Politics

9 Reasons Why The United States Should Ally With Iran

189 Comments

When President Trump visited Saudi Arabia, he concluded an arms deal with the oil-rich kingdom, and toured its Global Centre for Combating Extremist Ideology, a think tank devoted to fighting Islamic terrorism.

If this strikes you as a joke, then it should; Saudi Arabia is the world’s biggest funder of Islamic terrorism. With its billions in oil revenue, it sponsors an anti-Western, jihadist ideology known as Wahhabism. Indeed, your local Sunni mosque could be receiving Saudi money and propaganda. This same ideology is responsible for organizations like al-Qaeda and ISIS.

‘I see much terrorism in your future…’

With this in mind, the United States, and allied countries, should swiftly seek to make alliances with Saudi Arabia’s competitor, Iran.

1. Shia Islam is superior to Sunni

Of the two Islamic branches, Shia Islam is the superior one. Those countries that have significant Shia populations – Iran, Syria, and Lebanon – are pro-Western and science-friendly. Furthermore, Shiites have scarcely engaged violently with Westerners. Saudi Arabia, by contrast, is largely Sunni.

2. Saudis have no sense of taste

If you ever walk through fancy shops in Oxford Street or Harrod’s in London, you will be quickly accosted by wealthy Arabs in town for a weekend of shopping. Mostly from nations like Saudi Arabia or UAE, they have little decency, and, like the Chinese, simply care for conspicuous consumption.

This is because Saudi Arabia has no deep culture of its own, unlike Iran, which has millennia of civilization. Iranians that I have met, abroad, are vastly more cultured and well-read than Saudis.

3. Iran is more democratic

Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy, in which the House of Saud maintains power over a compliant population (Saudi citizens are given well-paid sinecures to shut their mouths). There are no meaningful elections or free press.

I heard a story, once, of an Indian man who entered Saudi Arabia, carrying a Bible. His assets were promptly seized, and he was thrown into an open-air prison for two weeks – for being a Christian.

Iran, by contrast, has political elections, and while it is not a full democracy, it protects the rights of minorities – including Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians.

4. Iran has never attacked the United States

To be precise, Iran has never attacked another country, at least since Reza Shah Pahlavi consolidated his power and transformed the country in 1921.

Although Iran funds groups like Hezbollah, these organizations have never attacked the United States, and are primarily concerned with Israel. Yet Israel, a small Middle Eastern nation, is no more important to us than the Czech Republic, a similarly sized country.

Iranian leaders have made acerbic remarks about the West, referring to the U.S. as ‘The Great Satan,’ but as we all know, actions matter beyond rhetoric.

Saudi Arabia, on the other hand, has recently been engaged in a barbaric invasion of neighbouring Yemen, with the United States’s full support.

5. Saudi Arabia has accepted zero migrants

Although Saudi Arabia has 100,000 air-conditioned, vacant tents, it refuses to accept any refugees. Instead, the kingdom would rather have us Westerners accept the economic and social burdens of the Muslim horde.

Iran, to its credit, has put up millions of Afghan refugees within its borders. These migrants have had trouble integrating into Iranian culture, so perhaps Iran can sympathize with us on these issues.

6. Persian girls

They are cute and will put out (if Westernized). Anyone who has visited Los Angeles can confirm this. Sure, Saudi women may be gorgeous, but if you manage to rip that burka off her body, you have my congratulations, for you are the King of Game. Of course, her father and brothers will likely murder you afterwards.

7. The nuclear threat is overblown

If Iran develops a nuclear weapon, the only country that should worry is Israel. My response: who cares?

If Iran and Israel both have nuclear weapons then that would return balance-of-power to the Middle East between two nations that refuse to obey the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. This can only be good for the United States, which has been Israel’s bitch since 1967.

The analogy to game is clear: plate-spinning is an important technique to manage women. Once that whiny girl you have been monogamous with sees that she has competition, she falls into line.

8. We still need oil

Amidst the shrill songs of global warming activists, the fact is that no technology has surpassed the internal combustion engine, in terms of efficiency and convenience. Electric cars and windmills are no solution. We need petroleum.

Should we be buying our oil from a country that supports terrorism, oppresses religious minorities, and engages in hedonistic consumption? Or should we buy from a country with an ancient culture, that does not actively support violence against the West?

9. Iran’s leader

Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khameini, suggested that feminism and sexual libertinism are Zionist ploys to collapse Western civilization.

