It is a Christmas tradition in Netherlands to paint your face black and act like a black Santa. Generally, even the local blacks don’t take offense to that. They know it’s done in good spirit and it isn’t a big deal. Of course, it is not fair to compare Netherlands to the US, as they don’t have our history of slavery and segregation on their own soil, but the bottom line is the same – the issue of race is not a sensitive topic over there, or at least not nearly as sensitive as it is here.
We can talk all we want about celebrating diversity, equality, and freedom. However, it is clear that behind all these big words and promising statements, we still have a long way to go toward true equality and true freedom from racial, religious, gender and other types of discrimination. I believe there is a simple and reliable way to know when the bigotry is truly over: when we stop being so damn (hyper)sensitive about those very issues, and we are able to make racist, sexist or gay jokes anywhere without offending anyone or feeling victimized by those words.
As of today – we are still very much behind in that department. On the contrary, it seems that even bringing up the very topic of race or religion makes you a racist. Even as much as citing objective statistics will backfire and will turn others against you. Imagine coming up to your black friend and telling him that according to official statistic some large percentage of people who are incarcerated are black. You will automatically be classified as a racist, even though you didn’t express any opinions of your own and simply delivered objective data that you obtain from some other source. One of my Indian friends thought it was racist of one of his friends to ask him whether he plans to go back to India after he graduates from his masters program. What is so racist about that? It’s not like he encouraged him to go back to his home country or in any way suggested that he wasn’t welcome in the US.
These days, even saying something positive will turn you into one evil bigot. Try coming up to a female executive and telling her that you admire how she was able to get so high up in the corporate world without trying to behave or talk like a guy. She will likely freak out, completely misinterpret what you said and will twist what was supposed to be a compliment into a chauvinistic insult. I can almost hear the bullshit—“What do you mean acting like a man…. you don’t think I can be powerful and confident and be woman at the same time? Do you want me to stay in the kitchen or something?”
One of my favorite jokes with the girls I am trying to flirt with is interrupting them right after they say “In my opinion,” and telling them: “Hold on a second, you are about to state your opinion. I have to play close attention as I know it’s going to be very important…” I may even pull out a notepad and pretend like I am about to write down what she is about to say, to tune up the sarcasm even higher. I may not be able to expect the whole nation to stop being uptight about gender and race issues overnight, but at least I know that if a girl responds to this laughing and playing along, instead of “I can’t believe you just said that!”, she is my kind of girl.
It will take at least a few decades from now for the current generation to die out and for the world to forget about slavery, holocaust, apartheid, feminism, and other genocides around the world. Until then, we will have to continue walking on eggshells, at least here in the US, when it comes to talking about race, gender, and religion, among other things.
Read Next: Introducing The Muscle Bio-Diversity (MBD) Movement
You only have to walk on eggshells if you’re a straight white male. No other demographic has to worry this way. It will continue as long as we keep living in fear of name-calling.
If we don’t quit apologizing, our grandsons will be sitting down to pee.
Try being an Asian or Indian male, you have to do the same shit. On one hand you have to hear White males bash your race and on the other, you can’t say anything racist about White people.
Cry me a river in your alternative universe.
If he had just said Asian males, I would have agreed with The Voice. But its absolutely ridiculous to include Indians. They have no problem harping about whatever offends them. And I say this as a half Indian guy. I cant stand my fathers side of the family.
What a prize your mother must have been to end up with an Indian guy
She was probably Indian too
My parents went to the same Christian college and married upon graduating. If you hadnt already noticed, Christian Indians dont have a problem with women the way Hindus do.
i call bullshit bro. sorry but i got a LOT of indian and some east asian friends. you hear a comment by a white guy here and there but you get about the same right back from south and east asians.
The thing is, no matter what negative thing an Asian guy says to me, I know he’s got a small dick so it’s like water off a duck’s back. I’m pretty sure most white guys feel the same. So don’t worry about offending white men, unless they’re bald and fat, it’s pretty hard to do.
And no, I’m not saying this to piss you off, just thought you’d appreciate understanding our perspective on the matter.
That would only be the case if you voluntarily inserted yourself into a majority white country. If I go freeload off my neighbor’s dinner table, I’m certainly not going to have the gall to also criticize the way he runs his family while I’m at it.
