Recently, Forbes ran an article alleging that thousands of men including JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon have been getting throat cancer in epidemic proportions due to HPV.
But it’s very possible that Dimon has been swept up, along with thousands of other men, by an increasingly common disease: throat cancer caused by infection with the human papilloma virus, or HPV.
“It wouldn’t be unusual,” says Eric Genden, chief of head and neck oncology at the Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. “This is an epidemic.”
…
How do you get HPV cancer? HPV is sexually transmitted. It’s mainly known as a cause of cervical cancer, which is what happens when it infects women. But men can get it by performing cunnilingus. It’s also possible, though less likely, that it can be transmitted by kissing. Eighty percent of sexually active people between the ages of 14 and 44 have had oral sex with an opposite sex partner. Researchers estimate that HPV throat cancer in men will be more common than cervical cancer in women in the U.S.
Jamie Dimon wouldn’t be the first to get throat cancer through oral sex. Last year, actor Michael Douglas said his throat cancer was also caused by HPV.
Asked whether he now regretted his years of smoking and drinking, usually thought to be the cause of the disease, Douglas replied: “No. Because without wanting to get too specific, this particular cancer is caused by HPV [human papillomavirus], which actually comes about from cunnilingus.”
Thousands of men are dying each year from infected female genitals. And not just any men—Forbes describes these men as “men at the peak of their lives and professional power”—or as we like to call them, alpha males. These aren’t just men who are sexually attractive to large numbers of women, but the ones most attentive to the sexual pleasure of their female partners. Truly our best and brightest. How can we stop this “epidemic” from claiming their lives?
I offer a modest proposal: female circumcision.
Female circumcision would remove all the the genital tissue associated with STD transmission when oral sex is performed on a woman, creating a smooth keratinized surface free from cancer spreading bodily fluids. While it may seem like an extreme measure, here are a few reasons we need to begin circumcising women in America:
We Already Cut One Gender To Protect Another
There is historical precedent for cutting the genitals of one gender to protect another from STD transmissions, and specifically HPV transmission. In 1954, researcher Ernest Wynder suggested that smegma found in men’s foreskins was causing cervical cancer in their partners. (It was later discovered his research subjects were not sexually educated enough to know if they or their partners were circumcised.) Though there is a link between cervical cancer and HPV, the link between circumcision and cervical cancer was later disproved, but not before becoming such a strong cultural meme that many doctors still use this myth to justify cutting men’s genitals.
Smegma was thought to be behind STD transmission in intact men. Smegma is of course a naturally occurring lubricant secreted by the genitals of both men and women, thought to have bacteria killing functions. The word smegma comes from the Greek word for soap. When a woman gets wet, her body is producing smegma. Women naturally produce more smegma than men, and any man who performs oral sex on a woman probably swallows some of her smegma. If smegma spreads STDs —and in particular HPV—and women have more smegma than men, then it is imperative we begin circumcising women as quickly as possible to protect men from this public health threat.
The AAP Has Already Supported Female Circumcision
In 2010, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) released a policy statement which stated that pediatricians should be allowed to perform a “ritual nick” on girls genitals for immigrant parents who come from cultures that circumcise women. The policy statement said that since pediatricians already perform the significantly more invasive procedure of male circumcision, they should be allowed to draw blood from the genitals of little girls to satisfy the demands of parents.
However, the ritual nick suggested by some pediatricians is not physically harmful and is much less extensive than routine newborn male genital cutting. There is reason to believe that offering such a compromise may build trust between hospitals and immigrant communities, save some girls from undergoing disfiguring and life-threatening procedures in their native countries, and play a role in the eventual eradication of FGC.
The AAP policy quickly retracted their policy due to outcry from anti-FGC (Female Genital Cutting) groups and Intact America, but if “because parents want it” is sufficient reason for a national American medical organization to pull down a little girls pants and driving a sharp object into her clitoris, saving the lives of our best and brightest cunnilinguists is a good enough reason to reopen the debate.
We Used To Practice Female Circumcision In America
Female circumcision wasn’t outlawed until 1996. As Patricia Robinett, a woman circumcised by the American medical system, details in her book The Rape of Innocence: Female Genital Mutiliation & Circumcision in the USA female circumcision used to common enough in the United States to be covered by Blue Cross Shield and other medical insurance companies. Playgirl actually ran an article in the 1970s suggesting female circumcision might increase female sexual pleasure.
It Would Bring Greater Gender Equality
The United States is spending millions of dollars in grant money to circumcise Africans to prevent HIV, based on research that has been called both ethically and scientifically questionable. Shouldn’t women get some of that grant money too? Men get 100% of the genital cutting in America, and women get none. It’s time to change that. Female circumcision shouldn’t just be legal, it should be federally subsidized like birth control. Women should be in the streets protesting religious groups that refuse to pay for their employees female circumcision. It is our duty to support women in whatever they need to express their sexuality, including removing parts of their sex to make the sex they have safe sex.
Activists against male genital cutting say that condoms already prevent HIV transmission better than any surgery. While that may be true of the penis, who uses a dental dam when going down on a woman? Anyone? As comedian Patrice O’Neal humorously notes most women shame men who try to use protection when going down on a woman. Men are so thirsty, they will literally drink cancer before risk offending their female partners.
It’s time to make sex safe again. It’s time for equality. It’s time for female circumcision.
Read More: Negative HIV Tests For Sale
The ensuing comment tsunami should be hilarious.
Tuthmosis would be proud
Please share this on mothering and parenting groups, especially those with strict a “no bashing” rule, where it could do the most good.
Absolutely, -not- helping our cause with this reactionary shit. Yes, it is obvious parody, but feminazis don’t have a humorous bone in their body so expect to see multiple citations of this article in their pending ‘hate crimes’ legislation for even saying the wrong thing on the interwebz.
1. It wasnt parody. 2. Fuck them. 3. Fuck you.
Listen up you little fucking sissy “guest” try to at LEAST post an alias before you ‘fuck me and fuck them’ you faggot. What is being described in this article isn’t male circumsicion the foreskin snip. It is the glans penis, the DICK HEAD, being chopped off. No one does this you dumb ass nigger. I see 3 people as fucking dim as you upvoted your bullshit. You wonder why Europeans want to re-enslave Africans? Your comment makes the case you goofy illiterate ineducable monkey. HOMO ERECTUS WALKS AMONGST US.
How did you know he’s black when he’s a guest? Either way fuck you little dick. Fucking white people. Whenever shit goes bad that nigger shit comes out. When I punch white old ass grandmas tomorrow for fun in reparation I’ll send their bitch asses to your comment. You’re fucking welcome Dick Snot
No, it is absolutely, undeniably parody. There’s no escaping that fact. Re-read the article if need be. It is not serious.
Even I can tell this is a parody, and I’m exactly the person you’re trying hardest to piss off (the fat, ugly trans* feminist). As a piece that points out how unreasonable male genital mutilation (aka circumcision) is by saying that it should also be practiced on females, this actually has some merit. But somehow I don’t think that was the intent of the author.
It is also important to note that removal of the clitoris would be the equivalent of removing the entire head of the penis; female circumcision would be the removal of the clitoral hood only.
There WILL be people who take it literally… probably because it’s incredibly incendiary and will be offensive to a substantial number of people who are even remotely educated on human rights, and people aren’t too good at thinking things through rationally when they’ve been angered.
“Absolutely, -not- helping our cause with this reactionary shit.”
“Our” “cause” IS “reactionary shit” you halfwit.
Fullwit, actually. If I inserted a metal spike into my corpus callosum I’d have given myself a full frontal lobotomy based on 20th century psychological medicine. This means what for you ‘gu’ (nice 2 letter name, I’m certain your heritage and legacy will be carried on for at least a millennia) Even severing my right and left brain hemispheres I’d still be your better. How does that make you feel ‘gu’?
PRO TIP— Feeling brave gu? (Can’t lie talking to gu is like talking to a retarded kid who can only write 2 letters as his name) but intends to lecture Mozart about classical music.
I love how female circumcision is framed as a “modest proposal” 😀 Oh God… please let the femtards take notice of this post!
You missed the reference. Google “A Modest Proposal.”
D’oh! Thanks for clearing that up.
How did you make it out of high school without reading that one?
And, as satire goes, this article isn’t anywhere near Swift’s standard.
Homeschooled :
Superb article!
Female circumcision is a part of African cultures too. But the premise about female circumcision will help some points:
1. Reduce transmission of HPV
2. Reduce sluttiness. Because a man’s most sensitive part is the foreskin, while a woman’s most sensitive part is the clitoris. Male circumcision was introduced to reduce sexual desire and pleasure among men, in addition to the religious and health benefits.
