History

Nelson Mandela Has Left A Legacy Of Utter Failure In South Africa

313 Comments

Most people believe Nelson Mandela was jailed simply for being a dissident. Actually, he orchestrated a full-scale bombing campaign. The music scene brought him to international celebrity status; a testament to the effectiveness of media power. The government offered to release him if he renounced violence, but he refused.

Despite all this, he received an obscene number of awards and honors because of obsequious virtue signaling. (Did Ted Kaczynski ever get an honorary degree or have a street named after him? How about Timothy McVeigh?) If all that wasn’t enough, the Robben Island prison where Mandela stayed became a World Heritage Site.

Mandela’s Communist beliefs

Winnie and Nelson Mandela by their friend Joe Slovo, South African Communist Party leader

It’s well known that Mandela was a leader of the African National Congress, ostensibly a social democratic party advocating peaceful change. It’s less well known that the ANC is allied with the South African Communist Party and the Congress of South African Trade Unions, and its paramilitary arm was Mandela’s terrorist organization Umkhonto we Sizwe. Few are aware even now that this avuncular teddy bear, later to become the President of South Africa, was a closet Communist. Mandela passed the “duck test” with flying colors, but that’s not all.

Recently I discovered a treasure trove of documentation about Communism, and in it is a manuscript called “How to be a good Communist“. Much like Antonio Gramsci, Mandela made use of his prison time to write in support of his cause. Here’s what Mandela promised:

Communists fight for a world where there will be no unemployment, no poverty and starvation, disease and ignorance. […]

Under a Communist Party Government South Africa will become a land of milk and honey. Political, economic and social rights will cease to be enjoyed by Whites only. They will be shared equally by Whites and Non-Whites. There will be enough land and houses for all. There will be no unemployment, starvation and disease.

Workers will earn decent wages; transport will be cheap and education free. There will be no pass laws, no influx control, no Police raids for passes and poll tax, and Africans, Europeans, Coloureds and Indians will live in racial peace and perfect equality.

The victory of Socialism in the U.S.S.R., in the Peoples Republic of China, in Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland and Rumania, where the living conditions of the people were in many respects similar and even worse than ours, proves that we too can achieve this important goal.

Actually, I found it to be a pretty good primer on Communist theory, at least from their perspective. However, Mandela’s knowledge of actual conditions in Warsaw Pact nations and Mao’s China was a bit sketchy. Let’s see how things worked out after Mandela became President in 1994 and had the opportunity to implement his ideas.

First, a very brief history

Most victims of the modern educational system believe the evil Dutch and British conquered South Africa and took away all the farms, roads, mines, hospitals, factories, and skyscrapers from the peace-loving Zulus. Then they implemented apartheid to be a bunch of dicks. The truth is a little different.

The Dutch Cape Colony was established in 1652. Upon arrival, they found a very sparsely populated land. The few inhabitants were the San and Khoikhoi (then called Bushmen and Hottentots). The various Bantu-speaking tribes arriving later from the north were as genetically different from them as American Indians and East Asians. So, the now-majority Zulu, Ndebele, Xhosa, and kindred peoples were not there first, contrary to popular opinion. The first Bantu contact with the Dutch-descended Afrikaners occurred around 1770.

South Africa became a pretty rough neighborhood. The Bantu presence greatly expanded over the years. In 1816, Shaka Zulu assumed rule over his tribe and became the African version of Genghis Khan. That certainly wasn’t the last of intertribal warfare. Eventually most of the original Khoisan population was slaughtered or absorbed. Blacks and Whites fought too, most famously with the British-Zulu conflict. During the early days, British colonial interests clashed with the Afrikaners, eventually leading to the Boer Wars, the second ending in 1902. After that, open warfare ceased, though low-level conflicts still occurred.

The Black population increased dramatically, thanks to cessation of constant warfare and access to Western medicine. During the 1940s, Blacks became a majority, eventually greatly surpassing the White population. The British instituted apartheid, involving segregation. Less well known is that it also promoted sovereignty for tribal homelands, which would’ve been a positive development if carried to fruition.

Colonialism gradually ended; the European powers were exhausted by WWII, and the ideological climate was changing. Many African governments became brutal kleptocratic regimes, often with Marxist leanings. Infrastructure began crumbling, and Western aid often fattened the bank accounts of the dictators, or was misused (most notably with Ethiopia). This is one reason why Africa is still a mess. Immigrants flooded South Africa; they considered living under apartheid better than kleptocratic misrule. It was Africa’s only First World country, and its best ordered, despite its unpopular regime.

South Africa declared independence from Britain in 1960, but still under White control. In 1965, Rhodesia followed suit, but granted voting rights to everyone following guerrilla warfare and international sanctions. Then Rhodesia, renamed Zimbabwe, became another Marxist-flavored kleptocracy, led by terrorist Robert Mugabe since 1980. In 1991, South Africa abolished apartheid. In 1993, they held a referendum, and the Whites (apparently suffering from a short memory) extended voting rights to a hostile majority population.

The ANC’s rise and the failure of Mandela

Res ipse loquitur.

Unsurprisingly, Nelson Mandela won the 1994 election, as practically demanded by “international opinion”. Afterward, the ANC won every election since then. Let’s see how Mandela’s predictions of eradicating social problems turned out, after he assumed power and the ANC (still allied with the Communist Party) got a permanent tenure.

Unemployment: During the early 1990s, unemployment was a steady 16%. That would’ve been lower without international sanctions; that hurt the common people. In 1996, unemployment spiked up, reaching 29% in 2003. Official figures are about 25% for the last few years. This wasn’t an improvement. Inflation is way up too, worse than Carter’s or Obama’s stagflation.

Other than that, racial preferences in employment didn’t end with apartheid; rather, they switched direction. (Who would’ve ever guessed that?) This duplicity is the same racial spoils system as America’s Affirmative Action, though far worse in South Africa.

Poverty: Now, large numbers of Whites who had been capably running things are unemployable (see above) and reduced to shocking poverty. As for the Blacks, a small number have become wealthy, but most are no better off than before.

Starvation: South Africa exports grain to the continent’s hungry masses, but perhaps not for long. One aspect of the horrifying post-apartheid crime wave is attacks on White farmers. Exactly the same thing happened after Rhodesia, once considered the “breadbasket of Africa”, elected Robert Mugabe. Other than that, because of the dysfunctional economy (see above), one in four South Africans are chronically hungry.

Disease: South Africa suffers terribly from the AIDS epidemic. It didn’t help that Mandela, and some other highly-placed officials, didn’t believe the long-established fact that AIDS is a communicable disease caused by HIV. This is one reason why South Africa’s life expectancy fell by seven years. Many believe that having sex with a virgin cures AIDS; the obvious results of this superstition are too disgusting to describe.

Other than that, the world’s second largest hospital is in Soweto—Mandela’s old neighborhood—built by those evil British. In 1997, it was renamed the Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, after a martyred South African Communist Party leader.

Ignorance: Things are going badly with the educational system:

For example, the 2007 South and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality showed that only 32% of Grade 6 maths teachers in South Africa had desirable subject knowledge…

Further, schools are horrifically violent.

In summary

Mandela didn’t attempt to create a Socialist paradise—perhaps getting sensible in old age—but he certainly adopted the race-baiting features of cultural Marxism and its subversion script. This is quite dangerous for all citizens where the group having by far the best track record of running an orderly country has become a minority. He had his chance to deliver on his golden promises, but instead made everything worse. Further ANC rule continued worsening everything. Some believe an engineered crisis and mass slaughter might happen soon.

Let’s stop the madness. Since the presence of Whites in Africa is so intolerable, and Africans in Europe aren’t getting along so well, they can trade populations. Whites in South Africa (and Rhodesian holdouts) must no longer be presented with barriers to emigrating to Europe, and Blacks in Europe (chiefly Britain and France) will go to South Africa where they can live in peace and harmony with their brethren.

Unfortunately, this is too sensible for politicians to consider. If warfare erupts, will European governments let in Afrikaners and British South Africans like they are doing with Syrian refugees? I think we all know the answer to that one.

Read More:  The Traditional West Is Man’s Best Civilization

313 thoughts on “Nelson Mandela Has Left A Legacy Of Utter Failure In South Africa”

  1. Put Germanic/Celtic Europeans on an island and you get Britain. A high IQ and delayed gratification prone population which created one of the most technologically innovative societies this world has ever seen, allowing them to control large swaths of the world. A fucking ISLAND.
    Put Northeast Asians on an island and you get Honshu (Japan). A high IQ and delayed gratification prone population which imitated and improved upon the white man’s technology to become the 2nd largest economy in the world in the late 20th century. A fucking ISLAND.
    Put Sub-Saharan Black Africans on an island and you get Haiti. Nuff said.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e538366a1bd76877afd44851308a9dc1dbdab4ddc5f13b2d82396027e04004e0.jpg

      1. I know. I’m really NOT trying to be purposefully mean here, but ROK is all about the red pill and bitter truths which are impossible to swallow for SJW’s.

        2. damn as a rhodesian this is bitter but true .our post colonial government really screwed big time ..so big that we dont even have a currency we use US dollars our .our hyper inflation was so hyper u culd buy bread for a billion dollars

        3. Yeah, but it gave me a 100 trillian dollar note, something I will always treasure. I’m waiting for the rhodesian currency to come back and be revalued, and I’m rolling in it.

    2. When the average IQ is in the 70s, you can expect their morality to be equally low.

        1. Rule #163: Don’t date girls that have backpacked in dindu territory.

        2. It’s always a novel idea too. They act like they’re the first do it it. Like the girl in this photo. First ever to visit African orphans, can you believe it? They project their ignorance onto the rest of the world. If they didn’t know it, you didn’t know it. They must have this, they cannot bear it when reality comes crashing down that they are just like everyone else.

        3. Notice how all of those kids have a clean uniform, despite living in utter poverty? I respect their mothers more than I will ever respect that Amerislut.

