News

MTV Doubles Down On Degeneracy By Granting “Gender Neutral” Award To Emma Watson

209 Comments

I’m so proud to be part of a film that celebrates diversity, literacy, inclusion, joy and love the way this one does.

— Emma Watson praising the film

Seeking to make the most of the professional uncertainty of her post-Harry Potter life, British actress and SJW Emma Watson has praised a brand new “gender-neutral” MTV acting award for the horrible live-action remake of Beauty and the Beast. Of course, Watson praised the award after winning it and received pats on the back from seemingly all those fellow celebrities in attendance. No one should be shocked that the first person to win this title is an infamous gender activist as well, rather than simply being a professional entertainer who does their job and leaves political commentary to others.

To the merriment of Return Of Kings, Beauty and the Beast is a pastiche of the patriarchy that feminists loathe with a random interspersing of SJW pet causes like homosexuality (in the form of a plot-irrelevant gay scene). We may not find Watson attractive, but her character Belle is clearly valued for her perceived beauty and she dutifully falls in love with the man, the Beast, who imprisoned her. Even with the clumsy leftist angle inserted into the film, it reads as a somewhat classic example of Stockholm Syndrome. Like it or not, the whole reason as to why Belle and the Beast end up in a relationship is because of a series of acts that SJWs would describe as misogynistic and indicative of “rape culture.”

The MTV Movie Awards have a reputation for bestowing accolades on trashy blockbusters and the fawning attention given to Emma Watson merely continues this trend. What is of more concern, however, is the very self-contained buzz Watson’s award has generated. SJWs are not demanding, for example, that companies do away with binary gender quotas, such as Norway’s requirement that 40% of boardroom positions are filled by “women,” without any measures for “androgyne” or “bigender” representation. Or that the Olympics should become either a gender-neutral competition or expand to 60 different sexual and gender categories to allow “two-spirit gender” and “pansexual” athletes to win gold medals, too.

The logic for SJW gender identity politics was pathetic to begin with. It is now unraveling further still. Furthermore, once again the pontificating of celebrities and their media sycophants has isolated them from the general population. Even many readers on “news” websites such as The Guardian are lambasting the pseudo-human rights activism of these multimillionaire professional victims.

At first glance, this gender-neutral acting award might seem to be another nail in the coffin of commonsense. Yet I, for one, welcome it as a case of significant overextension. So should you. Caught up in their own ideology, celebrity SJWs are progressively (pardon the pun) undermining the notion of feminism itself.

By insisting that the male-female divide is intersected by a billion other gender identities, they poke massive holes in their own previous arguments that women deserve special privileges, such as separate sporting competitions, which are presently denied to those claiming to be from other genders. Consequently, many of the programs feminists spent years yelling for can now be described as discriminatory and pernicious using SJWs’ own belief systems.

Gender-neutral acting awards, so why not gender-neutral sports?

Isn’t this just a spinoff of lesbian?

The woman who presented Emma Watson with her coveted gender-neutral MTV Award claims that she is gender-neutral (or she simply has a mental illness). Her name is Asia Kate Dillon and she is best known for her roles in Billions and Orange is the New Black. Earlier on, she had written a self-righteous letter to the Television Academy, insisting that its binary Best Actor-Best Actress awards discriminated against people like her. Here’s the best part of her diatribe:

The reason I’m hoping to engage you in a conversation about this is because if the categories of ‘actor’ and ‘actress’ are in fact supposed to represent ‘best performance by a person who identifies as a woman’ and ‘best performance by a person who identifies as a man’ then there is no room for my identity within that award system binary. Furthermore, if the categories of ‘actor’ and ‘actress’ are meant to denote assigned sex I ask, respectfully, why is that necessary?

The funny thing is, there is no room for Dillon’s “identity” in professional or even most amateur sports, either. So where is Emma Watson’s outrage? Dillon, after all, wouldn’t feel at home in men’s OR women’s athletics, basketball, or tennis, so surely this binary system needs to be dismantled as well. Considering that New York City’s Commission on Human Rights and other quack organizations presently recognize dozens of different genders, the only sensible choice for SJWs is to make all competitive environments, whether in acting, sports, or another arena, “gender-neutral.”

