Most men, even if they’re still swimming in ocean of blue pills, have some awareness that something has gone awry with the relationship between men and women. Statistics prove this as well as divorce has been epidemic for a while now with record-number of children growing up with single parent around the world while young people are having less sex than before. And whether you be a feminist or part of the manosphere, I think both sides can agree on one thing: that a war between the sexes have been heating up in the recent years.
Why is all this happening? While men and women tend to play the blame game to avoid taking any responsibility, there are greater forces at play. The fact is, the continuing transformation of our society is making the antagonism between the sexes inevitable. Feminism is just a symptom, not the cause of our problems.
Before we look at why today’s sex relations are in a dismal state, consider the single factor that makes relationships prosper: Mutuality based on different but compatible roles.
All relationships work best when two parties have something different to share for their mutual benefit. For example, humans and horses have enjoyed a close relationship together throughout history (unlike, say, humans and bears). The relationship works because in exchange for food, protection, and care that humans provide, the horses offer themselves as transportation.
The relationship between men and women was also mutually beneficial for the entirety of human existence with men offering their services in exchange for having the women bear their children. But now, with the advent of modern society and its conditions, things have changed drastically.
1. “Equality”
At least these men had their male privilege.
“Equality” for women is the most abominable lie to have ever perpetuated on mankind.
Men have always provided for women. Men hunted for food, labored to build everything, and fought battles to defend their tribe. To say that men oppressed women throughout history is an insult to all those who sacrificed themselves in the factories, the coal mines, and the trenches. If women didn’t have certain rights that feminists like to cherry-pick, it’s because women weren’t drafted to fight wars. In exchange for their toil, the only thing men asked of women was to be supportive in their roles as wives and mothers.
But fast-forward to today, now that women have “achieved” social and political “equality” and even various advantages just for being born a female, many women today no longer feel that it’s necessary to exchange values with men for mutuality. It’s like when humans developed automobiles and didn’t need horses anymore. The difference is, humans and horses don’t need to be together; men and women do.
However, men’s sexual desire—which is greater than that of females—is still alive and kicking. So what we have today is a situation where women have gotten their social equality while sexual inequality persists for men (which is why many men choose to give up sex entirely to level the playing field). This is what happens when you standardize human beings into economic units.
2. Education and career over family
Stressed out from balancing between work and family? Yup, it’s the men’s fault that you tried to do both.
To maintain their advantage over men, women today are dedicating themselves to their education and career. Western women, in particular, have been so thoroughly sold on the idea of status and consumerist orgy that they are no longer interested in relationships. More and more women today are delaying marriage (if not outright rejecting it). And when they do get married, they are using it as a means to trap men into donating their sperm and cash, only to bail out when they want to.
3. Slut culture
Wow, what an achievement! I’m sure your failed parents are just as proud.
The advent of contraception and the decimation of whatever feminine decency that was left has turned the vast majority of young Western women into drunken sluts. The increasing number of sluts is diminishing the availability of quality women that men want to start a family with and has social implications for the society as a whole.
4. Government supplanting men
The only way women were able to “liberate” themselves from their supposed oppressors was by latching themselves on to a new alpha provider: the government. As said before, men form relationships with women by exchanging values, with his strength to provide and protect being his greatest asset. But now, the government (along with corporations and education system) fulfills those roles that men previously occupied. And not only that, but the government is deeply involved in the affairs of marriage, sending professional white-knights to extort and arrest men who’ve been used up and thrown away by women.
It also doesn’t help that the government is increasingly monopolizing violence, one of the most important value that a man possesses. And that leads to my next point.
5. Too few wars, too many men
I doubt these men had to think of ways to entertain women like a monkey to get their attention.
The recurring theme across patriarchal societies of the past and present are violence and warfare. And the most commonly associated traits of masculinity are also traits of warriors such as strength, bravery, aggression, discipline, and so on. It’s quite simple: the more violent the environment is, the more masculine men become. And the more conflicts and wars there are, the more the women depend on men—thus keeping the collective value of male population high.
It’s no coincidence that Western societies have started to feminize as they endured decades of relative peace since the end of WWII. The lack of warfare also means that there are now more young men per woman (practically 1 to 1) than there normally would have been under a warring society. Excess of men—who are also emasculated and feminized—means that the collective value of average men has dropped to a historical low, upsetting the balance of sexual marketplace in the process. Only the top 5-10% of men with the warrior traits and wealth are able to enjoy a semblance of a balanced relationship with women—and even they have to play the game.
6. The decimation of Western women
Declining marriage rates? Don’t worry, some simps will try to put a ring on their fingers.
Many Western women have been corrupted by our toxic materialist society. They are fatter, uglier, more narcissistic, more entitled, hedonistic, superficial, less faithful, and seem to think that having bitch attitude makes them hip. Women can afford to stoop low because their sex drive isn’t the same as men’s, while they couldn’t care less for love and companionship when they’re too busy with their travels and careers.
And because of all the thirsty men, women’s collective sexual market value hardly suffers while the value of those who are merely average becomes inflated beyond their real value. You only need to check out the gross discrepancies between the sexes in dating sites and apps to see how bad things are.
7. Anti-male culture
Men are all rapists waiting to be hatched out of their facade, men merely uttering a word to a woman is a harassment, men are always “mansplaining” to women, men are insecure cry-babies, men open their legs too much when they sit, men and their toxic masculinity need to be controlled, men have to do more for women, men are dominating in tech fields because of sexism, men shouldn’t say this, men shouldn’t do that, etc, etc… And of course, if men push back, they’re “misogynists.”
And we’re we still wondering why relationships are getting harder to form these days?
8. Lack of shared values
As social beings, we humans need more than economic incentives and passions to form a relationship for a family to prosper. There must be shared values.
With traditional family values under constant attack from all directions, the bonding between males and females have been reduced to mere hook-ups and economic unions. To make matters worse, many from both sides are resorting to predatory behaviors to exploit one another for either money (for women) or sex (for men), augmenting the distrust between the two sexes. Others, who either don’t want to play games or have become overtly hostile to the opposite sex, have given up on relationships entirely. This is the end result of atomization and extreme individualism under a system that destroys all values for the sake of economic advancement.
Conclusion
The destruction of sex relationship is having a negative effect on society as a whole and is transforming the demographic landscape of many Western nations. Unlike what the aesthetically-challenged feminists and the man-children crying their own way believe, men and women are not adversaries. You don’t have to be a traditionalist to see that the sex relations have gone awry due to the development of modern society and its destructive cultures.
Many Western men have already checked out or gone out to find traditional women elsewhere. But that is merely adapting to the situation; it doesn’t solve the problem at a societal level. The continuing antagonism of the sexes will eventually spread around the world. Unless the current course is somehow reversed, we can only wait and see how far the damage will run its course.
Read More: Carl Jung Predicted The Catastrophe Of Modern Gender Relations
Things will get back to normal, one way or another. As always, I have no idea how long it will take and how violent the transition will be.
One can only live his life as good as possible and pray for the best.
Right. all systems seek an equilibrium. Typical societies have a slightly larger number of females ( usually 1.1 to 1). Lack of wars means more males than equilibrium. China and India have the worst imbalances now. Look for the next large scale wars on those continents.
China and India can fix their sex imbalance problems in a generation, though, and they’ve already begun to do that. But you’re right that an equilibrium always arrives at sunset. 🌇
Sadly, Indian women are discovering feminazism.
At a VERY slow rate, man. Poor Desi girls are as gold on the inside as ever.
They are absolute naturals…
Maybe, but the sex-selection ultrasound genie is well and truly out of the lamp.
No. China is stuffing the Genie back in. The ban on multiple babies has been lifted. It’s okay to have girls again now (thank gods, or China’s future would’ve been the definition of faggotry!)
As for India, they aren’t aborting their daughters (as far as I know), it’s just that some poorer families are dumping them at orphanages. That’s terrible news as a whole… but, you know, it makes it really easy to pick up a wife in India with all these disenfranchised Desi girls looking for a way out of their misery.
I thought about checking India out and might still eventually but bringing her to the states might not be so great for me and I doubt India would cease to scare the shit out of me with all it’s antics.
You should hit India. I’m going to for sure.
Why won’t bringing her to the US work for you?
In the end, do you want easy hot, young pussy? If yes then you’ll figure out a way to make it happen.
Yes but so much so that they’d NEVER date or marry a white man so it kinda defeats the purpose.
Desi girls won’t wed a Caucasian man? Why not?
Have you ever even been to SE Asia?!
I’ve lived in India.
And I’ve lived 10 straight, unbroken years in Thailand. India can’t be that different.
Let this be understood: SE Asian girls – and especially the poor ones – absolutely fall head over heels for hot, young white guys.
I guess I’m not hot then, oh well.
I saw a damn miserable older Caucasian man today with a hot young Thai wife. She was probably a former prostitute, but it was sad to look on all the same. Still, he’s an example of how easy it is to pick up SE Asian women. All it takes is time and effort. Super sexiness helps get a younger, hotter, non-prostitute bride, but it’s not a prerequisite for scoring altogether.
I’m aware that in the Philippines or Thailand it is easy but my original point was that desis (Indian/Pakistani) are a lot harder to attract as a white man, unless you are hot/rich/etc
Well, I’m hot enough, but I’m not rich by Western standards. I’m going to India in a few months. I’ll learn whether or not you’re right first hand, I guess. I plan for my next wife to be a Desi girl and I won’t settle for scraps – she’ll be poor, but young, hot, and chaste. I don’t think I’ll have trouble, but we’ll see.
How poor do you mean? Slum material?
Maybe. It really depends on who I meet and hit on. I can’t say whether she’ll be from a slum or where. I’ll just hit on a girl that looks poor and looks like she might be interested in something better.
They are so incredibly traditional that a slum girl won’t date you. Now marry maybe, if you can adapt to their culture and learn the local language. Depending on Indian State Hindi might not be enough. In the South they even hate it. Tamil or Malayalam are a lot harder to learn also.
Fuck, man, I don’t want to “date” girls! Yeah, I want to get married. I boycott contraception, see, so I also pretty much don’t have sex outside of marriage, too. I’m a traditional kind of guy, I suppose, and I lived 10 years in south Thailand, so SE Asian traditions aren’t so foreign to me.
I’m going to learn a bit of Tamil or something before I go. I’ll research the best language to learn and start soon.
Where’s a good city with poor girls working in markets and stuff but also hotels for me to stay in and so on? I don’t know much about India and I don’t know where to start. Advice would be welcome. I hope to be on a plane to there on Christmas day.
Tamils are probably THE hardest to relate to. I think Mumbai slums or Delhi are better choices. Those places are widely Hindi speaking too. Maybe Kolkata isn’t too bad either and they mostly speak Hindi as a second language but speaking Bengali is greatly appreciated. Rajasthan is also very traditional but in the bad, won’t marry outside of their caste let alone race way. They have Hindi as their mothertongue though.
Delhi – is that “New Delhi” on the map? Yeah, I think there and Mumbai look alright. I’d go to Delhi first, then Mumbai second if I run out of luck, I think. And Hindi is the primary language in these places?
Something I was wondering about: India statistically has more English speakers than any other country in the world. Is it correct to assume the poorest people don’t speak any English, though? I imagine the poor only speak a single language, but I’m not sure.
Yes, New Delhi is what I meant. Hindi is the national language but also the native language in some places like Rajasthan, Bihar, Jharkhand etc. most people in North India will know Hindi as a second language at least. Only posh people know English and maybe a few professions in contact with foreigners like taxi and ricksha drivers. Don’t expect too much from the average poor person though.
Honestly, man, take a look at the girls in the pic below. Young and hot enough. You seriously think if I – a tall, lean, handsome, 29 year old Caucasian guy – hit on them, they’d be too “traditional” to follow my lead? That’s what I mean. I don’t see it happening. Girls like that will do anything to get out of that hole, and I can’t see any sane reason why not to include me under the label “anything”.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/image/6090094-3×2-940×627.jpg
It’s what I used to think when I was young. You have to realise slum dynamics. Yes, to us it is a crapholes but it’s their home, the place they grew up in, where their family and friends are. They have arranged marriages matched by caste, religion, astrology and other irrational crap but it matters a lot to them. You have to deal with their parents too. You can’t imagine walking in that slum and try to pick them up and expect they’ll go with you to a Starbucks or something more local even. It’s not in their culture. The girl has a reputation to defend. Those people can honour kill you or her if they just even suspect anything between you. The girl knows this. When as a white man you walk with a desi girl among desi men you do get dirty stares.
Man, Hindus aren’t honor-killing each other; that’s Muslims. The only thing I need to watch out for when hitting on girls in Bhalswa is that they aren’t prostitutes!
I’ve lived in rural Thailand for 10 years – as I told you – and I understand traditional, poor SE Asians. I seriously think you’re exagerating things in your head.
You’re right that they have a reputation to maintain and I fully understand that – and I even support the notion of a girl being suspicous of a man’s intentions. However, the urge both to get out of poverty and to find a good husband is very strong in girls. If a man genuinely ticks both those boxes then she’s going to follow his lead and respond positively to his advances.
Anyway, I’ll be writing articles about picking up Indian girls based on my experience hopefully in January next year. They’ll be posted on Return of Kings, I hope. So I’ll learn all of these things first hand and post them publicly. You should look out for them. If you’re right then I’m going to find out first-hand, okay, but I seriously doubt you are right (or, rather, I think you’re partially right, but slightly exagerating the problems with the idea).
i’m looking forward to read your articles. GL
On another note, honour killing does exist in Hinduism even if they are generally less violent than muslims. This article is an interesting, but sobering read:
http://www.meforum.org/3287/hindu-muslim-honor-killings
Well, it’s a reminder to be respectful and careful, and don’t treat the girls like whores. Also, if you don’t practice Hinduism then you should probably take your wife and move far away from her home to some place where a nutter isn’t going to try avenging her family’s honor.
So long as I do those things, though, I don’t anticipate I’ll have a problem. Yet we shall see, and I shall share what I see.
“Typical societies have a slightly larger number of females ( usually 1.1 to 1)”
It’s not even that favourable because this factors in very old women, who outlive old men.
Great article. The main problem of all relationships in western countries is that both men and women are living in a perpetual state of immaturity. No one wants to get the responsibility for anything while everybody wants to have fun. Giving a “everything goes” pass to women and emasculating men only make this worse.
In other words, we have been trapped in the paradox of hedonism. Only strong morals and traditions can reverse this destructive tendency but i am afraid that we have already crossed the point of no return
This is exactly it. Everyone is living as a perpetual teenager. They just want to hang out, spend money they dont have on shit they dont need, and fuck off in every aspect of their life.
So true brother. I said it before: too many 30 year old adolescent in the West right now.
I have come to the conclusion that after world war 2, western societies have gradually demoted humans into alienated and apathetic individuals driven only by short-term gratification, consumerism and hedonism. It is literally a life without higher purpose aka without meaning. And you can see it in every aspect of the modern life: Meaningless education (acquiring college degrees that gives you no real skills and no practical use in later life), Meaningless occupation (9-5 jobs that produce and contribute nothing to society), meaningless relationships (just “having fun” without a goal for family and kids), meaningless entertainment, meaningless activities and so on …Everything of course is designed by our social engineers in order to maintain the status quo and keep us asleep. The closest description of our sad reality can be seen in the movie “The live”. This is not a sci-fi, It is actually a documentary.
Agree with everything you said (except the social engineers part). I think this “life without higher purpose” stuff is a huge part of why rates of depression, ADD, and “anxiety disorders” are so high now
Yes. Depression, anxiety and all the increasing mental disorders of our society are byproducts of this unnatural way of life. You cannot live ignoring natural laws without being punished (Only humans are capable of doing that). People are extremely unhappy even if they are leaving a comfortable life with lots of money, commodities, multiple partners etc and this is because they are alienated (Not in touch with their nature).
It is extremely unlikely that everything that happened after world word 2 (feminism, sexual liberation, religion liberation, scientism, cultural marxism etc) in almost every western country were by accident. It is pretty obvious to me that there is an agenda here. That is why i wrote about social engineering (which is the design of a society)
Personally I think as a man you can go live as a junkie in an alley and fuck hookers every once in a while or you can work your way into a multi-million dollar lifestyle. It does not change the fact that you really do not owe the world a mother fucking thing when mother nature is trying to kill you, society and all it’s clown fuckery wants to kill you, and of course whether they realize it or not women want to kill your ass (the bitchy ones anyway).
Well said! The demise of the sexes was a well executed design by our social engineers. And here we are today!
We had the Space Program for about a decade, but TPTB decided that it was better to p*ss that money away on “lifting people out of poverty” and being Santa Claus to the rest of the world. WHAT a waste THAT was!!
Unfortunately, I also have concluded (based on my research) that the “Space Program” and everything related to NASA, ESA and other “Space agencies” are meaningless spectacles to be consumed by the more “educated” individuals…Just visit the official NASA website…you will not find a single true original (not composite) image of earth or other planets…But according to them, they have thousands of satellites taking pictures of the earth and space…Where is the proof? Where are the images and videos? Except their CGI, there is nothing…I not only doubt that they went to the moon (which i think it is not possible even with our current technology, let alone with the 60s and 70s), i am pretty much convinced that they haven’t even been to “space”…
The space race and NASA were and are nothing but fronts for military research. Every bit of space technology developed had military applications, and have been put to maximum use.
They all become bitchy eventually. It is only a matter of time. When they do, DTB.
There’s videos of astronauts saying we’ve never been passed low earth orbit. You’re right about it being a front to military operations. I think the new budget for NASA breaks down to around $55 million a day. As long as they keep printing out cgi photos people are happy.
World War I symbolized that the West was totally alienated from its leadership (foreign monarchs, etc.), and I think from there, things lost meaning.
