The term “cuckservative” is much more than an insult. It comes loaded with some ideas that makes me think that we are witnessing a great shift in American politics—perhaps even the birth of a new movement.
If you are unfamiliar with the term cuckservative, you need to read Matt Forney’s excellent introduction to the concept. Here is Matt’s definition:
[C]uckservatives are right-wing politicians and pundits who make a big show of defending traditional values, yet when push comes to shove, they roll over for the left on every issue out of fear of being called “racist,” “sexist” or “homophobic.”
Some moderate GOP pundits have claimed that the term comes from white supremacist circles, but in an article on the topic, Milo Yiannopoulos believes that the term cuckservative derives from “cuck” which is:
[A] byword for needlessly relinquished manliness, for selling out and caving in. The original metaphor of watching your partner getting slammed by another dude now simply means abandoned principles and a lack of backbone. It’s a byword for beta male or coward.
In other words, Milo argues that the term is primarily an attack on wimpy conservatives. I am going to disagree with Milo a bit here. While some users of the term “cuckservative” are using it against GOP moderates who are scared of their own shadow, there is no question that other users of the term are using it to describe Republicans who support policies that undermine white people.
I believe that most conservatives, myself included, simply consider themselves Americans, and they are uncomfortable with thinking of themselves as a separate community. But since the Left has been trying to divide the nation into a bunch of ethnic factions for the past 50 years, it was just a matter of time before whites started to think of their own interests.
Regardless of how you approach the term, the use of the term cuckservative is more than an insult. It comes along with the idea that the US government is no longer responsive to the desires of the majority of voters. It also means that people are tired of not being allowed to debate controversial issues that have a significant impact on their lives.
The red pill hits politics
There have always been people outside the political mainstream, both on the left and on the right. These have never amounted to much. The left has groups such as the greens, communists, and socialists, but I have never been able to discern a difference between the agendas of these groups and the Democratic Party platform. On the right there are libertarian and paleo-conservative groups.
There have also been “revolutions” in political parties where a party’s center shifts to the left or to the right. The most recent examples of these movements were the “Reagan revolution” which moved the GOP to the right, and the election of President Obama, which shifted the Democratic Party to the left from the more centrist policies of the Clinton administration.
Unlike these “revolutions” a particular leader is not leading the current awakening. Rather, it is a grass roots movement where a whole segment of the Republican base is waking up to realize that the Republican Party is completely unresponsive to the wishes of its constituents. It is as if a large portion of a major party took the red pill at the same time.
Causes of the awakening
Interestingly, it has been the Republican response to the policies of President Obama that have precipitated the awakening. Here are a few examples.
Corporate Influence
The “signature legislation” of the Obama administration is Obamacare. It’s a political masterpiece. It enriches the President’s big money donors (insurance companies, drug companies, and the AMA) and provides marginal aid to low-income voters while making the middle class foot the bill.
The Democrats played hardball to get it passed, but the Republican opposition has been clownish. Instead of acting intelligently to modify the law, they voted on repeals of the whole Act, knowing that these repeals had no chance of passing both houses of Congress.
Obamacare is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes corporate influence on US politics. Disciples of Ayn Rand like to believe that corporate CEOs are all incorruptible John Galts who are valiantly opposing socialism and any check on human creativity. In truth, they are more likely to be schmoozing government officials in the hope that they can gorge at the government trough at the expense of taxpayers.
Whether it is wrongheaded immigration policy, free trade deals that ship manufacturing jobs overseas, or environmental legislation that bans cheap incandescent light bulbs, corporate money is likely behind it.
Identity politics
It is not a secret that the Democrats are heavily reliant upon blacks as a voting bloc. Part of the President’s success is because he was very effective in getting black voters to the polls. Hillary needs to do the same thing to win.
To make sure that black voters stay active, the Democratic strategy has been to inflame racial tensions. The way this has been done is through the hyping of events such as the Trayvon Martin shooting by the “white Hispanic” man, and events in Ferguson and Baltimore. In a different political climate, these events would have remained local news stories. Instead, they have been amplified and turned into the Black Lives Matter movement.
Ironically, the people who get labeled “racist” are not the leftists who are perpetuating identity politics, but the people who object to it.
Illegal immigration
Another thing that has been annoying conservatives is the lack of enforcement of existing border laws. This was compounded by the President’s executive amnesty for illegal immigrants.
The Left’s aim is to shift the racial, and more importantly, the voting demographics of the country. The political Left in the US is not dispassionate about the decreasing role that whites will play in the future—they are positively giddy about it. A recent Salon headline read:
Enjoy it while it lasts! GOP base is still white and aging. Yes, Democrats got hammered yesterday. But the demographics are undeniable, and the GOP’s base still has no future
If you don’t have a problem with the above headline, consider what the reaction would have been if it read:
Enjoy it while it lasts! Hillary’s base is still aging females. The demographics are undeniable. Hillary’s base still has no future
The GOP not only did not oppose the executive amnesty, they funded it without raising an eyebrow.
The Republican presidential candidates have been similarly weak on immigration.
While he was campaigning for the Senate, Marco Rubio opposed creating a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants saying, “We have a path for citizenship. It’s called coming legally into this country.” But as soon as he was safely in the Senate he started work on a comprehensive immigration reform bill that included a path to citizenship.
GOP establishment darling Jeb Bush stated that for some immigrants crossing the border illegally is an “act of love.”
Meanwhile, anyone who makes the perfectly reasonable suggestion that we should actually enforce the border laws that are already on the books is called a racist.
Cuckservatives don’t want to debate
Conservative Americans have always harbored reservations about the issues listed above, but they have never dared to speak openly because they feared being branded with a label. The difference is that now, these issues are being discussed in the open.
This should be a welcome development. Instead of demonizing people for raising wholly legitimate concerns, we can freely debate these issues.
But the cuckservatives are not happy about that. They believe that the future of the Republican Party is to continue to move leftward as the wider society marches leftward. And if the current policies are hastening the move then so be it.
What next?
The more important question is what happens from here? Is the new awakening the start of a new movement? Or even a new nationalist political party?
Let’s hope it is not the foundation for a third party. Parliamentary systems favor the creation of new parties, but the US system of government makes third parties a losing proposition. Plus, Hillary would like nothing better than to see a third party candidate to the right to help her cruise to victory.
Instead, I’d like to see the new openness go mainstream. I believe the majority of the Republican base feels this way. The campaign of Donald Trump has shown that conservatives will support politicians who fire their politically correct cuckservative handlers and talk about the issues that Americans care about.
But will other Republicans have the courage to do it? I am pessimistic, but I never would have dreamed that illegal immigration could be discussed openly at a national level. Perhaps there is still hope.
Read More: 10 Signs You Might Be A Cuckservative
Trump is the only one who can save the US…
maybe.
each american needs to strive towards saving the US (taking on personal responsibility, hard-work, using their brains independently, forging strong family bonds (and then neighborhood/community bonds)), but we need a true leader who 1) has a pair of balls in the face of bullshit, 2) doesn’t bow-down to every-lobbyist/special-interests, 3) doesn’t lend an unwelcome/unappreciative hand to every foreign country ‘in-need,’ 4) and doesn’t get on his knees for SJW’s…
at this moment i’m not particularly optimistic on the ‘leader’ part…
alternatively if things continue to go to shit, then “Let all the poison that lurks in the mud, hatch out.”
If you believe that, then I say “cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.”
“The US government is no longer responsive to the desires of the majority of voters”.
This sums it up perfectly. Instead of listening to the majority, we have several minority (and other) lobbies who join forces to get policy enacted over the will of the majority. It doesn’t matter if they don’t 100% agree with one another, so long as they can override the direct opposition then it is tit-for-tat.
We have singular judges (and up to as many as nine) who are actually deciding how we will be governed, that’s a very small body of unelected, non-representatives of the people making the decisions directly contrary to the intent of the constitution. And illegally expanding the powers of the centralized government while they’re busy re-writing legislation. The thing is, it’s now par for the course, Washington as usual BS, and no one from either party is addressing it except for maybe when it doesn’t fit into their own agenda.
Sorry, but I think we’ll have to crash before we can rebuild, and when we do, we’ll have to make some harsh choices, because right now, no one in politics has the stomach for it.
Democracy was always a sham even in Ancient Greece:
http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/07/27/the-cathedral-is-democracy
No good quality articles as of what late in ROK.
Who cares about politicians when the whole system is corrupt.
well thats what this #cuckservative phenomenon is about. it’s the alt-right assaulting the mainstream milquetoast conservatives. We in the alt right sit outside the Overton Window hoping that the GOP can at least conserve something… anything… but they never do. They deserve this attack. The fact that this has become so big and popular shows you just how weak the conservative establishment really is.
People in America will never learn. Another Bush, another Clinton…
The country is utterly finished. Despite all of the evidence about the existence of the Bilderberg Group, Bohemian Grove, Council on Foreign Relation, Trilateral Commission, Rothchild Central Banks, people still talk about these political parties as if they have any relevance.
100 million Americans out of work.
PEOPLE NEED TO WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!
“The country is utterly finished. Despite all of the evidence about the existence of the Bilderberg Group, Bohemian Grove, Council on Foreign Relation, Trilateral Commission, Rothchild Central Banks, people still talk about these political parties as if they have any relevance.”
I hear ya… any viable solutions for us, good sir?
I’m working on my spoken Mandarin. The written part will be more difficult.
.
Wait a couple of years and then practice this:
你想要一份薯条吗?
(Would you like fries with that?)
…
The weird thing is that the most “racist” jokes about Chinese people; if I explain them to Chinese people they think they are funny too.
Ok, maybe not this one. If MacDonalds continues to dominate the fast food industry in China, it will be a nation of Chunks. (But the genesis for that joke was my Chinese girlfriend from 2 decades ago).
What did the founders of the USA do when faced with a far less oppressive, far less corrupt, far less taxing, British Government?
They left and started over.
They really do deserve this attack. They have been losing for decades. Do they really think that it will be any different if they keep on appeasing?
the alt right (just counting RoK as well) is gaining more and more influence.
fantastic!!!
Thank you red pill. I just took a small dose here and there to minimize the chances of making mistakes in social situations. Now somehow over the last year I went full 1488. Is the final level of enlightenment really the stage where you realize /pol/ is always right? Anyone who’s travelling a few miles behind me on this path beware…you might not like what you find out. LOL.
the alt right . Another name I’ve heard is the dissident right…cool
This is a great article and summary.
I watched one of Trump’s speeches last night and I thought I was reading The Onion for a second. He just openly talks about different ethnic groups, immigration, or economic problems like these issues are common sense… Which they used to be… And which to a lot of people they are…
My grandfather and wealthy barber uncle have talked about these kinds of things at the dinner table. It’s not that absolutely no one believes in right-wing thinking, it’s just that there is a threat if you speak about these issues in public.
