? About 138 per 100,000,000.)
          Note: The infection rate among gay males is about 500 times greater.

        3. When two gay people have sex, the probability of an unwanted pregnancy is actually zero, no rounding necessary. We can cherry pick all day. Your turn. Since you already added the “white” caveat, I can assume you just want to go down the “no true Scotsman” rabbit hole.

        4. “unwanted pregnancy”?
          A woman’s body is not a plaything. Any sexual activity that is engaged in for pleasure, with no intention of procreation, is, therefore, an act of perversion.
          Get it? If a man has sex with a woman and uses birth control, that is a homosexual act.
          Only heterosexual sexual acts, with the intention of creating a baby are okay.

        5. Yes. As I predicted, you’re prancing down No True Scotsman Lane. First it was all heterosexuals are better than homosexuals. Then it was okay, white heterosexuals. Then it was okay, white heterosexuals who don’t use needles. Now it’s white heterosexuals who don’t use needles and don’t enjoy sex, but just have it once and see if a baby comes out, and if not, then okay, you can have it again, but no enjoying it, okay? What else is on your list?

        6. Say, what’s this “Scotsman” thing — something you learned in college that is supposed to make you feel like an ace debater?
          The simple statistical FACT is that a homosexual has a probability of getting AIDS that is 500 times greater than the probability that a heterosexual, white, non-drug-using male will get AIDS.
          If you are a man, and you have sex with women, you get a baby.
          If you are a man, and you have sex with men, you get AIDS.
          (“White” is included, because it further reduces the probability. Most other racial groups have a higher probability of getting AIDS.)

        7. It’s a thing I learned by reading. You’re smart. I’m sure you can look it up. Also, you’re repeating yourself. And you included white because you’re a racist as well as a homophobe, and the fact that heterosexual Black men get HIV in epidemic numbers in parts of the world doesn’t fit your argument, so “No true Scotsman.”

        8. Anyway, you’ve been boring me for a while, so I think I’ll go do something more interesting, like the dishes.

        9. Yes, I am about ten time more of a racist than Hitler ever was, and, as a racist, the high AIDS infection rate among black males fits right into my standard presentation.

        10. “(‘White’ is included, because it further reduces the probability. Most
          other racial groups have a higher probability of getting AIDS.)”
          Holy fuck that’s so racist, I can’t even…
          “No True Scotsman” is a well-known example of a logical fallacy. It’s easy as pie to google it.

  36. My old roomate was a male model in NYC. He would tell me how all these gay managers and designers in the fashion industry would try to get the straight guys to have sex with them. If they didn’t then they wouldn’t promote them as heavily as the ones that did. They would get a kick out of turning the straight ones out. He never did so he was stuck with all the small jobs. The modeling agency he worked for even tried multiple times to get him to be an escort to filthy rich business men. Pretty sad really how the industry works.

    1. That was going in the music industry back in the 80s as well. Around 1988 I was in a hard rock band and a rich gay record company executive would consider giving us a production deal if the singer (a straight male that banged more chicks than the rest of us combined) would sleep with him. My singer took offense to that, of course turned it down & by that I mean told the guy to go fuck himself fudge packer, pole smoker, etc right to his face, which in this day & age some would consider a hate crime.
      Around 1990 I was working in recording studio just outside NY City & my boss was co managing a few rock bands with the original manager form Kiss, Bill Aucoin (only reason I mention his name is because he died 10 years ago). He was strung out on drugs, flat broke, lost millions of dollars, & my boss was supporting him. I’d drive him around & the guy kept touching me to the point I had to grab him by the neck & tell him if he did it again I’d punch his fucking face in. That behavior I found offensive & had to make it stop, but today that could be considered a hate crime because he was gay & I was not. He apologized after that, which I accepted, I didn’t hate the guy but there are boundaries

      1. Would love to hear about some (((KISS))) stories from the ’70s if you feel so inclined!

    2. The filthy rich men who like getting doo doo on their stick are likely criminal rich. If they’re fags, you bet they’re illicit in many other ways. The economy of a culture suffers with gay predators at the top. Poor pauper fags too make an area destabilized in regards to safety. There are hazards for raising a family in a community where fags aren’t shamed and persecuted out of the area. ‘Strangers’ are all feared on playgrounds where fags are accepted. Pederasty is as much a cancer as feminism.
      I just wish someone would finally club the skull of Islam once and for all like an Alaskan sealing excursion. The media shows Islam as virtuous but pederasty and goat fucking have eaten the culture up like 4th stage cancer. The Islamic rot is just as advanced as the feminism cancer that has the west coughing up blood. The west will never trade off feminism for state regulated patriarchy with mandatory circumcision while becoming racially mongrelized for eternity while still retaining Islamic customs of goatfucking and pederasty. We’ll simply beat feminism with our bare hands and be done with it. Fuck the Islam, the circumcision, the pederasty and the goatfucking and fuck becoming a slave race of dumb brown zombies.

