Of all the words that the alt-left / SJW’s have twisted around in recent years for their nefarious agendas, to the point of being radically different (i.e. given the 1984 treatment) from it’s chief dictionary term, is the verb of “hate” or the noun of “hatred”.
It’s definition is pretty straightforward, simply indicating “intense or passionate dislike” while synonyms include ‘loathing’, ‘detestation’, and ‘abhorrence’. Wikipedia goes a little bit more in depth.
Hatred or hate is a deep and extreme emotional dislike. It can be directed against individuals, groups, entities, objects, behaviors, or ideas. Hatred is often associated with feelings of anger, disgust and a disposition towards hostility.
As everyone has witnessed an innumerable amount of times in their lives, hatred is just as common an emotional state to experience in life as happiness, guilt, grief, gratitude, empathy, trust, or wonder. However, a growing contingent of the utopia dreaming political left seems to believe that human beings can be rid of ever expressing hatred, and particularly when it is directed towards other people (or just their butt-ugly blue hair).
Why Do We Hate?
Holding feelings of hatred for other people, places, things, or ideas is a perfectly natural reaction to substantially negative stimuli which a person (or group of people) has experienced from said people, places, things, or ideas. For instance, if a tourist gets robbed twice while in South Africa, it is perfectly understandable for that person to have a substantiated claim to hate the idea of ever visiting South Africa again.
If you wanted to establish a global meetup and the Australian media was one of the first to try and sabotage the idea via spreading non-stop lies, you would probably develop a hatred for the Australian media.
Finally, if you jumped on the Bitcoin bandwagon really early and sold 75% of your holdings when it simply passed the $1,000 mark, you would probably be hating yourself for making that decision at this point in time. As a frequent reader of Return of Kings, you probably also hate a lot of things out there.
For instance, what would you think about people who passionately supported many of the following things, and particularly if you believed in traditional masculinity, patriarchy, and nationalism?
- Homosexual marriage – which makes a mockery out of the traditional family unit
- Open borders – creating an irreversible flow of poor quality migrants to the 1st world
- White male privilege – used as a crutch to constantly belittle white males
- Social justice – any nefarious agenda under the guise of doing something “just”
- Feminism – giving women 50% of all power positions with no basis of personal merit
Thought so. But it’s not like we are actually going to go out there and cause criminal mayhem just because we know Salon.com has a love affair with ripping on white men via dubious claims and data, and because you suspect that two men across the street may be sharing the same bed. However, the left thinks you will do just that in mass effect. Especially if you are a right-wing European blooded man who likes sleeping with women.
Angry White Males: The ‘Face’ Of Hate
“To hate” something or someone, or to express “hatred” for that thing or person, now makes you public enemy number one in the eyes of “love” obsessed so-called progressives. However, public ridicule and scorn for people accused of “hate” or “hate crimes” are almost exclusively reserved as a label for heterosexual white males, especially when they are expressing some form of intense displeasure with a non-heterosexual white male, or element of non heterosexual white male culture.
Understand that the alt-left deems white males to possess a particularly dangerous–even genocidal–potential for hatred, since they are the only people in Western society who are capable of “prejudice plus power”, which is also encompassed in their twisted modern definition of “racism”. Hatred (and racism for that matter) is something that everyone else is incapable of having, because white males have “all the power” in their minds. Non-white males can only merely be ‘prejudiced’ at worst.
Long story short, this new grand chastising of “hate” is all a part of the latest ramping up of anti-white male sentiment across the United States, in addition to other parts of the western world.
Conclusion: To Hate Is Human
It makes perfect sense that Arnold Cuckinegger would think that hate and hatred is something which can be “terminated” (3:32), since he’s been most famous for playing cinematic cyborgs with an emotional depth ranging from “A” to (almost) “B”. Sorry Arny, but to hate certain people, places, and politics is to be human.
Zapped or lobotomized of our ability to hate foul spinach, Chinese hawk-and-spit “culture”, rampant black crime, anti-Western cuckoldry, Muslim “truck of peace” attacks, and the new normal of American obesity among other things, is to deprive ourselves of what it means to be a unique individual with varying turn-ons and turn-offs. All humans hate (intensely dislike) many things at certain points in their lives, so stop hating on hate you hate haters.
Actually, now that you think about it, we should “terminate” some elements of hate out there in the world. I nominate Arnold Cuckinegger to lead by example, and show Antifa that we no longer have any time and tolerance for their hatred, bigotry, vandalism, profanity, illegal road blockages, and suppression of other people’s first amendment rights. “Terminate” (disperse) hate with a barrage of non-lethal gas canisters, and maybe they’ll get the message. ‘Love Canisters’ and ‘Canisters of Peace’ are coming your way, so breathe in all that love.
Read Next: Islamophobia Is Perfectly Natural
149 thoughts on ““Hate” Is A Perfectly Normal And Healthy Emotion”
Supressed anger is probably one of the greatest causes of cancer. Search it. Non-healthy white man. This is what they want.
so much for the angry aryans 🙁
Too white for you.
Old School Hate!
“They” being Jews, hippies (Or hipsters or slackers as they referred to in the 90’s), gays, blacks or the rest of Leftists actually love sucking one another’s cocks in San Francisco lofts or taking another blast of Peruvian flake cocaine LA apartments to give the white guy in the plains with his Walmart and his gas tank in his front yard and his boarded up downtown much thought.
They don’t have kids at 22. Their money will last them an entire lifetime and their skills are post-industrial. They do not worry about the state of public schools. Their Lesbian daughter will not become a crack whore mudshark who leaves them to raise her Mulatto child when they are weary parents in their 40’s. Their son won’t seek belonging with Mexican youth gangs. Their property won’t be devalued to nothing in Chicago or Detroit or Cleveland.
So they are happy and have no feelings for what it is like to try and raise a family on a minimum wage job in a state with a primary income. They are busy “cottaging” in gay restrooms in public parks on Molly.
No reason for them to hate anyone, really. The only blacks they meet are gays on the downlow who suck their cocks in public places.
You’ll never meet the power-people at public demonstrations. They have too much to do. The SJW line suits them well enough because it protects their right to make porn or do drugs or spread AIDS or get some EBT handouts.
Why would your average Democrat, barring a few blacks or Mexicans, be full of hate.
Chances are he lives in a nice suburb of a Blue State or perhaps California.
Let us take Arnold. Arnold has no reason for hate. He’s been getting his knob polished all his life and has loads of money.
If he lived in Dick’s Knob, Missouri he’d feel different. If his child had been born when he was 21 and he had to work hard jobs he would feel different. If his kids went to public schools he’d feel different. If he could not get a decent job because of immigrants he’d feel different.
But the actors and public people decrying hate are driving down the Ocean highway being blown by some Russian $10,000 an hour hooker or would be starlet. So why hate anything.
Sorry to say the “angry white male” is not dangerous, he is just the loser white guy out of the white men. Stop crying, build yourselves up, or just get lost, because nothing is hated more than a whiney man no matter the race. You guys are like descendants of a previously wealthy family that no longer has money, but you still have the family name, and you think it means something, but nobody else gives a fuck. Your looking back at past glory, and becoming impotent on creating future glory because of it. This just might be the curse of having very successful forefathers, and the time has come to a close of their linages glory. You had a good 400 years though be glad. STOP BEING PUZZIEZ
Sheeeeit. Well said. Except it was a good 3000+
Blacknigga129… Don’t let these descendants of Irish potato framers and german cabbage farmers fool you. They are not Greek decent, nor are hardly any of them Italian or Spaniard decent, those places along with a few other s in southern Europe. In a nutshell it was from the Mediterranean that western culture began and flourished, these are the true roots of western civilization. Not those trash heaps that just became something maybe 700 years ago such as Germany, Britain only became what it was because it was a Roman colony, and they became civilized because of it, the germans at the time were just savages. Most of these white guys here have no real history to look back on, and claim, that’s why they obsess over this concept of the American myth. If you ask Italians, Greeks, or Spaniards what they are they will tell you exactly and, not I’m “white” like these dumb aimless American “whites”, that are not of anything more than farmers escaping famine in the old world. Like i said they had only 400 years here in America and its already falling apart, because they are not truly builders of civilizations only copiers.