Similarly, female circumcision will reduce female pleasure and reduce their tendency to slut it about. As seen with African women who are circumcised.
The funny part is that wikipedia lists male circumcision as circumcision, while female circumcision as female genital mutilation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation#Procedures_and_health_effects
This is a serious advice. Female circumcision will not only reduce sluttiness, but also reduce HPV too. Ir’s not only about gender equality, female circumcision will reduce HPV more because women won’t slut it about so much. Superb article, runsonmagic.
I guess barbarian gonna barbarian!
So you want to reduce womens and mens pleasure why? To stop promiscuity? Yeah thats why Naughty Nomad’s out fucking half of Africa, including the circumsiced ones.
Even better, female circumcision will reduce sexual enjoyment for the man!
Whoa, whoa, reducing sluttiness? Whose side are you on?! If she’s not a slut, she’s not going to put out… we need those sluts!
The foreskin is not a “man’s most sensitive part”. Just as the little lips are not a particularly sensitive. In both cases, they’re humid, bacteria-fostering environments, but since men penetrate their partners, the foreskin has long been proven to be a factor in cancer of cervix and more recently in transmission of STDs amd AIDs. Since the politically correct credo these days wants us in the West to consider that the female genitals are perfect and absolutely beautiful, women do of course not experience problems with wetness, infections, unbearable itching, etc…Those who do have to treat it themselves and if they want their labia minora off they have to pay through the nose to get it done as a plastic surgery “reduction”. Which can also take care of clitoral problems if need be. Boys are lucky, since there is general consensus today on early removal of foreskins as desirable.
Women don’t NEED to have their sex drives reduced. What is every man’s worst complaint against wives/girlfriends/dates? That she won’t put out. Women do not slut it up. You are confusing us with them. WE slut it up, women don’t.
(Oh, my wife pointed out what “slut” means to anonymous posters: it means a girl who sleeps with someone other than YOU.)
You think the ladies of “The Talk” would entertain this notion for as long as they did Catherine Kieu’s husband’s “circumcision”?
Yeah, me neither.
Got a YouTube link to share for it? It’s really disturbing how a lot of non-Anglo/Western women buy into “#YesAllWomen”, but the Anglo white female feminists use the prior for their own agenda.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrvDhSB7GHk
It is interesting how the Wikipedia called male circumcision ‘circumcision’ where as female circumcision as ‘female genital mutilation’.
Anyway if some cunt gets cancer cause she swallowed my semen and then dies I’m not going to be losing sleep over it. Unless receiving oral I always use a condom.
For some people, circumcision keeps Abraham’s covenant with God.
Genesis 17
‘9 Then God said to Abraham, “As for you, you must keep my covenant, you and your descendants after you for the generations to come. 10 This is my covenant with you and your descendants after you, the covenant you are to keep: Every male among you shall be circumcised. 11 You are to undergo circumcision, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and you. 12 For the generations to come every male among you who is eight days old must be circumcised, including those born in your household or bought with money from a foreigner—those who are not your offspring. 13 Whether born in your household or bought with your money, they must be circumcised. My covenant in your flesh is to be an everlasting covenant. 14 Any uncircumcised male, who has not been circumcised in the flesh, will be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant.”’
Blah blah religious bullshit. Come up with your own reasoning or don’t bother.
I’d expect leftist governments to ban circumcision because it would violate Jewish beliefs and all leftists are anti-Jewish, using freedom from mutilation as the reason. Talk about a can of worms. Or dicks.
It is a form of ritualized abuse. it’s quite simple. It’s also way to create a signifier of ingroup identification.
Of course, but that’s of no concern to leftists. They simply hate Jews and should welcome a way to attack them that has a reasonable basis.
It was generally adopted in the US because doctors circa 1890 convinced women that it would prevent the unspeakable horror of boys jacking off.
Nice. No concrete reasons whatsoever for the benefits of male circumcision. Just your standard “follow what I say or ye shall be banished”.
Think I’ll pass on that one. Let the insecure sheep find solace in their messiah while real men of character carve their own paths in life.
LOL “real mean of character”?
Aren’t you the least bit ashamed of being an objectivist at your age?
Not in the slightest. Thank you for asking.
If “God” wanted men to be circumcised, then “He” wouldn’t have created foreskin…
Actually, Kabbalah teaches by circumcision a male you perfect him. By perfecting him you become a co-creator with Gd.
people are free to have themselves cut, it’s their body. shouldn’t be legal to cut other people than self, ie kids.
If that’s the case, then all circumcised men should have Jewish priveleges (including free birthright trips to Israel)
Yes and that covenant ended when Jesus Christ died on the cross. The Bible in the New Testament clearly states circumcision is now FORBIDDEN. Don’t believe go read it~
Christianity is Paganism with a different name.
I don’t think anyone should be cut. Honestly, were we ever in such a HOT WAR with the other sex that things became so drastic where even handcuffs wouldn’t suffice, and we felt we actually had to start CHOPPING our other half. With all the chopped men running around, our women have actually forgotten their role, rendering them defenseless when a REAL DICK thunders on the horizon, whether he be benevolent or malevolent.
I’ve never been down there nor do I plan on a visit, so the answer is – I
don’t care. Whoever stoops so low deserves it.
That’s just harsh.
No woman would let you
Describes you…
If a college woman has at least one different partner per year for four years, the probability that she will leave college with an HPV infection is greater than 85%.
Note – Condoms can do nothing when you decide to lick that smelly, dirty vagina.
Note 2 – EVERY vagina stinks. The ones that stink MORE are related to hygiene and diseases. That does not mean healthy, normal vaginas don’t stink. Every vagina stinks. Some more, some less, but stink, they do!
One good alternative solution is protected heterosexual anal.
Sluts deserve that only. Pussy licking is always going to be beta behavior. Douglas had no option;his wife is 25 years than him. He must’ve fucked 100 women at the time when his wife popped out of her mother’s womb.
But it also tells that Zeta Jones has a diseased cunt. Even Zorro can get HPV.
Zorro is a skilled matador………………Ole!
Zorro fail
Ha ha, and the 2 packs of smokes a day had nothing to do with it.
My nephew got a std when he was 17. He didn’t realise his girlfriend, who was 15 at the time, had need riding everything in sight from the age of 13… she convinced him that she was on the pill, and he was the only one. I had to take him to the clinic because he got a nasty rash and cold sore like marks all over his member. He was embarrassed and upset because he didn’t know what they were or how he got them. He learnt a lot from that outing. Never to trust chicks, never ever to ride bare back under any circumstances and to steer well clear of sluts.
Hey, guess what asswipe!
Vaginas may stink but so do penises so maybe think twice about being a dick before someone refuses to suck yours because it smells like week old meat
Are we sure these males are sucking clitorises?
Most women want men to focus on the clit to maximise pleasure during oral sex. You have techniques on the web telling men to carve alphabets with the tongue on a female clit.
http://cuntinglinguist.com/2005/08/the-mans-guide-to-cunnilingus-pt-3.html
You will never see it discussed in the Western media. You can only find it on ROK.
Fact: The promiscuous behavior of American women has caused a massive health epidemic. This health epidemic is even worse than the spread of HIV by anal sex among homosexuals. The extreme sexual promiscuity of American women is spreading cancer to large numbers of American men.
To address this health epidemic, drastic measures are required. Sex is still needed to propagate the human species. But unsafe sex could kill large numbers of both men and women. The solution is obvious: female circumcision.
America has proven that it can get behind a massive circumcision program. It proved this by circumcising almost every American male baby. So, with the proper education, America can do the same for women.
As Obama proved with Obamacare, every American has a right to good health. As he proved with provisions that give free birth control to women, everyone has a right to sex without risk of unwanted disease or pregnancy. Obamacare should not not only pay for, but mandate the circumcision of all female babies.
I hope you die a slow, painful death. Circumcision of any non-consenting human is an abomination. As long you take care of yourself, it shouldn’t matter what other people do with their genitals. Stop trying to play God. It is not your place to fix what isn’t broken.
And Obamacare is shit.
Male circumcision is perfecting the imperfect….
The golden rule which every man must remember is:
Never practice oral sex on a non-virgin woman. More so if she’s a slut , or from the Anglosphere, or if she’s not shaved.
I never understood the appeal of cunnilingus for men. It’s desperation, like the kind you see in porn – which shows men sticking their tongues in female butt holes. Not only do men lower themselves in front of these women, but also men open them to a host of diseases from promiscuous women (all women tend to be promiscuous, but Anglo women are the most promiscuous). Sex is always a power game. Don’t lose your power.
The fuck are you talking about? Have you ever had a relationship? My guess is NO
Describes you
What is it most men will eat off of a pie, but never off of a pussy?
