How The Sexual Inquisition Against Men Started

The British press have raised a slughorne to the manosphere:

Why do so many false rape accusations come to court?

A proper explanation requires us to butcher the most sacred among sacred cows: female sexual liberation.

The ‘Respectable Slut’ Paradox

As an ecological event, the Sexual Revolution is unprecedented. Quick credit, contraception, and computer networking have handed western girls completely unobstructed and commitment-free access to the sexual marketplace. The ‘customer is always right’ dynamic means that anyone who opposes or questions a girl’s judgment while she is in her nubile prime is treated with scorn, so the entire West has gaslighted itself into the assumption that the female sexual whim is infallible.

Women have stolen nature’s mandate for a 1:1 relationship between sex and commitment and now marry the men they need only when they can no longer get the men they want.

Feminist marriage advice

But the female quest to play God can only work so long as men are prepared to submit to their zoning by women into sheepfolds of ‘sexy bad-boy’ material and ‘stable husband’ material, overlooking the retro-active cuckoldry that threatens their future marriages. Today, as men increasingly opt out of marriage, feminism is attempting to protect the women who invested their bodies into the cartel by doubling down ever more forcefully on rationales which shift accountability for their sexual behavior to men.

‘Men only think about one thing… Girls have to be so careful these days!’

Enforcement of the Sexual Command Economy

Society covertly sets its gold standard of feminine rightness with conventions, clichés, and pocketbook pathologies that overwhelmingly describe masculine wrongness. Did the vast spectrum of ‘autism’ exist before the attempt was made to frame empathy as more correct than rationality? Did the ‘Madonna Whore’ complex exist before men were expected to comply with their female sexual categorisation? Did party-girls dismiss stable men as ‘sweet’ or ‘creepy’ at 20 then whisper of ‘closet homosexuality’ or ‘fear of women’ when they refused to step up and marry at 30? Does a female creep even exist?

Type ‘narcissist’ into a Google image search. Are you confronted with advertisements for treatment and help centers, or with a slew of easy access vindication memes for single moms and jilted women? These ideas tell us much more about those who casually apply them than those to whom they are applied. None of this rubbish existed before women expected to have their cake and eat it (which reminds me – neither did fat acceptance).

Thus, man is chivvied into compliance with the emancipation from nature that woman first sought for herself – and men are complicit in this every time they ‘make an honest woman’ of a slut or project shame to their brother with the ‘guess you just can’t get laid’ rhetoric.

Adam, the first White Knight, refused to put his foot down with a rebellious woman. Nothing has changed in the basic pattern of male failure since.

Female State Power

Where culture goes, law follows. The crime of male insubordination to the female whim does not appear on statute books, but we can know it exists just as we can know an invisible celestial object exists by the movement of other celestial objects around it. Whether he’s an ex-husband, lover ,or someone she saw across the street, a man who fails to step up on cue and commit intimacy or resources to the value that a woman ascribes to her own sexual intimacy can now be prosecuted under other civil and criminal charges which are defined in law.

Joseph rejected the advances Potiphar’s wife. She then accused him of rape.

The only problematic challenge is how to use a law which technically has not been broken to convict for a crime that technically does not exist.

The Cathartic Prosecution Service

It is impossible to say whether rapes outnumber false accusations (no specific crime of making a false accusation exists in the UK), but, by redefining rape in the broadest possible terms and false accusation in the narrowest, feminism has developed a theory of Rape Culture.

Like all good conspiracy theories, the fact that hardly any of the survivor hashtags, self identified victims in anonymous college campus surveys, and #metoo style claims actually come to court is taken as yet more proof of the depth of society’s problem.

Victims of rape trust Twitter more than they trust the police! – feminist queef

No – liars trust Twitter more than they trust the police.

But the incantations of survivors presents too good an opportunity for the openly politicised Crown Prosecution Service to pass up and, rising year on year, a staggering fifth of their cases are now based on allegations of sexual violence. Not a week passes without another man being paraded through the press for a perfidious accusation and, even when acquitted in court, his negative publicity remains a sentence in itself.