        6. They need safe spaces and escorts around campus to make sure white patriarchy does not rape them. Go to a third world country and travel alone? No problem!

        7. Someone is bitter because they can’t get an attractive blue eyed white girl.

        8. Looks like your forced to respect all sorts of neat black things….by de facto. Burn coal…childrenze slow.

        9. Hey look….it’s the lifelong Michael Jackson fan posting again. Beat it McCulky.

      2. Eat, Sleep, Shit on the corner (or in a bucket), and “where can I stick muh dik today?” is pretty much the daily agenda of a Haitian.
        Nothing to build, nothing to grow, nothing to craft, nothing to fix, nothing to improve.

        3. We had a Haitian girl in a new flight attendant class. It didn’t take long for her to start blowing the racism whistle over absolutely nothing. She was jealous of the one pretty white girl aside from the fifteen black girls we hired. She started a load of drama. I think she washed out after a week of training. They take a really tough test at the end of the first week with questions like, “Emergency exits are marked with red, purple, blue, or green signage?” She failed.
          Yeah they’ll shit in a bucket in their country, come over here, won’t assimilate and criticize us to no end with an insatiable amount of dissatisfaction. People like that will not be happy until all white people are dead.

        4. Funny how I’m the bad guy when I refuse to give to people who will not help themselves. They just squander foreign aid and when they fail we are told we’re racist for not wanting them in our country leeching off my work

        8. Foreign aid simply encourages them to breed beyond their naturally sustainable population, recreating an unsustainable population that either needs more aid, or rafts over to the developed world.

        11. If you are going to compare Blacks and Whites, you should use Blacks and Whites of a similar age. I could easily make a meme with a pretty Black girl and an ugly old White woman. To be deliberately misleading is to discredit your own argument.

        12. My thoughts exactly… And maybe if you’re going to use the most attractive white woman you can find, do the same with the black woman.

        13. I agree that the “racism whistle” is a favorite of those who are incompetent, or who fail at life due to their own negligence. To be fair, however, White girls can be just as stupid – they just scream “misogyny” instead of “racism.”

        14. This is huge. There is a lot of research on the negative effects of charity. Pretty strong research showing that the population explosions in India and Africa could have been caused by foreign “aid.”
          It takes a wise leader to say ” let them adapt or die” but it’s the right decision. Otherwise they bring the whole continent down and leech off the rest for generations. We’re only rewarding a failure to adapt which is dangerous for all civilizations

        15. They’re awful there’s no doubt about that. Hearing them complain about anything is unbearable. They’re the most spoiled people on the planet, they have everything and they still bitch. Everything handed to them on a silver platter and have the audacity to claim independence. And they have zero modesty when they do succeed. As a man I was always taught to, “act like you’ve been there before.” This is completely lost with them.

        16. The reason the black would be attractive was due to the large amounts of Caucasian DNA.

        17. No hospitals or medication and let nature take its course then the world will readjust itself.

        18. Wouldn’t matter. The two types of giraffes and tigers look extremely similar yet are considered different subspecies. A hot black girl matched with the white would be the same. Btw the dark skinned woman is actually an Australian aborigine, of whom “pretty” purebloods do not exist.

        19. If you don’t understand the Bantu limits of intelligence and how they socialize amongst their own you’ll never understand why they get aggravated and shout to be heard.
          They are extremely resourceful and clever when using Caucasian morale and rules in a way to advance their will.
          A recent example where a black crook guilted a smart phone vendor into handing over merchandise by using calls of racism to shame the employee. That wouldn’t work for me because I don’t respect them and their cries are of no interest to me.
          I basically treat them as a Southern would during the Jim Crow days. I don’t shame or belittle them but I make them know I’m the alpha and that’s all there is.

        20. In the words of Gunnery Sgt Hartman; “holy jesus, what the fuck is that?!?”

        24. Foreign aid goes to corrupt governments that the “aiding” government wants to support. It has nothing to do with helping poor people.

        25. Nope, I’m a pilot. We combine some of the indoc training with the flight attendants. I know you wanted it to be true Bob but that one backfired on ya. Beat it.

        26. And I don’t think there are any straight male flight attendents. And our female flight attendants are ugly. “Fags n hags” as we call them.

        28. I had to suffer through an all male cabin crew on BA recently. Actually, they were way more professional than the women. I think I prefer it.

        29. I think the greatest characteristic to be taken into account, in order for two animals from the same species and or with otherwise similar characteristics to be considered to belong to different subspecies is the impossibility of cross breeding and consequent viable offspring. Either they can’t reproduce at all or their offspring is rendered infertile. If that defining characteristic is not present, they are to be considered of the same species/subspecies.

        30. One of ours hit on me at the hotel recently. Our rooms were side by side, he said, “you know, if you get bored we should..” “No, I’m going to bed.” “”Well, I should give you my number just in case.” “No, I’m done for the day, I’m going to bed.” Then I went back to the desk and asked for a different room. When he was talking to me he was using that sexual seductive voice too. Fuckin gross dude!

        33. Lymph edema. Look it up. Don’t judge her too harshly now, she is smiling – you know, fat and happy. I bet she has a nice personality. Where her snatch is, I just don’t know. How she cleans it, I just don’t know. How she wipes her…..oh, never mind.

        36. I’d like to aid them in getting more unsustainable rafts. Truly, these people haven’t figured out birth control.

        41. Exactly. Their “independence” is predicated upon the hard work of men, and the advances of technology largely invented and maintained by men.

        42. Unfortunately, that really is the best, and most humane course of action. Saving them only encourages more to undertake the journey.

        43. I have to admit I’m impressed (within the limitations imposed by the shoddy foundation upon which this endeavor began, anything more and I’d claim it is an impostor)

        44. Yuck! Well at least the guys on BA were retirees on their last run. I don’t think that they were homos.

        45. “Whales are a widely distributed and diverse group of fully aquatic placental marine mammals. They are an informal grouping within the infraorder Cetacea, usually excluding dolphins and porpoises. Whales, dolphins and porpoises belong to the order Cetartiodactyla with even-toed ungulates and their closest living relatives are the hippopotamuses, having diverged about 40 million years ago. The two parvorders of whales, baleen whales (Mysticeti) and toothed whales (Odontoceti), are thought to have split apart around 34 million years ago. The whales comprise eight extant families: Balaenopteridae (the rorquals), Balaenidae (right whales), Cetotheriidae (the pygmy right whale), Eschrichtiidae (the grey whale), Monodontidae (belugas and narwhals), Physeteridae (the sperm whale), Kogiidae (the dwarf and pygmy sperm whale), and Ziphiidae (the beaked whales).”
          What would be the Latin name of this legged species?

        46. It is annoying how liberal white girls will call you a misogynist if you disagree with them on much of anything or hurt their feelings. I actually quite like women in general, but it seems like the definition of misogyny has changed to “anyone who offends any woman for any reason at any time” rather than a general hatred of women.

        52. It’s almost as bad as hearing white men cry and play the victim card.

        53. it’s messed up.. it is planned for other animal species how not to upset the ecosystem, eg removing a predator or introducing a plant that grows wild then causes other changes why do they have to do the complete opposite for humans

        54. She looks like a badly made up transvestite. Have you seen hone boo boo? Why, she’s a growin like the Christmas hog. Mommy June has passed on the bad genetics and eating habits. Honey moo moo, anybody?
          PS – That’s at her best and it’s probably photo shopped.

        55. But not near as bad as hearing a qu€€r, like yourself, engaged in any dialogue.

        56. Like an attempt at pottery and all you have is the moldiest, flakiest, most impure “clay” :v

        58. I can’t tell if you’re being serious or sarcastic. My first inclination is to laugh at that question.

        59. I recently heard this description of foreign aid; poor people in rich countries being forced to give money to rich people in poor countries.

    3. Take a bunch of them and put them in a huge country, give them opportunities but don’t mix with them, you get the US ghettos. Mix with them, and you get Brazil.

      1. Meh….white men who give up power to women or non-whites deserve their ugly fate. Enjoy the decline, it is irreversible as white men have lost their mojo.

        1. Yup. More White American women are fleeing to Middle Eastern and Indian dudes now.

        3. There are a great number of white men that have not given up but are simply restrained and shackled by a system they have little hope to overcome.
          Why are such men held in the same collective of deserving an “ugly fate”
          What little power they do give up is generally because they have to lest they be excommunicated from society or face ruin.
          The sell outs who betray their own for ascension to power and greed should be hung from tree’s, we should be starting there and other root causes instead of condemning the little guy to a fate he had little control of, who apparently, to a lot of the purple pillers, only needs to ‘man up’ to fix this mess.

        4. Perhaps a deflationary collapse is our best hope, when the Fedgov can’t afford a welfare state. But entire generations of white women have rendered themselves unsuitable for marriage and motherhood.

        5. LOL I suspect there won’t be much left of a world to these savages to inhabit when we’re done with it.

        6. Before white men they were stone age, and without white men, the stone age is where they will return.

        8. Good. We need chaos to bring down the system and let the cities burn.

        9. If it ever comes to war in the streets, there is a significant percentage who are armed, capable, and we’ll aware of the possibility
          My feeling on that, is it will get so bad before that, that it will be past saving. At what atrocity do you reach your breaking point?

    4. dude can i ask ? .as a (black guy) .should we as blacks copy whites in terms of the way they handle and manage things or ? try forging our own work philosophy of some sort ? what are your views on how we can improve our societies ?..um 17 by the way

      2. depends on the whites and what they did. Look at the results and methods and ask yourself if that’s what you want. Every ethnic group goes through this.

      3. Anything that is given and that didn’t need to be earned is worthless.
        The only thing that’s important is what the person itself makes with whatever he has.
        Approach is everything, don’t pity yourself ever and with the mindset to continuously improve success is inevitable.

