Politics

The 5 Biggest Heroes of 2016

157 Comments

2016 has been a turbulent year to say the least and it is during times of uncertainty that we see great men emerge above the rest.

I’ve chosen five prominent men of our times who either has shaped the world for the better or shown great leadership capabilities.

1. Nigel Farage

One of the biggest event of this year was the Brexit, and if there is one man who deserves the credit for leading the UK out of the EU, it is Nigel Farage.

Farage fought relentlessly against the EU for years and I’ve always admired his passion which he exercised without being pompous and crass. What is surprising is just how hostile the media had been towards him and his party as though they were racists or extremists. This, in spite of the fact that there’s nothing to suggest that Farage holds any “racist” or extremist views. He has managed to fight through the barrage of defamation efforts to emerge victorious in the end.

The fact that he has stepped down from his party after Brexit shows that he was truly fighting for his country alone and not for personal power or profit. Even though he was one of the major figures in the Brexit campaign, I don’t think he has gotten the full credit he deserves. Perhaps the future generation will grant him the historical recognition that he has earned.

2. Donald Trump

First, I’ll come out and say that I don’t particularly like Trump (the fact that he’s already gone back against his words, hired Goldman Sachs executives, and shown his loyalty for the Zionists all suggests that we’ll be seeing much of the same old). My reserved “support” and cynical view of Trump has led me to disagreements with both his fans and detractors alike. However, in spite of all the aspects that I may not like about him, I recognize that: 1) You don’t have to agree with someone’s politics to recognize his strengths and achievements. 2) The other option, Hillary, would likely to cause full-blown conflict with Russia or its allies, leading to catastrophic consequences for the world. That said, no one knows knows for sure what kind of president Trump will be—not even himself, so I’ll focus solely on his presidential campaign.

Trump’s campaign was both historical and unprecedented. Not since Reagan was a non-establishment candidate able to capture the hopes and enthusiasm of so many Americans. And he did so with such energy that people were made to forget that he reached his 70th birthday this year. Compare that to the lackluster performance and feebleness of Jeb Bush who is several years younger than he.

Trump fought against all the political correct nonsense, the establishment, the mainstream media, the countless accusations and attack on his character, and so on. And like Farage before, he came out victorious in the end against all odds. For his symbolic victory against the leftists, he is one of the heroes of this year.

3. Julian Assange

Julian Assange is an ordinary man fighting the lopsided battle against the global establishment. He’s already been trapped inside the Ecuadorian embassy for five years as a result of false rape accusations, and even his life there isn’t entirely safe and secure—all for exposing the crimes of the elites.

And as a result of being impartial to the information he releases, Assange doesn’t have a strong support from either the Left or the Right. For example, many of the liberals who saw him as a hero for his earlier leaks regarding the Iraq war now regards him as an enemy agent who conspired with the Russian hackers to help Clinton lose (of course, these liberals don’t seem to care about the content of the leak itself that exposed just how rotten and corrupt the DNC is). It’s clear that Assange really only cares about delivering the truth to the general public without worrying about winning approval. Some speculate that he’s helped Trump win in hopes that he’ll be granted an amnesty, but I doubt it. I think Assange fights for what he believes is right and releases whatever information he can.

I don’t think anyone else on this list made as much personal sacrifice as Assange has for a cause and I hope that he’s still alive and well (there’s been rumours that he’s been silenced, killed, or captured due to his lack of public appearance after his internet connection was severed.)

4. Bashar Al-Assad and all who are fighting for Syria

If there is one country in the world that is fighting against the globalist onslaught, it is Syria. The war there has been waging for almost six years now as American-Wahhabi-Zionist axis along with their allies have been flooding the country with Islamic terrorists and giving them weapons and diplomatic support in an attempt to destroy the secular nation that had previously been stable and growing.

Leading the Syrian nation’s fight for existence is Bashar Al-Assad, who, in addition to fighting ISIS and other Islamic militants at home, faces international criticism as a “brutal dictator” who needs to be removed. It’s quite telling when an elected Arab leader who defends Christians and other minorities is being accused of war crimes by Western nations that are backing the “moderate” rebels who are really nothing but head-chopping Jihadists and Al-Qaeda offshoots. If you want to know the kind of leader Assad really is, just watch him speak for yourself:

Besides Assad, the Syrian people, the Syrian Arab Army, and other allied groups including Russia, Hezbollah, and Quds force from Iran also deserve mention for fighting against ISIS and other Islamists, something they will never get credit for by the West.

