Culture

Why Do People Become Cuckservatives?

154 Comments

Cuckservatism is a topic that has previously been discussed in detail on Return Of Kings, in articles and comments sections alike. The underlying reason that this topic is the focus of a great deal of discussion is because its roots are deeply steeped in both cowardice and betrayal.

While our readership is well acquainted with the political and social implications of cuckservatism, there is also a need to also discuss its behavioral roots. To accomplish this task, I used my social media accounts to examine connections of mine who displayed all of the classic red flags associated with cuckservatism.  I then searched for common traits that they possessed based on the nature of their rants or posts.

The three characteristics listed below represent key factors which, in my opinion, are necessary for any individual to transform from an otherwise normal person into a cuck.  If we can understand these factors, this will enable us to develop a more comprehensive strategy for rendering them irrelevant, apart from merely ignoring them.

Political Naiveté

Nothing screams political naivety more than voting for a last minute candidate who considers himself a "conservative" alternative to Trump.

Nothing screams political naivety more than voting for a last minute candidate who considers himself a “conservative” alternative to Trump.

This factor represents the first step that one must take to become a cuckservative, because it entails believing in a series of premises that are patently false.  Political naiveté can include simpler forms, such as believing in the wage gap or that illegal immigrants are natural republicans.  Conversely, political naiveté can also be more complex, in that an individual afflicted with it might believe in equality as a virtue or that a democratic two party system is the best form of government.

A perfect example of this can be seen in my friends and associates who blindly believe in the Constitution.  These individuals refuse to vote for anyone other than a “constitutionalist,” and their sole metric for judging candidates is the implications of an obscure constitutional issue that only they care about.  This perspective is indicative of political naiveé because the globalists who run our political system jettisoned any belief in the Constitution and rule of law decades ago.  For them, the Constitution is merely a convenient rubber stamp used to justify unpopular political decisions.  

Accordingly, anyone who votes ONLY for candidates with such narrow viewpoints is naively playing into the hands of globalists because they fail to understand that the Constitution will only function in a nation that’s virtuous and willing to abide by its principles.  

If the United States continues on its current demographic track, we will eventually import a new population that not only despises original American values, but would also actively vote to eliminate them.  The Constitution will provide no protections if this occurs, because these people will simply ignore it, invoking arguably the most important phrase in all of American legal history.

To fail to understand these stakes when considering one’s voting patterns, instead opting to emulate the local revolutionary war re-enactors, is a hallmark trait of a cuckservative.

Lack Of Self Confidence

A Cuckservative would never get this far.

A Cuckservative would never get this far.

Lack of self-confidence, and the feelings of doubt that serve as its foundation, represents a second symptom of cuckservatism, which is why Return Of Kings has countless articles on how to acquire and maintain self-confidence as a form of preventative medicine.  

Doubts as to one’s chances of success, coupled with fear and the innate need for self-preservation, can easily shatter most people.  In such moments of weakness, it’s very easy for a person to do a 180 and to do something that they would normally find revolting.  Conversely, if one steadfastly believes in their convictions and themselves, their self-confidence will become stronger. This is true even in situations when seemingly the entire world is against them.

The following clip is from an interview that Jeb Bush did with Lester Holt during the Republican Primary, and is an excellent illustration of how a lack of self-confidence can lead to powerlessness and a lack of control over one’s surroundings. 

https://youtu.be/Dmnd2yM1SKA

From the very beginning of this clip, Jeb’s lack of self confidence is readily apparent.  Whether it was the fact that he was too far hunched over in his seat, his attempts to curb his nervousness by forcing himself to smile or laugh, or the fact that he rarely made eye contact with Lester Holt, any ability that he has to project himself was undermined by his body language.

An even deeper sign of his lack of self-confidence begins at 0:45 in the video, when Holt proceeds to ask him why he didn’t frame the Charleston shooting as an act of “racism.”  In this situation, if asked such a question in any setting, an individual has one of two choices.  If he is self-confident, he would turn the question back on Lester Holt by saying that racism is a social construct and the only people who care about it are limp-wristed losers.