What a fun bit of slopisim. Be a man period and not walk on eggshells in an office and see what happens. Source : Me, black guy who has been up on false harrasement charges and chastised for saying anything other than PC crap in the work place. The enforcers? White white knights.
This is quite true from my experience. It’s not non-whites who push PC dogma with the most fervor, it’s SWPL white liberals. Conversely, the most relaxed racial attitudes I’ve seen are from Latinos, blacks and blue collar white guys.
yeah its really the empowered women and the full of white guilt knights. they push it the most and its fucked up. they push it on you guys. but they push it on us harder believe me. like they expect me to be like them, like they owe the world something and so that means i do to. if they pushed it on black guys as hard they would be called racists. so they take it easy as much as they have to.
you dont see very many black and latin men (yes men, the women still do it) calling race on white dudes or calling us sexists or gay haters. you see women and white pussy dudes doing it. ive never been called a racist by a black guy or latin guy. and i like dry humor from time to time, they all seem to laugh and get that its all fun. maybe make a cracker joke right back. white guys on the other hand start getting all uncomfortable and shit.
yes its true. black guys and white guys have different obstacles to face. you guys got the “horndog hollarin at every bitch” stereotype and so are likely to get hit up with harassment charges quicker than us.
but i think it gets progressively worse. if you are a man, its bad. if you are a white man, you are now the enslaver patriarch responsible for all evil in the world. should you decide to comment on how rediculous that is (with any reasons that back that up) you just dig yourself in the hole deeper. not to mention if you are straight (and as a consequence couldnt really care less what gay people do) then you are a womanizing bastard that hates gays.
take no offense to this, but it looks to me that the straight male is the new punching bag and the straight white male is the new nigger.
Only if you’re an American white male. Europeans are much more chill about racial/gender issues as the article suggests. Even in Germany, where anything even remotely critical of multiculturalism or neofeminism gets you painted as a Nazi, people just seem to get along better and can speak their minds more freely.
Coincidentally, most of my friends here in Europe also sit down to pee….
Its too bad I’m a straight, white male. If I wasn’t maybe I’d be allowed to have an opinion on this.
Nonsense, straight white males are allowed to have precisely one opinion on this: the PC opinion. Don’t forget that not having an opinion is itself evidence of being a heretic.
This point is definitely a subtext in my posts at White Male Privilege.
Check your privilege, you ableist, fedora-wearing, neck bearded shitlord.
Sooo glad I’m white. 🙂
Boo-hoo…. you sound like a victim. Must be so hard being a white male in America huh? GTFOH!!!!…. with that facetious attempt of oppression.
some people couldn’t recognize sarcasm even if it shat them in the face.
Real recognize real and you guys are unfamiliar to me and my kind. Your faux sincerity just reeks of fugazi & manginaism.
What’s this guys problem?
It will never be over because ending it isn’t the actual point; it’s like permanent communist revolution, it can never end.
It doesn’t matter whether the war’s in Eastasia or Eurasia…
Blacks and Muslims are the most self pitying race and religion in the history of man – they’ll still be blaming slavery for their low levels of attainment and high levels of criminality in a thousand years. I am with Lincoln all the way on this one, the blacks should have been returned to Africa following the civil war.
THIS right here….. this is not a reasonable discussion or a VALID opinion, just a lousy, mean spirited, nasty collection of words cobbled together.
Racist? definetly. Just a dude stating his opinion? Yup.
But ” just an opinion ” varies. This is a racist opinion, ignorant and mass-blaming nonsense. Nothing wrong of ” PC ” about calling that out.
The problem would be how to ship them to Africa. Who would pay for it? How would they pay for it? The cost would unthinkable.
Look up the history of Liberia, we tried…
Though I totally disagree with your racist views, I’m happy to see someone acknowledge that Lincoln was a white separatist and not an equal-rights humanitarian.
Slavery ended about 150 years ago. Women have had suffrage for a 100 years. The Holocaust ended close to 70 years ago. We recently elected a black president, TWICE.
And yet, people grow more sensitive to perceived racial and gender injustices each year, not less.
Slutwalks demonstrating against rape are at an all-time high while rape is at an all-time low. Street harassment is now a thing, because actual assault and real harassment have been so greatly reduced.
Its one giant shit-test. The more we acquiesce, the more they demand.
Traditional slavery still exists in other parts of the world. In the US it just took the form of waged slavery so that all colors could be included.