5. Vladimir Putin

Last, we have Vladmir Putin who has been leading the Russian nation against the globalists and the cancerous Western influence that is wrecking the world. Like the other men listed here, Putin has been on the receiving end of relentless media attack to defame him as a corrupt and tyrannical ruler and even a war criminal. He has become the boogie man in the West used to blame everything from the US election results to the war deaths in Syria, as well as serving as an excuse for NATO to expand to the East even when it is the US that is to be blamed for re-starting the Cold War.

Putin’s role in making Russia the main resisting force against the globalists and a stabilizing influence in the world is wholly unappreciated. It was Putin who stepped in to stop the West from completely destroying Syria as they had done with Libya, it was with the help of Russian airforce that the Syrian armed forces were able to achieve the victory they did this year, it was Putin who maintained his cool and tamed Turkey so that the two countries could work together even after Turkey downed one of its aircraft. You can tell just how much the world is stacked up against Putin and Russia by how the Western media has been silent on Russia’s humanitarian aid to Syria and the death of Russian paramedics in the hands of the “moderate” rebels even as the West lies and sheds crocodile tears about the situation in Aleppo.

Some people still hate Putin because they see him as the enemy of America and a threat to the West, but these people need to realize that it was not Putin’s decision to stir conflicts. He’s merely been reacting to the West’s efforts to undermine Russia. It is the US and its allies that chose to be Russia’s enemy, not the other way around. And if the West continues to expand its globalist influence around the world, Putin’s Russia will continue to fight back against it.

Closing Words

We have heroes not just so that they may lead us, but so that we be inspired by them. We shouldn’t merely worship great men, but strive to be one ourselves. Because no matter how great, an individual man by himself cannot change the world. All the men above did not act alone but had others who followed their lead. If you are truly interested in changing the world, you must become one yourself.

Read More: 4 Reasons Why Assad Must Win The Syrian War

157 thoughts on “The 5 Biggest Heroes of 2016”

        1. There was a tv show in the 99’s (maybe 80’s?) about a grown man who was essentially raised by the television and now all of his interactions with daily life are filtered through old tv

        3. Just remembered show was called Dream On and was an early HBO program which was absolutely brilliant

        4. Never saw it. But I’ve never seen a lot of things. I like “Dream On” by Aerosmith. That’s kinda related…uh…isn’t it.

        6. Wow. I’ll bet if you listened to Aerosmith’s “Dream On”, while you watched the TV show, “Dream On”, you’d wind up voting Democrat, getting a sex change, and attending SJW rallies.

        7. I remember that show, it hit too close to the cultural bone for it to stick around. Even as a kid I thought that was a sad idea.

        8. I was at dinner with three families a couple weeks ago (early thirties parents.). All of their kids were in the other room playing video games and screaming at eachother. All of them coincidentally have ADHD and 3/4 have mild autism.

        10. Civility and conversation, a lost art. Such a shame. The alphabet generation comes after the “participation” prize generation.

        12. This is why we need mandatory labor service for a couple of weeks each summer for high school and college students (and I’m talking about robust physical work outdoors,, and not running a cash register indoors in some store), followed by mandatory military service. Yeah I know, that sounds authoritarian and Socialist, but too bad. Those damaged children that you described will never be able to live free – or even understand what that means – without some loving shock therapy to undo the damage done to them by their parents.

        13. What you’ve described should also be one of the requirements for citizenship and voting rights.

        16. Some one’s been reading “Starship Troopers” again. Not that there is any thing wrong with that.

      2. Or too busy playing golf 4 times a week, or screwing around with his mistress, like mine was. I do not blame him for wanting to get away, with my mother being a vile, evil harpy and all. But he absolutely failed me. He was totally and completely equipped to train me, but simply neglected to do so. He could have also sent me to military school, but I figure he just didn’t give enough of a damn. Sure get away from the harpy…but he should have gotten me away as well!

        1. Tell him your perspective. Maybe he’ll agree and you can rekindle the comraderie. Ive learned a lifetime of wisdom avoiding my dads mistakes (particularly with women.)

        3. Would be a little tough now, as he’s been dead for for almost 12 years.
          But very good advice for someone much younger who may be in a similar situation. Especially for a kid or teen who still has a chance. Also good advice for relatives and close friends of men who may be neglecting to properly train their sons. Show them the error of their ways, if possible.

        4. My father also failed to play the man in our household. All his children suffered not just me. I blamed my mother for the problems in our family for a long time. I have lately come to realize that it was my father’s responsibility to make sure things happened as they were supposed to happen. Women are who they are. As your father, my father was competent to train me as a man, but alas, he did not. I had to forgive him before I could move on. Believe me, the moving on is doable. The flesh is weak even when the spirit is strong but keep working at it; you will make progress day by day.