While his categorizations may be imprecise, the Ayatollah seems acutely aware of the dangerous culture war at play. Singling out human rights groups and liberal think tanks, he said:

…cultural attacks by the enemy are more dangerous than military attacks.

A plan forward

For Donald Trump, I suggest a three-point plan:

  • Change your visa policy to ban Saudis, while permitting Iranians to visit.
  • Begin immediate negotiations with President Hassan Rouhani of Iran, with the express purpose of gaining access to Iranian oilfields.
  • Sanction Saudi assets – the priority should be financial assets.

If these three points are followed, the West would be safer, wealthier, and we can avoid seeing Saudis on the streets of London.

Read Next: 4 Reasons Why Assad Must Win The Syrian War

189 thoughts on “9 Reasons Why The United States Should Ally With Iran”

  2. The leadership in Iran is top notch. There are inefficiencies in their system, as there are in any complex system. When I see what passes for “leader” in the West, I feel sorry for the West in general, and the United States in particular.

    6. Germany used to have a masculine Defense Minister but the SJWs ruined him.
      All the SJWs hated his guts because he had the potential to be a new Ronald Reagan. And Reagan like characters are verboten in Germany.
      That being said, with Trump being a major league fuckup, the stage is being set for this guy to come back in a big way.

  4. It is well worth looking into the history of Saudi Arabia, founded in 1932. One might wonder why the globalist “British” government gave the country to the Saud family.
    Nothing new under the sun. Terror by proxy.

  6. In case anyone wonders why Obama’s handlers told him to do to the Iran deal and give them some cash on top
    “Give them enough rope…” might be a clue.
    Clever bastards, them Globalists.

  7. I definitely agree with this. It’s had me really sad how even Trump carries on the neo-con legacy of groveling before America’s “allies”, while making hostile attacks on a country that wishes Westerners no harm. Iran is one of the countries in the world that has been the most stepped on by international powers, with the UN and similar organizations turning a blind eye. The international community didn’t bat an eye when Saddam was using chemical weapons against Iran, and the nuclear deal that Trump, as I understand it, is going to revoke? That one was simply giving back the country’s assets that had been seized because of the revolution. The time when Iran no longer accepted being a puppet of foreign interests any longer.

    1. Yes, Trump has always been a disappointment to me in his stance on Iran. He seems to be echoing hardcore Zionists on this.

      1. Are you surprised? He let his daughter marry a Jew. Once his son in law’s family came into the fray, Trump was forced to be their puppet. Not that the GOP has ever been on our side (e.g. Bush Jr., another pawn of the Jews).

        1. Well, he claimed we could work with Russia in Syria against ISIS. This flew out the window with his petulant attack against Syria, etc.
          Syria, another country that is not tied to the global banking system, is a threat to Israel Middle East hegemony, and has been long demonized.

      1. Actually, it would be best for Iran to not follow the path of Western nations. Last time I checked, Iranians had an educated and cultured population uninfected with feminism, progressivism, and degenerate hedonism that is rife in the West. They don’t need to ruin what they have with Western “culture.”

        1. Point taken, but I’m thinking like how China is also slowly reaching us. They retain control of the population, putting value on the family unit, efficiency, advancement of technology. Yet while doing so, they still progressively loosen the reins, because for individual happiness, the individual should be free.
          I don’t know why, but is it possible to imagine a free capitalist secular society without feminism, degenerate hedonism and self destructive tendencies like making in-group preferences taboo?
          I hope so, but I’m starting to lose faith

        2. I don’t think it’s possible. Modern societies always seem to swing to one or the other extreme eventually. Russia, Japan, and Iran seem to be the closest in achieving the right balance, but all three have their own social and cultural problems.

        3. Yet Russia and Iran fetishize the west, and both countries have regressive behavior just waiting to surface the moment a more socially liberal government comes, and Japan have unsustainable birth rates while there is a clear lack of work-life balance.

        4. There is little doubt that China, within a couple of decades, will have surpassed the US in terms of global power. This is probably a good thing, on balance.
          However, I am not so sure about their family values. The divorce rate in the country is around 30%, and steadily rising. Most of the urban-dwelling Chinese around the age 30-35 that I know are already divorced. I would not at all be surprised if their divorce rates reached similar levels as the US (ca 40%) and western Europe (44% on average) soon.

        5. Sure, perhaps we just need to face the fact that humans are incapable of maintaining societal structure and we will eventually self destruct.
          But I genuinely believe China has a much more solid foundation than the west had, and they will be at the front of the world for so many years to come

        6. China has the benefit of an authoritarian government so if things start looking bad you don’t have to consult the citizens to enforce policies.

