We red-pillers all know that androgyny is a vice often confused as a virtue. People from all ideological sects have written at length about what masculinity is, but what is femininity?
It’s worth mentioning what femininity is not. When looking for a wife or girlfriend (or just a bang-buddy you won’t hate to be around), some tomboyishness isn’t a disqualifier. That’s on a spectrum, and a girl who enjoys playing basketball isn’t necessarily androgynous. Nor do we want a complete ditz valley girl or a codependent basket case. After all, addiction to the iPhone is certainly a womanly trait, and none of us want that in a partner.
If we are to grant a little over-simplification, masculinity is about power and femininity is about beauty in the broadest sense of those descriptions. Ultimately, to be feminine, a woman must be in touch with her femininity (If that is not too much of a tautology to say). She must be willing to embrace it. And that femininity must involve docility.
Real Men, Real Women
I like the word “docility” to describe femininity. It’s laden with much more meaning than “submission.” On the surface it has the same meaning, but it’s missing the negative connotation the modernists have given it. “Docile” is from the Latin word for “to teach,” which frames it even better within proper relationships between the sexes.
A feminine woman is a woman who is teachable. And what woman is not attracted to a man who can do everything she can better, a man who is greater than her? She wants someone to admire and aspire to. She wants someone to teach her things. In short, she wants to be docile.
You’ll notice in our society, everybody has a different definition of a “real man.” People claim being a real man involves hunting, growing a beard, chivalry, or expressing your emotions. Everyone may disagree over what the exact definition of a “real man” is, but most males strive for some ideal. Note the phenomenon among millennials who play dress-up masculinity by bringing back old trends like the straight razor or fedora.
However, people do not have a notion of a “real woman,” at least in today’s society. So if masculinity looks like [x], what does femininity look like? We’ve eradicated that notion. If a woman can cook well, we believe it is merely a useful skill, not an expression of her sexuality. And even then, what good is a woman who maintains a home if she is unbearable to be around? Domesticity is worthless without docility.
Not masculine. Now with bonus mason jar.
Why is there an ever-present war between the sexes? That doesn’t seem healthy for anyone. Men and women should strive for symphony, instead of always one-upping each other for the mere bragging rights of it all. Men continue to try offering an olive branch, but women gloat incessantly at every slight way they excel beyond men, such as how they graduate more often from the baby-sitting service known as American universities. In one breath, they’ll claim that taking care of small children isn’t part of being a woman, and in the next they’ll claim men are all dunces about it.
Nor can you have two people agreeing on every decision. That just sounds miserable. Eventually the man will give a compromise just to appease the woman, and he will resent her for it. Meanwhile, she’ll resent him for his half-heartedness.
Compound that on a regular basis over several years, and suddenly everyone is terrified of marriage. Nobody is ever truly happy in a compromise. You need one to make the decisions, a man the woman trusts to look out for her best interests. And it must be the man, because no woman respects a man who never gets his way.
Taking Accountability
I’ll preface that I’m about to quote the Bible at length to tell a story. I think I’ve ragged on Christianity enough that the regular reader will understand I’m not trying to convince him to become a Christian. However, remember that part of the purpose of religion is to keep people from coloring outside the lines. If one can view the Biblical narrative as a myth in the classical sense, then passages like below will fit in well with our purposes.
1 Peter 3:1-6 has a very effective picture of femininity. It’s good general advice regardless of one’s worldview.
1 Likewise, wives, be subject to your own husbands, so that even if some do not obey the word, they may be won without a word by the conduct of their wives, 2 when they see your respectful and pure conduct. 3 Do not let your adorning be external—the braiding of hair and the putting on of gold jewelry, or the clothing you wear— 4 but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which in God’s sight is very precious. 5 For this is how the holy women who hoped in God used to adorn themselves, by submitting to their own husbands, 6 as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord. And you are her children, if you do good and do not fear anything that is frightening. [ESV]
A few months back, I showed it over Facebook chat to a friend of mine who was unhappy with her new marriage to an alcoholic video game addict. (Women suck at choosing partners, amiright? Unarranged marriages…) She is non-religious but vaguely spiritual. We’ll call her Florence.
I explained to Florence in brief about what female submission looks like, in that it’s not a coercion but a desire to seek the best for those around her. I told her that if he’s being less than all he should be, she should focus even more on being all she can be, and that will pull him up in a roundabout way. But if she is constantly criticizing him, then he’ll just become resentful and withdrawn.
