110 thoughts on “How Feminism Is Causing The Destruction Of Western Society”

1. Author Bio should be changed to:
   Joseph hails from the epicenter of American feminism – (((Manhattan))).

   1. Whose that Manhattan Pokemon?
      

      1. Imagine completely eliminating your enemy by not even lifting a sword but by convincing its women to turn against its men and essentially cripple and destroy its tribe. That is what feminism is, an insidious weapon.
         Now who has historically hated, exploited and tried to harm and enslave the white European tribe and other tribes for centuries?
         Who has a very religious foundation and holy book (the [email protected]) on doing such things.
         It’s time to get real and answer those questions honestly.

         1. Your description of feminism as a well thought-out weapon is right on the money. And it’s worked probably better than (((they))) had hoped for.

         2. The grande irony is that feminism was not thought of, theorized, financed, developed, implemented or maintained by women — although a token handful were used in it’s promotion and marketing (Steinem, Friedman, etc.). It’s a social weapon (and ultimately destructive to women and their families) created by a small group of light-skinned men with as much money as god. In fact, they are the creators of our money system and literally the printers of our fiat currency. There is ample evidence to prove this, but yet 95% of the guys on this site still think feminism was pushed down our throats by relentless and ugly middle-aged women, and as such, they are the enemy. In reality, women are as much victims as us (men), but they are far easier to dupe and manipulate via their emotions and lack of logic / discernment in order to destroy the family unit and undermine our culture. And yes, many have become very willing dupes, but they are puppets far more than they can fathom.

         3. It can be disarmed and destroyed by the holy water weapon of withdrawing access to all monies the women desire. Men just need to personally boycott all womens desires for their money. It will flip instantly. Cut them off from mens wallets (I know unrealistic right? REALLY? No, it is really that simple. Just stop giving them ANY money at anytime. Make them EARN their money. Sure pay the hookers after services rendered, but no more loans, no more 5 bucks here and 5 bucks there, no more capitulation to the whining ‘Please get this for me”…)
            The biggest stumbling block to destroying feminism at its source. Thirsty men. Beta cucks and WHITE KNIGHTS.
            Other than that, the key to controlling women is to cut them off financially from your wallet in all forms. they will shift over and overrun the Governments money giveaways to them and it will stymie those programs, and choke them to death on the demand.
            So simple..CUT THEM OFF. make them earn every last red cent they get, no more freebies or giveaways. TOO simple. Its what makes them function. all their SJW shit will stop too after they go hysterical at first, and then as their desires fiscally starve, the nonsense will go away too. they will be begging for someone anyone to pay attention to them to throw them crumbs, to “pay” attention to them. they will all become pay for play and the realistic market value of the snatch will come back to reality, as will respect for men. But continuing to indulge their bizarre seat of power they hold solely because of vagina.

         4. @DNJ,
            “The biggest stumbling block to destroying feminism at its source. Thirsty MEN. Beta cucks and WHITE KNIGHTS.”
            So True, but as I said previously, Truth is always “bitter” !! especially to “pussy manics” aka “thirsty MEN” !!
            I am tired of saying the same Truth, that pussies:
            =masturbate on regular basis, probably more “vigorously” than MEN !!
            =need sex as much as MEN need !!
            =think/fantasize/want & enjoy sex, more than MEN !!
            =always get sex on-demand, no-strings attached & absolutely FREE !!
            But still, just because of pussy maniacs aka thirsty MEN, pussies are ruling the roost !!

         5. Of course it’s on the money. FUCKING DUH. A Rockerfella (can’t remember which one) boasted that feminism was designed to destroy the american family unit and assist them in taxing women.
            No one needs to hear the same story over and over, we get it.
            Boring ass article.

   2. When I read the header “Awake: The return of Man” I thought it was a reprint of an article from the Jehovah’s Witness ‘Awake’ Watchtower magazine. I used to like those Johos. They would come by knocking and I’d preach red pill to them until they looked at their watches and said they had to go. Come to think of it, they had nowhere else to go. Silly me I should have called them out on their “we have to go” bit. They said they had other ‘appointments’. Appointments my foot. And it was always when I was just getting warmed up with the good stuff.
      Come to think of it, I’ve never seen an ‘Awake’ magazine that explicitly called out and fully denounced feminism. I’ve not seen an LDS ‘Ensign’ magazine article that fully deconstructed and outed feminism either. They’re all getting mushy and WISHY WASHY and pandering to the blabbering biddies.