        5. Yeah, I know you are right.
          Even though I was dealt a rotten hand, like you, I suppose I am am plenty to blame as well, for not taking matters into my own hands. I am past half a century now, and it is very hard to get motivated to change. I guess I have to try to figure it out, somehow.

    2. What about K.R. Atom, Texas billionaire, time traveler and inventor of kratom?

    3. Could not agree more!
      I have posted many similar comments and will continue to do so, at the risk of sounding like a broken record.
      A father’s most important job in life is training his son to be real man. It is more important than even work or being a good husband. Those things are important, yes, but training his son to be a man and to eventually surpass him is the most important job as well as the greatest gift a father can give to his son.

      2. My dad is my closest friend. Every year I fly him out to spend a month with me. One day Ill have the honor of taking care of him. Its normal in other countries. I would never send him to one of those old age prisons.

    2. I like Orban, but he’d be pretty far down on the list as there are more effective anti-EU euros who’d merit higher ranking than he.
      Orban rattled his saber against the EU, but then relented and decided that perhaps Brussels could be reasoned with, a position that Farage has spent years demonstrating to be be a pipe dream.
      So, I’d put the French, Dutch and Austrian nationalists above him.

  3. Good article some astute observations. Though not sure all are “heros” in the classical sense.
    1) Nigel Farange is most certainly. He’s achied his taskand devlivered ot the voters. As much as they try the Globalists don’t seem to be able to stop Brexit.
    2) Assange is defineitly a useful figure in the fight against globalism. The fake rape case against him, that even the girl didn’t want to file an that has been pursued without merit for what 6 years says as much.
    3) Trump definitely for destroying Big Media and the Evil Democatic Party and HRC but verdict still out. If he can get the US economy going, manage China he’ll be a world hero..
    4) Assad is little more than a tin pot dictator. Without Russia (Putin) and Iran (Hezbolah) he’d be gone by now. Really he’s the best of bad choices in Syria
    When he took over in 2000 after his father died he promised democratic change, and could have made a more dynamic economy but devlivered none, and now he lives on Putin’s whim and Iran’s dime.
    Better than terrorists no doubt but a hero? Nope..
    5) Not sure Putin is a “hero” in the classical sense but he is your typical autocrat from Russian history no unlike the Tsars of yor. Democracy is and always has been a “managed” affair in Russsia when it’s allowed to exist at all and Russians seem to like it this way so that’s their perogotive.
    Putin’s is playing the “Great Game” with the West and winning it no doubt but he mainly acts not out of international concerns but because of domestic ones.
    He must look like a big man in Syria and Russia cannot let Assad fall or Putin would look weak to Russians and this what puts autocrats in danger.
    Remember he mus keep his cronnies in check, mostly with bribes of one sort or another and force when necessary but really they need each other to rule or exist in Russia.
    He knows all of this so well. It will be interesting to see what happens if the price of oil doensn’t go up a lot to float the Russian economy as they’re exhausting the Reserve Fund and will need to raid other funds to keep things running…
    Regardless Putin is not the threat to Wrold Peace that Globalists like Obama make him out to be….
    Regardlesss it’s been a terrible year for snowflakes and Globalists so let’s hope 2017 brings more of the same!!

    1. 4) Assad is little more than a tin pot dictator. Without Russia
      (Putin) and Iran (Hezbolah) he’d be gone by now. Really he’s the best
      of bad choices in Syria
      When he took over in 2000 after his father
      died he promised democratic change, and could have made a more dynamic
      economy but devlivered none, and now he lives on Putin’s whim and Iran’s
      dime.

      Democracy is not god so stop the non-sense. Muslim nations lack the basic building blocks in order to make a democracy work, let alone be successful. Had Assad followed such a formula, Western intervention might not have been necessary, they would be a completely failed state, like Yemen, Libya or Iraq, where majorities oppress anyone they don’t like and themselves.

      1. I’d add that democracy for most of the case did destroy and destroys western nation and the conformity it breeds (no one who deviates from the average is taken heed of) is largely to blame for the modern situation. The fact that the people of the USA elected Trump doesn’t change the fact that the American people (and not only them) have been making tremendous mistakes in the choice of their leadership for decades. In Greece Democratically we got ourselves in that mess we reside now and there is no political power that can truly fix it. Personally I’d prefer living under a late medieval empire where a Monarch with divine authority would rule. Much better than a rich ex-plebeian with a lot of influence…
        The main failure though of democracy is only one: it lacks a political thoery. A political theory is the equivalent of a human’s theory of mind (by which we understand and interpet other people’s motivation and actions) for states. In a democratic state it is believed that the will of the people cannot err so it doesn’t matter how one may run the state or guide it, hence the reason that most democratic thinkers NEVER explain anything beyond the distribution of power.