And as far as US presidents are concerned, they all report to the same boss.
US-styled representative democracy is a fallacy. Its goal is to concentrate power
¨Racism¨ is a socially constructed word that is scientifically unproductive. However ¨Kin selection¨ or the preference of one´s own race over another is inate, natural and hard wired. Even the most liberal egalitarian types when hooked up to probes that scan the brain, the areas that respond to racial impulses go off and show them to be deep down ¨racists.¨ Social conditioning/engineering doesn´t make it go away. This evolved for the survival and proliferation of ones own genes that were best suited for the enviornment to which they evolved.
¨Racism¨ is a socially constructed word that is scientifically unproductive. However ¨Kin selection¨ or the preference of one´s own race over another is inate, natural and hard wired. Even the most liberal egalitarian types when hooked up to probes that scan the brain, the areas that respond to racial impulses go off and show them to be deep down ¨racists.¨ Social conditioning/engineering doesn´t make it go away. This evolved for the survival and proliferation of ones own genes that were best suited for the enviornment to which they evolved.
The trouble is that there is now a huge industry (=the US Government) which has a vested interest in seeking out and fighting racism and sexism, whether or not it really exists at all. Therefore we see ever more strained and recondite definitions of sexism and racism, ever more subtle and bizarre examples of “unconscious sexism” or “racist dog whistles” which only the professional racism-and-sexism hunters can perceive.
It will go on until white men react with organized violence. That’s the only thing liberals actually respect and understand. They used to hate Muslims until Muslims started murdering Americans. Now they have added “Islamophobia” to the list of official thoughtcrimes. If conservative white Americans show a willingness and ability to kill, liberals will cower back in fear.
OKC Bombing. Boston Bombing. Olympic Bombing. Trail of Tears. Aboriginal ethnic cleansing in Austraila. Wars in the middle east. Whites show their ability to kill every single day. WTF are you on about?
OKC bombing is legit. Bostom bombing was a muslim first. Trail of Tears, Abo cleaning are organized violence by the state.
Clarification: Boston Bombing story you heard on the news wasn’t the truth. Look up some conspiracies with an open mind, they have photos that 100% prove the “bad guys” weren’t the real bad guys (stuff like pics of one of them running from the blasts with his backpack still on; backpacks they were carrying were different colour to the exploded ones etc).
The term racist, drained of any sensible objective meaning, has itself essentially become a racial epithet, one directed almost exclusively at white people.
The term “racist”, drained of any sensible objective meaning, has itself effectively become a racial epithet, one directed almost exclusively at white people.
Oh please shut up. Don’t whine about racism because you aren’t allowed to crack Black jokes as you please. It is hilarious, the same White men making race jokes about minorities are the ones who will throw a major fit if you bring up the fact that most serial killers and serial rapists are White males.
Yes, it is bigoted to tell an Indian guy if he is going back to India after doing his masters, same as saying most men in prison are Black. Because most of the times when you say it, it has a racial motive. You want racism to be over? Quit talking about it.
You are a White male and I am a minority, but why the fuck does it matter? Why can’t you treat someone who is from say India and trying to be an American as an American rather than segregating him into a small category and asking when he is going back to India?
Why can’t we just admit that due to history, Black men have had less opportunities to succeed and had to resort to crime hence leading to more going to prison? Rather than constantly bringing up the fact that most men in Prison are Black.
But lets live life by your standards, say you are allowed to not walk on egg shells and say whatever you like about minorities. Would you be willing to handle minorities saying racist things about Whites like bringing up the fact that most serial killers are White? I find that men who whine about political correctness are the same ones that will tell a racist joke but get hypersensitive when someone else tells a joke about their race.
You can definitely talk about historical lack of opportunities *and* incarceration rates in the same discussion…in fact we should talk about both, and that’s the point, you can’t talk about both if we’re so afraid of racism that we can’t recognize basic facts or bring up differences between different communities. And yes, it cuts both ways (ie IIRC whites commit the vast majority of corporate crime), and that’s fine with me because we owe it to each other to at least be honest.
So really, I have no problem with non-whites joking about how we can’t dance or whatever, actually I’d prefer it if they did. You can’t very well coexist if you can’t jest, and every community needs to be able to laugh at itself.