      4. Learn a trade or get an education in something useful. Don’t have bastard kids you can’t afford. Show up on time. Put some effort into work. Not real hard to follow the life of ‘white privilege’. :LOL:

      6. Speak out against the victim mentality people get stuck in. It makes people resentful and apathetic. Prop up positive role models for children. Encourage young men to learn trade skills they can use in the real world. Tell young women to stop having children they can’t afford. Discourage generational welfare dependency. It keeps communities stuck in poverty.
        Ignore the people who call you a “coon” or an “uncle tom” or tell them to fuck off.
        Once you’re successful in life, teach what you learned to the kids in your neighborhoods.

      7. Machiavelli states in “The Prince”, that any leader who wishes to achieve greatness, should look at other great leaders in history, and emulate what they did.

      8. Surround yourself with good successful people.
        Ditch the losers.
        Take care of your physical body always, you’ll always earn more respect on a basic level for looking like you take your appearance and health seriously.
        EDIT: Oh I misunderstood your comment… You’re talking about your community in general. I’m throwing out suggestions for you as an individual.

    5. You may find that Haiti`s poverty is due to more factors than simply genetics.
      Corrupt governments, (often supported or at least tolerated by world powers), plus the Clinton-government`s failed trade policy that nearly crippled Haiti`s agriculture contributed a great deal to their problems.

      1. how about the deforestation in haiti vs the dominican republic? still a buncha of trees on the DR side of the island

        1. The DR could afford and try and invest in “green(er) technology” due to foreign investment in DR – something that Haiti is yet to receive.

        2. why are investors more willing to fund things in DR and not Haiti

      2. People who singularly point their fingers at genetics are guilty of the same lack of nuance that the left engages in to justify cultural marxism.

        1. Name one modernized nation on the planet composed of equatorial peoples…I rest my case.

      3. You say that like the government of Haiti isn’t made up of Haitians.

    8. Those Germanic guys… didn’t they create the Socialism that Mandela was writing about?
      Delayed gratification? You’ve not been to Britain have you?

      1. As compared to most black populations where impulsiveness and here-and-now mentalities thrive? Yes.

        1. The path of least resistance. All animals follow that instinct. It works to an extent but it requires human intellect to overcome it.
          However, in a democracy what happens? Lowest common denominator takes over. Human intellect gets pushed aside. So black/white proportions are rendered irrelevant. Socialism is on the rise in Britian and everywhere else because the impulsive people, (the majority of which in Britain are white) are taking over and politicians do whatever gets them elected.

        6. High starch/carbohydrate diet. Low income and low intelligence to figure out how to eat properly. Sugar damage to brain, organs and body.

      2. Ah yes… those (((German))) guys.
        (((Joe Slovo))) and his crew, who manipulated Mandela like a hand puppet were of Israeli stock. You know, that hyper ethnic apartheid state that subjugates its Palestinian inmates.

        1. Yeah I was using the term in the same sense as Huburt to whom I was replying. Note I said “Germanic” and not German.

      3. Was gonna say something similar. Guess GermanTown in Jamaica is filled with (((Germans))) and not authentic Germans.

    9. It’s dindu genetics-they do not possess the ability to create a civil and educated society. The great problem with globalism and feminism is to deny this fact, contaminating our society and destroying what our ancestors worked so diligently to build.

    10. What about shitty White countries, like Chechnya and Georgia and Macedonia? I’m not saying that you are “wrong,” necessarily, but you are clearly cherry-picking examples to feed your own narrative (kind of like what liberals do?)

    11. They didn’t migrate to Haiti on their own, they were forced off of their continent and into the western hemisphere. We all know about the Transatlantic Slave Trade. But you seem to ignore that.
      Red pill philosophy will ultimately lead to nowhere because all you have is a bunch of bitter, racist white men degrading others instead of coming together about the issues we all face as men.

      1. I agree with half of your statement. That is some jump you made to conclude the red pill will fail because of white men. The red pill won’t fail unless if it is centered solely on these white men. With all these numbers and so little facts spouted, some in the red pill sphere come off like bitches and the worst like male feminists.
        On Haiti, you are a hundred percent right. Newly freed nation gets embargoed and black balled nationally for freeing itself. Not to mention several CIA agents and double agents implanted to disrupt the country along with bogus charities that de-funded a few hundred million in hurricane relief money. But hey, those blacks need to take the blame and pick themselves up by the bootstraps.

        2. Not because of white men, but because of these specific white men that focus on race more than gender issues. Granted that red pill seeks to debunk Marxist and leftist theories, I can understand why that is a part of it, but not to the degree that ROK authors insist.
          Any group has to assume responsibility for their selves when they are sovereign. However, after the earthquake in Haiti during 2010, it’s unlikely much will take off after that.

    12. Mandela failed to realize that his people weren’t and could never be as smart as him – just like Obama and Martin Luther King. They wasted their talent.

      1. MLK, Obama and Mandela all has jewish speech writers. They were/ are not smart, other than being smart shysters/ hucksters.

        1. They were all very smart when comparing them to the average African. Do you really think that just anyone can do what they did? Outside forces are overrated, biology is everything.

        2. An average African can screw up a decent neighborhood and turn it into a ghetto. It does take an especially smart African to screw up an entire nation and turn it into a ghetto.

    13. Over 200 years of “INDEPENDENCE” !!!
      What the f**k have they done in those 200 years ??

    14. Blacks are incapable of making successful independent nations, the same is true with Muslims.

  2. I lived in Hollywood, CA., when Mandela came to town in 1990. Magic Johnson and all the celebrities went to meet him and attend a speech he gave in a stadium that was packed. I don’t remember which stadium.
    The only thing I remember from his speech is this; “Los Angeles is a beautiful city.”
    The man had been in prison for decades at that point. How could anybody think he’s got things figured out by now?
    It’s too bad a country once as successful and prosperous as South Africa has devolved into what it is now.
    As for Rhodesia, “bread basket of Africa” has become a “basket case of the world.”
    Terrific article. Thanks.

    1. South Africa and Rhodesia are perfect examples of showing how even just modest amounts of whites in their population (5-10%) improves the quality of life, infrastructure, and food abundance of the black majority tremendously.
      African Americans enjoy the highest standard of living of any black population in the world by a phenomenal degree by reaping the benefits of living amongst a majority Germanic white population. Ditto for the much smaller British Black community.

      1. “South Africa and Rhodesia are perfect examples of showing how even just modest amounts of whites in their population (5-10%) improves the quality of life, infrastructure, and food abundance of the black majority tremendously.”
        That is only when qualified whites are allowed to run it. Otherwise, well you know….

        1. yes north part 110 kilometers from the capital still in high school btw

        2. On my experience, Zimbabweans (I don`t like calling it Rhodesia) on average are really decent, nice people. They certainly deserve a better government that they currently have.

        3. Okay.
          As a child in USA, growing up in the 1970s, I kept up with the war in Rhodesia as best I could. In fact, the first military manual I ever purchased, in ’79 or ’80, was the Rhodesian Leaders Guide, allegedly used by the Selous Scouts.
          I had hoped to come there and fight with you all, but in 1979 a cease-fire was reached, and the rest is infamy. And I was too young.
          Do any of your relatives talk about the previous era in Rhodesia?

        4. thats true.but it seems our current government is gonna win next years elections .oppositions are too weak and the ruling party has its roots deep in the core of the country.

        5. yes in fact my parents do, They say it was nice the country was well run
          employment was there .everything was efficient however problem was the racial segregation there where some white only schools streets neighbourhoods and so on plus blacks couldnt get higher on the corporate ladder

        6. TY!
          How does the current era compare to the previous era, with Ian Smith as Prime Minister, in the opinion of your parents?

    3. I’ve worked or socialized with South Africans who emigrated after the country started to slide into shyte. They are both sad and bitter at what became of their homeland and how they had to leave for a decent future, I would not have called it the jewel of Africa given apartheid, but it was the only first world country on that continent, but it has fallen well down on so many metrics of success since Mandela came to power. I heard from them more about what became of SA than I did in the press.
      I was also aware how the whites took over the country (and built it) but also that the Bantu had massacred the original bushmen of SA. Mandela – one man’s freedom fighter/rebel/hero is another’s terrorist/insurgent.

  3. South Africa was better off under Apartheid. When Johannesburg has the same level of violence as Baghdad or Kandahar did under US occupation, you can be pretty sure that what they’re doing isn’t working.

    1. Been saying that for years.
      Not defending apartheid but you can’t replace something bad with something worse and call it a victory. The breakdown of law and order has killed more innocents than apartheid in far less time.
      Rape and murder is the order of the day, and telling someone they’re now “free” because they can vote in rigged elections every few years seems like a cruel joke.
      It took centuries to civilize the barbaric tribes of Great Britain but we seem to think five minutes of voting and you’re good to go.

    2. If you can’t live with them, then throw them out. Your problem has always been a lack of manpower. You never had enough people to make use of the area.

    3. have a guy from Jo-Burg just recently started working for us, his wife & daughter are trying to get permanent residency here as well, and what you say about the violence in your comment is spot on from what he has told me.
      what he said is whites are trying to get out of South Africa really fast because they are so PC about the blacks that the country is going to be Rhodesia mark 2 very soon.

  4. i live in zimbabwe south africas neighbour ..and the dude has a point the wealth inequality in S.A has given rise to a huge crime rate that .plus um told mandela also removed the death penalty wrong move….murders in S.A get something like 15 years behind bars .

    1. Chile has among the highest rates of wealth inequality in Latin America and yet it’s the regions most successful and peaceful country. That “wealth inequality causes crime” argument is 100% bogus.

      1. really ?? i ddnt know that …I guess the media using wealth inequality as the main contributor of the high crime rate is a lie ?

        1. Multi millionaire black NFL players still routinely get into trouble off the field as well. All that “wealth inequality” must have caused them to brandish that handgun at the nightclub because Tyrone was dissin’ his fly girl.

