As you probably have heard in the news, earlier in August a Pennsylvania grand jury handed down a 1,356-page account of sexual abuse which involved around 1,000 kids and 300 priests during a period of approximately 70 years. It is another pedophilia scandal within the Catholic Church that adds up to their collection of countless other ones reported in recent years.
The commie pope—while on his two-day visit to Ireland—begged for forgiveness again, just the way he did in Chile back in January of this year.
You can notice how quick and scathing the mainstream media is to denounce these recurring events, after all we know who owns the MSM and the (real) Church has a long, well-known history of “anti-semitism” and resistance against the tentacles of globalism. I wish the media had the same commitment to inform the existence of other pedophile rings full of high-ranking people as well.
What about Hollywood? Remember Corey Feldman and Corey Haim? NXIVM and similar others? You won’t see the media going after it. Don’t fool yourself, darling! (Picture: Pope in Ireland)
Is the problem of the church’s innumerous sexual abuse allegations really pedophilia? To me there is a deeper explanation for it, and that explanation is: homosexualism. 81% of the alleged victims are male and three-fourths of them are post-pubescent. As you guys are certainly aware of, the Church has a very big issue with homosexualism among its clergymen.
I have a theory for the high presence of gay men inside priesthood: until not long ago being gay was definitely not ok, homosexuals were not accepted as they are now, so they became priests.
The developed Western world of today encourages people to become gay, it applauds individuals for their gayness, but it wasn’t always like that. Now, try to imagine a closeted homosexual man living in the 50s, for example. What a better place to go than the Catholic seminary? People wouldn’t look you down, you wouldn’t have to get married, the place was filled with other young men (potential sexual partners) and that’s how the Church got corrupted by perverts.
Pedophilia x Homosexualism
One normie could argue “how homosexualism relates to pedophilia?” Any red-pilled person who has ever wondered what causes someone to become gay will notice that there is an undeniable link between pedophilia and homosexualism.
Let’s remember the occasion of Milo Yiannopolous’ resignation from Breitbart over comments which seemed to endorse sex between “younger men” and older men. Something that is—as he pointed out—extremely common among gay men. A 2009 report revealed that 74 percent of bisexuals had been sexually abused as children, I am pretty sure homosexuals follow the same numbers.
I won’t say homosexual behavior is exclusively caused by pedophilia because human (or animal) sexuality is a very complex topic which can certainly involve many variables. I just don’t buy that “born this way” hype, until this day not a single reliable proof of the existence of a gay gene or anything like it was discovered.
The Vatican once bought a £21 million apartment block above ‘Europe’s largest gay sauna’.
Pope Francis, a champion of the left-leaning agenda inside the Church, has been accused of covering up former Cardinal McCarrick’s abuse allegations (one of the many cases in Pennsylvania). The accusations were made by Carlo Vigano, a former Vatican ambassador to the US, and if it proves to be true–I am positive it is—that should result in pope Francis’ resignation. As a traditionalist Catholic myself I would be delighted with such an event.
Francis has already been complacent with other pedos before. One good example is the 2015 ‘Synod on the Family’ when the pope invited Godfried Danneels, a Belgium Cardinal convicted of covering up pedophiles in the 90s, to attend the meeting. Danneels is a hard-left priest that tries to push the Church ” liberal reformation” and admitted that he was part of a plot against (right-leaning) Pope Benedict and in favor of the election of leftie Francis.
To affirm that the Church’s gay/pedos are exclusively part of the left-wing priesthood would be too Manichean. I am sure there are tons of sick people who lean right also. But it can’t be denied that the liberals make up the vast majority of these issues involving sexual misconduct.
“Religious progressives”
For those who don’t know, the Catholic Church, just as any other political institution, is divided in factions that tend to be more liberal or orthodox. The liberation theology, for instance, is a movement created inside the Catholic Church (and some Protestant denominations) which aims to mix Christianity and Marxism.
Even if you are an agnostic don’t underestimate the influence they played in various regions such as Europe, Latin America and even New England. Brazilian Workers’ Party attributed their success to this movement and Unions.
Be wary of any religious leader that tries to push a liberalization of dogmas and traditions. Because all religions are intrinsically conservative according to their respective contexts, they establish doctrines that dictate sets of rules that must be followed properly in order to attain their objectives (whether is Salvation in Christianity or Nirvana in Buddhism). There are no (real) religions without their traditions.
Whenever you see liberal religious men doubt their characters. There is a good chance they don’t even bother with religion or spirituality, perhaps they are closeted atheist. What they do care about is the religious platform, which can offer various benefits such as large audiences, political influence, money and even sex.
Estimates of the number of gays in the priesthood are all over the lot, from 20 percent to 60 percent, although a Los Angeles Times poll in 2002 found only 15 percent of priests saying they were homosexual or “somewhere in between but more on the homosexual side.”
Every time pedo priests’ cases pop up in the MSM, secular people are very quick to point fingers and show their moral superiority, but they “forget” the existence of secular institutions that are way more sexually perverted than the “gayish” modern Church, such as Hollywood, the political and corporate world.
Real Church x Sissy Church
It is also important to notice that the Church was emasculated, an emasculation that took place during the process of secularization and establishment of liberal democracies across the Western world (e.g. French Revolution).
The Church had to be softened, becoming an institution that barely resembles the once powerful and great Church of the Crusades or the Inquisitions. This same phenom of emasculation can also happen in other secular institutions too, the Military, mainstream Music, Politics, Sports and even Boys Scouts. And it will only get worse as liberal-democratic globalism advances, so secular people: watch out!
St. Basil the Great, a 4th century bishop and Doctor of the Church, defended that gay/pedo priests should be publicly flogged. That was the (real) Church, not this sissy catholicism created after the Second Vatican Council (a modernist reform imposed in the Church from 1962 to 1965). A lot of things got bad in the 60s.
The (real) Church has a very important and vigorous story in the construction of the West. Always being a target to the globalists and that breed who rules the world, a clear obstacle to their goals.
Examples are many: Gabriel García Moreno, Catholic Equatorian president, who made a terrific job in a Confessional Equator and was killed by the Freemasons; Saint José Sanchez del Rio, who was killed by Mexican secular, freemason and leftist government with the support of the US, for refusing to abbandon his faith.
Inconvenient truths are ignored
The media only goes after what is convenient to their narrative, don’t expect them to expose Hollywood pedos nor the obvious link between pedo priests and homosexualism. The left has already pushed the normalization of pedophilia many times and I didn’t see the indignation of the MSM.
Late Vatican’s Chief Exorcist Gabriele Amorth once said, “The Devil resides in the Vatican and you can see the consequences”.
“The floor of hell is paved with the skulls of bishops”. – St. Athanasius
The answer is simple: the Catholic Church is losing the tolerance and protection it had for a long time from the Temporal Powers.