I don’t care what you people say about whites. Your disproportionate rates of violent crime against us is what I find offensive. But I’m sure it’s justifiable, “due to history” of course.
Another false statement.
*sigh* this is also a very popular un-thruth.
What you’re hiding from us is that, in 2010, whites were 72% of the population, while blacks were 13%.
http://www.census.gov/2010census/news/releases/operations/cb11-cn125.html
Contrasted with your data that “in 2010, 69.4 percent of all persons arrested were white, 28.0 percent were black” — therein lies the disproportion. But it’s okay, I’m sure it’s somebody else’s fault. It’s *never* their fault.
Me taking “offense” is perpetual, because we’re perpetually being lied to.
But wait, there’s more! He is also deliberately hiding the fact that the 69% number includes Mexicans and other Hispanics. The FBI lumps them in with whites in order to muddy the waters. Unless you want to believe that Mexicans combined with all other races only commit 2.8% of all crimes. So you be the judge what percentage of that 69% is white versus hispanic. It’s obvious that white per capita crime rates are far below that of all other races combined.
“Bigotry is the state of mind of a bigot: someone who, as a result
of their prejudices, treats other people with hatred, contempt, and
intolerance.”
So asking if a guy is going back to India after he completes his degree fits this definition? Must’ve missed that one somewhere.
>Same as saying most men in prison are Black.
This is a statement of fact. Not bigotry.
>Would you be willing to handle minorities saying racist things about
Whites like bringing up the fact that most serial killers are White?
This is another statement of fact. Anyone that would cry about this as being bigoted is pathetic to me.
>Why can’t we just admit that due to history, Black men have had less
opportunities to succeed and had to resort to crime hence leading to
more going to prison?
These are two different things. Most prisoners are black. It is also true that blacks have been denied opportunities in the past and this is a contributor to the former (although I’m going to say that the failing and incredibly misguided war on drugs which disproportionately affects minorities is probably the biggest blame). Both of them are true. Describing things the way they are is not by itself bigotry.
>You are a White male and I am a minority, but why the fuck does it
matter? Why can’t you treat someone who is from say India and trying to
be an American as an American rather than segregating him into a small
category and asking when he is going back to India?
It shouldn’t. You should ask yourself the same question, not the author’s friend.
It’s been stated numerous times in your comment that ” most men in prison are black ” and that it is a statement of fact.
What facts are you looking at?
How, pray tell, is that even possible without letting all other races out of jail.
Please, check your facts.
That statement is made an awful lot and it shows a predisposition in thought. It’s false and statistically inacurate, but many, many men, white males, appear to believe it like a religion.+
Oh wow. Please do go on. Actually, hang on, I’m just making some popcorn.
If you run out of things to say about prisons, here’s some more topics to run off:
1. Blacks like to rape… a lot.
2. Blacks are dumb(er) than whites (and I think just about every race, will have to check that one up).
3. A higher percentage of blacks (compared to whites) are gay (per 1000, or whatever figure you want to chuck in).
That should be enough fuel for now. Let me know if you want more.
On the whole I find that most LEGIT bigotry is in fact gone, and as is, will continue to decline. Leftists simply need to use white guilt to push their social agenda. It is not a coincidence that the people that most often mention and categorize race these days are the peddlers of diversity and multiculturalism and the so-called “anti-racists.”
Eh, as a black guy I have it bad for expressing non PC beliefs as well. The funny things is white liberals shaming me for things I’ve noticed/lived during times of war. What the fuck would these spoiled brats know about being in a war and how arrogant can you get thinking you can tell me how I should have behaved in something you have no fucking clue about, something that completely defies your imagination?
If you’re afraid of losing your job because of your real opinions, find a new one. I heard dealers are always recruiting and the hours aren’t too bad!
Diversity + proximity = war
actually, proximity=war
there will always be divisions, tribes and groups, if its not on skin, it’s on class lines, if its not on that its something else. people tend to groupings, its why a universalist mentality wont work
the best you can get is trade for mutual benefit
Because like most accusation of bigotry, it’s mostly just a witch hunt. And it gets pretty absurd.
Few years ago a guy at university asked me “Where are you from”? Before I could answer, this white girl at the same table piped up and started lecturing him about how insensitive and racist he was for assuming I’m not American just because I’m not white. She went on and on about how my colleague’s “white privilege” blinded him to his racism. The dude was Indian. Not very swarthy, but still Indian. This didn’t discourage her, instead she just blew up onto “white skin privilege” and “white passing privilege”, until I asked her to leave us.