The genius of this inquisition is that it fulfills feminism’s covert purpose of frightening men into compliance not through successful convictions but through constant public failures.

By showing that even the sickest rape fantasist can condemn a man to show trial without consequence, the CPS has handed women automatic power of state over any man who disappoints her.

CPS Director Alison Saunders – fairy Godmother to mendacious women

This inquisition is damaging to both individuals and society, but it will ultimately defeat its own purpose in one of two ways:

1 – The law will change to grant the accused the same anonymity as the accuser.


2 – Slowly but surely, the failure of the show trials will make the accusations of sexual abuse – whether true or false – as laughable to the British public as they already are to the women who make them.

I suspect that even most diehard feminists would prefer the first compromise to their state power – although I’ll let the sales figures for Fifty Shades of Grey and the rape fantasies of Jemma Beale speak of a possible female lobby for the second.

However, until this is over, an upright man must be prepared to turn his back on the whole pantomime of British justice.

Judge in Your Own Cause

I’m a reasonably good looking and wealthy man in my late twenties. I doubt I’ve met my wife yet and, as I don’t believe in free love, I occasionally turn down the sexual advances of increasingly desperate non-wife material. Daring to rebuff women like this is like playing the coin-pusher in a fairground. Eventually, one tipped over the edge and escalated a series of false accusations against me over the course of four years – mostly online, which I had no problem with – but lately also in the courts. Her increasingly deranged claims of sexual abuse (I never so much as held hands with her), could well culminate in the R-Bomb and a subsequent trial which would serve her penal end as well as feminism’s social end.

I have no intention of becoming another one of Britain’s broken souls trying to piece his life together after a pyrrhic court victory. I also have no material trappings in the West and a pied-à-terre in a non-aligned country so, like any dissident in a revolutionary society, my suitcases are packed in the hallway.

Your move, CPS.

A land of chaos is better than a land of tyranny that is ordered against you.

Read Next: Feminists Try To Debunk False Rape Culture With False Data

46 thoughts on “How The Sexual Inquisition Against Men Started”

  1. One thing we may see is that men in elite positions stop pushing rape culture since it’s clear they can lose their power through it. Otherwise, they’re merely strengthening a tactic that can remove their elite status. The point of them pushing rape culture in the first place was to marginalize men who could threaten their power, not themselves.

    1. Society intends, nature allows. But as nature is the more powerful where carnal urges are concerned, I would always bring this problem back to extreme sexual liberation rather than a conscious effort to marginalise one group or another. What we are looking at here is the social face of an ecological phenomenon.

    2. one might wonder whether those men who have fallen enjoyed the same level of indemnity as their peers. Are they masons? If so have they fallen foul of someone? Is it a question of in-fighting or rivalry?
      Harvey W. was untouchable until he suddenly wasn’t. Was that because the accusations reached a critical mass, or because of rivalry with his brother? The elites protect their own but sometimes they sacrifice their own as well. So if your reasoning is sound, it’s not just the weaklings and stragglers who’ve fallen out of favour who need to feel vulnerable, all elite men need to fear falling foul of a system that typically they promote for reasons both of self-interest and of ideology (lower wages / but also the principle of gender / hermaphroditism in masonry etc.). The connection between sex, including deviant sex may also be a part of that, but now we are seeing major players like Weinstein, Weiner etc. going down it’s clear that there are tensions between the people who thus far have been promoting feminism and the feminists themselves. It’s too early perhaps to break open the popcorn but there are certainly some fissures forming. Feminism is a golem run amok. When that happens the shem needs to be taken from the mouth.
      On the other hand, right now it’s doing God’s work. Hollywood is corrupt and corrupting. Let it run amok but in the right direction. “Metoo” is about shifting the focus from hollywood on to the usual goat of male heterosexuality. It is important that they don’t succeed in pulling that off. The focus needs to go right back to their doorstep and nowhere else. “Metoo” needs to loop back to Hollywood

  2. It is all part of the march through the institutions and destroy western civilization plan.
    The promised glorious world of next Tuesday will be nothing more than a steaming pile of third world irrelevance.