But don’t worry, Pedophilia is still blooming in every place or groups who can’t be scrutinized or criticised…
Most of the responses are very good.
Heres the reality: The Offender rate is about 1.5%. Far LOWER than Public Schools, Protestant Denominations 240 Vs 1, or Jewish Rabbis. The biggest pedophile offenders are Uncles, Step Dads and Public School Admins, but thats besides the point. This isnt about children.
Because the Church is centralized, there is a much bigger payday for Schlocky Attorneys Like Cohen & Cohen.
Ill attach some links to verify my statement. Feel free to research yourself.
PROTESTANT PEDOPHILIA
https://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0405/p01s01-ussc.html
RABBI PEDOPHILIA EPIDEMIC- Hidden
https://educate-yourself.org/cn/tedpikepedophiliaorthodoxjudaism11feb13.shtml
The so called crisis was engineered.
Communist Bella Dodd admitted on US Congressional testimony to personally placing 1500 Communist Agents to Subvert it in the 1940s.
These are the fruits. J EWs HATE the Catholic and Orthodox Church, they are their staunch enemy, sworn enemy, so any Witch hunt launched like these, is a win win. If nothing else, they drag up these decades old stories to continue said attacks.
In Ohio, we had a Freemasonic Lodge 642, Screening all Seminary Candidates in the 1970s. You can bet, only ‘ringers’ were admitted.
http://freemasonrywatch.org/cincinnati.curious.masonic.church.html
The Book by Michael Rosen called ‘Goodbye Good Men’ discusses this. 100s of hours of interviews with Priests & X Seminarians that quit.
Catholics serious about their Faith should find a SPPX, SPPV, Independent Latin Mass, or FSSP to attend.
The Novus Ordo (New) Mass was literally a COUP perpetrated at Vatican 2 to destroy. A book called THE PLOT AGAINST THE CHURCH by Maurice Pinay (pen name) was written as a forewarning to attending Bishops and everything predicted came to pass. Every Christian Man should own and read this book. Its a historical book chronologically detailing Jewish crimes and heresies in 2000 years. Its free but a hardback book belongs in every home.
Link to it here.
http://holywar.org/txt/pinay/
In the book Most notably, is Nostra Aetate, which absolved J EWs from Deicide, Killing God, a Charge Catholics held for 1962 years, by Freemasons, J EWs and Protestant lackeys in attendance. The Fruits of Vatican 2 are pure evil, measured in any way. Seminary Candidates, Mass attendance, Sin. I could write more but thats enough for now.
Trout: You mean like female school-teachers having sex with underage boys in American schools.
No, the answer is simpler than “Church losing protection from Temporal Powers.” The truth is, pedophiles go where the children are most vulnerable.
A better question than “Why are priests pedos?” is, “Why are so many pedos homosexual?”
The stats are wrong in the article – the amount of pedo priests is a percent of a percent – compare that to, “From 2009-2013, Child Protective Services agencies substantiated, or found strong evidence to indicate that, 63,000 children a year were victims of sexual abuse” [in the United States] – Whereas in the Catholic Church it was “1,000 kids and 300 priests during a period of approximately 70 years.” – huh, doesnt sound so bad now does it? Obviously the ‘percentage’ isnt to diminish the act (which is obviously horrorific), but it looks to me kids are getting fucked by adults 24/7 OUTSIDE of the church – everyone needs to fuck off with this gay story – yeah, the church screwed up, no shit, but LOOK at your OWN schools and communities too “Every 8 minutes Child Protective Services substantiates, or finds evidence for, a claim of child sexual abuse.” – If these stats are even remotly accurate if you ask me it sounds like you would WANT your kid in a Catholic Church / School WAY before a public school or somewhere else – EVERY 8 MINUTES theres some ‘report’ of child sexual abuse – and in the Catholic Church were talkin over the course of 70 years less than a percent of a percent of a handful of cases. While the story is definitly relevant its been beat to death, your own school and community is 100, no wait 1,000x more of a safe haven for sexual predators than your Catholic Church, give it a rest.
‘The stats are wrong in the article….’
…and so much else. You are correct to point out the lazy dishonesty of this writer.
I did so myself, earlier today, but my post has been deleted.
Boo Hoo.
Who could write about such a subject without bothering to do ten minutes research?
Pathetic.
Our time and attention deserve better, not to mention the victims.
When I researched this distressing topic some years back, I found a deep and broad resevoir of direct substantive evidence and easily accessed reports from multiple agencies, stretching back as far as the 1950s, from multiple agencies (not all Church).
That’s not me, buddies. That’s what the MSM is telling people, I linked the News pages. I also believe these stats are very misleading. The only stat I would stand for is the Church Militant one, which show us 81% of the victims are males. This one seem very accurate. PS: My intention was not to make a deep study about this subject, but simply point out the hypocrisy of the media towards this particular matter. Articles here on ROK are meant to be brief, I guess…
That’s not me, buddies. That’s what the MSM spreads, I linked the news’ pages. I also believe these stats are very misleading. The only stat I would stand for is the Church Militant one, which shows us 81% of them victims are males. This one seems accurate. PS: The intention of this article is to expose the MSM hypocrisy towards this particular subject and not make a profound study about pedophilia inside the Church. Articles here on ROK are meant to be brief, I guess…
Good post.
Wer should pray you are wrong.
Nothing to do with liberation theology. And the problem has been well covered in Catholic (if not mainstream) media. It’s homosexuality. The overwhelming number of victims are boys, usually on the verge of puberty if not already there. Seminaries are full of young men with same-sex attraction disorder. There are even well-founded rumors of a homosexual “mafia” even among bishops. What Catholic in the English-speaking world hasn’t gone to a mass where a priest isn’t a bit fey or fruity? And let’s face facts, not many heterosexual men nowadays will want to pursue a career which shuts them off from the company of women (would the priesthood be a good career move for MGTOW folks, we can discuss that here). But for a homosexual man, being among other young like-minded men, and boys as altar servers, youth groups etc is hardly a problem. Go to sites like Church Militant (or see Michael Voris’ YouTube videos) for more information.
In the homosexual community, sex between older men and teenage males is very common. But no one cares at all. Sure, every once in a while in the name of equality, gay men might get some finger wagging and a good talking to about the need for age appropriate partners.
But in reality, no one cares if some 40 year old gay guy is sleeping with a 16 year old young man.
On the other hand, many people will be seriously outraged over a 28 year old man sleeping with an 18 year old girl.
Queers are only 2 percent or so of the population. So if some old queen is sleeping with a 16 year old twink, normal folks will never know about it (unless he’s a Big Name like Kevin Spacey, then ka-BOOM!). As for the 28 year old man with the 18 year old woman, that wouldn’t be too big a deal in straight circles. After all, they’re both young adults. As legal as a hot dog at a baseball game.
