Bill Cosby has been criminally charged with sexually assaulting one of his many accusers. Hooray! Therefore he’s guilty of all the other “rapes,” plus this one. No need for a trial to call him a serial rapist—or that’s what the Twitter witch hunters and others would have us believe. Celebrities have joined the typical SJW crowd in celebrating the arraignment of Cosby after using their Harry Potter divination techniques to verify his guilt.
With the idea of contempt of court all but dead, these leftist do-gooders have flooded the internet with claims that Cosby is a serial rapist. They have promulgated what they feel are immutable laws of dealing with rape accusations, such as “listen and believe” and “women do not gain from lying.” As they do this, Bill Clinton, a hero for many of them, continues to have the many rape and sexual misconduct allegations against him swept under the carpet.
Here comes the witch hunt
Grateful that Bill Cosby’s criminal record will be marked forever, like the lives of the women he raped. They deserve justice and peace.
— Lena Dunham (@lenadunham) December 30, 2015
Cosby had only just taken his first step outside, accompanied by police, when a torrent of “I told you so”‘s began emanating from the Court of Twitter. The Instigator-in-Chief was, unsurprisingly, Lena Dunham, who has admitted to playing around with her sister’s vagina.
One day, as I sat in our driveway in Long Island playing with blocks and buckets, my curiosity got the best of me. Grace was sitting up, babbling and smiling, and I leaned down between her legs and carefully spread open her vagina. She didn’t resist and when I saw what was inside I shrieked.
My mother came running. “Mama, Mama! Grace has something in there!”
My mother didn’t bother asking why I had opened Grace’s vagina. This was within the spectrum of things I did. She just got on her knees and looked for herself. It quickly became apparent that Grace had stuffed six or seven pebbles in there. My mother removed them patiently while Grace cackled, thrilled that her prank had been a success.
Joining the fray was Judd Apatow, whose activism might be explained by his biggest hits, The 40-Year-Old Virgin and Knocked Up, being long behind him.
Really, what is the point of a trial anymore? If Lena Dunham and Co. have the crystal ball that can determine guilt (clue: it involves always siding with the female accuser), why don’t we dismantle the courts? Another element that mainstream commentators haven’t raised is how on Earth anyone can now ensure a fair trial for Cosby. Rape memes involving him now permeate the internet and every major media outlet has sprayed their viewers with pieces sympathetic to the accusers, a group that includes often bankrupt ex-supermodel Janice Dickinson, who spent most of the 1980s high on her own drugs but still claims Cosby drugged and raped her.
And then there’s that tricky issue of the standard of proof. Anyone familiar with rape accusations and convictions will be aware that the requirement of “evidence” to convict is artificially lowered for women accusing men of rape or sexual assault. Accused of a bank robbery? DNA evidence and bags of unexplained millions found in your home are the sorts of things usually needed to put you in jail. For rape and sexual assault, pure testimony and being at a particular place at a particular time is enough.
What about Woody Allen?
So Woody’s fine because he tows the Hollywood liberal line and continues to generate millions from his artsy films?
Unlike Cosby and his recent history of attacking the cult of African-American self-victimization, acclaimed director Woody Allen has stuck to the distinctly pro-liberal official line of Hollywood. Remember that Woody, who is certainly entitled to innocence before guilt, stands accused of molesting his adoptive daughter Dylan Farrow when she was a child.
His career as a director has also continued at a very consistent rate, whereas the acting presence of Cosby, for whatever reason, declined substantially from the 1990s. Bill kept largely to conventional comedy, which, despite its status as a segment of the wider entertainment industry, is treated separately from and less royally than film and television. In fact, unless you’re a comedic actor or presenter on TV, as opposed to mostly being a stand-up comic, making people laugh is seen as more like clown material than having genuine A-lister status.
Because Allen is still producing and remains an avowed Democrat, he’s largely immune to any calls for him to be charged or to “resign” from Hollywood, let alone being chased out. This is why Judd Apatow is too spineless to “listen and believe” Dylan Farrow and call for Allen’s head. He can conveniently hide behind “there’s truth in numbers” assertions because the director of Annie Hall has, as far as I am aware, only been accused of sexual misconduct by daughter Dylan, compared to Cosby’s many accusers. So Bill’s in the rapist bin for Apatow now that so many angry women have surfaced and Allen remains out of it. Unless the latter changes his party registration to Republican, joins the birther movement against Obama, or criticizes gun control, of course.
What this shows is that your popularity and value to elite communities insulates you from social witch hunts. We see a similar theme with Roman Polanski, a self-admitted pedophile who is protected due to his avant garde cinematic image and liberal, non-contrarian beliefs. Irrespective of whether his victim did not look like a child, she was rightfully deemed a child legally and cognitively.
Cosby denies any wrongdoing, whereas Polanski was very open about the fact that he plied a 13-year-old girl with drugs and alcohol before penetrating her in the anus. The Polanski case was undoubtedly a case of both statutory rape and rape from an inability to consent through intoxication and being drugged. So why do the hearsay claims against Cosby generate so much outrage?
Are we moving even more towards popular justice instead of objective justice?
The answer has actually been “yes” for years, but recent times have evinced a particularly sinister turn. Almost all the time, the basic logic of a Judd Apatow or Lena Dunham is that once the number of accusers reaches a vague definition of critical mass, whether 3, 5 or 50 women yelling “sexual assault,” the allegations just have to be true.
On that basis, you don’t have to wait for a court decision and can quickly strip people of their reputations, jobs, and income streams via “justified” mob actions. This is, ironically, how the principle of justice works too often in the acclaimed rule of law state of Pakistan, where a slew of blasphemy allegations and convictions have invariably pitted accused minority Christians against the much larger groups of more socially powerful Muslim neighbors accusing them.
