Recently, psychologist and lecturer Jordan Peterson received criticism from his detractors for using the term “enforced monogamy” in a NY Times interview. Feminists mischaracterized Peterson as advocating a form of domestic slavery in which hapless women are assigned to undesirable men. Peterson clarified that he meant the type of socially-enforced monogamy already in common practice, as understood by anthropologists and psychologists.
Dr. Jordan Peterson no doubt offending people with his common sense advice
I observe that, while monogamist social enforcement targets women, legal enforcement targets men as manifest in palimony and divorce laws favoring women. The financial and legal risks for a man of fathering a child out of wedlock or cheating on his spouse in a marriage discourage many aspiring womanizers (or at least give them pause).
Sluts, Whores and Johns in the sexual marketplace
The act of slut shaming — often perpetrated on women by other women — along with Christian religious mores curtailed female promiscuity in the modern Western world while female selectivity and palimony laws curtail male promiscuity. Slut walks and other feminist rhetoric work toward breaking social stigma toward female promiscuity, but do nothing to address the legal imbalance against men. Conversely, as women enjoy greater employment opportunities, the US legal system still treats them as the wards of men where palimony and alimony are concerned.
Without social stigma, with ubiquitous access to birth control, and with the legal system in their favor, women can pursue high volumes of casual sex that, while not consequence free, is certainly consequence mitigated. With their sexual needs easily met, social stigma around promiscuity removed and increased financial means to support themselves, fewer women have incentive to commit to monogamous relationships.
In the sexual marketplace, it’s a perpetual sellers’ market with women as the sellers and men as the buyers in the figurative if not always literal sense.
Vaginal futures trading in a bull market
A sexually frustrated man can resort to buying sex from prostitutes with some risk involved. Here, male sex shaming is most prominent. The Nordic Model prostitution laws in some countries, and their de facto enforcement in some US states, penalize the sex buyer rather than the sex seller. Pro-prostitution feminists employ their own brand of double think rhetoric that depicts first world prostitutes as empowered women exercising their own agency whilst also calling them victims of patriarchy. In contrast, prostitutes’ male clients are uniformly depicted in the media and popular culture as pathetic and dangerous sex criminals.
Legal prostitution: panacea or nostrum for frustrated men?
Podcaster and columnist Dan Savage — whom I generally disagree with — posits that legalization and removing the stigma against both sex sellers and sex buyers would solve the incel violence problem while caveating that sex workers shouldn’t be “human shields” against male rage (Real Time with Bill Maher s16e16).
I think he’s partially right that legalizing prostitution and removing the stigma against sex buyers can be a palliative for some men who can’t get laid, but argue that it fails to solve the underlying issue of male self-worth. Further, the potential for negative transactions with prostitutes (a demographic not renowned for their honesty or sincerity) can exacerbate a frustrated man’s misogyny.
Emotional Currency and Labor of Responsibility
Another question in the enforced monogamy debate centers around why single men are more likely than married men to run afoul of the law or become violent. While many pundits focus on the sex factor, the legions of incarcerated men who have fathered children or were otherwise successful with women belie that causality. I believe it’s the responsibility inherent to marriage, rather than merely consistent access to sex, that dissuades men from bad behavior.
Moments like this make putting up with bullshit at work all day seem worth it
What causes single men with no prospects to act out is the nihilism and depression that comes of feeling unnecessary. I consider monogamy to generate a form of emotional currency comprised of men feeling needed as providers and respected as husbands and fathers. Women exchange emotional capital in return for male labor of responsibility (protecting and providing).
Emotional capital is particularly valuable in a technologically advanced society; as Karl Marx once said: “The production of too many useful things results in too many useless people.” As labor becomes more expendable, a person’s self worth derives more from personal relationships than from professional accomplishments.
In Islamic Cultures: Enforced Polygyny
Under Sharia law, Islamic societies employ a form of enforced polygyny where the high status men get the lion’s share of often very young women (up to four wives each). Sharia law allows for the fact that not all men will reproduce and attempts to solve it by covering up women to remove sexual desire in low status males.
