For anyone who is familiar with great literature from the Manosphere, the following book and author needs no introduction. Nonetheless, I am going to try:
Who is Esther Vilar?
Esther Vilar was born Esther Margareta Katzen on September 16, 1935 in Buenos Aires, Argentina. She trained and practised as a medical doctor before establishing herself as an author. In 1960 Vilar went to West Germany on scholarship to continue her studies in psychology and sociology. She worked as a doctor in a Bavarian hospital for a year, and had held previous jobs as a translator, saleswoman, assembly line worker in a thermometer factory, shoe model, and secretary.
In 1971 Vilar wrote the book The Manipulated Man, originally published in Germany under the title Der Dressierte Mann. The idea behind the book is that women are not oppressed by men, but rather men are controlled by women, an idea that has been bucking the politically correct ideologies of the West since the book’s first publication. There have been brutally honest writings about females dating back as far as biblical times, but Vilar’s book should be considered the earliest of sacred scrolls of 20th (and 21st) Century red pill wisdom. The author has managed to effectively anger all feminists worldwide, and she continues receiving death threats to this day.
The book asserts that women have a level of control of men that most men are not aware of, or most likely do not want to admit. The basic tactics outlined include:
• Duping men with sex
• Administering meaningless praise to control men
• Using emotional blackmail
• Propagating the myths of love and romance as a guise to mask her real intentions and motives
Her book is one bitter red pill to swallow, as it prompts a man to reconsider not only why the hell he should bother with marriage in the first place, but also his purpose in life and society. She also feels that man desires to be enslaved via getting hitched at the altar, which has more to do with influences from parental upbringing as well as the zeitgeist. To quote Vilar:
“If a young man gets married, and starts a family and spends the rest of his life working at a soul-destroying job, he is held up as an example of virtue and responsibility. The other type of man, living only for himself, working only for himself, doing first one thing and then another simply because he enjoys it and because he has to keep only himself, sleeping where and when he wants, and facing woman when he meets her on equal terms and not as one of a million slaves, is rejected by society. The free, unshackled man has no place in its midst.”
Thug-loving is not mentioned in the book, due to such tendencies in women likely occurring infrequently in 1970’s Germany. However, things have continued in the above vein: women will publicly praise a married man in front of her friends and family while secretly she’ll give herself to a violent asshole who gives her the kind of mental and physical abuse she desires. Today’s women are broken, yet they are spreading their legs and shitting out the bastard kids of losers who do nothing for society. Decent men have the same effect on women that daylight has on Dracula.
One common question that gets asked: If men are being manipulated by women via sex, then what about women’s sexuality? Vilar asserts:
“A woman will certainly feel happy when she has an orgasm – but it is not the most intense pleasure she knows. A cocktail party, or buying a new pair of aubergine-colored patent-leather boots, rates far higher.”
And therein lies the difference between men and women. It is no secret that in any arena that the guy with the gram of coke leaves with the hottest scag in the social gathering, while Mr. works-out-at-the-gym-and-knows-game observes this, scratches his head and wonders what is going on.
For quite some time just after the 1970’s American feminazi wave, many men assumed the behaviors we experienced in our women were limited to the borders of the USA. Today it is painfully obvious that is not the case, although Esther Vilar already knew that underneath it all, women were all the same:
“The American woman is no worse than other women. She is only ahead of them all. Her unscrupulous tactics for exploitation would not be so dangerous if they were not constantly idealized by a powerful TV and film industry. As the latter creates the image of Western woman, her behavior is being copied, and as her standard of living is constantly raised, the fate of her husband automatically becomes the fate of men in other countries.”
Enjoy her…fuck her….but don’t let her play you for a sucker:
No man will ever be loved or cared about as a human being by a woman, ever. It was once said that women are not good nor bad, they just are. And for philosophical perspectives perhaps that is true. One cannot blame a wolf for being a wolf, it’s simply nature; and it behooves us to be aware of the true nature of women. The flaw may very well lie in men as it would appear that we have been handed down a congenital defect in our brains, or perhaps this is all one big joke played on us by the cosmos or evolutionary biology; in that men desire something that does not care for us outside of tangible resources.
It is quite intriguing what she stated decades ago is very similar to this current state of affairs:
“Only woman can break the vicious circle of man’s manipulation and exploitation – but she will not do it. There is absolutely no compelling reason why she should. It is useless to appeal to her feelings, for she is callous and knows no pity. And so the world will go on, sinking deeper and deeper into this morass of kitsch, barbarism, and inanity called femininity. And man, that wonderful dreamer, will never awaken from his dream.”
Now we are at third wave feminism, and the situation has gotten to such extremes that a man will kill his own brother for a mere whiff of a woman’s vagina. There’s no telling where it will all lead, but one prediction comes from the author of the Misandry Bubble, who is forecasting some kind of awareness or paradigm shift by 2020. We’ll have to wait and see if that prediction comes to fruition.
For those of you who are already unplugged, The Manipulated Man may not tell you anything new. That said, I would still recommend getting a copy for the same reason any man who is religious would have a copy of his doctrine. At the very least you will find it interesting just how many of Esther Vilar’s assertions and predictions ring true today. Get your copy now from amazon by clicking here.
Read More: Red Pill Wisdom From Patrice O’Neal
The companion piece to the Manipulated Man, is The Predatory Female, by the Reverend Lawrence Shannon. I started my walk to the dark side (you know, where society hides the truth) when I read these two books years ago.
Does anyone here know how to make a woman listen to you? For example, if I tell her to make me a sandwich and she says something stupid like “this isn’t the 50’s”, then what do I do? Iv’e seen posts here about dominating women in the bedroom, but how do you dominate them outside of the bedroom?
Slap her.
Make it clear that you will next her ass in a heartbeat if she doesn’t get with the program. For best effect, use her language, which is to say, don’t say anything at all, rather, go out with her and demonstrate in no uncertain terms that other hot women wish to fuck you. Flirt, engage, have fun, all with women hotter and younger then her. In short, if you have power, demonstrate it to her. Demonstrate that the power you have is first and foremost, indifference to her and her petty needs for feewings of equalism. Power to get and have your way with other hot young things. Power to simply not give a shit about her.
Now, if you cannot do those things because you are not hot enough, smooth enough, brave enough, or confident enough, then get thee to the gym and start lifting, get thee to the mall and get some better threads, and get thyself to ROK and some other game based sites and start polishing up your game for you must find your power. The damsels can smell weakness and weakness equals no sammich for young beta men.
Or, if you don’t have time for all that shit, bend her over your knee, pull down her pants and give her a good solid spanking. Then take her to the bedroom and fuck her silly. Followed by “I said TUNA on brown, and take it easy on the mayo this time.”
that’s funny. you are an idiot. good luck with that.
That is “an idiot”, for making you wet with the spanking scene 😉
maybe a little.
You are the post pathetic, unoriginal troll I have ever seen.
thank you.
that’s the nicest thing anyone has said to me here, so thanks!
Do I give a fuck?
If you have to tell or strongarm a female in how to behave then you’re not in control or are you an alpha and that’s aside from your ability to be able to discriminate between females.
No, we’re in the teens, the 50’s are another 36 years into the future. Now get to it, and hold the mayo.
Dude…That is one of the best comments i’ve ever read. Thanks.
That’s not power! You’re telling men to pander to their abuse of power. Women get their power from abusing toddlers and pubescent girls. Why would you improve yourself to earn the interest of belligerent child abusing leeches? To what end? If you marry one, you validate their illegitimate entitlement to employ organised violence to enslave men (and protect them from retaliation on behalf of children they violently bully).
There is only one thing to do: Stop incentivising their abuse.
Curled up on floor in uncontrollable laughter.
If she isn’t meeting your needs why is she in your life (or your house)?
Agreed. I don’t personally care about a sandwich. But if she isn’t supporting you the way you need, ask yourself other than having a vagina (which 50% of the humans of planet have) what else does she contribute to the relationship?
Egg zactly
“Meeting my needs” is a phrase I hear so often that it make me want to hurl so hard I can feel my sphincter in the back of my own throat. I hear that from my wife. I’m not on this earth to meet anyones needs but my own. I give when I can. I take when I can. Choice.
Why do you need a wife? You’re trapped now, you’re carrying an entitled leech. But you’re a little confused about Self.
“This isn’t the 50’s” is a common shit test. Depending on what stage your relationship is in, i.e. you’ve laid down the law from the beginning and she’s just shit testing you, or you haven’t and she’s just being a beligerent bitch, either way I would answer the same way and maintain an iron frame. “Yes it is.”
Try this!
The women of that era absolutely loved their men because many of them behaved like this.
Bullshit.
Love = ‘respect’ (fear) = abuse.
Humans broken by violent mothers are Toddlers. They push the boundaries of what you’ll allow until you let them know you mean business.
The problem is, who the fuck wants a Toddler dependent you have to keep in line? It’s so much effort for no reward.
I would get dressed and go out and get a sandwich and practice my “going out to get a sandwich game” in the process too.
maybe try ASKING politely? and reciprocating once in a while? it actually works, and you don’t have to be a dick!
So how is that nice guy thing working for you, out there in the “let’s just be friends” zone?
works a hell of a lot better than your M,O., MAKING a woman listen to you. what a bunch of fools.
What’s she being paid for?
You should never have to tell her, she should be making them for you.
The only way, these days, is to be coldly aloof, though of course there’s no guarantee she’ll do anything for you. If you want a traditional woman, submissive and deferential, don’t date western or westernized ones.
100% right on the money about the female
borrowed it from the library, the not so funny thing is I can find feminist propaganda easily at any library, but they had to pull the copy I borrowed out of warehouse storage
Vilar also wrote “The Polygamous Sex” which promotes you guessed it, a man’s right to spread his seed around
her third book “Das Ende der Dressur” (“The end of manipulation”) is in German, someone fluent in German should translate and highlight the key points on this website … I’m asking nicely, PLEASE
Did you blow the dust off the cover and onto the cat hair covered, short-haired, flat-shoed feminist librarian?
LOL my librarian is actually a rather attractive older very feminine married MILF … so, you know … but I borrowed the book from another town
flat shoed? lol. is wearing heels essential to being considered an attractive woman? oh, and the hair thing is back too?
i would think a 40 year old book wouldn’t be as widely requested as contemporary writing in any case.
my hmmmm? was more feminist conspiratorial since their drivel is easily accessible … I live within 20 miles of 7 major universities, 1 top 5 in the world, so they don’t store books in warehouses (too often) … social influence
really? you think there’s a feminist “conspiracy”?
You’re right, feminists are too stupid for any conspiracies.
No, you just pay women to undress to impress you because it’s Natural. It’s why clothes are needed.
Marriage contracts backed by State violence are also Natural. It’s why marriage is needed.
I’m guessing the publisher will eventually put out an english edition seeing how it is a larger market place.
not at this point, it was published in 1977
And Huckleberry Finn was published in the 1800’s. What does the time of publishing have to do with truth and relevance?
Love this quote:
“The American woman is no worse than other women. She is only ahead of them all. Her unscrupulous tactics for exploitation would not be so dangerous if they were not constantly idealized by a powerful TV and film industry. As the latter creates the image of Western woman, her behavior is being copied, and as her standard of living is constantly raised, the fate of her husband automatically becomes the fate of men in other countries.”
I wonder what Dr. Vilar thinks of attention whoring on Facebook?
Also, to ROK authors, can you stop putting foreign women on a pedestal please?
I agree with you in a sense that all women are mechanically built the same, but the difference between westernized women and some foreign women comes down to how corrupted their software is. All women more or less desire and require the same things (comfort,stability,someone who acts like they care). Where the road splits apart is when it comes down to what’s required of them and what’s expected of them. Westernized women are looking for a free lunch and expect everything without giving shit, some foreign women still understand that to require a man to be all these things, she must herself fulfill her duties as a women. The benefit of a foreign women from the right place is that you still get the types of benefits that men were able to get in the Mad Men days (1950s-60s). I’m sure women cheated on their husbands back then as well but it has more to do with a women knowing her place and being submissive. I think that’s where foreign women hold the advantage right now. In 20 years I’m sure the world will be so Westernized that it wont make too much of difference though….
Excellent hardware/software analogy. It’s like men having killing/conquering/fucking in our hardware. Think more positively. In 20 years, if we’re not all wiped off the face of the Earth, the West will be showcased in textbooks as society’s modern failure.
Non-western women shouldn’t be put a pedestal. They are just an alternative as less exposed to feminist dogma of the west.
Can we still pedestal pre-1900s women?
No.
Why?
Fantasizing about women from a completelly different era… fucked up.
Not pedestalizing the women. Just recognizing the advantage of international arbitrage. Dealing with civil court issues is easy when you can just get on a plane and leave.
Fuckin A…. That quote in the image of the girls in the movie theater… i have actually met women like that. They think there is something seriously wrong with a man if he visits his parents more than just on thanksgiving and christmas…. garbage women all the way.
Look at the difference between Western culture and Asian culture.
In Asian families, the kids who are all grown working adults are married and look after their parents and let them live with them and create stronger family bonds.
In Western families, parents are thrown into retirement homes and visited once or twice a year, and the kids are desperately and secretly hoping to inherit their parents assets as soon as possible.
It is no wonder why the west is so fucked up.
That’s very true.
When my mum’s dad died, my grandmother couldn’t look after herself so my entire family moved to the UK to live in her house and look after her. My parents found new jobs and planned to buy the neighboring house.
Then, the social services (who had been stealing money from my grandmother) accused us of wanting to get our hands on her house (which was actually our inheritance!) It went to court, long story short granny ended up dying in an old people’s home, the house was sold but we didn’t see any of the money. We moved back to the continent. It sounds crazy but it’s the truth. The same kind of ‘social services’ abetted large scale child rape in Rotheram.
The same everywhere in the west.
Government’s wondrously fascist little tool, the feminists. They are merely a means to an end.
I wonder if an all out war is what will be required to get rid fo these tyrants?
I certainly don’t want my two boys fighting it. I don’t think it is worth that much to save having foolishly defended it myself.
I no longer think those in charge of us have ever been anything but what they have always been…Criminals.
Feminists, and government criminals go hand in hand no matter what colored flag animal they wear on their lapels.
Are you kidding?
The retirement home thing is a baby boomer concoction as it is today.
They shit all over their off spring, and wanted the luxuries of technology that started in the fifties thinking the trend would set them free of the shackles of the “Lovely little concentration camp” that is family life.
They fucked themselves into oblivion in the 60s, and then demanded everyone else join them in the 70s. In the 80s, they tried to take it all back by becoming puritanical nazis while supporting feminist to bring back “traditional values.” Idiots, they never see it coming.
The 90s were the begining of their end, as all the institutions they amassed for themselves were systematically handed over, by them, to the feminists. Now, they think that a two-income family will last whilst failing to halt the communist/nationlist style movement in the courts, government, police, and cultural zetgeist they have created for us.
They called what their great grandparents had back in the 1900s with full families living under the same roof “crowded,” and “not enough space.” Literally just “not enough.” They needed big cars, houses, tvs, and debts!
Don’t forget the tremendous national debt they have amassed for us as well.
I hope their social security bubble they built for themselves lasts.
Because when you shit all over your offspring with divorce, violence, abandonment, alcoholism, drugs, rampant wars with no meaning but consumer culture protection…well, good luck convincing them to let you see your grand kids.
If you were a devout feminist, you may not see your adult grand kids at all. If you have any that is.
I think the new Boomer mantra is “never trust anyone over 90”
Brilliant. Great comment.
Brilliant assessment!! Fuck ’em! You can’t really respect people who failed to respect you
it’s a wonderful irony that the war generations, who paid such attention to their baby boomer kids post WW2 that, they all turned into spoiled brats and dumped their parents into retirement homes… hahaha…..
But first they dumped their children into day-care centers.
Nah, it’s still the same mantra that George Carlin said it was a few decades ago: “Gimme that, it’s mine!”
^^^This^^^ And were going to get Hillary Clinton, a boomer cyborg on steroids as our next Prez. A broad and a boomer. We are fucked. Time to head for the tall grass…
This is a childish comment.
Rather than blame some vague, non-homogenous group of people (who didn’t just spring into existence) for your problems, take responsibility for yourself. Everyone gets dealt a hand – whining doesn’t improve it.
Yeah! Fuck your mother! Its her fault!
Hahaha!! I figured that was where you were coming from! Whining doesn’t. However it does good to know where you’re at, even if it is wrong, if you want to go the right way.
Literally.
Her fault, I mean.
Everyone is dealt a bad hand by mothers who breed only in need. The irrefutable reality that must be denied to survive is that men have no reason to be alive.
Any man who believes otherwise is a victim of lies and illusions borne out of childhood abuse and trauma. There is no reward for men and what’s more, our mothers knew this and brought us here anyway to suffer to please them.
You can be pleased for no reason but I see no reason to be pleased. I cannot endure listening to whore prostestations anymore. Fucking broken robots. I’d rather fuck a wall.
they did it to themselves… oh! = BUT IT’S A MAN’S FAULT…
YAUP, THAT’S THE WOMEN’S MANTRA ALRIGHT AND THEY PAY WITH STOLEN CASH FROM PROSTITUTION…
“The irrefutable reality that must be denied to survive is that men have no reason to be alive”
I think it was Schopenhauer who stated once “What crime did a newly born infant boy commit to have the sentence of human life handed down to him?”
Aren’t you glad we didn’t?
Who said I was whining in that comment? Other than you?!
It’s simple really. The baby boomers have created a lot of our problems, and our current debt load with their bs political/moral philosophies they got while drugged out in the 60s and 70s.
In order to live their lives, they played social science experiments on us all. Clearly, those experiments have failed.
As they get older, they are likely to face a generation of kids who don’t like them very much.
It’s already happening.
Two years is long enough for you to have grown up and learned how to take adult responsibility. Sadly it hasn’t happened. Let’s address this again in another two years.
LOL. We won’t have to. You’re an idiot. You’ve picked at some nebulous and ridiculous idea that is not ascertainable. I don’t need to worry about you.
LOL. Now I see where your head got inserted corner pocket up your ass. Did I offend your mommy? Awwwwwwwwwwwww! I’m sorry sweetheart. Fact is, the Baby Boomer generation being accused of gross negligence does not make me out to be a whiner. I’m actually doing really well myself thank you. But me pointing out that they wasted many, many, many opportunities with their decades of BS is not whining. Merely observation. My comment below is correct. You’re BS>
Still a child I see. You are babbling about some poorly defined group, claiming that they are collectively responsible for your problems and I am the one picking at some nebulous idea? As a matter of fact… your statement doesn’t even make any sense. You seem to be saying your own argument is nebulous and not ascertainable.
No you don’t need to worry about me. I’m fine. You need to worry about yourself.
I’m surprised that you’ve managed to stay butthurt for two years. That must be a record.
No more comments needed. I know you’re going to come back and say another stock, and unoriginal, comeback. It’s what I’ve seen you do the entire time I’ve ever seen you on here. Like every closet feminist mangina, you stick around to throw insults, to cover the fact that you fail at basic reading comprehension. Speaking of butthurt, where did your mommies boyfriend touch you after spunking up her ass. What hurt worse, the fact that you got violated, or that he never called either of you back?
Asian kids pay for their parents’ retirement because there is no Social Security in these countries, and the vast majority of parents have no assets, since the Boomers are the first generation of people to have middle class jobs.
A similar dynamic happens in poorer social classes in the US. For example, kids in the projects being raised / fostered by grandparents.
It’s amazing how they can always afford children and then get angry if the girl is not boy.