  37. Homosexuals don’t bother me as much as the faggots due. Ya dudes? Fine whatever, just please for the love of all things sacred QUIT ACTING LIKE A FUCKING GURL!!!

      1. I hate guys who act like girls. I would figure that’s pretty easy to deduce, unless you’re trolling.

  38. I don’t think that there is a causal relationship between acceptance of homosexuality and modern sexual degeneracy… related, perhaps even correlated, but far from causal.

  39. Good observations. I agree with a lot but I think there are multi-causal relationships: capitalism, feminism, liberalism, technology and shrinking testosterone levels combined.
    As for meterosexual grooming, specifically, it is a question of balance. But there are ways to reduce time and costs on that. 45 minutes for girls and 5 minutes for a man. Shower, brush teeth and take a look in the mirror. Dress and put on eau de cologne. Sure, bodybuilding takes a lot of time, but that transcends metrosexuality IMO.
    The most “gay” thing I do is to dye my hair blonde a few times a year. 45 minutes x 3.

  40. Rich42a

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !ai72d:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !ai72d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash372ShopForm/Pay$97/Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!ai72l..,…

  41. I have been saying this for at least 25-30 years. Even Christian women are duped by it.
    My best friend from the Service was the best man at my wedding and I was best man at his. We had a very close friendship but did not live close together so we made it a point to make time to spend time together.
    Several years into his marriage he told me his wife was jealous of our relationship and had actually challenged him about it, asking him if we were gay! My wife laughed at the notion, but she had known him as long as she had known me, the three of us having met in the service. Nevertheless, over the years I felt some distance growing between us and today we are nowhere near as close as we were. I wonder just how much of an effect her accusations and attitude had on him.
    In the 1970s, according to a study I read a while back, the average man had approximately 3.7 friends he considered “close”, meaning he could talk to them about the hardest issues in his life.
    Today, that number is down to less than 1. I believe it is 0.08 “close” friends. I have no doubt homosexual culture is a very large reason for that. Sex already dominates so much of a man’s life, there are just some areas you don’t expect, or want, to be sexual. Male friendship is one of them. Homosexual culture has changed all that.

    1. Real same-sex friendship doesn’t include butt plugging or any of that. Kissing fags should be shot. Those lines are never crossed with buddies. Before the fag mania was promoted, there was always a chubby retard with downs in every village who wanted to play pee pee games with anyone like he regarded everyone else as barnyard animals. It is because he had the IQ of an animal. Human man friends don’t cross those lines just like the lines aren’t crossed with parents to their blood children. A father teaches his sons to grow up virtuous and imparts wisdom. A son would not lust after his own mother either.

    2. Meh, sounds more like she shit tested him and he failed it.
      A former girlfriend tried the same thing on me, asking me if I’m gay for hanging out with my friends so much. I simply smirked at her and said “Don’t flatter yourself.” That shut her up pretty quickly.
      I will agree, though, that everything today has become waaay to sexual. It is hard to make one statement without some simp interpreting it in a sexual way. Even if it is meant as a joke, it gets repeated way to many fucking times.

    3. very common for women to isolate their man…
      just the fucked up way it is.
      happened to 100% of my friends.
      most(all?) women try it with me…

      1. Isolate them to make sure they have iron clad control of the resources he has and potential income he can generate….its the new human paradigm and women are exceedingly skill at manipulating modern society and technology to support their self servingness right down to killing their own born and unborn. That is what has changed.

      2. This is a result of women being allowed into all venues where men hang out. Anyone who is married knows that any social function that involves both men and women will have the women chatting and hamstering while the men can’t get a word in. Frustrated, the men will usually clam up and ignore. Got to have social settings where the women stay home.

        2. Let me guess, no woman will be with you, you Neanderthal. So let’s blame the gays because women stand up for themselves and won’t be belittled by your sexist inadequacies.
          It’s called being a well-adjusted adult.
          P.S. John Wayne was a pansy-ass poser who didn’t even know how to ride a horse.