I then told the guy my family immigrated from China when I was 6. That’s it. We got along fine. He wasn’t mocking me, he was just curious. No ill intentions, no hurt feelings, not offended, not racist, nothing.
People have asked me several times since then, and I just told them.
Was I supposed to flip out over these minor things?
—
What social justice zealots don’t understand is that being offended is a state of mind, not something defined by rigid rules. They choose to ignore this in favor of creating taboos, making up obscure terms for things even the alleged victims weren’t offended by prior to being TOLD they should be offended.
Despite liberals constantly telling me that intentions don’t matter and that I should feel hurt, I’ve never felt offended unless I sense bad intentions from the speaker.
Trust me, I’m old enough to remember times when such a question didn’t evince the kind of rabid “white privilege” rant that this chick made. What’s considered an “insensitive” question now was just an innocent question about 30 years ago.
When I was 6 years old my mom took me to the pool. I met a black kid and we played all day together. Then when we went back to his towel to rest I asked him why his hands and feet were a different color than the rest of him. His mother overheard and started yelling at me and told me to go and play with the white children, “where you belong,” she said.
Everyone here, regardless of race, should recognize that tribalism and in-groupism is a male trait. This does not mean that we cannot get along, or work towards a common goal. Nor does it mean we have to degenerate into pointless PC verbiage.
The biggest flaw to nationalism and racial identities is assumed hostility towards other groups, which then lets liberals and feminists divide us and gloat about how awful we are to each other. Don’t give them that chance.
We can certainly discuss stereotypes or racial statistics as long as it’s done in good faith and not enmity. For example, you can ask me why Asians commit a disproportionate percent of financial crimes and I’ll give you a straight answer, as long as you’re not trying to be insulting.
The feminist PC crowd has us heavily outnumbered in every social institution. Media, government, academia, everything.
Alienating like-minded men simply because of race is the LAST thing we want to do.
I have to disagree that in-groupism, as you put it, is a male trait. If anything, it seems to me that this is a distinctly female trait, as evidenced by how successful feminism has been. Yes, we all know that male enablers have aided and abetted its ascendancy, but the cohesion wouldn’t have existed were it not for females. They seem to be hard-wired for this, whereas we men judge each other on respective merits.
In the US, women have far more resources available than men do. If women are the beneficiaries of affirmative action, it’s considered a good thing. If men benefit, then it’s the “old boys’ club.”
To go into an explanation would be too much over type, but “tribalism” and “in-groupism” is a part of the “herd instinct.” It is exclusively feminine in nature and crosses over sexual boundaries solely because of our bisexual nature (physically and metaphysically/bodily and lived-bodily), and our sociocultural evolutionary heritage. It doesn’t exist in men that have fully assimilated their more feminine side. Of course this is my (along with a few others) opinion.
This is the inverse of truth. Women have a greater in group bias than men to a large margin. Science : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274/
If that’s the case, then how come women are more likely to believe in all that love and tolerance liberal nonsense?
I think we’re talking about different kinds of in-groupism here. For women, perhaps it’s more being social with others, whereas for men, it’s more about having an identity, and being proud/defending that identity.
It should be noted that the in group bias tends towards women being bias for other women.
Also, women are submissive. Lacking a bedrock of sovereignty, they adopt the strongest ideological paradigm. With a strong man in their life they will adopt his ideology. Lacking that, the state as father becomes their ideology.
There is no better follower than a woman or a weak willed man. That is until you show the slightest weakness and then forget it. They’re nowhere to be seen, monkey vining off to some other bastion of strength they can latch on to in order to gain the benefits of that strength by proxy.
This PC stuff will never die out, as long as it’s profitable. The civil rights movement achieved their goals 50 years ago, but you’d think nothing has changed since. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson make bank hustling cowardly whites. Homosexual rights advocates won’t stop screaming as long as any religion considers homosexuality sinful, which won’t happen. Feminists will keep attacking masculinity until pigs fly. All of these minority groups, whether religious, sexual, ethnic, etc. are entrenched in our government and universities and funded by hundreds of billions of dollars annually. Every major corporation has a “diversity” policy that discriminates against straight, white males. Asians are also discriminated against in university admissions.