CRUST!
Oh ,OH, OOOOOOOOH!
You are wrong on so many levels, let me first debunk your claim that all women are promiscuous, this essentially goes against female nature (sluts are created by social constructs telling women that sleeping around somehow makes them ”adventurous”), and promiscuous women are uncommon if not rare, the worst are in Finland, and Eglish-speaking nations have a very few of them, my first-girlfriend had more than 100 ex-boyfriends and if you’d go to any discussion about losing your virginity and number of sex partners every woman there has had more than 1000 and lost her virginity at 11 or 12 ¿why? because they’re a loud minority that goes out to ”brag” on those fora, in reality most women have had less than 3 sex-partners (yes, even those in their 50’s), and though the more men a woman sleeps with does psychologically makes her ”colder” (thus more likely to divorce and unloving), most women (90% of them) PLAN on having 1 sex partner or just keep it on a low number as possible, ”slut pride” is something Feminists do to ”justify” their actions (while shaming male Virgins), and other women don’t condemn their actions due to another aspect of female nature, which is that if they know that 1 woman’s behaviour could be seen as socially unacceptable she’ll do whatever she can to justify other women’s lifestyles, they don’t usually ”like” it, but they know that they’re only 100 sex ”adventures” away from being called a Slut…
“my first-girlfriend had more than 100 ex-boyfriends”
– And you like cunnilingus? Man, you must be having HPV already.
“in reality most women have had less than 3 sex-partners (yes, even those
in their 50’s), and though the more men a woman sleeps with does
psychologically makes her ”colder” (thus more likely to divorce and
unloving), most women (90% of them) PLAN on having 1 sex partner or just
keep it on a low number as possible, ”
– Lmao. You do have a split personality disorder or you’re retarded. Can’t you see the contradictions in your statement? And your first girlfriend of 1000 partner count, did she plan to have only 1 partner, but somehow three zeros added them to her existing 1 partner count? Female irrationality is terrible;but even worse is mangina irrationality.
So much blue pill, where to start? Even chihuahuas understand women better than you.
Hahahaha as one far rapper once said ” Bibles of truth nigga, bibles of truth !”
That’s why blue pill men live off viagra.
Dude, that’s disgusting. Go to the doctor and get yourself tested for STDs, and cancer. Also get a mental health evaluation. Something’s seriously wrong with you man, you’ll thank me later! I may have just saved your life.
“He” is not a man. You’re arguing with a woman pretending to be a man. Don’t do it.
Read the first few pages of replies.
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/fort-myers-fl/TN4JM9BRK3J7ALRIN
EVERY BLUE PILL MAN SHOULD READ THIS
Here is another dumb point you made (besides that ”sex is Always a power game” B.S.) that men don’t like cunnilingus, I’m a heterosexual men who likes cunnilingus more than any other sex act, I enjoy making my woman happy, not because I am submissive to her or because I think more of her, I like it because I’m an empathic person who enjoys making others happy, not out of desperation, my ex girlfriend gave me the choice of receiving a blow-job (which I hate), or penile penetration (which I LOVE), or performing cunnilngus on her, I chose cunnilingus every time, I could do it for hours non-stop, and I enjoy doing it, different men have different tastes, we did it a lot while she menstruated, and others would avoid doing it then, not everything is so simple and WRONG as you describe the world to be.
(note that I’m both an Intactivist and a Men’s (Human) Rights Activist, so don’t think that I do this because I ”am super desperate” or something.)
Describes you…
“I enjoy making my woman happy, not because I am submissive to her or
because I think more of her, I like it because I’m an “empathic” person
who enjoys making others happy, not out of desperation,”
– Too many contradictions, don’t you think? Maybe you have a split-personality disorder.
“I chose cunnilingus every time,”
– I’m sure you’ll like rotten sushi also.
lol, yeah, because vaginas = bad?
Why did you choose to post as “guest”? Was raving faggot already taken? Quit hating us heteros. We LIKE pussy, unlike you.
Your ex-girlfriend gave you a choice… what the… gah! You have that completely backwards son!
you is a vampire?
whatever happened to you do mien and i’ll do yours….sigh you is selfish. Plus HPV isn’t just found in females.
Do the virgin a favor and don’t go down on her either. Any time you are in a position that shows you naked & willing in front of a chick, you are her submissive little slave. This includes sex too, or knob-polishing. She sees a boner, and she knows she’s in charge.
But you know what’s funny? My wife went to school with someone who ended up working for Exotica-2000 for $2500.00 per hour. That is two-thousand and five-hundred, plus tips, per hour to fuck guys. But none of them wanted to fuck. They all — each one of them — wanted to go down on her! She’s had more sexual partners than you’ve had hard-ons, and filthy rich guys were paying (and tipping) her for the privilege of going down on her.
Know why? Because none of the guys’ wives allowed oral at home. Wives were seemingly cool with blowing hubby, but refused reciprocation. And you know what else? My wife’s friend ALSO hates getting eaten, ha ha ha, omg we laughed and laughed as we read her reviews on TER talking about guys who rated her a 10+ at getting her pussy eaten. She’d be flown out to NYC every two months and fly back with $30,000 for a week of putting up with tongues up her snatch, and she couldn’t stop her bitching about it. She’s a pretty detestable wench, even other than that.
Anyway, just sayin’, not all women like getting eaten out, and it seems most just put up with it to make their guys happy.
Jesus Christ my friend you have unleashed Pandora’s box here the waves of femicunts ensuing will make the Normandy D-Day assault look like child’s play. This is gonna be fuckin hilarious!
Let ’em come. We will make their hamsters turn white-hot before they burn up from terminal overheating once we are through with them. It will be like the final Zulu charge where the British introduced twin-Gatlings to their hilltop fortification.
hmm Gatling gun seems good but id prefer to see the analogy of unarmored yuppies running into the steel tip of a Spartan phalanx, surprisingly quiet in the comments sections though is it not? Well i suppose this is a blessing, nothing is more nonsensical and futile than female comments in the guise of ‘sticking it to the patriarchy’ or however they fucking masquerade and qualify their bullshit now a days.
Originally the Zulus simply overwhelmed British volley fire with wave upon wave of “suicide warriors” until the followers were able to climb over the meat shield created by their fallen comrades to get close enough to spear the enemy to death. After all, life was cheap on the Savannah and the Zulu king had plenty more where that came from. At the last battle, however, they were finally mowed down like grass by advanced firearms technology despite outnumbering the British more than ever before.
I make the analogy between early attempts at “engaging” feminists and their enablers when they were still able to overwhelmingly shame and blame would-be redpillers into submission with our current state now where they are simply torn down the moment they appear. That probably explains the current silence but don’t celebrate just yet. It is indeed quiet. Too quiet. Usually it is always calmest before the storm.
Islandwana was a disaster because the camp wasn’t in Kraal formation. Had they simply set up the Wagons in a circle or square when encamped the Zulus would have been massacred.
The Boers fought the Zulu and used their Wagon train as a mobile fort/wall system. Zulus were never able to adapt.
Tip of the hat to the Zulu though. Good soldiers.
Laager oops. Although a Kraal with a wall is essentially the Roarkes Drift scenario.
Their hamsters and the revolutions could power a city if hooked to a generator…
Won’t someone please think of the lesbians! They runch mug too!
I did think of the lesbians. Their article is here:
Cut and draft……Equality baby, equality .
OK, that’s it, I’m joining the other side. Between losing all my fucking money, learning Game, and now cancer, I think I turning gay or Japanese.
“i’m” And I mean it
Brilliant. For the headline alone.
This will be epic.
Opie and Andy
So, I’m taking pix in NYC & a black girl who was in frame punched me in the face. I called her a fucking “&$;;-:” cause that’s what she WAS!
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 2, 2014
Then she punched me 5 more times. She’s lucky I was a white legal gun owner or she’d be dead. Then 5 blacks started giving me shit!
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 2, 2014
I told them to back the fuck off, this wasn’t their show. The cunt then punched me again. Seems white boys don’t hit back. Lucky savage.
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 2, 2014
It’s a jungle out in our cities after midnight. Violent savages own the streets. They all came 2 defend this pig. I had to yell like at dogs
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 02, 2014
The automatic jump to violence in that community is astounding. No discussion. It’s start punching at the least little thing. Uncivilized!!
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 02, 2014
The switch to violence is immediate. No discussion, just violence. When will THAT be addressed? Oh, right, never. Slavery did it? Oh, ok.
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 02, 2014
There’s a deep seeded problem with violence in the black community. Try to address it and you’ll be exiled to racistville. But it’s real.