Yes, people are very much repulsed by the idea that an older man would seduce and have sex with a young boy, 16 or otherwise. The difference here is this – most normie conformist go along types that are obsensibly pro gay are unaware of this very common occurrence. For that matter society is in the dark about the very real connection between gays and pedophilia. And if you mention this to gays or pro gay types there is a visceral reaction. For gays, they’ll go into hysterics because they know it’s true and they know what is at stake if this becomes revealed. For normies it’s because they know gays through “will and grace”. I’ve been saying for years that if you want to bring the gays down then expose the links to pedarsty and pedophlia. It’s all in plain sight and all right there for us to expose. The gay community is a perverted community. I’m not gay but I’ve been to a gay community and the sexual inferences and innuendo are hardy such inferences and innuendo…hard core sex is systemic in these communities and the gay culture. gays have way too much power today and all because they make themselves out to be poor innocent and fabulous victims. In reality they’re gluttons in the same way an obese person refuses to control their appetite for food, so do gays for sex. It’s no kind of community we want. And the clincher is the very real culture of pederasty and pedophila.
Liberation Theology is a heresy embraced by heretics. The Lavender Mafia has thrived in places where Liberation Theology exists, places where civil authorities haven’t yet started to get involved. There DOES seem to be a correlation between Liberation Theology enthusiasts among the heretics in the red beanies in Rome and the queer cock carousel of holy pimps providing mutual aid and protection. Note that Frankie The Pimp put one of his butt-buddy Lib Theo cardinals in charge of the Synod For the Family, the single most important conference of the past few years. The St. Gallen Queer mafia, too, like beating their meat to political power strokes amongst the peons who are too ignorant to crucify the self-styled modern day gay Borgias who are trying to run South America from Rome.
A purge is needed. Benedictines with sharp knives and clean consciences.
Reasons:
1. Catholics don’t marry like normal orthodox priests do, this is an incentive for those with homosexual tendencies(homosexuality & pedophilia go hand in hand) to become priests.
2. Most priests were altar boys, that means that at some point they were left alone with the priests. Being fucked while very young usually means that the kid will end up a sexual deviant like the one who molested him & thus the cycle repeats itself.
3.Masons infiltrated the catholic church, these are repercussions of that happening, a lot of people suspect that some of the masonic rituals involve butt sex.
With regards to Orthodox priests marrying, Orthodox bishops are all unmarried having come from their monastic traditions.
Good comment, but as usual, my lengthy response doesn’t “register” on this site…
Is it because I used the triple brackets in my comment?? Do I need to register a different persona to have my commentary accepted?? Should I simply stopped wasting my time here???
I can continue to write BS / worthless comments that get immediately published (like this one), but when I actually spend some time and brain cells on thought-provoking commentary… nada, nothing, lost in space, never to see the light of day…
It happens to me all the time and this guy Roosh complains that he’s being banned left and right. Karma is a bitch!
Allister: Think more, write less.
tl;dr if it’s more than 8 lines.
You aren’t the only one…. Believe me. I’ve had long deeply thought out comments go the same way… Not sure it’s mods doing it though.. Would bet exclusively on Google interfering and censoring. Everything these days is routed and scanned and checked by Google. Copy and paste your comments before hitting send.
I don’t think the “deleting” or “censoring” or “delaying” of comments is being done by Roosh or the Mods, but something odd is at work for sure. There must be others (both human and bots) that monitor this site’s commentary and have the technical ability to manipulate the comments.
All asshole, ignorant and stupid comments are immediately published, while those exposing aspects of the truth seem to get “flagged” in some capacity. I think the intention is to portray those who read this site and comment as nothing more than retarded, misogynistic white trash Nazis, but all comments to the contrary manage to get sucked up by some black hole…
No, Allister, it’s got nothing to do with brackets, you probably wrote a banned word. And the banned word list is fucking random. Sure, the n!gger word is obvious, but J3w is less so.
It’s telling that we have to use a certain code to bypass naming or implicating {{those who shall not be named}}
It’s inconsistent too as some get through. Lending itself to believe it’s not so automated with a possible hand above censoring.
I’ve had posts appear for a few hours only to be deleted later.
There are few spaces on the web where red-pill dialogue can be discussed without forms of censorship or riddled with $hills trying to control the conversation.
Further, A name like ‘demslaveowners’ that has tried to play down your concerns should be regarded as highly suspect also.
Yes Sasquatch, these are interesting times we live in. I am not a techie, but I make it my business to understand how communication is manipulated. An interesting development is the obvious “shill”, who can be an automated bot or an actual human who is paid to monitor specific sites. I have encountered these paid shills, starting many years ago when I used to review controversial books on Amazon and have lengthy discussions / arguments in the comments section. I stopped bothering when one morning I woke up and more than 50% of my book reviews on Amazon were deleted, and about 25% of the others were actually carefully edited… this was about 13+ years ago. So it was either an Amazon employee, or someone hacked into my Amazon account to do the dirty work.
About 15 years ago, I also came across a man who’s son worked for an alphabet agency beginning with the letter N. The son’s job was to recruit national guard guys to download and organize / categorize the tremendous amount of info from their spy satellites, as well as to train guys to quell conspiratorial stuff on the internet. They were assigned to monitor certain sites (they had training manuals with certain techniques and phrases to use) and control / derail the discussions. Main keywords to use were: tin foil hat, kooks, lunatics, ha ha ha (laughing), conspiracy theorists, and references to needing “meds”. At that time, hot topics included anything related to the 9-11 NYC debacle and Israhell, as well as the moon landing BS. Many years later, I learned that government agencies of Israhell employed at least 10,000 people to scan the internet for so-called anti-semitic discussions, especially in relation to the so-called holocau$t.
A handful of years ago, I was introduced to the concept of the Holographic Internet – and subsequently experienced evidence of it. The concept is that what you see from your “portal” (the electronic devices tied to your identity) is unique from what others see. For example, the comments you see on websites is different from what others see. As such, the comments you type and the discussions you have are not seen by others – you become an isolated entity in a vacuum (or Matrix or sorts) merely interacting with bots or someone assigned to monitor the website. You may think your “brilliant” commentary is seen by all others and making an impact on actual people, but in reality you are completely sequestered. Obviously not everyone is shoehorned into this Holographic Internet, but those who continue to make controversial commentary on certain “hot topics” eventually are.
Just some food for thought, Sasquatch.
My post appeared and was then deleted.
the fact that an all male priesthood exists in often close proximity without any kind of sexual outlet in any direction straight or gay is the most obvious objection to the idea that the catholic church as it stands is simply a magnet for for gays, although it probably is. The fact that most sexual abuse is of (elder) male on on a younger one (altar boys or whatever) does suggest the problem relates to homosexuality (expressed in pederasty / hebephilia/ paedophilia) but that doesn’t exclude the possibility that the church’s culture might be ‘homoerotic’ given it’s exclusion of the possibility of heterosexual love (I’m from a protestant background so married priests isn’t a problem so long as they are chaste)
The idea that masons infiltrated the church is interesting. Do you have any evidence / links relating to that claim?
