Much to the amusement and derision of those in the reactosphere, CNN recently did an article extolling the virtues of cuckoldry. More specifically, the article delineates that for some couples (perhaps using the term “some” to play it safe), cuckoldry might have a positive effect on a couple’s relationship and even strengthen it.
In our current political climate, the term “cuck” — short for “cuckservative” — has become an insult of the so-called alt-right, aimed at men they view as spineless and emasculated. The slur has its roots in the concept of cuckolding, or having an adulterous partner.
But, according to a recent study by David Ley, Justin Lehmiller and the writer Dan Savage, acting on cuckolding fantasies can be a largely positive experience for many couples, and hardly a sign of weakness.
As somebody who has extensively studied humanity in all of its splendor, I will be the first to tell you that while there have historically been a few of those fabled “take my wife, please!” tribes where everybody is running about having sex all willy nilly with everybody else, there are many more tribes—including, purely by coincidence, the tribes that actually amounted to anything in the grand scheme of things—in which the thought of being cuckolded is rightfully considered one of the greatest shames and humiliations.
What’s notable is that even many tribes that are primitive and unlettered are enraged by the thought of getting cucked behind their back—and if you don’t believe me, the Yanomamo, the “fierce people” of the Amazon rainforest, can demonstrate how seriously they take patriarchy and a woman’s faithfulness (hint: it occasionally involves lighting a woman’s cooch on fire).
So with all that being said, it seems that cuckoldry is something universally feared and reviled amongst almost all masculine cultures. And rightfully so—if your wife (or husband, women are allegedly capable of engaging in the cuck fetish as well) is looking to somebody else for sex, it means you’re not satisfying your spouse. It seems pretty obvious an affront, so why are our societal betters at CNN trying to push it upon us?
Their theory
According to research by Dan Savage and Justin Lehmiller—and, importantly, presented by CNN—cuckoldry is a perfectly normal desire to have; so much so that the majority of American men have had cuckold fantasies at some point in their life (again, according to the CNN article). Part of what makes cuckoldry such an erotic act is that it is a taboo act—the big bad patriarchal society that we live in claims that there’s something wrong with allowing some other man to bang your wife, and in fantasizing about that you’re being a brave rebel, thus more of a man than those patriarchal assholes!
Indeed, those who have anxiety or abandonment issues, lack intimacy and communication, and aren’t carefully planning the fetish, might have a negative experience with cuckolding—as you can see, only the strong allow themselves to get cucked!
Those of you who read the CNN article linked at the beginning might notice that the article is rather sparse on explanations as to how cuckolding is supposed to be such a wonderful positive for a relationship, only that it is. It might have something to do with the fact that the recommended cuckold formula involves honesty and intimacy between the cuck and the woman, or it might have to do with the openness of a “taboo” fetish, but I think a quick glance at the writers of this study might shine some light on why all of a sudden they’re claiming cuckolding is such a boon.
The writers
Dan Savage is a name that will likely need no introduction to politically savvy readers—maybe a man, maybe a tulpa of every single negative gay stereotype, Savage is a syndicated columnist in various newspapers around the country who writes about various sexual issues both hetero and homo and everything in between.
He’s also known for his “Santorum” neologism campaign, occasional acts of lying, accusations of holding various prejudices within the merry band of twats that is the intersectional righteous community, and launching his “It Gets Better” campaign in support of downtrodden gay youths, with the support of such tiny and weak entities as, er, the United States Government and the Microsoft Corporation—plucky underdogs, surely.
Justin Lehmiller, in addition to looking disturbingly like a brunette version of Kenneth from 30 Rock is the Director of the Social Psychology Graduate Program and an Assistant Professor of Social Psychology at Ball State University. He is also a Faculty Affiliate of The Kinsey Institute at Indiana University and runs the allegedly popular blog Sex and Psychology.
At the risk of seeming unprofessional, I think there are a couple of conclusions that can be drawn from looking at the authors of the study, and CNN’s reaction to it.
Is being a cuck really positive for your relationship?