To boot, US conceptions of justice have always been undermined by the election of district attorneys. Populist candidates for office can very publicly promise to chase after high-profile potential scalps. The district attorney investigating Cosby even campaigned on dealing with him. There are serious questions about how this accords with fairness and objectivity as it basically enshrines the overt politicization of criminal prosecutions. For all the elitism sometimes associated with judges, at least their secure tenure was designed to protect them from the more volatile opinions and demands of the masses.
Found guilty or not, Cosby’s life is ruined
Guilty because the SJWs said so.
Thankfully, the escalation of personal attacks against him have come at the end of Bill Cosby’s life. Unfortunately, though, these attacks will shave at least five years off his lifespan and rob him of any real financial means to support his aged care needs. He has lost, other than probably meager royalties and passive income from his investments, millions in anticipated earnings. And much, if not all of what remains will be plowed into his legal defense.
With the watered-down requirements for rape convictions vis-à-vis other crimes, Cosby will be found guilty. Not that this matters, as millions of very judgmental people will ensure he endures all the consequences of being guilty, even if a miracle occurs and he’s exonerated by a court. Like a prison, they’ll keep him confined to his house as he seeks to avoid the angry mob always waiting outside, both figuratively and literally.
Read More: Why Don’t SJWs Call Bill Clinton A Rapist?
The whole Cosby ordeal like many other just further proves you don’t need evidence in regards to being raped. So long as you have the right genitalia. Over three deacades, more than 30 women with zero toxicology reports and rape kits. Another man was jailed for 28 yrs because a woman dreamed he raped her
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/clarence-moses-el-after-28-years-inside-us-man-jailed-for-a-rape-he-claims-he-never-committed-is-a6784216.html
How could Cosby resist temptation?
I am so glad I wasn’t eating or drinking when I saw this….
If you’re willing to hit that, you need help.
You have officially made my list of people I hate most for forcing my eyes to take in this monstrosity.
I was ambushed too. Just paying it forward.
Ok. You are off the list. But you are on notice of probation.
Lena Dunham’s selfies are what happens when dumpy girls try to attention whore even though they know they dont have the body for it
it’s almost tragic to look at
Her Instagram account seems like a painful exercise in self-loathing, apart from a brutal attack on the eyes.
Huh. Never in my life did I think I would find a woman’s ass disgusting without fearing being called a faggot, but there you go.
Can we just choose neither side and think that Cosby, Clinton, Dunham, Allen, Polanski, R Kelly, Paula Poundstone, Michael Jackson, et al. are all fucking weirdo creeps and just avoid them all? When one hits a certain level of fame and/or ego, they believe themselves invincible and their dark sides emerge.
Nothing says equality like sexual predators. Well said.
Allen was investigated and never charged. Mia Farrow is a crazy that made it up.
Regardless, Allen left his wife for his adopted daughter. That crosses so many boundaries of decency.
Adopted daughter of his girlfriend. Was not his. He did what cops wanted in the investigation and there was no evidence. Not the same as others.
Adopted daughter of his girlfriend makes it less skeevy? Maybe I’m a fucking prude, but he’s gross.
No reason to false charge him with child rape. Cosby cheated on his wife. Doesn’t make false rape OK.
no…she wasn’t allen’s wife just his girlfriend.
Allen basically did what everyone here talks about. He found a younger woman, trained her to be the way he wanted her to be and then married her and remained with her.
There is no evidence that he touched her as a minor. He was not her father, adopted or otherwise. And her cunt of a mother wasn’t married to Allen.
You think it isn’t decent? I don’t know. I am not privy to the details. I don’t see anything wrong with it.
He was wealthy and famous. He left his girlfriend because she was a psychotic cunt who was feminist to the core and married her adopted daughter who was over 18.
So what is the problem? The age difference? You don’t like that he was older? That he was dating her adopted mother before he dated and eventually married her? That she is from a third world country with no feminism infiltration? You don’t like that? Where does this cross a boundary?
He dated Farrow for 10 years and adopted two of her other children. It wasn’t like a casual fling and then quickly moved on to the daughter. I can’t define it exactly, but that’s a little too intimate/incestuous of a relationship for me.
If it strikes you as odd then that is ok. However, don’t be so quick to give the benefit of the doubt to an unstable woman and a media portrayal. I like the fact that Woody has never really felt the need to explain himself. He hasn’t done anything illegal, he is happy and everyone else can go fuck themselves.
LOL – a Jew diddles a Korean and people call it incest.
She wasnt his daughter in any way, shape or form. Soon Yi had a father figure, some other guy. What he did was icky and yucky, but its not a crime.
Yup. Woody was charged by a mentally unstable woman and the daughter she poisoned.
Also, woody allen didn’t adopt Dylan and wasn’t married to mia so daughter is used pretty loose here.
As for Soon Yi he wasn’t legally her father nor her adopted mothers husband either.
You may think it is odd, but they have remained together.
You talk to them? Were you there? You may feel that woody is a little creepy, but the truth is that there is zero evidence that he has ever broken any law…..legal or moral….
Woody took Soon Yi to avenge himself on Mia for using her last chance to conceive to have a child with Frank. Mia got the message. And she is still furious.
I am not so sure it is like that. I think it is possible that Mia is a total shit and Soon Yi was a well mannered younger woman with youth and the love and appreciation Woody couldn’t get from Farrow. In one interview he said that she loves to listen and be taught and he loves to talk and to teach.” I think his attraction to her is perfectly natural.
Farrow seems mentally unstable.
After Sinatra she was never the same. Notice drastic short hair cut. Sinatra served her papers by having his personal lawyer walk onto the set of Rosemary’s baby and wait there while she signed all the documents.
I agree with the general sentiments, celebrities are not superior and do tend to exhibit a range of issues, so I appreciate seeing one knocked from the superficial pedestal they tend to enjoy and should not be given, but also torn as we’d all do well to bear in mind two points in this case because it is the why and the way behind this hoopla that should be alarming to men:
1. He is a well-known black who chose to call on his community to quit seeking perpetual victim-hood and ascribing blame to others for problems largely perpetuated by their own choosing.