      2. Always thought it was morally repugnant as well. The idea is that if you’re poor you must be crooked.

      3. Inequality is not the problem, poverty myth. Inequality’s harm is one of the greatest myths of this century.

  6. Black Pigeon Speaks did a great short presentation on how the ANC wants to re-appropriate all white owned land and businesses and give them to blacks. He has also shown that there are no successful black run countries anywhere in the world – I’m not trying to be racist, I’m just sayin. I have the video set towatds the end where a Chinese business man is interviewing a black guy in South Africa, and he asked why can’t blacks succressfully run nations. You’ll have to turn OFF the english CC to read the already embedded english subtitles of the chinese business guy:

    1. “I’m not trying to be racist, I’m just sayin”
      I dream of the day when we don’t even have to say such things because the point we are trying to get across is so blatantly obvious.

      1. I just hate that even I am inclined to say such things. I want to be able to say, “Stick that insult back up your ass where it came from,” but I am afraid of being slandered and losing what I have.
        I hate that about myself, and I hate more that such fears are not unfounded.

    2. They are invaders and colonists. They have no right at all to be there.
      I’m not talking about the Dutch settlers. SA is their legitimate territory.

  7. I think Nelson Mandela’s efforts will have a huge benefit in the long-term. The benefit will be the preservation of “living” and human cultures.
    Just imagine for a moment what the world would be like if every country turned into a giant shopping mall like America or into a rigid and stratified class-based society like Britain. Anyone who is fully human should shudder at such a though. The real benefit of resistance to imperialism is the preservation of “human living” itself.
    Of course, there will be much material strife in the short-term due to such resistance. Personally, I think humanity will be better off in the long-term though.

    1. For those who aren’t being raped and murdered, maybe they will be better off.
      But the question is how? And how long do we wait for these long term benefits? And how does a breakdown of law and order help?
      He said a lot of good words and the best that can be said about him is he didn’t call for the murder and expulsion of non blacks like every African dictator usually does.
      Not defending apartheid, but you can’t replace bad with worse. We know how to create civilization and prosperity and he has done none of it. Rivers of blood spilled to turn a country into the rape capital of the world. More dead innocent people than apartheid created in less time.

      1. Hence why I said that there would be short-term pain.
        Of course, the preservation of “human living” is no small benefit. The current existential death of America clearly shows this. In the end, civilization is not simply about having low crime rates and indoor plumbing. Those are good benefits, but a civilization is not solely defined by them.

        1. But how will there be long term benefits when all the signs point Angola or worse?
          What “human living” is being preserved?

        2. “Human living” isn’t something that can be clearly defined, at least not in the techno-scientific language of the current West. The closest thing I can come up with is a deep existential purpose for living. However, a society cannot be considered a true civilization without it, what I like to call “life.”
          A society that has material benefits (e.g. plumbing, medicine, etc.) is not necessarily a civilization. A techno-bureaucratic society can provide those benefits as well, but it is not a civilization. America is perhaps the best example of such a society. Americans have numerous material benefits yet live with an existential void inside their souls. This void manifests itself in various ways (e.g. consumerism, opioid addiction, etc.).
          A society can survive intense material deprivation, but it cannot survive having no “life.”

        3. I must say “of course”, meaning is key. However how has Mandela preserved this and how will the meaning of South Africa lead to civilization? Human living has clearly not been preserved when chaotic violence pertains.
          America is a civilization. Do not confuse pop culture with actual culture. We are admittedly weaker on culture then we’ve ever been, but we have a deep religious foundation, a coherent philosophy, for all of its faults, and a great deal of order by world standards. Even as messed up as our justice system is, it still functions better than the third world.
          Economics is part of this. Economies work best with good justice systems and social trust.
          How can South Africa be rich in purpose? People, black and white, are resorting to vigilantism just to have some order, corruption is astounding and there is social tolerance for victimizing whites and Indians in the most gruesome ways possible. There is a deep void in the South African soul. The tribes hate each other, whites self flagellate, and your most intelligent citizens flee the country. Many of your citizens fantasize about the day of “justice” where whites will be murdered, dispossessed, etc. en masse. They have a child like view of riches and hate any truth that could show a better way.
          No more rose colored glasses. Pretty words are cold comfort to men, women, and children being violated.

        4. America is not a civilization. The fact that Americans desperately try to fill the void in tbeir souls with various things (consumerism, drugs, etc.) is proof of this.
          Also, I never said or implied that South Africa is perfect. My point is that South Africa has a future while America does not.

        5. SA’s future is a dismal shithole with ethnic cleansing on the horizon. But don’t let that stop your dream casting.

        6. Truth be told I’m amazed you can just blow past everything I said and say, “well America is consumerist”. Well sure, but what shows more poverty of soul? Shopping malls or the rape capital of the world?
          This is way beyond not being perfect. What kind of future does South Africa have and EXACTLY how do you get there from here?

  8. An argument could be made that his wife was an even bigger asshole, a terrorist who advocated burning people alive who got in the way of her cause. Nelson’s divorce from her was finalized in 1996 because he learned that while he was in prison she (surprise!) was riding the cock carousal. She wanted 5 million from the divorce settlement but she didn’t get it due to her failure to appear at the settlement hearing. AWALT, men!

  9. Great article, but I have a few disagreements.
    1. The Dutch colonists were there first, that means that this is their territory, not the territory of the north African invaders. Anyone who says otherwise is a racist thieving piece of shit, and I’m not saying that sarcastically. Yes, I know that many white racist pieces of shit on this board will all of sudden start pretending they care about that, but it’s irrelevant. Right is Right. If we don’t stand up for what is Right, then we are fucked when it is our turn. The Dutch earned their territory, and the entire world did them wrong. That is the simple truth.
    2. There is a lot not being said in the article. From what I know, the Dutch who settled the region had a policy of accepting intermarriage between the races in order to integrate. That means they approached this about as honorably as anybody could. And that’s important. Because the first step in murdering a man and a people is to dehumanize and delegitimize them. This is standard operating procedure since Cain killed Abel. It’s the Same Fucking Thing Done Every Goddamn Time. The ANC blacks have successfully invaded South Africa over the past few generations and now with the aid of feckless European governments they are trying to whitewash history so they can complete the job via mass murder.
    I should know, my country has to constantly put up with the same filth.
    3. The South Africans got this onto themselves when they abandoned Rhodesia due to world pressure. NEVER betray your allies. I don’t care how tough it is. Then the Israelis gave in to world pressure and abandoned South Africa, and LO AND BEHOLD we got a “peace process” shoved down our throats not 10 years later. That’s the game. You may like watching some group you hate suffer, you may not like it, they can offer and threaten whatever they like, but I promise you that every last national ethnic group is going to be on the receiving end of this treatment. Pick your allies and stand strong no matter what.
    Because your real enemies don’t even hate you, they just regard you as meat to be processed.
    4. the obvious results of this superstition are too disgusting to describe.
    NO NO NO NO NO. You absolutely have a moral obligation to describe it Goddamn it. Don’t be prissy about this shit, and don’t back down because you don’t want to make people uncomfortable. Be uncomfortable. Make people as uncomfortable as they need to be. Because as God is my witness, all our people are going to be made to experience THE SAME FUCKING THING. People cannot relate to this because we do not tell them. TELL THEM UNTIL THEY VOMIT.
    5. Whites in South Africa (and Rhodesian holdouts) must no longer be presented with barriers to emigrating to Europe,
    I have a problem with how this is said. South Africa is Dutch territory. Goddamn it, that is their fucking homeland! Throw out the African and Middle Eastern colonizers from your territory of course! And give the Native South Africans your full support.
    And who are the “south African natives”? The Dutch who originally colonized it.

  10. On the positive note (this may be something most readers won`t believe) but Zulus and other Black folks in South Africa are MUCH less racist towards people of other backgrounds than some African-Americans in major US cities.

  11. The crime rates, murder and rape especially, also sky rocketed in post apartheid South Afrika. Though, that should not come as a surprise to anyone on ROK.

  12. Astute article, but I have given up even showing a light on some of the points mentioned and have found his biggest zealots are western whites. Mandela is another martyr in the pantheon of evil whose past cannot be allowed to surface in even polite conversation. The last guy I met singing his praises, I encouraged him to go to SA and see it for himself (fat chance) and ask for the “Winnie Mandela necklace” in Jo’burg.
    On the flip side (of which I cannot confirm), a Boer I know told me that Mandela was hand picked. De Beers was seeing which way the wind was blowing and made a deal with him. When he was released and came into power, the mines stayed in De Beers hands.

  13. “They shot Sonny on the causeway. He’s dead.” – Tom Hagen, Corleone family attorney, shortly after making a deal with Nelson Mandela

  14. https://images.dailymaverick.co.za/images/resized_images/849x493q70Ronnie-interview-Poplak-subbed.jpg
    On the right of Mandela, when he sings about killing the Whites, is Ronnie Kasrils, whose grand parents fled the “Czarist pogroms in Latvia” and fits a familiar (((profile))).
    Posing as an anti-racist “White” but rabidly anti-Afrikaner, he was one of the founders of terrorist organisation umMkhonto we Sizwe. He received training from the soviets in Odessa, in order to then recruit other leftists/violent Communists in places like London to bring them to SA and help them organise terrorist acts.
    “To do so, he attempted to do something that has remained a secret for the best part of four decades – recruit white men and women in Britain to go to South Africa and set off bombs. “Apartheid, like any racist doctrine, presumed that all white people were natural allies. Hence suspicion was very low with regard to ‘caucasian’ visitors from abroad,” Kasrils explains. His idea was that young men and women would travel to South Africa pretending to be honeymooners, business trippers and tourists. They would explode homemade leaflet bombs, unfurl banners, and play rousing speeches to large crowds from improvised sound systems.”
    Recruiting brainwashed virtue signalling White leftists to set off bombs around their fellow Whites. Their methods never change.
    He also was a minister under Mandela and Minister of the Intelligence services under Mbeki after the Apartheid.
    One can only wonder (((what))) would push a man to hate so much the country that gave him everything and especially its founders. A wretched wart insulting with every breath the blood shed by the Boers in their quest to find a land where they can leave in peace.
    “The first and fiercest punishment ought to fall first on the traitor, second on the enemy. If I had but one bullet and I were faced by both an enemy and a traitor, I would let the traitor have it.” Corneliu Zelea Codreanu

    1. On va devoir se mettre en contact nous deux.
      Un Français qui a comme image de profile ma saga Viking préférée, cite mon Roumain préféré, publie des articles sur mon site préféré… l’occasion est trop rare.