They augment this custom with a draconian criminal justice system that includes beheadings and dismemberment to keep low status males in check (many then channel that frustration into sectarian violence). It’s no coincidence that, according to Islam, the divine reward for death during jihad involves a man receiving 72 virgins in paradise.
What low status men get to fantasize about in an islamist dystopia
Were a secular society to adopt a polygamous culture without Sharia-like enforcements, the skewed sexual marketplace would naturally gravitate toward polygyny, leaving a large enough swath of the young male demographic emotionally disenfranchised and prone to crime.
Conclusion
While women aren’t the curators of male behavior, the breakdown of the monogamous family unit robs many low status men of a purpose. As lack of purpose can lead to bad behavior, then unsuccessful men will become more criminal. At a certain point societies that don’t socially enforce monogamy will break down in favor of societies that do. The ugly alternative once a culture crosses that rubicon would be an oppressive society similar to fundamentalist Islam, which controls low status men by denying them even visual access to women.
Read Next: The Sexual Marketplace Is Hard But Not Impossible
Informal social expectations worked pretty well for ages. Then during the mid-1960s, all that started going away. Putting the genie back in the bottle won’t be too easy.
No, the key is to give up on marriage and family, and pay for Punani.
I just had a supple Chinese woman tonight give me a fire and ice beejay, while you idiots are on here discussing forced manogomy with these western hambeasts.
That would be a bigger punishment for the men.
Hambeasts. Excellent.
Any tips on where to find hookers safely and affordable (100-150$)? Ever since backpage got shut down I’ve had a hard time finding some regular ladies.
RubMaps – can confirm, used one of the parlors last week
I’m not for prostitutes. However, if you look at how much Slash from Guns and Roses had to pay his ex; men are always paying for sex.
Now that women can work, we need to truly support them! And by support, I mean them paying their own damn consequences, and destroying the institution of marriage itself.
Then, when they beg for it, deny the.
Enact pro-woman draft policy for giggles. Prosecute female abusers, and enforce visitation rights! Sure, they’ll scream. However, they have to realize the game is over. Men are winning.
And they foolishly bought into feminist boilerplate. And that ironclad plate will keep them hemmed into their own brand of human male hell. It’s called the dead end cubicle job.
They have no idea how great their grand mother’s had it. And when they figure it out, the commenter above’s genie will be male. And he, unlike poisonous Disney fairy tales, is like the Muslim variety. He ain’t going back in. Just like the descendants of his makers won’t ever leave Europe except by force!
Good luck with that ladies! “WE SUPPORT YOU!” Muahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
I submit that it didn’t go away.
It was deliberately destroyed by a radical leftist political movement with multiple wings meant to destroy various and important cultural institutions in Western civilization.
Feminism, of course, is the wing that targeted women. Many of the pioneers of feminism (Dworkin, Friedan, Steinem, etc) have (((something))) very specific in common with each other. You’ll also find that many of the leaders and notable members of the political wing of said leftist movement ALSO shared (((something))) in common.
This article is close, but still off track.
The key isn’t monogamy. It is marriage, as defined by the Bible (normally monogamous, though polygamy is also lawful). God knows best, and His Law is best.
Socially enforced marriage would be a huge step in the right direction.
If you are one of those who thinks the Bible forbids polygamy, then I recommend you actually read the Bible. 2nd Samuel chapter 12 is a great place to start. God was fine with David having more than one wife (God even explicitly said that He gave David multiple wives and would have been happy to give him more). David’s polygamy was no sin, but David violating Bathsheeba (another man’s wife) was a horrible abomination in God’s sight.
The Bible never prohibits polygamy. It never calls it immoral, impure, unclean, or anything of the sort (like it does with homosexuality and adultery). To the contrary the Bible calls polygamous marriages “MARRIAGE”. Many righteous men (Abraham, Jacob, Moses, Gideon, Josiah, David, and many more) had multiple wives (while they were in some cases actually writing the Bible). They didn’t think it was wrong, and God never rebuked them for it.
Yes, your Sunday School teacher, pastor, mom, dad, and grandmother are misinformed as regards this issue. 😊
Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, and Deuteronomy pretty well explain the Biblical Law of marriage (which the Apostle Paul affirms in the New Testament).
