News

9 People In The Media Who Are Upset Jackie Coakley Wasn’t Raped By White Men

131 Comments

An entire fraternity was persecuted by the Rolling Stone for a crime that wasn’t committed, but the following prominent individuals care more about future rape “victims” instead of actual male victims of the establishment whose lives suffered due to the efforts of their media colleagues. They insist on using the biggest media controversy of the past year to push a twisted agenda without admitting that there was absolutely no rape at UVA.

Katie Love — Reporter for NBC4 Columbus (Ohio)

(Archived)

Jessica Valenti — Writer for The Guardian

(Archived)

Lorrie Goldstein — Columnist for Toronto Sun

(Archived)

Charles Johnson — Co-founded Pajamas Media

(Archived)

Melia Patria — Producer for ABC News

(Archived)

Katie McDonough — Writer for Salon

(Archived)

Gretchen Carlson — Reporter for Fox News

Dafna Linzer — MSNBC editor

(Archived)

Chloe Angyal — Writer for OpEd Project and Feministing

(Archived)

It’s a shame that these individuals have zero sympathy for men who were charged for a crime they didn’t commit. Their efforts will simply encourage women to come forward with bogus stories that continue to harm men.

Read Next: Is Elizabeth Stoker Bruenig Single-Handedly Destroying The New Republic?

131 thoughts on “9 People In The Media Who Are Upset Jackie Coakley Wasn’t Raped By White Men”

  1. This has jumped the shark. HuffPo, jezebel, xojane… all the feminist hate sites that generate their income from male bashing. If any other demographic was targeted this way there would be hell to pay.

    1. They’re just punishing the evil white male penis oppressors. That is a “good work” and anything that advances the cause is excusable.

    2. This has jumped the shark. HuffPo, jezebel, xojane… all the feminist hate sites that generate their income from male bashing.

      This is wishful thinking I’m afraid.
      Where is the Twitter campaign to boycott all the products that advertise in these websites?
      Where is the email campaign to name and shame all these lunatics and the MSM that created and validated all these lies?
      Where is the campaign for all young males to boycott misandrist Universities?
      Nowhere….
      Just like the the Duke lacrosse rape scandal this will simply become a wikipedia page in a few months….nothing else.

    3. Meanwhile, in France there is a real rape culture, mainly from immigrants: 200 rapes per day, 200’000 rape attempts per year…
      “France: A Clockwork Orange” is a book which will shock you and horrify you.
      What’s going on in France these days? Well, 13,000 robberies, 2,000 assaults, and 200 rapes…PER DAY. We are beginning to see Frenchmen demanding the right to bear arms, and even some talk of a”reconquista”.
      http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/review/B009S2LKLY/R2MLBC265TJPZC/ref=mw_dp_cr?cursor=2&sort=rd

      1. 13.000 robberies an rapes per day ? LOL. There’s no way police can investigate all that.

  2. I don’t know if all these articles were a concerted effort, but good work. Hopefully the MSM picks them up.

    1. They were a concentrated effort, mostly written yesterday afternoon. Most of them have already been published, but a few are still in the hanger.
      Check google search results of the individuals criticized. Most of our articles are first page. Win for the ROK community.

      1. Excellent. I posted on Reaxxion a link from 8chan showing that Operation Disrespectful Nod (from Gamergate) had effectively caused advertisers to completely (and quietly) abandon most of the shit gaming journalist sites that were involved in the scandal, including Gawker media:
        https://8ch.net/gamergatehq/res/27041.html#27041
        From my understanding some on 8chan are actively working to take this battle from gaming to the mainstream media at large. The MSM itself has taken serious blows to its credibility in the past year, so adding articles like these cutting through the bullshit and exposing these people for who they are and their agendas is going to ultimately have a snowball effect. Eventually it’s going to become even more obvious that the people involved in the MSM are pushing an agenda and are not interested in pursuing the truth, even at the expense of innocent people’s reputations and livelihoods.