      1. Ben ça tombe bien, mec. Je rentre à la maison bientôt. Passe un email où j’peux te contacter, si on est pas trop loin, on boira un godet à la santé des Chouans.

    2. This is excellent info, and new to me. Not surprised in the slightest that a useless, anti-white agitator like this is one of “them.”
      I recall the name Joe Slovo, another of the “chosen,” who was a huge commie and anti-white activist there in SA.
      And as always, I’ll bet neither one of them faced an ounce of the harsh justice they deserved.

      1. Kasrils still walks freely, is on many TV shows and hailed as an apostle of peace.

        1. It figures. Instead of being “hailed” as anything, he should receive a hail of bullets.
          I wonder why the Boers have not dealt with this guy.

        2. Like in the rest of the West, their cucked government prefer virtue signaling to protecting their own.

    3. That wasn’t the only Jew around Mandela. Ironically, South Afrika under Apartheid was never against the Jews, and in fact they were rabidly Zionist and best buddies with Israel.
      But, as Jews hate everything explicitly white, they destroyed South Afrika, the only nation with a explicitly -yet mild- racialist regime after WWII.

      1. Israel had close economic and military ties with South Africa for decades – and played a crucial role in the survival of the apartheid regime. Netaniyahu also snubbed Mandela’s funeral.

        1. As said before, no connection, no argument. Do you deny the fact tha Kasrils is a violent communist, hates Whites and should be shamed and prosecuted instead of being celebrated?

        3. http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-Ed-Contributors/Mandela-and-the-Jews-318627

          Shortly before Shabbat last week, South Africa’s chief rabbi, Dr. Warren Goldstein, spoke to Dr. Makaziwe Mandela, daughter of former president Nelson Mandela, to convey to the family the Jewish community’s prayers and support.
          In thanking Rabbi Goldstein, Dr. Mandela asked him specifically to convey to the Jewish community that her father cherished “the special and warm relationship” he had had with South African Jews” and that he deeply appreciated how throughout his life he had enjoyed the warmth, kindness and support of the Jewish community.

          In 2011, the South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD) partnered with the Umoja Foundation in bringing out Jewish Memories of Mandela, a history telling the Mandela story from the perspective of the various Jewish individuals who were a part of it. For me, as the author of this book, it was an inspiring project, one that brought to light as never before the extent to which Jews were involved in the cause of black liberation while providing many fresh, and often deeply moving insights into the kind of man and leader that Mandela became.
          Jews have been a part of Mandela’s life from his arrival in Johannesburg in the early 1940s to the present.

        4. Of course he doesn’t. He is trained to deflect and discredit anything that may expose Israel/Zionism’s crimes against humanity.

      2. There is still a lot resource wealth in SA I believe. And you can bet your last shekel on who is robbing the country blind of that wealth now that they own its government.

    4. another smartass attempt to hand pick random facts without telling the whole story.
      so you found one fucking commie Jew – who was also virulently anti-Israel, supported the Palestinian cause, and invited a Hamas leader to visit South Africa. but you omitted decades of tight economic and military ties between Israel and apartheid South Africa – and the fact that that Israel played a crucial role in the survival of the apartheid regime. not to mention Netanyahu snubbing Mandela’s funeral. but hey then you wouldn’t be able to use the retarded brackets, which would be a fucking shame.

      1. What is the connection betwen Kasrils posing as White and trying to kill them and Netanyahu not going to Mandela’s funeral?

        1. are you kidding? the entire point of your comment was to emphasize that Kasrils was a Jew and to connect his activities to the entire “jewish question”. hence (((the brackets))) and the quote of that Romanian fellow.
          so if the Jewish side of this is somehow important, then you have to bring up Israel too in order to show the true objective picture. otherwise, the jewishness of this commie is irrelevant either. you can’t have your cake and eat it.

  15. Nelson Mandela was bananas. Look up ‘Mandela necklacing’ sometime. The dude was a terrorist.

  16. South Africa is the MSMs monster it will refuse to take accountability for. Without endorsing apartheid, it was at least honest and accountable. The ANC is proof of what happens to any country with a one party state. The Boers should be given the right to return to anywhere they think will work out for them. The White liberals who wanted this should be left inside South Africa. A fitting punishment for their betrayal.

  17. “Many believe that having sex with a virgin cures AIDS; the obvious results of this superstition are too disgusting to describe.”
    Even when always expecting the worst, I’m still shocked by the stupidity of some people in the world.

  18. Interesting article, just shows how Socialism & Communism destroys everything they touch. Time for these guys to embrace capitalism so they can rebuild south Africa.

  21. Guy was a fucking terrorist, full stop. And the American media has been bending over to suck his dick for at least 30 years.

  24. This article is spot on but there were some notable blunders from the Afrikaner people, all throughout their lives pre Apartheid era the Afrikaners brainwashed themselves religiously that they were “Gods Chosen people” kind of similar to their Khazarian counterparts.
    That’s not to say that it’s not hard core to get in your wagon and live
    off the land while you travel off into the wilderness, but they really
    built up a lot of substance where there was none. The skirmish at Blood
    river, for example, became some sort of epic battle that confirmed the
    Afrikaners as God’s chosen people.
    They failed as a power-holding group due to their collective allergy towards
    manual labour. Apartheid was primarily a system for exploiting black
    labour at an artificially lowered price, the racial supremacy thing was
    just to get the useful idiots(working class) on board
    (if it was really about race, why
    did the Apartheid government build massive black-only hospitals with
    state of the art maternity wings ? E.g.
    Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, the third largest hospital in the world built in a black ghetto. The Apartheid government basically
    sponsored the mass production of black people, because more black people
    meant more cheap workers, dooming white people to becoming an ethnic
    minority when once white people were about 50% of the South African
    population).
    Unfortunately, it also made them dependent on black labour
    for their wealth, meaning that one black labour could organise
    effective strikes and labour sabotage, that the entire system they had
    made for themselves would fall. So rich Afrikaans guys decided to
    preserve their wealth and give up power. This left a lot of the useful
    idiots in the Afrikaner middle and lower classes dazed and confused, and angry.
    As a collective, if they had been willing to do their own dirty work,
    their own laundry, their own gardening, their own farm work, their own
    mining, their own labour, then they would still be in power. They would
    have herded black people into reservations, and like the Americans and
    the Australians, and have built up an entire country without them.
    But they didn’t, because they wanted someone to do their work for them while they relaxed.
    Sure, it’s a stereotype and it’s unjust to apply it evenly to an entire
    ethnic group, but they failed as a collective, because they wanted
    things to be easy and sumptuous and free from hard work for themselves,
    which ironically only gave them the opposite things. Life is funny like
    that.
    The history of the Afrikaners shares many similarities with the Spartans
    and the Slave-owners of the US south. They all shot themselves in the
    foot by depending on cheap sources of labour rather than just doing the
    job themselves.

    1. There are issues with South Africa no doubt but this article is spot on only if you think missing the entire dartboard is the same as scoring a Bull’s-eye.

    2. I agree, but let us not fall into the error of accusing whole human groups, the upper classes and the big capitalists exploited the cheap black labor. The white working class was “a little” better, in any case more “safe”. From the perspective of the rich being the whites a minority it did not make sense to maintain their privileges.

  25. Very nice article. I’m glad that more people are becoming cognizant of the fact that whites are being replaced in every last one of their countries. South Africa is just a preview of what is to happen everywhere else if whites become the minority. You think London’s mayor being muslim is bad? Wait until more muslims get into positions of power there. I unfortunately speculate that in South Africa’s case, the world will simply have to bear witness as the whites are eroded down to much smaller numbers, before eventually getting insta-genocided by the majority blacks. Then, and only then, will enough people will wake up to this.

    1. If whites become the minority… in South Africa? Did you bump your head?

      1. He just didn’t word it right Bob. Everybody gets the underlying message. Whites as a minority in a black country = bad news (for everyone)

        1. I think this is specious reasoning. Like MJ said “…it doesn’t even matter if you’re black or white”. If the ideology is bad the whole country is bad. If you have black capitalists like Walter Williams then race is not the issue. Ideology is the issue. The USSR was almost entirely white. And it was fucked up then and the surviving countries like Russia are clinging on by their fingernails.

    2. Their more merciful alternative Is to just let the whites die out, since whites will consider bringing a new white child into a country where that white child will be despised as a form of extreme child abuse

    3. South Africa is an extremely important example for Europe and the US to look at when looking where the future is going..

  26. Just what the fuck is this nonsense? How did this article get past Quality Control? Mandela was convicted by the White South African court (which you laud so much) of inciting strikes, sabotage and conspiracy to overthrow the government. If he was engaged in a terrorist bombing campaign why did the White Africans fail to even charge him with this offense!
    “How to be a Good Communist” was written by Liu Shaoqi not by Nelson Mandela! There is some suggestion that he wrote a summary of it but there is no clear evidence that Mandela was a Communist.
    If you are going to level accusations against someone of Mandela’s standing at least provide more support than linking to a bunch of random websites.
    Africans and Europeans are getting along fine in Europe. Stop making stuff up.
    Really this article is a joke.

    1. “Africans and Europeans are getting along fine in Europe…”
      Really???

        1. I would say this should be required viewing for all “white guilt” lefties, but I know it would not make a difference.

        1. If by “getting along” you mean fucking up a beautiful continent with their shitbrains, then yes, Africans are getting along with European whites just fine.

        3. Then I applaud your singular vision. Go forth and be Europe’s resident baboons.

  27. I was taught he went to jail for “standing up to a racist government.” Everyone always left out the part about the bombs.