2. This is a fellow man who is being convicted in the court of public opinion without any facts or due process and suffering consequences as dire to having actually been convicted, continuing the practice for even more men to suffer the same fate. And for those who’ve already had their reputations tarnished shrinking recourse for ever gaining their good names back.
It is indeed a bit of a tricky situation. I generally find great glee in seeing celebs crash and burn as I view them as a serious blight on Western culture. That being said, my integrity demands that the truth and justice, true justice, be served. If he legitimately raped those women, he should be charged. If not, leave the man be.
Sometimes the way you say what I am trying to say is not only uncanny, but also enviable.
Hah, right back atcha.
Sure, I won’t say he’s guilty until he’s convicted. And I know some women lie and some seek attention, but not as many as have come forward. That’s too many to be a conspiracy. Also, his previous statements in depositions where he basically admitted to drugging women all adds up to the dude being skeevy as fuck.
No, it’s not too many, unfortunately it’s very common, a man is accused of sexual whatever and there is a subsequent dog-pile of accusers (seemingly directly correlative to his status) seeking out of court settlements or 15 minute fame that prosecutors and investigators have to then sort through and vet the credibility frequently finding there to be nothing there to back the claims. And when this is done to intentionally ruin or harm someone finding more dogs for the pile is exactly the forte of Gloria Allred and those like her.
As for “skeevy”, yeah I won’t sleep with a drunk or intoxicated woman (personal choice on my part for a slew of reasons), but the truth is many people go to parties or to hook-up/booty calls simply because they know they can get high and have a quick fling no strings or believe it might gain them something, not uncommon at all. Convicting them of legal wrongdoing for something that is as yet unproven is unconscionable.
Maybe Cosby administered these Qaaludes (was it?) through nefarious means, maybe not, I don’t know and the court case hasn’t started to provide this evidence so I won’t speculate. If he did then she has some type of a case, if she took them willingly (rather as a stress reducer or a way to “unwind” or whatever) that’s on her.
No different than when its been pointed out that Drunk-sex regret isn’t rape on this very site countless times.
fuck that victim shit, truth is truth. bottom line there are millions of racist motherfuckers in America. you think you going to keep fucking me and I am going to lay there and not say shit? fck that shit..but what bill said was truth there are some fuck ups in the community. but I live in 97% white seattle and see plenty of white folks committing crime every day. I am worrying about a white boy breaking in my house or car here because that is who is committing crime here poor whites and quiet as it is kept the Asians and Russians are doing dirt here.
Why include Cosby in that list? There is still no evidence that he raped anyone.
I agree and also Michael Jackson was exonerated. One of his now grown accusers admitted that it was a farce to get money. The father of one of his accusers even committed suicide (they think) due to guilt after Jackson’s death.
All that evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
There is no evidence to convict Cosby; several of Jackson’s accusers later testified that they were put up to it by their parents; and Kelly (as much as I hate his music) had a girl lie about her age to him.
Justice for some is justice for none, and if we allow these accusations to go uncontested we provide moral ground for movements like BLM (which is only interested in defending the guilty, but nonetheless we granted them moral ground).
It is vital that men of good character stand up for law and order, and that we stand up for each other.
LOL silly – most criminals do everything they can to erase evidence, especially if a mere speck of it can send you to prison for life.
Especially rapists – they love drugged victims who wont be able to remember anything, and they take great pains to erase all the DNA from her.
BLM is not defending the guilty where you get that shit from? how come these racist cops are shooting folks who are not the real bad asses we know are out here? fuck the racist lying redneck cops. you are saying keep letting these lying racist mother fuckers do dirt and not say shit because they are white males with a badge
Rape accusations are today’s moral panic. And like all moral panics, it’s going to leave many people ruined financially and most importantly, their reputation. If it were up to these modern day witch hunters, a “R” would be branded on their face after castration for the men while the women would walk. At least through lawsuits the accused can be financially rewarded.
Still, isn’t it strange that within the week of Cosby suing his accusers he’s brought up on charges?
The statute of limitations was about to run out on his case involving Andrea Constand.
Ms. Constand should be made to pay back any settlement money she got from Cosby, as talking to prosecutors in this case is clearly a violation of the confidential settlement to which she agreed when she took Cosby’s money.
the laws do not apply to black men in America. then motherfuckers cry somebody playing the race card.the shit you just described is a perfect example of it. mother fuckers unsealing sealed documents
1. Had these women reported these alleged rapes when they supposedly happened, the fact that Mr. Cosby is black would have worked far more against him back then than it would now. He could have easily been the victim of racist vigilante terrorism.
2. Bill Cosby, being a black man in the USA, is “expected” to toe the leftist line on all issues without question. Cosby made the “mistake” of daring to step off the plantation, and he must now be made an example of by the left.
WHERE DA WHITE WOMEN @ ?1
Haha! The irony of seeing SJWs forming a lynch mob against an isolated black man…
The narrative for women: someone has to be the accuser (a man) because women are always the victim. This is all you need to know in order to understand women.
Even when they are the ones at fault, somehow (in their mind) they are the victim.
“Even when they are the ones at fault, somehow (in their mind) they are the victim.”
That’s actually what Otto Weininger wrote about women :
” Women are convinced of their own integrity without ever having sat in
judgment on it.”
“No male criminal has ever believed that his punishment was unjust.
A woman, on the contrary, is convinced of the animosity of her accuser, and if she does not wish to be convinced of it, no one can persuade her that she has done wrong.”
but they are quiet when white males are fucking over black women
Personally, I never liked Cosby. His show was nothing more than Full House for black people, he wasn’t funny, and for some reason, he creeped the heck out of me. Maybe it’s was his “moral” image, or how he hawked Jello pudding pops. Even his Hello Friend sweaters have that child molester vibe to them. So even though I still give him the benefit of the doubt regarding the rape accusations, he still managed to screw himself over. After all, when you fuck psycho bitch Janice Dickinson, you’re just asking for it.