        4. Why are you here? Part self loathing, hanging around all the str8 guys ypu can neber be with, and part voyeurism into our world, i get it.

    4. At least your wife knew the truth but it is sad that a society that has been created that the thought can enter the mind of a woman that a guy and his friend could be gay. In the past women did not worry about that and probably seen guy friends as a positive thing for their husband.

    5. He’s completely right that it’s destroyed the bonds between non-homosexual men. I can see that with several of my best pals I’ve known for years, to my young nephews, and as well older men that have been mentors to me through work. My wife has certainly been no replacement for that male bonding. I’ll agree with your figure of 0.08%.

    6. A wife’s jealousy is a funny thing. I would bet you she had no real suspicion that they were gay, but was using that as a wedge to dampen the friendship. It is a very common tactic.

    7. Oh my god. If you can’t live with the stigma of someone questioning your relationship with another straight man, could you please take the responsibility of that. That’s your fault. Someone secure in their sexuality wouldn’t think twice about it.
      And if you put a best friend above your wife, SHAME ON YOU. This person is sacrificing themselves to be your partner in life. Living with your gross maleness. You should cherish her, not complain about her to another guy. She should probably dump you instead of having to question your sexuality.

  42. Going fag is something a male can never undo. It’s kind of like how mudsharks become branded for life. But a man can still soil his tool in a negress and soap will wash him clean. Soap will never help a fag though.

  43. Three points.
    “It has made men vain.”
    Yes it has, but to wrap up self respect and basic personal grooming and calling it vanity is gross negligence. WHEN you OBSESS and PRIMP AND PREEN and idolize yourself in your pictures and in the mirror and become the worst self absorbed narcissist, yes.
    “It has destroyed mens ability to bond”
    No, it hasn’t for men who are secure in themselves and person. For all other insecure bitches, yes it has, when men obsess over labels and appearance, but this goes hand in hand also with the above…WHEN you OBSESS and PRIMP AND PREEN and idolize yourself in your pictures and in the mirror and become the worst self absorbed narcissist, yes.
    “It given them an unhealthy sex appetites”
    If men have normal self worth, normal self image, normal and secure about themselves and their person, bonding among themselves as normal men should and historically have and society is not racing hell bent into Progressive Cultural Marxism that is skewing all reality sideways….then men have normal appetites WHEN WOMEN HAVE NORMAL SANE APPETITES, but when all their environment is cucked up and backwards and insanely stupid, men cope to the environment they live in. So the short answer is when all else is NORMAL, men have normal appetites, in the current cucked up world, YES they do, a mal coping mechanism to insanity and stupidity and cultural suicide, and is NOT reversible. this is a one way path that ends in tragedy, but from the ashes I expect mankind will rise from, provided it doesn’t go full extinction level…Mother Nature always brings her wayward back to normal if they can be turned, or into extinction if they cannot.

  45. “I have no malice toward gays. I feel the same way about people who have the flu. I want them to get better, and I don’t want it to spread.”
    I feel the same way, Gays are what they are. However where I do feel malice is towards the SJW’s who parade this disease around and shove it in the media.

    1. I also do not wish them malice, but I have to say that I have felt more then once malice from gay males for not being gay.

      1. You must be passably attractive to look at, or else we wouldn’t care if you were gay or not.

  46. Promotion of gay culture is simply another leftist engineered protocol designed to destroy and remove the globalist/Marxists number one obstacle – straight men.

  47. The worst is the second one: the attempt to sexialize all male affection. They’ve done the same thing with male child affection. All men are now assumed to be child molesters.

    1. Since most child molestation is done by straight men, maybe you should invest in a mirror.

        3. No, maybe you should ignore the speck in other people’s eyes and concentrate on the beam in your own. Most pedophiles are straight, the vast majority. Lots more little girls get molested than little boys. Straight folks also really like to give it to their ladies up the bum, probably more than you’d think… something like 40 per cent of straight couples surveyed indulge in anal sex on a regular basis.

        5. Ignorant people have equated homosexuality with pedophilis for so long that now we have to research these things thoroughly, so we can properly refute asinine statements with cold facts. A fool’s errand, I know, because cold facts never seem to make much difference to those who feel icky about gayness.