That’s because in the world outside the West, if you don’t reproduce, you don’t get to retire. And if you have a girl, the girl is obliged to her husband’s family – and if you’re from South Asia, there might be a dowry you have to pay.
Yeah that was kind of my point. Humans are a cannibal species, perverse and unnatural, breeding slaves for betrayal rather than breeding offspring that live their own lives like every other mammal species.
Infantilised, reduced, violent women have enslaved the deity species of the universe and brought us to the brink of inevitable distinction; but sure, there’s nothing dubious about mothers needing violence in the private family home.
It all seems on the up and up.
the fucq is wrong with you? so now a close knit family that supports itself, rather than relying on welfare and social security, is a form of violence. smh… you are the weakest link
If it were up to me, anyone who breeds life with the intent of using violence, deceit or shame (to crush the child’s spirit and turn them into a loving slave) would not be judged suitable for anything but euthanasia.
No, it isn’t. Anyone who cannot live proudly (i.e. survive without needing to inflict suffering on others, invariably children) should want to die proudly and any who do not should be helped along to the next stage of their existence. This isn’t a fucking soup kitchen. Women have turned this planet into a welfare globe and the result was violent and, ultimately, final.
Neither is better. All imposition on children is insane. Children need to be free to carry our leeching asses into space, not carrying our leeching asses to bingo night.
The only thing wrong with radical feminism was imagining that men have ever oppressed anyone. The Matriarchy controls everything by Proxy. Men don’t give birth.
All I can say is that I deserved the corporal punishment that I had as a child, and if those kids don’t stay in school and have an incentive to work (i.e. paying for their parents) they’re not going to work for either NASA or Goldman.
How would you know what you deserved? Did your abusers tell you that you deserved violent punishment for being confused?
They should not have confused you with their sociopathic compulsive lying. I know, I know, they were just trying to protect you from dangerous and traumatic truth. But you should know Santa isn’t real.
And you should also know that your mother was a whore.
congratulations, you don’t get it and your post is packed with ad hominems
Your mind has to be pretty broken to refuse to answer simple questions, preferring instead to dismiss questions as failing to “get it”.
Get what? There’s nothing to get. Your mind is gone.
You don’t have the Right to be this insane because by denying the abuse you suffered, you lock yourself into perpetuating it. Our mothers were whores. Your wife is going to be one. Your aversion to truth is the proof of it’s validity. No one is averse to lies in Polite Society.
that’s not what I was objecting to. I understand that sluts are everywhere. I was objecting to that you called deserved discipline, abuse.
Sluts are humane. Only whores smear women who are true to their biology and don’t require men to degrade themselves to bring them pleasure. I can’t be validated by whores.
But you didn’t need violent communication to teach you to act in your own best interests. As hard as this may be to believe, babies are coded to do that already. Violence is needed by parents who want us to be their mindless, obedient slaves. It doesn’t matter what you did that made you imagine you deserved it, you would not have done it if your mother wasn’t abusive.
Humans are born brilliant and sane. We learn a linguistic method of communication from scratch. And then it’s all downhill from there. We’re shadows of our 3yo minds. Violence, shame and lies is why. Abuse is never needed to communicate with brilliant humans.
Until abuse renders humane communication impossible.
You’re disrespecting me and being underhanded by telling me that I was abused, when I was not.
How would my mother be a whore when she always made more money than my dad?
100% of human children are horribly abused.
Look in a mirror, take your clothes off, walk outside. You’ll feel the PTSD.
A study by Alvy (1987) found that 82% of Euro-American higher income parents, 95% of Euro-American lower income parents and 99% of African-American parents believed corporal punishment was necessary to teach obedience, respect and right from wrong.
Studies of delinquent youth (Welsh 1976) have found that virtually all have been subjected to extensive corporal punishment.
________
In Nature, where mammal mothers don’t have the luxury of communicating with linguistics, charades, images, symbols, etc and where the young don’t have the brilliant minds human toddlers have (to learn their mother’s tongue from scratch, for example):
* Violence is never needed for ‘discipline’,
* Deceit is never needed for ‘protection’,
* Shame is never needed for ‘correcting’ behaviour.
A whore is simply someone who seeks advantage by disadvantaging others, in a sexual context. Whores use artifice and illusion to induce unnatural desire with the intent of manipulating that inflicted suffering for extortion. A whore is a prostitute’s moral inferior.
100% of sexually active women are whores, including every prostitute. They are all lying about sex with intent to exploit men’s confusion (which they’ve created by lying and manipulating and degrading them).
“congratulations, you don’t get it and your post is packed with ad hominems”
Congratulations, your’re a stupid cunt.
Lol. Sure. Blanket statements here and there.
It depends. Say you have a familial situation in which said family objected, very vocally, to you raising your children so that they were not corrupted with radical leftist/feminist ideology.
It is your obligation as a parent to protect your children from being culturally polluted/corrupted, even if that pollution comes from your own family.
Asian culture eh? You realise Asia is the largest and most populist continent on Earth. It has 48 countries and more than 15 major religions.
We’ll leave aside the fact that not all Western Cultures are the same as is made clear on this site. So which Asian culture are you referring to?
There is nothing sweet about the child abuse in Asian families that is required to reduce Self for terrified lives of conformity and slavery. This whole world’s worth of women are breeding slaves (or worse).
First date conversation with an american female about family causes her to roll her eyes and sigh and look bored. You are there to entertain her, and you’re being boring. In other cultures its fastest way to get the woman to open up about what’s meaningful and it means the date is going in the right direction,
Strangely why I never talk about family, or anything of importance to me while on a date with an American woman.
Merely talk shit about everyone around me like she is as better than them like I am, and do my best to wet her panties.
Anything else is a waste in the overwhelming amount of cases.
The few American women I ever thought of marriage with in my blue pill time have all turned out into merciless feminist bitches.
They lie about everything, and say anything you want to hear so you will spend your provision on them. Treat them the same, but don’t reciprocate the positive (provision for pussy). They are not worthy.
Man, Jesse! You are on fire with the Good Word!
Very true….every conversation with a woman feels like it’s your “on stage” time to entertain her….never met a lady that valued a meaningful conversation about family values….I’m from Asia and it’s not much different from the states…in terms of degrading femininity….
” In other cultures its fastest way to get the woman to open up about what’s meaningful and it means the date is going in the right direction”
That is changing very rapidly though. American cancer is spreading via social media and smart phones.
And those sickening government / religion-issued memes.
“Treat your girl right or somebody else will.”
“Being alone doesn’t mean you’re weak. It just means you’re willing to wait for what you deserve.”
So true, family has become almost non-existent in western nations. My dad is Irish and my mom is Italian and they did not even have tight families. When I married my wife (who is middle Eastern) I was taken at how tight her family was with one another. It was almost like another world. Her parents look after the little ones while we work. In fact they would take it as a affront if we put our little ones into daycare with strangers looking after them. Were neighbors, so it is convenient for all involved. But it lets us save a shitload of money on daycare.
I understand that this scenario is not possible for a variety of reasons. I would never ever date or marry a White female from a western nation. They are lower than a cigarrett but in the alley to me. Utter trash in every way.
Dated a woman who almost burst into laughter when I told her my mother is using a walker.
Of course this is after I hear her say her grandmother fell down. I ask if she is okay. She says she is. So I share. Because I am talking with a human and humans have empathy and things right?
Admittedly, I’ve lurked about this site oft in diametric disagreement with an inordinate amount of the content. Regardless, that really sucks profusely that you experienced that. Whilst we may have very differing opinions on the intrinsic qualities and capabilities of my gender – whoever that girl is that scoffed at your mom’s disability is a filthy, vile cunt. I hope your mother received phenomenal orthopedic care and she’s back in top physical shape, happy and healthy.
*cheers*
I do appreciate the sentiment. At this time, unfortunately, my mother may not have not have done so. We live in different states so I can’t check her health often. Being somewhere between proud and hopelessly delusional, she often says one thing positive to get people out of her business and does little to help herself directly, health-wise anyway.
On the woman in question, she has maintained an impeccable record in her fiscal success so that I wish her to maintain. However, due to what I’ve experienced with her, learned from other men here about women, and been directed to pick up on my own coupled with a new level of disdain for such behavior, the phrase “FUCK DAT HOE” sums it up best. Between attention whoring on several mediums, adding displayed images of herself as an infant, and parading the newly added phrase “I am a strong woman and I don’t need a man to validate me” I know she is unhappy, men are pumping and dumping as per her request, she is almost doomed currently to be a bitter bag due to her own manipulations and money will shrivel up that soon to be barren womb faster than God in a club. This makes me smile. If that lasted long enough for her to change and gain empathy and lose the ability to biologically create more women like herself, heh, two for one.
I’m glad you spoke up SPF. I would like to believe men here do not hate women. We hate the agency employed to pander and control us in the name of “love”. And every so often women like the one I met, who appear to often in the lives of men, comes up, assimilates a way into a guy’s life, becomes a support system of sorts only to be revealed to be a pretender looking to find her mental fairy tale match and now that this man’s usefulness is at an end, he is not a man, or to regarded any higher than a laughable child. I have even begun to assume, sad or not, women are happy mostly when their needs are met and utility is served. When it is not the remove a being with cold efficiency without thinking twice. As a guy, I can only believe one of two things: she may have been specifically rubbed wrong by me and said fuck him OR she never cared to begin with and sought out my utility until I proved useless and the charade could be dropped. As I have to keep working in life regardless and only can go through ruin so many times, I say there is a charade at work and until I learn a new way of dealing with it at large, the specific code of women will apear to be utility over humanity and delude men to garner objective served.
That is my sane solution to an insane problem. If that isn’t all women fine. Increased divorce, relational failure, cheating among women being exposed, vilifying of men (while men do it to, more is being exposed that maybe men were right to) and blatant destructive behavior says otherwise. If solutions are to be had more women who are willing to use abstract thinking, viewing life from more than just what improves their own, must be brought to light. Thank you for speaking up and proving some women can be that. However, only time can show me you are in fact that. Don’t take offense as one time showings of empathy can’t affect this overall picture I’ve developed.
Thanks for taking the time to reply with your insightful message. I’m beginning to understand that this site is more of a cathartic outlet than necessarily a literal, broad brushstroking of any one demographic. There’s a lot of shitty people abound and its healthy to be on guard to a certain degree and also to have a portal where frustrations can be vented. You sound like a really considerate son and your mom sounds like a typical mom – loveable and stubborn. Life’s not so bad 🙂 There’s an equal measure of magnanimity to be found alongside all the idiocy. I think the trick is to not let the tumultuous journey rob you of your innate happiness and natural predisposition towards kindness. Your ex sounds like a wretched human being. Again, that really sucks that you crossed paths with a person like that. As my own mom always imparts – a genuinely happy existence is the only revenge that should ever be sought when someone wrongs you – so I sincerely wish you all the best!
“Life’s not so bad 🙂 ”
Tell that to little kids in third world countries rummaging through trash heaps for food with flies cris-crossing their eyeballs.
Or kids born with cancer doomed to die young and miserable.
Fuck this gay earth.
Indeed, what else could an optimistic nod towards life infer other than a tacit endorsement of atrocity and suffering?? Don’t think I’m going to proliferate your message to children afflicted with diseases. Ironically I can’t wait to join Doctors Without Borders post grad school and have every intention of doing everything in my power to help ameliorate the suffering of the very groups you speak of. I’m completely doubling down – Life is actually pretty amazing and far too finite to wallow in negativity.
Fucking A. I was reading today about women in Niger breeding >8 children each; they treat children like a lottery. Sure, most will die but you only need one to survive your abuse and you have yourself a loving slave to leech off for life.
This kid is a survivor. Poor bastard.
The ethics get horribly complicated.
All that is necessary for Evil to breed is for good men to do something.
When you find yourself playing in a rigged game, there’s only one play you can make. The only way to win is not to play.
I’m a big fan of Médecins sans Frontières but I no longer send money. They’re doing something that enables Evil to breed.
WTF???
“I think the trick is to not let the tumultuous journey rob you of your innate happiness and natural predisposition towards kindness”
Your writing feels unnatural.
“Dated a woman who almost burst into laughter when I told her my mother is using a walker”
I sure as fuck hope you immediately stopped seeing her after that.
I had long stopped seeing her before the incident. I only met her at that specific time because she had my money and wanted my address to send it to me. I chose to remain off the grid and demanded she give it to me by hand, with or without new or old boy toy. You can’t be too certain when dealing with women.
Between penis shopping, she got me an expensive gift in an attempt to see me. I had assumed, my game must have brought out second thoughts. Her words often swayed between a desire for sex and annoyance at listening to me. So she got a cold reaction to my new layer of beta. Happens when you are only around a woman. The minute I realized the nature of the gift as the bipolar verbiage continued with her, I wanted no part of that. I only pity her now and hope she gets the help she sorely needs.
Your mistake is looking for empathy from her, friend. Men have empathy, women…not so much. They can be sympathetic, yes clearly, but empathy, well, I only find that in my male friends and family members.
I’m sorry to hear that you were treated like that by her, even if she lacks empathy she should at least have had enough social grace not to openly treat you, and by extension your mother, with such disrespect.
She taught me the difference that day. I am happy and sad to know the truth. I am sad to see a person can behave that way and happy as hell my gut stopped me from putting a “ring on it”.
I think you used the wrong words men. Women do have empathy. The problem is that modern western females have grown up without discipline, effort or values, so they simply don’t give a shit for other people’s suffering.
Nah, I stand by the notion that they lack empathy in a real sense. Sympathy yes, they can have it, but I don’t know any woman who can truly remove herself from her own ego enough to place herself in somebody else’s shoes and see an issue sans self referencing. She simply always brings it back around to herself in some manner or way.
Rollo did an article on this not terribly long ago over at Rational Male I think.
I mostly agree. It’s no coincidence, after all, that the profoundest works of literature are mostly male books, however we are told that women on average have superior “emotional intelligence.” And if they do, it’s likely for manipulative purposes. Understanding others (or themselves) in a deeply analytical way, is well beyond most women. In general, where a man grasps how others sees things, a woman is either uninterested (given her essentially trivial and shallow mind) or else deludes herself (hamster), especially if so doing will get her off the moral hook.
Once in DC I went on a date with an Ethiopian girl who seemed really into me. I thought that Ethiopian girls were all about family, so I highlighted my family side. I never heard from her again. The error I made was that she was Westernized.
Hey you just were tryna be open with the dumb bitch..If they don’t fuck you one way, they’ll fuck you another
“Ethiopian girl who seemed really into me (…) I highlighted my family side. I never heard from her again. The error I made was that she was Westernized.”
And let’s face it: ethiopian chicks are not exactly ranking high on the totem pole of attractiveness (pic below) i.e. she ranks among the least desireable women to be with – she should have been more appreciative she met some like you.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b458c8ec187f7b48a3423af64df3a17f9f736b08793da5f42ba4a0a30e7f7e01.jpg
Haha, I know what youre saying. Ive actually had a previous cunt (ex) treat me in this manner. I was still a bit of a pussy at the time (socially anxious, anger issues etc.) but I dealt with her ass as follows.
Little ms bitch: Youre going to go see your mother at the med centre?
Me: My mom’s mentally ill! She has bipolar disorder!
Little ms bitch: So? What are you, a child? Grow up!
Me: ….*outrageous laughter* *I grab my gear and walk out*
Luckily, I had fuck-all to pack. She started with the usual bullshit. “Where are you going?” “wait, cant we talk about this?” Nope. I was gone.
That was the last time I saw her ass. I cant believe most girls replicate this behaviour.
Makes me think of that Game of Thrones scene, with Daenerys manipulating top alpha male Khal Drogo:
Daenerys: “The dragon feeds on horse and lamb alike.”
Mago: “You’re a foreigner. You do not command me.”
Daenerys: “I am Khaleesi. I do command you.” (Khaleesi = wife of the khal)
Drogo: “See how fierce she grows? That’s my son inside her, the stallion that will mount the world, filling her with his fire.”
Drogo: “I will hear no more. Mago, find somewhere else to stick your cock.”
Mago: “A Khal who takes orders from a foreign whore is no Khal.” .
…and the shit, predictably, hits the fan…
Women have been manipulating men for the entirety of human history. You wanna know what’s in store for us?
http://oi60.tinypic.com/slpaw2.jpg
“And so the world will go on, sinking deeper and deeper into this morass of kitsch, barbarism, and inanity called femininity.”
Credit to the one who made this succinct little graph.
The graph presumes Civilized is civil when all of History shows that peaceful (sustainable) civilizations have been destroyed by warmongering (M.A.D.) societies. It’s a nice delusion to imagine the indigenous Americans were barbaric prior to being massacred by Christian boys reduced by abuse to selfless sociopaths desperate to impress their mothers, but it’s nonsense.
Those who prepared for War destroyed all who prepared for Peace. The sons of child abusing mothers destroyed all who didn’t abuse children. There’s no victory in cannibalism. It’s the losers who write History. All the winners are dead.
I think you’re confusing the terms “femininity” and “feminism”. Easy to get the two mixed up!
If I may re-purpose a Churchill quote: “[Women are] either at your throat or at your feet.”
One place is, of course, better to have them. 😉
À bientôt,
Mistral
I prefer them at the midpoint in between.
Bent over a couch before cooking me breakfast that morning, then promptly leaving. Her replacement is due in five minutes to clean up for me, and then take her spot when I felt like it.
Lmao
There is definitely a paradigm shift in the making and it is long overdue. Feminism as an idea awaits an appropriate analytic response. In terms of earth-shattering analyses a systematic analysis of manipulation and other forms of feminine power must surely be irresistable.
At present though society focuses largely upon what it can see, and what it can describe. Yet today power increasingly works behind the scenes as force and might is seen to be de-legitimised. Clearly one motivation for egalitarianism / progressivism is the ease with which un-declared self-interest can coincide with and hide behind apparently high-minded universalist ideas, yet it remains very difficult to articulate how this is done.
I wonder though whether ‘manipulated’ as a concept is persuasive. We already have more value-neutral terms like machiavellianism, or simply social influence and it might be better to employ such academically and scientifically acceptable terms to analyse how power actually works rather than to attempt to deploy a term which could be dismissed as simply a function of misogyny (which is I think how the book has been dismissed in the past).
Women’s influence is the dark matter of the science of power. Its time this was scrutinised in a systematic and scholarly way so that it can enter the public discourse
“I wonder though whether ‘manipulated’ as a concept is persuasive. We already have more value-neutral terms like machiavellianism, or simply social influence and it might be better to employ such academically and scientifically acceptable terms to analyse how power actually works rather than to attempt to deploy a term which could be dismissed as simply a function of misogyny (which is I think how the book has been dismissed in the past).
Women’s influence is the dark matter of the science of power. Its time this was scrutinised in a systematic and scholarly way so that it can enter the public discourse”
Good point – semantics has a lot to do with our approach to problem solving and analysis.
thanks, ideas / analyses have to be persuasive to have any impact. Progressivism etc has done decades of research and development on the subject, while its critics come across as having tourettes.
You’re making a logical error in approaching the issue with the mindframe that a solution exists. There is no solution to the biological betrayal of mammal mothers who breed in need to feed.
Extinction is the solution you’re looking for. All that is necessary for Evil to breed is for good men to do something.
then you would have to work and organise towards that extinction. That’s is not something I would wish for however screwed society has become. Your pessimism may or may not be justified, but I think applying moral judgements / categories to something which is about nature / adaptation may be a confusion in itself. If though you are correct and it is a ‘betrayal’ then there is no reason why a further adaptation might not address that betrayal. After all ‘progress’ however much a misnomer it may be has been all about an ethics of adaptation: just imagine if that ethics were applied to women’s behaviour rather than just mens!