Yet I apply the same principles to Lena Dunham. After all, she did admit to touching her sister. Then there’s the false rape accusations, and the fact that most of her “work” involve sex. It says a lot when she made Hillary Clinton herself uncomfortable after asking about Lenny Kravit’z dick. At least Cosby pretended to be clean. Dunham has no moral qualms whatsoever.
In conclusion, defenders of Dunham throwing Cosby under the bus is like a Nazi and a Communist arguing and the Nazi telling the Communist “Nu uh! Stalin exterminated more people than Hitler!”
The more things change the more they stay the same.
Dunham is far worse than Cosby, as she admits to having molested a child. Cosby has admitted no wrongdoing, and there is no evidence that backs up claims of any wrongdoing.
This is just gut feeling, but I do believe Cosby had sex with most of these women because, why the hell not. He had money, power, influence, and an impeccable public persona, which he could use at whim. But, as I mentioned before, I am still giving him the benefit of the doubt. If it is proven he was banging these women, then his reputation is already done. But as far as one can tell, these women are also doing it to perhaps clean up their own image as well, so who knows. But as far as rape, the bullshit flags are up.
And yes, Dunham is worse. As a side note, both Dunham and Josh Duggar should hook up. Those two schweinhunden make a cute couple.
fuck that those chicks gave him the pussy. women like men with money and power. that is why guys are crying on this site about not being able to get hot chicks
And of course, as parting advice, avoid drugs or alcohol whole having sex. Shit like this happens.
You should watch the old Fat Albert cartoons.
So now we finally know what it takes to get more people to report rape… money.
I have yet to see one picture – one – of Cosby with any of his accusers, most of whom are white women. You would think that being one of the most photographed men on the planet during his peak years, years during which interracial relationships were still largely taboo, would make it statistically impossible for him to have cavorted with these harpies without attracting attention, let alone engage in a rape spree that allegedly began at a time when black men could still get strung up from trees for even the hint of impropriety toward a white woman. Yet, I’m supposed to believe these women were afraid they wouldn’t be believed if they came forward then. Yeah, OK, as if there wouldn’t have been an army of white people happy to take down a successful black man in the 60’s and 70’s.
Instead all the evidence I have seen is that “all these women (who read each other’s stories) all say the same thing so it must be true.” Recognize that this is the exact unjust non-logic that was used at the Salem Witch Trials.
At the end of the day, I believe that what Cosby probably did was no different than what anybody else did back then – they took a lot of drugs, willingly, and fucked each other while high out of their minds. These dipshit feminists are just trying to change the rules after the game has been played to alter the outcome. This may – and I stress “may” – be undesirable behavior these days, but back then, it was the social norm, and more importantly, it was not illegal. I seem to recall something about a prohibition on ex post facto laws in the Constitution…
Regardless, even if you could show me evidence that Cosby was a bona fide bang you on the head hold you down at knife point and Fuck you rapist, I am still drawn to the conclusion that I don’t give a fuck. If his crimes were not serious enough for these women to report for decades while he continued his “rape” spree, I see no reason that I should care about them now, especially since they are long since over and done with.
Gloria Allred is representing many of the accusers. That fact in itself should raise a ton of red flags.
Allred, at this point, should be compared (often) to Al Sharpton (an opportunist….and a hypocrite).
shes a real american hero! should have a GI Joe character named after her:
Dafuq did I just watch?
that family she repped was trying to sue a pitching coach(probably MLB actually) because he made this gesture at them(they were hurling insults at him first, but that’s not important of course).
slightly difficult to fap to.
Best comment on RoK!
When it comes to Dunham and her group…it really doesn’t matter if the facts are true or false. What matters is who was accused of the crime. Clinton gets a pass from many (especially those women who consider themselves liberals) because he was their champion for so many years. Cosby, no champion for them – plus no tingles – so he must be guilty. It’s the same for anyone in Hollywood, big business or politics. It all depends on who is accused (no real facts apply).
This is how you know we’re dealing with a sick society. It shouldn’t matter who is accused. It should matter what is proved in a court of law and then the outcome. That’s how society used to operate “back when”.
Here’s another inconvenient fact to the whole rape culture/women never lie/always believe narrative – of the 337 cases chronicled on the Innocence Project where DNA evidence has exonerated someone years after conviction, 301 of them, or 89%, were convictions for sex crimes. Of those, 221, or 75% involved “eyewitness misidentification.” See:
http://www.innocenceproject.org/cases-false-imprisonment/front-page#c10=published&b_start=0&c4=Exonerated+by+DNA&c7=Sex+Crimes
Read that again and let it sink in. 89% of the exonerations documented by the Innocence Project involved sex crime convictions where it was subsequently proven that the convicted man was not guilty. The largest causal factor, by far, was misidentification. Even accepting that women may misidentify through pure mistake, how do you get to this place unless a significant number of women are flat out lying in the first place?
Don’t worry though, it’s safe to dispense with the bedrock justice principle that it is better to let 10 guilty men go free than to wrongly convict one. After all, the average sentence each served was only 14 years! Believe!!!!
Sheesh, that is a terrible statistic, though even if was 20% sex crime and 80% murder and or robbery its was still a horror outcome for the men (the original court case outcome, not the eventual exoneration outcome). Some of these eye witnesses and dodgy over eager cops deserve some time in the slammer or forced payout to the falsely accused to help offset the taxpayer’s likely payment of compensation. .
I don’t know how much this can be relevant to Cosby’s case though. His celebrity face was well known and I gather he met and chatted to the women beforehand, and it was not a case of him bursting into their room at night with a stocking over his head or there being 3rd party witnesses with hidden agendas.