        6. You are right that there are more heterosexual pedophiles than homosexual pedophiles. But that is because there are far more heterosexuals than homosexuals. But as a percentage of their respective populations there are far more homosexual pedophiles. As for feeling “icky” about homosexuality, specifically male homosexuality, that is a natural healthy reaction. However in these tyrannical PC days you’re simply not allowed to say it or even think it.

        7. It’s not a natural, healthy reaction. It’s just puerile. Americans have a weird Calvinist attitude toward body matters in general, and not just gay stuff, either. A woman exposes a nipple on TV or breastfeeds in public (not a sexual act) and everybody loses their shit. It’s an unwholesome cross of adolescent titillation and fundamentalist horror, and this shocked schoolboy sniggering is really fucking tiresome to listen to. I mean, grow up, for Christ’s sake. Bodies are not immoral, and sex is not supposed to be “dirty”, it’s supposed to be fun. The Europeans have the right idea.

        8. It is a natural healthy reaction. Regardless of you trying to conflate a woman showing her nipple in public with one man sticking it up another man’s ass.
          But it is none of my business what two consenting adults do in private. But I certainly don’t celebrate it.

  48. I always have believed that the causation was in the direction of the opposite your article describes. Specifically, once promiscuity was Unleashed, it was a case of everything goes and everything went. Homosexualism emerge as part of that General relaxation of self-restraint. Is it homosexualism that changed the definition of what it was to be a man, or did that definition change first, allowing for the egregious growth of male vanity among the queer set?

  49. Action55a

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! :!ao145d:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    :!ao145d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash435BuzzExperts/Pay$97/Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!ao145l..,…

  50. What unmitigated, unsubstantiated drivel. If this is what passes for cutting-edge thinking on the right, no wonder the right just got Trumped. Go back to Victorian America and washing some rich English toss-pot’s arse crack if that’s what you want, but leave me out of it.

  51. I find myself believing that the ONLY way to end this bullshit is to let it all fall apart, and let the killing, begin. When arguing with a 20 year old know-it-all SJW, I realize that I’d rather beat the shit out of him, rather than argue. What’s the f’ing point dealing with these people verbally?

  52. I couldn’t agree with you more brother gays are going to hell ,lets not follow them!

  54. I read that in the US only 3% of people are gay and that’s a small minority. Is just that the corporate media got all the entertainment full of gays so the average person believes that gay people are becoming a majority but it is a false flag.

  55. It Has Destroyed Men’s Ability To Bond
    Women who feel bitter about men having fun that doesn’t include them often reach first for the “maybe you’re really gay” tool to try and shame men into being solely their pet.

  56. The fags even control straight porn, which explains why it is so SHIT. Boycott it guys, don’t support a gay industry !

  58. I fucking love this website. The amount of delusion, bitterness and insecurity is hilarious.

  60. Bull crap. Own your own dysfunction – stop blaming it it on someone else. If you are vain, that is your issue. If you can’t make friends, that is your issue. If you have a fetish, that is your issue.
    Stop this stupidity of scapegoating others for your own issues.

  62. Wow. If there’s a more ignorant piece of tripe on the internet today, someone will have to show me.

  63. This is honest to God the sickest $hit ever; having gone down this rabbit hole and reading comments and articles in the comment section I Came across
    1) an ex gay man who told his sick life story and wears diapers
    2) shoebat article on his site about how gay communities are reckless and throw bareback parties and lie about aids ergo spreading it
    Sadly I learned more than I ever wanted to know and the ultimate conclusion is this is really all mental depravity hedonism and an affront to God.
    I truly believe that the left who promotes this and the god serving right have become too polarized to coexist.
    This must not be allowed to continue and the what I mean is the grooming the indoctrination and the seduction of the innocent what you do when you are 18 years old and behind closed doors is your own business and should not be advertised or talked about. I truly think the Tipping Point it’s going to come on the pedophilia normalization comes full force. We should not feel guilty when it comes to that point as they have already drawn First Blood numerous times at their rallies and more than one Bernie Sanders supporter have already drawn guns. They are itching for this conflict and in the end they will regret having started it.

  64. I’m pretty sick of this gay BS being shoved down my throat every where I go. I live in a small town that had to paint a frickin crosswalk rainbow coloured so these special people could celebrate their pride WEEK. They need a whole week now to show off their bedroom habits, I kid you not they even have patrols guarding their precious cross walk against vandals.
    . Time to cull the herd. We need a biological reset on the whole human race.