First of all, it’s pretty well-documented that Dr. Alfred Kinsey, like most social scientists, fudged a lot of his data in order to push an ideological agenda, so I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to think that an employee of the Kinsey institute might have similar goals. But interestingly enough, that isn’t the biggest problem with this article.
Rather than the study being biased, it appears that the CNN report on the study was what was biased. Looking at the study itself, the study says nothing about cuckoldry being a net positive for heterosexual couples. The study’s abstract says that:
…The present study investigated fantasies about and experiences with cuckolding in a large and diverse sample of predominately gay-identified men [underline was put in by the writer]… Our findings also indicate that frequent fantasies about cuckolding are linked to several overlapping sexual interests (e.g., voyeurism, group sex) and, further, the content of these fantasies is associated with a number of individual differences (e.g., agreeableness, sensation seeking, sociosexuality). Finally, this study also suggests that gay men who act on their cuckolding fantasies tend to report positive experiences; however, the likelihood of reporting positive outcomes appears to depend upon one’s personality and attachment style.
In other words, the study itself doesn’t seem to be the sort of “corrupting the masculine men” thing that the manosphere thinks it is. Indeed, Savage and Lehmiller admit that “…It’s not cuckolding if there isn’t an element of humiliation, degradation or denial,” and that the fetish isn’t for everybody. CNN just wanted to portray it as something that Average Joe and Jane should do.
So why would CNN want to make it seem like it can “Strengthen a relationship and be a positive experience for [heterosexual] couples”? As a specific attempt to weaken and humiliate American men? That seems likely. Just think about that, CNN managed to out-poz Dan Savage.
Read More: Is Anthony Bourdain Getting Cucked by his MMA Wife?
Cnn should be banned
WHAT THE FUCK HAS HAPPEN TO THIS SITE?? You guys have lost the fucking plot by allowing this article to go up. No one with any respect for himself would happily watch his wife get railed!. Get it together you lame White Guys! I move for this to be removed, too.
Agreed but always remember “black lives don’t matter”
Derp, it’s making point of what is being suggested by the left. You missed the plot, not anyone else. Get it together Black Pawn.
In depends on the angle you look at it from… on the one hand its a pathetic kinky beta fetish… on the other its so ubra alpha… to be so detached that its a relief to let someone else do the heavy lifting for you.
Urban legend has it that the slave masters used to get the big males to drill their wives for them…..
And now, whenever anyone on social media cites CNN, I post a link to this, their true opus.
CNN? Fake news
And gays should stay the fuck away from psychology.
The correct term is Sodomites. It is not wise to take relationship advice from Sodomites.
Why straight people take relationship from this person is beyond me. He’s ‘happily married’ to another gay but enjoys a life of promiscuity.
I’d love to see him thrown off a rooftop by the Religion Of Peace adherents.
so funny that Bush said that when the correct translation is submission which is quite the opposite
Cuck News Network (CNN)
In the spirit of male/female equality, I think it’s good that women watch their men fuck other women in front of them. As they say, “What’s good for the goose…”
That is true but she must be loyal
The war on heterosexuality continues …
Yes, but it is far more than that. It is really the war against patriarchy.
Patriarchy, even more than hetersoxuality, is the thing the degenerates hate.
You forgot to add ((( ))) around their names.
Yes, Every. Single. Time.
Any white person dumb enough to vote shit-lib today, when presented with overwhelming facts of what (((their))) plan is for white race destruction, should be considered an enemy of the State.
Quite so. Well said.
Ruprecht the Great — Thank you, you are right. Only a Jew would so shamelessly try to push this filth on a major media outlet. Honestly, I don’t think of myself as having a weak stomach (my father even thought I would make a great surgeon), but I am a bit afraid of finding out how many degenerate bastards actually took this article as anything resembling the truth or good advice.
One more thing, this is from that wonderful Talmud of theirs-
“To communicate anything to a Goy (non-Jew) about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.”
Libbre David 37
Hmmm….. Any thoughts, people?
I’m always hearing about “(((their)))” plan for the white race, but how can that be?