But hopefully people like Trump can bring some of these issues to the mainstream and open up free speech again (hopefully). Sad that it takes celebrities to do this kind of thing and show people that words wont kill them. If only more celebrities and public figures would show some backbone.
Trump has $billions of dollars behind him so he can discuss politically incorrect topics and give alternative views and survive the backlash. Many people may have these views but are scared to say them for fear of reprisal. I think that’s why Trump is going well, because he’s a breath of fresh air and is discussing things people want to discuss but are scared to.
He also knows he’s not going to win so he might as well say whatever the fuck he wants.
You’re right but at least he’s discussing taboo topics and actually getting some real debate happening.
He wont win because he’ll get swift-boated…TPTB dont want him in there…
Not sure if you live in America or not, but I would be Very surprised if Trump Loses, He also Gave a report recently on the Hispanic Vote and he has a large Hispanic base voting for him, Trump Admitted He thinks he is the Next President of the USA.
It looks like he is going to win, and his manhandling of the media leftists is winning him more votes. Rest of GOP field is betas and gammas….
Swiftboated = when eyewitnesses state the truth of events that doesn’t collaborate with the lying politician’s version of past events
I’m latino and will vote for him if he gets the nom.
I believe very strongly the country is dead and lost. I am trying to find prepper groups to join in my area, and plan to purchase property in a rural, defensible area in the next 5-10 years.
And I am a citified criminal lawyer.
Good Luck with your Preps, Hopefully the Country doesn’t go to hell, I think a lot of People who are up to date on current events have been stowing away as they should, It’s going to be a tough go for those who haven’t prepared if anything happens .
Yeah, no. This doesn’t sound like a man who assumes he will lose. If he was, then he’d out the system and ensure everything burns.
Probably, but more likely not.
I’ll be over there in a little while but I’ve seen this before. Some guy comes out, says what everyone wants to hear but then gets pushed out one way or another by the professional politicians.
Trust me, it won’t happen. If it does, I’ll eat my hat.
You mean like Ross Perot?
Like him and others.
Ross Perot. Another billionaire who made things interesting for a while until the big boys took over.
LOL I’m sorry but this guy is a joke.. no way he will win. I can’t even fathom him getting the Republican nomination. Then again, we elected both W and Obama twice… I guess anything’s possible. And he will definitely make things interesting. I think I will tune in to the debate tomorrow for the first time in years.
It’ll be on Tonight 🙂
They call it F U money. He has enough of it to speak his mind and not care if people like it or not.
Exactly.
Yup.
7/10 white Americans vote republican. Crazy statistic. That never happened til the left became the party of minority issues. 9/10 black Americans vote democrat. Realistically a white republican voter has 0 chance of taking office by preaching to minorities just stay on point.
The democrat party is a collection of freaky fringe groups and minorities…Gays, Lezzies, Trannies , Enviro cultists..
Blacks vote 90-93% democrat…that is cult /Saddam Hussein numbers…
No fucking kidding most of my friends are all of the above and it scares me. Which is why I now keep my libertarian persuasions to myself
Not a cult, they vote out of fear. You can vote for a party who wants to take your voting rights away, shoot you in the head and hoist a confederat flag on capitol hill which was used to enslave and murder your ancestors you have to be one spineless coward. Frankly I am surprised anyone votes republican who has more than 3 teeth.
1. asking for a picture Id isn’t taking your voting rights away. Voting has never been easier. Ballots sent to your home. One month of early voting in most states. Same day registration. In Oregon you can vote by mail for an entire month. I think it’s kinda racist to think that minorities don’t have an ID
2. Confederate flag? ALL the flags and monuments were put up by democrats. ALL of them. Sen Fritz Hollins of SC had the confederate flag hoisted up on the state house grounds. All the monuments , statuary of confederate generals was done by democrat governors ,mayors etc. The flag is a relic and should go into a museum but taking it down isn’t going to stop the black on black murders in South chicago or raise african american test scores. Silly symbolism ….
3. Shoot you in the head?? If you’re referring to police killing black people there is a general uptick in police brutality against everyone and all races. Blacks have a disproportionate association with crime and therefore interact with the police and the legal system more. Lots of theories of why this is but it isn’t a GOP thing. Bill Clinton signed a lot of the mandatory sentencing bills that were passed in the 90’s. Gulliani , former GOP mayor of NYC, saved a lot of black lives thru tough policing
4. Vote GOP? Blacks couldn’t do worse. They (African Americans) have tied their wagon to the Dem party for decades and things are worse for them. It wasn’t always this way. Blacks were improving themselves and making incredible progress despite real discrimination ( jim crow ) until the Great Society programs of LBJ. The decline of african americans can be plotted exactly with the Great society laws . The Grand Kleagle of the KKK could not have damaged blacks more than endless welfare , dependency, crappy government schools …
5. a small fix and not a cure- all but the GOP wanted some sort of school choice thru vouchers or private school etc. All crushed by democrats because they are in thrall to the teachers unions.
6. immigration and the Dems. Dems love illegal immigration. this massive flood of illegals is not good for the poor and wages. Democrats are the champions of illegal immigration despite it’s disproportionate impact on African Americans
1. Asking for photo ID is taking your voting rights away when your local/state government has made it impossible for you to get a picture ID. Why is it we allow people to vote by mail and not show ID but it is an issue of a person who apprears in person to not show ID? And you are right, it is racist that minorities don’t have ID, this is precisely what racist southern states do.
They deny ID to mainly rural blacks in places like Mississippi, Georgia, Alabama and so on simply to prevent them from voting. And why do you think a state like Oregon permits voting by mail? It is because they previously had a law making it literally illegal to be black (as in the law said black people are not permited in the state of oregon) in the state so they can be assured already that there will be few black voters.
This just goes to prove that the voter ID laws are entirely aimed at discriminating against black folk.
Its no coincidence that Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina, Tennessee, Missouri, Louisiana and Texas say you must have an ID but in states where blacks and asians have been purged like Oregon and Colorado and washington don’t require you to show an ID.
Voter ID laws might seem neutral on its face, except if your state practices a policy of denying you an ID based on your race. Imagine for a second a state with a black governor like Duval patrick issued an order to deny any whites an ID in state offices. well if you need a voter ID to vote you lose your right to vote.
2.
The defenders of the flag today are all republicans not democrats. And removing the flag might stop more white on black racial massacres. It won’t stop white on white drunken 16,000 a year murders. But it will hopefully reduce tensions.
3.
Good, so now us whitey can get some of what blacks have been getting. No, whites commit more crime, whites don’t want to police their own neighbourhoods and the white officers don’t want to patrol white areas.
DEA agent told to not arrest whites for drugs and not to patrol white areas despite the fact they have statisically higher rates of drugs and crime
http://blacktimetravel.com/dea-agent-says-he-was-told-not-to-arrest-white-people-for-drugs/
”
Officer Pedro Serrano secretly taped a conversation with Deputy Inspector Christopher McCormack, who told him to specifically go after young black males for stop-and-frisk”
See it is not go after criminals, or bad guys, or people who “look suspicious” it is go after a specific race and gender. That is it.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ordered-secret-recording-stop-and-frisk-young-blacks-males-article-1.1295665
When the cops literally are caught on tape saying we are targetting a race, of course they will end up being arrested at a higher rate. If I go out my house and target whites for arrest, 9/10 people I arrest will probably be white, even if 9/10 criminals were actually mexican.
LOL, Giulliani wasone of the most prolific anti-black racist, I swear he is in the klan. He probably has lots of blood on his hands.
4.
Again, the GOP right now represents the worse of the two parties, they want to strip your voting rights, they pretend you aren’t being executed by police, they try to deny what seems so obvious to the rest of America. And again the GOP offers nothing to African Americans. Even if they weren’t against them (which they seemingly are), they offer them nothing. Blacks are a minority of welfare receipeints, that being said, corporate welfare outnumbers poor people welfare 100:1. If getting welfare makes you poor then why are the f-500 who all get handouts in the billions and trilions so rich? And the crappy government schools are crappy because republicans have underfunded them.
5. Is true. Teacher unions are a white female affirmative action job. So much so that liberal states actually will shut down black charter schools for the most pompus reason. Often the state will force the schools to take a bunch of low performing expulsion students as a requirement to operate, then when the schools predicatably underperform they shut the school for not meeting testing standards.
It isn’t just black schools, christian white schools are targetted in this way as well (tend to have more male teachers). This is just to force them to be educated by white women.
It is not like liberals are not racist, they just aren’t shooting you in the head and dancing on your grave so are seen as LESS evil. If the liberals were really interested in black student performance they’d give every black student a black male teacher. but it would never happen because they want to continue to create affirmative action jobs for police unions, white teacher unions, white justice liberal systems. So the white liberals have a large vested interest in $$$ in keeping blacks down.
I am not black but I’d take the latter racist over the former racist who won’t hesitate to shoot you in the back.
6. This is true as well. I suspect black “leaders” who can be divided into two groups. 1 group of black leaders are financed by black people and are basically banned from tv and jewish mainstream media. They form the majority of blacks or what most blacks honestly think and recognize that the illegal aliens are being brought in to replace steal their jobs and depress their wages. Blacks have to pay taxes from what little money they have so illegal alien children can go to school and pay no tax. From what I can see blacks really don’t want to be near illegals which is why waves of blacks from California have left the state to move to Atlanta or other western states.
2nd. Group of black “leaders” usually blacks hand picked by jews and backed by jewish money to be for everybody like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and so on. Fit what you describe, from what I see their job is to trick blacks into accepting their own demise and to sing cumbaya because they are all people of color. Which is non-sense to anyone who has actually encountered an illegal because they are just as racist as white folks, maybe even more.
This is likely why Trump was easily able to find a black guy who supported him in california when he was talking about mexican criminals pouring into America. Notice the jew media doesn’t talk about that black kid heading to university on scholarship with a father and mother and a model citizen shot to death by an illegal alien? Of course not because it doesn’t fit the jews coalition to attack white folk. So the media is bias too.
But the blacks vote against the Republicans because of discrimination from the right being too prevalent. The thing is, blacks who own farms cannot even get loans from fha with same credit scores as white, so how can they vote for business party like gop, when they can’t even get a business financed?
Did you know that MORE black people voted in Alabama after voter ID was required, than before it?
All you have is wild allegations, the cold, hard facts do not support your assertions.
Untrue.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/28/republicans-admit-voter-id-laws-are-aimed-at-democratic-voters.html
Your post is crazy on stilts. Keep up the democrat representation on ROK. Makes for a good case study.
