The abasement of standards in British public life has reached a new low, after Caroline Criado-Perez, a shrill, feminist tubthumper of no discerning talent other than screeching and wailing online, was awarded the Order of The British Empire.
The decision to award Criado-Perez the honour is a strange one, since the pinnacle of Criado-Perez’s achievement was to successfully campaign for the author Jane Austen to feature on a British banknote, the sort of token gesture which institutions like the Bank of England are keen to be seen making anyway.
What has Criado-Perez achieved that warrants putting her in the same box as established entrepreneurs, actors and inventors?
Caroline who?
Privately educated Criado-Perez, for overseas readers, is a Gawker-calibre churnalist who makes a living writing about asinine topics of interest to feminists: what hashtags have been used on Twitter, what nomenclature should apply to male feminists (are they feminists or are they “feminist allies”?), referring to the patriarchy as if it were an actual thing, and so on.
She is also a fervent supporter of the decidedly dodgy prosecution for rape of Julian Assange. Assange is being sought for extradition from the UK by the authorities in the Scandinavian territory of Sweden, a feminist banana state where the application of law and reason is known to have collapsed.
Criado-Perez, who has a Masters Degree in Gender from the London School of Economics, accepts the absurd regret-rape allegations against Assange uncritically.
Pictures of Charles Darwin damage the aspirations of women and young girls
But Criado-Perez’s crowning glory was to convince the Bank of England to print a picture of Jane Austen, the English novelist, on the English £10 note. The drive to have the Bank make the token gesture is set out in her own, man-hating words:
I spent much of my time rehearsing arguments about the damage a public culture saturated with white male faces does to the aspirations and achievements of women and young girls.
Criado-Perez’s gripe was with the “all-male line-up on banknotes.” Even ignoring the patent inanity of the campaign (all British banknotes bear the face of a very powerful woman, Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom), the harpy-in-chief came in for an unusual level of sustained attack. One man even sent her a letter at home to show her he knew where she lived!
Bank of England governor Mark Carney, earning himself mad Hampstead dinner-party kudos points.
After the Bank of England capitulated to requests, putting Jane Austen on banknotes and offering a stream of mealy-mouthed platitudes about representing the “diversity” of society and complying with the “Public Sector Equality Duty”, our Caroline was subjected to a further “deluge of threats of sexual violence”.
Trolls started tweeting under various hashtags, like #rapecrew and #hopeyougetraped, offering such gems as:
You need a good smashing up the arse
and
So looking forward to titty-fucking you later tonight – I’ve got an invitation to your anus
The various internet abuse continued until Caroline, ever the strong, independent womyn, had a break-down. In her own words, she “broke down completely, utterly overwhelmed, starting to think that it was never going to end.”
The effect of these words on a screen upon her, was, in her words “dramatic.” “When it was at its height I struggled to eat, to sleep, to work,” she complained at the time.
Melody Hensley was attacked after saying her PTSD is on par with war veterans
Just like Melody Hensley, the SJW who claims the internet gave her PTSD, Criado-Perez is a embodiment of the soppy, weak-willed millennial. For all her education at Oxford and the London School of Economics, she is unable to grasp the simple logical proposition that turning off a computer prevents other people being nasty to you on the internet.
Your rights end where my feelings begin
What Criado-Perez has managed to do, and will perhaps be a greater “achievement” than her lunatic scheme to put Jane Austen on the £10, was to promote the notion that having your feelings hurt on the internet is a matter for the police.
The common sense sense advice offered when she was under a barrage of puerile, locker-room abuse was pooh-pooed by Criado Perez. She was indignant at being told “don’t feed the trolls.” The advice, she kvetched, “doesn’t magically scrub out the image in your head of being told you’ll be gang-raped till you die.”
No, the only way of dealing with the weak-mindedness of Criado Perez and her like, is for the long arm of the law to get involved and police online communication!
Furthermore, in a Britain where the police is under stringent cost-cutting measures that is putting strain on the front line, special snowflake Criado-Perez indignantly demands that “if the police don’t have the resources to deal with these crimes, they need to be given them”.
When privileged white women manipulate the legal system, simple people go to jail.
Our Caroline got her wish. On 24 January 2014, Isabella Sorley, 23, of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, was sentenced to 12 weeks in prison and John Nimmo, 25, of South Shields, was jailed for eight weeks after pleading guilty at Westminster Magistrates’ Court to the Orwellian-sounding offence of “improper use of a communications network”.
Victim impact statements are a classical ploy used by British prosecutors to shoe-horn “evidence” into court that would not stand the light of day under the proper rules concerning witness statements. It is worth reading this extract from the victim impact statement of Caroline Criado-Perez, the strong, empowered, independent, go-grrl feminist. The melodrama alone is enough to make one weep for Jesus.
It’s hard to get my thoughts together at the moment as my stomach is churning – hearing the outcome has made me realise how tense and anxious I have been feeling. But here goes.
I did not attend the sentencing as I didn’t feel I could cope with being in court with them – and I didn’t feel sure that the judge would understand how terrifying and scarring the whole experience has been for me, which again is not something I could face.
I feel immensely relieved that the judge clearly has understood the severity of the impact this abuse has had on me.
The real legacy of Caroline Criado-Perez
Appointment as Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) is awarded for “having a major local role in any activity, including people whose work has made them known nationally in their chosen area.”
This is a convenient vessel for the Conservative government to kow-tow to the haute-chattering classes by awarding a gender huckster du jour, Caroline Criado-Perez, a trinket to hang on her mantlepiece. It makes David Cameron trendy and hip, and it makes the British Establishment look full of empathy.
Criado-Perez is the walking archetype of shameless privilege. Her father is the former boss of UK supermarket chain Safeway. Like flotsam, she has drifted from half-baked pursuit to half-baked pursuit, dabbling in opera singing and digital marketing before studying at Oxford as a mature student, all done at a leisurely pace and probably with lots of cash injections from mummy and daddy.
Her lasting legacy will not be the banknote with Jane Austen on it. Rather it will be the day that she invoked the power of the state to make a court imprison two simple, working class folk for hurting her feelings on the internet.
She did this in the same cowardly manner she conducts her entire life, that is, remotely—over the internet, over the phone, from the comfort of her armchair. Criado-Perez did not even have the stomach to come to court, as two people whose lives were the diametric opposite of her own pampered upbringing, were taken down to gaol.
Beyond this, she added to the precedent in the UK courts whereby an agent of the state, a judge, will deprive men of their liberty for putting words on a screen that hurt the feelings of a “celebrity.” Words that anyone with any common sense knows can be banished to the ether by switching off or pressing the block button.
For hammering another final, fateful nail into the coffin of the free speech and common sense in Britain, we salute you, Caroline Criado-Perez, Officer of the British Empire.
Read More: Special Snowflake Lashes Out At Oxford University For Not Accommodating Her Made-Up Disabilities
How can any sane person take somebody who has “breakdowns” over words on a screen and who is “traumatized” by words, seriously? Christ almighty, this girl would be ripe for reaping from the face of the earth during any time other than the present.
Every time I hear someone complaining about being attacked online I think of this:
Oh god, not that ‘PTSD’ girl from the article haha.
Look at that one yard “Twitter stare.” The fluorescent glow of the twitter cluster bomb erupting in the distant LCD screen. She’s a Twitter war veteran!
“It was hell! The message was 160 characters deep of vile hatred stacked up hundreds high!
Get over yourself!
Stop whining!
How can you compare yourself!
It kept going on and on!”
She deserves a purple fart.
Yes I meant “fart” cause I can’t give a shit.
lol. Nice.
You weren’t there man!