        1. I looked at that link. Made my week to see Gawker fall so badly. Passed it onto the Kings Media team.

        2. Awesome beyond words. SJW’s aren’t used to facing consequences from their words / actions, so it must really sting!

        4. The Washington Post article has this line…

          “If you’re concerned with ethics in games journalism, the best thing you can do is contribute to an atmosphere where journalists are not afraid to speak their mind,” said Ian Miles Cheong, the editor-in-chief of Gameranx. “When you target a writer’s livelihood because you disagree with their opinion, you’re enabling the hostile atmosphere that leads to silence and dishonesty.”

          Ironically, SJWs and Leftists are the first people to say, “freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences of that speech.” For example, when they forced the CEO of Mozilla to resign after he opposed gay marriage. It makes me sick that I have to share air with these people. Such hypocrites.

        5. Indeed! I caught that blatant hypocrisy in the article. I’m glad that gamers are sticking it to the SJWs. Now if only the politicians could grow some balls and do the same. Oh, here is some more good news! A British cabinet minister attacks Gawker.

          ancient chinese wisdom

        7. The MSM knows that they’re next. The entire reason that that SVU episode happened is because the MSM didn’t actually do any real journalism. They just pushed a narrative and did zero research or try to find a counterpoint. Then you factor in the UVA case and they’re even more terrified that they are going to be held accountable for their laziness and agenda-pushing. That’s why they were so quick to retract and apologize, but that isn’t good enough. Innocent lives have been negatively impacted by their shoddy “journalism”, and a real apology would have been them terminating those responsible for this happening.
          Because they won’t do that themselves, we’re going to have to force the issue. 2014 was when we got fed up with the media treating men as their personal go-to whipping boy. 2015 is the year we start showing these asshats how big and terrible of a dragon they’ve truly roused form its slumber.

        8. I’ve heard about 8chan’s “mediagate” operation and can’t wait to see how it plays out.
          I find it hilarious when people talk about putting a “stop” to gamergate, as if that’s even possible. GG will hopefully cause a domino effect which will, in time, shame and purge the SJW’s from additional spheres. It’s hard to imagine a scenario where gamergate could “lose”….being that they’ve already successfully exposed corruption. Someone elsewhere mentioned that its like the wizard of oz, in that the curtain has already been pulled back, and the wizard has already been exposed. What exactly are they hoping for? They can re-draw the curtain but its too late…the emperor has no fucking clothes and this fact has been established already. It’s only a matter of time before these degenerate pricks get what’s coming to them.
          No wonder they’re terrified of gamergate.

        9. There was freedom of speech in Nazi Germany too: it just had grave consequences.

  3. “Believe the victim!”
    “They’re trying get off the hook by saying they believed the victim.”
    Someone needs to give Jessica Valenti a glass of warm milk, a plate of cookies and a rubber room to eat them in, before someone gets hurt.

  4. These are women I’d love to see get raped and hobble off to insecurity to hide their shame. They need to go.

    1. Nobody should be raped. Rape is an inexcusable crime, and should be punished harshly. The flip side of that is false accusations of rape. Any false accusation (committed with malice, not simply mistaken identity) of rape shoild be punished just as harshly as rape.
      That being said, your comment:

  5. Yeah, the poor women who cry ‘wolf’ are the victims according to feminist narrative. That last moron with the PhD gives the game away with her telling statement. ‘…whose lives have been made so much easier’. So it never was about true justice.

    1. Feminism is all about the narrative to push for special privilege.
      One of my friends knows an escort and introduced me to her. She’s hilarious, young, and completely frank about her chosen profession. He was never a client, he went to school with her. According to feminists, she’s a victim of the “patriarchy” that makes her be a escort because she doesn’t have better opportunities.
      She is not a feminist. As she puts it, she loves her job. She gets some big dollar per hour, and gets to have fun. Or, as she put it: she’d rather be on her back getting fucked a few times a week (and the orgasms that come with the fucking, which she claims are awesome) than ass in a chair doing useless paperwork 50 hours a week. Of course she’s probably that 1% of escorts that can command a big dollar amount, and definitely works her ass off to stay toned and desirable, even at 22. Oh, and she loves power of being the “other woman” married men are jumping. Wives not fucking their husbands dutifully enough are her bread & butter, and she takes immense pride in giving the guys what they really need, namely great sex / orgasms.
      A nice piece of work, but I did get a free ride and the girl definitely has sex skills. I just wonder if she has an out, because I’m wagering the market value of a 32yo escort is probably far lower than a 22yo. She probably hasn’t thought that far ahead…

        1. Unless she’s very (very) smart: unlikely.
          She’ll probably fritter it away on useless shit.

      2. I dated an escort for a very brief time a couple of years ago, one of those upscale types.
        She even stopped doing it after I asked her to, but boy was she broken. Early twenties and a complete asylum case already.