        2. There is also one more thing that I might add to stir you up: Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, the father of Romanian Nationalism, who is sanctified and was the only REAL traditionalist and a fervent fighter of communism in his country once pointed out that the greatest absurdity of democracy is that the people try to elect their own elites…
          Dwell on that thinking how Kim Kardashian got her influence and how were people like the Rothschilds allowed to become so powerful. respectively the plebeians liked Kardashian’s selling of her private life and bourgeois liked the money recycling abilities of the Rothschilds, disliking the authority of European Aristocracy, who basically made Europe, due to them being uneconomical.
          Last small point the problem of bourgeois thought, this is easily demonstrated in the book Why nations fail or any other bourgeois work is that while what they note is correct they never really address the genesis of the reason, for example it is stated that only luck creates good institutions in a society as there are no underlying factors. That and ideology the middle-class gets easily fixated on an idea that it cannot let it go if proven wrong, it will try to rationalize it.

        3. Fantastically articulated. There is wisdom in what you right and an impressive astuteness and clarity.

      2. Libya could have united the African nations, and he was actually on his way to doing so. But the US killed him.

        1. The US? I’m pretty sure it was the islamic “Libyan rebels” who fatally sodomized him with a bayonet.
          Sure, the USA helped those rebels get that far, but how much help was it? This would be the same USA that bungled Benghazi.
          Additionally, the USA lost at least one military aircraft over Libya. That’s just shameful, and shows that either Ghaddafi had the power to shoot down US military aircraft, or that the US military had rotted away during the 0bama administration.

        2. The US often proxies their warfare, as with ISIS.
          If you play in a lot of crap, some will stick.
          I don’t know much about the military but it has certainly been declining.

        3. How about bombarding Libyan regime forces, weaponry, money. If that’s not support I don’t know what it is.

      3. Precisely. There will never be western style democracies in the middle east (or at least certainly not in our lifetimes). The best you can hope for is a benevolent strongman (Ghaddafi, Saddam Hussein) or some kind of hybrid secular monarchy like the United Arab Emirates.

      4. What nonesense? Dictatorship is good?
        Nobody’s expecting Syria to be like Switzeland’s democracy but just ot the south is a country called Jordan where a little more power is shared between the government, the king, and it’s people.
        That country did not fall into civil war and has a decent economy considering it’s flooded with refugees and next to a civil war.
        Jordan is proof some form of democracy can work in the Middle East and that decent economy not based on oil can be had..

        1. I guess I have to remind you that
          1. Jordan is not a democracy, is a constitutional monarchy where the king enjoys more legitimacy than his counterparts in the Arabic Peninsula (despite their weaponry and influency) due to his blood relationship with the family of Muhammad (the Prophet). That in itself protects him from most of the constant uprisings and and attempts of coup d’etat.
          2. Assad opponents are mostly Islamists, supported by the West. Even the “moderate” elements wanted full democracy, something which would invariably degenerate into oppression for all minorities and the very Sunnites living in Syria given their current conditions and culture.
          3. Jordan enjoys international support even from Israel (the last thing they want is a wave of millions of refugees streaming through their borders.
          Assad whatever his flaws is the best option Syria has for a more or less peaceful existence.

    2. Assad is better than his opponents, for sure. As were Saddam and Khadafi…Now their countries are ruins and backstage for ISIS and co.
      They were NOT good people, but they somehow maintain stability and unity in there very divided countries. And they hated our ennemies with guts (political Islam)
      Putin is more complex. Russia was becoming a third world country ruled by Maffias and Oligarchs thanks to ‘democracy’, and HE brings it back to a superpower with ONE legitimate government.
      Russian people really loves him, in their immense majority.

      1. Assad is indeed a hero and a good man. Keeping peace and stability while protecting the minorities such as christians and also a relatively stable economy such as pre-war Syria is more than one can ever hope for a middle-eastern country.He has also shown balls keeping fighting when the situation seemed hopeless and the whole “civilized world” was against him. Western leaders who have dropped bombs in Syria are criminals of war and criminals of humanity. Also this democracy thing is bullshit. Look at what is doing to the West. The only worthy form of democracy is that where only males over 30 , who own a certain amount of land and pay a certain amount of taxes vote. We live in the age of degeneracy.

