Though the use of social media is at an all time high, there’s no shortage of detractors who get on their high horses and preach about how it’s leading the demise of our culture (and then, of course, posting a selfie). While there is a lot of truth in what they point out, social media does have its uses.
Advertising, promotion, and a host of other uses have made their respective founders extremely wealthy. There is, however, another use for sites like Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook not related to making money that can help a man improve his life:
Red pill truth.
Once a man becomes unplugged and scrolls though his social media feeds, it’s as though the world has been decoded to finally show him what’s lurking between the lines. As a result he sees the world, more specifically the sexual marketplace, for what it really is.
Remember this scene?
I use Twitter mainly to stay up to date on the goings on in the ‘sphere and posting the occasional crimson capsule thought or observation. I use Facebook to occasionally keep up with friends and family but mostly to demonstrate high value and establishing preselection, as most of my pictures are of me engaging in outdoor activities with my buddies, my adventures through travel, and of course, countless pictures with girls.
Over the past few months I’ve collected a series of memes, someecards, and the like to spur ideas for future articles. But instead I’ve decided to put them all in one place to show that similar to the eyes being the window into one’s soul, social media is the window into our degenerate culture.
Each one of these was posted by a Facebook “friend” of mine. You’ll see a mix of confirmations, contradictions, and feminist-inspired wet dreams. The captions will be my own red pill translation (more or less):
Women can’t pair bond after sport fucking her way through her 20s and is admitting she can’t erase the memories of the cock buffet she gorged herself on
No it’s not…and she knows it
She’ll continue to choose the bad boy until she hits the wall
And that, Junior, is where single moms come from
Funny….the illustrated chick is skinny
Women absolving themselves of their bad behavior, present and future, and blaming it on men
A classic example of women not understanding their limitations and the importance of fathers
This man may at least be starting to break through the matrix
Dread game works
Posted by one of my hard core crimson capsule comrades. The hilarity that ensued in the comments section was quite amusing
And when the asshole calls her back, she’ll answer on the first ring
The only females who bail betas out of jail are their mothers
I’ve touched on this truth before: http://goo.gl/OWZOwu
Nice guys finish last
Sluttiness is glorified.
This one was posted by a woman confirming her insatiable need for bad boys between her legs
A telltale sign of rom com overdose
A woman projecting to the world what she wants and needs in a man
False: Every woman wants a man who has it all.
A rare occasion where a woman lets slip what she thinks marriage is really all about
Women want it both ways
Tell us something we don’t already know
We see this all the time
Good question Mr. Wonka
Posted by a friend of mine. I was encouraged that he may be starting to see the light….
…until he posted this
This question (and subsequent answer) crosses all races
Translation: I’m about to hit the wall and I need to lock a man down quick
Another example of a man who seems to be on the brink of a realization
If this were true, she’d be cheating on him. And where’s her spotter?
Bonus
That’s fucking scary….
If you like this article and are concerned about the future of the Western world, check out Roosh’s book Free Speech Isn’t Free. It gives an inside look to how the globalist establishment is attempting to marginalize masculine men with a leftist agenda that promotes censorship, feminism, and sterility. It also shares key knowledge and tools that you can use to defend yourself against social justice attacks. Click here to learn more about the book. Your support will help maintain our operation.
A single mom who was relatively bangable that I met on Tinder recently said she “didn’t know” where her kid’s father is.
Bitch, is it THAT hard to say the bad boy is in jail?
or he fled the USA in order not to pay child support
or he was actually home cooking her dinner like a good beta
or she meant, “I don’t know who the father is”
That second to last picture with the girl benching: she’s using her back to make it seem like she can do much more weight than she actually can.
Does she even lift, bro?
Wrong call. Her hips are on the bench. She has solid benching form.
Regardless, she doesn’t have enough upper body strength to lift that kind of weight. It defies physics.
form is on point. still…bumper plates…she is prob using a 35 pound bar with about 2 20 pound bumper plates.
As I said before: women and crossfitters need to learn that they aren’t fooling anyone.
wait, those guys n gals doing these clean and jerks on espn are hoisting rubber plates?
I am sure that at the very high end of the crossfit world there are some really impressive athletes….the guys who get on espn are really phenomenal. But go to any box and scope out the 80% skinny fat membership population doing vids of themselves cleaning about 50 pounds and pretending it’s a work out.
Also, while I do not know for sure…I would bet that guys like Rich Froning does a lot more than Crossfit to get into shape. Crossfit is the quickest way to kill hard earned gains. Just like the chicks who looks best in yoga pants are usually doing dead lifts and squats far more than they do yoga, the CF elite are also doing a lot of real working out too.
She is not pressing the bar. Her elbows are locked.
I can hold a shit load of weight with my elbows locked.
Got a couple
Red pill truth start at the 50 second mark to about 1:02.
Magua understand the English very well ha ha ha.
Simple, sweet, and the most accurate red pill message ever.
If you haven’t seen the whole film it is a great watch.
Why we were such a BAD ASS country, BEFORE the Revolution and up until 1909 when we began the slow death spiral we’re in now. Before that time, men were independent and knew how to fight and kill…it’ll come to that, again. We are not immune from history. The collectivists have decided to DESTROY Western Civilization, and when that time comes you need to be ready.
I thought the point of that clip was to illustrate that Englishmen’s (western) notion of chivalry is now the petard they’re hoist upon. Not sure if r selection is any better
It’s a contrast between the idiot Englishman and the heroic Americans who deal with reality and the brutal truth of life, rather than the pretentious position of that represented by the English soldier. It’s why they ultimately lost the Revolution.
I’ll have to watch that movie again, for that greater narrative. That clip was among the formative patriarchal lessons I was exposed to in numerous movies in the 80s/90s.
Read James Fenimore Cooper’s “Leatherstocking Tales,” which, Last of the Mohicans, is among the 5 books. They were written around the 1820’s, and shed light upon the founding of the Republic. This movie does a great job of showing the wildness of the nation during the 1665 French and Indian War, which was a world war. The movie doesn’t give that much perspective upon the larger picture of why we became a nation. It does illustrate the individual attitudes toward the Big Government policies of a far off king.
Thanks, I would love to – whether I’ll get the time or not is another story. I may take your recommendation if I ever take an interest in American history. The place seems to have ‘gone off the reservation’ a bit in recent years.
Because the jew world banksters, themselves a bunch of faggy manginas, already knew the qualities of effeminate weakness they needed to instill in the head-strong independent American Caucasian male to weaken his resolve to resist the theft of his labor through taxation and inflation, and to weaken his resolve to revolt against his dark masters by branding manliness as patriarchal extremism.
True men are colored as the evil that ruins the world, rather than the force that builds it and maintains its working. Making us the target devices and distracts the masses from the real evildoers in this sick world.
I’ll have to see the movie again, but it’s also worth reading Twain on “Fenimore Cooper’s Literary Offenses” – http://twain.lib.virginia.edu/projects/rissetto/offense.html
1765. Typo.
Blaming it all on the Jews, as if they were some magicians, the way Black people blame everything on Whites. Jews did not found the Fed, Woodrow Wilson and JP Morgan did. Rothschild never had a branch in the US. Jews got to join the elites – they are not the entirety of the elites. Who is responsible for the rise and rule of the unaccountable elites? Look in the mirror. Go to the mirror, boy!
yeah…
Cooper’s stories are not 100% historically accurate. However, they do illustrate early America, and the settlers who pushed back the borders of the original colonies.
Seriously? It’s all the Jews fault. Actually, I blame the philosophy of altruism, and anyone who believes that the ends justifies the means.
Just because Jews didn’t found it doesn’t mean they aren’t the owners of it today. Go back and do some deep historical research and you’ll discover what I already know.
Now, Jews don’t found, build or create much of what they now control. They are parasites. They invade their host and take it over. The centuries old house of Rothschild, Jews by the way, knew well how to control the world without putting their name all over it.
Of course JP Morgan and other non-Jews founded the fed. But you’re looking at the name on the front door, not who really owns and controls it. But who “owned” or more importantly controlled JP Morgan? Who allowed JP Morgan to control the banking system at the turn of the century? Yup, Jew Rothschild, that’s who. The Rothschilds appointed JP Morgan as their representative over their US interest, including establishment of the Federal Reserve.
To this day, the Fed is now run by and presumably owned by Jews. Also, who do you think run the major banks in the US? The media? And, many corporate boards? That’s what I’m saying. Just because Disney Corporation bears his name in no way indicates that this All-American company is owned by Disney or his heirs. If fact, it is now and has been controlled by Jews for decades, especially it’s media arm ABC.
Since Jews control the banking and financial systems, they control the lawmakers and laws. They set and manipulate prices of everything from interest rates on Fed T-bills to the price of oil and gold. They are the market makers in every major stock and commodities exchange.
As result, their best returns on investment come from war, financial crises, and indebting sovereign nations and their peoples through lending money to countries who are completely capable of minting their own currency — mainly the United States. By having this control, they reach into the pockets of every human who pays taxes to these illegitimate slave masters, who demand taxes to be paid in the currency they produce and control. This system of financial slavery is the most endemic problem around the world, impoverishing billions of people on the planet by destroying humans independence and freedom as a result. Jews profit from financial slavery, poverty, misery and death.
As for the rise of the elites, there has always been an elitest class. Even America as founded by a very small group of aristocratic land owner politicians. Sure they tried to construct a republic where individuals could enjoy freedom as they themselves sought from the crown. But even our republic was sold out by Alexander Hamilton, and agent of his Jew overlords, the house of Rothschild, when let them establish the First Bank of the United States, to control this fledgling country’s monetary system and currency. Andrew Jackson successfully drove them out, albeit for a shot time. But like the virulent virus they are, they came right back, stronger than ever. Lincoln, Kenedy, and others who tried to stop the “rise of the elites”, as you say, were assassinated and murdered as a result of trying to wrestle control of the hands of world Jewery.
Your analysis is simplistic and your conclusions incorrect.
As for stopping the rise of the elites, they rose to power centuries ago. There is nothing for me, you or anyone else to stop. it’s a centuries old establishment that was in power loooong before my granddaddy was even born. So no mirror will show anyone the solution bozo, as there is no stopping something that’s already arrived. And as far as unseating the elite class from power, that will take nothing less than a global revolution against the world banking system, reestablishment of national sovereignty under every countries constitution by regaining control over the national money supply.
However, just like privatization of oil production is the main engine of global war for the last 60 years, I speculate that regaining control of currency production would take nothing less than all-out world war as the population of the planet fights to unseat the guberments that the world bankers empower and control. Again, consider who owns and controls those institutions, and you’ll hopefully reconsider your comments.
< I have l0st 40lbs f0ll0wing a pr00gram I saw which f0cuses 0n the tw0 things we kn0w
are g00d f0r us: a healthy BALANCED diet c0mbined with a cardi0 regime. It really is
that simple,,,N0 miracle it’s FREE find
Here/
=============================================================
He should have pointed to a spot and said, “Big Spider”. See how really tough they are …
just as many men are afraid of spiders as women, as well as wasps and bees.
A bee can’t even phase me, I can’t even realize why the fuck people are afraid of bees, like they’re harmless as long as you don’t swat them or something they leave you alone.
They’re annoying if anything
They should change their flat tire by themselves, if I can do it a lot of women can do it too.
Drilling a hole in the wall, fixing a bicycle tire, painting. Can they do that too? 80% I see can’t. But I have to admit, the best sex is with those 20%. They are generally more masculine (higher test. better and more sex.)
For many reasons most women don’t do those things but it does n’t mean they would never be able to do it if they put an effort.
I correctly did many tasks that women supposedly can’t do, including fixing roof, and I’m not stronger nor more skilled than average women. It’s not pleasant all the times when weather or conditions are not good but I still enjoy doing it most of the times and I feel satisfaction once it’s done.
“effort”. Yeah, I can make become a millionaire if I want, just like other guys here. Doesn’t mean I have interest in doing what is needed for that e.g becoming some YouTube star or starting a business. If you can do it but don’t stop saying you can do it.
I got your point… But still, drilling a hole, fixing a bike and painting is way easier than becoming a millionnaire for almost everybody…
I know lost of men who can’t do those, but I can and have. I’ve also done plumbing and electrical repairs. And, I’ve helped my mother in law add a new room to her house when the guys were off fishing
Nobody here cares sweetie
Men here don’t care that you can do that stuff. I guess it’s necessary if you plan on being a single cat lady. Not necessary for a healthy relationship with a real man. Can you cook well, are you willing to clean, and do you treat your man with respect and submit to him?
yes, I’m a damned good cook and I clean and treat men with the respect they deserve. you’I’d tell to fuck off with your attitude of “poor me women won’t fuck me because they’re bitches” while all the time, its your attitude that’s not getting you laid
oh, and I don’t like cats
NO, BECAUSE WOMEN WHO CAN SURVIVE WITHOUT BEING BEAT UP BY MEN LIKE YOU SCARE THE FUCK OUT OF YOU
fuck off with your attitude
Thanks for making me laugh.
Forget plumbing and electrical repairs. Have you done some fucking? I suggest you better do that. It will make you less of a manhater, and possibly cure you of your pedophile desires.
Wow you escalted real quick, in like three comments. Your craziness is showing.
Get some therapy for that abuse you seem to be angry about
That was uncalled for. You have no evidence that that the person you accuse contemplates or advocates violence. That you can do what a man does, so what? Any man can do that. But women can do things men can’t possibly do. And it is in that comparative advantage that women can best invest themselves. It’s simple economics. The second point is about opportunity cost. While you are busy doing what a man can do, what have you given up than only a woman can do?
Please stop screaming and just go away. Nobody cares.
I’m sure they all “worked” really hard to save up for the expenses of that safari. They sure strike me as the type, oh yeah!
◐◍●◐◍●◐ Join it , Now….its Real And Trustable.. MAKE M0NEY AT Your H0ME 88$ pr H0UR.✯. Marina . although Ashley `s report is terrific, on tuesday I got a great Lotus Carlton after having made USD 6753 this-past/five weeks an would you believe ten-grand last-m0nth . without a doubt its the best-work Ive ever done . I started this 6 months ago and pretty much straight away was bringing h0me at least USD 83 per/hr ….
For more Information Open this…
➧➧➧➧ https://www.JoinWork/PartTime.C0m
☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏☏
Haha thanks for the compilation. I see that self promoting bullshit from females all the time.
Agree. I see it listed in different articles on sites explaining social media and how it’s changed over time. I don’t have a Facebook account but it’s interesting to read some of these articles (non-business related) about how social media is changing how people interactive with one another.
Women need these “thoughts out loud” to convince (or promote) themselves and others around them. You know a woman has low self esteem by the number of selfies posted or by the number of these thought tags posted everywhere.
The topic of feminism only became popular on Facebook over the last few years in my opinion.
Now there are You-Go-Grl posts non-stop.
I never had a real, personal Facebook account, only one for a work project for a short time (which I then deleted), but in the course of developing some leads, I found some chicks, typically fat and black, literally posted pics of themselves ALL DAY LONG, in various smiling poses. Nevermind it’s like, get a life (and a job), they had 50 likes and men posting, almost as if to mock (but it wasn’t), “damn, can’t believe you got no man”. I have to think that eventually reality has to set it. Lots of likes, maybe some dick here and there, but no ability to lock down a life long beta provider.
Like Clark said one time: I use facebook for case study.
This reminds me of the time that I was debating this so called conservative female on FB not so long ago. She was on a mutual friend’s page mouthing off about how soccer is a “manly” sport as if she understood what it was to be a Man herself. I observed as she petulantly argued with every Man who posted an opinion to the contrary, and after having properly assessed her motivation, launched an intellectual offensive against her.
I finally got her to expose herself as a feminist, and ended up reducing her arguments to cinders. As expected, she slithered off in defeat but not before referring to me as a “bible thumping sexist” lol.
I thought i’d submit some of the memes she has on her page, so you all can get a better idea of what kind of female i was dealing with there. Not surprisingly, she has 3 kids and not surprisingly she is a bonafide land whale. She is also about as cute as a bathtub full of red bellied piranhas.
The funniest thing was watching her attempt to convince others that she was an expert on soccer because she played it “in her youth” lol.
https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/522249_737659903179_1285544061_n.jpg?oh=ddb6a839f830c125e7a56f88316b402a&oe=562BF45C
https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/407706_736517861839_898599602_n.jpg?oh=e51b9541da5a53ca1c95293063fca6cb&oe=562BC6B5
https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xaf1/v/t1.0-9/262888_721063297909_1823099095_n.jpg?oh=2cf0c535cbe5b21ec59181a0a6bfdfdf&oe=5633D95F
https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/564680_721062848809_1365875583_n.jpg?oh=59d4e3b1428ba8cc7afee136a3db9542&oe=55FCBC1C
https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/1459824_10100122268426589_6019739064974647026_n.jpg?oh=4400b901951479ec7296cb0e1120aa15&oe=55F38638
https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xta1/t31.0-8/10841990_10100221719580679_109495577656128768_o.jpg
(this one is her default)
I had two nasty debates with fat ugly single women on Facebook. It’s just a waste of time to deal with them. While I wish I could totally ignore them,
knowing many will be voting for Hillary, does make their irrationalness my
concern.
There’s really no point in debating with them just for the sake of correcting them, since they aren’t open to correction.
If however, there are males around and you want to out a closet feminist (as i did) it’s best to take them on for that purpose, so that others can see the (substandard) quality of female and avoid it (if they are male) and avoid being like it (if they are female)
It is the God given right of every red blooded Man to expose the bs of feminism, obvious and otherwise, and the bs of feminists, declared and otherwise, for the benefit of males everywhere.
Bingo.
You see a lot of people overlook the “power of argument”.
Sometimes I think that the whole “run to the mountains! It’s all collapsing! Go live in the woods!” prepper shit is really a psyop to make all those pesky libertarian-bent patriot types remove themselves from society and not be ” in the same room” as the various progressives, feminists, and other dolts who need someone nearby to tell them how stupid their ideas are.
You see, you cannot simply round up political opponents and deport them somewhere. So instead they convinced them to run off and go live in a cabin.
When I argue with feminists and other losers, it’s not to change their mind. It’s to affect those who may know them or read their shit.
Having never had an original idea in my life, I know this concept is spreading. Hence the need to regulate the internet such that you can be barred from it if too many people get their feelings hurt.
And if that happens, the only recourse will be to put on a brown uniform and start bashing heads in the street.
You had me at everything you said. I’m in total agreement.
Personally i’ve never been one to run from a fight. While i believe that this society is falling apart at the seams, i’m going to go down swinging as it happens.
I have the confidence to believe that i will survive the collapse that’s coming, since the matriarchy that we are currently under is unsustainable since it’s built on the bs lie that males and females can achieve an equality of ends (progressivism) and not simply an equality of means (constitutionalism)
Female=closet feminist, imo.
A lot of women are catching on to the “I’m not a feminist” social cred but meanwhile the blue-haired screechers are doing all the trailblazing, dynamiting, tree-cutting, rock breaking, field-razing work into new grounds of misandry and gynocentrism. The “I’m not feminist” crowd can wander along in the same direction unnoticed and it’s exactly what they do.