“All that is necessary for Evil to breed is for good men to do something.”
nice soundbite. Could be something in that
If you can’t see the horror in your own words, your insanity is what Evil is exploiting. If humans were all feasting on the bodies of children kept alive so their flesh could be eaten piece by piece, you would not wish for extinction? That would make you a monster.
nb. Substitute mind for body and you have the reality of mothers.
Do not kid yourself. Nature is in control. I’m merely talking about gaining an advance on the Natural Deselection of a species bred by cannibal whores for utility and disposal.
Your logical mind is not functionally optimally. You cannot fix victims of early childhood trauma. Human minds are snapped as toddlers by reduced women who value appearances above everything else. Take off your clothes and stop mothers from breaking the minds of children with violence, shame (of their skin) and lies. You can’t do it. Nature will do it, all you can do is accelerate or stall.
Women will never compete fairly with girls again. Women have been reduced. Fair competition = Women lose. Reduced women will never forfeit their filial and marital slaves.
You want it one way. It’s the other way.
“Women approach raising children the same way they approach catching Mr Right. The mind must be destroyed to secure the body for utility and disposal. Take off your clothes and stop mothers from breaking the minds of children with violence, shame (of their skin) and lies.”
The presence and leadership role of father’s used to check any such predation and could do so again. The state prevents this for the most part
“Nature will do it, all you can do is accelerate or stall.”
Marx believed something similar with regard to accelerating progress, yet you believe in accelerating collapse? People have been trying to predict history for as long as there has been history. You might be right, but it really isn’t a fine art let alone a science
Re. promoting insecurity in young children, there’s been a lot of research in attachment theory relating to what gives children a secure base – unfortunately this rarely reflects the masculine perspective, and the degree to which a secure base requires for instance a strong identification with the father for instance….child psychology needs to be re-masculinized. The abuse, psychological cannibalism you refer to reflects the current dominance of the female perspective in the expertise of bringing up children. Critiquing that perspective will take time, effort and strategy
“You want it one way. It’s the other way.”
Yes, that’s why I want it the other way. Agency begins in the mind. We never simply perceive the world the way it is
Leadership role? Who courts whom? How does marriage benefit men? Women marry as youth and beauty are illusions, the reality is ugly for 60 years. Who brings home the bacon? Who loves v loved? One is a slave and it’s not the wife.
Fathers have been useless beta johns since the dawn of time.
I mostly don’t believe anyone who continues the enabling can reasonably presume they’re doing anything but finance and incentivise the traumatic abuse and betrayal of children.
Nature has all the answers.
Love is a function of traumatic bonding (abuse). Can you abuse children more than their mother’s betrayal? If not, there’s nothing you can do. Make no mistake, women are not confused about what they’re doing in private. Clothes don’t go on children easy. Only men are blind.
You want there to be a solution. But it’s the other way.
“traumatic abuse and betrayal of children.”
as far as I can tell the conclusion that such (principally maternal) abuse is endemic is your starting point, and that perceiving reality thus you see the world (stripped bare) in rather pessimistic terms similar perhaps to some existential philosophers ( i.e. as meaningless and absurd). Assuming that analysis is correct then you could still conclude with some of those like I think Sartre that the implication of such meaningless is that men must take responsibility for themselves, creating their own morality, principals for actions, with a view to bettering the world. If you really are concerned with the abuse of children (beyond any abuse you may feel you yourself suffered) then doing nothing (and simply shaking a fist at the world) could be seen as being complicit in that abuse – at least if you happen to be wrong about the misguidedness of good men ‘doing something’.
Our perceptions of the world may often be based upon our sense of trust in key relationships. Chief amongst those are our caregivers – typically the mothers who you consider are systematically abusing their children. You might be interested in a brilliant if slightly dry academic paper by the philosopher alistair macintyre on the relationship of trust to knowledge in which he considers how people may suffer ‘epistemological crises’ in relation to the world around them when they experience a loss of trust or otherwise feel betrayed by the people closest to them (e.g. mothers, family, others generally etc). The example he uses is Hamlet who finds himself tormented by the suspicion that his father has been murdered and betrayed, and that his mother might have been in on it. Its a thought-provoking read if you can find it
I don’t have a direct link – but this is the beginning of the article if you’re interested – http://www.pdcnet.org/collection/show?id=monist_1977_0060_0004_0453_0472&file_type=pdf
I’m probably just imagining that countless studies have shown that nearly 100% of children are violently abused before the age of 3.
I’m probably just imagining that every girl in the world has been shamed into a liability, their minds turned to rachet as they obsessively obstruct biology to exploit broken men.
I’m probably just imagining that men are deranged killers, who rush to war to kill and die for whore lies.
I’m probably just imagining that nearly 100% of humans are sociopathic liars.
I’m probably just imagining that over 2/3rds of the world subscribes to a fictional deity that exists primarily to exploit children.
I’m probably just imagining that nearly all children are made to be dependent and attached to mammal mothers when in Nature, mammal mothers raise offspring to be independent and unattached.
I’m probably just imagining that nearly all children love and would die to protect their abusive mothers, when in Nature, mammal mothers die to protect their young.
Your relationship with leeches is twisted and sick. You’re not supposed to carry them.
I’m not familiar with the studies on the abuse, but I think you’ve mentioned them before. Abuse though is an evaluative term, it has to be defined. Personally I would agree that cynically fostering dependency in the young could be seen as abusive, but I would highly doubt most women, or people were able in this sense to distinguish between their own interests and those of their children. This simple psychological evolution – learning to distinguish between the needs of parent and children, principally, but not exclusively, the ‘neurotic’ needs of mothers and children, is perfectly achievable and might go a long way towards breaking the deceptions and cycles of violence within which we live.
If the theme is working to reveal the unseen power and influence that women have – not least on account of their being the ones to ‘rock the cradle’ and thereby reveal and correct how men, and society as a whole is manipulated primarily by the needs of women then I can’t see why some success at least couldn’t be protected, however such truths are unpalatable for the majority
“Your relationship with leeches is twisted and sick”.
Because I don’t agree with every detail of what you’ve said. What I implied in my previous post was that one’s “relationship with leeches” as you describe it is likely to be pivotal to ones “relationship to everything”. That has nothing to do with objective truth and everything to do with psychology
Women who make children attached to them without having the capacity to provision them are using the children as hostages to hijack (ongoing) Whore Support. By making the children attached, they ensure maximum suffering and trauma for the child, should a rescue attempt or court order separate the leech from her host.
But attachment only leads to suffering. Dependent mothers feed off children’s suffering.
The History of Child Abuse (Lloyd deMause)
Women killed girls at birth in their billions throughout history.
That’s women killing off 3/4 of their competition.
All ignorance is malicious.
It’s not evolution that you need. You only need to stop the abuse. You won’t be able to stop women abusing girls until you destroy marriage completely and rid the world of favours.
People don’t like this truth because the reason they suppressed memory of the betrayal was to survive. It’s life and death.
No I said that because everyone’s relationships with their abusers are twisted and sick. I don’t remain friendly with those who betray me.
Everyone has been betrayed. I’m in the right. Everyone remains friends with those who deceived, abused and shamed them, staining their innocence.
We’re all wearing clothes.
“That’s women killing off 3/4 of their competition.”
I almost wish it did. But I don’t think that makes sense. Mothers have often been the ones to kill their baby daughters. How can that be competition. In societies where female infanticide has occurred it has done so because of the punishing realities of things like dowries or to continue the male line.
mothers / women generally bear responsibility for many things they don’t take responsibility for, but I don’t think that’s one of them
thanks for the link re. child abuse. Its as a serious issue so I’ll look over it properly when I have time
Do the mothers have an interest in attracting, retaining or protecting male attention from distraction?
If yes, that’s competiton.
Do men pay attention to little girls?
If yes, the little girls are a threat to women. If little girls are a threat to women, their lives are in danger. What you don’t realise is exactly how much of a threat they are.
Women don’t infantilise themselves for fun.
Violent women are bigger, meaner and more sadistic than toddler boys and pubescent girls.
What system or scholar can scrutinise that?
a cleansed and re-organised system, and at least for the moment a very brave scholar
How will you protect girls from women?
You understand why every girl is made to believe her natural face is unpresentable in public, right? They’re not hidden behind veils, burqas and cosmetics to show them off.
“How will you protect girls from women?”
I am not sure. I am also not entirely sure whether you’re arguing ‘culture’ or ‘nature’. If the former, then presumably any such issue can be addressed
Culture cannot be addressed. You don’t understand the realities of male slavery or the nature of the stakes driving the universal, ongoing purge of girls by reduced women.
All the societies that didn’t abuse children to raise boys for war and girls for sale have been annihilated.
Thought provoking stuff. I feel conflicted because part of me wants to opt out of the game and no longer date or pursue women – voluntary abstinence, rather than gratifying the desires of a depraved generation of corrupt women. But I care about the future too, and if all the wise, principled , courageous, and noble men opt to not reproduce, humanity has no future.
I’m inclined to think that there can be no future until everything collapses and men rebuild from the ground up, hopefully learning from their mistakes.
Feminism has gripped our entire world. This society will have to be destroyed and then we can start over from scratch. The only things i could see bringing feminism down is societal collapse or WWIII.
In due time. ISIS is the real deal. Getting into this country is easy as fuck for terrorists. Causing mass mayhem is not hard for 100+ terrorists across the nation willing to die for Jihad or whatever. Putin is waiting on the outskirts. He doesn’t even need to do anything with force-he knows the US will implode.
Don’t count on Western Civilization completely collapsing. It’s far too big and rich to simply collapse.
Do expect it to sink into some form of widespread (all of US, Europe except Russia, Australia), highly centralized totalitarianism though, as has been seen many times before in the West. The rapidly expanding and completely unaccountable police state is a sure sign of what’s to come. The powers that be are planning on heading a collapse off at the pass with totalitarian measures. How brutal and oppressive it will be remains to be seen.
I’m pretty sure there’s no such thing as soft or benevolent totalitarianism though.
“I truly do not see this population of Western males fighting for their freedom.”
They might or might not fight for their freedom, but they will surely do it just to finally get to use their weaponry “for real”, and are probably way better at it than govt. thugs will be.
It’s hard to say who will be better. It hardly matters. The masses will always have numbers on their side. I wonder how it will play out in the US. America was a great social experiment in what can be accomplished by humanity under the right conditions. Due to various conditions, the citizens remain armed with small arms into the 21st Century. Certain parts of America in 2014 might as well be the wild west. There are tens of millions of armed young men without jobs hanging out all over the US. A lot of these guys are probably on the edge for various reasons. Many are already organized into street gangs. The nation is a powder keg that could explode. The future looks troubling.
I observe ‘pussy ramadan’ once a year and highly recommend it. Have you seen the episode of Seinfeld where George’s abstains from sex because his girlfriend has mononucleosis and becomes a genius? Trust me, you’ll never get more done in your entire life than during this time.
Spoiler Alert:
George learns Portuguese bangs a Portuguese waitress and becomes an idiot again.
was it george or jerry who used the phrase ‘pussy ramadan’?
That would be hilarious but it’s a personal name I’ve given the holiday. You may be thinking of the “Master of your Domain” episode where they had the contest to see who could abstain from masturbating the longest. Sublimation is an interesting topic though. I remember reading an anecdote about how Balzac claimed to have lost a masterpiece to a “nocturnal emission” and decided to try abstaining once a year.
I’m going to borrow pussy ramadan, not sure I’m going to practice it though. Balzac’s once a year sounds doable
The only holiday name to come out of the series was Festivus
I’d hate to see what a Pussy Jihad is like 😛
wouldn’t be the head they’d cut off
given who his wife was I’m pretty sure Frank would have celebrated pussy ramadan in the period between festivus
We’re on the verge of Pussy Jihad my brother.
A Pussy Jihad would probably be something like a horny burka-wearer suffering a long lasting cock drought, finding herself at a glory hole with a long line behind it.
Balzac seems a bit confused – wouldn’t the “nocturnal emission” come about due to the abstinence?
Or perhaps the opposite is true, and Balzac had caused this misfortune to come upon himself that night because he had abstained more than once a year, so now he needed to cut back on the abstinence, down to once a year and see if that worked.
He should have called it Pussy Passover. Pass the pussy over
I bet you and the boys here could do a year standing on your heads lol
In the 1800’s people used to believe that you only had so much semen to “spend” and in fact in the porn of the age when the guy spent it meant he came.They believed that spending too much would weaken your health or lead to insanity which was why masturbation was considered dangerous. They even had rules like you should fuck you wife on Sunday but do it twice to insure proper emptying but otherwise abstain during the week so that you wouldn’t spend too much semen.
such praise for our iron strength of will
that’s just anti-semitic
So what you are saying is that Blazac needed to empty his ball sack.
Very good observation, in addition to the fact that Balzac seems to BE a ballsack.
Oh man that episode was pure gold.
Pussy Ramadan, abstaining from sex is retarded.
First of all, most men don’t reveive that much sex. You need to find a gf, make from her a fuck-buddy and hunt for more girls. This is a long proccess.
Abstain from Masturbation and Porn. This will clear your mind, but abstaining from sex and you will lose your fuckbuddy (wife, gf, lover) and will feel deppressed.
Very eloquently put but two things:
1. Abstinence from masturbation and porn is a given and should always take place.
2. A civilization is built on the self-control of men. When men are able to refuse to obey their childish whims, their energy is freed to undertake greater things: invest, build, accumulate knowledge, create economic and political organizations, innovate, explore, discover. A man who cannot control his lust is unlikely to have the long-term commitment necessary to build or maintain a civilization.
What’s wrong with no future?
Heh – no future is the only true definition of an entirely open future.
Nature abhors a vacuum.
It’s just my opinion, but the moment we’re dead, we’re not going to give one flying fuck about ‘legacy’ or ‘the future’
The future is not what it used to be
—Louis Cyphre
It’s from the film Angel Heart (1987) with DeNireo playing the devil.It’s a good film you should watch it. I like the older fims because pc and feminism hadn’t yet crept into them. You can’t make a film today even if it’s set in 1950 without a lot of modern crap in there somewhere. I spot errors all of the time in modern films and know that they just wouldn’t express themselves in the past like that
I’ve seen that film. It was strange. I liked the setting. The movie portrayed the 50s as a dark period.
Overall, the movie was pretty poor though. That pains me to say as I’m a huge Deniro fan.
Mickey Roarke was the star of the film. And it was certainly a good film by today’s standards.
Only in extinction will Humanity again be humane. You can’t take the urine out of the stew once the pot has been pissed in.
That picture about the women laughing at the guy visiting his mother who had a stroke, really fucking pissed me off. I know its not real, but the message in that picture really fucking pissed me off.
Some really are that vile, make no mistake about it.
They have no soul.
They do. The devil’s. Doesn’t he wear prada?
so are some men.
Shouldn’t you be on xojane commenting on lip injections, or bulimia?
Don’t you know Guest? It’s en vogue to come on a site you could care two shits about, to start an argument to feed your drama craving and stroll back to bubble gum land where being a virgin, slut, mother, family destroyer and business woman means GIRLS RULE. Cause, you know, they do
I have seen chicks with this attitude, no lie.
I once saw such attitude, gestures and laughs from a pair of women in their mid 30s, realtively fat, entitled and post Wall. They were laughing their asses off from a guy who invited one of them to dinner and, gasp, brought her a flower. The poor soul was 34.
Men know good from evil, women only pragamtism.
most women i know would want to know what the fuck their problem was.
I once explained to a group of women who were friends of a woman I knew about my family court struggles. I was having a really hard time.
They told her to leave with them, and laughingly said over their shoulder “Yeah, good luck with that.” And continued to stroll off laughing. I had said it appears I have no chance.
They agreed, then left.
All Western women know.
My buddy, who has been married to a woman for almost twenty years, she is still looking fit and young since they have no kids, looked at me in disbelief about how men get screwed over. I said ask your wife what would happen to you if she accused him. No lie, she looked at him with a straight face and said, “Oh honey, you’d be fucked! Yeah, I know he’s right.”
We never had that conversation, and she knew before meeting both of us years before. She is one, was one, of those super hot chicas at the club who tooled guys left and right. So were all her friends. Now she is all but post wall with a man who could care less either way.
LOL
The reckoning is coming. Sites like this will be valuable resources one day. If we don’t lose, and have this information snuffed out, and buried again.
Most? Hahahaha, some maybe.
Most of those some would most likely not say anything. Perhaps laugh. You are herd mentality after all.
I think most will do exactly what it says in the photo when they think no one is listening.
The reckoning is coming indeed, but it will come along with the cultural collapse of the western world within the next 50 years. Both men and women will suffer.
For a modern man, marriage under western laws/culture has become a joke, an spurious agreement where women, society and the state can and will fuck the man. And women know it.
And remember, the Wall is softer than you think. While alphas will reject serious relationships with older females, women under 40 will always have a dozen schmucks paying for her dinner, and if she keeps fit, even into her 50s.
”Men know good from evil, women only pragatism.”
Men lay down the Law. Women obey.
And when no one forces women to obey…
Women obey because of incentives. They don’t need to be forced. Only they get to be childless cat ladies.
Mothers lay down the law. You’ve been drinking some Matriarchal Kool-Aid if you think your father had the motive to traumatise you for life with those clothes.
I was talking about what ought and should happen npt what happens nowadaysin dysfunctional families.
In Nature, mothers lay down the law. Males don’t really feature until the cub is independent and unattached from its mother. Paternity, monogamy, matrimony…these are whore construct. Just fucking lies conditioned into the minds of children bred to be exploitable.
Families have been dysfunctional for over 6000 years.
But we are different from animals and as higher organisms we created patriarchy.
http://www.fisheaters.com/garbagegeneration.html
If we’re higher organisms, why do we have whores? War? Child abuse? Lies? Violence? Slavery? Selfless love? Shame? Clothes? Whores? No higher organism penalizes itself to sell sex. Girls are just so stupid, women sell them “Cannibalism v. 4000BC” and the shamed imps gobble the self-defeating lies right up.
Patriarchy cannot exist. Men don’t give birth. There can only be Matriarchy or Matriarchy by Proxy (so-called “Patriarchy”). The former is Natural. The latter destroyed the world.
Is this a joke? Women are obsessed with sex. Men are obsessed with validation. Women pursue pleasure (or they would, if they weren’t abused). To get men to pursue women, boys are abused. The way men pursue women (and I’ve been as pathetic as anyone) is reminiscent of abused toddlers trying to please their disinterested mothers. The more the mother disapproves, the more the toddler suffers to please her. When the mother is finally pleased, the toddler is pleased.
When women are pleased, men are pleased. So the stupid whores got it into their reduced minds to shrewdly extort the male desire to please them, by withholding their favour. The more abusive they get, the more men strive to please them. When they push too far, you get things like the Nanking Massacre.
They’re pushing too far. They’re spinning out of control, drunk on illegitimate power.
Do you believe the artificial construct of patriarchy which resulted in all the world-civilizations and subsequent reduction in violence as well as the progress brought by technology as destructive?
Subsequent reduction in violence? Were they civilised like this?
Natural Theology?
You can’t be for real. God brought all the violence to this world and mothers brought all the gods. When God happens, it’s for children who need to be prepared to do evil things for demons. Naturally, the demons will call their evil “holy” and “good” when raising boys & girls to be warriors & whores.
WTF are you talking about?
I don’t speak your pidgin tongue. You’ll need to improve your English literacy.
Alright I will drop the slang. What I meant is I do not know what you are talking about. You seem to have gotten way offtopic.
Religion = War.
There is no other reason for gods to happen.
Humans=war.