        1. Taking that much dick? I’m not surprised she was broken. Even a high dollar escort is going to be pumped by (minimum) a half dozen cocks each month. That’s likely a minimum of 30+ different men a year, even with a some regular clients. Add in birth control (really, STD control) condom failures and maybe catching something, and many see men almost exclusively as cash machines.
          OTOH
          I’d say this one was broken too. I don’t think she could really be happy with one guy anymore. Our trysts were a lot of fun while her vacation lasted. She appears receptive to taking it again, from the sound of her emails, when she visits in a few months. The question is: Is this because she actually likes me and the sex is really as good as she says? Is this because she can’t live without a dick in her for a week, doesn’t want to work at “home”, and I was arrogant enough to try and get it free? or Is this because she’s trying to use me as her out?
          One thing to remember, she likely can’t be happy with only one guy giving her attention anyway.

        2. “or Is this because she’s trying to use me as her out?”
          That’s very likely. I had that with mine. First it was me pushing her to stop and she was quite willing to give it all up and start planning a future with me but… I don’t know. It quickly felt stale or made-up, it’s hard to describe. Unnatural, anyway. It’s like she went from total slut to wanna-be housewife in two weeks, it felt like watching a movie montage, it was uncanny. And I didn’t buy into it, I wanted out and she broke down, clawed her fingers into my carpet while crying on my floor, begging me to keep her … it was the moment when I saw what a trainwreck she really was.

        3. I tend to agree. The only thing that makes me question that is the feral look in her eyes talking about how much she really enjoys fucking. I do mean feral, animal like, just like she screws. She’s an animal in bed, non-stop.
          Plus the neighbor slut got super jealous the last time she was around. How jealous? Well, she’s just over a decade older, and she apparently heard little miss petite having multiple orgasms, and definitely saw her naked (petite) ass walking to the bathroom. After little miss petite left town, she was even more pliable than normal. Double win.
          I’ll take her as she is now. She wants to fuck, great, I’ll ride her petite ass again. She doesn’t want to fuck? She wants money to fuck? The neighbor slut will open her legs for free. I think the neighbor will be sexless for a week.

  6. Pretty sure the guys who were not charged with the rape won here…Oh wait, they are still feeling the pain and no one gives a shit about them.
    I like how two women can lie and falsely accuse men of a heinous act and it is still a man’s fault. A man that had he not agreed with the article being run would be labeled a rape apologist. Hope he learned his lesson. He has a penis = he is the enemy no matter what.
    Serves that beta right.

    1. I like how two women can lie and falsely accuse men of a heinous act and it is still a man’s fault.
      It’s simple. It’s an all out (overt) war on men and it’s all about winning for them. Fairness has no place in war.

    2. Go back and read on the net a few months ago. Any man who dared question the RS story was a called a rapist apologist, etc. It doesn’t matter how much money you donated to RAINN. Feminists are playing a zero sum game, men must be destroyed so women can win.

  7. This is straight from “Roots”. But it might as well be an SJW Mantra.
    Wrestler: Kunta Kinte, you do not eat?
    Kunta Kinte: When I eat the white man food, my stomach comes up.
    Wrestler: So does mine. But eat the food, Kunta. Listen to me! Listen carefully. You are a warrior, and a warrior must eat because he must be strong to kill his enemy. So eat the white man’s food. Live, Kunta. Live and be strong! Be strong to kill the white man!