Just like with muslims, feminist females exist into one of two categories: active and clandestine/apathetic.
The active ones (jihaadists for muslims, declared feminists for females) are the ones making the loudest noise, engaging in public militancy, and all around acting in manners unbecoming of a civilized person. Aggression and obstinate natures are par for the course for both. They are both committed to their cause and no external viewpoint to the contrary can cause them to reconsider because of their extensive inculcation in their respective philosophy.
The clandestine ones on the other hand (the muslim community that is quiet on jihaadist atrocities, the females who are quiet or apathetic about outspoken feminists) are the ones who generally don’t make a stink about their philosophies; they either quietly further them or quietly benefit from them so they have no reason or compunction to oppose them openly.
While i won’t use absolutes in either case, i am using this to emphasize that a majority standard of both demographics display the characteristics i described.
And it goes without saying that i am not stating that the frequency to commit violence is on an equal ratio between both groups, just equating them insofar as to why they do what they do and how they tend to do it.
It’s the reason why the nonsense has gone on for too long…no one speaks out against it. People are too afraid of being on the wrong side.
It’s every red pill man’s duty to call out this bullshit whenever they hear it.
Yeah I heard that Muslim taxi drivers stopped their taxis to dance in the street upon news of the towers coming down.
Your posts have been amazing reads, btw.
Thank you sir. I don’t tend to post an absolute on something unless i believe myself to be within a 99% threshold of accuracy.
That involves painstaking research backed up with some typical footwork at the local library (just to make sure)
I don’t have a facebook now, but I used to debate feminists on myspace and in the end they would slither away and call me a male chauvinist as well….then’d they’d slither right back and ask to hook up. Most of them were overweight as well.
The duality of females. The ones they end up hating are the ones they end up being attracted to. This is true a lot more often than it is not.
I used to think they were hard to figure out, until i understood the driving force behind their actions: emotional chaos.
The only consistency in true chaos is a lack of consistency.
Once you understand that, you can anticipate and even plan for, the chaotic actions of females.
It’s not just a possibility, it’s a necessity, at least if you want to keep your sanity intact.
I agree. I think also it’s the spirit of antagonism, or rather opposites. If you are in shape. a woman will try to get you to gain weight and not work out so much. If you are not in shape, she’ll try to convince you to work out. If you are happy doing one job, she’ll try to convince you to do something else. If you are wearing a red shirt, she’ll try her best to get you to wear a blue one. None of these choices are designed to make you better, she just wants to change you just for the sake of doing it.
Absolutely. When you have an input into another person’s life, to the point that you can get them to do this or that, you wield power over that person that over time becomes accepted and second nature on the subconscious spectrum.
This therefore explains the phenomena of “henpecked males.”
When Men have this sort of power over Women (which we wield responsibly aka NOT in a nagging fashion) a patriarchy is established and society benefits, as those in society are accepting of their roles and flourish in them. (Men lead, Women follow along with the children)
When females have this sort of power over Men as a majority standard, you have a matriarchy in effect and it has an inimical effect on society that is cumulative the longer it remains as the standard.
It’s obvious which one we are in now…and it’s obvious why this society isn’t worth the dung it deposits as a result.
Myspace, the place where the “Myspace angle” was invented. It’s when fat chicks put up photos of themselves where their overly madeup faces are dominating the picture, usually a downwards from up higher” direction. .
When you see the MySpace angle, you know she’s a fatass. Next!
yep!
Imagine a world (as Dalrock and Rational Male’s Tomassi) have pointed out, where men who like George Castanza go around posting how women like short, fat, balding men. That’s the world we live in, basically, the way these fat women carry on.
Except that you can’t help being short, and can’t really help being bald. It’s more like a world where men go around posting how much women like homeless bums; smelly, broke and drunk. All things that the homeless bum could change if he so desired. Just like a fat chick can stop eating a box of Twinkies for lunch..
It’s pretty insulting when women look for a man with traits he can’t change but expect men to accept fat women that can change their gut size
That is the rub. Many women have expectations of their ideal man and then you have a look at this special snowflake (and you’re thinking to yourself “just how fat are you, again?”).
Women hate this one the most. They hate to admit that they are batting way out of their league (and weight class) but a short guy has no chance. This is a fat woman calling out a short guy for being short but ignoring the fact that she is fat – not curvy – fat.
I kindly remind women of this one, very often, because I know it pisses them off. But, they really don’t have much to say after I bring up the whole argument “but a short guy can’t get taller..a fat woman can lose weight”.
Silence after that one…nowhere to go.
“”but a short guy can’t get taller..a fat woman can lose weight””
Driver, you and every other Man on here will probably appreciate this little anecdote from the late great Winston Churchill.
Supposedly, there was some gala or event that he and some landwhale benny hill in drag looking socialist by the name of Bessie Braddock attended.
At some point, Churchill bumped or otherwise stumbled around her, and she remarked: “Winston, you’re drunk and what’s more you are disgustingly drunk.”
Not missing a beat, Churchill’s immediate response was: “Bessie, my dear, you are ugly, and what’s more, you are disgustingly ugly. But tomorrow I shall be sober and you will still be disgustingly ugly”
ZING!
Churchill confirmed himself as a BOSS with that one. In later years the progs have tried to say he didn’t say this or said this to someone else, but like so much of what they say the effort itself is just pure bs.
Pretty insulting when men look for a woman who is both a virgin and a whore. Oh, and one who only eats cheap food, doesn’t drink, has big tits and weighs 98 pounds. And don’t let you know she is smarter than you, because that insults your intelligence
Female Virgins no longer exist in western society, I don’t know any man nowadays that expect a virgin b/c most women are whores. Also most desperate betas will take anything, even fat whales that don’t even check off one point on the huge list of imaginary requirements you made up. In reality if a girl is young, and over a 5/10 most men would hit that.
Of course they do! But then, I expect you are middle eastern and have fallen for the lies taught by the religious leaders, and think its OK to rape western women.
Good one. I’m all for airing out the facts. Women (especially today) do not hesitate to openly criticize a man (let alone all men) out in the open, on TV, etc…it’s considered the norm in society.
I’ll gladly tell a woman the truth whether she likes to hear it or not (especially if the gloves come off like it did in your example). Women will keep conducting themselves in the same manner until someone (a man ) steps up to the plate to challenge them.
I am that man.
I’m an Atheist of East African decent. Nice try on your armchair psychoanalysis though.
Now let me try: You are an old saggy white woman who’s value is all but gone in the sexual marketplace. You are now depressed and on a variety of medications and have some type of anxiety. You live with at least 2 pets and spend your off time trolling sites that disagree with you.
Gee, I happen to be the parent of a six month old, which means I’ve probably had sex since you did. I am only on one med, for blood pressure problems I’ve had vsince childhood and I don’t have any pets, oh, and my extras fat is far. from saggy. Talk about trolling sites looking four someone who disagrees,, you fit that bill, east african is middle eastern and I’ll bet you were raised muslim, simply by your attitudes towards women
its not rape if she knows whats going on, agreed, and is paid well. you should read about “sponsoring” happen in saudi arabia, and thats just one example. but if that profile picture shows you, then no one has interest in making you offers. or rape you. i dont know why why you are worried about rape? it`s almost certain it wont happen to you.
its rape when it is unwanted, which happens more often that what you describe. just because you throw a few dollars onto a woman after you raped her does not make it any less a rape. it just makes you a fucking prick who needs to be in prison
Yeah, I know, right? It goes along with their incapability of reason and fairness.
East Africa isn’t middle eastern you fucking idiot. The middle east doesn’t include Kenya, Ethiopia, and other east african countries. I was raised Orthodox Christian, haha why is it so hard for you to believe that a non muslim isn’t a beta supplicating castrated male feminist who hates themselves.
the saudis do make little contracts before the event, and it is exactly described what sexual “services” are to be expected and how they will be paid. “throwing a few dollars onto her” doesnt fit here. and darling, since i know about game i have no desire to rape. you can come back if you actually write something that has substance, instead of the typical “you rapist, prick, you deserve to be in prison” blabla that has no merit whatsoever.
but you aren’t in Saudi Arabia, are you so its rape.
how is sex with consent rape?
I don’t know who you are…..
But If you write another racist comment…..
I will find you and I will kill you!!!
“Gee, I happen to be the parent of a six month old”
Fuck off silly lying woman!!! Looking at you photo it seems like you are the granny of a hundred year old!
RACIST!!!!!
GO KILL YOUR SELF, YOU WHITE NATIONALIST CUNT!
DIE SOMEWHERE, YOU LEFTIST HYPOCRITE!
PEOPLE LIKE YOU PRETEND THAT YOU ARE VERY TOLERANT!
BUT IT IS BULLSHIT!
YOU KNOW IT AND SO DO WE!
YOU AND OTHERS LIKE YOU ARE RACIST CHEEKY ASSHOLES!
HATEFUL WHITE WOMEN SEEKING ALWAYS TO OPPRESS MINORITIES AND CALLING MEN OF OTHER NATIONS RAPISTS!
IT WAS WOMEN LIKE YOU, WHO IN THE PAST WOULD FALSELY ACCUSE BLACK MEN OF RAPE, BECAUSE YOU HATED THEM AND THEIR WOMEN AND WANTED THE BLACKS TO DIE!
RACIST WHITE WOMEN LIKE YOU HATE EVERYONE, INCLUDING YOUR OWN WHITE MEN!
WHITE MEN HAVE BEEN OPPRESSING WHITE MEN AND MINORITIES SINCE TIMES IMMEMORIAL AND EVEN IN THE MODERN WORLD YOU ARE STILL AT IT!
SHAME ON YOU!
absolute gold
Unless it’s George doing “opposite day”.
Didn’t it strike you that he was doing an legit impression of an Alpha Man there?
There are a lot of women out there calling themselves conservatives when they are not truly so.
You see there are koolaid drinkers, and there are people who drink it and don’t know it.
And modern conservatism is so blue pill that women who call themselves conservative can have a feminist streak a mile wide and get away with it.
On occasion I have had so-called conservative crypto feminist women unmask themselves in a rage by giving them a good old combo dose of red pill and some Moldbuggian flavor.
Red pill and conservatism don’t mix well, because conservatives are so indoctrinated into blue pill it seems intended. This is why when conservatives are in power, they do not roll back progressivism. They may not further it for the time they are in power, but they don’t actually go alpha and roll it back and tell progressives to fuck off.
I agree with everything except the remark about conservatism, because i think what you’re referring to is an offshoot of it, conservatism filtered by progressivism, aka neoconservatism.
I’ll give you a related example: People tend to cite examples of politicians employing wall street types as an example of the flaws of capitalism, when that is actually an offshoot of it commonly referred to as “crony” capitalism. It’s capitalism mixed with trace elements of socialism which people tend to confuse for the real deal.
Philosophies in their most purest and inviolable forms aren’t invalidated simply because of the existence of so called followers who tend to move the goalpost tenets because of their own agenda.
This is also why the existence of so called Christians who are socialists and for homo marriage and abortion doesn’t mean that orthodox Christianity itself has changed, just that some of those who feign to represent it or incorrectly believe they represent it are seeking to change it from its traditional definition to a superimposed progressive one.
I consider myself a traditional conservative. I opposed GW Bush on his neocon policies of “exporting democracy” as well as his penchant for increasing the size of government through the formation of the dept of Homeland Security, for instance. Even though Bush and i would find common ground on social issues, the fact that we don’t on foreign/domestic policy as well as some fiscal issues means that i am more of a conservative than he actually was, and far more than the media interpreted him to be, especially considering that they label any R as a conservative in order to create an “us vs them” scenario to rile up the reliably hardcore leftist voter base.
A conservative can only be a “complete” conservative if he encompasses fiscal (free market, low taxes, small government) foreign (non interventionist unless a LEGITIMATE American interest is threatened) and most especially, social. (for legitimate Marriage, against abortion, etc.)
Conservatism in this pure form can’t be tainted by the evidence of conservative leaning “lite” members who only follow pieces of it, making them CINO’s. (conservative in name only)
While American conservatism tends to differ from non American conservatism, the basic concepts are the same…with the possible exception being God, since at least as far as America is concerned, conservatism there is the natural political extension of one’s judeoChristian beliefs.
I’ve heard your belief from other self identified non conservatives who refuse to consider themselves conservative precisely because of the pseudo-conservative neocon types you and a legitimate conservative like myself are opposed to, so i thought i’d give you some insight there, since I’ve been debating over this for a couple of decades now.
You are of course, free to disagee. As i essentially said, i just wanted to share some insight.
Ah yes I know much about the neocons. I’ve battled them back when I was working for the Ron Paul campaign(s).
You know, it was from the neocons that the SJWs learned their tactics, which is really a “coming home” considering that the neocons have their roots in Trotsky.
It started back in 2002 when you have everybody from Rove to Rumsfeld calling anybody who did not want to go to war in Iraq an “anti-Semite”.
So naturally more than a decade later in that environment we have a generation where any accusation of pretty much any villain label will come out of simple disagreement.
This might be why mainstream (neo)conservatives are so horribly blind to SJWs. They are of the same ilk.
Ugh, this again. So people can be trusted to run a business and make money without interference, but not when choosing who to fuck or whether to suck out a fetus? Fucking “conservative” mental gymnastics – as bad as the god damn liberals.
1. Those that don’t breed are going to be overrun and ruled by those that do.
2. In this day and age with dozens of varieties of birth control abortion should rarely if ever be an issue.
3. Constitutionally, at least in the USA, this was an issue that should have gone to the individual states.
4. I would never willingly be a party to an abortion except in a few specific extreme circumstances but I personally don’t give a shit what you and others do or don’t do. I would suggest reading Will Durant on the subject of the survivability of societies that don’t breed.
1) So are we all inferior to the Duggars? The quality of my life is much more than how many times I spawned.
2) I like the catholic take on it–either contraception is wrong or it isn’t–kinda silly to say certain forms are ok and others aren’t.
3) Not sure what issue you are referring to, but one form of tyrant is no less oppressive or more preferable than another. And keep in mind that state governments in the USA are equivalent to national governments in the EU.
4) Agreed. However, worrying about societies that don’t breed seems silly to me. Can you name a society that went away because they failed to breed? Even if this were true, our society is already failing, and it has nothing to do with breeding. Quality, not quantity.
I don’t think you are reading what I wrote. Mr. Conservative up there thinks we need more oppressive laws. You wisely take a freedom minded libertarian approach.
I agree on 1, 2 and 4. As for 3, no, gay marriage and abortion shouldn’t be a state issue. As for abortion, it shouldn’t be anything other than an issue between a woman and her doctor. As for gay marriage, it shouldn’t be an issue for anybody other than the church. The state has no reason to be involved.
The debate about abortion is fundamentally an ethical one about what a fetus actually is. The answer to that informs us as to whether abortion should be legal or not on the basis that unjust killing is morally wrong. Running a business does not entail such ethical dilemmas so your attempt at equating them is wrong. For example, a conservative could say that he believes abortion to be murder (unjust killing) and run a small business without no mental gymnastics as you put it. That’s because practically everybody regards murder as morally wrong and practically nobody regards business as morally wrong.
Wrong. If business was not an ethical issue, there would not be so many regulations on business. It was children dying in carpet presses that made work safety laws. Ask the Indian workers of Union Carbide whether business whether business is an ethical concern.
Regardless, I still don’t see abortion as requiring an ethical debate about fetuses because that assumes the premise that the government can control your body. Call me a slippery sloper, but I am not willing to start down that path for the greater good.
“This might be why mainstream (neo)conservatives are so horribly blind to SJWs. They are of the same ilk.”
Pretty much. Rove has more in common with obama than he does with people like you and me. At the heart of their motivation lies power and the ruthless pursuit of it. The letters D and R might as well be listed contiguously in the alphabet, since they operate so similarly at least in regard to their hierarchy.
This is also part of the reason why there’s a civil war brewing in the GOP, as the establishment types led by Boehner, Mcconnell and the other “Rove” types are seeking to purge the party of the grassroots tea party/constitutional/christian conservatives within it. It’s because of this reason that the GOP always pushes for the most obvious RINO presidential candidate. Given their past efforts, they seem to be winning the war. It’s a pyrrhic victory that will only end up making them go the way of the Whig, of course.
On a different note, i would like to mention that Ron Paul is in my belief a hybrid of socially liberal and fiscally conservative beliefs. There was even video of him from a few years ago where he declared that he and obama’s followers “overlap” until it was scrubbed from the netcrawler. I have thoroughly researched his views over the years and found his social conservatism exaggerated, at least in regards to abortion. On the subject of homosexual marriage, RP is by no means a conservative, but given his self description as a libertarian i don’t think he would disagree.
This is why i think Paul’s followers tend to be fiscal liberals who are for abortion and homo marriage but are for lower taxes and smaller government (despite the fact they support a government that builds an infrastructure to support those 2 social issues)
I was one of the first to coin the phrase “liberaltarian” to properly describe the RP effect, and contrast it with the classical libertarianism of the Founding Fathers’, who have more in common with modern day orthodox conservatism than with RP’s libertarianism, interesting enough.
RP types tend to be pretty rabid in their devotion. Despite their fiscal conservatism they tend to operate in the same militant fashion as orthodox liberals, which always makes debates with them inflammatory, to say the least.
Instead of resorting to typical polemics, why not debate on the constitutional merits of abortion and homosexual Marriage?
Or is knee jerk pejorative the best you can intellectually provide?
Okay, neither are in the constitution and thus the government should have no power to regulate them. There should be no such thing as government issued marriage certificate nor the attendant rights of marriage. Abortion is the government interfering with a person’s body. I don’t see where they are given that power in the Constitution. There is a semi-valid argument that these topics should be left to the states, but I would still argue the states shouldn’t have the right to interfere.
Yes neither of them are in the constitution. I will address them point for point.
“There should be no such thing as government issued marriage certificate nor the attendant rights of marriage. ”
Agreed.
“Abortion is the government interfering with a person’s body. I don’t see where they are given that power in the Constitution”
The problem is, the bodily autonomy argument collides head on with two amendments.
The 5th amendment: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
The Founding Fathers made no distinction between developing life and the rights attributed to it before or after development. Their interpretations of the quickening (evident in Jefferson’s remarks regarding the barbaric abortive efficiency of the native American) indicates they held a strong pro life belief, which is reflected in the constitution’s lack of a bodily autonomy exception within amendment V.
This is also why it lists person and not “citizen” since the latter would by logical extension indicate that a process would need to take place before the life in question was entitled to protections afforded by the 5th.
In other words, if the Constitution had used “citizen” instead of person here, a developing life would not be protected under this amendment since it would have to be born in order to qualify. By using “person” they distinguish that regardless of the progression of the fetal stage, it is indeed a person that is qualified for this protection regardless of the stage of development.
