In 2005, some Swedish feminists got together and decided it was time for a political party that held feminism as its guiding set of principles. The primary goal of the movement was to eliminate sexism, racism and class differences in society. The strand of feminism that this party represented was radical feminism, as the focus was on patriarchy, patriarchy and more patriarchy. Radical feminism has a hyper focus on blaming men for social ills, as opposed to liberal feminism, which is more targeted at legal “inequities.” The party was called the Feminist Initiative, or FI.
However, let’s step through creation of the party, it’s time in the spotlight and it’s ultimate demise at the polls. In 2004, there was some restless stirring on the feminist left about the abolition of marriage – replacing it with a gender-neutral, polyamorous institution. Essentially, this would be creating a government institution that allows for formal recognition of any two or more persons. Further, there was some anger at the fact Sweden hadn’t adopted Norway’s gender quotas for corporate boards. Norway, in 2003, had passed a law that mandated that 40% of publically owned companies must be filled with women. This feminist malcontent lead to an exploratory meeting to find out if a feminist party should be formed.
The party origins are at that meeting – headed by Gudrun Schyman (pictured above). While the organization claimed to not have a hierarchy and the people at the meetup refused to identify as anything other than equal individuals, clearly any group of people has to have a leadership pecking order and Schyman was the “alpha” female.
At the meeting, gender quotas on corporate boards were discussed, as reforms to marriage and violence against women. They correctly determined, at the time, that they had enough support to take the party to the public. They decided on platform – which reads like any radical feminist screed – and decided to make the focus for the upcoming election on devolving marriage into simply consent between two or more people. Of course — in the advancement of gender equality — they reluctantly agreed to allow males to have leadership roles.
The party went public with much public approval. 5% of the population said the feminist party most assuredly had their vote – clearing the hurdle to be met for political parties to get into the Riksdag – the parliament of Sweden. Upwards of 20-25% of people said they would consider voting for the party – very impressive numbers for a nation with multiple major political parties. This wave of support was bolstered by the media, who praised the movement for advancing a progressive agenda based on feminism.
Buoyed by this support, the party began to advance an increasingly aggressive agenda. While their leader Schyman had previously espoused support for a “man tax” that would purely be used to fund female-only shelters, she once again began to talk about the advancing this tax. The rhetoric heated up when some members began to publically call for sex to be based purely on verbal consent, a law like the policy on sexual conduct at Antioch College.
Comparable worth legislation was campaigned for, as was forced paternal leave. The feminists wanted men to have to take the same amount of leave from work to care for a baby as women. At the time, either men or women got to take a year off work – and this could be split purely as the couple decided. Predictably, this wasn’t good enough, because the patriarchy was still forcing women to take most of the leave. The movement even inspired Jane Fonda and Eve Ensler to campaign on behalf of the movement.
These feminists also supported the suppression of gender-specific behavior of boys and girls in preschool and early childhood. Take a note that, in Sweden, after the year of parental leave, children are shunted into state-run nanny care. Their push has helped result in now the abolition of he/she pronouns used by government workers – the word is now “hen” for all children. This leads to what the major parties did in reaction to the initial popularity of FI.
The major parties realized the threat this party posed
The major parties and the government began to change some of their positions. First, they allowed for free artificial insemination for lesbian couples, regardless of formal status. Second, was the upgrade of homosexual relations from registered partnerships to full marriage. Third, was pushing forced female participation on corporate boards. Even — in that spring — feminist outrage cancelled the Miss Sweden pageant.
However, the real impetus – being anti-male – began to seep through. What kicked off the public’s souring on the party started with the release of the movie “The Gender War.” This movie described in detail how radical and how anti-male shelters for women are in Sweden. A feminist activist in the movie stated that half of women in Sweden are victims of male violence, a clearly false claim. Further complicating matters was a positive reference to the SCUM Manifesto – most specifically the quote, “To call a man an animal is to flatter him: he’s a machine, a walking dildo.” The director of Sweden’s women’s shelther, Under Von Wachenfeldt, agreed with statement, saying: “Yes, man is an animal. Don’t you agree?”
The public began to sour on the movement at this point, and the upcoming convention for the party leading up to the 2006 elections did nothing to help the party. The convention, in sum, was a disaster.
The above pictured Tiina Rosenburg gave a speech at the conference, which both was met with thunderous approval and disgust from convention attenders and the media. Her speech was famous for her exhortation that women who sleep with men are “traitors to their gender.” Further, the fools at the conference, in order to combat heteropatriarchal norms, mandated that there were no “formal leaders.” However, when you have women telling other women that if they have sex with men that they are traitors, then you clearly have leaders. There was more male-hating garbage from the convention, but it is fairly predictable fare. Men are the cause of all that is evil, men are all rapists or rape supporters, etc.
Public support faded fast
In response to the “perception” they hated men, they tried to find a male feminist to promote onto their director’s board, but the male chosen declined to take on prestigious position. They continued to tail off bad in the lead up the election. At polling time, they registered only 0.68% of the vote – far belong the level needed to get into the Riksdag. A complete and utter failure.
In its aftermath, let’s consider the anger that underpins the feminist movement. I have long thought anger in the feminist movement was motivated by psychology – a manifestation of obsessive compulsive personality disorder. Instead of being outright bullies – while some feminists are – most are just severe and over-the-top enforcers of “the rules.” You see this in the idea of rape culture.
While a strain of blank-slatism and authoritarianism runs through the theory, part of the impetus is a bizarre adherence to the rules. “You aren’t supposed to rape!!!! If you rape, you are violating the rules!!!” Even though rape laws exist and feminists have changed laws and approaches, rape still exists. So, feminists assume it must be some deficiency on the part of the laws – or rules – instead of individual psychology and biology.
While I do think part of this obsession stems from female biology (women are far more likely to adhere to authority and submit to dominant people), another part stems from this idea that if the rules are changed, then the world will change. However, this is also a form of narcissism, as feminists demand the world around them change in order to sort out their own internal conflicts. Of course, this never works out, as the only person who can change your mindset is you. I have repeatedly seen this at feminist blogs — such as Eve Bit First — with the projection of violent fantasies of rape, murder and freaky sexual behavior onto men.
Sometimes, they just blame men for their thoughts. Mostly, though, they just claim that these sorts of thoughts are the typical sort of thoughts that swill through the mind of the average male. Changing the rules won’t prevent bad thoughts or bad actions (generally), nor will they save you from your own ability to come to grips with your own inner turmoil, nor your ability to understand men.
Feminist demands continue
As the world, haltingly and slowly, stumbles towards their “gender utopia,” the prospect looms of feminists dealing with their anger and hate. It is not surprising at all that the demands and accusations mount and become increasingly insistent. The day came long ago for feminists to judge themselves in the mirror, in my opinion; but for feminists, the day is coming faster and faster.
Just how an alcoholic fears having the sauce taken away from them, feminists fear losing their mindset to hate, blame and fear men. It saves them from the painful and very real process of coming to grips with reality. It is no surprise that the more radical a feminist is, the higher the numbers of male rapists in her mind becomes. As aforementioned, a feminist claimed half of Swedish women were subject to male violence – that is not just an astounding number, but emblematic of the fact that there is a direct correlation between a feminist’s anti-male bias and her belief in how many women are victims of male violence.
In sum, the FI was an abortion of a political movement that got a disturbing level of initial support. Given that the feminist hamster is combative, angry and hateful, it did not take long for itself to uncloak itself and show off its true identity. Some moderate “feminists” noted that making all men pay for domestic violence shelters implies all men are part of the problem is wrong. She is right, but FI would completely agree that all men are part of the problem. Given their support of the Society for Cutting Up Men manifesto, these feminists see men as an oppositional force.
In another view, however, these women just hate themselves. Unable to come to grips with their sexuality, psychology and upbringing, they decide to blame Daddy – or just every person with a dick. What a loss.
Read Next: This Is What A Feminist Looks Like
Feminist… why do they call themselve that it makes no sense, they should have no part in the word feminine. Its similar to a coward man calling himself a masculinist. Actually…. it make sense, by aligning with that word it appeals to collectivist part of feminity without having nothin to do with it. Strangely despite years of feminist indoctornation and the abolition of gender, sex the most… hurtful thing you call a women in today’s scoiety is a MAN
I agree it would be far truer to feminism’s purpose to call all women who subscribe ‘;masculinists’ as that is what they actually promote for women.. I wonder if we could encourage feminine women to reclaim the word femininsm for femininity? As in a woman who tries to look and behave in accordance with traditional gender roles / expectations
the best way to actively counter something like is, is as you say to promote it using it’s own name – but with a totally different set of goals…. feminism for feminine women….
it will soon catch on…… and suddenly the old hard feminists will look even more angry and stupid than they do already….
“It saves them from the painful and very real process of coming to grips with reality.”
the reality is that they have a pair of saggy tits on their chest, a gaping, bleeding cunt between their legs, and need a good 8 inches of cock from the husband – a couple of times a day to help them calm down the volcano that hides at the top…
there’s only one way to be a woman and that is by being a woman…. those that do it well are fantastic….the rest are less than worthless
“there’s only one way to be a woman and that is by being a woman”
amen to that. I’ve had enough of women pissing standing up so to speak then calling themselves ‘fem’
Yeah, the feminine women should reclaim that word and we should assign the rest of women as transgender or asexual. Its weird because a VAST MAJORITY of women do not subscribe to feminism they just support certain aspects when it BENEFITS THEM. Honestly I love the manosphere but it kinds of stings and deflating when high potential men are being bullied out of society they created and are reduced to internet chatter. Feminist really have NO power….. men give it to them
I do think feminism should be called out as something that always masculinizes women. I think women could be persuaded to make a distinction between Testosterone Feminism (self-explanatory hopefully) and True Feminism (femininity, acknowledges what is good and beautiful in women who affirm roles and behaviour that is actually feminine. A selling point might be that men could acknowledge such a true feminine feminist as equal but different. Terminological confusion can be a good or bad thing
Feminists don’t have power, the elitists that funded and promoted them do. If in the future the elitists change their mind about their social engineering programs, the feminists will end up in the dust bin of history.
“If you are really feminists, why are you so set on trying to look like men?“
SHUT UP
Man.
Yeah man, what he said.
Sorry MAUREEN those feminist tactics dont work hear. Maybe on CNN or NBC but NOT HERE
Proof of penis envy.
As a hard core mgtow I´ve beginning to think that men that sleep with women are gender traitors.
you’re no different than these people, seek a therapist
chyeah
No, just no.
Nope, only those who marry women. This is from ROK’s MGTOW writer.
Troll, attempting to use some of ROK’s own methods against the men’s movement. http://www.returnofkings.com/29651/black-propaganda-in-feminism-part-ii
What’s the matter buddy, never learned to fuck?