    1. You straight boys really love those gay-sounding analogies, don’t you? When you’re getting it “shoved down your throat”, I hope you swallow, because that would be polite.

      1. Poor lil poof. Are you offended because I don’t like the fact you dig boy’s bum holes? You gay toffs are the most miserable bunch of folks I have ever met. Nothing “gay” about you lot. Everyone of you I have ever spoken too are either bitter, sad, vile, angry, perverted, or suicidal f*cks.

        2. Wow. You seem to be pretty angry and hysterical for for a happy, well adjusted straight man. Are you off your meds, girl?

  65. I’m sorry I am rolling my eyes so hard I can see last week.
    1) Straight men bond pretty much as little or as much as they ever did, it depends on the men in question.
    2) Blame the moisturising & sunscreen culture on global warming and runaway cancer instead of a group of people.
    3) Men have ALWAYS had a variety of sexual appetites, it is just pretty much more available on the internet so people are more educated.
    This writer sounds like a closet case at best or a straight guy in need of a good shag and a good therapist. Now get out of my way while I get on with being awesome.

  66. Triggered broflake alert . . . . straight men do more to hurt straight men than any other group on earth. Fact.

  68. Men avoiding intimate platonic relationships for fear of seeming gay is a surefire sign that homosexuality is indeed not accepted.
    Also Homosexuality has been legal in Turkey since the Ottomans decriminalized it in 1858. In the US, it only stoped being criminal in 2003. Perhaps your middle eastern friends are able to build stronger male friendships because their cultures, while necessarily accepting of homosexuality, have historically been less obsessed with rooting it out than societies farther to the west.

  69. Lord, and you all talk about liberals being snowflakes. Frozen ice crystal, heal thyself.
    I have never heard so much misdirection of responsibility than this. I have several straight guy friends who are completely secure in their masculinity. If they dress up sometimes, it’s because they want to look nice and be impressive. Also I have several gay friends who are slobs. If you want to talk about real peer pressure of fitting in, ask how a woman feels when she’s expected to be thin, with perfect hair and makeup, strapped into a girdle on 6-inch heels to look good for you. Because if you, as straight men, feel like you’re pressured to look better than you normally do because of a bunch of nelly queens, let’s see how attractive you find your girlfriend or wife the next time you see her with old sweat pants, a baggy shirt, no makeup, and greasy hair. If you can have standards for the women in your life, then they sure as hell can have with you, and it has nothing to do with gay men.
    Grow a pair and take some responsibility. No woman wants a gross guy and it’s feckless trying to blame gay guys for your inadequacy.
    And if you are unable to platonically bond with your straight guy friends, consider it’s because you’re unable to platonically bond WITH ANYONE, you piece of human trash. When you’re out at bar are there some host of swishy queens giving you the side-eye when you’re just hanging out with another guy? Whose judgment is involved there BUT YOURS. Gay guys have tons of platonic friendships with straight people, why is it so difficult for you? Straight men distance themselves from other straight men not because of the existence of gay men, but because you’re afraid of being labeled as gay men. Take the responsibility. You can’t have the platonic straight relationships you want because someone might, GASP, think you’re “one of those.”
    If you’re not secure in your masculinity, that’s your problem. Stop blaming anyone but yourself. Stop trying to put down other people because you can’t raise yourself up.
    And again, if you can’t keep your D to yourself, that’s YOUR fault. I’ve had straight friends say “oh if only I were gay I could have sex with as many people and as often as I want.” I was appalled. First of all, I’m not like that. Secondly, many other gay people aren’t like that either. Third, it was so offensive as if gay people ONLY want sex and not love, stability, relationships, and trust.
    If you have trouble with promiscuity, it’s because you’re promiscuous. If you have “an unhealthy sexual appetite,” it’s because YOU are the pervert, not because of gay people who have nothing to do with your sordid sexual interests.
    Take responsibility and be an actual man. If us gay guys can do it, then you should be able to as well.
    Bunch of whiners.

  70. The author of this article reminds me of the nerd who couldn’t get laid, so he takes out all his frustration at gay people who ARE getting laid…all the time. So much self pitying: “Oh, I’d be a man alright if it weren’t for those damn homosexuals confusing the world about what being a man is really about. Like hanging out with your bros, getting drunk and doing stuff with your bros that you just can’t seem to remember when you sober up. And then there’s the fashion stuff. I look good in nylon stockings…oops, I meant in a jock strap. Ya know, doing bro things with my bros.”