Look up the Alta Vendita
Thanks that’s very interesting. Cheers
There are many many married RC Priests (!)
They marry before the take Holy Orders.
I once saw a figure of 20% outside of Europe but have never been able to confirm this very high proportion.
ps some time ago (perhaps 18 months) we engaged in a lengthy and (for me) interesting discussion regarding the Occult.
Unfortunately, I was not able to be as forthcoming as I would have preferred, though you remained very patient.
The reason for this was that there are immediate direct consequences should a person reveal/discuss certain aspects of this subject. The only way to avoid this is if the questioner (on that ccasion, your good self) directly asks specific questions. These can receive direct specific answers in some ‘safety’. For better or ill, you did not ask questions in this manner, and I dared ‘prompt’ you; only so much.
Anyway.
Point being, sure enough, I suffered immediate direct consequences and then broke off our back and forth until these were resolved. Serious stuff.
When I went back to the RoK article to inform you, the comments were closed.
Obviously.
As is the way of these things.
Anyway, take care.
John R.
Re. (already) married priests versus “celibate” (i.e. supposed to be celibate priests) perhaps there should be an impartial (perhaps third-party) study into rates of sexual offending between the two groups. If the article is correct the married group have a ‘normal’ sexual outlet should be less likely to offend (particularly against boys).
Re. our previous conversations, yes I remember them. Wasn’t aware you revealed anything compromising though as you probably suggested rather more than you revealed. I liked your posts but they could be a little on the theatrical side as I recall. Then again perhaps the occult – real or otherwise – is not a little about putting on a good show for the audience. One must work the imagination to achieve an effect.
good to see you’re still on these boards
the masons and catholics are traditional enemies. it’s possible the catholic churche’s woes are generated by masons in disguise. pope francis is a mason for example.
@Ahoy – Finally, someone who can see : ) Freemasonry has been enemies of the Roman Catholic Church since the church had persecuted the Knights Templar in 1314. Jacques de Molay had cursed the Pope and the Catholic church, as well as the king of France. However, it also needs to be pointed out that the Roman Catholic Church is not Christian, but rather has usurped Christianity and blended with the ancient mystery pagan religions. The pagan religions are sex positive and are supportive of sex with young boys. Of course, this does not make Freemasonry good either, as I am sure you are aware.
Infiltration is certainly an issue, perhaps celibacy might be one as well; for some at least. I have a hunch that many of these allegations are bogus, and that these encounters are with late adolescents (who are probably just under 18 and had already been sexual) and therefore these encounters were more gay than pedo. The media simply want to go after the church; pure and simple.
Though you are 100% correct that the MSM hates and fears The HRCH, the sad truth is that we are looking at perverted abuse, not perverted sex.
The author sounds like a moronist, the entire article reeks of stupidism.
An orthodox priest who originally attended Catholic seminary told me he abandoned his goal of becoming a Catholic priest largely due to the very high amount of gayness in those ranks. He said from his experience that the % of homos was incredibly high.
And I remember some ex-seminarian being interviewed on 60 Minutes, I think it was, that said many of the other students/seminarians had gay tendencies, were giving each other racy birthday cards with pics of handsome, muscled dudes on the front (the sort of cards meant for women to give to other women), etc.
Now with that in mind, check out the sickest of the sick:
https://heavy.com/news/2016/01/joel-wright-seminary-student-priest-ohio-sex-rape-adopt-baby-tijuana-mexico-documents-photos-vermont-glaucoma-blind-ice-san-diego/
Heard something like that on EWTN. Author of a book on the problem heard stories of straight seminarians dropping out because of the predominance of homosexual classmates. They quite properly felt uncomfortable and out of place.
catholic church (as an organization) is behind many of the worlds evil and degenerate bs
All Churches, with the exception of the Somalian, are born of The Church.
That should never be overlooked.
At this point in history one is better off as a Buddhist than a catholic:
“Shutting out immigrants is not Christian,” pope Francisc says.
“Europe belongs to the Europeans” Dalai lama says.
Very good point
The Pope is never The Church.
Look at the history of some who have held the Pontificate!
Beauty and truth will endure.
We seek salvation, not ‘enlightenment’.
Read The Plot Against The Church By Maurice Pinay
On a lighter note, who takes the time to ‘down vote’ a reading recommendation????
…without a word of explanation…..
Probably a tribesmen, they hate for people to read about their plots.
Personally, I’m not anti-semitic.
Here’s something you may find interesting in this regard…
‘He proposed to re-open on a grand scale the pedophile cases that had been put on ice since the Summer of 1936….Shortly afterward, Hitler ordered the judicial authorities to reopenthe trails….Goebbels was displeased by what he considered the inadequate reaction of the media, and he summoned a special press conferenceat which the papers were commanded to launch”a large-scalepropaganda campaign against the Catholic Church’
‘Goebbles’
P. Longerich
Page 332-333
The Catholic Church is filled with homosexual priests.
Homosexual men who engage in suppression of their sexuality (like many Catholic priests) become pedophiles.
I know progressives like to argue that there is no link between homosexuality and pedophilia but the facts in the Catholic Church speak for themselves.
The Catholic Church will die if they don’t clean house but the foxes are in charge of the henhouse at this point….so good luck with that.
Homosexual men destroy all they touch just like women. You can bank on it….
The Church is not ‘filled with’ perverts, though it’s an honest mistake one could make.
Instead, these perverts link up, work together and network. Further, according to ex-Bulgarian Secret Service, since the 1950s, Eastern Communist intelligence agencies planted as many perverts in the Church as they could. The results are now better known.
ie Sicily is not ‘filled with mafiosi’, but sometimes it may as well be.
Hmmm, let’s analyze, for a moment. Last year “they” (liberal progressives and gay) hollywood makes a movie celebrating an older man seducing a young boy. That is gay culture for you. I mean it’s out in the open. Meanwhile you have the average normie, particularly, the suburban young female act as though gays walk on water. That said, in the same way killing Jews in Nazi Germany was in plain sight, people pretended otherwise today with all the bad things they don’t want to see when it comes to gays. If you want to kill homosexualism then keep exposing the pedophilia link. That’s it. Proof that this strategy works? Want to see a gay online troll or just any gay lose it completely? Just say gay and pedophilia are one of the same. And, by the way, you’ll win every argument. Meanwhile you’ll reduce your opponent into a blathering hysterical blob. Works like a charm. Regarding the Church, it is ultimately a gay issue and the Church needs to fix this. Without the Church’s authority we have drifted ever lower into depravity. After the first wave in the early 00’s there has been a moral void ever since. As a Catholic I can’t blame people. pedophilia is evil and the Church or rather Christ is pure good. We need the Church wether we are believers or not. Lastly, you MUST take into account the acute hatred the left has for Christians. It’s full on bigotry, period. For every scumbag pedophile masquerading as a priest there are dozens of public school teachers committing pedophilia. Not to mention the center of Christian hating, hollywood, is a hive of sexual abuse were pedophilia has been institutionalized. The “spotlight” should be on them.
