350 thoughts on “Feminism Has Lost The Minds Of Young Women”

1. Most western governments are about 1 year’s entire GDP in debt … and escalating fast!
   I honestly think this can be traced (directly or indirectly) through to leftist politics and feminism in particular.
   Bullshit government jobs
   Excessive welfare and depency
   Bribing client voting blocks
   Hopelessly unbalanced trade deals
   Interference in foreign affairs
   Reset this cuntish shit and watch how the finances “magically” rebalance

2. I can’t say that this is broadly true, at least not yet.

3. Most women may say they think feminism is lame, but the ideas of 3rd wave have still still subverted and destroyed the vast majority of millennial/Z women. And I see it getting worse, not better with each year. MTV/Sex In the City/Girls have really shifted the overton window. It’s now unquestioned among young women that uncommitted sex is a rite of passage and part of maturity that will not have lasting scars. “Body positivity” and the thought of trying to to stay slim and attractive is self repression and any man who desires a slim woman is a Nazi. That a Mr Big will be waiting for them at 35 when they get done having fun – and they deserve Mr Big no matter how fat and how much mileage is on their pussy. Oh and they can begin having that family between 35-40, no problem, Angelina Jolie and all those celebrities are so they can too. Tattoos, nose piercings. Public schools teaching kids that all whites are racist, all men are sexist. Combat roles in the military/reducing standards for fitness to make it more “fair”. Company paid Egg feezing parties at Facebook/Google/Apple (soon to be every company). Open your eyes my friend, the war is still raging and they are pressing their offensive.
   The nose pierced tatted slut scoffs at the word feminism, because we have been pretty successful in making the word “uncool” culturally. That’s a small battle won. But 3rd wave feminism continues to wreak havoc via the filth emanating from Government Schools/Hollywood/Viacom/etc, and it’s beginning to affecting women in heretofore “traditional” cultures like south america, eastern Europe, even Russia. Asia is next. We may have won the battle against the word “feminism” but we have a long, long way to in pushing back this degeneracy.

   1. Yeah I’ll believe it when I see action towards it. When girls go back to making it a point to be married by 21 and make a wholesale embrace of feminine behavior and not when it benefits them, then I’ll believe that they are against feminism.

      1. AGREED! “Women Against Feminism” is phony, a false ‘movement’ of Western women who do what they do best: LIE (they have proven this for the last fifty years).
         They want to deny the label of ‘Feminism’ while they continue to enjoy all the advantages of it. They need to do the following (at a minimum) to get me to change my opinion about their sincerity:
         — demand the enactment of mandatory 20-year prison sentences for proven perjurers and false accusers,
         — repeal VAWA,
         — repeal “No-Fault” Divorce,
         — repeal ALL “must arrest” laws,
         — repeal ALL “rape shield” laws,
         — eliminate ALL ‘Women only’ government-supported scholarships,
         — eliminate ALL quotas for education and employment, and
         — eliminate ALL lowered standards for women in education and employment.
         If they refuse to agree with this, this proves that they don’t want to break with “Feminism”, just not have to bear the label of “Feminists”.
         PS:
         If a “Non-Feminist” wants you to marry her, just ask her if she will agree to take your last name; any hesitation or excuse-making on her part will show you how ‘non-feminist’ she REALLY is.

         1. Thank you for your comment. As author, I was not trying to assert that women have seen the light, per se. Only that the tipping point is coming. Reading your above list of actionables… I don’t want to sound like a prophet, but if you look to history, patriarchy always wins. It won’t be pretty, it won’t be easy, but truth and justice always prevail. What I wished to highlight with this piece is the beginning of it… the first small ripple in the pond, the beginning of the turn of the tide.

         2. Bravo. The cold hard truth.

         3. I thought it. And you wrote it. I would add that at this point, we are at a tipping point. Because of feminism, the birth rate is below replacement levels. Men are opting out of marriage, employment and society in general. This is not just imaginary, it’s pervasive, systemic and in some ways permanent. If you want to avoid suicide, and destitution stay away from women. Don’t marry them, don’t live with them. Don’t give them chances. When the governments finally wake up to themselves and de-feminise society. Like they de-nazified Germany after the war. Then we can move forward after this aweful and unscientific experiment. I would add that governments would have to implement anti gold digging laws. Apply the same rules to family court that they do to other courts. Ban alimony which is really a type of prostitution payment in perpetuity. (Without the sex). As well as getting rid of no fault divorce, that would stop women coming home and saying “i don’t love you anymore” and ending a marriage on a whim. We need to rise up. We can’t be the generation that let it slip away.

         4. “– eliminate ALL ‘Women only’ government-supported scholarships,
            — eliminate ALL quotas for education and employment, and
            — eliminate ALL lowered standards for women in education and employment.”
            Wow! Horryfying. No wonder Americans hate feminists. 😀 I am against all three laws because they are stupid, harmful for the society and unfair.

         5. Well, the tipping point will occur once the system crashes under its own weight, or when the men realize its about to crash and then make a hard turn to undo all feminine rights.
            Because thats actually how this historically goes.
            Either you pull it together, or you will be overrun by the society that actually reproduces (the West does not).

         6. Sorry Karolina, its not enough. Without a decent reproductive rate, the West will collapse in the exact same manner that every civilization before this one collapsed once womens rights were enshrined and women stopped having babies.

         7. And what do we, women, care? You, manosphere-men, shame unwed mothers and claim they are worthless and abusive towards kids. On the other hand, you want married women to bear much more kids in order to save Western Culture from collapsing. In other words, you don’t care about an individual’s happiness, personal freedom or any true moral values. It’s all about your vision of a perfect society where just one family model is accepted. My bad. I won’t be bothering you any longer.

         8. An individuals true happiness and freedom in not gained through personal preference. There ought to be no freedom for error or evil but freedom only in excellence.

         9. Actually the opposite. “Womens rights” are more about granting women privileges they have no real right to, and forcing males to act on their behalf.
            Men who form companies should have the right to discriminate against hiring women. Just as banks who give mortgages should also have the right not to lgive mortagages to people from specific ethnic groups. Alimony and child support should be discontinued entirely. Instead children should go with the parent most capable of providing, and a divorced woman must find work, yes in an environment where business owners dont have to hire her simply b/c she is a woman.
            Welfare should also be discontinued, as should all minimum wage laws.
            But I suspect none of that would appeal to you. Most people would like the liberty to do as they please, but would be very uncomfortable if others had their liberties to do the same.
            There is one thing I would not allow you to do. I would not allow you to vote. You are too much a slave to your emotions. It is far too easy to appeal to your needs over the needs of the greater good.

         10. I agree with banning alimony but not with discontinuing no fault divorce. There are simpler methods to achieving the same goal, one must be consistent.
             However, I believe all these vhanges must take place on the State level. Let one State try your way, and another my way, and we will see what works, and that way we can get something done!

         11. Exactly! I’ve run into articles such as this that make it sound as if “feminism” is just simply a social trend and all us men need to do is stop catering to women and it will just go “poof”. Most men just simply cannot get through their stupid retarded heads that there are still LAWS that have created on purpose as an attack against men by global marxists to give females an unfair guaranteed advantage in society. And what codemonkey above says is correct. If a business wants to discriminate and not hire women, then it should be their right to do so. If they feel that their business environment would be most product with 100% men in their workforce, then that should be their right to go with that strategy. But businesses are forced by law and with violence if they do not comply with giving females guarateed job positions and high salaries.

         12. Codemonkey, I feel I should answer your comment. Women are emotional, true. But not incapable of making sound decisions. Just because they see “greater good” in helping people rather than leaving them alone to die of hunger doesn’t mean they are stupid. Are forgive me, but from what I’ve seen on this site and many others infested with manosphere-guys, men are slaves to their emotions as well. But instead of empathy and compassion, they submit themselves to anger, frustration and contempt.
             Perhaps the unemployed should not vote. Religious maniacs. Ignorants who know nothing about the politics. People with criminal record. How about that?
             I’m against privileges for women. But if they already exist, most women are tempted to use them. It’s not their fault, it’s the fault of the government.
             I don’t know how it works in USA, but in Poland the father of the child, no matter – a husband or a lover, has to pay money for the kid. How much – it depends on his earnings. If the father is unable to do it or flees from the country, the government is supposed to pay for the children.
             Last but not least: helping people in need is something noble, privided the help doesn’t prevent them from going to work (if they are healthy and work is available). If you are for NOT helping anyone in need, then I guess you are either very young and know little about life or you have rich parents and will never suffer poverty.
             Now you can call me names. 🙂

         13. Sir, judging from what I’ve seen on this site, your (manosphere-guys) morality is far from perfection. You don’t want to eliminate evil. You want to establish a new world order. Just like your sick American feminists. (Polish ones are only slightly better.)

         14. “If a business wants to discriminate and not hire women, then it should be their right to do so. If they feel that their business environment would be most product with 100% men in their workforce, then that should be their right to go with that strategy.”
             Why the hell not? I hate women being so weak and vulnerable and in constant need of support. Every private company should have freedom in hiring people.
             However, it wouldn’t be wise to dispose of the “work law”. Do you, Americans, have something like that? I read that in some American companies employees couldn’t always go to toilet when they needed. I hope you are not in favour of employees being treated as slaves.
             (Sorry for mistakes.)

         15. Truth and justice always prevail… Really?

         16. I have no allegiance with any so called manosphere. It sounds like a nightclub for sodomites. Like yourself , I find the conversation interesting here. Not American either. I am Irish with a Polish Wife (Thanks be to God). I was in Poznan only a few weeks ago. However, the issue I raised was of family models. Father, Mother and Children, that is the family we all want to be part of. Right?

         17. I did a review of timelines of my friends’ parents who got divorced in the 80s . Each one of them the woman filed within 3 years of No Fault divorce ruling… it’s like they were just waiting for the path of least resistance to get easier.
             In each case, it seemed like the father treated the mother, and the kids, and kid’s friends wonderful (from an elementary school kid’s perception), yet bickering in a far-off bedroom while we, the kids played, or snarky comments they thought flew over the kid’s heads, didn’t always get by me. Every damn time, the cunt mom was slowly degrading the man.

         18. We’ve let women attempt to bear the brunt of just a few parts of the constructs of society. So cute they wanted to try crushing themselves under the weight of burden men have carried for millennia.
             The test failed, now let men get back to the normalized pain-in-the ass our lives naturally are, and enjoy kicking ass instead of getting in the fucking way.
             That’s all I ask of women. Oh, and stay the fuck out of business, unless it’s makeup or some female crap… emotions and rational transactional operations of anything whatsoever do not mix.

         19. You just actually revealed how silly our laws are. See, we’re forced – especially in companies +49 employees – to quota hire for diversity. Funny thing is what do you think companies “really” do? They hire X% of people they’re forced to, make the good workers work 1.5 times harder to make up for the force-hired slackers, and everyone gets screwed on toilet breaks, and lunch times, often working straight through half, if not all their breaks.
             I’m dead serious.

         20. Many have argued that the quotas should continue to exist for Native Americans and African Americans since they have some moral claim to the benefits, but even now, these are muddled due to immigration. My wife and I have close friends who are African American but they have no historical legacy of slavery. Yes, not ALL African Americans have ancestors who were slaves. Obama is half white with a father who came as a voluntary immigrant and did well for himself in the states. So even in theory, if his 1/2 African side was entitled to some kind of reparation, that would be cancelled out by his 1/2 side that owed it to him.
             For veterans, they are not victims but rather those who have earned the respect of the nation for their service but in that case, they should be compensated directly in the form of a Veteran’s Administration taking care of any medical issues they have (it’s notoriously corrupt) and improving the standards of their service (better “chow”/food, body armor, safety, etc.) and ensuring that the military treats them with respect throughout their service. Same with police and firefighters.

         21. Karolina, Privyet or Dzien Dobri, whichever applies!
             I appreciate your concern and if you’re still listening, please allow me to clarify. I’ve been involved in the “manosphere” for 30 years including with the key leaders of the movement.
             Before feminism, there were provisions to take care of women who were left vulnerability due to abusive men. This included treating them the same as married men in getting higher rates for work. Yes, women were in the workplace throughout human history especially in the west. Insurance was also created and my own father put a great deal of money in so that when he passed on, my mother would have her home paid off. Men were regularly injured in dangerous work in the coal mines where I grew up and provisions were made for their widows or to help the women care for disabled husbands at home.
             When more white collar jobs opened up, feminism promised mainstream women the tempting dream that they could get high paying professional jobs AND also marry men who earned as much as them, or not, and do as they please (independance) while the men would still be working stiffs. This essentially reduced men to serfdom. I know not all women are like that, but that’s how most women went for it. With a shortage of men able or willing to earn as much as professional women, and pay all the bills while the women did as they pleased, unwed mother rates exploded. On the other end, non-professional women went on welfare and generated a massive social liability for the west.
             And it wasn’t that bad yet.
             That was in the 90’s. Then at the beginning of the 21st century, the west was invaded by non-westerners who realized that they could play the entitlement game even better. They could have a dozen wives on welfare, raise them to try to take over and impose sharia law, and the feminists would become serfs (before being subjugated themselves.) I saw it all coming back then. It’s funny that the same feminists who compared me to the taliban back then as a primitive caveman now are Muslim rights supporters.

         22. Karolina! Jak sie masz!
             My friends in Poland tells me that the child-support system in Poland was relatively limited and gave few benefits to women to have children out of wedlock. Also, the welfare state in Poland largely didn’t make becoming a single mother very profitable. Perhaps this also was exacerbated by Soviet times ending.
             In the west, it was a perfect storm of benefits for the anti-male/anti-western welfare state as professional women could earn great sums of money (this is dying off in recent years), the welfare state was VERY generous to welfare mothers (and still is) and family courts would assess so much money for what we call “bastard” children of unwed mothers against working fathers that many working fathers owed more in “child” support than they could earn. Yes, this happened because judges could demand that the father find a job that earns more due to “potential” earnings. So if the judge found a job that paid 4 times more, and the guy couldn’t get hired for that job, it didn’t matter. SOMEONE earns that much so he has to pay based upon that.
             After almost 2 generations of this, American men are largely “spooked” and the culture is strange. It’s sort of like Sweden in a way.

         23. My understanding is that Obama is a descendent of King John on his mothers side. If that is true, then the man is more white than most of the commentors on this site.
             Quotas should not exist in any form whatsoever. It is utterly destructive to whoever its applied to. If people feel guilty about slavery than they are welcome to hand over their own private property to blacks on their own time, they dont have the moral right to force others to do so. The country I live in has a lot of ethnic grievances. There is just cause for an open civil war. But people in all the communities work overtime to keep the peace and integrate because we realize how important it is to move on. No one talks about quotas or special handouts to one community over another.
             As for the Veterans, I agree with you 50%. Is say “50%” because I honestly think every federal program should be gutted if necessary to provide Veterans with EVERYTHING THEY COULD POSSIBLY NEED. It disgusts me how American vets are treated. And I wish people woild do documentaries and news reports on it so as to shame the government and military into getting their act straight.

         24. I’ll start with the vets: I think the cleanup should start with the military first and then from there, ensure they are well compensated and treated directly instead of making the whole government into a kind of welfare program for them. It’s better to clean up the mess at the source than spread guilt around, IMO.
             Next, the term in the states for compensating descendants of slaves is known as “reparations”. This was actually a promise made during the civil war era to give former slaves some land and tools to begin their own farms. Also suggested was deporting them back to Africa along with supplies to begin anew. This was the origin of “Liberia” since some actually did go back to Africa, but that didn’t work out so well as the former American slaves and the Africans of that region didn’t get along. I have a friend who worked in that region from just before a civil war broke out.
             Sadly, “affirmative action” was a terrible scheme for “reparations” since it went mostly to well-to-do white women whose ancestors had been privileged. Logic 101: How is a privileged white women “oppressed”. Her mother’s side was denied equal employment opportunities but her father’s side did well. So they cancel out since such women enjoyed economic advantages from their father. I even saw some of them ride in expensive cars on college campuses and chatting at cafes at how “oppressed” they were. Laughable. Rather than helping African Americans, these women often pushed successful, up-and-coming Africans out of the job market!
             Interracial marriage and voluntary immigration of Africa means that there are probably not that many African Americans with ancestrial claims to reparations. The same with Native Americans. Quite frankly, I’d love to see a payout to them of a scholarship program for those that can provide evidence of ancestry and be done with it. There was a hilarious controversy here where Elizabeth Warren claimed to have Cherokee ancestry and it turns out her claims were shown to be unfounded. She now has the unpleasant nickname “Pocahantus” The left tried to run her as a presidential candidate and she got laughed out.
             In the end, race quotas ultimately uses the same logic (in reverse, which is why the defenders hate the term “reverse discrimination”, because it’s true) in that someone is assumed to be a victim due to their race. How is this less racist than assuming someone is a criminal due to their race? This logic is as racist as the Jim Crow laws and the left has doubled down on perpetuating them. I can hardly wait for it to explode on the public scene since this will destroy the left as having any legitimate causes whatsoever. They have jumped into bed with crony capitalism and regard the working class with contempt.

         25. Looking at different parts of the country, I believe that part of the fall of the US will be precipitated by immigrants out breeding native whites. I have been working for the last couple of months in Arlington, and you can not find a white person in the service jobs. Resturants, Hotels, ect. What this means for sure, I can only make and observation, but it doesn’t appear to be good.

         26. There should be no reparations made to anyone, ever. That ship has sailed. And besides, if they ever were paid, Blacks would lose the right to claim victim hood for ever forward. As they would have been recompensed.

         27. you have a terrible problem. I also have a similar one where I live. but it is balanced out by both the religious groups, and the external circumstances we live in. Still, it is very bad.

         28. You have confused “helping someone in need” with “compelling someone by force of arms”. Those are not the same things, and it is a perfect example of what I was saying before about your emotions overrulling your abikit to reason.
             You can reason, but your reason is enslaved to your emotional needs, rather than the other way around. And so you unconcsiously twist words around to suit those needs.
             Helping someone in need, is usually noble, yes. If you wish to work at a bakery for 8 hours a day and give half your earnings to a poor woman to aupport her and her child after she has divorced her husband, one could call that noble. But picking up a gun and holding it to the head of a man who did not ask for that situation is not noble, it is selfish and self serving.
             That being said, I am willing to back child support laws. Provided I see that it is not causing too much harm. Right now in the West child support and alimony have completely devastated the family. So until that situation changes, I would prefer to ban it entirely.

         29. 3rd wave feminism is not only misandrous, but infantilizing to women. “Rights” do not equate to “recommendations”, and teaching both young men and women that the world will somehow cater to their whims is very dangerous. Choices always have consequences, and the prevailing ideology seems to ignore this. That said, there were a number of layers between early feminist proponents and today’s “everybody is special/gets a medal” philosophy. I’m a woman, and it’s not about seeing the light per se, many of us never agreed with these current social “causes”. The problem is, women like me have jobs to go to and/or families to care for, and we simply aren’t as visible as the unemployed social justice warrior with far too much time on their hands, and far too many social media accounts.

         30. Trying to be specific here. You (or your kind of women) are NOT doing any favor to anybody (not even to your MAN, if you have one) by “having jobs to go to and/or families to care for”.
             You are going to job because you want to earn money and you have family because you WANTED one ! Nobody is forcing you or putting a gun on your head to start a family ! You know very well what you are doing and about your choices and you have to face it !!
             If you are going to have children, you are supposed to plan properly, it’s your responsibility ! I hardly seen or heard about a MAN who is not helping around, especially for his OWN blood.
             If you have problem with doing a job, then don’t do it ! If you can’t put natural, mundane, obvious, not-a-herculean “effort” needed for a family, then don’t start it !!
             MEN has many things to complain. Your MAN will always be the primary bread winner (in majority of cases, even if you “work”) and will always be looked upon/liable/held responsible when something goes wrong. May be your MAN is doing a job that requires more effort, more stressed and more demanding (and even dangerous) and as a result, sometimes he might not be able to cater.
             MEN take up more responsibilities than females but quite often, those are conveniently “ignored”. There is every chance that whatever MEN earned by hard work (property, lifetime savings, home etc) and by sacrificing their desires, will be looted by “half” by their “better half” !! There is every chance that MEN might forgo access to their kids, their very OWN blood.
             I don’t want to list the full hardships and atrocities faced by MEN because of societal & legal double standards; favoring one specific gender.
             Lastly, Hard to manage work & family ! really !? Do you vacuum your home daily ? Do you do laundry daily ? Do you clean/dust your furniture daily ? Do you clean you bathtub and toilet daily ?

         31. Chris, my dear Brother, you seem to be really confused. I understand your concern about “immigrants” but out breeding native whites !? H A R D to believe. Cannot find a white person in service jobs ? You mentioned Restaurants, Hotels etc. In any Western Country, service sector & jobs (shall I call as “under paid” jobs ?) were always catered by “immigrants”, mostly Asian (Chinese and from Indian sub-continent).
             And guess what; How many immigrants are living on EBT cards or State welfare schemes (effectively leeching out Tax Payers Money) ? How many immigrants are engaged in drug-trafficking ? How many immigrants are looting shops & malls ? How many immigrants are doing mass shootings ? How many immigrants did “protests” and killed on-duty MALE police officers or policemen ? How many immigrants shouted “Asian Lives Matter” ?
             Coming to service jobs; do you mean waiter/server, cleaner, cashier, cook !!?? I am living in the West since past 12 years and didn’t seen a white person working low-paid & mediocre job/position, unless it is a popular food chain or their own business. No complaints here, everybody has their choices and I am not showing any sympathy or partiality for “immigrants”. Immigrants are not fools, they are coming here because they can make more money even with the under paid jobs (currency conversion !!!).
             The positive contributions of immigration & immigrants far outweighs any perceived/real problems. Note that we are not talking about Refugees, Asylum seekers and illegal immigrants.
             Chris, if you look into the details and analyze the problem, I am sure you will notice that there is no relation between immigrants and reduced birth rate among whites. The fault (and blame) is with the State/System & few “vested interests” encouraging pussies by giving them entitlement and “free pass” (and effectively harboring & feeding femicuntism) to go against the Culture, Religion and MASCULINITY.