I do think that polygamy would be rare in a properly functioning Christian society. Most women have a strong aversion to sharing their husband. This aversion provides a strong counterbalance to hypergamy.
I’d guess that 80% of men would be in monogamous marriages, while the top ten percent would have more than one wife, and the bottom ten percent of slackers would keep jacking off in their mom’s basement.
The possibility of polygamy would help keep wives on their toes. They would know that depriving their Christian husband of sex might lead him to take a second wife. It would also help motivate men to pursue excellence, knowing that doing so might enable them to gain an additional wife.
Spot on! I’m glad someone finally noticed this. Western society didn’t really start embracing monogamy until the Romans made it the de facto marriage standard. The Romans were experts at training soldiers and building cities, but they certainly weren’t relationship gurus. Monogamy (along with the banning of prostitution) puts women on a pedestal. Polygamy complements a man’s naturally high sex drive while at the same time complementing a woman’s need to compete with other women for a man’s affection. Men would no longer have an incentive to have affairs, and women would a) have other women to help them with household tasks and keep them company and b) would have enough low-level “dread game” in action to keep them in shape and looking good in order to outdo the other wives. Divorce would probably become a rarity. We need to remember this simple truth: if God has placed His seal of approval on something, it has to be good.
Polygamy is only allowed in the old Testament, nowhere will you find it in the New Testament. In fact the bible states that church elders are to be husbands of ONE wife in 1 Timothy 3:2, 12 and Titus 1:6 . Western Civilization was build on monogamy, not on polygamy. Going back to Adam and Eve you can see, Gods original intent was monogamy, or else He had given Adam multiple wifes.
“cultural institutions in Western civilization.”
!!??
Islam is doing quite well in the world and certainly doesn’t enforce monogamy.
More nonsense from you, marriage is strongly recommend in islam, ,monogamy is expected and non-married men are shamed , polygamy is less common.
Not my fault you don’t know the definition of monogamy. (the practice or state of being married to one person at a time).
Marriage is “strongly” recommend is islam !??
Now, that’s quite obvious & nothing to do with respecting MEN and/or Patriarchy! islam (and “another” religion) always wanted to fill this entire Planet with muslims (same with the “another” religion !!). That is the reason they force marriage & advocate popping out in the name of “GOD is giving & we are popping out” !!
Shame single MEN & allow more than one family; Good tactic to propagate their “religion”, isn’t it !!
Islam treats single males like jackals. In the Middle East theyre banned from public family areas.
Totally off-topic, but just learned of this, and gotta share. This guy gets it.
What do you guys think the the ramifications of getting caught purchasing sex in the US would be in terms of ones career. I’m aware it’s only a misdemeanor. I’ve seen upward to 100 prositutes in the past year and have not ever once come close to running into Law Enforcement.
I don’t care about the stigma. Or being labled a loser who pays for it or criminal yada yada yada…. I just want access to my job, work and income so I can afford rent, food and more escorts.
Check out a “sugar daddy” website. My good friend is quite successful meeting girls on such a website. He banged a chick who was 21 yesterday and probably gave her $200.00. If you took a date out into the city, you might spend four times that amount before you actually got to bang her. This type of activity would never attract the attention of the vice squad. They are concerned with human sex trafficking.
Seeking Arrangement? I have a profile and lurk there. Got lots of biddies hitting me up and liking me but i can’t respond back as I’ve chosen, for the time being, not to pay $60 a month for the premium account.
I usually pay anywhere from 120-350 and that grants me access to model teir women.
Women don’t want enforced monogamy cause they don’t wanna commit to mediocre guys.
How can men solve this problem?
Peterson says that boys should start acting more mature so that women will agree committing to them.
So what’s the mature response?
Well, if all boys get their shit together then there’ll be too many good men for the small number of good women out there, most of the bitches nowadays are undesirable sluts. What to do?
There was only one answer for as long as humanity existed, no matter how much Peterson & his ilk try to come up with new solutions they’ll never work.
Solution: u enforce patriarchy, u take women rights away & u beat them when they get out if line.
& fuck Jordan Peterson!
So an Iranian revolution then.
This idea of civilization being beta is such a dumb fuck notion.
Our decaying civilization is beta, no shit.