Thats the worst part about this Culture War, the rank and file leftists are all a bunch of brittle pansies that are shattered by mere words. Theyre a far cry from the fanatical members of the Khmer Rouge or the Maoist Red Guard who were prepared to commit attrocities in the name of leftism. If they weren’t being bankrolled by a bunch of powerful elites we could probably wipe them out in an instant in a fair fight.
Less a fair fight and more of a well deserved spanking that mommy and daddy never gave them.
…
Mate, I get PTSD every day from the stuff people write about me in the comments section of RoK…
Hey, check that persecution privilege! 🙂
Someone just took exception to an Amazon review I wrote. The trauma is killing me.
Survived multiple deployments in The ROK comment section.
Both your service and your sacrifice are appreciated.
Just a man doing my duty.
Silver Star awarded for the Battle of Jezebel in 2008.
Hard winters were good for this.
Indeed they were. While I don’t relish wishing bad things on people in a general sense, it does seem like we’ve short circuited evolution with technology and now the refuse and rubbish are allowed not only to thrive, but be taken seriously.
The societal reset button is just itching to be pushed…
It’s now clear to me using using liberal logic…
Twitter and Facebook are clearly an instruments of hate. The people making the statements are not “wrong” or “right” those are simply constructs. What matters is how people feel and the emotional context used. The weapons are easily available to the general population, even children young as 6 are being bullied, harassed and threatened by haters and intolerant people.
These are “Assault Social Media Platforms” and we need to strictly control access to them. They are hurting people’s feelings, the most heinous crime of all. 130 millions guns aren’t the problem because there are far more users of Facebook than guns. There is no real restriction on access!
The CEO’s of these companies are Hitlers! They tag and categorize people like animals. You cannot “dislike” anything, only “like” it.
Careful, they’ll come up with a “select-fire rhetoric muzzle” …
Your feelings only count if you are a self-appointed member of some minority group.
Something I have noticed lately but seems glaring here: SJWs are masters of double speak, what they say contains signals and code words for their own ilk. “This is a safe space!” doesn’t actually mean that, it means this is an aggressively hostile space for anyone not 100% in my camp. Here, where she has breaks downs and is traumatized means she became irrationally angry and violent and is signaling her followers and allies to attack. Remember, they must keep up the charade that they are helpless oppressed victims, because that’s all they have, they have to obscure their raging personality disorders, so can never come right out with attacks (unless their target willingly exposes their vitals, like apologizing publicly). Orwell called their bullshit close to seventy years ago.
Agree. You can always spot the hypocrisy for a mile out. It’s hilarious just say “strong and independent woman” because we all know it’s circumstantial.
Shit goes down and everyone looks to a man to figure out the problem (get everyone to safety).
Yep and women want to be in combat units yet words cause them to lose it?? Women want to be in the Special Forces yet twitter messages cause them to breakdown?? Puhleese
More money is needed to open up the old nuthouses (not more jails).
We’ve got plenty of these nut jobs walking the streets.
BREAKING NEWS:
The economy is going to collapse this year. When Greece defaults on its payment, the markets will crash. The final crash could possibly take place this September, where the fiat currencies may collapse altogether.
There has been a 7 year cycle where a crash has happened:
1980: Recession
1987: Stock market crash
1994: Bond market crash
2001: 9/11, dot com, recession
2008: Housing crash
2015: ???
Start to buy and invest in gold and silver now. The many websites supplying gold and silver have crashed, so this could be another indicator that the issue is serious.
don’t care, have no money atm anyway.
what if they call in all the gold like Roosevelt did?
Are you saying Greece is supposed to default or that it will have no choice
What if they do? How would they know who does and doesn’t have it? Silver and gold shops don’t require an id to buy bullion if you pay cash. So they call it in, big hairy deal.
but you’d never be able to sell it though, so it ceases to be the asset it was supposed to be.
probably won’t happen, as the situation is different, but if the petro-dollar collapses what backs the currency (in theory as its always mainly for appearances sake)
I don’t think this is the same world as the time of FDR. Black markets would spring up overnight.
What backs the dollar now? Nothing. Same thing as when it collapses.
I bet you all the gold in fort knox it won’t collapse…..safe bet since its (most likely) empty. Your point about nothing backing the dollar is why Bitcoin etc is interesting. Can you stabilise confidence in something that is inherently vapour?
They do now if you want to sell it…
And they’d know if I sold it to others how precisely?
Nobody ever checks my id when I buy silver/gold. Not once. Ever.
They will be doing exactly that.
If gold gets too pricey, they will set a fixed price for exchange just like they did in the 30s. Per Gerald Celente, that price will be in the $800-$900 dollar range…
just looked him up. Worrying, but if you think about it, puncturing confidence is just what the commenter I was responding to seems to have been aiming for. Some people are predicting runaway inflation, others deflation. Balancing the broken system seems like the least bad option
CPI hasnt included food or energy costs(I bet they dont include health insurance either) for something like 25 years. This is why economists claim “there is no inflation”.
I get what you are saying though, best to keep whats broken muddling along, its better than the alternative (ie, Thunderdome).
Kinda makes you wonder what’s the point in tracking the cost of cars and televisions and whatever else they are still measuring. Shouldn’t the whole purpose of “measuring inflation” be to find out how much the costs of necessities like food, energy, housing costs?
Around here our water bills have gone to around $75 a month MINIMUM. Gasoline has tripled since I learned to drive. Food it’s a little harder to track but I remember a grocery store when I was a kid had a gallon of milk for $1. I think it’s well over $3 now. As far as I can tell, the prices of everything have about tripled since the 1990s. And we had a much more reasonable government and fed back then. I can only imagine this will accelerate going forward.
The point is to not spook the herd.
CheeseburgaX3, PHD in economics, Nobel Laureate in Economics, decrees things are much worse than they appear to be, the markets go down.
As far as water goes: it was FREE in nyc until the early 90s. I wish I remember the guys name, CEO of whatever-corp, but he was on TV talking about privatizing water supplies…
Wow, yeah one of my high school buddies moms told me when they moved here in the late 1980s they billed you for water every 3 months and it was less than $10. Compared to now with $70+ / month bills. The funny thing is the majority of the cost is for the sewer–it costs way more to let fecid dirty water drain off your property under gravity than it does to pump in fresh, filtered, chlorinated water under pressure to your home. Of course the rich areas of town are all on septic tanks and don’t pay this sewer fee…..
I’ve read stories of water privatization in third world countries and it is so bad it almost pushed the citizens to armed revolt. Of course what we have in America isn’t much better. The “public” water utility is simply a private monopoly operated by city employees. The annual rate of increase in water rates has been double digits for the past decade or two here. I don’t know how much longer that can continue, because at some point the cost of water service will be greater than the cost of rent in a shithole studio apartment.
Gold will NOT be the refuge. When the big crash happens, expect deflation. Gold will go to $250. Hold cash. The whole world will go in the shitter and cash will be king.
I don’t own any gold, but how in the world would pieces of paper printed willy nilly be worth more than *any* real asset, whether it is a house, a car, a gallon of gas, or a piece of gold?
In the event of significant deflation, houses, cars and gold will lose their value. Fewer buyers with cash means that the value of those items diminishes. Conversely, those with cash will see their purchasing power increase. In a global meltdown, the reserve currency will continue to be the US Dollar, further increasing the value of your cash. Those with cash will have incredible buying opportunities and can build incredible wealth with it.
Just a matter of clarification. These items will not lose their “value”. Their value will remain the same. They will have a lower price in US Dollars.