However,  if one is like Jeb and lacks self-confidence, their response to this situation will be to immediately try to “compromise” by acknowledging the premise raised by someone like Lester Holt and then spend the rest of the interview trying to show that they’re not a bad person.  This was the approach that Jeb used, and it demonstrated to Lester Holt that he was weak, which then led to Lester forcing Jeb to backtrack and question his own decision to support Stand Your Ground laws during his tenure as Florida’s governor.

A lack of self-confidence, as evidenced by Jeb’s failure to retain control over his surroundings during his interview with Lester Holt, highlights a classic character trait shared by cuckservatives.  The only answer that I can come up with, as to why this trait is so prevalent, is that it might be a product of their childhood that they haven’t been able to get over.

In a way, the archetypal cuck was likely bullied or mistreated as a child, but has never learned how to fight back or to love being hated by others.  Because of this, they never developed the necessary level of self-confidence to succeed in life, which eventually translates over to their politics.

They Want To Be Friends With Everyone

Actions speak louder than words.

How to destroy a political movement established by one’s father in one fell swoop.

Having grown up in the leftist Northeast, and considering that I still live and work there, I’m used to being in the political minority.  My coping mechanisms for this situation consisted of (unknowingly) embracing key tenets of the Alternative Right, and knowing how to pick my political fights.  Additionally, I also resolved to never be friendly with or ever trust anyone from the political left, a decision that has been vindicated over the last several years.

Unfortunately, my approach is not a popular one amongst political dissidents in my region.  This is because many of them, having grown up with leftists, simply view their political disagreements as a series of gentlemanly differences that they can put aside over a few beers.  They refuse to believe that leftists and SJWs hate anyone who even slightly disagrees with them and, like women, view weak men as easy targets.

Accordingly, when faced with the choice of staying true to their beliefs or “moderating” them in order to ensure that they get invited to the next sushi night, art showing or paint nite; the cuckservatives that I know will roll over every time.  Specifically, they’ll profess support for third party “libertarian” or “constitutional” candidates, while supporting a slightly less-liberal version of their leftist friends’ politics.  

This tendency demonstrates a key principle that most cuckservatives subconsciously hold: they want to be liked by everyone, and will therefore do anything they can to make this happen, even if it means betraying themselves and their own beliefs in the process.  When does adopting this attitude ever lead to success in life?

 If a child keeps getting beat up by a schoolyard bully, should they cower in the bully’s presence and act as his lackey in order to avoid getting hurt?  We all know that such an approach is worthless and that the only way to respond is to fight back, yet these people adopt the same approach when dealing with the political equivalent of a schoolyard bully.  Perhaps their reason for trying to be friends with globalists and trying to appease them by being moderate stems from the way in which they handled problems in childhood, however that issue itself is another topic that deserves discussion by itself.

Is There A Remedy For These Character Flaws?

Even if we understand these characteristics, and can think of active ways to subvert cuckservatism, we will not be entirely successful.  Most people who fall under this category have been psychologically conditioned to act this way, meaning that much of our attempts to open their eyes will fall on deaf ears.  I have no sympathy for these people because they’ve never had the internal drive or fortitude necessary to overcome adversity, and would rather wallow in misery while also pulling others into the abyss with them.

However, there are always a couple that might show potential.  These individuals might only be seen by us as cuckservatives because they imitated others around them, while lacking a positive role model that could show them the truth.  The greatest service we can do for these select few is to identify them and prove that there is a viable alternative.

If 25 cents a day can supposedly help a starving African family have rice for six months, then us acting as positive role models to our weaker brethren will help them immeasurably while also advancing our own cause.

Read More: David French’s Candidacy For President Shows That Cuckservatives Can’t Stop Donald Trump

154 thoughts on “Why Do People Become Cuckservatives?”

  1. Excellent topic and analysis. Thank you.
    I think some of this can be explained in a structural way. Real conservatives got absolutely massacred by the institutions of power (look at how the media and elites treated Barry Goldwater, Pat Buchanan, or Ron Paul). We know that one cannot win a primary election without support from the elites, and the elites want their cucks.
    Keeping the alternatives within a range that is acceptable to the elites is the move.