American colleges, rightfully perceived as some of the most radically feminist and anti-male institutions in the world, are also paradoxically falling afoul of SJW demands for non-binary gender recognition. The Education Amendments Act of 1972 created the infamous Title IX system, which prohibits federally-funded universities from engaging in educational program “discrimination,” including for sports, on the basis of sex. Because feminists have used Title IX to insist on equal funding and attention for women’s sports, as opposed to “equality” for all the genders that SJWS say exist, they participate in exactly the sort of discrimination that celebrities like Asia Kate Dillon have railed against in the world of entertainment awards. You can’t make this up.

Yet another reason to not take celebrities seriously

Man-beast kidnaps woman who wears dresses, woman falls in love with him, actress portraying woman wins “gender-neutral” acting award.

Let’s remember that for all her supposed activism on behalf of “victims,” whether fake refugees or very wealthy, non-binary fellow entertainers, Emma Watson is a multimillionaire out of touch with the everyday needs of those watching her films. While her employer Disney has benefited from this age of globalization, countless millions in Watson’s native Britain are laboring under the burden of a new form of middle-class relative poverty. The sorts of fake causes that she advocates for are exactly the ones that people without material concerns can indulge in.

And, to repeat, Watson refuses to take her crusading to its logical extent. She won’t argue for gender-neutral sports because that would wipe women–and other non-male gender categories–from the athletic map. She won’t endorse transgender boardroom quotas because feminism’s greatest beneficiaries–wealthy upper middle and upper-class daughters–will lose out from any change.

Instead, Watson will restrict herself to the activism that suits her well–anything and everything that increases her own profile.

Read More: Emma Watson’s Boobs Show How Modern Feminism Is Lost

209 thoughts on “MTV Doubles Down On Degeneracy By Granting “Gender Neutral” Award To Emma Watson”

      1. Mark the correct answer:
        (a). Pangender
        (b). Neutrois
        (c). Lunagender
        (d). Quadgender
        (e). All of the above
        (f). None of the above

        2. Answer is f.
          To elaborate on that answer, she is a spoiled, degenerate straight white woman in Hollywood who thinks it’s cool to claim “gender neutral” or “gender fluid” as her orientation.
          And Hollywood is such a cesspool it probably WILL enhance her status there.

        3. F. None. He will impose his manhood by pump and dump. Or so we hope.

        4. all it does is prove that femenism and all this is one giant shit test that most men are failing. Women,even the clown haired feminist, want a strong dominant masculine male.

        7. Like when I was in high school and every awkward, socially inept theater nerd claimed they were “bisexual” because it made them look edgy even though the truth was simply that nobody wanted to fuck them…

        8. Which is probably why most gay males become gay – women won’t fuck them when they need it the most (in their teen years)…

        9. Ours went by ‘asexual’. Which is slightly more respectable, in that it was a reasonable acknowledgement of reality.

        10. You would think that movie she did a year or two ago which made about $100 would have deflated her ego somewhat.
          But, of course, this is Hermione from the Harry Potter series. There is no stopping the ego.

        13. Sometimes I wonder If we don’t need it though. We’ve gotten so cushy that even mentally handicapped people can breed and raise their offspring with the help of the state. Maybe we need women to only fuck men with big muscles and/ or big bank accounts made by big IQ’s, followed by cultural collapse to kill all the weaklings. I don’t know, but sometimes I think so.

        14. The thing is outside of welfare queens your liberal hipsters are not breeding so in a way it’s happening

        2. thanks for making me look that up, not
          skoliosexual – “sexual attraction to non-binary identified individuals”
          To think I thought it had to do with skull fucking

        3. i thought it had to do with people who have a scoliosis fetish

        5. I was hoping it would involve a link to an ROK article about gaming women with multiple sclerosis

        6. I have that fetish, I just prefer chicks with spines that curve to the right now (her right, not mine)

        7. if you date two of them and line them up symmetrically you can train your dog to jump through the hole

        8. Good God, that is a great idea! You may have just birthed the genesis of a new sub-fetish.

        9. It’s like the olympics, the para-olympics and Crufts all got together to make a completely inclusive sporting event

        10. She better chuck that “award” in the dumpster, because it will hurt her career. Newsflash: there is no moviegoing market made up of skoliosexuals.