I generally agree with eliminating debt and hoarding cash, but I’m far more worried about inflation than deflation, so I try to buy houses, real estate, stocks, etc (I prefer real assets to financial ones but stocks are very liquid) because I think these will hold their value more than dollars that are being printed up by the FED. I’ve read some books about deflation. The problem is, there is no evidence for it. And everything our government is doing encourages out of control inflation.
The lunatics have taken over the asylum
The Conservatives have had to comply to feminism to an extent – Pressure from Europe
Either way, they’re party’s policies are still better than the entire alternative of Labour, Snp, Lib Dem and Green
If we exit from Europe, things will be better, socially and economically – Greece is gonna fuck everyone over
Here’s hoping…. the EEC (for ’twas what it was originally formed), has become a stale ideology driven bureaucracy. The sooner it dissolves the better. When it was trade driven association of countries it provided advantages for agriculture and industry. Leave a bunch of politicians and bureaucrats in charge and they will always want to “progress”, read grab and centralise more power with the bigger countries dictating to the smaller countries.
I always hear how the “EU” has prevented war within Europe…bullshit….it was the US and the threat from the USSR prevented war again in Europe. The sooner the EU gets its ass kicked by the Russian Federation the better…..
I know we have a lot of readers from overseas… but I’ve got to say it: This is yet another reason I abhor Europe and why the worst thing that could ever happen to America is to become more like Europe.
As a fellow American, I can honestly say we’re not too far off from this.
Just a few months ago, some army broad was given a medal for crying about getting “cyberbullied”, and promoted to 1st Sergeant.
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2014/12/23/army-thanks-soldier-for-confronting-offensive-behavior-online.html?comp=7000023467983&rank=2
People who complain about being cyber bullied can’t stand turning off their laptop and going and doing an activity that stimulating like doing exercise or (…gasp!…) reading a book. Instead they’ll lap up the abuse and then play the victim.
Hey….it’s all about equality. And if they can’t make it, then just let them keep trying (or just let them in already). What could go wrong?
Female soldiers second attempt at army ranger school:
http://www.military.com/daily-news/2015/06/22/three-female-soldiers-begin-second-attempt-at-army-ranger-school.html
If the evil patriarchy really did exist then why would she be getting an award for criticising them? In fact if the patriarchy existed she wouldn’t even be able to sprout her feminism or get women on bank notes. If the patriarchy was real feminism wouldn’t even be allowed. Professional Feminists are all mentally deranged humans and I mean that seriously.
Indeed. That’s my normal comeback towards most “oppressed” groups. Yeah, you’re so oppressed that you can stand toe to toe with me in public, call me every name in the book, and not be cut down or even silenced.
People have no clue what real oppression is like any longer, in the West. Bunch of spoiled rotten children, really.
go out on the street. look how people behave. look at the strut of the meek females and the hunchback of even big men.
where the fuck is this so-called patriarchy? i am not seeing it.
Crypto-patriarchy? Maybe those cowed men are just pretending
…………….
to trick the cows?
Im still waiting for my “patriarchy” membership to pay off. I guess I must have memorized the wrong secret handshakes.
that’s what i always thought, too.
two times flat, three times fist and a knowing smirk: “yeah, brother, everything exactly as we planned.”
maybe this whole feminism thing is just a giant practical joke by the powers that be. I’m just waiting for them to start giggling and give the game away
yeah it all started as a joke, but a joke isn’t funny if you explain it so they are really waiting for everyone to break out in laughter, but after so many decades they are slowly starting to get bitter and lose the faith in good humor.
I imagine the punchline will be:
“haha, you women believed we actually thought you were equal. We really had you going didn’t we?”
That’s why ROK is a threat. We’re ruining the joke
it’s kinda stupid when the jokester starts to believe his own joke, though.
hey, i read about sparta yesterday. did you know that there are many texts suggesting that spartan women had quite some power, especially in the economy and households, because the men were always at war?
Sparta was a strange situation. There was a lot of segregation, and the women had that power I think because the men were all needed for war, or preparation for war. Lot of homosexuality for that reason too.
So beware the phrase “this is sparta!”
damn, it’s kinda hard to get a reliable source these days, don’t you think? i read that there was lots of freedom for both sexes, so everybody was happy.
but you would probably have had to live there to know it.
i gotta say the idea fascinates me, though. total dedication to warfare. it’s kinda obvious that somebody has to do the managing, then. freedom for women to divorce, so competition and wonderful status anxiety all the time. no wonder they were so strong.
its rare to have a society structured around warfare in such a dedicated way, but sparta didn’t really have any choice if I understand correctly. Its economy and power was based around control and exploitation of its slave satellites, so a constant war readiness was necessary to prevent revolt by the Helots. As such I’d say it was a kind of strength built around an internal vulnerability
doesn’t necessarily make it a bad way to live.
it is always some form of strong fear or force that demands strength. without a challenge, no strength is needed.
probably true, but is it the basis for anything lasting. I’m not sure
our culture didn’t last, either. in the end, life consists of old stuff dying and new stuff taking over. can there be a constant way to live forever, the “right” way?
isn’t there a danger though that that will be self-fulfilling. Western civilization seems to be powered by the death drive. Does it have to be?
death drive? i don’t understand.
thanatos I guess. Its Freudian. I’m not an expert
interesting, but the concept moves me emotionally more than it does rationally. i don’t see the practical use of the concept.
you’ll probably live a longer life by not seeing the practical use of the concept
Us patriarchies are supported by the chaos god, Tzeentch. Just as planned.
The homosexuality or man love was real back then and not just in Sparta. However if you could teleport Spartan men in space and time and put them in the middle of a big American city “pride” parade they would no doubt be aghast and carnage would then ensue.
oh how cuteeeee!
http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/warhammer40k/images/6/6d/937084-tzeentchspawn.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20111021201940
would totally hire as a babysitter.
Feminism is the patriarchy’s ultimate plan, for white males have already weathered the storm, but other cultures will self destruct and violently lash out, leaving only whites left in a hostile world where women need to be ruled by men again. Feminists actually work for the evil manipulative patriarchy.
Kekm8 feminists.
oh, your holiness, your plan is so monstrously ingenious. in fact, it is so ingenious that i don’t even understand what the fuck you are writing. brilliant. this is beyond philosophy. this is art.
I am simply a herald. Cishet white men (how sad is it that my phone knows what that is?) are favored by the changer of ways, father of time itself, master of mysteries, and master of just as planned.
ah, now i (pretend to) understand.
Spartan women had probably the most freedom comparatively than any other women living in the Greek city states.
Coincidentally Aristotle blamed the downfall of Sparta on its women. Correlation?
I have said for a long time western civilization is nothing more than a revived neo pagan death cult for its host members who are unwitting low level initiates.
The modern western woman is a witch that is under a spell.
there is a strong pagan element – and I don’t mean that in the ususal ‘dismissive’ sense. “Alternative” religion is a big part of what has been happening, but its very much under the surface. I think the whole of society is under that spell though – its literally a kind of mesmerism
from what i read on wikipedia, they lost a big battle and then there weren’t enough real men around anymore. in a way, it’s not women’s fault that our society is fucked up, either. it’s the failure of men who let it happen.
for the sake of precision: ‘Aristotle blamed’ is not equivalent with ‘it is proven’.
i find it very tempting to rely on the most convenient historical source, too, but my excessive pride to be factual trumps my excessive pride to be right.
Nurgle will bring an end to that.
They were also expected to by physically fit and strong so that they could produce strong children. Nowadays, women eat Twinkies and cookies while pregnant because they’re “going to lose their body anyway…”
Homosexuality in Sparta was punishable by exile or death.
It’s a myth probably derived from erroneous translations of ancient Greek.
I mean seriously, would you take it up the arse for any reason?