        1. I can’t quantify, it’s solely a gut feeling, but I think Iran has a more solid foundation, in spite of slightly lower IQ than Europe

      1. Well, Sir, we can stop this nonsense but, we surely can’t sit on our hands and watch and listen and do nothing. Did you take note of what the leader of Iran said? …”cultural attacks by the enemy are more dangerous than military attacks.”
        There IS an enemy and it is within and, although I don’t like the idea of having to address what is going on right now ignoring it is NOT an option. It’s obvious that the MSM, to a large extent, is the propaganda arm of the enemy within.
        Having been around for a while, I can tell you that THIS is something different than anything that I have seen in my lifetime. There has been a steady, controlled onslaught against all that was once guarded as “acceptable” and “unacceptable” in the West. Slowly, all of that has been attacked and, in many cases, already dismantled. We are like frogs in a pot and the heat is on. Trump wasn’t just whistling Dixie when he said during the campaign that “it may be too late…but, I hope not, folks” With the media obviously against him, even Big Three Prime Time (just pay attention to the story lines, the innuendo, and always the “slighting remarks” directed towards him. They know what he wants to do. We would be much better off without Israel and much better off with Suni Islamic friends…no question. He has slowed down the Globs and IS turning things, slowly. This was the best explanation that I have been able to find, so far:
        http://www.voltairenet.org/article197618.html

  10. I totally agree with this. The US has an antagonistic relationship with Iran only because that’s what Israel wants. Iran is not our enemy and Saudi Arabia is certainly not our friend.

    2. If America lost its Dollar hedgemony it wouldn’t have any incentive to support Israel and Saudi Arabia.

  11. The big deal about Iran is it’s not tied into the global banking system. The Central Bank of Iran is government owned.
    You can look at most of US foreign policy through this lens.
    Smedley Butler was right, wars are for bankers.

    2. “The big deal about Iran is it’s not tied into the global banking system. The Central Bank of Iran is government owned.”
      Exactly.

      1. Also Syria and North Korea. I believe Libya, Iraq, and Afghanistan were the same way.

        1. These countries also trade (or used to trade) oil in other currencies, besides the dollar.

        2. Inside62b

          Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! :!ag82d:
          On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
          :!ag82d:
          ➽➽
          ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash372ShopHub/Pay$97/Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!ag82l..,..

        3. That’s true the petro-dollar. The requirement to buy oil in dollars props up the value of the dollar and increases exports to the US, as I’m sure you well know.

        5. That is the reason why Iran is the enemy and Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, and Egypt, and Turkey are our “friends”. I used to think Israel was also enemies with those Muslim countries, wrong they are frenemies.

    3. Well the global financial system and the U.S.’s hegemony are closely linked. No surprise then the US defends banking interests. Those are also US interests. The problem is the American people, and the world’s people, could probably do better. Not to mention it is democratic governments, NOT the banks that are selling us down sh*t creek with deficit spending. That isn’t the banks fault, that’s our fault for letting it happen.

      1. As I understand the Federal Reserve is set up so all money is created by them from thin air but interest is charged. The deficit spending is “our” fault, I think Bush and Obama hiked it to a whole new level.
        Are these countries pariahs because they don’t belong to the global banking system or do they not belong because they are pariahs? I’d suspect the former, conventional wisdom would be the latter.

      2. Americans are addicted to consumerism. So these policies won’t change for a long time, right now America is transitioning from
        a white Anglo Saxon country to a multiracial one and so is Europe. The banks have us by our balls.

  13. I generally agree with this, and these aren’t the Muslims I’m personally worried about. I have day-to-day experience with Iranians and they are mostly hard-working, open-minded, future-forward, intelligent and modern people from what I’ve seen. In parts of America we have significant factions of the Iranian diaspora that beat a hasty path out of Iran in the early 1970s, at the time of the grand theocratic coup and the Ayatollah’s ascension. Without getting into details, I believe they (by and large) make the city I live in a better place and aren’t into the whole “by-the-book Muslim” thing…their attitude is evolved and seems closer to a benign form of agnosticism.

    1. Modern, secular Muslims aren’t a threat and assimilate well. They take their holy book with a grain of salt, just as modern Christians do. They’re not running around chopping of heads of unbelievers just as modern Christians don’t kill witches. Neither do they aspire to world domination, just as modern Christians don’t.