First of all, in spite of all the talk about how tough Israel is, if America collapses on Monday Israel dies on Tuesday, in spite of the so-called “Samson Option” which would require the nuclear weapons we are always being told Israel doesn’t have. Thousands of years of history has shown all too clearly that if a nation hates its Jews, there is nothing they can do about it. Assuming Jews are a separate race, then the white race is their best, their only defense as World War 2 proved. If the Arab/Islamic world ever REALLY wanted to destroy Israel, then it would happen. Period.
What’s more, we all know that blacks do not like Jews, to put it mildly. If whites suddenly disappeared, does anyone think black people will consider Jews to be non-white? If Jews were really behind “kill whitey” then that’s the same as telling other races, even Asians, to kill Jews as well!
So I just don’t see how this can be. If Jews are as selfish as people say, then pushing any kind of anti-white, anti-western agenda is pure suicide! Therefore, they should be the LAST people in the universe to want it.
Subtlety is not their strong suit and rats eat mice
Most J EWs are INSANE, the inbreeding has caused it as well as the seedline of CAIN- Satanic.
Thats the only rational explanation for biting off their nose to spite their face.
That and as Rosenthal said, Lucifer is their God.
And being bashed by muggers is excellent for your health.
And, of course, War is Peace, Freedom is slavery, Ignorance is Strenght.
Of course it’s better for your relationship. Once you’ve been cucked in your failed relationship, you can dump the whore, work on improving yourself and then get something better later on down the road, preferably younger, hotter and tighter.
But yeah, CNN is fake news.
great comment
True, it’s better because once a cunt even remotely suggests it, you either bin her into the bang-only category, and lead her ass to believe she’s your boo, or just straight up tell her only a useless whore would suggest this, I have no utility for uselessness.
Back in the day, me and group of buddies I had would test girls we “thought” might be potential keepers.. have another guy in the group come onto her a bit, see how she reacts. If she gave in and got frisky, she either did her hoe rounds and discarded, or shunned and left out of future socializing and dumped.
Oh, no no no no No, don’t you see, she was DRIVEN to do it because the husband (fill in the blank, I don’t have a week to type in all the reasons for her “mistake”).
If he tries to leave her, therefore, HE is the guilty one!
The author of the CNN article is Ian Kerner…. He’s a gay Jew
So wrong on so many levels. You see, this is my objection to homosexualism. Rights? Do you mean from rights like due process, speech, assembly etc? Or do you mean the right to impose your culture into others? I think it’s been demonstrating proven its the later that gays want and demand. In this instance, they just assume we’’d all the better off if otherwise mono relationships were pluralistic. After all, they’re the gays and they’re just like the rest of us? Wrong! And, after all, it’s pretty much the standard for homo relationships to be “open”, because they can’t control their impulses let only be committed to just one person. I can’t help this…I always come back to homosexuality being fundamentally selfish.
This particular myth has been around a long time. If it had any advantage we would not be discussing it, but actually living it as part of the culture.
It seemed just another piece of clickbait until the end.
Sorry, but a study of gays has no useful correlation with hetero.
It’s like comparing motorcycles to rodents. Not comparable.
Monogamy isn’t the real issue. Patriarchy is. Homosexuals can be monogamous but they can never be patriarchal. Lesbians can be monogamous, but not patriarchal. Feminists and egalitarian can be monogamous,but not patriarchal.
Patriarchy is the order established and ordained by God at the beginning.
Monogamous heterosexual marriages can be patriarchal (like those of Isaac, Joseph, Noah, Peter, and many other godly men in the Bible). Polygamous heterosexual marriages can be patriarchal (like those of Abraham, Jacob, Moses, Gideon, David, Josiah, Elkaneh, and many other godly men in the Bible).
Cuckholdry, lesbianism, sodomy, egalitarianism, and feminism all reject God’s ordained order. Therefore, evil people will promote them.
Evil people will promote them for everyone else.
…
Based solely on a “study”/survey by a virulent gay activist with an agenda, on a small sample size, then extrapolated and twisted by CNN to aim this bullshit straight at the STRAIGHT WHITE COMMUNITY….The SJW are the marching army of cancer to destroy normal people.
aided and abetted by a captured perverted “mainstream” liberal media….sickening really.