The 14th amendment, paragraph one:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Abortion laws infringe on the rights of Men to have equal input into the developing life they helped create. They make it so ONLY females can have the final, legal say on whether a developing life lives or dies. This was especially evident in PP vs Casey, when the court erroneously ruled that a female can get an abortion regardless of the Father’s belief to the contrary. Even during colonial times (and again referencing Jefferson specifically) it was understood that the Father had a “natural” right (one which can exist independent of a law to support it) to raise his seed as was the customary standard. The SCOTUS once again took it upon itself to expand on the “right” of abortion in PP vs Casey, regardless of what the Constution had to actually say on it.
Roe for its part was unconstitutional in that it used pseudoscience (an arbitrary 24 weeks) which 9 judges in Black issued (when they did their best impression of ob-gyns) when they inferred more from the Constitution than it actually allows in order to create the “right” to abortion.
(This fulfilled Jefferson’s prophecy regarding judicial omnipotence in “Marbury vs Madison” btw)
Regardless of the medical limitations at the time, SCOTUS felt themselves medically qualified to pick 24 weeks when they stated that 24-28 weeks was probably the viability cutoff for developing life. In the days since, as medical technology has caught up with judicial activism, we have been able to adjust the viability standard to a definitive 24 weeks and we have made inroads into lowering viability to 22-24, which means that it is possible for a baby to be born within 2 weeks of the abortion threshold, since babies have survived being born even at that early developmental stage.
All this and the fact that developing life has been proven to feel pain as early as 20 weeks (and is theorized to feel pain at even earlier stages of development) means that abortion laws grant an unconstitutional right to murder (and torture) developing life and irrespective of several factors:
Medical science has shown that developing life is more than just a “clump of cells” as facial features can be detected as early as 6 weeks in development.
There is no constitutional right to abortion.
The 5th grants specific protections to them and the 14th grants protections to the Fathers who would object.
Indeed, even Roe herself came to understand the fallacy of her beliefs, which is why she’s done her best to atone for her past actions ever since.
On homosexual Marriage:
“There is a semi-valid argument that these topics should be left to the states, but I would still argue the states shouldn’t have the right to interfere.”
I actually agree, insofar as one understands that there is no right for the government to interfere with the definition for a religious institution that it did not create. Since the first amendment grants protections to an establishment of faith, having the government hear this argument (as they are in essence doing now) is itself a vast overreach of constitutional authority, since they are contemplating fundamentally changing the definition of an institution that the US government itself did not create.
This would also mean that a State for its part cannot change the definition either, since it is bound by what the Constitution says verbatim on the first amendment. It would be the equivalent of a State trying to bring back slavery and irrespective of the 13th-15th amendments that would prohibit that.
The only constitutional way homosexual marriage could indeed be interpreted as a legitimate right in the constitution was if it went through the constitutional amendment process. This occurs in one of two ways, although for the sake of brevity i will only list the more common and popularly understood one:
Proposal by 2/3 of the House and Senate and ratification by 3/4 of the States.
The amendment must by logical necessity issue a redaction of the first amendment, specifically the part about “congress shall make no law” with a statement that indicates an ability to make laws that can and do affect establishments of faith, such as would be the case in the SCOTUS redefining Marriage.
Since this has not happened, homosexual marriage for its part cannot be Constitutionally considered a right, regardless of revisionist interpretations of the 14th amendment. (which i will also explain if you like)
Do not buy the person/citizen argument. The use of person is to protect everybody including foreigners, women, etc. It’s to protect the minority from the majority. Further, the Constitution does not define person. I don’t care what the FF’s might have thought, they did not write in fetus rights or define it. How a citizen is defined implies that they have to be born. Also, a strong pro-life belief does not mean they wanted it as the law.
But all that doesn’t matter. You yourself claim it is a developing life. That life is developing inside somebody else and until it comes out, the host has complete control over it. The government should not tell you what you can and can’t do to your own body. They should not tell you that you can’t commit suicide or do drugs or slug down an abortion pill. It’s not their business. Get the fuck out of people’s private lives.
As for gay marriage, no the government is not trying to redefine a religious institution. They are trying to redefine the governmental definition of marriage and who can get the rights attendant with said marriage. Governments pass and alter laws all the time. That is all they are doing. State sanctioned marriage and religious marriage have bled together and shouldn’t be. If the government is to give special rights and privileges to two people, those rights should be available to any two people.
I didn’t say business cannot involve ethics only that running a business contains no fundamental ethical dilemma.
If I was running a business exploiting Indian children to the point they were dying, people wouldn’t be saying “hey nevermind about the kids, the very concept of trading goods and services is a real ethical dilemma we need to discuss”
But do people oppose the very concept of abortion and often regard it as almost always morally wrong.
It is an ethical debate because it is fundamentally about the status of the fetus. Is it another human with rights or is it not? This leads to debates about what constitutes a human in the moral sense of the term and forces debate about what makes a human a person.
“The use of person is to protect everybody including foreigners, women, etc. It’s to protect the minority from the majority. It’s to protect the minority from the majority. Further, the Constitution does not define person.”
Historical citation, please.
“I don’t care what the FF’s might have thought, they did not write in fetus rights or define it. How a citizen is defined implies that they have to be born. Also, a strong pro-life belief does not mean they wanted it as the law.”
They didn’t have to. The 5th makes it clear what they intended, therefore no redundancy was needed. Your argument is the equivalent of saying that they didn’t want every citizen to have guns, just the military. This is a view that is nowhere supported in the constitution and which the gun grabbers tend to make.
People either read more into the Constitution than was intended, or they read less than what is actually expressed. You are falling in the latter, especially given your dismissive statements regarding the 5th and the “person” argument i am making, which was ratified along with everything before it. The fact is this is text, and it is now up to you to show me why the Constitution didn’t mean person and meant “only those who are born” using legitimate historical reference.
“But all that doesn’t matter. You yourself claim it is a developing life. That life is developing inside somebody else and until it comes out, the host has complete control over it. The government should not tell you what you can and can’t do to your own body. They should not tell you that you can’t commit suicide or do drugs or slug down an abortion pill. It’s not their business. Get the fuck out of people’s private lives.”
When you use the word “host” you invariably assign the fetus the perception of a parasite, one that is unwelcome. I find this interesting. How exactly is a fetus a “host” when it came about through a natural propagative method? How is it exempt from the 5th amendment when at 6 weeks facial features can be evinced? A developing life is a person in the making, how is it therefore exempt from being given all the rights that come with 5th amendment personhood protections? How is it ethical to terminate life at will as if a person was the God of that life?
Regardless of the philosophies of it, the FACT is it’s not constitutional and not in the Constitution unless you can prove otherwise. Your beliefs to that effect, including those regarding attempted suicide, are just that, beliefs. They are not constitutional. You can believe what you want, but you can’t make it Constitutionally compliant.
“As for gay marriage, no the government is not trying to redefine a religious institution. They are trying to redefine the governmental definition of marriage and who can get the rights attendant with said marriage. Governments pass and alter laws all the time. That is all they are doing. State sanctioned marriage and religious marriage have bled together and shouldn’t be. If the government is to give special rights and privileges to two people, those rights should be available to any two people.”
Really? When the government put itself into the Marriage business it started offering “civil” Marriage for regulation and profit. What Constitutional amendment grants them that ability? Can you list it?
Your remark ignores the FACT that the government DID NOT create the institution of Marriage, it merely involved itself in it for regulation and tax related purposes. Participation does not equal validation, anymore than the government forcing us into healthcare means they are constitutionally permitted to do so.
Where does it say in the Constitution that the government can interfere with an institution that it did not create?
If the government started redefining Christian communion and saying everyone had a right to it, would you therefore agree?
Always a pleasure to read your posts,,good stuff man
Thank you sir. Decades of research, literally.
Beautiful.
Excellent content Daniel. Keep up the good work.
Well thought out and supported.
I don’t doubt it. It isn’t like they actually teach this stuff in school.
“Historical citation, please.”
I’m still waiting for you to cite where “person” as used in the Constitution referred to an unborn person. All you have done is cite TJ’s distaste for it. That is not any evidence that person was meant to include those not yet born. When clauses use citizen and then switch to person, it is pretty clear that the drafter meant a more expansive population than landed white males.
I don’t buy your 5th amendment argument either. There is a carve out for bodily autonomy but that is squarely in the criminal punishment realm. To state that it protects and or defines the life of an unborn is just not correct or rational.
As it stands, you never proved person ever included a “person in the making” (your words) which by definition is not a person.
You have spent a lot of time coming up with Constitutional arguments to justify your beliefs, but I question why you feel you or the government has any control over what another person does to their body. I don’t believe you or the government do have that right. If that puts me at odds with the Constitution than so be it. Men are fallible. A document drafted by them can be too.
I don’t think you are understanding my marriage comments. I don’t give a shit about what you want to call it, but if the government gives two people special rights and entitlements, they have to give any two people those rights and entitlements, regardless of sex. Filing your taxes as married filing jointly is not a religious tradition. The legal right to make healthcare choices for an incapacitated person is not a religious tradition. Those should be available to any two people who want them.
As I’ve said before, I don’t think there should be any special rights or entitlements, but if they exist, they should exist to all who want them. I have not heard a compelling reason to give them to straight couples only.
For you abortion ‘Don’t touch my body’ types. I always have this question;
At the 8 month 29 day mark of a pregnancy, can you just stick a knife in the vaj and slice the little dude’s throat and then say ‘My body, my rights. Get your laws off my body’?
I actually don’t care that much. I say we should start littering the inner cities with abortion clinics frankly. Talk about a great investment. Maybe through kickstarter?
Excellent!
Ronald Reagan: ‘Everybody that is for abortion has already been born’
Great point melmoth. I have pushed this logic before without much success.
Can you tattoo a dragon on the kid’s face? When you own a thing a whole raft of rights go along. Killing and disposing of an unborn child is the penultimate act of ownership and control. If you can kill a kid, are their not greater cruelties that can be done?
Heh. I’ve made similar arguments from many different perspectives and codes for the given pro lifer. They flat out refuse to accept anything other than their “the babies” argument.
Thanks for your comment. I enjoy reading you on ROK.
1. It is not a question of inferior or superior, just simple arithmetic. If A you are not breeding and B you let in masses of peoples into your country that do, how do you think that is going to work out? As for the Duggars, sympathy for the kids, the parents are pimping them. I live in the Bible Belt south where significant numbers of people think they will go to hell when they die if they don’t support Israel. If middle class and upper middle class people would have 2 kids, the occasional family 3 and there were sensible immigration policies things could stabilize in the west.
2.Agree in a philosophical sense although I am not against contraception and managing how many kids you have, I just don’t want to kill one once it is in the womb.
3. Just my interpretation of the US Constitution, which is largely abandoned these days. Specifically my interpretation of the 10th Amendment. I am far from alone in that view.
4. I have to disagree here. How much longer do you think Europe will remain Europe? With its disastrous birth rate and proximity to a continent that is melting down so that many risk their lives on makeshift rafts to cross the Mediterranean. There are already police no go zones in Britain, France and Sweden where sharia is the de facto law. As for quality over quantity Will Durant would disagree with you and I would have to say I agree with him. “So the first biological lesson of history is that life is competition. The second biological lesson of history is that life is selection. We are all born unfree and unequal. Nature loves difference. Inequality is not only natural and inborn, it grows with the complexity of civilization.
The third biological lesson of history is that life must breed. Nature has no use of organisms, variations, or groups that cannot reproduce abundantly. She has a passion for quantity as prerequisite to selection of quality. She does not care that a high rate has usually accompanied a culturally low civilization, and a low birth rate a civilization culturally high; and she sees that a nation with low birth rate shall be periodically chastened by some more virile and fertile group.” Although historians disagree as to the significance, there is evidence that exactly this contributed to the downfall of Egyptian, Persian and Roman civilizations. No matter how high your IQ or your invention and adaptation of new technologies you can’t think you’ll remain on your perch forever. I agree that our society is collapsing for multiple reasons, just happen to think this is a big one. Another end product of feminism by the way.
Have you ever performed an abortion? I can assure you it’s not like stepping on ants, or injecting botox. Have you ever treated a misscarriage? I doubt it. Most people that have aren’t as callous and “feminist” on the matter. Do you think this blue pill shit you are pushing is going to get you laid with college girls or something? I would have more respect for you if you just admitted you were terminating life and you are fine with that. I also love how you complain about business ethics. As if every obgyn out there terminates pregnancies for free with no type of business model whatsoever. The anesthesiologist just walks in and does it for free. No government check. No billing. The pro abortion argument always has stood on shaky foundations and rather how should I put it? Deficient intelligence quotients.
As horrific of a hypothetical that is, yes, that woman can. I understand that complete freedom allows for the possibility of revolting acts and I am okay with it.
Thank you sir.
Thank you as well!
Maybe some day we’ll get a chance to compare notes. I’ll look for you.
Abortion is someone (not the government) taking the life of another human being. Restrictions on abortion are the Government interfering with a persons body. Kinda like stopping someone from putting their body (a fist) through someone elses nose. Or stopping their body from walking off with someone elses stuff. This body autonomy BS is a weak and broken meme. The body is just the easily constrained portion of some malignant souls.
“I’m still waiting for you to cite where “person” as used in the Constitution referred to an unborn person. All you have done is cite TJ’s distaste for it. That is not any evidence that person was meant to include those not yet born. When clauses use citizen and then switch to person, it is pretty clear that the drafter meant a more expansive population than landed white males.”
You can’t be serious. You want me to list why “person” in the 5th amendment doesn’t mean person? Are you for real?
Why don’t you just ask me to cite why the word “Constitution” is spelled with a C instead of a K? It’s essentially the same thing.
Since you are making a formal declaration that the word “person” in the Constitution does not mean an actual person, the burden is on YOU to prove it, not on me to prove why you’re wrong, since I’ve already provided the text itself for you to reference.
However, i will prove you wrong anyway. Read further down.
“I don’t buy your 5th amendment argument either. There is a carve out for bodily autonomy but that is squarely in the criminal punishment realm. To state that it protects and or defines the life of an unborn is just not correct or rational.”
If you can cite for me where in the Constitution a bodily autonomy argument is made, one which grants an exception for abortion, i would kindly appreciate it. (i know where you’re going with this, but i’ll bite:)
Your latter remark is just subjectivism and not an actual fact.
“As it stands, you never proved person ever included a “person in the making” (your words) which by definition is not a person.”
So a developing human person being isn’t technically a human person? What is it then….an ostrich? Your argument here is fallacious in nature.
And i quote: “In sexual reproduction, conception occurs when a sperm cell unites with an oocyte, the two cease to be, and their constituents successfully enter into the makeup of a new and distinct organism, which is called a zygote in its original one-celled stage. This new organism begins to grow by the normal process of differentiated cell division into an embryo, dividing into two cells, then four, eight and so on, although some divisions are asynchronous. Its cells constitute a human organism, for they form a stable body and act together in a coordinated manner, which contributes to regular, predictable and determinate development toward the mature stage of a human being. That is, from the zygote stage onward, the human embryo has within it all of the internal information needed—including chiefly its genetic and epigenetic constitution—and the active disposition to develop itself to the mature stage of a human organism.”
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2672893/
“It’s cells constitute a human organism…toward the maturest stage of a human being.”
Now for a dictionary.com definition of “person.”
“a human being as distinguished from an animal or a thing”
So if my medical article establishes that a developing life is indeed human (and in the making) and the dictionary.com definition for “person” is a human being, how exactly is a developing human life NOT a person, and therefore not qualified for protection under the “person” clause of the 5th amendment?
I look forward to your answer.
By the way, here is an example to support my statement, that the Constitution does indeed protect life. The following is a quotation from James Wilson, credited as one of the most scholarly experts of all the Founding Fathers, a signer of both the Declaration of Independence AND the US Constitution itself and one of the few Founding Fathers most of the other Founding Fathers found themselves in awe of.
“With consistency, beautiful and undeviating, human life, from its commencement to its close, is protected by the common law. In the contemplation of law, life begins when the infant is first able to stir in the womb. By the law, life is protected not only from the immediate destruction , but from every degree of actual violence, and in some cases, from every degree of danger.” -James Wilson, lectures on law, 1804
https://books.google.com/books?id=lIs0AAAAMAAJ&pg=PA475&dq=james+wilson+contemplations+of+law&hl=en&sa=X&ei=5dGBVdyiEsavsAWe2bnwCw&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=indian&f=false
Again, show me a historical reference from a FF that supports your view. I’ve referenced FF’s who supported life, so it’s your turn to list those that don’t verbatim.
“You have spent a lot of time coming up with Constitutional arguments to justify your beliefs, but I question why you feel you or the government has any control over what another person does to their body. I don’t believe you or the government do have that right. If that puts me at odds with the Constitution than so be it. Men are fallible. A document drafted by them can be too.”
Because Man when left to his selfish nature, de-evolves to a primal state of savagery…not by aesthetic observation of course, but by his thoughts and in his deeds. Government does for Man’s deeds what religion does for a Man’s thoughts/soul: keeps it from running amok, through law.
Without (limited) and responsible moral government, you amount to nothing more than a dictatorship from which no morality flows from or flows into. A responsible and limited government is one in which the most fundamental laws are based on concepts of right and wrong (collectively referred to as morality principles) concepts which cannot be altered regardless of the degenerate fashions of the time. Morality is fundamentally explained and the infractions of it are condemned in religion, and with specific regard to the US, the religion of prevailing dominance at the time of the Constitution’s creation was without question JudeoChristianity. Most of the FF’s were affiliated or at least appreciative of JudeoChristianity. (Paine of course, being the notable exception.)
No legitimate government can exist or exist for long when it de-evolves its system of justice to base laws on merely good and bad (by removing moral principle) rather than right and wrong. US law was itself based on the concepts of right and wrong which were found in the bible, specifically murder, theft, perjury, and once upon a time: adultery and homosexuality. With regard to abortion, Founding Fathers saw it as a crime in the making in which Mothers would be held accountable for. They deferred to the States to legislate exactly how, but the understanding was certain that life, regardless of its state, was to be universally protected. This is why the wording of the 5th exists as it does regardless of what so called Constitutional experts tell you. Their words don’t trump the Constitution anymore than SCOTUS does. There is as yet no Founding Father who supported the concept of abortion. If you can find me one, i would greatly appreciate it.
While the Constitution is by no means perfect (it requires the support of people to actually be effective) that does not mean its concepts, ideals, and purpose are. It has served us well for over 200 years, but unfortunately i seriously doubt it will last much longer.
As Benjamin Franklin once mentioned to an inquisitive female regarding what type of government the Founders had wrought: “a republic madam, if you can keep it.”
Our current history shows some of us can’t be bothered to keep it and the enemy is intent on taking it away from us.
“I don’t think you are understanding my marriage comments. I don’t give a shit about what you want to call it, but if the government gives two people special rights and entitlements, they have to give any two people those rights and entitlements, regardless of sex. Filing your taxes as married filing jointly is not a religious tradition. The legal right to make healthcare choices for an incapacitated person is not a religious tradition. Those should be available to any two people who want them.”
They call those “civil unions” aka the true secular equivalent of Marriage. If homos want to get those that’s fine with me, since those are not called “Marriage” and are therefore not a religious institution that the FED has no true right to impinge upon.