        15. unfortunately they don’t need for markets to exist these days, they simply create them

        17. Nothing like a good skull fuck. As long as you’re not the one being fucked.

        20. that little proviso aside, an important part of one’s daily routine

      2. dumb bitch wasting her time on gender neutral awards when she can clearly afford war elephants

        1. Not to mention It’s time there were female war elephants. To compliment the land whale brigade

        2. Giving landwhales the vote was a huge mistake.
          War elephants would have never allowed this faggotry.

      1. And way too close to her feet. She has midget shins on a mostly normal body. She’s quite the shidget. And when I say normal, I mean normal lik a 5.

    5. Jesus fuck. That guy seems to be dating down seriously. She looks ugly as hell.

    8. these dumbass little girls just wanna be fucked well and often by real men. This guy is a pro footballer I think. Case in point.

    10. This guy has got to be a homo-pedophile. If he wasn’t he would be with a woman that looked like a woman and not a little boy.

  2. I identify as the Sex Terminator. I came back from the future to make Sarah Connor pregnant.

  5. In a genderless society why would feminists care about the identity of the people at the top of the pyramid? Just wondering. Sorry if my rhetoric question might be offensive to anybody, especially feminists.

  6. Wow, they gave her a “gender neutral” award because she banged an animal in a movie? Guess they really are promoting bestiality these days…

    1. “She”?? How dare you assume xer gender! Off to Gender Studies classes with you!

      1. yep, they only watch it so they have something to tweet about

  9. Asia Kate Dillon has invented a new style. Let’s call it Neo-Auschwitz.
    The shaved head. The gray circles around the eyes. The thin gray shirt. The protruding clavicles. The tattoo is even German: it says “einfuhlung”.
    I bet the earrings are made from shreds of authentic SS bedsheets.

  10. So the globohomos create another award for their masturbationary circle-jerk and can ejaculate all over each other with effusive praise about their tolerance and progressivism. Non-story; now the shit I took earlier in the day was exponentially more important and meaningful if you ask me.

      1. Yes-now Emma Watson will give me a stern lecture about my semen-hetero-normative-exclusivity reductionism.

    2. So I don’t get it. How does Emma Watson with long hair in a dress qualify as gender-neutral? Or is that some kind of bait and switch in which they get a woman to play a transvestite man who has a gay relationship with a female beast dressed as a man?
      More to the point… I imagine that the sex scene in this movie must be… beastly!

  11. How many people still watch this trash?
    I know the answer is “too many.”

    1. do they even do videos? Last time I watched it was for Beavis and Butthead, about 20 years ago.

      3. All I know of the channel is the YouTube degeneracy that keeps getting massively downvoted.
        They put out that “Resolutions for White Men” video, and they host Laci Green and ‘Cesca Ramsay (a crazy-eyed feminist and racist, respectively). Other than that, I hear they just put out trashy television targeting blacks.
        I want my, I want my, I want my MTV!

        1. I’am freelancing over the net, finishing normal tasks that only requires from you personal pc or laptop as well as internet service access and I couldn’t be delighted… Half a year have passed when i commenced this and also i attained till now overall 36 thousand dollars… Basically i make money around 80 dollars/hourly and work for 3 to 4 h every day.And impressive thing about this job is that you can actually choose when to work yourself and for how long and you get money after the end of every week.>>>> http://s.coop/25urz

    2. And if you see the comments of her acceptance speech, everyone loves her so much and she is perfect.
      How can people promote their own downfall is beyond me because these type of political movements only affect the mass people not the ones at the top of the pyramid.

      1. True, but EmptyV is like the TV network version of the old guy who tries to get with the young chicks, but has no game and comes off as a complete loser.