Once again, homos continue to prove they give out the worst dating advice imaginable.
CNN are experts in the field of cuckery. Stelter aka helium voice being the balding poster child for it. CNN is very very fake news
Yes but where you will find the Bull?, ahhh so that´s why we need more refugees.
Um… it’s pretty easy for a white woman to match with black guys on Tinder. Once they find out that they’d be humiliating the cucky white hubby they’d wann sign up double quick.
As long as i am the one who fuck other guys’ wives in front of them (or not) i am ok with that haha
I’d prefer cucking some cuck with him as far away as possible, and preferably not in their house. High likelihood they have a video recording device set up someplace.
Always be on the lookout for keychains, USB memory sticks, big black pens, and other items which can act as spy cameras these days. Oh and the classic “Clock Radio”. Should be obvious lol.
“clock radio” definitely have one of those
Yeah. I was just about to say, “So CNN says I SHOULD have fucked my ex-wife’s sister.” Guess that’s why we got divorced.
You should always fuck your ex-wife’s sister.
Cuckdom is definitely being promoted. See this James Allen ad.
Fuck James Allen. You never give a ring to a girl who isn’t a virgin (or a widow who was ever only with one man).
“First of all, it’s pretty well-documented that Dr. Alfred Kinsey, like most social scientists, fudged a lot of his data in order to push an ideological agenda”
Alternatively, you could say he faked a lot of his date in order to push more fudge
A classic data fudging the left loves is “white men killed more Americans than Muslims last year” blah blah blah.
Yeah…… whites who we can presume are overwhelmingly Christian, if not by faith then at least by culture, are 62% of the U.S. population while Muslims are barely 1%
So if whites just happened to cause 2x as many deaths via psycho terror attacks in a given year, Muslims are still overrepresented about THIRTY FOLD.
Leftists hate hate hate white men. About 40 Universities have taught whiteness studies in the USA. Only group you can step on.
I actually look forward to the day whites are 49% of the US population. It will lead to either one of two things
A) The “white privilege” browbeating agenda will stop
B) The white browbeating agenda will continue with refurbished terminology. “Historical Majority” will be the new leftist catchphrase, along with “plurality privilege” blah blah blah.
You and I both know it will more than likely be option B.
white-privelidge is an ethnic double standard. Needless to say a white dude growing up with a single-mom in the Ukraine or even the US in poverty has little privilege compared to any asian Doctor’s son. Poverty is poverty anywhere.
When you try and say the “black criminal mind” you would get pulled up because statistically not all are criminals. It may be disproportionate, the same as with white privilege, but correlations cannot be used against nonwhites.
All this leftist hatred across social science has woken a lot of whites up.
Just because the “men” on the left enjoy being beta cucks, it doesn’t mean the rest of us have to follow them.
Chicken Noodle News
“One way or another, we’re going to give you aids.”
My understanding is that only gay men were surveyed for this “study” and that the researchers merely extrapolated from gays to straights. Talk about a selection bias.
Dan Savage is a sodomite, degeneracy-peddling faggot who deserves every beating he ever got in life. If I found out somebody beat him to death, I’d call that person a hero.
Fuck him and everybody like him.
Alot of dudes out there take bitches back after getting fucked by some other guy. There is only one answer to this:
White Sharia.
Check bitches hard and check them often
One is a soy boy
The other is gay
Which is which?
Does it matter?
With the 80:20 rule of casual sex and the growing BBC fetish thing the 20% of men who consume the hook-ups may be largely black in the future.
One black pill site lookism.net a big theory is that black/muslim/ethnic men are usurping white men for casual sex opportunities. All black pill sites push that.
I’m hazarding a very very wild guess these are all beta AF low T whipped soy-boys who are agreeing to be openly cu-kolded.
The one group that don’t vote for multiculturlalism/progressivism are straight white men. They believe its just about enriching everybody else at their expense and sharing their stuff with others.
I wouldn’t be at all surprised if there is something to the CNN article.. that the average Western beta male really does fantasize about watching a buff alpha take his wife like a whore, making her scream in ecstasy, filling her with seed that could never issue from his beta loins. By agreeing to and witnessing the event, the weakling is living vicariously as an alpha for a few brief moments. Extra points if he jacks off while watching.. there’s some homoerotic fantasies thrown in.