The Frankfurt School moved in after WWI, and used the meaninglessness to grow more meaninglessness for the future.
It doesn’t make sense. Look at the cars being made in the 60s – they didn’t even have appropriate seat belts.
So, in the 60s, and entire spacecraft could serve as an ecosystem for a dozen or so people for a couple of months? and there were enough provisions to make that happen, and enough oxygen? Everything was kept at the right temperature?
And then they landed on the surface of a foreign body, not knowing the outcome?
They didn’t launch a dummy ship first? Everything worked on the first try?
Check out Wagging The Moondoggie by the late great Dave McGowan.
If the Apollo landings were real, then I’m Batman.
I think it’s crazy that some of you guys tolerate this bullshit and date these Western sluts. You’re playing a game that’s set up for women to basically extract resources from you whilst you “try out” for a long-term relationship (and almost always fail the try-outs, and if by chance you succeed the slut will likely divorce-rape you in a few years, anyway!)
Fuck that. If you don’t land a decent Christian unicorn before your early twenties then throw in the towel and come to SE Asia. It’s a different game over here.
yeh..but i am not attracted to asian women, unfortunately..also, it is definitely not as bad as whoever wrote this article is implying..maybe in america but that’s not where i am based.
You overcome your lack of interest in Asian women the moment you arrive here. Trust me.
So where are you based that’s not as bad as described in the article?
This is very true, the only reasons I’m dating at all are as follows:
1. I treat it as a game, in that I will never get into an LTR with any of the women I meet, unless she surprises me in terms of logical ability, usefulness, etc. I just date to improve my game.
2. I plan on getting to southeast Asia within 5 to 10 years if I can (I work in a financial/legal sector that’s in demand over there), this is to prepare me for when that happens (since I actually wanna start dating SE Asian women).
3. I kept dating on the back burner for the last few years while I worked on my advanced degree, fitness, and locking my career in. Dating is simply an area that I have yet to conquer fully, therefore I had to go for it.
As long as I don’t get thirsty in the process of doing this, I should be fine.
Im all for the solid latinas myself, but youre correct. Snag a girl who has strong beliefs and youll have it made.
http://nypost.com/2016/06/27/dont-do-this-dad-begs-wife-who-fatally-shot-daughters/
Women are nuts.
Just read the article and it didn’t mention why she did it. Her marriage was in the toilet, but it doesn’t have to end like that.
I can surmise that she was a total attention whore who hit the wall and was envious of her daughters getting all the attention over her. If she divorces her husband, the girls would be a hindrance to her party lifestyle and hooking up with a high SMV male.
No clue, but her pic has “crazy” written all over it. You are probably close to the truth in that her daughters were getting more attention than she was and her narcissism could not stand that.
She was taking “duck face” selfies. No grown adult takes a “duck face” selfie, especially not a mother of two. There clearly was something really bent in her as you note.
no mother of two *should take duckface selfies
The girls were 17 and 24. It’s true children these days are living with parents until 35 or older, but they could also be independent if mom didn’t want anything to do with them, and just divorced and got herself a 1 bedroom apartment she could have a new life, although at her age her options would be rather limited. I would suspect serious mental illness, likely combined with drug use here, likely taking some SSRIs for extended periods of time.
I suspect normal old bitch, actually.
Pussy pass means she’ll be out in five
I thought the cops shot her dead?
I think they did. Poor tormented soul.
(Sarcasm(
Yeah you’re right they did. It’s early and I haven’t had my coffee yet heh
yup: she was driven to do it by toxic masculinity and patriarchy and it was made possible by the easy of obtaining a guns.
The real perpetrator here is All Men and the real victim is the shooter.
Cops took care of that. She is worm chowder.
Those eyes. THOSE EYES!
But on a more serious note, without having read the article, until could tell this woman had it all, and yet something always ticks them off. And the sad part is, this happened in Texas, the buckle if the Bible Belt. This shows us that not only is this problem is common with American women, period. Also, Texan women are especially nuts.
The other day I almost ran over a couple of redneck kids crossing in the middle of the street while trying to pull into the YMCA. Turns out they were arguing something fierce. And she was barefoot. Now, what does this have to do with anything? Well, it was a scorching 95F outside. And she didn’t care. She was too busy yelling in his face and otherwise trying to pick a fight with him. Of course I wasn’t going to intervene. Let them beat the shit out of each other. Less defective genes to pass along.
In conclusion: Texan women are fucking nuts.
Heh, why do you think it took so long for me to find a wife? (I’m Mid 30’s btw) Women here like to claim that they’re God’s gift to men, but the reality is they’re the devil incarnate.
The average Texas chick is overweight, thinks flip flops are attractive, lacks hygiene, drinks too much (and this is coming from a former lush), can’t dress for shit and is so illiterate they make Muslim women seem intelligent in terms of literacy.
Sold!!
A sincere opinion from an atheist here. Frankly, if Texan men were God fearing they would put their gals in shape. Then again, to quote Gunny, only steers and queers come from Texas.
And now I’m thinking of dating Muslim chicks, hoping I don’t have to convert.
Heh, indeed. I actually saw a t-shirt once that said “Hook ’em with your looks, the bible will gut him like a fish” or some such nonsense at a local gas station. I think most of the men don’t give a shit either way here and pay lip service to the church so they can get some lovin’.
I’ve found that more often than not, modern Western women aren’t “God’s gift to men”, they’re “Satan’s spawn and burden to men”.
that last part was brutal
Texan women aren’t bad actually. The ones publicized are however, obviously. The mixture of them living traditional lives of stay at home moms mixed with the constant feeding threw media and bullshit tv of anti-patriarchy seems to drive them nuts no matter where they live. I’ve lived in many states in the US and the Texas women are more consistently attractive and conservative than any place I’ve been. Being In Houston however with our high % of transplants I guess most of the women im exposed to probably aren’t Texans per se.
Then you must live in a sane corner of Texas. To be fair, and I’ll give you this, you might be right about the transplants. Women are easily impressed by outside influences.
Naturally they have to give the obligatory “she was a gun rights advocate” which has NOTHING to do with her killing her daughters.
To be fair, if there’s going to be some comprehensive gun control, it should be to keep guns away from people like her. And in any circumstance, it should be gun owners who should be practicing gun control on each other, although that is difficult to do.
There’s no way to predict crazy. I think that’s what most people miss. No amount of “background checks!” or “bans!” can prevent crazy.
Plus there’s that whole thing:
Lion is asked what do you think of Hyenas? They’re crazy and dangerous.
Hyena is asked what do you think of lions? They’re crazy and dangerous.
Unfortunately, gun control is as good as it gets. That, and hope for the best.
I have zero use for gun control. Zero.
The one thing we can use? Pussy control.
We just need more advanced biometric security. If the gun box detects anti-depressants, don’t open. After a few women die or get injured because the box didn’t open during a real need. maybe they will rethink their “clinical depression”. I promise you this lady down here in Houston was on some cocktail of pills. the Women of Katy, Tx are well known here for it. Likely got jealous of her daughters about something.. hence not killing the husband. Dumb bitch
Gun Control:
1. Weaver stance.
2. Exhale then hold breath.
3. Squeeze, don’t pull trigger.
4. Hit target.
There you go, exactly.
You should put that on a poster.
Or a bumper sticker? Ah, its an old trope. I leave it to the printers in the room to run with it… but thanks!
Sucks, yes. Horrible, in fact.
Alas, if she didn’t commit suicide by cop she would have simply pulled the “depressed” (Port-Partum Stress By Munchasen By Menopause By Proxy By Cisgenderism or some other impromptu invented shitshow) card and gotten probation for a few years. We all know how this would have otherwise ended.
The dad and the cops didn’t do anything. The dad asked her to make a decision, didn’t tell her, gave her the power to end two lives.
Frame and male authority could have saved two young girls.
This the attitude the older generation of women has toward the younger generation of women. Daughter envy is also normal. The urge to kill is normal of them. I see it constantly.
Fathers like that guy don’t get to hide, though: he was a coward, and deserves a coward’s death. Men who always choose the path of least resistance are scum. Those cops should be sentenced. Those guys were virtue signalling to the bitter end.
Perhaps, but I find it unsurprising you blame the father.
Putting a womam in her place will get you jail time and financially bankrupt a man. I’ve seen it from friends. One did 6 years in the slammer for getting physical and the state, along with feminists in the court, crucified him.
A woman in New Mexico has been arrested for pimping out her 10 year old daughter to pedos. The only reason she was caught was because the kid was murdered and dismembered. Yeah feminism.
I don’t solely blame the father, I mostly blame the mother.
Okay, so if some crazy bitch was going to kill all your kids, would you tell them “don’t”?
My comment got deleted.
I don’t blame the father for anything more than his part in the crime: going easy on his crazy bitch of a wife, hoping that she was “inherently good” enough to not sacrafice his children. Avoiding jail time and danger, favoring safety.
What if these were your kids? Would you let some crazy cunt murder them, or would you make an effort? I think he actually got off pretty easily- the media frames him as a victim.
“wait, don’t shoot” isn’t wanting to save your kids
Older women are out to get younger women these days, for the most part. Unless an older woman feels happy and fulfilled with her life in some way, they live to sling mud at and control younger women. It’s creepy.
I was recently at a social gathering amongst a few people that I know. Some I knew well, some I didn’t. I was introduced to a woman who was in her early 30s—an elementary school teacher. This woman was bragging, and showing off, her recent acquisition: a tattoo on her shoulder. I won’t go into the details of what this stupid fucking thing looked like or what it was, but suffice it to say—it was a tacky piece of vapid shit that would cause embarrassment to any normal human being; but for her, it represented some sort of bragging rights and “deep personal meaning”… whatever the fuck that means.
So it comes time for me to offer my opinion on this tattoo. Everyone has been “congratulating” her, saying it looks great and how “cool” it is. She shows it to me, fully expecting to hear the same praise that everyone else has been giving her. I see it, shrug one shoulder and say: “How does it feel to know you’ll never marry a man who makes more than 30 grand a year?” She’s responds with, “Excuse me?” with a look of shock on her face. “That’s right,” I replied, “any man with his shit together isn’t going to put a ring on—or impregnate—someone who thought having some high school dropout permanently doodle that stupid shit onto their body was a good idea. Graffiti belongs on a freeway overpass in a shitty neighborhood; not on the human body.”
This went on for a while—me, essentially, letting her know that she’s a loser who will die alone in a convalescent home with no one coming to visit her or loving her; or if she does find someone to marry her, he will be a janitor at a fucking dog food factory. She was completely shocked, insulted, and repulsed my behavior and my “terribly judgmental personality.”
I fucked her that night, and have been fucking her for the past three weeks or so. This woman could have been a great mother and wife had she been raised right, and not been a product of all the things listed in this really good article. But she’s just another skank in a long line of skanks who offer no true value to a man; especially a man who has any value himself. She’s got about two weeks left before I drop her like a sack of shit. The sad thing is… she’s one of the better ones I’ve met recently. Society is broken.
Nice! There is no real reward for fucking another skank senseless, except for the obvious conquering of her notion of freedom. Women only seem to give up the goods to a few men consistently when they are treated like the objects they know themselves to be.
Exactly right. By the end of the night she was the one all over me. I was completely indifferent to her; had no use for her, and made it crystal clear that I thought she was lost cause with nothing good to offer the world. I hated how much she adored me for it. Women are dumb.
The only way to make your point is to get her to fall for you then cut her off… So be it.
Done this countless times before. Treat ’em bad and give ’em hell, then let them think there’s a chance for a real relationship; that my first impression of them was wrong, etc… then pull the rug out from under them at the best time to prove my point.
Sadly, though, I’d say 80 percent of the time when I’ve pulled this, these women will double down on their bad behavior. If it’s bad tattoos that were the reason I wouldn’t take them seriously—they’d get something bigger, and more elaborate shortly after the dumping. If it was slutty behavior that was the problem, they’d go fuck a handful of strangers.
Women are inherently self destructive. You’d think they’d learn their lesson, but they just keep going down the same dark path—knowing it will make them more miserable, less desireable, and drive them further away from their goals, and, ultimately, any true shot at happiness. It’s a pretty sad sight.
I read once that only men respond positively to constructive criticism. Something about our logical nature can take the slight to the ego and extract the value. The author contended that women need a different form of outside molding. Positive reinforcement, and encouragement of positive behaviors. The author was a new age putz though, so take that with a grain of salt.
Treat ’em bad and give ’em hell, then let them think there’s a chance for a real relationship; that my first impression of them was wrong, etc… then pull the rug out from under them at the best time to prove my point.
I have literally never seen this not work.
Last paragraph nailed it, they are their own worst enemies. You could bet money theyll make the wrong choice in situations 95% of the time, AKA the easy way out or the route of least resistance which will blow up in their face in due time.
The perfect example I can think of that pertains to that is my wife’s niece. Just this weekend I see her for the first time since she’s had her daughter, but of course she’s kicked the father out. The girl in question also decides that she wants to go to college, but wants to do the for profit schools you see advertised during the day.
I slapped her upside the head with as much red pill truth as I could, but I bet she’s already a lost cause at the age of 19.
In my experience, the stick works better than the carrot, but ideally you’d use both in combination with each other.
my company only hire univ of Phoenix grads…she will be okay!
Single mom at 19 by choice, yeah she’s pissing in the wind. I once had an ex try to sue me, it was the best revenge I could have asked for. I never responded to any of it and a scumbag lawyer took $20k of her money for the trouble. Judge didnt bother with it either.
stick in the pink carrot in the stink?
She is a fucking loser.
Or do it the Teddy Roosevelt way: speak softly and carry a big stick.
Hey man, are you still blogging?
Come on, you didn’t do it out of an altruistic wish to teach her. You wanted to have fun. If you truly had no interest in her at all, you would not have botheted.
Tahts the point, they are crazy/weaker and they also know it.
When you did what you did, her respect for you must have gone through the roof. She knows deep down that everything you said was the truth, you were also the only man in the room to calmly state it.
That you were indifferent to her is a sign that you are man with self respect. Her body is just a body, you werent impressed with just a body, so now she has a chance to be with a man that has actual standards and something going for him.
Are you kidding? Look a second time at all the broken emasculated men she has available to her. Of course she is obsessed with you.
that’s kind of the tragedy of slaying women. the hottest chicks I’ve nailed I’ve managed to not care for, so bedding her wasn’t really enjoyable as it should have been, but go figure once I started to like them they’d start shitting on me and leading me around.
“I hated how much she adored me for it. ”
Ha…aint it the truth?
So you’re surround by people with pay-to-play degrees?
Yes, I work for the Univ of Phoenix.
Not dumb; crazy. There just is no other word that encompasses the current status of women.
maybe it’s a loss of control that they’re reacting to. maybe if you treated them right when they started to go along with your views, while appropriately maintaining frame, they would change into what you want.
BUT would they be worth the effort?
women learn by positive and negative reinforcement, because they are pack-oriented. they rely on the pack for food and safety.
Ha. Well done. Nothing a well used slattern likes better than a guy who puts her down.
On a related notes…sometimes I feel really bad for cats seeing as they have to watch ugly women who don’t give blow jobs die alone.
In the end the cats get the last laugh though. They get to eat the owner.
You always find that silver lining in any cloud, bro.
Mister, you seem to be a visionary. Nice to know we have some around.
We all die alone. That is an essential truth of human existence. When ever a woman tells you that because of your attitude towards women, you will die alone, shrug and walk away because that threat is empty.
Dying alone is what makes it worth while. Best moment of life. All your own
Yes, broken beyond repair, especially these vapid adult chidren with XX chromosomes. We have reached “Peak Jew” and our society, culture, and values could not be more degenerate.
Peak Jew? So, your income is 50% above the average for your caste, race, and class?
Wow. Major props for publicly calling this shit out, and I suppose I shouldn’t be shocked a grown and mature 30-something adult willingly had sex with someone who publicly degraded and announced his displeasure with her. I shudder to think at the degeneracy that has scrambled her mind to the point where all she can do is spread her legs to someone who insults her and rightfully calls her out for how worthless she is. I’m curious what the reaction was from others–typically a man cannot offer a negative opinion about anything a female does–which is the main thing that keeps me from openly criticizing such debauchery.
If I had as little self respect and lack of worth as this woman does, I truly don’t know how I could go on living. You say she was one of the better women you’ve met recently–teachers typically pique my interest, as they are imitating natural nurturing and motherly duties which tends to be more feminine than working in an office cubicle in a pantsuit.
I met a girl at the bars this weekend who was certifiably insane. If she wasn’t hot and thin she would likely be sleeping under the interstate or locked away (does society even have mental wards anymore?) It’s truly becoming a scary place. It’s rather depressing as I cannot foresee civilization correcting to a normal sane environment in my lifetime–perhaps a real war (not bombing brown peasants from behind computer screens but truly battling a real enemy) or a correction to the financial craziness that allows us to live beyond our means in the west would end a lot of it, but in the nuclear age, war is basically over, and the powers that be will do anything and everything to keep our financial system from collapsing.
Women spending$$ is the only thing keeping this house of cards from collapsing
Made me think of my boy Reggie
“I shudder to think at the degeneracy that has scrambled her mind to the
point where all she can do is spread her legs to someone who insults her
and rightfully calls her out for how worthless she is.”
Meanwhile in Central America, my wife has two cute, churchgoing cousins in their twenties who are virgins and aspire to only be with one man their entire lives.
Are you the one who posted something about the Central American preacher who gave your wife a stern talk on anti-feminism? If so is he anywhere near Costa Rica?