        1. Okay, I haven’t lived in a high percentage Muslim area at all. I just know a few individuals.

        2. Islam is Islam. While it is true it has different “flavors”, in the end it is a foreign religion. We don’t need them.

        3. You do realize that in that sense Christianity is also a foreign religion? Both religions are from the middle east. If you wana be so european and white you should follow paganism.

        4. I totally agree with your second paragraph. Islam is universalist in the sense that divides humans between muslims and non-muslims.
          I may see your point with Christianity, but remember that the Roman Empire went further than Europe. We lost of all that.

        5. That is true that the Roman Empire conquered the middle east at that time, but Christianity was considered a foreign religion by the empire and all christians were persecuted and fed to lions in the Roman Colliseum. You would know this if you had read the gospel. Also when Constantine did convert to christianity and declared Christianity as the state religion. Everyone was in an uproar over this dramatic rise in this foreign religion. A lot of contemporary people attritbute Rome’s fall due to the rise of Christianity as well as historians. My point being is not to judge a religion or concept based on whether its foreign or not but on its merits. Islam obviously doesn’t merit acceptance as a peaceful loving religion in fact most of my college educated muslim friends admit to a lot of their religions failings.

        6. Christianity maintained Rome until the fall of Constantinople against the Ottomans. Be careful with history.
          I don’t like Islam because is others’ religion. I don’t care if it is peaceful or not. I am not peaceful myself, either.

        7. So you don’t care that their migrants assault women because you yourself do so?
          Your sentenced was worded poorly.

        8. ” That moderate muslim neighbor of yours will most defnitely not come out to defend you.”
          Maybe those moderate Muslims are afraid of what those people could do to them as well?
          I mean, I love my friends, but I’m not gonna put myself as a human shield and take a bullet for them. Nu-uh.

        9. All cultures are in competition. That’s what I wanted to mean.
          And I could not care less about women (who vote against me) being assaulted. They wanted the rapefugees, let them enjoy them!

        10. What does that have to do with Christianity’s origin? Jesus was a jew and he was born in the middle east. And last time I checked Jesus wanted everyone to live in peace. True believers are peaceful people. You and a lot of these white naitonalist alike are not true christians by the slightest.

        11. Why do you use modern toponomy? That was the Roman Empire. Period. I also want to live in peace, buy they don’t let me.

        12. Your obviously clueless about world history and the persecution from the ROmans that Christians faced because it was considered a foreign threat to the Roman Empire. And really? Who doesn’t let you live in peace? I’m assuming your American. What’s the most dangerous situation you could possibly face that leads you to not live a peaceful life? Unless you go out looking for trouble like these white nationalist, your pretty safe here.

        13. You’ve obviously failed to read between the lines. Extremists are very few in numbers in muslim majority countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan. But extrimists still manage to threaten and harm religious minorities & atheists in those countries quite easily. If the majority stood up in those nations and really believed that what the extremists are doing was bad, they could easily dispel and imprison them before any thing bad would happen. But if you really get to know a moderate muslim well you would know that you are nothing but a Kafir (non-believer) at the end of the day. And deep down they all think that you deserve whatever your getting for not believing in their religion.

        15. Syria was a great example of that. In mixed areas, neighbors that you and your great grandparents had lived with for hundreds of years almost immediately showed up at your door to cut your head off and rape your daughter.

        16. “But if you really get to know a moderate muslim well you would know that
          you are nothing but a Kafir (non-believer) at the end of the day. And
          deep down they all think that you deserve whatever your getting for not
          believing in their religion.”
          >All religions are like that. At the end of the die I’ll burn in hell, according whatever religion out there.

        17. Jesus wasn’t a Roman lol. The apostle Paul was a Roman citizen though. Gaining Roman citizenship was much more than simply being borned within the confines of the Roman empire at that time and was considered very prestigious for a jew or anyone basically from that region to have. You clearly know nothing related to that time period. Stop with the pseudo history lesson guy.

        18. That’s whats amusing about all the cop-out clauses in the Koran that Muslims use. They don’t apply to ‘you,’ you aren’t an actual person, just as slaves weren’t people to their owners. You’re kuffar, less than a person, something that needs to be abolished.

        19. Jesus wanted peace but Evangelical pastors are the biggest pieces of trash on the planet.

      2. Yeah, they just support it financially, pretend it doesn’t happen, and shelter the perpetrators. “Moderate” Muslims want everything the nuts want, at the end of the day. They just don’t have the stomach to watch the omelet get made.

        1. Well, I’ve heard it said the moderate Muslims hold you down while the radicals chop off your head, so to speak.
          Yeah, like that moderate Mayor of London guy often rubs me the wrong way.