Did Florence get angry at my suggestion that she should hold herself accountable to the success of her marriage or that she should make an effort to bring others happiness? That seems to be the common pattern one finds on those awful feminist websites.
No, the exact opposite happened. She thanked me enthusiastically and said it was a beautiful passage. A week later she messaged me again to express her gratitude. Apparently Florence doesn’t want the modern empowerment that society has fed her, and she is not alone.
Wired For Submission
So we see that—especially evidenced by the steamroller success of 50 Shades of Grey—that women want to be dominated. And this makes sense. Docility wouldn’t be expected of women in every human society ever if women did not have an innate desire for it. Men would not brag about their ability to control a woman, to conquer her will, if women did not naturally settle into submission.
Women are like Pokemon—they are designed to flourish most when taking orders from the ones they love. And like with Pokemon, the order-giver must prove his worthiness to the order-taker before wholehearted obedience is yielded.
Women show love through their femininity, and men show it through their masculinity. No man wants a slave for a wife, because a slave does not love. Love is a choice. It takes all your will to give up your will. And by giving up your “want” and focusing on your “should” (i.e. your role as a man or woman), it shows that you are willing to be selfless for another person. Marriage is about interdependence, not independence.
Recall The Taming Of The Shrew, in which both the metric of men’s marital success and the metric of women’s marital happiness is determined by the woman’s willingness to submit herself to her husband’s will. Even though I may not agree with them, it’s worth here defending Petruchio’s extreme measures, as Katharina would have been miserable on her wedding day no matter what he did and that Petruchio did not actually harm her through the brief starvation.
Katharina’s closing monologue is absolutely beautiful both in its aesthetics and its moralism. 20th century critics have tried to write the whole play off as satire, and both the the 1929 and 1967 movies made it appear in the final scene as though Katharina was merely faking adoration to appease the powers that be.
But the speech is clearly the thesis of the whole work, and if it were satire or posturing, there is never any shadow of it anywhere within the play. To abruptly shoehorn a modern moral into the end disrupts the natural flow of the play. Ethnocentrism is the hallmark of the liberal. The University of Alaska at Anchorage, however, has a fantastic red pill rendering of the play on Youtube that is one of the most endearing Shakespeare performances I have ever seen, far better than any Hollywood Shakespeare.
Perhaps ironically, the monologue fits perfectly in today’s society, even better than in Shakespeare’s society. One would think Katharina was directly talking to 21st century women. Let the below be a lesson to all women in miserable marriages.
Fie, fie! unknit that threatening unkind brow,
And dart not scornful glances from those eyes,
To wound thy lord, thy king, thy governor:
It blots thy beauty as frosts do bite the meads,
Confounds thy fame as whirlwinds shake fair buds,
And in no sense is meet or amiable.
A woman moved is like a fountain troubled,
Muddy, ill-seeming, thick, bereft of beauty;
And while it is so, none so dry or thirsty
Will deign to sip or touch one drop of it.
Thy husband is thy lord, thy life, thy keeper,
Thy head, thy sovereign; one that cares for thee,
And for thy maintenance commits his body
To painful labour both by sea and land,
To watch the night in storms, the day in cold,
Whilst thou liest warm at home, secure and safe;
And craves no other tribute at thy hands
But love, fair looks and true obedience;
Too little payment for so great a debt.
Such duty as the subject owes the prince
Even such a woman oweth to her husband;
And when she is froward, peevish, sullen, sour,
And not obedient to his honest will,
What is she but a foul contending rebel
And graceless traitor to her loving lord?
I am ashamed that women are so simple
To offer war where they should kneel for peace;
Or seek for rule, supremacy and sway,
When they are bound to serve, love and obey.
Why are our bodies soft and weak and smooth,
Unapt to toil and trouble in the world,
But that our soft conditions and our hearts
Should well agree with our external parts?
Come, come, you froward and unable worms!
My mind hath been as big as one of yours,
My heart as great, my reason haply more,
To bandy word for word and frown for frown;
But now I see our lances are but straws,
Our strength as weak, our weakness past compare,
That seeming to be most which we indeed least are.
Then vail your stomachs, for it is no boot,
And place your hands below your husband’s foot:
In token of which duty, if he please,
My hand is ready; may it do him ease.