Can’t reveal the exact country because I have to avoid being outed as a thought criminal for now. But yeah, that was me. She’s Catholic, so it was actually her priest. Not so much stern, more paternalistic. His exact words were “Remember when you go to the US that feminism is the work of Satan and is not a good basis for family life.”
Um, how much would she charge to divulge the cousins’ contact info? ;*)
I would actually be interested in the services of said individual, but I perfectly understand the need for anonymity. Shit is crazy these days. Just a couple of decades ago, it would be normal and encouraged for men to pass around the name of a good church leader to each other.
Are you actually in Costa Rica? My wife’s not from there, but we have friends there and we’ve been thinking of emigrating when the time is right. We were there for a week last year and it seemed pretty great. On the other hand, I’ve seen online that its divorce rate is actually higher than the US and it strikes me as more leftist than other places I’ve been in Latin America, although I can’t put my finger on why. If you live there, maybe you could comment on that.
As far as the priest, I got the impression that he’s the rule not the exception in Central America. Seems like it should be easy to find extremely conservative clergy down there.
I’ve been there at least half a dozen times, but live in the U.S. It does seem more “leftist” perhaps because it’s probably the country most open to American immigration / retirement, with many gringo communities. There are many “hippy” types there which I don’t mind as long as they are into preserving the environment but they could be bringing some bad gender relations ideas and feminism with them.
It is one of the better countries to immigrate to, although Panama and Nicaragua are cheaper and similar safety level, and will give them a look when I am ready. I do like the peaceful atmosphere and no armed forces. Police are actually nice. Girl I know down there moved to the city and is not a regular church attender, but I could check with her home church in her mothers rural community. So you married a Central American girl and are now living in the states? I’m thinking of a similar plan, marry her, bring her to states, start a family, and move abroad for retirement or if things get too crazy here.
South/Central American Catholicism was corrupted by the Soviets decades ago. They are big into liberation theology — that you don’t get “saved” alone, but that it’s a “communal” affair.
My daughters are American Conservatives through and through, get asked out nearly every weekend (but rarely go) and know that giving up their virginity is a cheap thrill not worth the heartache.
Never picked up on any Marxist vibe at my wife’s church when we were living in her country. They seemed like good people. You could especially see it in the young women.
But really who the fuck wants to go there with that zika shit and an over abundance of psycho thug spawn and their mudering ways.
There are a lot of downsides. You didn’t even mention the constant noise.
That info is priceless, like those old credit card commercial used to say.
Seriously though, I think Central America would be the ideal place for a wife hunter with an adventurous spirit. It would take some effort to figure out how to go down there longterm, but it might be worth it. It’s more wild west than EE in a lot of ways and more dangerous, I suppose (although I never had any problems) but there’s also a lot of awesome stuff down there. If you do go and you’re actually looking for a wife, you’d have to resist the temptation to go for easy lays with the club girls (we used to call them arañas) and go to church, then probably be willing to hold off on sex for a few months when you meet a good girl. Sounds crazy, I know, but it worked for me.
As an aside, I imagine that other parts of Latin America might be good wife hunting too. I’ve had guys on here swear to me that South American women are all sluts and whores, no exceptions, but I’ve never been there so I can’t confirm or deny so I’m skeptical. I suspect those guys weren’t trying serious church game.
Yes, my wife and I are in the US now and probably will be for a few years. We’re seriously considering an eventual move back down to Central America though, if we can pull it off.
Good luck with your girl in CR. If you’re feeling like settling down and she’s much like my wife and you marry her you’ll probably be very happy.
Zika is not what is reported to be, unless you get the Dtap vax while pregnant!
I did my wife hunting in the Philippines. All that you said is true about having to clean up your act, avoid the sluts, go to church for god’s sake, and put off sex with a good girl. The only correction I could give is the expectation that it would only take a couple of months to get to the sex. I had 100% chaperoned dates for two years. What I got for the patience is a 25 year old virgin (at the time) who wanted to be a wife and mother, and looked at those roles as a job description and not a retirement. Eight years later she actually weighs a few pounds less than on our wedding day, and is sweeter than ever.
I married a Costa Rican woman once. She was totally Americanized before I met her so the validity of my observations may not apply for native Ticas who are still in Costa Rica. She was a total psycho bitch; 2 weeks of screaming vicious bat shit crazy, followed by 1 week of zombie, then maybe 1 week of partially normal human being. Of course, when I suggested that this was not normal and she should consult a OB/GYN, I was a misogynous bastard. YMMV
My Filipina got the lecture from her mother. Two bits of marital advice she gave my wife stick in my mind: 1) YOU ARE MARRIED NOW SO ROLL UP YOUR SLEEVES GET OFF YOUR ASS AND GET TO WORK (MY FAVORITE) AND 2) IF YOU DON’T DRAIN HIS BALLS THE WOMAN DOWN THE STREET WILL. Sorry hit the all caps and too lazy to retype.
Sorry asking you. How much older are you than your wife?
I am a little over 27 years older than she is. Her female relatives saw that as completely normal. In fact the matriarch of the family, a retired high school principal, said our age difference was “perfect.” That is a direct quote.
If you think so. What about your relatives? What did they think?
Were you able to obtain anything useful other than good experience, ie a second passport, etc?
Wow, two years of chaperoned dates. That’s something I’ve never heard of, even in Utah or Central America. Is that kind of thing common in Asia? Still, can’t argue with the results.
Again, grand delusions.
So let me get this straight, Bucky, are you promoting race mixing and the worshiping of a Jew “god” at once as though that were a good thing?
Hey, why not just cut out the middle man, Bucky, and go directly for a real ape? If you are of European origin, what you are doing is bestiality.
You make me sick. You traded your birthright for an ape and you will never even be able to have an intelligent conversation with your own children. How sad.
What results would that be? De-evolution?
So you married a stupid crude whore of an inferior race who is 27 yrs younger than you, whose mother was a whore too obviously, and you think that makes you appear hot. Wow.
I imagine you’re projecting about the bestiality. Many of you white nationalist/neo-Nazi types seem to struggle with shame over homosexual urges or sexual perversions like bestiality, especially the spergy ones like you. Not sure if it has something to do with the same the lack of personal achievement and direction in life that leads you to focus on your race as your main accomplishment.
That’s rather amusing, Buddy. I am a pretty high achiever, Oxford, etc. and thus far, I have had no interest in close relationships with apes or the same sex, but you can comfort yourself with the idea that I must be the sick one because you are betraying and destroying your race because you cannot handle the idea of a relationship with a person who has an IQ above 60.
Wow. So your wife’s mother was a prostitute and you think that somehow all of this amounts to taking the moral high ground. No normal woman would say such a thing to a daughter.
Going to a prestigious university is no sign of intelligence, just a sign that you’re good at jumping through hoops and doing as you’re told.
Don’t get me wrong, I’ve talked to WN types who are actually rational and intelligent, you just don’t seem like one of them. The “IQ above 60” comment strikes me as the hysterical ramblings of an emotional woman, for example. One WN guy on here conceded that, although in his mind white men going to Latin America or Asia for a wife isn’t ideal, it’s the reality we’re faced with nowadays. My ex-wife was a neo-Nazi’s wet dream, blond, pale blue eyes, angel face, but she was also a materialistic, crazy, unfaithful liar. Current wife was a virgin when I met her and agreed with her priest when he told her before we got married that feminism is the work of the devil. She respects my role as head of the household and she’s a joy to be around.
If you’re the type who’d pass up a good, traditional woman because of skin color, I don’t know what to tell you. Good luck with white women. I guess build rock-solid frame, work on your Russian, and head off for the former USSR. If you obsess about another guy going for a good woman from another race, I have to agree with Roosh that you are just as bad as the feminists with your obsessing over other people’s sex lives.
How strange that you talk to me as though I am a man when I am a woman. Admission to Oxford is based on merit not on not being White so yes it does matter-only top 1st percent of students get in, and we are not told to do anything, we have a different system than America and do independent research. I think your attempt to justify your bestiality because you married one bad woman (according to you) is pathetic. Your children will not be of a normal IQ either if you have any. You will never even be able to have a proper conversation with them, and you deserve it too. Roosh is an admitted rapist and also not White. I am hardly a feminist. I am an Odinist who believes in traditional roles for men and women, but he is a White European hating piece of trash who rapes White women. You are far lower since, apparently, you are a White man (?) and you approve. If you have to marry an ape so as to be called the head of your household you must have pretty low standards. A real man who was deserving of respect would be respected by any sensible woman, and by men too. Only a very inferior man would have to seek out a women of a lower race in order to feel important by comparison.
You should know that there are plenty of people who find race mixing disgusting, and these are people of all different races, including Mohamed Ali, for example, not just us “Nazis”. You are taking away the identity of your children if you have any, and insulting your family, race, and ancestors, but as I said, you could not deserve it more, so I am glad that that someone like you, who does not even appreciate the greatness of his own race, will be removed from our bloodlines.
Yes, I know about Mohamed Ali. I’ll admit that I just find it difficult to care about people’s skin color more than their character. I know, the horror. That is, I’m more likely to hang out with the cool black guy at work who lifts and has traveled and knows a few foreign languages than the flabby, man-boobed white guy who spends all his free time playing video games.
I’ve been with my wife for years. First kid was born a little while ago. I’ve never been happier. If you really think I’d be better off with the average white girl, I don’t know what to tell you. Do you have any actual experience with white women?
Didn’t realize you are a woman, or that you were in the contemptible “Roosh is a rapist” crowd. Your hysterical tone makes more sense now.
The term your poorly-educated mind searches for is called: “moiety.” You have no idea what an “Jew” nor a “Gewe” is. So, why bother?
Logical fallacy hidden behind an poorly-contrived nom de plume.
Well put, dude
It is you who possesses no identity or “teeth;” as it were. “Race” was, and, in many respects, is, an “ecclesiastical” concept – never was it a “cognitive” concept. You are no “Nazi” as the word ‘Nazi’ is Persian for “Knight” or “K-night” or “Canaanite” – you, I’m sure, can’t even trace some contrived heritage before the 20th century, C.E. You thrive on ignorance, but make no mistake: willful ignorance is finished.
@Pos Identity comes from culture and race, ancestors, family… Race does indeed exist and is easy to determine through both physical anthropology and genetics.I can trace my ancestry back to 1100. Your problem is that you hate Whites and probably hate anyone who knows who his father is as well.
hey Art Bell married a woman almost 40 years his junior when he was in in 60’s.
“bucky” sounds like a term found in the menopause community tbh
wait, you brag about Oxford? and you aren’t about race-mixing? you mean for whites or other jews?
We’ve failed to keep white women virtuous. They’re no better than ghetto hookers now.
Women from non entitled countries say such wise things. “There are no ugly girls just lazy ones”-Russia. “Fat-shaming!”-US “. Guess which education will help the girl get the man and family of her dreams.
Most latin countries have a certain leftist bent. I think it just comes from native ideology. You might try out colombia too. Most travelers love their attitudes.
That Zika looked like some serious BS news the day it came out. They decided it caused microcephaly based on 5 cases. Really? Pinky swear? And the swine flu-is that still going kill us all?
I find it fascinating that the people at the very top of eugenics in fact think that sleeping with family is ok. Which is why king tut had a club foot and why jacob rothschild(the inspiration for Mr Burns on the simpsons) looks so dashing. It really comes down to psychopathy.
You havent studied much about iq apparently. He can find a genius level latina meanwhile you get stuck with some borderline guy with a low iq just because he reminds you of dad. Guess who will have the higher iq kids.
You said it! Serious BS it was, and it didn’t really take that much digging to find out the real agenda (and cause) behind it. Just frightening how people swallow the amount of BS spewed forth by both media and government bodies. I feel like I’m living in a twilight zone…all people do is parrot and regurgitate what they hear and see on heavily censored social media and so called news outlets, and zika was only one example of propaganda sprung on an unsuspecting and trusting public.
I felt like the king dunce for not catching onto this sooner. Some of the stuff Ive seen has scared the hell out of me. And how they can do so much right out in the open and people cant or wont see it. Incredible.
Hey just curious if you have an update. I’m terrified of bringing a wife back to USA.. how is it working for you so far? I think I could probably keep the wife sane, but the whole point of marrying her would be to start a family and raising kids in USA seems more and more toxic every week.
There no point in replying to this kind of idiot; according to whom “you cannot justify majority of women are bad because you wife is bad”
BUT
This idiot “can justify majority of MEN are creepy, rapists and sexist, just because 1 or 2 MEN did something wrong !!
We actually ended up going back to her country for family reasons, but I can’t see staying here permanently. CR on the other hand is nice. Why wouldn’t you consider settling down there?
CR has gotten insanely expensive. I spent $60+ a night there a few months ago for a very average hotel. I went to Mexico last month and stayed in a hotel built in the 1600s with white tablecloth dining room in a city with a very European feel for $40 a night. A 50% increase in housing costs (for inferior housing) is a big deal.
Costa Rica has a population of over 4 million. If just one tenth of 1% of Americans chose to retire there, they’re looking at an influx of almost half a million new residents. It doesn’t take many gringos moving down there to make serious changes to the costs and way of life down there (though most gringos moving down aren’t looking for a McMansion lifestyle). And of course it’s a very safe place with no military, great quality of life, low taxes, super weather, etc. It’s really surprising it’s not *more* expensive than it is, when you consider the popularity of places like San Diego.
I love CR, and if I was retiring tomorrow, would possibly go there, but the trend is for higher and higher prices, and one can live a similar lifestyle for far less in other Latin American areas. When I travel in USA I usually spend around $60 / night for hotels via priceline, so to me CR was about as expensive as USA. I still prefer the lifestyle there to USA, but there are dozens of countries one could move to and live like a king. I’m looking at doing a month abroad and working remotely in the near future, and CR would be tough to afford.
Anyway I’d be curious to talk more if you want to set up a burner email or something, as I’m looking at marrying and/or living abroad very soon and very interested in your experience.
You’re right about CR being more expensive than other places in Central America, but on the other hand it’s basically a developed country (at least the parts I’ve seen) and you don’t have to deal with the crime and chaos you see in places like Honduras or El Salvador. Also, if you’re marrying a Tica you’d get residency, whereas that might be tough in other countries (here in my wife’s country I know expats who have to drive two countries away every 90 days and stay there a few days just so that they can be here legally). I reckon that if Ticos can make ends meet in CR, you and your girl should be able to also. Just my take, of course.
About corresponding in private, are you on Roosh’s forum? I’m called bucky on there, or if you want to set up a burner email address, that works for me too.
I do love CR, I am more of a Tico at heart. I’m a nature lover (one reason I could never be a Republican in the states, and I sure don’t like the other side either). I love their food, their culture, their strong police and education system but lack of military (I’m far more concerned about crime than foreign invasion). There is a lot to love. But I just think if one traveled around other areas of LA, one could live a very similar lifestyle for far less $$.
I haven’t visited as much of L.A. as I would like to, but parts of Mexico (and there are parts that are extremely safe, and feel European) and Ecuador both have big expat communities and I found them cheaper.
Bottom line is I would recommend CR in a heartbeat to anyone, but I also hear stories about guys living off $1,000 a month like kings in places like Thailand, and I think you could really stretch your dollar if you considered other places.
One thing that bugged me was while CR has top level medical care, and there is a lot of medical tourism there from the US, I got sick in CR and this doctor wanted to send me to a private hospital and it was going to cost like $1,000 to treat a sinus infection. Back home I know a doctor I pay $75 cash too, plus another $50 for drugs. I realize he was just trying to push me into a private hospital for a kickback, but those prices are pretty obscene. I said no and he treated me for something like $180 including drugs, which was fine because I was in a remote location at the hot springs. You’re right, if you consider it a more peaceful, laid back, hippy, first world lifestyle, theres really nothing to complain about. But you can also go 2nd world and live like a king for less.
Anyway I’ll drop you a line soon.
No, she didnt have sex with someone who degraded her. She chose to give herself to a Man who had the integrity to be honest, the brains to know what the hell he is saying, and the balls to stand his ground.
Thats why he’s fucking her.
What happens in being honest to a woman, knowing what you’re saying, and standing your ground is ending up dealing with all the white knights that rise to her aid. She wanders away while the white knights do their thing.
Truth bomb! Stand your ground and you shall reap the rewards. It’s like catnip to women.
“Major props for publicly calling this shit out, and I suppose I shouldn’t be shocked a grown and mature 30-something adult willingly had sex with someone who publicly degraded and announced his displeasure with her.”
I was at a party around two months ago when some libtard woman (another leftist female “educator”) said that she would refuse to hang out with anyone who supported Donald Trump.
I did not say anything. But something deep inside me said that if I called her on her shit, that I could turn her face into a toaster strudel later on that night.
“But something deep inside me said that if I called her on her shit, that I could turn her face into a toaster strudel later on that night.”
^THIS
Love going Petruchio on some snarky Kate bitch.
Nice Shakespeare reference.
Funny how they never mention him. Instead, we hear about Romeo…
Hahaha. Romeo. When girls talk about Romeo and Juliette in romantic terms, I love to remind them of what a twat he was.
“Speak from a righteous place”-Patrice O’Neal. There is a part of Everyman that knows a chick is full of shit, or an being an asshole. You have to call her on her shit. When you don’t you stifle a part of your masculinity.
Very true. They are testing your meddle, essentially.
Patrice was one of the great ones. First time I ever called out a chuck on her bullshit I got immediate results. She was a good looking young girl with hundreds of beta orbiters whom she was a complete bitch to. No one could make any progress with her because they all kissed her ass and she would take full advantage of them, use them and purposely destroyed their self esteem. Almost by accident I called her on “bad girl” act and told her I knew she was full of shit. I followed up by telling her to take her high heels off because I didn’t like walking around next to a fucking giraffe, which she did. After that I saw a complete shift in the way she looked at me. She was turned on. After that I called all the shots and had complete control of this queen bee bitch. That was ten years ago and I will never forget my lesson.