  14. I’m not a fan of the House of Saud, but I can’t agree with the idea that those vacant tents ought to house (actual) refugees. They are intended for pilgrims to Mecca at peak periods. If they were filled with refugees they could not be used for their intended purpose.
    Of course, they could build more tent cities. It makes more sense to have the refugees stay in culturally and geographically closer areas until they can return to their home.

      1. Well I agree that the people invading Europe are largely not Syrian and not refugees but young male economic adventurers looking for the best welfare state to support them.
        These sorts of people would have little interest living in a tent in Saudi Arabia, only those genuinely in fear for their lives in a war zone, men, women, children, old and young would go for it. I would imagine they would be happy to go home.

        1. was thinking about this situation the other day…
          if you were to take 10000 US Marines (for example) and have them dress in plain clothes without their M16s of course and ship them to the French coast (for example) would they be classed as an invading army?

    1. I totally agree. Ron Paul and the founding fathers had it right. Don’t get involved in this shit, it never turns out well. We shouldn’t be siding with the Saudis, Iranians, Israelis or whoever.

      1. Got to thank the Evangelical idiots and their delusional prophecies for this.

  16. I have to agree that ideally the USA should build bridges with Iran.
    Beneath the screen of fundamentalism, Iranians are considerably more Westernised compared to many Middle Eastern Sunni nations (liberalism and social freedoms under the Shah isn’t yet confined to the distant past and lives on in cultural memory). However, whilst the urban centres are liberal, the rural population is very conservative.
    Within the region Iran is quite democratic: large numbers voted for progressive, more liberal presidents on a number of occasions and won c3 elections in the last decade, beating the rural conservative vote. With its potential to be a champion of liberal democracy in the region, its large oil reserves, adherence to UN nuclear restrictions, and its political clout over shiite political groups and populations, it should be a no brainer for the USA to form an alliance with Iran.
    But, there are at least three major reasons that hold USA politicians back from building bridges:
    – history: the Tehran siege and American hostages haven’t been forgotten or forgiven on both sides; the Iranian Revolutionary Guard is vehemently opposed to the Great Satan and continues to take pot shots at the US Navy in minor skirmishes
    – alliance with Saudi Arabia, Iran most hostile Sunni adversary and major competitor for regional supremacy: it seems like a case of being friends with one or the other, not both
    – funding and links with groups, such as Hezbollah, that USA considers major terrorist organisations

  17. What is Iran’s stand on ISIS and Syria? Where does their support of Hezbollah (and other nonstate guerillas) fit into that?

    1. Iran is one of the only countries that has sent ground troops to fight ISIS in support of Syria. Hezbollah and other militias such as the PMU are sponsored by Iran to help defeat ISIS. It’s too bad a lot of ignorant people just paint all parties as “Muslims” when there’s much more to it in the conflict over there.

    2. Iran and the CIA secretly cooperated in fighting the Taliban. Iran fought them long before the US invades Afghanistan in 2001.

    3. Iran has directly fought ISIS on numerous occasions due to the Sunni-Shia split in Islam. They are natural enemies. Not to mention, the Iranian people are actually quite educated and modern for that part of the world. It would be beneficial if we could tame relations with them (and if their old guard revolutionaries would hurry up and fucking croak). Take away the revolutionary brainwashing and they’re fairly salvageable.

      1. Many of their people are open towards relations with the US. There are radicals at the top, however, and our media also has an agenda of displaying the hard-core lunatics and attempting to paint the entirety as such.

    1. Exactly. I read ROTK often, a lot of good articles but this one is even more stupid than “Why You Should Start Smoking”.

    2. Any country who wishes to have a say in global politics must play the great game for control over the Eurasian supercontinent. And given that most Muslim countries are located at the centre of the same (and possess a large part of the world’s oil reserves), it follows that it is strategically necessary to gain influence over them. China has understood this, and is now making huge infrastructure investments and aid projects in central Asia to increase their influence over and link these countries economically to China. An emerging superpower will not let silly prejudice stop itself from taking the diplomatic and economic measures needed to secure their global position.
      But, if you in the US wish to isolate yourselves into irrelevance, by all means go for it! The rest of the world will not be mourning, exactly,

  21. Excuse me guys but these people attacked us when they grabbed our embassy back during the Jimmy Carter Days and have since then been supporting terrorists against us and our friends, they hate our non-muslim guts and have lots of blood on their hands to prove it.