    2. I’d add they’re really in it for the money like celbreties.
      Just like the corporations apparently supporting fag marriage to seem “progessive” in exchange for favors from the government these are bought and sold whores with little if any “real” values..

  3. Oh Rand…if that handshake doesnt cement the fact its all just showbusiness, nothing will

    1. That one picture might have more to destroy him than his campaign-trail accusations that the police are racist and his backroom “backup plan” deals with Mitch McConnell did.

  4. Bush crime family have never been conservatives.They need to be locked up with the other crime family – Clinton.

    1. well at least the bush lineage ended up getting thoroughly browned … bet old prescott bush is proud lolz

      1. His modern-day “incarnation” looks more hispanic than “Narco” Marco Rubio & Toxic Ted Cruz combined.
        Literally “bred for politics”, and hopefully a failed political experiment as the “Time of Trump” puts an end to that sort of identity politics.

  5. Cuckservatives are second rate globalists, too weak to go all the way.
    They are like the quintessential fat kid that’s being bullied in school. Instead of hardening up, improving themselves, and fighting back, they prostrate themselves to the bully with the implicit hope the bully comes around and starts respecting them. But nobody respects a supplicating wimp. It’s a similar story with these cuckservatives.

    1. Yup. They idolize and want the power of the state, but are not ruthless, aggressive, or imaginative enough to wield it. They are wannabe oppressors. Passive aggressive autocrats.

  6. Cuckservativsm comes from the broader trend in the culture which has replaced a personality ethic for our traditional character ethic. That seems to have gotten hold around the time Dale Carnegie published his books about “winning friends and influencing people” by learning how to exploit their psychological weaknesses – kind of like game, in fact. The traditional man does things to earn respect, even from people who don’t like him and who oppose what he stands for; whereas the cuckservative just wants everyone to like him, even the people who work against his interests. Naturally the opponents of the latter sort of man view him as a weakling, and they treat him as a chump.
    You can see the difference between a likable person you don’t trust, for example, Bill Clinton, versus an unlikable person with a reputation for good character. You know the latter will keep his word to you to the best of his ability, and he won’t lie to you or try to cheat you.
    Hillary combines the worst of both ethics: An unpleasant personality with a really defective character. If at least she could have demonstrated competence and the habit of doing the right thing, she might have plausibly become an American Margaret Thatcher.

  7. Cuckservatoves are people that have been brainwashed by feminism but live a lifestyle within a culture hat demands they signal their “conservativeness” as a means of social status. They are just sissies who haven’t had to learn any better. This is why they have the dispicable habit of backtracking and pandering.

  8. Cuckservative is a slur.
    A traditional conservative is taking a skeptical attitude toward change, understanding that practical wisdom is probably better advice than experts’ counter-intuitive recommendations, and for a straightforward, gentlemanly attitude toward conflict. The Quiet Man doesn’t seek a fight, but he can finish one just fine. A traditional conservative is a strong man who takes care of business.
    The Alt-Right, as diverse a group as that is, noticed that conservatives were getting crushed in the cultural war, and were getting crushed in the universities, the mainstream media, deep-state bureaucrats, and the entertainment industry. They were getting obliterated, and seemed to be OK with it.
    As a traditional conservative, I didn’t see this attack from the right coming. Too busy looking left. It was like a sucker punch. Fortunately, now we know to watch from that direction, too.
    The story of history is a war between barbarism and civilization. The progressives are moving in a barbaric leftist direction. The jury is still out on the Alt-Right. We shall see if you are civilized, or just another kind of barbarian at the gate.

    1. There is nothing left to conserve … the Overton Window has been moved so far to the left that to be a conservative today would mean advocating for things that only hardcore Leftists were agitating for 50 years ago.

        1. What is there to conserve? The national hero status of pro-black agitators like MLK? The right of women to terminate the lives of their own babies having been raised to a level of being ironically considered “sacred” or “god-given”? The right to have half your income confiscated by the U.S. government?