        1. ha yeh it had its day in the sun back in the 90s or maybe even the 80s. I’m sure the management team were all for this stupid gender neutral award for the controversy and to appeal to the younger sjw generation. If they are going to bring in this ‘gender neutral crap, then go the whole hog and get rid of their best male and best female award categories.
          Asia Kate Dillon comes up with a neutral gender for herself, which I’m sure helps to get her headlines, screen clicks and makes her seem more special in celeb land, and has the gall to complain the industry needs to cater for her (and supposedly others who classify themselves the same) with special categories.

        2. I’m sure the management team were all for this stupid gender neutral award for the controversy and to appeal to the younger sjw generation.

          The funny part about that is the younger generation by and large is too broke to be able to afford pay TV. They’re leading the way in terms of cord-cutting, albeit not on a voluntary basis.

  12. Watson’s dress is 1/4 skin,1/4 tablecloth,1/4 silver dollars, 1/4 panty hose.
    so hot


  13. I’m going to follow in the footsteps of my hero Clovis Ledbetter and identity as a log truck.

  15. “SJWs are not demanding, for example, that companies do away with binary
    gender quotas, such as Norway’s requirement that 40% of boardroom
    positions are filled by “women,” without any measures for “androgyne” or
    “bigender” representation. Or that the Olympics should become either a
    gender-neutral competition or expand to 60 different sexual and gender
    categories to allow “two-spirit gender” and “pansexual” athletes to win
    gold medals, too.”
    Don’t give those morons ideas.

  16. Steve Sailer points out that Watson did well enough as a cute child actress in the Harry Potter movies. She just didn’t mature into a woman with looks good enough to make her competitive for adult film roles.
    Unless she has squandered her money from the Harry Potter franchise, she should probably retire from acting and public life and live off of her fortune.

    2. If I had as much loot on hand as her, I’d never make another movie again. For what reason?

  17. The more I look at it, the more I’m convinced that these high-profile Hollywood actors play other roles in addition to the ones they play in mainstream films – like that of a Climate Change activist, or a feminist, or a gender-neutral advocate, etc.
    I wouldn’t be surprised if their alleged sexual leanings were scripted for them as well. At home, they probably laugh at all of it, and behave in a completely opposite manner. In public, they act as serious as a heart-attack and put on that designated mask.
    What next? Gender-netural products and groceries? What to do with Mr. Clean, Mr. Coffee, Mrs. Paul, Mrs. Smith, Lady Godiva chocolate, etc. Not to mention Aunt Jemima and Uncle Ben. I don’t want anybody to be offended by what I eat or purchase. Good lord, I couldn’t stand the abject shame of it all. “I’m shakin’ it here boss…I’m shaaaaakin’ it…”

    1. Not to mention all the sexist superhero names, like Wonder Woman, Superman and the Boy Wonder.

      1. They’ve got a lot of work to do. Maybe we should pitch in and suggest alternative names…

      1. Mr. Rapey…BWAHAHAHA. Mr. Muh Dick, another option there. Jesus. They were talking about making James Bond black, too, not long ago. Watch them remake “The Sound of Music” and Father VonTrapp will be black, his wife will be white, and the kids will all be mixed-race. What will they think of next (I don’t want to know)…

        1. How would they handle Maria’s Catholic faith in the remake, though? She didn’t leave the convent because she stopped believing in God; she left because both she and her mother superior agreed that she didn’t have the vocation for it, whereas she could serve God honorably as a married woman.
          Jeez, I dread what they would do with the children’s characters. Make some of them conflicted about their sexual identity?

        2. Probably so…they would need to put some sort of sexual-identity confusion into the revised script. A no-brainer would be to have a Catholic priest (white male) molest Maria. And her dindu boyfriend would comfort her, while acting all smart and strong and shee-it, and then he’d kick the priest’s ass.
          And to really dumb viewers down, they could call the remake, “The Sound of Rap Music.” (Or, “The Sound of Hip-Hop”.)
          Here are some suggested titles for Hollywood remakes, whereby they might switch out the white-male lead character, for a black man:
          1) Forrestonzo Gump
          2) Jacquan Reacher
          3) Jonmetrius Wick

        3. Jonmetrius Wick would probably go on a killing spree because someone beat his bitch.
          Whether it’s a dog or a lady is up to the producers.