Read More: Why Is Rebecca Sparrow Attacking Young Moms For Staying Slim And Pretty?
I’m waiting for the feminists.
Grr. Aargh.
….to die.
Mistral
… And never respawn.
Given how most of then look, I think that is a problem that will take care of itself!
Femininity is a lost treasure women simply can’t possess anymore. From a young age women are brainwashed with left-wing ideology in those feminazi public institutions.
It´s very sad to see that about half the people discussing this article act or think like good women do not exist anymore, or that ALL women are evil creatures.
This brings me to another biblical example… Remember when Jesus Christ resurrected and nobody believed the two apostles that saw him, it feels like this. Just because you haven´t seen or haven´t experienced it doesn´t mean it does not exist. Don´t just give up, good things are for the ones who are patient but wise. (Dont wife up the first slut that comes into your life.)
Maybe it´s the fact that I am not from the US, but man… I have experienced the patriarchy at its full extent.
My mom comes from a close-knit catholic family of 11 brothers and sisters. Her parents were married for 70 years until death set them apart.
My dad came from another close-knit catholic family of 10. His parents were married for 60 years until death set them apart.
My parents were married for 18 years until death took my dad.
It´s kind of hard to explain the relationship they had, because form me everything looked so perfect! My dad fulfilled his role to his full extent. Working his ass off in his own business. 7:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. !!
And my mother also understood her place at the house, by being a good mother and always providing parenting, food, and love.
But there is a funny fact, the best advice has come from my mother. Funny she is as red pill as it can get. You can hear from her things like. “Guys who marry single mothers are… dorks. So avoid them.” “A woman must keep herself virgin till marriage because if not a man will never take her seriously.” Things like these that keeps my standards high.
❧❧◔❧❧◔Make over 13k/M0NTH@af6:
Going Here you
Can Find Out,,,
►►► >>>https://WorkOnlineLink.biz/EarnS/Planes….
►►Make over 13k/M0NTH@af3:
Going Here you
Can Find Out,,,,,,
►►►► ::>>https://WorkOnlineNetwork.com/get/position…
god bless your mother!
What a nice pipe dream. Half of the cunts on facebook were whipped up in a self aggrandizing frenzy, frothing over this article attesting that 9 out of 10 Men want children while only 7 out of 10 women do. The number one reason cited for opting out of the procreation game – fear of losing autonomy: http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/03/when-men-want-kids-and-women-arent-so-sure.html
Docility is gone. Hamsters are doubling down on this shit. So apparently now they’ll condescend to being knocked up if we twist their arms, but only if we assume their role of servile homemaker. All of them now extolling the virtues of Men becoming SAHD, so they can continue on with their careers.Docility aint coming back unless its at the end of a fist on top of stripping these filthy pigs of the franchise of voting.
“Women show love through their femininity, and men show it through their masculinity. No man wants a slave for a wife, because a slave does not love. Love is a choice. It takes all your will to give up your will. And by giving up your “want” and focusing on your “should” (i.e. your role as a man or woman), it shows that you are willing to be selfless for another person. Marriage is about interdependence, not independence.”
Beautiful words.
Too bad I disagree with them vehemently.
EVERY man wants a slave for a wife, because a slave is property, something you own, possess, and care for. How can you love something that is not yours? How can you love someone if you do not maintain your own will? How can you love if you cannot be a true man, and prove that you are not just independent, but independent enough to support one or more others as your belongings?
Marriage is NOT about interdependence, It is about sharing your independence with someone else to ensure, what little you can have, of your immortality… It is the ultimate demonstration of your manliness to have, not only what you need, but surplus enough yo care for others.
Only a fool falls in love with what he cannot have… and if you cannot own your wife, you will never, ever have her. It is not beautiful, it is not honorable, it is not noble, it is simply showing that you are an idiot… sorta like ‘making love’ to a sheep with Gonorrhea.
In short, those poetically beautiful words have been cleverly and attractively gilded, frosted, and bedazzled, but you can still smell the faint whiff of manure at their core.
I don’ want a slave. I don’t want fake friends. I want those that give to me because they want to. Are there for me because it’s in their heart. I’d rather screw a blow up doll than a woman who is a slave to me, but if it’s in your heart baby service me in any and every way. Because you want to and need to, not because I have a gun to your head. If it’s not possible then fuck it. I go it alone
Not even women know what goes on in a woman’s heart. That’s why we disregard their ‘dating’ advice.