    1. I know. Even the South African police left that part out. Even back then the Leftist media were able to control the white South African cops.

  28. Mandela was just another no good, dirty, useless nigger. The opposite of a quality black person

  29. South Africa really needs it’s own Lauren Southern.
    Right now the most visible whhite South Africans trying to warn the western world are these surly alt-right guys and the chubby Simon Roche. The truth is that they just aren’t really spreading the word far enough to avert this genocide.
    A big part of the reason that Trump got elected was that conservatives actually got into the pop culture in America. Listening to Simon and Jan has been incredibly eye opening, they are decent spokespeople but…
    They are no Milo
    They are no Ann Coulter
    They are no Lauren Southern
    They are no Mike Cernovich
    They are no Stefan Molyneux
    They are no Alex Jones…
    If you really want to attract the world’s attention to this horrifying catastrophe what’s needed is a attractive young woman to deliver this message. Don’t underestimate the power of beautiful girls on the internet.
    Also, I hate the mainstream _anything_ as much as any of you guys do…
    But for white South Africans to get the spotlight of world attention shinned on their plight you guys really need to cut it with the anti-semitic/JQ rhetoric! That is NOT helping your cause.
    Even if Jews do cause all the problems in the world, as soon you blame them for a problem in South Africa with communism, all but the most red pilled/Alt right are going to tune OUT!
    80% of the people who might be sympathetic to your cause will navigate away and stop listening as soon as anyone brings up the JQ.
    In regards to this South African struggle, you can be effective communicators or you can be honest communicators. You cannot be both

    1. “80% of the people who might be sympathetic to your cause will navigate away and stop listening as soon as anyone brings up the JQ.”
      This needs to change though. I’m not saying full-on 14/88 needs to go mainstream or something, but it needs to become politically correct again to question Jewish behaviour and influence. To call out any group or individual behaviour really.

    2. How does one get to the root of the problem if they ignore it or only further encourage its ignorance.

      1. Indignant people on the internet and fringe public intellectuals have been blaming Jews and trying to direct people’s attention to “The Jewish Question” for about 50 years and has it accomplished anything?
        It seems to me that Israel and Jewish influence on geopolitics is as powerful as ever. Complaining about Jews just isolates you. Have you noticed that Alex Jones never talks about ‘The Jews’ and he managed to get into the pop culture and influence the country enough that Trump got elected.
        Blaming the Jews for everything has a counter intuitive effect to the goals that we have in the Alt lite/Alt right. Especially saving the white south Africans from genocide.

        1. Hold up, You’re accrediting Donald Trumps election win to Alex Jones. Heh thats quite a long bow to draw.
          Alex Jones is a shyster, a half truther if you will. He will flirt with some interesting topics but completely discredit them with his buffoonery. Deliberately I suspect.
          I wouldn’t be surprised to learn he is part of the control. It is not surprising he and others like him do all they can to misdirect the public from the Jewish question and promote ‘conspiracy theory’ stereotypes and kookiness.

  30. An apartheid regime is ethically unviable regardless of what replaces. The fact that communism was what effectively challenged that regime is unfortunate but predictable. Most people here are fixating on the whites can / blacks can’t run thing issue. That’s unsurprising given the pretty nasty post-apartheid but still very racial politics of modern south africa, but ultimately it’s a dead end unless you really think a glorious future of racial separatism is the answer. Who knows it may be the way we’re going right now, but ethically that throws out the window the very legacy of the very same white european civilization that so many want to celebrate, which is the fundamental principles of ethical universalism and equality under the law. I’m aware some will consider that ‘cucked’ and idealistic, but it’s the only discourse capable of getting anywhere: race realism, might have a place in the future, as may limited forms of nationalism and anti-multiculturalism, but as soon as one re-embraces apartheid you’ve lost the ethical debate, however much you may potentially win the populist. The fact is race politics, as exemplified by the apartheid regime, the nazis etc., is a (if not the only) mirror image of the communism – just the other side of the dialectic, and a very tired and worn out one at that.
    The reason we get nowhere is not because communism reigns and racism / nationalism has been suppressed but because out of those two varieties potentially totalitarian types of regime, only one of them – the racist (fascist) form, has been stigmatised and blamed. Communism has the greater death toll, and has done more damage than racism / fascism yet it is still ok to heap praise on people like Mandela (allowing for the fact he wasn’t forthright about his communism). What needs to happen is that we work towards a world where it is as equally ignomnious to be associated with communism as nazism, where anyone talking like Mandela did above when he says “communists fight for a world where there will be no unemployment, no poverty and starvation, disease and ignorance”….which be called out for supporting mass murder.
    Communism or anything it may disguise itself needs to be stigmatised. To be a communist, or anything like a communist, needs to be to bear a badge of shame and social ignominy. That can only happen if apologists are effectively associated with the crimes of communism past. In the case of South Africa to that can be added the crimes of communist corruption and incompetence.

    1. I think we all need to keep clear in our minds that Mandela did not institute a Communist government.

      1. sure, as the article makes clear he was a crypto-communism. In the modern world all we have is crypto-communism. Arguably actual communism’s only real purpose today (intentionally or otherwise) is to misdirect attention from the de facto but ‘evolved’ communism working under the surface. Today communism only ever works because and to the extent that it is disguised. People don’t know their lives are subject to creeping ‘evolved’ communism because they can compare and contrast with Pyong Yang. Communism may have been overt in the early days of revolution, but it has been disguising itself ever since.

        1. Actually the article doesn’t make anything clear. It is a poorly sourced opinion piece. The author clearly doesn’t like Mandela and has made a bunch of stuff up to retroactively justify his feelings. If you click on the links they just link to other opinion pieces.

        2. so you’re saying the source claiming he was a communist is incorrect, and that he did not write the words quoted below?
          “Communists fight for a world where there will be no unemployment, no poverty and starvation, disease and ignorance. […]
          Under a Communist Party Government South Africa will become a land of milk and honey.”
          I am not knowledgeable on Mandela, but assumed that they were his words, expressing his politics in which case I can’t see how he couldn’t be seen as a communist. Likewise
          I am not knowledgeable on Mandela, but assumed that they were his words, expressing his politics in which case I can’t see how he couldn’t be seen as a communist.
          Likewise his ‘enduring friendship’ with Joe Slovo, the communist leader, strongly suggests that he was communist, or at least that he made no distinction between regular and and communist freedom fighting
          http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/heritage/heritage-freedom-fighter-joe-slovo-helped-bring-democracy-to-south-africa-alongside-nelson-mandela-1-2357503

        3. How to be a good Communist was written by Liu Shaoqi, the former President of the People’s Republic of China. The link seems to be to a summary of the book. Somebody attributed it to Mandela but I can’t find any evidence that he wrote this summary. In any case, summarising a work written by a Communist dictator doesn’t make you a communist.
          I have enduring friendships with Man Utd fans. Doesn’t make me a Man Utd fan.

        4. It’s difficult to tell without further investigation what’s going on here; whether this an attempt to adapt and misattribute an obscure work by a chinese communist from the late 1930s or whether Mandela himself has adapted this work somehow. I’ve only briefly compared the two, but the ‘milk and honey’ quote appears in the introduction of the latter work (linked to below – easier to search than the article link) and the whole document appears to reference south africa. So it could be someone seeking to slander Mandela or it could be Mandela adapting a work he deemed relevant for a different time and situation.
          I take your point about friends not necessarily sharing the same ideology but it’s worth remembering that for all intents and purposes they weren’t friends who might or might not shared an enthusiasm for the same or different teams. They were on the same team. They were arrested together under an anti-communist treason act I think. Slovo seems to have provided legal counsel to Mandela . The Ham & High obituary does suggest Mandela may have seen commies as fellow-combatants rather than fellow ideologues when he says ““Communists… were prepared to eat with us, talk with us, live with us and work with us.”….which suggests he is differentiating himself from them. On the other hand they appear to be joined at the hip a lot of the time: e.g. “In June 1961 Slovo and Mandela formed the armed wing of the ANC, Umkhonto we Sizwe”. I’m inclined to think the quote above might be some kind of fraud, but is there really any meaningful difference to be made here if the guy is fighting alongside communist revolutionaries?
          https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/liu-shaoqi/1939/how-to-be/ch01.htm
          http://www.henrileriche.com/wp-content/uploads/How-to-be-a-good-communist-Nelson-Mandela.pdf

        5. The trouble is that the document refers to an unseen handwritten document. It is impossible to know for certain who wrote it.
          Being arrested for something doesn’t make you guilty of it. Also, fighting for a common cause (which in this case was not the creation of a communist state), doesn’t necessarily mean that you share the same political ideas.
          The way I look at it is this: what do Mandela’s actions tell us? It is clear that in the 60s he was fighting for liberation for Black South Africans. Later he presided over a democratic government. To me, there is no strong evidence suggesting that Mandela was a communist.

        6. Damn! You’re not winning a lot of popular support for your comments. Looks like half of the people are from Daily Stormer.
          I know next to nothing about Mandela, but the fact that no one tried to refute your arguments is highly suspicious.
          BTW, how do you add modifiers to text (italics, bold, underlines etc..)?

        8. Yea ROK has really gone down hill and went from neo-masculinity to white supremacy.

        10. I don’t think that it has; you just exaggerate. Roosh has made a good job to find a balance between white ethno-nationalism and multi-racialism and hopefully ROK can provide the best basis of all “alternative” websites, initiatives etc. Whites are the backbone of every Western country and blacks and other minorities should join. The websites still produce articles on game, travel, ethics, the sexes and so on which are universal, and they have writers of black and mixed descent. If it would turn into a Daily Stormer I would leave the sinking ship.