    1. You mean, unlike the US that has overthrown their democratic government, shot down their civilian airliner, turned a blind eye when Saddam used chemical weapons (while profiting from that war), and bombed, invaded, and destabilized several of its neighbors? How many countries did Iran invade and how many countries did the US invade just in the past few decades?

      1. I have word from someone who served on the USS Vincennes that the airliner it shot down had frozen bodies in it. Makes one wonder.

        3. Possible, but I don’t see a 37° C body freezing after 3 minutes of free fall at most.

      2. If I had my druthers Iran would have been flattened a long time ago back when Reagan was president.

        2. Fight fire with overwhelming fire just like Robert Rogers did the savages at St. Francis.

        3. Even though the savages may deserve to be flattened, I hesitate to flatten Israel.
          I realize I may be overly forgiving.

        4. Iran never tried to massacre the crew of a US Navy ship, and then pretend it was just an “accident.”
          You know who did, don’t you? — [ gtr5.com ]

        1. No one even knew about AJAX at the time, so I’m not sure how it was a direct precipitating event to the protesters.

        2. It was. Ajax was the reason why the Shah was seen by many Iranians as a stooge for foreign interests.

    2. Jimmy Carter sold out the Shah who was a long ally and friend of the US.
      Funny how democrat presidents have a long history of “fucking up.”

      1. I cant think of any Democrat President that hasn’t screwed things up other than Grover Cleveland who really wasn’t that bad a president.

        1. Of course not. Selective amnesia works that way…but the agenda you push is plain as day.

  22. If I’m not mistaken, didn’t a Breitbart article within the past year or so state that in the next few decades we may see the US, Russia, Iran, and India on the same side against Saudi, Pakistan, and China?

      1. but what would make the US change its mind with Saudi?
        and why are Russia and China enemies?
        the injins and pakis i get, but the others… ???

        1. Russia and China have been frosty with each other for decades. As for the saudis? Maybe admitting for once that they’re the number one exporter of terrorism.

  23. Iran’s biggest stumbling block is the old guard of revolutionaries that still tries to brainwash the population with delusional propaganda. Eliminate that, and you’re left with a salvageable nation that could improve itself.

  24. The biggest bull I have heard on the internet. These islamo facisist only want too our blood, they aren’t our friends otherwise you are not any different from the liberals you claim to detest.

  25. Hezbollah did bomb the marine barracks in Beirut in the early 80’s, killing more than 200 U.S. marines. Also, they collaborated in the 90’s with Al Qaeda to launch the Khobar Towers attack in Saudi Arabia, killing several dozen U.S. troops.

  26. We should ally with Russia.
    That is really the only country we need as an ally.
    A US/Russia alliance would be both an unstoppable force as well as an immovable object. And it would be fun watching China sh*t bricks.

    2. Well, that does not seem to be happening, instead Russia and China are finding more and more common interests. The US is on its way down as a global power, and there is probably very little to do about it.

      1. In your dreams. Russia is a nation in decline. Its GDP is smaller than that of the Netherlands, its military is antiquated, and its declining population is smaller than Pakistan’s (its Muslim population is growing though). Russia is like Italy in the 1930s, it struts about like a great power because real world powers allow it to do so. I wish RoKers would get off Putin’s jock already.

        2. Why do leftists like you hate Russia after eating out of the Soviets’ hand for decades?

        3. Not only leftists hate Russia. Go ask anyone in Poland, Czech, Hungary if they are leftist and if they like Russia.
          Having said that, I do not hate it but I think it is often presented in a way too positive light. They have a different agenda and while cooperation in certain spheres may be reasonable, endorsing it as an ally is not.

        4. I perfectly agree with you on that Russia is portrayed as some sort of Eurasian Texas of freedom.
          My statement was aimed more at the marx butt boys whose professors probably cried when the Berlin Wall came down.

        5. Well, not quite correct. Russia has a GDP of about 1.3 trillions, the Netherlands 0.8 trillion. A significant difference, but of course still far behind the US (ca 18 trillions), China (11-12) and Japan (5).
          No, Russia is not going to become a superpower again any time soon, but China is. When (not if, but when) that happens, the unipolar world order will have come to and end. This is not to say that the US will not be an important world power in the future too, it is just not going to be the only one.

  27. ” Sure, Saudi women may be gorgeous,
    but if you manage to rip that burka off her body, you have my
    congratulations, for you are the King of Game. Of course, her father and
    brothers will likely murder you afterwards.”
    – Saudi women may be gorgeous…
    WTF??? Is this true? Never would have guessed in a million years.
    – Of course, her father and
    brothers will likely murder you afterwards
    Only after they murder her for “family honor”.