        3. If Reagan or Washington was alive today, what would they say about ‘conservatives’ and the job they have done ‘conserving’ the culture and the country?
          If history is any example, Washington’s response would be rather profane.

        4. OK, let me back up a second and try it this way. In the First World country, taxes are collected and a road gets built. There might be some “extras,” but for the most part, the road is excellent and graft is reasonable. In the Third World, there are two degrees: (1) The funds are distributed (usually foreign aid), and (a) a substandard road is built, or (b) the road doesn’t get built.
          Our Social Security checks come on time. Things like that.

    2. God sent us Trump because even he realizes we are far beyond the “turn the other cheek” type.
      Sometimes, in order to fight evil, you have to have someone that is willing to go down in to the gutter to some degree if necessary.
      Preening in your suit up on the sidewalk while boasting of your civility does not take the fight to your adversary.

  9. I would rather live under a viaduct with Trump in the White House than live in a penthouse with Hillary in the White House.

    1. The only problem is that even if Trump does get elected, he will probably only delay the inevitable decline as opposed to reversing it (with God anything is possible, but America’s sins reek to high heaven, and the nation must be judged).

      1. I was on the fence with that issue a while back. But hearing his recent speeches, I think he is sufficiently bombastic to actually turn the ship away from shore.

        8. That seems a little negative. Things aren’t really all that bad

      2. I am old. Anything that delays the inevitable collapse is AOK with me. I just want to be dead before it comes, thanks.

  10. I think if Hillary does win, we need to rethink our strategy: I would say we need to adopt a strategy to accelerate the decline and crash of this country as much as possible. What does that mean? Advocate for more Syrian refugees, demand public schools spend more money offering classes in dirka dirka at the expense of science classes, we need to help turn the screws so to speak

    2. All while marshaling our own resources and waiting for the precise moment to jump in the driver’s seat.

    3. No, bringing refugees to the country will alter its composition, dealing permanent damage. We can advocate for all the terrible fiscal measures we want, throw the relationship between men and women under the bus, and stop all pretense of government investment in the future, and in the long run people will just seek a political alternative. But if we push immigration over the edge it will create a problem that could take 1000 years to solve.

    5. “Which is fallen should also be pushed” is not a wise strategy right now. Even if the enemy speed up the subversion, this entire system will not fall in less than 3 generations, maybe more.

      1. Are you sure? we are already low on money and dependent on imports. It’ more or less impossible to start a family. There are enough things wrong that a collapse could at least be engineered, even if it’s not spontaneous.

        1. Of course I’m not sure, it is an educated guess. Yes, the situation is really bad, but the system need years to reach the point of crashing for its own weight.
          If you look the brightside, it means that we can still DO something in order to stop this subversion…..but we need to act now. Every action counts.

    6. Classes in dirka dirka?
      My school systems just throw the rapefugee spwan straight into English-only classes with real Americans, there’s not even the pretense of specialty ESL classes like they have for the (hispanic) illegals.
      Though I can see how your plan to insist upon classes in dirka dirka would “Cloward-Piven” the schools into the ground as the stated reason for not having translators for the rapefugee spawn is because they all speak crazy, disparate dialects.
      Getting translators for all their various languages would cost a serious chunk of changes.

      1. Will he? Has King Romney allowed the Utahans to do so?
        I recall that Trump made a play to curry favor with ’em by putting turbo-cuck Mike Lee onto his short list for SCOTUS but I have doubts that plays like that would be enough to convince rank-and-file mormons to go rogue on Romney/Huntsman/etc.

    4. I think the best way to reward Utah is to send them a few tens of thousands of Syrian men aged 18-30. Send ’em to Provo, Utah. Let ’em mix and mingle with the high school Mormon girls … Mormons don’t like Trump for being “anti-refugee,” well let’s see how tolerant Mittens is when his sweet little daughter’s belly swells up with a Syrian baby lolz

      3. It’s all milk and honey up until they get the rapefugees. It is nothing more than an exercise of religious virtual signalling from the Mormons.