The greater threat of communism wasn’t a military attack but an ideological one. Most Americans believe in communism/socialism in practice, even if they don’t agree with the label. I think it’s impossible to roll back our economy and culture. It has to get much worse, then it’ll collapse and after much suffering something can be rebuilt, or we’ll just get an ever more oppressive government that turns the U.S. into a police state, like the Soviet Union. “Enjoy the Decline” by Aaron Clarey, helped me come to terms with the mess we’re in, instead of getting continually frustrated about it.
I think Americans are over sensitive. As a matter of fact, today, precisely in the Netherlands an American woman was giving a speech in a university and she made some less-than smart remarks. People started laughing at her “logic” and her reaction was not to reconsider what she had said, but to snap out saying “Is this because I’m a woman?” I mean, seriously? I guess if you grow up being taught that you are a victim you will see attackers everywhere, even if they are imaginary.
“I guess if you grow up being taught that you are a victim you will see attackers everywhere, even if they are imaginary.I guess if you grow up being taught that you are a victim you will see attackers everywhere, even if they are imaginary.”
BINGO!
Yup. Guys make fun of each other all the time, but the instant a guy makes fun of a girl it’s because she’s a woman and male privilege and all that crap. Don’t feminists want equal treatment?
>Don’t feminists want equal treatment?
First generation feminists did, today it’s only about getting the maximum amount of benefits (divorce, support for women in technical jobs etc.) for the minimum amount of responsibility (“I was drunk, I couldn’t consent!!1”)
I think it’s because less and less people today really are mentally mature. Why should they be, one may ask, there is no need to take responsibility for your actions in our society anymore, see the obnoxious “yolo”-movement.
If you criticize a child, it will think you don’t like it as a person. As we age, we (should) learn to separate criticism towards us from cirticism towards our statement.
Obviously many people today never made that mental step.
> It is a Christmas tradition in Netherlands to paint your face black and act like a black Santa.
There is also a Persian tradition similar to this where a jester paints his face black on new year’s. Of course, it has nothing to do with black people; it’s simply because old Persian monasteries had people in charge of keeping the fire lit, and their faces were usually blackened from soot. Yet, in recent years Persians have been upholding this tradition increasingly less often because of racial sensitivity.
> One of my Indian friends thought it was racist of one of his friends to ask him whether he plans to go back to India after he graduates from his masters program.
As a foreign person myself, that’s hilarious and retarded that he took offense to that.
It’s great that your servers is in the U.S i assume because if i said anything negative about race, immigration or anything close to the egalitarian view that all people are the same and even newly arrived somalis is swedish (eeh bullshit) you could get fines or jail for breaking “HMF” hostile against minorities (even gays is part of this but not the swedes as saying swedish people should burn and be devoured like one journalist (Tobias Hübinette, korean adopted lecture at a university) you’ll get away with it.
I would say that at least you talk about race and differences, in the intellectual desert, Sweden we do not talk about this atleast not in public unless you want to be an outcast in legal, social and every other terms.
But with every action there is a equal reaction, things are brewing in Sweden and around Europe. If i were an immigrant i would leave before things get worse, seriously it seems that it’s going to be another part of a bloody European conflict.
As for the slave-trade, eat the red-pill there please. There is much disinformation going on in mainstream media. The real slave-trade involved very greatly a people i cannot mention but i will link to this youtube-video for a hint. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ongalrKdJWg (It’s not the finns btw)
I’ve heard of that Tobias Hubinette guy. He’s a lunatic with serious self-identity issues.
I bet he’d wet his pants if South Korea was getting the same amount of immigration as Sweden.
When will the “bigotry” be over?
At a guess when straight white males flagellate, apologize, “assimilate” and guilt themselves out of existence? Going by the current trend of flailing birthrates and your average SWPL’s love of abortion it’s apparently not too far away.
I’m only 3 quarters white btw. So I’m allowed to have a quarter of an opinion that still counts.
What the fuck is this liberal horseshit doing on this page? Goddamn, liberals and faggots are invading all MRA/MGTOW spaces now. GO FUCK OFF AND DIE, YOU FAGGOT NIGGER JEWS!!!!
well at least we can see that Roosh has relaxed his censorship policy!
I laughed.
Thomas, however, has been banned.