Best of luck though I’m sure you’ll manage it.
“I want those that give to me because they want to.” Isnt that the whole point of Christian Baptism too?
“That doesn’t seem healthy for anyone.”
It’s not supposed to be healthy for anyone, it’s healthy for everyone.
It’s not about you, it’s about the species.
You really think constant warfare between men and women is healthy for the species?
a constantly falling birthrate, record suicide rates, and a falling-apart civilization might disagree.
“You really think constant warfare between men and women is healthy for the species?”
It is what has worked for millions of years, in many species, not just humans. If I had a question about how things are done now, it would be, why have men abrogated their role in it? The problem is not the conflict, the problem is that the balance of power has gone all out of whack.
” . . . a constantly falling birthrate . . .”
The birthrate has rather obviously not been constantly falling. The species has nearly tripled itself within my lifetime and is still increasing its numbers.
” . . . a falling-apart civilization might disagree.”
The cockroaches have no civilization at all, but just try to get rid of the buggers.
Oh, I see, you consider third worlders with an iq of 60 that cannot figure out that eating with shit on your hands causes dysentry to be ‘part of your species’. Guess what? Those ‘expanding’ populations you are claiming as your own are worthless, and ironically they are much more ‘traditional’ than today’s fatass femnazis.
No, Women and men fighting are not normal. What is normal is men dominating women, and only a complete fucking moron would assume that men dealing with women with both hands and their dick tied behind their back is ‘normal’.
Men and women at war with each other is a wholly artificial construct that would not exist if it were not being constantly supported, strengthened, and used by a vicious little core of half men.
Let me guess, you are one of these cockroach people, aren’t you? I have no problems with debating with black dudes, but I HATE arguing with niggers. They are worse than women.
” . . . you consider third worlders with an iq of 60 that cannot figure out that
eating with shit on your hands causes dysentry to be ‘part of your
species’.”
Or at least closely related enough that not only is interbreeding possible, but the offspring will themselves be fertile.
” . . . ironically they are much more ‘traditional’ than today’s fatass femnazis.”
I fail to see the irony.
“Men and women at war with each other is a wholly artificial construct . . .” I
If men and women were at harmony with each other, St. Paul wouldn’t have had to give them any more instruction in it than he did on breathing.
” . . .if it were not being constantly supported, strengthened, and used by a vicious little core of half men.”
Vicious is the key word. Sometimes I go with “murderous little bastards.”
“Let me guess, you are one of these cockroach people, aren’t you?”
I am a Germanic wildcat. I eat cockroaches, although I prefer rabbit.
There’s a vast difference between ‘at harmony’ and ‘at war’. both presuppose equality. Equality has never existed, we are an unequal species.
Women are not supposed to be ‘at harmony’ with men, any more than men are ‘at harmony’ with pigs. Men control, women submit. That’s how it works, and only when men stop controlling does it stop working.
But only a fool calls it ‘balance of power’ or ‘harmony’. It is not… all the overt power is owned by the male, all the covert power is with the female. There’s nothing balanced about it, never has been.
“… all the overt power is owned by the male, all the covert power is with the female.”
Exactly.
The mistake is thinking they are somehow equal, or measurable.
They are not measurable absolutely, but they are certainly measurable relatively.
You can see it in any henpecked husband or beaten wife, in each case one has failed to provide a countervailing power against the other.
care for some milk to wash down that blue pill?
Both of those cases are MEN failing in control. Women have no power not granted by men.
” . . .all the covert power is with the female.”
What on earth do you think she applies it against?
Addendum:
You want to see Blue Pill? I’ll show it to you right in the article:
” Even though I may not agree with them, it’s worth here defending Petruchio’s extreme measures . . .”
Even while praising the play he had to backpedal. He couldn’t bring himself to say, “Look boys, this is how it’s done!”
Covert power is not power. It is borrowed power, that exists only so long as the overt power is backing it up. THAT is what covert power is… it cannot exist without overt power.
You cannot blackmail a man without being able to destroy his life and being protected from the consequences of his deciding to quit being blackmailed.
And you cannot overpower someone who isn’t there, or while you are sleeping. A food taster might come in handy as well. I was actually poisoned by my mother in law once. After the fact she claimed it was an accident, but before the fact she had assured me that she had checked it and it was safe.