Personally I believe the majority (maybe not all as he might have become emboldened after a while to use it as a strategy) of cases are going to be as NE described a bit higher up – star struck women going back to his hotel room and both taking some booze & drugs and shagging. It can be very hard to produce evidence in such cases which depending on circumstances can be bad for the genuine rape victim or the falsely accused perp. Forty yrs too late for any toxicology report and if it was say Quaaludes and not Rohypnol showing up it wont prove that she was not okay with partying with BC but maybe having post sex regrets.
I’m watching the Netflix series now Making a Murderer, and the woman mis-identified an innocent man as her rapist, but it was the police’s fault. The police put this innocent guy who they knew was innocent in a lineup and told her they had caught him and even drew a sketch specifically of him when she described her assailant, and then showed it to her, of course when he comes in the lineup she’s gonna pick out the guy in the drawing. Not all of this is evil victims, a lot of it is police and prosecutor criminality.
In short: if it’s proven that a woman can’t trust her own eyesight while being raped, why do you trust her word?
What’s ultimately behind the bogus “rape culture” and trying to convince the ignorant masses — white — males on college campuses are out of control and raping everything in sight is the endless need for tax payer dollars. Feminists are well aware women LIE. As more evidence is presented in cases demonstrating women lie, feminists risk loss of funding. Therefore they’ll stump for legislation which will bar paternity test and DNA test in rape allegations.
There’s federal grants which are now more important than justice. This is why in many cases police automatically arrest the man when a DV case is called — even should the male be the victim of a female beating him with baseball bat, etc. I know in the town I’m from, last year the wife was ready to go crazy on her son. As the husband restrained her from attacking son, the police barged in. Someone heard screaming and phoned the cops. The cops seeing the man was restraining woman automatically arrested man. Even after the wife pleaded to police what had really happened, the man was still put in jail and destroyed by press. Why would the police still do this to an innocent man? Because they were desperate for federal dollars.
LOL stupid – So women lie eh – you must be talking about
Juanita Broaddrick, the gal rightwads say was raped.
Well, when she was subpoenaed in the Jones matter it, she DENIED he raped her. LOL boy – you DO know that talking under oath is your statement of record, and that youre supposed to be truthful and NOT lie?
No one is MORE believed thsn a woman who recants her rape story and admits she lied. Therefore, Clinton was exonerated.
Americans have loved selective enforcement for decades and in a practical sense it may have always been so. Laws are passed as tools to be used against ‘bad people’ frequently. Most people expect that. You can see local news stories frequently of how someone is upset that one of these laws was used against them. After all they are ‘good people’. The news story will center around how these good people have been unfairly fined or whathaveyou because of some stupid local law. There’s never a story when the people it’s supposed to be used on are subjected to it.
So true. Many people can’t understand why the double standard between Clinton and Cosby. It’s pretty obvious. Clinton promoted feminist legislation which kept feminist orgs well funded. Ultimately that’s all that matters behind these campaigns — the endless gravy train of tax payer funds to feminist orgs.
Anyone see the woman at Hillary rally days ago? Granted … I wouldn’t put up with someone shouting over people at my rally either. But how the press treated her spoke volumes. She supposedly was “raped” and was calling out Clinton. But because she’s a republican, the press headline was “GOP Heckler gets put in place by Clinton.” Political affiliation matters when you’ve been “raped.”
We all know damn well if a gaggle of left leaning feminists who claimed to have been raped disrupted a TRUMP event, they’d be lauded as “heroic!” “Heroic group of rape ‘survivors’ confronts TRUMP at rally.”
If she was a Democrat calling out a Republican she wouldn’t have been a “heckler” should would have been a “survivor”, and not “put in place” but “revictimized”.
Can we talk about how many of these women are raping an old black man of his finances?
Sure, but it’s a quick conversation – all of them.
…
Most alien abductees tell very similar stories too. The problem is that once the first story is public, for alien abduction it was the Betty and Barney Hill story. It doesn’t mean everyone since is a liar but just that similar stories no longer means its true. It’s only evidence of truth when people are separated and cannot know what the others are saying.
Weeks ago I was flipping through the tube and on Nancy Grace was Janice Dickerson. She proceeded to say how decades ago “Bill Cosby offered her an economy airline ticket free of charge and she was beside herself!” “She wasn’t flying economy and demanded first class!” Wow. Bitch. You’re making your case look real good when on TV you tell the public how you wouldn’t accept anything less than 1st class in your endeavor to convince us this is about legit rape and not monetary reparations.
Thank you!
AMEN everyone in the 70s was popping pills. Cosby was no different than what anybody else did back then – they took a lot of drugs, willingly, and fucked each other while high out of their minds.
I have seen a lot of focus on this “admission” in Cosby’s deposition that he procured Quaaludes to give to women for sex. My response is a big: “so the fuck what?”
Think about it. Is what he said really all that different than any other man today saying, “yeah I keep a bottle of [insert your favorite liquor] around in case a woman comes over” or “I like to smoke a little weed with a woman I’m trying to fuck because it takes the edge off”? People act like its revelatory that men and women like to get a little high before they fuck. Maybe these people are all virgins.
Cosby didn’t admit to surreptitiously administering drugs to render these women incapacitated so that he would be free to do things that they otherwise would not consent to. And even if he had, I’ll say it again: “date rape” was not illegal until the 90’s in most places, so none of this was illegal even if it was true.
All of these women have admitted to willingly taking the drugs from him!! All of these women continue relationships with him long after they claim to have been raped!! Those two facts alone make my bullshit meter explode.
If you can get fucked up, choose to drive a car, kill people and be held accountable, I see no reason that you shouldn’t be able to willingly take drugs from someone, get fucked up, and consent to sex. If you’re not down to fuck, it’s pretty simple really – exercise an ounce of prevention, don’t take the drugs and get the fuck out of there.