  3. First they get your kids with porn and other forms of degeneracy. Then they get your son to become either an “effeminate cuck” or a “misogynist player”. Your daughter becomes a slut against your feminist wishes, but you can’t do anything because “It’s Her Body, Her Choice” and your stuck at work all day paying off the debts they screwed your country over with. Then when your kids go off to college, your son gets a rape accusation while your daughter learns about how she was “degraded and abused” as part of RAPE CULTURE after spending money on “sexy clothes” and “cosmetic surgeries,” and you have to PAY FOR IT ALL, college costs and legal fees. Then your daughter becomes a bitter old cat lady who gives her money to all of these sham “women’s charities” while your son is either unemployed or homeless or stuck with divorce fees and alimony after his bitter feminist wife decides to “trade him in for a new model.” The Chosenites profit big time from their litigation, entertainment, apparel, plastic surgery, news, charity, porn and academia rackets while your family ends up being poor and miserable!!! These people have also made your symbols, the world’s oldest in fact with a worldwide distribution that is almost impossible to explain, illegal to display while acquiring Middle Eastern land in what was perhaps the biggest sham of the 21st Century. They have impoverished your nations in a seven year “Shemitah” cycle that has produced the 2008 financial crash and 9/11. The knowledge is out there for those who wish to seek it.

    1. but what happened to the last shemitah a year or so ago. There was a lot of talk about it, and then nothing happened. It was supposed to coincide with the introduction of the yuan as a reserve currency

      1. It got cancelled because too many people got wind of what was going to happen after 8chan /pol/ and all the other “weapons grade autists” started to notice patterns and blew the lid on it.

  4. Great article, but I must point out that the “you just can’t get laid” rhetoric is more often used by ‘manospherians’ (who don’t ‘pedestalize women,’ yet simultaneously use women as the barometer of success; hence the “you just can’t get laid brah!” rhetoric) who have been disagreed with on some minor point.

    1. There is no hardship in the West anymore. No struggle. Nothing to fight for. So we get bored. And what do we do when we are bored? We turn on each other for kicks to find meaning. It is like being on the trade floor at an investment bank, when there is money to be made in the Markets everyone has a purpose and that is to extract as much money as possible. A purpose, the struggle to make some nut. When there is nothing to do what happens? The senior guys start playing pranks on each other and pick on the newbies and interns.

  5. I must agree that bad boys are definitely NOT marriage material. Neither are serial abusers, but they seem to have an unlimited supply of women who willingly hook up with them.

    1. Like how we bros love sluts. We definitely hook up with them but wouldn’t see them as mother of our kids.

    2. Serial Abusers? HA, Serial Killers!, they drown in pussy, women love violent men, is in their nature, I wonder how many “love letters” the batman movie theater killer gets in a month?

      1. well, Ted Bundy had women in the courtroom staring at him, making passes. They knew he had killed 100+ women.
        Women are nuts.

  6. Of course, it happened incrimentally. The Sexual Revolution
    was Marxism’s master coup. You never rush something as
    important as the destruction of an entire civilization. (Unless that
    civilization is seriously weakened.) You disguise your devious intentions
    under the mask of virtue signalling. Since your evil nature remains
    unchanged (You “act” good, rather then ARE good) you chip away at
    social standards. You push limits. But you do it “progressively.”
    People’s need to see themselves as “good” coupled with social proof
    is all you need. “You’re not, racist, sexist, homophobic, Islamaphobic
    are you.
    You chip away at everything that worked before. You come up with
    remedies for “problems” that aren’t problems. You help people become “liberated,” then they turn around an enslave YOU.