  71. The real problem with straight men making close lifelong friends is unhealthy competition over status, money, and all those hangups over being strong and powerful. Most plots of novels, plays, and movies are driven by this competition, and in a society where even the poorest among us have more freedom and disposable income than 90% of the world, it’s ridiculous to place so much emphasis on it. It’s why I can’t stand “A List” Gay culture that apes it. Real Gay culture emphasizes how each person has something unique and exemplary to offer, so it’s easy to make all sorts of friends, and keep them.

  72. Gay and straight are inventions of Left Wing identity politics. Nature has made all men theoretically bisexual by conferring upon them a very powerful sex drive.
    Values, morality – and the ability of homophobic women to influence men – shape a man’s sexual behavior.

  73. Oh, please! We gay men have voluntarily taken ourselves out of the woman-dating pool, leaving the field open for you straight boys. Consider yourselves lucky, because otherwise you’d never be able to get a date.
    You’re welcome.

    1. You should encourage all men to turn to men to empower men. That doesn’t mean they can’t still be attracted to women, it simply means they have the option of turning to men if women don’t please them.

      1. Men can empower themselves individually. If they fail to do so, it’s on them, and nobody else is to blame. And if they want to fuck both women and men, I’m certainly not going to judge them as long as they’re respectful of whomever they’re fucking.

      2. Men don’t “turn to men” because they couldn’t score with women, and then made a decision to go in the other direction.

  74. Homosexual culture is pretty much based on a sex act. It’s not really a culture but an indulgence, an excuse to meet people for sex in a concentrated environment.
    Male power doesn’t come from segregating in the way gay culture has segregated itself. Male power comes from de-segregation both physically and emotionally – ie getting rid of the gay/straight divide that is currently dividing men.

  76. First of all, before you condemn in your obviously fearful rant you should know history. The 60s were about societal freedom and all kinds of self-expression to grow outside of a limited societal box and to change the government so that ‘All men are created equal’ becomes more of a reality. Or do you not believe in that intent for this great nation? Change scares controlling people like yourself. One person said you can tell who is which political party by the whether they see the 60s as beneficial or detrimental to the progress of the US. Still holds true from your op-ed.
    More history… Most men were okay with being very close with their friends like hugging, kissing, laying together (in all societies) until the governments stuck their noses in the bedroom to control people in order to divide and conquer politically. Once done, straight men reacted to governmental control by separating themselves from each other. That is each person’s choice. Gay men were declared illegal and undesirables. So, straight men started being not as close with each other while gay men were being hunted for how we are born.
    Second, how utterly arrogant and self-absorbed are you? Just like you blame the horrible influences of vanity, moisturizing, fashion, et al on gay men influencing straight men’s behavior, you forget that everyone is born with free will to choose how they think and how they behave. If you don’t want to blow a man then don’t do it. Pretty simple, eh?
    You are the type that wants to keep the Genie in the bottle at all costs. Blame everyone else. This world is about change. Life is about change. Each person in their lifetime has the option to evolve or devolve or see themselves as a victim to other people’s influences. Your desire to poo-poo the self-expression of a much maligned category of people shows how unbelievably un-self-accepting you must be as a human being. You must feel miserable when around anyone who feels and expresses personal freedom.
    There is an axiom in human interactions for those who take personal responsibility for their own life: “What bothers me about you belongs to me.” You would not have such venom for this unless it is within you. You cannot see something in someone that bothers you unless that same thing is within you bothering you. And people such as yourself spend all of your energy trying to fix, actually control, others rather than looking in the mirror to resolve a problem that squarely lies within yourself. But that takes growing a big pair of balls.
    Or you can remain in the republican camp and continue to hate and despise anyone who does not fit into your dull, old, ‘the past way of life is the only way” square peg of how to do life. Your breed is dying out. Keep kicking and screaming and condemning others. Soon you will be a past statistic relegated to the realm of the southerners who cannot accept we lost the Civil War. The KKK was born out of that. Your kind is born out of that same level of intolerance, hatred and unacceptance that society is changing…and is supposed to.
    Get on board or keep using your personal energy to hate others rather than contribute to something meaningful for the world.

  77. This article essentially reads like a man who is terrified and insecure about his sexuality, screaming hysterically about how the homos are harming all the nice straight men like himself.
    And Ted Haggard.
    How utterly ridiculous.