You can stab her in the chest, she can stab you in the back; violence is golden. Or, some sort of arrangement can be reached where nobody sees any benefit in stabbing anybody.
You have my deepest sympathies. I can only imagine what it must be like to have never been dominant over a woman.
Submissive males, when they finally manage to pound through their heads that it’s okay to be male, usually make the best, and worst doms… aggressively dominant in the extreme. The type leaves not a dry seat in the house.
Game is only a small part of being dominant, but it’s an important part.
“I can only imagine what it must be like to have never been dominant over a woman.”
Always end with a joke. Good man.
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/a37938/guys-who-are-absolutely-worth-your-time/
the bluest pill
As usual, Blair, you have offered up a salad of opinion liberally sprinkled with Red pill… and smothered with blue pill dressing. I do appreciate the Kate wrapup, however.
…Pokemon and Shakespeare in the same article? Are there stats on this site to show the average age of users? There’s a certain shame that comes with having to look up “Pokemon” on Wikipedia as an adult.
Couldn’t agree more, lets keep the articles on ROK R-23 please.
Reminds me of a beautiful poem I literally discovered just last night:
If You Want to Change the World, Love a Man
by Lauren Wilce
“If you want to change the world, love a man, really love him
Choose the one whose soul calls to yours clearly, who sees you; who is brave enough to be afraid
Accept his hand and guide him gently to your heart’s blood
Where he can feel your warmth upon him and rest there
And burn his heavy load in your fires
Look into his eyes. Look deep within and see what lies dormant or awake or shy or expectant there
Look into his eyes and see there his fathers and grandfathers and all wars and madness their spirits fought in some distant land, some distant time.
Look upon their pains and struggles and torments and guilt; without judgment
And let it all go.
Feel into his ancestral burden
And know that what he seeks is safe refuge in you
Let him melt in your steady gaze
And know that you need not mirror that rage
Because you have a womb, a sweet, deep gateway to wash and renew old wounds.
…
If you want to change the world, love a man, really love him
Sit before him in the full majesty of your woman, in the breath of your vulnerability
In the play of your child innocence, in the depth of your death
Flowering invitation, softly yielding, allowing his power as man
To step forward towards you… and swim in Earth’s womb, in silent knowing, together
And when he retreats… because he will… flees in fear to his cave…
Gather your grandmothers around you… envelope their wisdoms
Hear the gentle shussshhhed whispers
Calm your frightened girl’s heart
Urging you to be still… and wait patiently for his return
Sit and sing by his door a song of remembrance, that he may be soothed once more
…
If you want to change the world, love a man, really love him
Do not coax out his little boy
With guiles and wiles and seduction and trickery
Only to lure him to a web of destruction
To a place of chaos and hatred
More terrible than any war fought by his brothers
This is not feminine, this is revenge
This is the poison of twisted lines
Of the abuse of ages, the rape of our world
And this gives no power to woman; it reduces her as she cuts off his balls
And it kills us all
And whether his mother held him or could not, show him the true mother now
Smoldering in the centre of the Earth’s core
Do not punish him for his wounds that you think don’t meet your needs or criteria
Cry for him sweet rivers
Bleed it all back home.
…
If you want to change the world, love a man, really love him
Love him enough to be naked and free
Love him enough to open your body and soul to the cycle of birth and death
And thank him for the opportunity
As you dance together through the raging winds and silent woods
Be brave enough to be fragile and let him drink in the soft, heady petals of your being
Let him know he can hold you, stand up and protect you
Fall back into his arms and trust him to catch you
Even if you’ve been dropped a thousand times before
Teach him how to surrender by surrendering yourself
And merge into the sweet nothing of this world’s beat.
…
If you want to change the world, love a man, really love him
Encourage him, feed him, allow him, hear him, hold him, heal him
And you, in turn, will be nourished and supported and protected
By strong arms and clear thoughts and focused arrows
Because he can, if you let him, be all that you dream.
…
If you want to love your man, love yourself, love your father, love your brother, your son, your ex-partner… from the first boy you kissed to the last one you wept over
Give thanks for the gifts of your unraveling… to this meeting of the one who stands before you now
And find him the seed to all that’s new and solar… a seed that you can feed to help direct the planting…
To grow a new world together…”
These hos aint loyal
“When a rich nigga want you
And your nigga can’t do nothing for ya… These hoes ain’t loyal”
This sums up hypergamy.
In the words of the late Great Jeff Buckley:
“This way of life is so devised,
To snuff out the mind that moves.
Moving with Grace the men despise
And women have learned to lose.
Throw off your shame or be
a slave to the system.”
I don’t think he got it quite right…Women have lost their feminine Grace, not because men despise it, but because women themselves do. Feminists think equality is to forego femininity and to adopt masculine/androgynous traits…and so the SJW and manginas have learned to despise femininity and applaud androgyny with them.
Women really do want to be feminine and men really do instinctively want to be masculine. The Feminazi’s have the appearance of strength to stand in defiance of nature because they have the backing of the real enforcers who plague mankind. The sjw’s also join the feminazis as their back up do-wop act but they’re not the master’s of any plot, just second tier puppets. They’re among many that are nothing more than a front for the shadow government. Rub the right people the wrong way and the real scourge rears its ugly head, and the ugliest government suits pop out of the cracks. If you’ve ever seen the really ugly ones with the big heads and ruddy faces, built like the Rock and wearing perfect suits and cologne, still their beedy rat’s eye pupils give them away as totally alien.
“From my mother: piety, generosity, the avoidance of wrong-doing and even the thought of it; also simplicity of living, well clear of the habits of the rich.” – Marcus Aurelius
Mom was a good woman.
Assuming by this you mean her constant texting and chattering, my friend, women have been addicted to one form of conversation or another since the first two women started nattering. Clearly you don’t remember the time before smartphones and cellphones when you couldn’t get a girl off the telephone (remember those?)
Odd that you say you don’t want womanly traits in a partner. Unless you’re going to date a guy, you’re fucked. Frankly man, what better gift to man than a device that you can use to finally make a woman shut up?
a roll of duct tape?
And a length of rope?
maybe big mittens… Like I said before, we should have never taught them to talk. That was our first, and biggest mistake.
Nope. Cell phone addiction sucks.
Good thing it doesn’t exist.
LOL!
Consider this: The passage from Shakespeare (Taming…) was written more than 400 years ago. This suggests that the issues we face today are not new ones. That women have always strained against their yolk.
In this case, if you have a disobedient women this is because of two reasons. The failure of the father to teach his daughter respect and the failure of you to tame that woman.
Admit your failure, accept your responsibility and then you can act accordingly. That is, you have two options. Force that woman under your authority or kick her out of your life. And make sure she knows the reason why.
http://i.imgbox.com/saTYryKY.jpg
no actually European women are less happy than those in the orient because white men have been treating white women like shit since the spread of Christianity.
Lmao! Women fared far worse under the Pagan rule of Greeks and Gauls and Romans and Celts than then did under Christian rule…
“If one can view the Biblical narrative as a myth in the classical sense, then passages like below will fit in well with our purposes.”
It fits well with our purposes because it is what God wanted for us. The bible message is not “a myth in the classical sense” it is the truth given to us by God, something verifiable through history and it is no wonder that words that were written almost 2.000 years ago are still what we need.
The Bible could be called, “How to civilize caveman.”
I don’t like either “docile” or “submissive”, quite frankly, but I like the general sentiment. I prefer the Captain/First Officer model, in which both are valued and respected and free to disagree, even energetically with one another, but the ultimate authority rests in the Captain. That is a gender neutral expression, too. Most men will be Captains and most women will be First Officers, but there is room for outliers without judgement on either one of them.
Perhaps that’s just a spoonful of sugar that helps the medicine go down, though?
It’s possible.
Everyone has their bedtime stories.
This isn’t A voice for Manginas. No, man here is going to put you on a pedestal. I don’t like you nor that lesbian Karen Straughn.
You are not required to like me, nor I you.
And it’s awfully hard to run a good defense strategy from up on a pedestal. I’d rather not, thanks.
Apparently, you can’t tell the difference between offense and defense. As you continue to hide behind that ivory pedestal tower of yours. You and the rest of those honey badgers (Undercover feminazis) are a joke.
I can tell the difference. The question is: can you?
You’re a liberal communist and have a pure hatred for anything normal especially facts. Go back to your master, Paul “white knight” Elam and those dykes you associate with in a voice for manginas.
It’s obvious you don’t like this site, so speak up, what is your problem with it?
If she’s so awful and sycophantic that everything she says is poison, then why are you talking to her? You’re only validating her opinions and giving her a chance to elaborate on them. For example, If I see a crazy feminist post, I don’t go commenting on it. I just leave them to their own corner to stew. I don’t hate feminists; I ignore them.