  7. You have to admit Muslims in the west certainly know how to control their own women. But of course they can control them and it’s because Muslims are granted a legal holiday in regards to allowing natural male/female roles.
    White men on the other hand are under the legal gun to surrender their white women and children to the nanny state. Then the state forges a mandate for western whites to depopulate and ‘mooove over’ and accomodate a semitic racially mongrel overwrite. Then Muzzies come in with properly situated and functioning breeder women and with Islamic patriarchy. Muzzies have the proper management of the wife/mother by the sire down to a science.
    BUT ISLAM IS WEAPONIZED and used as a surfactant to render out the racial bloodlines and mongrelize the west. Islam is like salt. A little salt on food is good but rock salt shot in your face by a riot cop is harmful. ISLAM shot in your face is the same. Islamic semite rapists and pillagers are currently being cannon blasted through western borders. IT’S A BIG MONGREL GUN and carpet bombing once again of the Rhineland and elsewhere in Europe. Still you have to admit those Islamists know how to constructively manage their own shebeasts.
    But too much is too much. The loathing of Islam is triggered by hordes of brown semitic and Arab mongrels empowered by the state to be unleashed in a frenzy of rape and pillage upon western lands. OUR OWN STATE authorizes and enforces the force-fed semitic ‘transformation’ of the west – – as stated in the words of the 5 foot nothing bug faced Jewess talking head Barbara Lerner Spectre. Then the state puts on a feminist mask and orders western men to stand down and heel to the likes of
    Saunders or any bitch in a skirt on a judge’s bench.
    THAT BRITISH CPS WITCH is a propped up fugly stick puppet with a bitch mask. She knows not what she does. She was indoctrinated and programmed feminist, but feminism/antifa is like every other mind wipe program. Most every psy op engineered brainwash program comes with a built in back door which accesses a terminator kill switch. How else would the elites turn off their zombies once they’re ready to get rid of them and flush them down the toilet?
    Whereas WE largely are self discovered and self awakened troubadours. It takes inner creativity and self construction to be a troubadour. A self made red pill bulwark has no fake overwrite program and no kill switch, so WE CAN’T be turned off like the feminist skirt gestappos or like the antifa goons. The elites can flip a switch once they’re done with the antifas and they all either drop dead or they flop like sick fish into mental asylums. BUT WE are real and organic. We can’t be killed or turned off. Our strength comes from the source and from the glory HAIL THE PATRIARCHY!
    In our core we all want rid of bitch empowerment. Men and women alike know it’s killing us all. Men and women all across the west are shaking and waking in droves. Women know their place and men know theirs moreso, and that theirs is to guard and direct the order of divine PATRIARCHY. The isnsinct to survive is kicking in with the western creed and patriarchy will snowball soon.

  8. “Women have stolen nature’s mandate for a 1:1 relationship between sex and commitment and now marry the men they need only when they can no longer get the men they want.” One of the realest things I’ve ever read on this site. I’m experiencing this now. All the hot women who rejected me when I was young, now want me because I’m older, have a little bit of money, and am more stable. Meanwhile they’re bodies are all used up and most of them have kids. To combat this, I’m getting six pack fit, shredded, and only dating young girls between 18-24. Life is good! LOL.

  9. Firstly – Only Wahhabism is the only extremist portion of Islam. THe majority of Muslims (like 85%) actually believe in the same ideals as us. THey belie in technology education and social justice. It’s only the extremists – which ironically were inflamed by the CIA in the 60’s onwards (see Mujahadeen). And Israel is using that small percentage of Muslim extremists to justify a Jewish Holy War in the Middle East using their Proxy army – US Forces. Most problems are in fact cultural and not religious – most of the North African Rapists aren’t even Muslim. You can’t even Compare Saudi Arabia to Indonesia – both Muslim countries yet have massively different laws.
    Secondly – You should be hooking up with your future wife whilst still in high school – you should lose your virginity to each other and then never ever have another partner. It is the only way to keep a marriage sucessful.
    Source – My LIfe

    1. And here I was thinking the US and Russia were fighting over Oil.
      I never realizing it’s because of the deep altruism of the Russians and the overwhelming love the American government has for Israel that they involve themselves in these regional conflicts.