“As I’ve said before, I don’t think there should be any special rights or entitlements, but if they exist, they should exist to all who want them. I have not heard a compelling reason to give them to straight couples only.”
The key here is the definition. As i said, they can get the perks of Marriage without actually using the term itself, since the term is not a Constitutional right. Civil unions can suffice.
Thanks!
Yeah, but a fetus its not a human being yet, so no…
person : unborn person :: tree : seed
I don’t think we are ever going to see eye to eye on this. If you are correct in your Constitutional/historical interpretation (which you very well could be – this has made me want to read a history book), then, like I said, I just disagree with the FF’s on this one. Good talk though.
I knew you were hung up on the word itself and not the concept of two dudes banging and paying joint taxes! If they have to, the government should issue civil unions only to both straight and gay couples. In order to get married, you have to go to a church. That I’m totally cool with.
“person : unborn person :: tree : seed
I don’t think we are ever going to see eye to eye on this. If you are correct in your Constitutional/historical interpretation (which you very well could be – this has made me want to read a history book), then, like I said, I just disagree with the FF’s on this one. Good talk though.”
Thank you for not resorting to further polemics. I accept your conciliatory gesture here. And yes, i do advise you to read…read read read and be careful not to let bs passed off as fact steer you askew. There is plenty of that to be found online.
“I knew you were hung up on the word itself and not the concept of two dudes banging and paying joint taxes! ”
I’m against their lifestyle but so long as their mental disorder remains legal my Constitutional nature won’t curtail their right to pursue a secular manifestation of the benefits that come with Marriage. I have opposed other conservatives on this because i adhere to principle and not partisanship, philosophy and not party.
“If they have to, the government should issue civil unions only to both straight and gay couples. In order to get married, you have to go to a church. That I’m totally cool with.””
Agreed.
Interesting distinction, science free. Is it a poodle? Test your convictions, scramble up some eagle eggs and use that excuse when they cuff you. “It wasn’t an eagle yet”. Film at eleven.
You might do well to read my next to last remark to Gundog
🙂
Feel free!
Much appreciated!
🙂
Thanks. Hat tip to Williamdiamon for that one.
Ha ha. Perfect.
Credit to William, I stole it from him. He always does the heavy lifting.
Really?
If a human fetus isn’t a human, then what species is he/she?
William rawwkkss.
He is the best of us and I don’t think he even knows it.
1. I tend to avoid most groupthink; therefore just because I happen to live in the political zone currently known as “America” doesn’t mean if “Americans” outbreed, say, Ireland (my ancestral home) then I should feel any better. I would actually prefer more latino population–the men are hard workers, they are traditionally ethical and highly religious and conservative, and the women are hot and submissive and curvy. But that’s just my personal preference and it would be unreasonable for a group of people to adopt a policy of “hey let’s breed lots of Latinos because spicynujac’s pro-latino argument seems reasonable”. Actually, I would prefer a world with far fewer people in it, with more clean air and water, cheaper resources, less crowded, easier to get around, etc. But we all don’t get our druthers and trying to control the behavior of others en masse is a futile and unrewarding venture.
4) I was unfamiliar with Will Durant so thanks for bringing him to my attention. While Europe indeed has problems, and may even indeed cease to exist in its current form, I do not believe lack of population is the reason. The Roman Empire, too, fell, but it wasn’t because the Roman ladies were having too many abortions. Actually, the population density in Western Europe is among the highest anywhere, so one could argue that if reproducing at high rates lead to success then Europe should have been going gangbusters over the past 50 years.
In actuality, when the British Empire controlled one of the largest worldwide regimes ever, it was a comparatively tiny number of superior Brits ruling over vast minions of underlings. They didn’t need excess population to achieve their goals. Indeed, when they brought british colonists to America and encouraged them to start breeding away, that very act lead to them rather quickly *losing* their colony in the west, which they arguably could have held on to for much longer if America didn’t “grow” as rapidly. In the meantime, Britain could have still extracted resources from the New World and piped them back home.
I believe the idea that Europe is somehow underpopulated has been thoroughly debunked, but in case it has not, one question I always have for those who claim that “country xxx has horrible birth rates” is this: Japan has a population density of 337 persons per sq km (873 persons per Sq Mi). America is a huge country which is more equivalent to the EU as a whole, so it’s not really fair to compare all 50 states vs one smaller nation, but the pop. density of the USA is 33 / km or 85 / sq mile. Japan has roughly ten times the density of the USA. Do you really want the population of the USA to increase tenfold? Do you really think that would lead somehow to an improved quality of life? Imagine 10 times as many people living in your city. Imagine 10 times as many people living in your current block. It will be done with high rises, small land tracts with no yards, and a decrease in personal space, all of which I consider a NEGATIVE to quality of life. If there are those who think dense populations are great, then ok fine, move to Hong Kong (density 6,349 / km or 16,444 / mile) but please don’t try to encourage everywhere else to look like Hong Kong. (I’ll also point out that making everywhere into Hong Kong is impossible, as there are no farms or landfills or slaughterhouses or any of the other mechanisms located on Hong Kong which are needed in order for humans to eat and live)
Finally, the last paragraph I will counter with a simple graph. If “Nature has no use of organisms, variations, or groups that cannot reproduce abundantly” then nature must really, really, really fucking love some homo sapiens!
https://earthhabitat.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/worldpopulationgrowth1.jpg?w=746&h=590
You’re a bright guy, have to be on top of things to go back and forth with you. I hear you loud and clear and like the chart. It smacks one in the face. I’d like less people more space too. When I was born there were roughly 150 million people in the USA, the figure is more than double now. So yeah I get it. However, although many so called poorer nations have greatly decreased their birth rates, some are still pumping out the kids with abandon. The wealthier nations aren’t and they will pay for it in the future. Japan with its fierce racial and cultural hegemony and island status can hold off for awhile but they will eventually feel the pressure. I feel remiss in not being more detailed with reference to older civilizations and the effects of declining birth rates and immigration on them. I know Gibbon mentioned this with reference to Rome. Again I close with Durant. There is much more to the quote I referenced in my last post.
“Gaul survived against the Germans through the help of Roman legions in Caesar’s days, and through the help of British and American legions in our time. When Rome fell the Franks rushed in from Germany and made Gaul France; if England and America should fall, France, whose population remained almost stationary through the nineteenth century, might again be overrun.
It is amusing to find Julius Caesar offering (59 B.C.) rewards to Romans who had many children, and forbidding childless women to ride in litters or wear jewelry. Augustus renewed this campaign some forty years later, with like futility. Birth control continued to spread in the upper classes while immigrant stocks from the Germanic North and the Greek or Semitic East replenished and altered the population of Italy. Very probably this ethnic change reduced the ability or willingness of the inhabitants to resist governmental incompetence and external attack.” I don’t know what he would say about present day USA, Canada and Europe. I’d like that less crowded world too but reality makes me agree with Will Durant.
Wise words
Who’is to decide that? The same committee that decided blacks weren’t humans as well?
Agree on the description of Bush Jr. For so long, people had bought into this notion that he was a true fiscal conservative (I shook my head the whole time and said no). He did so many things that we’re just the opposite but people didn’t want to see it.
Then, the hand off to Obama – the policies remained pretty much the same, today (nothing has really changed). People can argue the point that our national debt is ridiculous (happened under Obama) but it was the fallout effect from the Bush administration (it happens to every President coming into office).
If you’re a realist and you’re honest, then you see it all. If not, then you’re living in fantasy land. The decisions under the Bush administration and continuing under Obama is why this country is a mess, today. It’s the same party (with the same donors) and you’re not invited (the taxpayer).
These psychopaths know it’s a baby, but they put their own selfish needs ahead of human life and as long as infanticide is legal, they will take advantage of that. They are like slave owners… they knew it was wrong, they just didn’t want to pick the cotton themselves.
Well okay then because you are being logically sound and intellectually honest. That’s fair enough. There are an awful lot of people that I wish would have been offed at that 269 day mark, frankly. I’m right wing (though losing interest in politics by the hour) but one thing I’ve never understood is why extreme right wingers dig in so hard on abortion. Let trashy people kill their kids. Who cares? It’s better than having to pay for them later through tax. You never even meet them either way. I’d rather whack ’em early.
#truth
The more I follow politics the more I realize how Bush’s ineptitude under the guise of right wing conservatism spawned the leftist explosion of the past 6 years. Obama’s failure is actually Bush’s fault, not only because of Bush’s incompetent foreign and fiscal policy, but the country’s misguided political leanings elected Marxist scum into office.
Note that I am not making excuses for Obama, Harry Reid, or any liberal politician. I am just observing the transition the country made from Reagan/Bush/Clinton/Bush to Obama.
Exactly. I would also add that the subprime mortgage crisis (which most tend to blame Bush on) was more the fault of chiefly democrat policies up till then, of forcing insurance companies (through HUD and through direct policy like with the CRA) to provide lending at lower interests rates for poor people to afford home loans. The whole Fannie and Freddie Mae fiasco highlights the fact that when the government tries to inject “fairness” into anything it usually ends up making things worse off for everyone involved.
To his defense Bush tried to address the powderkeg that was brewing, the problem with Bush’s approach however, was to resort to creating yet another tentacle of government to address the issue rather than using existing means to address it.
At any rate and as this article shows, Frank’s remarks (and congressional record) shows a complete disconnect between reality and evidence and a concomitant impropriety, as he either lied or played dumb on the subject of Freddie and Fanny Mae’s government encouraged untenable fiscal policy. We all know what happened after that.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/11/business/new-agency-proposed-to-oversee-freddie-mac-and-fannie-mae.html“
I was involved with MBS banking for a time, and while much was unclear even on the inside, other things were very clear.
1. Banks and broker-supported lobbies effectively wrote today’s federal “recovery” schemes.
There were regular meetings with key Sen. Chris Dodd, permitting maximum influence over upcoming legislation and careful timing disadvantageous to their near-death competitors, permitting fire-sale acquisitions. From what I saw on the inside, they blamed, and will continue to blame everyone but themselves.
2. It didn’t matter which puppet-party wrote the regs or helmed oversight, the industry was so powerful it would get what it wanted anyway.
Even if the regs, OCC, ratings guides, etc. were good back in 06-08 no matter who drafted them, trading entities would’ve managed to influence changes to the regs/agencies within a few years and have done exactly the same things. They do this routinely and have an unbelievable amount of influence and personal networking leverage. It is one of the few areas I am more lenient toward government interference as the only available check on the incredible power, psychopathy and insatiable greed found in the upper levels of these entities.
3. Most bankers at this level are jewish; that is not a stereotype.
And as a side note, yes, most bankers at that level are jewish. However only some are the psychopath elite zionist stereotypes. I will say those are often the scariest and highest ranking. Very scary. And I don’t consider myself a shrinking violet.
4. Lawyers were everywhere, resulting in far less evidence.
As for folks griping about “banksters” not being held accountable, securitized loan packaging is inextricable from ‘the law.’ Many of the personnel I dealt with were also capable attorneys. Most communications would be privileged, leaving a very small paper trail in evidence. It was all more ‘wolf of wall street’ than many would believe, and I can think of a few who do deserve to serve time…but it will never happen.
Yes sir i’m in total agreement.The Dodd-Frank bill was no more than a band aid over the mortgage crisis and an excuse to increase the role and influence of the FED over the business of finance, when it was their (chiefly democrat) bs that helped cause it in the first place.
In other words:
“hey, let’s force the banks to lower interest rates for the poor folks who are our constituents and when fiscal reality catches up to good intentions, let’s use the FUBAR that results as an excuse to gain more control over the private sector.”
No wonder the act itself was challenged as an unconstitutional overreach in a lawsuit brought by several banks and states.
Dodd, Frank, Pelosi…these 3 scumbags are at least partially to blame for the crisis, for helping to create it or helping to make its fallout worse. Bush gets all the blame for it but history shows the involved soiled hands of the democrats before during and since this crisis and they should therefore be held just as accountable.
By the way you should write an article about the subprime mortgage crisis, given your past experience with it. My remarks on here are no more than a brief and rather primitive explanation of the complex series of cause and effect choices and consequences that created and sustained the mortgage crisis, as well as the fallout that ensued.
I’ve been researching enough of it to understand the basic concepts, but to thoroughly explain it would probably require an article as well as the personal experience necessary to explain it in layman’s terms.
I’ll mull it over, you are right though…could be kinda dry unless I go into fine detail which would risk revealing myself to people you don’t want to piss off.
If you’re a Man of accuracy with a talent for brevity, it will go over well with the resident intellectuals here (myself included)
Just use a suitable pseudonym (as i do) if you want to stay anonymous.
Put it this way: i’m always in favor of an intellectual and informative article (however dry) over one which tends to become repetitive over time (why ____ has the hottest females!!)
🙂
Yeah glba (not a gay group) was cross-aisle and a huge part of that implosion. From what little I have seen up close, right and left politicians operate very differently than their red/blue label suggests. Chris Dodd, part of the 99-percenter new-left was suprisingly receptive to industry “amendment” proposals to dodd-frank. Go figure.
Thanks. I try for it.
As much as I like _____’s hottest females, the substantive articles on here are the ones I tend to carry with me and think about for the day.
“Chris Dodd, part of the 99-percenter new-left was suprisingly receptive to industry “amendment” proposals to dodd-frank. Go figure.”
Ahh yes, the Shelby amendment comes to mind.
I’m pretty sure the reasoning behind it is, it gives Dodd and Frank the excuse to say that the bill ultimately didn’t work because of all the pork or eviscerations made to it in subsequent amendments.
They could play both sides by claiming it worked in spite of the changes or that it didn’t work because of the changes. Effective, if one doesn’t mind the duplicity.
By the way, did you know Dodd is now in charge of the MPAA? This guy is now having the kind of input into movie regulations that he once did on finance.
I’m not sure whether to laugh or cringe.
You can see start the see the connection a little more clearly from Clinton to Bush to Obama (that all of these guy belong to the same party).
The policies, more or less, continue with maybe a new branding or new package (or new spin) to the American people. The housing crisis was a good one along with NAFTA and the repeal of Glass-Steagal (Bank Act of ’33). These moves show how all of them really move as one party and it does nothing to help the average working citizens of this country.
The money in politics (forget it). We knew all along that it was big money (donors) who controlled the politicians (and policies) for years – under the surface (including foreign money). In 2010 with the ruling in the Citizens United case, it’s coming to the surface who actually controls (owns) the United States.
I’ve always said that they all belong to one party – and we’re not part of it. We simply have the look of a democracy but not a true one. All of these politicians live a different world. They make laws and policies that really effect the average American citizen but really have no impact in their lives.
Clinton did his damage to the country, then he went off and made his millions (now, his wife wants in). Bush didn’t do us any favors and started some of this mess. Obama picked up where Bush left off – business as usual – nothing has really changed (so much for hope, right?). Who’s coming in next to finish us off (as a country)?
It’s business as usual no matter who resides in office. They (politicians) all belong to one big party – people need to wake up because you (the people) don’t belong to it.
I’m going to agree with everything except Citizens United.
In that instance it was the government trying to keep a conservative labeled org (Citizens United) from influencing government. (through showing a film critical of hillary clinton and progressive economic policy) while the ruling itself applies to corps, one has to remember that a CEO or a board of directors don’t give up their right to the first amendment anymore than a pastor does when speaking from the pulpit (as some mistakenly believe)
The first amendment applies to everyone or it’s not really a right, it’s a privilege that we give only to those we agree with. Even the Klan is entitled to it, sad to say.
Considering that the current government in power has shown itself to be so hostile to a laissez faire approach to big business (evident in Obama’s keynesian fiscal policies) it’s no wonder that the FEC would take issue with CU’s intent. (it takes orders from congress after all)
Not every wealthy person is by consequential effect a Madoff in the making, just as not every impoverished person at the bottom rung of the tax bracket is someone trying to make an honest buck.
I’m not saying you believe that (my last paragraph) but i just wanted to make it clear that i believe that the SCOTUS ruling there was just.
And to add another compelling point to my argument: Obama himself was pissed off at the ruling. Any decision that upsets that prog pos is probably one i am going to agree with 😀
You are of course free to disagree.
“As for abortion, it shouldn’t be anything other than an issue between a woman and her doctor.”
It isn’t the woman’s life that the woman and the doctor will be murdering. The baby itself is of more value than any mother who would want to murder her unborn baby. The baby is only 50% of the DNA of the mother, the 50% is from a man, a man whose entire life can demanded by the state and society (for war, or if the woman decides that the “fetus should be allowed to become a human by giving birth to it” then the father becomes property of woman and state), but God forbid some female be troubled for nine months in order to preserve the life of her own innocent child. If you’ve ever seen a NICU ward with premie babies who would still have been in the womb for 6 months, you’d know unborn “fetuses” aren’t mere tissue but just small human beings.
Btw, i thought i’d give you and everyone else some examples of so called conservative females that are pretty widely known:
Megyn Kelly, Gretchen Carlson, and Sarah Palin.
Exhibit one. Megyn Kelly, in her tv interview with Erik Erikson and Lou Dobbs on the subject of female breadwinners.
Megyn is a self identified conservative and catholic. She also believes in homosexual marriage and feminism. She’s a non sequitur with nice tits, essentially.
Undeniable feminist remark: ““What makes me submissive and you dominant?”
This is a classic feminist retort that ignores biblical gender based standards.
Feminist talking point:”Why should we take your word for it, Erick Erickson’s science?” (she asked, before noting that there were large numbers of people in the 1950s and ’60s who believed interracial marriages led to biologically inferior children)
She makes the typically liberal condescending and dismissive remark when faced with a view to the contrary. This is a gender based solipsism without question.
She also links traditional gender roles to racial/homosexual discrimination in order to promote her view of non traditional gender roles reductio ad absurdum. She does this with a fundamental lack of understanding of anthropologically antecedent and established gender roles which the animal kingdom today still adheres to as a majority standard, and with a fundamental lack of understanding that there is no undeniable proof that homosexuality itself originates biogenetically in humans.
She also tends to take the liberal approach by dismissing any related argument if it conflicts with the solipsist belief she holds against the thematic argument. Since Dobbs and Erikson are “wrong” on their views regarding gender, they must therefore be “wrong” on their views regarding homosexuality.
This and her profoundly ignorant remarks that “This country has a long history of discrimination against certain groups. Eventually we wind up getting it right. Right? Against women, against blacks, the civil rights movement and so on. And in justifying that discrimination when it was in place, some folks turn to the Bible and turn to their religious beliefs and said we have to have slavery because it’s in the Bible. Women have to be second-class citizens because that’s in the Bible. Blacks and whites can’t get married because that’s in the Bible. That wound up in a case. A judge wrote that in an opinion, which the Supreme Court ultimately struck that down, saying that’s not right, judge—the Equal Protection clause says you can’t do that. Why is gay marriage any different?” proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that Megyn is only conservative leaning and not a legitimate conservative, especially when the topics of feminism and homosexuality manifest.
Exhibit two: Gretchen Carlson, former FOX bimbo, in a couple of her antics over the years.