    1. Lots of pretty ones, you just don’t get much opportunity to see them. The prettiest ones tend to dress the most conservative, for obvious reasons.

  29. Interesting. But this “…Although Iran funds groups like Hezbollah, these organizations have never attacked the United States…”is just not an accurate statement.

  30. On #3 saying that Iranians have a superior sense of taste isn’t something I’d hang an argument on. I don’t even know where to buy a purple shirt with silver pinstripes.

  31. Good time to be pushing this idea now that the John McCain’s of the world are on the wane
    Very disappointing that the Saudis didn’t have to answer for 9/11 something they almost certainly had a hand in. The new prince should be pressured to come clean. He could blame his father’s evil advisers

    1. John McCains are never on the wane, there is always more money to be made from war and chaos.

      1. true, but one might wonder whether the appetite is undiminished. We might find out pretty soon given the current standoffs

        1. Well, the American Public seems pretty keen to crawl up North Korea’s ass right now, and it didn’t take a lot for all my ‘conservative’ associates to start eating their own because ‘muh nazi!’

        2. the timing was interesting actually. One moment the world’s at the brink of war and then a staged nazi baiting exercise changes the political map and stocks are on the up again and everything’s hunky dory

  32. I heard a story, once, of an Indian man who entered Saudi Arabia, carrying a Bible. His assets were promptly seized, and he was thrown into an open-air prison for two weeks – for being a Christian.
    Iran, by contrast, has political elections, and while it is not a full democracy, it protects the rights of minorities – including Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians.
    Well, I am personal friends with a man who has been thrown into an Iranian prison for being non-muslim. The ‘story you heard’ about Saudi Arabia, while believable, is no contrast to Iran. Iran does the same thing. The entire point being made in #3 is nonsense.
    2. Saudis have no sense of taste
    6. Persian girls
    Yeah, Persian chicks can be hot. This is no basis for a foreign policy.
    I usually just let the poorer quality articles slide without comment, but this one deserves special recognition.

  36. Iran has never attacked the United States? So the Iranian US Embassy hostage crisis never happened? US navy personnel were never captured nor US drones shot down and scavenged for technology? US was allied with Iran when the Shah was in power, the current regime is built on anti-US rhetoric. They should be removed for a different regime.

    1. You’d think someone with access to the internet would know the truth about Iran Contra – you must be a jew shill

      1. I was alive then and have been studying Iran and the history since that moment for decades. Pretty sure I know more than you buddy, but hey… a nation that chants death to America is one we should embrace? You sound like a cuck jew shill. KYS.

        2. lmao okay buddy I’m opposed to all those things but because I don’t like a Muslim regime that has never liked my country I’m a Soros plant. Keep up the good work Shill, spend those shekels deposited to your account well.

    2. Best post here. Of course the alt.righttards and the (((joo))) haters will disagree with you.

  37. This is never going to happen with Trump who still sees America as a world cop. In the future America will disengage from the Middle East.

    1. why does the US have to be Team America : World Police “F*ck Yeah!” ???
      Israel couldn’t possibly let the US disengage from the ME could it? otherwise they will be crushed.

      1. Give it 10-20 years of the far right and far left fighting each other and America will become a different country.

        2. I would agree that Jewish subversion is destroying America, that’s a central belief of the far right but violence solves nothing and marches are something that blacks in Ferguson do, better thing is cultural reprogramming. The answer was that both despise Jews.

        3. One sees the country as great, something to be preserved. One sees the country as fatally flawed, something that needs to be apologized on behalf of, and fundamentally altered.

    2. Trump tried to turn away from that role, but the Globalists and McCains of the world are still going strong. When Bannon goes, you know the fight is completely over.

      1. Steve Bannon isn’t leaving. It’s good he condemned white nationalists because they would sabatoge the cause.
        He commented that a military solution would not be the best course of action. You wonder why the establishment is pushing so hard to get him out?

        2. What about President Mike Pence which will soon be reality? Trump removing Bannon is not going to help his cause, he is already in deep with Robert Mueller, also his son in law is in the same boat.

  38. Inside62b

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! :!ag82d:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    :!ag82d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash372ShopHub/Pay$97/Hour… ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!ag82l..,…

  40. I fucked my first Iranian at my 18-year birthday. She also turned 18 that day. Really nice bang. She was a 6.5 with really big tits on a petite brown body. We dated for a while but not hot enough for LTR.
    My second was during university period. I approached at a large student corridor party. I lost my keys so we take a bicycle to her place and did the deed. She was a student in chemistry. 7.5, great ass and nice face. White skin. Smashed her good but for some reason I didn’t take her phone number.