        4. Or after somebody disrespected him. You know, after he tried to shake some white dude down for $20 on the street, and the white dude had the temerity to say, “I don’t have $20…”

        5. There’s probably a lot more cash for you in this world if you join the other team. And I mean the globalists, not the gays.

        6. Not too sure about “The Sound of Music”. Depends on if the Von Trapps still have the rights to the movie and the legal power to squish any variations.

      2. Back in high school I had a teacher that looked like Mr Clean with a surname of “Cseh”.
        Some kids got confused he just wore a white T shirt for Haloween.

    3. An actor is a paid professional liar. It is their job to pretend to be someone they’re not, say words someone else wrote for them, and convince the masses that it’s 100% genuine.
      Why would that stop when they walk off the film set?

      1. Exactly. I’ll bet it’s in their contracts with the studios that they have to opt for some sort of SJW leanings of some sort. Or they’re out. Except in rare cases. You know, when that one-in-a-hundred actor backs gun ownership, or whatnot…and that’s probably in the contract, too.

        1. Well, I do know that it’s not 100% necessary. Tim Allen, Sarah Michelle Gellar, and apparently hundreds of other actors and actresses are right-leaning, but they keep real quiet about it most of the time.
          I only know about those two because Tim Allen doesn’t give a shit, and I heard that SMG has worked with the RNC in the past.

        2. I’d wager some cash that in their cases, it’s part of their contracts with the studios, too. They can’t make it look like ALL actors are liberal SJWs. But it just might be in their best interests to make it look like the vast majority are…

        3. Certainly, there can be some profit to it. But, so far as I know, Tim Allen has always been pretty much what he looks like on his shows. The man went from widowed home to drug dealer to jail to standup to television back when studios were a bit more open to sane people.
          I have to believe there are at least a few genuine people in media. The alternative is just too depressing.

        4. Tim Allen’s show, possibly/probably the only conservative sitcom on tv, just got cancelled. It got almost 6.5 mil viewers per show, impressive only bc it was on Friday night. It had almost 3X the viewers as Agents of Shield, which costs a huge amount of money to produce

        6. (((Sarah Michelle Gellar))) right leaning?? Did you see a single episode of Buffy?

  18. To be fair, she is pretty gender-neutral looking at times. An article on here earlier posted pictures that made her look like a failed Justin beiber clone.

  20. “…then there is no room for my identity in that award system binary.”
    Yeah. So?

    1. You know he was singing about Prince? Weird, because Prince got more hot ass than a toilet seat, and had more talent than five Mark Knopflers put together.
      Not hating on Knopfler; I love his music too. But Prince was out of this world talented.

      1. He was quoting a TV and refrigerator delivery man talking about Prince. He wasn’t talking shit about Prince himself. But you’re right. Prince was way more talented.

        1. Call me crazy, but I’d rather listen to Dire Straits than Prince any day of the week.

      3. Call me crazy, but I’d rather listen to Dire Straits than Prince any day of the week. Walk of Life>Prince’s entire back catalogue.

    2. A lyric that has disappeared if you listen to music now. Plunk a quarter in the jukebox, that lyric is gone. Same for karaoke.

      1. Do you honestly think that it’s working? Seems like it’s only solidifying sides.

        1. I need to clarify – it is working to confuse the SHEEPLE only. Of course most people on this site and others like it, are not confused and yes, becoming even more polarised possibly. This is why the best outcome for the USA is a breakup of the union. Two groups are forming and they will never see eye to eye.

    3. Yeh the irony eh. Walt Disney will roll over in his grave when Disney inc start embracing the gender neutral androgynous look in both their male & female animation characters

  27. I haven’t seen the new one, but the cartoon makes more sense if you take it as the story a girl tells herself or her friends to backwards hamsterize her bad choices and how they are actually good choices or at least not her fault. Yes she ran away from her loving father, but he was being oppressive. Yes she left her stable fiancée, but he was evil somehow. Yes the bad boy she ends up with is a brute and abuses her, but he’s a victim of an evil spell. And on and on and on.

  29. Just look at that woman’s​ eyes, the gender neutral thot. The soul has completely been sucked out of her and now she’s on board poisoning your daughters.