In the Catholic Church, the most available forgiving figure is Mary, not Jesus. Catholics pray more to Mary than to Jesus. It took six hundred years for Mary to creep back into the Catholic observance, and can you guess who Mary is? Mary is Astarte, minus temple prostitution. Mary is a JEWISH MOTHER. Catholics refer to their church as the Mother Church. Does the Pope wear a dress and garnish himself with jewels?
The Tribe hates Mary and have written nasty things about her in their Talmud. Don’t be a foolish Protestant useful idiot by helping the Self Chosen blaspheme her.
You certainly live up to your name – Cavalier = White Knight!
If by that you mean a Knight in the service of Christ the King, then yes I am, and thank you for the compliment.
No, a white Knight in the service of a pussy.
Wow! That is how you refer to the Blessed Mother. How do you think Christ feels about that? You think you cam profess a belief in Christ, then insult his mother and think that somehow you will reach Heaven.
Does the Z in ur screen name mean Zionist?
@Cavalier – If you truly are a “Knight in the service of Christ the King”, then I am sure you know of Christ’s words…”Beware those who call themselves Jews, bat are not, for they are of their father the devil and the synagogue of satan.” uncle harley, below is on track when he mentions “zionists”, but it should also be mentioned they are British Israelists.
Yes I am aware of them and all the evil they have caused for 2000 years. One day hopefully soon the light of truth will shine on them and all their deceitful machinations will be exposed.
The Hail mary is Biblical, you fool.
No time for polemics, but if you want to go there, youll get eaten alive..
The text of the Hail Mary prayer incorporates two Bible passages: “Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee” (Luke 1:28) and “Blessed art thou amongst women and blessed is the fruit of thy womb” (Luke 1:42).
The Rosary was a vision from St Dominic to contrast the evil J EWs and their prayers to Lucifer, namely 150 prayers in Psalms vs 150 Hail Marys. The origincal format was changed however..
One neednt be literate or have eyesight to be saved. That is why we have the Sacaments, though I also love reading my non edited original format Douay Rheimes Bible. The King James has well over 150 Mistranslations in it.
That was the issue with the Church. It never forbid the Bible, just improper translated ones. There are now over 50 different versions, each edited by The Council of Rabbis, even PC bibles to not offend Sodomites and Feminists.
Our Founding Fathers fled Protestant England due to religious persecution. Think about that for a moment..a great book on this is The History of the Reformation in Protestant England and Ireland by Protestant Author William Cobbett. It discusses the horrors brought on by J EWs and Protestants introducing debtors prisons, which led to white slavery et al.
Robin Hood the legendary character was a Catholic. Not many know this history but Ill throw it out there for you.
&owe ver you guys wanna slice it, praying to Mary is idolatry. Simple.
Prayers arent said TO Mary.
She is Not prayed TO. She Is however, Venerated, As the Mother of God.
Just as Protestants Ask Others to Pray for them, so do Catholics with regard to the Mother of our own Lord, Jesus Christ.
And of course, the Bible also tells us that ‘Prayers To the Saints” are efficacious- Book of Revelation 8:4. This IS biblical and IS Sound, any way you cut it, silly Protestant.
The first assault and a grievous wound on the Holy Church was the Tribe instigated Protestant Deformation.
The [email protected] depicts Mary as a wh0re and Jesus as a crazy lunatic imposter that resides in hell boiling in excrement.
Many centuries later they’re still up to their old tricks slandering, vilifying and murdering any who dare call them out on their wickedness.
I disagree in part. No way do the majority of liberal religeous leaders need to be mistrusted across the board. Benevolent giving is a common liberal sentiment (to the needy) just as it’s a sentiment to the conservative. The conservative simply believes he should give at his own disgression, and the liberal believes he must give at the disgression of a representative leader, don’t they? I think people should be entitled to the fruit of their labor and should be free to give what they want to the needy. I also think the tithe, as a pecentage, is an (((old testiment))) idea. Thessalonians warns us against petty divisions that hurt the kingdom of Christian believers (I don’t mean the Catholics, but I don’t trust the pope one iota, I mean Christians), and no more petty a division stands than “collectivism.” Not all liberal religious leaders need be skeptically doubted (though they should appreciate the weight of their position) just as not all masculine men need to be prejudged rapists until proven otherwise. God sees the heart, not the membership. Innocent until proven guilty is what we used to say in my country. Yes, Poor Richard was the one who said if you lie down with dogs you rise up with fleas… like Jim Rohn’s “you are your 5 closest neighbors” notion, but still look at the individual, and see the fruit of his work, and go from there, not just doubt your fellow man because he’s different than you are. That’s prejudice.
Be discerning, but forget collectivism, as you would beware assumptions!
I disagree with a part of this article.
Don’t sew political discord and call it sound doctrine. Don’t tell us to predjudge liberal religeous men. The bible says to be discerning. Look at the fruits of a man’s faith. Don’t subscribe to collectivism (which we preach against here on ROK). Each man is an individual. A man is first a Christian or not, then a man or not, but never is he a group. Thessalonians warns us against conversations that cause divides in the body of Christian believers. Let us walk away from this petty collectivism. God looks at the heart, not the membership card. I’d rather eat with a liberal than a collectivist. I think the author here didn’t mean to really push collectivism, but still, I think it’s worth saying here that collectivism is not upright.
Good comment. What has to be understood are a few additional things:
1) the cyclical and self-perpetuating nature of pedophilia: kids who are sexually abused will very likely become abusers who are sexually corrupted. Nobody is born “gay” — although some hormone-related conditions (hermaphrodism) can cause sexual confusion.
2) the old Catholic Church, although never perfect, understood and opposed OUR greatest (((enemy))). As such, it was targeted many years ago, infiltrated and destroyed by the “cult” that currently leads the world. Pedophilia is one of the main tenets / practices of this Satanic cult, so no surprise “pedophile rings” are constantly being covered up in all our “higher” institutions: church, politics, banking, military.
3) those in power within the “higher” institutions always hire like-minded people under them, mainly for reasons of control / blackmail, so if a homosexual or pedophile (often the same disorder) leads a particular group, then most men under him will have the same deviances. The deviance will always be allowed / encouraged and then documented in some fashion — usually on video — which causes the pedophile to be “hooked.” A hooked man is very dangerous because he will do anything or perform any act to protect his darkest secret. Freemasonry has used this technique for MANY years. As such, the “rotten apple” always ends up at the top of the barrel in this sick and corrupted system. All current heads of state, church leaders, military generals and top bankers are active participants in this “cult” or turn their heads and allow the shenanigans to continue because they fear for their lives or their families well-being.