        1. exactly
          1st, 2nd, and 4th are men’s laws…and will be eviscerated beginning Wednesday if she gets in…

      4. The rainbow over the 2 of ’em is a nice touch…how did the gays manage to steal the rainbow back from Jesse Jackson, the “Emperor of black people”?

    2. What’s the story here anyways? Her weiner husband was shown to have connections to the “lost” Clinton emails, and this chick helped rat on Hillary?

      1. Its much more batshit crazy than that- she might be a saudi spy, all four of them went to “pedo island” multiple times…its kinda hard to believe

        3. pedo island??? satanic rituals??? not sure if i’m on board yet… not saying it’s impossible tho…

        12. Pedo island? Wasn’t that a 70s TV series about a man in a white suit, and a dwarf who could make perverts wishes come true?

        21. haha, is that what you got out of that show? Its a little bit before my time, although I remember my parents watching it

        22. It was a weird show. I was a child, but I liked the dwarf. The guy in the white suit was decidedly dodgy and probably a paedo

        23. 2 Latinos dressed up like Colonel Sanders- thats gotta trigger someone, somewhere

        24. Sex magic seems to be a major part of the Crowley / OTO influenced occult. But that doesn’t mean they necessarily identify as Satanist although they might. The spirit cooking woman is pictured somewhere with a bloody goats head suggesting the Baphomet is being evoked. Podesta is clearly comfortable in her company so it doesn’t seem like a stretch on c that basis alone

        26. thats enough internet for today…time to climb my way back out of yet another rabbit hole

      2. There are two theories, and I find plausible both:
        1. Weiner stole the emails in order to get a deal for his pedo acussation.
        2. Weiner was spying for his homeland, but get caught due to sheer stupidity in using his laptop for his pedo activities.

        1. 1 is probably accurate. 2? Well, he is from Forest Hills, in Queens, NY. I dont think he is spying for them

        4. Jews are only loyal to their own people, and they have a long tradition of spying on behalf of foreign powers:
          Jonathan Pollard
          Ethel and Julius Rosenberg
          Harry Gold
          David Greenglass
          Martin Sobell
          Harry Magdoff
          Nathan Silvermaster
          Samuel Dickstein
          Theodore Hall (original last name Holtzberg)
          etc, etc, etc, etc, there are hundre of examples, just google it.
          Anyway, I wasn’t saying that I’m 100% sure Weiner was spying for Israel, but it’s possible.

    3. Hillary’s eyes are shooting daggers. She seems to be saying, “Bitch, stop your crying. Don’t make me slap you again.”

    5. Indeed. The narrative is falling apart, Huma is in hiding and the world prepares for a Trump victory. Newsfeed is saying there was an assassination attempt on Trump in Reno (corrupt Harry Ried’s part of the woods) a few hours ago.
      It’s over.

  13. “If a child keeps getting beat up by a schoolyard bully…” That’s the purpose of the increased emphasis on “anti-bullying” campaigns that is hot and heavy in schools this year. They are trying to turn out an entire generation of cucks.
    These new cucks will be so passive, they will not only watch the stud fuck their girlfriend or wife, they will go fetch them a towel to clean up when done.

  14. Betas carry on for the very same reason that fake men stay hedonistic PUAs. Validation for their weak inherent frame/confidence.
    Roosh eventually breaking out of the trend is a defining testament to his character.

  16. Basically it is “social conservatism”, the general trend in which societies shun change. This is a form of conformism, centered around politics and societies, this is the reason why societies where maintained for the greatest of history and why societal changes stagnated in favor of stability, so civilizations could flourish on it without having to actively control their people.
    The leftists during the 70’s used to speak against this, as in the end, it is a form of conformism and during that time it barred them from success and control. Today, of course they complete overlook it. For a quick comparison think of when Nixon talked about the “Silent Majority”, during the time that the left was trying to grasp power, and Hillary pondering to hate and devicive speech. They both tried (and Nixon succeeded) on moving the normie based on “social conservatism”
    The cucks simply conform to the current situation, exactly as the writer sais, but with his descriptions he desribes also the normie. Cucks are blind normies that passionately believe that the change is good, as in our time conserving one’s country is found as reactionary or revolutionary.
    The left is in power today and that form of conformism helps keep them in power if we manage to overcome them this phenomenon will become an asset. ‘Till then though, we will need to help awake people on their imminent destruction.