    2. Complete and utter nonsense. You are lying. For instance, surveys on homosexuality in Islamic countries show massive condemnation of homosexuality and alternative lifestyles, reaching 99% in many cases. You can find other Pew Center studies on Muslim attitudes towards a variety of things like democracy, women’s rights, free speech, etc.
      A massive number of muslims believe it is okay to use force to suppress criticism of their religion. Almost no westerns believe that nowadays.
      You are spewing complete and utter crap. (Although I agree about Israel).

      1. A massive number of muslims believe it is okay to use force to suppress criticism of their religion. Almost no westerns believe that nowadays.
        In fact virtually every single western liberal believes it is okay to use force to suppress criticism of their liberal religion. And every single western feminist most certainly believes it is not only okay but desirable to use force to suppress criticism of their feminist religion. If you’re looking for intolerance the West is where to find it.
        surveys on homosexuality in Islamic countries show massive condemnation of homosexuality and alternative lifestyles, reaching 99% in many cases.
        Which just shows that Muslims aren’t as dumb and cowardly as westerners.

  10. No hymen – no diamond!
    (Possible exception for the true widow – that only ever had sex with one man, and he is now dead)
    That’s all
    Insist on finding a decent woman.
    A woman is either a virgin, a wife, a widow, or a whore.
    The vast majority of women in our world are whores. Proverbs chapter 5 teaches us about harlots like these.
    Of course, you should also be an honorable man, who only has sex within the context of marriage.

    1. This is so true! Most are just brainwashed and can’t see the obvios…
      Let it sink in and grasp the message.
      I recommend “MCGOO”‘s comment in the blog post “” for a more detailed picture…It’s a hard one to swallow

    2. Only have sex within the confines of marriage? That means you’ll die a virgin in most parts of the Western World if you did that.

      1. @Sam_seau
        No. It seems that way to a man until the supply-demand balance tips in favour of potential husbands. It is very important for men to understand this, because if they don’t, then they may blink and take the first offer they get. When you find yourself with ever better girls, you can use your (undeserved but natural), market advantage to weed out the majority and only settle for the best. Remember, THEY compete for YOU.

    3. “A woman is either a virgin, a wife, a widow, or a whore.” Yes – but the issue is the extent to which people ‘change lanes.’ In my submission, balance will be found when men change from husband to player with at the same rate and with the same ease that women shift from whore to wife. Under that circumstance, the whores would very quickly disappear and we’d all be much the better for it.

  11. Also, to the author:. I’m sorry that you live in a country run by lunatics (the UK).
    Your government is truly terrifying. Rarely has the world seen such wickedness and tyranny.
    The government in the US isn’t good either, but at least we have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to bear arms. You sad blokes don’t even have that.

    1. It’s not run by lunatics. The reason for all this is that in the past, men were necessary to advance England. Now that England is relatively stable, the majority of male slaves are less necessary and even worse are also competition to gaining access to more females.
      Simply exterminating all those male slaves would create great disorder and would even put all the gains made by the masters at risk. Enacting laws banning male slaves from interacting with females would lead to open revolt.
      Far more prudent to enact a series of laws that will punish male slaves for engaging in sexual relations or in acting in a masculine way. That way, the masters can pretend that opportunities exist for Englands male slaves, just not “too much”.
      As a side bonus, the criminal and proletariat class who are mostly useless past occasional manual labor will proliferate and take “from below” whatever females the male slave class has access to.
      Now why do England’s rulers not care about the proletariat scum advancing, but they do care about the male slave class advancing? That is because the proletariat know their place, revel in it in fact, and thus are no threat to England’s masters. The male slave class on the other hand are capable and ambitious, thinking past their station. Why, the uppity bastards might even get the idea that the entire concept of Lords is a ridiculously outmoded anachronism, and then where will we be?! We’d have to actually work for a living! @#$# that!
      Nope, best to have them all killed in the most effective and practical way possible with a minimum of disruption.
      It’s ingenious when you think about it.