But a maturing civilization produces a level of masculinity unmatched by any of today’s alpha pseudo-males.
There are many examples, but take a look at the Spanish Reconquista era. It produced men of a martial prowess who could drive hordes of Muslims off the Iberian peninsula and then go on to completely conquer the Mesoamerican and South American civilizations. Sometimes only a few hundred Spaniards at a time, like Cortes vs the Aztecs.
No weak-minded hedonistic man of Western consumer “culture” is in any position to call that beta.
Just take a look at Chechen youths getting together for street workouts; endless pull ups, planches, levers etc. Bet no one here can do that. That is the power of masculine association. That is civilization.
It’s vulture-like self-gratification that is beta here.
It leads straight into the jungle.
You will be alone, weak, and hunted like a feral dog.
Coz cooperation was too “beta”.
Not true. Technological innovation let us rule the world, the savages had no chance.
See now how they have guns and bombs, a fuck us up regularly if we aren’t careful.
Ironically, technological innovation is what got us into this mess, since technology in a woman’s hands unrelated to cleaning, cooking, or childcare is a pending disaster.
Not all technology is good, not all technology is bad.
A country which doesn’t develop its tech prowess(militarily especially) is vulnerable to outside forces.
But a country which forces its people to leave in smart cities is also vulnerable. Cause if someone shuts down the power grid the majority of the population will end up dead, but that’s probably the plan of the globalists. Not to mention its citizens will turn into soyboy worker drones.
“Technological innovation let us rule the world”
You are by no means ruling the “world”, my dear stank !! ALL (99.99%) of the Technological advances and Materialistic comforts are Invented, Innovated & Pioneered by MEN (color doesn’t matter !!). You skanks are simply enjoying & basking on the efforts & hard work of MEN.
So don’t just brag about what you are doing! You are merely using ehat the MEN made “available” to you !! Be grateful & thankful to MEN, my dear skank !!
PS:
James Marion Sims, Father of GYNECOLOGY !!
Well you need a challenge greater than a man in order for us to prove that we’re on top of the pecking order.
But exploration have died down and with it human curiosity. Nowadays curiosity comes down to silly gossip, and desensitization of the human spirit. Not about world building.
Yeah but why would I do workouts and tradcon Chechen shit when even some Asian incel could now kill them all from his basement with drones…
Jordan Peterson is a controlled opposition and the latest incident proves it again.
No it’s not. U may have prostitutes, u may have friends with benefits, u may have one night stands hell u may even have sex slaves but sex doesn’t substitude for emotions and love. No matter how u force some slut to be with u in the end she actually doesn’t care about u. U might be a medieval lord with arranged marriage but that doesn’t mean she will love u. The wahman either cares about u or she does not. Even if we distribute each wahman to be with a given man that doesn’t prevent them from wanting something else and as long as ur partner wants something else in life u are fuked that’s it.
Why are you afraid of the word “you”?
Psst, I have the fantasy that I am actually in the body of a 16yrs old girl, that’s why.
Do u know why women don’t care about most men?
Is because they perceive themselves of higher status?
Do u know why they perceive themselves as such?
Cause there are more women out there with degrees than men are. More women work in office jobs than men do. Hypergamy stops women from “falling in love”.
Will this problem arise once men strip their rights away & they’ll instantly find themselves at the bottom of society.
Answer: no.
Traditionalism always worked, it always will.
That was a surprisingly insightful article, coming from a pill-less comedian in the suburbs. Human behavior and the harnessing of male energy, and the social constructions that result, is a source of unceasing curiosity. Men with little chance at the high-value targets provided by female attention are disposed to rage against their lot, stabbing at shadows and flailing helplessly as a wing man – vicarious satisfaction is better than none, I suppose, and yes there is a pun buried in there. Some men might be able to contain, diffuse, or divert that into proxy acts or occupations but there is always that fleck in the eye reminding them of what they aren’t and what he is.
Jealousy and anger are stoked and have been the source of countless confrontations since we all swung from tree limbs.
Responsibility inherent in marriage, as nicely put by Morgan, is a reward of sorts by giving men a purpose beyond violence; harnessing energy away from predation and into nurturing is one saving grace of a family. But there is a price: females expect sole possession of the power they have harnessed or their jealous and anger temperaments are uncovered and, well, we all know what happens then. So monogamy is enforced, by implication and by expression.