“I have yet to see one picture – one – of Cosby with any of his accusers”
Here ya go:
http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2035450.1417818570!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_750/article-masten-1205.jpg
Cosby victim P. J. Masten posing for a snap with serial rapist predator lying a-hole Cosby in the early 1970s
Now you’ll have to change your line to “I have yet to see TWO pictures – TWO, mwaahahahaaa- of Cosby with any of his accusers.”
Interesting find. This got me intrigued so I started looking and apparently now some folks have put together summaries of all the accusers’ charges, and some appear to have pictures of Cosby with a few more of these women. Of course, the ones crawling out of the woodwork now are likely on to the suspicion that they’ll have to show proof, and so they show up with photos. Cosby was photographed with thousands of people over the course of his life, and so it shouldn’t be surprising that eventually some of the no-name women he was photographed with four decades ago would decide to jump on the bandwagon to claim their share of cash and prizes. I’d be interested to see how many of the original dozen or so have any photographic proof.
And for these new accusers, this only brings up a logical follow up question – when were these pictures taken?
For example, Masten’s story is that she met Cosby while she was working at a Playboy club in Chicago, and he invited her to dinner the next night. That night, she showed up in his hotel and went up to his room to meet him, where he was already hanging out with friends, and supposedly he drugged and raped her.
This picture doesn’t appear to be taken the day she met Cosby since she’s not in the bunny uniform working in the club. It also doesn’t appear to be taken in a hotel room. So I would conclude that this is taken sometime after the alleged rape took place. Her face doesn’t appear to me to be the normal reaction you would have to posing for a picture with your rapist.
I’m sure I could identify similar discrepancies in other photos. But it’s not Cosby’s burden to prove his innocence, its these retarded women who must prove his guilt. I still haven’t seen very much at all on that topic beyond “believe me because vagina.”
They’re real ‘modern’ women love to accuse men here of Rape while calling us all islamophobes when they work to import real ones from the middle east.
What happened recently in Cologne (Germany) in NYE sounds like more fake rape accusations. Women are becoming insane. We need to STOP allowing women to do this bullshit, by doing more than just ignoring…
Becoming? They’ve always been that way. They just show it much more ruthlessly ever since men stupidly let them out of their cage.
I would be very cautious about that. I agree something smells but unfortunately I am more inclined to believe the women. Modern Liberalism is the ideology of corruption, debauchery and weakness and its pathetic response as compared to what is going on in America especially on campuses speaks for itself.
No the rape epidemic and attacks against european females are very real and this instance was not some lies trying to frame men, there were countless witnesses.
This happened recently in france (use google translate) http://www.franceinfo.fr/actu/faits-divers/article/video-du-viol-les-deux-auteurs-presumes-interpelles-perpignan-756017
you get a group of men there will be some fucking rapist in the bunch. I know white guys who date rape drugged and gang banged a co-worker in Iraq. good ol boys at Halliburton were gang raping chicks in Iraq google it. one of my co-workers was told by Halliburton to stay way from the Asian chicks because he was strong arming the pussy from them .I know black men who have set up chicks to get gang banged. give me 200 guys and at least 10-20% going to be shitbags
Germany now has a real rape culture
SJWs always project.
If someone is on the SJW side, you can bet they have very creepy and possibly illegal sexual practices.
Bill Clinton was accused by 3 women, and married a wife who has defended a rapist in court, but he gets a pussy pass from feminists. Feminism is such a fraud.
From what I’ve read, at least on the internet, she’s been catching a lot of flack for that in the hardcore circles. Of course the MSM won’t hit her with it.
Last count I heard for Bill Clinton was something around 19, not three. There are three well known ones, but the total count is much higher.
Bill Clinton gets a pass because his OWN “”victim””, Juanita Broaddrick,
submitted an affidavit that she was NOT raped by him. Do you know when you talk under oath, youre supposed to tell the absolute truth because its the statement of record?
If false rape accusations are an outrage, your supposed to be livid that this happened to Bill Clinton!
LOL to steal some thought from Christopher Hitchens :: “rightwads are so full of crap, after an enema you could bury them in a matchbox””
Yup and it’s impossible that she wasn’t intimidated to do so. What about the other women including Clinton paying 850k?
LOL boy – funny how ya borrow feminist language when it suits your purposes – so if Juanita is capable of being too intimidated to come forward – so are Cosby’s victims.
Rightwad males are so full of shit, they outstink a southern sewer system.
LOL boy – Clinton paid the money to get rid of Paula Jones
so it would stop being a distraction when he was trying to do his job the Amer. people TWICE elected him to do.
lol Do you know that poor Paula didnt even get to keep that money, that most of it went to her rightwad lawyers – she got so little out of the settlement she had to pose NUDE in Penthouse to save her house ! But then Paula had posed nude before, for her boyfriend, who plastered the pictures all over the web!
Yep, thats when Paula Jones lost the rightwads – it made them question her character and wonder if backing her had been a mistake all along,
1) I’m not a “rightwad” and ad hominem attacks just make you look like an idiot (fwiw – I believe Bush was one of the worst presidents of the second half of the 20th century-today)
2) I don’t agree with the language it all – we’re pointing out ITS THE SAME language with Cosby, etc. When its a powerful left person (Clinton, Polanski, etc) it gets overlooked. A powerful right person or average joe get crucified. I don’t think Clinton should have gone to jail for it just like I don’t think Cosby should – there just isn’t any evidence of rape. I wouldn’t vote for Clinton (if he were able to run for re-election) or watch a new theoretical Cosby show in case they were guilty but I certainly wouldn’t put them in the slammer or crucify them in the court of public opinion.
RE: Your other reply – Half went to lawyers but I don’t understand what the point is? Clinton paid $850k when that was still a lot of money to them.. Typical rape victim logic is that is an admission of guilty. I don’t believe that for a second but that’s no different than plenty of others.