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 02, 2014
I was using my arms to block her punches. As I did, she’d yell “DONT TOUCH ME!” As she punched more! I really hope she gets shot & killed
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 02, 2014
It’s really open season on white people in this day and age. No recourse. Fight back and you’re a racist. The predators know this. Good luck
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 02, 2014
Savage violent animal fucks prey on white people. Easy targets. This CUNT has no clue how lucky she was. She belted me 10 times. I had a gun
-Anthony Cumia (@Anthonycumia) July 02, 2014
Red Pill black male onlookers? Nope.
She should have been castrated years ago.
Opie & Anthony, not Andy
Never heard of their show before. My apologies
That’s cool.
Patrice O’Neal, who people here refer to sometimes because of relevant topics he discussed (very bluntly), was on their show often before he died. Comedian Jim Norton as well.
Patrice was the man. Director wouldn’t recognize him though, he’s a nigger.
That was swift.
FYI how do you know these “alpha” men were not going deep on the shlong?
The moment you go down on a women is the moment you just turned in your manosphere card. Consider yourself banished back to the land of bluepill eunuchs, wimps, and sycophants of the matriarchy.
If you can’t fry it, I won’t eat it!
Hear hear! +10.
And you’re a fucking retard.
It’s a biological truth whether you care to admit to it or not. Don’t worry though, she definitely will take notice, even if you don’t.
I developed a couple sexual preferences very early in life (before I could ejaculate) after playing “doctor” with a neighborhood girl. I basically like enveloping my face with a hot chick’s butt cheeks. I had no idea what sex was or what I was doing at the time, but it became a permenant thing. Even if it isn’t pleasurable to the chick I’m doing it to, I still enjoy it. Nothing gets me more aroused. The pussy is right there so I figured why not include it.
Everyone really is different when it comes to sexual proclivities.
Do you like licking her dried turds out of her anus too?
Sure, everyone really is different when it comes to sexual ‘proclivities’.
Sounds like he needs to start a new kind of “Pride” march.
Don’t see the logic in your assumption. I never said anything remotely like that.
I’m guessing you’re familiar with porn? Lots of variations in sex involving ass and I can’t remember ever seeing something as extreme as you described.
I never realized how much guys care about the opinion of others when it comes to the kind of sex they enjoy. Your comment gives the impression that you probably aren’t having much sex, if at all.
I like eating pussy. I’m don’t care if it gives me throat cancer and it die. I don’t plan on living forever anyway.
No one plans to living forever anyway.
The idea is to die with dignity and peace, and not shame and agony. One of the worst ways to die would be to die because you got HPV from eating a cunt.
There is no shameless pain free way to die. When you die, you shit yourself, your body gets bloated and you start to leak body fluids out of your mouth. It isn’t pretty. I’ll go out doing things I like doing thank you very much.
Maybe indulge yourself in bit of research on the subject of genital cutting before you write an article on it? Using “female genital mutilation” interchangeably with “female circumcision” is just idiotic. The rough equivalent of male circumcision is the removal of the clitoral hood- which is still fucking barbaric. But if we allow parents to cut boys we should allow the same for girls. Or better yet 86 both procedures except for consenting adults who request it. (For a bunch of ‘lady killers’ y’all don’t know much about pussy…)
You dont read much do you. Google A Modest Proposal by Swift.
Oh Jesus Christ, all these fucking commenters circle jerking that other readers won’t know what this is based on or that it’s hyperbole. Dude, everyone knows who Swift is. Everyone knows A Modest Proposal. I know what this piece of shit is based on but even satire requires a basic knowledge of the subject matter. (If you poke around in these comments you’ll notice it’s the ‘alphas’ in favor of cutting not getting the joke.)
Too late; this article is more realistic than Swift’s satire, especially when scientific facts have been used in favor of female circumcision.
Like I said earlier, the points made in this topic have more legitimacy than Swift’s A Modest Proposal, especially when scientific facts are used in favor of female circumcision.
Who cares, taking knives to genitals of those that have no choice and are guilty of no crime is disgusting and inhumane, we can agree on that. And no one is going to go study the vagina, it takes a vagina to study a vagina. For our purposes, the vagina is just a hole, no one cares.
“And no one is going to go study the vagina, it takes a vagina to study a
vagina. For our purposes, the vagina is just a hole, no one cares.” Suddenly I understand why you have to use tricks and tips to get laid… if it weren’t for vaginas you wouldn’t get laid or even have been born. For folks who are so intent on having as much sex as easily as possible with as many women as possible, I would think you’d actually be MORE interested in the vaginas you are perpetually pursuing.
The greater point is that anybody who attempts to put a knife to male or female reproductive organs for any reason whatsoever outside of genuinely required medical corrective procedures should be summarily and unseremoniously chased out of the room, followed by ostracism and banishment from polite society as an undesirable dinosaur who should have long gone extinct and been swept off into the dustbin designated to receive mankind’s more idiotic historical anomalies. There is truly no excuse whatsoever in this day and age for these barbaric procedures to even exist, let alone for people to continue defending them for whatever twisted reasons may reside at the back of their minds.
Here’s one of those feminists you guys hate so much AGREEING WITH EVERYTHING Model 800 said. Snipping babies’ bits is invasive and unethical, be the babe male or female, and I would like to see circumcisions become illegal to perform on anyone under the age of 18.
I’m glad I’m cut.Don’t want a dog dick lmao.
While we are at it can we install an remote controlled chip with such useful functions as Play, Pause, Rewind, Fast Forward, and Stop?
Im kinda in the dark when it comes to men being affected by HPV…can i get any red pill advice regarding protection?
dont eat pussy.
don’t eat dick either.
Love it! Maybe we can get Bill Gates to throw a couple million into the fund. He’s already spent that much to make sure no African man has a foreskin, which he believes will lead to Aids.
Well, they do have a thing for dry cooch over there and many ways to dehydrate it before the act to increase “sensation”. What’s next? Sandpaper?
I wonder how many readers will realize the sarcasm here…
There’s truth into this article, to the point even a dedicated YouTube channel exists about the issue, YEARS before Roosh created Return of Kings.
https://www.youtube.com/user/cleansexy
And no, those examples are not hoaxes.
Or the cultural reference of “A Modest Proposal.”
Pussy is for smashing, not snacking.
¿Am I the only one around here who enjoys performing cunnilingus on a woman? it’s probably the most awesome sex act…
You must be a bull-dyke…
Co-sign.
There’s a vaccine that can protect against HPV-16, which is the strain that causes most HPV related throat cancer. The vaccine is available to both men and women.
Not only would you have better luck encouraging the vaccine to prevent HPV throat cancer, but I’d even wager that if you truly cared about the rate of HPV throat cancer in men you would actually discuss it rather than posting some ridiculous click-bait that isn’t going to do shit.
Are we not discussing it now?
It’s poorly written satire but if you can’t identify it as satire that’s your loss.
Female circumcision is only done in African Islam countries to prevent female orgasms. They believe it will prevent female promiscuity. Male circumcision is a Judeo-Christian and Islamic tradition. It does not affect a mans sex life. It will prevent penile cancer and phimosis. About 60% of American men are circumcised and are probably glad of it. There are quit a few men who electively circumcise as an adult to prevent these problems. If you’re afraid of oral pharyngeal cancer, either don’t have oral sex or chose your partners carefully. (Women get tonsillar cancer from their male partners as well). I’ve seen the end result of female circumcision in my female patients. These women have messed up genitilia and have problems their whole lives. If you saw what was done, you wouldn’t joke about it.
Actually, yes, we would.
it may be anecdotal, but watching ‘the view’ or whatever the fuck it was while Sharon Osbourne joked about a penis whizzing around in a garbage disposal reduced my sympathy.
Seeing literally piles of withdrawn fetuses reduced my sympathy.
talking to men in jail placed there on no more evidence than a woman’s word reduced my sympathy.
watching women abuse their children to ‘get back at their ex husband’, that the woman left in the first place reduced my sympathy.
Watching the violent, apelike antics of nearly every black woman in DC, Chicago, Compton, Detroit, Cincinnati, and Birmingham reduced my sympathy.
Getting deployed overseas and watching virtually the entire female complement come down with an acute case of pregnant reduced my sympathy.
Watching the ‘Lesbian Reich’ march again and again, screaming at any woman that dares walk arm-in-arm with a man, reduced my sympathy.
Now? I can quite happily laugh. Cut the bitches.
Specifically about Sharon Osbourne, it’s to be expected of her, especially when she’s English herself.
I’ve never seen such a misandrist society like the English; show the English woman loyalty, and she’ll sell you out faster than a Viking conquest.
She’s Jewish. Keep that in mind. The religion is marked by cutting bits off their menfolk’s junk.