  30. con ese corte de pelo y nada de carne, parece un pibe. y supuestamente es “belle”. malisimo

  31. Stefan Molynueax had a bomb diggity analysis of Beauty and the Beast that crushes this articles weak summations.

  32. So which did Emma Watson play in Beauty and The Beast? Beauty or Beast or both?

  33. I wonder if Emma Watson would be such a rabid feminist if she weren’t so cruelly ugly?

  35. I would hate fuck her so hard; afterwards I would spit in her bloody face and say: “feminist whore”.

      1. Well, a broken jaw is empowerment? if so, then she would feel really empowered after that hate fuck….lol

    3. You romantic. Please tell me you’d say it in Spanish-soemthing like ‘Puta feminista’. I’d probably say something to that effect in Greek and how I shredded their insides 😉

      1. Spanish is a language rich in bad words and insults (but not even close to italian). I would say “perra feminista” because ‘perra’ is the female dog, but when you use it as an insult is more hateful than ‘puta’.

        1. Greek has some really bad ones also. I relish in using them. Had one I had to unleash on earlier-slut strung me along so I ripped her to shreds. I’m an equal opportunity insult-merchant and I can cut right to the bone without blinking when necessary.

        2. In the hispanic Internet community there is a long list of
          insults towards feminists, liberals, freaks and others. Many of them are neologisms.

        3. Spanish speaking manosphere?
          Mi buen amigo, podrias darme los enlaces?

        4. Bueno, el caso de la comunidad hispana es más complejo.
          La revaloración de los roles de género, lo tradicional y la defensa ante las elites globales son algo más relacionado los sitios nacionalistas (ejemplo: http://europasoberana.blogspot.com/ )
          También vale decir que las personas del mundo hispano son aún
          muy reticentes a todo aquello que suponga una amenaza hacia los valores tradicionales (a excepción de países como Argentina o España). Eso se debe a que la doctrina católica y las tradiciones están muy arraigadas en nuestra gente.
          Todo lo anteriormente dicho es una explicación de el porqué no hay
          una “Esfera del Hombre” muy grande o bien marcada en nuestra comunidad, la mayoría de las páginas que sí pertenecen a la esfera son de “Movimiento por los Derechos del Hombre” y algunos de “MGTOW” (estos últimos son mal vistos por hombres y mujeres). Pero tampoco es que se sienta muy necesario un lugar de opinión masculina, ya que por lo general los hombres pueden expresarse sin miedo a ser censurados en la mayoría de los países hispánicos (por el momento).
          Solo podría darte enlaces a sitios nacionalistas y algunos de “MRM”, ¿igualmente los quieres? (yo soy más partidario de la neomasculinidad y los nacionalistas, los religiosos y activistas por los derechos del hombre son lo más cercano a ello).

        5. Estoy familiarizado con Europa Soberana y otros sitios similares, dada mi orientacion politica personal; aunque no los visito regularmente…..el unico sitio en español del cual soy visitante regular es del canal TLV1, el cual te recomiendo: https://www.youtube.com/user/CanalTLV1
          Aceptaria los links de sitios MRM, ya que tengo curiosidad por visitarlos (aunque sinceramente no creeria que sean de calidad…). Sitios Nacionalistas tambien seran bien aceptados, estoy bastante alejado de la escena de habla española desde hace años.
          Ahora, no estoy de acuerdo con tu observacion sobre la reticencia del mundo hispano dados sus valores tradicionales. Por solo citar un ejemplo, en Colombia (pais donde naci y vivo actualmente) he observado un fenomeno: muchas mujeres que no tienen una educacion ‘feminista’ (y de hecho algunas ni siquiera han ido a la universidad) defienden posiciones feministas dada 1) la influencia de los medios de comunicacion locales (bastante izquierdosos) y 2) de la TV por cable.
          Sobre la relativa libertad de expresion, estoy de acuerdo parcialmente. Si bien no existe el mismo tipo de represion que en paises como Canada o UK, nos encontramos en el mismo camino. Por ejemplo, en el mundillo corporativo local la represion es exactamente igual (lo se por experiencia propia, en el pasado tuve mis encuentros con RRHH…).
          Es bueno tener alguien de habla española por aca, creia que yo era el unico… de donde eres?