She is considered a conservative despite the fact that she took offense to an innocuous joke about Women from Brian Kilmeade….
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/gretchen-carlson-walks-off-fox-friends-set-following-brian-kilmeades-sexist-joke/
…and despite the fact she believes hook line and sinker in the 1 in 5 rape myth, and completely ignores the harm done to males in her impassioned decry over the rolling stones rape hoax negative effect on real rape victims.
It’s obvious given her inability to take any criticism of feminist inclinations (jocular or otherwise) and her solipsism regarding rape hoaxes and the true victims of it, that GC is in fact a feminist and one which would (just as MK did) oppose conservative males and conservative philosophy especially if it criticizes the corrosive philosophy of feminism.
She like Megyn is also conservative leaning and not a truly conservative female.
Exhibit 3: Sarah Palin. Self described feminist and conservative. Truly believes that the word itself can apply to females who are “conservative.” Joins a list of other so called conservative females who believe that striving for an equality between the sexes is somehow conservative, despite the fact that nature itself shows that equality cannot be established beyond the sexes. Males lead and females follow along with the young.
http://theweek.com/articles/493960/sarah-palin-feminist
She is also a member of feminists for life, a group which tried to push through the equal rights amendment, in order to further grant special class privileges to females in America
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminists_for_Life
Despite stating that she opposes the global warming aka climate change hoax, she nevertheless took certain measures to “prepare for its affects” during her time as Governor. This means her beliefs conflict with her actions. Pseudoconservatism at its finest.
http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5879
To conclude, SP herself is yet another pseudo-conservative leaning female who is not a complete conservative, at least when it comes to understanding that there is NO SUCH THING as equality among humans, because humans are not designed to be functionally equal. Men lead and females follow. A female is designed to be complimentary; her ancient sociological/judeoChristian role reflects the brilliance in that simplicity. Any attempts to bring about equality results in inequality for Men as their roles and rights are eroded to promote and pander to feminist solipsist beliefs about artificial equality. Not to mention the evidence indicating that she is probably a closet climate change shill.
She is the strongest leaning conservative of the 3 but that is not saying much, since she self identifies as a feminist and that philosophy is incompatible with conservatism since it strongly tends to dilute it.
Holy cow!
That is a wonderful breakdown of 3 “conservative” feminists and their contradictions (at default). You should submit that as an article. It’s time to start calling out conservative womyn.
Yeah I know, the conservatives are so fearful of “losing the female vote” that they are forced to tolerate this.
But that’s like setting fire to your ship to keep pirates from boarding it.
Palin isn’t just a Feminist either. She’s a Communist. I kid you not. Around the 7:20 mark she says she supports “collective ownership” of oil…
http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/1666599521001/palin-obama-doesnt-have-an-energy-policy/?#sp=show-clips
I would but i’ve got 3 articles in the works and i’m feeling stretched thin as it is. Thanks though!
If someone else wants to use it they are more than welcome to.
Your latter remarks are undeniable in their accuracy. Since Women can vote and because they tend to vote liberally (because of the emo instinctual response that liberals themselves exhibit and professional liberals have become masters at exploiting) the so called conservative R’s must by necessity pander to them, thereby diluting the philosophy at least in their presentation of it.
This is also why the D’s want to give the vote to illegals. Given the emotionally chaotic nature of females, they can’t be reliably expected to vote D even with the slickest of advertising, so giving another (illegal alien) demographic the ability to vote would practically put them over the top, despite the fact that the demographic should not legally exist since the ability to vote in elections is reserved ONLY for US citizens and not those who come here illegally.
When you give a vote to those who’s very presence depends on your support, you establish a reliable voting bloc that will vote for you and vote your way to near absolute adherence.
Hmm. That bears further research. Thanks for the submission!
The above information you provided above is part of what eventually guided my views toward the abolition of the 19th Amendment (among other Amendments). Granted, for me personally, it is an uncomfortable feeling since I was raised to believe otherwise. However, it appears the logical course of action to take. In my opinion, it is more important to implement what works as opposed to what is “fair”. It is unfortunate but it does appear necessary.
““What makes me submissive and you dominant?”
When the tingles start I’ll let you know.
Indeed. The 19th amendment has helped usher in some of the worst presidents in history, helped to try ushering in some who would likely be progressive, and tried to re-elect those who had been bad presidents to begin with, since it was originally ratified.
Presidents such as Roosevelt, Johnson, Nixon, Carter, Clinton, Bush Sr and Jr and of course Obama, i consider as some of the worst presidents in recent history. With the possible exceptions of Roosevelt and Clinton, most who’ve done the research and therefore don’t drink the kool-aid would agree.
To be fair, Women helped to usher in one of the best presidents too, although with only a slight majority and only in his second election campaign. (Reagan)
Given their chaotic nature, Women can’t be reliably expected to vote for a candidate on the merits of what issue he represents. Their emo-instinctual nature causes them to prioritize aesthetics, such as looks, charisma, etc. This is why they tend to vote for either the most liberal or most conservative candidate, with the majority of them backing the former.
Most of those i listed are Democrats, with the only exceptions being Reagan, both Bush’s, and Nixon. The following is an incomplete list detailing the majority of their votes. I’ll list with an asterisk republican candidates that Women supported.
Women voted as a majority for Obama during both his election campaigns (D)
Women voted as a majority for John Kerry (D)
Women voted as as majority for Al Gore (D)
Women voted as a majority for Bill Clinton during both his election campaigns. (D)
See a pattern here so far?
Women voted as a majority for Carter (D) in his first term.
*Women voted to a near even amount for Reagan in Carter’s second bid for President (Reagan 46% to 45% for Carter)
*Women voted as a majority for Reagan in his second term.
*Women voted to a near even majority for (Bush 50% to 49% for Dukakis)
*Women voted as a majority for Nixon
Women voted as a majority for Johnson (D)
Women voted as a majority for Roosevelt in at least one of his 3 presidential campaigns(D)
(date is inconclusive given the lack of polling sophistication)
With the possible exception of Roosevelt, their record shows that they vote more to the left than center or right, and since they outnumber male voters this helps explain why some of the worst elected presidents in history tend to be D’s.
http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/voters/documents/GGPresVote.pdf
Some good info on these 3 conservative women. It turns out they are women (first) looking out for their own kind first and a distant conservative (second).
The first two work for the mainstream media and it’s usually about ratings (money) so they’ll cater to the dollars and ratings by any means necessary.
Palin’s a typical politician always trying to establish herself as the outsider only to act the same way once she gets into office. She may lean a little to the right but it’s always going to be about women, first, as she’s always vocal about women and conservative values a distant second. She needs the female vote before the money (that will come later).
All three are good examples of women thinking they are conservative when they all actually support feminism, equality, etc….They’re all going to look out for their own, first, and everyone else a distant second (typical women).
“Palin’s a typical politician always trying to establish herself as the outsider only to act the same way once she gets into office. ”
Yes. Given her (legitimate) gaffes i consider her to be the female George W Bush. Her presidency would reflect a feminist philosophy first and foremost, and a conservative one a distant second, as you said.
“She needs the female vote before the money (that will come later).”
You nailed it.
I wish females realized that an equality of means (the Constitution) is the best they can achieve in a civilized society, since an equality of ends is no more than a fantasy that can only possibly come about through artificial progressive attempts at equality.
Given the failures that come with it (as we are all well familiar with) the matriarchal standard of equality of ends shows that its unsustainable and will lead to collapse before long. You can’t keep marginalizing the architects of society (Men) and expect society to truly flourish through the undeserved promotion of emotionally susceptible females (and feminized males) to positions of power and influence that they inevitably wield irresponsibly.
This is why society itself is collapsing at the seams. Females who take all day to decide what to wear and manginas who prioritize feeling over facts are now in charge of telling society what laws it should follow. Ridiculous.
“I wish females realized that an equality of means (the Constitution) is
the best they can achieve in a civilized society, since an equality of
ends is no more than a fantasy that can only possibly come about through
artificial progressive attempts at equality.”
Indeed. It seems to me that this country has had it too good for too long (for some, anyways) and that seems to be the driving force behind the march on equality and feminism. This shit doesn’t pop up when people are worried (struggling) to live, eat, find work, war, etc… You didn’t (and you won’t) see it during the last Great Depression because people were too concerned with getting through the day (surviving).
We (the country) needed the collapse in 2008 to steer the ship back on course. It’s been too good for too long and this is the result of it.
Even a collapse won’t steer the useful idiots back to reality for very long. They will just prioritize the true necessities of life up until the disaster or depression is perceived to be over, then they will just fall back on their default bs beliefs.
This phenomena is particularly evident in people who believe in a progressive philosophy and who choose to relocate from an area which is suffering under the crushing weight of progressive beliefs economically, socially, and so forth. (ironically enough)
For ex: You have a husband and wife who are staunch democrats who believe in the progressive philosophy even if they don’t call themselves progressive. They live in an area that has been democrat controlled for decades; say Detroit. They decide to move to another area because the crime is so out of control, and choose to move to a safer area which not coincidentally is considered to be Red (let’s say Texas)
They settle in and are happy that the area they chose has a higher quality of life, however they are appalled to see such a strong republican or conservative influence in local or State government. Come the next elections for both, they decide to vote for the democrats who represent the kind of (progressive) “values” they believe in, such as income redistribution, higher taxes and so forth….never mind the fact that these types of prog fiscal policies were the catalysts for the financial destruction of Detroit which resulted in them wanting to leave in the first place.
The colossal irony here is that this couple doesn’t realize that they are bringing with them the same types of views that helped ruin the place that they fled from, and by voting for D’s who represent them, will end up making Texas into another Detroit if they are successful and if enough people think like them.
This is the kind of institutionalized voter idiocy that shows people generally don’t learn from their mistakes enough to capitalize on the wisdom they tend to generate. The above example i mentioned actually happened, and happens more often than it should.
And look at Megyn Kelly now. The mask has dropped.
“yes my clothes are a bigger size, that just means you have access to a bigger prize”
– bahahahaha, but seriously, oh, my, god (facepalm)
“we are all self-conscious about our weight, and we never have a problem getting a date”
– very very disappointing to say that this may be true.
Men are enablers by approving this behavior, females are herd creatures and will follow ANY trend you tell them.
Currently we are saying poor behavior and bad decisions are rewarded with sex and resources, until men change our behaviors the decline will continue.
fun fact – in the media yesterday – new statistics show modern women weigh the same as a 1960’s man – equality in action, yay sign me up.
I’m in complete agreement. The more than manginas and white knights tolerate and encourage this solipsist feminist bs, the harder it will be to get these females weaned off the opium of their ignorance so that they don’t end up passing on these bs beliefs to the next generation of females, who will invariably make it harder for the next generation of males to graduate to true masculinity aka an Alpha standard.
Her hamster is in overdrive.
I saw the one of the chick benching a few weeks ago. My first thought was a) yeah, her boyfriend is making sandwiches but the trainer at the gym dead lifting 500+ is the one tapping her b) Women and Crossfitters need to learn that 10 lbs bumper plates aren’t heavier just because they are chunkier c) this is one of these girls that if you “pffft” her she will blow you to prove you wrong. Jokes on you….
Facebook is perfect for the modern insecure woman who can receive all of the male attention and confirmation she needs from overeager betas she’d never fuck.
and that’s all it’s about for most women…….the constant need for validation (low self esteem) and keeping the attention of beta men. The sad part is watching these “men” constantly feeding them likes or comments as if it’s a treat to just talk to them (some pathetic shit).
“Facebook is perfect for the modern insecure woman”
I guess you haven’t seen Instagram.
Guaranteed most of the women sitting around posting these things are fat and don’t look anything like the women in the pictures.
Both suckerberg & “tom” need to be shot for bringing this hell upon us.
The one with the graphic of your friend is brutal. And the ‘Because I treat girls nicely’ coloured in blue! Just perfect lol
All of these…..
Reason #2,345 why I quit facebook and Immensely happier and better off for quitting facebook. Save yourself the noise, endless privacy violations and frustration and do the best thing you could do for your peace of mind.Quit facebook and don’t look back. Unless you’re like these women and need constant validation from social media do yourself a favor and quit.
I’ve considered quitting too, but I still find it useful for the actual “news feed”. I don’t follow any women, so I don’t see their bullshit “proud, strong, single mom” posts. I have no idea how many “friends” I have because I don’t follow any of them. “Like” what you like. Local news, sports teams, the owners clubs of whatever motorcycle/vehicle you own. It is still useful for networking with people that share interests/hobbies.
You might think so but try going without and you really won’t miss it. That would make a great Lenten sacrifice.
I used to get on once a month, because people would send me messages, share photos with me in them, invite me to parties, etc. I haven’t been on since 2014 and can’t say I miss it. A friend did send me some contact info there for a hot single girl he knows, so I guess I’m gonna log on and check it out…
I’m off about a year. Don’t miss it a bit.
You could get that kind of newsfeed/interest angle from Pinterest without all the social interaction/comments etc.
The pitfall of “Liking what you like” is publicizing your interests, making them readily available for unwelcome profile viewers and big data miners.
Most men know in their hearts FB is gay. There is, of course, some utility but it is encased deep within the feminine primacy of our decadent culture. Its convenience is obvious, but to get at that utility a man is party to the very forces that are working against the Red Pill.
FB and its derivatives are the ultimate buffers to reality. Any Red Pill swordsmanship within its bounds is tilting at windmills. The RP is about living truths; FB is about satiating the sheep with the Soma of the feelz while the indoctrination into deep blue goes full tilt; it is illusory to its core.
And most women know its a massive navel gazing time-suck too; an emotional masturbatory chamber that commodifies the human experience into consumable bits of feelgood detritus, image projection, and brand association. Between the constant drip-feed of moral self-licensing and pictorial plattitudes, sure, you get to see pictures of your nieces.
Then we wonder why women have become voracious consumers of relationships with men.
That’s why, when discussing its “value”, people always preface/qualify their FB usage with their rationalizations.
You see, they are better than the dolts who do this or that, who post this or that. They are better than the women who suckle on the male (thirsty betas being their favorite target) attention and steady stream of validation and echo chamber soundbites because they *only* use it for this or that.
It matters not what. They feel the need to preface, to elevate themselves above others. They do this because they know they are wallowing in the shallows, even if it does yield them pre-selection or whatever. This knee jerk qualifying should be telling.
Following this kind of qualifying, then I am a better man for never having indulged in the social media jerk-off. Now I don’t believe this to be true, but I also don’t believe any Red Pill man’s life is truly enriched by his social media use and am thus immediately suspicious of those who would suggest as much.
A FB man can be strategic, selective, and even take the personal risk (not worth it IMO) of running disruptive redpill messaging, but this does not recuse him of being a participant. He is feeding the beast with one hand while (supposedly) yielding the sword with the other.
All fine and good, but then attacking the women who are face f*cking their Iphones over this stuff and skewering these thirsty betas who are stuffing women’s ego chambers really starts to look like splitting hairs.
Why not starve the whole damn thing? Certainly thirsty betas are not the only driving force of this decline we love to banter about.
If women truly want to be led by these Alphas, why not put that to the test and vacate? Leave the social media to the children, the damaged harpies, and grievance peddlers.
If you can’t demonstrate your value in real life, you may want to think on that. If you think you can game it, leverage it to get some advantage, that’s fine, but any betterment is on-the-margin compared to the value a man receives from elevating himself from the herd by jumping the FB fence altogether.
And there are always, always consequences and trade-offs; no man is truly above anyone else on social media if he is part of it.
Facebook is a cesspool of narcissists, thirsty betas and attention fiends.
I deleted my account years ago and never looked back.
One down, one BILLION to go.
Very well said and articulate response. I dont believe you can be r.p and actively take part in social media. Any real man should be free of living high school all over again by taking part in shallow social media acceptance and validation. I dont care if its the only way to keep in touch with friends. Make the effort to hang out with your friends or call them and have real contact. I dont give a fuck about the food selfie you just posted on fakebook. Call if you have anything worth saying. Quitting facebook trims the fat of who your real friends are. I see guys constantly on their phones checking in and all I can think is what a beta bitch, you are not a man.. I see couples at a restaraunt not talking and fucking around on their phones and I just shake my head and think good luck with that relationship. If you cant get your girl/ wife to commit to putting down her phone while having dinner, then she aint committed to you.
This is one of the best comments that I’ve read on the entire internet. This should be an article in itself. Welcome to ROK.
Facebook can be a headache, but it’s useful for challenging SJWs whenever I see them spewing their propaganda.
Neo and Co. may have took the red pill and escaped from the Matrix, but they still plugged back in frequently in order to help others escape.
I went to a pretty liberal art school that is pumping out class loads of SWJs and 3rd Wave Feminists. As soon as any of my friends post up an article citing Male/white Privilege, The Patriarchy, Feminism, or Sexism I immediately put them on ignore. I’ve found my FB page to be a much happier and healthier place.
I unfriended my own niece because she was constantly posting SJW crap like “I admit a war on women exists” like a good little brainwashed, commie lemming.
I am (under my real name) un-google-able. So I maintain a page that shows me to be an affable, entertaining guy with cool hobbies and a lot friends, so that I can give that page address to women to put them at ease…before I bang them to a fare-thee-well. Works best with some of the younger lambs.
What I don’t do is spend a lot of time arguing politics, esp. with SJWs or other dead-enders, because arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics: even if you win, you’re still retarded.
Here, when I engage someone, it’s not to beat my chest, but to get at the truth of the matter.
Mistral
“Here, when I engage someone, it’s not to beat my chest, but to get at the truth of the matter.”
I think most of us feel that way as well.
I have the opposite thing going on, but it also works to my advantage. A very common name, you Google it and you’re left sorting through millions of men.
That’s actually the same problem; I have a common name, and I don’t turn up until you sift through lots of guys.
I’m thinking of quitting due to the daily high school reunion vibe, I get. There’s a reason that high school reunions are only every ten years, I think. I’ve tried blocking almost everyone, including sacred old friends but the high school reminders/triggers are unavoidable. I need to quit.
If you’ve blocked most “friends then you’ll have no problem pulling out. Its pretty easy actually. its the people that have no problem posting everything cooler than everyone else. Low self esteem people need facebook the most.
I’ve been seriously considering that lately too.
What this article means for you is, take the blue pill.
And stay naïve like sheep? No thanks.
Never had a Facebook account, never cared.
Still glad I don’t have one and never got into that stuff.
It’s basically full of that, with beta orbiters who obsessively “like” images like that by the hundreds every day. Plus women who post everything they are doing on there “Going to the mall” “Getting my nails done OMG” “Drinking a super venti latte soy milkioso”
The one of the tiny girl benching… she’s using bumper plates, often favored by CrossFit. They’re solid rubber instead of iron, to minimize damage if dropped. Because rubber isn’t as dense as iron the plates are physically larger.
Here’s the unaltered image. The plate is 4.5 KG/10 LB. So she’s probably lifting 65 lbs (30 kg). Hardly impressive, even for a girl.
http://i.imgur.com/8sroT.jpg
At least she’s working out, but she doesn’t need to brag about it.