Not only that, any man who has trained in the fighting arts knows that the mere smell of a man is enough to repulse you. Letting one plug you in the arse would be a definite bridge too far.
…
pederasty then. It appears there are differences of opinion over the matter then as now. Xenophon appears to indicate punishment by exile or death whereas plutarch (at least as interpreted by some seems to suggest that the whole spartan state and military machine was organised around relationship that were basically some kind of man / boy love, although there’s a question as to how frequently (rather than whether?) this amounted to buggery and the like or merely the manly affection of an older love older
erastes, for a younger boy, his eromenos.
The purpose seems to have been to create erotic (and sexual?) love between the boy and his older lover as a means of training in becoming a masculine warrior (femininty was looked down upon and discouraged like today even for women). Homosexuality in this – pederastic – sense was a tool of controlling whereby the state controlled the lives and military effectiveness of its warrior citizens. The older lover (amongst others) was apparently responsible for the conduct and valour of his eromenos. Its pretty gay for the most part, but there remains an issue of how sexual these relationships were. Certainly adult sex / relationship between adult men would have been considered effeminate and punished accordingly, as the guiding ideal was masculinity
http://sexandhistory.blogspot.cz/2008/06/sparta-experiment-in-state-fostered.html
You are right it was somewhat of a lazy assessment on my part.
That doesn’t change the fact that one woman can cause lots of chaos in a household. Multiple women? Forget about it.
And yes ultimately men collectively agreed to give women the equal status and the most blame falls on those men. That is why everyone of us should hate white knights and treat them with disdain and mockery.
Sounds improbable to me giving the way men generally feel about each other. It is of course just the kind of thing homos today would like us to think. I think it is more likely a mentor relationship of the kind we still have today.
I hope it was mostly a mentor relationship. There’s definitely a gay rights angle being played here, but still even before gay rights ‘greek love’ was known as a euphemism for pederasty if not necessarily homosexuality proper
There is considerable evidence supporting all of this as social engineering by design.
Destroy this Tower of Babel God. That is my prayer.
There is certainly design in what we see about us. But if you think about the above it could be seen as part of the ‘working out’ of the new covenant. If we cannot argue our case persuasively then why should we be heard?
I was thinking the other day how all the Renaissance era and prior documentaries and films we have today distort the appearances of mistresses and wives. Today they may hire an attractive 25 year old actress to play the part of the young mistress, but really guys were marrying 13 year olds and their mistresses were likely teenagers as well. But it’s not PC for a girl to be seen in a sexual way today until she reaches her 18th birthday, so that part of history is rewritten. I suspect the same is true with gayness in ancient cultures. I’m sure it went on. I don’t think it was something ordinary people just did for fun.
haha
spoken like a champ.
i was in a zoo recently. the male gorilla had deceased, leaving 3 females behind. in the presence of a few girls, i said that i would kill myself too in that situation. got me a few fine looks.
I don’t see what the big deal is. Western “patriarchy” sounds much better than those other patriarchies:
Bah! Typical two faced tzeenchian bird talk! Eat your worms and fly away vulture head!
My chain axe drips with the gore of my enemies intestines!
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOT!
SKULLS FOR THE THRONE OF BONE!
AIIIEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!
Exactly.
This is also an allusion to fact that White men have essentially allowed themselves to be displaced over the guilt-trips that were played on them for things that every other group in history has done (e.g. genocide, slavery, war, “patriarchy,” etc) and that they were arguably late-comers to.
White culture/men is/are the only culture/men in the world to tolerate criticism of themselves, as well as their culture and who have essentially allowed others to use the things they invented (e.g. internet, electricity, computers, etc) to disparage them.
This is an honorable but ultimately flawed, trait that will lead to the forfeiture of the continent(s) their fathers’ conquered in addition to the destruction of Western (read: Anglo) civilization.
Sometimes I wish I could show them.
I have an expectation that people will get so fed up, they will show them.
And I don’t plan on doing a damned thing about it.
A man can dream.
That’s exactly right. If she were really living in some evil woman hating society then she would have dissapeared by now, not winning a major award. The Patriarchy is the Feminist boogyman they use to justify all their ramblings. Since women need to be oppressed for feminists to be relevant, and since stats and logic show that they clearly aren’t oppressed in The West, they just use the patriarchy as their oppesing force.
And the mentally deranged feminists can make a living now by being a ‘columnist’ or an ‘activist’. All they need to do is trawl the internet for something….anything that will trigger them into a frothing social media rage.
That’s right make a living finding something they don’t like and blaming in on the mythical Patriarchy.
Yep, good point. They need to try that shit somewhere else (other third world country) and see what happens. People in the west have no idea what oppression really looks like, today.
Once they really do become oppressed, then maybe they’ll long for the old days of “shut the fuck up and mind your own business”. That’s how it was done when I was younger. Take care of your own business (mind your own business).
Try feminism in Syria and Iraq right now and see what happens, that’s real repression. Women in The West complaining they are repressed is ridiculous when you look at all the rights and benifets they get for being female.
That’s the problem. Why haven’t we recreated the patriarchy? What are we waiting for? WE are the men, if we don’t make it happen, no one else will.
Basically because there’s too may manginas and white knights, plus big daddy government controls the police and military.
bird looks like she had her backdoor bashed in by many male Oxford students, probably a few professors also….. the thousand cock stare…..
that’s probably why she won her case. She was able to demonstrate to the jury that she did not need a good smashing up the arse. That stare was probably admissible as evidence
If she just farted she would have enough evidence from different penises.
you’d need a jam jar for evidentiary purposes I guess
Her back door is so worn that it resembles a blunderbuss so you might have to hold the jar real close or else it’s gonna fly everywhere like pellets.
your imagination is enviable.
maybe that’s the printing method for the new £10 note.
10 “go in” £10 come out
verity to be checked by the impregnation imprint.
cheaper than HP cartridges
She’ll give them the sniff and crispiness test after to check the quality. Maybe a tip-o-the-tongue to the corner of the note to see who “fathered” the note.
That’s a £7 note now, if you weren’t aware.
women’s work devalue’s the pound
Her eyes are too small for her mouth. Definite criminal.
“After the Bank of England capitulated to requests, putting Jane Austen on banknotes”
She evidently knows the right people, what with her daddy being part of the international uber-elite. Perhaps she could ask for the BoE to end fiat currency & fractional reserve banking too. They would do that for her because she’s a feminist, and the bankers like feminism.
As for daddy, what is it about these super rich alpha males (probably) who manage through hard work and dedication or at least ruthless alpha male profiteering to produce absolutely toxic good for nothing and entirely resentful daughters, destined to become radical feminists, strategic lesbians or otherwise do anything and everything they possible could to demonstrate that they are actually victims not members of the elite class who would end up on the chopping block were they to ever actually experience revolutionary politics.
But it isn’t just hypocrisy. It isn’t just a question of a little rich girl rebelling against daddy – the absolute chutzpah of wailing about the patriarch (as she actually does) when you’re part of the 1% by right of birth). In fact these women, these professional elite victims, have actually managed to turn the world on its head so that they can benefit from the ‘spiritual riches’ that accrue to the actual poor (depending on your politics). The two working class trolls are indicative of this. You just have to look at them to see they are right down at the bottom of the pile. Their aggression is the aggression of the unworthy riff-raff who have momentarily forgotten their place, and need to be reminded of the natural order of things whereby they need to show respect and doff their hats to their social betters. The twist of course is that this mechanism of having to defer to your betters no longer works according to traditional notions of ‘rank’ – under (fake) egalitarianism, under redistributive socialism – privilege doesn’t work that way any more. it works by ‘protecting’ the ‘vulnerable’, the ‘victims’, and the oppressed by virtue of their gender (sagging tits) or other mark of weakness. But in actual fact it is the privileged – typically privileged middle or upple class white women – the world’s new aristocracy – getting protected from everybody else.