         32. “Womens rights are more about granting women privileges they have no real right to, and forcing males to act on their behalf.”
             “Men who form companies should have the right to discriminate against hiring women.”
             “where business owners dont have to hire her simply b/c she is a woman.”
             “Most people would like the liberty to do as they please, but would be very uncomfortable if others had their liberties to do the same.”
             “It is far too easy to appeal to your needs over the needs of the greater good.”
             OMG ! You literally nailed it Bro. Bless you.

         33. Well said. I faced (and still facing) the problem working with “entitled” pussies, who were simply given the jobs because they have something different between their legs !
             Even though there are more qualified, experienced, hard-working, productive and risk taking MEN, Corporations are forced to give set number of jobs to pussies; with the added bonus of “false harassment cases” and “more number of days on leave” !!!

         34. Hats off !

         35. Wow. Way to completely miss my point. Perhaps you should re-read my post before spewing “very specific”-yet non relevant -rage. As you are apparently too angry to exercise rational reading comprehension, allow me to reiterate, Coles Notes style: this third wave feminism doesn’t actually represent the attitudes or belief system of any woman I know. The problem is, this screeching, angry, subsection of my sex apparently have an awful lot of time on their hands. Enough time in fact to start creating propped up “issues” and even more time take their issues to every social media outlet known. As a consequence. they are vastly over represented in the media. I wasn’t expressing hardship. Ever heard the expression “the squeaky wheel gets the grease”? In a nutshell, that’s what’s happening here with respect to SJWs and their so called issues.

         36. Actually, Elizabeth Warren’s nickname is “Fauxcahantus” (pronounced “Foh-ca-haunt-us”, from the ‘faux’ meaning “false”).
             Her nickname may be “unpleasant”, but it is well-deserved; she wouldn’t have it, if she hadn’t lied about her ancestry (possibly a political scam? Hillary tried the same scam with her name vis-a-vis Sir Edmud Hillary).

         37. One thing that everyone seems to forget is that the US is the only country in the world that went to war — the bloodiest war in our history — to end slavery in our country.
             “…Well, that might not be living, but it sure as hell ain’t dying. And dying’s what these white boys been doin’ for going on three years now, dying by the thousands! Dying for you, fool! I know, ‘cuz I dug the graves!” — Glory (1989)

         38. She claims that she didn’t intend to use this claim of ancestry to get affirmative action perks but nonetheless she did use this ancestrial claim in numerous professional settings. Her claim is so specious (that a distant great-grandparent) was Cherokee which, even if she’s correct, is laughable. That’s something like 1/16th Cherokee.
             It’s amusing to me that the left which claims that the Native Americans are victims of genocide (there’s partial truth to that, but there was also disease that wasn’t the direct fault of settlers) yet they seem to regard using similar tactics against Europeans as “diversity” and desirable to “address” “white privilege”. So it’s kind of like an affirmative action for genocide but it’s not even helping the very natives they claimed to want to help. Instead, Elizabeth Warren grave robbed their legacy. Astoundingly moral bankrupt.

         39. My observation, as well.

         40. yes we can and we should let it fall, all self respecting men have sold out, we are in Asia having sex with slender feminine woman, we don’t care anymore, feminism is cancer, infact I take great pleasure in knowing my ex girl friend in my degenerate country called New Zealand will die a fat ugly old cat lady, they deserve what they get, they reap what they sow.

         41. Actually, it doesn’t always win. It always loses. Feminism is not new and it has been the 4th and final stage of every great nation/empire. In fact, you can Google it.
             Once the majority of men are weak, they are weak.

         42. To a degree I agree with you. Women gaining political power and economic independence in the Empire (not Republic) is what brought Rome low. (And men were not marrying, as a law condemning bachelorhood was tried.) So yes, feminism in whatever form does weaken patriarchy and collapses empires.
             But what happened AFTER Rome collapsed?
             Christianity took over and consolidated and strengthened patriarchy even MORE than during pagan times.
             So history does bear out that patriarchy always wins in the end.

      2. Harold, why do you think that feminism or anti-feminism posture must result in submitting our personal goals to any ideology? Some females want to marry, some don’t. Some want to bear children, some don’t. And some bear children outside marital bondage. What do you care? None of your business.

      3. Generally, people don’t make changes that don’t benefit them.

      4. There’s almost no point to it. Men lose interest in their wives when they age. Very few Western men are committed to their family enough to not engage in cheating if the opportunity presents itself. A man’s love for a woman is entirely based off of sexual attraction and her willingness to support whatever it is he chooses to do in life, only to be abandoned by her husband when she hits 40. He either cheats on her and lies about it, or becomes addicted to porn because strong fertility is what drives a man’s sexuality. Once a husband no longer finds his wife sexually desirable, he no longer listens to her, respects her, or makes her feel loved. Men want to be married and supported by a good woman, but men gave up the right to have a decent woman in their lives the moment they began taking it for granted. Western men don’t honor family anymore. They’d trade all of their hard work just to stick their dick in a 20-something that makes him feel cool.

   2. [Most women may say they think feminism is lame, but the ideas of 3rd wave have still still subverted and destroyed the vast majority of millennial/Z women. And I see it getting worse, not better with each year. MTV/Sex In the City/Girls have really shifted the overton window. It’s now unquestioned among young women that uncommitted sex is a rite of passage and part of maturity that will not have lasting scars. “Body positivity” and the thought of trying to to stay slim and attractive is self repression and any man who desires a slim woman is a Nazi. That a Mr Big will be waiting for them at 35 when they get done having fun – and they deserve Mr Big no matter how fat and how much mileage is on their pussy. Oh and they can begin having that family between 35-40, no problem, Angelina Jolie and all those celebrities are so they can too. Tattoos, nose piercings. Public schools teaching kids that all whites are racist, all men are sexist. Combat roles in the military/reducing standards for fitness to make it more “fair”. Company paid Egg feezing parties at Facebook/Google/Apple (soon to be every company). Open your eyes my friend, the war is still raging and they are pressing their offensive.
      The nose pierced tatted slut scoffs at the word feminism, because we have been pretty successful in making the word “uncool” culturally. That’s a small battle won. But 3rd wave feminism continues to wreak havoc via the filth emanating from Government Schools/Hollywood/Viacom/etc, and it’s beginning to affecting women in heretofore “traditional” cultures like south america, eastern Europe, even Russia. Asia is next. We may have won the battle against the word “feminism” but we have a long, long way to in pushing back this degeneracy.]
      *round of applause*
      Brilliantly said, and 100 percent spot-on. No matter how anti-feminist women claim to be, they still practice the exact same double standards and hypocrisies as their blue-haired brethren — and until this changes, I am not playing their game, period.
      As for the filth breeding in our institutions — well, I hope, perhaps naively, that the election of Donald Trump can help change that.

      1. I may be repeating something many already believe, but it is worth repeating.
         Trumps election or not is really just footnote.
         I know that sounds crazy given the context and circumstances, but what Trump really represents is a tipping point. We have reached it. This shit show is not going to get cleaned up in 24 hrs, but too many people know the truth now. About feminism, about the federal reserve, about 9/11, about everything “they” don’t want us to know the truth about. They only win when we believe the lies and shrink in fear of speaking out and as of 2016, that is simply no longer the case.
         Trump… win or lose… has given a voice to EVERYTHING normal people in the west are thinking and feeling about America, about the wests culture… and made it ok not to just talk about it, but to CHANGE it.
         That is the real win of Trump’s campaign, win or lose the election. There is no turning back now. The corrupt, degenerate, lying and murdering elite are finished. It is just a matter of when and how now in my view.

   3. The nose pierced tatted slut scoffs at the word feminism, because we
      have been pretty successful in making the word “uncool” culturally.
      That’s a small battle won.

      But it might be a battle that they-the feminists-actually won. Liberal politicians have spent at least a century evolving from one toxic term to the next and there seem to always be people who are fooled by a new name for the same toxic ideology.

   4. ..

   5. I agree. They are doing exactly nothing in favour of men, it’s all just cheap posturing infront of a camera to boost their own insatiable egos and gain attention points.
      Westernised women are dead to me. Don’t want them, don’t need them and won’t protect them. They are on their own… This is the freedom they wanted, there is no turing back now. No more women and children first, it’s children first unless they act like adults and then there is everyone for him/her self.

      1. I agree too. I will never ever help or protect women (unless I feel that particular woman is “feminine” and is aware that she is not “equal” to MEN) . They claim themselves as independent, strong and empowered ! They asked for it and have to face the consequences.
         To hell with “innocent women” and “women first” !

      2. There’s still some of us left!

         1. Try telling that to a man who can’t see his children because the court’s wont let him, I too will not protect western white woman, it’s so toxic whatever this cult or brainwashing is that when I see a western white woman in Thailand I quickly cross the street to avoid her, I see them as brainwashed freaks to be avoided at all costs.

   6. Just like Adam & Eve women will take what’s presented to them as “free and best choice” in the short term. Today’s woman, each and every one, cherry picks the “valuable” parts of feminism for themselves, no matter how slight, yet turn around and identify as “against” feminism. It’s all bullshit so they can get the best of both worlds, just more incognito, and with a deeper stronghold on masculinity’s nutz.
      When women as a whole do what’s best for all of society, in continuity with their gender, for at least two full lifetimes (150+ years straight), then feminism will be dead. IMHO feminism has just started, it’s just become less trendy because the manosphere pushed back hard enough to take notice.
      What’s been sold to men is the ease of becoming a women. We all know that men’s lives always have been, and are increasingly so, harder…. unless ? A man chooses to become a woman. It can be done mentally, emotionally, physically, or some mix of the aforementioned. Act like a hipster bitch? Get hipster pussy.. to an extent, then get clowned while she bangs the ganstas then has you eat her pussy an hour later. This is the state of females. Give or take the extremes of my example, or subtleties, in some form and power of magnitude, the entire society was incentivized and indoctrinated to become weak mind, body, & soul. Just. Like. A. Scared. Selfish. Bitch.
      One of the wiser things I’ve heard Roosh say apx; “When there’s a choice between 2 paths, take the harder one.” The only tipping point that will stick is one that will Force the harder path on the masses. You would have to deconstruct all of society, and government, and rebuild it practically from scratch. I believe all we can hope for is a less damaging form of feminism than what exists today, but that’s +1 in my book.

   7. “And I see it getting worse, not better with each year. MTV/Sex In the
      City/Girls have really shifted the overton window. It’s now unquestioned
      among young women that uncommitted sex is a rite of passage and part of
      maturity that will not have lasting scars.” Right but Camille Paglia, who by the way the Manosphere quotes fondly, as evidenced in the above article, is an open lesbian feminist and Godmother of Sex Positive Feminism as quoted above, “”My wing of feminism—the pro-sex wing—was silenced.” So the writer of this blog agrees with Paglia that “pro sex feminism” is a good thing. Paglia is wrong that her wing was “silenced”. Rather its become the strongest and most prominant wing: Sex Positive Feminism.

   8. Sad, but true, my thoughts exactly. The Feminist Bullshit is enshrined in our schools and entertainment institutions. Women take it as a badge of honor to be a slut, as she is an example of an empowered woman. I have talked to school age Marines an Sailors, and they tell me that girls now have tthe right to dress as almost sluts… (yoga pants ect.) and if you protest, you are just a horny sexist pig, who wants to keep women in the kitchen. It is not their fault in you do not want to see their tits hanging out. Keep it in your pants, you perv! I myself, do not harbor much faith in the upcoming generations. I do wish to take a military Hop to Poland (via Germany) while I am still alive.

   9. I’ve known this exact woman under a few different names. The delusion is mind boggling.

4. Up in the Air was one of the best mainstream Hollywood films of the past 20 years.

   1. That is why I included that clip. That clip about modern “relationships” blew my mind when I saw it in theater. I just could not believe they actually put this on the screen. Mixed in with the economic crash… it played in my local theater, no exaggeration, I think it was almost 6 months, at least 3 or four min. I was a late goer and went because I saw the trailer, looked interesting, and it was STILL playing every week that went by thinking I missed it.

      1. Yeah, I had the same experience: “How did this actually get made?” And the whole plotline that led to Clooney showing up at that woman’s house was great. Their final phone conversation was incredible.

         1. Were you sitting next to me? I thought the exact same thing – “How on earth did this get made?” Seriously. To contemplate (just started to after this piece was published) that the writers and actors ALL thought they were creating a VICTORY movie for feminism and the “advancement” of women in the west.
            It would be like standing in club watching one of your friends go hit on a girl. It is clear to all brothers watching she completely blows him out of the water, no chance. Yet he comes back believing, acting and bragging “How freaking awesome was I!!! She totally digged me. I am such a PUA master. Chest bump”
            And the rest of the guys all looking at each other and without saying a word thinking “What fantasy world is this guy living in?”
            This is where feminism/liberalism has taken whole swaths of western society today. Complete delusion and no amount of real world feedback will wake them up.

5. Excellent videos to go along with the article.
   I was at a small house party last night and naturally politics came up. Of the 6 women present, 1 was a feminist (also the loudest and most hideous of he group), 2 were Trump supporters, and the other 3 were neutral. The only man at the party who was a Hilary supporter was the feminist’s boyfriend. I know it’s a small sample size, but it is promising.

   1. As small as your sample size was, it is probably far more accurate than the most well planned and designed “official” statistic one can set out to make. I think it was a business book that said while getting hard data is good, sometimes, just a quick show of hands in the air from people around you is good enough to get a general idea of just about anything. And that quick and dirty data is probably more accurate than any $$$ you could throw at trying to get the real “hard” data.

6. The tides are changing but this boat can’t turn on a dime, you know.

7. I used to call myself a feminist in the early 90’s. My 1st red pill stirring was signing up for a gender studies class in 1993. Fortunately, it was only one credit hour. 16 hours in class and a research paper to get credit.
   What a bitch of a professor ! But I went on another 15 years after and cheered for the feminsts in Duke Lacrosse case. Until it all became too obvious. However, most feminists did not yet seem insane.
   So still, I was a feminist until I heard about the campus rape tribunals and rape hysteria. Around 2014. Rage began to bubble up when I realized I had been conned.
   The Obama years saw me go from a radical leftist to hard core alt-right. Alex Jones, Roosh, and few others have been major cultural references for me. Judgy Bitch is also pretty cool. SO are Rick Wiles, Paul Mcguire, and the Hagman and Hagman show. I listen to Red Ice for info on the most mangina culture of all i.e. Sweden, that Saudi Arabia of feminism. But I do not like their paganism. And they drift a little toward NAZI-ism at times. Not cool for me, even if they have an entertaining broadcast which does give out good info with many flaws. Worth listening to with some caution.
   We need Trump to win to get rid of Title 9.

   1. I voted for Obama and believed the lies for a long time as well. Now we are awake. That’s what matters. However, some others are still slumbering. I see them on campus everyday. I wonder when they will wake up.

      1. I am wondering whether Trump is not just a case of too good to be true.
         Seeing how the FBI ‘reopens’ the case etc. His speech at Gettysburg…
         It is right what he says. I agree with it.
         But he’s successful. And what he says is almost a little too right. That frightens me.
         There is this thought in my mind saying: What if Trump is just someone they threw at us so that we would be lulled into a false sense of security, believing we can change something about the corrupt politics and media?

         1. I thought this many months ago. However, really observing things, I think he is an outsider.
            However …
            He has severely over promised. He’s not going to be able to do 1/2 the things he says. I also fear if he wins, he’ll suddenly change mind on the wall. If he can atleast get manufacturing back and people see uptick in their pay checks within the first 3 years of his presidency, there’s hope. Ultimately people care about the economy and jobs the most.

         2. I’m not basing this on any evidence or whatever, but: What if that is exactly what they want us to believe? That he is an outsider.
            Think of it. It would be so obvious. The good old ‘underdog vs established force’ story. It’s been beaten to death.
            And yeah, he has overpromised. I don’t think POTUS has the power to do all that stuff. It’s not feasible. Even if he’s for real, he’s gonna meet a lot of opposition that he often will not be able to do shit about. My guess.

         3. Oh he’s going to meet an absolute ton of opposition. The left will be relentless launching attacks on him to stir up their base which depends on Government — which they depend on for votes. This is why I’m saying if he can atleast get the economy moving where citizens see more jobs and increased pay checks within first 3 years of his presidency … it’ll have some people begin to question the left and ignore the absurd liberal campaigns since they’ve got more cash in pocket.

         4. … and he’s got the democrats to fend off.

         5. You know… I have thought a lot about this. That Trump is just another card being played by the elite. It does not ring true for me for one reason. He truly does not have to do this. I don’t think he even wanted to. He was a businessman. You don’t make money in politics and Trump loves making money.
            But he also cared about America. He sat on the sidelines for years. Talking about running, then not doing it. Taking out full page ads against the elites and thinking someone, someone, will step up and end this shit show. When no one did, he faced turning 70 and seeing America about to be handed another 8 years of WORSE than Obama. Trump… simply could not sit out and watch America be destroyed. And that, in a nutshell, has been his entire campaign theme from the start.
            His connections to the Clinton’s was disheartening. But, it also explains WHY he is running. Trump KNOWS who the Clintons are and sure enough, he went after them PERSONALLY when he did not have to. Trump KNOWS exactly who he is running against.
            Third… is the question of Israel. Trump has spoken a lot about being Israel greatest defender and that scares me. But, we have to remember there are two Jews… real ones, and the Zionists. What if there are also a lot of Jews, with real money and pull, connected to Trump who can SEE where the Zionists are going and know that Israel’s very existence is in deep threat.
            Just look at the Middle East. For all the animosity Muslims and Jews have against one another, the ME is BOTH there homes. Israel and Jews were FAR SAFER with Hussein, Assad, Mubarak and Gaddafi in power. Egypt, Syria and Libya all had crazy ISIS Islam under control and completely out of their countries. Isreal was MUCH SAFER 10 years ago than it is today. We have to remember that the politics in Israel is just as strained in America. It too is being split in two as the normal, sane half want peace, and the other…
            Trump will meet a lot of opposition. But when truth arrives, and providence plays its hand, that opposition will only fuel its own ultimate end.
            My thinking now… is that if the real polls show Trump and Clinton in a close race, or Trump only slightly ahead, they are going to (and currently are) to steal the election. But… if the polls and turnout is looking like a Trump tsunami (and it is), they are also going to try and gum up the machine and (ironically) be the first to call the vote a fraud or had interference by “the Russians” and call for an “investigation” and that government should continue under Obama until all things are sorted out. That is my current best guess as of now. They could always still try a complete steal, but if the Trump vote is overwhelming, no one will believe it. The whole country will rise up. As Leonidas once said “Pray, they are that stupid.”

         6. The bankers and corporatists will wreck the economy to destroy him and teach us a lesson.

         7. Trump is actively calling out the Elitists and Globalists. Most people don’t even really think of them as existing. There’s no way they’d want more attention drawn to them if they could avoid it. That leads me to believe Trump isn’t their puppet.

         8. I really don’t see why The Powers that Be would want to con us by hooking us up with a fake outsider.
            What would the motive be? If not for Trump, Hillary would have become POTUS effortlessly, giving TPTB their crony.

         9. That… and he just does not talk like one… at all. Seriously… the dude is just too damn street. Yes he’s a billionaire, but he talks like anyone I would meet that “gets” what is going on. No polish. No slick. Nothing. I think when you see someone who is REAL, honest and authentic in politics… it is unnerving and makes you distrust what your eyes are seeing. Believe me, I still have my doubts but… it’s been a year now. Still that same guy. And those five words… “because you’d be in jail.” Anyone who is trying to hoodwing and pull a con… you just can’t fake being real this long.
            I trusted and hoped in Obama up to a certain point in his campaign. Until… and I will never forget it… I saw him shaking hands with supporters and his smile… that… smug… something was off. Gut… whatever… I did not like it. It screamed “You fucking idiots, you are so stupid, looking at me smile and believing I am going to do a damn thing I say to help you.” Never trusted him after that.
            My gut… says Trump is legit. I WANT to believe he is a puppet… but my gut… it just does not twitch even an inch. Absolute rock solid trust in the man.
            We shall see. Nov 8th is the party. Nine more days.

         10. John Edwards and Barack Obama always came off as disingenuous to me from the beginning.

         11. Yeah who knows. I don’t know much about foreign politics, so I can’t follow that part of your argument.
             The question you can always ask is: How much about what you know of Trump is true?
             The more you question that, logically, the more power you have to assume in the hands of the puppet masters. But it’s fun to contemplate. And it’s really hard to come up with a valid answer without knowing facts. Or, say, knowing Trump personally.

         12. Well, what if we really live in a matrix … and as long as we are kept satisfied, we don’t go so deep in questioning things.

         13. Great insights, brother.

         14. I’ve had similar thoughts

         15. All he has to do is 1, maybe 2 things completely and successfully to be 100% better than Obama and Bush combined. If that truth doesn’t prove how suppressed – and pacified – we’ve become well..