    1. Because Kunta Kinte had no reason whatsoever to want to kill anyone.
      Right?

      1. Kunta Kinte and his crew were definitely stuck between a rock and a hard place back in the day. No doubt about it. But bygones are bygones, and it’s odd in this scene if you just add “social justice” before the warrior quote, it pretty much personifies modern cultural marxism.
        Wrestler: Kunta Kinte, you do not eat?
        Kunta Kinte: When I eat the white man food, my stomach comes up.
        Wrestler: So does mine. But eat the food, Kunta. Listen to me! Listen carefully. You are a (social justice) warrior, and a (social justice) warrior must eat because he must be strong to kill his enemy. So eat the white man’s food. Live, Kunta. Live and be strong! Be strong to kill the white man!

      2. “Because Kunta Kinte had no reason whatsoever to want to kill anyone.”
        Roots was a plagiarized fraud.
        http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2013/01/21/alex-haley-lance-armstrong-of-literature/
        Anyway, a sane person betrayed, enslaved, and sold off by own your family/race/people would resent those who sold you, not so much those who bought you. Joseph didn’t spend his life thinking of himself as a warrior, biding his time waiting for a chance for revenge on Egyptians (for buying him from Ismaelite slave traders, to whom his own brothers sold him), and so he earned his freedom, then his position in leadership among them.

        1. “Through a period of four months, including the latter stages of pregnancy, delivery, and recent recovery therefrom … he beat [his slave] with clubs, iron chains and other deadly weapons time after time, burnt her, inflicted stripes over and often, with scourges.” (From the book, “Roll, Jordan, Roll”.) There are lots of accounts like this.

        2. “There are lots of accounts like this.”
          Life is hard and cruel, and slavery/serfdom is the historic normal human condition.
          1 Corinthians 7:21-23:
          “Were you called while a slave? Do not worry about it; but if you are able also to become free, rather do that. For he who was called in the Lord while a slave, is the Lord’s freedman; likewise he who was called while free, is Christ’s slave. You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men.”
          All these people who make bank off of former slavery in the USA, why do they so rarely care about the blacks enslaved in Africa by Muslims, right now, today?
          No profit, no advantage, no power in it for themselves.
          That’s why.

        3. American slavery seems to have been an order of magnitude worse than its ancient precursors. For example, Greek slaves could be tutors; slaves in parts of Africa could be soldiers; the Israelites left bondage with their language and culture intact. In America, it was illegal for slaves to know how to read; America had problems with blacks being armed into the 1970’s; and few African-Americans (except Alex Haley) can tell you where their ancestors came from with specificity. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/slavery/experience/education/docs1.html

  8. How fucking insane can these people be? If they want true rape victims to be able to come forward and true rapists to be arrested and charged, they should be pushing women to stop crying wolf and making false rape allegations. It’s as simple as that. Why is that so hard to comprehend for them?

      1. The fact they can’t correlate false rape accusations with doing more harm to women they claim to represent is insane. Seriously it doesn’t appear to be in the interest of women but their f*cking egos.

    2. Yes, they’re saying Rolling Stone is making it harder for real rape victims to come forward, when it’s really attention-whores like Jackie who are undermining victims. But young Jackie has a PussyPass™, so she is immune to criticism or repercussions for all the time/money she made the world waste. Rolling Stone threw any shred of journalistic integrity they might have had to the wind in favor of capitalizing on the “rape culture” hysteria.

    3. They are just so divorced from reality it is unreal. Look at the last quote: “there are absolutely no winners in the RS debacle” What the hell does that mean?!? A woman lied and was caught. Who the hell would the “winner” be anyway? The statement is insane on its face.

      1. Look at the message before that one “Rolling Stone editor blames exactly 2 people, both women: Jackie, and
        the reporter who “convinced” a male editor to drop journalistic rules. This is the effect of parity between male and female logic. Since it is usual “female circular logic” and since it would be “sexist” to point out the lack of real logic “male linear logic”. This comment uses a false narrative. woman raped, woman reports, which are false, to justify the value of the story being reported, (do not look back to the fact that it is all false). Once the circular logic is removed, all that she is saying, is that if a woman says it, do not question it, because if you do, you are a sexist, because women are always right, truthful and smarter than men. Isn’t her underlying motive sexist against the editor for him pointing an obvious truth.