   3. playing both sides for the $$$

   4. This world (West primarily) is changing rapidly because, just like in the films They Live, The Thing or Invasion of the Body Snatchers, human bodies (especially women and high profile people) are most likely being replaced with ET’s (whether it be Annunaki, Demons, or other pieces of garbage).
      I’ve seen some friends and family members of mine acting completely different (if not insane or consistently irrational) in just the past couple years. No doubt many regular folks are just dumbed down from the chemtrails, GMO, WiFi, Smart Meters, Directed Energy Weapons, and Fluoride and are in a permanent or long term catatonic state.
      But, compared to several years prior, I’ve been given the look like “who the hell is this guy?” or basically completely ignored. It doesn’t matter by who either. THERE IS DEFINITELY A WAR ON MEN! WOMEN WANT THE FATHER OUT OF THE HOUSE UNLESS YOU HAVE $100,000 OR MORE IN THE BANK FOR HER.

      1. “WOMEN WANT THE FATHER OUT OF THE HOUSE UNLESS YOU HAVE $100,000 OR MORE IN THE BANK FOR HER.”
         Correct. And once she misappropriates your funds (or even just racks up credit cards which are “joint debt”), you’ll be out anyway, and still funding her lifestyle for years to come.

2. The chart where debt goes up after second wave feminism is not fair. That was also around the time we went off gold standard. Neither men or women knew what was going on. They just enjoyed the benefits of endless cash while society died slowly. Blame the greed and ignorance of everyone. Blame the Jewish banks and media. Modern Women are a result of that. Not the cause.

   1. The single largest (80%) consumer block, is wamen. That is the real seat of feminisms power. Everything they do vote wise, legislation support wise, through the courts activism wise is all about interpretation of law and getting the system biased to give wamen the power over the purse by manipulating men, the universal pussy pass. End of story. the ONLY fact that matters.

3. ”in more egalitarian countries like the U.S. and Scandinavia”.
   Scandinavia is not a country!

   1. BASIC
      True, Finns are more different to Danes than Danes are to the English.
      They’re Russians.

      1. No, they are not. Russia is way less PC less Finland.

      2. The biggest difference between Finland proper scandinavian countries is the language. Other than that the countries are more similar than different; the same lutheran church (followed by the orthodox church as the second most important in Finland), similar political parties, social democratic model widely accepted etc.
         Most finns speak some swedish because it’s the other official language there but only a few percent speak any russian. Russia is viewed with suspicion especially in Finland for obvious historical reasons and the cultural mores and behaviour of russians is typically viewed as relatively boorish and primitive relative to scandinavians.
         In the neighbouring baltic states the picture is completely different; russians are everywhere and russian is commonly studied in school as it was the lingua franca of the Soviet Union.
         The baltics, or at least Estonia, try to identify more with nordic states and tend to see the underclass or criminal element of their society as deriving from russian influence.

         1. Finns are Ural-Hungarian race while the rest of the Scandinavians are Germanics who pressed North.
            I’m not including the Lapps, who are some Asian group that migrated from Siberia at the dawn of time.

         2. I am from Michigan and know Finns well. They are geographically IN Scandinavia, but they speak a Uralic-Hungarian dialect and are genetically different than Danes or Swedes because well, they are Slavs.

         3. triggered,
            The finns are not only geographically in Scandinavia (depending on where you draw the line) but culturally and politically as well.
            According to timely research the population is composed of inhabitants from various geographical locations. I’m not an expert on the question but am fluent in finnish and have access to timely sources. In 19th century romanticization the finns shared an isolated geographical origin with hungarians and even turks and what not. Nowadays the nation is seen as a mixture of at least three major geographical directions (east, west, north) with the swedes and estonians being their closest genetic relatives.
            Furthermore the country is somehow divided into two distinct genetic lines; the east and the west and though the phenotypic differences are not that great, the genetic distance is vast. It’s not known if it’s a recent development.
            Speaking of a ural hungarian dialect implies that some sort of a proto-hungarian language would be the mother language of languages that are now completely different. I don’t think that even hungarian ultra-nationalists believe that. Hungarian, finnish and estonian and fading, smaller languages appear to have common ancestry but that’s about it. The mutual intelligibility or any historical connection of hungarian and finnish (or estonian) is only apparent to experts; normally when people bring up dialects, it refers to varieties of the same language or in controversial cases languages that are largely mutually intelligible but distinct enough for some to call them distinct languages for political reasons (this has been the case with karelian and finnish or perhaps ukrainian and russian many centuries ago or danish and norwegian in the 19th century). Functionally speaking finnish is a hungarian dialect like english is a dialect of chinese.