I don’t have anything against girls who work out, that’s not my point. I doubt the subject created the meme version. It was probably some dumb ass feminist, who knows nothing about fitness, and just assumed this tiny little girl had a ridiculous bench.
http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/524x393xsandwiches-300×225.jpg.pagespeed.ic.pQP6MNDekj.jpg
I saw this pic years ago without the meme on an honest site that wanted to help stop women from being fat-asses. It wasn’t created for this meme for sure.
She probably isn’t. My guess is some white knight doofus.
She is rather attractive though, I’ll give her that.
Nothing gets girls madder than mentioning monroe was a whore.
Ask them what she looked like at Fab 40.
I always use this one to knock down a fatty from her peg
Fuckin’ A that’s a good one!
11. Even though she herself is unattractive, she’s likely to be more shallow than you.
The “it’s what’s on the inside that counts” mantra is only one-sided. It’s not uncommon for fat women to lecture you on judging them on their looks, and then go watch a movie like Magic Mike and drool over Channen Tatum.
what’s wrong with drooling over Channing Tatum? He is hot. you drool over hot women, and compare regular women to movie stars. why can’t we?
Judy, I’ve checked your history on here and all your doing is trolling. Don’t try to make it like you’re adding to conversation or correcting viewpoints. You’re not capable of understanding what this site is about or how to behave properly, as you’re not a man or someone looking for enlightenment. Please go away.
I know exactly what this site is, its a denigrate and attempt to subjugate women and I feel sorry for men who think women are not as good as or as smart as men. the double standards on here are disgusting and any REAL man would never consider any of the garbage posted by some of the boys here to be anything but hatred and aggression. you should be ashamed of yourselves, both for your attitudes and your stupidity
Because you’d know a “real man” if you saw one, right? Let me guess, he’s tall, ripped, full of tattoos and ideally a millionaire because you “deserve” all that, correct? Personality and morals and ideals be damned, so long as he fits your “criteria” (since women have no actual standards but have criteria instead, as in race, height, income, social standing, etc.). Enlighten us please, oh didactic one!
nope, a real man treats women like people, not possessions. a real man helps raise his kids instead of being a deadbeat dad. a real man doesn’t talk like most of the boys on this site. it has absolutely nothing to do with his looks, but rather his attitude
Right, and we all concur, so why are you still trying to ice skate uphill?
Funny how the male responders on here show nothing but hatred and disrespect, yet I’M the one going against the flow. you don’t concur, you are just afraid of strong women who won’t take your shit. the last guy who tried to force me to behave the way you all expect women to behave needed 28 stitches. and I know it was 28 because my daughter is the ER nurse who cleaned off the blood. and her female friend was the cop who arrested him.
“you are just afraid of strong women who won’t take your shit.”
You’re going to have to do a little better than that played-out, worn-thin trope. Nobody’s “afraid” of that, we want that, as a matter of fact. Problem is, many women try too damn hard to posture just for the sake of it rather than live and let live to prove their “strong and independent” platitude.
Same old tired ad hominem comments and attacks. If you got 28 stitches (which you’re likely lying about) you certainly coaxed him into it. And your daughter’s lesbian relationship with a police officer is none of our business.
Women, and people in general, get the respect they deserve. You’re not earning respect with your attitude and the way you treat people on this site.
You’ve also given up your legal right to be here with your statement about “knowing what this site is about” and that you’re here to basically harass people.
bull shit
Snappy comeback – okay, whatever you wanna tell yourself, lady!
haha HE got those stitches,and yes, he deserved them, and more and my daughter is happily married to a man as is her cop friend, men in general get the respect they deserve and this site deserves none. apparently, you don’t understand about legal rights since I am still here ans still saying you should all grow the fuck up and stop trying to say women are evil because we won’t fuck stupid arrogant pricks who think they rule the world, men like you cannot even manage to run a family. you are all just Elliot Rogers fans,you think women are at fault because you can get sex when really, its your attitude, just like his
sorry dude, but the comments here show you are just frustrated boys who are too stupid and scared to function out in the real world
Don’t freely apologize, it’s a sign of weakness. Yeah, you know us so well based on some comments on the internet and know so many details of our lives and finances and social life and health and fitness and quality of life in general. What brand of crystal ball and tarot cards do you use? Because clearly I need to replace mine!
I know you all, I’ve met youall in other bodies. you think you want sex with a porn star, but don’t realize that porn is as fake a WWE. you think you deserve better treatment because you are a man while treating women like property. you think you should be able to tellwomen how to live and who they can fuck, you think you don’t need to be a good parent that boys should be raised to be ignorant bigots just like you. oh, I know you, you are weak, stupid, ignorant fools who want to drag the world back to your version of the 1800s. It was not like books say, it was hard, mostly on the women who had to raise the kids alone on the farm while the men went off fucking whores in town and getting themselves shot over stupid ideals like freedom. you don’t even realize that you are free ans so were they. you just want to blame someone else for all your mistakes and need someone to whine about
Wow, that made no kind of sense at all…
I smell b.s. What you’ve us about you so far. . .
1) You act out of anger. 2) You chose men who’re violent psychopaths, and then you provoke them. 3) You set up “Victem Drama” so you can game sympathy from hospital staff, authorities, and your own child. 4) You raised a mentally ill daughter. (Homosexuality is a mental illness. The high % of female cops are lesbians. Homosexuals don’t have “freinds,” just enablers. Happily married is b.s. and a cover.)
My guess is that you’re an alcoholic. The real tradgedy is that you’re just a “Type” and will never have an original thought or behaviour. You’ll get tired soon enough when we stop responding to you. Go find a different website to troll.
wrong on all counts, loser. and this website needs to be taken down for the hate site it really is
yeah, well, you aren’t all that smart anyway
I don’t need to be anything to decipher that nonsense psychobabble that you just spewed. I’m sure it all makes sense in your head, however. Enjoy!
Judy’s responses are brilliant in a way. Is she a troll or just another vapid, unattractive woman with a princess complex whose angry that her dreams are crashing before her eyes?
I laughed when she claims that RoK is out to denigrate and subjugate women. On the contrary, this site regularly advises men to step up their “game” to make themselves into the kind of men that women WANT. It’s Obama that claims that women are helpless and incapable of paying for their healthcare and then hits them with a double size healthcare premium and doubles their deductible.
Most of the men here want healthy relationships with women but barring that, they want to merely have consensual sex with them that the woman enjoys as well. The purpose of “the red pill” is for men to avoid being abused and “subjugated” for having sex with women. It’s feminism that attempts to dehumanize and punish men for enjoying sex. Not the other way around.
Regarding drooling over Channing Tatum: If women want sex with hot guys like that, they could develop their own game and easily pick up hot guys. Again, this isn’t a problem with men.
I dare you, go ahead and do everything you can to take down this site. You won’t succeed.
I feel sorry for you for thinking that women are just as good or smart as men.
Real men don’t call women vapid and fat.
“Real men” do as they please and conquer all things THEY choose without concern for others who would just destroy them if given the chance as is.
Hey, this is completely out of the context of discussion being held on this page, but I’m curious and just wanted to ask you this. Are you a tranny?
If he punched you back would you be happy he treated you as an equal then? You clearly don’t understand what you’re implying.
Oh I wish internet sites were somehow on paper. Then we’d see bonfires of books like the Nazis built and people would realize where the hatred and intolerance is truly coming from.
You just ignored his point about the women being fat. How convenient.
And shes a fascist! Cant deal with a site she disagrees with existing lol
Judy,
In the time you spent shaming men on here you could have done a 5×5 squat workout (the only thing you can do to improve your worth to men)
Nowhere on this site is single parenting or copping out on family idolized, it is shamed. We especially shame those who put children in single parent households.
How did you inflict that type of open wound and for what?
k
men must stop marrying women and atake their money. Women must be strong and independant because I want money from those bitches, the whole lot of them. The more feminist a bitch is, the more I will play her ass and take as much money as possible. I will even make it lick my balls and ass.
You white bitch
.
Go hang yourself. We men don`t care what you have to say. Men must stop marrying altogether. Those vaginas must get off their asses go to work and bring us our money.
It`s time for a revolution. To hell with your stinking pussy.
But I think many men will still refuse to wake up because many useless men are simply happy to at least get a little pussy. And probably the only pussy they had their whole life.
So you see, you white bitch, you and your pussy are nothing. The only men who will believe the shit you are writing here are those useless who have never tasted pussy before. By real men like me you can go hang yourself. If you are lucky I will let you lick my balls and will cum on your face. You white bitch.
What an insult, to treat a woman as a mere person. There are no persons! The human race is male and female. To treat woman like ‘people’ is to assert what they have separating them from men is valueless. This is no small error.
Your IQ sounds below 80
Fcuk off you white bitch. You feminists are not welcome on “OUR” website. Websites that are just for us. So go fcuk yourself or hang yourself.
I’m a man, but with your female-phobia you sound as gay as AIDs.
If you are really a man then I`m sorry to say this , but, truelly are hopeless. For such “men” there is no redemption. You are probably a faggot.
And even if you are male. We don`t you faggots here. So fcuk off away from here, you piece of rubbish.
Wow, your rant convinced me! THANK YOU JUDY you are awesome! UPVOTE!! UPVOTE!! No. Just no. Please go away.
I’m heterosexual.
Fuck you’re bad at grammar, man…
Don’t forget the excess stench.
Her diet costs a lot of money should be #1.
I’m glad not to know what having sex with a fat woman sounds like.
same as with a skinny woman except fat women enjoy themselves more
Wtf? Not sure if I need to lol or just hang my head at heffer’s confidence. Enjoy yo self.
She’ll ruin your health too.
this is gold.
The corner report for her does not paint the pretty picture that she was remembered for.
It’s pathetic how nearly every female singer dresses up like Marlin Monroe at one point in their career.
I could be corrected but there was a rumour that when Monroe’s body was in the morgue there was a line of guys outside ready to pay for a spot of necrophilia…..
That’s a piece of information I didn’t need to know.
Happy to oblige….😊
There was an article in the newspaper recently- an assassin on his deathbed(of course) claimed he whacked her bc she slept with Castro in the late 50s; she was deemed a threat to natl security
She had a bounty of barbiturates stuffed up her ass by the dr she was partying with. That’s what caused the OD iirc
This hoe was narcissistic, beyond mentally deranged and a giant slut… hmm maybe that’s why every modern chick idealizes or see’s a part of themselves in her.
most modern girls don’t even know who you are talking about, but nice try.
Oh the land whale i was debating had a MM quote too, interesingly enough lol
what girls?? Name one
Unkind and untrue. To obtain a better perspective, written by a woman who was an out and open man worshiper, try this:
https://ehehr1955.wordpress.com/2011/05/04/ayn-rand-on-marilyn-monroe-august-1962/
Haha this wasnt bad. Alot of good ones in this list. well done
The best advice:
“Don’t underestimate me.I know more than I say, think more than I speak and notice more than you realize.”
Now that I think about it, this is good advice when approaching anyone.
The fact that fat women need to constantly make up self-affirming platitudes is evidence that deep down they don’t actually believe their fatness is attractive
could not be more obvious ladies
Here’s a tidbit.
My own prom date flaked on me years ago. We kissed, but then she pulled a psycho-dump routine. Not a good thing to happen when your 17. Yeah, a couple of months later she hooked up with a bad boy. Lesson learned.
Anyway, I still see her on social media, just another post-wall fatty now, all those years of ice cream and boxed wine over reality TV has taken it’s toll.
She once got in my shit for reposting RoK articles and the images I see her posting on her timeline are indeed priceless.
By her account, she “chose” this lifestyle, not to have kids, and basically be just another fat gen-X chick in her 40s with a wasted life.
I have had great entertainment in firing shots across her bow but not in a way that lets her declare victim status. Kind of like how a therapist does not outright tell a patient what’s wrong, but eases the patient along into realizing it themselves.
Occasionally she will lock her account for a few days, usually followed by some dramatic “my feels” posts, and then come back.
To think of the life we could have had and how hard I would have worked to give it to her if we could have been together and grown together.
She chose poorly.
To think of the life we could have had and how hard I would have worked to give it to her if we could have been together and grown together.
Um. You mean chained to a fatty under threat of divorce rape? Let me go get a crane to help you take her *off* the muthafuckin’ pedestal….(or at least her hot, 17 year old self).
Seriously, she sounds like she should be filed under “Bullets, Dodged”.
She would not have spent her adult years on the ice cream and boxed wine if she was with me.
I’m thinking of an overall picture. You know, the way things used to be where women didn’t inflate like life rafts the second you put a ring on them.
It could be argued that, since she “had it in her” to do what she did, she was best left behind anyway. I can understand that argument. But I have observed over the years that women have always been the way they are. They are like dogs and horses. There are no bad dogs and bad horses, only improperly trained or mistreated ones. I have trained dogs and spent much time around horses.
For years I resisted the notion that women have to be trained too, that they are in many ways like children in that you can spoil them.
Heck, I have realized only in the last couple of years that any man can bring out the absolute worst in any woman and do it by treating her too nice.
I have done just that myself. And I have dealt with alpha dogs who will bite you if you don’t show them who the boss is, and worked with horses that will knock you down if you don’t assert your space around them.
A woman will become a demon if you let her. Any one of them, any time.
So ultimately it’s men who changed. I have changed for the better once I realized my errant ways. Now I don’t let women escalate arguments (I do not argue with them. Period). I don’t spend my money on a woman that gives me no value back. Shit a woman asked me for money recently and I said outright to her “So what’s in it for me, if I give you that money? What do I get out of it?” The woman is a masseuse so I was hoping she would arrive at the idea of you know, actually trading her skills for money (and I can certainly use a rub my back’s been acting up).
Yeah, keep your game on and frame up until you die, and all that. Seems tedious when looking at it from a little blue pill boy perspective, as if we are supposed to relax if we get married and our wives are supposed to become “friends and partners”. But that’s fantasy. Might as well expect children not to throw tantrums – but we can’t blame a child for being spoiled if we spoil them.
In the end I find that the more I keep my game on and maintain my frame the easier it gets. It’s almost automatic now, just like my daily exercise that I have been doing regularly for 30 years and have the same weight as I did when I started.
I’m trying to give you the BoD here, Herr Doktor, but your counterfactual diversion into Disney territory *also* assumes your swallowing of the Red Pill in the current timeline. Thus, if you had stayed together from that point in your timeline, who is to say that you swallow the Red Pill at all? You could have gone on, married her, had her squeeze out a few rugrats, had a nice house with a lawn, picket fence and tire swing in the ‘burbs, blissfully unaware of the impending divorce rape looming on the horizon….and pretty soon there are Nazgul in the Shire, you’re strung up by your nuts and Sauron has the ring.*
There aren’t really any do-overs in life.
Mistral
*Or, put another way, you get raked on alimony and you wind up paying her to fuck other guys and teach your kids to hate you. I just preferred the literary reference to that rather stark reality.
Freaking estrogen mimickers in the western world manufactured products. I really think it is having an affect on the men here. I can’t explain the one or two generation change of men that just happened to start after plastics started to pervade our environment circa the 1970’s.
Yeah I see your point. Like I said I was coming from past perspective.
You see I come from a generation that had the last of the NAWALTS. Yes, we actually had NAWALTS. I have a sister who is one of them, even to this day. She’s only a few years older than I am. She married in her 20s and is still with the same guy, 4 sons, 2 grown up already. She stays in shape, her husband is a happy power broker kind of guy (a bit of an alpha in his own way an overall nice fellow) and her sons are strapping young lads who have red pill naturally ingrained in them. She did not raise little pastel wearing spergers apparently.
However…
I see where you are going. How long would it have lasted for me? Who knows. You see a true NAWALT does not waver. So even if you had a NAWALT in the 1980s, there’s no telling if the Oprah or whatever would have sneaked in later. The “contamination” so to speak. I know full well. Even back then I had premonitions of where things were going in the big picture.
Hence I spent only a couple of wallowing in despair, then messed with another girl who called me later and said “you need to lay low because my boyfriend is coming back from basic training” and I replied to that by throwing out her number (well the boner was nice to have while it lasted) and then I went on, still a teenager, to bang a woman my age but could have been modeling bikinis. That was the first muffin I went down on – never seen it as young and sweet since. Heck it’s true: the worst part about getting older is having to fuck older women. I like my cheese on the plate and nowhere else, if you know what I mean.
While I was with the young (and filthy rich) bikini girl, the other girl who flaked was already getting her beatings from bad boy, and I had no fucks to give at that time either.
Millenials have it easy. Yeah all their women are disgusting fatasses and grossly as poisoned in mind as well as body. But you see the difference is this: my generation had NAWALTS and hence we still had a carrot on a stick. We still had that shining beacon of the NAWALT. So we tried like good little men to be good little men and work hard and all that. What a farce! I’ve been a sucker myself!
Millenials don’t have a carrot on a stick. The carrot is gone and they are being beaten with a stick. This is why I cannot blame them for choosing video games over fat cunts for example.
You know what’s funny about that? It’s made men so freaking girly that I can apply almost the same kind of game to them that I apply to women. Naturally the objectives are different. I’m not trying to fuck the men. I’m just trying to get work done, or get them to do their fucking work.
This is why I say that game, even if one is MGTOW and not so interested in getting laid (MGTOW does not mean “dead” though, they do get laid even when not looking for it), game is important. It’s almost as if we took the ideal of maturity and simply relabeled it “game” because the world is so far departed from maturity that exercising it seems like a game. It’s like when children see adults performing work as a game.
Agreed…A women is a direct reflection of the guy she’s fucking
I believe you dude, but I feel hella awful sad for these poor pathetic excuses for men we have in the USA. I really think we are being exposed to chemicals messing men up as a whole and they don’t even realize it.Destroying societies ability to defend itself and reproduce all for the bottom line of a few top people’s income seems jacked up.
“Plastics make it possible.”
Yeah, the whole world is becoming pussified and crazy but at least in Europe they don’t have fluoride in the water and GMO and hormone-laden meats. Not to mention the beefed up milk that makes 13 year olds grow huge breasts. It’s a weird world out there.
listen to your uncle Mistral, he knows what’s up
You see I come from a generation that had the last of the NAWALTS. Yes, we actually had NAWALTS.
Doc, I think you’re forgetting how old I am, which is 47. I (and you, and GoJ and RedHoodsAssault and Driver) can remember when America was still a pussy paradise. But were there *really* ever any unicorns? Or was AWALT just suppressed pre-Title IX, pre-3rd Wave Feminism and pre- thePhil Donahue/Oprah “But…but…but muh FEELZ!!!!” crowd?
Before the internet, there was less opportunity for attention-whoring. Now, girls can have THOUSANDS of orbiters online. It’s bad for the product.
Worst of all are the fatties. And I’m not trying to be mean, here, but the fatties truly distort the marketplace, as the rest of us–except for the thirstiest of omegas–are driven to higher ground by the roiling sea of blubber, competing for the remaining hotties.
That was the first muffin I went down on – never seen it as young and sweet since.
Oy. This should have come with a shimmering “fade” sequence….
Heck it’s true: the worst part about getting older is having to fuck older women.