  18. Cuckservatives are just Liberals who for whatever reason cannot make the jump into full-blown liberal insanity. They believe in all the premises of Liberalism like equality, fraternity, abstract rights, freedom of action ect. But cannot bring themselves yet to adopt the more radical novelties. This is why they will often be the most ardent of the virtue signalers doing things like adopting African children or being the first to tell you that their housekeeper is an illegal from Guatemala.
    They will cling to the “economic” issues and not the “moral” issues because they do not have the internal courage of their liberal compatriots who have got fully over into debauchery. Therefore because they are meek cowards they put on a strong face by combating the evils of the anti-free market crowd in order to sleep soundly at night and not introspect the fundamentals of their beliefs.
    The irony is that ultimately they will adopt the liberal platforms being promulgated today because ideologically they are fundamentally the same as liberals. They and the liberals are both parts of the same train whereas the liberals are the engine the Cuckservatives are the caboose and the train, all of its parts, will arrive at its destination ultimently.
    I have seen no greater example of this than the whole foistering of sodomy on the public. 15 years ago public sodomy unions were unthinkable. Today the Cuckservatives and their ilk, like milo, are trying to convince gays that Republicans are really the more tolerant and allowing more freedoms of gays than democrats.
    This aside I have a personal annectdote: yesterday my company ordered some bad parts. Cardboard boxes came in that were too small for our product. The two girls in charge of QC spent all day trying to figure out what went wrong with our specs. As they were explaining it to me I thought to myself: “Wow you girls went to college, gave up having children, let your bodies go, all so you could fret over cardboard boxes.”

  19. “If a child keeps getting beat up by a schoolyard bully, should they cower in the bully’s presence and act as his lackey in order to avoid getting hurt?”
    I know I keep yapping on about parents, but while defending yourself against a bully may be at least somewhat realistic, consider someone who is being mistreated and hurt by his parents since the day he is born. A baby has no way to defend itself and learns a pathological helplessness that is then acted upon even in face of situations that would be realistically manageable.
    You make a good point that its about stuff one hasnt gotten over. But it’s not an easy thing to do. Ive been meditating for a year now and theres still a lot of issues to work up. And that was with me practically being completely alone at home without having to deal with other people. It would have been remarkably slower otherwise.
    Reminds me also of a post on Facebook I saw about chicken who are kept in a stable during winter. When it becomes warm, they reopen the doors so that the chicken can go back out to the fresh air. And apparently, it takes many hours until even one chicken dares to step outside of the now open door.
    Or this experiment about a fish in an aquarium, where the area of the aquarium is subsequently made smaller through transparent glass walls. The fish adapts to it and stays in the now smaller area. But when the glass is removed again … the fish still stays in the smaller area.
    Conditoning is a bitch.

  20. For a Cuckservative:
    Diversity means everyone MUST think alike about ‘diversity’.
    Diversity requires that we take the lower and accept them as equal to the higher so that everyone ‘can just get along’.
    Virtue signalling is not a virtue.

  21. I liked your part about political naivete. People often rely on abstract ideals and some piece of paper called the Constitution. As you say, this only makes sense as long as the majority recognizes or believes in the significance of that piece of paper. When the country gets ‘reeducated’ or flooded with people who couldn’t care less, the Constitution won’t save anyone.

  22. I’m a single issue voter, I only vote for pro gun candidates because anti gun candidates are usually wrong about everything else too.

    1. The NRA endorsed Harry Reid in 2010. Every time they call for money I tell them why I no longer belong.

      1. The NRA and pro gun voters don’t necessarily mean the same thing. Many of us choose other less compromising organizations.