Removing temptation by hiding women under tarps, and damning anyone with impure thoughts to hell (masturbation is a sin?) are versions of camouflage and guilt. Neither are very effective against a scheming enemy. Sex with alternate lovers is a desire men can temporarily dismiss but cannot deny, so the unanswerable problem is what to do about it? I do not have an answer that satisfies more than one party to the contract. Maybe a sophisticated and civilized man can be satisfied with his birth status and value, but I suspect most of us will always want to improve. And by improving we also hope to get that hot chick’s top off. Married or not, young or old, fit or ill. We might not do anything about it, but desire does not die with satisfaction it only goes to sleep.
In Islamic culture, any man can marry up to 4 women. It’s not exclusive to high status men. The thing is that by marrying 4 women, you’ll be having 4 families at the same time. If you can support 4 families at the same time, then go a head and marry 4.
If you can afford four families then you are very much high status !!!
I think its a fair rule in any case.
Sluts gonna keep on slutting as long as guys keep validating their egos with dick. Guys gonna dick anything as long sluts keep slutting. The viscous circle.
*vicious
Lmao it works both ways Frank
A good start would be prohibiting social media sites and apps that give women too much bargaining power and a wide unmerited choice of men (tinder, instagram, facebook, etc).
Enforced Monogamy will promptly decay into
“Men are banned from having more than one
female in life and must be chaste” ; while the
womynz will be encouraged and expected to
explore their bodies and their “womanhood”
**But Tyrone and Rodrigo will be exempted
It’s either White Sharia or Brown Sharia.
White women do not care.
But I bet you do.
Make your choice, cucks.
Western society has become enforced cuckoldry. Ever since women got the vote, we are moving away from men taking care of their own children and toward taxpayers paying for all children.
“What causes single men with no prospects to act out is the nihilism and depression that comes of feeling unnecessary. I consider monogamy to generate a form of emotional currency comprised of men feeling needed as providers and respected as husbands and fathers. Women exchange emotional capital in return for male labor of responsibility (protecting and providing).”
This is one of the most intelligent statements I’ve ever read on this website. Overall great article. Bravo and thank you.
These autistic hair-splitting fedora theories are not necessary when you realize that women voluntarily give themselves up to powerful collectives of men.
That is power and that is what women submit to.
Male cooperation–the source of patriarchy and monogamy.
More powerful than anything a lone wolf “self-made” individual can match.
If you doubt this then just take a look at Europe where powerful collectives of Muslims–driven by male solidarity–are dominating the place, redefining the culture, and gaining the support of European women.
While European loner cuckold “men” are too dumb to even realize what’s going on.
If you want strength, you need to cooperate.
Competition is divisive and makes sitting cucks of us all.
That is exactly correct.
I actually believe the root of the problem is caring too much about women. In the past, men saw women as bonuses to bigger things, like conquest and innovation. Now we have “feelings”, and “emotional need”, something Vikings and islamists never wrote about.
Also, why blow yourself up for 72 virgins, who will get fat and nag you for all eternity anyway? Wake the Fuck up islam
RazorSpark, you hit the nail on the head. Just came off the phone from a libertarian group, the ‘leader’ was bashing nationalists and ‘alt righters’ wtf… The man is complicit in the civilizational rot we are currently experiencing. Libertarians don’t understand that soon we won’t have our private property rights if we don’t stick together as a group and drive out the rotting left.
Libertarians are too monomaniacal to realize that the fundamental concepts of libertarianism can only work in a homogeneous white society. Try selling some Hutu on the non-aggression principal or the rule of law. They’ll laugh in your face and take your wallet.
Exactly spot on!
“a form of domestic slavery in which hapless women are assigned to undesirable MEN.”
Fuckin ungrateful pussies! The correct phrase is below, cunts!
“a form of domestic, financial, emotional and legal slavery in which hapless & unfortunate MEN are assigned to undesirable putrefied pussies” !!
Now, go ahead with your “down voting” spree, you fuckin ungrateful pussies (and manginas, faggots, troll…) !!