         4. The typical guy from Denmark or Sweden will look like Floki from Vikings, Dolph Lundgren or Flash Gordon (Sam Jones). Tall (almost always 6’2-6’5), not obese and long skulled (dolichocephalic)with blue eyes, from blond-medium brown hair.
            The typical guy from Finland would be East Baltic with some Asiatic influence and most likely shorter then their Germanic neighbors to the West.

4. “men have evolved to be significantly more competitive and status driven than women” WRONG! Observing current society and trends I evaluate that there is absolutely nothing valuable u can gain by accumulating “social points” therefore I as a male don’t feel any urge to achieve social status or anything. U think money can guarantee u happiness and healthy relationship? Just sit and watch how ur slut dumps u for the first “cool” guitar playin tattooed pothead cuz… ur too boring just thinkin how to make money. On the other hand I think nowadays wahmenz are far more status driven than men, even the lowliest, scummiest and dumbest girls I have seen in my life have sick ambitions like becoming some managers or shit like this and travelin the world and livin the dream while most men I know are far humbler than this.

   1. He is talking about back in the days when there was no daddy government. Back then a women would think twice before she dropped her husband for a slick boogie dancer, because her family and friends would disown her and she would end on i the whorehouse. Obviously not so today because of feminism..still having status and wealth will still line up the bitches, just don’t marry any of them because they will quickly be on to the next shining cock, taking half of your assets with her.

      1. What on earth is a “boogie dancer”?

         1. Someone who dances boogie. Girls love them.

         2. HERBIE
            This ain’t the seventies and I am sure the guys getting blown by mindless female clubbers these days are either the DJ or the ecstasy dealer.
            Of course I have not been in a rave since the 90’s. What do I know?

         3. Dance clown game.

         4. You such a worthless troll (and young one) if you can’t fathom what that means. WTF is your problem, moron. GOOGLE IT you puissant snowflake. What an ignorant young stupid f**ktard you are, then your ignorant azz comes on an adult board and start slinging trolling insults? You are the reason why adults used to beat their kids righteously so they learn manners, back in a time when education was actually beneficial and useful. Now it cranks out pseudo intellectual and arrogant liberals that are dumber than dogshit.

   2. Deplorable NJ
      “Puissant” means “having great power or influence.” So thank you for the complement.

      1. F**king Google interfering with autocorrect…pissant.. PISSANT.
         Google keeps auto changing the context and content…censorship at its most nefarious. Doesn’t make you an intellectual, in any case.

         1. I’m old enough to remember when JFK was assasinated and the Beatles were on Sullivan, you verbose twat. Now pipe down and let the adults talk.

         2. @Herbie..If you are that old then shame on you for being such an ignorant and lazy f**k , Boomer.

5. Feminism is a response to technological change. Women lack upper body strength. So they cannot fell trees effectively with an ax for example. But the days when upper body strength mattered are over for all but maybe 10% of mostly low paid jobs, jobs dominated by immigrant Mexicans in the USA: construction, tree trimming, etc. The brain differences only matter for the top 10% of engineers/programmers, and those professions themselves are only like 5% of the workforce. For most modem jobs, women are just as good as men, probably better since they are not docile. This is true red pill truth: men just aren’t as valuable as we used to be. And that is the driving force behind feminism.
   .
   The sex problem with is not feminism (in sense of equal rights to jobs) so much as obsolete laws regarding alimony, child support, restrictions on prostitution, false rape accusations. Fix these laws and there will be a flood of cheap sex available from single mothers, same as in SEA. In the meantime, men can save themselves by simply controlling their dick. You don’t need a woman for sex, you don’t need children. Live like a monk and you’ll be unaffected by feminism. if you are fortunate enough to get rich, you can retire to SEA and both get plenty of sex and avoid feminism too.