        7. Maybe it was because of the language? some kind of ‘English only’ filter?
          In some way I’m informed of the local nationalist ‘scene’ because I’ve been involved in the Nationalist/WN/NS more than 10 years. In the spanish-speaking the best option right now is Proyecto Segunda Republica (they are from Argentina, they are starting a branch in Uruguay, and I think they also have people there in Paraguay), they are are basically Third Position, they are aware of the JQ, but the downside is that they are soft on race (probably because they want to reach all south american countries). Adrian Salbuchi, its founder, have a number of books which I highly recommend to you (especially El Cerebro del Mundo). If you want to exchange more insights write me: [email protected]
          It is true that the situation here in central and south america is less bad but sadly our countries seem to be ‘catching up’ them. Here in Colombia the influence of the Globalist ideology is both in the lower and upper levels of the society. In the lower is through TV and in the upper is through ‘high’ education [sic].
          Yeah, argentinian women are really fucked up with feminisn (been there a couple of times) which is sad because they are beautiful. I have little experience with spanish women, but I heard that they are fucked as well (in all sense).

        8. I had no idea about that group. They have not been mentioned in any medium of my country (they are busier in covering the words of models or sportsmen).
          But the truth is that I particularly became apolitical, mainly because the politics in my country is a circus and can not be taken very seriously. I am not a chauvinist nationalist or interested in race matters (I am mestizo). But I was always interested in being informed about the different political expressions throughout history (and nationalism is very interesting).

  37. Exactly, if we have gender-neutral Sports then men will destroy everybody and everybody will have to shut the fuck up.

  38. I love how these sjw’s think that cutting your hair short somehow changes your gender. I mean seriously, you have to be one big delusional dumbass to think that making a fashion statement changes your fucking genetics

    1. They believe that they can be “gender-neutral”…yet they cut their hair short to look like boys…yet they’re gender-neutral so they’re not boys…but they want to look like boys…since boys have short hair and girls have long hair…but you can be a boy or a girl
      I’m so confused 😕

      1. That’s because your trying to rationalize the irrational….or delusional

  40. The only answer to this problem is a total boycott liberal hollywood and promote the rise of conservative directors and writers. Not one cent should go to these degenerates. They’re many talented conservative film makers but since it’s so hard to get into the business they never receive the funding they need. So we need to attend conservative movies even if they are low budget so that one day these films will have the kind of financial backing they need.
    Liberal hollywood should be destroyed.

  41. Women get their egos stroked a thousand times a day by everyone they meet telling them they’re beautiful and special and if that’s not enough they are drowned in media and music promoting girl power and telling them they’re perfect in every single way. Their ego is so enormous that they mistreat any man who isn’t in the top ten percent of looks and status yet I’m constantly hearing we need to build women up because they have low self esteem. What a joke! It’s time to deflate these massive egos. Just because a woman might have a little self doubt doesn’t mean she has low selfesteem… It just means she’s experiences what every fucking person on earth does and she doesn’t deserve to be shielded from it. I’m launching an antiselfesteem campaign because there’s got to be some balance, folks.

    1. It is a very good point, and it shows up something fairly fundamental, I think. Which is that men are far less concerned with having their egos stoked by others because they have to earn their self-esteem through action. Whether anybody else notices said action is just an addition, you know if you did good. For women, it isn’t about what they do, they are born women and valued for it, not for what they achieve. But that value is determined by the opinion of others, so they are highly dependent on it.
      To become a ‘man’ a boy has to show it in how they act. To become a ‘woman’ a girl just has to reach maturity.