        1. I don’t deny that. But real politic is beyound ‘good’ or ‘bad’. Assad is capable, and protective. That’ enough for me. Far better than ISIS.
          Putin is a true winer because he shows he doesn’t give up his allies. In a near future, Russia will have the role than america and Europe had in the middle east… And that won’t please the Chinese, who are putting their silent hand on Africa by now… realpolitics…

        2. Agree. There is no “good” and “bad” in politics or elsewhere. Life puts you all the time in situations where you have have to choose the lesser evil. I gues realistically a good man would be someone who has done more good than harm in his life.

        1. Depending on your definition they are – 2nd highest # of nukes and right on the door of Europe. They are either #2 to #4 in world politics these days (US #1, China, Russia, Germany 2-4 in random order, with UK just behind)

    4. Putin is a threat to the world. The old KGB connections are powerful by faking news and the have nukes. Killed 10.000 Ukrainians until now.

      1. He’s a controlled threat. He plays that card to look undpredictable and intimidating but if you look at what he does he’s playing an old “cold war” game where there’s a lot of posturing but in fact his actions bely a certain amount of caution aimed at conserving reosurces while have maximum propaganda effect.
        Everything he he does is aimed at making “Russia Great Again” for the domestic audience as their economy falters to keep Russians distracted.
        But he heasn’t engaged in any major armed conflicts and committed ground troops like the soviets did in Afghanistan realizing 1) The Russian public doesn’t want it and 2) the the Russian budget can’t afford it 3) this could leave Russia trapped in a never ending conflict..
        The deaths of Ukranians, Syrian etc are an unfortunate consequences but of little concern to Putin and the international community..
        In this vein he’s not really a threat to the World more neighboring countries. Everyone has nukes..

  4. Assad and Assange are heroes? This author is pretty nutty. His blind anti semitism is getting in the way of logic.
    Assad is a brutal dictator. His only concern is maintaining the primacy of the Alawites, a small religious sect. If Assad doesn’t crush dissent, the Alawites perish. Assad had a chance early on to strike a deal for more power sharing but he decided to follow his father’s footsteps and crush the rebellion. He is also a puppet of the Ayatollahs and Russians. The result is now the utter destruction of most of Syria and millions of displaced persons and refugees.
    Assange helped Trump in this election, but his whole organization is not about parlaying truths, but destroying governments. Every society has a right to keep certain things secret and organizations such as Wikileaks are a danger to the sovereignty of any nation. I don’t see him as a hero just a narcissistic prick.

    1. I think Obama should have stayed away from Syria. Iran also crushed its rebellion, but without external interference, it didn’t became a civil war. Why did the US of OBAMA decide to give weapons to ISIS, er, I mean, the “rebels” of Syria? Without the interference of the US, that war would have had the same fate as the one in Iran or the coup attempt in Turkey.

    2. “Assange helped Trump in this election, but his whole organization is not about parlaying truths, but destroying governments. Every society has a right to keep certain things secret and organizations such as Wikileaks are a danger to the sovereignty of any nation”
      You’re saying that a government that records everything we we do and say, online, in emails, on the phone, everything and everywhere, has a right to keep certain things secret?
      Mmmkay. You’re not a power to the people sort of guy are you?

      1. You dont think the State Department, Department of Defense or any other branch of government has a right to secrets? I think they do. Anyone who signs an oath to keep secrets and then leaks them is a traitor and should be severely punished like that fag Bradley Manning.

        1. Governments have the right to be accountable to the citizenry. That’s the only right they can ever have. And seriously, have some respect: the heroine in questions name is Chelsea!

        2. But didn’t the kind interrogators advise it that gender reassignment was available, at no cost, because 30 years is a long time to be getting sodomised in just one orifice?

        4. Alas, poor Chelsea (at that time, trying to kiss Killary Clitler’s ass maybe for a pardon?) – would be poignant to change its last name from “Manning” to “Tranning”…

        5. (S)hes not very convincing as a woman, but she’s still more convincing than Chelsea Clinton

        8. You need to get your mind off of trannies and who-knows-whats(like the Clitler spawn), young man.
          Fapping will only get you into more trouble.
          Therefore, Amsterdam is your friend.

        9. Nothing wrong with fapping, unless of course Chelsea (either of them) is the object of lust. The lord would have smote Onan twice over in that case

  5. Beyond anything else, Trump worked extremely hard for his campaign. He held numerous rallies all the way into the Nov 7 midnight. Compare that with the lackluster Clinton’s campaign.

  6. It’s easy to spot a hero. Just ask yourself: “Who is mainstream media demonizing today?”

  7. Hey Pamela. Go take a few semen bullets from a Rottweiler, and stop trying to do things that don’t come naturally. Thanks. Have a nice day now.