  23. I want to give a shout out to David French from National Review. The man sticks by his principles, even though he married a broken woman with mental issues that claims she was raped or sexually assaulted by her church pastor and ended up with a little black kid when he returned from the military.
    David French is a good white knight who will not stand for vulgar misogynists like Trump. Don’t ever speak to him or his wife’s son ever again!
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkIUaWUUUAAkLQH.jpg

  24. the charleston shooting was clearly racially motivated and it along with numerous black church firembombings show that there are racial tensions in the south. This is not how a limp wrist fag would perceive this. It’s how anyone with half a brain would. Please do some more thinking before you write such nonsense.

    1. Agreed about Dillon Roof, but not so much with the church burnings. SJW’s and minority rights advocates are well known foe staging “hate crimes” for cash and prizes.

      1. Now that we know dems have been putting agent provocateurs in trump rallies its easy to fall in the trap of thinking it’s all false flags. But knowing the history of the south; it’s clear the flames are being stoked by both these kkk wannabies ,who are organized and not just lone wolves, and the BLM. The author’s dismissal of this as a social construct is absurd and as bad as when sjws cry racism over anything.

        1. When the media brings up racially motivated issues, it’s because they have a political angle to play. They don’t actually care about solving anything.
          And “racism” is a social construct. The American and the European left are the only ones who care about it, and that was only as of a few decades ago.

        2. its not a social construct it is a specific type of prejudice. A prejudice which Dylan roof clearly exhibited.

        3. Were ancient greeks and romans concerned about “racism”? Have Sunni and Shia muslims condemned each other for “racism” everytime one killed the other throughout history?
          They didn’t, did they? I wonder why…

        4. Being Shia and Sunni has nothing to do with race they are sects of Islam.
          Just because people 2000 years ago acted savagely towards each other doesn’t mean that we today should be acting the same way and condoning it. Especially within America itself towards other citizens of our country.

        5. That’s fine, but condemn it as a bad act in itself. Don’t adopt the narrative imposed on all of us by the left.

        6. Lol dude I just made the connection u were the author. It was a good article despite my disagreement regarding racism. You nicely identified these pro establishment conservatives and the specific traits attributable to them.

        7. Their biggest problem, I think, is their willingness to play by the left’s rules and prerogatives.
          If Jeb considers it to be such an important issue, he should’ve been addressing it in his own way as opposed to bending over backwards to placate Lester Holt.

    2. A murder is still a murder, the media just puts “racially motivated” in front of some of them in order to evoke an emotional response.
      I don’t see the media doing that if a black gang member shoots a hispanic gang member, or vice versa.

      1. Gang violence is rarely racially motivated,I live in Chicago home to crips and the 18th street gang (hispanics).They kill each other over territory and drugs. Dylan roof said he hated blacks and wanted to ignite a civil war between whites and blacks. Sure street gangs can be racist but most are in it for the easy money in a city with few jobs on offer. btw I’m pretty sure black on black gang violence is far worse and that can’t be racially motivated.

        1. Oh really, gangs aren’t “racially motivated” at all? I’ll take their word over someone on the internet,

        2. Hahahaha in a previous comment you mentioned it was just the media that was creating black white division. But here you have the history channel, with its horseshit content, clearly exaggerating and dramatizing for entairtainment rather than information. Hypocrite.

        3. You calling me a hypocrite doesn’t change the fact that the media covers murders with a double standard based on which race(s) were involved.

        4. I won’t disagree with that.MSM treatment of the Dallas police shooting and the Dylan roof rampage are testament to a clear pro black bias.

        5. They remember what the (((Trotskyites))) did. And they know the (((anti-Whites))) are the descendants of the (((Trotskyites))).
          Who do you think is arming the White nationalists in Europe?
          And who do you think will start arming White US militias and start hacking US elections?
          The International (((Clique))) always goes too far.

        7. The (((early Bolsheviks))) like (((Trotsky))) ruled and murdered White Christian Russians (and the Russian Imperial Family) until they were purged in 1936 by Stalin…
          (((They))) were too evil, even for *Stalin*!

    4. “..with numerous black church firembombings show that there are racial tensions in the south.”
      Where and when? Your boilerplate narrative is pretty old, but for your benefit can you provide evidence?