      2. The quote was from Chloe Angyal who, despite all the privileges accorded women in the West, insists that pretty much all men hate all women.
        So, no, she’s not prone to thinking very clearly.

    4. It was a huge media event for them. They got paid big time. RS did it for the money. They rationalized it with the idea that other women were raped who suffered in silence, so even if this story is fiction it makes up for those other women who didn’t get their story told.

      1. They rationalized it with the idea that other women were raped who suffered in silence, so even if this story is fiction it makes up for those other women who didn’t get their story told.

        Exactly. Textbook rationalization hamster.

    5. This is absolutely fucking disgusting. They have abandoned all sense of morals at this point. Seriously, not one single word on how lives were ruined with the lie. Not one single word on the lack of etics on Rolling Stone Magazine, not one word of condemnation on that lying cunt.. they are literally saying “Ohh fuck, how we wish that chick was really raped so we could blame men.. now people won’t instantly believe in false rape allegations, oh, that’s so horrible”. They SINCERELY think that Rolling Stone should’ve kept up with all the lies, un-fucking-believable..

    6. Because (bear with me, math)
      Hysteria = Easy Money
      Easy Money = Attention
      Attention = Validification/Self-Importance

    7. Feminism + Attention Whoring = False Rape Accusation. It doesn’t matter if it’s true because they hate men.

    8. “Why is that so hard to comprehend for them?”
      Because common sense ain’t so common.

    9. < …After— i quit my desk job one year ago, I was blessed to get introduced
      to this job opportunity on-line which was a lifechanger… They offer
      jobs for which people can do what is required online from their comfort
      of their home . Last payment after doing this job for them for four
      months was 10000 bucks… Great fact about the job is that the only
      thing required is basic typing and connection to the internet—
      Great opportunity to earn extra money….
      ===============================

        1. It helps them to make you comply if they’re holding a gun to your head and you’re disarmed.
          The threat of summary execution incites most people to submit.
          Blue Heroes know this.

  11. Translation: “How are women supposed to throw innocent men into prison if Rolling Stone is going to expose the ‘false accusation’ epidemic?” The beauty of this is that Leftists have accidentally undermined their own political agenda.
    Btw, did the cops ever find “Haven Monahan”? LMAO

  12. Their narrative is breaking down though. That is their real fear- not that women won’t be believed, but that all those politicians and activists, who try to use other people’s tragedies to punish unconnected third parties and make new claims on State and corporate resources, will no longer be given a free ride.
    For these people, rape victims exist to be pimped and used for a PR offensive in a war to control society itself. Therefore these people actually need more rapes to happen, and when they don’t happen, they make them up. But when you make up so many lies in an age of almost total verifiability, it is only a matter of time before you get called out and exposed. So their real shock and anger is not at some real or imagined injustice, but at their decreasing ability to manipulate people.

    1. And what is most messed up about it is that if this gets out, nobody will take rape victims seriously when they ask for help.
      They are slowly creating this rape culture they claim to fear so much.

      1. Honestly speaking, Ive become so emotionally numb to Western cunts that I don’t even care at this point if they are raped for real. Im usually against collective punishment against groups of people but for Leftists and western women Im willing to make an exception.Let them die on the bed that they have made.

  13. How does one get to be that hateful/incoherent? Typical leftists aptfully as described in the Kaczynski manifesto of several years ago. Sick puppies ….

  14. Nothing comes out of most women’s mouths that isn’t profoundly self-interested.

    1. i try to make up for that by putting something profoundly self-interested into women’s mouths.

      1. I note that your profile photo perfectly compliments this comment. Kudos!

  15. I’m sure these concerned journalists will want to report on the rape of Cyntheria in her home in front of her children.

    1. Only if she was raped by white frat boys. Seeing that she was raped by black thugs, it’s as if it never happened.
      Fuck the MSM. From gender issues to racial issues to geopolitics and war – all they dish up is a huge, steaming pile of horse shit.

    2. White woman gang raped by black men is reported on page 11 of local newspaper and feminists think about it for 1 second like a traffic accident. Feminists don’t care about rape, they don’t care about victims. They care about advancing their own selfish interests. Black men don’t have any kind of social power that white women value, feminists get more social leverage by blaming white males.

