The Growing Epidemic Of Sexual Dysfunction Among Women

In the past few weeks, several surveys have gotten a modest amount of press stating that people are having less sex than ever before. Many potential causes are posited: porn, gadget addiction, downward economic mobility. But here’s an element of the surveys our good friends in the media cover up: it’s aging women, twice more than men, who have no sex drive. They have Sahara Snatch. But they don’t want men to know this.

Young women have been slutting it up more and more frequently at younger and younger ages for decades. Very literally, the town tramp of 1950’s America would be the choir girl prude in modern America. Feminists are proud of this: their sugar daddies running the mainstream media print their books chastising “puritanical America” for not celebrating their prematurely stretched-out snatches. Mainstream books condemn America for using the word “slut” as a pejorative. They cheer 18 year old girls for their cavernous cunts, and they demand you cheer it, too. (And now, the sluttiness is being compounded by their “toys” – electrified rubber cylinders they shove into their pussies while reading perverted fetish porn like ‘Fifty Shades of Gray’, which is warping them irreversibly.)

SaharaSnatch-HORIZONTAL

So that covers their early years of fertility. Now well into their twenties, the media myth of the modern American woman claims that, astoundingly, she actually gets even hornier as she gets older! Women are constantly getting close to their “sexual peak”. Let’s call this the Sex and the City Mythology for shorthand (though it’s propagated through every sitcom, media article, and Hollywood RomCom).

A Google search for “female sexual peak” reveals a funny phenomenon. The newer the article cited, the higher the age they claim women sexually “peak”. They blame previous figures on “puritanical attitudes toward sex”. This article from the UK Daily Mail hilariously claims women actually want sex more as their ability to bear children decreases. (They cite a sex toy company and actress Cameron Diaz as proof of this).

To encapsulate the Sex and the City Mythology: American women start as sluts and continue as sluts, and the older they get, the sluttier they get. That’s the myth. The truth is far simpler, far uglier, and is actually tragic for both sexes.

SaharaSnatch-GRAPH-REDO

Virility = Fertility. Period.

Evolution and common sense observation of human behavior would suggest that most women reach their sexual peak when they’re most fertile – roughly ages 16 to 30, depending upon the individual and race. The whole purpose of sex, from Mother Nature’s point of view, is procreation and any sex outside of that is pointless or even detrimental from an evolutionary standpoint. Countless studies confirm that female sexual arousal peaks at ovulation (the point in their menstrual cycles when they can conceive children). Longer term, female fertility peaks in their early twenties. According to the National Institute of Health, their fertility begins plummeting “precipitously” in their late 20’s.

So the natural female sex drive begins dropping along with fertility in the 30’s. And the Sex and the City Mythology of women’s sex drive’s positive correlation with aging is a total lie.

Again: the notion that women want sex more as they age is anti-science, pop culture bullshit.

But wait, it’s worse than that, even. Much worse.

Testimonial of a single man in his 30’s

I have been compelled by personal observation to research the growing phenomenon of premature menopause, or “premature ovarian failure” in medicine. Just call it Sahara Snatch. More and more women in their early thirties (my age peers) and even in their twenties are having “irregular periods” (or amenhorrea). A woman saying “irregular periods”, I was recently told by a knowledgeable woman, is typically nothing more than the female ego covering up the fact that she’s having no periods. At all. No menstruation = no sex hormones = their pussies are like sandpaper = you can’t fuck them.

SaharaSnatch-2

Let me backtrack and get a little personal.

Many gullible men believe the Sex and the City Mythology and expect great times with their female peers as they reach their thirties. Sure, a 35 year-old woman won’t be as nubile or attractive as they were at 20, but they’ll be hornier and livelier than ever, we’re told.

I know gullible men believe this bullshit because I was one of these gullible men.

I spent ages 26 to 30 in a committed relationship. Unfortunately, the relationship ended (primarily due to financial disputes). But while I was disappointed to be both single and childless at age 30, I was secretly excited to be free to indulge in the “club scene” and have some wild weekends with these sex goddesses from TV and movies at their “sexual peak”.

The real world exposed the Sex and the City Mythology as total bullshit in every way, but it took me at least a year of emotionally pulverizing experiences before the reality finally trumped the mythology.

Three attempts at flings ended up thusly:

  • A girl who had been a fairly cute 7 as a twenty year old was now a titless, sickly-looking 5 in her thirties. But I was lonely and she did a good job of fronting like the carefree sexual gal by binge drinking and talking about sex all the time. But oddly, every date ended with her jabbering away narcissistically and postponing actual sex. After her excuses for avoiding sex reached the point of insult, I demanded intercourse or I was done with her. She hemmed and hawed before finally admitting that she hadn’t had her period in two years and had no sex drive.
  • A night with an ex-girlfriend (early thirties) sent her scurrying to her nightstand for some “help” when we disrobed. What “help”? Repugnant industrial chemicals she needs to put on lovers’ cocks because her exhausted pussy glands can’t lubricate naturally any longer. The night ended with me – lonely, horny, and desperate – humping her leg to climax because I refused the “help”.
  • A frumpy, late-thirties school administrator I met at a sports bar used double entenderes and sexual innuendo to earn my attentions – and my still-gullible faith that her sex drive matched her rhetoric. After several dates, we went to her place where we made out, but she pushed my hand away when I felt her up. I paused her ‘Princess Bride’ DVD and got more assertive when she softly told me that she was done with “casual sex” and she needed a “committed relationship” first.

I assumed that these womens’ problems were somehow my fault and I was developing deep fears of sexual undesirability and loneliness. Was I just a closeted homosexual and that was why I was incapable of exciting women nowadays? Was I an ugly person (how do you ever really know otherwise?)  I had all sorts of dark fears spring up as I encountered one sexless thirty-something after another.

But in time, the consistency of their sexlessness made me suspect that it was their age (the only other common denominator) that was the true cause. I asked around, and single men my age all confirmed similar difficulty in getting laid. Asked whether women want sex more or less at age 30 than age 20, to a man, they say women want it less.

As women age, they don’t put out. They don’t want to put out. And nowadays, they can’t put out. They have Sahara Snatch.

What is causing the Sahara Snatch epidemic?

So, the Sex and the City Mythology is a complete inversion of the truth: women want sex less and less as they get older and older. Of course. But it’s apparently getting worse: women are aging prematurely and therefore, thirtysomethings want sex even less than they already did. Female sex drive always fizzled slowly through the twenties and thirties, but now the downward curve has become a deadly plateau.

SaharaSnatch6

(A quick note: I recognize that many Western men are having bizarre sexual problems of their own. The preference for porn over real women, declining testosterone levels, repulsive boner pills, and utterly disgusting fetishes becoming commonplace are all proof of this. However, that is the subject for another article.)

Google searches for “premature menopause” (or premature ovarian failure) expose a great deal of both anecdotal and clinical evidence matching my own experiences with Sahara Snatch. This article from the UK says that doctors are seeing women reach menopause prematurely at “Higher than expected numbers” – four to five times higher. This separate study from a medical journal matches the UK increase.

If we just go ahead and use female fertility as a proxy for sex drive, the problem gets even more apparent. I won’t even begin to cite all the studies showing drops in female fertility as it’s now common knowledge. The increased dependance on surrogate mothers, adoption, in vitro fertilization, and other unnatural work-arounds for what is evolution’s core process (fucking and making babies) make female infertility almost like cancer – everybody knows somebody who’s affected.

What is causing this bizarre problem of Sahara Snatch? My theories:

  • Modern, low fat Western diets. Saturated fat and dietary cholesterol are the base for most hormones, and yet the media and government have commanded people to eat less meat, and they’ve obediently complied. Sugar- and grain-heavy modern diets and a reduction in meat consumption are, in my opinion, the cause of the obesity epidemic in America, and I would certainly guess their problems go well beyond even that.
  • Increased alcohol consumption. American women are celebrity cultists, and the women in pop culture movies and TV live at trendy nightclubs and bars, constantly downing martinis. I recall one large study from a few years ago showed a massive increase in female alcohol consumption, although I could not find that study for this article.
  • The pill. Call me crazy, but regularly sticking synthetic chemicals in your body designed to twist your hormones and fertility into knots might have long-term consequences. Again, several very smart people I know have told me that the pill is murder on women’s wombs.
  • Sexual burn out. Sexual Burn Out. SEXUAL BURN OUT. American sluts, copying the behavior sold to them in movies and TV, get fucked by so many men who pump-and-dump them that by age 30 their pussies are like Ozzie Osbourne’s brain: exhausted, spent, and hopeless. Sex is self-perpetuating for men: the more we get, the more we like it and the more we want it. (This is the Coolidge Effect in action.) But women are designed to be discriminating. Their perverted, feminist liberation nymphomania in their teens and early-twenties is an abominable lifestyle which strips them of their love of men and their ability for passion.

SaharaSnatch3

For the man simply seeking sex, the problem of Sahara Snatch is obvious: women capable of fucking are harder to find. But for the women, the problem is far more critical because it means they can’t ever be mothers. By the time she finally accepts that the Sex and the City Mythology was bullshit….her womb is already a wasteland.

Many OB-GYN’s have written impassioned pleas to women asking them to stop believing the media lie that they can postpone motherhood until their thirties (and even their forties – that is how stupid modern women can be!) Canadian doctors even kindly tried to help women by starting a National Infertility Awareness Week.

How did the media and women respond to these kind Canadian doctors? “Shut up! You’re sexist!” (Read the comments at the link.)

The bottom line for men

All of the medical stuff is for the women to reason out (never a recipe for success). For men, the main point that I’m trying to make is what I wish I knew back during those tumultuous months after my break-up.

It’s not you fault.

You do your best to woo a woman, and in college, these efforts would get you laid three times a week by 7s and 8s, but now they’re yielding nothing but empty promises from crinkling 5s and 6s. To make you even more confused, you believe that she’s 35 and so she’s at her “sexual peak”.

Still she doesn’t want sex. You’re going to bed at night curling up in lonely frustration and confusion. “What’s wrong with me?!?”

The Sahara Snatches love that you’re blaming yourself. They’ll always say that their rejections are all your fault, because it allows them to cover up their irreparably broken reproductive systems. Stock lies like these are hallmarks of vain, lying Sahara Snatches:

  • “I know what I’m worth and I’m not going to settle.”
  • “I don’t do casual sex.”
  • Anything involving “creepy”. For instance, a thirtysomething Sahara Snatch cackling with her friends about some sweet beta male, “Then he stroked my arm! How creepy!”
  • “Friendship first, sex comes later.”

You hear these things from women and you begin second-guessing yourself. “Is there something wrong with me?”

No, there’s not.

Is she genuinely old-fashioned or religious?”

Of course not: she’s just an aged slut.

Am I just a creepy pervert for wanting sex this soon?”

No. You’re normal and healthy, she’s abnormal and unhealthy.

She said she’s at her sexual peak, so why won’t she sleep with me?”

Because she’s not at her sexual peak – that was fifteen years ago. Because she’s barren, sterile, and a Darwinian dead-end.

When you see a Sahara Snatch stringing an innocent man along, implying sex but always making excuses to avoid it, call them out on it. Tell her, “Stop lying. There was nothing wrong with him at all. You’re the problem.”

Read More: Crazy Spinster: “Single Women Should Have Weddings!

822 thoughts on “The Growing Epidemic Of Sexual Dysfunction Among Women”

  1. Great article, man. Just goes to show that the smart men go for the younger women, under the age of 25. While the dumb betas go for the over 30 women.

    1. Agreed, one of my blue pill coworkers actually tried to tell me the following ( I could barely contain my laughter ) when he found out I flat out refuse to date anyone over 23-25 even though I am in my thirties.
      Little boys date girls, real men date “women”
      Sure thing bro, enjoy your trip to the Sahara.

      1. What a pathetic beta. He has been fully brainwashed by women.
        Women actually never mature and become adults. They basically remain children their whole lives. Arthur Schopenhauer said as much. So, might as well fuck a childish woman who has a youthful body than a childish woman who has an old body.

        1. I have maintained, since my early twenties, that the AoC is blatantly not based on any sort of mental or emotional development. If it were the overwhelming would be off limits for life.

        2. The best you could quote is a man who lived almost 200 years ago, when society was completely different?
          That’s very telling too, that you are quoting someone who lived in an entirely different era. He can hardly be blamed for his misogyny, as he was a product of his time, but the idea that someone would be using his ignorance now to support their own argument is just sad.

      2. I cant belive it, what a fuckmonkey. Bang 18y/o preferably.
        A slut im banging now is 26 y/o, and until I read this article I couldn’t figure out why she lubed her pussy prior to sex. Even in the heat of the moment ahe would get up, go to the bathroom and lube. Ill call her out on that ahit tonight, used up slut.

        1. Daniel, she’s just not that into you, otherwise she wouldn’t have to get up in the middle of it. Yikes! That’s the first I ever heard that one. Surprised you admitted to it. What do you look like? Post a pic, including upper body, man.

        2. Hello.
          33-year-old?
          Newsflash!
          The guy who is effing you is not getting his erection and having his O BECAUSE of you.
          He gets all these things because he has been “practicing” since he was 12.
          You are not giving IT to him, he is giving IT to himself.
          Only women have to depend on men for their own sexual satisfaction.
          You’re projecting, you sad clam.

        3. Problably not. If she was of the opinion that he sucked in bed, she wouldn’t let him continue fucking her. The problem is most likely with her, and she knows it.

        4. Why not? Don’t tell me you’ve always only ever had sex with someone you were 100% turned on by. The original comment proves you don’t. She wasn’t fully turned on by you but had sex with you because she wanted to have sex.
          Simple as that.

        5. “If she was of the opinion that he sucked in bed, she wouldn’t let him continue fucking her.”
          Yeah because everyone just pushes people off them screaming, “You’re lousy in the sack! Get outta here!” in the middle of mediocre sex with a mediocre person.

    2. Only if the males are fit. If not, a woman of that age would rather stay single than date older men… Very attractive girls pair up and marry their equal in their 20’s…

      1. Two reasons for that: 1) most slightly older men are brainwashed betas, often out of shape, who go with the social pressure to date women their own age, or find it easier, and 2) younger women tend to know younger men from college. But younger women not being actually attracted to slightly older men? Wrong.

        1. Agree. Im 35 now and while i was studying last year as a mature age i would catch some women in their early to mid 20s glancing over at me. When some of them found out my real age they got put off but others didnt care.
          Due to my old beta mindset i passed up an opportunity to hook up with a 19 year old when i was 31. I thought it was ‘wrong’ lol.
          thats social brainwashing for you.

        2. Young western women have been conditioned to think that older men are perverts and creeps and won’t consider anyone more than a few years older than her unless he is rich. Older women have fallen for the cougar culture and will date much younger men. This leaves the middle aged man with nothing but a wasteland of damaged goods as far as women go. I wish someone had told me the truth when I was younger. I would have tried to get more poon while the getting was still good. There’s nothing for me now except prostitutes.

        3. Its very important for men to stay fit and healthy as they age. In this country its important that they BECOME fit and healthy first of all, because most kids here are not fit and healthy.
          A fit, healthy, attractively faced and built older man of 32 has a leg up over a younger unhealthy 25 year old fat ass in the eyes of a young, fit 24 year old woman.
          That’s also one reason why younger white women date older black men, they appear healthier, fitter and younger than men from her own ethic group her own age. Probably has something to do with their T levels and muscle mass. I’ll leave the science up to any brainiac who might drive by.

        4. “Due to my old beta mindset i passed up an opportunity to hook up with a 19 year old when i was 31.”
          Its better that you didn’t because she would have been turned off of older men for life. Now that you have gone through self-improvement and refinement, you are a better catch for younger women. Please encourage all men you know to become smart, charming, healthy, fit and attractive. Its important for men to do this for the future of womanhood, humanity and the world at large.

  2. The bottom line is if you are actually looking to start a family you are completely screwed in this country. Our American culture is so fuckered up it is almost impossible to find anyone that can be trusted. Much less a female that can be trusted.

    1. Just overheard a conversation between two, female, Stanford students. One talked about how her “family dynamics” class made her depressed because so many people end up breaking up/divorcing these days. They talked about how the economics don’t stack up since women no longer need men to support them. She was really excited about the prospect of partying at her friends weddings though, to meet lots of other “fun singles”!
      As far as “Sahara Snatch” all these factors seem to be increasing testosterone levels in women. I rarely hear a real “valley girl” (“um yeah, like totally!”) voice anymore. Young women sound like men when they talk. They have a gravelly voice, as if they’ve just woken up, but it’s at all times of day.

      1. American men never “needed” women in the economic sense. However, all the evidence I’ve seen suggests that a healthy and functional family unit requires a mother and a father. Material consumption is the blind function of Americans these days. They don’t even know why but they do it because they are programmed to. I seriously question how much happiness it brings anyone.

        1. You’re right. Roosh’s recent post on H.L. Mencken’s “In Defense of Women” is a humorous reminder of how women have succeeded in suckering men into an arrangement that’s overwhelmingly to their detriment. There’s no guarantee of providing a stable environment for children either. http://www.rooshv.com/in-defense-of-women
          One thing Mencken wrote that struck me was that women’s families used to give men dowries to marry them, as an incentive to engage in what was otherwise a bad deal. Today men spend $10s of thousands on engagement rings. Check out this schlock from the De Beers website “Today, perhaps more than ever, the diamond engagement ring remains the most powerful universal expression of true and everlasting love, and an essential part of the marriage ritual, across the globe. The divine diamond and the power of love.” LOL!!

        2. If I were younger and had any intention to marry the girl’s father would have to give me a marriage settlement (dowry) or they’d be no marriage. I don’t care if the girl was the most perfect woman on earth.If there was a divorce and I had to divide my property with her she’d only be getting 1/2 of her own assets back and I’d still have 1/2 for my time and aggravation for a bit of compensation.

        3. It’s not necessary to give a betrothal ring. You get a gold band when you marry. If she wants to wear some sort of diamond ring then her mother or grandmother should give her one from the family jewels to wear.

      2. This is another sex and the city myth: women don’t need men to support them.
        Balderdash.
        Yes, some women make seemingly good money but articles about single mothers by choice who go with a sperm bank father admit that it’s tough for them to get by on their own. There’s a reason why most men don’t choose to go with a surrogate and have children without a mother: Men understand how much work it is to be a single parent. It always amuses me that women who complain they don’t want to get married because a stupid man will leave his socks on the floor or won’t put the dishes away somehow think raising a child will be a cakewalk.
        And this is if the woman is good with money. Most are not. The media caters to women but also exploits them relentlessly. Women are told they’re losers if they don’t buy a new Prada bag every year. Fashion costs career women about as much as housing. Then there’s the other costs of being a woman: Most don’t want to do car and house repair and they pay top dollar for such services.

        1. Yeah, women without men fall into spirals of narcissism, hysteria, and simple consumerism.
          Here’s Benjamin Franklin: “It is the Man and Woman united that make the compleat human Being. Separate, she wants his Force of Body and Strength of Reason; he, her Softness, Sensibility and acute Discernment. Together they are more likely to succeed in the World.”

        2. Sex and the City is just fantasy. There is no way that that girl could live the way she does just writing some dumb column.So “Mr Big” was obviously giving her money or she was hooking on the side. I once asked Gore Vidal (in the 80’s) how many writers could live well just on their writing. He said about 1k worldwide with perhaps a handful at the very top making the top money of that 1k. Below that there are writers who make decent money sometimes but have other sources of income or another job. Sort of like being an actor. You’re either the handful at the top or at a lower rung where you’re a reliable actor who gets jobs consistently at a lower pay, or you’re a waiter hoping to get any job acting.
          Someone like Cary would be collecting foodstamps based on what she’d make as a writer so this is just purely some female fantasy. Write a column, go out with alphas, party and live like a queen.

        3. I don’t agree with Ben. No female has ever improved a man. About all they do is push a man to work harder (for their benefit) Ben had it in him long before he met his wife and got married.And btw, when he died he left an estate of $250k which in today’s money would be at least $25m which is pretty good considering he was a publisher and the colonies only had 2m people.

        4. I highly recommend the film “That guy who was in that thing.” It’s about the lives of character actors and how some struggle but many earn a middle class living.
          But yeah, Sex and the City is about as pornographic for women as hardcore bondage stuff is for men.

        5. Many of those 2nd rung actors consistently work and earn good salaries and are in the more upper class income bracket. While I can make a list of actors who were stars for 1 or 2 films and then were never heard from again.

  3. What a fantastic summary of such a pervasive issue. Thankfully I’m British, but I can see the signs in an increasingly Americanised culture.

  4. We need to cut the losses and take back the control of our society. Seriously we are in serious decline and we can’t do anything about it because we are not the ones in charge of our societies developments and especially not in control over our own media, a.k.a. the Pussy-megaphone.
    We see the developments is taking us to a sterile and seriously unhealthy environment and as men we can’t hide, we can’t sit and wait for the women to solve this itself, it doesn’t work like that. What we need is actually to overthrow every power that be in every part of the western world. That what needs to happen unless we want to suffer even more in this society.

  5. Depressing, but well written and researched article. One of the best yet in ROK. Good job man.
    I hope you write another article for men’s sex drive. I’m only in my 20s and my sex drive is less than a third of what it used to be. I just can’t figure out why.

    1. I don’t want to assume what the issue is man, but porn. It is damaging the sex drive of millions of young men nowadays. The science makes sense. Thankfully, it is fixable.

      1. You’re most likely correct. I quit about 6 months ago, but I don’t really see any improvements yet. I also exercise more and changed my diet to boost testosterone.

        1. I concur with hipstink on the porn. I quit it cold turkey 3 months ago. Hard for me to say if it’s improved my sex drive though since I never get laid.

        2. Change your exercise routine, go for muscle mass development.
          I felt my drive declining at 27-29, then figured I needed muscles to get better chicks. At first it was just for the poon, but after a grueling workout I was trailblazing my way after girls like they could cure cancer. Go for muscle mass training, and your testosterone will sky rocket.

        3. Could link to dozens of clinical trials demonstrating direct link from saturated fat to T levels. Conversely, Americans have LESS saturated fat than ever….and are now fat, sterile, impotent, and Sahara Snatches.
          Funny documentary ‘Fat Head’ (free on Hulu) is must watch for people with hormonal problems.

        4. Diet will not change T levels at your age. Anyway get it checked but the actual number within the normal range means little unless it’s very low. Everyone has a certain level and it doesn’t matter what the actual level is because it’s a norm for your body. A man with an 800 is not more potent or manly than one with a 200. You would have had to have results from before to compare it to any new tests taken now. For example, if you were 500 a few years ago and now you’re 200 that may indicate something wrong in a young man.

        5. You cite epidemiological data, but link to an experiment. This does not engender high confidence that you know how to interpret the evidence.
          The subjects in the experiment were fed a laboratory liquid diet in order to closely control the macro nutrient ratios.
          This means that they were not fed “fat,” they were fed vegetable oil and different vegetable oils have different effects on hormone levels.
          Soybean oil lowers testosterone. Canola oil lowers it even more than soybean oil.
          Without repeating the experiment on a broad variety of fat sources the experiment is essentially useless.
          Unless, perhaps, you live on a diet of nothing but Ensure(tm).
          Extrapolating the results from a particular source of laboratory purified lipids to “fat” is either incompetence or fraud. Perhaps a bit of both.

        6. David, Gillian McKeith is obviously Anglo-Celt. Those people age the worst no matter their diet. Nigella Lawson is of Mediterrenean ethnicity and their skin ages much better than Anglo-Celts/Far Northern Europeans, no matter the diet.
          If Gillian McKeith advocates a vegetarian diet as the blurb says, then that would include butter and other dairy products much like Nigella eats. Vegetarians are not vegans. Perhaps the blurb meant “vegan”. In any case, my point still stands. I know lots of Anglo-Celts and other Far Northern Europeans who eat all kinds of things and they all have ugly skin by 45 which causes them to look much older.

        1. How is paleo diet racist?
          Its more or less just eating non-processed foods as much as possible. Americans can’t do it, but its not “racist” because we can’t.

    2. Something wrong with you see a doctor. I was the same at 45 as I was at 20.There’s a certain point where every man will go downhill but not at 30.

  6. Excellent. Science above all. You can’t fight Mother Nature.
    Oddly enough when I moved to Europe it seemed almost every girl I slept with, 20s or 30s (even teens heh), were not using the pill. Back in America or Canada every girl I knew was on the pill despite not having a serious boyfriend. When I asked these euro girls about it they simply replied that it causes damage to female hormones. Another cultural difference that sheds bad light on America.
    Japan – giving America a glimpse of its future.

    1. Japan’s population is declining because of this issue and the fact that they have a closed doors immigration policy. The US on the other hand have a large immigration population (not all legal) and the ethnic groups with the highest birth rates are latinos and blacks. You don’t have to do much calculation to see how the demographics will look like in few decades.

        1. The American census is stupid, they say Hispanic is an ethnicity and not race, but on practice they separate Hispanic as it was a race on its own, most Hispanics are Brown Mestizo, but as far as i know, a sizable number are White or very White (Singer Pitbull is one Hispanic American, does he look Brown? ), the census should get rid of ambiguous terms like Hispanic, it should use “Spanish speaking person” and the term “some other race” ,use Mestizo.