You are a funny guy Ravi. Glad to have you around. Keep driving out the muslims out of India, god knows it needs to be done.
In THEORY LEGALIZED PROSTITUTION sounds like a good idea where it might Balance out the Sexual Marketplace. But this past year has made me think twice about that. I recently joined POF. Even though I know its the SEWER of Online dating I was AMAZED at how many women are Openly selling their bodies on there with NO SHAME!! I remember back in the day a Woman would hide the fact that she was elling her body on the side. Now its NO SHAME & OUT IN THE OPEN! I would say probably like 40% of the website is now just hookers & Another 30% are Trannies… The remaining percent is fatties & the ONLY half way attractive Women are the ones Ive seen since LAST TIME I WAS A MEMBER Over 7 YEARS AGO!! The point is Women need Shaming!! If there is No Shame tactics to a Woman being a Whore then ALL WOMEN will Engage if they make it out to be some Female Empowerment Move. It WONT be a scenario where Normal Regular girls will try to be More decent since Now they have to compete with Hookers selling the Vajayjay for $50. They will just become prostitutes themselves & Every Interaction with a Woman will be a Hooker John scenarion… NOT GOOD!! I blame ALOT of this on RAP Music… If U ever hear the lyrics of some of the Female Rappers such as Niki Minag or Cardi B they are latantly talking About selling their bodies like its NORMAL. & since Women are HERD ANIMALS as long as its Normalized Women will do it!!
You know how women become whores? It’s when they aren’t held to a higher standards by their parents (ie character development falls to the wayside in the parenting department) so they succumb to peer pressure more easily, are treated like shit and/or are abandoned by their parents, or are sexually brutalized in some way in their childhood so they seek to normalize it by continuing the lifestyle “of their own choice” (giving them a false sense of control), or a combination of any or all of the above. That’s how women become whores.
Shaming women is a ineffective band-aid solution to the root of the problem. The real solution is to parent your daughters. The real solution starts with you.
Very interesting article. The only point that I’d like to argue is that single men are more prone to violence or criminality because of a) lack of access to sex or b) missing out on the socialization that comes with marriage. While those two factors should be considered, I think we’re making a mistake by putting the cart before the horse here. In other words, it’s not that NOT getting married or getting regular poon is making men act out, but instead it’s that a man so fucked up and dysfunctional that he’d consider shooting up a theater or school will almost certainly not be able to maintain a relationship with a woman.
It is true that women are dumber and more foolish than men on average, but they can still smell crazy and most of them want nothing to do with it. I’m not talking the sexy ‘bad boy’ dark triad type, I mean a legitimately crazy “I-stink-of-BO-and-live-in-mom’s-basement” type. These kinds of guys (and their female equivalent) are frustrated on any number of levels and they always act out in an attempt to compensate.
Makes sense to me.
Fatherlessness.
Up to 4 wives sounds more like punishment than reward.
Its 0-4 wives and as many slave women as you desire. If you get the slave woman pregnant, you cant just sell her on. She gets a promotion in rights as she is carrying your child. Historically, all slave-women were eventually emancipated and married by their owners, or worked themselves free (all slaves can work themselves free after a period of time).
The entire section on Islam is total horseshit and a figment of the authors mind. The article author should at least educate people instead of misinforming them even if you detest the other side, else keep silent.
Simply put? Yes. Yes it is. Women with too many options choose none.
Black pigeon speaks did it better. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN1GwOLgjVs&t=1s
I’ve been reading ROK for a while and I’m becoming disillusioned with a lot of the bullshit being discussed here. I see legimimate self-improvement articles and intersting goverment control awareness articles here and there, sure. But a lot of the articles as of late and even throughout ROK’s timeline have been articles bitching and moaning about how modern women are this and that. I’m starting to think a lot of you guys now are just mad that women nowadays have the freedom to fuck who they wanna fuck, and a lot of you dudes aren’t the ones these hoes are choosing to let bang them. A lot of you whiners talk a big game about Christian values then talk about(supposedly) banging sluts and hookers or about how Americunts aren’t worth it. Life isn’t that bad. There’s 300 million people in America and at least 2/5’s have to be women. You’re telling me no one here can find a good woman in this country when you have 60,000+(most likely an understatement) women to choose from? Man I’d like to see what most of you commenters look like. It’ll probably explain why many of you suckers feel the way you do. And no, I’m not an SJW, feminist/sympathyzer, soyboy, beta(my favorite manosphere term) or whatever terms you guys resort to calling anyone who disagrees.