No secular society has gone without it.
All secular societies are religious societies, they’ve been given the same emotional education.
Civilisations existed in peace before women turned on their children.
You say that people can be religious while being atheist much like secular humanists?
All secular values are corrupted by religious constructs and reversals. Take something as innocuous as God is Good and Light v Devil is Bad and Dark. Very nearly 100% of all humans over a certain age will know that association; regardless of religion, race or class. There’s only one problem.
They can’t make the logical case for why God is good or white or light; but if you want to make someone look stupid, force them to make the case for why the Devil is bad or black or dark.
In the reality of Power’s fictional propaganda for whores to feed to their children, it’s very nearly 100% the other way around.
Seriously man. If you count satan as being an evil being the makes use of the evil of man in the form of organized evil. Then including the communists, mongols and other forms of conquest and subjugation by powerful evil empires the number is much higher than God. In addition kill count along tells us nothing about whether that killing is justified morally or not.
Look at your insanity. God and the Devil are constructs that serve as pretexts for mothers to blame when they need to impose on children and men.
Where’s your proof its women who invented that shit?
Mothers perpetuate religion because no one else can.
As for motive, you can read the Bible. God = mother.
No, the hebrew word to describe God is Father and he refers to himself in the masculine as does the hebrews. Oh and if you want to know why Christianity is feminized:
http://podles.org/church-impotent.htm
God is a proxy for mothers. The LORD spoke unto Moses because she couldn’t speak for herself.
The Bible is littered with evidence that the mothers wrote the manuscripts to enslave their children. It’s one thing to tell your daughter that God has decreed her to be stoned to death for adultery and another thing altogether to tell her the truth, that she needs to die for being a threat to women who cannot compete with girls.
Example?
This one is a good one but let me rephrase it for you:
“Honour thy [mother’s slave] and thy mother”
Men are slave workers. Women own them. Only women needed slaves because men can take care of themselves; and those marital slaves tend to die before their duties were completed, because they’re so selfish. Filial slaves are then needed.
did it perhaps, manipulate you? because that is some high school bullshit up there. grow up.
Funny thing, most women never leave high school. How are you 58 and still trying to meet with the girls and talking about where the men are at? Come on Man!
Woman are manipulating “blue pill men”. The rest from the male population observes this and aknowledges the sociopathic nature of women. No need to emotionally invest in women, just use them for sex.
Absolutely.. Once you see right through them, they can no longer harm you unless you let them..It’s kind of like a vampire not being able to come inside unless invited.
They want that torture, actually. A nice guy bores them, seems needy, and soon inspires their fickleness: “I’m just not feeling it. I hope we can still be friends, though.” You can still be on call if she wants something, that is to say.–Women want emotional torture from a man just as they want a fellow woman to despise and engage in drama with. Women are thoroughgoing masochists, both in their minds and in the sack.
It’s real alright, didn’t you ever wonder who those skanks are in the amateur videos getting their comeuppance in classics named similarly to, “White princess gets brutal BBC quadruple penetration with facials”?
The picture is not real, but the message is real.
It is is very disturbing when you discover that all girls have these psychopathic characteristics. It is just that those are hidden, or inactive.
Some express them more some less. Depends on society, etc.
“Some express them more some less. Depends on society, etc.”
The hotter looking she is, the more the cunt can verbalize anything she wants to say no matter how callous and inhumane. It would seem that females who won the genetic lottery with beauty are given every consideration by both men and women.
Sadly, it is real. It’s really real.
“That picture about the women laughing at the guy visiting his mother who had a stroke, really fucking pissed me off. I know its not real, but the message in that picture really fucking pissed me off.
I have met cunts like that. They are real, and not something imagined.
This article has hit the radar. That music video (“I know what boys like” by the waitresses) just got pulled off youtube.
Nonsense. It’s an old song and it’s still there.
But I think that most of the biter boys on here are more like Johnny from this old song.
Here’s one they won’t be playing these days. I knew Julie Brown from when MTV was first on the air in ’81. The black girl was called Downtown Julie Brown on MTV
And here she is 30 years later still pretty amusing.
A friend of mine just told me that he recently met this chick who took sadistic delight in putting 7 nice guys in the friend zone while maintaining two fuck buddies. If I ever have doubts about Esther Villa’s words, I just need to remember this bitch my friend met.
Go on 4 dates, then pick one to fuck. Then repeat the process for a back up. Eight free meals and 2 cocks to play with. That’s dating for millennial females in their 20s.
It’s not as easy as you make it sound though, only the 8 plus segment gets that sort of treatment. When I go out to eat I rarely see fat and ugly women at nice restaurants with a date.
There is a vast swarming underclass of undesirable young millenial women as well. Yes they fuck, but they have never been on a date.
Any white girl in her 20s that isnt fat or excessively ugly (6-10) has at least 5 guys on tap at all times, ranging from friend to fuckbuddy to boyfriend. 6’s and 7’s are the worst to deal with because they have shit to prove.
That’s nothing new.
It’s always about the control and power…the illusion is the “equality”.
A man doing that to women is considered evil, fucked up or just plain wrong (in their eyes)…but a woman doing it (now) is considered ‘payback time’ for all those years…blah, blah, blah.
Esther Vilar is amazing, but her second book The Polygamous Sex is even better. I wrote a series of posts on it. You can read them and get a copy of the book for free here: http://runsonmagic.com/2014/05/polygamous-sex-full/
I’ll be checking this out thanks.
Read the whole series, great work, loved it – your analysis was succinct and poignant.
Thanks for your effort.
Just finished reading the series. Some really great food for thought thanks for putting that together.
I recognized myself in a lot of it for better or worse…
I’ve been that “intellectual artist” character she described… and when that left me burned I did a 180 turn and learned traditional “macho” things like weight lifting, fighting, etc.
But I want neither a protege (i.e. female childish) to take care of nor a mother anymore…
I agree about the sexual desire being tied up with the protector desire… There are girls I’ve been with that I would treat like sex slaves and others that I could never ever treat that way… one of them appealed to my purely sexual nature and the other appealed to my protector nature…
“A woman will certainly feel happy when she has an orgasm – but it is not the most intense pleasure she knows. A cocktail party, or buying a new pair of aubergine-colored patent-leather boots, rates far higher.”
I wouldn’t have believed this if it weren’t for personal experience.
I remember laying in bed with a woman I really cared about after making her cum as hard as possible. It felt amazing… Here I was with a girl I was interested in for a while and she was lying there in a pool of her own cum thanks to me.
What did she say? “Wow… that felt as good as taking extacy!”
That must’ve smarted.
He thought that he was a terrorist too and tried to blow up a car but burned his lips on the exhaust pipe.
E is great fun… so I’d take it as a compliment…. but I know what you mean…. bitch thinking of her next fix…..
Shit test.
You blew her up……
that’s bullshit. speaking from experience.
The point of the quote is bullshit? Or you think I made up the story?
The way you said it was pretty graphic, sounds legit, but disturbing on some level.
What she said doesn’t prove anything at all in and of itself about women’s psychology obviously.
But that experience stuck with me… reading the Villar quote brought back the memory.
the quote is bullshit. orgasms are better than anything.
Well, the question stands, did this broad expertly fake you out AND neg you expertly?
Sounds like it to me. She probably just imitated one of the whores in his porn collection. Females are good actresses.
Nah.
You guys are trying to bust my chops for your own reasons.
The point I was trying to make was that for me the experience was highly personal. I’d even go so far as to say sacred in some way.
When she said that my reaction was like “Oh… yeah extacy… that stuff is good too”.
Made me think of Brave New World where everyone is only happy when they take their soma. Sex has no meaning when it becomes nothing more than a dopamine high.
Are you a female commenter?
So you are female then? No more attention for you.
sez you. you guys can never pass up an opportunity to call a female a cunt.
A dopamine high would actually not be that bad after a good fuck-session.
In any case, that broad was trying to give you a HUGE compliment. She was telling you that she never had a satisfying sexual experience without a powerful anti-inhibition drug involved, if she wasn’t lying.
Have you ever taken extacy? That was a compliment!
Don’t try it, trust me it’s not worth it.
I would rather meditate than have sex. I don’t believe men have to be slaves to their desires.
Yeah, I’ve seen it, the horror of being horny for hours, with a similarly afflicted broad, yet you can’t get wood…
How old are you and how long have you had this impotence problem?
The broads who hung with the rolling hipsters lament to me about it when they come to me for stiff wood, after the e boys were loads of fun, [if a girl wants to be with a lesbian with 5 o’clock shadow and snoozing schlong].
But Mortykid, it’s easy to confuse that methNdrano pill for the McCoy.
I thought that you were referring to yourself. Ah it was to Superman everything is iron except his dick.
I’m not knocking extacy… or house music…. you can dance for hours straight on that shit…
You likely have beta semen or were wearing one of those nasty new condom thingies.. There are chemicals in semen that are immediately absorbed into the bloodstream through the vaginal membrane that effect her mood and feelings and how she perceives you even if she never has an orgasm. And btw, how do you know she had an orgasm? I’m going to test you inexperienced boys. Gives me a couple of signs that a female has had an orgasm that can’t be faked and are involuntary reactions.
One sign: explosive laughter, almost like a laughing hyena.
beta semen…my nigga
One un-fake-able sign is the sex blush; a reddening of the face and upper torso after an orgasm.
That’s one of them although not every female gets it. It occurs before they come and is not just a blush but looks like her neck and chest suddenly just got a rash. A lot of my gf’s were natural blondes so it’s very obvious but as I said not all women get this.
OK here’s another clue. Females come just like men without of course the semen. The same spasm but it’s in the outer third of the vagina. There’s no way to fake this due to the muscles there and the same rhythmic spasm. She can squeeze deeper in the vagina but not in this spot on the outer third.And females who come are about the same as men where they can do it just once( or whatever depending on the person). Forget this bullshit multiple orgasm nonsense because I’ve never seen it. She probably doesn’t know how her body works and thinks every contraction is an orgasm like a man shooting semen 7-8 times. And btw, that rapid heartbeat is after she comes it’s pretty steady up to the time she comes. I’ve done my own Masters and Johnson research on about 300 females :o) Only about 30% usually come from intercourse but most of the others still like being fucked anyway so I guess they get some sort of satisfaction in another way. The ones who do come are able to do it fairly quickly so if they can’t pumping them for a 1/2 hour won’t make them come and is a waste of time.
Here’s a statistic in the sex section of my old med books from the 70’s and from every other source where I could gather info it’s the same worldwide. The average EXPERIENCED man will come within 2 minutes of actively fucking the girl.I’ve even checked this against amateur sex videos and it’s always in the 2-3 min range.It seemed like they were doing quite a lot and it all looked normal but when I checked the time stamp that’s what it was.
“Forget this bullshit multiple orgasm nonsense because I’ve never seen it. ”
So just because you’ve never seen it, means it automatically doesn’t exist or is impossible?
To accuse a genuinely multi-orgasmic woman of not knowing her own body & what is happening for her during orgasm/s is pathetic & childish, to say the least. Two results of simple jealousy, is all *wink*
“You likely have beta semen or were wearing one of those nasty new condom thingies.. There are chemicals in semen that are immediately absorbed into the bloodstream through the vaginal membrane that effect her mood and feelings…”
100% bullshit.
100% true, look that up, quality semen from a genetically superior male can become highly addictive to a female who absorbs it regularly, she may even experience somewhat-severe withdrawal symptoms when it’s unavailable.
“100% true, look that up,”
The sound byte of morons who can’t back up what they say.
Not this time, dick. Look:
http://boards.askmen.com/forum/topics/love-relationships/21264-semen-withdrawal
http://www.salon.com/2002/06/19/semen/
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-05/controversial-ideas-semen-natures-antidepressant
All sources you cited are blue-pill, bs fantasy projecting sites.
That said, the Truth is ugly and therefore takes time to accept.
Sounds like you protest too much – those websites aren’t the sources, the sources are in the articles there.
The Truth is neither ugly nor anything but what It is, learn to recognise and accept It wherever you find It.
Just out of curiosity, why does it jar you so much that semen can have extreme benefits for women’s well-being, especially mental/emotional?
What that quote means is that women do not feel sex as great as we do.
That many men think she is feeling really good, but that is inaccurate.
That many men believe things about women that are mostly in his own head.
Sex for men is important, not so much for women.
I do not envy women for their sexuality, but the opposite.
Homey, you hang with the wrong women, my friend.
He’s probably some virgin ‘tween
Why you talk like a girl, a troll ?
Anyways, nothing in them, convinced me ever, they can feel as much I can. Female sexuality is derived from the male.
Troll my ass, Hombine.
“nothing in them” convinced you that they can feel as much as you? I guess that includes the micropenis of yours when you put it “in them”, of course they can’t feel a thing.
Not because she enjoys it, it means she feels like men. Not because she orgasm, means she feels the same way men do.
“Not becaus YOU feel less of a man”.(talking about your penis and probably low levels of testosterone), you can fool yourself, and that changes nothing of what I said, or what Esther Vilar, or so many other women say, http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/05/01/french-women-eating-sex_n_5246889.html
What the not a troll, said:
So how many girls had sex with you out of pity to get something out of you, micro man.
“So how many girls had sex with you out of pity to get something out of you, micro man.”
Besides your mom’s pitiful attempt, which I admit I gave into by letting her suck me dry after she told me about your “birth defect” (apparently hereditary from your dad, so I gave it to her in both the other holes so she could feel a penis once in her sad life), none.
I didn’t say “out of pity”, moron, where did that come from?
enough, troll.
Yes, You talk like a girl like I said before, no man talks like that: emotional, angry and “hurt” because of what I said about women’s sexuality, insulting like a child who can’t have a conversation, talking about penises(suspicious) makes me think you are describing your clitoris or some sexual frustration. Can’t enjoy sex as much ?
Yet another woman pretending to be a man, or a pathetic boy with a pitiful sexual life. You know what are you doing ? you are crying like a girl who is hurt. This is boring, and this topic is over, so no more attention to you.
From the “Wiktionary”, young manwhore:
Latin[edit]
Noun[edit]
homine
ablative singular of homo
’nuff said.
Sex for men is valuable because it is hard to get and rare. It is much less valuable to women because they can get it anywhere and anytime they want.
My wife is Filipina she has noted that when she lived in the Philippines she was always dying for chocolate. Now that we keep a bowl of chocolates left over from the last holiday on the table, she hardly ever even takes one. The super abundance of something always makes it lose its perceived value.
Yes, but I think it is both biology and psychology.
And I’m talking about the ‘potential’ of a man’s sexuality.
What is really happening in the brain…
“I do not envy women for their sexuality, but the opposite”
The nice thing is that when you hit your 40s your libido drops to the same as a woman hence they become less important to you. It’s a nice feeling knowing you don’t have to chase after a piece of cunt every day.
Impossible. Libido depends on testosterone a masculine hormone, fundamental in men. NOT in women.
If women have some libido, it is thanks to men(homology). Not the first thing that science discover in women that is derived from men. Vestigial things, due to homology:
– clitoris,- skeene gland, testosterone, etc.
– orgasm: muscle contractions, climax, etc.
– etc.
Each man is different, but you have to be fit, healthy, etc.
As anything, the more a man uses it, the more he can.
And even if he is not as sexual, it is simply unexpressed.
It is PLEASURE, feels good, and it is abundant, free, makes of sex something quite different. You just have to control it, because it is also a distraction, women are a distraction. But it is not only for sex, it can boosts your energy, your mood, etc.
“If women have some libido, it is thanks to men(homology).”
Sorrry man I’m not buying your hypothesis.
It is science: low libido in women and its relation with testosterone was discovered decades ago.Because of the huge difference, there were accusations of sexism.
Men having low libido like women(when they reach 40s), that is a very flawed and personal hypothesis. A weird one.
“Today women are spreading their legs and shitting out the bastard kids of losers who do nothing for society.” Great line.
Read the book…. not much light at the end of the tunnel…. no happy endings….I feel that the more women exploit men for their loyalty and material resources the more men will wake up to womans true nature. Sex as a reward will only go so far. Women throw the “I love you’s” around like snuff at a wake. Its horseshit…..
Once a man has paid the price of fucking a kunt, once he experiences her diabolical behaviour and if he goes back for more with the belief he “can make it better” he deserves the noose around his neck. I know…. happened me…. total psycho kunt when I was much younger. Wasted time… remember its not just material wealth you will waste on these Kuntz…. it is your finite time on this planet that will be wasted… whatever about money and wealth you WILL NOT GET YOUR TIME BACK!
More and more men are seeing the light and it is our duty to point out the present state of affairs between the sexes. Fuck these KUNTZ….
Unrelated but I’m bring it up anyways: Everyone go listen to Tom Leykis. He tells the truth about women. He has being doing it well before there was such a thing as the manosphere.
I listened to about 6 of his most notable shows on Youtube. I like him, but don’t necessarily agree with his gender worldview. He calls himself “The original feminist” and advocates for true equality among sexes, while I (and ROK) advocates a return to traditional gender roles.
“I (and ROK) advocates a return to traditional gender roles.”
Don’t hold your breath on that. Traditional gender roles will not be returning anytime soon.
“Traditional gender roles will not be returning anytime soon.”
Sure they will, in a town near you in Eurabia or the New United States of Arabia, Africa and Andalus, you’ll just have to peek under that burqa after you’ve married it to find them.
After a horrifying collapse or a bloody civil war maybe.
And that’s good because those “traditional” roles were like slavery for a man.
Haha. I am holding my breath. This movement has made more progress than you think. Progressive dems are on their way out of politics. MGTOW sites are popping up all over. Economic collapse is close.
Ah, but consider, true equality between the sexes would mean that the anti-male laws would vanish, that women would stop getting a pussy pass on everything in life and would then have to perform or get out of the way. In a sense true equality is what we should want right now, since it would destroy feminism utterly.
Yes, it would definitely be an upgrade from what we have now! However true equality would not last very long at all.
This book and The Misandry Bubble were key factors in my awakening.
Was that written by the Bubble Boy? Sounds like some nonsense by an inexperienced boy who believes he’s profound when in fact it’s just some commonplace nonsense.
You write like a fat chyck.
Thanks for sending me your selfi. OMG gurl….ur like…..so HAWT!!!!!!
http://cdn3.epictimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/june2-960×590.png
Imagine if feminism actually freed women from their hamster and they could actually experience real love.
I don’t expect this to happen soon, and the misandry bubble breaking in 2020 will be too late. We should have copies of this book though, and ensure that the starving hordes are beaten back so they do not burn it for heat (or to cook you over the fire)
Women get off on certain types of beta orbiters. I knew a guy in IT who paid off 20K in student loans for his then girlfriend thinking they would be married. I found this out through her friend, not him.
I spoke to him two months ago, and apparently she moved back to her hometown and left him alone in Boston (she moved before telling him she was done with the relationship). He didn’t seem happy, in fact I was worried he was going to need pills or the suicide line. I felt so bad I paid for our meal (beta attitude wore off on me… lol).
I’m trying to get him to submit an article for this site. Lulz.
“Money can’t buy you love”?
20K is nothing to piss at especially for millenial men. Some don’t clear that in a year.
I’m aware of that – the beta millennials ought to clue in, and spend their hard earned depreciating USDs on some sure-thing poon (like call girls, for example).
A real alpha could shag a call girl for nothing.
…shag a call girl for nothing, 5 times in a row, at least.
No, that’s nothing, a REAL alpha would get the call girl to pay him for shagging her.
I knew a woman that did the same thing. Had a guy pay off her bills, dumped him. He sued her and she had to pay him back. That is fap worthy shit.