4) the very act of sodomy is an ancient ritual meant to create subservient, semi-zombie-like men who follow authority and learn to keep secrets. They lead double / triple lives and develop strange / obsessive relationships with their abusers. This was well known in ancient Rome (as one example) and was why the pederasty system was developed. It’s not because anal sex feels good or because the old rich men couldn’t get it up with young women; it’s because of the type of “cult member” it produces. It creates an enslavement of the mind and is self-perpetuating in the next generations, as the abused invariably become the abusers. This pederasty ideology also infected the elite, all-boy prep schools around the Western world starting post-WW2 as the Catholic Church fell into chaos and lost it’s moral compass completely.
I think a big part of the rampant sexual abuse in the Catholic Church is due in part to the mandatory celibacy that priests are required to undertake. The apostle Paul said that the single, celibate lifestyle was the better option in 1 Corinthians 7, but he also aknowledged that men like him were the minority in that regard.
Repressed sexuality can be very dangerous.
But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn. 1 Corinthians 7:9 KJV
St Basil and St. Augustine both advocated the execution of pederasts and predators. This predated the rule of St. Benedict and priestly celibacy.
Bearing in mind that when you exclude gays and gay pedos, the number of hetero predators is far smaller per capita than that among public officials and government employees like schoolteachers, this suggests to me that celibacy is less an issue than having a corrupt, degenerate soul. I don’t believe that having the option to marry makes predators predate less. There are an awful lot of married men in prison for crimes against children and minors.
The MSM is definitely focuses on this issue with particular glee. On the hand if it fails focus equally on the – by some accounts – endemic abuse within hollywood etc one issue one has to consider is the issue of hypocrisy. Sure, hollywood actors / producers etc are hypocritical in that they quick to preach (propagandize) to the masses about their notion of virtue but when it turns they are actually grade A perverts the hypocrisy they may be accused of is the mismatch between public virtue signalling and private iniquity: there is nothing inherent in being a leftist or progressive that rules out perversion, although it might rule out violation of consent. With abuse of kids (etc) by priests the hypocrisy probably is more serious, because are explicitly violating the code by which they are supposed to live, and the values they are both supposed to live by and to evangelise. So allowing for the MSM’s partiality and hypocrisy on the issue it is still right and proper that the (catholic) church sort out this issue once and for all.
The allegation that this is primarily a homosexual problem is something that should be considered if those figures (80% of abuse is male on male) are correct, but again only to the extent that it is done seek to whitewash other forms of abuse: an organisation can only take be taken seriously if it takes itself and its integrity seriously.
The issue of homosexuality in the catholic church seems to be a huge one, but then if the opportunity to lead life sympathetic to homosexuality is the attraction for many in the first place then that’s probably something that needs to be addressed first. That seems unlikely insofar as recruitment of priests (other than with regard to homosexuality) seems to be problem in itself.
‘…… then that’s probably something that needs to be addressed first.’
Benedict stated he was going to take direct action to protect children/boys. He then banned homosexual men from the Priesthood, circa 2010-12, from memory. The annnouncement was around Christmas.
interesting. Are you suggesting he was forced to step down on account of what he threatened to do? I am aware of a lot of conspiracy theoristing about the vatican by people like Leo Zagami, although I haven’t read any. I think some also suggested Benedict might have been compromised
…THAT one gets through….
Typical.
that’s how it often goes
‘He proposed to re-open on a grand scale the pedophile cases that had been put on ice since the Summer of 1936….Shortly afterward, A.H. ordered the judicial authorities to reopenthe trails….Goebbels was displeased by what he considered the inadequate reaction of the media, and he summoned a special press conferenceat which the papers were commanded to launch”a large-scalepropaganda campaign against the Catholic Church’
‘Goebbles’
P. Longerich
Page 332-333
‘Re. our previous conversations, yes I remember them. Wasn’t aware you revealed anything compromising though as you probably suggested rather more than you revealed. I liked your posts but they could be a little on the theatrical side as I recall. Then again perhaps the occult – real or otherwise – is not a little about putting on a good show for the audience. One must work the imagination to achieve an effect.’
Hi.
Fair comment, it is bound to seem that way from the outside.
You are probably being charitable or at least generous. I’d have been caustic in my dismissal of such ‘tripe’ and ‘self dramatisation’, before I knew better.
My personal experience remains…no laughs….no laughs at all. No artifice, no upside and certainly no audience.
Anyway, since ‘takimag’ stopped comments I tend to write on youtube under ‘John Richmond’ I think I was using my normal ‘Windmillsofhismind’ when we last spoke.
Where else do you post?
This site isn’t really for me (too much angry abuse for my gentle soul)….;)
the background from goebbels to benedict is interesting. I am sure it will all surface in the fullness of time
yes, of course, we cannot evaluate another’s experience, but this is the internet so we can’t really evaluate it either.
No, I don’t that much here these days. Mostly because I find the commenting system irksome, but yes I suppose it can be a bit combative too. I don’t use disqus as much as I used to. I sometimes hang out at the vanilla daily mail – it’s so bad it’s good sort of thing, but you can’t really have conversations there just pontificate
Love combative.
Hate ignorant angry swearing. Life is too short.
‘…there just pontificate.’
Benedict tie in.
Like it.
😉
My posts are not getting through.
That’s three now, it’s wearing….
As for posting here, I’ve decided not to and have only visited in recent weeks.
oh that’s a shame. I got your posts ok and have replied but not sure if you’re able to view them.
I’ll try once more….
His Holiness cannot be ‘intimidated’ or ‘forced’ to do or to not do anything.
There is no threat, of death or otherwise; that would impede his actions.
Those who claim to ‘know’ what is going on inside The Holy See and the Vatican, are brave indeed and so alledged conspiracies are all conceivable.
As for sex abuse, this is an old old story, please see below*
This story is strictly for public consumption. Though deadly serious, it is a form of ugly destructive theatre. The ‘objective’ of these ‘scandals’ is always something else. In 2018 this will not be political, as per below.
Cheers.
‘He proposed to re-open on a grand scale the pedophile cases that had been put on ice since the Summer of 1936….Shortly afterward, Hitler ordered the judicial authorities to reopenthe trails….Goebbels was displeased by what he considered the inadequate reaction of the media, and he summoned a special press conferenceat which the papers were commanded to launch”a large-scalepropaganda campaign against the Catholic Church’
‘Goebbles’
P. Longerich
Page 332-333
Seems it wouldn’t let me put A.H’s name in.
That kind of adumbrates why I decided not to post here.
However, I’ll reply to you other post now.
Sheeeesh…..this is work……
“The ‘objective’ of these ‘scandals’ is always something else.”