“You’re telling me no one here can find a good woman in this country”
No, we’re telling you nobody can find a good woman in this country without a 50% risk of divorce rape at some time in the future. You want to bet everything you own or will earn in the next 20 years on a 50/50 bet, go right ahead.
Even if you try to jew yourself out of that fraud by not marrying ur thot, there is still a thing considered de facto. And she gets to take half ur shit anyway.
You are correct. These ROK losers first found solace in sexpatting, but they aren’t even successful at that, so now they turn tradcon, hoping to get at least 1 wife out of that… lol
There are a decent percentage of posters (~30%) who are basically the male equivalent of feminists. So just like with real feminists, you have to take their opinions with a grain of salt. Most feminists don’t so much like women as much as they hate men. So they spend an inordinate amount of time running men down and taking their 2 or 3 bad experiences with them and projecting that onto the population of half of the planet. You see guys do that here, too.
I get it though. I went through a pretty dark phase in my late teens / early twenties. I got destroyed emotionally by a couple of women and realized that all the BS my dad had fed me over the years about women was just that – BS. It was a tough pill to swallow.
But over time I’ve come to accept that women are what they are. They have good qualities and there are some decent ones out there. But they are fickle and vapid and disloyal and materialistic. So if you want to be with them then you HAVE to learn to take the good with the bad. Also you need to make yourself into something worthwhile if you want to attract a decent woman, just like they have to do if they want to attract a decent man. It’s not rocket science.
Johnny Chiefs: Give this man a fucking cigar! Bravo, brother.
This guy is tracking.
I dont understand this obsession with ‘muh, family values”. Are you guys really ready to spend 30 years with the same cumdumpster?? Sounds like a joke to me.
“prone to crime”
Because of lack of sex?, no, because they are unstable already, if anything they would be revealing themselves as they really are, which is good.
Enforced monogamy is something cucks would want, as well as prostitution.
Please God, all you have to do is destroy the planet and everyone on it. No more people, no more strife. Brand new planet, problem solved. We forgot that first we’re primarily spiritual beings having a human experience; spirit first, human second. We worship ourselves too much. We failed the test. Just destroy earth, the rest will take care of itself. Humans turned the planet into a cesspooling shithole. Time to start anew.
Or just watch as humans destroy the planet all by themselves. No need for any interference from anyone’s “god”. Everyone is an asshole, they just haven’t realized it yet.
like Rambo we have come full circle if the west is to be saved women must be subjugated and sadly physically restrained maybe in extreme circumstances hurt judo-christian values must be reapplied to save the west women must learn their place women should serve men as men serve the lord
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce_in_the_United_States#21st_century The divorce rate among highly educated couples is 11%, while the divorce rate for lower income couples is 17%.[15]
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/02/upshot/the-divorce-surge-is-over-but-the-myth-lives-on.html
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-divorce/rise-in-divorce-in-iran-linked-to-shift-in-status-of-women-idUSKCN0IB0GQ20141022 2014
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-3158119/Iran-changes-law-make-divorce-harder.html 2015
https://financialtribune.com/articles/people/69938/marriage-divorce-rates-up-in-tehran-province 2017 “According to the report, the marriage to divorce ratio was around 2.2 in 2016. According to official figures about 38% of all divorces happen in couples between the ages 25 to 29 and only 11% have the chance to celebrate their 20th wedding anniversary.”
If you would kindly stop spreading misinformation about everybody getting divorce in western world and nobody getting divorce in muslim world, thank you.
I hate to defend anglocunts but imagine you were a 5 out of ten, were overweight and didn’t have any particular talent in life.. but you could bang 7s 8s and even 9s every day of the week while putting in no effort.. for 10 to 15 years…
to be honest I couldn’t give a fuck if I hit the wall after that.. that’s a lot of years of living the dream