  8. Seriously? Harambe didn’t make the list? It’s days like this that I ask myself why I’m still reading ROK. *sigh*

  9. Here’s a little day-after-Christmas movie quiz. (And no, you can’t find the answer to this one at Google.) How many times did writer/director Quentin Tarantino use the following words, or variants thereof, in his script for the film, “The Hateful Eight”. The words are nigger, fuck, shit, hell, ass, whore, bastard, bitch, dick and damn. First guy with the correct answer (one guess only), gets a set of steak knives, payable at some far-out date –
    1) 151 times
    2) 198 times
    3) 221 times
    4) 286 times

    1. Correct answer – 3) 221 times. Over the movie’s 187-minute runtime length, this means one of these words, or a variant thereof, was used an average of 1.182 times across every single minute of the film (and that doesn’t account for the portions of the film that contain no dialogue).

      1. That’s awful! Can’t most people speak without these in English anymore, it is like the youth here in Greece where most can say only variants of malakas (masturbator), poustis (queer) and gamoto (fuck)!

        1. If you call somebody a genius enough times, people start to believe it. Then they go watch the genius’s movies. Then they say whatever the characters in the movie say, after they leave the movie…or so Joseph Goebbels claimed.

        2. I must confess I use the word ‘arhidi’, ‘pisoglentis’ very frequently also with the above but only in appropriate company/circumstances but otherwise am incredibly well spoken and articulate.

    1. Hope she has some MG42s and HK416s to bring along. Oh, I forgot. Can’t even get an AR15 in Germany.

      1. She’ll end up like Amy Biehl.
        Edit:
        I just googled “Pippa Bacca”, as I never heard of her.
        Yeah, you are right. That was a very good example.

      1. I bet those pieces will be scattered in Anatolia or some place like that. If she reaches Syria, then, isis will take good care of her…

      1. Is that because the white woman you were able to rope into a relationship weighs 170 pounds?

        1. Huh?
          What the hell are you squawking about, moron?
          I thought the brain damaged “jz95” was the designated black/mulatto agitator on this site…

        2. I think you know all about brain damage, Automatic Slim.
          Then again I could be wrong. I suppose you need a brain first. And you clearly are deficient in that department.

    5. Chances are that she would be raped and killed before she even got out of Germany by males from the Middle East and Africa.

    6. To think it was the boast of Cyrus the Great that there was such peace and safety in his empire, that a naked virgin with a bag of gold in each had could walk the Royal Road and no one would dare harm her. Some people think the passage of time means progress.

  12. 2016 was the year that started to change the modern world! It is the right’s may of ’68 and in time we might even see a reversal of the chaos, although not on all countries of the West, sadly. Still, we didn’t have that much of hope and opportunity for many years, we should not allow it to go to waste!

  14. Some of the true heroes will never be named…somewhere there’s an anonymous soldier taking out a brainwashed ISIS shithead, and probably some old and unknown scientists and astronomers working on cures and discoveries that no one will limelight in modern media–because they don’t fit into the central narrative that worships shiftless, victimized blocs of SJWs and also-rans.
    Or the dad who hands down legacy skills in a difficult age: How to survive alone in the wilderness without a phone or GPS, how to dress fish and game, how to respect and operate weapons, how to build something that matters in this world and how to be a force to be reckoned in a twisted time when pussies and weak-willed sycophants are falsely-empowered celebrities who have suddenly co-opted the mantle of “heroes.”

  15. Ok, there’s this guy called Sérgio Moro, he’s bringing the criminal faction we called government in Brazil single-handedly

    1. I like the cut of his jib; they need to cleanse all the socialist filth over there as they have done Brazil immense damage.

    1. Newt Gingrich pushed the legislation that Trump ran against in order to get elected.
      Newt is also such a left-leaner that he made Mitt Romney look like Reagan crossed with Coolidge back in 2012.
      The guy was tossed out of DC by his fellow “swamp creatures”, hopefully The Donald will also defenestrate him. No good can come of keeping him on.

  17. Kevin D. Williamson of the National Review (former conservative magazine):
    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/443303/
    “My own view is that Donald and Ivanka and Uday and Qusay are genuinely bad human beings and that the American public has made a grave error in entrusting its highest office to this cast of American psycho extras.”
    Trumps are equivlated to the level of the sons of Saddam who used to abduct women off the street and rape them and occassionally feed people through plastic shredders? Keep it classy NR. Keep waving those pomp-pomps for your RINO cucks.

    1. Neo-cons got neutered in 2016. That, coupled with the media being further relegated to the dust-bins of history, was the best thing that happened in 2016.