Agreed about suppressed anger being bad for health, John. Suppressing anger can cause all sorts of health issues.
That being said, anger and hatred are two different things. Furthermore, both are ultimately feminine type emotions.
There are things that I want to destroy in our society, like feminism or social justice warriors, not because I hate them or that they make me angry (they do on occasion unfortunately), but because, ultimately the existence of such ideas is damaging to our Republic and collective happiness.
Pick up a copy of Meditations by Marcus Aurelius. You’ll quickly realize that not only is hatred not a healthy emotion, but its an utter waste of energy and time, both of which should be used constructively always towards the ultimate goal — neo-patriarchy.
Think a little.
Tried it that way for decades. All it did was get us into this mess.
Arnold’s Guilt Story
Arnold felt guilty about being Austrian so he moved to California and began to suck the circumcised cocks of Hollywood power men in order to ease his sense of guilt at his country’s crimes.
His blowjobs were a source of such pleasure that Hollywood producers decided to make him a star out of gratitude.
The truth was that even huge flaming liberals moved away from Detroit. The Jewish liberal, Appalachian bigot alike fled the city during the time that Coleman Young was mayor.
Hate? If a Rhino chases you there is not hatred. You just want to get away from something that will cause you harm.
I’m starting to lose my sympathy for White people. If white women choose a pathetic effete beta to breed with, then their male children will also be pathetic and weak. Simple genetics. Whenever you hear some story of some hapless White family assaulted by Youfs at a county fair or amusement park, you already have a mental picture of what the father / husband looks like. Same with victims of the knockout game. They don’t target white men who would smash their heads into the pavement. They target the weak. And if White people keep trying to make themselves weaker and weaker, why should I care?
Blacks usually fight 3 to 1 or 2 to 1 and rarely at county fairs.
The location has to be in proximity to black populations which will urban. And in numbers.
Blacks will sometimes target big musclebound good-looking white guys, usually in groups of 2 to 3.
But in the end what do you do about people who plain just don’t give a shit about jail, life, their future because life for a black at the bottom of society is shit most of the time.
Violent blacks never have much money so it won’t be Orlando.
The reality is that you are only Alpha if you have cash. If you have cash then of course you can go to expensive places that blacks do not frequent because as a socioeconomic group blacks are not Alpha.
Peach. Blacks will target anybody if there are more than 2 of them. If you happen to be a 6’5 and 300 pound white male, walk through Detroit and see if you are not the victim of a knockout game.
Just FYI, the Knockout Game is what leftists call it. The thugs “playing” it call it the Polar Bear Game or Polar Bear Hunting. Guess why.
“I lived beyond my fears
Until my years
Have withered me, delivered me
Divinity and you’ll
Never catch me on my knees
Ride upon my horse so mighty
Hated both the black and white
Always constant never falter
Rage like fire move like water
(This hate makes me a better man
My hate helps me take a stand)
Strong inside, clear of purpose
Heart of stone, never nervous
Never hidden never ran
So hate me with all you can
Hate Breed (I’ve fallen in with the hate breed)
You wanna feel the rush until the crush
has beat you down spins you around
The hate you found and your rage
will never let you down
Strike them down with all your fury
Judged with hate the acting jury
Always swift with no deliberation justice
What’s really weird is how many of these retired he-men who made their living in the 80s and 90s exuding untamed masculinity now claim to be against hate. Arnold Schwarzanegger. Also, the wrestler Kevin Nash:
His Twitter claims he is “anti-hate.” Yet 20 years ago, he was a violent wrestler who joked about paralyzing his opponents. Weird huh?
Not really. People can grow up. And people can grow down. And left. And right. People change, period. Is it due to fluoride in the water, or plastics lowering T levels? Maybe. But an artificial change is still a change. Likewise, it could be due to life experiences, e.g. having a baby, or getting cucked, or whatever.
TL;DR Your comment is lacking.
He was scared sh*tless of Meng.
And most likely Rick Rude as well.
And the Steiners too.
You’re probably young, in your 20’s.
These actors participate in films to make money. It is a business. So they make PSA commercials.
Besides, being worth millions of dollars leaves you in a mellow mood. You are sitting in a 1 billion dollar house in LA or the South of France or Miami Beach getting your cock sucked by 10 beautiful women at the same time and driving a Ferrari and like Chuck Norris you merely point your beard in the direction of the camera and you get another $10,000,000.
If hate is normal, why are women to blame for hating disgusting human garbage like you? If they hate you, they’re bitter and crazy. If you hate them, it’s normal.
Aw another self hating liberal.. It’s ok bud we won’t hurt you like your uncle Charlie did at summer camp
Perhaps you should fellate some black hoodrats until they blow the back of your “dome” out.
Actually the reverse is true. If a woman hates men it’s condoned by the liberal media and the law but if a man dare criticise a woman it’s hate speech, misogyny etc.
1. Hate is a feeling, not an action
2. It’s none of anyone’s goddamn business how I feel about something. Their only concern should be my actions.
3. Hate is the appropriate emotion in the face of a threat to your existence or that of your loved ones.
4. Disagreement based on reasons is being assumed to be due to irrational hatred rather than real reasons.
5. Hate-speech laws are bullshit and are only there to allow certain groups to get away with anything they want without you being able to call them on it as a group effort.
6. They control us with language. This is gaslighting on a massive scale.
I deeply hate, loathe, despine and contemn people who claim that
– you are morally obliged to serve the society instead of following your own conscience
– you have to accept everyone and everything
– you shouldn’t judge anyone
– all married couples should have children, as deliberate childlessness is selfish
– single mothers (or fathers, or other non-traditional family units) can’t raise children well
– the government should interfere in one’s personal life if one doesn’t harm anyone but themselves
So you see, I’m a woman and I have lots of negative feelings towards many people. Whose hatred is more prolific, huh? 🙂
Mind you, I’ve got also lots of good ones…
Like most women, your hatred is entirely displace, carefully directed by your (((media masters))). Being childless IS the ultimate selfishness for a woman. You had ONE JOB, and you couldn’t even get that right!
Single motherhood is absolute poison for any healthy society. Women can’t even control puppy dogs let alone raise a teenage son properly.
The government SHOULD interfere to punish people who choose to be scumbags, as there is no such thing as victimless crime. That junkie shooting up in the abandoned building? He is responsible for the spread of violent foreign drug cartels and ghetto culture.
I have read lots of stories told by children raised by single and/or teenage mothers. Among many HAPPY stories (as there were bad ones, too) I read how SONS appreciated their single, often very very young mothers for working hard for them and being able to relate to them better. These are facts. I read their stories, I asked many questions about their childhood. You didn’t. So why are you speaking for all boys raised by single mothers? Just because yours did a bad job doesn’t mean every one is a failure.
Anyone who suggests that every fertile woman should get married and bear children should be executed. Some people are not meant to be parents, regardless of their marital or financial status.
Of course you have heard those stories. What are the sons going to say, that they hate their mothers? What you have not seen is how much happier and better adjusted those children would have been growing up in a two-parent household.
You can make the case that some people survive being raised by single parents and end up doing okay in society. That’s easy. But you can never measure what those same people might have been able to achieve had they been raised properly. And when analyzed as a whole, it’s proven that single parenting has a severely detrimental effect on society. More than two thirds of all men with criminal convictions, mental problems, and drug addictions are the product of single mothers.
In short, people who achieve success in life after being raised by a single mother are the exception, not the rule. The vast majority of the cases are senselessly tragic and cruel, as the female ego outweighs any possible consideration for her own offspring.
Single mothers vote liberal, raise mudsharking whores for daughters and listless thugs for sons. If you had to pin the majority blame for the collapse of the west on one single demographic, it would certainly be single mothers.
If your single mother was well-off you might be alright or if you estranged father has a decent job and pays child support.
But if your single mother is a big mudshark you will be raised under dire straits.
Often your grandparents will have to step in and this is a burden on everyone so they make you feel rejected.
Then of course your environment is tough.
Karonlina, it’s not debatable that the healthiest children are raised with strong feminine and masculine figures in the household, typically a father and a mother. Sure, single mothers can make do with what they have but is it an optimal situation? Far from it. And biologically/evolutionary speaking your main purpose on this earth is to procreate and produce strong fertile offspring with a suitable spouse. Take it or leave it but these are the facts.
Single mothers are especially damaging on the developing male psyche.
Think about it – the mother has double-cucked her own son. Castrated him twice.
First, she divorces the hero of his world – his father. She throws the father out like rotten trash, and fills the sons head with toxic lies about him. She shows him that men are disposable and unworthy of respect. She teaches that even though it is her who chose to mate with this man, somehow it is all his fault that things turned out badly.
So the bitch has already snipped the poor kid’s nuts off just as he begins entering puberty. But then she goes in for a second attack, to make sure any trace of the male ego that she so resents is crushed for good. She teaches him to be a good little feminist bootlicker. She teaches him the corrupt values of hedonist materialism. She teaches him how to be a preening multicultural femboi. But the one thing she cannot teach him is how to be a good man.
And so, her own son is fucked for life by her rotten self-centered choices, yet she eternally blames whatever scumbag she allowed to knock her up.
If the single mother is the daughter of a millionaire and grows up in a nice house than possibly they will be alright. Still, even in the best of circumstances, your grandparents are old.
But mostly single mothers are poor and the kid has less than others and feels deprived and you can look at the black ghetto for the result of this.
Mostly single mothers are not intelligent or particularly upstanding. A great many will continue being fucked by Alpha males in front of their young son which lead to a confused ugly Madonna/Whore perception of female gender roles and promiscuity in daughters.
As for mudsharks we have seen great societies emerge from the couplings of males and women whom they do not support or whose children they do not acknowledge. These are Brazil, Mexico and the rest of Latin America.
A country of orphans.
I will throw you one bone Karolina. Not all women or men should have children. If a woman feels strongly negative toward the idea of having children, she shouldn’t do it. In a healthy society that will be about 4 or 5 percent of women. Some will be lesbians, some cat ladies, some spinsters, some careerists. What we have today is a (((media culture))) that devalues motherhood and emphasizes the childless carousel lifestyle. It’s sort of like abortion, or interracial relationships. Sure, it’s going to happen here and there in very small numbers just due to sheer human diversity. But to in any way encourage, promote, or excuse it borders on the criminal.
@ GEN X-ILE
The poor are statistically doing worse. Poor married couple faces hardships too, and so do their children.
Since I am interested in single/teenage parenthood, I know that grandparents’ help is often crucial, although some abandoned women/girls did it all on their own. Just because it’s harder, doesn’t mean they are lesser parents. Unless you suggest that only middle class people should breed, you shouldn’t berate single mothers.
The best (optimal) option is to be raised by two loving biological parents with 2-3 siblings and a nice house, and a huge garden, and a pool… Wait, how many people actually have it? Are you aware that lots of married couples around the world can’t give their children „the best”?
We ALL do what we can with what we have.
And the FACT is, lots of children raised by single mothers are happier/better off than raised by two parents – because the quality matters more than quantity.
Another FACT: lots of parents are unfit. Regardless of age, marital status, wealth. Are you going to deny that?
@ GEN X-ILE
Most people around the world are poor, no matter married or single. Poor =/= criminal. There is correlation, sure, but your accusations are off the mark. Are you suggesting only wealthy people should breed?
As for providing for basic needs, it’s a shame a developed country has hungry or uneducated children.
I don’t doubt many single mothers are terrible and promiscuous. But merely having children out of wedlock is not sluttiness. Nor it is stupidity. Marriage is not a solution to poverty or recipe for success. Don’t mistake correlation with causation.
Karolina, there is no data to suggest that large houses with a pool, multiple siblings and a garden indeed allow for the healthiest and most stable children- your statement is just irrelevant. The system and current state of affairs is suggesting that women should become “independent” and work 9-5 jobs so that men don’t earn all the money and so that men don’t occupy the top positions in society and so men aren’t the only leaders. This type of propaganda is toxic for nuclear families and stable societies. Liberal propaganda will be the demise of the western world as we know it. We’ve come so far only to throw it all away but some loud-mouthed liberal schmucks want to turn everything upside down because they are not happy with the fact that men and women are inherently different all the way down to the DNA.
Classic female only thinking about feelings. “Among many HAPPY stories..” how about the word “successful” or “fruitful” or another word to describe an adolescent being raised properly. Females only think of feelings like good, bad, sad, hurt, happy, excited. It’s nauseating to have conversations like this with women.
“Karolina, there is no data to suggest that large houses with a pool, multiple siblings and a garden indeed allow for the healthiest and most stable children”
I presented a seemingly perfect picture of a happy, middle class family. Personally I don’t think financial success is most important, just like I don’t believe that mere presence of a man makes much difference. Much depends what kind of a man it is.
“The system and current state of affairs is suggesting that women should become “independent” and work 9-5 jobs so that men don’t earn all the money and so that men don’t occupy the top positions in society and so men aren’t the only leaders.”
Booo, the evil system makes women work hard in order to deprive men of their jobs! Please… If you want to make less money, but stay at home, by all means – do it. You don’t need anyone’s approval. Don’t seek it.
“This type of propaganda is toxic for nuclear families and stable societies.”
I’d take extended family over the nuclear one in most cases. For centuries it was natural that there were more than 2 generation in a household.
“Liberal propaganda will be the demise of the western world as we know it.”
Personally I couldn’t care less about the society. I care about VALUES.
I replied below.
“just like I don’t believe that mere presence of a man makes much difference.”.
As I have already stated there is evidence that the presence of a strong masculine male figure is next to essential for the healthy development of girls and boys so yes, you should believe it. Two lesbians with one trying to fulfill the male role does not cut it, unfortunately.
“Booo, the evil system makes women work hard in order to deprive men of their jobs!”
The “evil system” does not discriminate between who works harder than the other. It’s been shown that males naturally seek higher paying positions with more stress and responsibility. It’s also been shown that women are nurturers by nature and tend to gravitate towards jobs such as teaching and nursing. No liberal media covers the fact that there is next to no male nurses. This then leads to a fundamental question: why the heck is there such a commotion over male dominated jobs then? It all leads to one philosophy: hating men for the simple fact that men are not women. We’re even at the point where most institutions have a higher female population but feminists and liberals still find ways to complain and exploit men for being men. I’m not sure when the man hating (especially white men) will stop.
“Personally I couldn’t care less about the society. I care about VALUES.”
Well the society that you presumably enjoy was built upon standard core values that are currently being eroded.
“As I have already stated there is evidence that the presence of a strong masculine male figure is next to essential for the healthy development of girls and boys so yes, you should believe it. Two lesbians with one trying to fulfill the male role does not cut it, unfortunately.”
Does it have to be a bio father? That’s debatable. I strongly believe that men and women should both be present in children’s lives. If you have a SAHM and and an overworked dad, it’s hardly optimal for a child, don’t you think?
Having said that, most situations are NOT optimal. It doesn’t mean the children raised in these far from perfect family units are less happy, less loved, worse taken care of. Few lives are perfect. Lots of parents (of both genders) are barely fit. Or at least not too dedicated. That’s why healthy extended family helps.
If you come from pathological family, though, you need to carve your own path.
“It’s been shown that males naturally seek higher paying positions with more stress and responsibility. It’s also been shown that women are nurturers by nature and tend to gravitate towards jobs such as teaching and nursing.”
Yep, overfeminized schooling system is a problem, IMHO.
“Well the society that you presumably enjoy was built upon standard core values that are currently being eroded.”
Those values have been constantly changing, they weren’t the same all the time. When exactly was the “golden age”? The 50s, 60s?
Not really they often pass on the worst genes and in a couple of gens all americans and europeans will be the spawn of thugs and there will be little civilization possibly other than the eurasian middle class.
Single parents children have a slew of issues in abundance from depression to addiction to every known mental disorder. When rescources are pooled with a family the child gets far more and can be pulled up to success. Single mothers shouldnt be supported by the state and then the short fat ugly men who would make great fathers would get married rather than thugs and degenerates literally biulding the next generation.
Its why no socialist society will last more than 4 or 5 generations before it falls back to the third world. In one generation more than half of school kids in london are mixed black or black. The worst thug black guys are breeding these girls by the dozen and all of the west will soon fall below even the poorer regions of the east. The white guys there unless rich have no chance of a family especially the slavs as the socialism means although it cannot be talked about a white guy who isnt rich is worthless to a woman who’d rather be bred by a guy who will disapear and let her get the social housing and benefits and control the kid without worries of sharing it.
That’s reality for SOME single parents, not all (or maybe not even most). With premarital sex being rampant (which you, manospere guys, take great advantage of), single motherhood shouldn’t be considered a sin anymore.
Lol. What kind of bullshit this is? Where did you get the idea that ALL children raised by single mothers would be “happier” and “better adjusted” if they were raised in 2 parent households? There are lots of happy and well-adjusted children raised by one parent, and lots of unhappy and badly adjusted children raised by 2 parents.
The men I was referring to didn’t hesitate to talk about hard times. But hard times are not the same as misery or cruelty, which – as you imply – are a part of single parenting. You must be seriously delusional if you think that a mere presence of a man makes a great change in one’s life. What matters most is the quality of parenting. Sure, it’s great to have both loving parents. But if you have just one, you can still be OK. Most lives are OK – at best.
Your delusions are strange. No study says that most single mothers fail. Just like the poor, the young, the too old or in any other way disadvantaged parents they are MORE LIKELY to experience struggles and hardships, but by no means it is equal to what you said – that only exceptions raise happy children.
“Single mothers are especially damaging on the developing male psyche.”
Lol. Did your mother do it to you? Because the men I was referring to were raised by loving, caring and hard-working mothers, albeit poor and struggling. And their fathers were usually unfit (deadbeats, absent, drug dealers, abusive), not thrown away like trash.
“But to in any way encourage, promote, or excuse it borders on the criminal.”
Promote what? Choice??? 😀
I’m suggesting that people should be a middle-class two parent couple before they have a family.
Yes, you are putting your children at a disadvantage by becoming a single mother at the age of 17. Or even 25. If you are a female lawyer who makes 6 figures it does not matter-I’ve known well-to-do women who simply went looking for a sperm donor to reproduce the old fashioned way and intentionally raised the child alone.
For the average teenage girl however it is a trap in a working-class town or city or environment
It is a bad idea to be having a child unless the father is gainfully employed and supportive and decent.
But most people from the ghetto or the absolute poor white underclass (And I am from Detroit so I am know them well) are the result of teenagers fucking their heads off and the young man being 20-usually a few years older than the teen girl-and the child grows up with disadvantages often times.
You are might be trolling here on this site out of curiosity at what wretched middle-class male pigs will respond to you. Which I have.
Deadbeat Dads (Drug dealers, unfit etc)
This honey, is 80% of the reason that white trash and blacks and the Hispanic stay that way. Trapped in a cycle of poverty.
It is not a matter of morality. I smoked pot every day in college and had sex with many different girls. A piece of plastic was the core difference.
This is why the poor whites are stuck in a bad situation while the Democrats are not. The fact that more blue state men are gay is the biggest reason why they are higher-earning. Second is that Jews and Asians who form the money supply-side of that political party never have kids as teens and few are single parents by 17. See many Jewish girls in Manhattan pushing trolleys alone at age 18? How about Japanese-American women.
Nope. A male will be supporting them.
Some are porn stars. There are more Jewish male and Asian female porn actors than non. They won’t have kids. Part of it is IQ, on average. Or education. Or themselves being from a middle-class background.
And so it is not the amoral Jewish young man who is paid to have ugly sex acts on camera who is running around with a bench warrant for failure to pay child support. It is the poor white male from some exurb or poor decaying town in Indiana or Missouri.
It is the white prole or poor urban black having kids as a teenager who ends up in the dead-end existence; morality is nothing to do with it.
“Unless you are suggesting that the lower-class should not reproduce”
The difference better the lower-class and middle-class is sexual behavior. The lawyer’s daughter is not fucking her head off with 20 year old males at the age of 16.
@ GEN X-ILE
“I’m suggesting that people should be a middle-class two parent couple before they have a family.”
So enable people to move upward the social ladder.
That said, it’s utopian.
“Yes, you are putting your children at a disadvantage by becoming a single mother at the age of 17. Or even 25.”
The same if you are poor, black, not perfectly healthy, with a history of addiction or a criminal record – yet it doesn’t mean that most of these children will turn out badly.
I think welfare should promote getting on one’s feet eventually, instead of cutting one’s wings. It should be temporary support for struggling parents, no matter their age or marital status.
“For the average teenage girl however it is a trap in a working-class town or city or environment.”
If you can’t afford daycare or medical care for your child, or you can’t afford to upgrade your schooling because you have to work 2-3 jobs JUST to meet your child’s BASIC needs, you are being exploited. Sorry, that doesn’t sound like a developed country to me.
“It is a bad idea to be having a child unless the father is gainfully employed and supportive and decent.”
I have read and heard about middle class families falling on hard times because of children’s student loans or huge medical debts. Your country is terrible for poor people.
“But most people from the ghetto or the absolute poor white underclass (And I am from Detroit so I am know them well) are the result of teenagers fucking their heads off and the young man being 20-usually a few years older than the teen girl-and the child grows up with disadvantages often times.”
I read about such people. Those who come from pathological households are more prone to breed very young.
But I also read about hard-working, determined teen mothers/couples, who had to fight with discrimination from people who were supposed to support them (their parents and/or teachers). Is that OK? Just because you have a child young doesn’t mean you won’t amount to anything. Actually, out of most – if not all – disadvantaged groups teen parents are most likely to succeed, IF they are supported and guided, because their main weakness (immaturity and lack of education) MIGHT be temporary.
“This honey, is 80% of the reason that white trash and blacks and the Hispanic stay that way. Trapped in a cycle of poverty.”
Teen/single pregnancy is the result rather than cause.
“This is why the poor whites are stuck in a bad situation while the Democrats are not. The fact that more blue state men are gay is the biggest reason why they are higher-earning. Second is that Jews and Asians who form the money supply-side of that political party never have kids as teens and few are single parents by 17.”
And red states have bigger teen pregnancy rates than blue ones.
“See many Jewish girls in Manhattan pushing trolleys alone at age 18? How about Japanese-American women.
Nope. A male will be supporting them.”
Absolutely. They are statistically more successful, wealtier, stable. It doesn’t mean they are happier and better adjusted than POOR people (not mistake with drug dealing trash).
“Some are porn stars. There are more Jewish male and Asian female porn actors than non. They won’t have kids. Part of it is IQ, on average. Or education. Or themselves being from a middle-class background.”
The rich are less likely to breed on average.
“It is the white prole or poor urban black having kids as a teenager who ends up in the dead-end existence; morality is nothing to do with it.”
I think we are talking about two different things. It’s obvious the less educated and stupidier are more likely to breed; it doesn’t mean that those who have children young or while they are single have to be stupid.
“The lawyer’s daughter is not fucking her head off with 20 year old males at the age of 16.”
Seriously?????? So you are assuming middle or upper class girls don’t have sex in their teens? Because from what I read, they are simply more likely to be pressured to consider abortion or adoption.
You’re wrong, all children brought up my single mothers are deeply damaged. They should have been adopted or aborted.
Single mothers and their children are a plague on western society.
@ John Dodds
Yeah, there were times when illegitimate children were sent to adoption.
Only a complete moron could say that one biological parent is worse than two adoptive ones. Ask children raised by good, loving mothers if they would rather be adopted out – and lose their 1st family.
Also, you just spat all widows in their faces.
You are really not going to make any friends here as many of us men on this site have suffered terribly at the hands of female parents of the ’68 generation who rant about how fathers are not that necessary blah blah. I am not sure if it harms daughters but have seen multiple examples of how it harms sons, my balanced male friends agree, and to disagree, although of course there must be some exceptions out there, is just to perpetuate sickness and degeneracy.
I’m sorry. But forgive me, there is a difference between criticizing a woman for alienating a good, perfectly fit father from their child(ren), and a woman raising a child alone because she had sex prior marriage.
Yes, being happy is much more important than being successful. You just proved that feelings are what matters most to each one of us, by describing your own feelings towards me. 🙂
What do you mean by success? Wealth? Social position? Respect of others? Productivity? These are social problems. An individual, whether a man or a woman, wants to be loved, safe, happy and fulfilled. If you raise your child with love and instill proper VALUES in him/her, you are raising him/her properly.
Don’t sell me bullshit that men are less emotional than women. They just don’t show them so much.
I wasn’t trying to sell you on anything. I didn’t even go as far to say that these emotion aren’t important. I was pointing out how women generally as a whole use this kind of language to describe their lives, and how it is somewhat flawed. I’ll explain. Womem are always looking to be “happy” or they are always looking for things that are “exciting”. Often times this means going to some event. A concert, a night out, a fashion show, etc. These of course are fun things to do but they don’t last forever. Being successful, however, does last forever. When you’re successful, or satisfied, you can look at what you’ve done throughout your life and be content with your actions and decisions. I did not equate being rich or having nice things with being successful. To some, this may be true, but to me, being successful is setting and achieving goals and making good decisions that help me live a long, healthy, HAPPY life. Being happy is a byproduct of being successful in what you’re trying to achieve. Being successful for you could be finding a great guy to marry and have a family with, starting your own business, helping out in the community, etc. I’m a relatively young man so maybe it’s a maturity thing with the women I talk to but it seems young women (younger than 22) are looking for things that are “fun” instead of building success in things that will last a lifetime. In terms of what you said about the happy stories you heard with single mothers, yeah the single mothers may have made the best out of a tough situation which for you may be a “happy” story, but are the kids successful? Were the single mothers successful? Maybe, maybe not. Probably not though because women don’t think in terms of success they usually think either “bad” or “good” and “happy” or “sad”. If I’m trying to sell you on anything at all it’s to stop chasing emotions and instead to strive to be satisfied or content, emotions that are a lot more realistic to achieve all the time than trying to be “happy” all the time.
“You read”. Well probably you are not a Westerner (Eastern European, Indian, East Asian) so you’ve never seen the reality on US streets.
And also you are young and naive.
Here’s some advice for you own situation-go on the birth control pill.
It’s just playing with words. Feelings do matter, but… not short-term emotions! Few people achieve all their goals, no matter whether they come from 1 or 2 parent households. We all experience struggles and failures, together with successes. It’s not a black and white issue. And no, nothing lasts forever. You are truly young and inexperienced, and I dare say you are much too sheltered to post such claims.
Actually, in terms of becoming stronger and more resilient, children raised by one parent and with less luxury tend to do better.
In the end, though, it matters whether you are satisfied with your life. You might be successful and productive by objective standards, but if you FEEL badly, you are losing.
PS. Your words: “If I’m trying to sell you on anything at all it’s to stop chasing emotions and instead to strive to be satisfied or content”.
It’s exactly about EMOTIONS. Just not short-term ones…
@ Gen X-Ile
Any overgeneralization is wrong. When someone sells me bull that all single mothers are “unsuccessful” or that they can’t raise children well, it’s hard for me to believe you are the reasonable one.
I’m Polish. Are you suggesting we are more affluent than you?
Women not having children > Single Motherhood.
Have you been to California? Nearly every woman here is a single mother. It is an unreported pandemic. I applaud this woman for being upfront about not wanting to be a single mom.
I am an unwed mother. If my partner died or left, or I haahd to leave, would that make me worse? Please…
Make the world a better place, go further than not having children and kill yourself now.
Lol. Were you raised by a single mother? :)))
The feeling of hatred is real, the next question would be whether or not the audience agrees if it is justified. If it is not justified then the offender should be forced to strap a rubber dildo to their forehead. Now let’s take a look at some of these scenarios (and for British English speakers, let’s “have” a look).
-A jealous person will hate someone who makes them feel inadequate. Naturally, the fat dykie chick hates a good looking man and woman couple (what a shock, bring out the dildo).
-If you are being tailgated in heavy traffic, you get annoyed, you want to yell at the person. In that moment, you hate them. Is it dildo time? Eh, not necessarily, hopefully you learn to relax a little and let it go. Normal.
-The twist; a jealous person is overwhelmed by their own feelings of hatred toward perceived threats so they react by projecting their own feelings of hatred onto others in an attempt to level the playing field instead of improving themselves. They accuse others of being hateful but we know who the real hater is. “Judging by that red mark on your forehead I can see this isn’t your first time, have a seat and take off your hat.”
In the end, a dildo-free forehead is what we should be aiming for. As Mark Twain might have said, “Anger is an acid that can do more harm to the vessel in which it is stored than to anything on which it is poured.”
I hate that this site has a clear ‘no women’ policy and bitches like you can’t follow some simple rules.
I don’t see the problem with women commenting on this site. If we can get through to a few women who are willing to listen, everybody wins. Plus it makes for greatttttttt entertainment when the loser feminists attempt to troll and we steamroll them with impeccable logic
You must be really delusional if you think you are logical. :)))
Haha you are not qualified to comment on my use of logic, as you are a woman. Very few women, if any women at all really, can use logic effectively. Certainly no better than that of the best men in the world. Only a man can critique another man’s logic. And regarding to your previous post, you clearly have no idea what you’re talking about or what you were even trying to say, so it would be a waste of my time to respond to everything that was dumped out of your precious, little mouth.
There is nothing logical in your response.
Besides, you aren’t even a man yet…
Karolina, you’re just embarrassing yourself. The only reason for arguing/debating, with the tools of logic and rhetoric, is to convince the other side that you are correct and right.
You lost that battle a long time ago. You cannot use the tools correctly, and you have failed in the purpose of convincing anyone.
Plus, no one cares what you write.
Most excellent article. I hate anyone who doesn’t think it’s excellent, and I hate Anna Paquin. Hatred expressed, one more day without cancer
Hatred is like a hot coal. If it’s out of control it will burn up the man who holds it. But if it is carefully directed and harnessed as one of life’s most powerful energy forces, it can trigger a chain reaction that consumes the enemies of mankind.
“However, a growing contingent of the utopia dreaming political left seems to believe that human beings can be rid of ever expressing hatred, and particularly when it is directed towards other people (or just their butt-ugly blue hair).”
Embracing hate is bad advice for the simple reason that any very strong emotion will possess you. If it is strong enough to qualify as hate then you will be driven by the emotion and will become an emotional type of man. Nationalism, group loyalty etc never used to be driven by hate, it used to be driven by a sense of belonging to a greater whole, and by trying to ground such things on as negative emotion as hate, just plays into the hands of those who would argue that any kind of nationalist or group or racial identity must necessarily follow from fear of ‘the Other’, from what is different and unknown. Indeed by claiming hate is a healthy natural emotion and — presumably – a fit basis for group identification – you will need to tackle not only the superficial ideologies of SJWs but the (quasi-) psychoanalytic theories that go hand in hand with them. For hate and fear and with it desire by this reading go hand in hand. While this theory may be unsound, it is not completely so. Every man who says he hates fags may not be gagging to suck one off, but strong emotions do sometimes reverse polarity, and that’s the thing, if you fixate upon an object at some point that is the only thing which remains, the thing which will come to define you.
Now, SJWs are probably projecting when they claim right-wingers are driven by hate (unless of course we follow the advice in this article) but sometimes when I’ve visited alt right racist sites the emotion (negative emotion) is fairly palpable. They are easily triggered by perceived setbacks, white women mud-sharking, anything that they ‘hate’. In other words they are not fully in control of themselves. That is not because they are nationalist, or patriotic (which is sometimes is highly doubtful anyway) but because they have invested so much powerful emotion in the issues that get them going.
Now it may be true that hate is a natural emotional and that trying to eradicate it completely might be foolish, but there is a big difference between on the one hand accepting it as something that is inevitable and which we may need to deal with and on the other trying to cultivate it as something healthy in its own right.
The mindfulness approach here is probably quite helpful: you recognize that strong emotions like hate and inordinate lust / desire lead to a loss of control and perspective, and to a potentially delusionary state of being, but rather than fighting them and trying to eliminate them altogether – which may not be possible let alone easy to do – you accept them and as you feel appropriate distance yourself from them so they no longer have power over you. This way you control your emotions, rather than allowing them to control you.
Can you control ‘hate’ if you cultivate it as a positive good? I’m not sure but I doubt that you can. Moreover hate will make you miserable. As someone above says, its emotional correlate anger leads to poor health and early death. The SJWs, or at least the theory they espouse, is also not entirely wrong. There is a lot of interest in the discursive nature of emotions like hate. They are not just an emotion inside of oneself. They are also thoughts, behaviour and speech. Increasingly it is difficult to say whether an emotion precedes its expression, and indeed from a discursive point of view the emotion IS its expression. This is why beating up homosexuals or whatever is ‘hate’ even if there is no evidence of any inner animosity. There lots that can be said about equating emotions and thoughts and actions as though they were all of a piece, but it is not entirely wrong. The point here is that it is cannot be other than maladaptive. Cultivating hate inside will rightly or wrongly be seen as cultivating hate on the outside, be it beating up homosexuals with your fists or beating yourself up from the inside by stressing both your body and mind. Indeed at the risk of sounding like an SJW cultivating hate should probably be seen as a hate crime against ones own body and mind, and ones own ability to managing oneself efficiently and stoicly
It’s also un-christian.
I hope everyone here reads what you wrote. You’re spot on.
Cheers. Glad we’re in agreement
So is watching porn, drinking, smoking, sex except for reproduction and everything else that makes life fun.
you watch porn, drink, smoke have sex for non-reproductive purposes, have fun?
I will pray for the deliverance of your soul
Everybody that sips a vodka or smokes a cigarette or fucks with a rubber is damned?
Anyone who takes so much as a drag on a cigarette is damned for all eternity and will be constantly and unendingly prodded with pitchforks wielded by imps and devils
Anything else would be liberalism.
Maybe, maybe not.
I drank and screwed with ruthless abandon with the wink-wink of other High-T men and their condoning stance. I enjoyed every moment of it.
Being Catholic, I realize there’s always forgiveness.
Being Augustinian in my outlook, Complete abstinence is better than perfect moderation.
I also say give me chastity and continence, but not yet!!!!
Whenever I have sex, I’m hoping for reproduction, and it’s always fun.
Drinking, I’m probably a borderline alcoholic, I like to get drunk every day.
Smoking, never had time for tobacco, but cannabis with a little sprinkle of opium is the best (yeah, OK you need to add a bit of tobacco else it doesn’t burn right).
Never bothered with porn, sex is easily available where I live, porn is for desperate men.
I always wanted to buy weed in Bangkok but I heard the horror stories about paying fines and the like to cops in setups.
Yeah, nor worth the risk in PI or Thailand, go to Columbia, UK or Egypt for drugs with little or no risk. Thailand and PI is strictly booze and hookers.
John Dodds, you hit the nail on the head. My sentiments exactly with the drinking and the sex. never really smoked or did drugs. Zero porn.
I don’t mind spreading the wealth, so to speak. Sometimes I feel bad after nuttin’ all over a chick’s chest and then rubbin’ it in like it’s suntan lotion, but I get over it.
Can we not bring religion into this.
Hate is a symptom of fear. It’s normal to be afraid, I get it, but succumbing to that fear with hate isn’t strength, it’s weakness. I wholeheartedly disagree with what this article is preaching, and am wholeheartedly am not left-winging in my beliefs.
The left are using the anti-hate rhetoric to try to silence any opposition to their agenda. I get it. And they’re being disingenuous. And do you know what I feel about all this? Pity. I pity them. I am saddened that they have to resort to these word games to try to prop up the holes in their arguments. I pity that they envy white men so much they feel the need to preach how evil and stupid we are.
The right, on the other hand, are using pro-hate rhetoric to try to amass an army, thinking that it’ll help fight off the terror of the evil Muslims and illegal aliens. It won’t. Not even close. It’s like a Dutch boy with his finger in the dam thinking that he’ll stop a tidal wave, rather than trying to stop the gods who are making the tidal wave. Bad metaphor but I’m sure you get my meaning.
The REAL power comes from being disengaged from emotion when looking at these problems. A calm, rational mind will always trump a frenzied one.
I’m going to sound extremely gay to ya’ll right now and I don’t care, the real solution is love. Love yourself, love your enemy, love your life. I have so little time for whittling down the days thinking, “Ooh, I hate Muslims. Ooh, feminists are ugly. Ooh, fags need to die. Ooh, politicians, such scum.” Fact is it’s a totally futile existence and effort for anyone doing as such. You’re not changing shit, you’re just living a shit life. Get over yourselves.
I agree with you, that’s similar to what “The Spirits’ Book” says. Nonetheless, I am too weak not to hate. 🙁
You are better than me. I’m sorry.
Love ya none the less.
Every man is better than you!
Well, do the noodle-armed males qualify as men as in the technical term?
I would say young, hot, fertile women are better than those types, at least for the prerequisite limited amount of time.
The point of the article is not to ’embrace’ hate per se, but merely acknowledge that it is part of human nature, and the loony left does indeed think hate can be suppressed or eliminated.
Stop ‘hating on hate’ I believe is the point of this article, which is also a good premise to trigger butthurt SJW’s which is a always fun.
You do realise that the powers-that-be, whomever they are, aren’t going to shut down articles like this any time soon? They want you to be angry, to seeth with rage. Just for a second ask yourself why. Seriously, what could they possibly gain from a society who are at each other’s necks? Why would someone like George Soros fund the BLM movement despite not being black? Why would Merkel, who isn’t Middle Eastern, make Europe the go-to destination of Middle Easterners? It’s all a game and you’re falling for it.
You are absolutely blue-pilled, leftist, and cucked in your acceptance of the left-wing frame that hate is a symptom of fear. You lose from your very first sentence and the rest of your comment can’t be taken seriously.
A healthy loathing for those attempting to do your people harm is necessary in order to rouse the defenses to action. This used to be called heroism, bravery, warrior spirit. Now spineless weenies like you are squeaking about “hate”.
No one here has any reason to listen to a word you say here, John, you’re in love with yourself and your negativity. Every comment you seem to post on this site is bullshit designed to stroke your own ego. Get over yourself. There’s a reason no one in the real world can stand you.
Your tedious Jew obsession makes you another conspiracy-nut who probably thinks Jews are responsible for 9-11 and the Kennedy assassination.
I make your for Lebanese or other Wog who probably was raised in Australia or New Zealand. Its just on and on about how the Jews run your life and prevent you from getting the job you want and the pussy and everything else.
Jews are hiding under your bed.
Now I’m not a Jew. Also I’ll concur their power and influence but it is mostly in the media and only idiots believe what they watch in a film made by Weinstein who tries to force the lead actress to blow him to get the part (Curiously no Jewish women though). If you believe this shit than you DESERVE to let the Jews run your life.
You think I obsess about Jews being evil? No. I just point out the fact that they are. It has no baring on my emotions though.
And please would you stop projecting and assuming. It doesn’t matter what race I am and what country I am from but, for clarity’s sake, for the second and final time, I’m white.
And would you please stop being naive and thinking that just because I’m not living in the west that Jewish policy has absolutely no baring on my life. I can give so, so many examples of how their meddlings effect us in our every day, but here’s just one example germane to this site: feminism. They started it, they run it, they push it in the media and they have brainwashed a couple of generations of women who are now unhappier because of following this toxic indoctrination.
There’s little point you writing to me as your responses are more based in fantasy than what I have written.
Believing that Soros or Merkel do what they do for shits and giggles is “fantasy”.
Merkel has accepted refugee under enormous pressure from the US and NATO because Bush started a war for oil and Hillary killed Ghaddafi leading to millions of refugees.
Soros is a Jewish liberal who hates cops.
These reasons are not MUCH better than simply being a prankster, however.
Stop projecting, dude, you’re really shit at it. Like, seriously, you haven’t been correct regarding what I think, say, believe or anything yet.
I never said these world events are for a prank. Just stop writing to me, you’re getting on my nerves as you continiously misinterpret or misrepresent what I say.
Stop bullshiting people with this pseudo spiritual bubble dude. Hate is an intense dislike not just fear. It is more correlated to capacity of threat sensitivity and/or status consciousness. Every sheep – dog, every warrior and protector needs it to some degree. Stop lecturing people about what they should or shouldn’t feel and … get over yourself.
John, get your medicines…
You seem to need some. Either that or you are an Australian/Kiwi woman who is very young (Late teens even).
What socialist utopia do you live in?
The average Australian white or European just does not have the street sense of a goose.
You think at your age (18-20 probably) if you have a kid in America as a single woman that you will have anything? Your kids will go to rough lousy schools. You’ll hold low-paid jobs. You’ll live in bad neighborhoods.
Your life will be shit. I guarantee you.
I am a middle aged Polish woman. Far from being rich.
I read about single/teenage motherhood IN USA. There are lots of good and lots of bad stories. Those who claim no teenage mother will amount to anything are wrong. Sure, many lack support, but those who can get it (either from their families, or the community they live in, or the state), they can make it. But if you tell such a girl she won’t do anything of herself, then sure, she is more likely to give up.
BTW, most teen mothers are poor BEFORE they get pregnant.
But as you see, many reach the middle class.
PS. There is a difference between struggling and living modestly, and dying of hunger, filth and diseases. The former can make you stronger, the latter can kill you.
You do realize that what you wrote was ridiculous, don’t you? Hate gives one the urge to at least try and do something- look at what has been happening: the left, with all its hate, has gotten this far over the decades, winning victory after victory (how else do you think we ended up at the point where bakeries are forced to bake gay wedding cakes and where it’s actually “science” to say there are 50+ genders?).
Men get fired, jailed, taken for everything, all nice and legally; they get falsely accused of terrible things (e.g. the outrageous Rolling Stone Rape Hoax) with no consequences to the ones responsible; colleges and work places are feminist indoctrination camps where men are third-class citizens vulnerable to being accused by anyone for anything no matter how ridiculous, the list goes on.
Why do you think that is?
Because white men in America have been amazingly patient and trying to be “calm, rational, and non-hating.”
Didn’t work out very well, did it?
We’ve actually done it your way for years. It has NOT worked. Yet you wish to keep pushing your failed idea on everyone?
The people I see with the most hate in the are liberal progressives.
The thing is they’re right. White hate is the most destructive. I’m sure most of the readership here are aware of “when the Saxon began to hate.” The thing is that it’s slow to wake but is capable changing the face of the earth. You’d think it would be something to tip-toe around instead of poke and prod but if they had any sense they wouldn’t be liberals. Antagonizing the most destructive drive in the world in hopes of destroying it is playing Russian roulette with an automatic instead of a revolver.
“White hate is the most destructive.”
Think of the Japanese and British. Then ask Koreans, Chinese, Filipinos, Indonesians, Malaysians, Burmese, etc. whose colonial ‘hate’ was more destructive.
I hate Troy francis who lies about pulling hot French girls by just looking at them and then claims looks don’t matter . He is trying to sell books and he’s Jewish
I love to hate, I cant pretend.
Good article. Its a shame this article has to be written. Americans in the recent generations were raised to think racism ( the definition of which keeps changing) and hatred are worse than real things, like actual murder and violence.
There will be 10,000 articles written about the 500 hateful neo nazis in the south ( who dont commit any violent crimes,) but maybe only 10 articles written about all the thousands of murders taking place in Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, DC, etc.
This is because murders in Chicongo involve black people killing black people. Less people care. It does not affect the economy or the stock market.
Neo-Nazi skinheads are in the South as you said. Few Jews or blacks or Hispanics want to move to those small cities or exurbs. There is not opportunity below Dixie for them.
What are they going to do? Front a country band?