But it ended so well! What a success story for us to emulate
LoLz!
When I publicly call women out on their shit—especially women I don’t know very well, or not at all—I always make it a point to smile while I’m doing it. Operate in a tone that creates ambiguity; as in, make these women wonder if you’re serious or not. I also tune out and completely ignore any outside comments about my behavior from any bystanders, meaning: I maintain eye contact with my target and pay attention only to her reactions and words. Anyone else around and their opinions are simply ignored—they don’t matter.
Having conviction in what you say is important, too. You have to believe what you say; convey that you truly do hold the opinions that you do; that you have 100 percent confidence in the accuracy of what you say and that there’s no way anyone will change your opinion, and you have to do this in a light-hearted, comedic tone. Be serious with your points, but not serious in your delivery. You should smirk, even smile big sometimes (especially if your teeth are white and in decent shape, being a hard-ass alpha dog scores a lot of points around here, but smiling at opportune times is a very good thing).
That’s the best way I can think to explain it. For me, personally, I’ve always been able to get away with saying shit that other people would get crucified for. And people will have my back for saying it, even if they don’t agree with what I say—they’ll just attribute it to “that’s just A.V. Yader being A.V. Yader.” Being funny, sharp, and witty are compulsory to making this work, that much I know is true. Just pick your spots and be aware of your surroundings—choose your battles well.
This is actually a subject that I might sit down and really think about. It has potential for a decent article.
Yep. I always say that you can say just about anything to a woman, if you say it right.
And then you later realize that your opinion has zero value in that woman’s life… and that makes you angry… so you come to places like this to share your pathetic vitriol with other basement dwelling beta males.
Plz do write an article.
Folks over there at TheRedPill suggest “Think As You Like But Behave Like Others”.
I have always had a difference of opinion with them.
Plus being on the sigma side allows me to take certain liberties.
Although there are times I would calibrate depending on the context of the situation.
I do exactly the same thing you do and surprisingly get away with a lot of stuff betas in my social circle can’t get away with.
There is the right way to do things and there is the wrong way.
Just like some guys may say avoid complimenting a girl….but there is an alpha way to do it vs the validation giving beta way.
That’s a good point, about saying it with a smile to create ambiguity. I once brought up my wife’s Central American priest telling her that feminism is of the devil around a good friend’s girlfriend. She was amused at first because she thought I was mocking the priest’s ignorance. She was much less amused when she figured out that I think that priest is awesome.
That said, I did want to drive home the fact that I think feminism is satanic.
I just witnessed this congratulatory charade the other day. One tatted-up burned-out yoga-cultist praising another for her new strip-mall SMV discount label.
Its a shame, really. But my empathy seems to evaporate quickly these days as these same women are quick to spit their bitter anti-male venom at every opportunity when their equalist delusions fail to yield them their just-in-time-alphaman.
So they turn to their box wine, up their psychotropics, and double-down on the social media cesspool while peppering the hookup apps and dating sites with their self-lies about their amazing job and awesome friends.
When they are not inappropriately spooning with their misunderstood mongrel dogs, they rut with badboys, hoping to find that one with a heart of gold that will also pull her hair without her having to ask – just so she can feel something.
Something that, however depraved, falls closer to the truth than a lifetime of sameness and equality programming culminating in the incremental self-destruction of the goodness and beauty of the naturally feminine gifts they have squandered.
Most tattoos these days are just a more artistic (and socially encouraged) form of cutting.
When these look-at-me tattoo discussions arise, I usually just ask them when they were in the Navy.
I’m not quite to the point where I could full on call them out for being degenerate futureless cumbucket whores the way A.V. put it, but I like the “strip mall discount label” comment. The next time someone brings up their tattoo, I’m going to make a comment about how they’ve publicly announced a clearance sale price for their body, and act vaguely interested. “So.. each tattoo marks down the price of your body by 20%… is it generating any interest yet?”
That’s ironic, considering that I served twenty years in the Navy and never got a tattoo (briefly considered it when I had the opportunity, but finally decided that tattoos are like kids and some STDs: once you get them, you can never be rid of them).
Exactly.
Except this didn’t actually happen. The man who wrote this, similarly to the rest of you heathens, is living in a fantasy-land where he makes up gratuitous stories to make himself seem more relevant or masculine.
And you? Are you a true masculine dude 🙂 ?
A.V. Yader, nice story. I can’t even describe how humiliatingly stupid someone would have to be to believe it.
Well played sir. Calling out stupidity in front of others openly is a great, great thing.
Thats the medicine, right there. We need to take these ho’s down a peg, and publicly. Shaming is necessary to keep women in line. Aint nobody doin’ it these days except for red pill types
I’ve been selectively doing the “shame-a-Ho” call-out actively for years — be ready to have stuff thrown at you in wild hissy fits (comes with the territory). The best part is watching any insipid “white knights” in the vicinity trying desperately to pivot off what they think is your “mistake” for calling these uppity cunts out for trying to rise above their condition with their broken feminist groupthink and vapid sleight-of-hand. Drop that “verbal murder” on them, keep cool and blast ’em with logic.
Be prepared to lose friends if you do this, because in a mixed social scene sides will be chosen on the spot, and most people are too weak-willed to go against the collective attitude in a room.
Been there, done it, pissed of white knights en masse and lost “friends” that were never friends in the first place. No Ragrets.
A friend who will put any woman above his friends, should be discarded. They’ve drunk the “a woman’s pussy should = a man’s very existence” Kool-Aid, and should be left alone to deal with the inevitable ruination of his life, when all’s said and done. People don’t realize that women get their “power” from MEN. Women believe they have infinite choices in picking men, solely because of the momma’s boy/emasculated simps running around trying to “respect” women, or becoming less of a man just to attempt to get pussy from them.
The irony being it’s a shit strategy for getting laid at the end of the day
I know this is off topic, but why do women say rape is worse than death, but submit to it so easily? Like we see in Europe, women will assert their right to walk around naked if they choose without having to endure any looks that may make them uncomfortable, but only to western men. Because they know there’s no threat of anything.
But then, when a middle eastern man shows the slightest bit of verbal or physical aggression, they’ll submit so easily. I mean, there’s nothing stopping German women 13-35 from arming themselves with melee weapons and even good old fashioned hand to hand combat and forming guerilla groups and going to go fight these young, middle eastern men. Yet they won’t do it and instead submit to rape that is “worse than death”.
I don’t get it.
Western women don’t consider western men to be men anymore, that’s the difference. We’ve had it coming ever since we collectively butchered on behalf of the self-annointed chosen tribe the only segment of our population with the balls to stand up to the degeneracy and then proceeded to hand over the reigns of our civilization to women who didn’t earn it and minorities who would see us go extinct. It’s hard to blame them (the women) since its been our job to put them in their place and we haven’t done a good job at doing this.
I’ll believe rape is worse than death the day most rape victims kill themselves shortly after it happens.
they probably want it in their hindbrains, at least to some extent. although, maybe it’s no reflection on decision-making, but the subconscious propelling action
when a little kid or something gets raped and doesn’t fight to the death, for example, i can’t imagine the kid wanted that. or even a prison inmate being shanked, when he’d risk his life in a gunfight. human nature is strange.
although, here I might be comparing apples to oranges.
Mathematics at work.
She’s worth only a lay. Good job. Use that shit and then drop it at the curb when drama starts.
“one of the better one’s”……shhheeeeettttt………school teachers, these wimmin are teaching the next generation…. kids in her classes talking about Miss Jones’s new tat……. waitresses….. for the most part no ambition, party too much, drink, drugs, etc….. office workers, bottle of wine every night after work, constantly worried about the bills, next holiday…… put any female occupation here……
Being brutally honest really does pay off.
I agree that getting tattoos is stupid. I considered it seriously once and I am glad I didn’t do it. Its like an ego attachment that is burned into your body.
The more you challenge a woman and treat her like shit, the more she will wants to be fucked by you.
It reminds me of a female friend of mine that was fucked by this guy and then dumped and was always making those stupid pseudo philosophical posts on facebook that love will prevail, im a strong women, i will continue to live, no more tears…shit like that. Short story: she fell in love and wanted more, he just wanted pussy, so let me go to Facebook to tell everyone how strong i am. Guess what…she is now constantly with him, making him compliments and its like nothing happened. And all of this from a men, that made her cry, treated her like shit and even sometimes got physical…So, i will conclude as i began…The more you challenge a woman and treat her like shit, the more she will wants to be fucked by you.
Fucking her was a good plot twist. I did not see that coming Sir.
Something similar happened to me this weekend and I hadn’t reflected on it until now. I’m at my friends birthday party, which is more a reunion these days since we’re all professionals and in our thirties and there’s not as much time to socialize. We’re also at a place near Venice in Santa Monica, so it’s a good neighborhood, and the women that show up are mostly 8’s and 9’s. We’re having a good time and then this obvious feminist with blue hair comes up to me and says “oh I remember you, we had several arguments, blah blah.” I just smiled and agreed and I vaguely recalled her appearance but she wasn’t even on my radar as far as importance. So without giving her any opportunities to spout more of her, I’m assuming bs she had from whenever in the past we spoke before, I just narrowed down when this took place. From her reaction to me you thought we had a history, but it was all from one similar house party situation 6 years earlier. There were several good memories from that night but again she was not on my radar. So that’s the first reaction, that the same points we make on this site every day really agitate people like her. And after all that time she was worse off and her plans were to go back to school as she’s decided to become a teacher. I didn’t engage her further, bc it would have been another forgettable waste of my time. Course I was thinking great, one more person to poison young minds.
The final observation here also relates to your post. I did not fuck this girl. But if she hadn’t been such a broken waste, there’s a version of her that exists this culture didn’t create, where she probably would be worth it. So the friend is known for being in the lifestyle circles, which if you don’t know are meetups for orgies. That’s what she was there for. So at the end of the night she was fourth wheel for my friend, his buddy, their two girls and another.
Sounds like fun for a minute until you consider the alternate path that she could actually have a loving family of her own. And I know she’s probably proud of what she thinks is an awesome sex life, as she remains infinitely single.
Reading the incoherent lines above “revolutionary” I gather you think the foul mouthed trash you responded to is a hero for having sex with a low life woman with tattoos but that the woman is a skank and he is not. Amazing. Try looking up the word hypocrisy. Do you really think that you or he are providing a good example to the young minds you say you do not want to poison?
nobody thinks she’s a skank, she just is…
“try looking up the word hypocrisy”
*rushes to look up the word hypocrisy*
A woman who gets tatted up, is placing herself in the permanent category of “fuck’r and chuck’r”.
I agree. I have a cousin who is a single mom. She has disgusting tattoos and face piercings. That idiot loves to admonish me for how “old fashioned” I am because I’m happily married, I stay at home, I submit to my husband and I don’t advocate women sleeping with men they barely know. Meanwhile, I live in a lovely home with a devoted Alpha Provider, while my tatted cousin sleeps with random men and slaves at some low paying job.
I guess being “old fashioned” is working well for me. I am the only woman my husband ever dated who did not have any tattoos or piercings other than my ears. I also did not jump into bed within 2 days like some dirty slut.
When my husband advised me to stop working and keep house, I lost a lot of friends because they looked down on me. There’s nothing wrong with obeying a man who has my best interests at heart.
I love this website because the articles are well written and filled with truths that people refuse to acknowledge. I wish that I could chat some more but I need to go put on some makeup before my husband gets home and cook dinner. Keep up the good work!
Wow, I am impressed.
Having only recently taken the red pill, i am surprised that there are still women out there that know that they are biologically wired differently than men. You didn’t mention religion, and it does not matter if your relationship works. Enjoy your life and family — i take my hat off and bow to you!
Thanks so much! I was raised in a family where traditional values were taught.
I was trained to be a wife since I was 10 years old. My mother instilled the importance of cooking, cleaning, ironing and looking after myself so that I could marry a good man. I wasn’t allowed to date until I finished high school. I was also told that tattoos and piercings were for whores. When I turned 25, my mother advised me to start looking for a husband. I am so glad that I did because I didn’t want to end up 35 years old and single.
Stupid feminists have indoctrinated women into believing that submission to a man is such a terrible evil that will lead to abuse. A true Alpha male will only REWARD a GOOD woman by taking care of her IF she adheres to his reasonable requirements.
My husband does not ask very much of me. He just wants a clean home, dinner on the table every evening, a passionate sex life and a spouse who takes care of herself and listens to him. This is much better than working with catty feminists who spend more time gossiping and creating ridiculous office politics.
Wait until your cousin is in her forties and The Wall (along with her lifestyle) has taken its toll on her face and body. You’ll see who is happier and more fulfilled then…
This is so true! She’s 29 and still looks great but men still only want her for one night of sex. My cousin will whine to me about “needing male attention” and then call me a “desperate housewife” because I depend on my husband.
Hmmm…I don’t behave like a cheap hooker who is craves acknowledgment from men so much that I’ll open my legs to anyone I meet. I just bask in the love and commitment from my hubby.
Which one of us is truly desperate?
I do not have tattoos etc either, however you are clearly either a man pretending to be a woman, “hishumbledarling” or a very shallow person. A person who “obeys” a man so she does not have to do a low paying job, is a very materialistic person indeed, in fact that in itself might be considered whorish. A woman should love a man she marries, not think of him as a credit card.
You are impressed at a woman who talks about not “opening her legs” to other man, she is clearly someone of a very low social class. I take it you are lower class as well?
My husband did not want me to work so nobody is being used. Your ridiculous attempts at shaming me for being traditional will not change the fact that I have happy marriage. I married my husband when he had nothing. Now that we’re doing well, he doesn’t want me to work because both of us are happier when I am at home.
Maybe you’re a whore and that’s why you’re projecting that on other women. I see that you’re one of those angry feminists who follows some made up religion. That’s why you’re taking shots at me.
There is nothing wrong with a married woman not working. I just find it hard to believe a woman could speak as crudely as you do, which makes me think you are a man.
I cannot wrap my head around the whole “get a tattoo then put it on display 24 hours” stunt that they do. It’s as if they get one then go buy a whole new wardrobe that is cut in the exact way to show it off perpetually OR mutilate their existing wardrobe to do so. The chest and cleavage ones especially have to be given extra attention in attire and also accentuated in their daily selfie-posting ritual.
It really shows how basic and vapid a girl is when a drawing on her skin is such an accomplishment. They always make me laugh when their bio on dating sites is “pierced and tatted” like its a personality trait.
Yes, like it’s somehow a badge of honor or a claim to fame. The constant need to show it/them in their innumerable selfies and while out and about (day or night!) speaks volumes about their priorities, or lack thereof. And we know they didn’t get them in prison, because, well, come on now, they don’t go there!
You are the one who is broken.
Yeah, A.V.! You douchebag/awkward/creeper/every other tired and play-out tourrettes-ish clichè under The Sun!
TATTOO GIRL FOUND YOU
“This woman could have been a great mother and wife had she been raised right”
Indeed. A timely reminder that feminism is not only corrosive to society but it also leads women to hurt themselves and ruin their lives.
“…feminism is not only corrosive to society but it also leads women to hurt themselves and ruin their lives.”
Which is what feminism was supposed to accomplish.
Women who have tattoos belong in the nearest motorcycle “club” and should be their drudge and whore.
Tattoos are not called “tramp stamps” for nothing.
I call BS in you fucking her.
“I fucked her that night…”
To quote Ric Flair…Wooooooooooooooooooo!!!!
Edgy
Tattoos are so cool and original. My brain begins to devour itself every time I hear a girl explain her tattoo and what it means. I also like how the word “art” is thrown around in regards to tattoos. Scribbles and sayings that are about as original as a bumper sticker. Yes a tattoo is a form of expression, “hey everyone, this is what I thought was cool when I was 21.” Usually I just shake my head and say “no comment.” I’m gonna be more vocal from now on, thanks for the inspiration AV.
I assume you are not married. Are you sure you will not die alone?
Let me say again, we all die alone. It is inevitable and unalterable.
Maybe. But one thing if there are people who love us and whom we love and another thing to be lonely and realize that anybody doesn’t need you, doesn’t love.
At least we should be something good to leave after us.
She won’t die alone… But you will.
I don’t even know where to begin. Firstly, your language is appalling, secondly you appear to be hypocritical beyond belief. I have no tattoos but I do not care how much money you make because I am not a whore, and the fact is that, just like the woman you are trashing, you are a skank too, tattoo or not.
” She was completely shocked, insulted, and repulsed my behavior and my “terribly judgmental personality.””
So then how did you go from insulting her (good job, btw) to fucking her? Surely the conversation had to turn into a direction that led to copulation.
I can’t believe these stupid fucks are willing to turn off their brains to beleive your bullshit just because you basically get on your knees and suck their dicks. Your post is a power fantasy and everyone on here are cowards that want to be as boldly dickish as you’d have them beleive you are. You fucking virgin.
And yet you’ll fuck her. Says more about you (or lack of) as a person in my opinion.
Is that you Tom Leykis?
Doesn’t surprise me…if you had been nice and respectful to her, she would have contempt for you and treat you like shit
You have shared this same verbatim story in the comments section for other articles. I’m pretty sure this is a false story.
Here’s further proof that this story was written somewhere else a year ago:
http://imgur.com/ynE8E0Q
make sure you think of every which way she could possibly find to get pregnant and prevent it. don’t let her around your condoms, for example. i’m serious.
i get a little worried when I hear “tattoo” “30” and “one of the better ones”
Well done my friend
Good Job on not validating her dumbass decision. When you dump her remind her about her shitty tattoo. These Bitches get too many ego boosts in exchange for their degenerate behavior. It’s what keeps the decline at full speed.
knock her up first
Another article that I will have to bookmark. Good job on bringing together all of the forces in this forced war on the sexes. Today’s market really demands that you have your shit together in a way previously unseen and it seems at times like there is no off on this wheel. We all just got caught in the perfect storm and are only seeing shit because we are in the eye of it. Guess the only goal is to have your shit together because something else is brewing on the outside of this storm waiting for those of us who manage to get out relatively unscathed.
If this is the calm before the storm, we’re in for a doozy.
In light of this article, some rube sent me this. Here is my response:
Reality check. The Goldman quote is only accurate for the first two sentences.
He never said the rest, but let’s take a look at this little puppy:
“If you give her sperm, she will give you a baby” (The sperm came from a man.)
If you give her a house, she will give you a home.” (The house was paid for and built by a guy.)
“If you give her groceries, she will give you a meal” (Who paid for the groceries? … gettin’ the drift here?)
“If you give her a smile, she will give you her heart.” (And on whose face is that smile plastered on??)
Of course, what I wanted to say was, “You give a woman a sperm and a house and she’ll take the baby and the home and kick it all out of your life. Give her groceries and she won’t have a freaking clue what to do with them.”
Well this is a pretty true statement, to be honest. It implies Mutuality. It implies she knows what to do with what you as a man give her and she accepts it freely along with the responsibility that goes with accepting the Sperm, House and Groceries. The part where she gives you her heart for a smile shows that whoever sent this as an argument to this article is an idiot. The “Far superior” part is pretty much the only blue pill pandering I see, and to be honest he likely being facetious. This guy didn’t live his life in the degeneracy that we are.
Antique beta orbiter, probably knew the friend zone well. Give her temptation of an easy buck or cheap thrill-she’ll take the bait.
Also, guess who raised all the crops and livestock in those groceries? Exactly.
This fuckin retard doesn’t realize that even CASANOVA in the sixteenth century saw AF/BB strategy
Women’s sex drive is higher than men’s.
That’s what I’ve noticed. To be fair, men do have a higher drive as teens. Once men reach their 30s though, it diminishes. This is something I’ve parroted before, but it’s worth repeating, but this is why they market Viagra to women to the point of putting hot MILFs in their commercials. It’s still our job to satisfy their post menopausal urges.
Which is why you develop your own SMV, that way you can bang the hotter younger chicks and laugh at the desperate post wall hags.
Indeed. The outright glares of hatred you’ll receive from women around your age are a reward of sweet, sweet justice that gets sweeter each time they sneer at you while casting eye daggers at your hot young “friend”.
LOL and bonus sneers if you unashamedly tell a hag that she’s just too old for you.
Right? Heh. I’ve…witnessed…conversations with “older” women (women my age, in their late 40’s) who get absolutely livid if a man in their age range dates younger women. I mean palpable anger. I enjoy laughing at them and asking what a man has to gain by dating an older woman over a younger one. Older women in the dating market are almost universally jaded, desperate, angry at men 24/7 and come complete with their own Personalized Sexual Assault/Physical Assault story that is copy and pasted directly from the Hivemind into their skulls. Young women are generally happy, a lot more innocent about life, care free, everything is new and exciting and fun and they like men. It’s not even a contest.
Yep you have pretty much described what I have witnessed also. I’ve met a small handful in their 40’s who could easily pass for 30’s, in good shape, but they are just way too jaded and bitter. I’m in my early 40’s, I get a lot of younger ones coming on to me, but the problem with my current location is most of those are jailbait by a year or so. The early 20 somethings are seemingly non existent, they all move away from here, or are locked down in marriage with kids it seems.
I’m just 20 minutes north of the main Ohio State University campus. Hot young chicks are freaking legion here.
This is more how the manufacturers of viagra market their product
“SMV”= $= soft prostitution
Men’s sex drive doesn’t diminish in their thirties, just their options unless they pay for it in one way or the other. Most realise the effort ( as minimal as it was) they once put into getting snatch their own age when they were younger was not worth it so there is no way in Hell they would waste $ on a hooker, Rogaine, hair plugs, a rug, a gym membership, a metrosexual wardrobe or a mid life crisis red convertible sports car.
Um, no, it’s not. Sex drive is controlled by testosterone.
I see it like this: Men openly show their thirst for sex, while women don’t. From all my contacts with women I learnt that their sex drive was higher than mine after the initial phase of 1-3 weeks. I have heard the same from other men.
They were just rying to lock you down in a ltr/domesticate you. They were not really horny and they did not really crave it
^THIS
Hmm… a complex thing, that.
Women produce testosterone, as well…and even though they do that in smaller concentrations and quantities , it serves the same libido-producing purpose (among other things).
The catch is in the brain- wiring; while in males, the libido-associated neuronal activity spreads more diffusely through brain structures, almost ALL the female “synaptic horniness” must pass through amygdala – a brain structure associated with “fight-fright-flight” responses.
In other words, man’s sex drive is more difficult to inhibit…while in a woman with an active amygdala, ALL sexual synaptic activity is inhibited.
However, substances which more-or-less selectively PARALYZE the amygdala activity (e.g. alcohol, benzodiazepines, etc), effectuate therewith a TOTALLY UNINHIBITED flow of sex-associated neuronal activity through female brain.
So, when drunk, “when she’s in for a penny, she’s in for a pound”.
Thus becometh the slut.
;)))
Ridiculous nonsense, prostitution is always a male paying a female. Try to find one website like this one that teaches women the “game” of how to pick up men because of all the instagram, duckfaced, flip flop/see through yoga pants wearing, overweight, female slobs who can’t find a cock to save their lives. Good luck, it doesn’t exist.
Maybe you mistakenly think women have a higher sex drive because a female ages so much worse than her husband does. He looks roughly the same as when they met so she still needs intercourse occasionally as a form of validation whereas he is now physically repulsed by her.
A man’s sex drive does not decrease in his thirties and he does not need
viagra because he would still bang a female that looks the way his wife
did when he married her 10 years earlier.
Most women’s favorite part about sex, maybe the only thing they actually like about it, is feeling desired/attractive. It is completely psychological. Most young girls get off more on virtual “likes”/compliments on the internet than they do from intercourse so they skip the physical act of sex all together because they already got the narcissistic psychological validation. They could care less if the guy(s) who provided it get anything out of the interaction. These females are so selfish they actually enjoy wasting online admirers time by cock teasing them.
Sex drive is the direct result of testosterone and women’s bodies produce much less testosterone than men’s do.
u old
Old enough to know the validity of my statement.
No Jesus in the relationship if you get yoked with a non-believer it is doomed. Read your bibles ppl it will teach you to be a man instead of reading what men have to say. Be obedient to God he adds everything onto you walk righteous if you go find your own women you will pick out a Harlot because Satan will set you up.
(Sigh)
…well…to say it in a polite way…every devil likes an obedient woman, too…for himself, of course…:)
p.s. It would be incredibly nice of You to stop blaming human failings on Fallen Ones.
Thank You and have a nice day.
🙂
I have to agree. I’m a bible believer myself who understands there is a very real supernatural element to our world, but G-d gave humans the power of free will. Women nowadays have more than enough free will to act as they will, same with men. It is from their fruits that you know them. To the Dule gentlemen above, “the dievelle made me doo it!” Is not a worthy excuse.
From my observations, there are a couple other factors that are involved in destroy relationships today:
9.) Lack of engaging fathers/father figures: The lack of engaging father to show and teach his son lessons and values are leading his son and daughter astray in this world. From my personal experience, my Dad was always working and rarely had time for me teach/guide me. By the grace of God, there were other people in my life to help me in that regard.
10.) Manginas/White Knights: These fuckers have done more damage to the sexes, than any feminist would dream to do by herself. Instead of being rational and use their brain, these fuckers use there dicks to think instead. Willing to put up and facilitate harmful practices to females for chance to fuck a girl, has earn there special place in hell in the near future.
11.) Controlling Envy and Understanding Consequence: We compare ourselves with other, developing envy for how one man or women lives their life. We do not understand the consequences or trade off that person has to make to live it. There is price to everything: There one thing that has not been taught to either sex earlier on in life. For every action there is consequence, something females are discourage to learn in our society today.
One wonders if the massive debt and financial obligations of today weren’t designed in some way to soak up all of father’s free time, working multiple jobs just to keep the consumerist lifestyle for his family. Combined with divorce rape laws, the effect is few strong father figures in the family.
And holiday after holiday. Good gravy, holidays back to back, each one apparently requiring a major outlay in cash. Or so it’s sold to us.
Real Holy Days would be fantastic, and I love a good feast and festivities, but this whole “Buy her a diamond this Groundhog’s Day…” shit is insane.
My ex’s family is like that. For fucks sake, they’re Mexican and they celebrate St Patrick’s Day. They even decorate their house green!
All I can say to your last line is, fuck you DeBeers.
It’s gotten beyond being shameless. “Get her a diamond for…” basically everything. Screw that noise. Where are the “Show him you love him, buy him a Mossberg 12 gauge this Easter…” with violin music playing in the background?
That’s gay.
Funny thing is, in my corner of the woods, they actually had ads running on TV trying to sell guns to women. Unfortunately I couldn’t find them on the Internets, but it goes something like this: hot chick pulls into a seedy looking alley in her deluxe SUV with windows rolled down. Bad guy with hoodie pulls up and demands money. Hot chick tells him to standby and proceeds to pull gun out of purse. Bad guy takes off running. Sounds like something out of a Looney Tunes cartoon. And they didn’t mention it, but methinks that at some point they are going to be like, show your love for you beloved by buying her a gun so she doesn’t get raped by thugs in alleys because apparently she lacks common sense.
On and btw, the gun was pink.
Gay and a bit expensive. And not just that. Valentine’s Day, Mother’s Day, Children’s Day. It goes on and on.
You’re probably already aware, the advertisement industry targets women, because it’s so easy to do so, unfortunately. It’s like the low hanging fruit of marketing.
Yep, fuck the diamond industry in general– 100% fake social pressure, hype and “manufactured scarcity.” Men are jackasses paying through the nose for a rock that isn’t even rare in the slightest. One huge marketing scam.
To quote Sheldon Cooper, these men (unfortunately, myself included at one point) plunk thousands of dollars to buy a piece of carbon with the atoms neatly stacked.
Austria still does it right…and at Yuletide, packs of Krampuses flog women in the streets, for fertility…paralel to Baby Jesus festivities. 🙂
Exemplary.
;)))
“Where are the “Show him you love him, buy him a Mossberg 12 gauge this Easter…” with violin music playing in the background?”
There are not enough up votes in the universe to do this comment justices.
You sir, have just won the internets.
It’s a funny and ironic thing that the feminists and their statist overlords have spent years and billions of dollars selling the idea of gun control to the female population, because they’re pushing the idea that Big Daddy government and their ‘White Knights in Blue Uniforms’ will ‘protect them’.
A few years from now, the first ad in a commercial break will be as you describe, selling guns to women because scary men are out there. The second ad will be a donation drive to bring more muslim rapefugees from Africa to your neighbourhood. The third spot will be the local funeral home. And the fourth will be a recruitment drive by the local mosque.
Has that not always been the wet dream of tyrants…to control fighting age men and or destroy them if needed.
Definitely by design! Then they came for the women. Who’s raising our babies? The State of course…also by design!
Thankfully, the manginas I know are mostly miserable and treated like dirt by their women. Imagine if they were rewarded! Then I would be much more worried.
I find it strange when manginas think they’re “lucky” to get laid from time to time but treated so badly. But then again, there’s a counterpart to this on RoK where half of the articles are about teaching men to be a** clowns to entertain and seduce young women or engage in “negging” game. Masturbation and going to a brothel are frowned down upon here, but they are far more honorable and dignified than the dehumanizing behavior I have seen men engage in just to get laid.
I’ll be the first to say it: I whacked off thousands of times and in the end, didn’t have any debt, problems with psycho women making false rape accusations, mind numbing evenings spent trying to figure out the hamster moving in their heads. It was bliss. I went to some brothels in Europe. Amazingly wonderful. Treat yourself with respect. The rest will follow.
We are in the endtimes ppl prophecy is being fulfilled ….. no fornicator will inherit the kingdom of God. Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed for there sexual immorality and if you are to stupid to realize Satan is God of this world you deserve the Lake of Fire ……. 1 man 1 women marry her the one God brings to you after you got right with him …… You go and pick out your own women or try and fornicate around Satan and his demons will destroy you and your relationship because it is unholy and Satan has legal ground because God is righteous by his word and he allows it.
Hey, we atheists believe in the rapture, too: We can see that Christians have already started to disappear.
don’t you mean “we jews”?
9. The politically corrupted, pseudoscientific field of sexology, which determines the content of sex ed.
When sex educators tell girls that they deserve sexual fulfillment as an end in itself, apart from women’s natural roles as wives and mothers, that gives girls wrong-headed ideas about what to do with their bodies. And by teaching girls how to masturbate and have orgasms, this ideology lowers their resistance to having lesbian experiences, which further damage their marriage value.
Sex ed also propagandizes girls to accept male homosexuality as just another kind of normal, and it lowers their resistance to becoming fag hags. Women have no business hanging out with gay men. Gays will just validate these women’s bad life decisions and encourage them to accept their obesity.
If any field of “science” needs the Pinochet treatment to rid it of the social-justice ideology, sexology should go to the top of the list.
Well said, sex education is another way to normalize corrupt behavior. They talk plenty about how to wear a condom and prevent pregnancy. They do ignore the psychological, social, and future marriage problems that come along with promiscuity.
They ignore (or deny) those problems because it is a challenge to and an upset of their feminist orthodoxy.
Well…within coitus…female orgasm DOES facilitate conception (by cervical aspiration of semen). Some “habituation” might come in handy…
However, I agree that this knowledge can be imparted to the daughters by mothers, or grandmothers..
Anytime a i hear a girl say something about her sociology/psych class i just wanna tell the to shut the fuck up
Brush up on psychology; learn the terms, definitions, great “thinkers”, theories, etc. There’s not that much too it. Then when you hear some broad try to psychoanalyze something due to her “education” press back at her and expose her lack of actual knowledge.
Its always like my professor said about slut shaming ir some bullshit like that, of course they think like most men that I’m a sjw pussy and agree with them, blindsides them when i dont
…or, elaborate about “the immense relevance of the psychodynamics of the NEWEST “Primal Fart” therapy”…quote freely wise-sounding, but non-existing authors (e.g. “Schlumpfke & Ledermann” or, “Van Coors & De Miller”..etc.)….and then, smirk, frown, and criticize her heavily for her lack of knowledge…;))))
Finally saw that new Star Wars flick…the new Vader character looks like a cross between JD from Granma’s Boy and Ross from Friends. Very not so scary when he took that mask off.
Had to get that one off my chest. Thanks!
There’s a new Star Wars flick? Didn’t they just release Diversity Wars a few months ago?
Im a wee bit behind the times. The one where Han gets whacked
That’s Diversity Wars. They are making a new one I hear but that’s all I know about it, as I really am not giving that franchise another red cent and haven’t since the 1990’s.
I have yet to see The Feminism Awakens. I will pirate it sometime.
You would actually waste download quotas to pirate that shit? I hope it won’t kill your modem.
“The Feminism Awakens”? Wasn’t that “The Farce Mistaken”?
Star Gurrls and Mace Dindu.
;))
Yeah, Steve Urkel could kick the shit out of that loser.
Its gay, and only getting gayer. Darth Vader was badass. Kylo Ren is just..a petulant teenager…
,,You don’t have to be a traditionalist to see that the sex relations have gone awry due to the carefully calculated genocidal path disguised as ,,modern society values” and its extremely corrosive cultures.”
– there you go, I fixed that for ya’.
How to decrease population and castrate the human soul ?
1. Promote a life style that not only slows the forming of the most important societal cell ( the family ) but eventually evolves in a way of life that eradicates the idea per se – Gays, lesbians, importing hoards of extra-continental individuals.
2. Promote the constant shaming of the national cultures.
3. Promote the constant shaming of national values.
4. Promote the constant pedestalisation of ,,modernity”.
5. Promote the welcoming of extra-continental hoards of migrants.
6. Destroy the oposers.
7. Repeat.
These methods are already forming into a very fine tuned engine.
Somebody’s pouring truckloads of money just to decimate native populations.
Wonder who that might be ?
Brexit has been the first kick back at the points you make above. The sulking and vitriol in the main stream media is palpable.
8 Do all this only in the White countries.
Modern women’s programmed insistence on equality is toxic to marriage.
There’s a workaround, ladies. The punchline is you can always get a job : http://wp.me/p6QFjS-3B
There are only two ways patriarchy can exist. During times of instability, all decision making is immediately ceded to men as women assume their natural place until men return the stability that allows women to pretend they’re our equals. During times of stability the only way for patriarchy to exist is for men to understand the fundamental nature of the sexes and pass this knowledge down from generation to generation, along with strict laws and customs that apply this knowledge to the real world.
That is actually true.
There’s a wonderful Stefan Molyneux youtube video where he discusses the Islamicism of Sweden with a right-wing Swedish woman who agrees that feminism is a problem, but that it should somehow get solved after the men of Sweden “man up” and save the place through some miraculous uprising. This isn’t going to happen, of course. Perhaps one of the neatest things about feminism is that it’s suicidal. Yeah, men do stupid things but being stupid isn’t suicidal. We make mistakes and learn from them. This isn’t the first challenge western civilization has gone through and won’t be the last. But for feminism and the notion of women’s equality, the first thing women seem to be driven to do with rights is to use them to destroy the goose that lays the golden eggs and then let in the wolves.
Chivalry predates and is the core of feminism which is the notion of men protecting women as an entitlement. For men, “equality” means a lack of protection. American Constitutionalists tell me that “freedom” means basically anarchy: No protection from the state, but no oppression from it either. I’m not arguing with that logic but revealing how men have understood that protection carries a burden while modern chivalry has taught women for a few centuries that protection is guaranteed and to be taken for granted and even abused.
The new Patriarchy that will emerge from all this will not please the women. They will only get protection from individual men and only when the men are in a mood to protect them. The notion of a man giving up his lifeboat seat to protect a woman he doesn’t know will end. Jump under a bus to save someone else’s kid? No way. The John McClane of Die Hard will be a thing of the past. It’s a hard thing to sell even here.
Strict laws and customs won’t be necessary so much as elimination of the current customs that have messed up men’s heads.
“…The notion of a man giving up his lifeboat seat to protect a woman he doesn’t know will end.”
It has already ended — remember the “Costa Concordia”? And how the ‘not-feminists’ were crapping bricks because a lot of the men were no longer being ‘chivalrous’ (i.e., being a Blue-Pill sucker idiot) and were actually looking out for themselves instead of the nearest ‘privileged princess’?
The excerpt below, posted in its entirety, can be found at the following web address – http://www.henrymakow.com/feminism_spoiled_natures_great.html
“Feminism is the Real Enslavement of Women” – Of course, nature’s “great con” is designed to allow women to bear and raise children.
by Taylor Caldwell (1900-1985)
(Abridged from Caldwell’s prescient 1970 classic, “Women’s Lib: They’re Spoiling Eve’s Great Con Game.” Re-edited from April 19, 2010)
The left, alas, is now running yet another “Liberation Movement,” this one championing females who believe that the male sex has somehow done the ladies wrong. The members of this Front say they want all the spoils the boys appear to be getting out of life.
They’re quite mad, of course. What these “girls” are about to do is ruin the biggest Con Game, and the most ancient, which one section of humanity has ever imposed on another, since Eve invented it.
I’m just jealous, myself, having been deprived by circumstances from getting into that Big Con Game…alas, alas, alas. But I’ve stood on the sidelines and seethed with envy, and now I hope – I say with a grin over clenched teeth – that the Liberation “girls” will get exactly what they want. It’s all they deserve.
As for myself, I am … plenty happy that my two beautiful daughters are in on the Game and enjoying every minute of it, and wouldn’t even dream of Female Liberation. I brought them up to appreciate their blessings — and to shut their mouths around their husbands, for fear the boys would catch on and demand liberation for themselves, which is exactly the calamity these rampant females in the “Liberation Movement” are going to precipitate. God help the contented women who will be their victims!
I MISSED MY CHANCE
At eighteen, I fell desperately in love with a true man, a man of strength and masculine vitality and courage. He was attracted to me, too. But then one night he said to me, “Janet, you aren’t the gentle little woman my mother was.
My father worshiped her, and no wonder. You are too strong, yourself, and too independent for me. There’d be conflict in the house. You wouldn’t be satisfied just to be taken care of; you’d want to do something on your own, and be a ‘partner’ to me.
It’s just no use.” I was struck dumb at this horrifying statement. I wasn’t very articulate then. He gently picked up my hands and shook his head at the old callouses, and as gently put them down.
I wanted to cry out to him, ” But I want to be like your mother! I want you to take care of me and deliver me from my hateful daily job! I want you to cherish me! I want only to be your wife and have your children and keep your house! I don’t want a career or anything else. I just want you.”
But I couldn’t say it. I had no words. My rearing silenced me. And so I never saw him again. But I saw the creeps, all right! They hung on me like leeches. Charity prevents me from elaborating on the matter. After all, a girl has to marry someone, doesn’t she, when her yearning for love and protection overcomes her. And, believe me, unless she is a dyke or a Liberated Commie, that yearning is natural and heart-breaking…
MEN’S LIBERATION
I fear that men are beginning to suspect that we women conned them through the centuries. I fear they are asking themselves — to women’s terrible hurt — why they should support an able-bodied woman who can earn a good living too, and why should they be responsible for providing a home for women.
Why can’t women be architects and bricklayers and plumbers and stone-masons and lawyers and doctors and business women too, and pile up a fat bank account to be inherited by husbands?
Why should a man give his ex-wife alimony and child-support checks, when she is just as capable, if not more so, of rolling up her sleeves and getting on the 8:00 bus of a morning for an arduous day in the factory or the office?
After all, men whisper among themselves — I have heard — that women in Russia are treated exactly as men, and are farm-laborers plowing and seeding and harvesting, and they manhandle big machines in factories, empty garbage and shovel snow, learn to be bricklayers and steel-workers as well as doctors and lawyers, serve in the armies, drive trucks, wear felt pants, dig sewers and lay pipes, clean chimneys and work in the forests, and do the heaviest of manual labor.
Men, in short, are licking their lips and, for the first itme in history, are readying themselves to be exploiters in their turn — to be the soft gentle creature in the house, the soother of exhaustion, the serene person who has nothing to worry about in his pleasant life. Mom’s out there, plugging and “fulfilling” herself, and why should Pop worry? He’s had it coming to him since Eve.
It is a woman’s nature to make a sanctuary of love and delight in her home. That is the true “career” for women. Alas, alas, that so many multitudes of women are now forced — or choose — to abandon that career, and to become imitation men in society. The true men won’t marry them. The creeps will throng about them. They will reap the bitterness I have had to reap — though I never wanted a career, never wanted to be “stalwart.” I just wanted to be a woman.
THE PLAYBOY
You really can’t change human nature, and the instincts of that nature, for good or evil. I know a prosperous young man in New York, in his early thirties, who has a “pad” in a penthouse, and is up-to-date on everything, including Ladies’ Liberation. He highly approves of it. It is time, he told me, that women “stopped being parasites” and worked to the day they dropped dead or retired, as men do, and not expect a man “to support them.”
He is very enthusiastic, too, about women’s “sexual liberation,” and always manages to get a girl who, the dupe and dope, heartily agrees with him. “After all,” says the young man, “women get as much fun out of it as men do, so why should a man feel obligated to marry them, or give them more than a drink and a dinner in exchange? I’m all for this new freedom for the girls.”
He belongs to the Key Club. You know the kind I mean. When I was in New York recently he invited me to meet his “newest girl” at the Club. The “girl” happened to be a member of an advertising agency, a smart, pretty cookie with swinging hair and bright cheeks and eyes, and good manners and an engaging way with her. Only her eyes were vulnerable, and soft and tender as she gazed at my young masculine friend. The lovelight shone in those eyes, deep and passionate and devoted.
I thought those two hit it off wonderfully well, and I thought, too what a wonderful marriage they would make and what handsome and intelligent children they would have. After all, the girl came of a good family, had a master’s degree in publications and advertising, and money of her own. And I could palianly see that marriage was fixed in her own ardent wishes and hopes.
When she went to the “powder room” I said to my sophisticated, progressive, and with-it young pal: “Are you going to marry Sally soon?” He looked absolutely shocked! Suddenly the primitive man was there and not a “modern” man in a dinner jacket and black tie, in a Key Club with bunnies running around and the smell of winey cooking in the air. He was aghast.
He said “Excuse me, but you can’t be serious, can you? Sally’s all right. But, after all, she is a modern girl — she likes a romp as well as I do. No inhibition.” He paused. Then he said, “Playmates for play-time. But only maidens for marriage!” And he laughed.
When I still stared at him cynically, he got a little mad. “Let’s face it,” he said. “The liberated girls have made their own public bed, and they can lie in it, and we men love it. but if they think we are going to marry them, they’re due for an awakening. No man wants a woman who’s been out on the town with every Tom, Dick, and Harry. When we marry, we don’t want a ‘modern’ woman.” He laughed again. “Oh, we encourage the women to be ‘liberated’! It’s cheap for us, and we get all the free sex we want before we settle down with a decent girl.”
Sally came back, glowing at the boyfriend, her heart in her eyes. No one ever told Sally that she was being used, that her womanhood had been cheapened and degraded by her sister-women in the name of “liberation.”
Sure, Sally had her “identity,” as they wickedly call it, and her “freedom,” and she was being fulfilled all right, all right! She had her good job and her independence and her nice little apartment…and she was twenty-seven years old and she would soon be middle-aged, and all she could marry then (and even now) would be some “Liberal” creep eager to live on her salary and permit her to support him.
The young man now opposite her, with his urbane manner and excellent income and ambitions, would never marry Sally. He would marry some sweet, untouched creature who would not “stand shoulder to shoulder with him in the battle for life,” but who would make him a pleasant little wife of whose decency he would be proud, and who had never heard the phrase, “women’s liberation.” Well, I suppose, it serves Sally right and all her deluded and pathetic sisters who sprint off to work every morning and take care of themselves and are as “free as men.” But deep in their deprived hearts they know how tragic they are.
WHO WANTS EQUALITY WITH MEN?
Girls, the men are catching on — through your sister-women who have been “liberated — that they have been victims for ages of the Big Con Game, and the first thing you know they will be demanding Civil Rights and Equality for themselves, too! It’s up to you, in behalf of future generations, to lull them back and to again become superior. Who wants Equality with men? No woman in her right mind.
Remember this: The strongest sign of the decay of a nation is the feminization of men and the masculinization of women. It is notable that in Communist nations women are exhorted, and compelled, to do what has traditionally been men’s work. American women, some of them, feel triumphant that they have broken down the “barricades” between the work of the sexes.
I hope they will still feel triumphant when some commissar forces a shovel or an axe into their soft hands and compels them to pound and cut forests and dig ditches. I hope they will be “happy” when a husband deserts them and they must support their children and themselves alone. (After all, if a woman must be “free” she shouldn’t object to men being free too, should she?”)
I hope they will feel “fulfilled” when they are given no more courtesies due to their sex, and no kindnesses, but are kicked aside on the subways and buses by men, and jostled out of the way by men on busy sidewalks and in elevators. I hope that no man will extend mercy to them because of obvious pregnancies, but will rudely tell them that that is no excuse to shirt a day’s heavy labor, and they should be like Russian women. I hope they will be proud when some court demands that they support “delicate” husbands for a lifetime, and pay alimony. I hope, when they look in their mirrors, that they will be pleased to see exhausted and embittered faces, and that they will be consoled by their paychecks.
The decay and the ruin of a nation has always lain in the hands of its women. So does its life and strength, its reverence for beauty, its mercy and kindness. And, above all, its men.
——
Taylor Caldwell was born in England and emigrated with her parents when she was a child in 1907. She was an outspoken conservative and wrote for many publications until her death in 1985. The preceding article was reprinted from the 1970 issue of American Opinion.
“The increasing number of sluts is diminishing the availability of quality women that men want to start a family with… ” The increasing number of sluts is also a temptation that erodes the desire to be in a solid relationship (no matter how traditional values are based upon or how trained the woman in question is). I mean, what red pill kind of man does not miss gaming women, especially during these times?
Good article. I would also propose that modern psychology be put on the list. It emphasizes “feeling our feelings.” In most times throughout history feelings were seen as self created indulgences only recognized and followed by the weak. They were purposely sublimated and their energies reassigned to meaningful tasks, like putting in another row of potatoes, cleaning the horse stall, or whatever daily task was required. But today we are told our feelings have value in and of themselves, and that when we feel sad, we should cry, when we feel horny we should screw, and yada yada yada. This creates a capricious character that is in no way suited for the demands of a stable relationship. Besides, telling most women that they need to follow their feelings is a bit like telling Joseph Stalin he needs to hone his killer instincts.
“The recurring theme across patriarchal societies of the past and present are violence and warfare. And the most commonly associated traits of masculinity are also traits of warriors such as strength, bravery, aggression, discipline, and so on. It’s quite simple: the more violent the environment is, the more masculine men become. And the more conflicts and wars there are, the more the women depend on men—thus keeping the collective value of male population high.”
Barf. It is masculine to have courage and be ready and willing to defend oneself. Not to crave going to war. That’s an adolescent fantasy. There is a difference between being able to deal with pain and deliberately seeking to create pain.
Vikings raiding and pillaging villages, then having their way with the women were just “adoloescents fantasizing”, it was all in their heads, it never really happened. Their lives were not a million times better,more natural/satisfying than your contemporary existence ever will be and you are much happier than they were.
Well, I think most people would not choose a life full of violence if they were at least somewhat enlightened.
having courage is a battle with the world
The entire UFC and MMA wouldn’t exist if this weren’t true.
I guess #6 covers it, but I would have liked to have seen a number devoted entirely to the obesity epidemic, particularly how it relates to women. It is nearly impossible to find a fit woman in today’s world.
What part of the country do you live in? There are skinny broads everywhere here where I live. 4/5’s of them subscribe to the Nordic Viking Princess look, more or less too.
The adult overweight/obesity rate for males is 70%. The rate for females is 55%. Do you know what both those numbers have in common? They are both way to high…
#3 is Julie Baraowsky, and she is a Libertarian Satirist.
is there any other kind
Too many men and government supplanting men; damn good points.
“8 Factors That Have Destroyed Healthy Relationships Between Men And Women”. Fixed.
yesterdays news.
So, the first point…isn’t relegating men and women into Supplier and Child Rearer positions the same as regulating them into economic units? Yeah, men were sent to war and the factories while women were expected to raise children and do nothing else. …Is that…good for you? What if it’s not good for some men, or some women? Relationships still have give and take. Maybe the man is more creative and personable and likes raising his kids while the woman is more facts-based and likes going to an office to help build a company? People should be allowed to do whatever they want, not be forced into stereotypes because society says so. Or, we can just keep shipping young men out to war, and the ramifications of that culturally-vilified worthlessness can continue to echo throughout the male generations, building their fear and defensiveness.
If you’re worried that too many women no longer ‘need’ men for their resource-gathering qualities…are you afraid of “equality” (why the quotation marks?) because you are having trouble finding a relationship with a woman based upon your personality alone? That’s a different conversation.
Its not stereotypes.. holy shit. Its the actual roles we were put on the planet for. no man can nurture a child like a woman. Period. Just like no man can give birth to a child or breast feed a child. The only reason you have men who are “creative and personalable and likes raising kids” Is because he is emasculated in some way. The only reason a woman is facts based and prefers to go to work is because society told her she should do so, its not an internalized want to go work.
There is no equality. none among men and women and none between men and women period. Humans were not made to be equal. Equality is a fallacy that can never work or be true. Men will always be better at certain things, and vice versa. The Female CEO will never be equal to the Male counterpart as the Female has to take time off if she has a child to only mention one reason she should be paid less. In-addition to the other physiological inequalities, such as strength, durability in combat, the list goes on.
A woman’s body is made for child rearing. And as evolution has not taken that away from women it stands to reason that it is still the primary purpose of a woman on this earth. Get over it.
“The only reason a woman is facts based and prefers to go to work is because society told her she should do so, its not an internalized want to go work.” Isn’t that just your opinion? Every human being has a mixture of secondary sex characteristics. Giving birth is a biological action. “Nurturing” is psychological, behavioral, emotional, and intellectual to some degree (IE knowing good parenting techniques). If a man wants to kiss another man, is that wrong to you because a man’s penis evolved to go into a vagina and nothing else? What if people don’t give a fuck about what something was evolved to do? What if free will is a thing that evolution has also given us?
Physical attributes are one thing. Most women are generally physically weaker than most men. But if a woman can meet the rigorous physical tests of combat, then obviously she should be allowed to be a combatant if she wants to. Upper arm strength may be lacking but there are actual female soldiers/generals/warriors in the history books if you look. Actually, there’s a lot of research about how much better woman are when making decisions under pressure, because they’re “evolutionarily” designed to consider the needs of the group when in a crisis situation.
And if a woman wants to be a CEO then a company has to decide whether or not they want to be the kind of company that gives leave if she decides to have a baby one day or not. Companies have decided to give pregnancy leave because they’ve obviously seen that it is in their best interest. However, having a baby doesn’t necessarily interfere with your ability to be a good CEO. That’s just the American work-til-you-die myth that corporations like to encourage because they want you to live to work there, not to be a well-rounded human being.
Also, “purpose” is a very gray concept that you seem to think means “what the physical body is evolved to do.” Yeah, I’m sure you know a lot of women who are REALLY well-evolved (big birthing hips and big breasts) but who would make AWFUL mothers.
I’m just saying that maybe it’s not a big deal if a woman wants to work and her husband wants to stay home and be with the kids. You don’t have to hate them. It really doesn’t hurt anyone. If you want to have a relationship where you go out into the woods and kill things and your wife stays at home with the baby, that’s cool too. Evolution isn’t a prerogative, it’s a process, and it’s still happening.
Well this has been fun but I’ve said just about all I want to say. Good luck!
Looks like a really long reason why you think men can be women and women can be men. no thanks. I bet you speak with air quotes a lot. lmao
“But if a woman can meet the rigorous physical tests of combat, then obviously she should be allowed to be a combatant if she wants to.”
A woman can’t though. They always have to lower the standards for women. It’s happened in the armed forces, and it’s happened in firefighting squads.
“Actually, there’s a lot of research about how much better woman are when making decisions under pressure, because they’re “evolutionarily” designed to consider the needs of the group when in a crisis situation.”
Sounds like the role of a mother in a family.
Keep CHUGGING that Koolaid, loony toons.
Imagine that.. group mentality applied to the family? Noooooo lol fucking women.
You’re making a counter-argument to a tangent, not the point. And it’s way too fucking long.
Men and women are perfectly unequal, 2 puzzle pieces that fit flawlessly. Damage the shape of either puzzle piece, and you get what we have now. Most everything I can’t do well she can, and vice versa. Sure, I can learn to do most of her shit well, and maybe she mine, but it’s incredibly inefficient, and the inefficiency is in reality rooted in ineffectiveness.
Have you seen the fertility rates in western countries lately? Population of western countries is declining fast and soon we would have demographic winter everywhere. This means that the enforcement of traditional roles would be inevitable if we want to save western civilization from collapsing.
I am sorry to inform you but you have been brainwashed in believing that a career is more or equally important than being a mother and a house keeper. This is what modern society is pushing with propaganda.There are countless reasons that supports the opposite. Do your research and reconsider
The problem is on women not men…a woman that acquire many resources and status is difficult to find a suitable mate with more resources and status than her. A man would happily marry a pour low status but beatiful and fertile young woman instead of a middle age almost infertile career woman with lots of money.
“while the woman is more facts-based and likes going to an office to help build a company?” Doesn’t happen. Women are unhappy when they work. Universally. Go look at any study.
“People should be allowed to do whatever they want, not be forced into stereotypes because society says so.” Most men (even on this site) don’t want to force women into the kitchen, they just 1) Want a women who likes being in the kitchen, and 2) feel society needs to stop it’s propagandization of women in the workplace. If there wasn’t this propaganda, the vast majority of women wouldn’t work.
Men *are* more creative and personable as they are also more fact based too
“If there’s a war between the sexes, there’ll be no people left” –Joe Jackson. He wrote that song in the 80’s, and 30 years on, the war between the sexes hasn’t just gotten worse.. it’s raging out of control. The main reason being, at long last, men have started turning up.
Men aren’t waging any war. Women are terrorizing men. I don’t see men commonly using emotional manipulation on women, I don’t see men working to take away fundamental rights or create responsibilities for women…
Maybe “fighting back” is a better term. For 8 decades feminism has pulled the con act of making men feel guilty for centuries of “oppression of women”, and men have accepted being ridiculed and scorned because penis. Or as cyclist Jens Voigt put it, “just above the family dog in the hierarchy, and liking it”. But now, males have gotten jack of being feminism’s punching bag.
This website is such a breath of fresh air!
For many years I was the classic beta male — stepfather at home who did not discipline, physically abusive mother, married 32 years to a psycho bitch control freak. She kicked me to the curb, the breaking point was when i forgot to tell her ‘happy birthday.’
i had being a gentleman beat into me as a child. i am comfortable opening doors, etc. but i did not now that combined with modern feminists had made me codependent. Having stumbled onto this site and realizing that i am still purple pill, i am making changes.
I am engaged to a 40-something single mother from the Philippines. Just last night i told her that she is a treasured companion and i respect her greatly, but I am the boss. No screaming response.
There is a woman at the smoke shop who has gone out her way to give me a hug twice, although we are barely more than acquaintances. I am overcoming my shyness and am going to tell her that it is time to be adults and head straight to the motel. I might get my face slapped, but i did not have sex in mind anyway. Why not take a chance?
It is unfortunate that i did not learn these hard lessons many years ago, it would have saved me a lot of grief, time and money. However, this old dog is still willing to learn new tricks. Stay tuned.
Why are you even bother getting engaged to a 40 something year old single mom? Don’t marry her! Have your fun. Put a raincoat on at all times and enjoy, never commit.
“I had being a gentleman beat into me as a child”…….I doubt it, it probably was the feminist’s definition. Saying “Yes ma’am”, opening doors, and such is being a servant, not a man. A crucial part of being a gentleman is being a man. Otherwise, the polished behavior is to no avail. You can treat a woman well, but don’t let her walk over you. Otherwise, you will lose her respect because you cannot respect someone who kisses your ass.
Well said. The emphasis is on MAN rather than gentle
Watch John Waynes, McClintock or The Quiet Man and it makes more sense.
The girl in the photo in item #3 is Youtuber Julie Boronowski. She’s right of center so this photo was sarcasm.
The biggest problem is that young women have no interest in being wives and mothers, or even pleasant girlfriends. The result is most women only bring one thing to a “relationship”: sex. But with sluts everywhere, that isn’t exactly a prized commodity anymore. And from all accounts, once you get married, the amount you have sex plummets. Wow, I’m shocked that men don’t want to wife up sluts too!
You wife up a slut and she’ll have sex with every other guy, except you.
common trap, not red pill
Simps wife them up daily.
The #6 photo. Did the Zombie Apocalypse start?
Healthy relationships? You mean love, friendship, loyalty? Women only ever felt any real attachment to their pups. They only ever kept us around as a source of the wherewithal to sit around playing with their dolls. If there was nothing in it for them they wouldn’t piss on us if we were on fire.
What’s changed? Women now have sources of income that aren’t their husbands and fathers, removing any incentive to even pretend to have any use for a man who isn’t extremely rich or a black or Arab bull willing to treat them like the whores they are and teach them a lesson in manners if they can’t take a joke.
Men, meanwhile, are figuring out there’s only one thing women can do that men can’t do better or a machine can’t do better than both. Keeping house is no longer a full-time job, and men can do most of it themselves.
Assuming a 7.5 hour day at 15 minutes a session, one woman could easily do the work thirty do now. In 2016, putting up with a woman’s shit any longer than it takes to persuade her to let you finish in each of her holes just isn’t worth it.
When it comes to taking care of my place, it takes me maybe an hour every week to clean my place (eg. vacum, dust, laundry, etc.) And dishes I do every night, which isn’t much. My metal and wood shops take far more time to keep clean and then there’s tool maintenance. Even when I clean my computer, that takes longer to clean and defrag than housework does.
And when bitches complain about how hard housework is, I just laugh uncontrollably in their faces.
I remember my grandmother showing me the washboard she and her mother would use to wash clothes. They were from the coal mining region where they had no running water. And every day they had to clean the coal dust off the porch, house, shutters, every where. I can’t imagine a modern American woman doing any of that. I doubt they would even have the wherewithal to do that type of house cleaning.
And your grandmother probably did all that while pregnant with her 8th kid. Now they just let their chihuahua out of their purse for a few minutes a day and bitch that the air conditioner is on too high for them to wear thong bikinis in the office.
Not to pick nits much, but the chick in the “proud slut” picture is actually Julie Borowski, an outspoken libertarian girl who – from what I can tell – is definitely not a slut but the photo looks like a sarcastic one from one of her parody videos.
Meh she’s supposedly married now, but a 30 year old married woman pointing out that “sluts these days are so slutty” could easily be trying to mask her own college years doing 6 guys at a time in the bathroom every Friday night.
What is number 5 supposed to mean? Is the Mr. Savage promoting unnecessary war? Fuck that, I think I rather live under a feminist system then live though a war. Also, that is bullshit anyways… America has had had three and a half (pearl harbour) wars on it’s territory in 200 years, and of these wars, only one had significant casualties (the US Civil War).
Edit: 3 and a half, not 2 and a half.
Three. I take it you forgot the War of 1812. Plus all of the dozens of Indian Wars.
Actually i didn’t. The first two are the war of independence and the war of 1812. The third “half” war is World War II, I say this because both Hawaii and territories, not states. The Indian wars were basically just insurgency, the US was superior tactically and strategically to the point that the wars weren’t anything of significance.
Ok. I the previous post you said the Civil War as one of the two, so I figure you had forgotten one. 1812 is so often forgotten.
Oh I guess I did forget about that.
Could it be that affluence itself is a threat to relationships? It seems likely to me that affluence would affect the sexes differently, since men are less directed towards peace and safety than women are.
I can sum it up in one word-FEMINISM. It was the mistake of certain limp-wrested effete men that have caused this unmitigated disaster to take form; we have to take our balls back; they’re only women for God’s sake and we know they are the inferior sex.
Feminism is at the root of the matter. But what brought about feminism? Washing machines, electric ovens, modern technology. Electricity and indoor plumbing became widespread in the 1930’s, the 1960’s was little more than a generation later. Once the kids are farmed out to government ran reeducation camps, wives have little to do at home than sit and complain that they are not treated “fairly”. Now, with welfare, automated manufacturing, etc. men are not deemed useful now. Hence, you have the start of the men’s movement seen on this website and other places. It is not that far removed from the feminist movement as you would suppose.
As technology continues to advance, the demand for physical support will continue to diminish. However, the demand of spiritual/intellectual support will always remain. It is well known that a nuclear family is best for a stable society. My hope is that society will mature to recognize the value of both sexes.
Right to vote = Men not responsible for women on their own, government now is = Elitist purpose to tax the shit out of everyone because 1 women costs considerably more in medicare, medicaid, and every other gendered entitlement program = Labor force increase, wages drop, taxes forcefully taken at higher rates from men, add in the technology you speak of and now feminism…. the perfect storm really.
Yet despite their own professed beliefs, women are most attracted to Alpha Males (bad boys), who are abusive and domineering ( both very masculine traits). Subconsciously and biologically, females are still attracted to males (or at least very butch females) with high testosterone levels. Aggression and physical size are the most salient and desirable masculine features (aka bad boys). Whereas, the mamby pamby pajama boys (whimps) are relegated permanently to the friend zone.
Nature and the drive to reproduce can only be repressed and subverted by ideology and Marxist brainwashing for so long. The ‘urge to merge’ will and must ultimately prevail. It must or the human race will become extinct. That is why I believe the so called feminists refuse to actively oppose and speak out against the mass migration of muslim men.
Subconsciously, many women want to be taken by force, they want men to be men, and to put them back in their place. It turns them on to be dominated. (The politically incorrect truth is that many women have rape fantasies.)
Whereas, the politically correct, metro-sexualized, mamby pamby pajama boys have to run to their safe space at the very thought of being the dominant force in a relationship. They are told to ask for consent before any type of touching. (Momma may I touch your breast? Yuck, “hell no” is the answer.) For these “Castratos” the male female relationship all about appeasement and pity sex. No one can respect pathetically desperate males like these, because they are NOT men. They are weak little boys, and they are easily brushed aside and abused and used by the self-centered females who laugh at them.
LOL why did you use a picture of Julie Boroski to portray a slut? You do realize she’s making fun of said sluts and leftist culture in general right? You look stupid now.
Nevermind. In retrospect my post didn’t add any real value, and I can’t edit it easily in this weird software.
…
When WW3 arrives, many of these women will throw equality to the four winds, while the rest of us tell them “Here’s your equality, now suit up for battle.”
Ww3 might be the first war to ever actually slightly disproportionately affect women. Nukes means the draft isn’t terribly useful so the effect on men drops. nukes also mean that large cities will be turned to ash, and if New York is any indication then large cities tend towards a sex ratio that is more woman heavy. Secondary effects include female jobs being useless busy work will lose their importance in a world of hardship while male jobs to rebuild will be in even greater demand, and geezers (which have a higher proportion of women due to life expectancy differences) are more likely to be left to die when government gibsmedats dry up and their relatives either get killed or no longer care for the bitchy aging childless aunt who never helped anyone. For similar reasons, the proportion of minorities would drop like a rock after ww3 as they are vastly concentrated in prime nuking territory.
My door will be closed. Save yourself honey.
Oh trust me, I won’t need you for anything.
It appears that a lot of MGTOWS and WGTOWS went their own way with bitter baggage coupled with acrimony and antipathy towards the opposite sex. Perhaps they’ve never heard of the French proverb, “One kisses, the other turns the cheek”.
PURGE thirsty men, PURGE betas, manginas, willing cucks and all the festering diseases that further the decline of society!!
But it is correct to say that feminism isn’t the cause. It is not a byproduct either though. It is just another weaponized mechanism utilized by the elites (illuminati, zionists, etc…all the same by different names) to further their agenda. What is that agenda? That’s another conversation of its own.
Anyone else find it ironic that it’s usually educated women pursuing careers who are all about shows like Mad Men and Game of Thrones where traditional sex roles are not only the norm, but women are treated horribly? And isn’t it funny that a lot of feminists are into 1940’s and 1950’s culture and will wear victory curls or housedresses, even though these fashions are associated with patriarchy and a less civilized (In their mind) time?
50 Shades of Spank Me. Bestseller due to men purchasing?
Yes, this is what women need but men have become too weak to fulfil their duties.
sassy ;(
SAAAAAAAAAASSSSSYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
yes, kind of like the troll cinder ella and her “sassy” 50s postcard
https://www.yahoo.com/news/texas-moms-marriage-crumbling-years-130151415.html?nhp=1
This is a good example of the influence of women on men and society. Children become nothing more than pawns in a game of manipulation by their wonderful mothers.
Since women can make their own money they don’t have to have a man. Wouldn’t you prefer a wife who wants you for you and not because her only other option is poverty?
I want a husband because I want a partner in life and children.
If the women you meet are not up to your moral standards I suggest you look elsewhere because we do exist but it’s not usually at a bar. Try Panera after Church.
The life of a good girl is a lonely one – we are constantly made to feel that if we don’t “go out” or “party” there is something wrong with us. We face a lot of society pressure as men do; please consider things from our point of view. I just found this site and I appreciate hearing your side as well.
good girl oppression
Except women don’t actually make their own money. They get make-work jobs that only exist for the purposes of “diversity” for the most part, and take way more benefits from government than they pay for. Take away the government safety nets and make work jobs and 98% of single women would be below the poverty line.
True, it’s actually triple taxation. 1st- pays for you, 2nd- pays for everyone else automatically included in society besides you, 3rd- pays for the reduction in ALL wages due to #2 being forcefully expanded through legislation.. #3 also includes significant efficacy failures.
The most devious girls I’ve ever met are regular church goers or mildly Evangelical Christians. Just like a God Damned epidemic of child molestation Satanically hides in the Catholic Church, so does a less clearly pervasive group of cherry picking feminists within the other sects of Christianity and other major religions. Cherry Pick: To play both sides of the aisle and virtue card, masking oneself as a “good ole girl” but selectively using key components that are precisely the opposite because they fall on the “legal” side of law, but the immoral side of virtue.
Some of this is quite true, the rest is entirely one sided and paints men as victims of women, seemingly not dealing with the fact that our entire race is being targeted, not just men.For example, the reason women have to work often is Jewish financial slavery which has substantially reduced our assets as a race.
You have to go back all the way to WW1 to understand what’s really happened here. Not going to elaborate. there’s definitely a Jewish mad-banker component, but even further back, the core-source is tyranny. You need even to touch War of 1812 to really understand the successive build-up to here.
You could sum it all up with one word…feminism
one glaring omission in the article is that men do not act like men anymore……when they do, the quality women notice
Although this article makes good reading in its language, it’s very clear that the the generalisations of both sexes are more extreme than what is present in reality, for example not all women are actual sluts and of course the mass majority of the population would agree that saying all men are rapists is a stupid idea. Furthermore, it seems this site consistently mis defines equality- it shouldn’t mean that all women must be business women to stop injustice of the sexes- it means they have the opportunity to have the same occupations as men, and many women still choose to become mothers at some point, as equality allows them to. This choice actually seems to produce a better only unit, as the decision to make a family is the desired one. Finally, stop acting as if reproduction is the only aspect of life! Or are we nihilist here? Due to our worryingly huge overpopulation of the earth, there is no need for all couples and people to have children, those who choose to reproduce when given equality are high enough in number to sustain the population very easily.
Look, the point of articles here is to NOT have to add a fucking disclaimer to every statement, Every dumbass on the planet knows nothing about any particular group is 100% true. Wake up, get a grip, and a higher EQ. Rapists? Go read the – at time of data collection – Obama administration’s federal statistics on rape and see their decline? Riiiiight. We’re flushing out the bullshit here, and laughing at the individuals and components of society that got duped into believing otherwise, while simultaneously navigating the best way to swim out of, and away from the bullshit, and still lead enjoyable lives.
I don’t disagree with you on population issue, it’s going to be a real problem sooner rather than later. Yet, it’s the constant fuckery of the man-woman bond that’s the issue. Maybe making babies and nuclear families isn’t the answer, but dividing the genders by giving one gender a chain-weighted advantage over the other strong-armed by the government certainly has become a problem. Would removing the 19th Amendment create sudden “vicitmhood” among the female population? Would forcing women to pay more tax than men create “victimhood?” Yea, right.
not real eager for WW3 tbh. the kind of weapons available now would make the casualty numbers of the last 2 wars look like pocket change.
Go to war for a piece of ass and for a “traditional” civilization… Last time we did that we had a 100 year war, countless genocides, slavery across centuries and two atomic bombs detonated in order to stop alpha dipshits thinking they are supermen if they go kamikaze. Fuck you very much RoK !!!!
This is probably the best article I have read on this site for far. And that’s saying a lot! I have never even considered number 4 before, and it’s 110% true! Eye opening. Thank you for the great list!
The writer used the word “conclusion” as if there were some valid “proposition” made. I didn’t see one…
I suppose there are winners and losers with every society trend. This more fluid and free gender relations really suits me and pretty much everyone I know. I don’t see the battle of the sexes in my world, I’m happily married and adore my husband and almost all my friends are in couples. Our relationships aren’t about an exchange or services they are about love, friendship, companionship, passion and nice things like that. I have picked friends similar to me as most people do so it’s expected that this style of relationship suits them too.
In the ye olden days when roles were more fixed you would have loads of people trapped in unhappy marriages becuase divorce was more difficult, some men stressed about being macho providers, some women feeling trapped and bored in the home. You would also have people who enjoyed the tradition roles and greater fixed structure of convention. Winners and losers. There are always winners and losers.
There is no one ‘natural’ way to live in society. Society itself is constructed. Whatever the majority decide there will always always be a minority it doesn’t suit. I’m very please I was born at the right time for me.
This article was incoherent in some spots and nothing was factually based, which would’ve made it more powerful and thought provoking. The anti-feminism, promoted through strong tones of insecurity based upon odd statements like women think “men open their legs too much when they sit,” screams victim, not masculinity. Society has evolved, and if you don’t like it, do some critical thinking and figure out how to influence the future instead of referencing the past.