  16. The time for talk is over. It’s time to attack these false rape apologists, misandrist and evil creatures. And as much as I hate to say this, we need to drive them out from the Internet and silence their words. Free speech be damned. This is war now and we must be merciless. We can do this by exposing their crap to the public and turning public opinion against them, going after the advertisers and of course, through libel lawsuits.

  17. Sadly, this at could just as easily be titled “9 People Who Wouldn’t Care If Jackie Coakley had been raped by black men.”

    1. “Sadly, this at could just as easily be titled ‘9 People Who Wouldn’t Care If Jackie Coakley had been raped by black men.’ ”
      Unless those black men were Clarence Thomas, Alan Keyes, Herman Cain, Thomas Sowell, and Ben Carson. Black skin trumps vagina on the “progressive” caste hierarchy (excepting when the person under that skin is conservative).

  21. Stay tuned fellas for a book coming out later this month called “Missoula” by Jon Krakauer. It’s about a rape epidemic at the Univ of Montana. Now I used to like Krakauer’s work ( Into Thin Air etc) but I believe he also writes for Rolling Stone mag which should make this book suspect

  22. We’ve been saying it all along: feminism makes it easier on rapists. The “worst thing about this fiasco” (aka, par for the course for feminism), however, is the innocent, MALE victims who were internationally accused of a violent felony they didn’t do. Of course.

  23. A rape charge like this would ruin these men’s lives, land them in prison, and ruin both the university’s and fraternity’s reputation. It had national coverage from every major news organization. What happens to this “Jackie” woman who made all this up? A slap on the wrist? Where are her throngs of supporters now? 
    She should be expelled, arrested, and vilified like these men were.

  24. No true rape victim worth paying attention to would be dissuaded from going to the police due to the UVA gang rape being exposed as a hoax.
    Maybe I’m giving rape victims too much credit, but I don’t think, in general, they’re unable to see the difference between their own genuine rape and one that is a complete and utter lie such as the UVA hoax.
    For example, does the accused even exist? If yes, then your case is light years beyond Jackie Coakley, UVA false rape accuser.

  25. every time somebody actually gets raped or a white kid shoots up a school, it’s like christmas for these people

  26. Strangely, not one woman apologized, NOT ONE. Man almost had his life ruined, and not even a sorry we were so quick to judge you. Women cannot do anything that they cannot spin to make themselves look good or gain sympathy.

    1. When was the last time you experienced a woman apologizing or take blame/responsibility? It just never happens – it’s always someone else’s fault.

      1. “Society’s” fault. A group of 350,000,000 people, often with nothing in common and who would destroy each other if given the chance and could get away with it, are to blame for the ills of cute, over-privileged middle-class or higher White women in America. Come on man, get with it! :)-

      2. Agreed, I’m sorry never comes out their mouth unless they say it when they are crying, and then it is done to be spinned for them to gain sympathy from betas and other women who see them crying. Women are complete manipulators, and the only reason why they assume men’s motives are always bad is because they project their evil minds onto men.

  27. The disturbing thing for me in all this is how readily so many people want to believe frat boys are ritualistically raping girls on beds of broken glass. They want to believe the worst in men, even when evidence of the contrary is right in their faces.

    1. Its revealing isn’t it. These people want to hate something so badly they’ll just make it up.

    2. First, totally commit to the proposition that sexual abuse is prevalent.
      Second, justify the lack of credible evidence for the proposition is due to a skewing of the data – because of fear! (Yet another unsupported proposition that must be accepted on faith to support the fact that there is not evidence for the first proposition.)
      Third, when a false narrative exposes both one and two to be more politics than reality, restate number two to defend number one. They can not stand scrutiny individually, but together they hold each other up.
      Forth, deny justice for men to advance social justice for women who are all victims of proposition 2 (This is taken as a tenant of faith).
      Ironically the more they create fear and real injustice, the more men will stop protecting them and some will eventually fight back. Then the fear will be justified! Of course then the totalitarian state will need to come to the rescue, that is the end game. Abuse s of injustice toward men, for the purpose and the excuse to frighten will usher in a tyrannical state such as we have never seen.