   1. Since they are MORE docile. Most of my typos are of little importance, but that blooper might be confusing.

      1. The female brain is barely oatmeal to start with so it can barely function at all even in the “feelz” category….much less leadership or constructive effort or thought. Docile…my ass. It doesn’t take any effort or thought to spread their legs and get tingles. try to talk logic and reason to women and you lose them instantly. But talk the language of “feelz” and they are captivated by your useless prattle forever.
         how do you control whamen? Short circuit / overload their “feelz”…and then they are completely useless. That’s a fact. No secret science, just bare anecdotal evidenced fact.

      2. “For most modem jobs, women are just as good as men”
         For most government ‘make work’ jobs.
         Can’t think of any REAL job where a woman is better than a man, maybe you could name a few jobs where you think a woman is as good as a man?

         1. Cashiers, janitors, light construction (painting, laying tile), childcare, eldercare, healthcare (other than top 1% innovators, who really fall into the science and engineering category), elementary teaching, light lawn and garden care, bookkeeping and other than high level accounting/finance, etc, etc. The Russians used women even for heavy construction after WWII. The only places where they never used women were underground mining (most brutal job ever, especially coal mining) plus top level science/engineering, where the male brain really is superior and even tiny increments of superiority make a huge difference. I’m not an apologist for feminism, but overstating the case for male superiority is as bad as white knighting, because it implies we superior males should coddle inferior women. Acknowledging that women really are equal to men in most respects that matter nowadays is important because it raises the question of why then do we still coddle women who are not childbearers?

         2. Only the womb, as a baby gestation carrier. that’s it.

         3. Have to a agree, what a silly notion. Ive had jobs where the girls got paid more, did less, and we (men) were still expected to help do their jobs for them. Bitches wouldnt even take out the trash. Fucking idiots.

   2. Or feminism could be a blessing in disguise.
      Infant mortality has been on a stead decline since the beginning of the industrial revolution in England and elsewhere afterwards. From a (false) humanitarian point of view this might be a good news but in reality it has allowed for a lot of people with mutational defects to procreate and pass on their faulty genes. In parallel the level of human intelligence has also been on decline which is related to the overall degeneration of the population.
      Feminist ideas and other sexual perversions in fact might help us to reverse these trends as it has been noticed that people who are not very intelligent and/or physically attractive (healthy) are more inclined towards non-creative ideas like humanism, equality, miscegenation, feminism, same sex, and similar.
      So if what they say it’s true (probably is), that Jews are at the forefront of all this “left” ideas, it might turn out that they are indeed doing God’s work.
      Just a thought! 😉
      p.s. PUA ideas and Game perhaps could be lumped in the same category as the practitioners of these “techniques” very rarely settle down to a family and therefore have lower chance of passing their genes.

      1. Infant mortality is as bad as it always was.
         Women just kill them before birth, instead of them dying shortly after birth.
         Or am I imagining that the white race world population has shrink from 50% (1950) to 15% (2015).

         1. shrunk

      2. Interesting take on things. You suggest that Mother Nature is exercising Darwinism and fitness of the species by forcing the aberrations to weed themselves out of the population also by taking the fringe support of that aberrant population out too as collateral damage. In essence then all those single mothers that corrupt their kids by denying them a NORMAL healthy relationship and fathers are actually building an aberrant but virulent population that is in effect suicidal and soon to be in another generation or two likely to NOT be procreative at all due to the damage and negative effects. After a couple generations of these defective kids repeat the cycle, the damage is so bad in successive generations, they end up being non-procreative by all factors but firstly and foremost through abortions…a self regulating of the defectives out of the healthy population.

   3. The lack lower body strength as well.

   4. Gentlemen MGTOW is the answer.,

      1. MGTOW in the West, fuck around everywhere else

      2. MGTOW is monasticism without God. Pointless.

   5. @goat…,
      You dunb ass aka “troll in disguise”, what do you mean by “they lack upper body strength” !?
      I am damn sure you are a pussy troll & do yourself a favor;
      just stand in front of me and will deliver a mighty “kick” on your “lower body” (I promise I will only use hardly 30% of my MASCULINE Strength !!) and lets see how “strong” you are with your “lower body” !!
      By the way, hey pussy troll, did you ever saw a movie where MEN deliver a “swift kick” on the “lower body” of a pussy !? If not, then why not !? pussies are anyway “strong” below their belt, so why not !?