It was a payoff to keep her quite on sexual harassment charges not rape. Big difference, With ongoing lewd suggestions its possible to get charged with that and not have even touched the woman. He was probably fishing for some sex.and that’s risky for a high profile person who’s married. It leaves them vulnerable to blackmail/hush money even if sex took place and it was totally consensual.
Here’s what I really think is going on. Bill Cosby, imo, is very likely innocent. Might seem a little improbable given the number of accusations, but, this isn’t the first time numerous accusations have been proven false, especially in high status cases like this. As far back as the Salem Witch Trails, demonstrates this phenomenon. But I think its far more calculated then a phenomenon. Question: what has Bill been up too for the past decade or so? He more or less retired from entertainment a while ago. Answer: he’s been calling out the African American Community! And what is he saying that could be so terrible that he’s hunted down with false rape? Oh, terrible stuff like be a Father to your kids, don’t constantly say “know what I’m saying”, get an education, stop blaming other people, pull your pants up. I love listening to Bill. Before this happened you could youtube him and hear some really uplifting stuff for anyone. But, to see culture react this way to such as practical advice is really disturbing.
I feel like I need to go back and re-study the Salem Witch Trials. All I remember is from high school, which wasn’t much. Bunch of women accused of being witches, yada yada yada. I feel there’s some hidden stories that were a catalyst to said trials.
Perhaps not the best reference, all I’m saying is that accusations can run wild. Moreover, from duke to UVA to columbia, false rape accusations are nothing new. Bill Cosby wants Black people to be self sufficient, off the reservation, and that angers the liberal establishment who need these people for political capital.
Actually my comment had nothing to do with the rest of your post…it just sparked my curiosity, heh.
Agree with your sentiment throughout the rest of your comment.
A bunch of men and women accused of being witches, by a bunch of hysterical teenage girls and their white-knight allies in the government.
That was my general suspicion.
Hey Davis. Curious to know if you agree with my post above that Cosby is being set up because what he’s been saying is rejected and hated by the liberals. Sounds crazy when I write this, but, I actually believe that liberal progressives would destroy a man who says – go be a Father, go be responsible, take care of yourself.
Absolutely. He put himself on the radar by standing up for decency, which is why he became a target of convenience, an outlet for the 2 Minute Hate – the fact that he’s a successful seducer (demonstrated by the many videos of him flirting with women – Game recognize Game, Cosby) only exacerbates it.
Note that guys like Polanski are disgusting, Gamma creepers. Feminists and SJWs aren’t upset by these losers – even though they’re the actual rapey ones – because ultimately it’s penis envy, and their hatred of true masculinity, that’s at the core of hysteria.
It’s not a conspiracy, so much as it is the hatred of the depraved for the virtuous. The more you become a decent, strong, successful person, the more these vermin will seek to tear you down.
bingo
I think it is perfectly possible that there is a viral element to false rape accusations against celebrities.After one woman comes forward, several more seem to pop out of the woodwork.
One explanation is that they have found the courage from someone else taking the lead. Another is that they have seen the attention that other women have gotten and they decide in a deranged way, to join in and claim victim status themselves.
We have seen with the Duke Lacrosse case and others that some women are sick enough to lie to get attention only in this case because of the time scale there is virtually zero chance of them being found out.
Of the millions of women who would have known that Bill Cosby was accused of rape, it is not unreasonable that a considerable number of them would do this.
False rape allegations are nothing new but it’s how the media is all to happy to treat the allegation as the evidence now — broadcasting the poor guys mug and name all over the place. More importantly in all these cases where the female concocted a bogus rape allegation and the media has ruined the innocent male, they NEVER apologize to the innocent male. Instead they always twist it to fit their narrative. Something like, “Although this case proved to be false, it highlights an ‘epidemic’.” Bare in mind this “epidemic” is one they’ve manufactured.
first of all fuck the gop .second there are tons of successful blacks out here the media and white folks do not want to here about them. bill was talking about the 10% of black population .the average white person thinks every black person is poor and a crook thanks to our racist media.do you know how many black folks do not vote?tons of them. who is talking shit in the media and online about black folk ? conservatives who vote GOP. so why on fucking earth would I want to be on the team with them?
There was a rumor, before all this started, that the Coz wanted to buy a controlling interest in CBS News(the company was spun off from the parent a few years ago). Co inky dink? Maybe.
Anyway, his old I SPY show was very cool…
Didn’t know that, but, if he did he could influence a lot of people with his message. And, “they” would want to prevent that. Again, I keep coming back to the message this man preached and cannot bring myself to understand how it caused the establishment to hate him so much. I mean, if I’m right, these people, these fucking elites, really hate him with a deep passion. And again, what did he say? Be a Father, take care of yourself, don’t blame others. If this is how we treat not just the people who say this but by extension this kind of wisdom then I’m all for the East to invade and take over, because, this is just simply insane. I cannot live in a culture and society that literally fucks over a person that offers medicine.
I was inclined to think Cosby might be guilty, but that could be because I haven’t followed the case. Good point about the justice increasingly depending on the number of accusers, or rather fingers pointing rather than on actual evidence. What this reflects is the way accusers seem to come forward when a narrative of guilt becomes powerful enough. There are always incentives in such cases, and amongst those incentives may be the readiness to get in on a kill as directed by forces one might do well to please. That’s how blood sports work.
As for Lena, the way the accusations of diddling her little sister just wash right over her is evidence of the two clear justice system involved. She may not be an actual rapist but she clearly behaved in a sexually appropriate way with her sister, probably over a period of years.
One last thing – Barbara Bush? What kind of idiot would rape George Bush and expect not to face consequences?
Off topic: Seems you guys missed #matressgirl’s has her own porn video now. Certified attention whore
That was discussed here, at least in the comments. I think she actually acts out the supposed rape or something, clearly proving that it’s not traumatic to her.