Nope.
1400 vulnerable young white girls being raped by a gang of enrichers
while the police, social workers and politicians look the other way in order to
not offend the mohamedians or not to derail their great multicultural poisonous
plan IS the new low…..That is the yard stick that we must measure the rot that Cultural Marxism has penetrated to a once Great Empire….
It kinds of desensitises you to what crazies and damaged women like Caroline
Criado-Perez do….
women like Caroline facilitate equalism, and hence should be persecuted
Europeans should grow some balls – they can’t jail you all
Modern media potrays the Alpha Male as somebody who can seduce a lot of women or evince sexual interest in millions of women . I say RUBBISH!!
A true Alpha Male is the one who can inspire uncountable young men to kill , sacrifice and die for him…A God-Emperor among mere mortals!
That is why I want you to do Brahmacharya (No Masturbation,No Porn,No Sex,No Wet Dreams..Total Sexual Sublimation)
…To be The Man who would be King (to borrow from Kipling)
Aum!
and what happened to ‘the Man who would be King’ in the Kipling story – it didn’t work out well
I would rather be a King for an Hour than be a pick-up artist for an year..even Roosh is finding it tiring to be the clown anymore
show us your kingdom and i will believe you.
I just don’t see why “inspiring uncountable young men to kill , sacrifice and die for” you is necessarily a virtue in itself – you didn’t after all mention a reason. Don’t men usually kill, sacrifice and die simply because they’re taught told they should, for women, country, all the things that are betraying them.
The king for an hour has also historically been “a sacrificial king” so just be careful you aren’t yourself being suckered
as an intellectual challenge for a man with a low emotional intensity, i imagine.
as for reason … isn’t everything we take for granted just something we were told? what is the lowest common denominator that motivates everybody? lust. desire. aggression.
what other reason can there be than “you will get what you want”?
everything else is just built on top of desire.
Why is it either or?
There is no reason greater than a Spiritual Mystical reason..Show me a Great Man, a Conqueror and I will show you a Mystical Current guiding his ambition all through out his life…That’s why Islamic Jihadis will be considered way more masculine men in the pages of history than disco going slut-seducers…
Do you think only in terms of your life or you think in terms of centuries? Do you think in terms of countries or in terms of civilizations? Do you think in terms of politics or in terms of religion? Do you think in terms of common-sense or in terms of courage and mysticism?
If you want to establish a new order, you have to believe in something Higher than you
courage and mysticism? sounds like an oxymoron. what’s so courageous about belief?
The courage to fast for 20 days to know the root cause of desire even it may mean your life…the courage to meditate to highest states of concentration even it may bring the possibility of brain damage
interesting. a friend of mine fasted for a week a few times and told me it’s great. should try it someday.
ISIS doesn’t quite conjure up “something Higher” though does it? Drowning people in cages. Killing children for breaking the Ramadan fast? How will history judge that?
history will judge by how successful it is.
Because Sexual Energy of a Man is a finite energy..Seminal Energy of a Man is basically God and his Seminal Fluid is basically God in Motion…The more you restrain your sexual energy , the more of it gets saved and his channeled for your higher causes (like re-establishing Male Brotherhoods or reversing the Feminist Western Order or Religious Attainments)
Great Civilizations and Empires can be built by Men who are totally celibate or who donot enage in sex other than to procreate with their wives..and I believe if you impregante your wife after a year of unbroken celibacy, the son or daughter you will have is a guranteed 160 + IQ
“isn’t everything we take for granted just something we were told?”
social learning probably counts for most of our learning, and how we schematise our experience, but we can also ‘wake up’
“what other reason can there be than “you will get what you want”?”
but without constraint? and what makes you think what we want is a single thing without internal conflict?
except historians are always on the payroll
i don’t. i think that “want” is a very vague term, purely emotional in a way and temporary. one can follow a path, though, guided by reason. which is why morals and rules are so great – they give you some kind of orientation at all times.
no, not without constraint. the constraint must come from the world. fat shaming is a constraint not to eat all the time. fighting is a constraint not to let yourself go physically. sexual competition is a constraint to not just “be yourself”. the state is the constraint to not rob and kill everybody for stuff.
once, constraint may have been the fear of hell. doesn’t work too well today.
of those who win. ha.
Sometimes it is called Creative Destruction..You may see it as the dance of Ultimate Reality/Pure Consciousness/The Deep Void.
Whatever ISIS does , it will never match the barbarity of Chingiz Khan..and even the Great Khan believed in the Divine Inevitability of his success , inspired by his mysticism and his visions of his Tengrii God..He used to go into a catatonic state while receiving visions and powers from His Tengrii Deity
there’s probably more than one type of hell to fear
“no, not without constraint. the constraint must come from the world”
the world is certainly the most obvious limit on our will, but then we are part of the world too, and can limit ourselves, as you say through morals and rules. The tendency in history has arguably been a process of moving away from a morality of external constraints to one of internal constraints. Although I’d say politically speaking one might dispute that. I also think our ‘wants’ are increasingly and deliberately fractured and multiplied. In which case the question arises, are they really ‘our’ wants?
yes, you could say that we stopped to fear real things and started to fear imagined things, like “people won’t like me”.
but really, if you were wild, naked, in a forest, and saw a little nubile naked girl, without any society around, would you constrain yourself? why?
as i said, i don’t think that “want” describes anything in particular. an addict’s wants change depending on the cycle of his satisfaction and craving.
a rational want would be a purpose. a featherlight, unfelt idea in the back of the mind that underlies all action.
a purpose.
and this purpose you, unfortunately, must choose. and i don’t think there is the “right” one. although i have found something for myself that will keep me interested for a while, i reckon. language.
you put a lot of emphasis on fear. I’m not saying you’re wrong, but it is nonetheless a particular take on things – a fear/desire nexus? As for the naked girl – you’ve left the scenario deliberately ill-defined I think – only civilization stops us from acting as rapists or worse (how little is she?). But this is an imponderable, because we do live in civilization, and we are constrained and the direction of morality (leaving aside the decline for the moment) has been towards greater self-governance if not necessarily greater self-legislation. My feeling is that the increasing self-governance (e.g. ideology) is of the wrong kind: when it should be about self-legislation it is in fact about conformity to consensus values, and therefore inauthentically moral. If you don’t rape the little girl because of mere internalised social constraint then the inaction has no ethical value
Creative Destruction? I looked that up and it seems to be a term from economics, with a possibly marxist origin? Yet you are concerned with the divine economics. I’m not quite clear ideologically where you’re coming from here. You start off extolling the historical noteworthiness of islamic jihadis then you appear to move towards a dualistic mysticism.
“Because Sexual Energy of a Man is a finite energy..Seminal Energy of a Man is basically God and his Seminal Fluid is basically God in Motion…The more you restrain your sexual energy , the more of it gets saved and his channeled for your higher causes (like re-establishing Male Brotherhoods or reversing the Feminist Western Order or Religious Attainments)
“Great Civilizations and Empires can be built by Men who are totally celibate or who donot enage in sex other than to procreate with their wives..and I believe if you impregante your wife after a year of unbroken celibacy, the son or daughter you will have is a guranteed 160 + IQ”
God is not sexual energy.
http://www.holycrossyakima.org/orthodoxPdfs/YOGA%20Leaflet.pdf
http://www.sainthermanmonastery.com/product-p/gurus_ebook.htm
well, you don’t feel fear as long as you don’t try to do anything unusual. thus many a blue pill men will rightly say: i’m not afraid of being an asshole, i just don’t want to do it. but could you really?
there is no fear as long as you don’t consider breaking the rules.
the little girl, i don’t mean a prepubescent girl, just your normal little tight 18 year old with the most awesome features.
morals / ethics – if enforced – have the purpose of maintaining order. without that purpose, i see literally no rational reason not to do it. do you?
since morals always require consensus, where is the difference? i think the difference is that the consensus may once have been about a firm set of rules – christianity. but since that fell away, there is just nothing to agree upon anymore.