   6. I really don’t get the downvotes because imho you are spot on.

   7. BTW following your line of reasoning I suspect the robotics/AI/whatever revolution will spur at the same time a strong anti-immigration backlash and a new wave of even more insane feminism.
      When every worker, except those capable of coding the wackiest random forests, become obsolete it will be a giant scramble for government gibs…if this pradigm comes true, epect organized feminism lobbying openly for male population reduction programs

6. Men still rule the world – well an elite group of them anyway. They just rule from the shadows using women as a proxy army.

   1. “Men still rule the world – well an elite group of them anyway. They just rule from the shadows.” Yup.
      

7. The author could have just wrote this much( because this was perfectly succinct and well put);
   “Nation building requires a set of skills that are part of a man’s DNA. Women have literally never built any nation or institution. Yet women today claim equality with men and seek to hold roles traditionally held by men. Their track record in these roles is very poor. This rise of feminism coincides with a profound loss of national cohesion, weakening of the rule of law, and an explosion of public debt.”
   and it would have sufficed. All the bare naked ugly truth of why human society is imploding. This is what suicide by a species looks like folks. Yielding to the unnatural for the greedy and unaware morons. A Society ruled by “feelz”, and it goes straight into the shitter.
   Down vote me now you worthless cucked by wamen betas.

   1. I downvoted you because your unending support for your two feminist cock carousel daughters is essential the problem in the west. You entitle and support their feminist ‘we are as good as men’ equality. And while you do that you have NO credibility on this site. Just another ‘boomer’ loser.

      1. Uhhh… Dips hit, they are teens… They are idealistic minors.. If that threatens you, then that’s pretty pathetic. If female EMTs threaten your world view, there is nothing I can say beyond wow its better off for all that you hide out in a third world toilet.

         1. Yeah he married a single mom and hates his British kids . It doesn’t matter to me what my daughter thinks , I would kill myself and do everything possible to see her and show any of my kids love even if they we’re brainwashed

         2. Why would you have them work? Dnj like JD said you are the problem. If they are cute I’m 36 make 90k+ and looking for a wife to fill with my seed.

         3. Funny you say that DNJ, as your utter hatred of women seems unbounded. Some woman (mom? wife?) must have burned you pretty badly. Do you discuss your “philosophical outlook” with your girls? Yikes!

         4. @Herbie Fuckwit, my girls lived through what their mother did to them and us as a family. they don’t need me to tell them. They got it straight from her. You know who gets to be the rock steady one thing in their lives that hasn’t screwed them over? Me. GFY. I pity any kids you had that survived and grew under your blue pillage/white knighting.

         5. Hammered,
            But you don’t have any kids (failure in the mating game).
            While I have so many I can afford to ignore a few.
            My advice to you, post less, breed more.
            Maybe be a little less picky with single moms and increase your choices of available breeding partners.

8. it might be just on the contrary.
   Feminism and LGBT could be a blessing in disguise.
   Infant mortality has been on a stead decline since the beginning of the industrial revolution in England and elsewhere afterwards. From a (false) humanitarian point of view this might be a good news but in reality it has allowed for a lot of people with mutational defects to procreate and pass on their faulty genes. In parallel the level of human intelligence has also been on decline which is related to the overall degeneration of the population.
   Feminist ideas and other sexual perversions in fact might help us to reverse these trends as it has been noticed that people who are not very intelligent and/or physically attractive (healthy) are more inclined towards non-creative ideas like humanism, equality, miscegenation, feminism, same sex, and similar.
   So if what they say it’s true (probably is), that Jews are at the forefront of all this “left” ideas, it might turn out that they are indeed doing God’s work.
   Just a thought! 😉
   p.s. PUA ideas and Game perhaps could be lumped in the same category as the practitioners of these “techniques” very rarely settle down to a family and therefore have lower chance of passing their genes.

   1. It’s mainly targeted at the white racial group. Are you saying the Ju’s are doing Lucifer’s sorry ‘gods’ work by exterminating white people Melvin?

      1. In before the shill retorts with well this doesn’t effect the J or (insert ethnic group) and white people just bring this on themselves with no outside influence and constraints whatsoever.

9. Jesus Christ, the three day old fish taco owners at the top look like they escaped a Hellraiser movie…and the very appropriate shirt the first one is wearing..
   Yes, we cannot forget your haunting freakishness.
   Everything that actual trash could be and it is personified and labeled in the shirt “you will never forget”.

   1. The middle one is a Danish leftist extremist named Christina Höj Larsen. The right one is a Swedish leftist extremist named Fanny Åström. The left one is some non-white who I don’t know they name of.