Huh? If you “have” to fuck older women, then you’re doing it wrong. Aside from a 44 year old who I really wanted to bang*, I can’re remember the last time I tapped anything older than 27, and I have to go back about 15 years for that one. My plates are 19-26.** There’s no reason for you not to be killing it.
With no disrespect intended, I think you’re engaging in some imaginative, “What if things had gone the way they ‘should’ve’ gone?” speculation. Unfortunately, we’re not playing ‘should’ves’. If you don’t hold frame (and who knows if you would have, as this was pre-RP), then the prom hottie narfs down Hagen Daz and box wine and blimps out anyway. Be happy things turned out how they did, and don’t weep for the life that ‘should’ve’ been. Enjoy the fuck out of the non-divorce-raped life that you have.
Mistral
*The woman in question had basically been my dream girl growing up, and had kept everything together nicely. So when she txtd me about meeting up for a w/e, it was *ON*. But it’s not like I was going to marry her or anything retarded.
**The upper bracket dipped to 25 for a couple of days, when the 26 y.o. started giving me trouble so I canceled our plans for the next day and sent her home. Before the sun set on the second day, she had figured out, “Fuck, I just walked away from a baller! WTF was I *thinking*?!” and started blowing up my phone with a detailed list of what sexual acts in what sequence and for what duration she was willing to perform on my person to get back in my good graces.
Wisdom.
” roiling sea of blubber”.
That’s both funny and dystopic at the same time. 😀
Guess we are the just under 50 club. The younger fellow need to take heed from us. I’ve made just about every beta mistake except sire a child with the various mistakes I put my dick into.
Again, the millenials have it easier. Their women are already fat. None of that “skinny hotty during the wedding, fat blob 3 years later” shit for them.
As for younger women, I wrote them off. When I was 31 I was banking a woman who was 20 and she was so fucked in the head I had a mark on my face from the year long facepalm over my having even given her two seconds of my time. Holy cow what a basket case. Last I heard she was with someone who was making a sport out of beating the crap out of her. And I will have to admit, she probably deserved it.
So.. “Mature” women are fat as fuck and pathetic, younger women are fucked in the head and the millenials are fat AND fucked in the head.
Overall I’d say things are pretty fucked up around here.
Hmm I had a reply for you and it’s apparently gone. :-
It’s not chemical, it’s political. If all these chems were responsible, how am I and many other men apparently not affected?
Sure, but then, they have Sweden anyway, despite all that. Heh.
Ya’ll guys are strong like Bull!!! I don’t know, maybe your family didn’t use certain chemicals for the right amount time at the right amount of time. My mother couldn’t cook, she made everything from cans. She also used Jasmine( I since read stories that this is a known estrogen mimicker as well) everything growing up. I was fat as a cow with big narly man titties until I moved out at 19. I learned to cook, low and behold I lost weight like crazy. I made my own money, payed for surgery to get my extra skin/man boobs removed and I happy as F’ck. The funny thing is that I only got fat between the ages of 12-19 or in other words Puberty. When I wasn’t around my mother’s western consumer lifestyle, I quickly got control of my insane appetite that I had as a child. I try to stay all organic ,but it’s expensive and I feel like a pretentious fool.Maybe some people are more sensitive to their environments?Also, being a fat boy w/ man boobs as a teenager will almost certainly show you the true nature of women, but I didn’t really care until I lost weight and got into shape/my hormones seem to kick in how they should have been. That’s when I got red pilled like a mother*cker. Having women all of sudden stalk you is a strange thing to experience as an adult when they avoided you like the plague just two years earlier. I thought men chased women and boy was I wrong. If women want you they will show up seemingly everywhere you go. Women complain about creepy dudes, but there seems to be way more women
(6’s and under) doing those creepy things they complain about as it is acceptable for them to pretty much act the fool. It took me while to understand that if I literally just ignored them they would work to my benefit , they never approach out of fear I guess,and they seem to help give hotter women the impression I have a higher social value. I could be wrong though.
“Before the internet, there was less opportunity for attention-whoring.
Now, girls can have THOUSANDS of orbiters online. It’s bad for the
product.”
Agree…that and many a woman had better personalities (pleasant ones). Today, with the internet the game has changed (and the attitudes for the worst). The cure: really understanding red pill theory and the dynamic between men and women to get them “back in line”.
Once a man can master putting a woman in her place from time to time – it all comes together.
A lot of women appreciate a man who can lead, but far too many are doped up on the 3rd Wave F>M bullshit.
It’s a self-correcting problem that winds up benefiting the surplus cat population, of course….
Yep, I’d have to agree with you on “a lot of women appreciate a man who can lead”….as long as it’s one on one. I’ve found that too many of them in a group (the herd) will follow just so they appear united. You get many of them one on one and it’s a whole different ball game.
It seems they have to spout the communist (er, feminist) nonsense – just for show.
She did you a favor; you will never have to pay for her poor life choices.
Yes but he could have dumped her before it got too far. He should have gamed her and dumped her cause that’s all she was good for.
But women are a dime a dozen. I don’t know why we put them on such a pedestal. It’s unwarranted.
Ok. But you should also let it go now. You had your revenge now learn from your mistakes and find another. This time use your game and play the exciting bad boy that women crave and before she has a chance to get bored with you, dump her and tell her she just wasn’t that great and she just doesn’t have much sex appeal.
I’ve been able to get laid by not being the bad boy.
But, I’m not the goody two shoes either.
It’s a problem I’ve noticed a while back. Why does it have to be “Beta Chump” or “Bad Boy”? I have observed that women go to the bad boys because of beta chumps. That is, a beta chump makes the bad boys look good to women. Think about it. Do we select fat hausfrau over hot sluts? Of course not. But they make the sluts look better.
Do I have to be a shaved head tatted up bad boy dressed like an MMA fighter just to fuck stupid women? I have found that it’s not necessary.
What is necessary is to be able to do things to women and say things that might be construed as “asshole game” but in retrospect for all the past cases I can only conclude that all I did was treat women like adults.
Like being able to walk away from one, forever, if needed. I ask myself: “if she had a dick would I be here putting up with this crap?”
(the answer is always no)
I recently told a woman in my life “If I had to turn my back on you and never see or speak to you again, I would. Because I can do that”. A week later I got laid. I was not being an asshole per asshole or dick game, just being an adult not putting up with shit.
I’ve reached “peak shit” sometime in my 30s and simply have no fucks left to give for drama and shit tests. Women won’t shit test when they know it won’t be tolerated.
Well whatever you want to call it you are projecting the exciting alpha male quality if you are getting ass. You don’t have to be the stereotypical bad boy like Fonzie Fonzarelli or a gangbanger with teardrop tattoos. Yes these guys project an image that magnetically attract women but you only have to present an image of superiority in some quality. Dress nice, Smell good, and appear intelligent and confident. You need to show women that you are capable of showing them a good time regardless of the consequences. That is all I mean by being the “Bad Boy” Women don’t think about the consequences when in the presence of the Bad Boy. They simply have a strong primal urge to spread their legs. Just make sure you video record it with all this rape culture crap going on.
Good guys don’t finish last. They just don’t finish at all.
I’m 35 and hit the zero fucks left to give around that time too.
Agreed on women seeing you as ” asshole” at first when you hold them to adult standards.
I actually explain this sort of thing to women I game.
Her: “wow you’re an asshole”
Me: ” you know I can understand why you might think that but once you get to know me as a person you will come to respect that about me as I don’t beat around the bush and will tell you the truth regardless of circumstances”
Totally agree with you. No, you don’t need to be or fake being an irresponsible scumbag and loser. Just be your own man, treat everyone with respect, expect respect back, and don’t tolerate any bullshit. The bullshit usually comes in attempts at emotional manipulation, when it comes to women.
Women are drawn to assholes because they are not needy and do whatever they want. They don’t depend on the approval of others. You can do that too without being a loser or scumbag. It used to be called being a man and having the balls to stand by your principles, back in the day. I like to think of it as “Do no harm, but take no shit”. And take the lead with your woman, always .. be it in bed or out of it.
Yes, in the end what women crave is fun and excitement. You can give them that without becoming a caricature of something you are not.
I explain it in a shorter version so it’s not lost on them: “Hey I’m brutally honest. if you want someone to blow fairy smoke up your ass talk to the dork beside me.”
Sounds like you dodged a bullet there buddy. Be happy.
“Occasionally she will lock her account for a few days, usually followed by some dramatic “my feels” posts, and then come back.”
Watching their emotional roller coaster is like watching a ship sink. Yet the fact they are completely unaware of how pathetic they look is amazing.
They were better off in an era where their insanity was hidden from the public.
Holy shit we must be related. Sort of the same thing, minus the kiss, happened to me back in 2007. About a month ago I ran into her. She wanted to say hi to me and I said Hey back, but it was clear she changed drastically since high school. In high school she had a serious body, but now she’s fat and covered with tattoos, one being a giant Marilyn Monroe face (and look at the main comment here…). She really let herself go, but I still look the same. She seems to be doing somewhat ok though. She got pregnant right after high school. I definitely dodged a bullet. You see, later in 2007 she tried contacting me after her bad boy treated her bad and I refused to talk to her. I was somewhat developing a red pill mentality then.
Had a similar situation and got LBJF’ed. Ran into her years later at the grocery store fresh from a trip to Europe and still high off a recent promotion.
She was giving lots of IOI’s and trying to qualify herself to me as her groceries were rung up. Then her expression toward me changed when she realized it was time to pay and she had to pull out her food stamps in front of me.
Simply. Awesome.
Ouch, right in the gut with that reveal! Was she also your prom date? Or this is a combo breaker, hahaha.
Was not my prom date.
Nothing that happened in high school counts as soon as you leave school.
I have a set of responses whenever one of my family members post that shit. Usually, I post it to shut them the fuck up.
What’s a Facebook?
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2015/06/20150615_heavy.jpg
This just in… American women today weigh what men weighed in the 1960s…
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-15/bridging-inequality-gap-us-women-now-weigh-same-men-1960s
before I hit puberty, I had to wear “husky” pants- is there a “husky” area in banana republic for women these days??
It’s not just an area of the store, it’s an ENTIRE store! Ever heard of Lane Bryant?
How much do they weigh now, those US women? 166lbs or something. For the rest of the world using the metric system (the normal thing) that’s 75 kilo’s. Damn. And it’s probably mostly fat. Disgusting!
For the men it’s the same. Fat asses. You’re not going to fool me those extra pounds are muscle.
They are on me, but I’ve been lifting since age 18 and haven’t stopped and am now in my mid 40’s. I’d be the same size in 1960 under the same conditions. Plus I’m 6’3″, which is a bit taller than your average man by several points.
Seriously. How many people do actually lift. When I’m in the gym I am small compared to those bb’s. But outside my strength is probably superior to that of half the men I see, and I’m only 5,7. After 40 men develop serious beer bellies, it’s not so different from where you are in the west. Half the Dutch adult population is overweight also. Definitely not like in the US, but still, compared to the 1960’s it’s sickening. Well, the Netherlands and Germany are both miniature versions of the US, so it’s not that surprisingly. Our culture looks like the one in the US. Fastfood, sedentary lifestyles, too much cars, too much technology and entertainment to make us lazy slobs.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/posts/Screen%20Shot%202013-10-09%20at%2011.27.30%20AM.png
I lift. I do squats, bench press, and sit-ups 3 days out of 4, plus light swimming, and long walks where I stop to do push-ups.
There’s undoubtedly a few ripped guys here, but a few fatties, too…
Let’s shame ’em!
“Real men like curves, only dogs go for bones.” LOL. A real man go for what he wants and doesn’t give a shit about what others think about him. Also, being curvy is not being fat. Feminists changed the meaning of the word to include themselves.
Public service image by Bearded Bear. Don’t be fooled by stupid SJW bullshit. Know the difference.
Nice.
Hour glass figure is best. But if that’s not an option and I have to choose between a skinny girl with a flat tummy or a fat ass, I will go with skinny every time. Its easier to feed a girl than get her to diet and exercise.
Assuming that the one on the left is shopped and also the best possible version of her, she’s probably fat too…
i wonder how many of you so called men on here are overweight. here’s a thought you want to date nice women, take a shower, put on clean clothes, put down the booze and change your attitude. no woman wants to be seen with a man who thinks he gets to tell her how much she should weigh, or what she should wear. that is simply abuse.
No man wants to be with a woman who tells him how tall he should be (NEWS FLASH – you can fix being fat, you can’t fix not being tall), how much income he should be making to make her “cut” or what kind of exclusive parties or VIP events he should have access to in order to be worth her time. That is simply abuse.
no woman tells a man how tall he should be. period. that is just more lies used as an excuse to treat women like second class citizens. and you know, if you didn’t expect to date 15 year olds, maybe you’d realize that women don’t ask those other things either, its immature girls who do
Correct again, and those immature girls end up REALLY skullfucked and damaged after 40 when their sexual market value nosedives because they spent their youth overvaluing themselves and acting more bitchy and entitled than they had any right to be!
well, you know, if you let them away with it at 15 so you can fuck them, they are gonna get used to it. so its just as much your fault for letting young girls expect to be paid to have sex with older guys
I have no desire to fuck 15 year-olds nor pay for sex in general, nor do I know any men that do. Do you?
Once again honey get your thinking straight…this is a masculine self-improvement based website. Hence the male readers on here would tend to be above average as a whole in talent,character, physique and mental application.
No, male fashion designers changed the meaning of thee weird to make the miniskirt look good and for men to ogle women’s crotches easier
Most if not all male fashion designers are homosexual, and correct me if I’m wrong honey but I don’t think fags are that interested in women’s precious crotches.
A miniskirt show less and looks better than the yoga sweatpants woman wear constantly these days. Gotta have legs or curves for a skirt.
Fucking comical and pathetic when wildebeests think they can dictate what “real men” want. If such were the case, they wouldn’t be miserable and mad at the world for the shortcoming they imposed upon themselves!
I think you hit the nail on the head there, man!
I saw this one posted on a friend of mine’s wall today. She happens to be a single mother of 3. It made me cringe.
Nice – go for the throat.
Me like it.
It could technically be true though. Just not from the angle she was posting from.
Miley Cyrus is an empowered feminist who doesn’t need men.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3126211/Miley-Cyrus-shows-playful-yellow-boilersuit-gets-camera-lens-launch-transgender-portrait-series-Instagram.html
Men still use Jewbook? If I knew how I’d make a meme with Zuckerberg’s smug, ugly face with the caption “So you like making me rich?”
Its free to use. You can further use ad blocker so you don’t have to accidentally click on the junky ads, like on this site.
If you’re not paying then you’re the product.
FB has no way to verify if a profile has real info. Don’t put anything out there you don’t want others to see. I rarely use it with minimal info.
With internet and real world data all being inter-related such as phones and ip addresses being traceable to specific people, your profile doesn’t even need to be real. I wouldn’t be surprised if “Google” has a full profile on you, including speech and facial id along with thought processes, medical history, and a log of everything you have ever typed, said and done providing there was a camera, mic, signal or transaction there to record it. FB is just another mass data trawler and it IS interconnected with everything else.
Perhaps there was a reason why we were all groomed with books like 1984, films like The Truman Show and “reality tv” shit like Big Brother over the last few generations. Smile, you’re actually in a film… and 400 years from now, someone/something might care that you existed if you left behind enough “data” worthy of thought or entertainment. It will all be there to observe and review, much like how today’s people review philosophies and lives of people who lived 2-4000 years ago.
If you use credit cards, they already had complete “profile” on you long before the internet. All the internet does is fill in the blanks on what kind of porn you like, and your politics. FB is a toy, it will be replaced or up-ended by the next thing soon enough.
Spending all day on Facebook is for girls. Come on, it is about the most un-masculine thing you can do!
Dang much good stuff
Enjoyed them all. Thanks.
mbn
so, I assume the only way that guy can get a woman is either get her drunk or rape her> sad, really sad. time to grow up boys, mommy’s basement is not gonna clean itself
Oh wow hon, what a new insult! The basement! Laugh riot! That is so fresh and creative!
Yeah she forgot to mention how small all our dicks are also. Feminists, you are really slipping!
The rather interesting consistency of the same, cliche insults does display a curious lack of collective intellect on their part. It is as if their minds were created by the same manufacturer; replicas as if they were a mass-produced toy able to speak in only a small set of pre-programmed phrases, possessing no independent thought of their own.
The statements themselves are quite repetitive and therefore boring. However, the simplicity and irony is sometimes quite amusing.
It’s time for men to start commanding their basements as their Fortress of Solitude. My dad had a basement that was “his space” that he could retreat to and while we weren’t prevented from going there, it was common knowledge that you left him to do his business down there unless you needed him for something urgent.
Although I must say I like your comment that “your whole house is your domain” and you don’t need a “man cave”. . . still a guy needs somewhere where he can be alone and in peace.
and it’s time to stop trolling these sites looking for attention.
Someone forgot to tell you….you’ve hit the wall and you’re invisible.
Face it. You’re ugly and have nothing that men desire. So you’re on here trying to cause trouble. We’re all laughing at you.
And just to preempt you’re inevitable butt hurt reply, I’m 50 years old and have a hot 25 year old girlfriend who worships the ground I walk on. I’ve got no use for dried up ugly feminists like you.
what’s with you morons calling women over 30 ugly. look in a fucking mirror. and as for your 25 year old girlfriend, she is probably fucking your best bud’s son
Probably because women over 30 are fucking ugly as fuck compared to their younger counterparts. Especially ones with condescending attitudes and dyke haircuts like yourself. Just because your old, dried up, bitter, can’t attract a man anymore, and have no purpose or use in life aside from pushing papers in a cubicle and feeding your cats doesn’t mean you need to go around being a cunt. Why don’t you just accept that fact that you’re never going to be desirable again and just check yourself into the retirement home k bertha?
Men are attracted to fertility related cues. Women over 35 are far less fertile and their attractiveness decays accordingly. No men are truly attracted to older women.
In my blue pill days, I used to pump my fist at all the fem-positive memes. (cringe)
Now whenever I see one about a “good woman meme”, I just post this clip.
The women always try to change the subject:
I think this one sums up all of them.
That’s what Mary Magdalene said.
You cannot make people want what they do not want. Women don’t want nice guys and men don’t want women who aren’t pretty. Period. The reasons for this are biological and genetic. What is the point of complaining about this over and over and over again ? This story will NEVER change, not tomorrow, not next week, not next year, not in 5,000 years time.
I don´t like Sofia Vergara at all…
She makes the latin american women look bad.
The “attitude” of what she’s talking about is nothing more than be childish and inmature.
Chris Rock speaks the truth
and this one too floating around today…
Just curious as to why you boys are so afraid of women who can think for themselves, is it perhaps because you realize the only thing you are needed for any more is to scratch that itch women get. Best be nice children, we’ve perfected cloning.
lol except its the other way around. Tell me why any man with self respect would voluntarily spend time with a woman who won’t clean, can’t cook, disrespect herself by getting fat and unattractive, develop a shitty entitled attitude, and not contribute anything positive to his life? Men can out perform a woman in every aspect of life except taking dick. Its men who make society work. We don’t need you. As a gender you’ve never invented anything worth a shit, you’ve never made any major discoveries or accomplishments, and if men wouldn’t have allowed it you would have never even gotten the right to fucking vote. When compared with men you’re inferior in every area that matters. We’re stronger, smarter, more adaptable, and better at critical thinking and problem solving.