Seen it. Fails as art, fails as wanking material, and fails as “evidence” of rape. Makes the Paris Hilton sex video look like The Godfather.
…..
(From this NSFW link (March 15, 2015): http://interviews.adultdvdtalk.com/aria-alexander)
[interviewer]: What’s your ultimate sexual fantasy and do you want to live it out on camera?
[Aria Alexander]: I actually have an intense rape fantasy. I just think that’s so hot. Like you walk into an alley or if you go running at night, have someone pop out of the bushes and rape me. (laughs) I don’t know but I always thought that was so hot. I wouldn’t care what the dude would look like. That’s the point, you don’t want them to be good looking, you want them to be kind of nasty so you’re suffering and stuff like that. Oh, I thought that was so hot. Or getting too drunk at a party and someone drugs your drink and you wake up and you don’t know what happened. (laughs)
http://s23.postimg.org/4nxk1f4qj/internet.jpg
Mostly good article, but I wish the author would be a little more consistent and not repeat other unfounded rumors made by other jaded women (in this case Woody Allen) to judge Cosby. A close friend of mine had his life ruined when his ex wife claimed that my friend sexually molested his own son. Only now, years and years later, after he is finally exhonerated, as the son enters his 18th year, can the father and son have a relationship with each other. There is zero reason to bring up an unsubstantiated claim that Woody Allen’s ex wife made, especially considering no charges were ever brought in that case (unlike in my friends).
Lena Dunham’s book could have been called ‘how I fingered my infant sister into becoming a lesbian’ and she would have just increased her chances of winning a pullitzer. When the leftie elites do it their victims, its called education
NSFW: http://bifun6.tumblr.com/post/136272045693/rape-bait-academy-newcastle-uk
This is proof that it can happen
I’m sure it hppens all the time. I suspect that Lena’s comments are designed as a public kind of indemnification against her sister making an allegation should they fall out or something: once it’s already out in the open, there’s not much that can be said
Yep, she covered her ass perfectly, but karma always has a way of delivering justice.
Check out this story – 2 black athletes expelled from Findlay for banging a white chick. Absolutely everyone told the administration she was lying. They didn’t care.
https://reason.com/blog/2016/01/06/lawsuit-white-student-bragged-about-sex#comment
In that case, they should expel all or none.
Truly appalling, but this is a case ROK should pick up as it’s such a clear miscarriage of natural justice
Breitbart had a nice article on Lena Dunham’s big ass. She was ringing in the new year. I recommend it for anyone who enjoys frequenting a vomitorium.
This, boys and girls, is why you should avoid drugs and alcohol during sex.
I can’t see how they can convict Cosby. It is a years old case of he said, she said with no forensic evidence. I have no idea if he is innocent or not but he is certainly being treated a little differently from Bill Clinton, who has several rape accusations against him.
It isn’t justice to ruin Crosby over unsubstantiated allegations, especially in todays environment where many women will seek attention for just about anything.
In years gone past women didn’t go out unchaperoned, they knew that there was a danger that if a man forced himself on her, she would have no evidence that it had happened. This has totally been forgotten and no personal responsibility is given to the women for being in these types of situations.
The court of public opinion is now being applied to daily by women. There are newspaper stories only days ago of women who are *content* not to bring criminal charges against men for their accusations *because* they said “It’s all over the Internet now anyway, that’s a better punishment.” That would also be because they don’t have to prove their allegations.
And the reply to Dunham’s tweet should be: “So do the victims of child molesters.”
Google what happened to James Deen. He broke up with her girlfriend and she accused him of Rape on Twitter….so his employer fired him and his career was ruined. ….all the wile…she didn’t have to prove anything.
long as he can bring a hard dick he can work
Not at the same level he was at before. Take a look at all the side gigs he lost.
What about Woody Allen? What about Woody Allen? What about Woody Allen? You can’t be serious ??? You can go accusing a member of the Amish tribe ?? You can’t be serious ??
Will wonders never cease – Rightwad conserviturds are defending a black man accused of rape – when most of the things they say online have to do with how black men are raping THEIR women out of all proportion to their numbers! And outrage over the Simpson verdict, the Newsome Christian murders, the Wichita Horror, the Colleen Ritzer murder, etc etc etc
Hell the end of the world isnt just near – the end of the world is here !
“This was undoubtedly a case of both statutory rape and rape due to an extremely intoxicated inability to consent.” I thought the position of ROK was that having sex with drunk girls was perfectly acceptable and not rape? Didn’t the great Roosh himself have sex with a passed out drunk girl? The age bit is open to debate I guess, but couldn’t she have just been a teenage slut who cried rape after the fact out of guilt? And if not, at what age would she have been? 14? 15? 16? Do you really think a 17-year-old (underage minor) has no responsibility for her sexual behavior? But suddenly becomes totally responsible for it on her 18th birthday?
yes
And yet these people still defend Michael Jackson and are OK with him being acquitted.
Old Woody got a woody for his daughter.
where are the race baiters to defend cosby?
Bueller? Bueller?
If Woody Allen had done something that was actually *criminal* (which Cosby is accused of) as opposed to just distasteful, it would be a very different story for him. Roman Polanski still cannot set foot in the USA without getting cuffed at the airport. Pee-Wee Herman (Paul Reubens) is a member of the “tribe”, just like Allen and Polanski, and he went from beloved kiddy-show host to persona non grata just for jerking off in a movie theater.
Masturbation is like real estate-it’s all about location, location, location!
The talmud told woody he could. The solution to this is to have hot and happy partners like trump.
When due process dies, tyranny is born.
Don’t forget the OTHER thing that Dunham, Allen, & Polanski have in common that Cosby does not.
…a white penis?
James Deen is in the same ballpark. Stoya never filed actuall charges…but his life and career are already ruined by social media.
if you support cosby please kill yourself
Awww. Voted for Clinton, did you?
no