        12. The document seemed legitimate at first sight. I haven’t done a compare and contrast, but where forgeries occur they sometimes do involve taking an obscure text and that adapting it somehow. I don’t I think that can be assumed but I agree the lack of corroboration suggests it might be a forgery. If it isn’t it might make sense for Mandela to have provided the introduction to an adapted work of some kind, but again I’m not sure what they point is if his purpose is to deny he’s a communist.
          So, if it seems the document might be a forgery then we could suggest that he wasn’t a self-identified card-carrying communist. Likewise I don’t find it unreasonable to think his primary purpose was the struggle for black liberation. On the other hand I do find it troubling that he spent the best part of a lifetime in effective an combative alliance with an overtly revolutionary communist. You say he presided over a democratic government and that is true, but even in that Ham & High article Slovo is described as a communist fighting for democracy. Since when has communism between compatible with democracy – communists work towards a dictatorship of the proletariat, not free elections. Where they do engage in democracy it is usually with subversive purpose, i.e. to use democratic institutions to gain power and to take over. So the question arises, whether Mandela himself was a good man, a democrat and freedom-fighter against a racist regime (in which case I would be behind him as I have previously been) or whether the democracy bit was just a means to an end. Generally speaking revolutionaries tend not to be too dogmatic about ideology or scrupulous about methods since their purpose is to achieve pragmatic change. That doesn’t mean they are any less radical on account of it. How can you work together towards a shared revolutionary aim, including beyond the point of seizing power, with sharing an analysis of the problem (racism, black oppression, class struggle seen in racial terms) and similar solutions (dictatorship of the proletariat, rule by the oppressed class of blacks)?

        13. Thanks for the sincere response you don’t get that much now a days on the internet.

        14. But my main problem is that these sort of white ethno articles are popping up more frequently now. All these articles do is allow the stormer on this site to cry about the evil Jews and other minorities who are bringing down the white man. The balance between these kind of articles and actual self improvement articles have heavily shifted towards these articles that involve complaining. I thought the point of Neo masculinity was to help men become masculine men again. So I would expect more self improvement and less complaining.

        15. Actually a lot of Black leaders during the Sixties had Socialist sympathies (Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, Huey P. Newton) but of course, X and MLK died before they could change their minds. Newton softened with age.
          Really though, if you look at the revolutions around the world, most of them were inspired or funded by the USSR. And the USSR in this time seemed like a strong ally against the former colonial powers. But of all of the revolutions, only Cuba and NK became Stalinist dictatorships. The rest turned into fascist dictatorships or “soft-socialists” like Sweden.
          So its certainly possible Mandela was sympathetic to Communism but I think time showed him the error of that line of thinking.

        18. I think that some of the white ethno articles are important since demographic dimensions are crucial, but perhaps the balance could be somewhat adjusted.

        20. Should he stay or should he go now…?
          Depends. Is the problem with him or the board? If he leaves and is replaced by a new manager with no budget… I don’t see that as an improvement. If Kroneke loosens up the purse strings then I think Wenger should stay.
          I mean three FA Cups in four years? With that team? That’s nothing short of extraordinary. Who else has done that? The way he took down Chelsea, with his team, was genius. The only achievement that betters that is Ferguson’s record with the League.

        21. that seems reasonable. People will take up political positions that are available to them and which are compatible with the goals they want to achieve. I agree, that will pre-incline most most anti-racists towards marxism / communism / socialism for the same reasons that BLM and antifa today are only distinguishable from the former because identifying as ‘progressive’ serves as a catch all for leftism more generally. I am not saying one should not distinguish between say North Korea and Sweden as varieties of socialist societies that seem very different from each other. They are obviously not the same but equally my feeling is that substantive communism does not require formal communist ideology or formal state institutions. Indeed it works far better disguised than it does as some overt throwback to the bad old days of the 1930s or somethings. Re. Mandela and South Africa the discourse is democratic, but you also have the class struggle side of things. If whites end up having their land expropriated as with Zimbabwe – in whatever matter, it would probably be easiest to rationalise that in terms of marxist categories of the struggle of an oppressed class liberating itself the oppressor class, seizing control of the means of the production (the land in particular) and establishing some kind of dictatorship of the proletariat (on whatever basis). It isn’t even necessary to use such terms for such thinking to be working under the surface. If blacks do such a thing in South Africa (as they did in Zimbabwe) and much the same could be said to have occurred in Sweden with respect to feminists seizing control from men, then this would to my mind constitute limited but substantive forms of revolutionary marxism. Mandela’s status then as a democrat or a communist would depend on the extent to which he thought and / or governed in such terms.

        22. I always had the assumption it was him holding out on spending money, I like how he is big on bringing up youth and developing talent, it’s cheap and they learn to play the way you want but when they sell them for millions and don’t replace them with the profits they only set themselves way back and are essiently a farm team for the clubs willing to spend money. He seems like a likeable coach who is easy to get along with compared to a mourinho or pep. I like when all the teams are firing off and every game is crucial so hopefully they come up with a plan.

        23. If I were a Jew, or my job was to keep Zionist nefarious activities from having mainstream discourse, I would be very concerned as well.
          In fact, I would want nothing more than this site to go back to being the male version of feminism of men bitching aimlessly, misdirected away from the core of their grumblings.

        24. But that’s what this site is becoming now. All I see in recent times are complaining articles for the most part. The main point of the red pill is realizing the truth of reality and take the steps to ensure the best quality life in the reality. Constantly complaining about problem won’t make it go away.

        25. Honestly I think that democracy is all about voting away other people’s wealth into your pockets. It works fine if you’re in the majority.

        26. there’s always been an issue with potential “tyranny of the majority” which it’s rarely a good idea to have direct democracy, however indirect representative democracy is often easily manipulated / hacked. Most of the time commies are better at the latter than winning over the majority though

        27. Well it looks like a done deal now. Wenger to stay. But he has been ordered to “spend some fucking money”. Apparently they want the club in top shape by the time Wenger leaves and do not want a Man U style collapse.

        28. They might want to save some of that money for another coach, it’s hard to imagine them finally getting a new one. Dortmund just let their coach go. I think Diego Simeone would be great replacement, it would be nice to see how he does in the EPL considering he made atletico revelant again against two of the biggest clubs out there.

        29. I think the idea is that rather than leave a thrashed out Ford XR3i like Ferguson did with Man U, they want Wenger to get Arsenal into a fit state while they negotiate the hand-over with quality coach.
          I wouldn’t be suprised to see Arsenal win the Prem next year. The last two years its been won by a team not in the Champions League. If Wenger strengthens over the Summer Arsenal would be in a very strong position to do this.

        30. There’s not that many stormers here I don’t think and I am so much for free speech that have to say it’s nice and refreshing to have them here.

    2. The Apharteid fell when it no longer served, the white minority is disposable. Now you have great unemployment and lower wages to extract the resources of SA, that is why they want to get rid of the Boer and their “nationalism.” The Communists were only the labor force that ended up imposing a more ferocious capitalism.

    3. We need to find a place for race realism and/or race separatism, even if it has to be done through non-explicit means, nothing like apartheid legislation.

    4. Have been bothered about your long blue-pilled post for several days.. This in particular is a problem:
      …ethically that throws out the window the very legacy of the very
      same white European civilization that so many want to celebrate, which
      is the fundamental principles of ethical universalism and equality under
      the law
      Ethics is a construct, gender and race, which the loony left likes to call constructs are not. Capitalism works up to a point because it is in tune with instinct and human nature. Forcing races together as it is happening now is requiring people to excessively control racist instincts and a preference for ones own kind. The whole system is coming apart because people in the west think that pure intellectual and legal arguments alone can steer society. Who made the laws? If it can legally be argued that one should do something that instinctively feels self-destructive should you still do it?
      Anyway, the birth rates drop amongst the most intelligent while those living closer to their instincts breed more. The same is true on the societal level, this intellectual masturbation about human rights, ethics etc will bring about societal downfall, political leaders need to follow some instincts about various races. Hell some of these things are quite thoroughly backed up in statistics http://www.epochtimes.de/politik/welt/ines-laufer-die-fluechtlings-kriminalitaet-zwischen-fakten-und-medienluegen-a2132375.html which the ivory tower lefites do their best to suppress and ignore. Apartheid is too explicitly racist for the modern age, however some lessons from it need to be taken.

      1. you replied to me previously and I didn’t respond. If you’ve read my comments over any period of time you’d know I’m mixed race and probably for that reason while I’m sympathetic towards nationalism etc I don’t go in for the same ‘race-realism’ / white nationalism as some around here for what I imagine are fairly obvious reasons. We’re obviously not going to agree on that one, and yes, my own background probably is a factor in my stressing universalist values over particularist nationalist ones, but I wouldn’t say it is the determining one. If you junk over the side the legacy of Kant, and Mill etc. (both were in their own way pretty blue pill I agree) you will IMO, and for what it’s worth, lose something pretty essential about english, western, and indeed christian civilization. If you want race realism and nationalism defined principally in terms of race or whatever, you’re going to find yourself coming up against those principles of the universal, which are avowedly both weakness and strength. The weaknesses right now are obvious. Universalist ethics, turning the other cheek, looking out for the interests of others as well oneself or ones own kind etc. can be and have been manipulated and exploited by the unscrupulous, including with respect to immigration etc). I would say the response to that is to become red pill about letting those ideals get exploited – universalist ethics doesn’t necessarily involve sacrificing the self, or the ego, whether it be that of the individual or the nation (or race). But it does mean limiting the self / ego and constraining it for some kind of conception of the greater good (again, a notion that can easily be hijacked). If on the other hand you reject such things, you are arguably buying into the same reasoning as those you stand against: the unrestrained ego, the idea that you can predicate a civilization on nothing more than a race, or genetics, on being on the inside as opposed to being on the out. Maybe you’re right. Time may tell, but if you are and you choose that line, my suspicion would be that you will lose most of what you think you are conserving, your race may end up coming to oppose the civilisation that it built. I don’t expect you to agree, nor am I sure that I am right. It is just my position.
        One further thing though, and this was probably what I was mainly alluding to: that system of universalist ethics, of the principle of impartial law and of equality under the law may well prove the only thing that in the final reckoning stands between you (and me, and everybody on sites like this) and those who have a monopoly on power and would impose their will without consent. If you abandon the principles of universalist ethics how exactly will you oppose who more powerful than you would oppose you simply because they can. If you think taking to the streets and fighting hand to hand with the new world order or whatever, will do the trick good luck to you because you’re going to need it

  31. I’m glad that you are offering a counter-narrative to the common refrain of Mandela worship, however it really isn’t fair to mention that Mandela was violent without mentioning the violence of oh, I don’t know, the Sharpesville massacre? Give both sides – there is an argument to be made that violence was necessary. Also, Bantustans were not truly “sovereign,” as they were made to be specifically dependent on White-controlled South Africa as enclaves.