      1. Pussy pass. Females aren’t held to the same standards. Its about “diversity” and “inclusiveness”.

  31. Crap. The world is like this now, and I still have 3/4 of my life ahead of me.
    How can you blame the victim if there was no victim!? Actually….The fraternity members were the victims…so i guess they’re right.

    1. You’re still young. I know, it sucks. But, spread the word about ROK. Good things may come, the msm is dying and academia is too.

        1. The only thing that’s certain is change, said some wiseguy. Despite how bad things are, I can’t rationally see how all this is sustainable.

      2. Careful how you spread the word about manosphere websites because it can backfire right in your face. Basically, don’t do it at work; Dave from accounting who you got quite chummy with can be the biggest snitch around, and also women don’t like it no matter how red pill they seem.
        -Not the the workplace
        -Friends, unless you’re weeding the weaklings from your stuff then don’t do it.
        -Family, unless it’s your dad, brother, uncle, cousin, etc no females
        -Stragers, they could be a blogger or journalist and what a sensational story your advice would make
        End.

  32. There seems to be a real crisis of confidence in the rape economy. No longer guaranteed by the gold standard of rape namely of there actually having been one, people are beginning to question whether their rape currency is really worth the paper its written on. The MSM will no doubt inject much needed stimulus into the rape economy by printing loads more notes about rape out of thin air. But in private many people are starting to doubt the long term viability of a sexual economy based on quantitatively easy womens’ sick fantasies

  33. Being considered a rape victim is to feminist, as attaining the level of Eagle Scout is to Boy Scout.

  34. Check the last one with the phD, “I’ve got a phD in pop culture” Hhahahhaha
    Seriously? There’s a phD for such things?

  35. Well to be honest it’s kind of true, future rape victims (and I mean actually girls who have been fucked against their will, beaten, and had their lives turned upside down) , because of stories like this, we have justifiable reason to not jump on the rape hysteria bandwagon. Thanks Jackie Coakley

    1. You’re missing the point.
      The point is that with every fake rape charge the Men involved typically get their reputation dragged through the mud if not worse and no one except those on the manosphere stops to give a damn.
      The Men/males are the REAL victims in all this; their lives get ruined and the “possibility” of real rape victims not coming forward doesn’t overshadow that.

    2. I agree, but SJW’s come to the exact opposite conclusion from yours i.e. that we should “not jump on the rape hysteria bandwagon.” Instead, if you read between the lines, they’re saying our response to false accusations should be to treat alleged victims with even less scrutiny than we do now. The male victims of false accusations be damned.

  36. All of these SJ cunts and manginas fall into the typical far leftist category except for one…the SJ cunt that works over at Fox news and calls herself “Gretchen Carlson.”
    I’ve been railing on this cunt in fox’s clothing for awhile now. I’m convinced she is a mole for left wing feminist philosophy over at Fox.
    This is the same bim who walked off the Fox and Friends set for an innocuous sex related joke that singed her cunt hairs.

  37. Can anyone explain to me how you become a “victim” of an event that never transpired?
    Makes no sense whatsoever…

  38. “It’d be unfortunate if Rolling Stone’s failure [detered] journos from taking on high-risk investigations of rape”

    LOL… Exactly what makes investigating a rape “high risk” ??? Is there some mafia of rapists out there looking to rub journalists out for going down the wrong alley?? (puns intended there). These people are delusional, they actually believe they are on some ridiculous moral crusade against a wave of men who just want to rip women’s pants off and force the closest available female into intercourse. They’re so detached from reality that the very idea of an average man who just wants a woman to (*trigger warning*) willingly offer herself is inconceivable to them.

    1. Try telling a feminist you know a woman who willingly chose to be an escort. In their narrow little world NO woman can choose that. Nope, not possible. The patriarchy must have made her choose that demeaning work. Never mind that, in the words of one high dollar escort: she’d rather be paid to be on her back getting fucked, and get the orgasms that go with it, than paid to have her ass in a chair doing paperwork.