“By agreeing to and witnessing the event, the weakling is living vicariously as an alpha for a few brief moments. Extra points if he jacks off while watching.. there’s some homoerotic fantasies thrown in.”
Once you realise this, you’ll never watch porn again…
The whole cuck scene is homo and the guy being cucked is the bottom. The rapefugees rape the men also.
Good point.
You describe it like youre getting off on it. Creep.
Stop watching so much porno.
Its J EW Mental Conditioning and rationalizing the irrational.
Its what ‘they’ do. They dont call them nation wreckers for nothing.
Turn off the food and electricity for thirty days and the majority of these worthless, degenerate shitbags will be exterminated.
CNN’s next headline:
“Bugchasing might be good for health, study suggests”
This is part of an obvious movement in Western society towards emasculation of straight men, and empowerment of women.
Part of this movement I believe is organic and mostly biological. My evidence is the shift in hormones between females and males in developed countries. Males are seeing their testosterone levels decrease in their primes while their estrogen levels increase. This makes them more feminine, submissive, prone to homosexuality. Women on the other hand, have higher levels of testosterone in their primes. When testosterone is higher vis a vis estrogen in non-menopausal women, rates of homosexuality increase. As it does in men, testosterone makes women more sexual, aggressive, dominant, masculine.
The much stronger force I believe is due to class warfare and humankinds’ tendency towards jealousy/greed for power.
Straight men, in particular white and some East-Asian men, are the most wealthy and powerful in the world. The have-nots are the majority of the world. SWMales uncoincidentally tend to have more valuable skills in a free market–they excel in more lucrative fields like technology and engineering. The gender-wage gap when controlled for actual income inputs disappears because of this–simply put, women make less money because they tend to gravitate towards less valuable skills, and they show a less drive for money in general and pursue other manifestations of power.
The tyranny of the majority in a democracy is what will always push for wealth and power redistribution from those that have it–men–to those that have less. The advent of the internet has given them a louder voice day-to-day, and the demands of the masses encourage the media to spin more palatable (yet unscientific) reasons for wealth redistribution like a dubious gender-wage gap, dubious institutional racism etc.
Really great comment KRS. Anyone who runs a farm or barnyard stable that breeds dogs, horses or cattle knows a bit about controlled reproduction. Neutering is commonplace for wool and meat bearing stock. Culling of herds produces surplus hide and meat unlike human culling which only renders select organs and from a very small percent during a large culling.
In addition, male and female barnyard animals are segregated and only select male studs are paired to breed with female breeding stock. Makes you think of forced public school desegregation and the resulting racial melting pot that still has yet to reach the half way boiling point. It’s all totally controlled. We Humans living under global elite hegemony will become like a bunch of trapped CORRALLED DOGS and meat animals if we don’t bust ourselves free from their clutches.
“Justin’s on the left”
Hahahahahahaha to the most elegant joke of February 2018
Savage is a freaking fag! Can’t take anything that sissy boy fag says seriously.
This is a result of years of feminist poison. Men have become so effeminate to the point of being cucked. Such a disgrace! This is the ultimate fail of a man-celebrating your woman fucking another man. And of course the feminist trash in the media celebrates this crap!
Also totally sick of fag culture permeating “male” culture everywhere… it is just another attempt to demonize masculinity. It’s a bullshit.
All the players out there should go and hit on the gf/wife of the cuck who wrote that balless, shameless crap.
Fukenel cunt… society is going to the dogs. Getting real sick of all this gay shit.
All men should be chucked by me,but I should never be cucked.
Would this apply if it was the other way around?
Hardly.
End of discussion.
Cuck Nu-male Network
So the big reveal at the end is that the CNN article is backed up by a study based on kinky gay guys. Fuzzy math? Golly, who’da guessed it?
I could be wrong, but my wild guess tells me CNN is owned by Chosen people…
Oy gevalt
It seems CNN will be soon something similar to Buzz media.