God’s attribute of Ultimate Power manifests in a man as his sexual energy..If he wastes his sexual energy by constantly porning, sexing, Masturbating , then he is basically sqaundering his greatest wealth..
Christians may have explained the virtue of unbroken sexual continence/celibacy in a certain way, but all the great religions understood the power wielded by sexual restraint
And I believe in the concept of Ancestral Religions..It is not wise for a Greek Youth to pursue Yoga..in the same vein .It is not wise for an Indian youth to pursue Christianity..It just makes that many kinks in the national armour
christianity could equally be seen as a rejection / transcendance of a firm set of rules – the old testament law. There have been other religious movements that have done the same, although for different reasons and with different results . You’re right not to be self-deceiving about the issue – there is no doubt that our superegos or whatever you might call those constraints upon our will / desire are social constructions, often as you say with a religious derivation, but without – to refer back to a previous conversation – moralising – there is no necessity to see morality as dependent only on external (or imposed internal) constraints. If as you have previously indicated you believe in thinking for yourself, and doing so includes negotiating right action from wrong action, then there is no reason why you should not choose freely and in full understanding of their derivation some or other of those constraints that were previously imposed rather elected. There is no returning to a ‘state of nature’
right, but what if i do not know the derivation? who does?
most things i used to believe seemed inherently right – because everybody around me was repeating them.
once you lose that natural trust, you gain a form of free mind, but you also lose the conviction that there is anything but the law of the jungle.
see, whilst the derivation in society may be the necessity of society itself, this reasoning falls apart without society, hence the forest example.
what other consideration can there be ultimately than ‘will this be good for me or will it hurt me?’
what is your definition of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’?
when i said firm rules, i actually meant that as a good thing. if you have your set of sins that everybody – apart from the ruling psychopaths – enforces, you have a functioning society with little cognitive dissonance.
“God’s attribute of Ultimate Power manifests in a man as his sexual energy..If he wastes his sexual energy by constantly porning, sexing, Masturbating , then he is basically sqaundering his greatest wealth..”
God’s greatest gifts are forgiveness of sins when one repents of them and has faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, and the time in which do this.
Not sex and sexual energy.
God is a person who demands things of His creations, not an impersonal force to tap to accomplish things.
http://www.ancientfaith.com/podcasts/illuminedheart/father_seraphim_rose_spiritual_father
http://www.ancientfaith.com/specials/christ_the_eternal_tao/christ_the_eternal_tao_-_part_1
“And I believe in the concept of Ancestral Religions..It is not wise for a Greek Youth to pursue Yoga..in the same vein .It is not wise for an Indian youth to pursue Christianity..It just males that many kinks in the national armour”
Christianity is one true religion, (Eastern) Orthodoxy is true Christianity.
Orthodoxy is meant for everyone. It is the Pearl of Great Price (Matthew 13:45-46) that one must be willingly to choose even over family, race, and nation.
There is no spiritual relativism from the perspective of Orthodox Christianity.
I just meant their derivation in society, religion etc (rather than their true origin or anything). Of course society is the origin of our morality, but while we can quite easily go Lord of the Flies and beat up on Piggy (or rape, plunder, murder) etc, when we distance ourselves from society – I’m talking moral or physical distance rather than an post-apocalyptical mad max scenario – we have the opportunity for perspective, and potentially free action – I haven’t really read Sartre, but maybe something along the lines of the self-legislating man (don’t take that too seriously though because I’m not really talking about existential philosophy, just being someone who interrorgates the world around him). I don’t think we need to worry unduly about nihilism, or place ourselves under massive pressure to completely self-defining: the fact is we are social creatures, but have the potential to not be completely submerged within societiies lies / hypocrisy. Trying to find some kind of solid ground or worrying unduly about God / Society / parental authority being dead / busted just isn’t practically very useful or necessary IMO
To clarify about Christianity and the Old Testament. It sees itself as fulfilling the Old Testament and most if not all the the rituals concerning the Jewish people and Jehovah God are seen as only a shadow and a picture of the greater spiritual things fulfilled by Christ.
For example when God dwelled with his people among the 12 tribes as they wandered the earth in search of the promised land it was from inside the holy of holies that was kept the ark of the covenant….the sacred law. Only the levite priests were allowed to go beyond this veil. In Hebrew law when one wants to invalidate an old covenant and start a new one…both parties drive a nail through the original document.
This is represented in the New Testament through Christ crucified and those nails being driven through the old covenant which is His flesh.
Which accordingly God can now indwell within us through the seed of Christ inside our holy of holies….the heart of a man(not literal heart) wherein is written Gods law…..not on tables of stone but on tables of the human heart
But the value of sexual restraint cannot be over stated within Christianity. It was Christ himself that said it is better you never be with a woman. And Paul who says it is better that you remain single.
Okay how about Repetitive Destruction..I basically subscribe to Non-Dual Vedanta ..Eventhough I have no love for this Jihadis, I can silently admire them as manly men..much more manly than being continual seducers of women..when the hordes move in, they will take women by force…and not try to “game” them
Christianity is the religion of my father and I am of a christian frame of mind, but I respect the fact that not all are of that mind, or have that patrimony. I think we as a people are still working out what it means to live in a world no longer governed by ‘the law’, the external constraint of rules that must be followed. There is no virtue in rules or in law that can only be followed in blindness, and I think the christian idea of the new covenant encapsulates that argument well. We see around us ISIS seeking to force the rule of law – it does not for the sake of this argument matter which law, even if for them it is Sharia – against the hearts of people, and for me there can be no clearer indication that the heart of man – or indeed of woman – cannot be forced. We have seen Christianity violate its own covenant in seeking to force others to obedience against their will, and often against their religion and the church is suffering for its sins in that respect, as it well should. Once it has expiated its sins then it may argue its case once more, that the covenant may be fulfilled
Thanks for the clarification. I don’t know enough about Vedanta to comment although I’ve been meaning to read up on the sacred indian texts. I’m not sure Repetitive Destruction sounds that spiritual in and of itself. I just did a search to try to find out something about Vedanta and thinking I’d found a source of information I came across this campaign poster to ‘foil Vedanta’ which is apparently a mining company with a record of err. repetitive destruction (please forgive my cheek)
( http://savingiceland.org/wp-content/uploads/Cairn-India-AGM-leaflet.pdf )
After that I also happened upon this description with reference to what you described earlier perhaps:
“The Shiva Nataraj, or the dancing Shiva, depicts all three major functions of God in the Lord Shiva himself. He is creating with the sound of the damaru (small drum) The creation is preserved by Shiva holding down evil forces with his foot. But the whole cosmic cycle is consumed in a circle of flames. Thus the unending cycle of creation, preservation, and destruction continues around and around. He dances the rhythm of the cosmic cycles.”
http://vedanta.org/vedanta-overview/the-avatar-god-in-human-form/
As for the jihadis I don’t think they’re real men. Violence for the sake of it, raping children. Forcing people at the point of a sword. I see no virtue there. If they represent masculinity, the world will not bat an eyelid as it roots it out of existence. But they are not masculinity. They are a grotesque parody of masculinity
yes there are rich Indian resources…if you ever find any interest in Vedanta, start out with the earliest Upanishads with some solid commentary ..like that of Radhakrishnan
Cheers I’ll check it out
The difference being that for Christianity, anyone who calls himself this and forces against the will of another is anathema to the core of the belief system and its founder.