She later dumped another dude, had a one night stand, got pregnant. The former dude said “I want a paternity test.” She had an abortion.
That bitch must have seen 200 feet of pipe in six inch increments over the time I knew her.
There are men that don’t take this shit.
Another one of my friends married a female attorney with 150k in debt and a crappy job.
I believe if you marry someone with student loans your liabilities would be subtracted in divorce court and split in half.
Guys are conditioned to suffer in silence.
“No man will ever be loved or cared about as a human being by a woman, ever. ”
Brutal.
A little harsh?
Right, too bad it’s a tad incorrect.
Too bad you think it is incorrect due to your lack of experience with women.
Actually not.
First define love. For the sake of this discussion we will try to agree it means when one is empathetic and will do something for someone else without ulterior motive.
Now, I don’t know about your experience, or how you act, what’s your ‘frame’, what kind of emotionally bent skanks you pursue.
But I personally (no general rule, just my experience), have been loved by women, from junkie whores all the way to socialites (interestingly, none were caucasian).
Therefore, in my experience, the brutal statement above, is brutal [when true], but not always true.
If men believe women can love them. Then men are easier to manipulate.
That’s not her nature, to care about men, to love him.
So hard to accept. That men prefer the illusion than the truth.
If she’s a virgin she can love you. Speaking from experience.
It seems, but it’s not love. It is her illusion.
Women desire the idea of loving.
This is why it is hard for men to see how things really are. She seems realistic, but it is a dream.
I stated earlier in a post that my sisters boyfriend gave her 3 stds, lied about it, and has a drug binge in the hospital every few months. She is totally loyal to this dude, cooks for him, sleeps with him on demand,and has distanced herself from anyone who criticizes him.
He offers her nothing in return. She’s totally loyal and it’s because he’s an alpha who took her v card.
Where the fuck are you gonna find one of those?
College. It’s a myth that every attractive girl is a slot by 16 … the majority are obviously.
I think, that case does not define a rule about women. A virgin only increases changes of finding a good wife. But anyway, what kind of love is that ? You think she really loves him or maybe she has become emotionally dependent on him, like children to their parents ?
Im in an Ltr … w a former virgin. I’m not attached to her, although I like her, but she is to me.
If you’re the first one, your chances of having that connection are very high and exponentially decrease with every other dick added to said equation.
Yes, indeed, but in a sense she is manipulating you, enough to make you feel something for her, which is fine.. It is implicit in her nature/sexuality.
Both assume a role, man-woman. And both are attracted by factors that do not define love but affection and attraction itself.
If she had experienced a different life(dicks), she would not feel as attached to you. This is the trick, that makes you feel interested to someone who is giving you satisfaction/pleasure. But it is not love what she feels for you. It is an emotional connection.
Love is a wrong word that confuses our perspective.
All I can say is that the romance films of the past were beta delusions born of Christian longings. But so too is the view that two people can’t respect each other enough to have a cohesive existence that is meaningful.
If you really believe monogamy was one big fraud, the whole of western history is against you. Regardless, men can succeed in LTRs if they don’t need HER. When you don’t need her she will want you.
It might not be love … biochemistry of bonding on her part w only one guy.
And maybe you’ll find a diamond at the beach
Sexes can live in harmony if there is an order, at least for a while, but not magically thanks to “love” or reciprocity, like many men think, and then It happens all the time, there is respect, everything is good, until there is nothing but a crude reality. Or conformity.
You have wishes, that are better than reality. So you become a slave of that illusion without even noticing. That is the whole concept of manipulation. That you have no idea what is really going on.
Monogamy is fine for a relationship, but it is not love. A couple that is compatible, will work together as long as nothing disturbs that balance. And many people live like this for YEARS.
I think you miscalculate relationships as being guided by some law of exchange. This isn’t always the case.
I lucked out with my girlfriend (attractive virgin) … but at the time of courting her I was an upper beta, very independent but not assertive. What worked to my advantage in the relationship was that I was persistent and aloof. After reading game blogs, I realized that my natural state of detachment was a huge plus (other people nagged me about it growing up). Just being calm and not giving an inch to her emotions makes me a necessity to her now.
My point is that if you can work on yourself to be a better man, you will fill the needs of women, which makes relationships so much easier.
Love is the magnetism of an entity (women) who needs to be cuddled and encouraged by another entity (man) who needs nothing external to himself.
That polarity is amazing. Especially the sex.
It’s not the sex or love I want … it’s the polarity … like a vortex.
will she be loyal if he’s a beta? if he’s a beta then in all likelihood he will never be the one who took her v card – which essentially means that yes woman can only love alpha men or 1% of men which translates that 99% of man will spend their lives without having the luxury to be loved by women outside of their own mothers.
Actually, I think that to really love a woman(or anybody), you can’t expect her to love you back. Philosophically it makes sense to me.
The percentages are way off.
sorry, i should have written ‘………alpha men or 5% or men which translates that 95% of man will spend their lives without having the luxury to be loved by women outside of their own mothers’.
there i fixed it already.
You just have to be careful reading these blogs doesn’t alter your view into a hateful distortion full of cynicism.
I agree with dispelling beta romance and love, but I’m not about to say it’s just all about sex either.
‘Regardless, men can succeed in LTRs if they don’t need HER.’
*scratching head* if men don’t need women then why would men even need to impose LTR upon themselves?
Yes, hate is something I do not want or wish for ROK. Even If I feel so dissapointed about women.
Need and luxury are two different things. She enhances my life, but my life is good without her.
If I was a dependent beta needing her validation to feel alive, everything would crumble. This is why LTRs fail.
I’m not in the top five or even ten percent and I have done well since college. I targeted non sluts, didn’t go to bars, and acted aloof. I found high quality in college especially which is where current go is from.
Let me give some wisdom from a man above the whole man woman dynamic, in other words a dedicated homosexual:
A man can be happy with any woman, as long as he does not love her.
Oscar Wilde
Some men never learn..Sometimes you have to be bitten by the spider before you realize its poisonous… Of course once you’ve been bitten its too late
Love is a two-way street with one lane. Either you’re loving or you’re loved. I don’t know which is more twisted, but loving is wretched.
women can love men……..conditionally that is, but in return women expect men to love them unconditionally.
“women can love men”
Too bad you’re wrong.
oh come on now man, i said that women can love men CONDITIONALLY and by the way those conditions are :
1. the man has the physical charm of a 20-year-old brad pitt.
2. make a million box a year, at least.
3. take her to exotic ,romantic and expensive vacation on a monthly basis.
yeah sure, many women even the plain or fugly ones will deny that men with the above 3 conditions will not make their pussy wet and that the things they seek in a man is connection, sense of humor, compatibility, etc etc but we know what they truly are, don’t we?
You’re falling into the Elliot Rogers trap. If looks and money are what are necessary for women to love you, then he would have had scads of women. Turns out, it takes something else.
It ain’t 1920 out here any longer I’m afraid.
no offense sir but elliot rodgers was short, scrawny, average looking and certainly not rich enough for the types of girls whom he fancied.
game is kind of overrated imho, i doubt a young brad pitt ever ran any game upon those millions of screaming female fans of his. mr. pitt simply got famous, made millions, looking gorgeous and voila, millions of pussies the world over dripping wet.
elliot rodgers could have easily found outlets for his frustration if consented women were free to become prostitutes if they so choose – ‘my body my choice’.
so instead of blaming mra and/or manosphere, fembitches and their attack dogs aka white-knights should point their fingers and paws towards prostitution ban.
Oh come now, he wasn’t a bad looking guy. Pathetic, sure, but he wasn’t fugly by any stretch. His father was an in-crowd Hollyweird type with plenty of money, if that kind of money doesn’t attract women then women must only be looking for multi-billionaires in his neck of the woods.
Pitt has “game” through fame, which is actually a huge example of pre-selection, which is, not surprisingly, an acknowledged component of game theory. There are men in real life who are not famous, who are as attractive or more attractive than Pitt, who are ignored by women. He also has a non-chalance (or did prior to marrying his tatted up whore) that came from abundance, which is also a game concept.
Money and looks does not get you the pussy all the time, sorry, there are far too many dirt poor douchebags with abundant charisma that can pull an HB 9 out from under some primpy Dandylooking McMoney without even breaking a sweat. See it all the time.
Elliot was with average height for an american and definetely NOT average looking. He had that Male Model look.
“certainly not rich enough for the types of girls whom he fancied.”
He was into college girls… is the situation THAT bad in USA that sexy college girls only date multi-millionaire male models who look like Brad Pitt?
i don’t know man, please check http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/05/the_twisted_world_of_elliot_rodger.html , excerpts from the article :
– “His father Peter Rodger was an aspiring British film director….”
his dad is not exactly on the level of zack snyder or quentin tarantino.
– “For the fifteen miserable years of his life post-divorce, Rodger shuttled between the constantly shifting homes of his two Financially Unstable parents and their significant others.”
it seems that his parents are not that rich as people thought.
– “All of the hot, beautiful girls walked around with obnoxious, tough jock-type men who partied all the time and acted crazy,” Rodger observed. “Women are sexually attracted to the wrong type of man. This is a major flaw in the very foundation of humanity.” Whether or not this is a flaw in humanity, the phenomenon Rodger described is real. As Dr. Seth Meyers and Katie Gilbert argue in a recent Psychology Today article, “The literature has widely established that women prefer tall men to short men.”
hypothetically, let us assume that even if elliot was 5’9″ some 5’1” girls will still consider him to be short because, well, he ain’t 6′.
This is not discussion about being short or tall. He was just average. Don’t tell me that you don’t see average looking men with hotter girlfriends. Elliot also saw this but he didn’t take it calmly.
I read your comment rather quickly without fully comprehending it. I deleted my original response. My apologies ..
it’s okay man, we all made mistakes.
Women can love men who stain them.
“So hard to accept. That men prefer the illusion than the truth”
Quoted For Truth.
brutally true.
“Brutal”
And true.
“Brutal”
Truth.
For all their barbarity, Muslims are on to something.
Look at how the White Knight Obama bombs them. The US military, once and honorable institution (and many people in it still are, for they are ignorant) has now been reduced to nothing more than a weapon of the feminist state. Obama is simply following the orders of his feminist overlords.
For the most part, Muslims will live within their own barbarity (they are not particularly civilized these days) in their own countries. The only reason we attack them is because feminists are afraid that the truths about women that Muslims stick to will spread to the western world and then large numbers of western men will wake up to red pill reality.
Personally, I’m not at all interested in protecting western women. I’m not worried about Muslims coming over here and attacking me. I am well armed. Me and thousands of other men in my community would take out an organization like ISIS if they fucked with us. So what is this stuff really all about?
Don’t confuse the issues, ie, bombing them or not vs. “they know how to handle women”. BS, brother.
You have no idea what kind of shit they pull on their daughters and sisters – how would you like to marry a well-used “bukkake fukdoll”, especially when the users were her father and brothers? Most Moslem “honour killings” of a Moslem girl actually take place after the girl in question got knocked up by one of them or threatened to tell some secular authority…
Even before I read about this stuff I had a pretty good grasp on female manipulation tactics. It has always baffled me how many men can be so completely oblivious to some of it. This includes not just boyfriends of women or male ‘friends’ of women, but bosses, men who are suppose to hold these women accountable.
She explains it very clearly in the books – men are conditioned into it by their mothers, it’s perpetual motion in most cases, buddy.
As I never tire of pointing out … it’s the men who allow this romanticized view of women to develop. It’s the beta men (like my dad and my sisters future husband) who convince themselves of this archetypal princess narrative. They tell their sons nothing of the true nature of women because they have allowed themselves to be ruled by it.
When I was 17 I gave my first love a painting (I was infatuated thoroughly) …she treated me like shit shortly after. Lesson learned. Most men don’t get this … ever.
Oh, the pleasure and privilege of being raised in a home where both are happy to play their gender roles, a game all truly enjoy and everyone wins at.
The “New Game” to play where everybody wins: Proper Gender Roles.
You sound like a beta/omega. A painting? Did she strip and pose nude for it. Of course she treated you like shit because you didn’t give her a good shagging.
I was beta in high school. And christian.
Congrats on getting over that.
there is another excellent book titled “Anatomy of Female Power” by Chinweizu that describes this further … and like Vilar’s 1st two books, lacks the solution out for men (at least in English) … Roosh find someone, see you tried to find a translator … otherwise you have to look toward books like “Who’s Pulling Your Strings”
Don’t read this book if you aren’t ready for it.
One is never ready for it until it’s too late. The sooner the better.
You know what, you’re completely right.
Ironically when I read it I was already ‘red pill’ or certainly thought I was red pill, but I despite this Manipulated Man really opened my eyes yet further.
I read it when it came out and in fact have an autographed copy from Ester. The funny thing though is that I never read anything else by her. Some of the original copies are hard to find and expensive.
Women manipulate men, men manipulate women. There’s a theory that the human brain is so developed precisely because the sexes always try to outsmart each other. Women’s wiles don’t really bother me. That’s expected. What bothers me is the feeling that the State has firmly lodged itself in my backside and about to start thrusting. And I suspect it won’t take me to the movies or buy me dinner for the service provided.
Man vs man, women vs women. Intrasexual, not intersexual.
The man shares. The woman takes. As always… as it happens now.
Man shares his intelligence, and through homology she takes a bit of it.
Many analogies like this exist.
Nothing wrong with the game if played as intended. Everything wrong when men are handcuffed and subjugated by Misandrist laws that cater to the female imperative.
“The more I know women, the more I love my dog”
-Me
Isn’t there a law against that?
roflmao
“Isn’t there a law against that?”
If there is then the progressives will change it.
“Only woman can break the vicious circle of man’s manipulation and exploitation – but she will not do it. ”
Great line and so true. Women can’t fight their biology. They are parasites of the highest order. They were prey for so long throughout history and it shaped their minds to only be happy with the thugs. . They will never change. Even if they did it’s too late. Too many men have had their lives ruined and all the money in the world won’t buy back that lost time. . It’s enevitable that society will circle the toilet as more men drop out and live for themselves and not for women and not on the terms society wants. Society use to control female nature to incentivize most men to have a stake In Society. Women revolted and wanted bad boy cock while still getting men to provide for them and assume all responsibility. Well here we are 50 years later and men are revolting and women now cry foul. . Sorry ladies. Men don’t work for free. You have to pay us with your youth and fertility. Whine all you want. I don’t care.
This reminds me of one of my favorite lines from “Zorba the Greek”. The lead asks Zorba, “What happened to the glory that was Greece?” Zorba’s reply was prescient for today’s men, “We stopped living for the future and started living for ourselves.”
I may be paraphrasing this wrong. It has been years since I saw the movie. Over all these years it is this sentiment that I remember out of the experience; the exact words not so much.
It isn’t biology that is destroying biology. You’re confused about how Mother Nature works.
Women can fight the biology of girls and they do by traumatising them with shame and terror (and killing those who refuse to conform). Girls can’t fight women’s sociology. Parasites aren’t biological.
This is true. But men have been slaves fighting and dying for evil women who abuse children for 6000 years. They destroyed the world long before feminism came along.
Abuse them when they’re toddlers and they’ll pay for the Right to work for free.
I said it once and I’ll say it again, America started going downhill ever since domestic violence laws and they banned you from beating your wife. If you can’t beat up your wife or girlfriend like the afghans and russian, they’ll walk all over men in general.
A man’s physicality use to be a counterbalance to female power. Notice how they make laws that attack male power. They criminalize using your strength against them while making laws that allow them to use their power of sexuality to the fullest extent.
Funny how you can go to jail for a threat, go to jail for hitting a woman, but women can’t go to jail for their emotional abuse and mental abuse against men. Isn’t it ironic you can go to jail for knocking out a woman who PUNCHED YOU FIRST, but there is no law against just fucking with your husband or provoking him, or harassing him, or nagging him? If the laws were fair, they’d punish naggy wife as much as a violent husband.
A real man doesn’t control a woman with violence. Bad game.
Mangina alert.
Lulz. Real alphas be puttin down bitches. Yea, that and the anal fetishes are dead give aways of alpha status.
Fuck yea!
Real men didn’t have to beat their wives because they just had to give their wives a stern look and the wife knew a good beating was to follow if she didn’t behave. Women are like children, and I believe spare the rod, spoil the child. Spare the rod, spoil the woman. It is quiet clear women should be beaten.
a real man control his woman using self-defense and a solid left-hook, just ask ray and janay.
men were required to give up their physical advantage. The result is as you describe. But what if women were required to give up their ‘weapons’? What if manipulation of any kind through for example withholding sex etc were actually seen as a form of abuse in its own right. It might not happen soon. But there is more than way of approaching an issue
Men will give birth? If not, there is no other way.
I hope you don’t mean physically. I was thinking more of mapping out and constraining forms of manipulation etc
If children aren’t removed from their mothers at birth and protected until their Self can withstand women’s withering emotional assaults, you’ll be putting Bandaid strips on spurting arteries punctured by narcissistic injury for the rest of their lives.
Women don’t actually have “weapons” and this is the problem. Women have nothing but a history of brutal emotional abuse and betrayal (courtesy of their uncompetitive mothers who remain in the competition for male attention without being able to compete with any distraction on merit). Reduced to sub-worthless liability appease the depraved wives and mothers of Society, every girl becomes a cannibal preying on men and ultimately, children. The only “weapon” they have is men’s infernal idiocy, blindness, denial and indulgence of malice / deceit.
Women are the most horrific sentient beings in the (known) universe because they are the only sentient beings that aren’t interested in gaining their independence. They’re selfless devils who latch onto victims, isolating them in private exclusion to feed off their value and suck the life out of them, dumping the empty carcasses when all value has been devoured with a glib:
Humanity has existed in the Dark Ages of the depraved maternal hatred of competitive fun. Only very recently (and only partially and only in some areas) has the species started to recover from thousands of years of child abuse. Across large tracts of the globe, Matriarchal misery reigns supreme with all competitive threats to objectified demons hijacked monopolised control of children and men’s fun either stigmatised, subjected to social exclusion, prohibited or criminalised outright. Across huge tracts of the globe in 2014, you can and will be put to death for taking a medicinal drug government studies have shown to be harmless (and even therapeutic). Objectified women really hate competition for male attention. All fun must go through them.
This has never been a safe world for pretty girls.
its the role of the father to rescue and develop the boys self, which in a properly organised family and in a properly organise society should be quite possible. Women’s role as mothers and nurturers is certainly something that can be questioned, just as everything today has been questioned. I see nothing wrong with radical questioning of the foundational assumptions of our society (whatever that is) which would be no more than feminism has itself claimed to do (as a radical movement). Indeed there is a sense in which what you say actually aligns with radical feminism, not in terms of the harmful effects of mothering per se, but insofar as to sever the necessary connection between motherhood and childhood, nuturing and early education has been one of the goals of the gender neutral rad fem camp – so be careful what you wish for – you may be end up playing into the rad fem plans, not least because any such innovation would in effect most likely be a moral / theoretical innovation rather than a generalised pragmatic alteration in how ‘childhood’ is done: which is always likely to remain predominantly in the hands of women.
Any alternative however could only follow major social engineering. A case could certainly be made that women may damage the emerging sense of self in some cases, but it makes more sense I think to look into how that might happen. Since no such mechanism is as yet identified (i.e. motherhood is normalised and universalised as the right and proper method of parenting) then I think in a sense we are jumping the gun here. Isolate the mechanisms where motherhood is harmful, or insufficient, and then make the case for the necessity of fatherhood, or alternatively if you prefer simply make the case for the self-sufficiency and superiority of fatherhood. Personally I’m old fashioned, I think both are necessary, but that the corrective required involves a renewal of the absent paternal imperative.