My mother works at an elementary school. She tells me that it’s not uncommon for black kindergartners and first graders to insist that the only reason the teacher disciplined them was because they are black. That level of from-the-cradle indoctrination is impervious to rational discourse.
Blacks will continue to blame the white man for their every dysfunction. That’s a given.
The only profitable discussion to have is one about how to quit underwriting (financially and intellectually) their dysfunction. The more we insulate them from the consequences of their behavior (whether by providing more welfare checks for the single mother who just popped out her sixth kid by her fourth babydaddy or by publicly shaming anyone who talks about the realities of black criminality), the more we enable those behaviors. If you want more of something, subsidize it.
More White women are on welfare though… so I suggest that you use another nonstereotypical & valid premise to support your bigoted argument.
More White women are on welfare though… so I suggest that you use another nonstereotypical & valid premise to support your bigoted argument.
You don’t get it. We don’t need your input. Your input is toxic, and for more reasons than just your obvious inability to understand statistics. Pitch your fit for someone who gives a shit.
I hurt your feelings or did I hurt your credibility? Bigots like yourself (God forbid your mother is one too, especially as an elementary teacher in a position of influence over precious & innocent Black, Latino, White and other multi-ethnic children… a damn shame) are like the dinosaurs, in few hundred years your bigoted and degenerate offspring will all be like chickens. Wasn’t my intention to ruffle your feathers. Facts are only toxic to liars & perpetrators of lies & misinformation for nefarious agendas.
In a few hundred years, black people will still be low-IQ, low-achievement whiners prone to group hysteria and violent crime. What’s your point? Is there an argument behind all that bitching?
“In FY 2009, African-American families comprised 33.3% of TANF families, white families comprised 31.2%, and 28.8% were Hispanic. Since the implementation of TANF, the percentages of black and Hispanic families have increased, while the percentage of white families has decreased. In 1992, blacks represented 37% of those on welfare; by 2002, this number increased slightly to 38%. In that same time period, the percentage of Hispanics rose from 18% to 25%. On the other hand, the percentage of welfare recipients who were white decreased from 39% to 32% in that same time frame.”
Here’s their source: Schram, Sanford F (2005). “Contextualizing Racial Disparities in American Welfare Reform: Toward a New Poverty Research.” Perspectives on Politics 3, no. 2, pp. 253-268.
Also check out this site:
http://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/
And here’s a page with some more charts in case all this reading makes your head hurt:
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/resource/character/fy2010/fy2010-chap10-ys-final
Blacks make up about 13% of the population and get WELL over 30% of the welfare checks. Even if you adjust for poverty (25.8% of blacks live in poverty vs. 9.4% of whites), black people get welfare benefits at disproportionately high rates.
You’re free to keep thinking it’s all a big conspiracy by whitey to keep you down. In fact I’m positive you will. See the earlier referenced futility of reasoning with black people.
So do the statistics which you copied and pasted from internet sources supposed to solidify your credibility? It only proves how much of a lazy and functional imbecile you are. I’ve taken a couple Statistics courses in college & they do not tell the whole story and the data is very easily manipulated for desired output. Furthermore, how was these conditions of poverty and drug dependency created? Research that. I won’t make easier than it already is to verify.
Run! Run! The evil white man is using numbers!
You have no argument left.
Actually this whole exchange illustrates my original point perfectly. White people can have reasonable conversations that employ things like statistics and logic. The blacks howl and fling shit.
Ok buddy.
And thus the negro finally confesses to his agenda of miscegenation. Make no mistake folks, that’s what it’s all about – “where da white wimminz at?”.
And here we get to the next predictable arrow in the liberal’s pathetic quiver: when he is shown facts and statistics that he doesn’t like, he simply claims that all stats and facts are manipulated to serve the other side! It’s fascinating that so many brains can operate as so low a level, for so long. If whites weren’t there to prevent natural selection from working properly, blacks would be in serious trouble.
…ladies and gentlemen, may I present to you, The Bigot Defense. “…you’re a bigot!”….what was this article about again?
Man is there a SINGLE black guy out there who understands mathematics enough to grasp what “per capita” rates are????? So tired of this absurd argument. More whites this, more whites that – there are way more whites here than any other race you dolt! When you adjust the numbers to reflect per capita rates, black dysfunction is plain as day.
Dem statistics be lyin tho.