For Islam this forced conversion is part of the core doctrine and belief system as coming from its founder.
It does appear to be that way. But the difference in conduct has not always reflected that even if ISIS appears intent to ram the point home
No wet dreams? Interesting, how do you propose to arrest your subconscious over which your conscious mind has no control?
What is so noble and alpha about being a dictator? They’ve always seemed weak, insecure, pathetic little cowards when you examine them closely.
lucid dreaming, perhaps. also, arguing with your subconscious – it’s not totally out of control if you work on making your subconscious thoughts conscious. lsd.
i can imagine it is possible to completely subliminate sexual desire, but i couldn’t do it before having known that i can have the women i want. to kill all doubt.
then i won’t care anymore. perhaps.
You don’t get to choose to have lucid dreaming, it just happens when you realize you’re dreaming and take control. Or so I’ve been told.
there are ways to get there from all i hear and read. from what i gathered by now, it seems to be helpful to start writing down your dreams immediately afterwards. do that for a month or so until you remember more each time. and one day you will be able to do it.
This is what I would suggest to most men…Start self improvement, body building, Gaming (seduction) and become adept in seducing the type of women you want…Then quit Game at the top of your Game and sublimate your whole sexual desire for Higher Causes….But even while pursuing women , one can start out with two months of unbroken celibacy (No Sex,Porn,Masturbation) so that this gives you a mystical edge over other men…Roosh and others call it the Power of Horny..but when you take it to a stretch of few weeks, you exude an aura of mystical attraction also..This may not be enough to get the woman totally naked in front of you..But will immensely help you to get the woman hooked to you in first glance..This is something I can personally attest…Be in the Game for two years..have experience with 10 or 12 and then go for the exit…Try to fulfill unlimited ambitions through sublimation of sex desire..But you will become way way more of a chick magnet when you go full celibate..which will be another test for you…Ohh and best is to start full celibacy before age 32 or 34..to get the full result..but any other age will probably still give 90% of the result
shaswata, what are your credentials / references?
wait a bit i will type out a long post
I’d like to hear more details on your position.
The sublimating of sexual desire to harness ones power is an idea I would tend to agree toward but am unsure about.
The longest I have refrained from masturbation was around 3 weeks. I’ve had wet dreams even after the one week mark too.
Now on the flip side there is the fact that having steady pussy gives you the abundance mentality which causes pussy to fall in your lap. I have experienced this.
I am however at a point where this direction is of considerable interest. I have been improving myself physically for years. I was into bodybuilding then got into martial arts and mma which I competed in professionally. Now I do mostly muay thai and boxing. 12 yrs since I started Muay Thai and having the skills belonging to a brutal art of using your body to punish another is something that already makes me feel better than nearly everyone. Also a rock hard physique completes my narcissistic outlook on the world.
Now I want to focus on some more inner improvement and mastery and this idea has some merit to me.
The Best way as far as I have seen to sublimate sexual desire is to enage in hardcore Vipassana/Mindfulness on the horniness as it arises…But there are many other ways that have been employed by Western boxers, Eastern Martial Artists, Western scientists,philosophers of both East and West and of course both Eastern and Western monks
Given your background, you already have an unfair advantage over most men. If you already have been able to prove to yourself about your ability to attract women , then I guess you are primed for lifelong celibacy …else you should be try to reach the pinnacle of Game/seduction for 3-4 years before taking the vow
Remember the celibacy that is being proposed is kind of an integral spirituality where you use your conserved/trasnmuted/sublimated sexual energy to attain the pinnacle of your field in a span of 12-15 years (Nothing Less than being a Famous Top 10 in your chosen field of work)
During you seduction if you do manage to attract a Virgin, then YOU SHOULD marry her and have a couple of children with her and then go for lifelong celibacy…
If not then you Pump and Dump…You will not marry a woman who is not a virgin..they donot deserve marriage
If I can get 500 of the most Alpha men in every modern Western and Asian country to take to lifelong celibacy to reach the pinnacles of politics, academics, science, media and industry…this Global scourge of Feminism will be reversed
Ohh women will pine for you but wont get you..and wone will get the ,message that only virginity and motherhood matters to men
I give you three resources to start on your celibate journey either now or 3-4 years later and give you a list of scientists who used celibacy to achieve great heights
First book is The Practice of Brahmacharya
http://www.dlshq.org/download/brahmacharya.htm
Second is the celibacy/Brahmacharya section of The Yoga Sutras Commentary by Julian Lee
http://www.yogasutras.com/On_Brahmacharya_Lace_Up.html
Third is the two part book by Medical Doctor Dr. R.W: Bernard
Science discovers the physiological value of Continence
http://www.hariomgroup.org/hariombooks_default/celibacy/Dr-Raymond-Bernard/Science-Discovers-the-Physiological-Value-of-Continence-1.pdf
http://www.hariomgroup.org/hariombooks_default/celibacy/Dr-Raymond-Bernard/Science-Discovers-the-Physiological-Value-of-Continence-2.pdf
As you go along in your celibate journey you will find other resources both Western and Eastern
But now A western Resource, An eastern Resource and a semi-western semi-eastern resource (Western Man making a commentary on an Eastern text) should suffice
Now here is the list of scientific luminaries who used celibacy for intellectual growth..But remember every field has them
and you can always use temporary celibacy to power your different endeavours (anything between a week to 3 months)
Isaac Newton
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Nikola Tesla
Charles Lamaitre
Gregor Mendel
Paul Erdos
Leonardo DaVinci
Michael Angelo
William James Sidis ****** High IQ Guy
Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam
Steve Jobs (practiced NoFap and Tantric non-ejaculative sex and wanted to invent a tool to eradicate porn addiction)
Pythagoras
Galileo
Descartes
Copernicus
Herbert Spencer
Democritus Atomic Theory of Universe
Hippocrates
Edward Charles Spitzka (1852 – 1914) (Physician, endocinologist)
Max von Gruber (1853 – 1927) (Physician, Bacteriologist) :
Roger Bacon
I am also starting out on celibacy…I will take full celibacy at the age of either 32 or 34..but now I will use temporary celibacy to power my career and Game ..see my reply to CaptainObvious
and for resources/references
I give you three resources to start on your celibate journey either now or 3-4 years later and give you a list of scientists who used celibacy to achieve great heights
First book is The Practice of Brahmacharya
http://www.dlshq.org/download/…
Second is the celibacy/Brahmacharya section of The Yoga Sutras Commentary by Julian Lee
http://www.yogasutras.com/On_B…
Third is the two part book by Medical Doctor Dr. R.W: Bernard
Science discovers the physiological value of Continence
http://www.hariomgroup.org/har…
http://www.hariomgroup.org/har…
As you go along in your celibate journey you will find other resources both Western and Eastern
But now A western Resource, An eastern Resource and a semi-western semi-eastern resource (Western Man making a commentary on an Eastern text) should suffice
Now here is the list of scientific luminaries who used celibacy for intellectual growth..But remember every field has them
and you can always use temporary celibacy to power your different endeavours (anything between a week to 3 months)
Isaac Newton
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Nikola Tesla
Charles Lamaitre
Gregor Mendel
Paul Erdos
Leonardo DaVinci
Michael Angelo
William James Sidis ****** High IQ Guy
Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam
Steve Jobs (practiced NoFap and Tantric non-ejaculative sex and wanted to invent a tool to eradicate porn addiction)
Pythagoras
Galileo
Descartes
Copernicus
Herbert Spencer
Democritus Atomic Theory of Universe
Hippocrates
Edward Charles Spitzka (1852 – 1914) (Physician, endocinologist)
Max von Gruber (1853 – 1927) (Physician, Bacteriologist) :
really interesting.
however moronic that sounds, celibacy in itself seems to me like a good reason to learn game.
the absolute freedom of sexual distraction and focus on a purpose. love it.
thanks for the inspiration.