      1. Agreed. The butt hurt will last awhile and they will flail about, but no one believes them anymore. Their credibility is long spent.

        1. That “Roman Salute” for starters.
          You can tell a lot about leaders of movements by the people who are in them. If those men at that conference were representative of the average WNs (and judging from experience I’m probably right) then I think Spencer needs to find a new line of work.
          Looking back on it, the media really blew the whole thing hilariously out of proportion. The salutes weren’t threatening in the slightest. To be frank it was honestly quite pathetic.

        3. Doesn’t matter if he did it or not. The point is his supporters did. And whether you liked it or not, in the end it just came off as pathetic.
          Stereotypes don’t come out of nowhere. There’s a good reason why white nationalists/Neo Nazis are generally stereotyped as basement dwelling, LARPing omega male incels.

        4. Every political group has a fringe element composed of lunatics or extremists. Which political figures do you like?

    1. If true, that does not bode well for the UK now does it?
      But, I believe you are wrong. The fact that BREXIT passed tells me a majority of Englishmen are waking up and smelling the coffee, just like us here in the US and the rest of the West as well. No more bowing down to 3rd world savages. No more allowing parasites to invade our countries like locusts. No more ridiculous PC white guilt.

  20. “Trump fought against all the political correct nonsense”, Trump talked shit about Carly Fiorina’s appearance in a magazine interview, when that topic was brought up in a debate with Carly on the stage somehow Trump failed to talk shit about her appearance but ended up saying she looked great, why was he being politically correct when he was put on the spot?
    Trump referred to some Mexicans who come to USA as drug mules, rapists and he continuously said he will make Mexico pay for the wall he plans to build. When Trump had a meeting with the President of Mexico during the photo op Trump had nothing but nice things to say about the President, why was Trump being PC and not tell the President of Mexico to his face in front of all the cameras that he’ll pay for the wall and he needs to stop sending rapists and drug mules to the United States?
    Trump shit talked Obama on the campaign trail, after winning the presidency Trump had nothing but nice things to say about Obama during the photo op, why was he being PC again? Why did he not question Obama’s birth certificate to his face? Why did Trump not tell Obama he has been nothing but a disaster as president to his face?

    1. Have you ever seen “Blazing Saddles”?
      If so, do you remember what the old lady told the sheriff when he said “good morning” to her?

  21. I would have to include Matt Drudge and Alex Jones on the list. Along with perhaps a Breitbart journalist. I think the name is Bannon or something like that.
    I agree with the rest of the list, except perhaps Assad. I would put Trump number one, Farage number 2. Julian Asange merits a place. List perhaps needs to be expanded.
    But still a pretty good list.

  22. The thing from Gingrich about Trump supposedly not wanting to drain the swamp has since been debunked as inaccurate. I forget where I saw it, probably Breitbart or perhaps on Limbaugh’s radio show.

    1. Trump doesn’t have to show his hand until he’s inaugurated and has control of the machinery. He’s dealing with and placating an old guard of whining, volatile and apprehensive women right now who have the hen house sense that the chopping block awaits them. They’re all unpredictable women whether they have balls or not. Shitlib men and women alike are all basically women. Trump knows better than anyone about bitch nature and how to steer and divert it. He’s in the ‘grabbing them by the pussy’ phase currently. Shhh. Don’t disturb the process.

      2. Absolutely. Did you see the humiliation inflicted upon Mittens Romney? Was wined and dined in public and then knifed in cold blood; it was beautiful and a wonderful exercise of Macchiavellianism if ever I saw it.

        1. Romney might’ve been humiliated by The Donald (Romney’s mock-worthy on-camera “shell shock” was all on him though), but Romney was thrown a big bone for it: his niece is now the next chairman of the RNC.
          IMO there might still be a use for Romney, AMTRAK and USPS need someone to rehab them, and PBS/NPR need to be put down.

        2. All business to placate the RINOs and have them compliant so other things can be done without their attempts to derail reform such as what you allude to. I concur with your observation re PBS/NPR; if they cannot be non-partisan they should be put down with maximum contempt.

        3. Mike Pence was ripped a new one when he, as Governor of Indiana, attempted to open up a state-run news service. Perhaps now that could be thrown back at the political left when they protest the demise of PBS/NPR.
          I hope that Trump’s deal-making with the RINOs does make them amenable to his goals but I notice that Mitch McConnell is still rattling his saber at Trump, despite Trump tapping his wife to be Transportation Secretary.

        4. Yes-that’ll be a sight to behold. As far McConnell goes, he needs to be put down like a rabid dog as he is the epitome of the establishment RINO and will stop at nothing to save his and his ilk’s hides.