    5. Racially motivated? I have to disagree as Roof was a certifiable nutjob and who can really say what motivates them?

      1. No proof of mental ilness. He was very clear of his motivations. “Black people have to be stopped” and “niggers are stupid and violent”. These are quotes from his manifesto.

  25. I really have to lol at Jeb. What a pathetic candidate. Blacks and hispanics do not like the Republican party because they do not fit into it. They like welfare, handouts, and to feel like victims. Additionally, they want more of their own in this country regardless if it is for the actual benefit of our country or not.
    Additionally, a true White American knows that WHITE AMERICA MADE AMERICA. Minorities resent White America because we are successful and they are incompetent.

    1. They can’t stand up to any other women either, the worst of circumcised schlubs. Take Joe Biden. His first wife Neilia was killed in a car accident involving a tractor trailer in ’72. (Liberal Dems and their car tradgedies) Current wife Jill got swiped by a semi on I-95 right before inauguration in ’08. Geez what is it with the shitlib dems and bad tie-rod ends? Biden as you remember rammed through VAWA in 94. Of course he’s got skeletons. He was covering his little lies with bigger ones and bigger ones. Closet fag politicians also hide their fudge packing by timidly supporting anti fag bills and they’ll even vote down same sex marriage proposals. They look like honest Jim Bakker up front . . but they’re never stallwartly and committedly pro patriarchal/pro family. They’re cucks. They jam the works like mounds of horse shit in a commode. I can’t find a gif of Trump with a plunger but that’s what’s a coming round the bend you know.
      Mondale was as bad if not worse. His 1974 CAPTA was a slight of hand, shifting the focus to child prostitution rings and ‘stranger danger’ when in reality the government/foundation cabals were stealing the kids all along as they always have and the satanic blood eating farcas in the politico elite/secret societies were responsible for the growing number of vanishing youth. And their hunger grew. In 84 Ferraro had worked herself points in the kiddie protection racket business as head of women’s services and sex crimes prosecution in NYC and she campaigned with Mondale in 84 as a staunch supporter of child&women protection acts or basically advocating government lordship over women and children whilst nixing the man and squashing the patriarch.
      ALWAYS be weary of any judge or politico running on a ‘for the women and children’ ticket. They’re through the roof feminist, pro abortion, skeletons in the closet and it’s only a matter of time before they get smoked out as being satanic BITCH GODDESS followers that have orgies while drenching themselves in blood and baby parts like the recent stories of Hillary that have been eeking out in the past few days. Hillary would pass the most draconian anti male, anti father acts and she’d portray herself as ‘pro children and mothers’ to hide her skeletons in the closet. And a quadry of compromised schlubs in the cabinets can’t stand up to that or call it out? Trump sees it, calls it out without hesitation and says “you’re fired”.

      1. “They can’t stand up to any other women either, the worst of circumcised schlubs.”
        You got right to the point there. They are, consciously or unconsciously, the creation of Jewish social engineers – those who fear the idea of a healthy male, who cower before their perpetually unhappy wives. Those who are obsessed with the cult of genital mutilation.
        Right or left…it’s the same thing as long as you adhere to the consciousness of the subversive, secular Jew.

  29. Quote: Why Do People Become Cuckservatives?
    Answer: They are born with intellectual handicap, which is then reinforced by people educated well above their minuscule IQ = Academics ??

  30. I can’t imagine a cuckservative that ownes their woman. And a woman politico that’s conservative is cuckservative by default. Any woman in politics has more affinity towards the woman politicos on the other side of the right-left fence in regards to woman empowerment issues than they have towards the males in their own cuck camp. That’s what cuckifies both camps – LETTING THE GIRLS IN. That’s what makes the two sides of the political coin have the same face – BITCH FACE!!

  31. Also, all cuckservatives put the interests of Israel first, before those of the US and the West.

  33. ” If he is self-confident, he would turn the question back on Lester Holt
    by saying that racism is a social construct and the only people who
    care about it are limp-wristed losers.”
    Racism is not a social construct.

Comments are closed.