Wow….no, I think that those who intentionally don’t have sex with the opposite sex are traitors to evolution- so they don’t really matter anyway since their spawn won’t be around next generation. Women are silly creatures, which is why you fuck them and don’t give them any control over your life.
So men should sleep with men? No thanks. I’ll pass on that one.
“So men should sleep with men?”
If you want to be a radical masculinist, yes.
Troll harder, dear. The one good thing feminism has provided men is an abundance of sluts with no morals or values (a.k.a easy sex with no strings attached). Why would we go “sparta” now on each other’s butts when things are so good in the pussy department?
Obviously you are not a radical masculinist. And you know as well as I do that those sluts are only sleeping with men they find attractive.
yet evern more proof that MGTOW are faggots.
No need to sleep to get what we all want first.
Imagine the stereotypical MGTOW… an exercise enthusiast, outdoorsman, owns a Harley, supports small business (escort agencies) and has a close circle of good friends to enjoy activities, when he’s not developing himself intellectually. As opposed to his female counterpart, who masturbates furiously to Sylvia Plath and ‘rescues’ cats.
“Imagine the stereotypical MGTOW… an exercise enthusiast, outdoorsman, owns a Harley, supports small business (escort agencies) and has a close circle of good friends to enjoy activities, when he’s not developing himself intellectually.”
– This is not the stereotypical MGTOW. Stop kidding yourself, man.
Damn straight; I own a Redline.
Outlier.
I love it when you sweet talk me.
I’ve got more candy in store for you. Bend over.
And I own you.
Good article. But there doesn’t seem to be much proofreading going on on ROK. I frequently stumble upon typing errors which unnecessarily cheapens everything.
YES I GUESS THIS IS THE FAULT OF WOMEN TOO RIGHT?
Dude what the fuck is wrong with you, bitch? Chill the fuck DOWN! xD
Lol wtf
yeah we even rape the prose
Please don’t feed the trolls!
LOL
Looks like this bitch’s caps lock is liberated from patriarchical oppression as well.
Absolutely! All 250+ plus women I banged were begging for it!
250+ plus…..
Plus-sized or typo?
Blue whales. All of em; love me some blubber and lard. Say most around 5’8 and around 20 lbs over weight is plus size right? Or do all of yours have mine beat?
Ouch…
DOWN VOTE ALL MAUREEN POST
IGNORE ALL MAUREEN POST.
Then volunteer to be an unpaid proof reader.
I would absolutely volunteer to be a proofreader. Can someone please let me know how to do that?
Use the form on the Contact page.
Not difficult.
Yeah it’s by far the biggest problem this site has. Either Roosh needs to become an actual editor, or the authors need to start proofreading better.
This is a very good article, severely marred by a number of un-necessary typos and grammatical errors. Please edit your work as I’d like to forward it to some ‘feminist-sympathetic’ friends to read.
I see no link to the documentary, I think RoK writers would have a field day with ‘The Gender War’.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yn3cHsHnUPM
Part 1 was censored, a ROKS member (Riksorganisationen för kvinnojourer och tjejjourer i Sverige, not RoK) was on the Swedish Broadcasting Commission and stopped it from being aired. Charges of bias followed but to no effect. You can watch the whole thing on youtube though. Powerful stuff.
The first thing I thought of while viewing the first part of this video regarding the “ritual satanic abuse” was The US’s own McMartin Trial which was the longest and most expensive criminal trial in American history til date.
What I find interesting is how Biblical mythology continues to be so ingrained in Europeans and Americans, despite most of us no longer taking it literally. A “Satanic” panic? Come on now peeps.
The conspiracy theorists have a few different theories on this. They say the underground tunnels and abuse did happen and it was all covered up to protect The Illuminati. Or they say it didn’t happen but the threat of it was created as fear-based CIA Cointelpro Psy-Op propaganda.
Either way, the US government, the “elite”, The Freemasons, and Illuminati are of course all involved (according to them).
From Wiki regarding the McMartin Trial:
“The McMartin preschool trial was a day care sexual abuse case of the 1980s. Members of the McMartin family, who operated a preschool in California, were charged with numerous acts of sexual abuse
of children in their care. Accusations were made in 1983. Arrests and
the pretrial investigation ran from 1984 to 1987, and the trial ran from
1987 to 1990. After six years of criminal trials, no convictions were
obtained, and all charges were dropped in 1990. When the trial ended in
1990 it had been the longest and most expensive criminal trial in American history.[1] The case was part of day care sex abuse hysteria, a moral panic over alleged Satanic ritual abuse in the 1980s and early 1990s.”
After reading the SCUM manifesto I realised that women collectively are insane. Any sane person would have looked at that and then put the writers and anyone who espoused said beliefs into an asylum. Instead we have Bobbitt jokes doing the rounds.
The insanity and hatred are deep.
QUOTE: “After reading the SCUM manifesto I realised that women collectively are insane. Any sane person would have looked at that and then put the writers and anyone who espoused said beliefs into an asylum. Instead we have Bobbitt jokes doing the rounds.”
You got that right. I pulled a screenshot of the review ratings from http://www.goodreads.com which is one of the more mainstream online book reading communities. Over 1300 ratings and 78% of the people liked this man hate bible. Also worth noting that many men gave it a 4 and 5 star rating.
NO MISOGYNY HERE I SEE. YOUR MOTHER SHOULD HAVE HAD YOU ABORTED. YOU MAKE ME SICK YOU VILE RAPIST
In the words of GBFM:
LOLZLOLZOLOLZZZZZZ
I thought Quintus Curtius banned you?
NOTHING WILL SILENCE OUR VOICES….YOUR SILLY BANNING IS JUST LIKE THE CENTURIES OF OPPRESION AND MISOGYNY. I WILL NOT STOP UNTIL THIS WEBSITE IS SHUT DOWN.
Lol sister i love you! ( no lesbian) glad you are back,me too are back and together we will put in their place again these men that are out of control haha HIGH FIVE
If you are legit women, scream all you want, your words are wasted.
I have a hot little Filipina begging me to come over to fuck her and let her do my laundry and massage my back, and I fully intend to do so. Very soon.
I’m encouraging young men to start their own businesses (getting a trade is the easiest way to start your own business, and as an added bonus, you can hire just men because men dominate most trades anyway), make money, live alone, and go to another country a few times a year for sexcations. If he meets somebody he loves and wants to marry, get a prenup in all pertinent languages, bring her over, and keep her at home and don’t let her make friends unless it’s with others of her same kind; have kids and make sure she stays a devoted housewife.
We don’t need Western femcunts anymore. Men are good at ingenuity. This is my workaround. I don’t need western women anymore. 😛
Hahahahahaha
Can’t you false men do something better with your mouth?
Like swallow arsenic or something? Get your mind outta da gutter. Like the dead woman after a gang bang.
Are you a woman or a man?
You’re welcome.
Not bad, amigo, sounds like you & I have some things in common.
Would love to find out more about your opinions/etc on Filipinas; my email is in my author’s description. Thanks.
Well, I’ve had a Filipina employee for a while now and she’s a total sweetheart. I’ll be sure to report back after my cherry trip to Southeast Asia. Not too sure that I can tie myself down to just one lady, or even one nationality, but it’ll be fun either way. 😀
YOU ARE NOT ACTUALLY SHOUTING OR DOING ANYTHING INTIMIDATING BY LEAVING THE CAPS LOCK BUTTON ON. IT JUST MAKES IT HARDER TO READ WHAT YOU ARE WRITING
If you have to ask the answer is obvious.
Yup. These Americunts are only cutting their own throats.
Suuuure ya do 🙂 Whatever makes you feel better about yourself and your cat
Who let this man out of her feminine jail cell (read rape chamber)?
Man.
YOUR CAPS LOCK BUTTON IS ON, CLICK IT OFF.
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/7752/capslockor6.jpg
I think i’ve spend a good 2mins laughing at this diagram before reading it. if you dropped all the mathcraft and got rid of that thing with numbers and backslashes then it would be readable for some of our ‘guests’.
Yeah, I googled SCUM Manifesto as this was the first time I’ve ever heard of it. It would be scary if I thought women were actually capable of eradicating men. It’s good for a laugh.
Female “kickboxer” class girls think what they are doing is equivalent to bare knuckles brawling. When they see Angelina Jolee jump in the air kick 8 guys to the ground before landing, their lack of knowledge of physics makes them believe its possible.
Well remember, with females it’s all about feeeeeelings not logic or reason. IOW, their thinking is not reality based.
Yea because we really think this is possible! I wish I were as smart as you men, I must owe you sex not because you taught me this interesting fact! Thank you! (this is satire if you cant tell, Im not sure how dumb you guys are.)
Heh, they wouldn’t survive without us Sam. They’d be cutting their own throats.
“To call a man an animal is to flatter him, he’s a machine, a walking dildo” In this quote, one can find hypocrisy, lack of empathy and stupidity. A while back, Scandinavia used to be my ‘promised’ land, now I think living there must be hell with all the cultural Marxism and rampant radical feminism.
Only go there if your aspiration in life is to be sackless total mangina. Which I know you aren’t.
Are you black? You’ll do well with the ladies in Scandanavia. They luuurve them some chocolate. They even fly all the way to the Caribbean to get them some. See the little blondie at 3:38 and tell me she’s not Scandinavian. Swirl away, bro. Swirl away!
If I’m not mistaken, this is part of a longer documentary, and if it is, then there’s more to it than this clip. Later in the film, women lament their foreign love experiences. They whine and say things like, “I thought he really loved me, but he just used me for my money.”
Women can’t even do sexcations right. They get all emotionally wrapped up in it. We men, however, know it’s all just about wetting our dick and nothing more. It’s the same with cougars; my ex-wife’s best friend is a late-40s cougar and more than a few times she would fall in love with some 20-something, then wonder why he didn’t want to spend time with her outside of the bedroom. “But I thought he loved me,” the idiot cunt would complain. “No, he’s just fucking ashamed to be seen in public with you,” I’d think to myself.
Men find it much easier to fuck’n’chuck. From what I’ve read here, it seems young women have learned to fuck’n’chuck too, but they’ll grow out of that soon enough. Men never do.
4:36 Tell me he’s not in it just for the money.
These idiots will have a none too pleasant surprise when they go overseas to meet other white women in their own culture.
Don’t leave fellas, they are a different animal on their own turf, and around people they know.
Your “virility” will become another drop in the bucket. LOL
What I saw, these women in this video would not be able to pay me to have sex with them.
“These idiots will have a none too pleasant surprise when they go overseas to meet other white women in their own culture.”
That one “cute guy” with the golden eyes (who the young blonde teenage looking girl is kissing around the 3:38 mark) says he’s been to France with his French “girlfriend” and he loved it.
“Your “virility” will become another drop in the bucket.”
Appearantly its more than just one drop 😉
(African American readers will get the reference).
“What I saw, these women in this video would not be able to pay me to have sex with them.”
Most in the video were older. But that young blonde girl? The islands are filled with chicks like her.
Fella, there, your color will be like catnip to their rabid progressive mindset. You could easily manipulate a ton of them in a way a local man would get jailed for…because your “ancestors were so oppressed.” Also, because you will not have spent your entire life being mentally/emotionally castrated since birth by radical feminist witches.
You will be their catnip in that you will fullfill their fantasies of what any man should be, masculine; but also your skin color will satiate their brainwashed imperative of their ideological mind to “return the favor” for all the “injustices” you have suffered.
Go there like you are AL Sharpton, and they will cream themselves before you even talk.
But make sure you leave. How long can one boil in hydrochloric acid before they die?
TYPICAL IRRITATED SORE-LOSER BOY. YOU CAN’T ACCEPT FEMALE EQUALITY AND SO YOU PROMOTE RAPE AND HATE SPEECH.
I LOOK FORWARD TO WHEN HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON IS MY COMMANDER IN CHIEF; THIS COUNTRY STILL HAS SOOOO FAR TO GO BASED ON THE RAPISTS CONTRIBUTING AND READING THIS WEBSITE…
THE BATTLE GOES ON BOYS….AND THAT’S WHY I USE ALL CAPS. YOU WILL NEVER SILENCE ME AND MY FEMALE BRETHREN.
LOL
LOL at “female BRETHREN”. So sexist, you mental midget.
*Ahem.* Mods? This dude be trolling.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOUR IDIOTS. I’M NOT TROLLING. MY NAME IS MAUREEN BERNSTEIN. I AM HAPPY TO CALL ANY OF YOU RIGHT NOW FROM SKYPE TO LET YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT I THINK ABOUT YOU. YOU MAKE ME SICK. I HAVE KNOWN MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN RAPED AND I HAVE MADE IT MY MISSION TO SHUT DOWN THIS RAPE WEBSITE
Free skype show baby?
I’M NOT YOUR BABY. I HAVE A HUSBAND WHO LOVES ME. IS THAT YOUR NAME “SAM” ? I’M NOT AFRAID OF YOU OR OF REVEALING MY IDENTITY. REVEAL YOUR NAME AND LET’S HAVE A CHAT SO I CAN SHOW YOU WHAT A WHUPPIN IS.
Why would you be afraid of me baby?
tits or get the fuck out.
Dude, she wants you. badly. No cunt would have that kind of pepper for a man she isn’t falling in love with.
Remember, alpha fucks, beta bucks… 5 minutes getting ass plugged by you is worth a lifetime with that loser dweeb she calls her husband… she will remember you in her middle age, surrounded by cats with her worked-to-death husband’s ashes by her elbow, and her chair will grow moist as she recalls the greatest sexual experience of her life.
I bet she came here right after reading ‘shades of grey’ in order to try and tease her way into some alpha’s bed.
is it rape if I leave out a fake bank statement with extra zeros in it to get play?
Aren’t you worried about Skype rape? After all, that headset has a dick sticking out of it you have to talk into to hear.
‘brethren’?
durrrr…
HAHA HOW WITTY YOU ARE BRIGADON. WHAT’S YOUR NAME AND NUMBER? LET’S SEE WHAT A “MAN” YOU ARE. REVEAL YOURSELF AND YOU WILL BE HEARING FROM ME AND THE AUTHORITIES.
REMEMBER YOU CAN’T GET CHILD PORN. YOU CAN SPREAD RAPE AND HATE SPEECH. YOU ARE, ALL OF YOU, CRIMINALS AND CONTRIBUTING TO CONSPIRACY BY JOINING THIS WEBSITE.
RETURN OF RAPISTS…
My name is Brian Murphy, I live in Salt Lake City, Utah, right off 45th south and 7th east. I am the third condo on the left when you enter pacific meadows condominiums. My car is the blue 88 mustang. A hint, head east when you get off interstate 70 at the 45th south exit.
Bring it on, Bitch.
Mr. Maureen, its “sistren”.
Your attempt at impersonating a woman? FAIL.
Mr. “Maureen” – its “sistren”.
Female sistern is a pleonasm.
I hope MAUREEN posts a whole lot more. She is fun, in a creepy and socially retarded way. Picking on her is a lot like tripping a blind kid. Especially the way she keeps ranting about making it her ‘mission’ to shut ROK down.
Whatcha plan on doing, sweety? Crying? better watch that, a woman’s tears make me horny.
btw- ‘sisten’ is even more ignorant and retarded than ‘female brethren’. try ‘sisterhood’, or even simply ‘sisters’.
And typing what seems like a reasonable and well-thought out comment without using capslock is a lot scarier than what looks like the childish rantings of a twelve year old boy pretending to be a woman.
Yeah, it’s just a troll. just have fun with it.
what really gets me laughing is the way she throws the word ‘rapist’ around like she thinks it will hurt us.
I think Rape is funny as hell. you know, 9 out of 10 people enjoy gang rape.
Rape USED to be scary, it used to provoke a furious response, back when ‘rape’ meant some screaming woman being beaten and savaged by a barbaric monster… But now? when you have ‘rape rape’ and ‘date rape’ and ‘I woke up with a hangover’ rape and ‘six weeks later I decided I was raped’ rape and ‘I don’t want my daddy to know I’m a whore’ rape, and ‘Eyeballing’ rape, frankly, I could give a shit about being called a rapist. Doesn’t bother me in the least.
Now, if woman tells me she got raped, I check to see if she has been maimed. If not? welp, no harm done… it’s not like a rapist took her virginity.
LOL.
An endless supply of comedy, man.
I wonder how long it will be before a swedish anders breivik comes forward.
what i find interesting of these WNs that go crazy about immigrants is that they see their women as innocent. The whole reason the immigrants are here is because their women became “liberated” which resulted in low fertitlty rates which resulted in immigrants and coming in and taking jobs.
With hypergamy out, now she has a buffet of assorted bad boy lovers aka 3rd world guys that dont want to assimilate cause they know the culture is beta and sucks ass…doesnt take a genous to figure that out…
now the beta white boys aka WNs have to pay the bill as beta providers(not a playa among em).They are pissed that they failed the biggest shit test of all…feminism.
Women are just naturally more bossy than men. The feminists make me think of the bossy little girls from elementary school all grown up. You know, the ones who couldn’t wait to tattle to the teacher about some other kid who wasn’t following some arbitrary rule with sufficient zeal.
Feminism’s vice-like grip on Sweden is about twenty years old now. I remember when sweden was synonymous with porn and free love and then suddenly everything changed. I haven’t been back there since the 90s but perhaps the signs were always there. Most of the men are incredibly laid back, the women have always been fairly assertive. You have pippi longstocking as a model for young girls being able to do incredible things (namely things they aren’t physically capable of), then you have women who are generally tall of stature, who look great when they’re young but seem to age quickly on account of their fair complexions in combination with the sun (i.e. resentment), and who were evidently keen to live down their porno past (indignation) and their viking ancestry (historical rape culture)
I don’t know quite how it happened, but sometime in the 80s gender rot got onto the agenda in a big way, although I think gender ‘equality’ goes back a long way in Sweden, not least because of its socialist history. If you’ve read Stieg Larsson you may or may not be aware that his Girl with the Dragon Tattoo murders were based on the murder of a prostitute by two white male pillars of society. In fact the murder was almost certainly committed by a foreigner and the two were cleared but this appears to have been a cause celebre that helped convinced swedish society that swedish women were under seige from violent swedish men. In fact the exact opposite seems to be true – ethnic swedish men are about as domesticated as you can find, and their viking ancestry seems to have been gutted from their DNA – however shortly after this debate they criminalised the ‘buying’ of sex (but not the sale) and swedish / nordic feminism never looked back.
I think swedish men have a lot to answer for here. Stieg Larsoon was a Trotskyist Leninist, and believed absolutely in a very radical notion of gender equality, hence his male rapist arse-kicking eponymous anti-heroine. Central to the girl with the dragon tattoo is the notion that men oppress women with violence. Blomquist the hero is one of about two good men in the novel, and he is also the ultimate white knight mangina. Blomquist is characterised by the fact he gives away all his power to women. He gives control over his newspaper to women, lets his lover sleep with who she wants, is infinitely trusting and accommodating, makes no demands, bends over backwards etc. And guess what all this good behaviour results in endless sex from beautiful women.
Every other male is a rapist or a murderer or both. His universe is absolutely black and white. This novel series was one of the best selling in history. In other words the political philosophy of the Feminist Initiative, that all men are effectively rapists, and that male – female relationships are characterised by inherent oppressive violence is being exported to everyone who reads that novel. That’s how trotskyist permanent revolution works I guess.
Now the nordic solution to prostitution is being exported to France, probably Germany and elsewhere and Swedish / nordic gender quotas solution for boardroom representation for women are being adopted in the west etc.
Meanwhile the nordic council of ministers recently commissioned a report (which it hasn’t fortunately implemented) that suggested that any website etc that demonstrated anti-feminist speech was guilty of hate-crime and should be shut down and criminalised: http://theyoungsocialist.tumblr.com/post/46850658722/nordic-report-on-how-to-fight-anti-feminism-in-the
Enjoy RoK while you can
I regret ever giving my money to them when I went to see the American version. Damn that cinematography was great, though.
its hard to boycott fun films but its not a bad idea if you’re being trained while your being entertained
Wow…I watched and read all those Tattoo books and fliks. Themes are obvious now. Remember “Avatar” with the badass female warriors and the bull dyke lesbian chopper pilot who is the hero?? Same garbage…
yep, we need some cultural marxism deconstruction to see through all this shit
I saw one of the Swedish productions and it’s hard not to roll your eyes at a 99 pound weakling cunt being the hero. Good thing there’s fiction to inspire the femcunts.
I’d do Noomi Rapace. Not a bad little thing.
I remember a movie with Angelina Jolee jumping up in the air surrounded by 8 machinegun wielding men kicking all of them in the face and they hit the ground before she landed. I realized physics makes that impossible but probably every girl thinks it is.
MichaelMobius1, you write well and make a lot of good points, but I think we need to clear out the Swedish timeline here a bit. Essentially, the late 60’s and 70’s in Sweden saw a strong wave of Feminism, in the reactive climate of the 80’s it was out of fashion (and you know how being out of fashion works on the female mind – yeah, those were good times!), only to return in the 90’s, heralded by books such “Backlash” by Susan Faludi (1989).
How this could happen is something of an enigma, since there was essentially no objective reason for Feminism’s regained support. However, I believe it came along with the late 60’s/early 70’s pop culture retro wave, which was a prominent feature of the late 80’s/early 90’s. Like riding a radio wave, Feminism managed to smuggle back in its viral pathogens, this time infecting culture and officialdom at its core.
As for Swden being synonymous with “free love and porn”, I don’t think that ever existed. It was just about some 50’s and 60’s radical movies that showed a little skin, combining left wing messages with a nudist moral purism, and suddenly it was like the whole world thought this was some kind of haven of sin. Confounding and quite incomprehensible.
Interesting social history. For myself I spent many a
summer in sweden but wasn’t that aware of the politics. I did notice quite a few women with good careers well before that became the norm elsewhere, but certainly there didn’t seem to be anything oppressive as is the case now. I recall a friend at university in sweden in the 90s describing how her campus was besieged by feminism and that friends were spontaneously combusting into lesbianism.
Sweden’s a small country with a handful of universities – which I would presume were quite easy to ‘infiltrate’, but the media seems to have played a role in this transition, particularly in giving credence to the idea that sweden was a society besieged
by male violence. The case I mentioned which inspired Stieg Larsson – the sadistic murder of a prostitute by the name of Catrine da Costa – seems to have helped start the ball rolling. Julie Bindel, a feminist, has acknowledged that da Costa’s murder, provoked the women of Sweden to organise against male brutality” http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/8157585/The-real-life-Swedish-murder-that-inspired-Stieg-Larsson.html. Larsson’s trilogy were also based on
real-life cases of domestic violence and honour killings and this seems to reflect the rad fem idea that male violence is systematic oppression by the patriarchy and that idea is reflected in the feminist initiative’s (aborted) idea of a man tax. What’s interesting is that the fact that the da Costa case fell apart just as later the satanic conspiracies referred to elsewhere on this board were proven to be groundless. Facts have never got in the way of feminist progress.
Swedish leftoidism is so nutso that it appears to be (slowly) turning off the native Swedish population. In the following link, scroll down to the bargraph in the “Electoral History” section to see how the Social Democrats (the Swedish version of the USA’s Democrat Party) have been sinking over the past couple of decades:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_Social_Democratic_Party
Unfortunately, they still have a ways to go. The Moderaterna (the Swedish version of the USA’s Republicans) and their leader Reinfeldt are still complete idiots when it comes to Third World immigration.
As a singer in my country says: “If you take out your companies of our lands, we will take our immigrants back from yours”. Take Coke, McD, et al back to your country and I promise you not to put a feet into the US.
Because it’s nothing to do with the rest of your countrymen, for instance, buying Coke and McD. All you have to do is genuinely boycott them, and they will leave. But that’s not going to happen, is it? Because you and the ordinary people where you live actually have little in common.
That’s not what he means. Americans export their culture everywhere, with the hopes that people will buy into it. So don’t be surprised when they do.
And yet, nobody forces them to buy the “export”, so PaulMurryCbr is still correct.
Nothing hurts the left more than being held accountable for their own choices in life. If you detest American culture then stop buying McDonalds/Coke/etc. and the problem goes away pretty quickly.
” The rhetoric heated up when some members began to publically call for
sex to be based purely on verbal consent, a law like the policy on
sexual conduct at Antioch College.”
Verbal consent as opposed to written consent/signed contract? While the verbal consent is more natural and romantic, contractual consent is safer for men. At least with that we have proof.
Well obviously you would have been stupid not to record both the consent and the actual act. If you just produced a paper she signed she would just claim duress. If you have video of her saying “Yes, take me” as she is ripping your shirt off its going be a bit harder to refute.
Well then the vast majority of men the world over are “stupid” because the vast majority are not stealthily recording consent. As far as not stealthily recording the “actual act” – that’s not being stupid, that’s being smart, because doing so is illegal and can land you in jail.
The only time they would find out you filmed them without their consent is when they are falsely accusing you of rape/sexual assault. This puts them in the rather embarrassing position of having to admit they committed a felony, among other things. I might further add that recording somebody without their consent is not illegal everywhere.
As for the men world over bit, that is not relevant because most places do not required verbalized consent. I was making my comment in the context bizzaro world where you had to abide by such a rule. For example, if you were at Antioch College you should be filming any sexual act you engage in.
Sex often happens unplanned and spontaneously so stealthily setting up a way to video sex is practically impossible in many situations.
willbest obviously has motion activated cameras set up in every room, closet, garage ,attic, basement,crawlspace and the dumpster nearby.
“Well obviously you would have been stupid not to record both the consent
and the actual act.”
– That makes men the world over “stupid” because they are not recording any verbal consent.
” If you just produced a paper she signed she would
just claim duress. If you have video of her saying “Yes, take me” as
she is ripping your shirt off its going be a bit harder to refute.”
– What’s not “hard to refute” in that case is a dude who stealthily videoed sex, which, by the way, is illegal.
Who’s stupid now?
maybe videotaping for security reasons would be a good idea but that could be illegal in this case(assuming its not online), but youd be glad to have it when the cops come then again though you might be punished fo the tape.
Splooge my friend, I’ve already had this conversation hours ago. Just scroll down a bit.
“While I do think part of this obsession stems from female biology (women
are far more likely to adhere to authority and submit to dominant
people)”
– If this were true there wouldn’t be so many men around the world involved with religion, like there has been for thousands of years and continues today, with even so called “red pillers” defending The Cathedral.
” I have
repeatedly seen this at feminist blogs — such as Eve Bit First – with the projection of violent fantasies of rape, murder and freaky sexual behavior onto men”
– Oh come on, kink and fetish are by no means female dominated. Take a look, if you dare, at the sort of porn men are searching for.
heh, do you really think that the church was not an amazing avenue to incredible power for a huge number of men around the twelfth century?
Men are engineered to compete for power, it’s what we do well. Submission is engineered into females, it’s what they do well IF the male is dominant. However, with this submissive impulse comes a constant questioning of if ‘this male is dominant enough’.
“heh, do you really think that the church was not an amazing avenue to
incredible power for a huge number of men around the twelfth century?”
No I don’t. It was an amazing avenue to incredible power for a small number of cunning bastards. The vast majority of men involved with religion have always been and still are, the blind, stupid and submissive sheep.
You apparently have very little grasp of actual history. Compared to the average lot of men around them, the church during the middle ages was incredibly powerful, as was belonging to it.
primogeniture ensured that the vast majority of men were powerless in ‘the real world’. The church allowed those men to have a path to responsibility that completely sidestepped the nobility.
Seriously, read some real history, the kind you find in a library, not the crap they feed you in middle school.
Emancipate yourself from mental slavery. None but ourselves can free our minds.
Thank you, I have. the truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off.
“Compared to the average lot of men around them, the church during the middle ages was incredibly powerful, as was belonging to it.”
– Man, please. The “average lot of men” were true believers. Publicly defy the church or even the concept of god and you were done for.
“primogeniture ensured that the vast majority of men were powerless in ‘the real world’.”
– They were just as powerless in “the church”.
“The church allowed those men to have a path to responsibility that completely sidestepped the nobility.”
– Not at all. The nobility was The Church and The Church was the nobility.
And what sort of “responsibility” are you referring to? The responsibility for the common man to bow his head at The Cathedral was not something that granted him power.
–
you are confusing catholic and puritan. educate yourself.
“you are confusing catholic and puritan”
Not in the least.
Truth has never “pissed me off.”
If it has not, then you have not actually grasped the truth.
OK I’ll bite. What’s this pissed-off worthy “truth” you speak of?
Everything you has been taught is a lie. The version of history you have read is a lie. The idea that women are human beings worthy of respect is a lie. the ‘church history’ you have read filled with evil crusaders terrorizing helpless pagans is a lie. Religious freedom is a lie. The inquisition’s iniquity is a lie. human dignity? lie.
There are only two kinds of men (and one kind of woman) Those who seize what they want by any means necessary, and betas.
Chivalry, the church, marriage, all were created by beta men as a way to ensure that the losers had adequate access to resources and women. each attempt to destroy these were an attempt to reassert the dominance of the few over the needs of the many. And, for the most part, like language, they worked… they are proven methods for allowing non-beastial men to improve society.
Destroy these working methodologies at your peril. You are not a beast, you are not an alpha. You continue to eliminate the structures that allow you to feel like a human and a man, you will have only yourself to blame at the result.
“Everything you has been taught is a lie.”
Well I agree. Most of the bullshit I learned in this country has in fact been inaccurate.
Most of what you learn everywhere is a lie. I have spent most of the last 30 something years simply trying to figure out, not the truth, but which lies are worth keeping.
Honor, Faith, Honesty, confidence, responsibility, duty, noblesse oblige… these are the lies that define ‘man’, and are the ones that we can live with that allow us to live with other men in comfort and respect. They are lies worth preserving.
Any lies that violate these basic precepts, which have been proven to allow men to live as a civilized people over millenia, are suspect AT BEST and counter-survival at worst. And in the end, survival (and reproduction) is the name of the game… The lies that make us men allow us to survive and thrive better than those that make us into beasts, since civilized lies allow us to pool our strength instead of setting us forever against each other in the name of survival.
We have defeated every predator on the planet. We have tamed nature itself. Our environment is our plaything to do with as we will. We have unravelled the genetic code of nearly every animal including ourselves, we have split the atom and made it dance to our will. we have created unimaginable destruction and terraformed the deadliest deserts. We have survived nearly the greatest depths in the ocean and measured the planet’s core, we have placed objects in the sky that will never fall, and set foot on the moon itself. We have redesigned our own food, and nearly every creature we have come into contact with has either bent to our will or been destroyed. We can see a pebble on a beach from orbit, and measure the radiation from a pulsar so far away that all of human history has occured before light itself has had time to arrive from the star. Man has, with the great lies of civilization that allow him to cooperate with other men, become gods by any reasonable standard.
And perhaps the greatest achievement, the thing that made all this possible, was the creation of an ethical and moral code which could allow men to trust each other enough to work together to achieve these things. And foremost among those achievements was the concept of a greater being… something men could agree upon was greater than themselves, a goal for attaining, a way to look beyond the simple grind of birth, life, and death in a century, a way to feel as if immortality was truly within your grasp. Religion gave us hope, and a reason to strive and maintain the great lie of civilization.
And now arrogantly militant Athiests want to strip away our greatest achievements, destroy the very framework upon which cooperation and achievement rests, They want to slap people in the face with inevitable scientific fact and destroy all spiritualism and hope. They have a truly religious belief that the only thing in this world which exists is that which they can measure. This is wonderful for scientists, but for heroes, for doers, for men of action, this strips away reason and leads to nothing but nihilism and eventual dissolution.
So please, be my guest, stop believing in anything, having faith in anything, striving for anything… since, after all, it will all be wiped away in ten billion years, so why even bother trying?
But leave the rest of us out of it. We need no excuse for achievement, for greatness, and for faith… it is it’s own excuse, it has stood the test of time and philosophical worthiness, and has lead to greater and greater achievements in our lifetime. Achievement needs no reason, it IS.
Besides, who knows? Maybe with faith we shall discover a way to survive the heat death of the universe. Too bad you people gave in to the inevitability of destruction, stopped paddling, and drowned in milk… I plan on sitting on a pat of butter.
The labels alpha en beta is paradoxical here, if you keep your believes to yourself it’s ok.
Alpha thinking, like bullies on a playground, supports the labeling. Alphas know what to do to reproduce. But in their mind they could be beta.
I prefer the terms ‘dominant’ and ‘submissive’, but that term is far too misunderstood. Perhaps ‘Noble’ versus ‘peasant’?
It doesn ‘t matter, a noble person would label a peasant, there is no use for a peasant to label a noble person maybe. I don’t know. See it as a survival vacation, the dominant group leader thinks it’s ok to cross the rope bridge.He leads the group, but maybe it’s not a good idea. Also a beta could make that call, it doesn’t matter.But the alpha does, it could be right it could be wrong.
so you are saying natural leader versus natural follower?
regardless of actual ability, the natural leader has what we can label ‘charisma’, which trumps fitness for leadership every time. This is what I suppose is referred to as ‘natural alpha’.
The problem with using dominant and submissive is, of course, the fact that all men are naturally dominant and all women are naturally submissive, so it becomes too easy for a woman to see a man who is a natural follower, and dismiss him as ‘submissive’ erroneously… thus what we term ‘beta’.
It does not help that most betas refuse to recognise this instinctive female erroneous labelling. They are often simply too laid-back to engage in dominance challenges, and do not recognise the false labelling for what it truly is… an attempt to move a male into the category of female and thus out of the breeding competition.
“Friend zone’ is just a way of telling you that a woman has decided you are also a woman, and a much lower-status one at that. Any man that accepts this sort of treatment is badly broken.
As long as it’s natural yes.
A natural leader is better off with natural followers than leader wannebees.
But we are not all nature either, there’s always the greater good for building a better bridge.
A fierce alpha male could bring the whole thing down but could easily be loved by women.
They say the mating game is even scent related.
In a rational decision making way she could be not bothered.
Women are to me emotion guided, who can endlessly defend the undefendable.
As the word friendzone already reveils its cause, the zone is hers.
This dominated kind of thinking is useless for friends indeed.
“Too bad you people gave in to the inevitability of destruction, stopped paddling, and drowned in milk.”
Who’s “you people”?
I would think from the context that answer would be obvious. Those who have ‘cast aside the shackles of faith’
Well I’m not convince religion is needed to cultivate all the civilizational qualities you describe above. Scientific studies are coming out daily pointing to evidence that most if not all of those qualities are inherent. That being said, perhaps organized religion was needed at some point in history but now humanity has evolved.
I don’t know either way and there are more possibilities than the few I mention here.
I absolutely agree that a sense of something bigger than oneself is probably needed for the human to reach his or her full potential, and perhaps even just to be happy.
However I don’t think organized religion is needed for that.
scientific studies? really? Please document or at least link this.
I do not think humanity has evolved. And the fact remains that Organized religion is the only thing that we KNOW has the ability to reach for the potential of the human race.
The idea that ‘something else’ can take it’s place is at best betting on a busted flush, and at worst wishful thinking and reality denial at it’s best.
Note I use the term ‘reality’ and not ‘fact’. Reality does not neccessarily conflict with faith. In fact, Faith, by it’s very nature, complements reality… adds to it, rather than denying it.
You cannot KNOW that there is no god. For all any of us know, god sits across from the pope every morning at breakfast and discusses current events. There is no proof for, or against, the existence of a deity. So faith in a deity, or in organized religion, does NOT deny reality… it accents it.
Bear in mind that the Catholic church acknowledged the existence of evolution less than six years after Darwin’s book was published. They acknowledged that the earth revolved around the sun less than two years after Galileo published it, despite the fact that Galileo had been convicted of Heresy.
The Catholic church NEVER denied reality when it was proven… they simply had a lot more stringent rules of scientific veracity before publicly supporting a discovery than most scientists at the time had, and did not want to be seen chasing ‘cold fusion’
The fact is, ten minutes in a bastion of humanity… the inner city, a trailer park, even an art party, can convince you that mankind has NOT evolved beyond the need for an external code of ethics. The only people who truly believe that we are ‘beyond that’ are ivory-tower intellectuals completely and utterly out of touch with reality. people who have never stood in line for a soup kitchen, who have never done a day’s worth of REAL work, people who are literally at the apex of a huge supply line crewed by the very people they refuse to understand. Even the creation of so simple an item as a pencil requires a vast number of real workers, humans you refuse to conceptualize, and automation which they maintain.
But the idea that humanity has ‘evolved beyond the need for religion’ is so childlike that I am having serious trouble taking anything you say seriously. The overeducated, intellectually divorced, and oversocialized Ivory-tower idiots that believe this are just as susceptible to crimes of passion, rage, greed, despair, hatred, slothfulness, and gluttony as any gang-banging Compton crackhead. to look this sort of reality straight in the eye and then to deny that it is simple fact is to make oneself a complete fool.
Evolution does not means smarter. It means whatever helps you live to reproductive age gets promoted. It might mean running faster, or having blood cells that disease can’t recognize as human. High IQ, upper body strength, ability to plan, & ability to build would only help you breed in areas where winter forced you to build structures to survive.
be careful, you are treading into the arenas of race realism…
Again, I just love how a site that claims that it’s a “PUA/Game” does nothing but complain about feminism or the LGBT. I mean, at this point, you might as well just drop the act and embrace the fact that you’ve turned into the MRA equivalent of Jezebel.
the personal is political isn’t it?
Relax sweetheart, men sometimes talk about the “icky” stuff. History shows it’s what they do. Gonna have to deal with it you poor thing.
Oh, I could understand why you’d do it everyone once and awhile, but when it actually starts becoming an almost weekly, or even daily occurrence, the true nature of the site becomes pretty obvious (which in this case is an overly glorified version of the “He-Men Women Haters Club”)
It will be ok precious. I’m sure there’s gonna be another article on pussy acquirement before you know it. A couple of meany words were said about radfem leftards dude. Get a grip, it’s not the end of the world. Might be worth just not clicking on the “He- Men Woman Haters club” articles in the meantime if it upsets you so eh?
With all the brainwashing in the media (forced myself to sit through the shit that is Frozen), day in day out, hour in hour out, neverending, this site is doing way way little than what it can do.
Young men, and old men alike need this kind of slap back to reality, daily, hourly.
Besides, what is written here is backed up by facts and numbers, likely more reliable than made up facts and farted numbers.
Considering both sides have an agenda to push of some sort, I would use the term “facts” very loosely if I were you. (Yes, because of course you’d hate “Frozen”, after all, “Liberal Agenda”, and blah, blah, blah, blah…..).
The thing about RoK…is that seems to drifting away from the focus it claims to have, that being a “PUA” site with a…*ugh* “Red Pill Bend” (I’m sorry, but that’s just a smug fucking term). But then you start seeing these articles, which clearly have an MRA leaning to them, and it sort of detracts from the initial point. It’s stops being a PUA, and just become another platform for MRA’s to bitch on.
Starting a sentence with “Again,” – Womanspeak
I agree. Well… except for that fact that over half the commenters here have a functional brain. Other than that, and the fact that none of us here want to commit gendercide, we are identical. Oh, and the fact that if a writer makes a blatant factual mistake, they are corrected instantly. Oh, and the fact that most of us here (except for the occasional enraged cunt drifting in from Jezebel) know how to use the shift key.
Sure, you could call it “functioning” if you ignore the occasional bits of antisemitism here and there…
Really? Because I’ve honestly only seen one instance where an author actually corrected himself from a previous article.
But yeah, They’re both extremes in their respected ideals, they both refuse to compromise those ideals or admit when they’re wrong, and their comment sections are basically ideological circle jerks.
lulz she’s gone from the accusations of ” He-Man woman haters club” to “nazeeeswhowanttokillsixmillionjews” in one fell swoop.
Exhibit A of why it’s probably not a good idea allowing chicks to comment here.
Didn’t you hear the He-Man woman haters club & nazeeeswhowanttokillsixmillionjews merged to become the Henazeeeswhowanttokillsixmillionjewishwomen club
Why don’t a look at your buddies posted above you. Especially the nasty little Jewish caricature.
Huh? More ” hate facts ” and meany words?
We don’t hate gays, but we don’t want them teaching boys like my nephew that straight white men are evil & there is something wrong with them if they don’t want to get it up the but. There is a gay in my circle of friends that when I said “He isn’t gay he is just lazy and found out he can have sex without any work by laying on his belly” everyone that knew him laughed about it, because he is lazy. He even said about how lesbians hate all men even gays. If anything its straight men that are targets of hate.
“Oh we don’t hate gays, it’s just we apparently think that all gays want to teach our children that straight white men are evil.”
No. Not really. Pretty sure all they want is get married and live their lives. I honestly don’t think they give two flying shits about you do with your nephew.
So because you made a passing joke with a close gay friend (at least I can assume as much, considering he let you get away with a joke like that.), and then the said gay friend made a blanketed, generalized statement about lesbians, that must automatically makes it true?
Also, yeah, while I’m not willing to go so far as to say all straight men are evil, or that they don’t have troubles of their own, they’re not all comparable to that of the LGBT.
I once asked a “feminist” once that lets say that the male species died out and men longer walked the earth, who would you blame if your upbringing was rough? who would you consider the enemy if you are not deem the “prettiest” in the group? She game me a rabble for minutes avoiding the question, Typical female defensive maneuver when logic is required for an answer. So I said you can’t even give a straight answer as an educated feminist is it men fault why you cant answer? But the something happen when I told her with a polite smile and I said when we men are gone I hope you can come to terms with your demons for when you do, you still have live with those who still haven’t. When I said that I saw a hardcore feminist eyes water because even women know how hard it is to deal with other women. >:)
first mistake. asking a feminist anything. Either tell her to suck your dick, or shout her down/avoid her. Or backslap the silly bitch if you can get way with it.
“I once asked a “feminist” once that lets say that the male species died out and men longer walked the earth”
Heh, they wouldn’t survive.
“As aforementioned, a feminist claimed half of Swedish women were subject
to male violence – that is not just an astounding number, but
emblematic of the fact that there is a direct correlation between a
feminist’s anti-male bias and her belief in how many women are victims
of male violence.”
– Were these “radical feminists” by any chance also White Nationalists? Because I’ve heard similar numbers spouted by them and they blame the influx of foreign, non-white MEN into Sweden.
ya ive looked through the numbers on immigrants there and theres hardly any. they are only present in malmo an stokholm(25% are migrants). they mentioned that since 2008 most rapes in stokolm and oslo have been by foreigners. but many wn guys say its nationally for some reason. keep in mind scandinavias laws with rape are very vague. you can have consensual sex without condom and youre at fault.
1 pretty white girl crys the whole world moves. in 06 farrah noor adams was grabbed and dragged into the woods by a scotsman and was raped and killed resulting in a 16yr sentence..but of course you never heard of it. feminism is really to benefit ugly white women and never helped people of color despite their stance on fighting racism.
also a good documentry to look up is called brainwashed a good red pill video on gendar gays n race. think it was made in norway or sweden.
“1 pretty white girl crys the whole world moves.”
And then….
” feminism is really to benefit ugly white women”
Uh, ok.
never heard of solidarityisforwhitewomen on twitter?
plus pretty girls tend to use their looks to get what they want aka trophy wives. Seems like a transaction, looks fo cash in that sense
Twitter? Uhh, no. I’m not on it. I have heard of Womanism though, which has been a womens’ movement parallel to “white” feminism all along, but you probably haven’t heard of it as its inception may be before your time and “the revolution was not twittered”.
just checked it out on wiki..surprised it doent get any media attention considering life is harder for them then the white girls…wonder why
Really so the Stockholm riots last summer where so much of the city got burned after a black man wielding a machete (like the ones that killed white soldiers in London & Paris) was shot dead by cops was just a fantasy? A week of uncontrolled riots say otherwise
“A week of riots in Stockholm has torn a hole in Sweden’s image as a beacon of social harmony.
In Husby, a suburb north of the capital where 60 percent of residents were born outside Sweden and unemployment is twice the national average, youths torched cars, schools and other buildings in a show of anger that has unsettled one of Europe’s richest nations. The riots spread to more than 10 other suburbs in Stockholm.”
Bloomberg is a white power site now according to you.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-26/sweden-riots-put-faces-to-statistics-as-stockholm-burns.html
” another part stems from this idea that if the rules are changed, then the world will change. However, this is also a form of narcissism, as feminists demand the world around them change in order to sort out their own internal conflicts. “.
I think picture related sums it up rather perfectly.
Canada’s almost as bad as Sweden and getting worse. From here on out, I’ll just make my money in this cuntry and go to Phils a few times a year for real lovin’ from a real woman. I’ll be god-damned if I ever bring her here permanently; she’s just too sweet to ruin in that way. In between visits, Skype gives us the daily interaction we need. Life’s pretty fucking good.
That’s my solution to the problem. Of course, it only works when you find a good one who’s not too much younger than yourself, and when you’re hot enough for her to stay loyal to you, and when she never hesitates to spend large chunks of her life with you on skype. At any rate, you can’t take any woman too seriously. Women are like trains; if you miss one, another will come soon enough.
But as for Canadian women in my age range? NO FUCKING WAY! YOU COULDN’T PAY ME!
“Yeah, I like being with one woman and I don’t see the problem with that
as long as the sex stays hot and she stays in her place; otherwise,
BOOT!”
– As long as “being with one woman” means you’re ok with that being short-term as opposed to long-term. Filipinas will not stay with you long-term unless you bring what they want to the table for the long haul and by reading you, you aren’t bringing anything but perhaps some short term fun and a little short term money (if that).
Of course that works in your favor also if you are ok with multiple short-term relationships.
Filipinas do short-term flings until they meet their future husbands and then BAM! they are gone.
Meh, too many of them throwing themselves at me to really care. Women come, women go, but at least Filipinas are real women and are quite enjoyable as such while with them. Petite brunettes make me hard, so I’m happy!
I don’t ‘fall in love’.
Sam you talk my kind of talk. Couldn’t have said it better myself.
Whatever babe.
Tell me about it. The commute to work class or downtown just sucks. The reason why is those stupid ads “because Im a girl” champaign on over the place. All it is just wasted money to make someone else reach off of 3rd world girls and seems to be an attempt to control that poor nations fertility since career women have less kids. A youth bulged is better than an aging society like Japan. Plus its a subtle way of westernising girls under the guise of caring.
its like another way of colonization but in terms of values and culture this time. Dam dunno why white westerners like changing other cultures but complain about them when they resist(espically in western nations)
I suppose if even Ukrainian men think Filipinas are hot they have something going for them.
“I’ll be god-damned if I ever bring her here permanently; she’s just too sweet to ruin in that way”
Agreed. NEVER bring a woman back to cuntville (US, Canada…).
More power to you Sam.
You know what this site needs? A stealth banhammer. Permit the “soft banned” people to post, but prohibit any replies to their posts. The goal is to not feed the trolls. You might think that they would welcome the chance to speak without being contradicted, but I think you’d be wrong. “Being contradicted” is not a thing to these people, they are not here to convince or persuade the other readers. It’s all about being validated. What they want – quite simply – is male attention.
I never reply to them, up vote them or down vote them.
The problem is the fools that do.
I have come to learn that the world isn’t about interactions, it’s about avoidance.
Well ain’t this the pot calling the kettle black.
How women think of men in this dysfunctional country
…so here’s these twats. Sitting in a house built by men, using tools developed by men, getting interviewed with a camera invented by men, to post on the internet using computers invented by men, all from the safety and security of their home, made possible by men.
“Hang all men!” …who the hells gonna do it sweetheart? If it doesn’t involve bitching or eating ice cream, its gonna require someone with a cock.
Children living in Swedan today!
Women in the U.S. finally realize feminism has failed. They see themselves becoming a ever increasing minority in their own country aging looks are eroding fast and they know there will not be SS## when they retire. They don’t have kids and/or not enough to take care of them. What even worse is the way they raised the kids they do have.
I suggest surrogacy and adoption of white babies, you may not have a place in the white future when you become a minority.
So many names ending in “berg” or “man”.I wonder who’s behind this movement?…
lulz you noticed that too? Shhh !! Nothing to see there, always JUST a coincidence. Now don’t wander off the reservation again.
OY VEY DIS IS A SHOAH
REMEMBER THE SIX MILLION™ YOU FILTHY GENTILE
Agreed. As long as we also remember the over 7 million Slavs that no one ever talks about.
Actually, -berg and -man/mann are northern European or germanic names. Berg (‘mountain’) is common in Sweden, whereas -man/mann is common Germany. America has a lot of German Americans, hence all the Hoffmans. Quite literally “Man of Hof (farm/land)”, so one who manages land in some way, be it laborer or owner. Jews just happen to take common surnames and sometimes change them a bit, but you cannot conflate the two. Most of these leaders are your typical narcissists or daddy-issue career girls. Believe it or not, not everything is to do with the Jews, who never, historically, had any real power until the White Man began feeling sorry for himself. Now he just stands on the sidelines while all the emotionally-uninvested leeches make his history for him.
Hey imbecies, Rosenberg IS a Jewish name and these women ARE Jewish.
You’re dumber than cattle.
Seriously? You really don’t know that -berg and -man are common Germanic name endings, having nothing to do with Jews or Yiddish? -berg is a toponym meaning rock, and -man means, well, man.
Yeah, I have a couple of likeminded European friends with these surname suffixes. Definitely not Jewish. That cunt he linked is actually an Israeli immigrant.
Yea guys… they’re all swedish and german! silly me, no group behind it here.
Long story short. Did a couple years working for a company that did on-site document destruction in a truck with a giant shredder in the back (once put a pitchfork through it no problem). We did regular stops at the local women’s shelter, not with the truck, we just brought an unmarked van to keep the place off the radar- understandable, no problem, Picked up their paperwork and brought back to the office to shred. I’ll be god damned if the women in there didn’t look like your typical segment on COPS where they responded to a domestic disturbance. Large and in charge, or so they thought. It was a case of a me looking around and saying to myself “Yeah, you probably had it coming.” And I’ll be god damned if a younger, more naive Van Zan didn’t notice the wholesale lack of black eyes, casts, and life support arrangements amongst them. Battered my ass. More like called on your bullshit by a man.
This is the ultimate problem with feminism, and other vapid ideologies. Saying it isn’t so, doesn’t make it so. People, more often than not, get what’s coming to them. What sets the manosphere/redpillers apart is that we hold each other to account for our misdeeds, and ultimately only appeal to those who acknowledge their personal mistakes. Feminists and other generic leftists do not, never have, and never will.
“And I’ll be god damned if a younger, more naive Van Zan didn’t notice
the wholesale lack of black eyes, casts, and life support arrangements
amongst them.”
Because those things never heal, right?
The only people going into those shelters are those who have actually been abused. Those who cried false allegations are warm and cozy in their own homes, not living communally and sharing a bathroom with a bunch of other folks.
So if they have actually been abused, why are they still in a shelter? Surely the abuser should have been locked up, assuming the allegations had any merit and/or proof.
I suggest you volunteer at a shelter to find out. What you will find is that the people therein generally do not have other people in the area they can go to and their resources are scarce. And yes, their abusers are often locked up or in some sort of legal process, or under restraining order. The shelters are there to help people during a transition time into self sufficiency. Communal spaces like shelters are generally not the happiest, healthiest or most comfortable places to live and I can assure you that women and children who don’t need to go there, don’t.
Most women don’t “need” to go to the frozen dessert aisle or to a labor day sale either, and yet there they are. Going where they shouldn’t go and doing what they shouldn’t do are hallmarks of the female condition. So burning thru tax dollars and living in a barracks is a small price for an all-you-can-eat sympathy buffet.
…and given the foaming-at-the-mouth fervor that cops and judges have for locking up “abusive” husbands, how the hell are these women not back in their houses in the 2 weeks it takes a black eye to heal?
“…cuz my wounds are on the iiiiinside..”*sniff*
Or more likely, because popping off and throwing god-knows-what at her man got big momma the cuff in the mouth she had coming. Daddy ain’t going to jail, but she can stay at a shelter on the taxpayer’s dime!
All of the women cited in this article have jewish surnames.
This is a bullshit post. No need to go anti semetic
Feminism: A
Jewish War on Women
http://theendofzion.com/2014/03/01/feminism-a-jewish-war-on-women/
Yoda, No doubt Jewish persons have been agents of change throughout history. But, linking ethnicity to feminism is irrational and fascist. I assume you are one who believe that Jewish people are a cabal in control of Banking, media, etc. Its the same thinking that led to the genocide in WW2. This forum is a place to discuss ideas of masculinity, not promote racist ideas.
not much of a list if it includes christina hoff sommers, author of “the war against boys” and one of the best critics of nutcase feminism. Whatever the truth, enough with the race war
How do you think the nahtzees got to power? They needed money, and they got it from wealthy bankers like the Warburgs, who were also Jewish. It seems to me the nahtzees were a bogeyman started by wealthy Jewish bankers on purpose to cause a genocide of Jews so nobody would dare question Jewish motives afterward without being compared to the nahtzees. It was disgusting, but brilliant and effective.
Have you seen the map of Soros’s holdings that came out after he financed the Ukraine coup d’état?
Take away her and add the dozen new ones since this image was released. That list can easily be a lot longer.
And to think those jews nearly got away with the holocaust without anyone suspecting a thing!….sorry I don’t really buy it
do you have a link? The guy seems to behind everything
Your joking right? I suggest you do a search on this fella before you spout off any more “citation needed” shitlib boilerplate.
http://www.humanevents.com/2011/04/02/top-10-reasons-george-soros-is-dangerous/
Mind you they forgot to mention he’s also the main financier to a bunch of radical feminists, but it’s a start for you.
*You’re* – predictive text
I am aware of Soros’ sinister plan for world domination / open society etc. I looked and couldn’t see any maps of his holdings though – He’s a long time proponent of regime change in Ukraine but what isn’t clear is whether he’s profiting or likely to profit from from what’s going down. He also plays a lot with currencies – was he betting against the ruble etc?
“”citation needed” shitlib” – predictive text again?
The golden rule: he who has the gold makes the rules.
“Its the same thinking that led to the genocide in WW2. ”
So?
“This forum is a place to discuss ideas of masculinity, not promote racist ideas.”
Go fuck your mother you wet noodle. A dog has more intellectual courage consistency than you.
“Yoda, No doubt Jewish persons have been agents of change throughout history. But, linking ethnicity to feminism is irrational and fascist.”
Moronic shabbos goy telling me about irrationality. Lol.
If telling the truth is fascism I am gladly fascist.
Jewish persons always are “agents of change” of ot harms traditional (read: sane) western, Christian society. How many Jewish MRA’s white nationalists or trad cons do you know?
It is actually fascinating to see someone use the “MUH 6 GORILLION” as a literal argument.
Nobody gives a fuck if this kind of thinking “led to the holocaust”. Maybe Jews should seize shitting all over western society.
that much is true
Enough with the “naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews” accusations you tool. I’ll admit your accusations have been a handy tactic to shutdown any ” crime think” for half a century. But it’s starting to wear a bit thin in light of the statistics.
http://i.imgur.com/WGtVTli.jpg
Hitler, is that you?
Invested shill in soft genocide of white gentiles is that you?
…that is…quite..a “coincidence”. I mean, like what are the odds!
No, Hitler posts the one with pictures of bankers. Goebells posts the one with pictures of university professors and lawyers, and Himmler posts the one with media moguls. I dunno who does politicians.
Barbara Lerner Spectre
at 2% of the white population they are disproportionately at the center of problems. Someone suggested the FED get some diversity with something other than a jew at the head, and leftists howled.
Bigots and racists are just as fucked up as the worst feminists.
Noticing trends and statistics and daring to repeat them out loud is not “racist” you fucking idiot.
Learn the difference.
It never ceases to amuse me how impervious to truth and facts these cockroaches are. He has been trained like a dog to associate criticism of Jews with Hitler and him with “THE GU EVERYBODY THINKS OF THE MOST EVIL MAN IN HISTORY” therefore he fears being thought of in this manner ergo his brain automatically shuts down.
I sincerely hope that you and your close family die a painful, slow death.
Besides, it is supposedly a religion, not a race. Right?
Carolee Schneeman
Gloria Steinem
Betty Friedman
Bella Abzug
Ruth Rosen
Susan Brownmiller
Letty Cottin Pogrebin
Carol Gilligan
Phyllis Chesler
Andrea Dworkin
Shulamith Firestone
Besides being famous 2nd wave feminists, what do they have in common?
Time to take the dark red pill..
Yup, must be a vast sinister plot to destabilize and control the world. Just like banking, media, right. Maybe, blood libel (look it up).
Along with the many great thinkers on this site, we have idiots, morons, and bigots.
Yes. Yes, it is an ancient plot.
Men that sleep with women are gender traitors! Going Sparta is something that all radical mgtows should consider.
see more 6 You must sign in to down-vote this post.
TIL: The crones of jizzabelle and femifisting finally discovered MGTOW. Cool.
THIS IS CAKE TOWN! BRUSH YOUR TEEEETH!
I wonder if those Norwegians also mandated 40% representation for women in garbage collecting, taxi driving, the military, road-workers, oil workers, and all the other jobs that men do.
And heaven forbid that men should want 40% representation in child care jobs. Imagine the “all men are pedophiles and rapists, so its not worth the risk to our children”, that would be whipped up by the feminazis.
Of course not. That would mean equality. Which is a long way away from what feminists actually want.
They don’t care about equality. They just care about the fight for superiority. Armed to the teeth with their psychology, social studies, woman’s issues degrees… they come charging into the political institutions of the western world. And all the beta-male spineless bureaucrats just bend over backwards to accomodate their shrill hysteria.
“psychology, social studies, woman’s issues degrees”
This is where the manosphere can really help turn things around. We need to teach men to laugh at these “weapons” for the foolishness that they are. Hire nobody with a Womyn’s Studies degree. Mock and belittle all attempts at pop psychology. Give them ZERO credibility, make it clear from start to finish that everytime they try to Oprah/Dr. Phil you, that they will be mocked mercilessly and laughed at.
A glass ceiling must be addressed at once. The glass cellar, nah, you guys can keep those jobs.
Very informative article. Thanks!
The very idea of a formal anti-male political party is like something out of a nightmare. Seriously. Disturbing!
Should I turn myself in to the Male Re-education Facility now or await further instructions from our feminist masters?
Tina Rosenberg
Gudrun Schyman
You know, I could write this and just leave it here, but some people would still be dumb enough to not get it.
These women are Jews. Just like a huge number of other feminists who are Jews. (Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Hugo Schwyzer, Sheryl Sandberg, Adria Richardson and a bunch of other filth that I can’t be bothered to remember) Much like many other PC claptrap that is mostly, virulently supported by Jews.
But hey, why would you listen to me? I’m just a “conspiracy nut”. 🙂
It is sometimes difficult to tell the difference between Swedish and Yiddish names. “Schyman” could be a cognate of German “Schumann” (like the composer). Also, the name “Rosén” is 100% Swedish. But yeah, if these feminists had kosher in them, it wouldn’t surprise me.
…yeah, a feminist activist named Rosenberg. Could be Chinese for all we know.
No she couldn’t because Rosenberg is a (German-sounding, actually Yiddish, which in turn is a variant of Old High-German) name used exclusively by ashkenazi jews. Chinese jews have names which are roughly equivalent to those themes also found among western jews (stone, gold, silver, mountain …) but their naming traditions are probably different from those of western jewry.
On what Corvinus says, it is indeed difficult to assign names as jewish as there are many spelling variants depending on country/language, and depending on provenience. To give you an idea, some variants of “Schyman” would be Szyman, Sayman, Siman, Seiman, Zyman. The spellings vary but their pronunciation is similar – what again depends on the language context (and knowing that anglicized spellings of non-English names often are missing their diacritic marks).
Another source of confusion is that until about the 17th century jews living in eastern Europe didn’t use family names but patronymics (son of X, daughter of Y) similar to the naming system the Arabs use until now. This (and less benign reasons) let them adopt names of the host populations when the kings of those places decreed they had to adopt the naming system we know today in the West for census reasons.
…and there you have it.
There are lots of Sandbergs, Malmbergs, etc in Sweden. I find it hard to believe that only jews would use Rosenberg. A quick search at hitta.se gives 1958 people with the name in Sweden.
(my own surname, within the same naming tradition, get ~1500 hits)
What?! That’s crazy! That’s like saying that just because jews are exponentially over-represented in academia, law, politics, media, and banking, that somehow they aren’t playing by the PC-EO-AA rules that everyone else is. Like maybe there’s a “big secret jew meeting” every year where they decide to hook each other up before they hook up anyone else. You dirty national socialist, you should be hung. Taxed, then hung. Taxed, then publicly shamed, then hung.
All those feminists bitches are jews…what a coincidence.
Ah, Sweden, the frosty laboratory of Cultural Marxism.
Gustavus Adolphus, were you ever alive?
Seems to me that the Democratic Party in the US is FI in every way except what it calls itself.
I mean, come on. There is a “war on women”?
There is a war on women
http://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Bimbo-Care-590-LI.jpg
check out the new job corps commercial “women in a mans trade” rediculous
“Half of all Swedish women are victims of male violence.” ….to which I reply, “only half?” With all the feminist’ing and whining and short haircuts and turtlenecks, I’d say Swedish men have every reason to be furious and are to be commended to only backhanding half of these unattractive shrews.
If so many women have been battered, why are so few women ever deep-fried? Far more battered fish than battered women eventually go on to be deep-fried, and the disparity is egregious. Fish make up the vast majority of fried-and-served-with-chips lunches, and its high time women start doing their part.
FISH EQUALITY NOW!
LUNCH SPECIAL! BITCH AND CHIPS! …snatch o’ the day.
If so many women have been battered, why are so few women ever deep-fried?
Actually, I think meth usage is a serious problem in poor rural areas all over America.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
“In its aftermath, let’s consider the anger that underpins the feminist movement. I have long thought anger in the feminist movement was motivated by psychology – a manifestation of obsessive compulsive personality disorder. Instead of being outright bullies – while some feminists are – most are just severe and over-the-top enforcers of “the rules.” You see this in the idea of rape culture.”
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Try the combination of hereditary psychopaths, narcissists, schizoids plus the comparatively “normal” authoritarian followers if you want to understand the feminist movement. Those constitute the bulk of the human infrastructure carrying any religious or ideological movement you’ll ever see, and feminism is no exception.
“The anger that underpins the feminist movement” is but the inner rage of psychological deviants who’ve realized, conscious- or unconsciously, that life has screwed them, that they’ll never be able to enjoy life to it’s fullest as do normal people who are not defective as they are. This anger is then projected upon normal people, in the case of the feminists upon men.
The author of this article nicely deconstructs feminists as peddlers of their own psychological problems and delusions. Thanks.
its just penis envy. Nothing more, nothing less
2Wyked consistently brings the goods to ROK.
Great post.
Who would have thought 50 years ago that the descendants of the Vikings would be taking this shit from their women? To go from Leaf Ericson to gender neutral Ikea furniture is quite a transformation… for the worse. I just don’t understand how men keep letting subversives whether they be feminists or other leftist radicals corrupt their societies under the premise of “democracy.” Whatever happened to a good ole bullet in the back of the head or hanging when it comes to traitors, subversives and Marxists?
Most men take shit from women because they hate themselves. Puas call it weak inner game, lol. To be honest, the more red pill I have become the more I’ve become disgusted with this type of subservient man – he is in a mental cage and his development is stunted with narcissism blocking any possibility of him breaking out. It’s that bad.
No, they take shit from women because of the media owners pushing feminism on a daily basis, and making sure it is taught in the schools, “exposing” and attacking any school that would keep employing teachers who say something anti-feminist.
I don’t think my statement and your statement are incompatible.
Do you think the majority of Swedes want this kind of crap? But the workers kept voting for the Social Democrats and communists after WWII, since anything the Right said was accused of being “fascist” and since they wanted financial perks, as much as possible. The socialists gave them economic benefits, and at the same time set out with their agenda to destroy old architecture, fund degenerate “modern” art, teach anti-Swedish hate in schools, etc. The workers kept voting for it all in exchange for money, even though the average worker, like the average middle classer, actually supported conservative social values. (The word “conservative” was of course also practically banned, for being “fascist”)
When workers started wisening up, so that most Swedes have been voting for the Right for many years now, the Left started replacing them through mass immigration. Of course, no immigrants who fled from communist countries. The Right, meanwhile, has become socialist in all but name – the German newspaper Der Spiegel notes that the four “right-wing” parties in Sweden, who now rule in a coalition, would have been called leftist in Germany. The leader of the main “right-wing” party has thrown out all conservatives and says he would have voted for Obama if he was in the U.S. This is a sign of how the government’s monopoly on TV, radio, schools and universities up until the 1990s completely erased all conservative ideological tradition.
Take a look at who leads the feminist party and you will see that they are all overwhelmingly Jewish. Don’t deny it. The “chosen people” are not the innocent angels you think they are.
They have had a feminist party for years. Just like Hitler who keep pushing nazi values, in the end he took over Germany just like the Feminazis have taken over Sweden!
There might be hope for Swedish men after all…
http://www.avoiceformen.com/allnews/a-voice-for-men-opens-swedish-website/
i read that a feminist group in sweden were starting a movement– it’s ALWAYS a movement– to ban de menz from slouching on public transport. I mean like these girls are allowed to be slutty, boozy, narcissistic, borderline, bossy control freaks but we are not allowed open our legs on public transport because patriarchy something something.
also beards are a symbol of male oppression
go figure
It has come to my attention, which based on this article,
informs me you have no understanding of the simple contraction “it’s”, you see, when you use “it’s” you are actually saying “it is” if you wanted to show that “it” had ownership of something, you would use the word “its”. Please try to learn your own language before you open your gullet and spout out the virulent, often antithetical, dimwitted, obstinate, and infantile trite that you erroniously refer to as “manliness”.
Aww, little feminist tries to find something to attack. Funny.
You use the word “attack” loosely, perhaps the term “correct” would be better suited. I also find no humor in someone failing to grasp even the most basic concept of their native language. It’s rather pathetic, to be perfectly candid.
Actually, quotas forcing corporate boards to include women were never introduced.
Fun fact about Gudrun Schyman: she was the former head of Vänsterpartiet, the Left Party, which is full of communists. It used to be called Vänsterpartiet Kommunisterna, but they removed “The Communists” from the end as if that would fool anyone. Schyman however was a hopeless drunk. The media covered this up, mostly. At one time she was drunk in a movie theater and wanted to go to the bathroom; when she couldn’t find the door she sat down and urinated on the floor. The media never reported this. But the newspaper Expressen was going to write about her behavior, and they called her first and asked for a comment. She lyingly claimed that she wanted time to “inform her family” (she lives in some sort of leftist hate-extremism collective) and when they agreed to delay the story a day, she quickly “went public with her problem” herself, to pretend that it was voluntary. She then had to resign from the communist party. But since she wants power, she started the Feminist Initiative instead.
The government hands out “organization aid” to e.g. sports organizations, but also to favored political propaganda operations. However, there are rules for when to give government money to a party – a party that gains 1 percent of votes gets some money, and if it enters the parliament it gets more money. “Party aid” couldn’t be given to Feminist Initiative since they didn’t have 1 percent of votes. So they were redefined as an “organization” and given money anyway by government bureaucrats, on condition that they “didn’t take part in any elections that year”, a year when there were no elections to take part in. That’s how the corruption works.
About Schyman’s demand that there be a “men tax”. She was asked in a radio interview if the tax would also be forced upon immigrant men. Uh-oh, mustn’t say anything bad about immigrants. So she said no, they wouldn’t have to pay. Why not? “Because THEY contribute something to society.” Only Western men do not contribute anything to society, she claimed.
I recently read an article where a woman was proclaiming how there is an increase in female CEOs around the world, and according to her this make men in general very angry. Just one of the more subtle easy feminists stir up hate amongst women.
What’s even more scary is that FI’s popularity is soaring again due to extreme feminism having infiltrated most of our social media. Things are looking bad. Very bad.
Apparently the FI has made a second attempt, and is gearing up for third try this year. If these people get power, the Swedes will only have them selves to blam
I am not entirely against some of Feminisms goals, I can understand why they feel the way they do, but it’s these fringe lunatics pop up that I reject their movement.
Apparently this FI made a serious error judgement.believing that after the men of Sweden had been so thoroughly emasculated psychologically, that stepping up and start the ball rolling toward physically neutering them. Or worse.
If you know anything about the sort of Feminist Rosenbergs ilk, if a few million men castrated, and reduced to 2nd class citizens would be “light punishment
More likely in her view A few million Swedish men six feet under would bemore feel “justice”. Every man on earth dead and buried, would be true justice.
It’s not like they made a secret that an ideal world would have no men in it. Look at the SCUM manifesto if you think I’m being hyperbolic. Written by a lunatic. Explained away as satire by Feminist academics . Embraced as legitimate ideology by certain fringe Radical feminists.
What’s amusing is Rosenberg actually seemed to think her “if you sleep with men you’re a traitor to your gender”, would some how increase support.
Every one knows that no the hetero female is an artificial lie created by the evil patriarchy to enslave women? Right? Surely every woman in Sweden would be free to cast off that role, and finally embrace the inner lesbian she always was! Hooray!!!
Seriously? Yes. I’m saying it, Rosenberg is probably the sort of Feminist aspires to being the Feminist Hitler.
What’s even more irritating is, you never see other Feminists step up and call this sort out. Just like “moderate Muslims” never condemn terror.
These Feminist will tell you, it’s not a war against men. It’s about “women looking out for women”. “It’s about equality”. “Men benefit from Feminism to, so you need to be supportive”, and so on.
Hell maybe it is. I’m all for an egalitarian world. I am more then willing to admit that Feminist raise valid points.
Horrible, disgusting things are done to women (and Men) by sick and twisted men every day, all around the world. Anyone who condones it is just as vile.
I can even understand why some women hate men. But to blame all men and say mass murder of men, is the solution,seems a bit excessive.
Okay enough rambling. Apparently FI made another attempt, and failed. Now they are fund raising for a third try this fall.
If they succeed, this time? The People of Sweden will only have them selves to blame.
It will be interesting to watch what happens in Sweden. Its supporters call it a “Feminist utopia” and detractors a “Feminist Hellhole”. The truth is an experiment in socially engineered egalitarianism, heavily favoring feminist ideals. For better or worse, others a waiting, watching and taking not.
But in the future if things do get ugly, if it does indeed become a true “Hellhole” , how will the rest of the world react?
I am not entirely against some of Feminisms goals, I can understand why they feel the way they do, but it’s these fringe lunatics pop up that I reject their movement.
Apparently this FI made a serious error judgement.believing that after the men of Sweden had been so thoroughly emasculated psychologically, that stepping up and start the ball rolling toward physically neutering them. Or worse.
If you know anything about the sort of Feminist Rosenbergs ilk, if a few million men castrated, and reduced to 2nd class citizens would be “light punishment
More likely in her view A few million Swedish men six feet under would bemore feel “justice”. Every man on earth dead and buried, would be true justice.
It’s not like they made a secret that an ideal world would have no men in it. Look at the SCUM manifesto if you think I’m being hyperbolic. Written by a lunatic. Explained away as satire by Feminist academics . Embraced as legitimate ideology by certain fringe Radical feminists.
What’s amusing is Rosenberg actually seemed to think her “if you sleep with men you’re a traitor to your gender”, would some how increase support.
Every one knows that no the hetero female is an artificial lie created by the evil patriarchy to enslave women? Right? Surely every woman in Sweden would be free to cast off that role, and finally embrace the inner lesbian she always was! Hooray!!!
Seriously? Yes. I’m saying it, Rosenberg is probably the sort of Feminist aspires to being the Feminist Hitler.
What’s even more irritating is, you never see other Feminists step up and call this sort out. Just like “moderate Muslims” never condemn terror.
These Feminist will tell you, it’s not a war against men. It’s about “women looking out for women”. “It’s about equality”. “Men benefit from Feminism to, so you need to be supportive”, and so on.
Hell maybe it is. I’m all for an egalitarian world. I am more then willing to admit that Feminist raise valid points.
Horrible, disgusting things are done to women (and Men) by sick and twisted men every day, all around the world. Anyone who condones it is just as vile.
I can even understand why some women hate men. But to blame all men and say mass murder of men, is the solution,seems a bit excessive.
Okay enough rambling. Apparently FI made another attempt, and failed. Now they are fund raising for a third try this fall.
If they succeed, this time? The People of Sweden will only have them selves to blame.
It will be interesting to watch what happens in Sweden. Its supporters call it a “Feminist utopia” and detractors a “Feminist Hellhole”. The truth is an experiment in socially engineered egalitarianism, heavily favoring feminist ideals. For better or worse, others a waiting, watching and taking not.
But in the future if things do get ugly, if it does indeed become a true “Hellhole” , how will the rest of the world react?
Sweden is totally gone. Feminists ignore the facts that Sweden is now the Rape Capital of the Western World thanks to the massive waves of Islamic migrant from Africa and the Middle East. However, they and the press in Sweden have been guilty of under reporting sex assaults, and identity of perps. Its sad because once Sweden was a beacon of Western values of tolerance and justice. Now its a beacon of just how careful any nation should be about its immigration policies, and the resulting benefits of not having standards.
The problem in a nutshell is: Freud was right. These “feminists” “suffer” from penis envy and they will not be satisfied until they have penises that they can rape men with anally.