I love masculinity and manly men, but the points above demonstrate insecurity instead of strength. Next time, perhaps.
I agree with you Rachel. Strong men are still in charge, in partnership with strong women, who are equal albeit different.
shut up bitch
Cuck !
I disagree. He is not portraying men as victims. He doesn’t want anyone to feel bad for a man. He wants men to stand up for themselves and be masculine. When a man gets told he opens his legs too wide by a woman, they should respond with “I have balls, you don’t.” Assertiveness is key. Most of the points raised in the article are true and I have experienced or seen in my own life. He’s stating the way society is; not through men’s insecurities or their fears, but their struggles against a feminist agenda.
I thought it was excellent, but not everyone gets it.
Everything you’re referring to as a victim statement in fact has traceable instances of public occurance in major metropolitan areas, and some men here have also experienced similar cunt-lash in public to legitimize his article. What we talk about here is both what makes some of the news, but much of it isn’t allowed to be discussed mainstream, even on many websites because it’s not PC and shit’s censored everywhere but here.
An article isn’t required to be a “referenced” document like a college thesis. Get a grip.
Attitude. i was at a small gathering and was hitting on a girl for an extended period of time. We were talking so long that we were eventually alone together. I didn’t time bridge or anything and the kino was extremely weak but she never left or made an excuse to leave.
A week later i ask the mutual friend about her. Apparently i creeped her out. wtf.
Oh, for Christ sakes. This guy serious?
“Why is Generation Y having less sex?”
By Hannah… Slapper?
I know I’m reaching here, but did anyone else have a chuckle over the irony of that referenced article?
Two random and meaningless observations.
1) In the family photo, the wife is too old for the husband. She’s got wrinkles for god’s sake.
2) The conclusion photo actually gets it right. When I do see a hot girl like that walking with a guy, it is always a guy who looks like that one. Muscular, jutting jaw line, full head of hair, and a somewhat ticked off look on his face. I on the other hand, go around with a fully ticked off look on my face, but for completely different reasons.
Instagram. Validation 2.0
Voilà.
Online dating.
Aka ugly women trying to be alpha males cumslut for a 1min.
(Not trying anymore to fuck their equals in smv)
Iphones.
Who needs to go on a date btw? Just flake last minutes.
(Because dating is creepy and not validated by the friends.)
Movies.
Nothing to add on that one.
(Females caracters= great heros, male conterparts = idiots that can’t hold a gun or a certified simp.)
The Situation is catastrophique.
Another note: Due to all this, guys who’d normally fall in the mid-alpha range typically; bagging, tagging, with choice to hold or toss away 6.5s – 8.5s.. with the occasional 9, are now barely considered alpha males, if at all. Fad b.s. like 50 Shades just exacerbates it all. Genuine alpha male friends of mine, mostly red-pilled, have definitely had more difficulties with the smokin-hot type girls they used to pull with ease, and now dating 6s and lower 7s…. which is really the range any average guy “should” be able to land.
I for one, have turned my game down a lot, and turn it on only when the situation warrants. Just too much b.s., too much effort, for too little return anymore. When you’ve got bitches playing young 20s games into their 40s there’s a visceral, deep-rooted problem that isn’t going away in less than a decade. This societal condition is definitely here to stay IMHO.
I can corroborate my experience on the west coast matches this at just about 100%. Game is OFF, and tainted indeed (though I keep trying because sex/power is a thing we still want). So your “IMHO” is morphing into objective fact.
Don’t like hearing this but that’s the truth for ya. Midwest here, coast 2 coast and everything in between. I feel as men, we’re continuously running an adjusting algorithm in our subconscious that goes something like this:
age/point in life >>
current state of planned successes in all life’s categories, achievement level >>
amount of lifespan remaining >>
value stream map of where/how I spend my time >>
cost-benefit analysis & opportunity costs >>
implement decision >>
adjust & repeat >>
Ticker PUSS is a decaying Index with reverse splits cooked in only to be short sold, while the market makers are hiding the Bid/Ask on every trade.
I’m in the same exact position. Going out tonight to some nicer bars downtown and its the first time I’ve been out in quite a while. I just hate putting in all the effort just to get shit talked by a barely acceptable woman.
When I was out a few months ago in a different city, I had two girls approach me. One seemed genuinely interested and I took her number. The other was trying to get me to buy her and her friend drinks. I politely declined as I’m not cucked liked that and they went away. The other girl never answered my texts/calls and it turned out to be a fake number lol. I think an issue with that has a lot to do with the fake rape culture that this country is pushing. They cherry pick a few stories of how women were taken advantage of by big bad men. When the reality is, if there was a real rape epidemic in this country, the country would grind to a halt.
I never restrict myself as far as approaching women and even though I do get approach anxiety from time to time, it is not crippling like it was in my late teens/early 20s. But I do hate the clown game. I almost have no respect for men who parade themselves around just to get ass. Sure they get laid, but at what point is it really worth it?
The problem with clown game, is it works in a particular area, for a while, then critical mass in reached and it begins destroying you and you don’t even realize it. If you go heavy on it repetitiously at a water-front strip of bars for instance, more than a few nights back2back and you risk imploding chances with sought after girls. Localized, gotta change it up, esp in your current stomping grounds. Good Luck Bill !
I do think a lot of times girls can just see through the act too unless you really are a clown. and while many girls are into that, they are not the type of girls I would want to be with anyway.
I’ve decided recently that when I go out, im not outcome dependent. So what I mean is, I dont really care if I hookup or whatever. im just out to have fun and enjoy myself.
Or, more simply described those eight factors are; feminism, feminism, feminism, feminism, feminism, feminism, feminism, feminism.
9. A woman who knows everything or has better ideas, which is always been about trying to overcome being the lesser sex. That’s been an issue since humans.
Before feminism, she could be corrected…to not do it again for a few weeks until the next correction.
Oh come on, Julie Borowski (pic 5) makes fun of the slut culture!!
It’s very simple actually. The whole source of the problem is cucks and male thirst. Literally without that, feminism could not survive. Just like sweeping out the legs on a table. Women opted out of the contract, fine. Even beyond any arguments of necessary male oppression, which is a separate discussion, women could have even been stopped there. We could have given them complete freedom and things still would have been fine, except for the majority of males who enabled them. If all men simply said “ok, sure, you get equality, you get freedom, just we aren’t going to do jack shit for you anymore, since you have declared your independence from us” then feminism would have been crushed right there. Problem is men won’t do that. The majority weak link in the chain ruins it for everyone. Men got fooled into taking a one sided deal. Women kept our contract active but tore up their own. And men instead of responding with collective strength accepted this deal. And that’s how we got into and continue to stay in this position. One man’s rebellion is pointless when there are thousands of cucks to replace him. This is even true under feminist logic. Even under feminist logic, feminism wouldn’t work. Imagine that. Imagine in business if a man told you to give him $100 for nothing. You’d probably laugh out loud if you didn’t outright scold him for being so disrespectful. But if it was a pretty woman you’d get down on your knees and say “marry me”.
A big part of the reason it worked – i.e. men self-cucking at the first signs of feminist approval – is because before all this rise in feminism where women, as you say; “…opted out of the contract,” men have always been naturally perceptive to women’s emotions…. which was once OK and made sense. Women are after all the more emotional gender and expected to be because it’s natural and needed quality to nurture children, and even to feel “love,” which seems impossible for them to do now.
The switch was flipped relatively quickly with feminism, on men. A lag time is to be expected because much of this goes against what was biologically natural for millennia. Even some guys being naturally beta, and lesser amounts being naturally alpha didn’t mean a death sentence for a man to live a relatively “normal” life and fulfill hopeful dreams with hard work as usual. Despite the quickness of said switch-flipping, it was gradual enough a change, that most men didn’t even realize WTF was even happening until now, where it’s essentially too late for millions of men to rebound safely.
Had the majority of men, just 51% let’s say, at first signs of feminist in the late 60s/70s completely stood up to it, it would have died right there on the spot, and maybe only been revisited much later, instead of festered and grown into this giant mess.
For as much as I liked President Ronald Reagan, his demeanor, the way he spoke, he really was the key element that started much of this Federal indoctrination of a male-slave population to women by signing into law no-fault divorce. That really is the very backbone that allowed so much of this movement to springboard into existence in the first place. Well, that and the 19th Amendment in the first place.
I remember as a kid in the 80s seemingly great fathers, and all-around great men in general, of some of my best friends having their families and lives ripped apart in their youth, because NOW when the wife went off on an emotional tirade and the husband shut that bitch up and put her in her place as he should have, she had an easy incentivized way out. Can’t tell you how many phone calls and discussions, as kids for God’s sakes, I had from 8-17yo about “my parents keep fighting and it’s getting worse and worse, I don’t know what to do or what’s going to happen!” The guitar player in my band in high school for instance, @ 17yo took a classic maple on maple 1969 original Stratocaster his parents gave him.. awesome guitar, grabbed it by the body and smashed it to pieces in front of his parents right before they finally split. He’s fucked up to this day and turned out to be a real asshole as an adult. The exponential perpetuity of feminism’s damage would take generations to correct. Very sad indeed.
“Women kept our contract active but tore up their own. And men instead of responding with collective strength accepted this deal.” << I entirely agree with this, but one point we may differ on, is no matter how much we discuss the “true nature of women” here, their childlike solipsism, destroying everything in their wake, I simply will not completely absolve another adult, irrespective of their gender, of any responsibility in the matter. Once they got the right to vote, they’re adults. So as Roosh has written, removing women’s rights would be a very logical course correction here. And as I’ve said here before; “We tried the ‘woman’ experiment in society, it didn’t work and won’t.”
I believe the necessary female oppression argument is a legitimate one and one worth discussing, however I believe that we could route their destruction even without that, but it would require massive male unity strength education and rejection of feminist male manipulation. Even without direct oppression I believe order could be reestablished, but that would require a uncucking on a grand massive scale that simply seems exceptionally difficult if not impossible from where I’m standing right now.
Also I believe that cucking is not simply a bad decision that men make.
Yes it is, and they certainly have a responsibility to act as men and uphold justice and order (of which I believe cuckoldry is the anti thesis of, by the way).
However I do believe that this tendency and instinct is biologically hard wired and innate to the majority of males, beyond even mere brainwashing or false beliefs and ideas.
I believe males are especially susceptible to the manipulations of women naturally and although it can be overridden it requires a good deal of effort and is in fact unnatural rather than natural.
So it’s not even just a matter of proper thinking and knowledge but rather one of flawed human biological nature as well and I am happy to discuss this for both men and women, I don’t keep my biological criticisms contained solely to women.
Nevertheless I believe a campaign of mass male education would be extremely helpful and it’s certainly a vital step.
Men need to be educated in the truth about women.
Really we need a male empowerment movement, just like we had a female one.
Men need to begin to rally and support each other and create groups and organizations to protect themselves and their fellow man and to advocate for for them.
We may not have known better then, but we certainly do now.
And men deserve to know the truth, instead of suffering for a lifetime as the result of lies manipulations and confusions, told to them by women and society, by the way.
A male may reject the truth, but I believe he at least has the right to hear it and access it.
“In exchange for their toil, the only thing men asked of women was to be supportive in their roles as wives and mothers”
This quote really sums it up to me. In modern society, even our pathetic pussified version of it, the few remaining masculine men are expected to continue their toil. The women and manginas (though they’d never admit it) still need real men to work as cops, firemen, power linemen, miners, builders, tradesmen, soldiers, and pretty much any other job that requires actual discomfort and toil. Minus the insignificant percentage of women who do these jobs (inferior) to “prove a point”, most women only want glamorous and comfortable equality in society…they still expect men to sacrifice and do the dirty work. The difference is that, like the above quote says, women once appreciated and respected the sacrifice, and offered loving support to their men when their bodies and spirits were broken. Today, women still expect the same, but now they feel they can run around like spoiled entitled cunts acting like complete bitches to any man they choose.
I think it runs even far deeper than that. Even beyond the trades and jobs you mentioned, I don’t think women are capable for the most part at anything other than their original biological role.
I am not even saying that we must re relegate them to it, but I do believe that mass female participation in what was originally a male domain is simply a luxury afforded to females as a moral imperative rather than as a useful or functional endeavor. I am not aware of anything in the male domain (IE not raising and rearing children and being a wife / mother) that women can do better than men. Or that we need them for at all.
At best they can just hope to imitate and maintain pace although I’d doubt their ability to even do that in general.
I don’t really see their work as anything more than a sympathetic and compassionate act on the part of men in the grand scheme of things.
What do they contribute exactly?
I think most people would find these statements especially misogynistic … but that doesn’t necessarily make them incorrect.
I am attacking the actual objective merit of women in anything other than their original feminine role.
And I think that is a legitimate discussion to have and we gain nothing from censoring or concealing the conversation.
And that’s actually a pro feminist position by the way. I have no problem with empowering females, but I just want to have a discussion about wheter they are actually capable or not.
If anything feminism hiding from this illumination is anti woman rather than pro.
I mean it would almost make you think the whole movement was just a self contradictory entitlement scam rather than legitimate empowerment which it professes …
But I cannot imagine people being that unreasonable.
I understand your point, but let’s clarify something.
Their are plenty of cops, firemen, soldiers, construction worker & blue collar employee “maginas”. Have you ever seen some of the fat, blubbery cops we have here in NY?
Also, there are business, tech workers, finance workers, engineers, doctors, accountants, lawyers (well, maybe not lawyers) and other white collar workers that are plenty masculine. I am not accusing you of painting with a broad brush, just wanted to set the record straight for any readers who might have applied it that way.
There is nothing “masculine” about taking a job with the state and relying on the taxpayers for salary/pension/benefits. Yes, some of those guys are great men, but many others are fat weenies sucking on the teat of the taxpayer.
Shouldn’t this be:
8 (((Factors))) That Are Destroying Healthy Relationships Between Men And Women?
The photo for number 3 is Julie Borowski who is a libertarian youtuber. The video the photo is taken from is her doing a comparison pointing out how absurd modern day feminism is; she is satirizing the modern ‘slutwalk’ attitude. Given that her message in that particular video is pointing out the extreme silliness of ‘slut culture/rape culture’ politics–the video would probably be fairly popular if viewed here–I think its an unfortunate choice to use her as an actual exhibit of proud slut when she is making fun of them. There are far more actual ‘proud sluts’ out there one could use here; theres no sense using one thats not real.
This is true. I think she is a good one!
“a war between the sexes has been heating up…”
Many people on here seem to think that men are at war with women, assuming that traditionalism/patriarchy benefits men while feminism benefits women. This kind of thinking actually plays right into the left’s narrative.
We are not at war with women. We are at war with the government. Women are simply an extension and proxy of government replacement of male authority. Essentially we are being cucked, by force, by another bigger stronger male. Not by women. A bigger stronger male which also operates as an “alpha fucks” because he extracts resources from the weaker men while simultaneously controlling the women.
This is also why the corrupt two sided feminist contract is so crucial. Because it further destroys and finally cements the funeral of male authority.
If women are given complete freedom, even then their power is extremely limited, because their objective merit is severely handicapped and then men would still have the power anyways, since they would hold the mass majority of the accomplishments resources and wealth, and then women would become indebted to them anyways, even if not through physical force and physical oppression, but through the natural oppression of their own biology.
However, there is one way to circumvent this.
If you released a virulent strain of cuckoldry throughout the majority of the males, which caused them to irrationally and self destructively support and provide for the females even without any return whatsoever in a corrupt one sided relationship, then you could circumvent this problem and successfully replace the males authority with your own.
That is the whole source of the problem. Men providing for women who provide nothing in return, as their enablers.
For males to be at war with women, they would have to be independent agents, with independent power and will.
However I do not believes that females are this way, no have they ever been historically either.
Women have never even independently fought for won and conquered anything, ever, in any significant way, to my knowledge.
We are not at war with women, we are at war with ourselves, and with competing males.
The whole dichotomy and paradigm of male / female power is false to begin with. There is no female power, in a meta sense, there is simply male, and everything else is an extension of that, rather than two separate individual systems.
So females are a false target.
The two actual threats are government (competing male authority) and cuckoldry (self destruction of one’s own authority). But there is no male vs female authority, since there is no female authority in the first place. There is only male.
Agreed but would you say that women manipulate betas with the promise of sex, or at least a hot meal, to get power over other men? I see what you are saying but through this manipulation do they have female power?
Wait, you start by saying that feminism is a symptom, not a cause, then go on to list 7 causes of which 6 directly stem from feminism.
In a boat you cant sail directly againt the wind but if you tack left then right then left you can use the component of the wind in that direction to bring you the way you want to go. In the same way people reject tyranny so the deep state has used the method of tacking left and right to steal our liberties and grasp firm control of the nation.
Excellent article! Lets take it one step further and understand the ‘social engineers’ of society have planned it that way. This was no accident. Initially I thought feminism was the root cause of this demise between the sexes until I understood it went deeper than that. I believe men were manipulated and abused first before moving on to women. Just my opinion but I do see a lot of abuse hurled at men initially at the start of their lives as boys. It depends which society too, though their is a contrast between East and West and while one sex is glorified in their youth the other is not and vice versa. But it is there and it is evident. Both sides have developed a distrust that makes bonding impossible. I agree shared values following trust is paramount in order to make a relationship work. I feel sorry for men. Women are awful (I’m a woman). And the anti-male propaganda is absolutely frightening….I was almost sick when I saw an ad targeting boys now for ‘violence against women’, campaign. Apparently we’ve got to ‘get ’em’ while they’re young….these would be perpetrator’s!! How dare they target innocent little boys!! Frightening for any mother of boys!!!
Nice article.