  78. “I’m a coward who blames my adherence to toxic masculinity on anyone and everything but my own pathetic failings.”
    I just saved you all seventeen whining minutes. You are welcome.

  79. If we’re taking the writer at his word, it seems that what heterosexual men truly shine at is blame.
    That, and never growing up and accepting responsibility for their own actions and lives.
    You weaklings wouldn’t last a day in a gay person’s shoes.
    Seriously. The take away here?
    Straight men are pussies.
    And while this has always been true, it’s a new dawn when they blame OTHER people for
    all that they lack.
    Truly, TRULY hilarious in that way ONLY a straight dude can be.
    If nothing else, I feel like I understand why so few of your wives want to F you anymore.

  82. Amazing to me how Colbert, Maher, etc.. make jokes about Trump fallating Putin. I thought the Hollywood agenda was that gay sex was just as normal as heterosexual? They know it is extremely perverted, that is why it is the ultimate insult. They have to put on the PC act for their enlightened viewers.

        1. Be grateful you can do that and not be hurled off a building.

        2. Funny you should say that. Someone did try to hurl me off a building for being gay in the 80s. He tried to murder me. And nothing ever happened to him. So you played that card on the wrong person. How often do you thank god someone doesn’t push you off a building because they’ve recognized you a worthless piece of shit?

        3. I don’t because I don’t go looking for trouble or making a scene. So it’s a moot point.
          And if anything, my observation serves to make the point that as bad as gays think they have it because of some individuals acting out their hatred individually, at least as a society there isn’t state-sanctioned and religiously codified murders of such.
          It amuses me no end when feminists are silent about mistreatment of women under Islam and how they and gays and other ‘oppressed’ will march with the with such that otherwise view them as subhuman. Hamsterwheeling at its finest.

        4. Yeah. I expected you to assume I deserved it. It wasn’t just at a quiet dinner party in my own apartment when some asshole who was a friend of a friend decided I needed to die. You have a mighty low bar for straight behaviour.
          By the way, how do your Black friends react when you tell them they should be grateful they’re not slaves? And how do your girlfriends react when you tell them they should be grateful they can vote now and at least rape is illegal and stop making such a fuss? Do you actually live in a bubble where you and your friend just point to anywhere in time or space when things were worse for people who aren’t straight white men, and say, See, you should just be thankful and shut up?

        5. They find it hilarious actually because I am a master of deadpan and sardonic humour.

    2. No, it’s because really homophobic people feel so icky about it, that it’s lots of fun to make them crazy by suggesting that they like doing the thing that upsets them most. We just love to get your goat. It’s a little childish, but it’s effective.

  83. Think of prison and how correctional officers ignore men getting raped by homosexuals. That’s a possible future for society outside. Lot of misinformation will be made that the victim was homosexual and he gave consent to have sex with a gay all to fit the narrative that homosexuals could no wrong like rape or pedophilia

    1. You’ve been watching too many reruns of Oz. It’s not very sexy in jail. It’s mostly boring, not drilling.

  84. While I agree that the promotion of homosexuality is damaging to straight men I’m not sure that you’ve established that as the cause of issues you’ve raised here.

    1. Nobody’s successfully explained yet how homosexuality is damaging to straight men. It really doesn’t damage you at all unless you get raped or something. If you feel damaged, it’s all on you because you choose to feel damaged.

        1. Nobody’s really “promoting” it either, unless you think merely acknowledging that gay people exist is promotion. I mean, I never got a flyer about it in the mailbox and I haven’t seen any commercials for it on TV. Some straight folks wonder why gay stuff pops up in their Facebook news feed “all the time” — well, that’s determined almost entirely by your search history.

        3. Only in the author’s fevered imagination. No “recruiting of children” or gang-rapes in the shower or any of the other persistent myths.

        4. Maybe not but there is a clear and sustained promotion of the homosexual lifestyle in the media, similar to the promotion of feminism. I cannot find any television shows that don’t have an element of it. Black Sails is the clearest example, where there is more gay sex than straight.

        5. There’s twenty times as much straight lifestyle promotion as there is gay. It probably seems like there’s a shit-ton of gay material on the tube because there used to be zero.

        6. Normality doesn’t get promoted, it simply is. Abnormality that has publicists and watchdogs publishing lists of how many tv shows and movies contain that abnormality, is promoted.