Hate to tell you, but blacks only comprise 13% of the US population. Of course there are “more” whites on da welfare, but not a greater percentage.
People keep feeding the entitlement mentality hamsters of these “poor, oppressed minorities”. To the point that if you’re a fucking white male, you are being oppressed more by being forced to conform to the PC bullshit hysteria around this.
“Sensitivity Training” anyone?
Fuck ’em. It’s time that they grew some balls on their own.
On a side note: in holland ‘santa’ is still white. His helpers are black. I remember a few years ago someone suggesting to make the helpers rainbow colored to be PC and facing an avalanche of angry parents who didn’t want their child to learn racism because “its wrong if their black”.
It will die out when people admit they’re all racist (particularly blacks) and say “Big fucking deal.”
P.S. I’m racist. Most of my racism is down to statistics and probability, the rest is down to me (generally) not liking people of other races, particularly when faced with a whole tribe of them, but on a one-to-one basis “some” are alright.
Bigotry will be over when there are no white people left. The goal of diversity is zero white people. Africa for Africans. Asia for Asians. White countries for everyone. Anti-racism is just a code word for anti-white.
Imbecile… Not all white people are bigots.
Wow you’re shit at trolling. It’s an artform, you have to be less obvious. But, if you’re black, you probably don’t understand subtlety (both word and meaning). Then again, you’re probably white and think you’re being clever and original.
You’re a self-admitting racist… What are you going to tell me? You have no credibility on anything relevant to what I’m expressing. Besides, I cannot possibly be black, my grammar is too spot-on for that right? trolololol
Are you Cole Younger’s ghost writer, his alias or something? It doesn’t take a lot of reading comprehension to spot an egregious logical fallacy in someone’s argument ya know. You racists sure are dim-witted… but somehow you all try to come off as if you’re so sublime and sophisticated. Boy oh boy! Delusions of self-grandeur I tell ya!
Actually me admitting I’m racist (like there’s anything wrong with that) GIVES me credibility, as you know I’m not putting up pretenses.
Grammar… hmmm, probably type your responses in word to minimise grammar errors (though I don’t even bother looking for grammar errors on the internet anymore, it’s too frustrating), but your critical thinking is off enough for you to be black. So, yeah. I’ll take a punt you’re a nigger.
Trololol. Ahhhh, the good ole internetz; one of the few places where faceless cowards can muster up enough courage to slur at a Black man in anonymity:-). I bet you feel juiced huh?
But on another relevant note; go on catch up with your kind now.
This is the liberal and anti-white mindset, friends. If you disagree on any given position with a liberal, then ALL of your ideas are deemed flawed and worthless. This is the epitome of intellectual hubris and arrogance.
Ahh, the good old threats of violence and taunts of “you wouldn’t say that to my face” – the last resort of a thick-skulled negro who comes up empty of an intelligent argument.
If what I said constitutes a threat of violence and taunting; then your embellished accusations prove how warped & full of crap you racists are. Where are your “intelligent” thoughts on his slurs? Embellish that.
I’m anti-racist and independent(non-party affiliated). And you embody the epitome you mentioned.
Am I white?
… it’s conditional.
A lower case noun as designation for a people implies a totally deracinated people, thus paradoxically no people at all. Sure, you’re probably “white”, but that’s essentially a meaningless badge, and hardly a viable identity. You’re a Persian, struggling against the same group and or groups that other groups sprung from the soil of Europe have struggled against for millennia, whether knowingly or not. You’re a cousin and a comrade, and you do yeoman’s work.
Depends, if liberals like something you do, then you’re a Turk/Persian.
Look at this accomplished minority!
If they don’t like you, then you’re white.
Do you see yourself as white? Do you identify as an American white or as Middle-Eastern American?
Culturally I feel completely American, but genetically Middle Eastern.
…oh, haven’t you heard? It IS ok to make racist or sexist comments, so long as you only make them about men, straights, whites, or Christians.
Maybe a better way to put it is that “bigotry” will become passe about the same time it stops being advantageous to be a pussified victim.
Dutch were actually (one of) the last Europeans to stop Slavery, the difference is that they didn’t take any back. They’re making up for it now though!
This hypersensitive political correctness is manufactured in women’s studies departments across the country. Get rid of these departments and watch the hypersensitivity evaporate.
We all damn well know that only White straight males can be racist and full of hate. Sarcasm intended.