    2. Which makes sense, as Newt Gingrich was is one of the biggest swamp monsters.
      NAFTA Newt is a “frenemy” of The Donald. For ~20 years, Newt Gingrich pushed NAFTA hard. Now after ~4, he’s suddenly on-board with the man who got to the Presidency by crusading against NAFTA?

  23. I strongly disagree with your Assad assessment he sent supplies and fighters into Iraq during the invasion he can die a horrible death as well.

  24. So who is this faggot that doesn’t particularly like Trump? The man isn’t in office yet and people overlook his many good picks and bringing jobs back and point to hearsay about him reneging on his promises. Jesus just give him a chance. He’s a hell of a lot better than in anyone I heard in those debates. The other Republicucks were all beta blue-pilled pansies. Trump is red-pilled to the max.

    1. Whoever doesn’t like Trump is a fucking faggot. I judge people based on the answer-if they answer in the negative about Trump more often than not they are a blue-pilled beta simp and when I discern their other characteristics they are indeed such.

      1. You are 100% right and it saddens me to see that the writer of this article seems like one of those despicable pearl-clutching people who grudgingly hold their nose for Trump.

        1. It happens. People eventually come around. I was a Trump supporter from the very second he announced his candidacy for the Republican nomination and was elated when he won. What he has done is colossal but now the real test is to come-if he ensures Obongo’s legacy is nothing more than a fart in the wind that will be a very solid start.

    1. Beat me to it. I wanted to add those two gentlemen also and commend them for their patriotism and bravery.

  26. One person whom may be considered worthwhile adding despite their being a woman is Marine Le Pen and perhaps also Frauke Petry. I expect big things in the forthcoming elections so all the Leftist progressivist filth is annihilated next year-it is bleeding and we can kill it.

  27. I love Nigel Farage and enjoy watching his debate on YouTube. What a champ. He has that Brit way of basically telling you to “fuck off”, but in such a way where you start packing and look forward to the trip.

  28. What happened to President Obama?
    He saved the nation from the Herbert Hoover Bush economic and monetary collapse.
    Only superman could do that.

  30. Quite the diverse list. One Brit, one American, one Australian, one Syrian and one Russian. Hope the leftists are happy with it 😉

  31. Assad and Putin are dictators. Putin himself is a weak guy who let lots of journalists killed.
    You are on the wrong side.

  34. Believing what “someone else said about Trump…” makes you a good goy. Trump hasn’t gone back on anything yet. No one gives a shit what Newt says. Trump personally says he’s still on board. That’s all that matters.
    The Lügenpresse won’t give up on his “failed campaign promises” and he hasn’t even been inaugurated yet.
    The rest I will continue to watch, closely. Even Hitler himself worked closely with the Jew. It’s unavoidable when one group holds such an incredibly large amount of the power and money. Yet why would the Jew be so desperate to attack Trump if he was actually the ally of the globalist zog? After all… not all Jews are evil, right? According to the (((survivors))) it was the Jews that personally managed, maintained, and operated the labor camps, so they can’t all be bad.
    Trust, but verify.

  35. I agree. Trump makes me a little nervous, I don’t know if he’s going to stick to his words or he’s just a charade. Besides, his very gratuitious attacks against Iran and China don’t look good. Even more, he’s very close to Bibi and the Zionits gang. I hope Putin can canovince him to change his mind in some issues.
    Generalissimo Assad is definitely my man. In the worts days of the war, he colud’ve just left the country, accept tons of money and live in exile surrounded by all kind of priviledges, but he decided to command his People in a war of liberation against the Zionists.
    I would put Assange out of list and place Filipino President Duterte instead. The guy has guts and is politically incorrect.

  36. Bashar Al-Assad is a zero, not a hero. Like his murderous father before him. Mind, that does not means that it is in US interest to support the war against him. We should stay out of it.

  37. Honorable Mentions: Elon Musk, Bernie Sanders, Edward Snowden, Sam Harris, Paul Joseph Watson & Milo Yiannopoulos

  38. Assad is classic authoritarian Arab nationalist who has no problem killing tens of thousands of his own kind – it’s just that his opposition is worse. Similarly, Putin is the Mussolini of contemporary Russia – but he hasn’t got the trains to run on time yet;. Russia’s economy is in a very bad way. It has only two useful export industries, oil and arms, and oil is going to be less of a source as prices under the incoming Trump administration for US production will drop. To his credit, he has brought order and reined in the kleptocracy. But these achievements won’t help Russia become a competitive power.

Comments are closed.