Face it, aside from your part in reproduction and the hole between your legs YOU ARE LITERALLY FUCKING WORTHLESS. Then when you consider that men now have access to just about every kind of sex toy imaginable and we can grow fetuses in labs all the women on this planet could drop dead and we’d still be alright as a species. If all the men suddenly disappeared and the women were left to fend for themselves they’d fucking die of starvation because they’d all be too busy arguing and cat fighting amongst themselves to do anything productive. So how about you shut the fuck up, lose 20 pounds, invest in some anti aging cream, and learn how to please a man if your dried up dusty vagina will still allow it you stupid, worthless, old cunt.
yes, you are bigger and can beat the shit out of someone smaller than you, if that makes you feel like a man. however, you still need a womb to develop children in even if you do clone people, whereas, women already have the womb and are capable of raising children without murdering them, unlike those big strong violent men you so like. as for women being incapable of feeding or clothing ourselves, welcome to the 21st century women have been doing all that for centuries. so how about YOU shut the fuck up and grow a pair, you useless piece of shit. its YOU and your attitude that is way out of line, oh, and by the way, men like you can’t do anything, you are too busy complaining about how women are taking your jobs. the worthless people today are the men like you who think they have the right to beat women and force your misogynistic lifestyle onto the rest of the world. GROW THE FUCK UP AND SHOW SOME RESPECT TO THE PEOPLE WHO RAISED YOU, WOMEN.
And everything i just said went right over your head. It seems that not only is your uterus a dried up shriveled mess but your brain is too. lol you know I’m right you just won’t admit it, your useless, you have no purpose in life anymore, you obviously don’t have a family to look after or else you wouldn’t be spending all this time online shaming men. Id tell you to go do something productive and have some kids but we both know that can’t happen now. Even if you were somehow able to find a man who wasn’t completely revolted at what time has done to your body and was willing to put up with your bitchy entitled attitude it would all be for nothing. Its ok though, just go back to your paper pushing office job you thought was the answer to all your problems and grind it out until you slip into senility.
“GROW THE FUCK UP AND SHOW SOME RESPECT TO THE PEOPLE WHO RAISED YOU, WOMEN.”
The women who raised us, given the divorce rate of 50%, are as likely as not to be single mothers. And given the backgrounds of more or less every damaged person in the world, including all those in prison, the women who raised us, and you, and most men, suck as parents. Respect will be given when it is earned.
Usually the brainless, cliched shaming takes a sentence or two to appear, but you’ve managed to start trotting ’em out after a few words!
But seriously, can you do us a favour? We all know feminists have nothing else in their arsenal except insults about how we’re bitter little boys who live in our mother’s basement because of “afraid” of women, but could you come up a few differentt, fresh ones?
It would make the “debates” with feminists a touch more interesting, plus it would make a nice change. Thanks, feminist(s)!
I think you’ve answered your own question here as to why men hate feminists who can supposedly “think for themselves”.
You talk about reproduction and immediately bring up cloning! What wonderful independent thoughts you’re having, dear feminist.
There are girls in Asia who I talk with about reproduction and they blush and I wink. They actually KNOW what penises and wombs are for, see.
Best pay attention: You’re the one who’s becoming redundant. There’s no shortage of wombs in this world, but there IS a shortage of good men willing to invest in sluts.
Quod erat demonstrandum
Do you have any more cliches that show that you think for yourself?
Bitterness is pussy repellent
good stuff
This one is my favorite.
A small comment about the “Why I’m single” diagram: This is not particularly accurate or, at the very least, it only reflects one aspect of the truth. It is true that many guys fail to find a girl because they are too nice, but it is just as true that you can lose one for failing to be “nice” in the right way. Game works great to build attraction in a girl, but if you want to build a long term relationship, only attraction is not enough. You also need to create relationship comfort, to make her think that it is pleasant to be around you.
There needs to be a balance between domination and bad-ass game on one hand, and a certain amount of comfort-creating “beta”-like behaviour on the other (if she it tired after a long day of cooking, cleaning and taking care of your child, it is perfectly ok to make her a sandwich). People with military experience will probably agree that the best officers are those who are capable both of being authoritative and friendly/nice/supportive towards the soldiers; the same holds true for leadership in a family.
Its ok to have fun with bad boys just dont commit to them or have a baby with them and ALWAYS wear a condom…. isnt that what you guys tell eachother about women? Play around all u want till you find the one?
I’ll remember that. Thank you!
You forgot one: Don’t expect to ever land a decent husband after fucking around like that, either.
My language was a bit crude yes but the reality of it is most people date others before meeting their spouse
Those people are experiencing sky-rocketing divorce rates. What kind of idiot follows the lead of failures? Marry a virgin bride, though, and you’re much more likely to achieve a happy, lifelong marriage. That’s the reality. What “most people” do is irrelevant when most people are idiots and losers.
People do date though weather you agree morally or not. And from the looks of the comments on this site most people in here are not virgins and are not virgins when they marry. Im sorry but thats the reality of it. Im saying if your going to be out there… dont be dumb and have a baby or catch an std. Im not encouraging promiscuity (well maybe my language was lol) but obviously this was a response to one of the pictures in the slide.
Deleted
My last post got fucked up by pasting something from somewhere else. Ignore it.
I meant to say: “Virgin” only refers to females. I never meant the men should be virgins.
It isn’t hard for a man to find a virgin bride at or around the age of consent if he’s switched on. I’m 29. Age of consent is 16 where I’m from. You can bet your life that my next wife will be a 16 year old virgin.
You as a woman have less luck than I do. It sounds like you’re making poor choices already and will never know a good marriage. Time will teach you this.
Lets just chalk it up to cultural differences. The reality is (my reality) even my grandparents were not virgins when they got married neither of them. Im not in my familys or friends sex lives like that but most of the married people i know some married for 59 years…. the majority of them were not virgins. Now i have little sisters would i ever say to them ‘its ok to have fun with bad boys just use protection’ of course not. Oh and what i say or comment on online has VERY little to do with what personal choices i make in life. I admit that when i wrote my first comment i was trolling (if you can call it that) i mean no woman actually takes this site seriously.
For instance culturally where i live such a marriage between a 29 yearold and 16 year old would be very looked down upon .. so i guess not all values translate
Where do you live? And who looks down on it?
If you’re talking about feminists looking down on it then it doesn’t count – the feminists are just jealous. Same with religious folk – they’re just controlling of young girls’ sexuality. But no matter where you are in the world, all men are attracted to 16 year old girls due to biology.
It’s hardly celebrated marrying young girls in NZ, either. I just don’t care what people think.
In any case, nobody celebrates a 16 year old slut, either. Don’t kid yourself.
It’s fine so long as you don’t mind the destination that that train leads to…Ben and Jerry’s, your cat and lifetime movies
The sad part is, this is not just a single lady problem. Married women and even teen girls are doing it. I do recall dating girls during my adolescence and the first thing I saw while entering their home was the litter box. I’ve always wondered why that correlation.
i think its messed up that men on this site slut shame women then give advice on how to get laid and have flings … anyway lol im pretty sure when i posted that i was trying to be sarcstic or start up some light trolling i dont realy remember
You misunderstand the sex differences between men and women. Yes, you’re right, it seems hypocritical at first glance, but there are very real psychological causes behind this behavior. It comes down to the way men and women have EVOLVED to be.
Natural selection favored men who maximized their total number of sex partners because men have no minimal parental investment requirement to produce offspring aside the effort it takes to get a woman pregnant.
Women are different. A single copulation can burden them with years of mandatory parenthood. Because of this, natural selection favored women who minimized their total number of sex partners and maximized the quality of their mate in order to secure the best possible DNA for their offspring.
So a woman who has sex with many men is a low value mate by default, because she’s obviously not trying to secure the best possible DNA for her offspring. Her unconscious reproduction strategy has plainly hit rock bottom. Men are also unconsciously aware of this, hence the “slut shaming” here.
Men will still sleep with a slut in order to maximize their total number of sex partners, but they’ll never value her. Men only value chaste women, which is again an evolved behavior to protect against cuckoldry (promiscuous women are obviously more likely to cuckold their mate).
This is evolutionary psychology. It’s your choice how to behave, but if you want to be valued and attract a good man then you have to be chaste to prove your worth. That’s how it works. A few decades of feminism cannot undo millions of years of evolved behavior.
People aren’t basing their life choices off of what their 1 million year old ancestors did though. Women can have sex and not get pregnant now. Men can dna test to check patternity now. Men absolutely in this day and age have a social and legal obligation to help raise their children. And from what i understood from my biological anthropology class is that as old and as vast as the cultures and time we humans have lived on this earth… there is no one umbrella statement that can sum up our evolution.
You don’t realize that humans are evolved creatures. I’m sorry, but you’re obviously too stupid to understand what I said.
You don’t realize that ALL behavior is the instinctive by-product of genes interacting with their environment. So how can the sudden introduction of paternity testing override the old evolved behavior of sexual jealousy? It can’t. Humans can’t just magically update their genes, and therefore their behavior, just because of some new invention.
You’re living in a feminist fairyland, girl.
My advice is find and read this book:
Evolutionary Perspectives On Human Sexual Psychology And Behavior
It’s not a political book, just a boring evolutionary psychology tome. Yet it will help you realize how much your head is full of feminist dogma that isn’t true.
The solution then is to not be a slut. Sluts deserve the treatment that they get. Teaching men to take advantage of women’s poor self control issues is perfectly legitimate, as it promptly punishes sluts for being sluts by bringing men who don’t care about them into their orbit. Fuck sluts. Literally.
And all im saying is fuck men who ARE sluts then bitch about sluts the end its my opinion
Oh ive heard your argument a thousand times im not stupud just because i dont agree with you. Example the physically strongest male usually had the top pick of mates. He had more resources to offer (hunting) and protection. Fast forward to today. Women today (at least in my country America ) dont need a man to hunt i can go to the store and buy food. Physical strength used to be the sole factor in picking a mate for the majority of humanity. TODAY however, intelligence, physical attractiveness, and values are what women look for in a mate. So yeah you have nerdy weak billionared getting the hot women today. Is this completely opposite of what its been like in the past? Yes. Is it wrong? No. As women gain more independence from men is this feminism? No its evolution
Also yes here in my country it is absolutely looked down upon for a 16 year old to be marrying a 29 year old. As a matter of fact in many states it is illegal even with the consent of her parents for her to marry so young. But like ive said from the very begining cultures very greatly across the world.
I’m not talking about culture, I’m talking about biology.
That’s not my argument. You’re too stupid to understand my argument, clearly. I recommended a book to you. You ought to read it and learn something. 📖
And i suggest you take a biological anthropology class. its an objective look at pre civiluzed man sincesince thats what this whole discussion between us has been about.
IM talking about culture we arent animals in the wild culture we are dvanving human beings
Culture is a product of our biology, and we are 100% evolved creatures just like animals. Your ignorance is choking.
You are claiming I believe things that I never even remotely suggested that I believe, and then dismissing my argument saying you’ve heard it all before.
Also, I’m not speculating on how prehistoric humans lived. Evolutionary psychology is about studying how modern humans live by collecting real-world statistics and then trying to answer the question, “How did humans evolve to be like this?” It’s about asking and answering the question, “Why are humans the way they are today?”
You don’t seem to be even remotely capable of understanding this approach.
Dude you cant even have a conversation without insults its immature so this is my last reply. We were talking about the sexual behaviors of men and women. YOU brought up evolution. I dont believe evolution has anything to do with the topic. We live in the current Thats it. After taking an OBJECTIVE class on biology theres not much an OPINIONATED book on it can offer me. Thanks for the convo
Can you at least tell me whence you believe human behavior comes if it’s not evolved? I.e. do you believe God gave it to us or something?
The problem is that you offer no alternative explanation. That’s why I call you stupid. Also, you claimed that I believe things which I do not believe. That was a stupid thing to do.
Human behavior didn’t just arise out of mud and mist. It has a source. It has an explanation.
These are the things I’m trying to clarify, not more. If we cannot even clarify what human behavior is and where it comes from then how could we hope to adequately understand it?
And in what way do you think the book I recommended to you is opinionated?! That came out of nowhere.
I don’t get the one with the guy in line at the supermarket
I don’t either
I had toon zoom in for that. He is buying tampons and cupcakes
The cupcakes I can forgive, but tampons? And I should know. Once I had to buy Maxi Pads for my ex fiancee while going out to the movies because her period came in and her strong independent persona didn’t have the foresight to carry some in her ginormous Coach purse. Mind you, I had no choice but buy them out of my own pocket or else risk a potentially bad situation. Yet, let this be a lesson to you all. A woman that can’t buy her own sanitary products should be dumped ASAP. And of course, ladies, that goes also for men who don’t carry condoms and wants to shag you, unless you just don’t give a damn.
I would have let her sit there and squish around in her own filth. Fuck that noise. It happens every month at roughly the same time yet they always seem fucking shocked.
Some girl was whining about free condoms, and how they don’t get free tampons. I didn’t couldn’t muster the GaF to reply to such an idiotic statement.
Kinda explains the rules in Leviticus regarding women in their periods, like putting them in a sort of quarantine for seven days. As harsh and somewhat impractical as it sounds, at least in my opinion, we might have to consider bringing back some of those rules, since even with the advent of science, these girls can’t get their shit straight.
It’s a shit test man lol… And quite common at that.
Girls do that kind of shit to test men, are you enough of a fucking pussywhipped assfag to go buy tampons or pads or whatever the fuck it is.
The only response one should actually give to “I have my period” is “are you also bleeding out of your mouth?”
He was buying tampons. He was whipped.
I thought the “Bad-Ass Mom” one in the beginning was encouraging sex-changes… I was like, huh, that’s an interesting way of putting it.
Women: something to put your dick in.
Funny pics. But why does it sound like “nice guys” are crying because “bad boys” ruined all the girls turning them into sluts? I mean, is that an attitude men here seriously have? Or am I missing something?
Honestly, there’s nothing less attractive than a sulky wuss. The bad boys AREN’T to blame. The nice guy sitting in the corner crying is responsible for his own loserdom.
Anyway, a fresh batch of girls hits the age of consent every year, and most of them aren’t in bad shape, and the guys their own age have got no clue how to land them, either. That’s plenty enough opportunity for me!
I agree with the sentiment but didn’t get that from these pics. Likr DMX says “I’m tired of weak ass niggas whining over pussy that don’t belong to them. Fuck’s wrong with them?”
I think Donovan, however, was just giving us a glimpse at the prevailing attitude on social media and how it confirms what we already knew.
A fair bit of the comments here are from guys who seem bitter at women… I never understood where they think that will get them, who in their right mind would even want to fuck a girl who only does it because she owes you?
To me it always was about making them want it and often pulling back until they have to be overt hehe.
Few things bring a grin as wide as an attractive girl asking if you please would just fuck her at your earliest convenience.
Same.
It’s why prostitution was never appealing to me.
I’ves been thinking of a way to signal lol
For me it would be easy but for a lot of guys pulling out a cigar would be seen as strange…
I smoke cigars often, Cubans but it isn’t where a lot of people will meet hehe.
I don’t know what others think, but I suggest that using the word skinny to describe what is basically the normal state is unhelpful. We are pathologising normal thanks to the fatties and I would rather we used the word “slim” or “normal-sized”.
Yeah. “Slim” or “slender” is the go.
Good point. Skinny needs to be used for anorexic looking girls.
Would you fuck an anorexic girl? I would. Oral sex only, though. I’d feed her come all day to fatten her up!
Anorexic is better than fatty, anyway.
Would, have and look forward to next.
Really skinny girls aren’t my thing. Wouldn’t mind banging one though. They’re perfect for carrying them and tossing them around the place and spinning them around your cock while singing the Dreidel song.
Yeah. They’re really good for that.
I love skinny women but NOT skeletal.
Yes, but would you fuck an anorexic girl? At least orally.
If she doesn’t look like Skeletor or like she has AIDS, yes I would/have.
There’s model anorexic and there’s serious death bed anorexic. I’m not really a necropheliac so don’t dig the walking dead look 😉
All women are whores
Not my wife, but these days you don’t even know if all whores are women!
Those are bumper plates anyways. Even if they weren’t, 135 isn’t anything to brag about.
So apparently that felon up there with the hot and dreamy blue eyes is making it big as a shirtless model. All thanks to the same women who have kept Charlie Sheen, Chris Brown, and Justin Bieber alive. I guess background checks aren’t required anymore for him. If anything, he’s the one doing the background checks on girls, if you catch my drift.
And here’s my favorite feminist meme if all time….
http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/998/691/c97.jpg
Fairplay to him,i hope he bangs the lot of them !! and that is quite possibly the greatest feminist meme ever !!
That’s Jeremy Meeks. Female justice is determined by who’s hot and who’s not hot.
Female Reaction to an Ugly inmate : “string him up by his balls, lock him up and throw away the key, instead of doing testing on animals let’s use scumbags like this, What a disgusting pig it figures someone like that would end up in prison!”
Female Reaction to an Hot Inmate: ” He’s Hot he’s innocent, he’s Hot I’m gonna start a blog featuring him, he’s hot i’m gonna visit an write letters to him, he’s hot i’m gonna start an online petition so maybe he gets released, He’s so handsome it’s such a shame he ended up in prison (completely forgetting the victims)”
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev , and Richard Ramirez are a couple others, who despite their heinous crimes, still were swooning women.
Maybe I should consider burning down an orphanage in order to get poon. Or pretty much any crime that doesn’t involve raping children. That’s the take we can all get from this. Happy crime spreeing gentlemen!
https://media.giphy.com/media/j3HQ1zWosr1NS/giphy.gif
A real woman helps his man get it all….with his own money.
A real woman swallows
This just came across my feed. Felt appropriate enough.
College is too expensive and I might end up working as a barista or being one of Bruno’s Mexican furniture. I might get to hold Paula Abdul’s tight booty, but that’s as far as I’m going.
BLAME WHITE FEMALES!
You forgot this one…it gives bitchy women a free pass to act out all they want .
when you care enough to send the very best
The thing is, they are so fucked up they may like that.
I lost a lot of weight, hopped on online dating, and went through a couple large women to knock the rust off. One of them was tall, so not so large, but definitely needed the diet still. She was also my age. First night bang, but her big thing was “don’t waste my time” which Donovan’s translation above is spot on. Did the typical couple month shelf life of the relationship, then she started trying to control it with “well, I want this to be a real relationship, so we shouldn’t be having sex anymore until we know each other lots better.” I cut and left immediately.
You handled it correctly. Demand time is when it’s next time.
about sums it up
I wish somebody would punch the look off that bitch’s face in the friendzone meme (#10). That expression just oozes obnoxiousness.