  32. He was vile, filthy, criminal, terrorist scum.
    As was the perverted rapist, woman beater, and probable bisexual Michael King.

  33. Winnie and Nelson Mandela by their friend (((Joe Slovo))), South African Communist Party leader

  35. (((Joe Slovo))) Zionist terrorist that led the communist revolution of South Africa to end apartheid whilst his beloved homeland of Israel was and still is setting about acquiring forcibly more land from the native Palestinians and built an apartheid super prison to contain and control them.

      1. Ok shill, all those Jews and their networks used all the means they could to end apartheid South Africa yet don’t see the hypocrisy of apartheid on steroids in Israel.

        As he moved increasingly into political activism, Mandela came more and more to be associated with members of the Jewish community who were likewise confronting the apartheid system. Thirteen of his fellow defendants in the 1956-1961 Treason Trial, for example, were Jews, among them such Struggle stalwarts as Lionel Bernstein, Joe Slovo and Ruth First. Among the founders of the underground military wing of the African National Congress, Umkhonto we Sizwe, were Dennis Goldberg, Harold Wolpe and Arthur Goldreich (a volunteer in the War of Independence who later settled in Israel).
        Jewish lawyers were prominently involved in defending Mandela in the various political trials in which he was involved, among them Isie Maisels (later a member of the governing body of the Jewish Agency), Arthur Chaskalson, Joel Joffe and Sidney Kentridge. He also worked closely with the journalist Benjamin Pogrund, who later made aliya and in addition to promoting Israeli- Palestinian dialogue has been a staunch defender of Israel in the propaganda war against it.

        http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-Ed-Contributors/Mandela-and-the-Jews-318627

        1. nice try but the topic was Slovo, and the fact remains that Slovo was anti-Zionist and anti-Israeli – just like you

  36. Every state that went from a white colonial rule to a “black” rule has become an utter Disaster in central and South Africa.

  37. After talking with (white) friends from both South Africa and Zimbabwe, the rhetoric is always the same.. the blacks went nuts, and every educated white person who was able got the fuck out of the basket-case country, leading to a horrendous brain drain. Doctors, engineers, teachers, anyone with half a brain got their asses out. Result: Those countries devolved back to stone age barbarism.

  38. I have a good mate who grew up in Rhodesia…he got out because it all turned to shit. You have to give it to the whites out there…they knew how to run a country in Africa better than any of the native Africans. Shame about the Fascism. I still have relatives in South Africa who used to boast how great life could be if we moved out there, but now of course they are silent…and probably dead. And we could never palate their far right views anyway.

  39. “Sheeyut. White ho, I peep. Gat mah nine, she bedda lemme have it. Ya know? Muh dick, Muh dick, Muh dick, Muh dick, Muh…AAAAAAAAHH! Waddah doo? I just crossin duh street. Wachoo ressin me fo? I dindu nuffin! Yall raysuss”
    Here comes Momma.
    “Waaaaaa-huhll-huhll-huhll! Waddee doo? He dindu nuffin!”

  40. South Africa was under immense pressure from many Western nations around the world. Australia bullied South Africa as they did with Rhodesia. So did the USA.
    In Rhodesia they replaced a good goverment with a dictator (Robert Magahbe), and they pressured South Africa to follow suit. A terorist (Mandela) was backed. Both countries under black rule are an absolute mess.
    The PC politically correct are only good at medling and destruction.
    The sanctions imposed by USA, Australia etc, were killing South Africa’s eccomomy. They prevented many goods from being imported and exported. That is why the whites eventually gave in. It was the Left leaning politically correct governments who destroyed South Africa via pressure tactics.
    The blacks were treated fairly and if you ask most blacks old enough to remember, they would gladly go back to white rule. As it was secure, fairer, and much safer.
    My father spoke Zulu and treated his workers fairly. His workers at the time said that they would rather work for a white man than a black as the blacks were harsh. Have you ever seen a black who rises a little above the others. The power and money goes to their heads and they become extremely nasty even to other blacks. This is how the blacks in government today act.
    There are South Africans posting here with construed facts, as they are too young to have witnessed these events. And have been taught rubbish in school in presemt day pro black, anti white South Africa.
    Great article by the way. And very sad.

    1. I know what you are saying was even true back in the 80s, re Australia and other meddling nations bullying South Africa. Really does complete the puzzle when you see the anti-white politics of forced multiculturalism with third worlders in Europe in 2017..

  41. In the middle of no where, in the South African desert in the 1970s. Not a single soul for hundreds of miles, there was a secret under ground facility. A nucular facility.
    It was guarded by two fighter jets which were on constant 24 hour stand by. The engines were always on and turning over with a pilot strapped into the cockpit. That is how tense tbe times were.
    Every two hours a new pilot would change over and take his turn. No one knew about this place. It did not exist.
    Russia and a lot of countries wanted to attack South Africa. Russia was backing many of the rebels in Africa. Even Mandela.

  42. Blacks don’t want to go back to Africa, don’t believe all this BS that they love all things blacks etc !

  45. Mandela was freeing black and other dark-skinned South Africans from apartheid,a criminal system of oppression begun by the Afrikaner government in 1948 so whites could steal the country’s wealth from its majority population.Kacynski and McVeigh,ESPECIALLY the latter,a known fascist,were simply crazy white nihilists.
    As for the black South Africans,most were cruelly poor,even hungry due to every form of racism one can imagine.Unless you people are simple more “alt-right” neo-Nazis,STOP RE-WRITING HISTORY FOR YOUR NEFARIOUS ENDS!!!!

  47. The South Africans sure missed the boat in not killing him while in captivity.
    De Klerk sold out the Whites in South Africa and everyone went along with “giving it back to the natives”, even though they “natives” weren’t even in South Africa when the Afrikaaners built the country.

  48. Culturally European civilization across the globe is suffering a crisis of confidence. But I have faith that we have only just begun to sow the seeds of renewal with sites like Return of Kings. Slowly, we are educating ourselves and a vast community of men about reversing the trends of decline. Spaces such as these, require slow nurturing. But the seeds we sow now will grow in time. The decline has been rapid, but I have faith that we may yet reverse the course.

  49. It was natural for Mandela to behave the way he did. He grew up in a white-dominated environment which was superior in almost every way possible and he was never a part of it. Of course he’d do anything to destroy it even if it defied reason, an inferiority complex lessened is superior to sound judgement in the minds of such.
    It’s a shame and a tragedy what happened to the farmers in South Africa. It’s unfortunate they didn’t mass migrate like the pied-noirs did after Algeria fell. If the west refused to take them in then they should have migrated anywhere else rather than stay.

  50. Well look at the American Mandela, Barack Obama and his “legacy”, country more divided than ever, middle class disappearing, race relations dialed back 50 years, corporate greed at an all time high, his deep state goons harassing Trump, and America’s position in the world declining. Great Success!!!
    His highness Obama makes occasional public appearances and the cucks all get up and stand to pay tribute to Emperor Obama!!! If you think South Africa is in trouble, look at America!!
    Also what Angela Merkel said, she was thinking for a long time, before Trump, that Germany cannot rely on the United States. The EU has always been the engine for Germany. Obama played ball with her, but deep down the German leadership always had it in for the United States.

  51. Mandela’s vision of communist paradise reads like something written by a five year old.
    South Africa should have been partitioned after independence from Britain. It is too late now. Let the slaughter begin (already has on the farms) and watch as the West ignores it while hugging Mohammedans.
    Thanks for the reference to the Communism collection.

  52. ROK actually is an informative site its nice to know that people who wear pointy hats and burn crosses at night are somewhat smart I always had the impression that all they did was beat their wives and children and hang slave’s ,anyway as an African (black) I agree with most of what was said in this article its sad but true,nevertheless when people are genetically predisposed to pillaging and plundering of other docile cultures the repercussions are never nice especially when the plunderers gain a conscious then you have hoards of cultures coming to fuck your shit up after fucking their shit up .Most world fuck ups whether in Africa, Asia ,middle east are a direct consequence of your western ancestors thirst for conquest and exotic pussy ,most of the men no sorry barbarians who comment here long for the good ole days when you could club a woman over the head and drag her into a cave or better yet rape foreign women and take their gold after slaughtering their pathetic men, lucky for us most of your type are becoming extinct because of racial intermingling and I’m guessing Donald trump and his ilk represent the last stand of the old strain of err “white men”?? Surely the meek shall inherit the earth
    By the way I just read about ROK and what they stand for and by and large even if I’m not Western agree with some of there prepositions unfortunately they should have mentioned its a white supremacist site it seems they’re still trying to be politically correct while at the same time whining about how unfair it is that women and other races have rights come on guys take the masks of and wear your pointed hats or swastikas with pride.

  53. And now South Africa is listed as being in stage 6 of 8 on the scale towards genocide of what remains of the white population.

  55. White men waving the white flag is so common now. Perhaps this was one of the first few places that started the trend of White men waving the white I surrender flag. Rhodesia and S. Afrika were once beautiful places like Sweden and the U.S.
    We all know Sweden has brought in a million military aged men from Africa and Middle East.
    Swedish men will now have to stop waving the white flag if they wanna get married or have a woman.
    As we all know White wimminz are usually the first to start marrying the incoming masses of “newcomers” and apparently Swedish men are such total Cucks (cuckolds) that they think this is a good thing, which just shows how completely brainwashed Sweden, Germany, France and England are.

Comments are closed.