The men living under those societies must have internalized their Stockholm syndrome to the max. Dunno how else they can pull themselves out of bed in the morning without the irresistible urge to put a revolver to their temple and pull the trigger.
Director, I am outing you as nothing more than a classic case of why this site can live WITHOUT antisemitism and why Anglo white knights are also whipped, racist men that end up betrayed by one of their own. Yes, this topic has been previously brought up in other topics and I have to remind people those.
“She’s Jewish. Keep that in mind. The religion is marked by cutting bits off their menfolk’s junk.”
I did a Google search of Sharon Osbourne and every single search result I ended up with had ZERO mentions of her being Jewish, which you purport.
What’s the trade-off then, a misandrist society like the English? Wait, you’re too whipped and too deep to realize it.
Anglosphere men are not human in the traditional sense of the term. With the notable exception of a few more perceptive exemplars amongst them (who usually also lived abroad and benefited from external cultural input and upbringing), your average typical Anglo male is carefully and thoroughly conditioned from birth to act as the unthinking lapdog, enforcer, and defender of the crude low-level degenerate matriachies characteristic of those peculiar societies. For this reason, attempting to debate them on these matters is absolutely useless and may even provoke hostile if not outright violent acts on their behalf when dealing with the lower rungs of their societies. And the profound degree of internalization of their own expendability that they are capable of, as demonstarted by their direct support of policies and actions that are blatantly to their severe disadvantage, is matched only by a few extreme cults and a select number of fanatical groups around the world. Yes indeed, while other men on this planet are also oppressed and none too happy about it, they are at least much more attuned to what is going on, whereas to the Anglo male the state of things, no matter how unjust, toxic, illogical, and outright pathological, simply becomes adopted wholesale under the great overarching justification that it is “simply the way things are”.
No wonder the British occupants shared tips and tricks with the Indian Rajas on how best to keep their very own lower-level slave populations under the boot. If you think the caste system in India is something to bitch about you have never seen the deep dark traditional underbelly of Old Blighty. With a few cultural differences out of the way you could almost swap them pound for pound and end up none the wiser!
Yep, that’s sorta the reason I wonder why we went the way we went in world war 2. People seem to forget that Stalin killed more Jews than Hitler… It was a war between Germany and Russia over who was the better murdering socialist.
We sided with the English cause the English sided with the russians… I cannot help but wonder if we had sided with the germans, could we have prevented the cold war?
Aside from a (somewhat) similar language, do we REALLY have anything in common with the Brits in the last century?
You didn’t look carefully foolish young fellow. She’s tribal.
Her father is a well known Jewish music producer.
http://ethnicelebs.com/sharon-osbourne
A Jew of the Pale. She’s tribal.
Tim can’t do basic research. Sharon Rachel Arden Osborne is the product of an Irish Mother and a Jewish Father. She’s about as English as Ed Miliband.
Motherfucker.
Weinhaus is German. It’s not exactly Hebrew. Dolt.
This past Friday night, I met a 1st-generation American of British parents and even admitted to me outright it is an everyday fact of life that English women cheat on their husbands.
If anyone thinks I’m stereotyping, then let me introduce you to Phil Collins.
Point is that the English have historical paranoias towards Jews, Germans, and Asians (read: US vs THEM mentality)
Did the English demonize the Germans? SCHEISSE JA!
Did the English demonize the Jews? Duh, to the point modern-day anti-Semites keep the “Blood Label” fallacy alive.
Did the English demonize Asians? YES! It’s so bad to the point we have yellow peril and never mind the fact the Huns NEVER conquered England, yet the English act like they did.
Hearing from someone who’s paranoid of Jews, I’m actually NOT surprised to know you’re ignorant about how Judaism is a maternal bloodline and anyone who’s paternally Jewish needs to undergo conversion.
I personally know Jews in the single digits and learned their background straight from the horse’s mouth.
Misandry, for starters. After all, the concurrent state of affairs demonize men, just like how Victorian Englishwomen did likewise and proclaimed “ALL MEN ARE JACK THE RIPPER!!!!!!!”
Does that Victorian dismissal remind you of anything?
Even so, that does not change my general observations on the Anglosphere (i.e., Great Britain and her past colonies), as these become automatically obvious to anyone who travels outside of it at some point in their life with at least a half-eye open:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e3/Anglospeak.svg/940px-Anglospeak.svg.png
That would make sense.
It is maternal except when it isn’t.
The matriarchal aspect of the religion/cult/ethne/race SHOULD be a gigantic red flag flag for an anti-Feminist.
Go read a book or two by Pierre Joseph Prudhon. He’s a French antisemite-anti feminist. Try this book:
” La Pornocratie ou les femmes dans les temps modernes”
Is English your second language? You couldn’t find her ethnic background from a single google search and now you are quoting halachic law to me? Get thee to a rabbi you halfwit. She’s tribal through and through.
I can tell you that the “Brits” living over there now have (almost) nothing in common with the Brits from even a quarter-century ago. So the answer would definitely be a resounding NO.
Are you orthodox? Reform? Karaite? You sound Orthodox.
I am born and raised Roman Catholic for the record. That reminds me, aren’t the English paranoid of Catholics too, to the point that it spilled over to Canada?
You certainly stick up for ’em don’tcha? Montreal Orthodox?
Take a read of this book.
” La Pornocratie ou les femmes dans les temps modernes”
She’s more English by virtue, complete with misandry, as shown on The View.
I bet you’re too whipped to notice this, huh?
You should had just added the year it was published. By the way, nice job correlating antisemitism with anti Anglo feminism. #SMH
Ich bin kein Schoßhund, noch ein Dummkopf.
Where does she reside? Where do the kids reside?
The Pornocracy is the foundation document of Anti-Feminism. Just ask yourself, “what’s good for the Jews?” then think about “what would Susan Sontag do?” and you’ve got your talking points for the day.
Ugh, Don’t even get me started on Morgan.
Don’t bait me into having me ruined as if I were an antisemite like you.
Why don’t you give everyone the convenience of providing a download link, if you’re THAT adamant?
Feminists are hyenas.
‘cut the bitches’ ? oh man you don’t really mean that Brigadon? surely?
Of course not. I was on a roll.
However, I do consider people who abort foetuses for any reason other than the immediate survival of the mother to be the worst sort of cold-blooded murderers, and I support the death penalty.
Who is joking?
Do lesbians dream of electric dido’s?
Nonsense. There will be 1290 cases of penile cancer every year in the US, and 300 men will die from it. So much for circumcision.
http://www.cancer.org/cancer/penilecancer/detailedguide/penile-cancer-key-statistics
http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/hpv/statistics/penile.htm
Exactly, circumcision was always about hygiene. Back in the day they didn’t wash their cocks…. with hygiene standards in these enlightened times much improved there is no excuse for leaving a stagnant curd under your foreskin! Any lad that doesn’t look after his cock has no excuse if it falls off…..
Cocks are easy to clean.
It’s easier to clean your cocks than your ears and navels.
Phimosis and smegma contribute to penile cancer. HPV also is linked with penile cancer, as is smoking. Infant circumcision has been shown to greatly reduce the rate of penile cancer. Adult circumcision does not seem to reduce the rate of penile cancer. That’s why the academies of Pediatrics and Urology still recommends circumcision. It almost unheard of for Jewish men to get penile cancer. Muslim have a lower rate of penile cancer, but not as low. Muslim men don’t get circumsized until 13. If you’re a religious person, God’s covenant with Abraham had practical implications.
It’s statistically rare though. Like bollock cancer. It’s not something to really worry about.
Smoking? How does smoking relate to that?
Smokers have greater risk for penile cancer because they urinate out the chemical from nicotine that causes cancer, thus destroying the lining of the urethra. Almost all of bladder cancer is seen in smokers as well
Just wash your glans boys, it’s not that bloody complicated! Also, don’t just stick it anywhere warm and moist. Have some standards about you.
By God, it’s as if common sense needs to be instilled in grown adults all over again.
Wash your glans or cut of your ears.For the sake of cleanliness.
Then why not just cut off all woman’s Tits and prevent breast cancer
Sorry to burst your bubble, but there are American women alive today who had their clitorises removed at parents request, at a hospital, during childhood… 50 or more years ago. It used to be a “valid medical treatment” in the U.S.
And there are American female babies still having their clitorises operated today, when doctors think they have too large clitorises (clitoromegaly).
Cutting a clitoris is cutting a clitoris, whether it’s done by a traditional practitioner or by a doctor. When it comes to minors, nobody should cut anything from their genitals.
Clitoramegaly comes from too much testosterone in a females body. It’s treated medically first. Female circumcision done for Islamic beliefs involve removing the hood of the clitoris only. It’s like the the foreskin. It does not affect a woman’s future sex life. African countries like Somalia and Yemen remove the clitoris and most of the labia. It’s done so the girl will never enjoy sex, thus their solution to promiscuity .