      2. I’ve never understood how anyone could vote for something as intangible as ‘Hope and Change.’

         1. Me either. It’s completely idiotic. Especially coming from a Leftist.

         2. Somehow the “word got out” that “Hope and Change” meant something very tangible, like the woman who infamously proclaimed that 0bama was going to pay for the gasoline in her car etc.
            I imagine it’s like how many grounded right-wingers were conned by Ted Cruz. A bunch of vague promises and “winks and nods” that folks could interpret them to mean what they wanted.
            0bama: the first “projection candidate”.

         3. People like that aren’t worth saving. I’ve never been under the impression that Donald Trump will swoop in on his magic toupee and right all that I perceive as wrong in this world. Hell, I’d be ok if he only doesn’t work directly against our interests. It’d be a step better than his rivals and predecessors.

         4. Decades of brainwashing is a start.

      3. This is why I wrote this piece. Yes, there a lot still slumbering, but… I think the number that are awake outnumber those that are asleep. Again, we can’t see it because it is a silent awakening, but Trump is the cock at dawn. The first rays of light, of truth, are coming up over the horizon. As dark as that time is in the morning, it is absolutely breathtaking in its beauty and promise for the day to come.

   2. Red Ice Radio toward NAZI-ism??? I guess you still have a ways to go on your journey, gent. Best of luck.

      1. Only some broadcasts.

   3. Individual liberty is not even under consideration anywhere. The only viable options seem to be National Socialism or Global Communism. At least Trump would act in the interest of American people. The DNC and GOP both pander to just about everybody else.

   4. Do you support homosexuals?

   5. So basically you were a feminist while young and at your hottest. 15 years later you hit the wall and realized you could no longer find a guy to buy you dinner let alone pay for you to sit on your ass at home all day watching soaps and whining about everyone you know on facebook. So you took a hard look at what other middle aged women with few options were doing, saw that men your age were desperate for women who were even slightly friendly and nurturing, and all you had to do was pretend to be a born again non-feminist to stand out among your divorcee and cat spinster peers. How’s it working out for you?

      1. It’s a he, not a she

      2. I am a dude, dude

8. There is no substitute for victory. If we want total victory, we have to keep pushing things to the right for as long and as hard as possible. At some point, we’ll have pushed things so far right that what we consider an “ideal” society (feminine women, masculine men, no more divorce rape, etc) will seem mainstream, just as homosexuality is supposedly becoming mainstream because of the tranny and “animalkin” insanity. The left plays dirty, so we might as well adopt some of their tactics. In 5 years, a leftist might say “we can’t support gay marriage. I mean, it’s 2021! Cultural norms are changing and we have to go with the flow.” And the best part is, we have human nature on our side while the left is pushing against human nature.

9. Feminism is getting worse. Will continue to get worse when Hillary wins the election. Laws enslaving men are becoming more common. Few anecdotal images change nothing.

   1. They’re indoctrinating a whole new generation. Whenever there’s a news story on elementary school children where they’re interviewed … it’s alarming how little boys are professing “the need for feminism because they posses privilege by the patriarchy.” While at the same time having this attitude that they’re inherently bad for being a white male.

   2. Yes, t here is very little actual data, facts and analysis in this piece.. just a smattering of personal anecdotes and lots of wishful thinking.
      Feminism is a powerful force and shows no signs of weakening. It has become entrenched in Western culture and societies and its degenerate influences are spreading all over the world.

      1. Femicuntism (or whatever you call) is not powerful force, it’s being “allowed” to appear as “powerful force”.

10. I always find it a bit problematic to use movies (Up in The Air) to make a point. Movies are fiction. Movies can present any preposterous idea as believable.
    So I’d probably stick with real women voicing such concerns. It’s not like there’s not enough of them either way.

    1. Agreed. I am looking for relatively decent evidence to support the theme of the article. Movies in this case aren’t that at all.

       1. The author does bring up good points, I just thought the movie was a little … well … inconclusive in and of itself. I guess it’s fine to illustrate a point.

    2. To this excellent criticism I will say this.
       Politics is downstream from culture.
       http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2011/08/22/politics-really-is-downstream-from-culture/
       This is why Ghostbusters, the girl version, and Rogue One, another girl-power movie (along with the tranny stuff), is literally being shoved down our throats.
       The power of stories goes beyond entertainment. Stories evolved out of myth and religion. They give illustration to the morals and ethics of the culture we live in and aspire to.
       It is only in the 21st century that feminist culture is reaching its apex. Feminist culture IS 21st century politics.
       But the culture this century, the alt-right (That Clinton rightly is afraid of), the manosphere, THIS… is what is coming. All this LGBT shit… what… maybe a couple decades of mainstream acceptance? And it is going to far. EVERYONE hates this shit because it is pure shit.
       No one, especially women, want to go to a movie where the girl has all the biggest guns, argues with the male lead constantly WHILE rescuing him, and then ends the movie with a big “I choose you!” kiss to the “man” she is supposedly in love with (Gag me Terminator Genesis).
       And it was when they went full tranny… they went over the edge and pushed us norms too far. It is just plain, outright degenerate.
       The change in culture has been building, underground, for decades. ROK and other sites, the new media IS the culture that is coming into politics in the future.
       Again… that is the underlying thesis of my article. I am looking at the underground culture, the one to come not the one that is dominant, and seeing the future.
       Feminism is dead. And it will be dead for good. There will not be a return to the 1950s, those days are gone. But make no mistake, the future is not Hillary Clinton. Even if she wins, it will be a pyrrhic victory.
       —–
       A Pyrrhic victory is a victory that inflicts such a devastating toll on the victor that it is tantamount to defeat. Someone who wins a Pyrrhic victory has been victorious in some way. However, the heavy toll negates any sense of achievement or profit.
       —–
       Just look at the damage done to feminism, to the left, to the entire spectrum of liberal/progressive politics AND culture that Clinton’s run for the oval office has done. On one hand, you can rage at the sheer insanity that this woman is still in the race for President. But on the other hand… you can see WHY perhaps divine will let it happen.
       I mean… could you ask… ever… for a BETTER historical FACT… that feminism and leftist/progressive/liberal politics and culture is ABSOLUTE CANCER for a nation and its people?
       When future generations ask why the left, and feminism, died in the 21st century, all you have to do is point to a picture of cankels Clinton and the FACTS of her run for the oval office.
       “Oh… oh yea…. my god. How did we ever survive that?”
       “We did son, and daughter, we did, but once it was all over, it was clear to all. Never again. Never again.”

       1. Hah. Great comment. Nothing to add.
          Except perhaps a little note.
          I have this guy who is on my Facebook friend list. He professed being pro-Hillary and against Trump because in his eyes, the election is about “love vs hate”. Love being Hillary. Yes, he literally said that.
          When I confronted him with her emails and her negative ads, he said he didn’t care.
          When I confronted him with violent Hillary supporters, he said those are just bad seeds….
          And guess what happened. A girl from HIS friend list came in and remarked that where she lives, pretty much all the violence comes from Hillary supporters who vandalize, attack, etc. She said she has yet to see violent Trump supporters.
          But guess again if you think that convinced him. 😀

          1. “You can’t fix ‘stupid’…”

          2. That is simply classic denial of reality. You will NOT survive when you deny reality. As I said… playing prophet perhaps, but writing this piece and defending it as best I can to counterargument, I am more hopeful for the future than ever before. I just have to put on my rubber booties and hip waders for the SHEER SHIT I am going to have to wade through to get to the other side. We are not clear yet, but we are close.

11. Thank you, thank you, thank you for this article. It is so incredibly true. I actually found this website about a year and a half ago after googling “why do so many guys hate American girls” and I’ve been reading ever since. It’s been so eye opening. I was blessed to be raised traditionally and never considered myself a feminist but this website has helped me so much to see just how far the damaging effects of feminism have spread, and strengthened my resolve to speak against it. Not to mention helped my own life as I’ve learned what men are ACTUALLY attracted to and actually want from relationships. Thanks for doing what you do. You’re helping both men and women tremendously.

    1. It’s a great forum for guys, huh? I stumbled on RoK in 2012.
       Let’s enjoy it while we can. If Hillary wins I expect there to be a serious campaign to rid the WWW of sites they deem as promoting “hate speech.”

    2. You’re welcome. You… are the silent majority I wrote for.

    3. Why do guys hate American girls? I’m a twenty-something, and really am happy to answer that. They are mostly fat fucks, have no talent or initiative, and blame everyone but themselves for why they make 77 cents to the dollar. If it was up to me, I’d round everyone of those fuckers up and send them to Saudi Arabia, for a year so they could see what real oppression is. I find the easy way to shut the radical feminazi’s up, is to scream Allahu Akbar, call them a whore and demand they wear a niqab haha.

       1. Unnecessary. Women always do what the men tell them. Currently the men are telling them to act like boys and fuck other women.
          There is a video of a young man attacked by a crazy young female, after holding her off he finally loses his temper and body slams her. Not a single one of his “friends” stepped in to help. Not only that, all the other women started attacking him and cursing him for daring to “harm a girl”. This is the sick bulllshit currently infesting our society.
          Now try to imagine the exact same scene in a muslim enclave. Try to imagine it. Yes, its impossible isnt it? Because those young men at least have a concept of standing together against others.

       2. Well said. Although we might say/comment about the way muslims treat women, in reality, what they are doing is 100% appropriate. I don’t think they are oppressing pussies, they are only showing pussies their place !

12. Fun article to read, but I don’t think the war is anywhere near won. And even if it is, it’s like the broader war against leftism: you can’t stop fighting it even when you’ve won, or else the cancer will grow back.
    We’ve still got feminists and feminism infecting the minds of millions thanks to Hollywood. Until that stops, it’s a little too early to be sounding the victory bells.

    1. No.. not sounding victory. Simply pointing out the direction history will soon record as fact.
       

13. This is unrelated to the article, but who did the artwork with the barbarian and girl?

    1. Mike Netzer
       http://www.comicartfans.com/gallerypiece.asp?piece=714208

       1. Thank you

14. Feminism success stems from notions of equality. Male and females should have equal opportunities and rights, something every layman and laywomen would get support. Feminists work on subversion of layman’s notion of equality as they manipulated the numerous facets of civilization to the advantages of the females. Now younger women are reject feminism due to seeing the outcomes of the subversion first hand. Men are avoiding them, seeing numerous lives wreck by feminist ideology and their ideal life sold by a feminist is hallow existence.
    There is one thing that has feminism on the ropes at this moment: control. 4th wave feminism on the road to become Neo-Victorian: controlling how a girl can use a sexuality or interact with opposite sex. This is seen when feminist rags are complaining about how a girl wears a sexy costume, female video game character pose (Overwatch’s Tracer), or other banalities that affects females. Instead of freedom, feminism is becoming control a female’s interaction of the world. A girl with a functioning mind is become wary of feminism in ts current form.
    Females will not openly go against feminism until a breakpoint happens. That has not occurred yet. When that point occurs, the red pill will become a bitter pill to swallow for them.

    1. Modern feminism is nothing more than a redistribution of wealth movement. Women not only have all the same opportunity as men, they have more resources n programs to get ahead.
       The thing which should be of greatest concern now is this Pay Equality thing. There’s already laws on books to protect women when it comes to this. However, the left uses that bogus $.77 to $1.00 thing so much that down ballot candidates are now promising pay equity.
       At this point, the only way for “pay equity” to work is for men to get screwed. As in men who work 55 hours a week being paid the same as females working 30 so on paper there’s pay harmony.

       1. Money and opportunities will start to run out for men and women. That when the real fun begins.

          1. Money and opportunities ran out for men a long time ago. It is starting to do the same for women now, and they’re getting scared: witness how they are starting to verbally deny Feminism (but not the advantages that they have acquired because of Feminism), and their concern over the growth of men who are shunning relationships and marriage, MGTOW, and men ‘going Ghost’.

          2. This… not so much the economics of it, but the WITHDRAWL of men socially and romantically. Men also, young men especially, have no fear, no fear, of offending and telling women WHY they are completely rejecting them or going for foreign women. Girls… they are ALWAYS watching. Men are becoming men again, it was inevitable, and they will follow. Why it took this long, or why men forgot who they were, I don’t know. I am beginning to think it was God’s plan. In hindsight, what a horror to have lived through. But looking forward, what a blessing this feminist nightmare may, may, never happen again. We are talking about over 2000 years build up (yes, it goes back that far).
             Women know what is good for them. They are simply doing what women do by nature… waiting for men to man up and become men again.

    2. Male and females should have equal opportunities and rights, something every layman and laywomen would get support.

       Really? We did that and look what happened. In every country that’s adopted that it’s either been destroyed by feminism or it’s beginning to.

    3. I don’t think the pill will be all that hard for women to swallow. They naturally WANT to submit to a man they respect. When men RESPECT themselves once again and have STANDARDS, for themselves first and foremost, and then women… women will gleefully fall into line. Every man who has taken a stand with women in his life – family, romantic, at work – has noticed the effect it has. Yes, they hate you first. They may even curse you (or get you fired), but as you go about your life, ALL women will know you are a man they cannot and will never control. THIS… is what they want. THIS… is what patriarchy brought to the cultural table. THIS… is what is returning. There will be a few dumb women who will never get it and never did. They will still reproduce with whatever blue pill males are left. But as for the rest, a complete change in gender relations is coming, a full pendulum swing BACK to patriarchy without even stopping for a second in the middle for balance, for there is no such thing. You either have masculine/feminine parity, of complimentary opposites, or you have what we have now, complete shit. And millenial women… are sick and tired of the shit feminism and feminists have put them in.

15. my 15 year old daughter gets “brainwashed” by the leftist in schools. The craze now is “its okay to be fat”. I basically have to “reprogram” her by saying – so its okay for you to be fat”; but would you accept me for who I am if I was bald, unemployed, overweight and needy? Its not all about “You” females. I basically tell her that as a man; I walk away from fat women because they are not putting their best selves forward and I don’t owe them anything including my ATTENTION. Women spend 99% of their lives seeking attention – their makeup in the morning all the way to their stupid little phones that yap with each other with. If you want to change society men- then you don’t play in their world. You do it on your terms with your own metal. Like Kap in the NFL- he is disrespecting the flag; don’t watch. Walk away. Are you a bitch or what. Get a life. Go biking, lift, start a business…do it on your terms. thats what you do.

    1. The worst thing about being an American is having to see wall-to-wall morbidly obese fat fucks all the time. Like yesterday I went to a sandwich deli that I used to call the “big-boobs deli” because when it first opened nothing but buxom babes worked there, well now the manager is a lisping, shamelessly overtly flaming faggot, and the chics who work there are 20 pounds past the point of being fuckable. Furthermore I was the only person in the entire establishment who was fit, every other person in there was a tub of fucking lard. I think obesity and homosexuality are strongly associated and it is causing a feedback loop in the US population. Fucking gross, but the silver lining is I can continue to slay hot young puss year after year because not only am I good looking and charismatic but I’m one of the only men left alive who isnt a fat emasculated slob, thus there is little competition for the few women who actually still take pride in their femininity and fitness.

    2. [my 15 year old daughter gets “brainwashed” by the leftist in schools. The craze now is “its okay to be fat”. I basically have to “reprogram” her by saying – so its okay for you to be fat”; but would you accept me for who I am if I was bald, unemployed, overweight and needy? Its not all about “You” females. I basically tell her that as a man; I walk away from fat women because they are not putting their best selves forward and I don’t owe them anything including my ATTENTION. Women spend 99% of their lives seeking attention – their makeup in the morning all the way to their stupid little phones that yap with each other with. If you want to change society men- then you don’t play in their world. You do it on your terms with your own metal. Like Kap in the NFL- he is disrespecting the flag; don’t watch. Walk away. Are you a bitch or what. Get a life. Go biking, lift, start a business…do it on your terms. thats what you do.]
       Hear, hear, brother. And FYI, this feller here spends five days a week lifting his butt off at the gym to remain trim and in tip-top shape. That plus my work keeps me extraordinarily busy during the weekdays, but it is a price worth paying to be the best man I can be.

16. “that men are completely ignoring them now that they have surpassed men in almost all aspects of western society.”
    Wut…?

    1. Women are artificially propped up while men are being held down. That’s why they’ve “gotten as far as they have”.

       1. I’m disputing the entire claim of women having superseded men. Though my “wut”, probably didn’t express that fully.

          1. Fewer men attend college and men have a higher unemployment rate.

          2. Yeah, and let’s break those down shall we.
             Fewer men attend college…so what? Do you know what women study? Men are still DOMINATING, in all the actually useful fields such as engineering and others. In medicine (in the US at least), men are in majority in medicine and economy as well. Women dominate in the fields that are (forgive my wording) useless, such as gender studies, women studies, african-american studies etc etc, and other degrees that are I guess somewhat useful, but for example there are degrees for pre-school teachers, nurses and so on. You make more money in construction than you do in nursing and for most construction jobs you don’t need a degree. So fewer men attend university, so what. It doesn’t effect men in a negative way overall.
             Men having a higher unemployment rate could be true (assuming you are from the US but I don’t know what you are referencing) but let’s remember that maaaany women are not even in the workforce to begin with, and there is a huge demand for women in professional positions+traditionally men-oriented jobs such as in industry is leaving the US, this I’m sure will correct itself in the future though, industry either has to come back, or these men will work in other fields.

          3. Also, I forgot to say, if you look at other numbers such as who starts all the companies (private enterprise), and many other numbers which in my opinion are more relevant than number of degrees etc, you will find men are starting the extreme majority of companies (in my country 95%), and also building the most individual wealth.

          4. Yes… I actually agree with you. It is hard to make clear every point in one article as it would be too long.
             What I mean by women having “surpassed” men is precisely the appearance of it. Even if that appearance is concrete (more women in university, more employed, etc), it is still an illusion. But a real enough illusion to give women the feeling (all about the feelings) that men are on the ropes.
             But… while girl power is now dripping out of every pore in their body… they STILL have a vagina, and that vagina wants a penis. Only… the penises out there now want NOTHING to do with vagina and are more than just a little blunt and offensive in saying so.
             The women who are zombies… they just screech and shame.
             The SILENT MAJORITY of more normal (but still brainwashed) women… are noticing. They are watching. They are listening. They are NOT stupid.
             They WANT a man. They are seeing increasingly that a SMALL MINORITY of absolute, screeching crazy women and their political masters are DESTROYING natural male interaction with females.
             I am telling you… mark my words… before the return of kings, there is going to be the biggest cultural cat fight ever seen in human history.
             And we men just get to sit back and watch and laugh… and win. Did I forget to mention we win?

          5. Well, this is the first time anyone writing an article ever responded to my comment on said article >_>, so that’s something.
             Anyhow, you should see the response I wrote to obot on that post.
             “more women in university” <—things like this one doesn’t really matter when you consider that men still dominate and I mean dominate all the useful subjects such as engineering at uni, they are even the majority in medicine and economy even though women have made great strides there. And with majority I mean majority of graduates. I’m not sure of the state of doctoral studies in the US. Women get degrees in stuff that is either completely useless, such as women, gender, african-american etc etc studies, or subjects in which you make less money than many male-dominated occupations such as construction for example, such subjects could be nursing, pre-school teacher, even teacher lol, sociology and so on. So yeah, more female graduates is true, and it’s repeated ad nauseam, but what really matters is the value of those degrees, their usefulness, what matters is who starts the private enterprises, companies etc. Men who lost their jobs due to industry jobs disappearing will find money somewhere else.

          6. I read that comment. Good points. Men still keep civilization running, always have and always will. But the illusion is what I am talking about.
             You also can’t ignore the fact that even those men that are succeeding, are not in the same way their fathers did. The landscape has completely changed. There are a lot of men now making only equal, and many even less, than their female counterparts. A lot of men have also opted out of the system entirely as they won’t support it. Those that do, are making only 1/2 of what their fathers made in the same jobs.
             Lastly, a lot of men that lost jobs have not found a replacement. The whole economy is going into fantasy. If you are not writing an app for a smartphone, working the ponzy that is “finance”, or hooked up to the matrix of corp/gov, you are pretty much screwed. Men like my father, just a regular Joe good with his hands, are no longer participating in western society at the middle class level. Even if they MIGHT scrape close to doing so, the women of today don’t value them (especially the uni types).
             So… culturally… if you really want to split technical rhetoric hairs… women are now dominant. And when women dominate, men leave. THIS… is what women are noticing, along with the fact that working is NOT all that fun and staying home… would be hella nicer but… they guy can’t make enough money to do so because… the economy/banksters because…
             Trump. How this man is a shock and surprise to the elite and the left shows you just how many of them are completely living in a fantasy land.

          7. ” And when women dominate, men leave.” <—I also hear this one repeated by feminists, but I have not seen a single example of it yet.
             They always bring up teaching as an example, but people forget that in the past children usually only had 1 teacher, and not 1 teacher in every subject, teaching have had huge expansions of it, and as the number of teachers grew, wages stagnated, and men left the profession, it might not even be men leaving so much as women joining en masse, men don’t go where there is no money.

          8. Ah… again… when I say “leave”, I mean culturally, mentally, intellectually, and in some cases physically. Men simply stop helping, they stop going out of their way, they do only the minimum or they go the polar opposite, and do the maximum to be completely free (start a business, leave the country, etc.)
             But most importantly… they stop dating, stop marrying, stop having children. Remember, men have less invested in the propagation game. We know we are ultimately expendable, just sperm donors and one man can do a lot to reproduce with many females.
             But the women… they have eggs. Only one a month. And every month that goes by, every rag they throw out, is another reminder that THEY, the ones who carry and give birth to life, have not yet done so. It is a pressure and a dilemma men will never, or barely, understand.
             And this is what is being brought to bear by both MGTOW and Red Pill Neomasculine men.
             We men are still here. We are still building, succeeding, as you say.
             But we are NOT taking any women with us. Not western women, and we don’t care. It is scorched earth now for the western female gene pool as far as western men are concerned, and women are taking notice. THAT… ultimately… proves feminism is dead. Without women supporting it, if women CHOOSE to go back into the kitchen after all that feminism has “done” for women…

          9. “Ah… again… when I say “leave”, I mean culturally, mentally, intellectually, and in some cases physically.”
             Yes, but my beef is that I don’t feel you have given any argument or evidence that show that women are dominating in any of these areas.
             Women dominate mentally and intellectually? Who are we kidding? Men are still getting all the patents etc (with all I ofc mean the extreme majority).
             Culturally? This one I’m unsure about really, since I’m not much into modern culture.
             Physically? I fail to see this one also.

          10. Sorry, correction, I misread your first sentence, I meant you haven’t given evidence on how women are dominating so that men are “leaving”.
              My experience is rather than men opt out for frivolous reasons rather than anything else, to a degree it’s also women that don’t want families according to polls, while men do.

          11. Yet is this ever a discussion during elections? Of course not. There’s a whole crisis of unemployed males turning to drugs and suicide. What a male does is an important part of his self worth yet feminist legislation, HR departments and affirmative action policies have successfully ripped this away from men.

          12. From many of the comments on RoK by guys who majored in STEM, they all seem to indicate their GPA n effort didn’t mean shit as females who studied the same — yet did worse — were almost always hired over them courtesy of legislation in place which has companies desperate to hire females to avoid bogus discrimination lawsuits.

          13. And to an extent, that can probably be true. We all know that they set 50-50 goals, but women are not 50% of engineers.

          14. THIS… this is what I mean by men are “leaving”. They are mentally and physically checking out… while at the same time maximizing their independence and protecting themselves. So yes… men are still dominant in the sense they are keeping civilization running, but not like in the past when they were fully committed participants who had something to gain in doing so.

          15. The ones that are, are simply doing it for a paycheck and survival at this point.

          16. I’m a woman who is completely normal and I swear I’m not brainwashed.I would want to be treated like a lady and I still want to be with a man.Not a wussy one either though I think sensitivity is good

          17. Omg I love this site, im so glad there is an end to this utter lunacy, it takes time to get it out of the system, once you fully unplug from the matrix it takes time to recover…but im getting there, for years I thought there was something wrong with me, but it most definetly is not me, and now I can walk through life running things EXACTLY as I want it, if a woman disagree I simply tell her “There is the door” and im the master of my own place, my own cave is exactly how I want it, I fuck girls that I want to fuck, and I have relationships with girls I want relationships with, and if those girls don’t like me fucking other girls for entertainment they can go away.

          18. I left, and im not coming back, ever. And the men with money don’t need to go where there is money…we already have it. We go where woman treat men like men and woman act like woman.

17. I remember watching some bloke pose a question to Germaine Greer at a televised debate in the New York theatre for ideas in a recording from the end of the 1960s . Sexist Norman Mailer was there, holding his ground against her well, but this guy from the audience had the temerity to ask Germaine exactly what kind of society she as a feminist envisioned for the future. Greer who was actually very attractive at the time, a real firebrand and an extremely good speaker answered him with the kind of sneering ridicule than teenage girls have been copying ever since – basically she ripped this mild mannered guy asking a mild-mannered question a new arsehole. I don’t remember exactly what she said (you can probably find the debate on youtube) but the gist related to the impossibility of knowing in advance what the future might hold; that a more equal, feminist society was all about embracing the promise of human possibility, and a whole load of other high-falutin utopian demagoguery about the brave new world that would be improvised in the glorious revolutionary decades to follow.
    Fast-forward forty years plus, and that poor bloke, who asked a perfectly reasonable question now has his answer; an existentially absurd answer involving dumb feminists screaming inanities about universal rape culture while reading abuse porn like 50 Shades of Grey, feminists destroying universities with safe-spaces, trigger-warnings, and a general shut-down of free speech and free enquiry in the very institutions that are supposed to guarantee those things; not to mention feminists claiming air-conditioning is patriarchal, and feminist performance artists free-bleeding on the streets, slut-walking or generally doing anything and everything to get attention for themselves while posturing like children – all set against the general breakdown of the social fabric, family life, children’s happiness, women’s happiness, any kind of rootedness in one’s gender or nation, and general progressive chaos.
    Of course the chaos – as in (new world) order out of chaos – may be partly intentional, but I don’t believe it was ever intended by feminists like Greer, who were genuine idealists back in the day, never realising they were in large part useful idiots for elites, governments and corporations. Some of the things Greer has said recently – from memory – suggest she might be beginning to realise that she and her fellow ideologues fucked up badly. Greer, and other feminists like the late Doris Lessing have slowly come to realise that everything they thought they were fighting for only made sense in anticipation, while the revolutionary struggle was getting going. Just as soon as feminism started to win; just as soon as their ideas (or rather the ideas being put in their heads) started to be implemented, all hell started to break loose. They were always stupid ideas. Equality was always largely a pretence, involving the levelling of differences while covering up the much greater inequalities created by the act of levelling itself.
    Hopefully Greer, who for the most part is an honest academic, is watching what feminism has become with a sense of shame and regret.
    in fact I’d end by saying that if Greer had any conscience she would seek out that man in the audience who she so unreasonably humiliated, and if he is still alive apologise to him and provide him with an honest answer to his question: that the future feminist society would be absurd, unliveable, that instead of enhancing society it would turn everything of value upside down, would burn every institution of note, turn everyday life into a place of fear and absurdity, and promote the interests of privileged middle class women in the richest western countries
    while ignoring or paying only lip-service to real women’s issues in countries where women face actual oppression and hardship

    1. I wouldn’t be in the audience but I do feel for the guy that he was there. Leftist put a lot of wild crap into women’s heads that don’t take into account the biological differences over the last 100,000 years of breeding. If a gal gets fat, bitchy and stays unmarried because she believes in this tripe- so be it. Its up to males to chart their own course and do the choosing. For all the insight on the site; the fundamental question is who needs who more and how do you act. The whole point of a red pill mindset over blue pill is putting yourself first. Thats a tall order for us males who have been brainwashed from the time we have sprouted a tooth to buy into the left. It needs to come to end; 1 man at a time if need be.

    2. I hate to boil down your very intelligent and astute comment above down to this.. but Germaine Greer was actually “very attractive” at some point?!
       I think her humiliation of that man, as you describe in your comment, was as good of a foreshadowing of what feminism is really all about.. which is simply a mechanism for women to get more power and status at the expense of men, and to then humiliate and belittle men, and disempower them. If you understand that, then you understand why so many of their alleged claims of equality don’t make any sense.. and why they’re so willing to overlook the so many ways that women have power and privileges that men don’t, from reproductive rights to sexual power and so on.

       1. thanks. Yes, her looks were certainly a factor in my lasting impression of her performance in that debate. In 1969 or whenever it was she was definitely attractive – defying the stereotype of the ugly hairy feminist. I actually saw her give a couple of talks in the 1990s or thereabouts and I was grossly disappointed. Not only had she lost all her looks in those twenty years (being ravaged by age / radical feminism) but she was absolutely charmless, a dry, crabby intellectual, and for the life of me I can’t remember a single thing she said. That might have partly reflected the fact she had gone from ‘hot’ to crabby old harpy in the intervening period, but I’ve seen other non-attractive feminists speak and have come away with far more favourable impressions. Thereafter whenever I saw her on Have I got News for You (a british comedy gameshow) where she was a frequent guest, and she’d be flirting with Paul Merton or something, I couldn’t help but think how much of a facade it all was: a desperate attempt by a sour-faced feminist to prove how hip feminism was.
          In fact I’d say Greer’s feminism always had two bugbears. Firstly she couldn’t help but admire and envy the genius of dead white male artists like Shakespeare (who she would obsesse about) and secondly the fact there is a similar gender divide in comedy between men and women. She’s a solid enough intellectual and I think honest enough for egalitarian ‘anomalies’ like that to really nag at her politics.

          1. Germaine not ugly and hairy? Go online and you will find nude pictures of that will make you gag.

          2. yeah, that’s from when she turned 60 I think. There are a couple younger ones which aren’t so bad. Nothing special though

18. Feminism is dead.It is interesting because the feminism came from our lands to the West.But it turned into some monster.

19. Good article, the truth being said and what millennial women are experiencing, and it’s womens greatest fear are men who’ll just not give their assent to females anymore. This is the fruits of what feminism has produced and it scares the shit out of most women, despite all the equality and egalitarian mantra. The damage that has been done to modern western males who prefer the safety of pornography to having to interact with “real women” who belittle and undermine their frame constantly has become the norm for some many males and feminism is to blame for it.

20. Off topic but…Watching a couple reruns of Leave It To Beaver. Two great Red Pill moments:
    Ward and Wally in the living room reading the paper and talking.
    Wally reading the news paper: “Hey dad. What’s community property?”
    Ward: “Well, it means that your mother is owner of half of everything I earn and work for”.
    Wally: “What a gyp! No wonder they want to get married and have a house. Women have it easy!”
    Ward: “Such is the plight of the modern woman”.
    June walks in: “What are you two talking about?”
    Ward: “Oh nothing. Just explaining community property and the joys of marriage”.
    Wally: “Gee mom. Women sure do have it made”.
    June” What are you telling him?”
    Ward: ” Just telling him what he needs to know”.
    June: “Oh…..ok” walks back to kitchen.
    Scene two. Ward in his den doing some work. June walks in
    June: ” Ward. When the Beaver was in here earlier trying to talk to you, did you tell him to ‘Beat It’?”
    Ward: ” What? No….I told him I was working on something important for the home office and I would talk to him later. In the meantime he should go play.”
    June: “oh…I see.
    Ward: “Is there anything else?”
    June: “Oh no, dear”.
    Ward: “Well not to be rude, dear, but could ya beat it?”
    June: “Ok” walks back to kitchen.
    Hahaha I’ve watched this show my whole life, but it’s like seeing it for the first time when viewed through a red pill lens.

    1. Ha ha ha. Thanks for this. Man… THIS… this… is pure masculinity. No, it is not June’s submissive response, but Ward’s complete ASSURANCE of himself. He does not expect her to comply with his wishes, HE DOES NOT CARE. He KNOWS who is in charge, and SHE knows who is in charge. It is so subtle, but so powerful. As a Gen X’er, I remember this to a degree. Not this show, but it was still the dominant culture of the 70s when I was a kid. Men… just knew… they were men and women were women. I am convinced, after reading this, that this is all men have to rediscover. Assurance and confidence in themselves as men. We don’t have to be mean, or cruel, just men and take back the power WE gave away. This is what is happening right now with Millenial men. And it only took about 20 years? 90s and 00s? Seriously. Sounds like a long time, but just look at… this site, ROK. 20 years of taking shit from women is all it took and the boys feminists mothers raised to be feminists are going to be MORE patriarchal than their grandfathers!!! Oh, the irony.

21. Bwahaha this is how the vatican will bankrupt the U.S & the rest of europe …
    Zimbabwean africans go bankrupt because of loans. They take out another loan & create insane retarded african taxes to pay off the loan …
    Ironically the same loan hyperinflates the shit out of their economy, making their currency worthless & impossible to pay off the loan …
    Retarded africans go bankrupt … again .. jews & the vatican owned imf laugh their ass off counting their shekels …
    Africans form their own hard currency, retarded africans wait for economy to recover & ban the hard currency …
    Retarded africans take out another loan & use 99% of it to buy gold encrusted whores…. the kek continues …
    The jewing continues …
    Be Genactive – Activate your genetics – Activate Nationalism & Stop Artificial Scarcity, Stop the future planned crash off your economy by the babylonian vatican

22. The Catholic Church IS the new world order
    What is the true purpose of all of these impotent World organizations? They were all formed to enslave the World under a future One World government, One World currency and One World religion – Catholicism.
    The Vatican controls all of them with the unholy Pope as the One and only leader of the enslaved World.
    Why is there a U.S. and Global financial crisis?
    The Vatican is pushing to introduce a new World currency.
    The Vatican had its Jesuit bankers in the Federal Reserve bank create a fictitious financial crisis in the United States.
    They simply declared $billion losses in order to trick the American people into agreeing (through their elected representatives) to give them $trillions in bailouts. Each Jesuit Federal Reserve bank received 10 times more than their actual claimed loses and many even received 10 times more than their total yearly earnings. This was done to bankrupt the United States through debt. The Vatican’s Jesuit bankers succeeded as the United States people are now slaves to that debt. As a direct result more and more countries are now dropping the once powerful dollar. Because of fear they are playing into the hands of the Vatican. When the U.S. dollar fails so will their own currency fail. This is what the Vatican wants to happen.
    Be Genactive – Activate your genetics – Activate Nationalism & Stop Artificial Scarcity, Stop the future planned crash off your economy by the babylonian vatican

    1. The Vatican had its Jesuit bankers in the Federal Reserve bank create a fictitious financial crisis in the United States.

       The Catholic Church runs the world only in the late Jack Chick’s tracts. And I think you have “Jesuits” confused with Israelis:
       Obama Nominates Former Bank of Israel Chief Stanley Fischer as Fed Vice Chairman
       read more: http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/1.567961

    2. Please. Not the Jack Chick bullshit. Take it somewhere else.

    3. The entire federal reserve, Golman Sachs, JP Morgan, etc are all run by Jews.

       1. The Vatican invented “Jews” as a smokescreen for usury
          Since usury was prohibited by the early church this left the money loving Vatican in a terrible dilemma. Officially they condemned usury in the most stringent terms, but behind the scenes they found a way to circumvent it. Their answer was to invent Jews and use them as a smokescreen for their money lending. This way the popes could continue to act pious and let the Jews take the rap for the loan sharking.
          Finding fake Jews was no problem for Rome. Centuries before Christ, the Samaritans were pretending to be Jews. One of the most infamous Samaritans was Simon the Sorcerer, who tried to buy the Holy Spirit from St. Peter. This Simon later went to Rome, and was the actual founder of what later evolved into Roman Catholicism.

          1. actually Jews invented Christianity and sold it to the goy, same with Islam. It therefore makes sense they would have made usury a moral question for the deceived followers of Abraham who were not Jewish. The idea that the Vatican is behind the NWO is laughable. It’s always been the Jews

          2. Do the research, Rome invented catholicism to combat rising pagan religions
             Then islam a few centuries later to combat christian paganism in africa
             The real jews were wiped out centuries ago, the jews today are babylonian pharisee’s, which is why they follow the talmud not the old testament

          3. The jews are owned & funded by Rome a babylonian cult designed to create a nwo

          4. that makes no sense, there was no combating rising pagan religions. Pagan religions were part of Roman society. Christianity undermined pagan Rome because Jews wanted Abrahamic mind control as opposed to a natural pagan mind set and as we see, as Christianity became popular, Rome adopted a universal Christianity in hopes of gaining control which they couldn’t. Call it the first Bolshevik revolution. Islam was invented to get Abrahamic control over Zoroastrian religion and to give something for Christians to fight besides Jews. Notice, Islam took Jerusalem. You really think Arabs or Jews cared about that?

          5. you should go back to working real estate 🙂 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f45ba47d39d72d9f1b671cc4bb34e1f10f3bac90ead72243376408af5eee7368.gif

          6. Pagan religions were never a part of rome, rome co-opted pagan religions to prevent uprisings
             All pagan religions had to include worship of the ruling emperor & promote roman nationalism
             You’re one seriously clueless moron when it comes to basic facts…

          7. There is no evidence jews created christianity
             Jews did however insert celibacy to prevent christians from procreating & themselves as the chosen ppl
             All evidence shows rome co-opted pagan christianity

          8. what do you think Paul’s vision really was? A change in tactic. Not sure how paganism came to Rome but it was not an Abrahamic religion and in vogue when Rome was at it’s height. Notice as Christianity came to power, Rome grew weaker. Think Jewish revolutions and Protestant Reformation https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/19d9615a4845d6d0e4b4946d4072be917f08acc9968becf1aaed3d6530ded47c.gif

          9. are you Jewish? If so your elders are evil

          10. they also told them not to loan money so they could do it. That means you are controlling them through their religion. As far as proof. There is little proof of anything but I make my best guess and that sort of subversion lines up according to their own behavior today. There is little historical proof Jesus existed. So tell me, what was Rome before it was pagan?
              https://blindlight.org/index.php/other-template/hitlerian-pyramid/item/721-a-real-case-against-the-jews-commissary-to-the-gentiles

          11. Rome is a continuation of the babylonian cult the talmud is based on
              Jews & the catholic church created islam & christianity, the catholic church is rome, who funds & controls the jews
              Jesus is a fake created by Rome because jesus is based on a roman emperor

          12. heard all of that, bought all of that till I figured out it was the Jews

          13. How did figure out it was the jews

          14. Bolsheviks, the idea that Hitler was fighting the NWO and US was on the wrongside, the fact Jews financed the English Revolution and funded Street riots as claimed in “The Nameless War”. Realizing the Bolsheviks was a Jew op was possibly the lynchpin that cleared the way for everything else
              http://antimatrix.org/Convert/Books/Nameless_War/01.The.British.Revolution.htm

          15. Who funded the Rothschilds, the main source of all jewish wealth today?

          16. The Rothschilds are nothing without the Jewish power structure. If it wasn’t them it would have been another Jew. Ever wonder why we only get Jewish Federal Reserve Chairmans. Note The English Revolution, the Bank of England and Speculative masonry (Jewish dominated) had to occur to enable a Rothschild. The main thing is Jews work accxording to the plan of the top elders and I doubt Rothschild is at the top

          17. by that I mean that it is very likely no goy knows who the top elders are, truly behind the curtain never to be revealed till they annoint the anti-christ. In a certain sense, they Rothschilds are stage actors like many others just higher up on the ladder. They are clearly used as a buffer to the real Jewish power at the top

          18. There was no jewish power structure before the rothschilds … hence my question

          19. bullshit what made the Protestant reformation happen, the Jesuits form, colonialism happen, the North Atlantic Slave Trade a reality. Amsterdam-1600 was the first fed bank- corporatism is a Jewish invention. I could go on by I don’t strike a man when he’s down https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/270e1df3a8495c616965315c85537f68e38ce3b6b74ec1781a64761fa8196345.png

          20. The Rothschilds arent a recent phenomenon, look up their timeline

          21. that’s one of the first things I learned, they began between the creation of speculative masonry and founding of the illuminatti though I would like to know their history before becoming Rothschilds

          22. I have heard that as well. Haven’t seen any proof in fact there is little proof Jesus was anything more than a figment of Paul’s imagination. I see why Jews would create Islam to get goy fighting each other or serve Jewish interests but don’t see why it does Catholics any good
              http://www.thechristiansolution.com/doc2014/615_Amina.html
              http://www.thechristiansolution.com/Exilarch.html
              Now a long time ago, before I became Jew-wise I did view an effective video that claimed Catholics created Islam but you have to understand that Presbyterians and other revolutionary Christian groups hate catholics more than Christ deniers. Also, the main proof offered were masonic figures kept in Islamic religious sites. Well, I was impressed then but now I know masonry serves Jewry and also, mason signs are everywhere since just about everything is infiltrated by secret societies

          23. Prior to the Rothschilds, Jews worked with Rome as co-conspirators, but they were self financed
              They didnt have anywhere near the power they have today
              They have the jewish e.u, nato, cfr, even a country paid for by another country …
              The jews were always co-conspirators with other corrupt groups, but never as independent after the rise of the Rothschilds

          24. So you dont believe jesus existed?

          25. I don’t believe Jesus was the messiah and I therefore find the Jew’s claim that Paul used Christianity to undermine Rome extremely legit

          26. I sort of agree with that but it’s a voluntary relationship if you ignore the fact there is a loaded gun behind the offer. Clearly, Jews have been trying to subvert the Catholic church all along. I believe the Protestant Reformation hit it from the outside and they still as secret Jews subvert from within…The printing press enabled the ease which they could sell their subversion and then their growth in power and financial monopolies and colonialism and corporatism, all Jewish inventions basically took us where we are today. It has clearly been a JEw World Order since 1492, taking out the Czar was huge

          27. Theyre not real jews, they worship the torah, the bible of the pharisee’s
              Research the jew pharisee connection

          28. How did paul use christianity?

          29. Jewish subversion is a myth regurgitated by catholic apologists, who blame the jews for all the atrocities by the church
              Jews cant subvert the church, if they helped create the catholic church in the first place

          30. the church was created to try and coopt Christianity which the Jews were selling to the goy to undermine Rome. It failed because Rome still fell a hundred years later, the Jews won, It got out of hand this christianity thing since goy will be goy and Jews then needed to create Islam to assure the herd is continually culled. Then they created Protestantism when they infiltrated all over Europe after the Inquisition- note, they stood in Russia’s way with Christian help in her efforts to retake Constantinople from Muslims. Goy are total pawns, Jews can tell them the sky is purple, march out a bunch of intellectuals to “prove” it and the goy will believe

          31. Judaism is a secret society-race and religion is a cover that also have the run of the mill Jew fooled

          32. remember the vision, that was simply a change in strategy. I gave you the link. I suppose you aren’t looking at any of the links I am using for backup

          33. I already stated theres no proof jews invented christianity
              Christianity created by the vatican came after the formation of the catholic church, pagan christianity not invented by the vatican came before the catholic church
              there were two types of christianity

          34. Which link mentions paul?

          35. What sort of secret society is judaism?

          36. the big cahuna. Judaism is the original secret society of recorded history. That is my interpretation, for the Jew media or most of the alt would never touch that.
              Read this chapter to get an idea of the psychology there
              http://antimatrix.org/Convert/Books/Waters_Flowing_Easward/1.2.The.Jewish.Community_Its.Spirit.And.Organisation.htm

          37. until the Jewish psyop called the Protestant Reformation9 divide and conquer)
              I doubt there is proof anybody invented it. It alread existed and was standardized by the council of Nusea

          38. Christianity undermined the pagan spirit which had made Rome great

          39. https://blindlight.org/index.php/other-template/hitlerian-pyramid/item/721-a-real-case-against-the-jews-commissary-to-the-gentiles

          40. Thanks,
              I’m a huge fan of blindlight btw, you guys have a great site

          41. wow, thanks

          42. Its on my regular feed, along with infostormer & dublinmick, nationalist sites like yours exposing the christian traitours is always a good read, its an unwritten history so its great when sites put the pieces together

       2. Who allowed the jews to control the fdr?

23. The entire legal system, law enforcement, work places, campuses and all social situations where men and women interact are dominated by laws and regulations that favor women and that are enforced with extreme prejudice against men. This is true anywhere in the western world and all 1st world western countries.
    So I don’t know what the author means “Feminism is dead”, but a more accurate statement would be feminism is so normalized now even the vast majority of men in all American and European nations are agreeing to explicitly supporting policies that make them essentially 2nd class citizens… They would even vehemently argue with you and call you any of the buzzword lingo from sexist to misogynist if you bring up the indubitable fact that men are at a distinct disadvantage against women in these nations…
    You can’t go now a day without being force fed propaganda about how you should strive for further women oriented rights, more pay for women, more subsidies for women problems, more more more everything for women, and you wouldn’t even be surprised anymore to see these ridiculous causes championed by the majority of men…
    The masculinity and status of men in America and Europe have never been in worse shape, and maybe only a 3rd world war could wake up the completely emasculated western males from their zombie like subservience to modern women…

    1. [The entire legal system, law enforcement, work places, campuses and all social situations where men and women interact are dominated by laws and regulations that favor women and that are enforced with extreme prejudice against men. This is true anywhere in the western world and all 1st world western countries.
       So I don’t know what the author means “Feminism is dead”, but a more accurate statement would be feminism is so normalized now even the vast majority of men in all American and European nations are agreeing to explicitly supporting policies that make them essentially 2nd class citizens… They would even vehemently argue with you and call you any of the buzzword lingo from sexist to misogynist if you bring up the indubitable fact that men are at a distinct disadvantage against women in these nations…
       You can’t go now a day without being force fed propaganda about how you should strive for further women oriented rights, more pay for women, more subsidies for women problems, more more more everything for women, and you wouldn’t even be surprised anymore to see these ridiculous causes championed by the majority of men…
       The masculinity and status of men in America and Europe have never been in worse shape, and maybe only a 3rd world war could wake up the completely emasculated western males from their zombie like subservience to modern women…]
       Indeed.

       1. … a more accurate statement would be feminism is so normalized now even the vast majority of men in all American and European nations are agreeing to explicitly supporting policies that make them essentially 2nd class citizens…

          This also means that without manginas and white knights, feminism would be going nowhere. So who exactly is the real enemy here, misandrist women or the men who do their dirty work for them?

          1. Both

24. This shows the nonsense of Current-Yearism. Feminism made no sense a thousand years ago, it makes no sense in The Current Year, and it won’t make sense a thousand years hence. “Social progress” can’t happen because human nature doesn’t change, at least not through politics.

25. Women have at least 1/2 the money and all the p*ssy. Feminism won’t end until the day women can’t pick up the phone and have a pizza delivered. Only then will they discover the benefit of a man.

    1. “Women have at least 1/2 the money and all the p*ssy”
       So in a divorce, in a fairer world, ex-husbands would get half the pussy as the wife’s principal asset? Could be like a custody thing – weekends and Thursdays say

       1. Bringing up divorce is testimony to how degenerate we have become.
          Matthew 19:4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,
          Matthew 19:5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
          Matthew 19:6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

          1. yeah, and if women had to ‘share’ their special lady assets after divorce they’d be less divorce to begin with. Its just a joke you know

          2. Why are you so angry? You won. Enjoy it …
             Your like a negro scrambling to get out of Detroit. You’ll always live in a bad neighborhood as soon as you get there.

          3. It was you who brought up the idea of “p*ssy” as an asset comparable to money. I was just riffing on that idea.
             When you yourself refer to “at least 1/2 the money” I think it’s a bit premature to say we’ve won.

    2. Listen. Only a small fraction of the women alive today is necessary to supply all the sexual services men need. The rest could be dispatched to extermination chambers tomorrow morning without anything of value being lost.

       1. You got it backwards. That is the problem. Men have obsoleted themselves thru hard work and ingenuity. It has to crash. When it does, they’ll come running. Not before. Democracy always fails because reality always gets the last word regardless of the vote.

          1. I agree. Problem is, once reality re-asserts itself, your typical member of the sisterhood will have a real problem convincing men to tolerate her for any longer than it takes to make a mess on her face—and may the Goddess help her once her tits start to sag, because no man in his right mind will.

26. Guys, I think you should see this:
    

    1. Kinda makes me think: Even if feminism goes, no real problem has been solved. Those zombies are still out there. Whether they are feminists or not … not that much of a difference.

       1. They should be glad I’m not in charge. Every one of those people would be in jail. The one talking about “hate”… would be hung.

          1. Lol. You know, this video made me realize one thing. Maybe it’s just a fleeting idea in my head. But … why fight for a world or country full of people like these?
             I am not even angry at them at this moment. I am just scared. Like I would be if I met a pack of starved wolves in the wilderness. Only that the pack of starved wolves would at least have a valid reason to kill me.
             Reminds me of something I read somewhere. The theory that the neanderthals were really cool guys but the homo sapiens came with greater numbers and mindfucked and overran them.

          2. I’ve thought similar things myself. These days if there was some kind of conflict, and I was still in the US, I don’t know if I’d risk my life defending it. Friends and family absolutely. But is the country itself even worth defending?
             I’m not sure I want to ever face answering that because I have a sinking suspicion my answer would be that it wasn’t.

          3. Yeah. I mean, what is worth defending? Values.
             Is it sad that most people don’t really share your values? I don’t know. Maybe that’s just what it is. Maybe at one point in time, Americans were a great people. And I bet many still are. But a big big amount of the population seems to be like these guys.

          4. I think it would be one thing to be fighting for freedom. Or fighting to protect it.
             Today though… what am I fighting to defend? To get overtaxed by one of the world’s dumbest tax systems? To have my tax dollars fund freaks like in that video? To force schoolgirls to use the same showers as a guy just because he says he’s a girl?
             Nothing there worth risking a life for!

          5. Because the individuals do not represent the whole.

          6. But apparently enough to make Hitlery competitive.

          7. I’ve thought similar things myself. These days if there was some kind of
             conflict, and I was still in the US, I don’t know if I’d risk my life
             defending it.

             Seems to me that when the USA was at its peak, we weren’t thinking of defending the USA but rather our homes and individual states.
             Twisting the perception of nationalism in the USA is part of the problem IMO.

          8. Great point!

       2. I agree,The damage has been done.

    3. But I thought only Nazis had Brown Shirts.

    4. So many Liberals always claim to be for the poor, disadvantaged and working class and so on. They are not, they just hate the idea that they are not at the top and will use the illusion of helping the poor as their platform to gain the sympathy vote. They never interact with the poor, or disadvantaged people they claim to help, they live in safe neighborhoods yet say they speak for people in the ghetto, they are for single moms but have husbands. This video breaks my heart, it really does I just want to sit next to her and be on her side.

    5. Yes… just saw this today. Unbelievable. It’s over. This shit show is finally going to be over. Not overnight. Maybe not on Nov 9th. But the bell has tolled, the cock has crowed. There is no going back to what was. The future truly is for all of us to write.

    6. Who has time tio gather and hassle bums? Bunch of Self-Important millennial faggots…

27. You can tell feminism is on its last leg. The trolling and the screeching harpies have given up on the ROK comments section. That should be sign enough.

    1. Maybe it’s just a “sitskreig”, the “eye of the storm” while the harpies regroup and rearm?

       1. Their height was in 2014, before their spectacular decline. They still influence far-left politicians but the people hate them. 2014 was a bad year for feminism and it was downhill from there.

28. If ROK endorses any group of women, it should be THIS group of women . . . .
    http://www.leicspart.nhs.uk/Library/MeelsonHeels.gif
    “mmm that’s some GOOD maw maw”
    How good?
    Simply “oom poppa oom poppa maw maw” good!!
    

    1. HA ha ha ha. God I love you guys!

       1. The honors, good sir.

29. Maybe Feminism is dying, but it still kicks hard in its agony.
    So, good news, but we should make sure it won’t come back on its feet, and the the corpse will not continue to poison the ward.
    More seriously, Feminism is loosing its base for sure… but is it diyng or consolidating ? Modern feminism didn’t need women. Women are the usefool idiots of Feminism.
    Feminisrs loves women like Communists used to love workers in the USSR
    Anything to go to the tops places, then, work harder, you slaves !

    1. The elitist sponsors of feminist policy are sensing an impending crisis for their establishment. They’re losing the ‘ropes’. They get that feeling you get when you’re working high atop a roof of a building and you tug on your safety harness rope to tighten it, and it has slack for some reason. You pull in all the slack and find the rope has been severed. You say “Shit the rope just went”. AND it’s beginning to sprinkle and the metal roof is getting slippery.

30. Is there really hope? I don’t think so. I’m a twenty-something, and have so far, done my best to avoid college. I got a two-year degree, transferred, and delayed admission until next year, but really, I look around where I live and I see nothing but fucking cunts. Fuck the West, there is a reason I don’t look at women, I don’t want to face a lengthy court case, and don’t want to deal with the liability. Oh for the Prostitutas.

    1. How many miles to Nevada? How much for a ticket to Amsterdam? People will call you a loser for “paying for sex!” But you’ll be a winner compared to the sucker who sells it…. Or the sucker who goes without.

31. How was George Clooney in a movie that smashed a left-wing ideology?

    1. Maybe he was high on Kratom?

       1. Maybe, but I dunno if it could’ve been Kratom as his marriage shows that he didn’t take the advice of this Up in the Air film, and Kratom doesn’t dull perception.

          1. That was supposed to be a joke.
             Marrying her was a mistake. I am sure he will come to the same conclusion at some point in the future.

          2. I tried to chain one non-serious comment to another. Looks like I struck out swinging…

          3. Clooney is such a dumbfuck he is more likely to convert to Islam

    2. You know… that is a funny fact to contemplate. I do like George Clooney as an actor. I think he has done some incredibly good work. Three Kings and Michael Clayton being just two of them. I know he is a full on leftist as well, but a part of me thinks (or wants to) that he is just playing the game. The man, whatever you say of him, is not stupid, per se. Naive? Misinformed? Absolutely.
       Clooney in many ways absolutely blows apart the feminist narrative. At the very end of Up In The Air, he gives love a chance… only to find out it was HER using HIM for sex, and not the other way around.
       So yes, Clooney is “stupid” if he believes this is advancement, but he also knows it is wrong and WHY he was not married for so many years.
       I read somewhere once that Clooney responded when asked why he was not married with family… he said it was a LOT of responsibility. Responsibility he was AWARE of and either does not want personally, or does not feel he can devote the time to be responsible given his career and aspirations/goals. THAT… is masculine. To know what your limits are.
       I think he also knows EXACTLY what getting married meant to many a western woman. Just look at the flirt on he had with Julia. She SOOOOOO wanted him… but nope! Not a chance in hell, what a nightmare.
       I don’t know much about his wife, but I think he married someone who does not want kids. Every women before this wanted kids even though he made it clear he did not. He cut those women lose every two years like clock work, again, because it would be irresponsible to stay with them when they should be with a man who DOES want to marry have kids.
       I think Up In The Air is one of those classic cultural tales… that was trying to sound all triumphant and progressive… but in the end only made blindingly clear how screwed up things were.
       “This is the new normal” was the underlying theme of the movie. And audiences… in droves… rejected it.
       Hence Trump. Hence ROK.

       1. Clooney is probably gay.

          1. I agree, but his fan base consists mainly of middle aged hetero women. He married a “beard.”

          2. His lady just looks gross. There’s ample evidence that proves she’s been a woman her entire life, but I can definitely see why people could think she might’ve been a man at one point.

          3. You keep hearing that… but come on. Seriously? Why? Why still keep it such a secret in 2016? There is ZERO reason to do so today. Yes, it would KILL his heterosexual market value as a Hollywood actor, but if you are gay, in 2016, do you care at all about being a heterosexual?
             Here is my reasoning on this topic because I knew it would come up.
             Gays… hate heteros. They want us all to convert. From the men that approached Lot’s house to today, all gay men secretly believe all men are gay on some level. It’s just a matter of those guys “admitting” they have these feelings.
             Homophobic stereotype? Hardly. Just put yourself in a gay man’s shoes. You like guys, so why wouldn’t other guys like guys? Then you find out they really don’t, the majority in fact, and it makes you question why you like guys. But since you refuse to disbelieve your own life experience, you simply decide these men don’t act on there homophobic tendencies, which you believe is natural since you have them.
             So let’s take Clooney as being gay. He is now in his mid 50s. He has stayed in the closet his entire life. He has had to live a double life in the most openly gay culture in human history. He has had to DENY something that is deeply rooted in him, attraction to men, his entire life, both privately and publicly, just to make a living. You are not going to keep this a secret, not in the internet age, unless you not only lock yourself in the closet, you never, EVER come out of it for anyone.
             I doubt it and my proof is George Michael. If you watch his Freedom video today, you can see it is CLEARLY a cry to be openly gay. For a gay man who is really gay, to be FORCED to be straight for any reason is absolute hell.
             This is what the argument that Clooney is gay has to refute. That in the 21st century, a gay man, who HATES the hetero norm he is FORCED culturally to adhere to, is CHOOSING to do so for… money? Fame? To not shatter the dreams of his female fans?
             I think the truth is… “gay” is what EVERY hetero bachelor is labeled who does not swallow the blue pill. Stereotype or not, a heterosexual man who is FREE of female control… must be gay. Gays believe this. Women believe this.
             But at the end of the day, a free man does not care what anyone else thinks. He lives his life for himself. Which is why I respect George Michael as an artist and human being. It is unnatural what he has chosen, but it would be cruel and immoral to demand he live a life that is not true to who he believes he is.
             All we are asking in the Neomasculine camp is that the majority of us heterosexuals… are not then forced to accept or endorse the gay way of life as “natural” since it is unnatural to us, and thus to 99% of humanity. This is the crux of the conflict that heterosexual men have with gay men. We will NEVER accept their way of life, but we are willing to admit it exists. If gay men could accept that 99% of the men they meet are NOT going to be interested in “having fun if you want to” with them… we could come to a truce. But right now, this gay shit is too much, and the tranny issue is pushing it over the edge.
             

          4. I’ve known plenty of 21st century men that are still in the closet. How do I know? Because I’ve known gay men that have admitted to sleeping with these flamboyant, in the closet fellows.

       2. “I think Up In The Air is one of those classic cultural tales… that was
          )trying to sound all triumphant and progressive… but in the end only
          made blindingly clear how screwed up things were.”
          Are you really sure about that? I remember reading many gushing reviews of feminists and liberals about “Up in the Air” when it came out (which is why I avoided watching it).. claiming here was a movie where the woman (character played by Vera Farminga) was a finally the “sexually equal” of a man. T hey obviously loved the upending of gender stereotypes and that the woman was the one played him and was using him for sex instead of the usual plot involving a man using a women for sex. This is considered “progress” for women and feminism. And the data does show an increase in female infidelity as the culture changes and women become more sexually and economically empowered.

          1. YES! Of course liberals and feminists loved the movie. But, they are utterly retarded. Did you forget that? They will see precisely what I outlined – the hetero bachelor Clooney getting his much deserved lesson. But that is NOT how the majority of the masses saw it.
             If you have still not watched the film… do so. I will guarantee you will see what I am talking about. Especially the scene when he walks away from his lovers house all castrated. You are NOT going to feel Clooney got what he deserved… you will feel the opposite. That Farminga’s character is a complete degenerate human being, exactly what Clinton is accusing us of being.
             The heart of the Clooney/Farminga narrative was a moral one and of course, feminists/liberals saw their “moral” viewpoint. But they are the MINORITY. The majority… saw a cheating whore of a wife with no guilt or shame about her behaviour. The MAJORITY… for the first time… saw who their enemy was. The enemy is feminists and liberals. Don’t want to sound like a broken record but…
             Hence Trump.

32. Oh come off it. They still want to have their cake and eat it. They think if they make a show of not being “feminists” they can still wheedle a free lunch out of men. Sorry, no. It’s 2016. Men know, or have no excuse not to know, that “all women are like that” and not one of them has anything men have any use for for more than 15 minutes at a time.
    Honestly I have more respect for the girls who run off to Iraq to join the Islamic State and become the concubines and broodmares of jihadis. They at least understand that if they’re serious about regaining the protection of men, they need to be willing to obey their husbands unconditionally and stop insisting they have any more rights than a horse or a cow.

33. Feminism is dead?
    I only wish it were.
    A CIA engineered, government backed, taxpayer funded hate movement does not just disappear even when the populace comes to realize how twisted, sick, and depraved it is, how it sold a phony bill of goods to the people – the “equality” nonsense – in order to gain government power and control of the population, and the horrible destruction and devastation it has caused.
    Feminism will always be around in some infectious, cancerous, hate fuelled form. The government has too much to loose if feminism disappears.
    The best we can do is to inoculate ourselves against the latest virulent strain.
    Just wait until a certain criminal female inflicts herself on America and the world when she is elected President of the United States. We’ll see just how dead feminism is.
    The worst is yet to come.

    1. Feminism is the ugly, crazy daughter of liberalism—the notion (as phrased by someone who had the intelligence, and, as an owner of inferior breed of humanity, the experience to know better) that all human beings are created equal and are endowed with unalienable rights, a notion utterly contrary to all evidence.
       Feminism will die when liberalism is pushed aside in favour of patriarchal nationalism, the creed of all heslthy societies, freeing the white Christian and Jewish men who created everything making civilization possible to reclaim their inheritance—the entire planet—and send the women and their low-IQ bulls to the knacker’s yard behind the girls’ beloved ponies.

    2. “Feminism will always be around in some infectious, cancerous, hate fueled form.”
       It looks that way now, but truly I say to you, every beginning has an end. Especially beginnings that are based on falsehod and can only be supported by lies.
       I must admit… I am sounding and feeling much more positive the more I think about this piece. I am attempting to be a prophet? Maybe. But I think it is clear to all… that while feminism may still exist in 10, 20 years from now… its form… may be like those communist parties that are still registered political entities. Seen as nothing but a RELIC from a past that was PROVEN COMPLETELY to be utterly false and a disaster for humanity.
       So yes… their will still be feminists in the future… old ones, with no kids, and a lot of cats. I have no fear of old women with cats.

34. Young women who lose their minds will keep turning to feminism. You can discourage it but can’t kill it.

35. Excellent piece – aligns closely with the dynamic I am seeing as well. I wrote this a couple of years ago;
    Feminism is already a dead woman walking. All feminism has is shaming language and the State (ironically, ultimately other men) to keep men to the feminist line.
    But now, increasingly, the shaming doesn’t work. And men are disengaging from society in general to avoid entanglements with the state; if you don’t get married, you can’t be divorced, if you don’t co-habit you can’t have half your stuff appropriated, if you don’t have children, you can’t be on the hook for child support, if you don’t enter the corporate world you can’t be be accused of ‘harassment’ and if you don’t date you drastically reduce your chance of a false rape accusation.
    These are genuine threat points for men in the modern world that didn’t exist before feminism. It speaks to the feeble minds of feminists that they would think that men will simply carry on as they did when these threats did not exist. For the last 50 years men (mostly) still did. But that’s over now.
    So men are doing what they have always done: survey their environment, understand it, and behave rationally according to it. Which means, increasingly, living their lives without regard to what women want. This does not mean living without sex, relationships or female company. Just that the investment men make in all these areas is being dramatically reduced.
    As feminism reduces the value of women (in men’s eyes), so men are reducing the amount of time, effort, attention and money they are willing to spend for the declining benefits modern women now bring to their lives.
    But the real news is that the true cost of feminism, first born by men, and then children, is now being passed on to women. Record numbers of women are living alone, record numbers of women are childless, record numbers are on psychiatric medication, record numbers are facing a life-time of wage slavery in grinding jobs that they can never leave. And still feminism spins these outcomes as the conscious choices of these women and as ’empowering’.
    And yet, women’s self-reported happiness, across all classes, all races, all
    demographics is lower than ever since records began 50 years ago. Tellingly, for the first time ever, their happiness is also now lower than men’s.
    But you do not need to read ‘The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness’ to know this. Just talk to the increasing number of 30 and 40 year old childless spinsters one on one – not in a group – to get the REAL story. The REAL effect of feminism in the REAL world. These women don’t give two hoots about feminism, they are just wondering where all the good husbands, hell, ANY decent man, went.
    Mostly, disgusted with what feminism has done to women, he walked away.
    For the truth is that men don’t want to fight women, it goes against the core of what it means to be a man. But feminism thrust men into a fight that they neither started nor wanted. To the point that feminists are reduced to crowing about ‘winning’ battles that men never turned up for.
    And even now, as feminism pushes and pushes and pushes to ever more absurd levels, as ever more restrictions are placed on normal masculine behavior, ever more insane definitions of ‘rape’, ‘assault’, and ‘aggression’ are drafted into law in increasingly desperate attempts to somehow, anyhow, cast women as perpetual victims – even now – men are still refusing to be drawn into a real battle.
    That’s how deeply men do not want to fight women.
    The sound of the final battle between the sexes will not be heard in the streets or legislatures. It will not be televised or reported. There will be no flags hoisted or victory parades. Because it is already in progress. It is happening all around us in plain sight, for those with the eyes to see it.
    And men are deploying the most devastating weapon of all – indifference. In this final battle who cares least wins.
    The time has come to reap the harvest of feminism, and for women the fruit will be bitterest of all.

    1. These feminists got what they wanted. Or what they think they wanted. And they’re still unhappy.
       Man, as is true to our nature, will always attempt to understand the elements affecting our biological or social environment & attempt to claim mastery over it. It’s just the way we are.
       We didn’t need to demand legislation or nanny permission to learn to make fire, invent the wheel, power steam engines, build ships or send men to outer space. We made some mistakes along the way, dusted ourselves & got up & got on with it. The idea was to advance everyone, men & women.
       The consequences of a movement that seeks to advance itself through marginalizing a major part of humanity, men & the women who want no part of their toxic ideology, is just reaching the part of its life cycle where it’s bearing fruit.
       To them we say, ‘You got what you wanted. Not happy? Fuck you’.

       1. It was never really what most of them actually wanted to begin with, whether they’ve realized it or not.

          1. My second sentence above does address your point.
             But absolving the intended beneficiaries of the movement by granting them a pussy pass isn’t helpful. Can you see normal men cherry picking taking leadership & responsibility only when it’s convenient?
             Having said that, the war isn’t won yet. I’ve often commented in the past that while it’s a welcome development to have these Women Against Feminism as allies, our strategy must never be reliant upon them.
             They’ll follow wherever the winds of benefit tell them to go. And there’s no hate from me for that. It’s just their nature.
             We don’t hate the snake because it bites. That’s part of its nature.
             The onus is on us Red Pilled men to take the lead & create contingencies in the event they decide putting daggers in our back starts to look like a viable survival strategy for them.

          2. They got what they SAID they wanted…hell, they got what they DEMANDED. It was THEIR own poor choice. No one held any gun to their heads. Well, “they broke it, they bought it.” Not my fault.
             And they’re still not ‘happy’? Well –as frank rook said — FUCK THEM!
             Not my monkeys, not my circus.

    2. QUOTE: “These are genuine threat points for men in the modern world that didn’t exist before feminism. It speaks to the feeble minds of feminists that
       they would think that men will simply carry on as they did when these
       threats did not exist. For the last 50 years men (mostly) still did. But
       that’s over now.”
       Well said. Your comment was absolutely brilliant in reflecting my thinking far better than I articulated in my article from the male perspective.
       QUOTE: “Mostly, disgusted with what feminism has done to women, he walked away.”
       Consent… and assent. Men have removed both… completely. And when you think about this masculine power.. the simple ability to just not consent… and SEE the effect it is having. It’s an unstoppable force, completely immovable or amenable. It is almost… God like?
       THIS… is what I hope my article highlighted and why I left it to the very end.
       Man’s consent and assent… over the women in his life.
       We take that back… it’s game over. And that is what your comment brilliantly highlights so well.

36. This article is good in that it mentions many things that need to be acknowledged and encouraged. But as long as women and gender studies departments exist in universities, feminism is still alive and receiving government funding. When these departments are eliminated, then feminism will truly be dead.

37. Feminism is simply an extension of tradcon inspired gynocentrism. You have normal gynocentrism (the tradcon version) and hyper gynocentrism (the progressive feminist version).
    Feminism is all about wealth, power and control folks – and in which gender’s hands that wealth, power and control will reside. When you drive down the road – who built everything you see – including the road? Men. Who fought and died for the rights women have today? Men. Who enacted the many laws and policies that favor women over men – including no-fault divorce, alimony, asset division, child support, VAWA, Title IX, Affirmative Action, SNAP, WIC, male-only conscription, female-first-everything, etc, etc, etc? Men. In other words – now that men have created the perfect world for women – women now demand control of said world. The guys did all the building, dying and fighting to make it all happen – and as far as women are concerned – it’s now theirs for the taking. Will men stop women in this gender based coup d’état? Nope.
    There’s a new anti-male law in town boys – a total game changer – and its name is Affirmative Consent. In the relatively near future – if gynocentrists get their way – and they always do – Affirmative Consent will be made a part of federal and criminal law, just like VAWA. Who will make this happen on behalf of women? Men. As we all know, Affirmative Consent means that – if you can’t prove ongoing and enthusiastic consent at ‘every stage’ of the sexual encounter – you as a man are guilty. In other words – you as a man lose your right to the presumption of innocence and your right to due process. With Affirmative Consent – you’ll have to prove your innocence rather than the prosecution having to prove your guilt – totally upending long established criminal law – all at the behest of hyper gynocentrists (feminists). Is there anything men won’t give up for women – including their basic legal rights? Nope. Why? Blue pill social conditioning.
    There are two kinds of men in this world – those who see through the BS and those that don’t. The former have seen through the illusions and enchantments by swallowing the most bitter, nausea inducing, distasteful pill on the planet – the red pill. The latter is still living in that blissfully ignorant and sweet blue pill fantasy world – knowing that at any moment now – ANY MOMENT NOW – women are going to awaken and restore men to their well earned places as kings of the castle. Sorry to say blue pillers – but it just ain’t going to happen. But you keep dreaming. It is a beautiful man-dream after all. No one likes to wake up from a great man-dream. Trust me – I know. Unfortunately for the rest of us – your refusal to wake up will promote the destruction of countless millions more men’s lives – well into the future.
    In the past few short decades, through the aforementioned policies and laws – TRILLIONS IN WEALTH AND POWER have been transferred from men to women. Did women enact said policies and laws by force? Nope. They did it by exploiting men’s greatest weakness – which is what?
    The only thing that may have shaken women as a whole recently with regard to the potential downsides of feminism is the possibility of women being added to Selective Service – a bill the congressional blue pillers immediately quashed.
    Naivete and gullibility are not positive virtues. Feminism is dying? Pull my middle leg and it plays jingle balls.

    1. Thank you for this comment. That said… I would like to offer an alternative view.
       And it boils down to the most simple of Occam’s refutation.
       If you have to legislate, you don’t have power. Laws don’t comply anyone to “do as they are told”. If you have to make a law to get compliance, you will never get it. You have LOST the willful choice of people to CHOOSE to submit to your authority. You have LOST the battle of the mind.
       That was the point of my article. It is all about the mind and all these laws you cite are not indications that things will never change or only get worse, they are for me signs that the entire feminist matrix is on the verge of complete collapse.
       You are never, never going to legislate how men and women romantically interact. Especially the heterosexual side. You are going to get a massive, and dare I say violent, reaction.
       I agree with you that they are going to try everything you have written. But the world is not as bleak as you believe it to be. Is it still dangerous for men? Yes. More dangerous in the future. Sadly, also yes. But dangerous forever and ever and there is no turning back? That is black and white, a closed loop, and the future simply does not work that way.
       If you believe in God or not, humans choose how to live, not laws and governments. Since our nature, divine or evolved, is HETEROSEXUAL, you are NEVER going to demonize and cast out natural male/female mating and pair bonding. Both men AND women are going to overturn it.
       This is why they are going into overdrive to shove trannys down our throats. To “change” the patriarchal narrative by “updating” all the old patriarchal mythical troupes of the west – Star Wars, Ghostbusters, etc. They are trying… trying… to FORCE an UNNATURAL narrative onto a NATURAL process. It’s like trying to eliminate both an unstoppable force AND immovable object with complete fantasy, “laws”, of your own making.
       Just look at all the trillions of wealth and power you fear are so impossible to stop… and the rise of Trump. NOTHING is stopping him, nothing. They are throwing EVERYTHING at him, and it is having absolutely ZERO effect on the change that is coming.
       I suspect you are MGTOW. I respect your position. But, the underlying Achilles heel of MGTOW is its root belief that defeatism is the only path forward. It’s not.
       Nowhere did I say their would be a return to the 1950s. What I can tell you is that we are going to see a version of the 1950s because THAT is the history of the whole of humanity. Orwell may have predicted a future of hate and constant war, but humans simply cannot hate forever. It is not NATURAL to us.
       We choose to hate. We love by natural inclination.
       This… is what they are trying to upend and make the new norm – hate, not love. I doubt you will believe me. I can’t make you see with my eyes. But the future is not as dark as MGTOW paints it. Patriarchal man is rising again. And we will take all men, who wish join a more positive future, with us.

       1. I’m not a ‘MGTOW’ – but am of the MGTOW mindset – in that I’m going to protect myself legally and financially to the extent possible. MGTOW is more of a guidepost than an identity. There are no hard and fast rules. At most – the mindset offers examples of ‘levels’. It exists as a means to reverse blue pill social conditioning and to lesson the destructive forces wrought by gynocentric men and women against maleness as a whole.
          I don’t shun women or society – in fact – I’m getting ready to retire at a very early age with well over a million in tax free savings. But I will never – if I can help it – allow myself to be legally and/or financially destroyed in the way 10s upon 10s of millions of men have been annihilated before me.
          By that, I mean no marriage/cohabitation and limiting my exposure to false accusations to the extent possible. Some in the legal system estimate that over half of all sexual assault/rape allegations are false – but they’d of course be fired/falsely accused themselves if they were to publicly state the same. Look at all the women that came out of the woodwork to accuse trump right before the election.
          I have been falsely accused twice via the wrath of a woman scorned. This was years ago and I only escaped prison because, back then, you weren’t guilty until proven innocent. Men will have no such luck in today’s legal environment. A false accusation resulting in even a misdemeanor with regard to domestic issues and you’ll be unemployable for life. This is serious, suicide inducing, life ending business. Countless men’s lives have been destroyed through such deceit and who knows how many rot away in prison under such false pretenses today.
          As we write, laws and policies are being/have already been enacted in the West globally – by blue pill men and the fellow gynocentrists they serve – that give cohabiting women the same rights to alimony, asset division and child support that their officially married and now divorced female counterparts so enjoy. This is the Swedish/Canadian model that the progressives are so desperate to enact in the US. Did the Swedish/Canadian men fight such laws? Nope. They fell on their gynocentric swords without so much as a whimper.
          One of the things things I’ve paid close attention to is this use of ‘alpha’ and ‘beta’ to reference ‘superior males’ vs ‘inferior males’. This reference reminds me very much of white supremacy in that it negates certain men’s rights in favor of the rights of a ‘higher class’. If I were you folks – I’d cut that superiority/inferiority narrative out entirely.
          Appreciate your optimism and I respect your opinion and the spirit you’re trying to convey – but I’m not going to hold my breath.

          1. 100% agree with your assessment and viewpoint. I hope your comments are read by everyone.
             I may be jumping the gun in calling feminism dead, but I try to look out 10 to 20 years from now, not the next 2 or 3.
             Again… when you have to LEGISLATE, you have lost. Your advice on the dangers present to today for men REAL. I am not dismissing them. I just don’t see this state of affairs lasting.
             “I have been falsely accused twice via the wrath of a woman scorned.”
             Chills man. Chills. Never had a false accusation against myself, but a woman scorned… it is safer now for men to be rejected than to do the rejecting. Another consequence of the delusion and fantasy that women have choice in the mating game.

38. They may have ditched the label, but they haven’t ditched the beliefs. It’s not uncommon today to see such comments as “i’m not a feminist, i’m an equalist” or “i’m not a feminist, i’m a humanist” or “i’m not a feminist, i’m an egalitarian”. It’s easy to drop the toxic label of feminism because of it’s association with radicals, but that doesn’t translate to a return to Patriarchy, far from it.

    1. And to this you respond… bullshit. This is why the fight is not over. This is the future I am predicting and is proven to be true in your comment. That typical female reply… will be shattered every time it is uttered. And that shattering is not going to stop. We have reached the tipping point in the culture war. Ironically, it was only when men had their hearts completely ripped out and stomped on, that they finally grew a spine and said enough is enough. All the equalist, egalitarianist, humanist liberal bullshit… it’s over, it’s just plain done. Patriarchy is returning, I am simply ahead of the curve in calling it.

       1. I hope you are right.

39. When I first watched the movie Up in the air, i thought it was another of george clooney womanizer movies with the ladies falling head over heels by his alphaness. But it literally blew my mind when he started to fall in love, thinking she was the one, becoming more beta until he realized she had a husband, kids and was being played. Lesson from the movie: no matter how special you think a girl is, don’t put her on an effing pedestal.

    1. I think that part of the movie is more nuanced than you have described it.
       For me… it was Clooney realizing that even a bachelor desires and wants to be loved. We all do. We are human. When he decided to take a chance on it… the modern western woman was on full display for the whole audience to judge.
       While the scene I included in the article on the discussion of modern relationships for the young was good… the end scene when Cloony is standing at the doorstep of his lover’s house and realizes she is not single and not even remotely in love with him…
       It was a cultural nuke. This… is where we have “progressed” to. Having Clooney in the role as the cucked fool… being an avowed bachelor and hearing his entire life philosophy espousing it… having his HEART ripped out when he courageously dares, DARES… to reach out to love someone?
       BOOOOOOOOM!!
       It was agonizing to watch him walk back to his car/apartment (can’t remember now) with the idea of a woman loving him completely shattered.
       I believe the writers intended that scene to be a moral blow to Clooney’s character, to “prove” he was wrong and that being married was where true happiness lies. Even if less than perfect and spouses now routinely step out on each other, at least they “have someone who cares about them”, and children, and family, for which Clooney’s character had none.
       But the opposite conclusion is drawn.
       Instead we see an empowered, independent woman throughout the ENTIRE film, who is nothing but a cheating whore on her husband with any good looking guy with a “nice smile”. She has her cake, and is eating it too and, most importantly, HAS NO GUILT, NO SHAME., none, about doing so.
       As you said… that “womanizer” Clooney… he got what he deserved. She showed him!!! Treat women as a sex object, this is what you get.
       But that is not what happened. Audiences did not judge Clooney, they judged Farminga and the entire feminist cultural narrative in the liberal west.
       Trust me… far more than the economic narrative that was the other underlying theme of the movie… the feminist narrative was put on full display… in a real way that hit home to all, young and old, and I think a judgement was cast.
       Western civilization has failed, economically, culturally, and that was the end of feminism/liberalism.
       Hence Trump.

       1. Your interpretation of this movie seem to come from a cultural stand point which I completely agree. Having taken the red pill my visual filters saw this feminist narrative aswell, especially in a negative way, realizing how much of a cunt she was (representing most women nowadays). But I never thought the overall message could slap feminist on the face as if telling them “this is how miserable feminism made you become”. You elaborated this piece remarkably well indeed,

          1. Thank you sir… I do try to see through the looking glass as best I can.

40. I totally admire the raped woman who refuses to be a victim. I think that if I were raped, I would find myself in the abbyss of despair and in need of help from the others to overcome this experience. Yet after SOME time I would just HAVE TO recover from it and keep on going. Hating all men would do no good. But the question is if men would be willing to help me recover?
    The article states: “What women strive for most in their lives is non-confrontation and avoidance of conflict. Women (ok, normal women) want harmony, peace, love and happy relationships. […] You may think it is, but you must put yourself in the soul of a woman and remember how important relationships and being liked and connected is to them. Women don’t want to rock the boat. They don’t want to make enemies. They don’t want to create bad feelings among family, peers and co-workers.”
    That is what makes women VICTIMS! Instead of being strong, independent-thinking and self-reliable, they cowardly conform to the social norms – no matter whether it’s feminism or patriarchy. So pathetic… :/ I hate being weak and when someone claims it’s just natural for a NORMAL woman to be weak, I feel like throwing up. How can a weak woman survive rape, persecution, loss of a child?
    And by the way – Princess Leia is a STRONG woman. 🙂 Not a feeble weakling.

    1. Tits or get the fuck out!
       Oh, and before you go, make me a sandwich on your way out!!

       1. I’m not your mommy to breastfeed you. Get the fuck out yourself, Mr. Mangina.

          1. You just proofed that you are full of shit and indeed despise traditional gender roles.
             Get the fuck out, little attention whore!

          2. Is that who your mum is? 😉
             No, seriously, being rude just prooves how insecure you are. That’s why you hate women?

          3. that all you have Karolina? Princess Leia is a strong woman ..until she hit the wall. Then they put her on diet so even the dogs wouldn’t bark at her during the movie….
             As far as “rapes” the real stats are 52.9 per 100,000 as reported by the FBI not your fairlyland number to make your own self feel like a better victim.. Feminist are like Colin K as SJW.. 185 blacks get killed is an atrocity but not the 485 whites killed by police. Will he take a knee?

          4. What does that have to do with what I wrote????

    2. Shush those sweet lips princess. Do you hear it? The patriarchy train cometh. The step is high but nigh big bear arms will help hoist you aboard. ALL ABOARD!!
       

       1. The only stable thing in life is change.

    3. Thank you for your comment Karolina. I think you missed the point of the quote you listed above.
       Being submissive is not weak. Not speaking out or rocking the boat is not weak. Only a feminist mindset would see it as such.
       What I am talking about is the NATURAL difference in the genders in the context of social conflict.
       Women… avoid it. Men… welcome it. It does not make women “weak” or men “strong”, it is simply how we are wired.
       A woman NEEDS social supports if she ever gets pregnant. She simply cannot, CANNOT, risk being pushed out of the group, which is why social dynamics in female cliques are always PSYCHOLOGICAL in nature and extremely important for every woman to master and navigate.
       Men… simply hash it out, publicly, sometimes physically. It’s that simple.
       And when it comes to society, to civilization, men are stronger so it is not in womens interest to rock the boat, because the men that win will be the ones the women have to deal with.
       Strength… has a masculine/feminine component. Women in the west have given up, completely forgotten, what feminine strength is.
       As Xerxes lamented when Alexander was kicking his ass all over Eurasia…
       “My men have become women and my women, men.”
       http://www.stoa.org/diotima/anthology/artemisia.shtml

       1. Thank you for your reply.
          As a Polish woman I know little of what American feminist movement is. I even don’t know whether I am a feminist by Polish standards. Yet you might erroneously take me for a feminist cos I strongly oppose to the idea that there is only one model of true masculinity (Alpha) and femininity. Actually I believe this is an issue that shouldn’t be taken so seriously. It all depends on the period of time and the place you were born. What you perceive right now as not-masculine and thus not desired in case of men, in other countries might be considered neutral. It surprises me, how much “manosphere” guys are obsessed with the idea of “a real man” and “a real=decent woman”. You don’t hesitate to call names those who don’t meet your standards. To you a man is either an Alpha or a whimsical Beta. Nothing in between. A woman is either a good, faithful wife nurturing her children or a careless slut who is unable to raise her kids properly (hatred and contempt for unwed moms – I see it on almost every “manosphere”-like site). As much as I despise the stupidity of some Leftists, I have to say, that you (meaning men from “manosphere”) are NOT the remedy for the feminist whores’ and their supporters’ madness. 🙁
          People differ. There are lots gentle and sensitive men and tough, even violent women. It is NOT something new. The only difference is that NOW all types of men and women are accepted or at least tolerated. Much to your dismay, there is not just one acceptable way of life. Not just one appropriate family model. Why not living your life the way you want it and NOT shaming other people if they choose something else? Do we really have to support one role model for men and for women? Is this what America has become: the country where Liberals and Conservatives want to impose their will on others?
          Back to your comment. Neither avoiding a conflict at all costs or welcoming it eagerly is a wise thing to do. Both men and women should be taught to seek a sensible solution to the problems and when necessary, to negotiate it with other people. Taught, I say! Tht is not something you are born with. 😉 Both sexes should also be taught to stand up for themselves and their values. It has nothing to do with masculinity or femininity. It’s pure common sense.
          Sorry for the mistakes.

          1. Your welcome, and I won’t ask you to show me your tits. But don’t think I will go easy on you either.
             QUOTE: “Why not living your life the way you want it and NOT shaming other people if they choose something else?”
             This… right here… proves you are brainwashed. It is this EXACT moral relativism that has brought The West to the current state of degeneration it is suffering from – no standards. Of right and wrong, of immoral and moral, of ethical and unethical.
             Just think it through… one can justify ANY action or belief based on your above quote and simply dismiss all arguments against (as you have effectively done) by uttering “Who are you to judge?” This is what the liberal/feminist argument boils down to, and then proceeds to judge everyone who does not agree with them even harsher than God would for not recognizing their right not to be judged!
             While God is the ultimate judge, he clearly gave man, yes man, the power to do so as well. If you have a society that does not judge, you have have an immoral society. Period. This is what you are arguing for. You coach your argument in valid “truths” (everyone has a different life experience, there is no one mold/way for all, etc), but that does NOT thus imply that there are NO standards, no morals, no ULTIMATE truths on how we should live.
             QUOTE: “I strongly oppose to the idea that there is only one model of true masculinity (Alpha) and femininity.”
             While I agree with you that the manosphere in general focuses way too much on the whole alpha male issue, one of the ultimate truths being espoused by ROK is the fact that a GENDER model and role of masculine/feminine, husband and wife, the nuclear family unit, is the BEST form of societal organization to raise children in that produces a peaceful, loving, and just society.
             Just look around you. Look at your own backyard. There is ZERO evidence that children are better off with a single mom than in an intact and loving male/female pair bond in committed marriage. You would have to be a fool, or a feminist, to believe otherwise.
             Does this mean that single mothers are incapable of being good mothers, of raising healthy children and turning them into responsible adults? No. But the evidence, THE FACTS, are irrefutable now. The roots of western societal collapse is in the destruction of the family unit and marriage. Children of single mothers are at the highest risk of low self-esteem, low self-confidence, drug and alcohol abuse, promiscuous sexual behavior, delinquency, etc. I have no time to go looking for this evidence, it is all over this site and the web.
             And yet… you argue… still… that what we are somehow naive and childish in our outlook. That to see things in such black and white terms is to not see the grey and many ways human beings go about living their lives.
             We see the gray… but we also acknowledge you can’t HAVE grey WITHOUT black and white. The spectrum of grey has black on one end, white on the other. THIS… is what liberals/feminist refuse to believe. Truth.
             QUOTE: “Is this what America has become: the country where Liberals and Conservatives want to impose their will on others?”
             No. America is now CLEARLY divided on the only line that matters. Truth from falsehood, reality from fantasy. There is no more left/right, liberal/conservative lines. They are gone. All we have now in The West is people (liberals/feminists in the majority) who live in complete denial of basic reality and truth (gender is biological, at its very root), and those who acknowledge it (which tend to be conservative leaning). While the old political “divide’ is still explicit on the exterior, the inner drive of the divide is more fundamental AND more ideological now. It is their truth (feminists/liberals) vs ours (conservative). Trying to continue along the “many truths” way of living is over because the EVIDENCE, i.e. reality is refuting all of them.
             It is common sense to acknowledge that without a STANDARD for truth, one we can LOGICALLY, using REASON, come to discern, all we have is OPINION and BELIEF. Your entire comment is opinion and belief, not logically reasoned fact and conclusion.
             Again, can single mothers as you say raise good children? Yes. But reality however PROVES that this is an exception to the rule. The rule being, an INTACT family of husband and wife is the BEST model for raising children. If you can PROVE your single-mother-good model is BETTER than the intact family model, your exception becomes the rule, the standard, the TRUTH. It is not, and it never will be. Thus, you, as all liberal and feminists, live in a fantasy world.
             Which you can respond with “Not all single mothers, like not all families, will raise good children. Every circumstance is different. Why can’t you see this?”
             To which I would respond, why can’t you see I DO, and can also see the STANDARD that works.
             THAT… is the problem in America and the west. People who can see reality, black and white AND the grey of living life, and those who believe there is only grey and “don’t judge me you degenerate, deplorable, literally Hitler misogynist homophobic trans hater!!!!!”
             Don’t apologize for your mistakes. Acknowledge and correct them.
             Being Polish, you will understand the below video. All… ALL… ROK writing can be expressed as a return to this. The NATURAL roles men and women play in their lives loving one another as different, yet equal, human beings and respecting those differences because it is what attracts us to one another and makes us fall in love.
             

          2. You have some valid points (both parents in a loving marriage = healthier children). Men and women are different and are meant to compliment one another.
             The problem I see is that many of the men who post here are not interested in committing to nor loving women. Maybe they are so fed up with their negative personal experiences with the wrong women, I don’t know.
             I can’t count the number of posts about how a man should find a virgin or near virgin wife who he won’t let work, control what she spends money on, who she has as friends, what she reads or watches on tv, how she dresses etc, to wait on him hand and foot while he continues to fuck other women. That’s neither loving nor committed. Sorry but change goes both ways. Now I’m sure the guys who have this view have their reasons, but the average woman does not want to be controlled and treated like a child while her husband sleeps around. If things are going to change there has to be a buy in from both sides. I don’t see women giving up femism to be treated like garbage by men who see them as less than human, and many men in the manosphere do. Not all, but many and those ones post the most, kind of like how the militant feminist are the most vocal and hence most noticeable.

          3. “Your welcome, and I won’t ask you to show me your tits.”
             Thank you so much, I’m saving them form my lover and our child. 😉
             “This… right here… proves you are brainwashed. It is this EXACT moral relativism that has brought The West to the current state of degeneration it is suffering from – no standards. Of right and wrong, of immoral and moral, of ethical and unethical.”
             You are wrong, Sir. I believe we can do what we want unless (!) we hurt an innocent person on purpose. I don’t care who mates with whom, in what kind of family children are raised, whether someone is a believer or not. I am against hurting others. And FOR helping those who deserve it. You and other “manosphere” guys, on the other hand, want to adjust the whole society to one style of life. Just like feminists. I strongly oppose to that.
             “one can justify ANY action or belief based on your above quote and simply dismiss all arguments against (as you have effectively done) by uttering “Who are you to judge?””
             We SHOULD judge. Every society does so. The question is: HOW we should do it? Shouldn’t we condemn EVIL? By evil I mean hurting innocent people (and animals). Do we really have to deal with such issues as masculinity or femininity? We will NEVER have an eternally lasting agreement what “a real man” or “a decent woman” is.
             “[…] but that does NOT thus imply that there are NO standards, no morals, no ULTIMATE truths on how we should live.”
             I believe in ultimate truths, in objective morality and so on. I just don’t know if my conscience recognizes them correctly. The same goes with anybody else’s conscience. That’s why I stay away from every ideology, as they are all temporary fashions.
             “[…] one of the ultimate truths being espoused by ROK is the fact that a GENDER model and role of masculine/feminine, husband and wife, the nuclear family unit, is the BEST form of societal organization to raise children in that produces a peaceful, loving, and just society.”
             It’s better to be raised by mom and dad than just one parent.
             It’s better to be raised in a wealthy family than in a poor one.
             It’s better to have healthy parents and two sets of grandparents, than have one of the parents sick and no grandparents around.
             Am i right?
             But sometimes we can’t have it all. Throughout the ages kids (boys!) were raised by women only. Widows, abandoned wives, wives whose husbands were not engaged in the process of child rearing. In XX century: divorcees and maidens as well. And their kids WEREN’T all emotionally damaged. Sure, they often craved for a father, but more than often the father was a bully/idiot/criminal/etc. That’s why I am so glad the stigma of unwed pregnancy has been eradicated. If anyone would try to reintroduce it for the sake of the SOCIETY, then he/she would be against love and peace.
             “Just look around you. Look at your own backyard. There is ZERO evidence that children are better off with a single mom than in an intact and loving male/female pair bond in committed marriage. You would have to be a fool, or a feminist, to believe otherwise.”
             Yes, and many of the children raised by both parents would be MUCH better off, if the parents were richer, wiser, etc. But sometimes you can’t have everything.
             “Does this mean that single mothers are incapable of being good mothers, of raising healthy children and turning them into responsible adults? No. But the evidence, THE FACTS, are irrefutable now. The roots of western societal collapse is in the destruction of the family unit and marriage. Children of single mothers are at the highest risk of low self-esteem, low self-confidence, drug and alcohol abuse, promiscuous sexual behavior, delinquency, etc. I have no time to go looking for this evidence, it is all over this site and the web.”
             Sir, have you ever considered that:
             – the unwed pregnancies may happen more often to the already impoverished women than to the wealthy ones?
             – that the whole American society is somehow spoiled and corrupted? I believe unwed mothers that were robbed of their bastard kids in the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s would be better mothers than nowadays both married and unmarried ones.
             Back to the sad reality of today’s America. Both you and I know there are many abusive married couples and many great single mothers. Why not helping the latter with raising kids? I would never say the father is irrelevant. But sometimes he’s gone or absolutely unfit to raise his kid and then someone else should step in. Preferably someone from the mother’s family.
             Today I have visited some “manosphere” sites and I am taken aback by some of the statements about single mothers. Single motherhood in America comes in for a lot of criticism, perhaps because YOUR single moms are cuddled by the government and receive lots of help, which makes you, Conservatives, clench your fists and grind your teeth. Money issues and raising “betas” are your biggest concerns. 🙂
             In Poland single moms simply raise their kids. Apart from SOME fucked-up Christians or “decent” old people hardly anyone would ever dare to say that a single mother (even a troubled teenager) should place her child up for adoption. No, we don’t send unwed women and girls to the “houses for fallen women”. And for now, we don’t perceive them as scavengers who live on the welfare. Not until they have too many children. 😉
             “The spectrum of grey has black on one end, white on the other. THIS… is what liberals/feminist refuse to believe. Truth.”
             It’s one thing to know something is a FACT. The other thing is to JUDGE it.
             “No. America is now CLEARLY divided on the only line that matters. Truth from falsehood, reality from fantasy. There is no more left/right, liberal/conservative lines. They are gone. All we have now in The West is people (liberals/feminists in the majority) who live in complete denial of basic reality and truth (gender is biological, at its very root), and those who acknowledge it (which tend to be conservative leaning). While the old political “divide’ is still explicit on the exterior, the inner drive of the divide is more fundamental AND more ideological now. It is their truth (feminists/liberals) vs ours (conservative). Trying to continue along the “many truths” way of living is over because the EVIDENCE, i.e. reality is refuting all of them.”
             I could agree on that, but you are not precise enough. I told you: people differ. And if something is natural, then it doesn’t have to be supported by culture. So what is the thing with all that gender stuff you Americans are so much preoccupied by?
             “It is common sense to acknowledge that without a STANDARD for truth, one we can LOGICALLY, using REASON, come to discern, all we have is OPINION and BELIEF. Your entire comment is opinion and belief, not logically reasoned fact and conclusion.”
             When someone says: “Unwed mothers are usually poorer than married mothers” – it may be FACT. At least in case of American single mothers.
             When someone says: “Unwed mothers are worse mothers” – than I DON’T KNOW if it’s true. I would never say it about Polish unmarried mothers.
             When someone says: “Unwed mothers should selflessly place their babies for adoption” – it is OPINION.
             I know YOU don’t frown upon them, just using them as an example. 🙂
             “Again, can single mothers as you say raise good children? Yes. But reality however PROVES that this is an exception to the rule.”
             An exception? Maybe in case of black ghetto children, who are almost doomed to fail because of the stupid government policy to support pathology. But would these black kids be better off if their immature, unreliable fathers were involved in raising them? Doubt that.
             As for white women, to say that most of them raise bad children, is a LIE. Unless your single moms are different than single moms from every other country in the world.
             But what do YOU mean by “bad”? To me, even if a teenage girl gets pregnant, it doesn’t mean her (single) mother failed. Pregnancy is almost never a tragedy. Only you, Americans, perceive it as such just because the woman doesn’t have a ring on her finger. SAD.
             “The rule being, an INTACT family of husband and wife is the BEST model for raising children.”
             I almost agree. I would say: not husband and wife but the father and the mother. Biological ones. Yet other options don’t have to be much worse. (Unless YOU make them…)
             “Thus, you, as all liberal and feminists, live in a fantasy world.”
             No. All I’m saying single moms should never be viewed as failures. There are many factors that determine a child’s well-being. Instead of shaming single moms we should help them. And I don’t mean showering them with money.
             “[…] can also see the STANDARD that works.”
             Many family models work. But I’m not going to quarrel. I just wish our private lives weren’t anybody’s business unless we hurt innocent people or animals.
             “Don’t apologize for your mistakes. Acknowledge and correct them.”
             By mistakes I meant: I’m sorry for my bad English. 🙂
             I am NOT going to apologise for being an unwed mother because I DO SEE reality and I simply KNOW that marriage itself doesn’t do much good as far as rearing children is concerned. I am an unwed but not-single mom. 🙂 If I was one, however, I would surely not feel guilty.
             “Being Polish, you will understand the below video. All… ALL… ROK writing can be expressed as a return to this. The NATURAL roles men and women play in their lives loving one another as different, yet equal, human beings and respecting those differences because it is what attracts us to one another and makes us fall in love.”
             If something is natural, then there’s no need to support it. Why don’t we let men and women act accordingly to their wishes, provided they don’t hurt each other?

          4. Wow… I don’t even have to respond.
             ” That’s why I am so glad the stigma of unwed pregnancy has been eradicated.”
             Yup… don’t judge me, now support me with your taxes!!!
             Show your tits to your “lover”, until you tire of him and move on. This is why no one here even bothers to reply to women such as you. There is no point. I gave it an honest try, and now I see, and all here see, your true colours. You are a living example of WHY this website exists.
             The stigma of unwed pregnancy is PRECISELY the root of patriarchy. The father’s role. This you undermine by not referring to a husband, but a lover. Not a partner, but a dildo. Not an equal, but a man who will NEVER judge you or tell you no.
             This is why Roosh is bang on (lol… bang) on Poland falling to the cancer of feminism before Russia will. It is just not going to happen in Russia. You can’t talk in circles to a Russian and expect to be respected as a rational, mature adult.
             I have fed the troll. I have learned my lesson.

          5. Well, Sir, calling me a troll just because I disagree with your worldwiev is just as mature as asking me to show my tits. 🙂 So disappointing.
             If it’s all about money and patriarchy, then I can clearly see I have also wasted my time. I focused on how we can improve things or at least not cause harm to others. You, on the other hand, couldn’t care less about others’ well being. All you care about is your IDEOLOGY. The making of a perfect society. Are you a victim of a single mom or a living proof that two-parent household is no better? Thanks for proving my point.
             As for my lover, I love him dearly and if we were ever to part, we would part as friends. A ring on my finger would change literally nothing.
             Live you life the way you please. Hope when your pregnant daughter comes to you and confesses she’s pregnant you won’t set her on fire.

          6. Wow. All I did was call you a troll. You pray my non-existant pregnant daughter is not set on fire by my “ideology”… by me, her father.
             Nope… no violence in you at all… all “love.”

    4. Everyone, please ignore the commenter above. Just another attention whore

41. There was a good article on here before mentioning the rise of the anti feminist women. Women who love being put on a pedestal and all the other benefits of a gynocentric society such as anti male divorce laws, but they hate the low smv psychotic women who poison the well and scare off men, whom they could have potentially taken advantage of.
    Im sure out of the 4/5 statistic of women who don’t identify with feminism, there are some sincere ones, but we still need to keep our guards up as men.

42. Where is all this feminist craziness going? At least in germany I can’t see a point of return.
    Jennifer Rostock (the bitch that made the ‘Anti-AfD-Song’) released her new song ‘Hengstin’ which pretty much translates to ‘female stud’. It is the most trending video in germany atm.
    She is for islamic migration and is against the oppression of women in the german society. Because german men are such evil nazi chauvinists while females have thousands of priviliges in islamic culture. Of course.
    She claims that she isn’t a sex object while she presents herself completely naked in the video.
    She says that our society is ruled by men and boring – well, I guess she will enjoy her share of islamic society with all the terrorist action.
    The only good thing is that there are more downvotes than upvotes.
    Please leave a dislike:
    

    1. Holy good Lord almighty! You know… as much as a I feel for Europe under the threat of complete annihilation from “refugees” (cough, young dudes hunting for welfare and bitches)… you watch this… and can only say “Yup… fire and brimstone… it’s Sodom & Gamorrah all over again.”
       How is what is happening in Europe even remotely a surprise to anyone?
       On a prophetic note… Italy struck again with massive earthquakes. Whole towns being leveled and wiped out.
       Birthplace of the renaissance, and thus of western civilization, being razed by natural disaster.
       Germans, the strongest people on earth who had to be between back TWICE by the entire world in two world wars are now being raped by a people who don’t speak their language and who will kill them in their own beds. Their women are openly disfiguring themselves and walking around naked, begging for the invaders to show their men how real men treat women. The men, have become castrated, openly parading flaming homosexuals.
       In my dreams only… could this be a reality. But I am not dreaming. The nightmare of my genetic roots committing dna suicide is beyond contemplation or understanding.
       EDIT: What the fuck is with the horse/human? Seriously. What am I watching?

       1. The people of todays germany are so malicious, disgraceful, cancerous and disgusting that if I would be the 2016 Führer I would make Hitler look like a merciful guy, that I can tell you.
          I know so many guys who openly support migration and at the same time when the women get raped they say ‘If I would have been around that place in town – I would have killed those savages’.
          All big talk, but they don’t even get whats happening in this country. Not only in this country – they don’t get whats going on in the world.*
          The germans think that russians are supervillains and Trump is the next Hitler (Trump would get 4 or 5% of votes in germany…smh).
          I am against migration and when a german slut gets raped by a migrant I grin – because they wanted it, they voted for it. I am the complete opposite of the average german male.
          I am for true gender equality (if a woman gets raped I don’t care just like I don’t care if a guy gets raped) – while they are for female priviliges because they think it will get them laid.
          I am a nationalist – while they are globalists.
          Sadly I am all alone with my positions in this feminist utopia shithole.
          *Redpill Germany made a good video on german MSM:
          

          1. Yes, I feel for you. While N. America has gone a long ways down the rabbit hole of self destruction, it is by far nowhere near as gone as Europe. Which is why I think the return to patriarchy here will be less turbulent than in Europe. The men and women that crossed the ocean for a better life LEFT a lot of cultural baggage at home and were FORCED to adapt and change to survive in a new climate. Thus, I think N. America is more open to changing than Europe, which is why someone like Trump has come up so quickly and frighteningly for the elites across the pond.

          2. Btw: Trump’s family came from Kallstadt which is a small village just 50 miles away from my hometown.
             The Heinz (Ketchup) family came from the exact same village.
             Maybe I should move my ass over to the States and get rich af.

    2. Ahhh. The overwhelming hypocrisy of the ‘sexual objectification’ false narrative. What’s Hillaryous is that I can go on Google and type “nude women” – and in an instant – millions of naked women appear for my viewing pleasure. Many are women who engage in sex for profit and many just want to strip down for the camera so that others can see just how sexually self-objectified they can be. Quick Health and Human Services – women are addicted to exposing themselves nude! It’s another disability! It’s Hillaryous, is it not?! Don’t even get me started on marriage as an advanced form of prostitution. Don’t want to go there.
       Were it not for gynocentrism – hypocrisy might go out of business.

43. It’s refreshing that there are women who call BS on extreme feminism. In my opinion we don’t have much to complain about:
    We can vote
    We have control over our own lives
    We have control over our own bodies
    We can choose not to get married and have children if we don’t want that
    We can get an education
    We can work
    We can drive
    We can freely travel
    We can freely relocate
    Most of those freedoms are not available to millions of women in the world. You would think with the increased knowledge we have about the lives of other women in repressed countries these feminists would count their blessings when they compare their so called oppressed lives with women who get jailed for being rape victims or beheaded because they fled a forced marriage to a fat old man.
    But no, it’s like they live in a bubble and constantly look for issues to rage about. I can see why women are starting to get sick of this. I don’t necessarily think all women who are against this form of feminism want to revert back to a patriarchy lead society, but like the article states, they just want to have healthy relationships with normal men who will love and respect them, who they would love and respect in return.
    This kind of feminism just leaves women bitter because everything they experience in their lives is warped to feed into their feminist perspective, so naturally all they would see is oppression and repression because that’s what they’re looking for. Very similar to bitter men who hate women, everything they experience feeds into that view. What normal man or woman would want to be with people like that?

44. Of course, if The Cunt wins….this article will be banned, maybe this site…and the age of insane women will spread like The Plague all over Western culture….the fuse will be lit and violence will be the only response. White males can only take this for so long….it’s sad it had to come to this…..

    1. Well most self respecting white males have abandoned the west completely and are now living fullfilling lives milking what’s left of the west and spending up in the east and having lots of sex with beautiful feminine Asian girls as we see fit, western white woman are history, they will die alone, and their cats will eat their rotting corps…in effect those girls will BECOME the cat food…hahahaha.

45. I agree with this article.

    1. I don’t. Women still want feminism, they’re just less in-your-face about it to be more coy.

       1. True that.
          We need a new view in depth of the feminists.

46. Boomer women are still running the world and scapegoating men of all ages in the workplace. We’re not ‘jerks’ for noticing that, youngster.

47. I hope no one here is naive enough to actually believe this. Women still want all the benefits and double standards of what feminism stands for they just dont want anything to do with the word “feminism” because theyre realizing the attention/shoulders to cry on/free shit gravy train that men used to happily provide is drying up. They need men to believe theyve changed so theyll come back and put up with their shit.

48. Wishful thinking. To make the case that feminism is dead, you need a bit more than a tumblr log and a princess Leia video. If I look around me (and that’s all I can do given that I’m not a sociologist), I’d say the movement is growing on the contrary, or at least that the most retarded first-world feminist arguments (patriarchal oppression, wage gap, male-female equivalence, etc…) are spreading and gathering uncontested mainstream support.
    For example, here’s a recent stance that made the buzz in France and received mostly positive feedback in the form of righteous “you go girl” indignations, despite the obvious fact that the lady is a neurotic-attention-seeking damaged product of the feminist ideology, who should only be pitied :

    Mardi soir. 23h30. Quartier St Michel à Toulouse. Je reviens d’un chouette concert, la vie est belle, je vais m’acheter…
    Posted by Prisca Boh on Thursday, September 22, 2016

    For those who don’t speak french, I’ll tell the tale. So this girl is going to a grocery store after a concert. It’s about midnight, she’s alone, and she passes by a group of horny young men. One of them says “hello bella”, another “hello princess”. She ignores them, which is fine in my opinion, but the guys are not happy with that and insult her physique. We can all agree that this is not nice and that those guys are probably scum. But then, suddenly, the girl decides that will take no more of this “patriarchal” oppression (yes, that’s the word she used). You see, she’s harrased like that “10 – 15 times a day” (maybe she spends ten hours a day walking in the streets, I don’t know), so the time has come, apparently, to say stop and stand up against the patriarchal system. Right now. At midnight. Alone. In front of a group of not so well mannered boys.
    I don’t know if she expected to suddenly turn them into greek philosophers by the mere power of her word, the fact remains that she goes back and starts arguing. Of course, all she gets in return is a “ferme ta gueule” (shut your mouth). To which she reacted, like the empowered woman she is, by spitting at them. Yes, you read that right. She spat at the guy who told her to shut her face. Next stop for her : the hospital.
    Now of course she didn’t deserve that (even though I can’t promise I wouldn’t smack the face of anyone who spat at me), but you’d think that maybe she would admit she did not take the wisest course of action. But no : she’s proud of herself, she’ll keep on fighting, she says : “la peur doit changer de camp” (fear must change sides). I’m sure those guys are terrified by the sight of her in her hospital bed.
    But back to my point : the vast majority of the reactions to that pitiful anecdote apparently agree that the patriarchal system is the cause of her suffering and that more feminism is the answer. So no, feminism is not dead yet.

    1. No… she did deserve that. 100%. She was STUPID to not use COMMON SENSE and just walk away. Worse, she UPPED the conflict (as feminists do) and then… SPAT on another human being.
       That said… she is the minority. The silent majority of women I address in this article are NOT that stupid. They are just not, sorry to break it to you. Yes, far too many of them are getting that stupid, but they are still not as stupid, in the majority, as this woman.
       People can say I am cruel for saying she deserved it, but really, what else can one say? If she kicked and poked a pitbull all day long, and then is attacked viciously by said dog when it breaks its leash, COMMON SENSE says you deserve the attack you got because you PROVOKED it. You brought it on. You took actions and made choices that brought about… GASP AND HORROR…
       Consequences.
       The consequence of feminism is… the white female french women is going to bring an end to the white french race. You can argue against God it’s unfair all day, God is God. You reap what you sow.

       1. People can say I am cruel for saying she deserved it

          No you’re right about this.

          1. I won’t say she necessarily ‘deserved it’; however, it was certainly one of a number of likely negative outcomes from her chosen course of action.
             As the post stated- she thinks she’d do this again in a similar circumstance which demonstrates she either places no value on her life, or she’s ‘stuck on stupid’.
             My mom in her earlier years understood you didn’t go looking for trouble or escalate a situation you could walk away from— but grandpa made sure she carried a switchblade and knew how to conceal/pull/use at close quarters.

       2. I think, depending on where you live, crazy die hard feminists may be in larger groups and hence more noticeable. I’m thinking in urban areas you will see more of this, giving the impression that most women are like this. Of course some men, no matter what will see all women in a bad light and your article won’t sway them.
          In larger populations there are more of these women and they attract the media with their protests over EVERYTHING so I can see how it would appear that they are in the majority. Currently the media is hooking into protests and click bait type events because it attracts viewers. The green haired shaved off one side Women’s Lit major screeming into a microphone generates more viewers than the couple who found an old man’s stolen scooter. It makes it seem that all women are this crazy but I do feel that the average woman, while wanting equality, is not a crazed militant feminist refusing to shave her pits.

    2. Wow, spitting in someone’s face is considered assault here in Canada. I hope she didn’t get too hurt but what she did was not wise. This may sound harsh but I hope she learned from this, that ignoring losers like that is the best bet.

    3. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
       Discretion being the better part of valor and all that…

    4. The Muslims will teach her not to spit at them; they will also teach her the TRUE meaning of “Patriarchy”.

49. Some feminists are waking up to the fact that men really don’t like their arrogance, hatred, and condescending, self-righteous attitude. They have spent so much time denigrating men and blaming men for their problems, that they have woken up to the fact that men avoid them. There used to be a feminist troll who posted on Roosh’s websites who went by the name “Too good for all of you.” She constantly went on about how supposedly smart, beautiful, and successful she was, and how she was too good for any one on the website. Someone finally called her out and pointed out that if she really was all that great she would be out doing things and wouldn’t be on the web trashing men. Heterosexual feminists are discovering that you can’t treat men like garbage and still expect them to put you on a pedestal. Ironically, it seems that some heterosexual feminists are waking up to the fact that the loudest 3rd wave feminists are angry lesbians who only view men as a scourge of humanity. Some young women are realizing that they can’t trash on men, blame them for their problems, treat men hatefully, and still expect men to pursue them and romance them. They are waking up to the fact that the extremist 3rd wave feminists are mentally ill lesbians who simply don’t want to live at peace with men.
    BTW: Many western feminists are now realizing that they are losing to MGTOW and men looking for wives in other countries.

    1. QUOTE: “Ironically, it seems that some heterosexual feminists are waking up to the fact that the loudest 3rd wave feminists are angry lesbians who only
       view men as a scourge of humanity.”
       You know… you make an excellent point. If I ask myself the question “Why is the 3rd wave feminism OBSESSED with LGBT and other alphabets, it is because THAT IS ALL THAT IS LEFT IN THE MOVEMENT.
       Heterosexual females… have completely abandoned ship. Hetero girls have no love for lesbians, on par with hetero men and gays.
       There is now nothing left in terms of heterosexual female support for feminism. Some women are still brainwashed enough to quote like sheep the talking points, but the drive, the emotional attachment, the MINDS of heterosexual women… are off the feminist reservation BECAUSE it is all about the alphabets. It makes perfect sense to me know.

    2. “Some young women are realizing that they can’t trash on men, blame them for their problems, treat men hatefully, and still expect men to pursue them and romance them.”
       I can’t remember who it was, but this man put it succinctly: (paraphrasing) “I have told women “you can’t hate men into loving you”, but they just don’t seem to understand this simple fact”.

       1. “if women treat men as though they are ogres, they shouldn’t expect men to act like knights in shining armor”. Ernest Hemingway.

    3. Yea I saw those comments that bitch was making, what a pathetic creature, she will die alone with her 10 cats and then the cats will eat her rotting corps…so she will actually BECOME the cat food hahaha.

50. Although the article seems a bit overoptimistic, I think – or at least hope – that there is some truth in it. The feminist narrative is still dominant, but I have an impression there are more and more people who dare to openly question it.
    As to the young generation, I was really glad to read about several recent situations when large groups of 1st year students at British universities walked out in protest from “consent classes” for freshmen. It seems that, after all, they are not as easy to brainwash as one may expect.

    1. Same sentiment here. I hope the same happens en masse in the US.

    2. QUOTE: “The feminist narrative is still dominant, but I have an impression there
       are more and more people who dare to openly question it.”
       Exactly my point. Turn back time even only… 5 years ago. How openly were feminists/liberals/progressives challenged?
       The tide is turning. Trump, win or lose, is just the beginning.

51. One of the things I suggest to all men is that they refuse to enlist and sue the government for gender discrimination if conscripted. Yes – gender discrimination was ruled out as a defense against male-only conscription in the past – but in today’s environment – women’s acceptance of the draft would have to be mandatory or the draft would have to be dropped altogether. This won’t bode well for the so called ‘alpha male’ blue pillers that now dominate our ‘elected’, gynoentrically inclined ‘leaders’ – looking to defend their power and wealth from the supposed ‘betas’.
    Why would the above be such a positive step in ending gynocentrism? Because the primary defense used against including females in the draft would be misogyny – but that would expose deeply embedded cultural misandry and male disposability against men. What’s more – it could be said that nations would be far less inclined to engage in war if it were women’s lives on the line rather than men’s – further exposing cultural misandry and male disposability.
    Furthermore – it could be argued that women should become 100% of the front line fighting force and 100% of conscriptees for as long as men have held the same burden – in reparation to men and the millions upon millions of men’s lives sacrificed for all the the rights women so openly take for granted today.
    Finally – if women are going to demand quotas for the most prestigious, most high paying, most powerful positions – then in a fair trade, men should be given quotas working in the majority of nice, comfy safe, air conditioned jobs that women primarily dominate.

    1. I can already sense possible machinations to my comment, so I’ll address them here through a self-reply:
       One might argue that since women are the ‘givers of life’, women should not be conscripted nor held to national defense. This objection is easily nullified by pointing out that many women do not have children and still more abort potential life. We could have a national registry – like the proposed national sex offenders registry – that lists all of the women who’ve never given birth and are therefore eligible for conscription and/or mandatory female-only combat quotas.
       Another argument might be that – rather that the ‘givers of life’, women have become the ‘arbiters of death’ through mass abortion. Added to the aforementioned national registry could be women that have taken the potential lives of the unborn as candidates for mandatory conscription and mandatory front-line female-only, quota enforced combat positions.
       What’s more – the left is quite fond of claiming the world is over populated. Hence, by reducing the prime aged female population via mandatory female conscription and mandatory quotas for female front-line combat positions – the world might experience less over-population.
       Finally – women outnumber men by around 5 million in the US – so reducing the female population would add stability and remove gynocentric bias in the voting system.
       Such a lovely thing – this two-way identity politics street – is it not?

       1. Suggest it to Trump. 🙂

52. There needs to be a women for the restoration for Patriarchy.

53. Bring back slut shaming. It works
    Bring back traditional roles.
    Start a website hosting pics of mud sharking interracial women by city, so men can view them in their degenerate sickness for a lifetime of posterity.

54. It’s trendy to be an “anti-feminist” young woman. It’s about attention not ideology. Feminism ends when men force it to end not when women decide it should end.

55. Quite simply I believe there is a massive cognitive dissonance in most western women’s psyches, which in effect has them pretending to be one thing empowered, strong, independent and secure in themselves. The reality clear to at least all red pill men who date is the complete opposite to this. Never in the history of humankind have women been so lost, angry, vulnerable and insecure.
    But still they protest and won’t concede this. My dating life these days seems to be spent treating women the complete opposite from how they say they want to be. It really is a crazy situation mirroring a great big elephant in the room that very few people apart from us are talking about.

56. As long as all the laws in place that criminalize men’s normal behavior such as “Yes means Yes” laws in colleges and other insane legislations that destroy a man in a divorce setting are around, there can be no ultimate victory. Feminism can only truly be vanquished into the bottomless pit when those laws are reformed and all funding for gender and women’s studies are completely cut from all tertiary education.

57. Good article. My oldest boy (18 yrs old) is dating a 17-year-old former model (worked with Wilhelmina agency in NYC). She quit after a few gigs because she found the lifestyle abhorrent. While those two were not in the majority at their high school, they do seem to represent a minority of young people that are starting seeing the folly of the previous two or three generations for what they are.
    Incidentally, I’m a former Army infantry officer and raised my boy outside, hunting, backpacking, fishing, etc. It takes a lot of time and parenting to resist all-prevalent consumerism and materialism.

    1. Did she provide proof of her virginity? Remember to tell your son: no hymen, no diamond

       1. He is away at college now but keeps ties with her, and is making new friends too. So yeah, “dating” may not have been the right choice of terminology.

58. Those of us who were around to see the collapse of the Soviet Union, it was a very hopeful time. People were uniting in the face of tyranny. Things looked great for half a decade, until we realized the Communists didn’t go away. They just changed tactics.

59. I think it is too late. Men do not like getting kicked in the balls. It is very true that women do not understand men nor men women. I as a man have been suffering these women’s hatred of my man hood all my life. Love can be killed, and once it is dead can it ever be resurrected? I feel cold inside. Like trying to draw air through a collapsed straw. I know for a fact that as a man no woman will ever truly love me, no woman will ever truly respect or appreciate me. Even my fellow males will view me either as a resource to be used and thrown away or as an enemy to be destroyed. What does that leave me with? There is nothing left now but the end. There is nothing left now but for what we have inherited and built to crumble under its own weight. It is too late women for you have murdered love. It is too late men for you have consumed the hearts of each other. A very very dark age is approaching.

    1. Thank you for your comment. I think it is easy to go dark, very dark, about the future. I can’t and won’t try to convince you otherwise.
       All I will recommend… is to watch a sunrise, and a sunset, and realize just how beautiful the world is, right now, at that moment. And then contemplate that such beauty at the beginning of day, and at the end, is permanent, forever, and can never be destroyed by anything. And that you, yes you, are a living part of that living beauty that is creation because you are alive to experience it, to feel it, to take part in it.
       Once you realize this truth… their can be no more darkness in your life no matter what happens to you.

60. A largely insightful summation of the modern state of women in feminism but as an old-timer, want to add my 2 cents and minor quibble.
    Having traveled and seen how women behave outside of feminized societies, I think it’s important to note that men and women both need to be socialized to be decent human beings. As in The Lord Of The Flies, our natural state is barbarism. RoK encourages men to improve themselves rather than just rail against the system or give up. Throwing yourself off a building is not going to help your cause. The same should go for women and the PUA mentality prevalent in the west encourages men to not build women up as good women but rather “pump and dump”. This is unfortunately not much different than the modern-traditional dating style of clown game, hooking up, and perhaps getting married later.
    In non-feminized societies, women appreciate men and take an interest in pursuing them. I repeat that: That pretty Russian blonde in the article if she was in Russia would be “gaming” men just like western men do women. She’d spot the man whose reliable, got good earning potential, and healthy and move in for the kill. Outside of the Anglosphere, I felt eyes on me from women but in a good way. Judgmental or interested, the women were acting like adults and taking a proactive interest in their future rather than waiting to be “picked up”. They also could reject unwanted men with tact, humanity, and self-interest.

    1. “Both men and women need to be socialized to be decent human beings”
       That is exactly what we turned away from in the 60’s and 70’s when people walked away from church. One generation later, we are stuck in this feminist/barbarian battle. Women started this with the feminist “have their cake and eat it too” attitude. Human nature is human nature, and so the resulting slutty behavior is coupled with the the fag hipsters or players. There are religious circles that aren’t like that, but it isn’t a guarantee that you will find a choice mate either

       1. My wife likes to attend the Saint Mathews church in DC because it’s a lovely piece of architecture and the choir sings so well. Nonetheless, it’s about as conservative as a planned parenthood meeting. The priest asked us to pray for those who suffered from global warming. I almost laughed out loud (LOL).
          I went to a fundamentalist church (one of those that really gets into God a little bit too much) and the women were kind of b*tchy, quite frankly. They acted like their p*ssies were the property of Jesus (kind of like nuns) and men had to jump through hoops to earn their favors even AFTER getting married (and they often were materialistic as well). In some ways, they were as bad as feminists in their own way.
          I think what worked in the old days was a combination of a stigma against divorced people (men and women both), a minimum of alimony or “child” support (especially for unwed mothers) and this is forgotten as well, a system where employers were expected to protect married men (and widowed women) from economic layoffs. Also, before the Nixon administration, a married couple wasn’t penalized if the wife didn’t work in the tax system.
          There were cracks at the time that caused the whole culture to avalanche: chivalrous idealism and sexual pruditry combined with a mass media culture selling sex on the other hand caused a collapse of the above social contract as relations between the sexes were worsening even without modern feminism. Saint Thomas Aquinas observed that without prostitution, all women became whores as free men would pester all single women solely for sex (essentialy, being PUAs).
          All that being said, the nicest girls probably still can be found at church events and the last one I attended I saw some PUAs (with crude game) trying to hit on them. It was kind of hilarious. These women were foreign born or 2nd generation so they were nobody’s fools.

          1. No doubt that there were problems arising before feminism reared it’s ugly head. Simple modern technology and the electric washing machine created a gap were women were not as necessary around the house, add to that the public school system doing the raising of children during the day created a society where women did not feel needed.(much like men today are feeling unneeded or unwanted because of the public dole). The reality is, both are needed for a stable society. In the 70’s we seen women who were neglecting their homemaking duties in order to find a career and become more mannish so they can seek fulfillment on the other side of the fence, and now we have men neglecting their provider duties (becoming more girly) to seek fulfillment elsewhere. At the end of the yellow brick road, there is no fulfillment. Not only that, but we had the power to gain fulfillment all along. Women living alone with their cats, and beer bellied old men, talking about their glory days of chasing tail doesn’t sound that appealing. The guy who put the effort, married, and is surrounded by kids or grandkids sounds much more fulfilling to me.

          2. Keep in mind that the myth of the 1950’s housewife was mostly leftist marxist propaganda (I consider Soviet marxism to be right wing but that’s a long story).
             My grandmother worked outside of the home not for fulfillment but rather to help contribute to the household finances. It was not a “prize” or burden but rather a fact of life. My grandmother helped manage the family grocery store. Many women worked in textiles before outsourced to China (or replaced by Latino labor in Los Angeles which still produces a lot of textiles in the states for high end fashion)
             Even now and during the 50’s, childcare could take up a lot of time. I have a 7 month old myself and during waking hours, it can suck up my wife’s time: When the baby isn’t needing to be played with, she sleeps. That’s when my wife can (quietly) do some cleaning and meal preparation. And perhaps take a nap. With a family of 4, that’s a good 6 years minimum of a mother having to be on baby patrol. As the children get older and go to school (perhaps after 10 years total or so), then there is more time for the mother to relax and use the “time saving appliances” to clean the house and prepare meals and work part time which most did. After the kids are teenagers, even back in the 1950’s, the women were back at work full time more or less and kids were expected to do chores and contribute.
             What was different back then was that the notion of “independance” or “PUA” wasn’t as big. People in their teens and early 20’s dated with marriage as the end goal while for men back in the late 50’s, it was “hooking up” and for the women, it was “meal ho’ing” Materialism was kicking in mostly on the feminist side: Movies and TV portrayed families with luxury goods that could suck up a (recently invented) credit card like a hoover deluxe: designer bags, shoes, restaurants were what many career women aspired to show off to each other as the “new normal”. I lived during that era. Men bought things such as fishing boats or tinkering with cars which could be expensive, but were largely affordable and even useful in helping to provide leisure activities for the family.

          3. True, true traditionalism women worked

          4. I neglect my provider duties because what self respecting man in there right mind wants to provide for a bunch of spoiled entitled brats?..

          5. Agreed, not worth doing respectful work if that work doesn’t earn respect

61. “My wing of feminism—the pro-sex wing—was silenced.”
    Camille Paglia can’t be serious. Sex Positive Feminism is huge. Thanks Camille!

62. Frankly, as long as I’ve got my vote, and I’m paid the same rate as a man in the same role with the same experience, qualifications and skill level (and there are laws to ensure that) then feminism has done it’s job. They like to throw around buzzwords like ‘rape culture’ and ‘patriarchy’ but it takes a simple look at places like the middle east to know what a real rape culture and patriarchal society looks like. Feminism can step down now, unless they’re planning to do something about the middle east or address the fact that family courts lean in favour of the woman in the majority of child custody and divorce proceedings. And we all know feminists will not speak out about inequalities that benefit women.

63. I don’t see how feminism is dead, when millennial women are making more money than men, get hired more easily than men, and have 100x the dating options that the average joe has. On top of that, their dating criteria is too demanding for an average joe, even an above average joe. They keep ditching good men left and right (From what I saw in my social circle). How is feminism dead? It is very well alive and killing good men every day.

    1. Alex. The problem is what you see as “good men” is in fact “not so great”.
       They my look like good men but in reality they are semi-eunuchs who did conform to modern society way too much.
       Look at Conan. Look very closely. This is what men look like.
       A strong body from work or war – not sitting in an office 10 hours a day.
       A strong mind born from a place of strength – conan needs noone, he can do very well on his own. Nobody to pay him social security or a paycheck. If the guards want to arrest him, he fights them and gives a shit.
       Conan is proud to have many strong children. Can you imagine conan using a condom or asking a woman to take the pill or worse for an aborition because he can not affort it?
       Conan takes what he wants. If he see a rich guy with a hot woman he will climb the wall, knock out the guards and the husband and have his time with her. 9 months later she may very well give birth to a new conan and it will be her lovechild.
       Conan is free.
       Now if you look at modern society, we have progressed far. But it was not without drawbacks. We have it save, we have it cosy, we have enough to eat, we have it warm, we have everything.
       This made us weak. We are a looong way from conan. A long way from what women realy respect in a man.
       The more you are like conan, the more respect you will get. From both men and women. Thats the secret of steel – the weapon is nothing, the hand wielding it is everything.

       1. Good point but the fact is, women respect looks and status, and average guys are pretty much fucked in the dating game. Even if they were to act like Conan, I’m pretty sure that they would end up empty handed without any broad.
          To make matters worse, millennial women have taken over the job market, which makes it very difficult for men to get hired and STAY hired in the long run. So most of them already have a higher status than us.

       2. Awesome analysis. Currently reading Howard’s original collected works. Absolutely stunning writing. Would never get printed today in my opinion.

          1. Howard who?

          2. Robert E. The creator of Conan The Barbarian.

          3. Thnx

       3. “the secret of steel – the weapon is nothing, the hand wielding it is everything”…………NICE!

64. Please remember that there needs to be a balance. Jesus liberated women and equality is the result of a Godly nation. Women should be able to work and go to school and be respected and what-have-you, while the man remains in a position of authority in the family. The balance shouldn’t tip to feminism or misogyny. We just need to have some common sense.

    1. Women dont have common sense … hence the glaring flaw in jesus liberating women

65. #WomenAgainstFeminism
    Awesome! Love them all.

66. This article might counter act the low t experienced by democrat manginas.

67. Fucking Boomers. The worst generation…

68. Feminism is cancer, it will die on its own…goodbye you fruitcakes.

69. You talk about Western Feminism, yet try to prove your point by using a Russian girl?
    The thing is, that these “Anti-Feminism” girls may hold up these signs and may not be complete nutjob Hitler types, but they still are “Feminists when it suits them”.
    They will still claim to be “equal” to men, which is not true.
    They will demand equal pay, yet expect the man to pick up the check.
    They still buy into the “career first” mindset.
    They still get “Bobs”.
    They still curse and will talk right over men and expect the man to shut up.
    The only difference is that they’re not out in the street screaming about it and their attitudes ard calmed. But they’re very much Feminists. So their signs should read:
    “I am not a crazy eyed, fish mouthed, Skrillex wearing, vagina hat FemiNazi who screams at men in the street. Instead, I prefer to esmasculate my men in the privacy and comfort of my home, which is mine and any man who doesn’t like what I’m saying can get the f*ck out!”

Comments are closed.