10. How come every young feminist I see on the Internet says she suffers from mental illness, and often even have attempted suicide?

    1. Simple! this “pussy maniac” society has given her loads of “entitlement” !! That pussy can say, comment & shout whatever and on whomever; and she never have to face any “consequences” !!

       1. I remember one of these trashy feminist types not so long ago attacked a guy with a bottle and got pile driven by a closed fist through her face on TV. Pity all of them don’t get that treatment. Counts. They’d change their ways if they got their asses beat just ONCE, that way. None of them would remain feminist trash if they had to feel the pain of their stupidity and vile Ness for their ways. It’s why polite men don’t fight except openly and often. No smart person would tempt body crushing pain to be vile uncouth shit heads. Beat em down once and make them truly feel a cost for their bullshit and they get very civil very quickly. The morons who come back for more get a second helping with broken bones and mashed organs… They won’t be back a third time.

11. A feminist online once said to me that white men on the net are attacking feminism more than black men do. I told her that it is probably because feminists attack white men much more than they attack black (or any other non-white) men. The war on men is mainly a war on white men.

    1. A dumb feminist whoah will not hold a black man to the same ‘patriarchal’ scrutiny she would a white man. In fact (((feminism))) has taught her getting d1cked down and ran trains on by the brothers is good for her and rebellious revenge to her white male ‘oppressor’
       Black men are not complaining because it’s opened up a market to easy white crakka ho’s to conquer.

    2. That’s because whites (MEN, pussies, faggots, lesbos, transies,…) are the majority in this Country & the west. Isn’t it common sense !?

    3. What did she say after that ?

12. “For example, feminists are strong supporters of illegal immigration because they feel sorry for the plight of the third world poor.”
    That support and so called empathy would immediately dissipate if millions of young healthy foreign competitor single women were being imported from the plight of poverty instead of men.
    You can bet your last federal reserve dollar on that one!

    1. You are so right on this point.

    2. “pussy maniacs” !! Always banging, banging and banging !! Not even sparing the “dookie dispenser” !!

    3. That’s when their true racist selves come out..when the competition they cannot beat takes all of the men’s resources and attention out of their control and their pickings. They aren’t empathy at all, they just I crease the population of thirties they can victimize until they decide they don’t care about our laws then they want their white knight protectors back… Fuck them.

       1. … Fucking spell correct again… They are not empathic, they just want to increase the population of thirsties to victimize (and enslave and fleece resources from).

13. Gentlemen: I found this article written in 2010 and states the very same thing here only 8 years earlier and in more detail. Below is the summary and link to the article
    http://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble.html
    The Western World has quietly become a civilization that has tainted the interaction between men and women, where the state forcibly transfers resources from men to women creating various perverse incentives for otherwise good women to inflict great harm onto their own families, and where male nature is vilified but female nature is celebrated. This is unfair to both genders, and is a recipe for a rapid civilizational decline and displacement, the costs of which will ultimately be borne by a subsequent generation of innocent women, rather than men, as soon as 2020

14. Did any one take a good look at those girls? They looked like they were from the north east, plain, over weight and dull.

15. Yeah feminism sucks, but do we need a weekly article about it?

    1. There needs to be multiple daily articles on it until it’s eliminated.

       1. Gotcha, preach to the choir. Always works.

    2. Like matter has anti-matter, RoK is the anti-Jezebel. If the 2 ever meet, it’ll blow up the universe.

       1. Tell that to the SPCL.
          Anyway, ROK covers a much wider scope of topics than Jezebel, has mostly better and smarter writers, and ROK’s parent media company (Roosh V) was never bankrupted in a $100+ million lawsuit like Gawker was. Any site under the Gawker media umbrella is the lowest of low. Even Vice and BuzzFeed hate them; that should tell you something.

          1. Jalopnik is OK. As for the SPCL, they consider any organization or website to the right of the Rotary Club a hate group. Take them with a bucket of salt.

16. “in developing countries like India…”
    Didn’t you find or know about any other “poor & developing country”, you stupid !?
    It seems “few” people in the west will never come out of JEG&IIC Syndrome !!, especially against Hindustanis !!
    And what the hell “multiculturalism” has to do with “femicuntism” !?
    femicuntism is there because of pussy maniacs & vested interests in the west. Do not imitate pussies & blame others for something you are responsible for, pussy maniacs !!