Yemen is not an African country, it’s Asian, and that aside male genital mutilation in those U.S.A. started when Dr. Kelogg wanted to hault sexuality and prevent orgasms in men, it actually does affect sexuality and cause erectile dysfunction, in fact men who have had their foreskins removed are often unable to feel orgasms, and simply ejaculating doesn’t equate a male orgasm, that’s a dumb and too common myth.
Genital cutting culture exist in many societies and in many different forms. Always for similar beliefs in health, hygiene or social “benefits”. In some places it has evolved into a safer “medical procedure”. Even the opinions of medical professional reflect their culture and offer it as a curious form of preventative medicine. Google Ulwaluko if you want to learn more about male genital cutting in Africa… In the last seven years 456 000 boys have been hospitalized and 419 dead in South Africa alone.
Rubbish. Unless you have a genuine congenial defect requiring surgical correction to the foreskin, most of these problems can simply be alleviated by properly retracting it and cleaning the glans and base on a regular basis. The rest is simply a barbaric procedure perpetuated due to mistaken notions of preserving cultural practices and “masculinity” (whatever the hell that is supposed to mean in this context) that has no place in a modern, advanced technological society. Human males developed foreskins for a purpose and are not the only creatures endowed with a penis incorporating retractable parts. Though male circumcision may have had its place in more primitive societies due to poor hygiene and lesser understanding of the human anatomy, modern living conditions simply render it obsolete.
The same line of reasoning can also be extended to ideas regarding female circumcision (oops, I mean “genital mutilation”).
Interesting to note that both procedures result in significantly reduced sensations for both parties. Where the ancients attempting to quell epidemics of rampant satyriasis and nymphomania amongst their people?
It’s a behaviour mod that works wonders on African females. Short of spaying it’s the best thing for them.
It’s funny you think that male circumcision doesn’t effect your sex life. If you had your foreskin cut off you are missing 20,000 nerve endings on your dick. Also circumcision was made popular to prevent masturbation.
How does male circumcision prevent phimosis. Phimosis is usually present at birth. Does circumcision work retroactively on this condition?
You are a monster!
The clit is there for a reason, so she can finish banging you back to completion if you have to answer the phone half way through, or if you are relaxing from your morning jog and just want her to lap on it while you sit and read. She is more prone to do at least half the stroke if she gets feedback from her original equipment. Same for the man, if he has his full set of nerve endings flailing at the tip, he’ll be driven like all hell when agitated to CLOSE rather than do a hundred silly openers. When you’re DRIVEN, you always FIND A WAY, don’t you? Circumcision was metted out mainly in developed cultures SO BITCHES COULD RULE. Originally it was inteded for peasants, obviously another control tool of the rulers. It’s like as if you went and took a chainsaw and cut the crowns off every tree in Yellowstone forest. Why it just wouldn’t be Yellowstone forest anymore, would it? Or if you whacked the capstone off the top of the Washington monument. What you’ve just done – YOU JUST TOOK AWAY ALL OF ITS POWER. THAT’S WHAT IT’S ABOUT. What would it take for Jews to renounce circumcision? When is the last time the Jews had a king? No king can come forth from a bunch of chopped down men. A WHOLE BUNCH of princesses but NO KING for the Jews. Jewish women must lead the cause for their millenial handicap to cease. I would literally MELT at the sight of Magda cleaning little Ish’s doodle.
Americans are nuts to fall for Dr Harvey Kellogg and others like him. Americans are so sexist and ignorant and love misandry more than life itself. FEMinisty American men have been conditioned to hate them self and hate the NORMAL male body they were born with by God and or Nature Knows Best. Philippians 3:2-3 “beware of the mutilation”, Titus 1:10, Galatians 5:2. GOMCO CLAMP’S and PLASTIBELL’S would not be allowed in a SAW movie with an NC 17 rating but they are OK to force on newborn men at religious penis rape party’s with the $creepy mohel$ or force in the $shadows of the hospital$. “Woman’s body woman’s right!” man’s body get the KNIFE. It’s the family penis in sexist America just not the family vagina. SEXIST.
What happened to using dental dams? Oral sex is sex, and it should be done in a protected way.
No, anal sex is real sex. Especially fucking a woman’s ass deep with lubrication, and driving your cock deep in her ass up to your balls.
And pulling her hair and spanking her ass hard while you’re pummeling her ass hard and furiously like a compressor till she pisses in pain. Slap her tits at the same time.
And then finally inject your sperm deep in her rectum.
That is ‘real sex’.
Hear hear! Well said that man…..
Lmao
Would be interesting to see how you’ll be laughing your aching ass off after a nice anal pounding.
Same 2 u bro
A feminist’s demand for cunnilingus
ew…
Do lesbians develop throat cancer too?
They do have a lower life expectancy than straight women, yet don’t get nearly as many diseases as fags. My guess: yes, plus BDSMing each other to death.
The practice of fishing might have something to do with lower life expectancy for uphill gardeners too….. that’s gotta hurt…..
Oops fisting! Fishing….. well that may have an influence too….
“yet don’t get nearly as many diseases as fags”.
You would know!
Projecting much?
how did these ex-nerds become the go-to advisors on manhood? manosphere, alpha, beta what is this shit? i live in vegas and im 100% sure ive “been with” more women than any man commenting except maybe a porn star and im still in my 20s. i promise if youre not eating pussy, your girl is getting that taken care of on the low. if youre afraid of it being dirty make her take a shower first. i eat it, tie her up and fuck her til she begs me to cum. feminism is a problem but you lames are not the solution. as for this article no humans should get their flesh cut off male or female.
“i promise if youre not eating pussy, your girl is getting that taken
care of on the low.”
– Looks like your bitch is a real ho. You even ‘promise’ about her getting it on the side if you don’t eat her filthy cunt.
‘if youre afraid of it being dirty make her take a
shower first. i eat it, tie her up and fuck her til she begs me to cum.’
– Good luck with HPV and throat cancer.
You’re an idiot. Going down on women is retarded, and now we have scientific evidence to back it up. Go down on all the trash in vegas and get a mouth full of viruses and disease. Then come brag about that on the internet and you will really live up to your title as dumbass motherfucker.
He wont be able to brag when his jaw falls off and his larynx is removed…
Describes you..
@anon @Bragging @Cunt any man that refers to the wonderful thing called vagina as a “filthy cunt” is bitter from lack of sex or a closet homosexual. good luck never eating your gf or wives pussies, thats going to go well for you. better not let your girls go on a vegas trip with their friends lmao. lames.
Hmm…just vaccinate everyone with an existing vaccines???
Seriously stop with these silly articles: google HPV vaccines.
Interesting how those pushing the HPV vaccines never suggest that their recipients might actually benefit from not randomly banging away complete strangers like a bunch of rabbits in the first place. But oh no, we cannot allow anything to get in the way of our clients’ sex-positive mentality of plenty combined with a “get it while you can, wherever you can” attitude. After all, life is short and the greatest pleasures of all are free. Or are they really?
Or just dont give bitches head, simple, follow the Tony soprano rule
So many trolls today…..
Please, please get some better writers. In A Modest Proposal, Swift took held up a population (poor Irish) who no one valued and asked, “if they have no value- shouldn’t we just kill them? And why waste the meat?” The reaction was sympathy for the poor. Using that formula this article sets up women to be the ones pitied- certainly not your intention but the result none the less. All this talk of self improvement and excellence and you can’t even parody Swift well.
I have a problem with the logic in this piece – circumcise women to keep men who eat pussy from getting sick. In other words, circumcise women so men can eat pussy without getting sick. Wouldn’t it make more sense to warn men of the possible health risks associated with eating pussy and then let them make the decision on their own. This reeks of collectivism – one group of people making decisions for another group of people based on interests that have nothing to do with the group of people for whom the decisions are made. Congratulations, you are a liberal.
There is no logic to this piece at all.
I might need to walk my comment back for there is a logic in this piece, it is the logic that is the foundation for progressivism. The progressives, who are our modern day liberals, build their philosophy of social engineering off this premise – deprive a group of people of something that is naturally in their possession in order to benefit another group of people. Those with the power to enact this deprivation do so with the coercive force of government through law. There is a logic in this but it is a type of logic that justifies the existence of dictators and totalitarian regimes. This is why I described the author as a “liberal” because this is how liberals think. Once, they banned the right of an individual to create, possess, and consume alcohol in order to promote the “good of society”. They tried to ban the sale of sodas in large quantities in order to promote the “good of society”. They banned the right of the individual to decide how much of their income they can keep when they enacted an income tax. They extended this ban when they enacted a law that confiscates personal income to provide health care for all. They are trying to ban an individual’s right to possess firearms under the idea that such a ban is “good for society”. All the things I’ve mentioned are progressive concepts and policies. For the first time, ROK has published an article that bases itself on a logic upon which modern feminism, a progressive doctrine, is based.