        2. Hispanics are racially diverse, but almost all have hidden European recessive DNA. As Hispanics amalgamate with White (blond Nordic/alpine) Americans, that Recessive Euro DNA EMERGES, with the offspring looking mostly or all caucasian.
          More and more hispanics look like Christina Aguilera, Alexis bledel, Cameron Diaz, Charlie Sheen, Joaquin Phoenix, Mike lowell,Rita Hayworth, Raquel welch, Vanna White. All these are white Hispanics.
          But thats not the Census’s game. Apparently, multiculturalist are doing the counting, and the increasing number of people marking Hispanic & White bothers them. It shows Latinos are racially assimilating slowly, but surely. It means that whites will remain a majority, period. Just as the founding stock Anglo Saxon Americans embraced Irish, Italians, Jews to maintain their majority.
          The US census seems intent on SHORT CIRCUITING the hispanic assimilation process by encouraging them to see themselves as “special” and “different” , not to associate with a “mainstream”.
          America in 2060 will be 70% biologically white, but thanks to the multiculturalists doing the counting, only 30-40% will be categorized as such. Its all political.

        3. They can be. Hispanic isn’t a race but a language group. It basically says that the person originates from a country where the main language is Spanish.

        4. “They can be.”
          No…They can’t be. Just like Halle Berry isn’t white neither are mestizos. See how that works?

        5. Yes they can, perfect examples are Cubans, go to Miami and you will see many of them range from looking White (With Blue, Green) eyes to black, etc. Cuban’s aren’t a race, you can be French and Cuban at the same time. That’s just one example since I live in Miami.
          Do some research next time.
          And speaking about Japan, the reason as to why it’s like that is because of hypergamy. Most women DO want to become housewives but want a husband that earns a high paying job. If Japan decides to import immigrants (Which they will) their culture will decline.
          It’s the same as Jews protesting in their country wanting Africans to get out.

        6. And all hispanics are almost always included to increase the numbers for “white crime rates” by our leftist gov agencies..
          What’s your point?

    2. Another reason for rape culture’s failure. Why people want to head to the bokanovsky process is crazy.

    3. Indeed. Japan may be the nation with the most advanced effects of femminism. While adapted to Japanese society, their otakus, super betas, crazy sexless women and demographic catastrophe shows the future of many western cultures, at leas as for the white race is concerned. Hell, Japan can’t even make normal porn.

      1. Japan is a patriarchal society there women can’t advance careers past a secretary and are expected to leave the workforce as soon as they get married. How on earth can you call Japan feminist I don’t know but I imagine in the manosphere everything is possible.

        1. I think you’re grasping. Maybe a 2 or 3 decades ago Japan was a patriarchal society. Today though? Not a chance.
          Besides, true patriarchal societies tend not to self implode as fast as we are witnessing Japan. What your seeing is them absorb the poison of Western countries (matriarchal)
          inb4 “but but but the 1% elites are all men”
          That may be so but the left and fem-centrism is always matriarchal.

        2. Actually, friend lived there for a few years. Even 10 years ago it wasn’t uncommon for a woman who spoke 4 languages to be a greeter. Women in Japan are about the 1960’s in terms of wimmins lib. They’re no longer required to stay at home, but the boys still run the office. The biggest problem with Japan is that they rarely have an original idea. Even when they started bringing cars to the US to sell, they bought patents to use to put in features that they believed customers would want.
          They were right, consumers did want them. Detroit was lazy with a lack of competition and shorting pensions to cover the cracks.
          Even in the 90’s, you were very careful, because they would reverse engineer in a heartbeat, and their patent laws were pain in the ass. Of course, today, China puts the Japanese willingness to cheat to shame by actually just making shit off the clock.
          The Japanese are excellent refiners, see fuel cells, the FSX, et al. Not nearly as many original ideas.

        3. Japan is patriarchal and traditionalist country. Just because it doesn’t look like Afghanistan doesn’t mean it’s not patriarchal, women there are housewives and they don’t develop careers they stay at home, so no its not the top 1% as you said. In fact feminism is going to hit Japan now.
          http://world.time.com/2013/09/30/you-mean-women-deserve-careers-patriarchal-japan-has-breakthrough-moment/
          The low birthrates are a worldwide phenomenon of increased modernisation and women’s education you have already countries like Iran and Unated Arab Emirates with birthrates below replacement level. World population will grow till 2050 and then will begin to decline.
          Most of you guys seem to live in some parallel universe.

        4. “feminism is going to hit Japan now”
          Dont flatter yourself. Corporate Japan is becoming accepting of females into the workforce because the low birth rates there force them to.
          I wonder why Jap bitches hate sex so much?
          Weird.

        5. EXACTLY! After living there for a few years I noticed the same thing. There is next to nothing original about modern Japanese culture. It’s greatest days are long behind them. They are as you said the world best at refining and polishing the most obscure details till they achieve practical perfection in the way a turn stalk feels, or cellphone button feels as you press it. The type of shit that – while cool – really does not improve the actual effectiveness of the product.
          And the women are a whole other ball of wax completely. many of them actually hate their own men and are horny, desperate, single, and suffering mental disorders because of it. Its’ so bad I’ve read that Japan has the highest number of 30+ year old female virgins…

        6. It’s not a flatter it’s the natural outcome for a society that wants to progress. Only a total fool can imagine that anything good could come out of such inequalities.

        7. And I don’t think anyone cares about your definitions of true patriarchy. Appatently holding all positions of power plus the entire economy is not enough. Just calling Japan feminist says everything about your state of mind.

        8. “anything good could come out of such inequalities”
          Like building a country devastated from the wreckage of war to the third largest economy in the world.
          You are the fool.
          Now go make some tea.

        9. And that’s the farthest they can go before the downfall. When even the most successful patriarchy ever fails at the end there is nothing more to add. Feminism is inevitable.
          Now go drink some japanese tea.

        10. Idiocy. Japan was a patriarchy, but how can you call something like Japan patriarchy, when almost all masculine drive has been expelled by society, the majority of its men mentally castrated and it women practising self-hatred en-mass and willing to put out with anything foreign. By the way, real patriarchal societies (where men hold the first position in and out of the house, please note I speak first position as one of a leader, not a dictator that beats his wife every night) are not moribund porn addicted ones…Despite the appearances, Japan is a country where, in most marriages, the wifes assume the role of mother of their husbands, suppressing any passion after conceiving their first and oft only child….

        11. I watch much Japanese Animation, and in Japan animes with female heroines are pretty popular and get high ratings, in a way females are already powerful in Japan and such heroines show us it, that country has created more female heroines than United States, such as Sailor Moon, they are a good example of Girl Power.

        12. Have you seen the demented fetishes their men have? Is it any wonder why they willingly marry gaijin?
          Also, according to a friend, the average isn’t too kind to Asian men without Ainu in their genealogy, but marrying someone like that is still not socially acceptable. So she married an American instead. While Japanese females don’t idolize white males like Japanese makes idolize white females, they maintain social acceptability as long as the gaijin can speak a little Japanese and has a good job, showing diligence in work.

        13. A lot of Japanese women actually have to go to “host” clubs where they pay a handsome male to talk to them.
          Lol.

        14. In my ten trips to Japan I never found Japanese women showing any interest in foreign men other than to practice their hack Engrish on.
          They are all a bunch of mindless drones

        15. The demented fetishes are to get around the porn laws. It’s illegal to show a dick.

        16. “Appatently holding all positions of power plus the entire economy is not enough”
          Because we men do not see ourselves as a class. Just because the few hundred people at the top re men, does not thereby empower me.
          When men here talk about patriarchy/matriarchy, they are talking about the common person. In particular, they are talking about family law and family structure. A culture where men are expected to literally work themselves to death is not a patriarchy. In patriarchies, men lounge around smoking a hookah and women do all the work.

        17. Absent fathers. An attack on the father’s role in the family is an attack on the structure of society.

      2. Their women are infatuated with Hello Kitty cellphones and Dior purses and not much else.
        Thats why their men dress like faggots and trannies and dont date them.
        What a fucking boring shithole.

  7. “47% of women that have read 50 Shades of Grey say that it has actively influenced their sex lives”
    That right there tells you everything you need to know about how messed up western women are.

      1. She is a crazy bitch but she does have a point. Her crazy just makes it hard to see. Lol. I hate to say this because of how controversial it is. But 9 times out of 10, sex is “rape”. Not the legal definition of it of course. Most men could never truly rape a women and keep it up at the same time (with the exception of gang/war rape). But on an emotional level, it is “rape”. This is why women who have too many partners usually have so many issues. Every time she takes a man into her, he stays, for life (since most women don’t have the emotional resources to regulate and work through the “incorporation” process to it’s completion – i.e. they remain fragmented and become more and more so as time goes on). Most sex is like a battlefield. When true love and maturity isn’t present, both the man and the woman suffer. It just so happens that the woman usually suffers quite a bit more (especially if the guy has an IQ over 100) – even feminazis (the narcissists and sociopaths that they are) are vulnerable to the activity. They’re just so numb they don’t see the damage they do to themselves; and perhaps don’t care anymore. Moreover, they’re so focused on destroying you (men) that they’ll go so far as to destroy themselves in the process.

        1. I don’t pity women, or sympathize with them. To be honest I’m largely indifferent. But despite all the protection, consideration, handicaps, freebies, deference, money, etc. given to them, I would never ever ever in a million years wish to be born a woman. Some of you, especially the more intelligent/creative ones, take for granted the abilities given to you as a birthright. You’ll never again (since childhood) be dependent on another human being for life itself the way a woman depends on others. Also, your psychology allows you to make sense of the world in a way few women are able to. Most women are lost desperately look for some “truth” or “certainty” for which they can stabilize and orient their psyches. To live your whole life that way is very painful. Again, I don’t care one way or the other, and on some level I get a sadistic pleasure knowing this. Even so, I can empathize mit ihre pain.

        2. Admittedly, the problems men experience from emotional separation from a women are different from how they are for women; I wouldn’t say they’re any easier to deal with though, even for men with high IQ’s.
          It’s all a matter of how aloof you are, just so happens there are more aloof men then there are women, thanks to our society.

        3. Hey Guest,
          first, could you refer me to some objective, understandable and sane (scientific) literature which substantiates the “sex is always rape” dogma propagated by feminists?
          Second, what do you mean by “rape” vs. rape?
          Third, what do you mean by “every time she takes a man into her he stays for life” and “most women don’t have the emotional resources to work through the incorporation …”? Add references to sane literature to substantiate.
          As for sexual dysfunction, since I don’t live in the USA dunno, my impression is that 30+ women are horny beyond their physical abilities, but that may well be blustering to which David refers. To my knowledge, women go into menopause on average at 45-50 around these parts of the world and the kind of health problems described are (still) far less prevalent here than in the USA – we’re about 5-10 years behind the US in all things trendy BTW.

        4. Rape is a specific violent crime carrying a prison sentence – and justly so. Buying into blurring the meaning of the word is playing along with the maddest dreams of the radfems, a world where boys will be put into prison at birth.
          “Sex=Rape” makes as much sense as saying that lighting your stove is arson. It’s simply not what the word means.

      2. OR she’s never had sex, because she’s too ugly and/or fat.
        She fingers herself in the shower and feels discomfort, and assumes that being penetrated would have to be even more painful.
        She knows that she probably won’t ever have sex with a man, and is actively “poisoning the well” for those few sexless sloths willing to listen to her crap.
        The upside is that she will die sad and lonely herding cats (and being partially eaten by them before the smells start to penetrate the other apartments) – ridding the evolutionary pool of her stupidity.

    1. My God. One would think you guys would love that. 50 Shades is all about sexual abuse and control at the hands of a sex-crazed alpha male. One woman gets used and abused throughout the whole book series. Isn’t that what you dream about? Asserting your male dominance until you have a meek, submissive woman who is at your mercy and disposal?

      1. Nope but its apperantly every womans fantasy i mean look how many women loved it they love rape and having assholes dominate them except you you apperantly think men love being assholes and dominating women i certainly dont hell my sex slave wont stop screaming and it hurts me so but shes into

      2. You mean you actually BELIEVE that shit? That’s all bullshit women tell each other, lies you read in magazines, and what your feminist cunt sisters tried to fill your head with… AND YOU BOUGHT IT???
        There is ZERO benefit, thrill or enjoyment in “controlling” women.
        NONE.
        You want to know where the joy REALLY is for us “sex crazed alphas”? Reminding her exactly where the door is and letting her know she can LEAVE anytime she wants…… but she doesn’t.
        That’s the only kind of relationship with a woman worth having. KNOWING that every minute she is there is because she REALLY WANTS TO BE, and encouraging independence in women.
        That’s right sugar. You heard it here first. Now you run along and go tell the cunts that lied to you, we have no interest in “controlling women”. I don’t need to TRY and get into woman’s pants, because it’s much more rewarding to watch her peel them off FOR me.
        YOU UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE NOW??
        It’s WOMEN who are control freaks with their binding marriage contracts and paternity fraud and trapping unwilling men into fatherhood. As men we don’t play that game.
        Now you run along and have fun.
        And thank me some other time.

        1. I have complained to my boyfriend in the past about a few things that bug me about him and he has told me exactly “If you don’t like it, leave” …and of course I stayed. I love him and want him and if he doesn’t want to change anything to suit me then that is fine. I’m sure he deals with things that I do to annoy him sometimes too!
          Everything you say in your post is true, and I’m grateful people like you have the mind to preach it.

        2. You probably have no idea what if feels like to have a woman with you because she wants to be, sugar.

        3. Of course I do. And I can prove it. Because I can’t even get YOU to leave and stop messaging me. You’re here voluntarily aren’t you? So there you go.
          Make an appointment, dear.
          The lineup for fat chicks starts in Frogballs, Arkansas.

      3. It wasn’t before. But, now, if a woman stops me from blowing out her ass, its over.

      4. How oblivious are you? Most men are not into sadomasochism. By the way being sexually dominant isn’t the same as being into SM. Two entirely different things. Sadomasochism it seems is largely a female thing. Which makes sense. Women like to be ‘victimized’, they thrive in those roles. Makes them feel sorry for themselves (you know no accountability and responsibility). Every role that gives women plausible deniability, is a role they happily would like to play.

      5. ” Isn’t that what you dream about? Asserting your male dominance until you have a meek, submissive woman who is at your mercy and disposal?”
        LOL!! You western women are so messed up. No one would call eastern euoprean women “meek and submissive” that want to be at a mans “mercy and disposal”. You western women have no idea what it is to be a real woman any more.
        No one would characterise my fav#1 as “meek and submissive”. Those two terms are LAUGHABLE applied to her. She is actually very emotional strong. She is very strong willed and stubborn to a fault. She is absolutely willing to speak out and she has even been quite happy to punch me a few times…..being careful to make sure that she is not going to do any damage but to make her point. She is quite “violent and physical” and I really like that. She can also be very aggressive in her manner of speaking.
        She even told me, and it is in my book, that if we agreed to marry based on her promise that she would not have more children if she changed her mind she would cuckold me. She told me that to my face.
        Now does that sound like “meek and submissive” to you? It doesn’t to me…..but standing up for yourself and being a strong woman does not mean being obnoxious and hateful and condoning crimes against men…which is what western women are like. Eastern euopean women, in my experience, actually like their men…..they don’t hate on them like western women do.

        1. I enjoyed your comment about “Eastern European” woman alot. See, I moved to the United States from Macedonia and I have to say that I am disgusted by how our women are portrayed as these sex objects. There are alot of beautiful, respectful women in Eastern Europe, but they don’t live up to the stereotype that is given to them.
          As for Eastern European women “acutally liking their men” this is true for the most part. They do nag on them constantly and argue/yell loudly at dinner with them (an Eastern European thing). As lovers, we are just as good as American women.
          Another thing, after coming to this country from Macendonia, I am disgusted by many of the men here (like this website). An American term I would use is “douche” or “pig”.

        2. Alexia,
          “As lovers, we are just as good as American women.”
          I disagree. I think eastern european women are much better…but I was faithful to my wife for 23 years so I am a man of little experience in that area.
          “Another thing, after coming to this country from Macendonia, I am disgusted by many of the men here (like this website). An American term I would use is “douche” or “pig”.”
          The men here are expressing their opinions as they are entitled to. Remember, women in the west commit crimes against men with complete impunity. You are lucky men are only talking…if they stop talking they will start killing women. I am amazed how few women men kill actually. Western women are evil people and abuse men terribly so I would expect men to be killing many more women soon.

        3. You’re right, men are expressing their opinions, that is one of the greatest things about this country: freedom of speech. In my home country of Macedonia, there was less of a diversity of viewpoint and opinion. HOWEVER, their horrible behaviors still make them a disgusting pig in my eyes. Remeber, I am entitled to my opinion as well.
          Truthfully, MANY (not all) women have aweful attitudes here in the West. They are selfish, impatient, narcissistic and rude . That is one thing your little website gets right. However, Western men are no better. They tend to be dominating, hateful, selfish, and borderline psychotic.
          Also, another thing that disgusts me about this country is it’s treatment of women. You say that Western women are “evil people” who “abuse” men but I have witnessed worse treatment upon western women. Some of the female friends that I have made here since immigrated have gone through alot of hate and abuse. I was shocked that this would happen in a place like America. In Macedonia, men learn how to treat women with upmost respect (unless she is a whore/disgraced). I don’t understand why men in this country can’t have the same moral values.

        4. “HOWEVER, their horrible behaviors still make them a disgusting pig in my eyes. Remeber, I am entitled to my opinion as well.”
          And what about women who commit perjury, kidnapping, extortion, theft and child abuse against tens of millions of men? Where there are ACTUAL CRIMINAL VICTIMS?
          Men here are not criminally victimising women. There is no law that says you can not lie to a woman to get her in to bed. As long as the woman consents no law is broken.
          But there is a law called “thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour” that women routinely break and use that to steal a mans children and house.
          Maybe you would be better off dealing with the WOMEN who have destroyed the lives of hundreds of millions of men around the world who have actually generated the behaviour of the men here. After all? Every man here knows that if he marries a woman he waives the right to any children, his house, his business, his future incomes.
          When women openly laugh about their marriage vows and breaking marriage vows is openly supported how do you THINK men are going to respond?
          Women created these “pigs” you talk about. And the only way men are ever going to come back to the party is for women to be willing to be held equal before the law or willing to become chattel property. Apart from that? Welcome to the “new man” your mothers and grand mothers created for you.

        5. Maybe I should move back to Macedonia were the men are normal human beings. Their traditional attitudes can come off as sexist but at least they are not completely insane. I’ll take a nice Macedonian/Bulgarian gentleman over some of the slobs on this site.
          Also, women didn’t create “pigs”. Men are accountable for their own actions. They don’t blame their shitty behavior on women. They MAN UP to it.

        6. “Also, women didn’t create “pigs”. Men are accountable for their own actions. They don’t blame their shitty behavior on women.”
          The men are responsible for their own actions, sure. And the actions that make the most sense to men in the west is to behave exactly as they are doing.
          By your standards I would be a “pig” now. How did it work out for me being an honest man of honour and integrity? Of being a great father and husband who raised 4 children?
          Oh, that’s right. My children were kidnapped, my house was stolen, my business was destroyed and not even SIX YEARS LATER have I gained a community supported path to justice.
          And that is supported by 99.9% of western women. So men are treating western women like the liars and hypocrites they chose to be……which is exactly how such women should be treated.
          Western women poisoned the well…and the men are just reacting to what western women have done. They are not going to treat them as long term prospects for family because no woman IS a long term prospect for a family….women can have he man arrested and thrown out of his own house any time she chooses…..so men are going to treat woman badly. Get used to it. Western women brought this on themselves.

      6. Why would I, as a man, want to use and abuse just one woman when there are so many willing and available?

      7. Remember the 6 Million Jews that died… on the 1910s, 1920s, 1930s, and apparently WWII… It seems “6 Million Jews” died quite often 😮

      8. Exactly. As you point out, the popularity of 50 shades among women but not men shows that you are completely wrong about us. Perhaps a little honest inquiry on your part might rectify your opinions, bring the a little closer to reality.

    2. Salman Rushdie said 50 Shades made Twilight look like War and Peace. Ha! One of my ex’s best friends, a cougar slut in the truest sense of the term, gave this book to my then-wife. My ex said she was disgusted by it and stopped reading. This is part of the reason I would not tolerate a wife with such a slut as a best friend. Our marriage was doomed once my foreign exie made her Canadian best friends: one was this cock-crazed slut and the other was a frigid bitch who ruled her fawning, obedient husband like a slave. Fuck me! 😀

      1. Rushdie is no great talent himself. Simply hyped up and overrated.
        Even Salman Khan acts better than Salman Rushdie writes.
        Prove me wrong.

    3. Also makes one question how messed up we are. We have been around these “Darwinian dead ends” for the since at least the sixties. They also run the schools we all were raised in.
      We now go against the same old traditional marital system they have, in our own way. If both of us are lamenting the loss of traditional marriage, and the rise of feminist inspired sluttery, how messed up have they made us as well being their sons?

      1. “how messed up have they made us as well being their sons?”
        Oh..they messed us up pretty badly. That was part of the deprogramming I had to go through.
        Example. My oldest brother is a genius. He was once the highest paid programmer in Australia. When he was 34 he decided to quit working. He buys and sells on e-bay and works one 36 hour day a week at the local sale yards in Wagga and that is enough for him to live on. Never married. No kids.
        After my divorce my father commented that he had hoped chris had done more with his life. So I turned on my father viciously and said
        “Oh, you mean you wished he went to university, got a job with a company like IBM, worked his ass off, bought and renovated houses, married the woman he loved, raised his family, rose to the top of his profession in the world, was so respected that he was voted by his peers to give the eulogy of YOUR OWN MOTHER….
        And in divorce his children were stolen, his house was stolen and even HIS OWN FATHER WOULD BETRAY HIM? Do you mean you wished he did THAT with his life!!”
        And I stared him down until he hung his head and simply turned and walked away. How DARE he criticise anyone for what they have done with their lives when he did not say a WORD when his own grand children were kidnapped and abused.
        My father is a disgusting “gutless mongrel”. He is a coward. I have disowned him…and I am changing my name to Joschua Brandon Boehm so I do not even carry his name any more.
        When people call me “Mr. Nolan” I actually flinch inside I am so repelled by the name I still carry.
        And if anyone wants to talk to my gutless mongrel coward of a father his phone number in Australia is +61 2 69 25 46 18. Feel free to ask him why he betrayed his son and allowed his grand children to be kidnapped and abused without a word in protest. Ask him why he invited to the criminals who destroyed his sons life to come to his wifes funeral….feel free to email me whatever he says….because I sure as hell am not going to ask those question of such a yellow bellied black snake as my former father, John Thomas Nolan.

        1. Gents and Ladies, observe Loopy Peter Andrew Fucking Nolan the LIAR and COWARD in action! Loopy, your father booted you from his house and told you not to contact him again until you had stopped being a dickhead … hence he hasn’t heard from you since. You never confronted him like you said and as the coward you are, you put his name and phone number on forums such as this and invite strangers to harrass him on your behalf. You’re not much of a man, are you Loopy Pete – A FORMER MAN WHO HAS ALWAYS BEEN A COWARD WITH NO BALLS!

      2. “how messed up have they made us as well being their sons?”
        Oh..they messed us up pretty badly. That was part of the deprogramming I had to go through.
        Example. My oldest brother is a genius. He was once the highest paid programmer in Australia. When he was 34 he decided to quit working. He buys and sells on e-bay and works one 36 hour day a week at the local sale yards in Wagga and that is enough for him to live on. Never married. No kids.
        After my divorce my father commented that he had hoped chris had done more with his life. So I turned on my father viciously and said
        “Oh, you mean you wished he went to university, got a job with a company like IBM, worked his ass off, bought and renovated houses, married the woman he loved, raised his family, rose to the top of his profession in the world, was so respected that he was voted by his peers to give the eulogy of YOUR OWN MOTHER….
        And in divorce his children were stolen, his house was stolen and even HIS OWN FATHER WOULD BETRAY HIM? Do you mean you wished he did THAT with his life!!”
        And I stared him down until he hung his head and simply turned and walked away. How DARE he criticise anyone for what they have done with their lives when he did not say a WORD when his own grand children were kidnapped and abused.
        My father is a disgusting “gutless mongrel”. He is a coward. I have disowned him…and I am changing my name to Joschua Brandon Boehm so I do not even carry his name any more.
        When people call me “Mr. Nolan” I actually flinch inside I am so repelled by the name I still carry.
        And if anyone wants to talk to my gutless mongrel coward of a father his phone number in Australia is +61 2 69 25 46 18. Feel free to ask him why he betrayed his son and allowed his grand children to be kidnapped and abused without a word in protest. Ask him why he invited to the criminals who destroyed his sons life to come to his wifes funeral….feel free to email me whatever he says….because I sure as hell am not going to ask those question of such a yellow bellied black snake as my former father, John Thomas Nolan.

  8. Okay one thing fist: This article is one of the best ones, if not the best one that I have ever read on this site. Even if I am in my early twenties and just had sex with one girls who was in her mid thirties, this article was an eye-opener for me…especially for my future me. I doubted the myth of horny old women all the time but when I read this article all the pieces fitted together.
    What amazed me the most was the quote from the UK Daily Mail that women want sex more as their ability to bear children decreases. When you think about this for only one second everybody on the planet must realize that this can’t be true. In terms of biology that would make absolutely no sense. The biological goal of humans is to have sex and make children. Why would nature then do a fucked up thing like providing the ones who can’t have children anymore with an increased sex drive that is only there to make children?

    1. Does no one understand that the world is now seriously overpopulated? Maybe evolution gave older women a higher sex drive to control rampant overpopulation. If the most fertile girls were at their sexual peak, the overpopulation problem would be even worse than it is now.

  9. Clearly, the entire myth of women peaking in their 30’s is a mating strategy attempting to hedge out the young, nubile competition. “You don’t want an inexperienced, scared little girl, you want a real woman, just like me”.
    As for sex, men would do well to not let sexual desire control them. I’ve seen too any friends go down the path of spending all their time chasing trim, it’s a waste of good effort. The ancient sages were on to something when they tried to train themselves to no longer need sex, it’s one less fetter restraining you. I don’t even fee like jerking off much anymore, and porn is silly and boring (porn stars talk too much)

      1. This never sat well with me.
        Younger women START this game. As early as 12. They want “boyfriends” for all their stupid mall-hopping / Justin Bieber / Unicorn / Twilight fantasies … even before they are willing (or ready!) to date like an adult. And will they want a boyfriend the same age? Hell no. When they are 13 they want a guy who is 16. When they are 18, they want him to be 24. When they are 21, he should be 30…. while passing over guys their own age for someone “more mature”.
        Then BANG! They hit 31 and wonder why a guy her age is dating 19-21 year olds. She needs to be reminded that she STARTED that game and had no problem living in that little world. She even made fun of older women HERSELF!
        So is the dude really a “pedophile”? The age of consent in America / Canada / UK / Australia is the highest in the world. Across the globe it’s not called “pedophelia” it’s just NORMAL.
        17 AND LIKES OLDER MEN
        http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AiMbRV1urlqRZduOxVQxE8vSDH1G;_ylv=3?qid=20110203234637AACn3Me
        16 AND LIKES OLDER MEN
        http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AjnKlUASkdvUkobLVsqmMq3sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20110730222836AAOZevb
        TEEN ATTRACTED TO MEN 30-50
        http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtnqyeKyCQmF3k33H9fe_L3SDH1G;_ylv=3?qid=20130609182738AAfdsQc
        So the next time a woman pretends a man is a “pedophile” for enjoying (or looking to) younger women… you remind her she started this game and now she priced herself right out of the market.

        1. Yup. The correct medical definition of pedophilia is attraction to prepubescent children (which means lower than 13, today when puberty starts around that age). Presence of secondary sex characteristics determines normal attraction, not age or mental maturity. Its ridiculous to say that you are a pedophile for being attracted to a developed girl just because her age is below 18 or below 16.

        2. Yeah, because Yahoo Answers is such a credible, scientific source. *eyeroll* There are also people on Yahoo Answers who want to bang their siblings, bang animals, etc. Someone posting a question on Yahoo Answers has no bearing on what everyone wants.
          Speaking as someone who was a teenage girl not that long ago, it is very rare that teenage girls actually WANT someone older. There were 1 or 2 girls in my high school class who dated college guys, and the other girls MADE FUN OF THEM – they were not jealous of them at all. 13 year old girls may crush on 16 year old guys, but they are not emotionally ready to be dating them. 18 year old girls want 18 year old guys, and 21 year old girls want guys their own age as well. I don’t know of any woman under 25 who would have any interest in a 30+ man, unless that’s just who she happens to fall for naturally.
          Girls under 18 should not be having sex at all in the first place, even with guys their own age. And definitely not with older men who are going to pump and dump them, and then break their hearts.

        3. Below, I will PROVE that I am right and you are wrong. But first…….
          You’re incredibly self-centered – because you use YOURSELF and the people in your little world as “the example”.
          If you want to learn anything in life (and get smarter), you must REMOVE YOURSELF from the equation…… and think of something BIGGER and MORE IMPORTANT than just YOU.
          You’re like this stupid bitch.
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbizzLzcpnM
          She doesn’t even know – or care – if the world is round or flat (!). All she can think about is feeding HER fat ass and HER children’s fat asses. A walrus thinks exactly the same way. She only concerns herself with what is “true” and “important” to HER.
          If I were as self centered as you, I would talk about how every woman I dated after I turned 30 was AT LEAST 8-15 years younger than me. That’s how it works very commonly for men.
          But I didn’t mention that, because I am not a self-centered freak. I speak in the AGGREGATE (look it up). A personal experience (or opinion) is not the example of MOST. And your use of the word “should” as you lecture on about how YOU think things “SHOULD be” has no place in reality either.
          The examples that were used, I found in SECONDS on Google. Only 3… but that’s still 3 more than you provided with your stupid “i know this girl” bullshit.
          So now LET’s PROVE that I am right:
          Google “I love older men”
          And you get 143 MILLION RESULTS.
          Now google “I hate older men”
          You only get 63 MILLION results.
          Google “I prefer older men”
          26.5 MILLION results
          Google “I prefer younger men”
          11.2 MILLION results
          Google “I prefer MUCH older men”
          11.2 MILLION results
          Google “I prefer MUCH older men”
          30 MILLION results
          Google “I prefer MUCH younger men”
          10 MILLION results
          This PROVES that women are more than twice as likely (about 63% = to 200%) more likely to prefer and date older men.
          You could have save yourself the embarrassment by doing this simple homework yourself, but it was more enjoyable to expose you as a fucking ignorant liar myself.
          Thank You.
          And have a pleasant evening.

    1. “”Clearly, the entire myth of women peaking in their 30’s is a mating strategy attempting to hedge out the young, nubile competition.””
      Also serves to keep the average civilization building beta contributing/producing and not dropping out. Basically it’s a way of saying to him: “Yes, unrestrained hypergamy has you missing out on the sexual marketplace nowadays BUT don’t lose heart, keep playing the game and later on she when she’s older she will sexually ravish you”

      1. Excellent point. We would all do well to consider how these myths affect us at a personal level as a well as a societal level.

    2. Ignoring the fact that less fertility serves the ‘elite’ depopulation
      agenda, I think its pretty f*cking depressing how what this article
      claims, that women want less sex with age, is true. Hell, even the
      current 20 y/o women are not as horny as the 20 y/o from a decade ago.
      Cultural changes (extreme hypergamy/feminazism) and tampering with
      hormones in the water supply probably has a lot to do with it.
      I honestly feel cheated that I spent my 20’s working and studying and so
      had less sexual experiences than I could have. Getting a professional
      degree often feels like a waste of time when I could’ve just sampled
      more poosy. I am just going to have to make up for it. Only thing is,
      the west has become male heavy (110 males for 100 females) in younger
      age groups, due to health advances where males don’t die and mass
      (mainly male) immigration from countries with male-heavy working age
      populations. This, plus social media, makes women feel like they can
      pick and choose and so they do not bother any more, becoming unpleasant
      and/or fat, further exacerbating how bad things are. Japan really is our
      future, but I don’t feel like a sex-bot would satisfy me. And legalised
      prostitution is not a long-term solution for all men.
      How to improve? Its not even like working harder helps to get more money,
      unless you’re a millionaire (inheritance?). Game may help, but when the
      top gurus are doing 100s of approaches and posting 2.5% lay rates (see
      Krauser), this is only for a subset of men willing to put in the
      excessive amount of work. It is all about women’s choice, and fame seems
      to be the only reliable method. It is like Roosh said, but before 2020,
      to get laid consistently, you’ll need game, fame and looks.

      1. Right on! And while we’re at it, we need to take a close look at a system that forces men who want to make something out of themselves slave away in college to get a doctorate or master’s degree just to make over $50k a year. I know where you’re coming from about wishing you could do college over, because from undergrad to law school, I pretty much kept my nose in a book. Sure, I approached from time to time, but sporadically so, which meant that 9 times out of 10, I was meeting up with either flakes, feminists, or women who just weren’t interested. But I just didn’t have TIME to spend hours a day trying to sift through the morass and meet quality women. As a result, I can count the amount of dates I went on through both undergrad and grad on two hands. But again, if you wanna go white collar (as corporate America and contemporary women demand that you do because 1) it’s supposedly what “responsible” men do and 2) the system is set so anything less than a doctorate or master’s degree guarantees you a spot on an ever-elongating unemployment line) you’ve gotta put in your time. You do that only to find out that while you were cracking the books, the chicks who were telling you that you’ll look hot in a suit and tie one day were banging auto mechanics, lawn guys, pool boys, and backup dancers (yes, that was a jibe at K-Fed). About a century ago, you didn’t have all these B.S. hurdles. Between 16 and 17, a young man took up a trade and became an apprentice, and by 19-20, he was WORKING. GETTING PAID. NOT GETTING DEEPER IN DEBT AND STUDYING ON HOW TO WORK AT A JOB UNTIL HE TURNED 25 OR 26. And guess what? The guys who lived during our grandfathers’ era got married in their early twenties to women in their late teens/early twenties who hadn’t burned themselves out. Corporate America decided to take this common-sense approach and turn it on its head for the sake of dough-re-mi, because it figured out if you “warehouse” young people long enough in the educational system by calling it “higher learning,” you can control how many people are in the workforce at any given time and let the previous generation squeeze the last little bit of juice out of the system before they finally retire. Why do you think Warren Buffett is so rich? Because he was allowed to rake in millions without competition for years, while people a generation or two behind him had to “wait in line” for a chance to work as an unpaid intern at some schmo’s office. And like a poster said earlier, the responsible guy’s “consolation prize” is supposed to be that the women who ignored him in their 20s will see him as desirable in their 30s because he’ll have a stable career and because they’ll be “mature” enough to appreciate him. Hogwash. That’s just a beta bait trap designed to help women who see 30 fast approaching shop for simps. That’s why I’m seeing more and more of my doctor and lawyer buddies marrying over-the-hill women and women with kids. Yep, the system is indeed broken.

      2. These are the US demographics
        0-14 years: 20% (male 32,344,207/female 31,006,688)
        15-24 years:
        13.7% (male 22,082,128/female 21,157,025)
        25-54 years:
        40.2% (male 63,802,736/female 63,581,749)
        55-64 years:
        12.3% (male 18,699,338/female 20,097,791)
        65 years and over:
        13.9% (male 19,122,853/female 24,774,052) (2013 est.)
        This is for Russia
        0-14 years: 16% (male 11,740,877/female 11,119,318)
        15-24 years:
        11.5% (male 8,401,971/female 8,045,363)
        25-54 years:
        45.9% (male 31,945,797/female 33,417,073)
        55-64 years:
        13.5% (male 8,177,300/female 11,009,712)
        65 years and over:
        13.1% (male 5,687,515/female 12,955,556) (2013 est.)
        There are about equal numbers of male/female in the 15-24 group and also in the 25-54. In the later group there are more females but this group has a lot more older female in their 40’s and 50’s.
        The fake Russian girl who said there are 3x as many females as men was full of shit.

        1. With respect, those stats are from government sites (which are fake). They say the UK population is 62 million, when based of food usage, a major supermarket chain (tesco) and agrobusiness had proved, that based on food consumption, the UK population was 80 million in 2007-2010. As such, government stats are pure fabrications.
          I live in London and it is an immigrant heavy city, most of whom in recent years are male. The ratio of 110 males to 100 females in younger age groups I had posted is close to the truth (I picked 110 instead of 107 because I rounded it up).

        2. no its about accurate. In russia women do outnumber men by 5 million in the 15-65 category since the men have high suicide rates and the living ones are alchoholics so she feels that the odds are against her. Remember the “good men” are scarce. Hypergamy is every where.
          play with cia wolrd factbook or wiki for starters.

    3. Reading 50 shades of gray and Edward Cullen T-shirts is part of a strategy to pick up male interest? Not so! It is pretty much because they not only still have a sex drive but it have grown into something sick.
      And you may think, Thanks the gods they don´t reproduce! Just 10 years down the road, things will change considerably…

    4. Remember the 6 Million Jews that died… on the 1910s, 1920s, 1930s, and apparently WWII… It seems “6 Million Jews” died quite often!

  10. This display only further reveals the failures of feminism and the lies it has fed Americans. A society that cannot breed is a failed society. B.J. Urwin’s “Sex and Culture” reveals the sexual promiscuity and practices such as these lead to less births, more old people, and depraved men going guns-a-blazing.
    How sickening.

  11. If women continued peaking as they aged, then clubs would be packed with female baby boomers. Obviously, there’s no such thing as the senior discount at your average house-music bar/club, and there are no thong-versions of depends, so that claim actually doesn’t even pass the mythical tricorder test.

      1. Females are deluded. If a woman was 60 and someone guessed her age at 62 she’d be insulted lol
        I was in Saks years ago around Christmas time. I noticed a female in a red velvet jacket with some white fur on the cuffs. She was also wearing matching hotpants trimmed in fur.Very Christmasy, right. But when I got closer and saw her face she was like 80 years old! I could see that when someone else noticed her they would just sort of raise their eyebrow and probably thought the rich old bag was senile. I bet though that she thought she was hot.

  12. awesome post i cant wait to see some old riled up hos showin up here. let the tears fall muhaha.

    1. Who cares about the old ex carousel riders coming here and feigning anger. They’re more aware of the brutal truth than anyone. Do we really need an influx of angry NAWALTíng 40-50 year old’s “but I’m sooo horny bla bla”. Besides that, women and fags shouldn’t be here anyway.
      Awesome article David.

  13. “What is causing this bizarre problem of Sahara Snatch? My theories:”
    Not even close David. So before you put up theories? Why not actually go and ask the men who know, like me. It is not exactly like I am hiding, right?
    The causes of decreased fertility in western women are quite planned and quit deliberate. It is all part of the global depopulation program. But I guess you will just call me a “crazy conspiracy nutter” for saying so. I mean the fact that female fertility has collapsed in the entire western world is just an ACCIDENT and no one could have PLANNED it to be that way, right? It never ceases to amaze me how young men with forward their own pet theories rather than actually go find out from us older men who have BOTHERED TO DO OUR OWN RESEARCH what is actually happening.
    Why do you young men think forwarding your pet theories is a better idea than reading…or even easier, just asking the question of those of us who clearly know much more than you do.
    Meet my friend Kevin Galalae.

    You can get his books from this link. He is one of the pre-eminent scholars on the global depopulation program. Did you ever think to ask HIM what is going on? You can get him on facebook too. He has been persecuted very heavily for fighting for the children of the western world. You ough to at least read his books, right?
    http://www.peternolan.com/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=zS70noPJTNY%3d&tabid=538&mid=1230
    https://www.facebook.com/kgalalae?fref=ts
    Sooner or later you men are actually going to listen to me because I know much more about what is going on than any of you do.

    1. haha. I love how this side attracts all kind of jerks, nazis and conspirators. really proves the high standard of its content.

      1. lol yeah cause all these articles are just sooo lowbrow compared to the mainstream and cosmo. Nice try toots.

        1. Your feigned disgust of (“JERKS NAZEEES”) with the articles of this site was a kinda dead giveaway.

        2. We don’t need “proves” silly. We are all NAZEEEEES and JERKS remember.
          Although I suspect that’s just your libtard way of saying red pill and white, but still.

        3. But I thought the main difference between men and women is that you guys always have facts to prove your statements?
          I didn’t say that you’re all Nazis, I said that this site attracts many Nazis and other groups of men with – how can I put this politely – a very narrow view of the world. you need to practice accurate reading. Anyway, good night : )

        4. “”the main difference between men and women is that you guys always have facts to prove your statements?””
          Yep
          “”I didn’t say that you’re all Nazis, I said that this site attracts many Nazis””
          The white guilt libtard indoctrination is strong in this one.
          “”Nazis and other groups of men with – how can I put this politely – a very narrow view of the world.””
          wow….just wow

        5. Send me your e mail and I’ll add it to Skype. If after looking at you and deciding that you meet my specifications I’ll shag you.

        6. For some reason it’s the Nazis that trolls like you on this site attract in particular.
          Whenever a thread derails into a “it’s the jeeews!” I see John Doe doing it after being set off by some feminist.

        7. when i lived in ukraine, i noticed that ukrainians universally consider poland and all the other european former-soviet-satilite states “western europe” and will look at you like you’re insane if you say otherwise. but yes, in the US, they are just as universally considered “eastern europe.”

      2. Sweetie…feminism was created by the Illuminati. That you women are too dumb to accept this fact makes it impossible to actually help you….so I date eastern eurpoean women…they are lovely.
        I have passed this video clip to THOUSANDS of women. They can’t be bothered to watch it and learn that everything they have been sold about feminism is a lie. Hell, 90%+ of the “leading feminists” are jewesses….don’t you find it strange that jewesses are over-represented by about FIFTY TIMES in the “womens movement”? LOL!!
        http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/Forums/tabid/359/forumid/831/threadid/9299/scope/posts/Default.aspx

        1. Why are we calling these rich asshats Illuminati? They are anything but. Just call them rich people that likes to change the world for their own view.

        2. There is not really a point in talking with you since you are absorbed in a closed, self-constructed reality, I have just to points to make:
          1. I am an eastern European woman (and by the way, not jewish but catholic)
          2. There are so many jewish feminists because western European Jews used to have a different family structure than christians. While the men were meant to study the Tora women were allowed to work, make money and educate themselves. Jewish females such as Rosa Luxemburg were the first to enter the universities. But look, there are also way more jewish male intellectuals than christian ones which, for you, probably is a prove for the jewish world conspiracy : D

        3. lulz is that what they’re telling white gentile libtard chicks in gender studies classes now.
          “Most feminists are funded and backed by j’s because….errr…..the women worked alot.”
          You couldn’t make this shit up.

        4. Hey you fucking east european slut aviva.
          NO ONE GIVES A SHIT WHAT YOU THINK. The men here? THEY DON’T GIVE A FLYING RATFUCK WHAT YOUR TINY LITTLE FEMALE BRAIN THINKS.
          Go do something useful with yourself, like exercise, become fit and sexy, and bend over and take some alpha’s cock.
          No one here gives a shit about your retarded bullshit, whore.

        5. Haven’t you heard? Anyone who dares to think that the small elite that controls the central banking system is a CONSPIRACY NUTJOB!!! And Aviva says so!! We should believe her because she’s a WOMAN and women are never wrong.
          HOW DARE YOU disagree with Aviva!

        6. …and because you don’t give a shit you answer right away. men’s “logic” at its best. all right, good night.

        7. Lastly, Aviva. As a woman, WHAT THE FUCK are you doing on a website for masculine MEN?
          You’re just a pathetic little girl who is an alpha male attention whore. Go attention whore elsewhere, you pathetic little bitch.

        8. That is just about the funniest post I have read in the last 12 months. Talk about moron.
          Now…there is NO WAY this profile is really an eastern European woman…no way in HELL.
          No eastern european woman talks like this…..not in my experience….failing PROOF of who this woman is? Best to treat her like an agent and ignore her.
          A FIFTY TIMES over-representation of jewesses in “feminism” is explained by “some of them had jobs”!! LOL!! ROFLMFAO

        9. HOw cute… another troll.
          Go be an alpha male attention whore elsewhere. The men here are simply LAUGHING at you women’s stupidity. You women are simply ENTERTAINMENT for these men. That is how retarded you literally are.

        10. Dude,
          do you even know what an “Illuminist” is? Do you have any idea what you are talking about. Try listening to Mark Passio for a while. To simply call them “rich asshats” is to completely miss their entire philosophy and religion…..you are pretty dumb…do you know how stupid you are?
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7xIUXQgvE0

        11. Yes they are far more than just a bunch of rich people. They have a very deep esoteric understanding of the dark spirituality of Luciferianism, aka satanism.
          It is no exaggeration to say that our planet is controlled by a small satanic cult.

        12. The point about Jewish family structure is one I’ve never seen made. I’ll give you kudos for that. However, that doesn’t mean what worked for Jewish families in Europe was good for America. Other nationalities left their traditions behind when they came to the US and IMO this one would have been best kept within the Jewish culture.

        13. You also have a lot more American women in the women’s movement than German ones, and more German ones than Chineses.
          This is because, drumroll: you need to be a spoiled brat from middle-class parents to become one.
          Obvious, right? And it’s also no secret that Jews are wealthier and that Americans are wealthier, etc. – so they, on average, produce more spoiled brats.

        14. Peter,
          You are confusing the Jews with the Illuminati Witches. They are two separate and different sects. The majority of Illuminati do not disclose themselves but say they are Christian, Jew, Muslim, Hindu, atheist or any other doctrine.
          You need to look at who is behind those Jewish feminists and who finances them and who pays the big checks.

        15. Do you know what it really means? All it means is a united Germany. Different areas were almost like their own countries and this anthem just meant that Germany above these regional differences. It would be like singing the UNITED States over everything else and regionalism.

        16. “There are so many jewish feminists because western European Jews used to
          have a different family structure than christians. While the men were
          meant to study the Tora women were allowed to work, make money and
          educate themselves.”
          Interesting. So you’re saying that the Jewish wives and mothers were the primary bead winners while the husbands and fathers stayed home studying Torah all day? Most Jews I know come from dual income homes – both moms and dads work outside the home and both study a bit of Torah in their spare time. Basically its just Rabbis who devote full time to religious study while the Rabbetzin also stay home. The family is given donations by the community.

        17. The Illuminati were Free Masons who built a last sect in the 1800s before they got infiltrated by the Jacobson family.
          Please stop calling the Rothschilds Illuminati, they aren’t. They may want to dictate many lives and push their agenda, but again, they are not Illuminati Why would a group of world changing rich people even give a thought of publicizing their name? Making it synonymous with garbage such as rap to make it seem hip and cool?
          No, that’s too short sighted, the same goes for the religion aspect, I think those are tactics to keep you arguing and not seeing the point.
          In the end they are just men, men who make mistakes and will die sooner or later. The real question should be; why isn’t there anybody doing anything?
          And you know why? Because most Americans deep down don’t give a shit.

        18. I personally met and knew Jewish women in the single digits, and yet, they are the ones who are learning the hard way why and how their ilk got used by the English for one millennium and counting.

    2. For better or worse, the pill came out circa 1960 and a seismic shift occurred among those women who were most educated and most secular — women in the West. I agree with you, Peter, that these Sahara theories are feeble and unfounded — a hysterical clutching at straws, as it were. It’s more attractive for angry young men to grasp a fanciful, gynecologically explicit theory than to look at cold hard stats of the last sixty years.

      1. “Angry young men”.
        jesus, you women are so retarded you don’t even know how to troll properly.

        1. Aw, there you go again, Johnny. I’ll throw you an attention bone this once. Now go reread Peter’s post and respond to it.

    3. It is a wise man that says he does not know everything and in fact understands he knows very little. Be wary of one who makes absolute claims, especially impossible ones… ” I know much more about what is going on than any of you do”. You know not who all of us are.

      1. I know that I don’t know everything but I have a good general knowledge and experience to predict what will happen in life if I were to do or not do certain things. I also know what I have but don’t know what I’ll get if I were to change anything. I’m not a gambler and think gambling is stupid so I can’t understand why with a 50% divorce rate any man would marry. People are deluded and always think they’re the exception. No one thinks that they’ll get some fatal disease or get hit by a train. If I were going to sell some shares to someone and told them they had a 50% chance of losing half their money or that the best they could do was break even and retain their money with no gain they would think I was crazy. Assuming that you stay married what benefit did you get out of it?

        1. That actually has no effect on my mood. In fact most men are actually a little depressed after sex.

        2. Maybe you just got a good nights sleep. I guess you really arent such a bad guy after all Boomer.

        3. Like a baby. Besides, I have drugs for everything :o) Take some Xanax and you’ll sleep well and it’s a natural sleep where you can easily be awakened, not like the old barbiturate pills that just drugged you.

        4. I fully agree. I tell my younger associates this repeatedly, over and over, hoping it will cut through the lifetime of the disney impressions.
          I was referring to his broad statement of… “Sooner or later you men are actually going to listen to me because I know much more about what is going on than any of you do.” …and nothing else.

        1. Everything…
          You seem like a highly intelligent guy. When you put yourself on a pedestal and bark at everyone else about how you are so above them you turn them off your message. You’re not a shill are you? Then stop acting like one and exude traits of a true alpha leader. One that by action and words naturally attract followers not repel them.

  14. You forgot to throw in that most women now hitting their 30’s have probably at least one bout with an STD, which if it went untreated for any period of time has huge lasting effects. I would also say a good 1/8 acquired Herpes during their sexually active teens and 20’s. Put on top that a good portion of those women have also had at least one abortion, which despite media lies, also has long lasting effects on a woman’s reproductive tract. No wonder by the age of 35 women en masse are “no longer having casual sex”. They have literally slashed and burned their vagina, uterus, and ovaries. The female reproductive system was not designed to accept hundreds of penises. It was designed to take a few, produce children, then eventually shut down. That is why women can never have sex like men. Their machinery just can’t take it.

    1. “”The female reproductive system was not designed to accept hundreds of penises. It was designed to take a few, produce children, then eventually shut down. That is why women can never have sex like men. Their machinery just can’t take it.””
      Bingo!
      Not just their reproductive systems but their minds. Refer to Roissy’s posts on what the carousel does to a woman’s ability to pair bond with one man.
      For memory I think it was 6 sexual partners and we see a drop of 70%

      1. “Refer to Roissy’s posts on what the carousel does to a woman’s ability to pair bond with one man.”
        This is an important point because it also applies to some men. When I was young I had plenty of offers but I turned them down. The reason being that I figured, even at that young age, that I wanted to be with one woman all my life. And so I wanted to wait for the right one to come along.
        I could best be described as a prudish teenage Christian kid which is exactly what I was. It was no accident that the woman who was the predator who “bagged” me was actually a woman I had known since I was 12 and was the best friend of my “first love” who had turned me down.
        I knew intuitively at that time that if a young lad goes off having sex with lots of different women that it will be very hard to “settle” for the rest of my life with just the one woman. This is why I thought the girls chasing the alphas were so insane….even when I was 16 or so. I knew that any woman who landed such an alpha was asking for trouble.
        Of course, I assumed that the oppose was true as well…that women who have sex with many men will not be able to pair-bond for the rest of their lives….and this turns out to be true for a very good percentage of men and women. I have never done a study on it…but anecdotal evidence tells me that a man or a woman having sex with lots of people when they are young damages their ability to pair bond for the rest of their lives…..and it makes complete sense to me.

        1. Not that we needed proof anyway I might add, men are inherently equipped to know instinctively.

      2. You’re a little pyjama boy naive sex starved nerd who thinks the pussy wears out lol There’s nothing like cocks in a female to keep her pussy in good muscular tone. Even primitive people know this.

        1. lol not her “pussy” that wears out silly. Her mind. The thousand cock stare does not lie.

        2. LOL!
          But you can´t exactly expect Bet…. Gammas and Epsilons Semi-Morons to know that, now can you?

    2. Another unmentioned factor is high estrogen. Both men and women have measurably higher estrogen levels now days. Girls enter puberty at much younger ages. First mensies at 17 was normal 100 years ago and now it’s more like 14. Men have bitch tits and low sperm counts.
      High estrogen is clearly tied to premature aging and cancer.
      Some of this is probably xenoestrogens from industrial chemicals like BPA. A lot of it is from the stress of a shitty diet loaded with PUFAs and also phytoestrogens from garbage like soy. Another known factor in elevated estrogen is psychological stress.
      We have crafted a toxic environment for humans in America.

      1. Right on the toxicity of BPA and xenoestrogens, though high estrogen seems to ameliorate skin aging. Ever wonder why the wall tanks a woman’s looks, or why post-menopause the whole house of cards crumbles?
        (Positive) Estrogen and Premature Aging:
        http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2685269/
        http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3376696/
        Could be xenoestrogens interfering with natural estrogen through competitive inhibition and irreversible lock and key binding to enzymes, or causing lower production of natural estrogen, or both. Interestingly, it seems the mix of both is what does the most harm to cell proliferation.
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenoestrogen#Impact
        http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3643824/
        Ref your claims before making them, else you’re doing a disservice to the scientific credibility of your largely true sentiments.

      2. I agree your article 100%.
        Most American women above 30 are basically asexual or heading that way
        quickly. The worse sex of my life has
        been with American women over 30. It was
        almost unbearable. My last American GF
        had pussy problems and didn’t like sex anymore.
        It hurt whenever we tried to have it.
        Her GFs, that were her age, had pussy problems too. The reason they are having so many sexual
        problem is because they are not using their bodies to have babies. They are working against what nature designed
        their bodies for. Why should women
        produce eggs and be wet if they aren’t going to have kids. This is a biological reason for sex and a sex
        drive. There is no surprise their bodies
        are shutting down prematurely. Glad
        you brought this dirty little fact out into the open. I’ve known it for a long time.

        1. You forgot the twilight moms and all those perverts reading 50 shades of gray.
          Far from lacking a sex drive, they are the female version of what feminists despice in males, the new pigs.

        2. This has been my experience as well. Now they feel free to have casual sex based entirely on superficial attraction. Once they said men were only interested in women for the bodies and not minds. Women now feel free to value a man entirely on his body and his wallet. They engage in semipro prostitution on a regular basis and think they’re evolved and liberated. The go to the bars and clubs and find a guy to buy them drinks while they scout for a sex partner. This is called “finding a sponsor” and is one of the first things a woman does upon arriving at a bar or club. Every trait that a feminist reviles in a man they embrace themselves fully and completely. Feminism was never about equality or liberation. It was about behaving as badly as they want without remorse.

        3. I wouldn´t particulary want to be a young and/or attractive man in a country where feminists have really seized power.
          It would be kinda like 1984, except the human face would be a man´s body and the boot would be a morbidly obese boar. It is not a rape culture if the victim is male.

      3. Part (not all) is better nutrition. 100 years ago, I’d be considered tall, and my father very tall. He’s 6’5″ and I’m 6′. We also have accelerated growth, due to higher health status. You can see the effects in humans and animals. One of the reasons we give antibiotics (a small patch and shots) to animals like cows and pigs is because animals that get them are healthier and grow / mature faster. Humans that are healthier mature faster as well. You can see this in starved or sickly peoples, the less healthy, the slower they mature. That change takes energy.
        The actual arbiter I’ve found (props on the name!) for Sahara Snatch is women that either need pills (e.g. polycystic ovarian syndrome) or women that (off the pill) fall outside the 27-31 day cycle. The pills themselves I’ve not seen having a significant effect.
        Yep, no women know what their cycle will be until they fully mature. 28 days? Just a guideline. More fertile females average a little longer on their cycles. Shorter? Less fertile. Example, two cousins, sisters, that have very different cycles. ‘Fertile Myrtle’ (as her hubby jokingly calls her) could quit taking her pill and be knocked up less than two months later. She has a 31 day cycle, unlike her sister who has a 25 day cycle, and tried for a year before she finally got pregnant. Both were under 28 at first attempt, with the quicker cycle sister starting at 23, the other sister was 27 before she started trying.
        I’ve noticed women that have longer cycles seem to be fertile longer, and thus desire sex longer, matching the writer’s results. Maybe it’s because they burn through their ovaries less quickly? Whatever, I could be wrong, but thanks for calling out the sex drive myth! Last woman my age I dated tried to use baby oil as lube. W T F!
        Why do men divorce their dry 40 yr old wife for 2 – 20 yr old girlfriends? Because the 2 – 20’s enthusiastically put out.

        1. Whoa dude. Way to much info there on menstrual cycles. That is approaching beta-dom.
          There are more interesting things to discuss in this world than how many days these fucking cunts bleed for ok?

        2. The table for squeamish little girls that want to ignore biology class is over at Jezebel. I think they’re group watching Sex and the City reruns.

        3. ” Last woman my age I dated tried to use baby oil as lube.”
          Baby oil is made from mineral oil (gasoline). Food oils like coconut is far healthier.

        4. This would indicate that getting the uterus ready for implantation is a fairly constant amount of time, and the variability is in keeping it good for a few days.

        5. We are taller because we’re consuming more hormones in our diets. We are NOT healthier by a long stretch. We are swimming in a sea of synthetic chemicals and preservatives and have a whole host of new and ever increasing health issues because of it. People are spending more time and capital to be under the care of the health system today than they were 100 years go by a factor of 10. The medical industry only treats symptoms now, not causes. No doctor in the western world would dream of curing you when he can treat you for 25 years instead. 100 years ago you could eat your entire meal with your bare hands. Now you’re asking for food poisoning. We are increasing steadily the number of antibiotic resistant bacteria by the over-use of antibiotics in domestic live stock. The last truely new antibiotic was developed in the 70’s and nothing else since.

        6. 120 years ago people where not that much healthier.
          British governement grew scared with the Boer wars, realizing that 40-60% of those who could be drafted could not meet the basic standards to be soldiers.
          Nothing wrong with synthetic Chemicals and preservatives as such.

        7. Antibiotics = Health
          Oh God, you scare me.
          One of the big (no pun intended) reasons Americans are so tall and gigantic in general is due to all the animal growth hormones they are taking in from the tortured animal meat they consume from mass farming and, possibly, beyond the estrogen intake, the “milk” they drink.
          As Roosh pointed out in an article not so long ago, it’s scary how American chicken meat doesn’t degrade. The standards and self-regulation in the U.S are even more scary than your impression of antibiotics.

        1. Men can feed babies (and some do). We have milk ducts too. Its science. Google it. Some Indian widower made global news feeding his baby.

    3. At 35 they’re face planting into the wall so hard that they are in a hurry to hook a beta. Now it’s not casual sex, it’s hook a sucker sex. Hook that beta into marriage to (maybe) get a babby and a wallet.
      The rest, fark yeah.

    4. “The female reproductive system was not designed to accept hundreds of
      penises. It was designed to take a few, produce children, then
      eventually shut down.”
      Precisely.
      If her womb receives sperm from too many sexual partners her immune system will develop antibodies against human sperm cells. Once she reaches this point of no return her immune system will fight and routinely kill any sperm cells arriving in her womb, in the same manner it kills infectious disease germs and various microbes, thus rendering her completely sterile. This immune system response happens regardless of whether she’s at menopause or not. She will wonder why doctors keep telling her that she’s fertile but she can’t conceive.

    5. If feminists seized power, you would discover real quick how much sex drive they have, when the rape of men becomes legalized…
      Instead of a human face getting stomped forever, it would be a man´s body getting abused endlessely by a morbidly overweight pig.

  15. no lubricating cream? really? “disgusting fetishes”? the author sound prudish and dried up himself.

    1. You again. Listen woman if your unable to see his point, the bigger picture and the damage already done maybe you should just move along. This place is probably not for you.
      btw I bet you thought you were bringing down the authors walls of credibility with that little barb. Thinking “gosh I’m so clever and snarky”

    2. Why would a healthy woman need lubricating cream?
      Only thing I bring the lube out for is when I’m paving that dirt road, but usually a few dips in the gravy boat is enough, just gotta transfer the grool from the front to the back.

      1. I have pretty much always used lube. But then most all of the pussies I fucked were so small, young and tight I pretty much needed it to get it in.
        You dont need lube for American chicks.
        You just need to strap a board to your ass to keep from falling in the hole.

  16. This article elegantly and expertly answers the question of why 50%+ of marriages end in divorce. Sahara snatch, Darwinian dead-end indeed. Brilliant writing, @David.

    1. I’m witnessing this up close on a daily basis. The majority of married man i know are extremely sexually frustrated. A few of them are planning to push the eject button as soon as the kids are 18, the rest just give up and rube one out every weekend. Poor bastards.

      1. And look at the older gentlemen that are not married / in relationships. Relaxed, fit, happy, enjoying life. See them at the gym all the time.
        Women are bad for your health. Females are the human equivalent of a carcinogen for men.

        1. Do you know that a confirmed bachelor like myself looks 20+ years younger than my age? No one regardless of whether young or old has been able to guess my age. It’s probably just genetic because a lot of people in my family live to old ages and still look fairly good but I still think that marriage and kids do wear men out. And the fact that they likely don’t get much sex. I do notice that whenever I’m with some married guy that he’s looking at all the pussy while I hardly notice it so apparently he’s not shagging his wife. I didn’t become a bachelor for any reason, I’ve just always been one which is odd since everyone in my family was married 50+ years until one died. It just never appealed to me to always have a female around and having to compromise on even the most trivial things.I could also see that the novelty of having a wife would wear off and that I’d not find her sexually attractive very quickly. Men and women have nothing in common aside from sex (reproduction) and living together can only be annoying even with the best woman. Anyway there’s no shortage of young females around and if I get too old for that I’ll take up opium smoking for my old age. It’s a lot better than wiping some old lady’s arse in a hospital bed and I’ll still have all of my money :o)

        2. I am like you. I too looked far, far younger than my age. I was still getting “carded” at bars and liquor stores until I was about 37 years old. I still look really young at 56 and people cant believe my age sometimes but its not as pronounced as it was before. Seems like around 50 the gap started closing. Probably job stress I guess. I smoked a lot of weed from 15 years old to age 37 when I gave it up, and that contributed I feel to a very low-stress life which helped a lot.
          Its amazing some of the men I talk to that are my age are fucking shot. Mentally and physically. I feel bad for them but what can you do. Im in great shape, full head of hair, fit, eat healthy, with no health issues.
          Women are hazardous to your health.

        3. You’re a wise man. It’s nice to have a couple of kids and help them along in life, but as for a wife, you’re much better off with a dog.

        4. It’s nice to have a couple of kids
          How do you know? Kids are generally a problem even the good ones. And besides, you don’t miss what you’ve never had.

        5. How do I know? Because I have a couple of kids and because their parents are great so are they! Sure, you don’t miss what you’ve never had, but life is great with them, that’s all I know!

        6. OK but as I said you don’t miss what you never had. And you never know what you’ll get or how they’ll turn out. If your kids are young you don’t know what will happen at puberty when the hormones kick in.

        7. The same can be said the other way around – multiple psychological studies have shown that unmarried women live longer and age better. These same studies actually say that the opposite is true for men, so where are you getting your information?

  17. All of the above and not to mention the fact that there is extremelt little I can talk about with an American female. Their minds are so far out there in la-la land it is ludicrous.
    Just look at some of their comments on this blog. They live on a completely different planet. American women have socially drifted so far apart from men at this stage I dont think we can ever bring it back.

  18. Older women are not hornier, they’re just more desperate, so they will openly and aggressively seek sex. They will sand your dick in the process too.

    1. I’m glad someone said this. There is some overlap in male and female sexual proclivity, but more than anything else, sex is about control for women. Hence in their fit of egocentrism they assume it’s the same for men. Most women don’t feel safe/secure unless men are around and sex is the candy on the gingerbread house that lures men in. The less attractive a woman is to men, the more likely she is to put out (barring any mental handicaps). The older a woman gets, the less attractive she is. It blows my mind that this isn’t obvious.

      1. On another note, the feeling most men call love isn’t appropriate to men either. Sure most men need something to protect, but few men tap into this impulse. Instead, what most men call love seems to be correlated with their status and mate value. The more attractive you are, the less likely you are to fall under that illusion (share your ideals – of settling down and taking care of children – with a woman). Men of “low value” (or some gay men) are far more likely to pretend/deceive themselves into settling down and taking care of children. What most people call love is only weakness – low mate value appropriate to whatever your gender. And the love of 90%-97% of women is just that, weakness.

        1. Interesting. So the stunningly handsome alpha males that you see with the beautiful wives and cute kids are truly the dumbfuck betas that bought into the whole “love” bullshit hook, line and sinker. Trapped by the cunning females due to their good looks.
          Its amazing how many of these handsome douchebags will be broken men in their fifties when their cunt wives divorce them and steal half their 401ks. Then they will find themselves in the position as the undesirable losers they really are.
          Hahaha.

    2. Remember the 6 Million Jews that died… on the 1910s, 1920s, 1930s, and apparently WWII… It seems “6 Million Jews” died quite often…

  19. I’d love to see a ROK article on the “fit over 40” article that is in every womans magazine where women who still look had decent at 40 show off bikini pictures.
    Solipsistic readers see this article and think “well I’ll still look great at 40, I can keep riding the carousel.”
    But great looks and Sahara snatch are about as useful as a Ferrari with no engine. Players know this.

  20. “What is causing this bizarre problem of Sahara Snatch? My theories:”
    Two other points that need to be included:
    1. Stress. Western women are absolutely stressed the hell out. Guess what…chasing feminist utopia requires a lot of time and energy.
    2. Too much mastrubation. Western media encourages sexual overindulgence. Like most things moderation is key. Overindulgence desensitizes the sexual organs. Ejaculating twice or thrice a week should be more than enough.

  21. Something else that needs to be addressed is massive increase in birth defects occurring lately in the Western world. Studies clearly show that the later a woman has a child, the more likely it is to be defective in some way. Think autism (600% increase over the last generation in California alone). Basically, women should not be having children past the age of 25. Oh well. Leave it to a worn out narcissistic bag like Jenny McCarthy to take up the cause of anti-vaccination insanity because she’s too self absorbed to admit that it’s her fault her son is fucked up. Like a typical woman she claims it’s everybody else’s fault for the misfortune she has brought on herself. Anyways, welcome to the new age as the West is overrun with home grown genetically inferior half-wits.

    1. Autism didn’t exist as a separate condition years ago. Autism was merely a Sign of some form of mental retardation(a general category of diseases that effected intelligence and emotional, behavioral disorders)
      I think that it was invented because people did not want to believe their kid was retarded and wanted to blame the symptoms on something else eg. vaccines, fluoride etc or some other nonsense. If that were the case then there should have been more “autism” years ago because the US was a lot more polluted and there was a lot more crap in food and the environment than today (stuff that has been banned) These “autistic” kids would have just been classified as retarded. The fact that 1 in a million can play the piano or remember a gazillion numbers like Rainman means nothing but that a part of their brain controlling this may still work normally. Even Rainman couldn’t survive outside a protected environment.

      1. Come on. The definition of autism has been around since 1943. The increase in California has come in the last 20 years or less. Oh and by the way. Rainman was the mispronunciation of Raymond, Tom Cruise’s character. You do realize that was a fictional movie, right?

        1. I can see that when I write something I’m going to have to keep it much simpler and not assume that you 20 something pyjama boys know anything and may also have to define some words for you.
          Autism, as I said, was a sign of mental retardation. A SIGN is what the physician observes( a symptom is what a patient complains of) The word autism was used in medicine but not for a distinct disease entity but only as one of the signs of retardation.
          I used Rainman because I knew that readers would know which film I was referring to. The film may have been partly fictionalised but it was based on an actual person. They changed a few things, like the character in real life did not live at a psychiatric institute etc

        2. I’ve heard of cases of non-autistic children become autistic immediately after the vaccination, so no re-classification of a diagnosis can convince me that vaccines are not a cause of some health problems.

    2. http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/08/autism.mother.age.risks/
      http://www.webmd.com/brain/autism/news/20100208/autism-risk-rises-with-mothers-age
      Of course you’re taking the information out of context and blaming it solely on older women for having children, when mother’s age is said by experts to only be responsible for 5% of the increase.
      Not to mention, any medical expert will say 35 is the cutoff age for all these birth defects, not 25. MRAs and guys that frequent this site say 25 to justify their ageism against women. If you only want to bang girls under 25, that’s fine, but call a spade a spade. Don’t pretend it has anything to do with fertility. The difference in fertility, as well as incidences of birth defects, between 20 and 34 is generally negligible.
      Also, the father’s sperm deteriorates with age as well, possibly just as much as the mother’s eggs. Meaning if women should not wait to have children, neither should men.
      Women over 35 should not necessarily be trying to have kids, but what happens if she gets pregnant accidentally? Should she be forced to have an abortion just because you would consider her kid to be genetically inferior?
      The one woman I know who has an autistic child, had him at 23. She had another at 25 who has Marfan’s syndrome. The age of the mother has much, much less to do with birth defects than a lot of MRAs would like to believe.
      BTW, Thomas Edison’s mother was 37 when she had him. And there is NO doubt that he accomplished more in his life than any of the men on this site could ever hope to.

    3. Jenny McCarthy was TWENTY NINE when she had her son. So now 29 is too old to have kids?
      What’s your reason for being fucked up? What did your mother do wrong raising you?
      If you want to see a genetically inferior half-wit, all you need to do is look in the mirror.

  22. “The preference for porn over real women”
    That is exactly the problem. There are no “real women” in the west any more. You have “failed wanna-be men” in the west. It was not until I started dating eastern european woman that I even realised what a “real woman” was like. I was too young to know these things when I started dating Jennifer. I was 20.
    When I started dating the woman who went on to become my fav#1? She could have come from another planet. When I was spending time with my fav#3? I was simply astonished. “THIS is what woman are supposed to be like?” I used to say to myself. Shaking….my….head.
    And since REAL MEN are not afraid of showing their feelings? When my fav#3 and I split? I actually sat down and shed a tear. I actually cried. Why? Because I knew that the chances of ever meeting another woman like that, and being so close as that, is very unlikley for me for the remainder of my life.
    Don’t get me wrong…I was not “sorry”….We dated for about 20 months. We were quite clear I was her “practice husband” because I was too old for her. We knew that when we struck that deal. But I can tell you the days we spent together were some of the loveliest days of my life. Only fav#1 has the title over her.
    How sad that 23 years with the woman I loved so dearly does not have days in it that are even in the same ball park as many of days I spent with my fav#1 and 3. Western women reading this are very well advised to take note of that comment.
    The other 4 favs I have had are not shabby either. Every woman I have dated in the last 6 years rates higher than my ex-wife simply because my ex was “feminised”.
    Men in the west going for western women? You are digging a barrel full of rotten apples looking for the one that is not spoiled. Guess what? They are rare.
    I will tell you men this…I was just on facebook IM talking to the ONLY western woman I call a friend now. We met back in 1986. She immediately struck me as an interesting and intelligent woman when I met her. We met in admin school at IBM.
    Our kids are the same age. Jennifers sister Kerry used to look after her kids as well as our kids when both Jennifer and this woman was working at IBM. After 28 years at IBM she has recently finished up.
    I know THOUSANDS of western women….THOUSANDS. And this is the ONLY woman who I know from the west that I call my friend. She IMed me because it is my birthday tomorrow. How about that? She is the ONLY western woman who wishes me happy birthday every year, without fail, as I do her.
    We were just laughing and joking over the IM how we have known each other for so long and seen so many different experiences of life and shared them…..we are “great mates” as Australians say. What a shame I have only ONE such woman from the west in my life, eh?

  23. Good article but your number one cause isn’t accurate.
    ‘Low fat’ ‘ Sugar- and grain-heavy’ diets are followed by the people of some of the most fertile regions on Earth (South-East Asia & East Africa).
    The other reasons are pretty legit.
    Women consuming synthetic hormones daily via ‘The Pill’ is bound to have major negative effects on the endocrine system, much like when a man injects test without a PCT.

    1. In that case, women should be more fertile and horny than ever. Sugar+grain increase has skyrocketed since 1990, meat consumption plummeted.
      Modern American grains are materially different and consumed in much greater quantities than anybody else. I personally recommend the paleo diet for good hormonal health.

      1. That’s false.
        Sugar consumption has been declining since the late 1990s: http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/94/3/726.full
        Meat consumption in the US has massively increased from 89.2kg per person in 1962 to 124.8kg in 2002.
        http://www.theguardian.com/environment/datablog/2009/sep/02/meat-consumption-per-capita-climate-change
        Most of the leading figures in the Paleo movement, (such as Mark Sisson and Dave Asprey) are using some form of synthetic testosterone (or TRT).
        A healthy diet would not require roids to function properly.

        1. Your article talked about sugar as a condiment. Utterly irrelevant. Total sugar intake has skyrocketed.

        2. “Since the 1970’s, sugar consumption has gone down nearly 40% [NOTE: Mean cane sugar]. But high fructose corn syrup has more than made up the difference.” -60 Minutes.
          Also not counted as “sugar”? Honey, syrup, soda, cookies, etc.

        3. You totally ignore the fact that the data just completely disproved your claim of declining meat intake in America.
          The decline-sugar article link is quite relevant, given that the bulk of Western sugar intake come from added sugars.
          Youtube videos are entertainment. Try reading if you like facts.

        4. I did my nutrition research three years back. This led me to the paleo diet, which has been a Godsend to my hormones and energy levels.
          I have no interest in getting into a PubMed link war with you. I owe you nothing, and honestly I think you’re a phony, anyway. If I had the interest in carrying on with a phony, I could dig up plenty of articles.
          The bottom line: You (claim to) concur with the US government: grains and sugar are good and meat and fat are bad. Excellent. God bless. Do your thing and rock on!
          Conversely, I concur with Robb Wolf, Mark Sisson, John Durant, and all the research I did back in 2011 that saturated fat and dietary cholesterol are great for you. This man’s story is pretty much the exact same as my own (we even look kind of the same)
          http://www.marksdailyapple.com/complete-recovery-within-a-week/#more-11416

        5. The increasing meat consumption link was not a ‘PubMed’ link, it was a cold, hard stat from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – which clearly showed you were making false claims.
          You initiated by replying, posted some promo Youtube videos- yet when challenged to provide sources, you claim to be above such pursuits.
          Good luck with your diet, seriously, but if you are going to give advice to strangers at least try to back it up with a legit source..

        6. Why do you hate doctors? Why do you hate ’60 Minutes’? I linked to a YouTube video about a doctor on ’60 Minutes’, and you’ve reacted with rage and anger. Very bizarre.
          Great that you have a belief that meat consumption has gone up. False. It’s flatlined….and beef and red meat (the healthiest kind) had PLUMMETED from 72 lbs/annum per capita in 1980 to 58 lbs. That’s http://www.beefusa.org/CMDocs/BeefUSA/Resources/Statistics/annualpercapitaconsumption-meat-boneless491.pdf
          Here’s another:
          “Meat consumption in the US has been on the decline for nearly a decade. …. Volume
          sales through these outlets (supermarkets, drug stores, and mass merchandisers) in millions of pounds have gone down overall from 2008 to
          2012 with decreases in all but two of the meat categories and in one of
          the two poultry categories.”
          -Market Research firm Packaged Facts
          -http://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Markets/Is-the-decline-in-US-meat-consumption-terminal
          So! Red meat consumption has plummeted…and so have testosterone levels: https://www.endocrine.org/news-room/press-release-archives/2006/testosterone_lvls_in_men_decline
          Your solution….cut MORE red meat! Logical. Is your goal to make men into women? To make white women sterile? I believe that is your goal.
          My solution, cut the things that postively correlate. Here again is the great Dr. Robert Lustig on ’60 MInutes’.

        7. Here’s something that may shock you; TV aint real.
          Mainstream television will say whatever its biggest financial backers want it to.
          ’60 minutes’ is widely regarded as a joke, produced for dementia-ridden Baby Boomers. See the reaction to their ridiculous recent hack-job on Ed Snowden
          Also, nice changing of the goal posts.
          First you say meat consumption has plummeted.
          Then UN data shows it has actually risen by two thirds.
          Then you change it to just ‘red meat’. What next?
          You’re clutching at straws.

        8. Now Dr. Robert Lustig doesn’t exist? He’s a hologram? Dude, you’re so tiresome.
          You (claim to) agree with the US government’s diet edicts. Once again: Great! God bless!
          Conversely, I think that the decrease in meat consumption and boost in grain and sugar consumption are to blame for obesity, fertility, and hormonal epidemics in the U.S., and therefore I do basically the opposite of what the government say. It’s been a Godsend for me.

        9. One thing to note is that they had government committee of doctors and professionals go through 16,000 studies and came to their conclusions with some of them initially being against high fat low carb:
          “The switch in dietary advice followed the publication of a two-year study by the independent Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. The committee reviewed 16,000 studies published through May 31, 2013.”

        10. I like the “sledgehammer” work out he talks about. I had to bust up some very deep concrete footings a couple summers ago and smashing concrete with a sledgehammer for a few hours straight is an amazing workout.

      2. Yeah… the Pill is the #1 culprit in my book. Unlike food, the Pill messes directly with a woman’s hormones. Anybody who insists otherwise is on something.

        1. A girl I’m seeing (who’s an insatiable lover right now) did tell me that when she was on the pill, her sex drive plummeted. So there probably is more than a little truth to that.

      3. Also, Robb Wolf in his own words in 2011, several years on Paleo:
        “My biosignature showed high Cortisol, insulin resistance and the testosterone levels of an 80 year old. Woman.”
        http://robbwolf.com/2011/01/24/my-training-at-39/
        Guys like him are internet marketers. As you can see in the linked article, Wolf is all about selling supplements (‘OrthAdapt 3’ ‘Tribulus’) to the gullible.

  24. Respectfully, you forgot to mention antidepressants and anti-anxiety drugs. Many of them are known to kill libido dead. Given the number of women who take these on a regular basis, I’m not surprised that so many women suffer from sexual dysfunction.

    1. B I N G O ! ! ! This is a large cause of “sexual dysfunction”: the antidepressants and anti-anxiety drugs (amongst other things) are essentially reverse Viagra for females.

    2. Remember the 6 Million Jews that died: on the 1910s, 1920s, 1930s, and apparently WWII. It seems “6 Million Jews” died quite often.

  25. For you younger fellas who have never partaken in an older woman, don’t let this article cause you to totally write them off as great casual romps. Take them on a case by case basis, because some (an ever decreasing number as time goes on, sadly) may have passed through their teen years and 20’s without offering free parking to every cock that passed their way. You have to remember that it was a lot more common for them to settle down and get married early in life than it is now. Doesn’t make them any more suitable for relationships- they are recently divorced and trolling the bar for a reason, but less apt to waste time when it comes to getting validation out of your pants.

    1. “Take them on a case by case basis, because some (an ever decreasing number as time goes on, sadly) may have passed through their teen years and 20’s without offering free parking to every cock that passed their way.”…
      Lol….

    2. Some can be quite fit but I guess that’s all genetic but you have to remember that a female in her early 40’s won’t be the same in a few years even if she’s that 1 in a 1000 who still looks ok now. She may also be a widow if she was married to an older man when young and may have some $$$

  26. To tell you the truth. I dont even feel like fucking, I much rather have them just suck my dick. I keep telljng this slut(who btw I banged after the first date) that Im just her FB but she is convinced Im the Boyfriend who will rescue her banged out divorced ass. Any takers?

  27. I will say straight out I agree the ‘sex and the city’ myth is a crock of shit. Barring those few who were blessed with really good genetics and took great care of themselves, most women crash after 40. Some do so sort of gracefully, while others hit the wall harder than the Titanic meeting the iceberg.
    However, your experience that a lot of women just starting their 30s are doing so, sounds a bit extreme to me. I don’t know, maybe it’s also a cultural / geographical factor. But I’ve been with several women in their 30s (I’m almost 40 myself) who were still extremely sexual and good lovers. I haven’t seen this sahara pussy epidemic so far. I do hope if this is a real trend it doesn’t pick up, cos it doesn’t bode well at all.

    1. This article applies more to western, feminist, ango saxon women.
      Latin and mediterranean women live healthier lives and hit the wall more gracefully.
      An ango saxon women who has rode the carrousel since 14, taken drugs, tobacco and alcohol in abundance, coupled with the genetics of the white race, produces Sahara Snatches even at 27.
      The cougars from sex and the city indulged themselves in exerise, healthy eating and had a far healthier life than most women in the world, and henceforht, had some sex drive in their 40s.

    2. “…while others hit the wall harder than the Titanic meeting the iceberg.” I just spit coffee all over my screen. CLASSIC!!!

  28. You are right. That 45 year old pussy was as dry as sandpaper, shredded my damn condom to pieces. I thought it was me…nope.

    1. I know what you mean. I had one who was 35 who I couldn’t get it in. I had to use this stuff she had called “Joy Gel” and it was ok after that. But it was easier popping a virgin’s cherry which is really not even a problem.

  29. The funny thing is, the older a woman is, the more arrogant she is. I mean christ, do women not understand basic economics? Old pussy = low value. You do not go around trying to sell low value crap at a high value price.
    See pic below

    1. The girl on the left is a dingbat. She’s supposed to put that whipped cream on my dick not herself.

      1. And I hope for her sake it’s low-fat. Last thing you want is putting whipped cream on your dick. She goes down looking like Rosie Hungtington-Whitely…. and comes up looking Rosie O-Donell.

    2. The older woman on the right looks dignified and pleasant. Like a woman her age, any age, should look. She is not a porn model. She is in an ad meant to represent ordinary people – mothers and grandmothers, probably an ad for a multi-vitamin or something. She’s not trying to sell herself.
      The woman on the left is a porn model and is not representing “quality” of character. She’s representing body and phishing for compliments from young men who are at least as physically appealing as she is. That’s her target demographic.
      So be it.

    3. Apparently, it’s because someone isn’t “allowing” it. This kind lady stepped up to illustrate your point, nicely: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/16/women-not-allowed-grow-old-erotically
      The “Comment is Free” section is a goldmine of such drivel. One of the articles provided me with one of my favourite feminist quotes:
      “I want my hypothetical daughters to be able to eat out and shop and live in peace, without the unsolicited company of violently penetrated vaginas, and that includes the two-dimensional ones.”

  30. Wow, this is a great article. Might be the best thing I’ve ever read on the site. Bravo for such a well-researched yet entertaining piece. I think ROK should rerun this piece every few months with whatever new info comes along (studies, anecdotes) to keep this out there.

  31. Ironically older women tend to think their opinion amounts to something, and they have to tell the rest of us what they think, whether we want to hear it or not.
    In my peculiar little world, cryonics attracts relatively few women. It acts like “female Kryptonite” for complicated reasons, mainly because women don’t see cryonics (yet) as a space where high status males congregate, despite the stereotype that only millionaires can afford it. But the few women it does attract I would characterize as airheads and scolds on the sterile side of 30. I dislike going to gatherings of cryonicists where I have to listen to these broads mouth off, especially the ones who have nothing better to draw upon in their minds than the combination of liberal-feminist ideology and popular culture.

  32. I’m a 60 year old male. The last three women I’ve banged were all in their 50’s and had very wet pussies. Maybe you’re doing it wrong.

    1. Why am I not surprised the bigger picture is totally lost on a baby boomer. Let me guess, you were a “hope & change” supporter cause of the feeeeeels?

    2. You’re a liar. Women over 50’s poosies are so dry, they tear, break open and bleed just from wiping. It’s called low to no estrogen.
      Maybe you should read Jizzabel. They’re more your speed, crusty old man.

      1. That may not be true because they’re usually so loose that they don’t tear. The wetness may have just been incontinence at their age lol

    3. Please man, i just puked in my mouth. Spare us the details…just say; “I ‘ve banged some elderly ladies/women” or something of the like. I’ve you’re active in that age group just don’t mention the age. The mental visualization of three sexually active women in their 50’s messes me up.

  33. I wonder if hormones in food products that kick-start female puberty early are partially contributing to women running dry by the time they’re 35.
    I’ve had some of the same experiences, I don;t call women back who duck the cock so I haven’t had some of the long-term dramas. But some of the weird, dramatic, shame-filled tearful ass I have gotten from the “vintage” crowd seems like they’re willing to slut it up only on the off-chance that some man is going to finally take them home from the clearance rack….

  34. Older housewife here. I can attest that this article is true. Hormones are a strange thing, and they are stacked against us despairingly as we watch ourselves get older.
    The desire greatly diminishes. Although I’m not going through early menopause, I’m still having normal periods and not yet suffering from sandpaper snatch, I’m just not as sexually charged as I used to be. And that’s okay, these are the stages of life women are supposed to go through.
    It’s sad that this false notion of MILFing and old lady “sex appeal” is being propagated at every turn. Older single women have absolutely nothing to offer younger men. They are forlorn basket cases – that’s why they’re old and still single. Nobody wants them, even older single men.
    The “cougar” phenomenon should be a laughing stock erring on being a crime against humanity. It’s just another form of assault on marriage and family. And the biggest victims are the women themselves. They are a miserable, alcoholic, desperate, medicated, lonely lot. And they don’t even get to be beautiful anymore, they get to be invisible

    1. “The “cougar” phenomenon should be a laughing stock erring on being a
      crime against humanity. It’s just another form of assault on marriage
      and family. And the biggest victims are the women themselves. They are a
      miserable, alcoholic, desperate, medicated, lonely lot. And they don’t
      even get to be beautiful anymore, they get to be invisible”
      If they are cougars they are not invisible. Its the ones who don’t cougar it up that are invisible. But I know a lot of senior citizen women, divorced or widowed, and they are not looking for a relationship. Those that are mostly date old men their own age but even then, they don’t want to live with them or marry them, they are happy having their own homes, own space and privacy and quiet time finally after many years of raising kids (and often grandchildren) and having a husband constantly at their side. At most they are open to having an old man activity partner (golf, movies, whatever) but they like to return home alone to their quiet, clean and peaceful apartment or condo.
      I think more Americans would do well to learn the art of not feeling lonely when alone. Detachment, meditation and a spiritual practice is great for that. We’re getting there as a culture, slowly. Dare I say the internet can even help in that direction.

      1. “Its the ones who don’t cougar it up that are invisible.”
        Only to guys looking to bang. To their families, loved ones, friends that they spend time with, people in their lives they value – to the ones who matter to them, they are not invisible at all. They are very much there.

        1. This could be said of any unmarried woman who doesn’t sleep around – although this article and many of the comments try to devalue any of these women who are over 25.

    2. Tell that to Nica Noelle. She’s cashed in big time on the whole “Mrs. Robinson” fantasy, though to be fair, she often shows older men with younger women as well. The latter scenario, however, is way more realistic than the former.

    3. Remember the 6 Million Jews that died… on the 1910s, 1920s, 1930s, and apparently WWII. It seems “6 Million Jews” died quite often.

  35. A well argued and coherent piece. Can we have more of these than 10 ways for this and 15 ways for that of 5 reasons for shit

  36. You are just a bunch of guys that don`t know how to satisfy a woman!!!! How can you just blame it on women.. Why don`t you think about what women need and maybe you have a little more success!! Women are not machines that will just have sex with you any time your penis is hard. Thankfully, it takes more than that. Too bad you haven`t figured that out.

  37. Also, American`s best kept secret is tons of asexual guys trying to convince everyone it`s because women are not into it when the truth is, they are the ones with issues.

    1. Stop trolling. You keep rattling off mutually contradicting posts, claiming you’re a young man in one, an old housewife in another, and now the keeper of “America’s best kept secrets” in a third.
      You will be banned.

    2. Why don’t you regale us with your story of “that time” you offered an “asexual guy” sex, and his ultimate refusal. I mean come on everybody has heard that one right?
      Either you are not attractive or the guy doesn’t want to get caught cheating. End of story.
      You know I am really starting to think this site is onto something, just by the sheer amount of feminist trolls that come here to post. Where there is smoke there is fire.

  38. It is so funny to see how women do not understand that we do not want to hear their opinion around here. Not because we are butt-hurt losers, but because we sincerely do not care.
    But they are just coming back again and again.
    “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
    Albert Einstein

    1. They are alpha male attention whores. See, a woman doesn’t care if you love or hate her. All they care about is ATTENTION. Now, this is the exact same way that CHILDREN think. Women never mature past the mental age of 12.
      It is men’s indifference which truly terrifies women.

      1. This is an understandable behavior , in caveman times no attention from males=no protection=certain death.
        The problem is, they are doing it wrong. They should post sexy pictures. My attention to their words is null.

  39. A girl can be really horny and wet and lube still makes sex much more comfortable for everyone…it’s not a substitute for arousal.

  40. Great post. It’s rare to read a new idea in the manosphere, but this concept hasn’t really been articulated before to my knowledge, and it may well be an important background factor in our increasingly sick society.

    1. The fact that American women enjoy vibrators and cats far more than men has been infinitely “been articulated” in the manosphere.

  41. Generally true. Women are being sold a lie.
    It’s worse than we’re told by the likes of Jezebel: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr051.pdf
    It’s a combination of factors I think, largely chemical. Primarily the Pill, especially if taken from a young age (so the body never acclimatizes to womanly hormone cycles) and over years at a time before motherhood (which it was never designed for). Diet comes in next, the huge alcohol consumption and cigarettes drive away plenty of required nutrition. Lack of sleep, generally not taking care of oneself, failure to get regular checkups for ‘harmless’ STDs like HPV. It could be additives, some of which cause infertility in rat trials, but that’s yet unproven in humans.
    I keep trying to tell women about ovarian reserves but most are lost causes. Probably wouldn’t have made good mothers anyway. Click on Figures on the left: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0008772#s2
    I would add, to counterbalance, men’s sperm quality begins to decline from ~40, so if you want the best possible offspring (less mental illness etc) you’ll need to consider your own fertility in tandem with your wife.

    1. It’s the woman. Men even at 80 have fathered healthy kids and in fact the kids seem to be even smarter when the father is older. If he had low sperm counts the woman wouldn’t even get pregnant. And all of the things that you mentioned rarely mean anything, it’s entirely just ageing in the woman that causes her problems.The oldest case that I could find where a female has had sex, got pregnant and given birth naturally was 47, and that’s a world record. You do get females who have kids in their early 40’s and rare ones at 44-45 but all of them had kids previously. Getting pregnant for the first time just before your body is about to give out is not good.

      1. I was explaining dysfunction. Namely, why ever younger women who shouldn’t be having problems, suddenly find what should come naturally to be almost impossible.
        There is no control when it comes to such quality. As in, you might think that an 80 year old man has fathered a healthy child, but if he’d sired it with 20 year old sperm it would’ve been healthier, and that is the point, a general awareness.

        1. There’s no proof that sperm deteriorates with age and in fact men keep producing new healthy sperm into old age.The man would have to be very old or sick before his sperm would be effected. Of course delivering it into her pussy may be a problem if he’s very old.

  42. Ever consider that these women you’re talking about aren’t all dried up, but just unable to become aroused BY YOU? Maybe you’re just the male equivalent of a boner-killer.
    Oh, and a woman who doesn’t sleep with you right away or want to have casual sex isn’t “dried up” – she’s just not being a slut. The fact that you deride sluts and still expect women to sleep with you on the first date shows your incredible stupidity.

        1. Blow it in your own mouth – I’m sure you’ll enjoy it so much you’ll realize you’d rather have that than pussy.

        2. Wait: I thought you old women were at your “sexual peak”, so you should love it when a guy’s offering to cum on you.

        3. Biologically impossible. I shoot my muck through my ample cock….8 inches and thick. That’s all I’m telling. Go back to your thumb tack bitch boy and enjoy his lack o girth. Baby…..

    1. So unless we men are willing to fuck older women, we are just a bunch of losers?
      Fuck off grandma. I’ll stick to the under-25 aged women, thank you.

      1. Yeah, seriously doubt that they would want you. And I’m not a grandma just because I think this article is idiotic. Retard.

        1. Your tone suggests you’re a bitter grandma who hit the wall. Feel free to post some pictures of yourself to prove us wrong.

      2. And it has nothing to do with who you want to sleep with, it has to do with being a prick and making a fool of yourself while doing so.
        Women reach their sexual peaks in their mid 30s. It’s biology. No amount of ranting by a bitter loser is going to change that.

        1. NO. Women do NOT “reach their sexual peak in their mid 30s”. That’s a LIE you need to tell yourself and hope that other morons will buy it. By 35, stick a fork in you. you’re DONE.

        2. Again, biological FACTS are not going to change just because *you* don’t want them to be true. Who has more credibility, biology textbooks or some random guy who frequents manosphere blogs? Not to mention older women who are now in their 50s or 60s who actually recall wanting more sex with their husbands once they hit about 35, even if they were done having children.
          How do you know what a 35 year old woman thinks? Are you a mind reader?
          Biology and medicine state that you can stick that fork in men once their in their 30s, not women. Deal with it.

        3. lol. What “biology textbooks” say that women reach their “sexual peak” in their 30’s.
          Hollywood movies ≠ “biololgy textbooks”.
          Repeating lies with your bitter hatred doesn’t magically turn them into truths.

        4. Um…the biology textbooks that I read in college.
          The truth is the truth. You just want to believe that it’s a Hollywood myth because you’re so insecure about t your inability to get it up that you want to believe that women have a similar problem.l
          “Repeating lies with your bitter hatred doesn’t magically turn them into truths.”
          The EXACT same thing can be said to you. Except that in your case, they actually are lies, and you actually are bitter.

        5. Right, right, right, right.
          So, still waiting on the “biology textbooks”. We’re talking biology and evolution, you’re responding with hysterical lies.
          No more personal anecdotes and unfalsifiable claims. Just link to clinical studies (or biology textbooks with them) showing that pussies get wetter as women become more sterile. Show us this.
          http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr051.pdf

        6. Explain exactly how a woman peaks by her mid 30s. Women peak in their late teens maybe 26-27. By age 30, you have lost over 90% of your eggs. So what use is a mid 30s woman if she can’t have kids? The main function of sex is reproduction. The later a woman has kids, the more likely the child is going to have some sort of a defect. And you call that peaking?

        7. You clearly have no argument. Here’s a thought. Instead of using insults, how about stating facts and backing it up with sources. I guess they don’t teach that in school anymore.

        8. • “How do you know what a 35 year old woman thinks? Are you a mind reader?”
          Of course I’m not a mind reader. Don’t be silly. I don’t need to be. I just need to show sexual interest in a 35+ year old woman and she will come right out and say she is flattered.

          DEAL with it.

        9. “Instead of using insults, how about stating facts and backing it up with sources.”
          Funny how *I’m* the one being insulting, when the entire article is just a long bitter rant devoid of any real facts.

        10. You’re the ones being vulgar and showing your bitterness, and I’m the hysterical one…riiiiiight.
          You’re not talking biology and evolution…you’re talking trash and speculating based on what you want to believe. Huge difference.
          I’ve read it in multiple biology and psychology textbooks, and I’m not going to go through old textbooks to provide citations. If you want proof, go to a library. If you want to go on believing what you believe, go ahead. Maybe I should just let you live in your ignorance/bliss, so you can feel better about your own increasing inability to get it up.

        11. Still waiting for these mythical “biology textbooks”.
          Until you can find these Bigfoot-like tomes, stop your hysterical whining and pathological lying.

        12. So again, you have no argument with facts and logic. your argument is insults and typical feminist shaming language. Word of advice, no one is going to take you seriously when all you’re saying is “you’re just bitter and angry”. That’s not an argument.

        13. How do you know what a 35 year old woman thinks? Are you a mind reader?
          I know everything a female thinks and what she will do in any situation. It’s all based on their subconscious instincts and all females (unless they are insane) are pretty predictable.A lot of young men can’t figure out what makes a female tick because their behaviour seems so erratic (that’s a defence and survival mechanism) but that’s only due to their inexperience and their desire for sex that blinds them. If they were to study the female dispassionately the way I’d study a rat in the lab it would become clear to them. There’s nothing “mysterious” about the human female. I don’t want you to think that I’m saying females are bad it’s just that they’re programmed by nature to behave in a certain way.

        14. We all know that she is just hanging around here trying to get laid.
          I say let PabloandGringo give her a trail run and if his dick doesnt fall off maybe we could give her a go.

        15. I wouldn’t rely entirely on old textbooks. I was looking at an old Merck manual I had as a student which is over 30 years old. I won’t go into details but there was a condition where it stated that the cause was 99% psychological. Today we know that this same condition is 99% physical and has nothing to do with some neurosis.
          But putting aside the med books I can pretty much answer any question simply based on my extensive experience.
          Dr. Masters wanted to study sex scientifically because he knew that most anecdotes, especially from females, were worthless. His studies were far from perfect but he did discover a few important things. I can also see a couple of things in his Human Sexual Response that I’d disagree with but at least he tried to get some cold hard scientific facts rather than a bunch of old wives tales and feminist nonsense.
          As that TV character Dr House would say, “patients lie”. I don’t know who the medical advisor was for that show but that doctor was right. For some reason patients, people who fill in questionnaires, studies that rely on what people tell you etc etc have a great deal of lies and errors in them. I guess that’s why Masters wanted to actually test and record what went on physiologically to collect real data.
          Now, to get back to the 35yo female. She is by no means at her sexual peak at this age. What’s happening is that she’s nearing the end of her reproductive life and nature’s giving her one last chance and burst of energy to reproduce before the end.Once she hits menopause at the average age of 40 it’s all over. It sort of reminds me of an old tree on my property that looked like it was dying for years. One Summer it looked like it came back to life and produced acorns and dropped them in autumn. But by the next year was dead and had to be cut down.
          Another thing Ms Babe, don’t try to use the 1 in a 100 exception to try to “prove” anything. Females like to do this but intelligent men know how to make generalisations.

        16. No amount of ranting by a bitter loser is going to change that.

          LOL. Yet you come here as one poster-name after another shilling the same old junk ideas. That’s a lot more the *ranting of a bitter loser* than anything else.
          Trolling has everything to do with being a loser.
          Tits or STFU
          (and it better not be saggy grandma ones too.)

        17. You believe that bit of outdated mythology? You better get textbooks that tell you the real truth about the biology. Your credibility just went out the door.
          However, your reputation had quite the head start in running off. It’s probably time to change the old poster-name and start trolling all over again. ROFLMAO.
          Still waiting for
          Tits or STFU.

        18. “Women reach their sexual peaks in their mid 30s. It’s biology.”
          Even if that would be true (which it isn’t) it doesn’t matter. Men overwhelmingly aren’t particularly interested in middle aged women.
          As someone already noted (i’m paraphrasing); “women in their thirties don’t get more horny but more desperate”. Their desperation makes them more sexually aggressive. Some folks confuse that desperation with horniness i.e. it’s an act just to lure a man in.
          The truth is simple: aging has a deteriorating affect on the body, a deterioting body has an – negative – effect on sexual responsiveness. With this comes the fact that females generally age quicker than males. A thirty year old female on average is on the same plateau with a man 10+ calendar years older. With all this said we aren’t even taking in account the naturally significantly lower libido of women. Women can frankly never reach the libido a man has, even if we take out negative artificial factors for correction like: the pill, anti-depressants, modified food etc.
          Sexually it’s downhill beginning by 30 (in all honesty I would say by 26, but just for the sake of rounding the numbers).

        19. This is just another lie MRAs and PUAs tell to feel good about themselves, because their own sex drives are diminished in their 30s.
          Every older woman I know who was married during her 30s says she recalls wanting more sex once she hit her mid 30s. Obviously they weren’t trying to hook men because they were already married. Some of them even say that they were done having children at this point, their husbands had gotten vasectomies, and they still had increased sex drives. Not to mention all the women I know who said they didn’t even start having orgasms until they were almost 30.

        20. “Every older woman I know who was married during her 30s says she recalls wanting more sex once she hit her mid 30s. Obviously they weren’t trying to hook men because they were already married. ”
          Typical, indeed the women YOU KNOW. We’re not talking about your group of friends in specific, we’re talking generally. I’m not denying some women will want to have more sex at mid thirties, but that generally is an act of desperation (ulterior motive) not genuine horniness. Those women know their husbands are in demand (especially men in that age group) so they have to put in a little more effort to keep them on board. Everyones libido decreases (some quicker than others) after approximately thirty, men and women alike. You’re fooling youself if you think otherwise.

        21. “Um…the biology textbooks that I read in college.”
          Could you give us the book titles and page numbers. I would like to look this up.

        22. “This is just another lie MRAs and PUAs tell to feel good about
          themselves, because their own sex drives are diminished in their 30s.”
          Really? Cause I am 56 and some days have no prob fapping to an orgasm ten times a day. I smashed a 21 year old about three years ago that told me I was like a 16 year old in bed.
          I think what you meant was that all the men that were in their 30’s that were in bed with you had diminished sex drives.
          There, fixed it for ya.

        23. “Explain exactly how a woman peaks by her mid 30s.”
          I think she means in terms of sexual desire. That her desire peaks in the thirties and then tapers off from there on out.

        24. Nope, I’m basing all of this on what I’ve read, not personal experience. Your insults aren’t powerful at all when they’re grounded in ignorance rather than fact.

        25. I don’t hate mothers at all – what an idiotic interpretation. Any woman who wants to be a mother should be. What I do hate is that a woman would feel pressured to become a mother when it’s not really what she wants, by ignorant people such as yourself who think that giving birth to children is the only way a woman can have value.
          It’s the children who suffer the most due to this type of ignorance – children who were born to mothers who had them because they felt pressured by ignorance. Like it or not, YOU are partially responsible for this by being a part of it.

        26. Go ‘way Sahara Snatch. You’re genetic line is gone forever, and nobody cares about your mindless babbling.

        27. I would say the same to you, but I can only hope your genetic line is gone forever. The world doesn’t need more brain dead pricks who keep hammering on insults that don’t even apply.
          All you’re doing is making yourself look stupid – you’re not helping your case at all.

        28. Protip – it’s not “mindless babbling” just because *you* don’t like hearing it.

        1. Because he is a desperate beta loser. Or perhaps he has a fetish for older women, but that is still a total beta fetish.

      3. Better yet, just stay away from women completely. Your genes should not be passed on, and women don’t need to be traumatized by their experience with you.
        The world is overpopulated, and the first people to help with this problem should be the so-called “alpha” males, by removing their unevolved selves from the gene pool.

    2. No we don’t consider that because it’s not a consideration.
      • “The fact that you deride sluts and still expect women to sleep with you on the first date shows your incredible stupidity.”
      And NO…. YOU are incredibly stupid and we are going to prove it now:
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1093011/Women-far-promiscuous-men-says-shock-new-study.html
      So since women are more promiscuous than men, NATURALLY every man can assume she is more willing to put out.

      1. A couple years ago I read a study that showed ( amongst other things) that the average American woman had 39.4 partners by age 25.
        Makes you wonder why marriage rates are in decline.

        1. It’s not a wonder! It’s a FACT. When a woman has had 2+ partners … the odds of her initiating a divorce double. At 6+ partners, the odds skyrocket to +72%. This is a result of oxytocin depletion which inhibits her ability to bond with only one male. The “thousand cock stare”, and all that.
          The more dicks she wanted to be ravaged by…. the less mesmerized she will be by any one of them.
          Contrary to what Beyonce says…. even if you liked it, DO NOT put a fucking ring on it.

        2. I was being facetious, Tom. No one wants to marry the town bike , or let it bear and raise their children.

        3. That 39 partners before 25 is just… I mean, in what universe does that chick turn 35 and think she deserves to be proposed to buy a guy who she thinks should KNEEL DOWN with a ring. She should be buying HIM a ring for that. Minimum 5 carats and up.

        1. It’s simply ridiculous how she behaves like some kind of “prize”…… intentionally WITHHOLDS sex and then thinks a man should give a fuck about her being “aroused”.
          Imagine thinking: “No I won’t be having sex with you, because I don’t want to be thought of as a slut. But you should still try to arouse me. Your orgasm is totally unimportant, but you should still care about mine.”
          Jesus Christ.
          What are they…. trying to be comedians now?

        2. I would just laugh at them, but the comedians have the law and the brutes of the government behind them. And that is not fun at all.

      2. Oh man. it is definitely no wonder women are grossed out to be with you. No wet vaginas for you, thankfully and just as you deserve. I bet the ones that end up with you have to fake an orgasm.

        1. Who cares if you girls have to “fake” an orgasm? You fake everything else. Your hair. Your nails. Your height. Your weight. Your age. Your boob size. Your motivation. You’ll even fake who the fucking father of your bastard womb turd is. You’ll even fake pretending to know anything about my personal life. So why would an orgasm be any different??
          Adorable try, though, sweetie.

  43. Very good article, a strong melange of hard facts & honest personal experiences I’m sure many of us can relate to.
    It’s important to understand if you’re a man of integrity who is seeking sex & getting rebuffed via these tired excuses, there’s probably something wrong with her.
    Listen to everyone except yourself & you’ll end up empty, as you feed them & starve yourself.

  44. Naturally this problem has a political dimension. Progressives have promoted a totally confused and self-contradictory message about human health, where on the one hand they advocate healthy living, clean environments, organic foods, etc.; while on the other hand they encourage young women to have an inorganic and unhealthy sex life which does violence to their evolutionary history. When a society allows women to meddle with their natural fertility cycle using artificial hormones and other means like IUD’s so they can have a series of sterile and impersonal hookups with a series of men they have no intention of forming relationships with, much less marrying, then of course this way of life will make these women dysfunctional, both physically and cognitively. Progressives care more about the health of farm animals than they do about the women they sucker into voting for progressives’ destructive, Opposite World policies.

  45. Three words: birth control pills. They wreak havoc on women’s bodies and fertility. Chemicals in the food and pollution in the air also contribute. And men are far from unaffected–phthalates in plastics, for example, disrupt male sex hormones and cause immature testicular development. Modern Americans are now born into a world that compromises sexual development and fertility.

  46. I suspect evolution has selected for the male mind to develop more with age than the female mind any way. Some of the older men have to wind up as the experienced tribal elders who know how to solve problems and keep the tribe cohesive, whereas the women who wind up as grandmothers have a much simpler challenge to deal with. Basically a grandmother just practices skills to she learned a generation earlier as a mother, while a grandfather who earns some status and shows some responsibility in the tribe has to learn and develop new skills which he didn’t have as a younger man. That would explain why older women just sound tedious when they talk, whereas an older man, even a blue collar guy, might have some interesting things to say.

    1. Arthur Schopenhauer said that too. A man only begins to reach his full maturity around age 28 or 29.
      I’ve got a new article coming up that discusses this point.

      1. “The nobler and more perfect a thing is, the later and slower is it in reaching maturity. Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is eight-and-twenty; woman when she is eighteen; but hers is reason of very narrow limitations. This is why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most important.”
        -Arthur Schopenhauer

        1. Ha. I thought my starting to feel like an adult instead of a clueless kid at about the age of 30 was just me. I guess not.

      2. I agree. I will be 28 this month, and in the past few months I have changed a LOT. I am starting to feel like an adult finally. Funny, but I am looking forward to be older. My life is getting exponentially better since I have left the 27 mark.

  47. Great article. Having been with girls who straight up told me before sex “don’t bother trying to make me cum, I can’t because of the SSRI’s I’m on” I can relate.

    1. Holy shit, one ex girlfriend also told me that same thing. She said “Feel free to cum in me, I am on so many psychiatric pills that I am not fertile anyway”.

      1. It’s way more common then people talk about. 1/4 of women are diagnosed with a mental illness of some kind. 65% of SSRI’s are given to women. That means up to 25% of the female population is going to have sexual difficulty due to chemical dependency.

  48. No one likes a sandy vagina.
    I enjoyed this piece, David , and I hope to see more from you in the future.
    The one issue I have to bring up because you didn’t mention it, is foreplay. I’ve very rarely encountered “Sahara Snatch” and those rare circumstances where I have, was usually because we were rushing things.
    The average woman , per my experience, takes at least 10-15 minutes of foreplay to get her juices flowing. Some take up to a half an hour. Ive known quite a few women well into their 30s who were sopping wet in 2-3 minutes .
    I don’t mean to assume anything, put the blame on you,or be captain obvious but the proper application of skilled foreplay might be your missing ingredient.

  49. Not so sure this is about age and fertility. My experience with several late 30s/early 40s women went like this. They told me up front they had trouble having an orgasm etc and my reaction was total dominance. One I told, the first time we had sex, “You will have an orgasm when I let you.”. You see what I perceived with these women is that this was a battle for control and their lives were all about control in their eyes. They fought against submitting to a man, but when they submitted to me, moistness and excitement wasn’t a problem.That woman? By being dominant she had multiple orgasms in our first encounter because i teased her and wouldn’t let her complete. Instead of buying into her trying to tell me how it was, I demonstrated my dominance by not even rushing, by holding her on the brink for a long time. She was like a dazed puppy gnawing on its first bone afterwards…
    Another story is really instructive. Late 30s “Sex in the City Gal” (she’d make me watch it if I was staying over on Sunday nights) who is addicted to her vibrator who is a control freak. She makes me wait 6 weeks to for actual sex but during that time when she wants to make out like a teenager and tease me I stop her in short order every time. I would tell her firmly, I’m not in effing high school, I have no interest in getting all worked up only for you to say your not ready. So I maintained control and then one night she gives in – but I’m still dominant. She completes within 30 seconds of entry and goes crazy. She actually starts hitting me and screaming curse words, angry at me. What I realized is that she was terrified of not being in control, but at the same time she craved it and this freaked her out.
    Now, both these women eventually stopped yielding to my dominance and stopped having orgasms easily, after a few months. As well, you should know I’m not a sexual svengali, nor am I “big” (just average) – although I do understand women’s sexual anatomy and know how to get a women off (if you don’t you should learn). I also was not “dominant” in the sense of BDSM or 50 Shades of Grey, there was no tying up or abuse. I just maintained an “Alpha” frame with these women
    What was really going on is that they had psychologized their own sexuality due to feminist indoctrination, the “female dominance” garbage that pervades our society and actually on a conscious level had lost respect for men, thinking we were all “equal” and the same just with different skin bits arranged on us. What I did was just ignore all that BS and treated them like the sex toys they were. I dismissed everything they “said” about sex but also didn’t spend a lot of time on it. I treated their attitudes as irrelevant. With the one who made me wait 6 weeks, we had maybe 4-5 dates in that period of time and I never made it a wrestling match or big deal, and just respected her boundaries. I think the fact that I took her power of teasing away up front had me maintain control
    Last. Not saying this is what’s so in every case. But the average corporate gal with some success and experience has a hard time giving up control. The other part of this is that I did all this subconciously, being naturally alpha dominant but with no “game awareness”. In other cases women in this bracket were insecure or not “in control” types and the dynamics were different. But in every case. these gals were physically capable of getting sexually excited and did so when I established and kept dominance. In fact, the more “control” BS they radiate, the more they want to be dominated. Just ignore it all and don’t act obsesses by any of it. And then plow them like wet field…

    1. Thanks for articulating what I had suspected of “control freaks”. Something I had wished I had learned earlier in life- I can be erect and ready for another ejaculation in less than twenty minutes after coming the first time. A friend reconed it could be less than five. A chick revealed this to me by doing it regularly. Same with my pal. Now, I’ve let other women know this, particularly when they say up front they want more than I can give. Not once did they ask how it was done or attempt it. To do it she just holds your limp cock in her hand or mouth with very gentle manipulation and a little ball stroking. No hard tugs etc very non sexusl in away but the results can be truely astonishing when done right.

  50. The solution — bang younger women. I’m 41 and currently seeing a 28 year old. problem solved. But when I can get one even younger and I’m pretty sure I can, I will.

    1. A 26 year old slut Im currently stuffing lubes her pussy before every bang. That tells you something-she is used up.

  51. Brace yourselves, guys. Some fat chick has killed herself in the UK over “fat shaming”. I would not be surprised if Return of Kings gets a TON of heat for this. We’ll probably see articles blaming RoK for this girl’s suicide.
    The incoming shitstorm is about to be massive.

    1. How can someone who you never met – in another country – be expected to to take the heat for what you do to yourself? (Rhetorical) It would be silly and stupid.
      A little perspective:
      https://twitter.com/expsnghghtsm
      Here you have countless women WISHING DEATH on guys for not being tall. This is not just “short shaming”. This is actual “fucking kill yourself and die” stuff.
      Now HOW HARD WOULD WOMEN LAUGH if any guy under 6′ jumps out of a window and kills himself because of that twitter account?? “Fat shaming” doesn’t even come close. Rub that in the face of any woman who has a problem with a fat shaming…….. but be nice and put some mayonnaise on it to make it go down easier.

      1. Haven’t you heard? Women are above the law. A woman can MURDER her own husband or children and in many cases, she will get ZERO jail time.
        Modern women are subhuman barbarians. The ONLY thing that will put them back in line is the extreme force of Islamic Sharia. That, or else we just replace women and make them obsolete with VR porn, Artificial Wombs, and Sex Robots. I’d choose the later option over Sharia, of course.

        1. You think anyone noticed the IRONY of the last line of that pic you attached? HILARIOUS!
          The BBC printed in the news that it was —->> difficult to tell her apart from a WHALE.
          Conclusion: Girl who kills herself for being fat shamed – gets fat shamed by BBC after suicide. If there is going to be any backlash it should be directed to the BBC.

        2. holy shit bro, I didn’t even notice that. That IS hilarious. She was a landwhale, even in death. LMFAO!

        3. Yeah, and the part about the “heavy lifting equipment” being brought in for the search was toooo funny

      2. I’m only 5’11” I better kill myself lol This is stupid because height is something you can’t change. 99% of fat girls can at least make an effort to be slimmer. They may not get thin but they’ll still look better at a lower weight.

        1. Exactly right. But I would really love to know WHERE in the universe of fuck a woman who is 5’6″ gets off on saying “short men have no business existing” and she is short herself.
          That’s like a Jew calling for the extermination of the Jews.
          I can’t even…..
          wow, just wow.

        2. 5’6″ is not short for a female. And stop paying any attention to these internet dingbats.

        3. Oh no, it’s VITAL that you pay attention to it, because that’s the female auto id exposed. The internet is a BEAUTIFUL thing and has allowed western women to show their TRUE nature.
          Indeed the only reason women were such a privileged class throughout history was because only her GOOD qualities were displayed openly in society for everyone to see.
          But NOW – possibly for the first time ever in history – technology, “social networks” and Twitter has allowed the female to willingly shout her TRUE nature…. and it’s the worst thing they could have possibly done for themselves. Because now, the physical beauty of women comes as a double-edged sword of DOCUMENTED – and well known – unbridled greed, manipulation, selfishness, hypocrisy and toxicity. And not since the days of Samson and Delilah have men been so KEENLY aware of what they REALLY are behind their “sugar and spice” masks they paint their faces with. And as a result, women are no longer able to fetch the admiration and devotion of men in a meaningful way.
          Men aren’t are no longer amazed or awestruck when they look at women…. men have plenty of reason to become suspicious and cautious and frankly want as little to do with women as possible. And when men want as little to so with something as possible, we strip down our interaction with it to the necessities – which means men only want to be around women for as long as it takes to fuck them… and feminism (and the women it created) are to blame. Not MEN. THEY are. THEY will be accountable for that behavior.
          Don’t deflect the behavior of COUNTLESS women and try to turn this into MY problem. The fact that I payed attention and pointed it out is NOT MY problem. You should be THANKING me.
          Remember when little baby women would freak out when their older brother would even TOUCH the cover of her diary?
          Well… we’ve come a long way.
          Want to know what ELSE the internet can tell you about them?
          http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/women-will-qualify-you-so-you-must-resist-their-efforts/

      3. As if twitter comments from a bunch of low-value twerking hood-rat nigresses matters,
        Ask them if the call spell “ax”

    2. Of course it wouldn’t occur to this low-grade British [but I repeat myself] chick that perhaps she should just not eat so much…

      1. hahaha. better to just kill yourself than go on a diet. Death is less painful than cutting down on the daily McDonalds food. LOL!

    3. This is really disturbing.
      Regardless of how you feel about gender roles or how women are living their lives, the fact that you would make light of a human being committing suicide shows you to just be pathetic, worthless excuses for human beings.

      1. LOL!
        30,000 MEN kill themselves every year in the USA, most of them as a direct result of the effects of feminism, And where is the massive female outcry about this? NONE.
        Even YOUR OWN MOTHER won’t protest against feminism if you kill yourself as a result of the effects of feminism in society.
        So Babe, I am showing just as much sympathy for these dead women as they show to dead men- which is NONE.
        You bitches demanded equality, remember? Be careful what you wish for.
        Hell, in many cases, I’ve even see women LAUGHING about men who killed themselves after the man’s life got destroyed in divorce.
        Do you understand the level of HATRED against men in the West? If a woman destroys your life, and you kill yourself? She will not only feel ZERO guilt, she will LAUGH AT YOU.
        So I will treat women the EXACT SAME WAY as they treat us men. That is EQUALITY. So if a woman kills herself? I will LAUGH ABOUT IT.
        You bitches DEMANDED equality. Well, you got it.

        1. Men killing themselves is just as sad as women killing themselves. Well, unless they’re heartless pieces of shit that make fun of people who’ve committed suicide – in those cases, they’re doing the world a favor by removing themselves from it.
          And I’ve seen people blame male suicides on feminism, which is just laughable and pathetic.
          You don’t know how much sympathy other people have for those men. Again, you’re not a mind reader.
          “You bitches demanded equality, remember? Be careful what you wish for.”
          That doesn’t even make sense and has nothing to do with the topic.

        2. “Men killing themselves is just as sad as women killing themselves. ”
          Sure thing, sweetie. If you actually believed that, you would be protesting against the anti-male legal system which drives so many men to suicide.
          You women are such filthy fucking intellectually dishonest lying hypocritical pieces of shit. You will say ANYTHING to try to make yourself look good in the eyes of others.
          Sweetie, we aren’t buying your LIES here. The men on this website are too smart to fall for such bullshit.
          You act like you “care” about men and then you turn around and make all these man-hating comments.
          You are truly pathetic. Grow the fuck up and stop being a childish little attention whore, you immature bitch.

        3. I wouldn’t try to make myself look good to you people because I couldn’t care less what you think. I don’t care if you think I’m dishonest – I have no reason to lie about anything to people whose opinions I don’t respect anyway.
          What exactly about the legal system is anti-male? You can say fathers have their children taken away, but I don’t know of one single occurrence where a father was denied access to his kids unfairly.
          I don’t recall one “man-hating” comment I’ve made. You’re the one posting venom about women for no reason whatsoever. Ever heard of projection?
          Unlike you, I care about people. Anyone, male or female, who commits suicide should be mourned and respected properly.

        4. But U just spent the last whatever time writing that post…..anyhoo U need to rim the guy you’re with. Look it up. He’ll love it….. rimming is the way to go ladies……mmmmmmm….rimming……

        5. Hmm… “heartless pieces of shit”. To quote “Babe Chandler”…

          If you really thought that everything I was saying was such bullshit, you wouldn’t feel the need to respond with vulgar language. Sorry if the truth hurts.

          LOL.
          It’s not that “John Doe” does not read minds, its that you are offering no mind to read.
          While we are on the topic…
          Tits (or proof of lubrication) or STFU.

        6. “Couldn’t care less what you think”.
          LOL. Looks like Marshallaw called you out on that one. You spend a lot of time responding. If you really didn’t care, your posts would be independent of what others where posting. It’s not and you are just pretending to put up a front.
          The anti-male aspects of the legal system have been presented on many topics on ROK as well as discussed in depth on the comments in those pages. You can go and find it yourself.
          Practically all of your comments are “man-hating”. What that shows us is the projection of your own self-loathing. Even if people have not heard of the concept of projection, they can see it in your behavior.
          You should care about your reputation as you have very much put it to death yourself. People here care about your reputation in that it is really trash. You just saved them a lot of effort in having to prove it.
          Tits or STFU.
          (Won’t save you reputation, but at least it is another good laugh.)

        7. It’s sad that on a site like this, someone who believes that women should be respected as human beings rather than objects is interpreted to be a man-hater. What a bunch of miserable, broken people you all are.

        8. Really sis? Because, to be honest – you dont know any of us.
          Anyone that would come to that conclusion based on some comments on a blog is pretty shallow and naive in my opinion.
          We have seen your type here before many times.
          And, like them – you add nothing of value.
          None of the RoK people are “miserable, broken people”
          Some are in marriages, monogamous relationships, students and successful in life. We are all fit or getting there and work hard on a daily basis to improve ourselves.
          I think the problem is that your little ears are not used to hearing the cold hard truth.
          If your only reason for being here is to insult us – Maybe you should go back to your “herd”

        9. People earn respect for their deeds. Being a man or a woman isn’t an automatic claim to this privilege. You get basic civility (something you demonstratively do not offer people in return).
          That you use false logic, rely on decades old misinterpretations of research to back your claims (and when it is pointed out, you cannot even offer any “text book” reference), shows that you have the agenda of bashing men. Hence you *are* a man-hater.
          You can project the misery of your broken psyche all you want, but you know no one buys it.
          Show us Tits (as miserable as they are) or STFU.

        10. Anyone who would laugh at a person, man or woman, killing
          themselves is a sociopath who doesn’t deserve his/her own life, honestly.
          Not going to get involved in most of the arguing here, but I just don’t get MRAs. A friend of mine has two kids that he never gets to see, and it tears him up. He never married their mother, and now she’s never letting him see them. And because of the way the laws are, she’s getting away with it. It really sucks to see a friend going through this.
          But it seems like all MRAs really do is spend their time in the manosphere on the Internet, which has a lot more to do with bashing women than focusing on men’s rights. Most of the articles on here seem to be about ridiculing fat women, older women, infertile women, etc. Is there any real purpose to this, other than giving you an outlet to vent at what you’re mad at? It seems that a much more useful and productive way to spend your time would be trying to change the legal system. Start petitions, find out how to effect changes in the legal system so that women can’t marry men and then divorce them and take money and assets that they should NOT be entitled to, and can’t keep kids away from their fathers without good reasons.
          Because it is bullshit that women are able to do this. That’s not equality at all – but it seems that MRAs prefer to bitch, moan, and make fun of women rather than doing anything productive or constructive to change things.
          Seriously, be the change you want to see in the world.
          Also, I don’t understand how MRAs think that women should forgo education and careers and just get married young and have children. First of all, the world is overpopulated, so in a way it’s a really good thing that women are no longer starting to have children at 20 and ending up with multiple kids each – the problem would be even worse. Second, do you not see that women who have no skills or abilities are part of the problem you’re bemoaning? If a woman has her own education/career, she will be less likely to marry and divorce a man for his money – also, the courts would be less inclined to allow her to take his money in the event of a divorce. Additionally, if they have kids and are both working, the courts will be less likely to award full custody to the mother because both parents have played an equal role in the kids’ lives. It seems like it would be the domesticated housewife type (who marries young, has no education, and values a man for his money) that you all love who is most likely to screw you over.
          You may not like this post, and that’s fine. As a law student, I just thought I should mention an alternative way of thinking.

        11. Anyone who would laugh at a person, man or woman, killing themselves is a sociopath who doesn’t deserve his/her own life, honestly.

          Well, we can all certainly take the high road if we focus on the extreme measures any apparent lack of compassion. However, the reaction is understandable considering the extreme sense of entitlement that many of the trolls (yes, that’s what they are) feel are owed to them. Not only that, most of these hostiles feel that anyone that opposes their narrative are deserving of being physically battered, maimed or even killed. This is not an exaggeration. There are numerous examples of this on the response threads of this site.

          Not going to get involved in most of the arguing here, but I just don’t get MRAs. A friend of mine has two kids that he never gets to see, and it tears him up. He never married their mother, and now she’s never letting him see them. And because of the way the laws are, she’s getting away with it. It really sucks to see a friend going through this.

          Right. “Rosie Thomas” doesn’t need to get involved when the guise of “Babe Chandler” or whatever one chooses to name herself can do so (Seriously, when one avatar literally answers for the other, it is obvious).
          To pretend one doesn’t understand the opposition to how radicals who call themselves feminists continue to add insult to injury is surreptitious. It is akin to saying one doesn’t understand why some are not pleased when a thief sues a homeowner for negligence when he injured himself on the way out.

          But it seems like all MRAs really do is spend their time in the manosphere on the Internet, which has a lot more to do with bashing women than focusing on men’s rights. Most of the articles on here seem to be about ridiculing fat women, older women, infertile women, etc. Is there any real purpose to this, other than giving you an outlet to vent at what you’re mad at? It seems that a much more useful and productive way to spend your time would be trying to change the legal system. Start petitions, find out how to effect changes in the legal system so that women can’t marry men and then divorce them and take money and assets that they should NOT be entitled to, and can’t keep kids away from their fathers without good reasons.

          It may seem that MRA’s only spend their time online but that is really just an attempt to shame any plaintiff into silence.
          Do you have some sort of proof that none of the people here are part of campaigns to create a more just society? They don’t have to proof that they are as it is your implied assertion that they are no, and it is reasonable to understand that their agenda extends beyond the Internet.
          Many of the articles are meant to satirize the sickening amount of mollycoddling political correctness that has gone so far that it has damaged the social experience for all. In particular, fat acceptance is really about catering to the feelings of those who apparently feel no need to acknowledge the feelings of others. Older women articles here are about how women feel it fine to demand 20 something six foot chiselled models while hardly dispelling the snobbishness about men who want younger women. Impotence and ED are items of hilarity on cultural trash like “Sex and the City” but infertility? Woe to those who joke about that! You only pretend that this double standard doesn’t exist and is actively promoted by feminists.
          The change needs to be more than merely at the legal level.
          The change has to be at the political level as it drives policy that manifests into law and the enforcement of that law. That includes a visible presence on the Internet. It is sites like ROK that become the drumbeat of this political movement. For that reason, zealots sympathetic to the misguided feminists cause work to stop it. They will attempt to do this by shouting down, personally attacking or shaming people into silence. These tactics are easy to spot (as are the trolls that employ them).

          Because it is bullshit that women are able to do this. That’s not equality at all – but it seems that MRAs prefer to bitch, moan, and make fun of women rather than doing anything productive or constructive to change things.

          As it was mentioned, the acts of bringing the injustice to light (be it by satire or more obvious opposition) and that of direct petition of political office are not mutually exclusive. One can choose to do one, the other, none or both. Attempting to shame into silence those who publicize these matters is just the usual opposition towards social justice.

          Seriously, be the change you want to see in the world.

          ROK is exactly that. It is the small but hostile group of radical feminists that don’t want that change much less anyone to be part of that change.

          Also, I don’t understand how MRAs think that women should forgo education and careers and just get married young and have children. First of all, the world is overpopulated, so in a way it’s a really good thing that women are no longer starting to have children at 20 and ending up with multiple kids each – the problem would be even worse. Second, do you not see that women who have no skills or abilities are part of the problem you’re bemoaning? If a woman has her own education/career, she will be less likely to marry and divorce a man for his money – also, the courts would be less inclined to allow her to take his money in the event of a divorce. Additionally, if they have kids and are both working, the courts will be less likely to award full custody to the mother because both parents have played an equal role in the kids’ lives. It seems like it would be the domesticated housewife type (who marries young, has no education, and values a man for his money) that you all love who is most likely to screw you over.

          While there may be some who subscribe to having most women uneducated, it is unlikely an important factor to the greater portion of men who support what ROK is about.
          The problem is not having more educated women. The problem in the First World is a system that allows women to take advantage of playing “victim”. This is the crux of the matter. To delve into the intricacies of why educated women are better for society is merely obfuscation. As a legal student, I am sure you are familiar with that courtroom tactic.
          It is those who have selfish intentions that will “screw you over” if and when they have the chance. Their means of alternate income, which is usually tied to one’s education, is relevant, but is not necessarily mitigation to a lifestyle she has become accustomed to. If one chooses to play “victim”, they will do so to the full extent of the law.

          You may not like this post, and that’s fine. As a law student, I just thought I should mention an alternative way of thinking.

          Whether one likes or dislikes the post is independent to whether said post contains valid or invalid conclusions. As it has been shown to be largely based on a faulty premise of what ROK is about, it really isn’t an alternative way of thinking. It is merely a journey into fantasy.

      2. Cause feeeels over any logic that may put the brakes on this disgusting obesity epidemic.

      3. I just checked Babe Chandler’s previous comments. She’s definitely a woman.
        Just another pathetic alpha male attention whore. Babe, this is a site for MEN. What in the FUCK are you doing here? Other than being a childish little attention whore? Grow up, you pathetic little girl. Woman up, bitch.

        1. If it’s a site for men, they should make it so that only men can log in, read, and comment. Until then, there’s this little thing called freedom of speech. Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean that women need to leave.
          If you really thought that everything I was saying was such bullshit, you wouldn’t feel the need to respond with vulgar language. Sorry if the truth hurts.

        2. Here is a comment that you previously had written, Babe.
          “LOL are you serious? My not wanting to post pics has nothing to do with how I look and everything to do with the fact that the Internet (particularly sites like this one) is full of creepers. The thought of giving a bunch of pervs pics to jack off to is just icky as hell.”
          Here is my reply.
          1. You are an ugly, FAT bitch and are too afraid of what men will say about you to post your pic here
          2. If this site is so full of “creepers” and “pervs”, then what are you doing on it?
          You truly are a pathetic excuse of a human being, Babe.

        3. LOL okay, keep thinking that. What I said stands – I don’t want to give a bunch of pervs pics to jack off to.
          Yeah I’m a pathetic excuse of a human being just because you say so. Never mind that you’re the one who is bitter towards women and makes fun of people who have taken their own lives.

        4. Lol. You are seriously too dumb to realize the article was satire and not real?
          Seriously. You just totally made yourself look like an idiot over the entire internet.

        5. Most would hope they don’t make it that only members could sign in. Making trolls look stupid is half the fun.
          Real women should post here too. It would be more fun if they did instead of the childish little trolls. Then again, real women would admit when they are defeated in a debate.
          No. The truth is that if *you* had real insight, you would have to resort to trolling. So far, in all your different poster-names you’ve been defeated. The sorry truth about you hurts you and it shows.

        6. Few, if any here are bitter towards *all* women. Only trolls like you try to hide behind *all* women so they can deny that men (Alphas, Betas, etc.) only dislike them.
          You only wish that men would jack off to your pictures. That is beyond pathetic. Besides —
          Tits or STFU.
          (don’t worry, we won’t laugh, really.)

        7. Clarification; The article about the fatty jumping off the bridge was satire . NOT this RoK article.

        8. There are three types of female Trolls that post here.
          The ones that claim NAWALT. They feign sincerity in “saving” men. When in actuality its sheer desperation that more and more females are experiencing in real-life. That men just arent falling for their bogus crap anymore.
          The ones that snipe with a snarky, typically ad hominem and standard “shaming language” post and run.
          The ones that use the comments section as some kind of feedback “sounding board” for their fucking gender-studies / sociology class. They are very annoying and persistent little trolls.
          And the very few that have a little common sense and pretty much agree with us on most points, show some respect and decorum to the Kings. Still, I really dont see how males can relate to any American females today on a conversational level
          Unfortunately American women have lost any semblance of grace and charm.
          Enjoy the decline bitchez

        9. You are on to something there. The NAWALT claimers are just feeding their delusion that being a little child makes them attractive.
          The snarky types realize that being a child is their own fault but need to feed their denial of it.
          The gender study types use a false sense of moral righteousness to present their self-absorbed and falsely based arguments. They basically drop that educational shield one it doesn’t work and resort to the same old lame name-calling and shouting insults the first two rely on.
          This is what happens people have arrested development.
          They need to woman-up and show us tits, or STFU.

        10. Contrary to what you believe, I’m not here to be an attention whore. I’m here to emphasize that the way that men on this site is NOT NORMAL. Not for your benefit, because as your rhetoric shows, you are so angry and bitter that you’re a lost cause, but other people who may stumble onto this site and read all of these comments that are just brimming with irrational hatred for women.
          If it’s a site for men, why are almost all of the articles focused on shaming and degrading women?

        11. Nope, I suspected that it was not real. Especially since I looked up “Janet Rumbelow” and couldn’t find any article on Google. But I was just going along with the rest of the conversation about it.

      4. No. The disturbing part is that, like trolling, suicide or harming oneself is a cry for attention.
        Regardless of how you lie to yourself in denying the lack ability to argue a point, the fact that you cannot see how trolling is harmful only to yourself is pathetic. It’s worthless in comparison to actually trying to debate real issues.
        But hey, it’s *your* life to waste.

      5. Its a fake Babe. Reread the last sentence of the so called “article”. Besides even that, its obvious from the first “I can’t nay more” that is a fake, probably created by a time-passer reader of this site, no less.

  52. Being desirable is a tremendous human need, and a valuable resource for women in terms of obtaining protection and provision. The “sexy older women” trope is to make women feel like they will be desirable (and therefore able to use it) forever.

  53. What a pathetic article. And what a bunch of pathetic comments.
    If you want to bang young girls even when you’re WELL past your prime, that’s your right. But the fact that you’re so nasty and have zero respect for women of any age is just going to ensure that you end up old and alone, drowning in a mire of your own shit. No woman of any age is going to want to bang you, and even the hookers will charge extra. Because you’re such miserable pieces of shit who lack a shred of humanity, you’re not going to have any family or friends and will just be all alone in the world.
    Funny how no one mentions the limp noodles of any man who is past his early 20s. You probably can’t get a woman to want to have sex because you’re so unattractive, and she knows that you’ll need Viagra to even get it up.
    Oh, and to all of you who are going to call me grandma and say I must be a dried up old lady, I’m in my 20s and looks-wise probably out of any of your leagues.
    I’m sure I’m going to get a bunch of venomous responses – bring it on, I need a laugh today. All it’s going to do is show how miserable and angry you are.

    1. “But the fact that you’re so nasty and have zero respect for women of any age is just going to ensure that you end up old and alone, drowning in a mire of your own shit.” = False. Generally, the less you respect women, the more they want to please you, so long as you have other attractive masculine qualities.
      “No woman of any age is going to want to bang you, and even the hookers will charge extra.” = False. Men age like wine, women age like milk. Older men who are even halfway attractive have their pick of women their age, and a fair number of younger women who won’t kick them out of bed.
      The reason why you don’t realize these truths is because you are young and don’t have much life experience yet. It’s ok; we’ve all been there.

      1. Yeah, if men disrespect women, the only ones they’re going to get are the battered wife types who will take all their abuse and kowtow to their every demand. Which is probably what these men want anyway, so I guess never mind.
        As for the “men age like wine, women age like milk” – that’s one of the most ridiculous myths out there. The only reason older men have ANY success with women is that their looks aren’t valued as much as women’s, and the only time they can get younger women is because of money. Men age like milk too – it’s just that the bar has been set so low for middle aged male attractiveness that almost any man is considered attractive, as long as he doesn’t weigh 300 pounds. Kelsey Grammer on Frasier is one example – the man was overweight and noticeably balding, and people still called him “handsome” and “attractive.” Whereas a woman the same age would need to try to look like she’s in her 20s to be considered attractive – hair dye, Botox, etc. And childbirth often ages women pretty badly too, which accounts for the average 40 year old woman looking older than the average 40 year old man. If you put a 40 year old woman who has never had children next to a 40 year old man, on average, she won’t look older.

        1. Question: who gets more action, any random 60 year old male celebrity, or Hillary Clinton?

        2. First of all, Hillary Clinton is married. Second, how would you know how much action she’s getting? Third, that’s a very poor example, considering that Hillary Clinton is not considered attractive. Fourth, considering that success/money are considered attractive in men, an ugly older guy would get laid more than an ugly older woman – doesn’t make him any more attractive physically. Fifth, Hillary Clinton has gone through childbirth, which by itself aged her. I could go on and on but won’t…
          You just completely missed every single point I made.

        3. First point: irrelevant.
          Second point: Judging from my dick (and Bill’s infidelities), zilch.
          Third point: What old hag is?
          Fourth point: You admit here that success and money is more important for men than for women. Game, set, match.
          Fifth point: Bullsheeit.

        4. Men age like wine. Women age and whine about it. Trolls? They get younger, why you, at 28, argue like an 11 year old.
          Tits or STFU.

        5. Maybe Hillary should start trolling. That way she would look like 11 years old to everybody.
          Tits or STFU.

    2. If you are experiencing men in their 20’s with ED, that means you can’t get them hard. If you think you’re so hot, post some pics, otherwise we’ll assume you’re a bitter slut that already hit the wall and is losing that beta male attention you’ve been used to since 14.

      1. Nope, not experiencing it, but it’s common knowledge.
        Assume away – your opinions really mean less than nothing to me.

        1. Thanks for proving my point. If you were really as hot as you think you are, you’d have no problem posting some photographs of yourself.

        2. LOL are you serious? My not wanting to post pics has nothing to do with how I look and everything to do with the fact that the Internet (particularly sites like this one) is full of creepers. The thought of giving a bunch of pervs pics to jack off to is just icky as hell.

        3. Rest assured grandma, no one will be jacking of to your pics when the Internet is full of naked 18-21 year old girls who are actually hot – not just pretend Internet hot.

        4. Of course you’d come back with something like that. And no, you couldn’t be more wrong about that, not that it’s any of your business.
          Also, as I said, I’m in my 20s.
          You really did step off the short bus, didn’t you? I wasn’t talking about fertility at all, just sex drive. Sex drive and fertility are not the same thing.

        5. Stop your ramblings and link to your “biology textbooks”, crazy lady. Still waiting.

        6. Wow how clever. You can try to dodge as much as you want but we all know you’re ugly…It’s common knowledge that anyone who defends feminists in comment sections is ugly. Prove me wrong or get the fuck out.

        7. Nah. If the guys here wanted pictures of you, they would only have to Google, “Delusional Fattie that has to troll once her arguments were easily shredded”.
          Tits or STFU.

        8. Much better that anything you’ve presented in all your attempts here under different names.
          Tits or STFU.

        9. No, no. You have your numbers mixed up. You may be 28, but your maturity is about 11. Your comeback lines are as original being a troll.
          Tits or STFU.

      2. If you are experiencing men in their 20’s with ED, that means you can’t get them hard.
        Or maybe she’s just a ball-cutting shrike.

    3. Why are you guys still feeding this troll? She’s a fat ugly bitch and is just another stupid bitch who is coming to this website, which is meant to be a MALE space, and acting like an attention whore.

      1. What a dumb bitch. She’s not even aware of how fucking transparent her MO is:
        1. Storms into a room unwelcome and uninvited.
        2. Starts insulting and ranting on everyone in it.
        3. Then says: “Im sure I will get venomous responses…. all it’s going to do is show how miserable and angry you are.”
        That’s 100% attention whore who can’t get attention any other way. Spews epithets and then accuses everyone who tells to her to fuck off is angry and bitter. That is ONE FUCKING UGLY fat bitch right there. And I don’t mean on the outside. Right down to her core. She is a cunt to everyone but herself.

        1. Dude, do not feed these fucking female attention whore trolls.
          From now on, my only reply will be “Tits or GTFO”.

        2. Agreed. And deal. But you’ll notice I didn’t reply to her. My comment wasn’t for her. it was for YOU and other MALE readers. If I can help ONE – just ONE – guy see more clearly through a woman’s fraud bullshit then I have done my 0.0001% of good at making the world a better place. Expose them. No mercy.

        3. Yea that is perhaps a good strategy too. I also generally never directly respond to a woman but will just use her comments as an example of how retarded most women are, in an effort to try to educate the younger men.

        4. I will respond to them only for as long as it takes for them to expose themselves. Usually that’s 2-3 comments or less. And then it’s all there in black and white for everyone to see.

        5. Yea maybe 1 or 2 replies at most, but I see guys just keep responding to these dumb fucking female trolls and all it does is feed them.
          Women are ATTENTION WHORES. They do not care if you love them or hate them as long as you give them attention.
          It is men’s indifference which terrifies them the most. The opposite of love is not hate. The opposite of love is indifference.

        6. And their typical modus operandi is of course the pre-emptive statement that they are young and attractive and have great boyfriends.
          Lol.
          Cookie Cutter female troll RoK bashing 101.
          Nothing to see here, move along.

    4. Pumpkin, please explain to the class exactly which women “deserve” respect, and why. Be specific.

      1. New policy: Don’t waste time trying to talk logic into a woman. Also do not reply to their arguments. If any woman comes on RoK? Probably best to simply tell her “Tits or GTFO”.

    5. What a pathetic article. And what a bunch of pathetic comments.

      Nah. It’s your posts, every single one of them, that are a trove of pathetic comments. It reveals a very angry individual that thinks trolling somehow makes you superior. It doesn’t. You just make yourself look foolish as well as everybody have a good laugh at your expense.

      If you want to bang young girls even when you’re WELL past your prime, that’s your right. But the fact that you’re so nasty and have zero respect for women of any age is just going to ensure that you end up old and alone, drowning in a mire of your own shit. No woman of any age is going to want to bang you, and even the hookers will charge extra. Because you’re such miserable pieces of shit who lack a shred of humanity, you’re not going to have any family or friends and will just be all alone in the world.

      Few of the guys here are nasty. Unlike yourself, who resorts to calling people names, laying on the personal insults and basically acting like a hurt little child, they understand how the vastly self-centred and dysfunctional First World women are becoming.
      As a hostile troll, you neither represent all women nor do any of your opinions (and that’s all they are) deserve consideration. The guys here are absolutely willing to discuss any of the topics. However, it is your demonstrated inability to do anything more than trying to insult and shame others that shows how miserable and self-absorbed you are. The bleak existence that you incorrect predict of others is likely the world that you are sadly familiar with.
      You don’t have any logical argument and in lieu of it your comments are just a slurry of juvenile denigration. It’s fun to watch, but the humanity in most would ask that you seek professional help.

      Funny how no one mentions the limp noodles of any man who is past his early 20s. You probably can’t get a woman to want to have sex because you’re so unattractive, and she knows that you’ll need Viagra to even get it up.

      Even if men were to have “limp noodles” past their 20’s, as you say Vitamin V works. Of course, this “wish” that the men here are looking at a flaccid future is only your wishful thinking. Most men are fully capable of sufficient turgidity well past 30. You can look up the “hard” facts yourself.

      Oh, and to all of you who are going to call me grandma and say I must be a dried up old lady, I’m in my 20s and looks-wise probably out of any of your leagues.

      It’s quite the opposite. You may be 28, but your behavior has the maturity level of an 11 year old.

      I’m sure I’m going to get a bunch of venomous responses – bring it on, I need a laugh today. All it’s going to do is show how miserable and angry you are.

      LOL. Just because you choose to be venomous doesn’t mean that others have to resort to it. All any of us have to do is to recognize that you are a troll and have some fun at your expense. You think it bothers us, but just who has to go out of their way? ROK is for guys and we hang out here. I can’t speak for all, but if the cat’s out, the dog goes online. She’s not going to bitch ‘cause she doesn’t subscribe to your kind of hate. You, on the other hand, are in way over your head as usual. Your bad logic gets pointed out every time and you just rename yourself and try again… now that’s a miserable existence.
      Troll!

  54. When I met the hottie who is now my wife, she was 24. We were friends first, but I knew I wanted her the first time we met. One night a couple of weeks after we met, we started making out. I wanted sex, so I started fondling her tits and touching her everywhere. I wasn’t forceful at all, I was very gentle, but dominant. She resisted at first, and kept saying “we really shouldn’t” and moving my hands away, but she eventually stopped trying to resist me and we ended up having great sex that night – twice.
    It was the hottest, wettest pussy I had ever had – to the point that I knew I wanted to marry her after one night together. She had only had sex with one guy before me too – and it was back in high school, about 8 years before we met. So the women who think that sluts are the most able to get aroused are wrong – she was practically a virgin and I’d never felt a girl get so wet.
    I want to make it clear too (for all the feminazis who could be reading this) that I don’t condone rape. If she had firmly and seriously said no, I would have stopped. But I could tell her resistance was really just a show – she just wanted to appear proper and good but wanted the sex just as much as I did. She just needed to be dominated and needed a man to take control – and still does. Five years later and we still have great sex. And every time, I’m the one in control.
    Really, I think a lot of women’s hangups about sex and inability to get wet comes from their need to go against nature and control the whole process. They want to be equals in the world, that’s fine, but in the bedroom the man is in charge. He needs to dominate his woman, and that way they’ll both enjoy it.

    1. I think it likely has more to do with lack of confidence, leading to a psychological inability to thoroughly enjoy the moment. At least that’s what I’ve gathered from my friends (in their twenties, mind you) that have issues in that area.

      1. Good CHRIST, what is with all of the fucking females on this site?
        Do you bitches see us invading Jezebel and other women’s sites? NO.
        Why the hell do you attention whores have to try to invade male spaces?
        You’re like a bunch of little children throwing a temper tantrum. WAAAAHHH, those bad boys won’t let me play in their sandbox, WAAAAHHHH!!
        I thought this website had a rule that women would be banned immediately? Obviously with a rule like that, this website is meant to be a MALE only space.
        There are millions of women and feminist sites online. Why can’t you bitches stay there? Why do you always have to invade male spaces? Bunch of goddamn little children.

        1. Same reason they wanna post Instagrams showing them shoot a gun, or snowboarding when they are in their 30’s, wearing stupid Football jerseys, riding motorcycles…they just want to invade, be one of the guys.
          Quite pathetic and sad really.

        2. It’s an extremely childish mentality, this desire of “not wanting to be left out”. I think I outgrew that shit by the time I was 12 or so.
          Many men have suggested that women never mature past the mental age of 12. And that is looking more true every single day.
          WAAAH! You guys won’t let me play in your sandbox. WAAAAH!!
          Oh and PS. If we men are such inferior beings to women, if women are so fucking superior to us men, then why is it that women are constantly trying to get men’s attention and get validation from men? Seems like women need men far more than we men need them.

        3. In fact, some of you DO invade women’s sites. That’s how I even got the link to this article, and probably how other women did as well. One of you posted a link to this article on another site, and posted a string of unwanted comments that all ended up being deleted.
          Despite what you may think, we (at least I) have no interest in getting your attention. I have time and attention from QUALITY people, so I really don’t give a damn about whether a bunch of miserable men are paying attention to what I have to say. I would have preferred never to read this article or these comments at all, as is the case with any other woman who isn’t a masochist. We don’t generally seek out ignorance and negativity.
          If you want women off of this site, stop advertising these articles and linking to them on other sites.

        4. First, I would just as soon be left out of the cesspool that is this site and most of its articles. Again, you can’t write trash about women, put links to the trash on women’s websites, and expect women NOT to have something to say.
          I don’t think any woman said anything about women being superior to men. But studies would indicate that you are wrong, and men need women more – unmarried women live longer than married women, and the opposite is true for men.

        5. First of all, you do not own the internet. You’d think that anyone with half a brain would realize that the content of this site is naturally going to attract the attention of women.
          Second, I find it incredibly amusing that I’m here simply trying to have an adult conversation based on logic and reason and have shown respect in my comments. Yet here you are with personal insults and name calling, yet *I’M* the one who’s acting like a toddler throwing a temper tantrum?
          Critical thinking is obviously quite lacking among many of you.
          And for the record, I’m just as appalled by feminist websites (because they are extremist) as I am by THIS website (because it’s extremist).
          In short: Fuck off you giant whine-ass.

  55. Every time I read an entry on this site where the writer details his experiences with a 30-something woman, be it her sexuality/ability, behavior, etc. I find myself asking the question, “What the hell kind of women are these guys hanging out with?”
    I really don’t understand it. I’m not here to troll or give the same old tired “NAWALT” line. But honestly, I just don’t get it.
    I’m 32 years old. I not only love sex more than I ever have, I’m also better at it than I’ve ever been. I definitely don’t need the assistance of synthetic lubricants. And thanks to actual cancer, I had a hysterectomy at the age of 28, so I’m also hormone depleted. But you won’t find me giving excuses to not have sex. It just seems absurd that so many of you have had such negative experiences with women over 30. I have a hard time believing it.
    If anything, I guess I feel like a unicorn.

    1. I also agree that it`s not that women don`t feel like having sex; they do, but not with everyone. And if women don`t want to have sex with you, it is because they are not attracted to you, and there are many reasons for that. It would be helpful if guys would think a little deeper about this issue, such as why it`s happening and what they can do to make it better. Just expecting for every woman to easily have sex with you, no matter what you do and how to behave, is ridiculous.

    2. If you’re not only 32, but a cancer survivor with no uterus, I guess you’re very much an outlier rather than the rule.

      1. Women are incapable of grasping concepts of statistical aggregates and outliers. The immediately retreat from questions of larger truths and instead want to turn it into a trivial issue of their own (supposed) personal life.

        1. Funny that you would call a woman out for that, considering that that’s all that the article is about – personal anecdotes and bitterness.
          And the “I feel like a unicorn” at the end shows that she DOES understand that she’s an outlier. Too bad you were too stupid to comprehend that. Dumbasses.

        2. Summaries from bodies like The National Institute of Health is “personal anecdote”? ROFL. It looks like the guys have it right and you are just applying the typically fallaciously based argument of a troll. The bitterness you taste is in your own mouth.
          A clearly subjective opinion from a single account is “evidence” that a trend is wrong? Just what kind of “science” are you applying. That practically every female troll applies this kind of statistical *cough* *cough* “expertise” is an unmistakable trend of poorly based bias. Don’t pretend that you don’t know you have no case. Don’t fool yourself that people can’t see it too.
          The comment “I feel like a unicorn” was clearly meant to be sardonic. Too bad you are fooling yourself in thinking that everybody has figured that out.
          You’re condescending attitude is just a defense mechanism. As the man says. Tits or STFU.

    3. First of all i feel for you. You ‘re increased sexual appetite is largly psychological. With all due respect, you have very little to offer a man. You have no ability to procreate, a history of serious illness (which im sorry for) and the probability of that illness returning later in life, and you’re on the wrong side of thirty. Many a man will look at you as a serious liability. The only way you’re possibly going to keep a man is by having a pleasant personality and be sexually responsive, both of which you’re doing (i commend you for that). Again i mean no insult to injury…just trying to keep it one hundred.

      1. No offense taken. I know and understand that in a traditional sense, what you said is very true. I also understand that there is a high likelihood that I will forever be alone, which is unfortunate, because I think I find it quite fulfilling to increase the happiness of others. All in all, we only have the option of playing the hand that we were dealt and try to look at the positive, right? At least that’s how I live. 🙂

        1. I should add that I HAVE found an incredible man and while I hope it lasts forever, one can never know!

  56. Oh god what a confused bunch of men in these comments section.
    1) you want to be able to screw whoever and how many ever you want. Yet you’re commenting on ‘who wants a used town bike to bear their children’. You realize that’s a conundrum right. If you’re wanting to screw around multiple times, then women aren’t gonna be virgins?
    2) men have sexual dysfunctions and age just like women. The perception of female beauty is so distorted that balding men with beer bellies in a suit can get away with being considered ‘attractive’, because for men attractive is not socially associated with youth in our society, where as it is for women. In other pre-industrial or tribe societies, you will not find the same pattern.

    1. “In other pre-industrial or tribe societies, you will not find the same pattern.”
      Provide some sources for this statement.

        1. Kapott esélyt bizonyítani, de még ezt is elszúrta.
          Annak örülök hogy hazámfia is olvassa a ROK -ot, jobban terjed mint gondoltam.
          De jobb ha angolul beszélünk a későbbiekben, csak hogy más is értse.

    2. Wow you are so confused. ROK advocates for the traditional familial unit, not people slutting it up. The problem is that this ideal is no longer attainable and the site makes an attempt at explaining why. In the absence of this ideal the site seeks to help men “get their jollies off.” Essentially to attempt to fuck sluts, all the while realizing they are just that, sluts.
      The fact that older men have it easier than women, is clear as day. It also serves to show the difference between what women desire and what men desire. You can blame this phenomena on culture all you want, but we have eyes, and we have observed this phenomenon globally.

      1. “RoK advocates for the traditional family unit”.
        Uh, not really man. Because remember, in the traditional conservative society, men were far more oppressed than women were. Men were expected to go die on battlefields.
        Frankly I am thankful to feminism for liberating us MEN.

        1. Interesting perspective. From what I have read, a lot of the articles lament the current state of the beta male, and seem to suggest the conservative lifestyle would be better. I am definitely a beta trying to play an alpha on TV so to speak.
          But I understand your perspective, and lately I have come to embrace it. I don’t have to work these shitty 6 figure jobs anymore, find baby sitters for the kids or put of with the typical shit these married guys do.
          Enjoy your life bro, you sound like you have had a tough one.
          Cheers!

      2. “RoK advocates for the traditional family unit”.
        Hmmm, who told you that? RoK doesn’t advocate anything except accepting reality, and it offers tools, opinions and perspectives on dealing with the situation as is.

        1. That’s what I had gathered, but I see the other perspectives, I accept gladly all challenges to my beliefs, that is how you learn.

    3. Another female troll. Let me guess. This “emulsifier” bitch rode the cock carousel during his 20s and then she hit the wall at age 30, lost her youthful beauty, and now can’t find any man stupid enough to marry her.
      Yea yea yea. We’ve heard it all here a million times before. You women are nothing but a bunch of immature little children, attention whores. Grow the fuck up already. Did you miss the part about RoK being a site for masculine MEN? Therefore, WTF are you doing here, bitch?
      Jesus, I think we RoK men are going to have to start using the “Tits or GTFO” reply. This is what happened to the original 4chan, when a shitload of stupid cunts started invading it. We shouldn’t even bother replying to any females on here. Our only response should be “Tits or GTFO”. IN this way, we won’t be feeding these disgusting female trolls.

      1. Two can play at that. Let’s see, you are a fat ugly misogynist in his 40s, using PUA but women see right through me, and gloats about being an alpha male, but is still sorrily single.

        1. You can only play the game that way if you have creds. All you’ve done is to try to insult and attack others. On the other hand, John Doe has contributed a lot of good insights on these topics. Also he correctly identifies the underlying angst and self-loathing that causes little children to troll.
          Tits or STFU.

        2. You first as you were asked first. Besides I need to learn the pan feature on the camera to catch all the dick.
          Tits or STFU.

    4. No.
      1. YOU want to screw all the men you want, at your convenience (not theirs) and expect to remain their kept woman, their taxes financing your makework gubmint job or your affirmative action job in HR making everything we buy more expensive. Oh, and they get to die in battle defending your right to be a slut. What do we get out of it?
      2. In the feminist society, you get to decide who you sleep with. Guess what? A guy with a corner office will have every girl at the firm lining up to bend over for him, no matter how fat and repulsive he would appear to them if he were poor. Don’t spit in men’s faces and call it rain.

    5. 1) you want to be able to screw whoever and how many ever you want. Yet you’re commenting on ‘who wants a used town bike to bear their children’. You realize that’s a conundrum right. If you’re wanting to screw around multiple times, then women aren’t gonna be virgins?

      It isn’t a conundrum since that necessarily requires the very same women to be both. Since a woman can be in one set and not the other, your premise is flawed. So much for “feminist troll logic”.

      2) men have sexual dysfunctions and age just like women. The perception of female beauty is so distorted that balding men with beer bellies in a suit can get away with being considered ‘attractive’, because for men attractive is not socially associated with youth in our society, where as it is for women. In other pre-industrial or tribe societies, you will not find the same pattern.

      Yet in must pre-industrial and tribe societies, you find a dichotomy in what is considered attractive in men, and what is considered attractive in women. Again, so much for the “logic” *cough* *cough* *bullshit* of feminist trolls.
      Try again, and don’t forget…
      Tits or STFU.

      1. So you require women to be virgins, but want to screw as many as possible. How does that superior male logic work.
        no you do not find a dichotomy is tribe societies, it generally disappears or is significantly reduced. It is only a function of patriarchal societies. Again, so much for the “logic” *cough* *cough* *bullshit* of misogynistic alpha male.
        Try again, and don’t forget…
        8inch dick first or STFU.

        1. Lol. That’s weaker than your usual attempts.

          So you require women to be virgins, but want to screw as many as possible. How does that superior male logic work.

          Where is it said or implied that I (or men in general) require women to be virgins? Again, where does it say the same women who are near virgins are the same that get screwed a lot? Your lack of logic as well as your denial of your inability to accept that your argument has been refuted is showing. That’s the far inferior illogic of the typical feminist troll at work.
          The argument that refuted yours is logically intact. Yours is proven as rubbish. Try again.

          no you do not find a dichotomy is tribe societies, it generally disappears or is significantly reduced. It is only a function of patriarchal societies. Again, so much for the “logic” *cough* *cough* *bullshit* of misogynistic alpha male.

          Merely saying that your view, one that flies in the face of demonstrated record, is not a refutation (and you know it). All it is, is the typical parroting fallacy that you have applied in all of your trolling attempts.
          The onus is on you to provide proof that this dichotomy of what is considered as beauty in men and women “generally disappears”. Submit this or your reputation is forfeit (as usual). So much for another of your impotent attempts at a refutation… LOL. Try again.

          Try again, and don’t forget…
          8inch dick first or STFU.

          Again, you were asked first. Parroting is what little children do. Try something original. You won’t look as stupid.
          Tits or STFU.

        2. Excellent. That troll whatever her name is today – Lisa, Emulsifier, etc whatever – got totally pwned. You are right. All she does is just the usual “I know you are, but what am I” grade school style arguing. She’s way off and she knows it. What a total pathetic person – even for a troll. Keep up the good replies. Angry trolls are the best type. :-))

        3. Your comment section and past studies have shown that. Men want virgins, yet at the same time, believe that men need to spread the seed, therefore, must have multiple partners. So that’s kinda flawed considering that there are about as many men as there are women. And for these men to want partners >1, would mean that women are no virgins, which is something they also want.
          Secondly, you can look up social role theory, or wood and eagly 2002, and work from there regarding literature on this.

        4. Your comment section and past studies have shown that. Men want virgins, yet at the same time, believe that men need to spread the seed, therefore, must have multiple partners. So that’s kinda flawed considering that there are about as many men as there are women. And for these men to want partners >1, would mean that women are no virgins, which is something they also want.

          Lol. Right. Just because you say so… not. “Your” comment section? It’s not my blog. Lol. Anyways, none of these comments show that. As far as “past studies” you will need to provide citation or, again, be seen as just blowing the usual smoke.
          Now it’s “kinda” flawed. Ha. Talk about back tracking. No. It’s not flawed and you know it. You are wrong again.
          There being about as many men as women does not equate to the two conditions being linked. It’s like saying, “Men want beer and men want steak. There is about the same amount of beer and steak around. Therefore, men want beer to be steak”. That’s inane and you were clutching for reasons to support your prejudice. If you actually don’t get this, you are even less intelligent than most trolls.
          Speaking of clutching for reasons to support your prejudice…

          Secondly, you can look up social role theory, or wood and eagly 2002, and work from there regarding literature on this.

          Nice try. The criticism, in context, was about your comment on “perception of female beauty” (comment-1196558575). It was not on “gender roles” and how it could be related to how much biophysical differences are built into a societal structure (the focus of “A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Behavior of Women and Men: Implications for the Origins of Sex Differences”).
          The “perception of female beauty” is clearly not addressed in that paper (you can’t even find the word “beauty” in it. You are merely attempting to obfuscate your error by hoping no one would actually read, or have read, that document.
          Wrong. It doesn’t support your false notion. Try again.
          (Hint: While biophysical differences can be somewhat held independent in an artificial environment, it is still “artificial” and, hence distorted. It does not reflect the true underlying nature. The biophysical differences still exist. This is the fundamental flaw in all “feminist” thinking of “equality”.)

        5. Righteous! Thanks.
          That troll is rather amateur, but still fun. I love how she thinks her gender studies references back her up, when they don’t. Typical of these femmie-babies.

  57. “I assumed that these womens’ problems were somehow my fault and I
    was developing deep fears of sexual undesirability and loneliness. Was I
    just a closeted homosexual and that was why I was incapable of exciting
    women nowadays? Was I an ugly person (how do you ever really know
    otherwise?) I had all sorts of dark fears spring up as I encountered
    one sexless thirty-something after another.”
    Your pheromones could be off-putting. Or maybe you are somewhat low on T levels (which would effect pheromones). It could be any number of things. I wouldn’t have refused the “help” though with that one. That you suffered is your fault. You could have been less of a prude and more sexually adventurous and put it on and gotten yourself satisfied. Oh well what’s done is done.
    Check your T levels and buy some pheromones.

  58. Is this why more and more old hags are fucking young boys? Because they know the law doesn’t apply to them.

    1. How many pervert female high school teachers did they catch having sex with underage male students THIS week?

  59. I’m not religious by any means, but the more I read ROK content, the more I appreciate the strong family values and strict guidelines Islam emphasizes on women. I honestly have more respect for women wearing Hijaabs because they genuinely respect themselves.

    1. Most muslim and indian dudes are gay and bi for that same reason – the pussy is too unobtainable.

      1. Arab and Indian men are pathetic beta males. Maybe not Arabs, but Indian men. We should send all the white women to India. The indian men would throw acid in their faces for acting the way they act in America.

        1. I’d agree with you on Indians. I think its because Indians have no confidence or self worth unless they achieve their parents dream of becoming doctors. That and Bollywood is 10x worse than Disney when it comes to romanticizing love. From my experience Arabs have the extremes. Extremely beta and extremely alpha.

        2. Actually the white women who end up dating and marrying Indian guys are generally the more family oriented types. I know some very nice, very smart and not too bad looking (6 and 7 on the scale) American gals who married Indian guys. They wanted a nice, family oriented husband, kids and a solid cultural ethos to raise those kids in. In order to get past the Indian in-laws they’ve had to prove their metal. Indian parents hire private investigators before they allow or give their blessings for their own kids to marry a foreigner. Could it be the Indian guys are getting our best, least slutty American women?

      2. A lot of it has to do with economics. Parents won’t give away their daughters to any schmuck without a decent job. Decent jobs are hard to come by in the third world.

    2. Depends. The ones from the Muslim world, maybe. The converts from the West tend to be former sluts suffering from advanced Sahara snatch, unlikely to appeal to any man except an arselifter in need of a Western wife to get immigration cops off his case. In our feminized, multicultural society, basically the only socially acceptable excuse for hopping off the carousel is to turn Muslim.

      1. Oh yeah no question western culture has definitely infiltrated Muslims. Especially in America. I’m talking about the religion at it’s essence.

    3. “I’m not religious by any means, but the more I read ROK content, the
      more I appreciate the strong family values and strict guidelines Islam
      emphasizes on women.”
      Divorce is allowed in Islam and Muslims have high divorce rates. Hinduism actually does not allow divorce, though legally any Hindu can obtain one. However the legal process for such in India is very lengthy. The Hindu divorce rate is extremely small.
      “I honestly have more respect for women wearing
      Hijaabs because they genuinely respect themselves.”
      Some wear it out of family or cultural pressure and in a few countries (Saudi and Iran) its even law. So I wouldn’t assume everyone hijabi you see or meet is doing it out of her own personal sense of self respect.

  60. This is a huge issue where I work, the aging females are outright jealous and nasty to the younger females . . . I guess when you put all of your eggs in one basket there is a price to pay!

    1. Well, you shouldn’t put all your eggs in one basket if you’re just going to flush one away each month.

  61. Spot on.
    Return of the Kings is doing a huge job by documenting facts that deeply affect our society. This is for real. Some people would say that the language in ROK is rough and offensive but many articles expose on-going problems that nobody else dares to mention.

  62. So, yet another detriment to having a high N Count….a woman’s body begins to shut down even sooner, and she’s got nothing left for her husband.

  63. As to the decreasing age of menopause, I think the author has a some good points. Nevertheless, with regard to fertility and sex drive, this author didn’t do his due diligence. He connected the dots garnered from incomplete research and in the process got everything exactly backwards. I don’t know where that graph came from but it doesn’t square with the evidence. It looks like the vertical axis was mislabeled “Female Sex Drive” rather than “Female Fertility.”
    The evidence shows that what the media tells you is indeed broadly true, despite the author’s unfortunate anecdotes. Of course during ovulation, when fertility is highest, so is sex drive, but this is only over the course of the menstrual cycle. This is just reproductive biology and has nothing to do with age. A woman’s sex drive increases during ovulation until menopause, when, obviously, it plummets.
    After puberty and until menopause, sex drive increases as fertility decreases. This makes perfect sense from an evolutionary perspective. The reasoning is simple: In her early years, a woman can get impregnated relatively easily because of her high fertility. She has many years to find a good partner. Therefore, the risk of dying without passing on her genes is low and she can afford to wait until she finds a partner with good genes.
    As she ages, a woman’s fertility decreases and she has fewer years to ensure that her genes are passed on. Therefore, the risk of dying childless is greater and she can less afford to wait to find Mr. Right Genes. The benefits of having offspring with the genes of some stud are outweighed by the risks of dying without any offspring at all. Her body responds accordingly and her sex drive spikes. This hypothesis is borne out in a 2010 study “Reproduction expediting: Sexual motivations, fantasies, and the ticking biological clock”
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886910002588
    So, although it might be a bit disingenuous to call a woman’s pre-menopause reproductive Hail Mary a “sexual peak,” it looks like the cougars really are getting hornier.

    1. Fine in theory, bogus in practice. Women can’t have children as they get closer to menopause, and therefore all the “self-reporting” of supposed “sexual fantasies” is meaningless.
      If these women were so horny, they’d actually, ya know be HAVING sex instead of just claiming that they THINK about sex.
      And, from an evolutionary standpoint, its irrelevant because aging women can’t get pregnant, anyway, even if they haven’t technically hit menopause just yet.

    2. This is obviously just another feminist fucking troll. Female trolls are invading the comment sections now, like ants to sugar.
      She sounds like some slut that rode the cock carousel and hit the wall at age 30 and can’t find any man dumb enough to marry her used up vagina.

      1. Yeah. They have to rely on silly, self-reporting polls (of 847 women) about their “sexual fantasies” instead of simply asking: Who fucks more: 25 year olds or 35 year olds?
        Much simpler question, much more revealing answer. Not surprisingly, unmarried women in their mid-30’s are the most sexless Sahara Snatches on Earth. (Revised graphic below.)

        1. just tell them “Tits or GTFO”. It is a COMPLETE waste of time trying to talk logic into a woman. God did not create women with the capacity for logic. Many great philosophers have recognized this.

        2. Yeah, but it’s still good practice to be logical with oneself. Sahara Snatches might be spinning their hamster wheels with pellets of purified bullshit, but being able to grasp the real world still means something to me, personally.

        3. SNES Gamer. LOL do you play SNES roms? I’m more of a Sega Genesis guy myself. Sega CD was also fucking sweet.

        4. Oh yeah. Pure ZSNES. There are good Genesis emulators, too. I use “Gens”, although I rarely play it.
          I’ve never really played Sega CD games. I did try to play the Ecco the Dolphin, but the only rip I could find was all glitchy (which is rarely a problem with roms from more popular systems).
          I’m very grateful to all these men who do this for free. It’s kind of a miracle, in a way: you can get 200k worth of video games (going by retail costs in 80’s and 90’s), for free….in minutes. God bless the great men of the internet.

        5. Yea roms are fucking awesome. I’ve gotten N64 and PS1 roms working too.
          But anything further than that doesn’t seem to work. To run a PS2 emulator on your computer, you’d need a very powerful system.
          NES 8 bit is probably my fav though. I’m old enough to remember that shit.
          I remember the first time that Super Mario 1 game came out, it was just mind blowing. I used to have a massive NES collection, I need to sell them, you can sell the games for like 500 dollars each on ebay.

        6. You can sell a FEW of the games for 500. But, then again, what sort of sucker would buy it? Only hording weaklings and people too stupid to use BitTorrent actually pay for media, nowadays.
          I don’t know how good your computer is. However, for most of the emulators – for the PS2 generation of consoles, definitely – you can go in and customize the settings so that the games can run even on lower quality systems. You will have to eliminate things like shadows and anti-aliasing and maybe some physics. But unless you have a REALLY slow computer, you should be able to run a PS2 emulator.
          Also, always remember to turn off any anti-spy and other processor-intensive programs. (You shouldn’t use anti-spy software, anyway. Use a good browser, AdBlock, be mindful of what you download, and stay the fuck away from the Jews’ porn sites, and you’ll never have any problems.)

        7. Just because they don’t agree with you doesn’t mean they don’t have the capacity for logic.
          Seriously, if you have such a bitter hatred of women, why not try dating guys? I’ve actually known a few guys who were as hateful towards women as yourselves, and it turned out that when they finally came out of the closet they were much happier.

        8. Seriously, if you old women love sex so much, why aren’t you fucking? Why do you talk like you have so much sex, but you never actually have it?
          (BTW, the “You must be gay!” feminist reply here is so cliche you’ll just get howls of laughter.)

        9. Wait, weren’t you the sexless old broad promising “biology textbooks” (plural!) which “proved” that (a) sex drive and fertility are inversely correlated, in defiance of evolution, and (b) that women reach their “sexual peak” in their 30’s and 40’s?
          Still waiting for these “biology textbooks”, babe. Still waiting….

        10. You’re wasting your time trying to talk logic into women.
          I talked to over 2000 women online and tried to get them to take the red pill. Guess how many took it? ZERO.
          Women are dumb animals. Treat them as such and life becomes much easier.

        11. LOL “stay away from the jews porn sites”.. I am running AVG Antivirus, it’s free. I don’t think it’s an anti-spyware program.
          Have you heard of League of Legends? You can walk into a cyber cafe anywhere in Asia, and it is the ONLY game all the young boys are playing. I admit, it’s a pretty damn good game. It’s pretty cool to see 20 young men in a row all playing the same game.

        12. AVG antivirus? Dude, that program is a resource hog. Go get UTorrent and download Symantec Endpoint (it used to be called Symantec antivirus corporate).
          Its industrial strength. Its what corporations use. Nothing gets by it.

        13. Great – thanks. I knew I had seen that somewhere. Great stuff for all RoK readers to be familiar with.

    3. Hormone production decreases with age in women and men alike. For women, estradiol and testosterone (produced at low levels) are responsible for shaping libido. In addition to monthly oscillations in libido there also exists a downward trend in libido for woman in their 20s and 30s owing to declining endogenous estrogen production (and testosterone production). Familiarize yourself with basic endocrinology before spouting off.

    4. Historically, how many spinsters do you think existed 5,000 or 10,000 years ago? Females delaying childbirth until their 30s is an entirely recent phenomenon. There’s almost no chance of what you’re proposing having been selected for because there wouldn’t have been any selection pressure for a stable libido: almost all women gave during adolescence, or at the latest, their early 20s and there would have been no need for continued reproduction beyond that point. A woman’s genes would already have been passed on well before her 30s. In fact, a stable, strong libido until menopause would have distracted females from parental investment and increased their risk of engaging risky/irresponsible and unnecessary copulatory behaviour.
      More importantly, we know that sex hormones are of chief importance in determining libido in males and females, and we also know that sex hormone levels decline in males and female (much more rapidly in females and then precipitously after menopause).

  64. “(A quick note: I recognize that many Western men are having bizarre sexual problems of their own. The preference for porn over real women, declining testosterone levels, repulsive boner pills, and utterly disgusting fetishes becoming commonplace are all proof of this. However, that is the subject for another article.)”
    =================
    You also forgot to mention the rising popularity of the t-girls with men. T-girls are taking over. Like I said once in another comment in another article, t-girls were once complete freaks of nature when I was a kid. Now….little by little, they’re becoming more popular with straight men.
    Watch for it. T-girls have already begun the invasion and it’s not going to abate anytime soon.

      1. Trannies. Traps. Transexuals. Pre-op, post-op.
        Guess the females are really happy now, they are driving young males to surgery to turn into females.
        Hahahaha.

  65. Wow, this article is really bring out the fem-trolls. Guess discussing theire low sex drive touched a nerve?
    LOL.

  66. It just goes to show that women are now worthless. The only thing they were good at was being the kitchen making sandwiches, making babies, sucking c*** and nothing else.

    1. Very true. Now that modern women refuse to cook, make horrible mothers (women are NINE TIMES more likely to murder their own children than the biological father), and suck at fucking (most women suck at sex, which is why many men would rather jack off to porn than fuck a real woman), they literally have ZERO value now.
      I think it’s time we make women obsolete and replace them with Artificial Wombs, and virtual reality porn.
      Modern women aren’t worth a shit. They make horrible companions, are annoying as hell, and are generally absolutely useless parasites.

      1. Don’t worry. Now the sisterhood have control of the Fed, it won’t be long before the Fed-confetti women get for bothering to show up at their non-jobs in HR and the federal government won’t be useful for anything but TP.
        The day the welfare state runs out of money (money that’s worth anything anyway), women will shape up so fast your head will spin. Till then, rent, do not buy.

        1. Yes, let women have all the power, is what I say. They will destroy society, destroy the economy, and then they will come running back to men and beg the men to fix things. But when that happens, men need to refuse and tell the bitches to fix things for themselves. They don’t need a man, remember?
          Hopefully by the time this happens, we will have Artificial Wombs, and then there will be no more need for human women. VR porn and Sex Robots too.

      2. Then do everyone, including yourself, a favor and stay away from women. They’ll be much better off without you in their lives.
        Women suck at sex? That’s pretty telling. Ever consider that you’re not really attracted to women sexually, and that’s the real problem?
        You want to make women obsolete? Funny, because men are already obsolete – two women can now make a baby.
        If you think women are horrible companions, are annoying, and are parasites, look in the mirror – they probably feel the exact same way about you. So the best thing to do is for you to keep your distance from one another.

  67. Good Lord in Heaven Up Above! I am an American male living and working overseas. Life overseas is not perfect. There are times of loneliness and moments when you miss the place you where you grew up and called home. Whenever I get the slightest tinge of homesickness, I just pull this website and read ANY RANDOM ARTICLE and its a good SLAP across face with a SLEDGEHAMMER back to reality of I should never come back to that HELLHOLE! Thank you for this free service, R.O.K!

    1. America is indeed a HELL HOLE. I’d rather live in Afghanistan, North Korea, or Iraq than America.
      America is the worst country on earth, by far.

      1. Guess you’ve never been to Ireland. The aridity of Irishwomen’s p***ies is matched only by the ugliness of their bitchfaces and their overall bad attitudes—in America only ghetto blacks come close, and they at least put out. The bubble only made their sense of entitlement worse.
        The crash was Irishmen’s cue to go their own way, as far away as possible.
        (Goes without saying I’m Irish. Fled the frigid Brigids for America 25 years ago, never looked back.)

        1. I spent a year in Dundee, Scotland studying energy law. The local chicks in Dundee were ghetto sluts who fucked like rabbits once you got them drunk or put them in their place verbally. I miss Dundee.

        2. Well the problem is white women. And this means Canada, UK, Ireland, Australia, and the USA.
          Those 5 countries have the worst fucking women. They are also white countries. Don’t forget Norway, Denmark, or Sweden either.
          White women are complete shit. This is why intelligent white men, if they choose to breed, should breed with non white women. The white race dying out is perhaps a good thing. No more white women = no more feminist bitches

        3. I’ve managed it, I’m not ashamed to admit. Irish accents, meanwhile, are the best cure for a hard-on since the cold shower.

        4. You’re a militant Marxist to the nth degree – promoting Sharia law and white genocide.
          You must be a plant. You should change your av to Che and stop disgracing Guy Fawkes in such a despicable manner.

        5. Wrong on all counts. You’re acting like a hysterical bitch, at a site targeted for cool men.

        6. Not all. Eastern European women are still worth it. Reason: after communism collapsed, so did the welfare state. Women had to re-learn how to have more appeal to men than rotgut vodka did, and fast.
          (What you shouldn’t do is buy one online. The ones looking for American husbands are the ones nobody in the old country would touch.)

        7. With all due respect, I’m not the one busting out all caps like an indignant child. Guy Fawkes Marxist guy is.

        8. are you implying you had a negress with an irish accent?
          sir, i do believe if what i said above is a true, then you have a story to tell!

        9. I live in an EE country, and during the good ‘old Soviet time the welfare was shit compared to USA now days. My mother and father both had to work just to make a low-middle class lifestyle for us.
          As my father used to say: “We were poor, but at least everyone was equally poor”. There were 5 kind of car to choose from, all equally bad, and you had to wait 2-3 years to get a car due to the quota system. So it was kind of an “ignorance is a blessing” existence.
          What is happening in the US is just a horrible mutant neo-communism of some kind. The Soviets were never able to pull this off. And that won’t end well.

        10. Black and brown women age much better than white women too – another reason to go for them. White women start looking long in the tooth in their late 20s, and darker women stay hot much longer. My wife is Indian – she’s 29 and people are always mistaking her for a high school girl. And I’ve seen some of her white friends that are the same age or even a little bit younger, and they’re already starting to look like hags, with the orange peel textured skin, crows feet, etc.
          Just look at Halle Berry, Stacey Dash, Gabrielle Union, etc. – they’re in their 40s and look better than a lot of white sluts do at 25.

        11. Well, 95 % of them are low value hoodrats true, but the few attractive ones at least can be approachable and sweet and dont put up all these stupid “bitch shields”, self-imagined superiority and play mind games like white American women do. Sure, negresses sport a lil’ attitude but you can just knock that shit away like a piece of cardboard.
          Never fucked one tho. Not sure if I want to try.

        12. I wouldnt mind an Indian woman. They seem reasonably smart, have common sense and good etiquette and I think those sarees they wear look kind of classy and hot.
          Seems that all the ones I have met have big attitudes though
          and because of their parents and those lame ancient cultural mores they are interested in getting anything going with a successful white american male.
          Plus whats with them wanting to get pee’ed on and peeing on people? Sick fucks lol.

        13. He asked to see your tits not your vag.
          Surgeons can trim that roast beef these days now you know.

        14. Be very wary of indian women. Indian women who live in the West are MORE materialistic than white women. Yes, they tend to be more loyal to their husband, but regardless, now you have to work your ass off and make 100,000 dollars a year to keep her happy.
          Marriage to ANY woman is slavery for the man. At best, keep a girlfriend, or even better, do not have any long term relationship with any woman and just get a new girlfriend every couple of weeks.

        15. Not all welfare is an obvious handout. The fact that full employment was guaranteed even to the Gypsies (most of whom never even pretended to work again after 1990) says it all.
          I do understand that the feminists overwhelmingly support the unrepentant Hungarian Communist Party even now. Red-pill men who bother to vote support Jobbik. Yes or no?

        16. Gypsies are given handouts, they dont care to have a job.
          I do not care about the politics in Hungary due to the fact there is no party who would I vote for. It is just a complete clusterfuck. The fate of Hungary will be decided mainly by the future of the EU, especially the future of Germany. (We have strong ties with them economically, and historically.) Or we will get under the influence of Russia again.

        17. “We were poor, but at least everyone was equally poor”.
          Can you explain that mentality, Molnar. It doesn’t quite make sense to me. Why should he want all to be equally poor or equally rich or equally in between?
          I say nobody should be poor, but all should be in a range of in between and rich. That means everyone should have their needs met in a healthy way.
          What says you?
          (Maybe we can create a new system together on a small island off the coast of Croatia. Google “Venus Project” and let me know what you make of it.)

        18. Someone deleted my questions to you Molnar. Anyway, soon we will be communicating directly via email, and then if i like your voice, via phone. (I’ll call you. I can afford it.)