      1. The reason why girls become women through maturity and not action is because women aren’t taught or valued for their action. Centuries of practice has taught us that the best a woman can achieve for herself is to have a baby, and the first achievement for that is maturity. It’s a practice of oppression, of subduing women so they can’t act, not a celebration of women. If women really were given deferential treatment, then they would be given opportunities to act, opportunities to affect real change — not empty encouragement to follow a sedentary life.
        And contrary to your assertion, most women don’t have overinflated self esteems. Studies have shown that by the age of five girls are far less likely than boys to think they can be brilliant. Also by the age of five, girls are less likely to think they’re as smart or as capable as boys — even though the average school grades achieved by boys and girls are the same.
        Women do need to have their esteem validated by others, but that’s because they’re not allowed to have any positive views of themselves. If a woman is confident in her appearance, then she’s vain and shallow. If a woman values her skills and knowledge, then she’s self-absorbed and immodest. Compare this to a man, who if he’s confident in himself, then he’s just confident.

    2. ‘we need to build women up because they have low self esteem’. – that’s 1970s talk. Its bonkers you hear it more than ever yet its less relevant than ever imo. A lot of expectations on women dont come from the patriarchy but competing with other women, social media, women’s magazines and high expectations for themselves. As you say I’m sure much of it is some self doubt, which is normal for most people, but getting blown out of proportion by feminists likely to leverage more social change for their benefit.

  43. Maybe it’s just me but I just can’t fap to this Watson Bird……I was very disappointed to hear she is not related to the good Doctor…..

    2. i would have fucked her when she was underage/barely legal. Didn’t grow up to be a fantastically great looking woman though.

  44. And the first winner of our inaugural “Anyone Except A White Heterosexual Male” award is…

  46. “Gender neutral” but they still find a way to give another women another award.

    1. Yeah….I wonder how many penis owners that don’t wear dresses will win it in the coming years.

  47. Given as she’s just marginally female, why not?
    A flat chested, flat assed chick that looks like a 13 year old boy, I mean c’mon, even *they* knew she “deserved” this award.

  51. Maybe we should just scrap awards altogether. It’s nothing more than self aggrandizing ass kissing anyway.

  52. Another clear demonstration (for those with eyes to see) of what a mentally-ill society we live in. Or perhaps, being pushed on us all to believe we live in.(??)

  53. Whoa whoa, I’m a little confused — your arguments began running into each other, and you drew some strange conclusions.
    So, in essence, you think that advocates of women’s rights are discriminating against non-binary people in that they seek to better their situation. Is that correct? You assume that there’s only so much of the privilege pie for us to eat, and if we don’t play nice and let the other oppressed groups get a slice, there won’t be any left over.
    What this argument fails to account for is that all feminists want is to eventually achieve equality or opportunity, or, access to the same opportunities men get (note: not TOTAL equality, as you often assume, which is impossible). This is not discriminating against other groups — rather it paves the way for their rights as well. It’s like, if the manager doesn’t get a raise, then the lower employees won’t either. If women’s sports aren’t even recognized enough to get funding, then we certainly can’t expect recognition for co-ed/gender neutral sports teams.
    I think you might not really understand discrimination; discrimination is the prejudicial treatment of certain groups, such as what you do every day to belittle and discredit women. See? It’s not that hard to understand!

  54. Emma Watson may not believe in genders but the Muslims who migrate in large numbers to her home country in fact do, and when they look at Watson, they are not seeing a male, but some tasty white female flesh. I am insinuating about the Muslim males who groom white women for sex over there in Britain, it is shockingly common and many British females get involved with it, mostly because they are misdirected and have screwed up families with no strong male leader, a father.

  55. Gender neutral sports mean basically only men will compete on any watchable level. Let men into the WNBA see what happens. Let men into girls college softball, see what happens. Let men and women compete in swimming or volleyball or weightlifting, see what happens. The list goes on and on and doesn’t bode well for female athletes.

  56. Hollywood is beginning to add in anti-God themes in its films. Its very apparent in the latest Alien film, when in that film the head of an evil corporation believes that human race was created by an Alien race, and his alternate hypothesis is that we are just some biochemical accident. I found some of stuff so disturbing but very subtle anti-God messages in the newest film.
    Hollywood is now promoting deviancy in so many obvious ways. They have promoted deviancy for years, but now its getting to the point where such behavior is seen as “normal”.

  57. I will not even entertain the bizarre narratives of SJW’s let alone summon up the energy to argue against their irrationality.
    No one can or should argue with stupid- give them their own country somewhere to protect what’s left of civilization.

Comments are closed.