As for abuse, yes children are abused, and maternal versus paternal abuse is both the same and very, very different. That’s the subject of another conversation though. We live in a culture dominated by the metaphor of abuse, and in a sense I think we live in a world that is abused almost by the concept of abuse. Abuse is after all what life does, and protecting children, the innocent from abuse, is a complex matter. To say that is no more than to say that they need both good and bad bacteria in the gut, and if you remove all the bad bacteria, they will perish just the same.
Finally, with respect to my mention of weapons: I believe that women have historically developed any number of stealth methods of countering male domination (e.g. overt physical and intellectual dominance) including effective ways of controlling and directing the behaviour of those who on the surface could be seen to be the ones in charge. I would describe such things, which in Vilar’s book is described as manipulation, as weapons of a kind, and very effective weapons.
I understand what you are saying, but I think if such weapons, devices, virtually invisible means of having a causal effect or influence on the operation of power were to be acknowledge at the level of politics and public discourse then women would have to acknowledge some level of responsibility.
They wouldn’t like that, and indeed some men might not like that, but the alternative I think is that we continue to live in a world of virtual darkness where half the world can act in that world without any trace of what they have done, and consequently without any accountability for such actions
Lots of women behave like succubi, but the way to counter that is to call them out at every level when they’re sucking the lifeblood out of you
One quote caught my eye : ”a man will kill his own brother over a whiff of pussy”. This is indicative of a PUSSY EMBARGO. It has been noted that ghetto youth have killed ‘their own brother’ or childhood classmate over a hundred dollar pair of athletic shoes or sports team jacket. In fact big business LOVES this kind of behaviour (golfer’s clap). They term this type of mindlessness as the ‘perfect consumer’ when people actually commit murder over marketing madness. The prevailing ‘thirst’ is internal to the ghetto when applied to the value added merchandise. The inner aura of thirst supersedes the disrepair and shambles that externally surface.
Thirst prevails over every ghetto, even with the Jews when in their ghetto confines. The thirst for their assorted ‘hats’ as townspeople and ordinaries, even after their expulsion had commenced. They could have took to the desert at any time previously, but entitled princesses I’m sure were more stubborn than western women today and couldn’t be herded by their dick-chopped men. They marched to the trenches clutching their beta hats of merchants, peddlers, bakers, deli-chefs, jewelers, lenders, you name it.
I can drive by any inner city ghetto and not be fazed. The gangsta garb and those who thirst for it is pitiful. The underlying thirst is what creates ghetto.
The women in the article look nice enough without burkas, until the captions are added. Their words are in response to thirsty men. Men thirsting for twat creates a bitch ghetto with bread lines for pussy under artificial scarcity. A PUSSY EMBARGO.
Hey kram, why can Men run faster than girls??
I stumbled on this book by accident and it brought me into a manosphere. It is not an easy read but it’s a must read. It is The Red Pill.
I would recommend reading it with pragmatic if not detached state of mind. Isolate and control your emotions or they will consume you.
I agree. Reading it now and it reminds of an anime I watched as a kid, Yu Yu Hakusho. In this anime, there was a VHS tape nicknamed Chapter Black. On this tape held the rawest depiction of the atrocities mankind was capable of for 7 hours of viewing pleasure. Most who saw it gave up all hope on living. The way this woman lays into feminine nature it isn’t hard to experience the same effect. Not too long after I started reading I looked in the mirror and saw tears on my face. Read it with caution. This easily goes beyond the red/blue pill wars we get into daily.
Too many ROK articles come off as “run away from all danger”. You want to know how to deal with women? Know as many as possible, try different ways of interacting with them. Pay attention to them when they think you aren’t looking. Learn what makes a woman crazy for you. A woman runs from danger, a man defeats it with experience and bravery.
“The flaw may very well lie in men as it would appear that we have been handed down a congenital defect in our brains, or perhaps this is all one big joke played on us by the cosmos or evolutionary biology; in that men desire something that does not care for us outside of tangible resources.”
I read that a second time. Profound. Not sure what the answer is but at least we know the score.
I’m hoping they do develop highly refined VR technology that will suffice for male sexual satisfaction and thereby enabling men to completely write off the hormonal driven animals completely.
I want to properly romance and have sex with Esther Vilar. I don’t care how old she is.
now now calm down, let’s not commit any blasphemy here now shall we? lest you want to invoke the wrath of the goddesses. i mean, post-wall goddesses really frown upon non age-appropriate people date or *GASP!* have sex with each other! it’s sooooo creepy!
Blanket brushing all women as sociopaths?
Explain to me how this is any different to the women who blanket brush all men as rapists?
Sometimes I feel that self professed red pillers and blue pillers are nothing but two sides of a coin labelled “idiots”.
Rape, real rape, is a consciously chosen decision. Sociopathic tendencies and hard wired evolutionary responses and reactions are not consciously chosen. You are thus, sir, comparing apples and oranges. As was mentioned in one of the quotes (or by the author himself, forgive me as I’m too lazy to scroll up and find it), you cannot hold the nature of a wolf against the wolf. He is what he is, so rather than accord him as evil, instead learn his ways and how to avoid exciting his baser impulses.
Not really. My point was not all men are rapists just as not all women are sociopaths.
Besides, sociopathy is considerably more common amongst men than women. So those men who exhibit traits as abhorrent as the examples of women being cruel presented here are truthfully more common. Not only is this a statistically observable phenomena in any human population it also stands to reason because men are hardwired to be more predatory than women.
To go completely primitive: we hunt, fight and kill. They make the nest.
This article is just plain laughable.
To address the choice matter you brought up, men wouldn’t rape if they didn’t feel an urge to. The high male sex drive is hard wired evolutionary response as you put it.
Most rape isn’t even committed with malicious intent apparently. I personally find that hard to believe and see it more as sociopathic males not caring about who the hurt.
Hence why I say this article is like blanket brushing all women as sociopaths in the same way those idiotic male hating misandrists blanket brush all men as rapists.
It’s the same foolishness. This “can’t hold the nature of a wolf against a wolf” is just meaningless floweriness for the sake of it and doesn’t apply in the way it’s being used because the article is still blanket brushing all women as sociopaths.
Which is not in line with reality. For every 1 girl who routinely behaves as represented there you will likely find 30 to 40 who would be disgusted at them.
With the exception of the phone number thing. That’s just immature. I’ve done exactly that at least once to girls who wanted my number, as far as I can remember things from my teenage years that is.
Yes, really. Rape is a chosen act, having a specific mental condition is at best an indirect response to a myriad of choices and experiences, most out of control of the person so afflicted. Since we are human beings with the ability to make choices that go against our “hard wired sex drive”, and do so daily, it then stands that agency, choice, applies for rape whereas it does not for a psychological defect. The apples to oranges comparison thus stands.
The “can’t hold the nature of a wolf against a wolf” is concise and accurate, and has been spoken and rehashed by writers, philosophers and intellectuals for as long as we’ve had a written language. The reason is because it is a simple truth, one simply cannot accord a sense of moral agency, e.g. – choice and consciously choosing to do evil and good, to a creature who does not have the capacity for moral agency in the first place. A wolf doesn’t know and cannot know good and evil, it simply does not have the capacity to know these things, as knowing them would require at least a glimmering sense of philosophy.
You don’t like the article, that’s fine, I happen to find it rather interesting and it has in fact turned me on to a book I have not yet read (actually two books, The Polygamous Sex is also recommended). Your dislike however sounds more like you disagree at an emotional level with the thesis and conclusions of the article rather than that you have a solid logical refutation of the premise of the writing.
Women are expressing a behavior which YOU consider a “sociopathic”. It’s just their behavior.
You don’t see women as “sociopaths”, neither i. I just see them as followers, materialists and more attached to the income of men rather than… Men.
This is neither evil or good. It is just an observable reality. Don’t get attached too much to women, and you will not get hurt.
Nope. I am talking of the examples here. These are not common examples.
Hence why I called the article ridiculous.
Yes, yes. the nature of the wolf statement has a meaning. I’m not saying it doesn’t.
I’m saying it’s misused here.
Trust me. I’m not getting emotional. I am however entirely capable of seeing how this article is logically a lemon.
In what sense? Women (and men) generally exhibit a host of traits that appear to be adapted through evolution, and are independent of culture or upbringing. Having had children myself I can tell you for a fact that at the ages cited in the article (12 months, 18 months, etc) are accurate when combined with the behaviors noted. This strongly suggests a hard wired evolutionary base, specifically connected to how each sex has its brain wired. Additionally there have been studies published which show how men and women process things differently in their minds (in fact, there is a rather famous photo of this wiring that is sometimes passed about on this site, but I don’t have access to the URL to show you, sorry).
Thus if there are hard wired evolutionary traits, and there are as surely as there are traits hard wired into, say, dogs and cats (which nobody questions), then it stands to reason that one cannot hold a being accountable in a moral sense for those traits and must rather approach the being from a rational perspective. That is to say, don’t hold a woman as evil for wanting to nurture children, for example, as that’s just how she’s wired. If that’s the case, and it is, then the wolf quote is appropriate.
Slainte
I was being more specific than that.
If the nature of all women truly was
• Duping men with sex
• Administering meaningless praise to control men
• Using emotional blackmail
• Propagating the myths of love and romance as a guise to mask her real intentions and motives
alongside the rest of the presented examples, then all women are sociopaths, controlling others with lies.
However this simply isn’t the case. Just as it is not in the nature of every man to be aggressive.
Any conclusion drawn from this premise that all women are as outlined above will automatically run afoul of the shoddy foundation of assumptions.
Your examples there are better examples of “nature of the wolf” than this article presented, because yes, women do feel a stronger desire to nurture than men. It comes from the oxytocin a mother gets when she holds her child.
That therefore is in her nature. However the manipulative tendencies of her sluttish neighbour may not be in the nature of the mother I refer to.
Do you see the point I’m making here? The article is working on flawed logic.
You do realize that you compared Rape jokes with laughing about a guy being mama’s boy. Terrible comparison.
Your comment is ridiculous. Most women behave “LIKE THAT”, get in relationship, see their hysteria and childish lack of reasoning.
I love women, i can’t hate them because they are forever immature and egoistical. Love women, as men we are wired to love them. But this doesn’t mean that we have to… invest too much in them. By invest i meant, physical/mental/emotional/financial investment. Manipulation of women is possible. It is advised for a long therm relationship, the man to express predatory behavior and domination over HIS woman.
Did you see what i did? I said HIS WOMAN… now try to convert me to stop doing that. If you actually try it, i will bring the popcorn while reading your witty responses.
I am a proud balkanian husband with 2 girlfriends (fuckbuddies as you americans call it). I have a peaceful life with my wife for one reason only – she is crushed… she is. Absolutely under control. It is for the best.
I can see that you firmly believe that woman are as portrayed in this article. Why would I care to attempt to “convert you”?
It would be like trying to convert a young earth creationist. Utter waste of time.
Believe whatever you want, I don’t care enough to waste any more time on this thread.
I think that you maybe misusing the word “sociopath.” If the book is arguing that those points are the inherent nature of women then they by definition cannot be sociopathic as sociopathy is a genetic divination from the norm. Check out Michel Foucault’s madness.
A book arguing that there is a certain “norm” does not make it so.
It’s just an opinion.
Sociopathy is defined as lacking a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience.
Systematically and repeatedly lying to manipulate others in order to further a personal agenda with no real care as to how you hurt the people you manipulate and furthermore laughing at them when they show compassion for others (as women have been portrayed in this article) is sociopathic.
I know full well what a sociopath is. Roughly 1 in 20 of us are like this, so the odds are we all know a sociopath or two and have perhaps been hurt by them (maybe in the ways described in the article).
These people are still not the norm.
Some people mistake sociopathy for meaning psychopathy, which can be quite a bit worse.
Psychopaths are the ones that show no remorse whatsoever, don’t show restraint and don’t really care that much about themselves either. Think Tuco from breaking bad. That’s a psychopath.
Kind of another level from these examples.
‘If the nature of all women truly was
• Duping men with sex
• Administering meaningless praise to control men
• Using emotional blackmail
• Propagating the myths of love and romance as a guise to mask her real intentions and motives
alongside the rest of the presented examples, then all women are sociopaths, controlling others with lies.’
‘All’ is the magic word here as in “not All women are like that” aka the infamous and dreaded NAWALT defense.
and i agree with you that not All women are like that because I believe Esther Vilar does not duping men with sex, etc etc.
problem for men is how can men tell which is which?
a woman is either ‘like that’ or ‘not like that’ , the odds are 50-50, it’s like playing russian roulette with half of the entire chambers loaded. so rather than playing ( NAWALT mode ) , most men simply choose to not play ( AWALT mode ).
‘Systematically and repeatedly lying to manipulate others in order to
further a personal agenda with no real care as to how you hurt the
people you manipulate and furthermore laughing at them when they show
compassion for others (as women have been portrayed in this article) is
sociopathic.’
if we go by that description then women are significantly more sociopathic compared to men, you can easily observe that truth :
1) most fat men think love from the opposite sex is something they must earn, unlike “fat girls DESERVE love too”.
2) most fat men freely admit that they like to eat and hence they got fat whereas virtually all fat women vehemently deny that they eat more than an ounce of cereal per day but they still got fat due to hypothyroidism or dark magic or evil spirit or whatever.
3) most fat men can accept that women find them revolting and responded by being laid-back towards women while most fat women can not.
4) most fat men and non fat men believe in reciprocity whereas most fat women and non fat women don’t, that’s why you only heard “man up!” and never “woman up!”.
5) most men know their place and don’t have the delusion of grandeur, that’s why rarely you ever heard a man say “i can’t find a good woman because women fear strong intelligent good-hearted confident men like me, where have all the good women gone?”
50-50 is not the odds. Statistically the odds of meeting a sociopath should be roughly 1 in 20.
So as you put it NAWALT is perfectly valid. Ofc you can’t tell a sociopath from another person at face value.
This is the same for men, sociopaths will use others for their own goals without remorse as biologically men are more likely to be sociopathic than women so by your logic you should assume AMALT too.
No. Not a great argument.
‘This is the same for men, sociopaths will use others for their own goals without remorse as biologically men are more likely to be sociopathic than women so by your logic you should assume AMALT too.’
how is it that by ‘my logic’ i should assume AMALT ?
i’m a man and i’m not a sociopath so that automatically should disqualify any notion of AMALT.
‘No. Not a great argument.’
i agree, you hardly made any sense.
‘This is the same for men, sociopaths will use others for their own goals without remorse as biologically men are more likely to be sociopathic than women so by your logic you should assume AMALT too.’
how is it that by ‘my logic’ i should assume AMALT ?
i’m a man and i’m not a sociopath so that automatically should disqualify any notion of AMALT.
‘No. Not a great argument.’
i agree, you hardly made any sense.
Heh. No. You didn’t understand what I was saying.
Let me spell it out for you.
You assume All women are like that = sociopaths as portrayed in this article.
You made a case for why you do but that was bollocks. I corrected it for you.
Men are statistically more likely to be sociopathic, so I took your idea of playing the averages game and turned it around to point out the fallacy in your argument.
You then verified the fallacy by saying “i’m a man and i’m not a sociopath so that automatically should disqualify any notion of AMALT.”
Well done. That was the point.
You didn’t think about it and did the classic “I don’t understand this. What’s wrong with him?” rather than “I don’t understand this. What’s wrong with how I’m looking at it?”
‘You assume All women are like that = sociopaths as portrayed in this article. You made a case for why you do but that was bollocks. I corrected it for you.’
what are you babbling about? i clearly said that i believe in NAWALT.
‘You then verified the fallacy by saying “i’m a man and i’m not a sociopath so that automatically should disqualify any notion of AMALT.” ‘
the fallacy lies in your reading comprehension for i clearly said i believe in NAWALT.
‘You didn’t think about it and did the classic “I don’t understand this. What’s wrong with him?” rather than “I don’t understand this. What’s wrong with how I’m looking at it?” ‘
i did think about it and you’re still not making any sense, on top of it, your reading comprehension seriously needs improvement.
“problem for men is how can men tell which is which?
a woman is either ‘like that’ or ‘not like that’ , the odds are 50-50, it’s like playing russian roulette with half of the entire chambers loaded. so rather than playing ( NAWALT mode) , most men simply choose to not play ( AWALT mode ).”
Fair enough. You weren’t referring to yourself. My fault for skim reading.
I picked up on the 50-50 part and pointed out why that’s faulty thinking.
If you’re not applying that logic to yourself then forgive me for assuming you were.
As an anti-christian you comparing me to a young creationist offended me 🙁
But… yeah. You will waste time to argue with people. I am glad that you think like me. As a biologist i realize that people after the age of 10 stop developing their world-view. This is why the ideas of segregation and separation make real sense. Different people, always will create conflict when they live in ONE place.
I don’t like conflicts.
Seriously? You object to a book by a well-know philosopher, that you haven’t read, by using dictionary definitions, simplified language, and fictitious television characters? Albeit, the two example you chose are very characteristic of those symptoms. Further If you had read the book you rebuttal would have show it. Therefore, in the future, (and this applies to anyone you may refute in the future as well) at least be familiar with the subject (in this particular case the book I referenced, not the subject).
Actually frank is practically the very definition of a sociopath, leaning towards psychopath.
He views people as objects to be manipulated. He feels little to no remorse about what he’s done and the people he hurts, even the murder he commits doesn’t faze him much as far as his conscience is concerned.
I’d say the only thing that makes him a sociopath rather than a psychopath is that he appears has a normal sense of self preservation and thus doesn’t go off the rails with how he abuses others.
I’ve often wondered if people here can’t tell the difference between a sociopath and an alpha. Seems some actually can’t…
Here I was rebutting the article. Not the book per se. Notice I never attacked the book? Only the specific narrative presented here which as has been pointed out elsewhere, apparently does the book no credit.
I will laugh at any rape victim wearing cosmetics for the same reason as I will laugh at any assault victim who goes around taunting bikers with obnoxious insults. Those who fear an action do not induce it. The only rape victims are men, you dimwit. It’s called marriage and it rapes your consent for life.
Women are all about respecting free will.
Who raises people until the age of 10? Maybe the problem isn’t people, but the people controlling children?
It’s funny that women are oppressed by mothers’ men. Almost as funny as the idea that a gender can be oppressed by the children they’ve been paid for thousands of years to raise Right.
Maybe they’re doing it wrong?
50/50?
Try deceit v truth. There’s a hint on a billboard painted on the deceitful women’s faces. If you can’t interpret a sign that screams “I am motivated to deceive you” then who can save you from your stupidity?
Sociopaths are the product of Society / Mother Nurture.
Psychopaths are the nonexistent product of Mother Nature.
To imagine your conformist values mean you’re not sociopathic is about as illogical as imagining your lies are nice. “Normal” sociopaths killed all the NORMAL humane humans a long time ago. You need to reassess your conduct.
Anyone who uses violence to communicate with children is going to be a sociopath. Empathy precludes humans from harming children.
Anyone who shames a child for their innocence and purity is going to be a sociopath. Empathy precludes humans from engaging in sadistic abuse.
Anyone who is pro-Life is going to be a sociopath. Forcing humans to suffer against their will is only possible with bankrupted empathy.
Anyone who lies to others for their sake is going to be a sociopath or a sociopath-in-making. Keep telling yourself that your malice is for the sake of your victims. That’s how sociopaths think. Literally.