I object to your premise. Most of what you describe is not properly hatred, but grave distaste, which is a member of a separate (if often related) species of feeling. It is perfectly natural to regard certain sorts of people with distaste, which might be more accurately defined as an aversion to their company and a disdain for their conduct. Hatred, however, is neither normal nor healthy. To hate another person is to either wish him ill or delight in his suffering out of sheer malice (stoic, detached satisfaction with suffering conducive to reform is not to be confused with hatred). This is a perverse attitude and a cause of much needless sorrow in the world. Many of the extreme liberals regularly mocked on this site are the ultimate haters. Those who relish the misery of conservatives in general and white men in particular are petty and proud, and they wish to see their ideas vindicated in the basest of ways. Hatred represents a surrender to the lower mind, and it ought to be beneath the dignity of the civilized man.
While I don’t hate any specific individuals, I do very much hate this “world”, and all the systems of thought control (i.e. feminism) within it. I hate what people have become – slaves to a global system that makes them feel powerless. I hate how gullible people are, and how most are unable to think for themselves. I hate my job. I hate narcissistic attention whores who constantly seek validation. I hate selfish people. I hate the lying, deceitful media, who are responsible for creating so much division between people.
Ok, I’ll stop now due to time restraints.
Life is too short for ‘hate’, the most I can manage is ‘mild dislike’ and ‘aversion’.
Don’t hate homos, usually can just avoid.
Open borders, great idea, means I can live outside my cold and wet home country.
Feminism, I avoid white women, they can do and think what they like.
White privilege and social justice, no white people where I live, and anyone spouting notions of social justice usually ‘disappears’ fairly quickly with a bit of help from the army/police, it isn’t an issue.
I make you for a recent arrival overseas. I’ve been overseas most of my adult life since 25 (Now 43).
I make you for your mid-50’s and about 1-2 years into overseas and your kids are grown and you are divorced and your house is paid for.
“Aversion” is the reason a small percentage of us simply leave the West and move overseas. Most of us will be white since poor troublesome minorities lack the initiative or money to leave. Middle-class of birth and profession.
Few of us will be women, either.
You have to realize the young have more stake in a place, they cannot leave.
10 years in SE Asia now. 60+, 6 year old son.
Wife has the house, I make the repayments.
If she f&^%s up I leave, no more payments.
Life is good.
Yes but you mentioned that you lived under those conditions for 35 years before (I assume) retiring overseas.
Here is the thing about living overseas for most of us.
Either you are a very young man (I was 25) and you have no family, wife, house, credit problems or like yourself you went through this and you are not a young man.
Or you are yourself older and (This is more common) and had nothing to lose. Kids grown, divorced, house paid for, money in the bank.
These people on this website are young and cannot relocate overseas.
As for “disappearing” yeah good enough about the Philippines or Thailand but have money in case cops want a bribe. They bribed me. Actually, though I do not use drugs myself, I am not sure that I would return to Philippines in the middle of a violent drug war. I’m sure the bar business is doing terribly with all the negative press that president has gotten.
I don’t use drugs in SA Asia, not worth the risk.
But in Columbia and the UK, I take loads.
Yoda would not agree with you.
You have lost me. To be honest I left America when I was young and actually had more opportunities overseas.
The country was not-that-hot in Bill Clinton’s era but it has gone downhill since Bush’s Dad bought the election for his son in order to make his oil-friends money from a war in Iraq.
White trash are now “mudsharks” and meth was replaced by a Opoid crisis and race relations got worse.
Glad I got the fuck out of America young.
Sorry to say the “angry white male” is not dangerous, he is just the loser white guy out of the white men. Stop crying, build yourselves up, or just get lost, because nothing is hated more than a whiney man no matter the race. You guys are like descendants of a previously wealthy family that no longer has money, but you still have the family name, and you think it means something, but nobody else gives a fuck. Your looking back at past glory, and becoming impotent on creating future glory because of it. This just might be the curse of having very successful forefathers, and the time has come to a close of their linages glory. You have a good 400 years though be glad. STOP BEING PUZZIEZ
If that is true than you are like the housekeepers thar are suddenly out of a job when the money runs out. The Big House of welfare and other subsidy supports you. Once the once-rich family moves, you are still hanging around the house and the property. Much like Detroit.
Did I mention I HATE most of these insipid ROK Articles but I come back for the absolutely hilarious and sometimes insightful Comments which I do not always HATE???
If “whitey be down” the blacks will no longer have a source of tax money.
Blacks and female posters can read common practicality from cynical white men on this blog.
Also blacks and other races get a real insight into the actual thoughts on the commentary of white men.
That is why I continue to read. Truth hurts, even sucks from my perspective, but it’s good to know, to be “woke,” one might say…
The Grand Admiral
Here on this site you will receive the pure enlightenment of complete and total wisdom from males who know the truth.
Also, a few of us are expats, which means we can say whatever we want and do not care.
So we do.
You do not have to leave the planet in ignorance. Our posts encompass 1,000 experiences.
If the title of this article is true then the modern Left must be the healthiest bunch in history…
I don’t think this article deals with some core issues here. The left defines hate in the broadest possible terms. For example, I don’t hate anyone I don’t know because they are a foreigner, but I am opposed to millions of culturally incompatible foreigners immigrating to my country. I don’t hate fags, but I don’t want to work with or share a house with them, and so on. To the left, that’s all hate.
As the article says, hate is an emotion. Emotions come and go, like the wind, which is totally normal and proper. But holding onto that emotion and making it a life philosophy is something else. As many wise folk have said before, holding onto “negative” emotions like hate poisons your mind, damages your relationships, and has no effect on the person you hate. From a tactical perspective, hating one’s enemy limits one’s ability to empathise with and understand them, and you can ask Sun Tzu what he thinks of failing to understand your enemy.
Holding onto hatred so often leads men to destroy themselves for no gain. If a man’s wife fucks his best friend, sure he will feel hatred towards them, but then nurturing that emotion to the point of murdering them in cold blood is only going to make a shitty situation into a truly life wrecking one.
You can be sure of this: any decisions you make when you are charged up with anger and hatred are almost guaranteed to be terrible ones, unless that decision is to hit the gym until you cool down.
Fits Hyundai I30 Fd 2007-2011 Banner Running Bull Efb 60Ah Battery Replace
Seat Cordoba 6K1 6K2 1993-1999 Vetech Battery 63Ah Electric System Replace Part
Bosch S4 Battery 52Ah Electrical System Part Fit BMW 5 Series E34 1988-1997
Type 069 Car Battery 570CCA Bosch 12V 70Ah 4 Years Wty Sealed OEM Replacement
069 Titanium Car Van Battery 12V 68Ah – fits Toyota Land Cruiser Mitsubishi
Type 017 Car Battery 900CCA 12V 100Ah Exide Premium 4 Years Wty OEM Replacement
Seat Toledo Mk2 Mk3 1998-2009 Bosch S3 Battery 70Ah Electrical Replace Part
068 Titanium Sealed Car Battery 12V 550CCA – E24, S4026, S 4026
“Hope has two beautiful daughters. Their names are anger and courage; anger at the way things are, and courage to see that they do not remain the way they are.”
Masculinity is not about being Spock or detached stoic. In typical survival scenario masculine hate is about threat sensitivity and status – consciousness not just cowardly fear. Imagine a warrior who doesn’t hate or feel anger in face of mortal enemy or threat. He would be less efective or even totally powerless at worst. Becouse anger is an animating spirit of warrior. It is perfectly valid, masculine emotion.