      1. …The patriarchy must have made her choose that demeaning work.

        Meanwhile, 99% of trash collectors are still men. Demeaning to sell your body for money? Really?

  40. these people are seriously deluded, they’re professional complainers and use all the lefts dirty tricks like crying ‘rape’, ‘racist’, ‘discrimination’ and other tools of the self hating xenocentric narcissistic dickhead brigade to try and ruin ordinary hard working peoples lives and diminish traditional masculinity, they’re repulsive!

  41. Reliable statistics about false accusations of rape are very hard to come by, but we know, simply from human nature, that there must be some. Every “Jackie” that happens along with a highly publicized fairy tale about having been raped will reduce the prima facie credibility of other accusers, whether or not those others are telling the truth. Thus she (and Sabrina Rubin Erdely, the “reporter” who made her a public figure) has truly victimized her own sex quite as much as ours — but the “sisterhood” is rallying around her, and we’re supposed to take their abuse in silence.

  42. If as admitted by some that this will make it easier for rapists and rape apologists then why keep doing it? Why are Rolling Stone and other MSM outlets continually pushing false rape stories.
    The thing that comes to my mind is that Rolling Stone and MSM are underground rapists and rape apologists who are looking to shut women up when they really do get raped.
    And then we get man hater Dafna Linzer who wants men to be held responsible for everything women do. Well I’m good for that Dafna so long as you give me all the authority that goes along with such responsibility. Of course that authority would extend to firing your sorry arse for trying to avoid responsibility when the buck stops at your desk.

  43. Interesting that they seemed to blame everybody except the person who made the false accusation in the first place.

  44. It seems pretty important that people take a stand in support of the future victims in this moment. Without false allegations, our society is already rife with doubt and blame of survivor narratives. The way that media and social commentary berate survivors exposes them to retraumatization and furthers their pain as they are unable to escape the incident. In this case, a lot of people are jumping to take one moment as “proof” that all allegations are false. Less than 2% of reported sexual assault cases are false allegations, so offering support for the future victims who are bound to feel unsafe coming forward to report is incredibly important. It is important that we stand for justice and push for fair trial, not indicting innocent individuals for crimes they haven’t committed, but it’s equally important that we open a safe space for real survivors to be able to report the crimes they’ve endured. We need to be able to have more accurate records, and pursue justice for victims and survivors just like we want justice for the few individuals who are falsely accused.

    1. Ahhh, the old “false allegations are rare so we must believe the (alleged) victim / survivor” trope. Never mind Brownmiller’s 2% number has never been able to be validated, let’s keep using that as a number just like the 1 in 5 stat. Both are bullshit (even the author of the web study says the 1 in 5 number shouldn’t be used, hence why Senator Gillibrand wiped it from her webpage, and don’t try Yunh either as his extrapolation is decidedly murky at best), and even generous numbers peg false allegations at 8%-50% of reported, but keep that meme alive!
      I’m all for stringing up people (men and women) who rape. Wait, women can’t rape men, because men can only have “ambivalent feelings” about being “made to penetrate” (classified as “other sexual violence”) according to feminists like Mary P. Koss.
      Take your Daycare Child Abuse, er Rape Culture, hysteria back to the SJW boards. When you want to talk about real numbers like a grown up, then you can come back here. Until then you’ll be looked at like a troll because research doesn’t bear your hysteria out. Heck, if anything, it shows your compatriots have chosen to wage a war against something that affects less women than cancer or suicide. Check your privilege.

    2. “In this case, a lot of people are jumping to take one moment as “proof” that all allegations are false.”
      Even more people were jumping to take Jackie Coakley’s story as “proof” that rape is endemic on college campuses. In particular: Rolling Stone. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, and rape statistics are even more overblown than false rape accusation rates.

  46. What makes no sense is how RS’s legal team, which I assume is a thing that exists, allowed such a deeply flawed story to go to press. As a journalist and former reporter, I have seen stories held for clarification with far fewer and less significant holes. How could so many mistakes and poor judgement calls have been made? And as the mother of two adult sons, the fact that Jackie Coakley has not been prosecuted is maddening.

Comments are closed.