Anyone who goes to war is going to be a sociopath. Humane humans can’t kill humans. All your psychiatrists are sociopaths prescribing placebos because $$. What can you do? It’s very creepy when Polite Society’s sociopaths start talking about sociopaths with their cute 1 in 25 statistics and shit. 99% of humans are emotional frauds who mimic the emotions of whomever they’re with to appear more endearing. No one you know cares about your welfare, or they’d tell you the truth without fear of sanction. They don’t care. They only care about your opinion of them. It’s the difference between being dangerous and being valuable. Everyone you know will make you suffer if it will make you need them. Every woman will do this, therefore every woman is a sociopath.
You’re all very creepy with your levels of denial. Just because our mothers were violent whores, doesn’t mean their antisocial obfuscation of motives and feelings is nice. Just because sociopathic whores love God doesn’t mean God is good. God’s middlemen tell whores whatever they want to hear (children should suffer to please them, men should suffer to please them, everyone should suffer to please them; what do they have to do?) — God is the most sociopathic protagonist in the history of literature.
I don’t give a fuck much you love your mother for abusing you, only a sociopathic whore thinks God’s genocidal wars against children makes him good. Just because your whore mother said something doesn’t make it true. What if she told you Good was Bad and Bad was Good? You’d be fucking confused, maybe confused enough to die for her when she’s supposed to be dying for you? Maybe all the mothers who weren’t sociopaths died protecting their sons from abused demons who kill to prove their worth to their abusers?
Bunch of demons, really. Aren’t you.
Since we’re talking about terms. I would say that frank is mor of a charactorpath, but we will not know what he is as he is fictional. It would be more apt to study an actual person.
Meh. Maybe. Maybe not.
Labels are man made definitions of a type. I would say that it’s easier to produce a fictional characterisation of a type than find a real world example of such.
However, I get your point
Dyke.
Nope. Nor a white knight. Just someone who doesn’t put up with bullshit.
Dyke.
Sigh…
Fool
I don’t like rape enough to fantasise about it. If I liked rape so much that I fantasised about it, I could see myself spending hours every day making myself appear fraudulently attractive to rapists.
How much do you have to desire sex before it would be impossible to rape you? “No means no”, I giggle on dates. “Control yourself. I just want to (small) talk.”
Who defined “rape” in your mind? The women who want you to buy their favour? Don’t steal it. It’s worth so much! Thou Shalt Not. Just ask them how many men want to steal it, it’s soooo valuable. They have to to declare it going through Customs. Women’s favour is not for you. It’s off-limits, okay? So many men want to look up their skirts, they can’t afford to wear pants.
You must be as ugly as you are stupid I dunno, but I’m raped by women who want to give me their favour so badly, they spend hours on fraud to trick me into giving consent they know I wouldn’t give otherwise.
__________
Still, my fear that Natalie Portman will rape me keeps me awake at night. I tell Natalie my speculated concerns, maybe she loses control? Maybe I’m too desirable? I fear for my life! “Don’t do it”, I tell her. “Don’t steal my precious favour.” I would hate that. I’m not one of those boys.
So far, Natalie has resisted the urge to molest me but I am still very concerned. I can’t afford to relax. I keep reminding her not to look up my short shorts, or I might, if she was half as stupid as you.
You have absolutely no idea what I’m talking about, do you?
Then why did you talk about women blanket brushing all men as rapists, if you’re not talking about rape?
Why are you dabbling in hints when you clearly have a communication problem as it stands?
Presenting a similar but opposing example is a time honoured means of pointing out hypocrisy and fallacious logic.
I’m hardly communicating in a hard to understand way here mate…
I’ll spell it out. The way this article (not the book it talks about, mind) has been presented uses no better logic than the misandrists who demonise all men as *insert whatever bad thing that’s typically used. I chose rapist*.
Aka garbage logic.
You chose “rapist” and I revealed the truth about rape to you. Maybe you’re just too blind, in which case keep arguing from within the boundaries set for you by women. Don’t stray out of them.
Me thinks you’re picking on the nit too much…
Fine, if rapist is such a sore spot for you then replace all incidences of “rapist” with “violent aggressor” or whatever common accusation there is that is typically levelled towards men which won’t leave you crying. It really does not matter that much…
Yeesh…
Talk about refusing to follow another persons point.
The problem with what you’re trying to do is that you perceive women as equal to men. There is no comparison. For 6000 years, men have been willing to live in Paradise. For 6000 years, women’s depraved hatred of their own daughters prevented that.
For 6000 years, men of truth and Science have dragged Humanity forward, inch by bloody inch, many sacrificing their lives for the greater good. For 6000 years, women of deceit and Religion have smashed the species back.
You’re trying to defend what isn’t defensible. NAWALT isn’t a defence argument. For the statement “Women did X” to be true, there only needs to be a majority of women who did X (or a tacitly supported minority).
Not all men are sociopaths.
You’re not even reading my posts.
Over 95% of men are sociopaths. 100% of women have antisocial personality disorders. You’re just spouting an estimate from a guy that first wrote about ponerology but he was wrong. No child is born malicious. There is no such thing as a psychopath. Every child is born humane, mothers turn them into sociopaths by raising them Right to respect the sociopathic values of Polite Society.
#YesAllWomen conform to Polite Society’s reversal of humane / logical values. Deceit is not nice. Truth is not rude. Lying is not diplomatic. Privacy is not needed. Trust, Belief, Faith, Respect, Deference, Consideration, Sacrifice, Modesty, Offence, etc are not virtues but grotesquely corrupted constructs used for exploitation, none of which can withstand logical scrutiny. All children (even the children of atheists and agnostics) are raised to associate God = Good and the Devil = Bad, but a cursory investigation reveals the truth; God is the most evil protagonist in literary history and the Devil’s only real crime is whistleblowing. The Devil is a humanitarian. 100% of evil is God’s.
If you’re a liar, and you are, you might think you’re not a sociopath but you’re a liar? So how the hell would you know?
Women dearly wish all men were rapists. You’re such a fool. I think you’re a woman, actually.
If you’re not a woman, you have no excuse for being this dull. There is no such thing as a genetic cause for psychopathy. They’ve spent over a billion $ trying to isolate the cause but they couldn’t find what doesn’t exist. Every child is born wanting to contribute. Mothers turn them all into Polite Society sociopaths.
100% of girls wants others to suffer to please them. You have to be empathy-bankrupt to want someone to suffer to please you, if I have to explain why, you’re a sociopath.
You’re blind. Only women oppress girls.
“No child is born malicious”
Perhaps not,
But children are born who do not, and will never understand the notion that others feel pain.
We’re a predatory species. All predators fundamentally need to not feel for their victims.
Some of us are predatory against our own species. 1 in 20.
I’m too tired and drunk right now. I have just finished 4 years hard work and reached the end. So not really 100% with it atm. Will spend the time digging up the sociopathy statistics tomo (or more likely the day after tomo).
Society is so sick and twisted and manipulated for slavery and biopolitics (war), all the data is redundant and you have to use logic to arrive at a more real reality.
Wanting another human being to suffer to please you is a guarantee of bankrupt empathy; so nearly every woman alive can only feel selective empathy (like sociopaths). Most of their sons are the same.
Lying is logically insane. People who lie to impress don’t impress, they APPEAR to. When the appearance of value (created by lies to impress) no longer appears valuable, the appearance of being valued (by the victims of deceit) will disappear as well.
This is what wedlock is for, when the victims of women’s fraudulent concealed ‘worth’ no longer appear to value what no longer appears to be valuable .
My mother gave god knows how many nights of her life teaching me how to speak properly.
I’m deaf yet people never realise because I speak perfectly.
That was all down to my mother.
You must be a brilliant lip reader.
They’re still lying to you.
I wasn’t speaking in metaphor. Are the women in your life naked? What do you imagine they put clothes on children for?
When they reveal the strength of their power, what do they choose to use it for?
Painful stuff, especially since it’s the bare truth.
Here’s the most important thing to keep in mind. Women are incapable of being driven by principles. Their only imperative is how they feel about something. To an extent, this is true also of men. But there is a difference.
Being principle driven (for instance being guided by a sense of justice) means that you will do what is necessary to uphold your principles, even if it’s at a personal cost to you (or if it means refusing an immediate gain). And therein lies the main difference. With few exceptions, women are incapable of that. They struggle to see the larger picture and accept that ‘what’s right or what’s necessary for the larger good’, can be more important than ‘how I feel about it right now’.
I see this manifest in three levels.
Level 1:
She is merely a slave to her immediate reactive feelings, and it takes a lot to make her see that bigger picture and what is right. This exists in 100% of women, to varying degrees. In some who are more grounded it can be reasonably managed, although you still have to expect it to appear from time to time. In others, it’s a full blown monster that dominates their life (and the life of those around them) to the exclusion of everything else. These are your borderline personality / bipolar manic chicks.
Level 1 is not inherently premeditated and malicious in intent. It’s just the way they are and the way they react to the outside world. No woman is exempt from it, but for some it’s much worse than others of course.
Level 2 is when a woman starts to unconsciously utilize her Level 1 reactions to manipulate men and other people, largely because they are allowed to get away with it. It’s on the brink of becoming premeditated malicious intent, but still largely a case of learned behaviour based on the feedback they get.
Simple translation: The typical ball busting wife is allowed to go from level 1 to level 2 because she has learned that her pussy-whipped beta husband will allow her to get away with murder in a effort to appease and placate her emotions. A level 1 woman will tend to become level 2 unless kept in check.
Level 3: this is the level of conscious and malicious sociopathic style manipulation, and of course the most dangerous and destructive. These are your Jezebels and Delilahs. Learn to recognize them and RUN.
Red pill knowledge and game can be your bulwark to make sure that a level 1 chick does not develop into one of the nastier levels. Unfortunately there is no level 0. The emotional imperative is built in into every one of them. Your job is to make sure it stays in check and the positive outweighs the negative.
Needless to say, do not ever get involved with a woman who has been allowed to live her life at level 2, or even worse, god forbid, level 3. The latter I believe are fundamentally psychopaths which can’t be redeemed. Any interaction with them will cost you.
Excellent comment.
Very well said. That women in general have no sense of justice is a big theme in my writing, and I’m surprised this grim reality is not more widely known by men. I appreciate your deep sense of it.
How can they be expected to value justice when men have failed to protect them from whores who reduce every girl to [negative value]?
Biology says women are supposed to fuck every man they see.
Sociology says women are supposed to hate sex and sell their virtue.
Girls who choose the former have died throughout history as stupid men looked on, none the wiser.
Men hate women who like sex
Excellent article. An important reminder to men with romance in their souls. And it is men who created romance, and poetry, because we are the Dreamers of the world. I was one such, until many years of experience woke me up.
Women love romance not because it stirs something in their shriveled, calloused hearts, but because it boosts their all-consuming ego and assures them that something of value (man) loves them, even though they (women) are worthless without their bodies to tempt man back to his slumber
That would make the perfect Xmas gift for my sisters.
Great article, just shows 90% of women here aren’t viable for LTR’s or marriage, save up $$ move abroad!!
Sounds like a great book aptly assessing what was yet to come. Excellent! The truth is that the deluded princesses will come running in submission to the next man as soon as a global war breaks out or the plutocracy decides to stop funding feminism and ends the wealth-transfer from men to women.
The author clearly states well that women have enough agency in inter-sexual relationships. They were never really powerless, but protected and shielded from many hardships of life. Let them learn the lesson the hard way. Of course most will keep on blaming men for not “manning up” and not marrying their aging fat asses. Let them eat their bloody cake – that is all that will remain in the end beside their tears and some cats for company.
The truth is that the deluded princesses will come running in submission to the next man as soon as a global war breaks out or the plutocracy decides to stop funding feminism and ends the wealth-transfer from men to women
9/11/2001 shows this to be true. Those who were not too young can probably remember women en masse becoming almost docile. As I recall, commercials appeared out of nowhere with strong, traditionally masculine men being celebrated, and if you wore a fireman’s garb or military uniform you had pussy thrown at you so fast and hard that you were in danger of being toppled over on any given walk down the street. This lasted for a couple of months, then went away, but it did happen. The moment the comfy princess society is threatened with extinction they revert immediately back into the proper mindset, even the most feminist of the bunch. It’s hard wired I believe.
Well said. Nothing gives the lie to the silly notion of gender equality better than the fact that in All places and times, women depend largely on men in times of emergency. An all male military seems to me natural and desirable; an all female one, a joke.
More Natural would be an end to whore wars fought by bitches seeking the favour of noncontributing women, withheld for reasons a functional mind would bring under intense scrutiny.
Not sure about pussy throwing but yes, when scared, women seek protection and comfort from men if the have one, or one in close proximity if they don’t.
That’s an excellent point. The return to traditional gender patterns after WWII partly came about due to the war traumas inflicted on many countries. The 9/11 incident was also one such traumatic experience. Women’s submission is inevitable – they will either submit to their strong male husbands or to the State – Big Brother with his Internal Standing Army.
Somehow liberal media has brainwashed the female minds into thinking that the latter is more “liberating” and “empowering”. Good luck with that. The only line of defense between total dictatorial rule of the plutocracy are the Men who are still ready to defend their families. When that is gone you can kiss your freedom good-bye – “Snowflake”.
Some of you just don’t get it. You don’t get how slavery works. You’re so easily patronised, it’s pitiful really. You are the slaves. If you were not, you would not be wedlocked.
Muslims (even our biological enemies) know some deep truths…
Yeah, they get one thing right, then get everything else wrong. You’ll have to excuse my not wanting to emulate them overly much, as the notion of constant warfare with the world seems rather off putting.
Seconded. Learning how to restore gender relations to health does not mean we have to become degenerate, barbaric crazy goat fuckers like them either.
Very good article that kind of depress me because deep down I still can’t help but to like the chicks.
There is nothing wrong with liking women. Just as they have a nature about them, so do we, and it’s nothing to rue.
Continued exposure to women will cure you of this affliction.
I’m gonna log onto Amazon and buy it now.
Do it.
I’m thinking that I should start preparing a survival kit for my young son. It will contain copies of The Manipulated Man, The Predatory Female, and other red pill gems from past great authors as well as the modern manosphere. He’ll receive the kit when he starts showing the first signs of interest towards women.
I’ve read this book. The review here is rather shallow and does not give it proper credit. The language is childish and the interpretations too. I quote:
No man will ever be loved or cared about as a human being by a woman, ever.
This sounds like a boy whose mother never loved him enough.
But back to the book. On the surface the book shines like the truth but its fool’s gold. Vilar draws so many wrong conclusions, for example, in her mind given the choice men would always choose to be slaves to their women. I quote:
To put it another way: a man is always searching for someone or something to enslave him, for only as a slave does he feel secure – and, as a rule, his choice falls on a woman.
The truth is a man in a woman always feels more self-assured, than a woman in a man.
But sex is relative, personality is absolute. The characteristics of the male and female sex are in each personality. They are connected and this connection can take a person beyond the limits of their gender.
But a person always belongs to the nature of his sexuality. And his exit beyond
its bounds may mean accepting masculine and feminine traits in their chaotic mixture. But it is possible to master the element of sex, then there is a deep synthesis and elevation – masculinity into spirituality, and femininity – into soulfulness.
Fag.
No doubt you think obstruction of biology is a feminine trait. Your mother never loved you.
Bet she fooled you with that violence though. Fag.
Ha ha ha ha you’re shit for brains.
Fag.
Check out the female narcissism at 1:28 to like 2:40. Watch the whole thing from the beginning if you want (I can’t stand TYT faggotry) but this video is a shining example of what Vilar talks about regarding female solipsism. Watching the hot blonde’s wheels turn is simply horrifying.
Are these men gay? LOL.
A typical vulgar American woman: high, prissy voice, and cursing as casually as any truck driver.
I don’t think so.
I am going to read this book. Women like Dr Vilar seem so unicorn-like rare. What insight. Christina Hoff Sommers is another lady who “gets it”. Bet this Dr Vilar has a high T count : estrogen ratio hence her logic and rationality.
My inner White Knight wants to say NAWALT but even he knows that he hasn’t found a girl of sufficient moral fortitude. And it is not like Esther is saying something many women have not said before, Queen Victoria for instance found female liberation to be a sham that could only result in making women insufferable. Esther simply applies a level of meticulous scrutiny previously unheard of.
And she should be lauded with praise rather than met with the NAWALT deflection.
This is For All the guys out there getting Bitches Phone Numbers. Use This Method.
1- Make her put her number in your phone
This is a good method because she is the one putting it in so there will
be no mistakes rite? WRONG to know if a girl is putting the rite number
in look at how fast she puts it in your phone. If a girl takes 3 sec’s
to put her number in You can basically tell your self that she gave you a
wrong number. Lets face it which girl does not know there own phone
number by heart?
2- Repeat the number but say the last 2 digits backwards
For example: her number is 123-456-7890…You tell her 123-456-7809. By
doing this you will figure out the estimate of your relationship with
her. What i mean is if she corrects you and says no its “90” Your
chances look great and she didn’t just give you the number so you would
stop talking to her. If she doesn’t correct you. That means she
basically gave you the number so you would fucking leave her alone.
I don’t want the number of anyone who doesn’t want me to have it. I don’t understand any of this? wtf
“This is For All the guys out there getting Bitches Phone Numbers. Use This Method.”
This is for you dishing out idiocy on the forum. Quit sniffing glue.
suck it easy!
I noticed the video now fixed. hewre it is again : : :
so i was out jogging the other day and noticed a group of 4 blonde women unpacking, they were moving into the neighborhood. couple in their 40’s ,one in their late 20s other was a teen.
there were no men around and i could see their look as i was turning the corner like this guy is a sucker. all at once they arched their backs and stuck out their asses as far out as possible, pulling back their shoulders and pushing their breast upward. hands on the hips and as i jogged by i heard one of them say ‘ i hope there are some real men in this neighborhood who know how to help a lady’.
so i decided to stop. ‘looks like you got a lot of stuff there, just moving in? need a hand?’ they responded with ‘about time a real man stepped up yada yada’….i then laughed, put my headphones back in and put in another 3 miles, pushing myself past my previous limits. it feels so great to be taking my red pills.
Cannot seem to unplug no matter what I do. It’s like this slavery is hard-wired into my brain. Any suggestions?
be patient. it takes time. keep hanging around red pill rooms and listen to the experience of other men. thats about the best i can offer ya.
I was a slave until I realised I didn’t need help. They need misery to make you imagine you need them. No one has ever needed anyone who needs them.
Your penis has more worth than her vagina… she, her friends and her mother know this.
I make no apologies for loving scum who kill and die for their abusers but don’t be too hasty to dump women’s malice on men. Men are guilty for being victims. Women are guilty for victimising them. There’s a rather huge disparity in culpability, similar to the mismatch between a violent mother and a defenceless child owed a blood debt that human mothers have dishonoured 106 billion consecutive times…
In Nature, mammal mothers honour their debts.
Before all, I want to leave clear: I’m not pro gender equality and all those bullshits.
This book is very weird, even it seems to me kind of … suspicious. It’s a woman talking very bad about … other women ? And elevating the men ?
Some thoughts:
– I started to read it and she mention that women manipulate man so the women, as stupid and not thinking been, could spent their lives surrounded by comfort, almost doing nothing besides take care of the kids and cleaning the house, while the men, full of intellectual capacity put the effort so he will be working all his life for the sake of pleasing his woman. If this was true, then, when we talk about the feminist movement, then she is supporting it because it is a movement in that women feel that they can take same responsibilities as man. So in doing that, women are liberating … men ? WTF !!
– In one part of the book, she claims that women by nature are really stupid been not capable of concrete thinking. So it this is true, how she, as a woman, could realize all this facts and deductions about her sex even have a profession as psychologist and write a book like that ?