Can you say what the real objective is then? Just the embarassment of the catholic church?
Bank robbers rob banks because that’s where the $$ is. Homo, pedophile Priests (and boy scout leaders) become priests because that’s where the boys are.
Normal men want to bang women. It really is that simple.
And you never really ever hear about a priest getting caught fucking the nuns.
The pope should not be allowed to travel in that protected vehicle. Fair game like you and me
Modernism has taken hold of the Catholic Church. That’s what happened. I’d suggest reading Pascendi.
it surprises me that anyone could still be catholic now a days taking in regard how our counciousness has evolved regarding spirituality, life and what has been revealed abiout the church itself in this later years.
it is obviously a demonic institution. no doubts about it. besides from the obvious reasons is is also important to point out that in the churchs in general what you will see in the altar is a crucified jesus christ. on the walls are paintings or sculptures of how he is being tortured. it is all demonic, like a celebration of jesus suffering and assasination. the excuse i hear for this is that we must be reminded that jesus died for our sins. well, i know that and i dont need to be contantly reminded about it i wont forget. in a genuine christic temple you would meet a smiling jesus in the altar, paintings of him laughing and joking around with his friends. no doubt in my mind he had fantastic sense of humor. everything in these demonic churches is depressive and negative. its your fault your fault, by the blood of jesus and so on. satanic
Mazel Tov, Schmuli. You figured it all out.
Why is there so many Pedro’s in the church?
Easy. Perfect atmosphere to groom the victims for it, and perfect defense to exposure through the threat of humiliation and shame and abuse of position of trust not to mention threat of “God will punish you” if you tell. Fucking religion is the bane of human kind so unnatural its power to coerce men to do so much vile evil shit in the name of God and God’s will…. Fucking evil that religion should actually be seen as Satan himself in action, while he blames a fake deity for everything else. Satan is man’s actual nature, good men resist and overcome it because of choice not coercion. Life is all about choices, right down to believing in outright nonsense.
… So many Pedo’s…. Fucking Google autocorrect at work yet again…. This is the vile leftists AI at work.
Oh, there are tons and tons of Pedros too, along with their weird animistic beliefs.
This is a long-standing problem inside the Church, but since the clergy commanded so much unearned respect had their own courts it was forced underground. It’s just another example of abuse of authority.
The Catholic Church requires celibacy for priests. In today’s sex saturated, secularized over all culture and the watered down (Progressive) Catholicism, that is an absurdly impossible standard to meet.
So only gay men go for priesthood, probably knowing that they can deal with this celibacy shit by fucking other gay priests.
Unfortunately, a lot of gay men are also pedophiles, so we have predatory gay pedophilia running rampant in the Church under the protective umbrella of the corrupt and rotten to Clergy hierarchy.
Burn the whole thing to the ground and rebuild it.
‘… that is an absurdly impossible standard to meet.’
Nick, that would suggest no men can be celebate.
Some are.
These clergymen may be gay but that’s not why they’re pedophiles. They have a psychological disability known as a neurosis. They suppress their sexuality to such a degree that it morphs to suit whatever it can find. These priests are ashamed of their sexual urges for women and so they repress it and their mind changes to find an outlet for those urges without being caught, so they turn to kids and keep it secret. You could fix most of this by letting them marry.
That makes no sense. So guys who have a hard time getting laid become pedophiles? Why are 15-24 year olds targeted almost exclusively?
Catholic parents used to send their “gay” sons to join the priesthood in hopes it would prevent them from acting out on their “urges” but what happens when you put a bunch of gay young men in a building together?
Then they go out to gay bars and actively recruit other gay men to the priesthood. In some seminaries they don’t even allow a man to join if he isn’t effeminate enough.
So that now most of the upper echelons of the church are run by Satanic homos. Barnhardt has been beating the drum about this for years. https://www.barnhardt.biz/
I heard that they took over that seminaries decades ago. Any young man serious about the priesthood vocation who goes into one is going to have a rude awakening.
Glad I’m a Protestant
Sadly this problem has been found to be across all denominations. It shows up everywhere that adults have such authority over kids. The CC is just a big target so it is easier to see there.
Sadly, research (and common sense) demonstrate that evil can appear in any church.
No such thing as a ‘gay gene’, however there is a correlation between having an enlarged hippo-campus and being same sex attracted so I think it’s mutation.
Makes sense as it’s obviously an evolutionary dead-end.
I have gay friends, I think someone on here put it better as ‘not all gays are pedos but the vast majority of pedos are gay’.
Not a gene (maybe a genetic predisposition?) most likely to do with hormonal imbalance in utero. So it’s a birth defect. Lots of birth defects preclude reproduction, either by killing before puberty, or in this case, discouraging the normal sex act, but they’re still around. Yet some still blame it on a bossy mom and weak dad. Old wives tales are hard to quash.
Another poorly researched and ill thought out article that betrays complete ignorance of all central themes??
Wow.
To the writer…..
Pedphile attacks on children in the HRCC are LESS than in state institutions.
look it up.
Homosexuals have only been allowed to become Priests since around the 1970.
Look it up.
Open., flamboyant homosexuals were famose long before Wilde or when Sir John Guilgood was CHEERED BY THE JURY that refused to convict him for ‘cottaging’ in a public toilet in the late 1950s.
Look it up.
Homosexuality had been illegal in the UK for about 96 years of our 2000+ year history. There was nothing to hide from and adolescent homosexuality has always been enbedded in the Public School system. Elites never hunt each other down.
Look it up.
READ about a subject BEFORE before you type, it saves everybodies time, especially those who would trudge through your output.
Cause being a priest is good cover for being a gay pedophile
Dogma dilutes the religious message. Priests are vessels of the deity it represents (i.e. Jesus, etc); they are to teach, lead, and live by example, nothing more. Once the doctrine pushes towards distinct agendas and selfish interests, it’s no different than worshiping a golden calf or holding a bazaar at a synagogue.
For the billionth time…the general public idiots still are uninformed and do not understand the attacks against the Catholic Church. In the early 20th century, communist groups recruited homosexuals into the seminaries with the intent on destroying the church from the inside out. They KNEW the homos would molest boys. This was the intent. The same people that own and control the mainstream media that hate the Catholic church and publish all the sex abuses, are the same world powers of communism that CAUSED it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Bella Dodd testified to Congress. She was a communist agent, worked for communist special interest groups. Her mission back in the mid 1900s was to recruit faggots into seminaries. The same entity that financed the special interest groups to recruit fags into the church that molested boys, is the same entity that then reports it! They caused it to begin with!! (joos)
http://romancatholicheroes.blogspot.com/2009/03/bella-dodd.html
Excellent comment showing a great understanding of the main issues!
Has anybody heard the recent pedo scandals involving Jewish Rabbis?