    1. RAVI
       India
       The US thankfully only imports Brahmin or Dravidian dorks so we have not had to endure Indian crime like Canada or UK. Even the Sikhs are mostly higher-caste.
       Beginning with the Gypsies, importing Indians of lower castes imports a scourge.
       I like Brahmins because they are pansies. Perhaps arrogant in their assumptions of reincarnation made up by the Proto-white Aryan invaders they desended from who introduced the caste system to India (A good trick, considering the Dravidians already invented Hinduism).
       In general though, the US has only imported Bania caste Indians and Dravidian IT dorks. So we have the situation under control.
       If a country is going to accept Indians they SHOULD be Hindus from the middle-to-higher castes.
       I’m a Gora who worked in India (And probably will again so of course I cannot tell you who I am or what I do) and you will always get a nice response from me, Desi.
       Your Mom was arranged to marry your Dad at 14 and I bet she has a lot of experience fucking.
       I should come over and give her my big Gora dick in her thirsty Dravidian pussy. Sure, she is already 40-something but it will tight because your Dad has a small dick.

    2. RAVI
       Your Dravidian Mom is a Gora dick maniac.
       I bet your Mom is “thirsty” for a big white penis in her vagina and butthole because an arranged marriage to your Dad at 14 deprived her of sexual pleasure from the “lundas” of white males.
       I gotta warn you Ravi…I worked in India in a media communications field and know Mother India well, Desi.
       Its fun to insult you.
       Of course, I have to business in India again.

       1. @pussy maniac or pussy,
          I can “suitably” reply to you, but, the word MOM has a Respectful meaning & Divine feeling in Hinduism. So I won’t reply in your own “tone”; because, a MOM is a MOM, doesn’t matter mine or yours.

17. RAVI
    I bet your Mom married your Dad when she was only 15 in an arranged marriage so she is really “thirsty” for a big Gora dick.
    Tamil/Nair women can be sexperts.

    1. @pussy maniac or pussy,
       I can “suitably” reply to you, but, the word MOM has a Respectful meaning & Divine feeling in Hinduism. So I won’t reply in your own “tone”; because, a MOM is a MOM, doesn’t matter mine or yours.

18. “Feminine empathy makes it difficult to establish the rule of law because women continually demand exceptions for those perceived as vulnerable.”
    This is crystalized in the news with the illegal immigrant children being “separated” from their parents. What a fucking joke. Go to any kindergarten or daycare and see children cry when the parents drop off their kids.

    1. Exactly.. It is pure situational propaganda by the pissstream media. Fucking woem don’t give a ratsass if they think they can rope in invading allies until they can ignore them after they get some other pyhrric victory.

       1. Indeed. They are just doing this because they hate President Donald Trump.

    2. “For example, feminists are strong supporters of illegal immigration because they feel sorry for the plight of the third world poor.”
       That’s wrong! They support illegal Immigration because no man has a sexual interest on those ugly hags except those who can get citizenship by marriage.

19. Especially Tamils in Malaysia, actually everybody in that country (including the Ching Chongs) is pretty much a sex freak, that’s why nothing gets done there.
    PS
    I guess it’s still better than my native Italy where people pretty much are mired in the same crap and on top of everything it’s the most boring, most depressing and repressed place on Earth.

20. So it begins…there’s still hope.
    Michigan woman who lied about being raped on college campus sentenced to jail
    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/06/19/michigan-woman-who-lied-about-being-raped-on-college-campus-sentenced-to-jail.html

21. “The Romans forced the conquered Europeans”
    Fun fact, Romans are Europeans. You should have phrased your sentence differently.

22. Deplorable,
    I have a better idea. Just kill all the fucking feminist.

    1. A rather last ditch drastic measure, but if it came down to it and all other ways to remove their power fail, then logically the last option, yes.

23. feminists

24. So the solution is to get rid of women’s power. When the old generation of cucks and boomers dies off, I doubt generation zyklon will give a shit about all this, as long as they’re well informed so that when generational succession happens in U.S. congress (assuming the country ISN’T divided into 4 or 5 smaller countries by then – and if that is the case then at least one of them will have it right) they will repeal all the bullshit laws that have been enforced by the (((feds))) and their (((internationalist backers))).
    More than likely America will collapse before the boomer generation dies off in which the hard reset will be the only option to pursue if there is any flicker of hope in rebirthing a functional civilization.

    1. Generation Zyklon is not the saving grace.
       There will be no “hard reset”.
       Unless YOU are married and have at least five (white) children, you are a detriment to the West.

25. So let me get this right – your opening argument in a piece about how society is better off being run by men, is that society has got a lot less violent and war-ridden since women started making decisions?
    Admit it, you know that’s not going to fly with anyone outside this manosphere ecochamber, right?
    (But then it doesn’t need to does it, because no one outside that echo chamber is ever going to be persuaded to buy your book , are they?)

26. I don’t think the the author has a full understanding of history, especially the ways in which civilizations and different forms of government evolved. There are a few points I would like the author to consider.
    Firstly, nations and nation-states as we know it today did not evolve for a very long time. For the majority of human history, there have been different forms of civilizations, such as chiefdoms, enpires, and feudalism. (I will return to the idea of feudalism later.) The first beginnings of nation-states with collective national identities did not emerge until the 16th century, at the absolute earliest. Before then, there really were no concepts of “immigration,” “illegal aliens,” or “patriotism.” People went where they wanted to go, if they had the money that is, and if they weren’t slaves. Their identities were NOT centered on their nationality. More likely, they would be centered on their religion, their race, and who their ancestors were. Owning land or not was also a huge factor. So, these appparently destructive female ideas that the author speaks of, such as being sympathetic to immigrants, had absolutely so bearing at all on society for a long time, because those concepts didn’t even exist. And yet, somehow, humanity continued to flourish and evolve, with people traveling around all over and having no real sense of national identity or patriotism. How can the author reconcile these facts with his beliefs?
    A second thing I find fault with is how the author just off-handedly assumes that men everywhere, since the beginning of history, all played a role in creating and developing civilizations. This simply is not true. It’s fallacious to believe that every man had the ability and the voice in whatever time he was living in to be able to create and shape civilization. I’ll use an example to explain. Feudalism was a firm of “government” and a way to structure civilization for many centuries in medieval Europe. It has also existed in many places at many different times outside of Europe as well. In Feudalsim, there is not a president and a representative government as we k ow today. There was not even a king. Instesd, a small group of very rich elites held all of the land in a certain area, controlled all of the means of production, and received all the food surpluses. These nobles could be men or women. 99% of people were not nobles, but we’re instead serfs of peasants. This includes 99% of men. Serfs had absolutely no power whatsoever. They had no freedom of choice. A man in this position would be unable to look after himself, as the author claims that men always do. The system would not allow it. Instead, the man would toil every day for his particular noble in the fields. All of the food he produced would go to the noble. He would receive no money. His house was built on the noble’s land, he did not own it. The very fields that he rolled were not owned by him. All of the land belonged to the noble. The peasant simply worked for them. A peasant was unable to marry into a higher social class. This was the same for men and women. So, if you were a man for a staggeringly long amount of history, you simply would NOT have been able to build anything. You would not have been able to even look after yourself independently. Society was not built by a bunch of working-class heroes all working together and being stoic. It was built by a small minority of elites, men and women, who engineered it to benefit them and only them. With this in mind, how can the author reconcile his beliefs of every man being a builder of civilization, while women simply sat around and did nothing? I look forward to a reply.

    1. Dean,
       “Their identities were NOT centered on their nationality.”
       Never heard of ‘Rome’ or ‘Roman Citizen’ then?

27. 1. i saw that video myself.
       it is very insightful.
       not surprised the
       usual trolls downvoted
       you for spreading truth

28. The past week has been a perfect example.
    On one side we have abstract and logical arguments in favor of borders and the rule of law; how such concepts underpin our liberty and make our civilization possible. The hard headed understanding that the law must apply equally and we cannot pick and choose.
    On the other side we have chilidsh emotional arguments based on a photo of a child crying (whose mother we now know is just an illegal alien) and a photo of a child in a cage (which we now know was faked). This prompted twitter campaigns and marches where women could be photographed waving signs (all made possible because of the safety and technology of the white man’s civilization even while women abuse these very luxuries to invite in foreign hordes to destroy us).
    And which side won out? The emotional one of course – and it always will while women are allowed to vote. With women voting, abstract concepts and logic will always lose out to emotion, virtue signalling and a refusal to deal with consequences.
    The crazy part is of course that the more women get the thigns they vote for the unhappier they become.

Comments are closed.