      1. “That is because the proletariat know their place, revel in it in fact, and thus are no threat to England’s masters. The male slave class on the other hand are capable and ambitious, thinking past their station.”
        I think it’s absolutely no coincidence that white and Asian males (the smartest groups) are the only groups given zero sympathy by the left.

    2. british culture is heavly influenced by centuries of monarchism and the peasant, lord dictonomy. tyrany is the british flagship. one can’t simply think 150 years of french and 70 years american influence will disrupt that

  12. Question for all CS Lewis fans
    Is it just me, or does CPS director Alison Saunders remind you of Fairy Hardcastle from “That Hideous Strength”?

    1. Whoa, you have read “That Hideous STrength”? I am impressed. Most of us Amerikans have only finished our H.S. assigned reading or DVD viewing. Good for you. I always liked “Out of the Silent Planet” myself.

  13. Maybe it was the 60 deadlifts I just did but I had a hard time reading this. Something about the style made it less comprehensible to me. However, I can tell he’s a good writer and smart person.

  14. #MeToo
    Been there in the UK, been accused, then harassed by the police. Was told by my solicitor that despite the original accusations being unfounded the police would continue to pursue me until they found a charge that would stick.
    Moved to a different country.

  15. didn’t know about joseph and potiphar’s wife.
    false rape accusations by scorned and rejected women go back to the old testament and beyond.
    there’s nothing new under the sun

    1. “there’s nothing new under the sun”
      Um… except maybe…um…. birth control?
      Females have always been females.
      But not the wholesale misandry we have today.
      That’s technologies fault.
      Technology got us into this mess. Technology will have to get us out.

  16. i enjoyed this article way more than your usual ROK article. Please write more. this site has been turning to shit lately

  17. that Sheryl Sandberg is a particularly cancerous jew.
    She was gonna be Hitlery’s Secretary Of Treasury and control the IRS.
    Fully legalized theft from the goy, all their bank accounts,
    only the chosen ones allowed to be Millionaires and Billionaires.
    You don’t even know how badly we dodged the final bullet

  18. That was a fantastic article. I could feel as I was growing up in the 80s and 90s that girls and women somehow were assigned excessive social power and men a kind of worthlessness. Of course the boomers who raised me couldn’t understand it as it wasn’t like that when they were young. All this social engineering from subtle messages in advertising down to smartphones is implemented slowly and with an evil intelligence.
    Good it sounds like the misfortune of a rape accusation has not prevented the author living an ordinary life, pursuing a wife. Can imagine with people like Roosh what it must be like once your political passion gets so strong it kind of becomes your career, will see if I can avoid that happening to me in the future.. Once your eyes are open to what is going on, it’s hard to forget about it..

  19. “Did the vast spectrum of ‘autism’ exist before the attempt was made to frame empathy as more correct than rationality?”
    Aside from Kanners, I believe the entire autism spectrum is intended to invalidate systemic ways of thinking.
    Also note how one can draw striking parallels between people with autism petitioning society for acceptance and men petitioning females for dates, sex, etc.
    In both cases it is all about systemic thinkers forced to the feet of so called ’empathic’ thinkers. Because the ’empathic’ thinkers are the gatekeepers to social acceptance. And that acceptance needed for pussy.
    Also the parallels between beta males slaving away to support the world while getting the scraps left over from alphas and ‘nerds’ contributing the lion’s share of technology to modern society and being rewarded with fat, frumpy, wives at best.

  20. “However, until this is over, an upright man must be prepared to turn his back on the whole pantomime of British justice.”
    As the British courts increasingly embarrass themselves with this trype the Sharia courts will come to be recognized as the only respectable ones.

  21. Christopher, thank you for letting me cross your lawn and having me in for a cup of tea. I like your ideas and website. Good stuff. Stay in touch.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *