Culture

What The Future Of News Will Look Like

119 Comments

The mainstream media is in free fall collapse. Big outlets are laying off workers by the hundreds, the masses have low trust for politically correct articles, entire TV networks are getting pushed around by the likes of Donald Trump, crushing lawsuits are making their unethical practices obsolete, and their blatant hoaxes are being immediately called out instead of slipping under the radar. We are firmly in the eye of a turbulent storm that will lead to a new order for news.

The siren node

news-node

Right now there is opportunity for “siren nodes” to start their own news outlet. A siren node is an individual who has built up enough trust within his network that he is fed scoops before it reaches the desks of mainstream journalists. All the big guys you know in the alt sphere, including myself, are siren nodes, a position that we can then leverage into forming a rudimentary news organization along the the likes of Charles J Johnson’s Got News. Once Johnson became an entrenched siren node, people began sending him daily tips without him having to seek them out.

The biggest problem with the indie news approach is that the profit margin is razor thin. News is the most expensive non-video content you can produce, and competition is incredibly high. If you’re just one hour late with your story then you will get scooped and miss out on tens of thousands of pages views, losing out on untold recognition and glory. If you want to do news, you must have cat-like readiness to the smallest perturbation of the news cycle and be more on-call than an emergency room doctor.

Another problem is that advertising alone will not be sufficient to keep indie news operations afloat, especially in a time where readers are getting annoyed at ads and seeking out blocking solutions. If the mainstream guys can’t make a profit, with their in-house MBAs trying to monetize even inch of content, it won’t be easy for the little guys either. This means that indie news outlets will certainly be required to use crowd-donation efforts (Kickstarter, Patreon, etc.) or sell their own products.

Why the old media won’t completely die

washington-post-bezos

Old media will find it impossible to run a profit, but most outlets will continue to survive as pet projects for oligarchs who need to push out their agenda in the form of propaganda. One oligarch will buy Newspaper A to focus on his global warming agenda, another oligarch will buy another Newspaper B to aid his immigration agenda, and so on. These oligarchs will accept their money-losing outlets as merely the cost of doing business. What’s a $100 million a year loss for your own personal Pravda if it’s making you $1 billion a year through favorable government policies and modified consumer behavior?

You’ll always see the big names like Washington Post and Guardian exist, but their news desks will be gutted and replaced with cheap scribes who pump out Buzzfeed-like garbage with the occasional propaganda piece thrown in. It will be a race to the bottom in terms of quality, pushing additional readers away from these outlets to indie news, especially as the narrative continues to fade away. Oligarchs will have no love for the “news tradition,” putting thousands of veteran journalists out of a job to be replaced by low-wage millennials who believe that rape culture is the number one problem in the world. Most of the journalists who wrote attack pieces against me and Return Of Kings in February will be out of a job within five years.

How indie news will evolve

alex-jones-infowars

Indie news sites will start niche, focusing on specific areas, and out-scoop or embarrass old media outlets that will find themselves in an increasingly small box of political correctness. Each indie news site will be relatively small, serving under 1 million users a month, and so there will be a logical push for them to merge and create outlets that look very similar to old media. Until then, expect indie news to be rough around the edges with typos and a lack of fancy multimedia content like custom charts and original photography.

The best example of how a large indie news outlet will look like is Info Wars. It started as small news site that piggybacked off of Alex Jones’ radio show but now pumps out 40 articles a day, much of it original reporting. They have a TV studio and a growing staff of journalists. Their main way of making money is not through advertising but through the sale of supplements that fit the overall conspiracy and survivalist theme of the news it offers. Within a few years, you will see several additional outlets that are similar to Info Wars in providing both print and video coverage.

Indie media outlets will compete head-on with a zombified old guard composed mostly of “true believers” to the social justice cause. Old media will be able to survive on brand recognition for many years until they get driven into the ground, and then the oligarchs will simply buy the indie media sites before destroying them, just like they did with Vice.

Another option I anticipate is for old media to create outlets that appear indie, such as the billionaire-owned The Intercept, but still share massive overlap with the establishment on umbrella issues like feminism and immigration. It’ll be increasingly important for you to know who owns the outlet you’re reading, and which agendas that owner has vested interests in.

Why I won’t get into news

sisyphus

As of now I have no intention of starting a news outlet that goes beyond the occasional news article you see here. Other than being a low profit business, the news business is too much of a grind. The news never stops, and you can’t even rest after a successful scoop because the insatiable public demands more. I’d be more inclined to get into news if I had an agenda that was monetarily tied to my business, such as if I was a globalist who needed massive amounts of cheap labor. I also don’t have a go-getter or fast-paced nature that is required for news operations.

https://twitter.com/rooshv/status/712072306647048192

I will move into focusing more on timeless content that doesn’t go stale after two days, and which can give value to the reader for years. Such “long tail” articles are also more friendly to advertising revenues and promotional tie-ins, but this means I will miss out on the daily action and fun of being a part of the hectic news cycle. There are always trade offs.

Conclusion

The news industry is being realigned as we speak. The old media will lose a lot of jobs and readership, but still maintain enough influence that it’s worthwhile to run for those with money-driven global agendas. Indie news will rise forth and cause a lot of pain to the establishment but remain niche until they mimic the old guard and form more professional outlets along the model of Info Wars. Either way, opportunity has arrived, and I have no doubt that ambitious men will take advantage of that. I just won’t be one of them.

This article was originally published on Roosh V. 

Read Next: Roosh Destroys Media At Washington DC Press Conference

119 thoughts on “What The Future Of News Will Look Like”

  1. yay FIRST!!!!
    jokes aside….I don’t see the old news companies dying off or ever really going away. there will always be TV which means there will always be news channels. then you have radio programs like Hannity, Rush, and glenn beck that draw a lot of ratings as well.
    while I see the news system changing perhaps….I dont see it ever going away. theres too much money invested into the current system. and anyone that wants the off beat conspiracy news….we all know where info wars is. and coast to coast AM is still a very viable thing as well on the radio.

      1. Thats what the internet is. Im sure when TV came out, radio and print were scared to death. In fact, the internet did more for “radio” and “print” than TV ever did.

      2. honestly Im not sure what could replace TV as a thing. nor is there a real reason to replace TV.
        TV has accomplished its goal by the elites. it is in every home. it’s future companion the smartphone has managed to fit right along side the TV without kicking it out. TV is simply too effective of a tool to brainwash and pacify people.
        EDIT:
        I’ll also add that TV appeals to the older generation as well. for instance anyone over 60 isnt likely to view this new media as better. plenty of old folks like my parents will never get into netflix or other media outlets. they just wont. they can youtube but on a computer or smartphone but not the TV.
        TV keeps all generations pacified.

        4. people say that….yet most who do are smartphone netflix junkies.
          even if you arent….well congrats that’s one in a million and the plan of the elites goes unaffected.

        5. It amuses me how many of our red pill brothers assure us they stopped watching tv shows years ago, but when ROK publishes an article about sitcoms or Game Of Thrones you can count on these same men in the comment section to describe all the episodes and cast of characters, proving that Hollywood can always get them to discover a need they never knew they had. My quality of life did not suffer as a result of not knowing or caring what the hell they’re talking about.

        6. Yeah its not the TV that’s the problem. Its the stuff that comes out of the tiny hole in the wall that’s the problem.

        7. Yeah true. Im on the “threw TV out a year a go” team, However I game on my PC for hours a day, I doubt there is anyone these days that is truly digital free.

    2. As long as the Jews print our money, we will never be free.
      And as long as the Jews print our money, they will have the “cash” to run any “media outlet” they wish to run.

      1. this is also true. but i like to think there are still a few rare souls that arent paid for by said Jews and the other elites. rare as they may be.

    3. You do realize the top TV news program views are in the low hundred thousands. As an example, there are more conservatives who listen to NPR than there are Fox News viewers.

    1. everyone listen to the “Dangerous Internet Sea Otter” who has risen from the seas like an angry prophet!!!

        2. Fool….The Dangerous Internet Sea Otter not only has learned the ways of “the computer” but he commands the respect of the seabeasts who laugh at your foolish toys the coast guard uses.

        6. “lmao…man yall got me in tears today. I appreciate this”
          Arise my brothers, someone has infiltrated our prophet and convinced him to bring down our fourth wall of defense. find the landwhale responsible for this so she may be dealt with quickly and swiftly.

      2. “Next time I’m in a biocave, don’t send me a level 2 homing call”

    2. Its a bummer that, because its a comedy, its like no one takes its arguments seriously.
      You’ll find that many of the “red pill” types perceive the movie as insightful, and many people of above average intelligence will chalk it up to mocking Republicans and arbitrary, but well crafted comedy. I’m not saying Mike Judge is on Huxley’s level in terms of understanding social metrics and applying a seemingly impossible capacity for accurate foresight, or discerning the ends of contemporary realities we face. I don’t think he was even trying to be political or profound. Judge was just trying to make a good comedy story that made people think a little, based on realities he percieved.
      But the stupidity of the cultural vacuum that is mindless consumerism, the subservice towards exploitative forces, the brokenness of dumbed down and subverted minds, the grotesque result of dysgenic societal practices, etc.. These are some of the things we readily accept as bitter realities in our journey for self improvement. (When I say we, I mean modern men who are into philosophy, self improvement, Roosh and QC’s Neomasculinity, MGTOW etc). And its important that we take these things seriously and attempt to discuss them, for ourselves, those who depend on us, and generations of the future. We can be like /pol but less meme-based and actionable.

      1. great post man. I really can’t add anything else to that, seriously.
        I read an interview with him, where he was even saying himself that when he made the movie, he didn’t even think it would be remotely possible to seeming so true to reality today. one thing for sure, he’s got amazing intuition.

        1. Idiocracy plus Office Space should be enough to get Judge some lifetime achievement award when the rest of society catches up to his ideas.
          Side note: I met the guy who got kicked in the balls at the end of Idiocracy, the one with the stutter. He was nice but weird. I also dated one of the film’s producers for a short while, but she didn’t really want to talk about Judge, or the movie, so whatever.

        2. true genius level work man. it’s crazy that alot of things in the idiocracy movie are trending towards true, way ahead of his time.
          damn that’s pretty cool, I guess you would have to end up pretty weird when ppl just remember you for getting kicked in the balls for the rest of your life lol

  3. Spot on, Roosh.
    My wife used to be a game industry blogger, mainly for fun, as the pay was so low. She worked for one of the larger outlets and was then laid off last year after saying thanks but no thanks to her boss’s request that she generate the same amount of content for 1/3 the salary, lol.
    There truly is no money in blogging/news. It’s for people who are a) very dedicated almost to the point of obsession and b) who don’t care about profit.

    1. The first thing I though of when I read the title of the article was “Idiocracy come to life”. Yup.
      The reason for this I thin is simple: people think news should be free. Free = worthless = easily manipulated and maligned. The day that we as a culture value honest reporting enough that we’re willing to pay for it again… we’ll have real, independent journalists. Until then… we’re fucked.

      1. I’m a big fan of Mike Judge. He definitely has a solid understanding of Western society.

      2. Being an actual journalist is hard, thankless work. It takes dozens of hours to do the research for a single piece, not to mention the weeks (years?) it takes to cultivate sources who serve as the foundation of said piece in the first place.
        And yet your average investigative journalist makes what, 40K annually?
        It’s a joke, and it’s no wonder that the vast majority of these guys make shit up, fabricate sources, etc.

        1. I would bet the pressure is high to make stuff up, because so much of journalism is disposable. Write a killer article about a big investigative project, and 6 hours after publication it’s old news. The risk/rewards are out of whack.

        2. Are you telling me working as a journalist for 8 hrs/day is harder than anyone else working 8 hrs a day at any other job?
          You don’t see car mechanics “making shit up” because their job is thankless.
          Fucking do your job, and do it well. And if you don’t like it, get another fucking job you precious little snowflake.

    2. this “ad” killed me the first time I saw…also:Buttfuckers hamburgers

  5. Say we put a few things into play at the same time here then:
    1) Virtual Reality
    2) Minority Report-style advertising
    3) Absolute Totalitarianism
    That’s a recipe for complete and total mind control and without anything remotely similar to traditional news formats being needed.
    Suppose you just plug in and without even knowing it are bombarded by audio and visual subliminal messaging from Press Start, then the virtual environment is literally scrolling product placement. People will go in big for it and never question because it’s just non-harmful entertainment. Couple the sensory stimuli with addiction and no one jacked into it will give a damn because they’ll be living in tropical beach-side estates fucking supermodels tailored to their most lusted after specifications.
    Maybe a long time coming, but it’s also likely closer than we think.
    And I’m not certain that the people running the current media are terminating these employees for any other reason than to more firmly and dementedly double-down on the narrative, that is the SJW way after all. They didn’t watch the Matrix or Citizen Kane and see a warning, they saw a guide.

    1. Got an HTC Vive this week and have been playing around with it. Let me tell you, virtual reality is going to be some scary shit in terms of influencing kids and the weak-minded.
      And it’s not as far off as some people think.

    2. I was discussing last night how the next generation of kids is going to have unfettered access to VR porn and how that is going to affect their skills and abilities in dealing with people in real life. Kids today already think people actually fuck like in the dirty movies. Adding VR is going to really screw with them.

      1. Agreed, just imagine when that gets coupled with the rise in gay and tranny porn to reinforce what they’ll be learning at school about “gender identity” and the likely androgyny push from the earlier article.
        Add zoophilia, necrophilia, and ideas like Lolicon or Shota from Japan. I’m betting there will be plenty sign up to bang Vocaloids, futanari, or characters from Zootopia
        Gonna be one funked up smelly stew.

        1. Dafuq is a lollican or shota?
          I dont know half of what you are talking about

        2. I’ve been too long in this damnable realm we call the internet and can’t unlearn what I know (it’s why I unplug periodically and take in no electronic media for that time).
          Basically it boils down to drawing legal age female characters but with very childish features or in real life it’s when young Japanese women dress up in costume that would better suit a child and usually with a theme (like say Gothic or Victorian era clothing).
          In the case of shota having male non-legal age characters have sex with older women (since you know, the hypocrisy that women can’t be sexual predators, so that’s fine).

    3. Hopefully the system will collapse before the world turns into one giant virtual swedish prison.

      1. Gigantic sweetish prison isn’t the good kind like on the pay tv channels right?

    1. Saudis are not the ones working on the oil wells.
      So what do we need Saudis for ? Saudi Arabia is a cancer.
      I will do everything in my power to eliminate all Muslims and Jews who want to destroy whites. They are our enemies.

      1. Yeah but they know their time is up and are buying the shit out of everything before the rest of the world catches up. They bought 51% of Canada’s wheat board.

      1. in one of his videos, he briefly explained the context behind the “how to stop rape” article, so i think he visits.

  7. It was ADVERTISING that supported the old-school “unbiased” newsroom (circa 1945 to 2005). Newspapers lived and died by ads, especially classified ads, which brought in nearly 80% of their revenue. Basically, they remained “independent” because JC Penney wanted their Memorial Day sale ads to reach the maximum number of eyeballs.
    Now that JC Penney ads are gone and the classified ads have moved to craigslist, the papers have no reason to stay “unbiased”.
    We’re returning to the pre-WWII form of journalism, in which every outlet has an agenda. Pick the agenda you agree with, and find justification for all your thoughts. This neo-journalism won’t help us become better thinkers, but it will provide confirmation bias.
    Nice one, Roosh.

    1. A friend moved to an upper mid west state recently, so I looked up the state’s history. I was surprised to learn that, around 1900 or so, this sparsely populated state had six newspapers. Guess who owned four of them? Rockefeller.

        1. I know, you know, most people dont know. Theres never been “free” press in this country. Walter Cronkite said he was “muzzled” the last 20 yrs of his career

    2. Don’t forget though that this goes hand in hand with subscriptions. Those ads only reached eyeballs if people paid for the paper in the first place. Newspapers can’t sell ads not only because retailers don’t want to piss off customers, but also because they can’t guarantee that anyone will read the ads because subscriptions are in a death spiral.
      One of the big problems for media is that they give their content away for free. Anyone with any sense knows that there isn’t much value in something that’s free. So it’s really no surprise that modern “news” is crap. There is still a market for information that people will pay for, but it is much more narrowly tailored than old media used to be. The general populace isn’t willing to pay much for news these days because they no longer have to with the internet, but also because it really isn’t worth that much to them. How much of the shit that’s in the WP or NYT every day do you really need to know? When the answer is basically nothing, the price you’ll pay is also basically nothing.

      1. There’s a big problem with investigative journalism. Bloggers have stepped in and provided free news services to replace the old media. I read infowars and enjoy reading independent news from bloggers, (Steve Lendman has stuff mainstream media would never tell you). But a blogger writing an article for free can’t afford to do a deep investigation the way the big boys do like Woodward, Bernstein, Hersh, etc. They can’t go to the Mideast for a month like Taibbi. They can’t follow around politicians for months. So what’s the solution?
        I would crowdfund an investigative journalist like Seymour Hersh. But a lot of that is simply because he’s well known and has a track record of giving a huge middle finger to the establishment. What about the up and coming guys who want to cut their teeth and prove themselves? I suppose you can work for a handful of big papers like the Post or the News, but investigative journalism seems like it is dying. Under a capitalist system, it’s simply more profitable to pay peanuts to the HuffPo 20 year old girls that we saw yesterday to churn out clickbait articles to earn fractions of a pennies for viewing weird ads for stuff no one is buying.

        1. Yeah, part of the problem is market saturation. How many journalists do we really need?
          And I’ll admit that I occasionally read really compelling pieces of investigative journalism even in the WP and NYT, etc… But the vast majority of the content is just clickbait. Part of the problem is that with the internet and the ability to widely share information, you just don’t need as many journalists to get the word out.
          There is still a market for information, and people will pay for it. You and I just won’t read it because it will be buried in an intelligence report, or a confidential corporate due diligence briefing, etc… If you eliminated 90% of the noise that exists in “journalism,” picked a core focus for your outlet, and went hard at that, you could probably turn a nice profit with a very tight crew in journalism. But old media still thinks I need to come to one place for news about what’s going on in my neighborhood, sports scores, national politics, science, crime, classifieds, advice columns, business, technology, entertainment, etc… I can find better information on every single one of those topics, and much faster, from a source that isn’t the WP. Funny that you never hear about the providers of those services, many of them still charging subscriptions, having trouble turning profits.
          By trying to do too much, Old Media is working towards being able to do nothing. An outlet like the WP ought to cut everything except that which it is uniquely poised to do – politics – and focus hard on that, requiring subscription to view. It should aggregate news and have deeper investigative journalism. If it did this, I bet it could turn around. But the buggy makers want to pretend those automobiles are going to un-invent themselves…..

      2. One reason I won’t subscribe to a newspaper is because of the incredible bias. If they showed integrity I’d pay. I’m not stingy: I fund RooshV and several others. Now Retrurn of Kings is biased to a certain market but it doesn’t lie, or censor to suite an agenda and hide its own lies by blocking posts. Sure some of the articles in RoK is a bit shallow but it’s not being peddled as brain surgery.
        I was actually thinking of subscribing to one paper in Australia when that paper lied about RooshV’s “how to stop rape” story and I realised they lacked ethics and integrity.

    4. Dear Roosh,
      I feel there is a news market you could enter. You could create an aggregator page in the style of the DrudgeReport. You could create revenue from this through advertising just as Drudge does. It could link to news stories all around the world and also to some of the news commentary pieces you publish on Roosh V and Return Of Kings. It would link to the stories that the MainStreamMedia ignore. You could run the page 24/7 by having people share shifts in return for a share of revenue/ownership. You could even create some commentary articles for this site.
      Regards

  9. Black boy Will Smith complained about the lack of “diversity” in the Academy.
    I don’t see him protesting against the lack of diversity in the top ranks of the Hollywood studios. They ‘re all fucking Jews.
    I don’t see him protesting against the lack of diversity in the media. So many Jews there …
    Who prints the money ? The Jews. Who controls us, as a result of this ? The Jews.

      1. Apparently the Joos in Hollywood essentially operate like Eyes Wide Shut according to recent reports. It doesn’t really surprise me though that they would make a movie about what they actually do. That is just the arrogance of leftist Joos.

      2. According to celebrity Tranny Alexis Arquette he’s sold his ass. According to his wife they’ve got an open marriage and can do whatever they like.
        “When Jada comes out as gay and her beard husband admits his first marriage ended when she walked in to him … servicing his Sugar Daddy Benny Medina … then I will listen to them,” Arquette wrote in a since-deleted Facebook post on Tuesday, according to the Daily Mail.

  10. http://www.rense.com is also an example of the future of news. A news aggregator web site pulling news from multiple (often opposing) viewpoints to give savvy readers a much more accurate perception of world events. They combine this with their own original content.

  11. Sounds like you need to start hocking Roosh brand Kratom and Fleshlights for the guys, and tattoo removal kits and fat burning pills for the chicks.

      2. You can just get them to shave it off then wait for it to grow back to its natural colour.

  13. Also the oligarchs can use the losses from their bullhorn propaganda outlets as tax write offs. The major record labels used to do the same with indie labels to bring on new talent. If the indie label made losses as a subsidiary the losses were just written off against the main company’s profits.

  14. Reminds me of that great scene from Citizen Kane, when the oligarch Kane says, about his newspaper: “You’re right, I did lose a million dollars last year. I expect to lose a million dollars this year. I expect to lose a million dollars next year. You know, Mr. Thatcher, at the rate of a million dollars a year, I’ll have to close this place in… 60 years.”
    These days, it’s just more zeros and the oligarchs are named Bezos, Turner, Murdoch, Zuckerberg, etc.

  15. P.S. Alex Jones is a shill for the ZOG. He reveals much already known facts about the governments and oligarchs of the world but never talks about how Israel and their Euro/American counterpart cucks are building the cradle for this NWO of mixed-race atheist hedonist chimpivilization. The idea behind what he supports is good, but what he is is a sellout and part of the controlled opposition. The bread crumbs only go so far and yet their everywhere, no one is without deception nowadays.

    1. “Race” is a darwinistic term created by Charles Darwin who’s father was an elite and sons are eugenicists

  18. All well and good until the rouge media outlet gets approached by a multi billion dollar insurance company and “Sponsored Content” starts to show up. The average person cant tell the difference between news and an advert so we are right back where we began.
    Or worse, once the rouge media outlet gains popularity and trust, they start to push their own agendas.
    I think its impossible for any human to be completely neutral.
    And everyone can be bought for a price.

  19. I saw an interesting stat the other day, not sure if it’s accurate or corroborated: women occupy the top three positions in over 60% of news rooms. The news is now by and for women. It explains the growth of fluff news in even “news papers of record” that used to take themselves seriously. I’ll see if I can dig it up.
    As I have been saying for a while, TV and the Internet is for women. It’s not for us. So now is the news as well.

      1. Respectfully disagree. Where is the money? Social media and online shopping, and who doe gossip, relationships and shopping appeal to? Men might make up the majority of users, but the direct path to cash is through women. Web 1.0 was about individual passion, but 2.0 is all about monetizing the internet.

  20. There is an extremely high likelihood that all of the major mainstream media news outlets are owned by Blue Blood elitist families (in other words, the intelligence community, because, if you research it and go down the rabbit hole deep enough, you’ll find out the two are one and the same). They own most of the well-known “truther” websites, too, which are set up as controlled opposition…
    They also utilize myriad storefront cutouts who play-act and serve as “the guy who founded the billion-dollar computer/Internet company by tinkering around in his garage” (i.e., Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Spencer Raskoff, et al). But in reality these guys are straw men who did no such thing, and usually come from Blue Blood families, and the idea here is to make you think that you, too, can start a company from scratch and become a billionaire – which you can’t. All the seed money for those companies came from Blue Blood-backed start-up funds, and those same Blue Blood families scripted the whole charade and in the end they own the vast majority of the stock, too. And all they needed to pull the scam off was a decent actor (usually a relative) to pretend he’s the genius who figured it all out and made a billion dollars on his own (just because, you know, he’s so gosh-darned smart!), and they’ve got you hooked on going to college and becoming a debt slave to the banks they own. (And they own everything else, too, including Apple Computer, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Tesla Motors, Zillow, etc.)
    You can find out more about all of this at the following website, although I think the guy who runs it is an intelligence agent himself – http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html – he does throw some solid nuggets of truth out there, because, after all, if he didn’t, you wouldn’t read what he had to say, now, would you? (Check out his work on the Sharon Tate “murders”, and the O.J. Simpson “trial”, both of which were entirely choreographed, fake events, by the way.)
    The only way to find out anything of real value is to do all the research yourself and draw your own conclusions – consider all of the evidence on both sides of any issue, and then make up your mind…or your mind will have already been made up for you.

    1. You’re more correct than you probably know, although less than 1% of guys on this site will be able to grasp it.

    3. Great example is Alex Jones, who is funded by Turner. The comtrolled opposition is strong.

      1. Yup…a blue pill within a red pill. They are all over the place. Jeff Rense, Henry Makow, David Icke, et al. They’re all on the team. They’re Pied Pipers. They play their tune and lead you down a blind alley. The glaring tip-off is the fact that they will bash you about certain subject matter, no matter what evidence you submit. They’re all for freedom of speech, and freedom of opinion, unless you disagree with them. And then they say you’re crazy, just like the MSM talking heads do. Heh. What a scam. (Hey, it works…which is why they do it. Attack the messenger, not the message. People distance themselves from messengers who are called crazy, even if everything they say makes total sense.)

        1. Exactly. The thing that makes Jones worse than people like Icke or someone like Jordan Maxwell is that Jones appears to be like us; alt right, libertarian, red pill, and most importantly Christian. Whereas Icke and company don’t hide their new age, liberal minded narrative, so as long as you know where they stand if you pay close enough attention.

  21. This article is absolutely spot on Roosh. The era of relatively unbiased attempts at objective news have been over for 10 years. From that point the media has entered this creepy soft propaganda and language sharing circle jerk. I don’t understand how people who are otherwise intelligent cannot identify this morbid change in tone and laugh at such obvious Orwellian manipulations.

    1. “people who are otherwise intelligent” – I wish we had strong demographics of these.

  22. Astute analysis but what happens to the so called “wire services” such as AAP, Reuters and to an extent the BBC. These services seem to have played their part in fake atrocity scandals, war mongering and promotion of the globalist agenda. They seem most nefarious.
    They would seem to have a stranglehold? Can they be beaten or bypassed.

    1. BBC isn’t that bad. They don’t propaganda infuse stuff to nearly the extent of CNN, MSNBC, Fox, etc. while at the same time, they are big enough to get a pretty big information base.

  23. Instead f news, why not focus on analysis. Do the sort of thing Vice did where they would find some obscure bit of information that was not time sensitive, and publish that. For example, instead of talking about the Bundy Militia taking over a forest preserve, document the strength of militia movements as a whole, and the degree of anti-government sentiment. It beats the rush that naturally comes of documenting events instead of analysis, and on the whole it’s more relevant because it allows people to pick sides in fights that other people don’t even know exist. The downside is that whatever analysis occurs this way, it has to be regional because these events would have to be relevant to the common man to be worth documenting.

  24. You’ve got to be kidding me. You actually tried framing in this article with zilch in the reality sphere? Are we going schizo?

  25. In Australia, I’ve been seeing advertisements for the old media a lot – the top 3 channels (7/9/10) have been running advertisements for their news programs and recently, I’ve been seeing ads for the two top newspapers (the Herald Sun and the Age) on billboards.

  26. The editorial page in the big city newspapers is the brain deadest shit you ever saw. I’m talking about the real big city’s newspapers. You know the cities that have the big fat commode stopper sized newspapers like NYC and DC, the cities with a Sunday paper that’s big around as a tree trunk rolled up. They’re killing the trees man. They’re gobbling up whole forests just to keep the presses screaming 24-7, just to keep a wad of fresh steaming propaganda plopped in front of your doorstep every morning.
    Roosh’s statement:
    ”These oligarchs will accept their money-losing outlets as merely the cost of doing business. What’s a $100 million a year loss for your own personal Pravda if it’s making you $1 billion a year through favorable government policies and modified consumer behavior?”
    It’s true. And the editorial page, with all the glossed over and obscured news to drown out and cover up the antics of the regular schutsters and their money trails and body bags coming out the back doors of the city halls, the editorial page always seems to have space to cover the famed filler topic of ‘citizen outcry’ against some new pooper scooper ordinance in effect over in ‘bird dropping park’, or in some rotting old money neighborhood in some ward that was built over a WWI ammo dump.
    The filler news and filler editorials are such nonsense. The real message delivered must be subliminal advertizing or brainwashing. When the substance is lacking, look and see the real subliminal shit. Ever watch a rediculous insurance company ad? Watch a Progressive or Geico ad. They’re selling absolutely nothing for something right? Contraire. Those senseless ads are packed with more brain warp junga than you know. Just turn the shit off and use the paper in your garden.

  27. Some old/established news services actually still have good content. The Guardian, Daily Mail, BBC… Now that I think about it, it’s just that American news services suck…

  28. This is happening with news and will continue. But, and perhaps even more important, this is also happening in entertainment. Politics is downstream from culture and a large part of our culture is fed to us by a handful of large media corporations. That’s why there is a fucking debate on whether or not men should be around women while they shit. The good news is that everything that we’re seeing with news will happen with other forms of media. I don’t watch any conventional tv shows…I watch FPS Russia, Terminal Lance, Dayjoborchestra etc/

Comments are closed.