        7. Yes, I’ve noticed that about Black people. You’d think they could just be Black, but noooooo, they just won’t shut up about it.

        8. Not really mate. I don’t remember when there was zero. The issue is the artificial insertion of homosexuality into shows that would be traditionally enjoyed by straight macho males. I have no issues with TV shows that address gay issues. I just don’t like it placed in shows that I watch continuously and in an overtly contrived manner.

        9. Well, I’m probably older than you are, so I do remember. Gays were invisible on series TV back in the dark ages when I was young, except for a few times as campy comic relief to be sneered at and ridiculed like so many Stepin Fetchits. They were usually played by straight comics doing the gay equivalent of blackface. And now that gay people are finally asserting themselves, you would have gay characters segregated to their own shows so as not to — I don’t know… infect? — the rest of your macho TV show (or Corrie, or whatever program you might be referring to). Well, enjoy your anti-gay apartheid while you can, Mr Botha, because the tide is finally turning.

        10. Yeah you kind of took what I wrote and ran away with it. Just like you, I like TV to reflect my life. Rampant and majority gay sex in the most of the shows I watch doesn’t reflect my life.
          The tide will not turn and it is because of this contrived levering of homosexuality into shows that I enjoy. People know propaganda when they see it and this is creating a backlash. Don’t be so confident that ramming the Gay Agenda down people’s throats is the best way to get them to accept you.

  87. lol is it possible that the reason you are unable to bond with your male friends isn’t so much due to gay culture but with the fact your friends may think you spend far to much time as a straight man talking about gay men? Maybe they think you are gay albeit a self loathing queer but perhaps they fear getting close to because the worry one day you may drop the act and go for their dicks. Sorry but while you are clearly a talented and compelling writer it’s unfortunate you spend so much time contemplating what gay men. Whether it be what they do in their day to day lives or when they’re behind a closed doors. I’m not someone who subscribes to the notion all men who are homophobic are actually closeted gay men who hate themselves and hate out gay men for their ability to accept and embrace & love who they are. I think it’s totally possible that it’s just how some may feel, either due to their own ignorance, lack of compassion or their fear. This however is one time when all signs are pointing to scared self loathing queer. Seriously man accept who your god made you and direct your talent at helping people rather than blame people for either your short comings or changes in society that you aren’t comfortable with.

    1. Oh, you know, we sometimes like to swing by and throw peanuts at the monkeys. No biggie.

  89. This is the definition of a witch hunt, you accuse someone or some group of something without any proof, and a whole lot of people with an axe to grind jump on board with the group mentality.
    Is there a KKK chapter here?
    Surely, that sort of group behaviour is worse for the youth than anything the gay culture will produce?
    It’s like the Trump haters group, you can write the most ridiculous things and people will rush to believe it. There’s no attempt in this article to prove any of the statements made.

  90. this one didn’t require much thought……..the “flu” comment pretty much sums it up

  91. I agree with this article except for one point. I live in Colorado. It is DRY AS FUCK HERE. If you don’t moisturize daily you will look like an old time Colorado Native-like a piece of worn out shoe leather. That is all.

  93. The big one is straight men are discouraged from taking better care of themselves. When you get the wrong kind of attention at gyms, you don’t want to go there, plus you rather make yourself less attractive to being harrassed.

  94. Homosexual agenda is probably the most destructive force in society today, because it’s so inexplicably powerful. When I was in high school twenty years ago there was no gay right group. An out homosexual would have been (rightly) mocked and harassed.
    Now, culture has been transformed so that homosexuals are now the most deified people in our society. They can get “married” and if you disagree, you’re a bigot. One thing not mentioned enough is how homosexual culture corrupts women and encourages promiscuity and other bad behavior.
    For me, the advance of homosexual acceptance is still somewhat baffling. Media brainwashing has been successful, but I have to think that most people, if they are being honest, know that homosexuality is disgusting.
    So, I think we should consider how to undermine this homo acceptance in our personal lives.

  95. Meh. I’m agnostic on this one. Although “gay culture” is perverse, it seems like some proportion of the population is indeed “born gay.” Normal gay people are fine. Where I part ways with you and Forney (a fine writer and critic) is that I don’t think it’s the government’s business to get into folks’ sexuality. If the government butts out of our lives, the pathological aspects of gay, and straight culture, will not be able to spread, because it will be understood we’re all responsible for our own actions and lives.

Comments are closed.