How can it be a scandal if:
1) it’s been going on for 2,000+ years unabated.
2) it’s deeply ingrained into their “religion” so it becomes a religious freedom issue.
3) the ability to produce a media “scandal” is owned and controlled by people of the same faith / cult who have plenty of incentive to squash the stories.
4) the legal system is dominated by the same cult who make sure the guilty are protected and the innocent victims get punished if they don’t shut up.
Saint Basil the Great, a Doctor of the Church, writing in the 4th-century, described how the early Catholic Church dealt with those guilty of sexual abuse among the clergy.
“1) Any cleric or monk who seduces young men or boys, or who is apprehended in kissing or in any shameful situation, shall be publicly flogged and shall lose his clerical tonsure.
2) Thus shorn, he shall be disgraced by spitting in his face, bound in iron chains, wasted by six months of close confinement, and for three days each week put on barley bread given him toward evening.
3) Following this period, he shall spend a further six months living in a small segregated courtyard in custody of a spiritual elder, kept busy with manual labor and prayer, subjected to vigils and prayers, forced to walk at all times in the company of two spiritual brothers, never again allowed to associate with young men.”
Time to bring back the old ways?
This is only ONE reason why the early Catholic Church was such a force for good, and why it was chosen for destruction by our true enemies.
Catholic Church has had its fare share of pedos and even Rapists Popes but its still standing after all this time.
The article was very good, but it didn’t address myopic anti-celibates who ridiculously think natural sexual inclinations turn to pederasty if denied (sheesh, if a priest wants a woman, there’s always a floozy waiting at the bar who isn’t illegal). Also, to be perfectly well-rounded, the essay would have to point out that school teachers *and* Protestant ministers often have a higher rate of abusing than Catholic priests.
Being a woman (and following TL;DR), I’m going to pass the baton off to a male expert. I don’t know if I am allowed to link, so search for ‘Fr. Ripperger on the Abuse Crisis and the Theology of the Priesthood’ on youtube. If you want to know the truth in depth, have a listen while jogging or something.
Further opinions on the matter:
1) 80% of homosexuals are abused as young children – either sexually, physically and/or emotionally – which destroys their sense of sexuality and turns them into very confused / unhappy people with Peter Pan Syndrome. These 80% don’t choose to be gay and (deep down) don’t want the Gay Lifestyle. Specific therapy (common up until the late 1970s) can be up to 70% successful in turning gays back into heterosexuals as documented by some pioneering psychologists.
2) I consider most boys raised by single moms a form of abuse (depending on the dynamics), as it has been shown these boys have a much higher chance (50%?) of coming out “gay” later in their lives.
3) Around 15% of homosexuals become such due to a combination of hormone-altering chemicals in foods / beverages / medications / plastics and constant social reinforcement via the media (TV, commercials, movies, kid’s books) that a Gay Life is awesome and cool. As such, this is an environmental cause to be distinguished from out-right abuse, although feeding your kids estrogen-altering shit and forcing them to watch “gay pride” events SHOULD be considered abuse IMO. I would also put some feminist lesbians into his category – particularly the ones who are divorced and become extremely misandric (“all men suck”). As such, they try the “other team” as an experiment and social / political statement.
4) The remaining 5% of homosexuals experience some alteration within the wombs of their mothers – either from trauma, genetic mutation, chemical-altering maternal diet or other causes. As such, these people are born confused and/or homosexual, but I don’t think this should be considered NORMAL – it should be considered iatrogenic or a birth defect.
Just my 2 cents.
Regarding this article and many others on this site, it’s amazing how many comments appear and then disappear when you hit the refresh button or reopen your browser or choose a different browser to view these articles. Anyone else notice this?? Is this the Holographic Internet at work — as I mentioned in the comments somewhere above??
“The developed Western world of today encourages people to become gay”
Why the developed western world of today “does not” encourage people to become “lesbians” !??
Gay might be the term of “homosexuality”, but why it is almost always targeted towards the MALES, why not the pussies !? Let the legal system bring out “lesbian” marriage rights !! Whenever you want to use the term “Gay”, do not forget to use “lesbians” !!
After all, pussies wants “equal rights and representation” !!
I would like to posit another angle that ties in with the rampant pedophilia: satanist priests who have infiltrated the clergy. Many of these satanist/Luciferians are part of other occult and secret societies; all which perform rituals. From mock sacrifices to actual spilling of human and animal blood. Sexual abuse of minors and victims among these members are common, as dictated by their rituals.
Add to that, most cultural Marxist and post-modern Frankfurt school/critical theory ideologues stem from these secret society members, it’s no wonder why pedo rings exist.
In addition to the contents of this article – I would really like to expose the connection between satanists and pedos hidden among the clergy of the RCC.
Pretty sure if the victims female instead male, the church hierarchy would be in jail and the church would be sued out of existence.
Payoffs. Before coming out was a good thing for homosexuals they kept their mouths shut. Now the thots are getting paid, the male sluts are suing too. 30 year old barista with no prospects? The Church has deep pockets. Whores are whores no matter the gender
This article is retarded, the real answer is that chatholic priest havennot sexual outlet, the male sex naturally seeks weaker partners. You see a lot of altar boys but not altar girls, and you gender dismorphism is not completely obvious among kids
The fact that the Catholic Church has enlisted the services of un-vetted pedophile priests has been noted since the 50’s, when the number of novitiates enrolling for the priesthood dropped precipitously. Coincident with a high point of post-modern relativism and the disdain for orthodoxy, the Church unwisely enrolled outright and/or latent homosexuals who, either joined the priesthood out of sincere effort to reform, or perhaps to gain access to young prey. Regardless, the Church’s position on ordination as a sacrament will remain the same: once a priest, always a priest.
That said, the Church has now reversed this erroneous position since the 70’s when this grave mistake became apparent, and no longer will rush novitiates to the priesthood without a vetting process. That said, any attempts at covering up abuse is illegal, and should be punished. To the extent this happened, it should be reported and properly dealt with (civil/criminal penalties, disbarred from priesthood, etc.) But the author correctly points out that pedophile abuse rates still are a fraction of other professions, but we won’t hear that from the liberal media.
I hope we can look with understanding on this situation when we realize several popes have come and gone after this practice had begun, and, apart from recognizing the scandal and pain such practices and their cover-up have caused, at least there is some attempt at acknowledging harm. And, again, like the author pointed out, I’d like to see a similar effort from other well known public arenas that sponsor pedophile activities to own up to their part in damaging youth, instead of attempting to normalize homosexuality. As a teacher, I’ve seen the LGBT agenda disguised in “tolerance” curriculum attempt to infiltrate schools. I am ready to accept any sinner, but we must call sin what it is.
That one is easy. It’s because The Catholic Church denies normal healthy heterosexual men and women access to the priesthood. If you deny the wholesome then don’t be surprised when the void is filled with the un-wholesome.