Liar.
Thank you.
Good post but I have to disagree with #3. Whites commit fewer crimes per capita than blacks. This is probably more correlated to poverty than skin color, but it’s still true.
Also while both parties are horrible, the worst part about the Republicans to me is they never offer any solutions. Hence why they are sometimes called the party of No. Health care sucks, so they attack Obamacare, but don’t offer any alternative health care reform. Immigration is blown out of proportion (its actual effects are low on the list of priorities but many politicians pander to racists and talk it up, meanwhile they do nothing to change immigration levels at all). Relations with Cuba? Most Republicans are afraid of talking to and treating the Cubans fairly (while they have no qualms dealing with dangerous and violent regimes elsewhere). I can’t think of a single Republican idea that, if implemented, would help me. Perhaps that’s true of Democrats to some extent, but at least they *have* ideas.
Oh, I guess the last Republican, W, did give us that prescription drug care program for the elderly, which is really just a smaller version of Obamacare. Funny how no one wants to repeal that one, or even talks about it.
The claim whites commit less crime per capita is based on usually arrest, convictions or some other result from judicial or police processing. That is however a flawed argument. It is based in a false assumption that rates of judicial or police processing are actually correlated to ACTUAL crime rate, an assumption which has never been proven. A practical example of this would be the DEA agent who was told to only go after blacks and not go into white neighbhourhoods. Or the New york city cop who recorded his boss telling him the exact same thing. Even with stop and frisk new york they found despite stopping mostly blacks, whites had a higher rate of engaging in crime and carrying contraband when stopped and frisked. What we do have are studies which show whites have higher rates of drug use, commit assault more crimes in general. But again law enforcement s told to turn a blind eye to white crime because the reality is, when whites were the vast majority of prison due to prohibition, and all kinds of whites were being imprisoned for drinking, it undermined the economy very badly so it was banned. This is the same with most other white crimes. The cops are told to ignore it because if they persecute the drug laws on whites in the suburbs or college campuses or at may 2-4 the way they did in the black area, too many children of prominent whites would be in jail and you’;ll get full scale legalization. And this is precisely what occurs in white majority states like Colorado or Alaska. They aren’t going to fill up jail with white guys smoking drugs. Heck the judge and the cop would be in jail too! Hence you get a system which turns a blind eye to white crime. I don’t oppose all of the Republican ideas, They certainly need tod eport the Mexicans, Trump is right. Their healthcare plan doesn’t exist. We need to stop immigration it is unneeded. Cubans have a sweat deal, instance citizenship on arrival.
I agree there is some selective prosecution going on, which skews the numbers, but the fact still stands that blacks commit more violent crimes than whites. I’m not saying black people are inherently evil. But their background (both genetic and social, that they grow up under) does seem to create a more violent individual. It’s hard to argue with these numbers:
Now, murder victim data should be fairly straightforward–either you were killed or not, and you were either white, black or other when you died.
Despite whites far outnumbering blacks, the number of homicides of black men was almost equal to that of whites, despite them making up only 13% of the population. Stats show that around 90% of murders are committed by someone of your race (which makes sense, since most murder is committed by someone you know and are close to)
Sorry I cant post the FBI data because I can’t make heads or tails of their tables but here is a source confirming that blacks kill at a rate of 7 times of whites in the USA. Again, I’m not making any pro-eugenics argument, or stating that their dark pigment is causing them to be crazy and murder, but simply stating observable facts. And this article also suggests that the likely underlying cause is poverty, not skin pigment.
http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/factcheck-black-americans-commit-crime/19439
The claims of whites committing ‘more’ crimes but just not being prosecuted for it must be proven with some data.
And the anti-immigration argument I find odd–you do realize that all the blacks we have here immigrated from Africa (typically as slaves)? I personally find Hispanic immigration to be a positive culturally and socially, economists find it beneficial financially, and like it or not, the debt based growth model economy we have will require mass immigration in the future in order to continue. Either that or we will see huge austerity, worse than what was witnessed in Greece. I think we know which path our politicians will take.
And I would say Americans have a sweet deal.. instant citizenship on birth, no matter of ability, contribution, or intelligence level! To Paraphrase Ayn Rand who was criticized for being a firrener: “I love this country, I chose to come and live here. What did you ever do besides being born?”
So now you are switching from crimes to violent crimes. Interesting. So is it make much of a difference if a person robs you without violence than with threats and violence? I am not saying white people are inherently evil But their background causes them (both genetics and social that they grow under) create more criminal individual. It is very hard to argue with the numbers. Murder VICTIM data is not fairly straightforward at all. Firstly, it will be classified differently based on who killed you.
There are several cases where black men have said they were attacked by whites and shot them in self defense states yet were found guilty of murder anyhow. Whites under very similar circumstances were often found not guilty but not even arested by officers in the first with highly similar circumstances. The south carolina shooting of the unarmed man in the back is a very good example OR THE ONE where they shot the guy in the head the other day. But for cameras, in both cases it would be ruled not murder and self defense and this is typically what occurs when whites commit murders. Not only on blacks but often on each other. You have that Peterson guy who murdered several of his wives yet they only caught him after wife number 3 or 4 went missing. Thus you are just dealing with a totally unreliable data set to look at who the cops are charging for murder, or who is being convicted.
On average in America whites have a wealth around $150k+ most non whites have 30-5% of that wealth. That will affect who you can hire as a defense lawyer and experts and so on. And there is racial and gender bias along the whole stream. If a 6 foot black man shoots a 5 foot white woman who reached into her pocket with a shiny object or charged him he is going to be found guilty, even if he legitimately feared for his life. Turn the tables and she wouldn’t be charged it would be ruled self defense by the cops so it wouldn’t make it into the data. The data is grossly incomplete as well, it doesn’t for instance list the 1 million african americans who had been murdered by white doctors and nurses in the last 10 years due to sub-standard healthcare just for their race.
Anyone who is of any race and has lived in a black community quickly learns to avoid any hospital there with a substantial number of white staff because they are places where you go in with a minor problem like a swollen toe and come out in a body bag. Then you have the fact that hundreds of thousands of blacks are being kidnapped by whites and jews for the organ trade each year. These crimes are listed as missing people or persons. Then you have the fact you have black folks being lynched and they are being classified by the cops as suicide in scenarios where it was physically impossible for them to hang themselves.
Like the 9 african american women who all turned up dead in prison cells this month and the man in texas who alleged stab himself in the back or the other one who allegedly shot himself in the back of the head while handcuffed. Of course if you were to count the homicides from drunk driving where over 98% of times the driver is white and less than 1% the driver is black, you’d quickly realize that white drunk drivers commit over 10,000 murders a year, when you add up all these different murders, whites out murder blacks by a ratio of about 9:1 despite outnumbering blacks just about 5:1 or 4:1. The issue is your data is flawed and you are drawing additional interpretations which aren’t supported by your data. The irony is 14,000 whites did murder last year according to the government between shootings and drunk driving murders, blacks did 2000, yet whites do murder by their own stats at a rate 7 times that of blacks but whites are about 4-5 times as numerous.
So whites have a dispropotionaelty high rate of murder but it is ignored. Over 80% of people in jail for sex assault are white, over 90% of people in jail for pedophilia and arson, the studies show whites commit assault at a higher rate than blacks, but again these are ignored by those who don’t want to face the facts. And then throw on the fact most rapes and assautls are not even reported and who knows how that scews the data. I am not sure where you got your data that african americans are immigrants. An immigrant is a voluntary migrant, not someone kidnapped, thrown on a boat, brought in chains so they don’t runaway and forced to come here.
African Americans or original people firstly are not immigrants. The experts like Harvard Professor Roland B Dixon tell us the first native indians like the fulsom and the cree were black peoples. The seminole indians continued to be a black tribe in Florida even into the modern period. I don’t have a problem with LEGAL hispanic immigration but illegals must go back. Furthermore, the country has 30% youth unemployment we don’t need more people. It is just a logical point, if your raft is sinking you don’t add more people to your raft so it can sink more.
Look, I selected murder because it’s obvious when someone is murdered, there is no ‘underreporting’.. basically all murders get reported. Whereas something like theft or graffiti, you are right, only a portion of these are reported / prosecuted and so the data can’t be correlated accurately to race.
The stats I gave are people killed by other people, there is no massaging the figures. These are unnatural deaths caused by another human. I’m not looking at who was found guilty of murdering anyone. I’m looking only at how many white people were killed and how many blacks were killed in a year. You really can’t argue with that.
A lot of the above talks about prosecution for murders, now that is an entirely different argument. The only thing that is clear to me is that blacks in America commit more homicides than whites.
50.3% of homicides were dead white guys.
47.4% of homicides were dead black guys.
Blacks are 13% of the population. They are committing proportionally FAR HIGHER murders than whites.
You can say this is due to unfair laws, you can say it is due to institutionalized racism, you can say it is due to poverty, you can say it is due to poor education, you can say it is because blacks are genetically weaker than other races, you can come up with a lot of theories as to WHY this is true, but you can’t change the fact that it IS true. It’s not a condemnation of black people, and these disproportionate rates do not occur in other countries. Don’t let it bother you that it’s true. Try to understand it and discover why.
It is not “obvious” when someone is murdered from a data reporting point of view. The self defense and stand your ground defense is much more likely to work when you are white. All murders don’t get reported, because when its ruled self defense by police its not counted as murder. Then you have people who bury and hide bodies. and almost all of them are white.
The stats you gave are highly open to massage. In fact the fact it omitted the 10,000 homicides a year whites do while behind the wheel is proof of that. Yes I can argue with that, you ignore all the white murderers killing behind a wheel. It would be like ignoring all blacks who shoot with a gun or conk people on the head. Your numbers are way off, you are cherry picking.
Ignoring the fact whites are killing 10,000 just from drunken driving. Ignoring the fact that whites hide bodies of people they kill ie mafia, serial killers pickton farmer, etc. Ignoring the facts that whites kidnap and kill people who are simply reported missing but since no body can be recovered it cannot formally be ruled a homicide in the data.
I cannot dispute the fact but I am not disputing the facts, you are, you are ignoring the vast majority of murders are done by whites. You are cherry picking the types of murders.
All murders don’t get reported, because when its ruled self defense by police its not counted as murder.
It is counted as a homicide. The data concerns homicides.
Clark Kent, buddy, you would enjoy getting into the serious corners of the AltRight, such as therightstuff, radix, and Amren. At a certain point, it gets tiring to read articles about game by thirsty black/hispanic dudes who want white pussy.
I’ll see ya on the altright.
http://www.dailystormer.com/, AA really cuts the BS.
This was a great read, since American society is going more and more left Republican’s seem to be going more and more left in order to try and get more votes. I’m not really sure what the future is for conservatives.
The biggest vehicle by which leftists get on the voting rolls, probably even more than illegals having kids here, is the public k12 school system. This of course compounds the many problems with this system, its treatment of boys as “defective girls” being chief among them.
I hear many conservatives tell me “oh that’s not MY kid’s school” and then when junior graduates he thinks Che Guevara is god and that certain self-destructive alternative lifestyle choices are a good way to live.
In Canada the elections administration organizes student votes at high schools, generally 14 to 17 year olds. The Conservatives get hammered, the Liberals do well, but the socialist NDP does better than any historical election and various fringe political parties like Greens would be elected for a variety of ridings.
.
Basically, the students vote like their largely left-leaning, public servant, high priced help teachers which gives rise to two possibilities: 1) the teachers are indoctrinating the kids and only some students will shake it off after they graduate and become adults or 2) leftists generally have the intelligence, wisdom and political sensibilities of a teenager.
You can vote at 14 in Canada? Am I misunderstanding this?
Nah 18 is voting age… which is still too young to have any concept of what one is voting about.
The voting age is 18 but some liberals want to lower it to 16. Elections Canada organizes a mock/moot election as an educational exercise for kids. My point is that it seems to be an indoctrination tool because the results in the student election (which thankfully don’t count for shit) depart so drastically to the left from what adults choose.
ah lol- Im an idiot.
College kids should NOT be allowed to vote- I didnt know jack shit about politics(and of course, I voted liberal with the rest of the herd).
If you dont pay taxes, you dont vote, that simple…
So war vets and senior citizens should be disenfranchised?
Pretty much…
I was more left leaning when I was younger too. How could you not be? You’re just beginning to realize how fucked up the world is and there are older people parading around about how they want to make the world a better place.
What they forget to tell you though is that they want to come to your parents’ and neighbours’ houses to take their money and give it to other people so they’ll vote for them. And they’re cool with you having less opportunity so long as they get to sit in their air conditioned office and eat junk food.
They’re basically that kid who borrowed your toys and lost them, and then got upset when you didn’t lend them anything after that.
16? I have two girls in my hood, both about 16, both pushing around newborns in strollers- we are gonna let them vote too?
two ex-coworkers, both on different commuters trains, relayed the same story to me once: Teen girls walked up to them, asked them prego questions, then said “Im thinking of having a baby because the govt will give me money!”
This is gonna end in tears.
Not to mention at that tender age most of us have no idea how the world actually works, and haven’t seen first hand how socialist policies always cause more problems than they solve.
Why would that impact vets? They work, right?
Its a tough call for me on old folks- if you are still working post 65, let them vote. I’ve overheard or been in enough convos involving my parent’s generation(post- 65 now) and “let the next generation pay it”- oh really? Im sorry, you guys enjoyed the best of America, decent jobs with pensions(and none of them went to college- our gen in debt up to our eyeballs bc of college with no job security or pensions), inflation wasnt out of control and you could actually raise a family on one salary- now I gotta pay for your useless meds and screenings?
It used to be that land owners were the only ones who could vote.
Ha ha ha. You have obviously never been to the VA.
I really don’t know which way you are going with that comment.
Vets come home all fucked up and then the state takes care of them.
What I found interesting was OKCupid’s take on this. It was not a longitudinal study but rather a snapshot of various ages and their political tendencies, but the implication is that as we age we (as a group) move left and right and up and down. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7035d18897c00fbf72620da44d4dc0844af3b0a450b9024ae087f6ee15509ef0.png https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b086dc44fe8644ffce5beedfecb546be17597e5b9fb37a690b8b45dc8dc0c055.png
You spelled conservatives wrong. I don’t want to be an ass, but things like this are what make conservatives obviously more intelligent than the social media addicted left.
I’m not really conservative i don’t actually live in America i just think conservatives have more logical views overall usually. As for grammar I make mistakes all the time trying to type on my phone.
I actually liked the typo (not to detract from agreement with your original point).
It started me to thinking: Comcervative > Comrade Servitor > Communist Servants. Which had obvious application to the topic at hand as well as being amusing.
I actually like the idea of using Comservative as a way to express those who publicly claim solidarity with the ideals of the “right” yet in practice support the same entitlement/welfare policies of the “left.”
There is theory X and theory Y, I suppose. Theory X is that to beat liberals, conservatives have to become more like liberals: move to the centre, bleed a bit over to the left, and hold the mainstream centre right. Theory Y is that to beat liberals, conservatives have to actually be conservative: command everything right of centre except for the complete lunatic fringe while doing little more than paying lip service – if any – to liberal ideas or anything left of centre.
.
I tend to believe in theory Y although politicians like Stephen Harper might indicate theory Z.
In another 50 years, the cuckservatives will be looking back fondly upon the days when marriage was between one man and one chicken. Or one woman and one carrot, or two women, or two furry otherkins…ect.
“The Left’s aim is to shift the racial, …! and more importantly!, the voting demographics of the country.”
Voting preference more important than racial demographics?
I smell a cuck!
You cannot be a conservative when there is nothing left to conserve. Down with America 2! Death to the Antiwest! Revolution is the solution!
Resurgemus!
I remember Sarah Palin being quoted as requoting the famous “we have not yet begun to fight” saying.
All I could think is, well duh, that’s exactly the problem. The left wins because it fights. Anyone who fights will win against someone who doesn’t fight.
When the GOP finally figures this out, it will win.
Not really. The country is in hell already. All this provides is a hilarious way to get our own back on the people who caused civilization’s death. They are cucks.
“The Democrats played hardball to get [Obamacare] passed, but the Republican opposition has been clownish. Instead of acting intelligently to modify the law . . .”
And if they had done what, I agree, would have been more intelligent, they would have been rolling over just like those you’re calling ‘cuckservatives’ now.
This is going to be a fun election season here, you guys are all over the place with your politics.
Regarding the ACA the problem is twofold:
1. The establishment GOP likes it. They want to have the power it gives over the people should they get the chance.
2. The same establishment refuses to use the power it has to stop this law.
If the GOP was serious about stopping the ACA it could do the following:
1. Immediately defund the law. There is nothing 0bama could do to stop this. The GOP has had this power since 2011 and has consistently refused to use it.
2. Every GOP candidate for president should say “if I am elected, on Day One, everyone gets an exemption from the ACA.” This is perfectly legal as 0bama has been handing these out like candy.
Well, to defund they would need a supermajority in the Senate to get anything past a filibuster and/or veto. So for the moment that’s a non-starter
Exempting everyone (from the mandate) would actually make the structural problems worse, since healthy people would decline coverage and unhealthy people would continue to enter the market.
Not necessarily. Budget items are usually simple majority votes in the Senate. Also keep in mind that in order for anything to be funded Congress has to act. If it doesn’t act, i.e., no vote is held on either ACA funding by itself or no action is taken to include it in another spending bill then the there’s nothing for the president to veto.
They’d still need supermajority to override a veto, even if it was passed by reconciliation (which is the simple majority mechanism).
The “no action” method would be to fail to include ACA funding in the annual budget, let the budget fail or get vetoed, and have the government close. They’ve tried that . . . didn’t work and won’t work.
If there were a simple way to do it without Senate Dems, it would have already happened
Yes the government did shut down.
The left made a big deal out of it but in reality it did not impact anybody, and 0bama decided to act like a crybaby over it and close memorials and national parks because of it.
That’s a tried and true tactic of a big city politician. Close “the good stuff” (i.e., schools, police, firefighters) until you get the concessions you want from the people.
The shutdown didn’t hurt the GOP terribly, as they had their best election in recent years, but I think had it dragged on for months and months and months, with most people not seeing any impact from it, the GOP would have prevailed politically there.
Yep, notice how they didn’t shut down the TSA or IRS, which the public hate, just the stuff we like, like national parks. I’m surprised they didn’t shut down the post office too.
The GOP secretly loves the ACA. It is a plan based upon writings from the right wing Heritage Foundation. It is basically the same model as George W Bush’s prescription drug benefit (use public dollars to subsidize multiple private insurance companies providing health insurance coverage to the public). It’s actually a very Republican Party way of providing health care (a more Democrat option would be Medicare for all, which would be cheaper and more efficient, but the Democrats didn’t push for this either).
The only reason you even hear them criticizing it is because it was introduced and championed by a black Democrat. I think after 2016, you won’t hear any more talk about repealing it.
Not to mention the GOP has never repealed any type of social welfare benefit. They’ve never cut anything.
I would prefer going back to the old old system of health insurance, where you had a high deductible, but paid low premiums. That kind of insurance was a financial tool to shield people from the cost of very expensive catastrophic care. The price of care would start to come down because people would be a lot more judicious of how they spend their money when more of it is on the line. People would also have a financial incentive to live a healthier lifestyle since more of their money is on the line.
Of course there are other cost-control mechanisms we should consider, but going back to these kinds of policies would be a very good start.
Yeah, that’s absolutely the way to do it, have a cheap plan that covers you if you are mangled in a plane crash or get cancer, and you will likely never use, costs low double digits a month or less, and pay for every other health care service yourself.
The next best way is to provide health care as a public service, the way the state provides libraries, schools, and military health care.
The worst way is probably what we had before Obamacare, with the ACA only being a smidgen better, but still in the ‘worst way to fund health care’ category.
It is government policy (Nixon administration) that gave us the terrible system we have today. The feds enforced price controls after Nixon lifted the gold window and devalued the purchasing power of everyones dollars. Employers were unable to raise wages to attract workers. The loophole they came up with was paying an employees fringe benefits directly, like health care. The end result was having health tied to employment, and having an insurance plan that was used annually or sometimes monthly. Imagine if your car insurance covered oil changes or airing up tires, how much would it cost???
I think a huge problem as well is the older generations of conservatives who have blind faith in the the Republican Party. They grew up with republicans like Reagan and they still truly believe this is the same party of yester-year.
So many heated debates with my father on this subject (he just turned 60 and a life long Republican Conservative and I’m 29 and a convert of about 3-4 years from the degenerate left).
When we discuss how the left is destroying everything about this country, the discussion will always move towards how he believes that the Republican party is the only hope for saving our nation. To where I’ll retort to a lot of the points that were mentioned in this article and how the current conservative right has basically bent over, grabbed their ankles and allowed the Democrats and left to just have their way with them.
That’s when he just goes into an angry rant about how I’m part of the problem and just can’t wrap his head around my dismissal of the current Republican party.
I am in my mid 40s.. big Reagan fan. Couldn’t vote in the 84′ election, but glad that he was my commander-and-chief when I joined the army in 87′. I stopped being a Republican in 2005.
Ask you father this question. George Bush was re-elected in 2004 and both the House and Senate were in Republican hands. What did they repeal? What did they do to reverse the tide when they had power? The 2014 election gave Republicans more power at the local level than they have had since the 1920’s. What are they doing with it?
Let him answer that.
John, I can’t stress enough how many times I bring up the point that although the Democrats and liberals are eroding the moral foundation of our country, the current Republican Party share he blame because they are allowing it to happen.
That’s also when he brings up the lesser of two evils argument which just drives me insane. As if there is a winning choice when choosing between a shit sandwich and a piss smoothie.
“..he brings up the lesser of two evils ..”
Ask him how is supporting any evil brings any good. It’s a false choice. Refuse to support either, as the analogy presented of “if not A than B” outcome only differentiates in terms of when.
Besides, can you really draw a line between one evil and another? I mean who’s to say gay marriage is worse than increased arsenic in the water supply? And who the hell wants to make those kind of choices?
I think the author is struggling with this too.. the comment ‘Let’s hope it is not the foundation for a third party.. the US system of government makes third parties a losing proposition. Plus, Hillary would like nothing better than to see a third party candidate to the right to help her cruise to victory.” shows an illogical allegiance to a group that is not helping in any way, but the author wants to continue to support or “fix” them for some reason, instead of creating a group that people could actually like.
People want to cling on to certain labels and allegiances. I don’t give a shit. The guys I like are always the fringe members of each party who piss off the mainstream party members (Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel of the Democrats, Ron and Rand Paul of the Republicans). These are the true mavericks that don’t tow the party line. I couldn’t care less what party a guy belongs to, and would trust him a lot more if he didn’t belong to either.
Fascism vs. Socialism in America. I’m expecting American Hitler vs. American Stalin. One guy rallying against SJWs the other rallying against Ubermenschs. Kill the weak to save the strong! Enslave the strong to protect the weak! Americans seem too spoiled to save their country. Seems everyone’s waiting to get rescued or struggling to save themselves; no one’s manning up and rebuilding.
Let’s really open the door to hell with this: Attack women’s sexual freedom (WSF). When women’s own unfunny feminist comedians make films about how WSF has turned their lives into “trainwrecks,” we know we have an opportunity here to challenge the values of the slag culture made possible by modern feminism.
They’ve made movies about that!? Which ones? I would love to see that!
The movie “Trainwreck” just out
“sex and the city” of course but that series is tough to stomach…
I predicted this would happen sooner or later last year in light of UKIP’s rise in Britain, and the rise of nationalist parties in general in Europe, we just needed our equivalent of Nigel Farage or Geert Wilders overs here to force the media and the political class to have the discussion the rest of the nation is wanting to have, which we now do thanks to Donald Trump.
Both parties are very weak and unpopular right now. Reagan won because he was able to get blue-collar democrats to vote for him. He was able to reach across political divides because he was a patriot/nationalist and was sincere about wanting to make the country great (he wasn’t perfect but honesty of intent is what matters).
Trump embodies what makes this nation great, and exemplifies the American Dream. He doesn’t talk like a politician, but like the rest of us, and is unapologetic about calling a spade a spade.
I’ve been saying that political correctness is dead/dying in Britain/Europe, and is beginning to die here. I think it’s safe to say that with the shake-up that Trump has brought to the table, and the explosion of “cuckservative” and growing pushback to SJWs across the board in the past yer or two, and the growing irrelevancy of the MSM, we are now seeing the same thing happen in the US. People are fed up with the Status Quo, and this time we have a man who isn’t a career politician that we can rally behind.
The political machines in this country are very weak. Both parties are in bad shape. Diversity politics are tearing the Dems apart from within, and conservative voters are fed up with RINOs in the Republicans talking out both sides of their mouth, and Trump making them all look like fools, and show the country what real leadership looks like. This is going to be a very fun election to watch…
A few months ago I was aying America needs a guy like Nigel Farage. Someone who couldnt give a fuck about political correctnes and try to do whats right for AMERICANS. Trump doesnt care about being p.c because he’s too rich to care about stupid p.c bullshit and hurting someones feelings. Sure he’s a brazen arrogant asshole but he represents people that want common sense when it comes to decisions and not what the polls reflect especially when polls are skewed and biased. Some people say that he’s just a businessman and nothing more. What makes that any worse than these carear sheister politicians that do more self serving business deals pandering to the lobbyists that have ruined government? Give me anyone other than the dynasty cronies we have in Clinton and Bush. Just the two names in the running after the last 30 years reeks of corporate family cronyism … an indictment of the corporate stronghold that has held this country back and embarrasing to the to the rest of the world
Yes, but a huge problem remains – the money needs to be attacked. Trump talked about how in dealing with ISIS he’d bomb oil fields to help kill their income. Well, the right still has no comparable strategy in dealing with the left. They have complete control of the media and entertainment complex which generates huge sums of cash and allows them to control much of the national conversation.
A lot of the tools of the “Left” that you speak of are becoming less relevant in the face of reality. Over half of US Universities will be out of business within 20 years due to money drying up and alternatives via computer learning and homeschooling. Likewise the MSM’s ratings are in the toilet. People know they are full of shit, and thanks to the internet you have a huge and growing network of people who are able to verify what their lying eyes see.
I do agree though that the money needs to be eliminated from DC. If Trump can get put in, and we can start flushing out the career politicians, then we NEED to mandate political reform in the form of term limits for all politicians.
Simple.
The right needs to become pro-piracy. Specifically, end the intellectual property protection of media products like music and television and movies. Or at least loosen the strength and monopolization of those intellectual property rights.
This would both have popular support, as everyone loves to download music and movies and tv shows, and it will completely obliterate the leftists media and deprive the cultural left of A LOT of their power..
The next thing you need to target is college education.
Make it so that college debt can be discharged in bankruptcy.
This too would have popular support.
At the same time it would result in banks restricting access to college loans and drying up business for colleges.
At the same time as doing this start up cheaper and official online/electronic education alternatives and make it so those alternatives have state or national examinations.
Just imagine, instead of having legions of mediocre lecturers all teaching the same stuff over and over each year, you could have the best lecturer record his lecture and use that one lecture again year after year. Imagine the cost savings! Imagine the efficiency!
And best of all, if would destroy and defund leftist academia!
All with popular support!
It’s the time to Darwinian nationalist!!
We rounded up and deported over a million illegals in the 1950s with Operation Wetback. Anyone who says “it just can’t be done maaaan” is a cuckservative or a leftist cocksucker.
illegals… their very name demonstrates that they’ve broken the law. round’em up… deport them. every single one.
But aren’t we all “illegals”? I’m sure I’ve broken multiple laws today…
OT- but have you guys seen the insanity on social media regarding that lion-slaying dentist? Ive seen many people post his full name and address and call for his death.
An illegal shoots a young girl in SF (he didnt mean to do it, he was trying to shoot the sea lions in the bay) and you dont hear jack shit on social media about that….
It has little to do with the Lion, and girl is irrelevant to the Transformation. The Left have formed their Red Guards. They attack to defend the Cultural Revolution from regressive thought. The dentist is an easy target to help motivate the troops. He’s chum for the sharks, to whet their appetite.
It really bugs me when people use this comparative morality.. like because worse things than killing lions goes on the world we should ignore this guy shooting a lion. I’ve been to Africa on safari, these are beautiful creatures, they are protected for a reason. Ship this guy back to Zimbabwe and let him sit in a prison cell for a while. It has no bearing on the social security trust fund or prosecution of bribery laws or increasing pay for teachers. These are different issues.
We don’t stop going after rapists because there are still murders out there to solve.
I don’t know what story you are referring to, but someone being murdered happens all the time, and even if she’s young, that’s simply not national news (sadly). Murders happen daily in Chicago. A murder in SF to them is irrelevant. The lion story is national news (international really) as it is a rare crime and a story of a majestic and beloved and protected animal, and of a rich fuck who is used to doing what he wants without consequences maybe finally facing some old school type punishment (we shall see). That doesn’t imply anything about a lion being more or less valuable than a child from SF. It’s just a fact that we live in a violent society, and murders happen all the time. It’s not a reason to ignore wildlife and environmental protection.
People are starting to realize how bigoted and racist the left is, how they only gain voters through illegal means, and that fighting fire with fire is the best approach.
And it matters not a wit that you or I recognize it. We have no power to change anything. Enjoy the decline.
Defeatist attitudes like yours are exactly what’s holding us back. Liberals love nothing more than for guys like you to concede defeat before the fight is over. Pull yourself up by your bootstraps and play to win, otherwise, don’t play.
Until we Americans start leaning into the politicians with blatant arrogance and as citizens with rights, we can only blame ourselves for the decline of our country.
Email, call them and get in their face about corruption, incompetence, illegal immigrations, stupid wars, and lobbyists pulling their strings.
Your remind me of someone.
Life is hard. Be harder.
http://img0.joyreactor.com/pics/post/9gag-auto-house-md-swimming-pool-267409.jpeg
everyone… e-v-e-r-y-o-n-e is at least a little bigoted/racist. and if you’re not yet, then it’s because you’ve been living under a rock and haven’t been exposed to enough ‘diversity.’ red-pill truth.
I think bigots are funny- see archie bunker and his black doppelganger george jefferson….they were hilarious
absolutely! but that was back when folks had thicker-skin and there wasn’t a collective SJW effort. i mean, look at the movie ‘trading places.’ fantastic movie… meanwhile we have reboots of ‘vacation,’ which i wouldn’t go see if the theaters paid me! ah well, i’m off topic… cheers!
It’s hopeless for Conservative men. Store your bucks, take care of yourself, marry never, support nothing but yourself. Enjoy the decline, Gents. It’s over. Enjoy your life, bang when you can and watch the collapse. Contribute nothing to the hierarchy that has emerged that has no use for us, men, white and black. It is over for men.
Sadly I’m starting to agree with this more and more
Ive known its over for 5 years. Its hard to enjoy it.
it IS hard to ‘enjoy’ it. it can be extremely frustrating in fact. my grandfather is rolling over in his grave.
Below is probably my favourite thread of all time. I think it’s universal to the ‘sphere. A great piece of writing.
http://www.travel-talks.net/thread-37819-post-771705.html#pid771705
thx kal
What a breath of fresh air. High quality posts throughout. Thanks CK.
Might as well be a NEET living off of Good Boy Points, tendies, and Autism Bux amirite?
lol wtf
We may be over-thinking things. Think about it: if enough white guys settled into a complete loser life with no job, no gf/wife, no friends, no basic hygiene, living at home with parents on welfare and Autism bux, the system would collapse. It could not support millions of white guys not working and doing shit to pay into the system with money and labor. This would be the “nuclear option”.
See pic https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a8ceb72119ef7175661cedcb6ed700448f804d9267ab9f2f401bc45e7f9994c1.png
ROFL
I almost teared up from laughter.
I have no idea how to respond to this.
After reading the story the pic is too good.
Got another one for you. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/55e439e7bfe266a976e6fa2126df293597708710004c89e5619dbe127fa8e2b0.png
mmmm tendies.
That picture made me lol
Dude. Stop it. We talk a lot about alpha/beta in these parts. That defeatist attitude is the most beta tell there is. Grow some damn balls. Get mad. And fight. Your comment is the equivalent of immediately dropping to the ground, curling up in the fetal position, and saying “Please don’t hurt me!” as soon as some dude pokes you in the chest. MEN fight. Even when it seems hopeless.
And how are you “Fighting”? Are you going to shit out more kids than the Mexicans? Are you going to round them up and gas them?
Denial of employment and deportation would suffice.
It is not that complicated. Works for the rest of the world.
I’ll tell you what I’m not going to do. I’m not going to give up on the world and spend the rest of my life covered in Cheeto dust, jerking off to porn alone in my room.
I’ve spent HOURS today debating with leftists online. I realize a lot of you guys think that’s pointless, but I disagree. No. I’m not going to convince any SJW’s that their insane worldview is completely fucked up. But when they go spouting their asinine bullshit, and I poke massive holes in every single point they try to make, people reading those comments sections see that. You’re upset that liberals control the megaphone? Maybe they wouldn’t if people like us wouldn’t just hand it to them without a fight. Roosh didn’t just say “It’s hopeless” and give up. The guy over at Chateau Heartiste didn’t either. Nor did Rollo. THESE GUYS HAVE MADE A DIFFERENCE by speaking out. We can too. Spread red-pill truths all over the web. It’s helping. People ARE waking up. It just takes time.
You’d have had more fun and accomplished just as much if you
You’d still to have to increase the white birth rate. Your plans? How many kids do you have?
“It is over for men.”
Speak for yourself pussy.
cuckservatives are being pushed into the same dumpster that’s home to liberal/left-wing losers?
Side note: there is a HUGE difference between Eastern and Western Communists. Eastern Communists, like KPRF, Belarus Commies, and other old school Stalinists are so socially conservative that they make all conservatives look like cucks. Western Commies “Eurocommunists” are the remnants of Stalin’s Useful Idiots.
Further, in the Alt-Right, you’ve got intellectuals like Aleksandr Dugin and various French and German intellectuals that have given rise once again to the “Rovolutionary Conservative”, a synthesis of old Left-Right extremes into a futurist conservative outlook. One example is the Identitarian Movement, examples of which are Front National of France, Generation Identitaire, and United Russia party.
For conservatives, this is the way forward
Agreed.
Here’s the rub and the challenge conservatives face: I disagree with the assertion that the government has become unresponsive to most of America. In fact the government has become MORE responsive to most of America… because most of America is getting a handout of some sort from the govt. The problem is the swarms of low information voters who simply vote for who’s cute or who’s black… or whomever will give them something for free.
The founding fathers stipulated that only landowners could vote for a reason. I don’t think that’s the appropriate benchmark today… but I do believe that voting should be restricted to those who know what they’re talking about. I believe you should have to pass a citizenship test, even if you’re a current citizen, in order to vote.. every time. I believe you should have to pay more in taxes than you consume in govt benefits in order to vote. If you can’t do those simple things… you don’t even belong in our society… let alone voting.
Getting to that point will take a huge fundamental shift in our cultural landscape… and I don’t know if that can happen or not. But I don’t see things getting better when mindless droves of idiots who are dumber than a pack of monkeys is given the right to vote. The vote should be transformed from a given right to an earned privilege. You want to control the destiny of the country… you need to show you’re capable of making such a decision. Because 75%+ of America isn’t…
agreed.
in fact… the only voters should be those who pay income tax. (boo-hoo that’s unfair! too bad. you want to vote? get a job… even if it’s one ‘suitable only for illegals’).
Hey, I try to avoid as much income tax as I can, and there have been years when I didn’t owe any (most Americans do not pay federal income tax I believe). I don’t really give a shit about voting, but that seems to be an odd test to use.
I love this idea and I’d go even further.
No one who is on means tested welfare should be allowed to vote.
Agreed. If you can’t run your own life such that you need to rely on other people’s labor and money to survive… you have zero business deciding matters of policy.
If you paid more in taxes than you received back (excluding payroll taxes, social security/medicare), for 3/5 years, I’d say you passed an economic requirement.
I’d also require a basic economic literacy exam.
Exactly, the founding fathers had the idea right. Allow only people who are not parasites to vote. Today a welfare mom with 5 kids and 5 baby’s daddy has the same say-so as the woman who works 2 jobs and goes to school. It’s wrong on soooooo many levels.
Wow you are so right. If we were to use a way-back machine and redo the Constitution we would put in those very statutes i.e. voting only for landowners or people with assets. If you go on the dole you lose your right to vote . Get off welfare you can vote again.
If you research government systems, you will find Democracy does not work, at least not yet, perhaps we’re just not doing it right. All this talk of “yeah, lets just limit voting to landowners, or taxpayers, or military veterans, or schoolteachers, or whatever” may be fun to think about, but in the end I don’t really want my neighbor deciding I need to chip in and pay for a new $14 billion bomber because he hates Ethiopians and it’s time for a war there, or that we need to build a new gym for Nancy down the street to send her 6 kids to after they get home from the school I just helped pay for.
No, my friends, Monarchy was the best system we have seen so far. A monarch based on hereditary lines passes down power from generation to generation, and has a long term time horizon in his decisions. He is not worried about elections, and thus does not play politics. Silly issues like abortion or gay people marrying would be decided quickly, and then moved on from–the important parts of governing are managing the treasury, running and maintaining the infrastructure, making the legal system work, providing public health, safety and education, and the monarch does this because it is in his best interest to have a healthy, stable, happy citizenry. A stable money system was always present under monarchs, and they were far less likely to go to war, unless absolutely necessary and with clear goals and a good reward for doing so, as Monarchs hated wasting their gold. Monarchs are trained from a young age in the art of leadership and learn about their peoples needs and you don’t end up with people like our current leader who has very little experience.
Monarchy eh? Kings and queens and earls and dukes and such?? I used to think that was nuts till I see the current shit show we have now. I watch all these documentaries about the Sun King and Queen Elizabeth and Frederick the Great and a lot of cool shit was done under monarchies. The art ,architecture ( Versailles , the Hermitage ) music and culture done under monarchies was staggering.
Yes, I love talking about monarchy so I will summarize a bit here:
1) Long term time horizon
Monarchs think about the long term when planning. Politicians think about their next election (in America, usually about 6 weeks after taking office, politicians began actively campaigning and fundraising for reelection). Answering questions like “I’m concerned about the health of my subjects / citizens” one would arrive at much different answers if one considers a 100 year time horizon versus 6 years.
2) Training and ability of the leader
Monarchs are groomed from an early age to be leaders, they travel around their kingdom, get to know its people (not individually), its territories, its geography, and are instructed thoroughly on its history, as well as being taught philosophy, music, art, etc. in order to create a wiser, more thoughtful leader. Look at the incompetence of W, a failure in the private sector and the inexperience of O, who came out of nowhere as a state senator to suddenly take the reigns of power over the strongest nation on earth.
3) Family lineage / posterity
A king knows that his grandson will be running his nation in a few decades, and wants to leave him a full treasury, happy, healthy, educated, satisfied subjects, a stable and peaceful society, and will be very reluctant to waste money in the treasury on things like wars of choice, bad policy, and short term solutions. Politicians on the other hand, love to borrow and spend, especially for big things like retirement pensions and they love watching million dollar missles explode onto huts of people who know nothing about America, knowing it doesn’t matter to them when the bill for these bombs come due in 30 years.
4) The business model
Can you imagine Steve Jobs winning an election by the workers of Apple? Or would they prefer the hot-air lazy guy who said he will give them Fridays off and a 15% raise? You think your boss at work (love him or hate him) could ever be elected to his position? No, he was put there, indefinitely, to be in charge of things, because that system works. The iphone would never have been invented if Apple was a democracy. In no other part of our society (churches, team sports, businesses, the DMV, etc.) do we decide things by popular choice. It’s simply a silly and unproductive way of getting things done. But for some reason we think it’s a great idea when it comes to governance.
5) What is civilization?
When you think about what has marked the earth as signs and visual recordings of civilization, you think of the pyramids, the Great Wall of China, the great works of art and music, they were mostly created under the orders of a monarch. The only president I know who did something similar was FDR with the WPA, who was probably the most monarch-like president.
6) Ability to make hard decisions
Sometimes the hardest decisions are unpopular (isn’t that what the definition of a leader is?) Kings will make tough choices and there will be little consequence. Politicians lose their job if they make unpopular choices.
7) Radical change is possible
OK So maybe the king decides that measuring things by the size of his great great granddaddy’s foot was stupid. Well, he issues an edict that the metric system will now be used. Or suppose he discovers that tracking currencies and pay is so much easier in the modern age, and a flat tax would be a more efficient way of running things. So he states that on Jan 1 of the next year, sales taxes and property taxes will end, and all subjects will remit 15% of their earnings from all sources to the treasury, upon penalty of imprisonment. Done, and done. If a modern country like the US wanted to do the same thing it would have to: deal with labor unions of IRS workers, accountants, and tax preparers, pass new laws and ratify a constitutional amendment in the individual states, get each state to reorganize how it collects and processes taxes, fight special interest lobbyists who prefer the current system, and
as to the metric system.. well I think we are the only country in the world still measuring things by the king’s foot, even though we no longer have a king. Pretty dumb!
OK That’s all for now, but there are a laundry list of benefits. Even the weaknesses of monarchy are typically things that democracy often has, if sometimes to a lesser degree. I am with you, I used to think it’s nuts to be ruled over by someone who was “better than me” but I’m currently ruled over by thousands (millions?) of bureaucrats who think they are better than me, and I must agree, and submit to each and every one of them.
hmm.Compelling arguments. Most of the world has been ruled by monarchs for most of its’ history.
Immigration is the existential threat to the nation. It is the single issue for me . It ( illegal AND legal ) immigration is nothing more than voter replacement or demographic gerrymandering. All immigrants, regardless of race will vote for the party that lets them in. The democrats /libs are just importing more voters. It is probably too late. The nation is hanging by a thread. If say Texas goes blue the democrats win forever.
I’ll be out of the country by then, but for the people planning to stay (white women) they need to wake the fuck up. like you said it’s probably already too late tho.
The British Labor party were pissed off when the Tories allowed people to buy their government owned houses. Labor then decided to import an underclass of millions of non whites to create a new political base as the new homeowners moved into the middle class. They literally toured every shithole in the world handing out passports. Self serving cunts.
When people talk about immigration in the US, they are typically talking about Hispanics. Hispanics are a natural mix for the conservative party. They are family oriented, hard working, independent, religious, anti-abortion, and risk takers. But the so-called conservative party in the US demonizes and attacks them. So, without the opposing party doing a single thing, Hispanics will be driven to the Democrats. It’s quite nutty.
Also, I have to disagree with you on immigration being a bad thing. 1) Free people should be able to cross borders freely (ie if you were born in Nevada or Nanu Nanu means zero shits to me, work, live, shop, or be a tourist wherever you want). 2) Immigrants are one of the largest drivers of growth and small business startups in the country (this is well documented in the great book The Millionaire Next Door) 3) American culture is the very bottom of the barrel–I welcome any immigrants from traditional family backgrounds. and 4) I should be free to leave this country and go live and work wherever I want. Just because I was born on a certain plot of land doesn’t mean I should be treated differently than another person wanting the same thing.
Gents, sure seems like things are done, but, glimmers of hope are out there. The GOP needs to be realigned, period. That process is taking time and will be painful. Part of that pain is ceding power to the left, which seems to be invincible, for the moment. Alas, so were the Japanese in the 80s. Heck, conservatives were invincible in the 60s and yes all the way up to the 70s and 80s. The Red Pill is the future of the conservative party and I see plenty of “Don’t Tread on Me” bumper stickers and flags around town. Trump is a welcomed development unlike the Paul’s he can self finance an important distinction because the Paul’s captured a popular vote only to be marginalized by GOP treachery. Much of that was made possible by the money the established GOP has. Trump does not have a problem with money. Elsewhere the left is showing itself to be the very thing they said they were against – bigotry, oppressive, authoritarian. And increasingly we’re seeing the left eat itself. Don’t discount whats happening with planned parenthood – the truth has now been exposed and regardless of your position on abortion, selling baby parts is too far. We could see a major shift on the issue of abortion and abortion was the start of the lefts slippery social slope. Who honestly wants our national heroes to be bruce fucking jenner who is set to make 100 million. Would you dress as a woman for 100 million? Yeah, bruce, you ain’t so courageous – freak.
I hope you’re right sir…
Those abortion vids are so revealing..that abortion doc stuffing her piehole with salad while talking about avoiding the fetal “crunchy parts”is ghoulish…
Even with Republicans winning the election they still managed to pandered to the lowest common demonstrator after the election.
From putting in the female version of Eric Holder in the justice department, you
could of ignored democrat’s for a long time and now you are stuck with a Clinton lacky.
If you still think in terms of democrat versus republican, if you still think your vote counts for anything, if you still think candidates are elected by the people instead of selected by the oligarchs, then you are a useful idiot, a tool for the International Banksters, the Rockefellers, and the Vatican.
Take the political red pill, too. Not just the gender relations red pill.
I think we need to start realizing that All Politicians Are Like That too, women ain’t the only demographic that’s been corrupted in the west…
Better: Take the all-encompassing Red Pill. The one that forces you to live based on the Reality Principle.
It’s the one way ticket to living a better life.
Baby steps man, no one is going to stand against the Jews and Illuminati or whatever group holds the true power as long as the average Joe is a brainless zombie voting against his own rights.
The true revolutions? The ones that changed shit on a fundamental level, like the French one and the Russian? Those happened only when all of the average people agreed that the elites had to bite the dust. Once the proles are united, then we get banks, and the media, and the merchants.
PS: If you think the Vatican holds any kind of power in modern society you need to update your databases. The West has replaced Catholicism with Progressiness as the default religion.
It’s a process of multiple demonization tactics. First up for elimination by SJW’s and the media and also feminists were Ted Cruz and Rick Perry. Pro-life, anti-illegal immigration, honestly tough on crime. Cruz and Perrty were demonized long ago. Right now, Trump, Rubio and Walker are talking about immigration, illegals, etc, with Trump the most straightforward about business, energy, illegal immigration and, he outlines the corruptions of Hillary.
He tells the truth; the first act of an illegal immigrant is a felony, coming here without a visa and the other felonies against our citizens and society flow from there. He tells the truth of Hillary’s corruptions that the media won’t touch. Liberals HATE that, shut off illegal immigration and you skew the demographic they desire, catalog Hillary’s many, many corruptions and incompetencies and you show she isn’t fit to sit in the White House. Very soon, Trump will have been made into a cartoon character, demonized and discarded, he’ll drop out.
The media will push Rubio out, Scott Walker and Jeb are beloved, but when push comes to shove, the press will elevate one over the other as “acceptable”. They claim to LOVE Jeb. Once he’s the front runner and running for President, the process will complete itself, the press will make Bush out to be a radical, racist, sexist white man Republican and Hillary will get in. I’ve seen it too many times. The Republicans drop the Conservatives, hand the nomination to liberal Republicans and Conservative voters sit home.
Make no mistake, media, driven and terrorized by feminism is driving all this. Only the feminist, Social Justice agenda is served from now on. Women, the prominent, upper-middle feminist minority of this country, all White women by the way, are driving ALL of this. It’s over. Men abdicated their very existence in this country (and throughout the West) to the very weakest and worst of society and ironically, their power comes to them through defeated males.
Through the dilution and pollution of our population of illegal immigrants and the entry of millions of Islamics with their 8/woman breeding habits white and black men and our interest is over.
0-40 years hence, feminism will be dead because Hispanic men and Islamic men did NOT come here to cater to the shrews of American feminism. But in the meantime, the man’s interest is dead whether you’re White or Black. It’s over. The country I defended 40 years ago is gone. If it makes anyone feel better, the country we see now will be gone in 40 years and it will yield to a most unkind culture to the women that wrecked everything at the societal level. Enjoy the decline and keep your head down, gents.
I think this article is too nice. For example, the section on “illegal immigration”. One of the defining characteristics of many cuckservatives is to denounce illegal immigration but embrace legal immigration, even proposing increasing it (as Ted Cruz did in the last amnesty fight in the Senate), and of course, parroting the tired meme “America is a nation of immigrants”. But legal immigration leads to the same end: whites as a minority, and the GOP further reduced to the “me-too” wing of the Democrats, if not a permanent minority party like the non-ANC in South Africa.
Legal immigration wouldn’t be a problem as long as immigrants were denied entitlements and were forced to wait 20 or so years before voting to allow them to assimilate.
Not all groups are equally assimilable. I’ll let you figure it out.
Yes, that’s a cuck move. Legal immigration needs to be overhauled as well. George Washington recognized that some groups assimilate more readily than others. That seems to be a common sense approach to me.
I say put every single country on this planet and let the voters decide.
Japan? Sure. Jamaica? No Fucking way.
Germany? Welcome Home. Guatemala? Don’t bother.
Who thinks that shit-skins will get 51% support to emigrate?
That is, of course, impossible as the US is neither a Democracy or a Republic. It’s just dressed up as one.
This is the only form of anti-immigration I can accept. I am personally pro-immigration, but the whole “illegal immigration is awful, but if people fill out some paperwork, somehow it becomes a great and wonderful thing” is ridiculous. There are benefits and drawbacks to immigration, and benefits and drawbacks to restricting it. And therefore I can respect your view, but you’re right, you never hear it from politicians.
Also, if this was pre-1860 I would probably be anti-immigration.
Trump has no real competition at this point, and will crush Hillary if nominated…..
DO you live in this country?
13% Blacks are hive minded automatons and will vote for what ever shitbag the (D)s put on the ballot
16% The Spics “es racista”
5% Asians mostly vote (D)
That leaves the 67% non-latino whites. The young and women mainly vote (D) but let’s assume that 2/3 of whiteies are feed of with the mulatto messiah and want to ‘Change Back’. That equals 44% of the electorate.
I’m going to cash in when Cuntlin wins the election. I have 350 “Magpul” AR15 magazines that I bought for $8.5 and hope to sell for $20-30 each.
‘government husbandry’ is another good term to add to our red vocab. ‘cuckservative’ is a new word (didn’t exist that I know of a month ago). It’s gone BIG.
I stumbled upon ‘government husbandry’ in this piece below where it appears early in the article. Curious I googled and the two words ‘government’ and ‘husbandry’ don’t appear adjacent as a descriptive term. So here’s another one to launch into the clay target machine – – ‘government husbandry’:
http://rebukingfeminism.blogspot.com/2012/04/anatomy-of-matriarchy.html?m=1
Conservatives need to find a way to cause a scizim within the Dem party. Consider that Dems encompass socially liberal whites – gays, Feminists etc- and socially conservative minority theists, it shouldn’t be too hard to do.
Take the FSU quarterback hitting the fat white woman back. The blacks sided with the QB while the fems believed that they where entitled to special treatment. It’s almost certain that both of those groups vote (D)
white women only pretend to be for minorities out of a sense of self righteousness and arrogance.
white women most frequently accuse black men of rape, or if you look at pro athletes’ marriages, ruin their lives.
No they pretend to care for blacks because the liberals, both men and women, are repressed racists. Everyone has racist thoughts but rather than admit this and accept it as a normal part of themselves that has some rational basis, they repress it. People try to keep their feelings repressed through denial and projection which leads to overreaction, conflict and obsession. Cuckservatives are repressed racists too. The reason neither side wants to talk about the fact that blacks make up the vast majority of violent crime despite being a minority is because they fear their repressed racism. Why do you think they fear being called racist so much? Because it is true and they know it but they don’t want to admit it.
I am not arguing that they are the “real” racist as opposed to me. I am not projecting. I admit I have racist thoughts. The problem is they won’t admit it and pretend to be better than me. They are so repressed that they are willing to sacrifice their own daughters to niggerdom and flood their countries with other races in order to prove how “not” racist they are. It’s sick.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DRovF1zsDoeM&ved=0CB4QyCkwAGoVChMI-d660PiDxwIV70vbCh1PeQpB&usg=AFQjCNEJeYZRe5rHvFzZCKfB6tqIHYomrQ&sig2=Ut4ukhqvMIYL_cOcC2oxCA
LOL. Yes I’ve heard that before. Excellent song.
I’d love to see a “Duke Rape” Hoax with the racist reversed. That put the fems and ‘groids at each other’s throat.
Getting off topic. UVA students suing Rolling Stone Magazine. Editor of RSM resigns.
If you’re against cuckservativism you should check out the alt-right http://therightstuff.biz/2015/07/28/crashing-cuckservatism-with-no-survivors/
“Conservative Americans have always harbored reservations about the issues listed above, but they have never dared to speak openly because they feared being branded with a label.”
Bullox. Little to do with fear, but more to do with having no special interest group with deep pockets that will get you air / face time and a platform to be heard. Now that debt is king, we import millions of illiterates who add no national value, no jobs (outsourced due to the fucked up taxes, labor unions, EPA codes, etc…) … reality is hitting hard and there is nothing that is going to cover that up.
Just this month, Microsoft and Qualcomm laid off thousands of employees after becoming top beneficiaries of the foreign worker visa program. The Republican focus on economy and dismissal of social issues has led to this poisonous economy and America is shooting itself in the foot. How can we get political power away from these corporations, unions, and radical Leftist groups?
Third party politically, but I would advocate an insurgency campaign and a para-military wing with clear objectives.
If people are really banking their hopes on Trump (or Jeb Bush), then they are setting themselves up for a big disapointment in the near future.
But of course, that is a bit radical which most do not have a stomach for. It will be a slow train wreck– public services (eg. police) will not repsond, rolling black outs, shortages, etc…
Donald Trump is what you would call an angry cuck. He’ll talk a bunch of shit about the bull fucking his wife but he won’t actually do anything about it.
We simply cannot rely on this fraudulent electoral system to fix things. We’re just going to get another corporate-backed whore politician in who is going to keep towing the line. How long are we going to sit on our asses watching our country getting fucked while we wait for some politician who is never going to get elected to save us?
Bull fucking? Which wife?
This reminds me of Moldbug’s idea of the high-low alliance against the middle class in his humorous article on Castes of the United States
http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2007/05/castes-of-united-states.html
How I miss the days of self improvement, history, philosophy, fitness, and game. I can no longer read an article without stumbling across buzz words and acronyms. This site may as well be another Jezebel for this type of shit especially for people playing the victim. Time to do something more productive than read this blog.
many men reading ROK (like me) are planning on leaving the country. We aren’t ‘playing’ the victim because we realize it’s too late and wont do any good. Women will vote for their big government, free birth control, and ridiculous marriage laws. The only thing left will be Mexicans, debt, fat bitches and a shit economy.
ROK still does all of those things. Check these recent articles out: http://www.returnofkings.com/68431/the-four-cardinal-virtues
Part of being a complete man is also being aware of what is going on in politics and current events. What other site in the manosphere or the internet offers such a broad range of articles?
After searching the internet couldn’t find another site like this one. Both articles you recommended were excellent.
Yes, but be careful of having this movement co-opted by the elites, like the Tea Party movement was.
The Beltway Republicans got into power by subverting every grassroots angry citizen movement and making it vote for them while they pissed away the country to the left.
We anti-cucks should take membership cues from Google, who’s hiring policy is: we would rather turn away 10 perfect job applicants than hire 1 bad one.
Or, a little more legally, a person who wants to be anti-cuck is guilty of being a cuck until proved innocent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRwUoOFqsMw
Here you go, cucks:
http://www.amren.com/news/2015/07/an-open-letter-to-cuckservatives/
cuckservative comes form the altright. This comes from the edgisphere: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKDeyuM0-Og
This is a good article!
Hitlery Cunton is going to be the next president
She would have black voters and women voters guaranteed thats a 60% pretty much at a total looking at least 90% or higher
Landslide
AT least it’ll be funny to watch the feminist realize that their savior is a sham just as the negros did with their Ace of Spades.
My problem with the Republicans is that they don’t really look out for the middle class. I feel forlorn in the sense that, as an A-type white male, I identify more strongly as a conservative but understand that the modern Republican party does not really have my best interests at heart.
I might vote Democrat in the next election but beat back liberals in my social and professional life. Such a quandary. Also, I do have black friends and believe that black men deserve, as granted by God or “God”, whichever you prefer, literal or metaphorical, to be treated as equals.
A cuckold is someone who enjoys watching their wife being fucked by another man. And conservatives love to see china fuck us up the behind, with all their deals sending the jobs off to china and mexico.
Men must vigilantly work on their game and social connections and networking. Social currency is priceless in the face of unstable fiat notes of debt. The channels and veins of monetary currency can suffer cardiac arrest but the social currency flows from the true heart of our civilization which never quits beating.
The War on Cuckmas means saying “Happy Holidays” from now onward.
This is great!
To be honest, this reads like a typical jewish rant that is meant to deflect and mislead. The term cuckservative should be taken quite literally, white people are forced to care about eggs from other nests that have been smuggled in, sometimes – and absolutely horribly so – through the disgusting race mixing that partly stems from the respective propaganda, sometimes through immigration, illegal and legal. The whole talk about corporate influence and enforcing the border will lead us exactly nowhere.
Identity politics is actually what we need as white people, we have to realize that we are targeted specifically because we are white. I am from Austria, but the demagoguery is quite the same throughout the west, and every attack on my european cousins in America hits me too, if only because every bullshit you try out over there seems to come here five years later.
Our whole genetic and cultural heritage as Europeans is meant to be destroyed, our identity is to be vanished, first in our minds via rewriting of our past etc., then on a physical level.
Please, don´t let yourself be fooled by articles like this, it was quite obvious that somebody would try to co-opt this meme.
Repeat after me: We are white, and that is awesome.
I heard a mainstream economist, and I wish I could remember his name, but he was on a regular show (one that was not racial or racist in any way) and out of the blue, in his discussion about the future of old people and health care, long term care, etc, he said something I (and many others) have said for decades, he just segued right into something like, “And Bob, I think if the aging white population thinks that a diverse community that makes up the youth, are going to take care of them in old age via health care, social security (laughs), well…I think people need to be realistic” and then, without missing a beat, he went right back to “in other news” about the economy. It was like someone dared him on a bet to speak a blurb of the truth. And of course, he was right.
‘Cuckservatives’ I think of the RINO establishment and their Epsilon crowd as more like TransPoliticals basically they’re a bunch of Bruce Jenners, Liberal Democrats trapped in Republican Bodies who just don’t understand what they really are, LOSERS. I have been voting republican for over thirty years and I must say I am totally disappointed with the crowd in charge, talk about losers. Look at their ‘Winning Candidates’ Bob Dole, Juan McCain and Mitt Romney who ran on a platform of Conservatives Get Lost and total capitulation to democrats, and each time they ran they lost big time, America needs leadership and this pack don’t have it. Sadly Jeb Bush is just another total loser disappointment in the making while Trump well he may not be perfect he certainly gives me hope. The RINO crowd claim that republicans need to reach out to ‘minorities’ well what about reaching out to the Majority first? We might win by doing so. They say They saw Republicans need to include women, these guys are women. This nation has been going down the toilet for over fifty years and all they want to do is flush it down more.
We need real conservatives to take this nation back and up to our future, that means strong real family values, restoring the Free Market Economy and less coddling of society’s free loading deltas.
The term cuck-servative likely comes from the sexual fetish of inter-racial cuckoldry. If so, then race is at the heart of the matter.
Every man is racist in that he does – and should – prioritize the well-being of himself and his own particular family, and what is a race, if not a very large, extended family?
The anglo-saxon man created a civilization in which men of all races were invited to contribute freely to the commonweal, sharing in the risks and rewards, giving rise to the world as we know it today, which has benefited the white race in that men of different races bring different talents and perspectives and so forth to the table.
Having set the table, the white man remains psychologically and emotionally dedicated to the notion of racial diversity, willing himself to overlook all sorts of insults and perils for the sake of racial harmony.
As with everything, however, there is a point of diminishing return, and it is entirely possible for a white man to place too great an emphasis on racial diversity at the expense of his own best interests or that of his family or race, in which case, the term cuck-servative seems an entirely appropriate epithet.
Ultimately what needs to be asked by every single Westerner is one simple question: Is this action the best possible one for the future of my civilization and my people?
You cannot have Western civilization without Western people. No amount of “brotherhood of men” or “everyone deserves a chance” will change the fact that if this nation continues on its current trajectory it will become another version of Brazil.
Loyalty to your own people is a virtue and it is a sign of true honor.
This site should also stop nibbling on the red pill and go full bore on it. How can someone accept gender tendencies but then say that races which have been separated for 70,000 years are not going to have unique tendencies? It is a denial of science to claim that Whites, Blacks, Semites (Jews, Arabs, Berbers, etc.), and East Asians are all the same.
Why not write up an article on the MN Transracial Adoption Study? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study
Blacks adopted by Whites still end up with an average IQ of 83.7 … that is not an impressive number. Why is this site afraid to touch this?
Well, according to the anti-Cucks, you’re a Cuckservative for not accepting the racist label: https://heartiste.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/cuckliebrul.jpg?w=500&h=761
My impression of the anti-Cucks is that they’re white supremacists first and foremost who are trying to hijack the new right. They’ll quickly jump ship when it’s expedient to do so (which ironically makes them the Cuckservatives). Hell, they’re doing that now by cheerleading for Trump whose record is decidedly Left-wing.
Great article, thank you Mr. Sebastian for writing it.
Given the choice between moving a debate and commiting the circular group onnanism of using the scatalogical term “cuckold” they have chosen to pleasure themselves as the world burns.
These aren’t conservatives or traditionalists. These are losers.
Keep an eye on Scott Walker. They guy does not back down on unions and big government. Only governor to ever survive a recall in history. He has a bad haircut, but not as bad as Trump’s. And does not have that Ross Perot factor – still think Trump is just doing this to boost his ratings.
I can’t argue with the article, the only thing I want to add is that Rubio called the future on what would happen without some form of comprehensive “reform.” He said without the legislation, he feared that the Obama regime would simply issue an executive order and Congress would completely lose control of the process…which is what happened.
There is no reason to mince words. Of contemporary times, cuck comes from the online porno world. It’s a porn category. It means guys, often with small cocks who watch men with big cocks fuck their wives. These cucks let themselves be dominated by big cock men along with their unfaithful wives.
It is from that meaning that someone adapted the word as cuckservative to mean Republicans, whether an elected politician or Beltway pundit, sitting wimpy and helpless for Americans as they watch the Democrats and other leftists fuck Americans over, Americans who have become increasingly unfaithful to the ideal of what once was a republic USA and the American Dream (your life is what you make of it in a country designed so there is no nobility, not castes and a level playing field for unbridled competition.
Of course, the American Dream has become an American nightmare precisely because cuckservatives have sought consensus and have moved the USA further left since FDR.
Watch Thatcher explain the cuckservative in action.
A BRILLIANT LADY AND WHY DONALD TRUMP IS MOST POPULAR WITH AMERICANS
And learn what happened to the American Dream:
CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN NIGHTMARE. WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE AMERICAN DREAM?