But there sure is white hot righteousness in it. Personally I’d call it brilliance.
There are certain demographic groups that should be FGMed. It looks barbaric to outsiders but certain populations of women need to altered.
“Need” to be altered? What if these “certain” populations disagree with this “need”? What is the next move?
Extermination Al, extermination. Africans cut the clit off their women for a deep reason. A fully equipped Sherilla is a dangerous thing.
So, I’m taking pix in NYC & a black girl who was in frame punched me in the face. I called her a fucking “&$;;-:” cause that’s what she WAS!
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 2, 2014
Then she punched me 5 more times. She’s lucky I was a white legal gun owner or she’d be dead. Then 5 blacks started giving me shit!
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 2, 2014
I told them to back the fuck off, this wasn’t their show. The cunt then punched me again. Seems white boys don’t hit back. Lucky savage.
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 2, 2014
It’s a jungle out in our cities after midnight. Violent savages own the streets. They all came 2 defend this pig. I had to yell like at dogs
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 02, 2014
The automatic jump to violence in that community is astounding. No discussion. It’s start punching at the least little thing. Uncivilized!!
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 02, 2014
The switch to violence is immediate. No discussion, just violence. When will THAT be addressed? Oh, right, never. Slavery did it? Oh, ok.
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 02, 2014
There’s a deep seeded problem with violence in the black community. Try to address it and you’ll be exiled to racistville. But it’s real.
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 02, 2014
I was using my arms to block her punches. As I did, she’d yell “DONT TOUCH ME!” As she punched more! I really hope she gets shot & killed
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 02, 2014
It’s really open season on white people in this day and age. No recourse. Fight back and you’re a racist. The predators know this. Good luck
— Anthony Cumia (@AnthonyCumia) July 02, 2014
Fully trained black women in Africa are less savage.
I’m certain that Cumia did not interpret that event the way you did. This was an issue of culture. I could take you to two all Black female college campuses and this incident will either be met with “please don’t take my picture” or “I do not give permission to have my image displayed”. I could take you to an all Black male campus and most of the Black men would say “Aren’t you that shock jock on that show where Patrice O’Neal makes frequent appearances?” http://www.returnofkings.com/8066/red-pill-wisdom-from-patrice-oneal
Look at who jumped in to help the cunt.
Look at how this practice does not occur when surrounded by Black people who are raised properly. Don’t confuse culture and race.
He’s a devout racist. Don’t know why he’s posting here so much all of a sudden. You can bet he’ll turn every discussion into race.
🙂
Feral Cunt Mob Violence. Uncut Africans.
No, he is not a devout racist. I’ve listened to Opie and Anthony since they debuted on WNEW during afternoon drive and then as the replacement for Howard Stern on WXRK. I only stopped listening because they moved their entire program to the Sirius pay format. I’ve been listening to O&A since the 90’s, I know. Besides, identify the racist content of his tweet. I fail to see any.
He might be a troll who is here to present himself as a follower who is racist in order to make ROK look like a racist website. I post frequently in the right of center and conservative websites and liberal trolls do that all the time. They assume a conservative sounding username and then post racist commentary. That is my best guess.
I call BS on you. you are pretending to be something you are not, a reader of ROK. I believe you to be a feminist troll who is trying to make ROK appear as a magnet for racists. And on that note, I’ll comment with you no longer. You are clearly full of shit.
I ascribe to many of the points made by Pierre Joseph Prudhon. He’s one of the original Anarchists. Although I can’t stand Trustafarian Anarchists. Bunch of cunts.
Find a copy of this book to see my POV:
“La Pornocratie ou les femmes dans les temps modernes”
Can you read the original French? The English translations are pretty good but the subtlety is often lost.
How do you think the executives saw Cumia’s comments?
SiriusXM has assembled a highly experienced team that is bringing satellite radio out of the future and into the present. Click on the links below for more information on the SiriusXM executives who are making satellite radio a reality.
James E. Meyer | Chief Executive Officer, SiriusXM
Scott Greenstein | President and Chief Content Officer, SiriusXM
Dara Altman | Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, SiriusXM
Patrick L. Donnelly | Executive Vice President and General Counsel, SiriusXM
David J. Frear | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, SiriusXM
See the tribal names btw. Lol.
Don’t confuse culture and race? Lol. Nice one. Culture is a racial çontruct.
Race and culture have nothing to do with one another. Cultures vary within races. Ever hear the term “Poor White Trash?” Ever hear the term “ghetto”? These are cultural distinctions that exist within the races.
All you’ve done was tell me that Cumia was outvoted by a small group of people who defined his comments as racist. I see no racism in the content of Cumia’s comments. And people you’ve listed are seeing things that do not exist.
I’m referring to “Director” not Opie and Anthony or the related article.
The logic of the piece is the same exact logic employed by male infant circumcision advocates as their justification for cutting off healthy, functional parts from the genitals of baby boys. The intent of the author’s logic is to expose the absurdity of perpetrating this crime against boys in the name of “protecting women from disease”.
But here is the “thing”. Infants are involuntarily circumcised by their parents and few of them complain. In fact, HUGE majorities of these men have it done for their male children. Rinse, wash, repeat. Female circumcision, on the other hand does not have this dynamic. I’m gonna trust the market on this one. Female circumcision seems to be like brussels sprouts and beef liver, when given a choice, most people, women in this case, do not want it. At best, make it a voluntary option for parents.
The dynamic is very similar in any society that practices genital cutting, based on similar beliefs. That is why it continues and is so difficult to eradicate. Western media normally portrays only one side of the story regarding female genital cutting. There are just as many women defending the practice, for example in Kenya recently there have been protest for it. It is a complicated matter, if it really was as bad as brussel sprouts it would not be so prevalent and widespread.
“Parents who continue this practice are compassionate and loving. They believe that they are protecting their daughters from harm.” Female Genital Cutting: A Persisting Practice, Nawal M Nour
“This means that even if parents understand the dangers and negative health impacts of cutting their daughter, they may still choose to do so because they perceive the benefits as outweighing the disadvantages. Those who support female genital cutting often believe that it is closely linked to cleanliness, virginity, healthiness, beauty and morality.” Orchid Project dot org, Why FGC happens
They don’t complain because they’re knife-raped at birth and never have a point of comparison. FGM does have the same dynamic. It’s done by women who’ve been FGM’d themselves to their daughters in pre-pubescence. Most victims of FGM don’t complain.
As a guy who was circumcised at 14 yrs old without my informed consent, I can say for sure that it utterly destroyed my sexual pleasure. The foreskin is where virtually all sexual pleasure comes from. This is backed up by neurological analysis , objective touch tests and the fact that any intact man will tell you the same thing.
I suspect you’ve never read the interesting proposal made by Jonathan Swift regarding how to prepare and eat Irish babies, have you?
The author gave away the tongue in cheek nature of the article by stating “A modest proposal” and wrote in a very similar fashion.
The More You Know! ™
I don’t see how that changes anything. The logic in this piece still argues that a particular group should engage in a practice that they have not voluntarily accepted in order for another group to have the ability to partake in a practice that is voluntary. In other words, he is saying that women should consider removing either a part or all of their clitoris so that men can engage in oral sex without fear of disease. This is like asking men to endure a surgical procedure that renders them impotent so that women can enjoy sex without the worry of getting pregnant.
Or circumcise boys (with or without their consent) to reduce transmission of diseases during sex to women, like HIV and the like.
Oh wait, that’s EXACTLY what the WHO argues should be done in Africa to men.
Excellent article.
Male genital mutilation is considered to be for the greater good, encouraged and legalized.
Advocating female genital mutilation would be considered hate speech.
Such is the misandrist age we live in.
Like!
This is Roger Ebert, who, I suspect, lost his lower jaw to this HPV bullshit. This is also a rich man who could afford to survive and live with this shit. It ain’t pretty. And he still didn’t survive.
RIP
You suspect fucking wrong. Metastatic thyroid cancer. Dimwit. After a bunch of treatments and surgeries the first time, he said if it comes back he’d rather it kill him than go through anymore shit.
Are you fucking kidding me with this shit? You are an idiot. Mandate HPV immunizations for boys and girls period. Notwithstanding the abhorrent morality of sexually mutilating half our population, If you cut off their clits….what would the point of eating pussy be? Jesus H CHrist…ROK is truly becoming infested with some morons. How is something like this approved to be published?