    1. I thought Turkish women in Germany were stunning and unlike leftist German women they love America.

  41. You are out of your fu*king mind with this BS. Iran is responsible for the deaths of 1,000s of Americans in Iraq. They are a dictatorial theocracy. They hang gay men with cranes. They stone women to death. They are (or have) working to get nukes on missiles. And you don’t care because Israel would be target #1??
    Islam as followed by EITHER sect is incompatible with western civ. Their prisons are crammed with political dissenters. You think the mullahs would do anything but play us for fools?
    Haven’t you seen the photos comparing contemporary Iran with Iran in the 70s? It looks straight out of 1984. And you want them as an ally? You are insane.
    Plus your bigotry is disgusting.

    1. The picture you paint is much more fuzzy than that. Iran is a big country and traditional Shia elements, including Ja’fari jurisprudence, merge with more liberal such that tend to appear beneath the surface. Rich kids in Teheran behave in the same way as those in all other countries, including Western ones. Money talks and often go hand in hand with increased hedonism.
      As for the criticism in some other comments, many must understand that at ROK sometimes realtalk is juxtaposed with humor and “sexism” (such as that the Iranian girls can be pretty hot, which of course is irrelevant from a serious, literal viewpoint). Likewise is that the Trump administration should neglect Saudi and prefer Iran as an ally, which is not realistic. Still the point is pretty valid as a thought experiment.

      1. America is based on a petro Dollar making it impossible for the US to align with Iran. As you said money talks.

    3. When America was founded they warned against involvement in foreign wars. The current day leadership ignored that advice.

    4. Another sensible post. Of course the alt.righttards who obsessively hate Israel will disagree with it.

  42. I’ve been saying this for years. Henry Kissinger(please just die already) just said that an Iranian/Shia empire could rise if we don’t stop it. Maybe it should. The Zionists and House of Saud have been doing a terrible job running things.
    There are tons of parallels between Christianity and Shia Islam, too. No wonder Hezbollah protects Christians:
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/98be7a07056e607833da3a90505a0719718ae16363b0c7e731ec5562d0579480.jpg
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e40762a4bb227ee7c3655d8eaf0909337aca9bed307170b374537b277229b4a2.jpg

  43. Y’all are forgetting the reason the Shah was overthrown in the first place is because he tried to modernize and westernize Iran. But the Iranian people didn’t want that. This atavistic, backwards-looking people wanted to return to the Dark Ages. That’s why Khomeini appealed to them. There’s no way civilized nations can ally with such people; such a culture.

    1. You know that democratic elected government was thrown away in CIA arranged coup that installed Shah.
      “This atavistic, backwards-looking people wanted to return to the Dark Ages”- lie, they just didn’t wanted to be whores to jewsa.

    2. Eh, kinda, but not quite. There were religious, as well as socialist elements, in the revolution, but the main focus was to restore democracy. Unfortunately, the more moderate elements brought the Ayatollah back out of exile to help court the religious. Never in a million years did they expect him to stay, and declare a theocracy (and then murder them all).

  44. The reality is that America will leave the Middle East with three powers replacing it. One is Iran, the other is Russia and China, and the third will be a European reformation of the old Roman Empire.

  45. “Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khameini, suggested that feminism and sexual libertinism are Zionist ploys to collapse Western civilization.
    While his categorizations may be imprecise…”
    You mean he is exactly right.

  47. “Those countries that have significant Shia populations – Iran, Syria, and Lebanon – are pro-Western. Furthermore, Shiites have scarcely engaged violently with Westerners”
    Iran and Azerbaijan are the only majority Shia countries and Iran is definitely not pro-western. Hmm, you do know Hezbollah and IRGC have killed American soldiers in Beirut & Iraq right? Shows me how ignorant political articles on this site are.

    1. Azerbaijan is less religious than most of Europe, even though it’s technically an Islamic Republic. They only have one real religion there, and it isn’t any supernatural being that gets prayed to…

    2. If the US would only keep out of places like Beirut and Iraq, then they would not take casualties. If Iran send its forces into Washington and Mexico, then they would be attacked there – and quite rightly so.

  48. But if the USA did that then it would have to stop sucking Jewish cock 24/7.
    How would the USA survive without this?

Comments are closed.