Also, JB has some good writing. She’s an in-between us and the MRAs. Haters gonna hate, regardless of the target.
She is a liberal feminazi invading a male space, period. Quit being a white knight sticking up for her. Gynocentrism has really done a work on you guys to think she has any quality of good writing. She is trash. I have seen many videos of her talking with Paul Elam, avoiceformanginas and so on. Do some research on her before making a comment.
“avoiceformanginas”
If you’re referring to the website “A voice for men” i totally agree. I checked them out awhile ago and discovered they are very pro homo. That site’s name is misleading. No true Man will support homosexuality no matter what type but ESPECIALLY NOT the male kind!
Captain is higher than First Officer! So the First Officer should still be submissive to the Captain! Therefore, the woman still has to be submissive. Interesting idea though.
Glad to see youve discovered ROK. A woman comes to ROK to comment for the first time on the article where men examine femininity. This, is awesome.
She commented a few weeks ago on one of Forney’s articles.
Who cares about her? Awesome article.
I like the Captain/First Officer model too (which I think was in Clarey’s Bachelor Pad Economics), but I’m looking for a good adjective.
It is another interesting analogy to compare.
Why don’t you like those words? What’s wrong with them?
Women have no clue;what it is to be feminine anymore. As these guys put it: “In the coming New World, females will be taught to perform as men, eventually becoming disgusted by the mere thought of femininity.”- Raisi Smith & “Too little, too late.Women are now short Men with tits.Men are never going back to that shit.
Enjoy your cats, and boxed wine!”-Anonymous quote The Bible is crystal clear about these types of harlots. I respect none of them nor show them any remorse for destroying our society.
This a fantastic example of why we as men must take every opportunity to educate women about submission and obedience; evidence shows they take to it like a duck to water. It’s their natural state of being. It’s where they belong.
You dont talk sense into women, you fuck them harder.
Then they will do everything you say.
It really is that easy.
Not every woman should be fucked into submission, unless you’ve a penchant for married friends and family members.
Sometimes a conversation is all it takes, at least it’s worth the try.
addiction to the iPhone is certainly a GENERATION Y trait – I fixed that for you.
Why is there an ever-present war between the sexes?
Because the government is involved in their interactions, picking winners and punishing losers. This is a natural outgrowth of allowing women to vote and no society can survive it for long. Let men discipline their women, eliminate the free rides women have voted for themselves and family will flourish again
That excerpt is some of the most beautiful, poetic writing I have ever seen in my entire life.
What a gap between the poem and reality. A million miles.
This sight is fascinating. I’m still not entirely sure it isn’t a subsidiary of the Onion.
Your occasional digs at hipsters were inexplicable but appreciated. Still, nothing can top the section opener: “Women are like Pokemon” for sheer entertainment value.
Love this!
But it is a bit sad that I have to read a men’s website to find lessons on femininity.
Where are the older feminine women who are supposed to be mentoring the younger generations?
Ok, so I want someone better than me, for lack of a better term. Do you men know how hard that is for women to find?
Oh my goodness… You know there is so much bullshit here I don’t even know where to start so I’ll just say a couple of things: 1. Any true man does not and would never want to rule a women just like he would never want to be ruled over by anyone else etc. now not to say that there are not differences of cours there are which is where the saying comes from all are equal though all are not the same; now men and women do need to be able to respect (one another) and there does need to be mutual cooperation yes: and yes somtimes there does need to be a leader, but that does not mean that it will always or would need to always be the man or woman; with certian exceptions of cours it really is dependant upon the ability and skill proficiency etc. of the (PEOPLE) involved… So what is submission/dominance well unfortunately for anyone else reading this who are also trying to figure this out I don’t really know…but I do know this, it is dependent upon the indeviduals involved, it is as much of an emotional thing as anything else, it is NOT about dictatorship or perhaps even authority or anything like that, and it is often to be used and regarded either in a sexual context; (which I don’t really understand how that quite works etc. either) or in cases of extreme emergency… The true man does not want or wish to crush or rule a womens will; along with his own and the ones he is around the true man wants and wishes to see the womens will grow and flower…to treat and be treated truly equal for mutual benefit. 2. Could everybody that is doing it please stop with the death cult religious crap…please.!? and thank you.