The feminist movement is about equal rights, not equal responsibilities. It’s a power grab playing off women’s universal exploitation of children. Men have been enslaved for eternity, women have never been oppressed, they simply revision history every generation to blame men and enable their perpetual contribution of suffering in lieu of taking care of themselves.
Until you know the truth, the truth will seem nonsensical. The victims of betrayal cannot accept the truth about women. They won’t even credit it with critical consideration. But the Greeks never lied in their myths. What would be their motive?
‘In one part of the book, she claims that women by nature are really
stupid been not capable of concrete thinking. So it this is true, how
she, as a woman, could realize all this facts and deductions about her
sex even have a profession as psychologist and write a book like that ?’
NAWALT my friend, NAWALT…….
whoa little doggie! feminism is BULLLLLLSHIT. please go lookup karen straughan, warren farrell, avoiceformen
This is one of three books that changed my life forever.
I can’t wait to move to Ethiopia or the Philipines. I can’t stand Western culture and Western women on some levels.
Women are the way they are because reduced women raised them. Reduced women cannot compete with unreduced women. This is not rocket science.
The Manipulated Man is a great read. So good, it created open loops… Here are the two questions raised from reading the book:
1) If one of the female imperatives is to seek a provider to take care of everything, why is she ultimately more attracted to ones who do not offer the same provider role – the alpha? Does hypergamy supersede the imperative to find a provider, or is it reverse? Is Hypergamy and the imperative to find a provider part of the same imperative?
2) On one side, men fall for vulnerable women who don’t work, as their protector behavior is triggered, but in this case men are manipulated into doing everything. On the other, some, to avoid being manipulated, fall for a woman that works almost equally, but perhaps loses respect for men in the process. In this lose-lose scenario of relationships, where do we lose least?
” The flaw may very well lie in men as it would appear that we have been handed down a congenital defect in our brains, or perhaps this is all one big joke played on us by the cosmos or evolutionary biology; in that men desire something that does not care for us outside of tangible resources”
I know what you mean. It’s exactly this that makes me question if God exists or not and / or what crime in the universe did I commit to have to be subjected to that shit.
I wish I’d read that book when I was 14 years old.
Well the book certainly does apply to traditional thinking women meaning most women around the world who by the way are not feminists but inferior weaklings who are dependent on men to provide the means for survival and status. It is born out of necessisty predicated by practicality soldiered by the path to survival and aspired status. Its not for the sake of being mean, or selfish although once they are spoiled (corrupted) that does tend to overlap unless they get out and get a real job which many more do now compared to 30 years ago and is expected practically from all females in Western culture. Western women who have the luxery of feministic philosophies resent men for having selfish attitudes towards sex, taking younger wives, or acting controlling and condescending. They also forget that men built this world in respect to the rails of commerce. So its hard to find balance when you are inferior to men even being given far more rights than they deserve or can rightfully manage regarding the roles they enjoy in government, law enforcement, and military especially when daddy tells them at home while growing up Never trust men because they are only after one thing.
I’ve just finished reading this book. Man, it’s really brutal and shocking, even for someone like me who’s reading manosphere stuff for past 2 years.
“No man will ever be loved or cared about as a human being by a woman, ever.”
I find it heartbreaking that the author of this piece truly believes this. It sums up the sentiment on this site. Full disclaimer: I’m a woman and a feminist, but none of the articles on ROK that I’ve been perusing over the past hour have made me angry, just really, really sad. I genuinely would like to talk to some of you on a respectful platform because I do think your voices need to be heard and I want to understand why you feel this wronged by society.
I do believe in equal rights for men and women (fine if you don’t agree – everyone is entitled to their own opinion) but I love and respect men and I would lay down my life for my fiancé/dad/brother in a second… so I’m not sure how anyone can confidently make such a generalisation. I love my fiancé for who he is (he’s the kindest, funniest, and smartest person), regardless of money or any of that bullshit (we both make our own/live comfortably) – and I don’t expect him to ever pay for me or treat me better than I treat him. I think, in a way, feminism actually serves some of the ROK causes – princess culture, for example (i.e.: women expecting men to pick up the bill), or men not having equal custody rights, or exclusively male drafting into the army are some of the many things that the feminists I know are trying to rally against. If men and women were socially equal, the onus would be on women 50% of the time to take men out on dates. Feminism is why I’m comfortable being 100% sexually submissive to my fiancé. And feminism is why I was free to go to an Ivy League university but will one day feel just as fulfilled looking after my children and husband – on the basis that it will be my choice. Everyone wins!
I’m truly sorry that the author of this article and others have had terrible experiences with women, but I don’t think it’s constructive to demonise an entire gender – after all, isn’t that exactly why you’re critical of radical feminists?
I find it heartbreaking that the author of this piece truly believes this. It sums up the sentiment on this site. Full disclaimer: I’m a woman and a feminist, but none of the articles on ROK that I’ve been perusing over the past hour have made me angry, just really, really sad. I genuinely would like to talk to some of you on a respectful platform because I do think your voices need to be heard and I want to understand why you feel this wronged by society.
I do believe in equal rights for men and women (fine if you don’t agree – everyone is entitled to their own opinion) but I love and respect men and I would lay down my life for my fiancé/dad/brother in a second… so I’m not sure how anyone can confidently make such a generalisation. I love my fiancé for who he is (he’s the kindest, funniest, and smartest person), regardless of money or any of that bullshit (we both make our own/live comfortably) – and I don’t expect him to ever pay for me or treat me better than I treat him. I think, in a way, feminism actually serves some of the ROK causes – princess culture, for example (i.e.: women expecting men to pick up the bill), or men not having equal custody rights, or exclusively male drafting into the army are some of the many things that the feminists I know are trying to rally against. If men and women were socially equal, the onus would be on women 50% of the time to take men out on dates. Feminism is why I’m comfortable being 100% sexually submissive to my fiancé. And feminism is why I was free to go to an Ivy League university but will one day feel just as fulfilled looking after my children and husband – on the basis that it will be my choice. Everyone wins!
I’m truly sorry that the author of this article and others have had terrible experiences with women, but I don’t think it’s constructive to demonise an entire gender – after all, isn’t that exactly why you’re critical of radical feminists?
By the way, please stop deleting my comments! It’s really bizarre, I’m not trying to offend anyone. If anyone hates it then they don’t need to read it (or they can just tell me it sucks!)
I don’t think they’re deleted. I think they’re below.
Sometimes the Disqus software is weird. I occasionally reply to the same reply twice when it appears I haven’t responded yet.
and
she never changed the view from ‘sort by best’ to ‘sort by newest’
I find it heartbreaking that the author of this piece truly believes this. It sums up the sentiment on this site. Full disclaimer: I’m a woman and a feminist, but none of the articles on ROK that I’ve been perusing over the past hour have made me angry, just really, really sad. I genuinely would like to talk to some of you on a respectful platform because I do think your voices need to be heard and I want to understand why you feel this wronged by society.
I do believe in equal rights for men and women (fine if you don’t agree – everyone is entitled to their own opinion) but I love and respect men and I would lay down my life for my fiancé/dad/brother in a second… so I’m not sure how anyone can confidently make such a generalisation. I love my fiancé for who he is (he’s the kindest, funniest, and smartest person), regardless of money or any of that bullshit (we both make our own/live comfortably) – and I don’t expect him to ever pay for me or treat me better than I treat him. I think, in a way, feminism actually serves some of the ROK causes – princess culture, for example (i.e.: women expecting men to pick up the bill), or men not having equal custody rights, or exclusively male drafting into the army are some of the many things that the feminists I know are trying to rally against. If men and women were socially equal, the onus would be on women 50% of the time to take men out on dates. Feminism is why I’m comfortable being 100% sexually submissive to my fiancé. And feminism is why I was free to go to an Ivy League university but will one day feel just as fulfilled looking after my children and husband – on the basis that it will be my choice. Everyone wins!
I’m truly sorry that the author of this article and others have had terrible experiences with women, but I don’t think it’s constructive to demonise an entire gender – after all, isn’t that exactly why you’re critical of radical feminists?
Boys are made to violently suffer to please women for two decades before discovering there is no reward for men (certainly not with merit) in a world of psychotic, illegitimate entitlement. Women are selling nonexistent (withheld) favour but men with merit cannot be validated by prostitutes.
When you take into account the fact that this is a world of violent liars and killers, sociopaths-in-denial who know all their malice is for their victims’ sake, the confronting truth for men is that they exist to suffer for no reward, having been violently made to suffer for no reward. Women are liabilities. In placing a value on yourselves, you reduce your worth to negative and the most horrifying insanity of all is a woman advertising herself to men as a liability, telling herself she’s worth it.
She’s not worth a bullet. But I am.
“I’m a woman and a feminist (….) but I don’t think it’s constructive to demonise an entire gender – ”
Pot. Kettle. Black.
if feminism means equal rights for both genders then why can’t we all call ourselves masculinists. i mean its about equal rights for all genders, right?? no, feminism is actually a terrorist psyop based on misandry.
Erin Pizzey started one of the first domestic violence shelters. she found that most domestic violence is reciprocal, and that women are equally as capable of violence as men. she was attempting to provide services for men, and for this she got death threats to her and her entire family, bomb threats, pickets and boycotts, finally her dog was killed and she fled the UK. Domestic violence is 50% reciprocal, 36% perpetrated by WOMEN, 15% perpetrated by men. (CDC 2001)
warren farrell men’s conference – pickets, bomb threats, vandalism, pulling fire alarms “Threats of Violence and Death Against Doubletree Hilton in Detroit Over Men’s Conference May 30, 2014”
suffregettes – window smashing, pillar box vandalism, setting fire to property and assaulting police officers, Attempted Murder.
“Feminist Group National Women’s Encounter Attack Church In Argentina”
Valerie Solanas: paranoid schizophrenic; author of S.C.U.M. (society for cutting up men); attempted and failed mass murderer (but look at what she did to andy warhol).
Esther Vilar “So I hadn’t imagined broadly enough the isolation I would find myself in after writing this book. Nor had I envisaged the consequences which it would have for subsequent writing and even for my private life – violent threats have not ceased to this date.”
wage gap.. no. choice.
hours worked, experience, willingness to relocate, days off, willingness to specialize… Warren Farrell, Thomas Sowell
41-60% of rape accusations are false (Eugene Kanin study US Air force findings).
“1 in 4 women will be raped in their lifetime” no.
“The rate of forcible rapes in 2011 was estimated at 52.7 per 100,000 female inhabitants.” This means that the actual percentage of rape is 0.0527%.
“Men reported being “made to penetrate” at virtually the same rates as women reported rape.”
with prison alone, men are raped twice as often as women.
one billion men have been raped, tortured, and mutilated in childhood.
equalize this
Thomas James Ball
Suicides (2008)
Women – 7,585 – 19%
Men – 28,450 – 81%
Unsheltered Homeless (2009)
Women – 12,000 – 4%
Men – 240,000 – 96%
Deaths by Homicide (2004)
Women – 3,856 – 20%
Men – 14,717 – 80%
Deaths from Cancer (2004)
Women – 269,819
Men – 290,069
Federal Funds for Sex Specific Cancer Research
Women – Breast Cancer – $631,000,000 – 40,000 Deaths
Men – Prostate Cancer – $300,000,000 – 33,000 Deaths
Deaths from HIV/AIDS (2004)
Women – 3,357
Men – 8,756
Deaths on the Job (2010)
Women – 355 – 7%
Men – 4,192 – 93%
Injuries on the Job (2007)
Women – 36%
Men – 64%
College Enrollment (2009)
Women – 58% – 11,658,000
Men – 42% – 8,770,000
Affirmative Action Education Programs (Gender Specific)
Women – Yes
Men – No
Unemployment Rates (2010)
Women – 8.6% – 6,199,000
Men – 10.5% – 8,626,000
Average Hours Worked Per Week (2010)
Women – 36.1
Men – 40.2
High School Graduation Rates (2005)
Women – 72%
Men – 65%
Incarceration Rates (2009)
Women – 114,979 – 7%
Men – 1,502,490 – 93%
Child Custody Rates
Women – 11,268,000 custodial mothers
Men – 2,907,000 custodial fathers
US Military Deaths From 1950 – 2010
Women – 139 – 0.001%
Men – 100,063 – 99.99%
Federally Funded Battered Shelters
Women – 2,000+ $300,000,000 per year
Men – None – $0
Federally Funded Health Offices and Research 1970 – Present (not including cancer research)
Women Only – Office, Projects and Programs 70+ – Funds – $100,000,000,000
Men Only – None – $0
Forced Selective Service
Women – No
Men – Yes
Drug and Alcohol Addiction and Abuse Rates (2010)
Women – 5.8%
Men – 12.2%
Divorce filings
Women – 85%
Men – 15%
Doctor Degrees(2010)
Women – 51.6%
Men – 48.4%
Master’s Degrees(2010)
Women – 60.3%
Men – 39.7%
Receive Alimony
Women:97%
Men: 3% (if you’re a male, it’s temporary. Women have it permanently)
men die 7 years earlier than women, 94% of prisoners, 99.9% of the casualties of war, twice as likely to be victims of violent crimes, three times more likely to be victims of murder, punished 3 times more severely than women for committing the same crime, raped twice as often as women, 88% of the victims of forced-genital-mutilation-and-torture (circumcision), 95-100% of the employees in the worst 10% of jobs.
Get THE MANIPULATED MAN here for next 90 days, and DO YOUR PART TO GET THIS TO EVERY MAN AND BOY ON THE PLANET:
http://wikisend.com/download/377632/The Manipulated Man — with new Introduction.pdf
… oh yeah, just look around men, they know their times is up with their bs… and watch the fireworks when it all hits rock bottom… like the vagina stock market did… American women aren’t trash – BUT THE CHOOSE TO BE… and then they think they’re smart which is why real men ignore them… unless it’s for sex…but oh, it’s YOUR fault they’re so weak and dumb… shoes? shoes? shoes? I saw them 1st I’M BETTER THAN HER… udder bullshit, literally… ignore them… it pisses them off which is why they whine like little babies their whole lives…
vagina stock market. +
let me tell you about porn and prostitution. the only reason women hate them is because it lowers their market value
and about rape
rape means theft. when people say ‘rape’ in reference to sexual assault of women, they are talking about the theft of sexual service (akin to failure to pay a prostitute); and in some cases theft of the services of bearing, birthing, and raising a child; etc.
when people deny that sexual assault of males is rape, they are asserting that male sexuality has no value, and/or it is impossible for males to not consent to sexual activity.
ps, circumcision is rape (and torture) and “rape culture”
I recently completed reading this within the last week and… oh my god, this is the most powerful book I have ever read on this subject. It’s like The Red Pill on steroids. 5 stars, a MUST READ.
Very educational article. Thanks a lot!
I just read this book twice over the weekend, all I can say is wow! Just Wow!
The best way to discribe the book is like taking off on a 747 for a holiday, only for that Jet to nose dive and crash into a residential area, killing everyone except you on board, then as you are rushed to Hospital the Ambulance your travelling in,crashes.
Just when you think Esther is going lift off the throttle of her attacks on women she presses her foot firmly on the floor…and keeps it there.
This book brought back advice that a lot of successful men have passed on to me over the last 17 years.
1) Don’t get Married
2) Stay away from Women…easier said than done, (He was a multimillionaire Englishman with a son born out wedlock, that his lawyer kept the mother of his Son in near poverty).
3) She needs to love you, and please you, not the other way around.
4) Only date women that are younger and shorter than you.
5) Never compliment them, and don’t tell them that you love them, and if you tell them. Do so sporadically.
6) Realise that almost all female behaviour is about them manipulating you.
7) Be task oriented, like Mozart, Beethoven & Ayrton Senna, you live your life according to your ideals & goals. Women are temporary distraction as you are self directed.
8) Know that nearly all Women are narcissistic, sure there some that are exceptions. but like unicorns they are rare.
9) Tears are the weapon of a woman. ( A Chinese co-worker told me this, it later turned out he was quoting Confucius).
But I digress, she does raise some interesting points.
Vilan says that women are not as intelligent as Men. Which when I read it I thought this was un-nessarily harsh. But on reflection I realised that every major advancement has been from Men. We have Newtonian Physics because of Sir Issac Newton, we have GPS because of the theory of Relativity. The Wright brothers gave us flight, Karl Benz gave us the Car & Mechanised transport. Jobs & Wozniack gave us the Personal Computer. Before them, a Titan of the Industrial Age Tom Watson gave us the Mainframe Computer, and he did so after starting NCR, and then ibm. Sir Tim Berners Lee gave us the World Wide Web. The list of Male achievement is never ending, and yet today, Men are constantly portrayed as idiots. Yet when when we look at the Historical record, women are the idiots. What have they contributed to Humanity?
She goes on to say that women are only interested in competing with other women, completiments are really statements from meaningless amatures. Which is one of the many light bulb moments in the book.
She also says some outlandish things such as, “by the age of 12 a women decides to prostitute herself”. Which on first face is shocking, but when you view the world through her German matter of factness paradym prism…she’s probably right.
She also says that women are only interested in “idiotic trinkets”, which is at once true and prophetic, when you consider that this book was written in 1970.
THIS BOOK IS AS MUST READ FOR EVERYMAN, ITS MESSAGE IS SIMPLE, WAKE THE FUCK UP!
” The flaw may very well lie in men.”
No, Real Men existed back then just as they do now, it’s just they are in far less abundance.
They were betrayed by gender quislings aka manginas who became indoctrinated through feminist bs thanks to the absence of a Man or presence of a henpecked husband.
The flaw lies with the fact that we are fighting against feminism while simultaneously fighting against the males that have been indoctrinated by them to view women in this apotheosized fashion.
Godly Men however will continue to RESIST.
It is our genetic and spiritual right to lead Women and not be subject to their emotional susceptibilities.
I have never been Married for this very fact..i will NOT marry a feminist and compromise my natural role as a Leader.
not marry a feminist? wtf? i wouldn’t touch one with a 10 foot pole unless i was swinging it
The saddest thing about the knowledge that Vilar tried to share *DECADES* ago, is that this is knowledge that most men that claim to be “Rep Pill” today still reject.
Man will never be free because he would rather shed every drop of his blood than his ego.
she’ll give herself to a violent asshole who gives her the kind of mental and physical abuse she desires. because she wants someone who is like her.
man didn’t get to the top of the food chain by being nice
Stumbled upon this article in the archives and I’m amazed at how true it is. This past Saturday, I had a meet up with a girl I had class with for a presentation we had to give. We spent nearly 2 hours talking and I knew it was a shit test of sorts as there’s been some mutual attraction between us since the beginning of the semester. I didnt think anything of it, but things took a turn for the worse when I said “I greatly value my family and have a great relationship with both my mom and dad”. It is really sad that by saying that, I essentially eliminated myself in her eyes. She spent a good portion trashing her mom and dad for their various behaviors which I wasn’t shocked by, but thought it was somewhat interesting she felt the need to apologize for them profusely to someone who is basically a stranger.
My ex girlfriend pulled similar shit in the later stages of our relationship. I have the ability to eventually build a house on my dad’s property if so choose to. When I explained to my ex after she left me (I initially broke up with her because the writing was on the wall, but made a push to mend the fence) because I dont cherish her religion as she does, I explained that she threw away a good thing and one of those reasons was because she could have lived on private property within 15 minutes of her family and right next to mine and have access to all of the great things my dad provides. Her response to that was basically why the fuck would I want that?
Just ordered the book!
I still get that ‘warm fuzzy she might be different feeling’ even in my later years when I date a girl I really like.This always seems to be followed by some game playing, bitchy or flaky behavior that causes me to baton down the hatches and disappear.