Thanks for the info and links.
Right now there is no way I could make any kind of vow about celibacy and be confident that I would honor it.
But I feel I can use it intermittently for self mastery and to put a lower value on the pussy. I agree about the virginal wife but I highly doubt I’d ever find that and plus I’m 35 so it’s not gonna happen here in the west I’m thinkin.
Do you actually know any of these kind of men who are celibate and elite level in their field?
Also do you feel that the sublimated energy is only able to be trans muted into productive energies? Or can some act of the will channel it towards other areas?
No Wet Dreams is the highest challenge..even Buddha refused to recognize Wet Dreams as transgressions..Basically it MAY be achieved through constant mindfulness and non-dual state of awareness..then even in your sleep , you donot become totally unconscious…If you can do that for 12 years and still retain ambitions for a worldly life, YOU WILL become nothing less than a Superman..but the trick is to complete the challenge and still not become a forest monk and sustain healthy worldly ambitions..like re-establishing a new order in your Nation
“… even Buddha refused to recognize Wet Dreams as transgressions …”
So we’ll just take it as read that you want to be a policeman for spiritualists …
Can’t you run off to your sangha to eat some doughnuts with the rest of your precinct’s Buddhacops?
“but the trick is to complete the challenge and still not become a forest and sustain healthy worldly ambitions.”
So it is a trick?
well a challenge ..see it as a challenge of balance
As an attorney, what I find really chilling is the shift in legal standards.
Take this line: “The advice, she kvetched, ‘doesn’t magically scrub out the image in your head of being told you’ll be gang-raped till you die.’”
Yes, but this line belies that she understands that there is no real “threat” here. She wants to be able to punish people based on what she feels about what they say, rather than whether there is actually a “threat” in the commonly understood legal sense, which also requires an “intent” on the part of the person who utters the threat.
Think for a moment about how dangerous that is. If you look at her in passing on the street, and she decides to imagine you raping her in the alley, well, that image should be the legal test because she can’t scrub it out of her head. That’s fuck all stupid.
“Insults,” which is what most of these degrading messages are, are not “threats.” The day we allow them to become so, kiss “justice” good bye.
the problem is that when you trust a source, you trust their predictions. thus, when you grow up with feminist authority, you believe them when they say that every man will rape you if he looks at you. well, of course you start to be damn scared going through the streets.
Perhaps it was the image of patriarchal white men surrounding her. If she had a large contingent of men of colour with large appendages she wouldn’t feel the need to report the incident as they are also repressed by white male privilege.
We are there pal. Face reality don’t run from it.
Minority Report (movie) comes to mind here. All of a sudden it’s something similar to “pre-crime” or “thought crime” (1984).
Interesting read: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/18457-obama-justice-department-pushes-to-target-thought-crime
I’m starting a campaign to have Mike Tyson on a British banknote. Who’s with me?
I’m in.
All ears
Id rather a hybrid of he and prince:
http://www.pmslweb.com/the-blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/12-Mike-Tyson-plus-Prince-equals-Printhe.jpg
That’s awesome!
I cringe when I read these horror stories from the British Commonwealth and Scandinavia. We here in the US are only lagging slightly behind but don’t worry. We’re getting there.
The image of the cup probably describes what the feminists want. They want to drink male tears and if alpha male do not understand the same and shun feminism they will suffer forever.
Partha
http://www.themalefactor.com
Figures the two trolls who were “menacing” her were just two goofballs — young, naive, perhaps a little bit ‘special’, and one was a female. Not exactly the picture feminists like to paint of “men’s rights activists and right-winger terrorists threatening to rape me because of my feminist stance!”
The way I’m seeing what feminism is this. Women (as always) complaining about stupid bullshit because they have nothing else better or productive to do with their lives. The men in power (with more useful and productive things that need to get done for the common good) is tired of hearing the bitch complain so they comply so they would SHUT THE FUCK UP! But that doesn’t work with women as we all know. They just get louder and more of a nuisance and men keep complying to keep the peace. Until one day whenever that will be, men will have enough of the bullshit and put an end to it.
NOOOO, I share a last name with that melody cunt. What a fucking disgrace, I’m probably related to her very distantly as part of my family is very english a few gens back. Way to tarnish my name cunt.
“Criado-Perez, who has a Masters Degree in Gender from the London School of Economics,”
Now I know why she’s so insane.
A very good article and a good reminder of why ROK is needed as most media outlets at least in Britain wouldn’t dare publish it.
Caroline Criado Perez is the embodiment of everything that is wrong with feminism and wrong with western establishments who are terrified of simple minded bigots like her. Who would ever believe that the Bank of England would bow down to such an airhead? It encapsulates everything that is going wrong.
And yes it does prove that OBEs now mean nothing and the author is right to point out how wrong it is that today when someone is “offended” he calls the police and instead of getting a stern telling off from the policeman for wasting his time the trouble maker is indulged and the liberty of the accused is undermined often for no good reason. Even if he isn’t even charged he still gets talked to by the police, a quite intimidating thing. It’s incompatible with a free society. Feminism is nearly always authoritarian in nature.
Thanks again for the article.
Here in the USA, it’s a guy Jack Lew that wants a woman’s face on the US $10 bill.
I say when there is finally ever a woman who has contributed to building something worthwhile in our society that’s worth placing on our currency then we’ll talk about it.
Until then, it’s men (the builders) only on our money. I don’t mean a woman taking over a company or daddy’s money, etc…to continue on. I mean building something from the ground up (like men).
Women have a knack for jumping into the middle of a project and then claiming equal ownership (or receiving all of the credit). I’ve seen this happen plenty of times in the work place (and in society).
Where’s Kryten to blast a hole through “Jane Austen World” …
What an evil bitch! Typical rich feminist who uses PC to persecute poor people.
PLEASE! Stop posting that Melody Hensley face. It triggers me.
Looks like Hitler Youth, sounds like Hitler youth. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck…….
Fuck Jane Austen. Who cares for a proto romance novel typist. Give me Margaret Thatcher instead on the ten pounder
Jane Austen is hilariously overrated
Were it not for girls with pedestrian literary tastes, she’d be a nobody
“Pedestrian” is and understatement. Try “gutter” literary tastes 🙂
this is why conservative governments are no substitute for nationalist governments
An equalist should not think you’re “trendy and hip”, they should cower at the mention of your administration
Female ferality after liberation from civilized mode of behaviour i.e. feminism
One of my favorite lines from the novel Vril:
“belongs to a virtuous and well-ordered household.” Naturally desiring to represent in the most favourable colours the world from which I came, I touched but slightly, though indulgently, on the antiquated and decaying institutions of Europe, in order to expatiate on the present grandeur and prospective pre-eminence of that glorious American Republic, in which Europe enviously seeks its model and tremblingly foresees its doom.”
Hmmm, how telling!
TL;DR Fuck feminists. Actually, no, don’t fuck them.
UK is turning in Sweden. How is possible that Darwin, maybe one of the 10 most influential persons in the history has been swapped by one of the ten or more million most important persons?
The next change will be Muhammad for the Queen or/and delete the names of the male (white) philosophers, scientists, military who wrote the history in the textbooks, “because history doesn’t allow affirmative action”
That reminds me something: “Who controls the past control the future; who controls the present control the past”