“Mandate HPV immunizations for boys and girls period” mandate a vaccination for a non socially communicable disease? do you work for a pharmaceutical company?
Come on boys…the point of the article is assuming some sort of forced medical procedure to prevent cancer. If that is the assumption, then do we prefer a low risk, low invasion shot, or chopping off of sexual organs?
This is clearly not a serious issue, its troll bait pure and simple.
So it’s abhorrent to “sexually mutilat[e]” people without their informed consent, but it’s morally acceptable to “mandate” injecting them with something? How about you just leave my body alone and let me decide when I am old enough.
The problem with feminism is that it removes female accountability. Men shouldn’t be slobbering and falling over themselves to get their own pleasure and women MUST be made to pay the social debts they incur. All this does is white knight sluts via syringe. These women earned their badge of shame and they ARE going to take it to the grave with them and the fewer men they drag with them the better. Fuck your HPV vaccine! Let them rot 🙂 they earned it.
Both female circumcision as well as HPV vaccination for women must be made mandatory. A lot of females avoid HPV vaccination because of supposed deaths from the procedure, and these sluts continue to take men to the grave with them. The white knighting part about HPV vaccination is correct, but what must be understood is that by the time female circumcision is ever introduced back again, a lot of men would’ve already lost their lives to HPV transmission from non-vaccinated sluts. So vaccination, even though may appear as white knighting for sluts, still protects men. But female circumcision should also be made mandatory alongside it.
Both these restrictions would then make future generations of women more responsible. HPV can also be transmitted from heterosexual anal sex, in addition to HIV. The more restrictions on bitches, the more they’d learn their lesson.
You seemed to have missed the words “A Modest Proposal”. Might I suggest you Bing that sentence and tell me what you find. Be swift about it and you’ll win a cookie.
I get it. I doubt most will…ROK aint the place you find subtle satire about the excesses of the manosphere.
And who the fuck uses Bing? Keep your cookie
Well, if they read down this far, then they’ll learn something new, another great canonical writer will hopefully be discovered and explored, and all is right with the world.
How is it a satire of the excesses of the manosphere? It seems rather to be pointing out the absurdity of nearly universal (in the U.S.) male genital mutilation done with nary a thought to men, whilst simultaneously screaming bloody murder over the same thing done to women.
Bing or Startpage. I don’t use Google directly.
according to what is written here, women, then, ought to get throat cancer at the same rate as men. vacination against that virus for both genders at puberty at the latest.
you americans have a sick obsession with cutting little boys’ penises…how about not cutting anything from anyone til they’re adults and can decide whether or not they want their body part removed?!! and meanwhile teach them how to take care of their hygiene and genitalia…horrendous and barbaric practice.
It’s a Third Reich “never again” way to hide the Jews Among You.
A foreskin is disgusting! Eurotrash have no clue! Europeans are basically filthy animals! Being circumcised is cleaner, healthier, better looking and makes sex far more enjoyable for both partners!
foreskin is not disgusting and no it doesn´t make sex more enjoyable. those are lame-ass excuses to cut anyone´s penis. but more power to you, i´d personally never mutilate my kid´s genitals.
Good for you! My wife and I chose to have our boys circumcised.It is normal to be cut circumcised in the USA. Most white females won’t go near an uncut guy…..
BTW- I have 3 boys(7,4 and 6mo) and all are circumcised, as all their male relatives and extended family are!
WAKE UP and realize – our noids are cut TO CONTROL OUR FUCKING. How about if we had our TOUNGES CUT to control our autonomous speech. In conversation, an astute girl can often ascertain if she’s talking to a chopped guy or one who’s ready to give her an elevator tour of the monument. She naturally senses and alerts to this even before she is compelled to cop a feel to verify. On the other hand imagine how OBVIOUS a CHOPPED TOUNGE would be in normal conversation. You could only say certain words like ‘heey’ ‘baabe’ ‘yaaah’ ‘yo’ ‘mamaah’, that’s about it. Try holding your tounge at the bottom of your mouth and see how many words you can say without your tounge. Try in on the streetcorner on passing chicks and they’ll be whispering ”hey, I think that guy’s . . ya know . . tounge-chopped”. Just as your swagger reveals your DAGGER. Men FLY YOUR DICKS HIGH AND PROUD LIKE THE AMERICAN FLAG and the bitch squalk noise peters out and dies.
Circumcise women too – especially feminists.
Women should get cunnilingus from…
American (feminist) women – 2014
If you read the Forbes article, what it says is, don’t worry guys, throat cancer from HPVs are easily treatable. Just deal with it. But when there’s a risk women might get HIV from you, snip snip boys, time to man up.
No need, we don’t need to lick a hole meant for fucking. It’s time for women to women up.And neither do we have to undergo an agony for HPV treatment for licking a cunt.
Get yourself circumcised, bitches. Or you’re getting head from animals and manginas only.
God that’s disgusting. Women really are filthy pigs that need to be under the yoke!
The more you read about the horrifying effects of sex in the modern world, the less you want to kiss, or even fuck a woman. It does play a horrifying effect on a man’s mind about the depravity and filth modern women can fall to. That cutie you see every day, who knows how many sperm showers that cute face has taken, how many
cocks she must’ve sucked or how many dicks have rubbed themselves
between her breasts.This is the thought you get with every woman. Women simply can’t be trusted, and this sluttiness itself births misogyny in men.
The ‘safest’ way for a man have sex in the modern world is now to only fuck her mechanically like a whore: bend her over, lube up your dick, and wear a rubber, and slide it in either of her orifices on display, of your choice. Atleast with a whore you can be sure she’s fucking around with so many men, but what about a common woman? Women have more germs on their mouths, and holes, and are more filthy than a toilet seat.
Always use protection at all times – as if your life depended on it. Kissing is out in the modern world of promiscuity. Just keep sex mechanical. Bend her over and pound.
Level 4 Mgtow, like the honey badger, doesn’t give a shit.
Our bodies die. Get over it.
True, everyone dies. But death can be peaceful, or with willingly self-inflicted agony and shame.
“Ultimately, we’re all dead men. Sadly, we cannot choose how but, what we
can decide is how we meet that end, in order that we are remembered, as
men.:
– Proximo, GLADIATOR (2000)
The choice depends on every individual. No man has do die in shame and agony for eating some sick pussy. But again, to each his own.
False. I said our bodies die, not us.
I’ve eaten so much nasty (and I mean so nasty I don’t want to expand on that) pussy over the past 20 years and I’m still alive. HPV is overhyped; it’s been with us for thousands of years.
Most of the time our immune systems deal with it. HPV throat cancer is cured relatively easy if caught soon. If not, then fuck it, give me a few bottles a wine, a generator, and a shed.
Sometimes we DO choose how.
My name is Melisa
am from Cameroon, I must tell you about a wonderful doctor that cure my HIV/AIDS,
i was not one day a harlot either a prostitute, i visit a friend of mine we
have seen for a very long time, I didn’t even no she was HIV positive we share
the same needle together i was hill for time to time when i now went for
checkup they told me that am now HIV positive i cry that my days in earth is
now numbered, I tell my friends that am going to live then soon but NIKKI told me no that is not right,
that there is a doctor that specialized on HIV/AIDS that he can cure mine, i
did not believe because since this incident i have tried many he force me to e
mail the doctor at [email protected] i try
once but i withdraw back for about 6months later I was tin as a single broom them she remember
of this doctor again them i said let me give he a try, so we started chatting
he ask me to fill a form of mine details them i do, doctor etelabe was
now like a father to me them about 3days that we chat he ask for many which i
provide because my life is important to me. them he sand me a Paso after i have
done every things I did not even waste any time, the day he told me that he has deliver the Paso that was the day i
went for it. them i apply it as he told me, some minute after i went to toilet
it was something i cannot even describe it ,after that i was empty inside me,
i E mail him and tell he how am feeling
he laugh and told me to go to the doctor for test. i went immediately them I
was confirm negative. them now i believe that a way to success is very narrow,
and a friend can kill at the same time a friend can save special thanks to DOCTOR ETELABE
if u want to e mail at [email protected].
Excellent article. I would have this done to my stepdaughter in an instant. Men need to take charge and prevent women from being harbingers of disease and immorality. A woman’s pleasure is instintcively connected to service and nurturing, not physical lust. Educating them like men and removing the natural shame that is their’s to bear with sexual activity, has made them forget this.
What the fuck am I reading?
The wave of the future bitch 🙂 Hop up on the gourney and spread ’em tramp. Snip Snip
The trolling of this article is unreal. Bravo to you runsonmagic
Don’t stick your tongue in a hole that bleeds for week
and doesn’t die
OR everyone could just get that super-simple hpv vaccine that’s available pretty much everywhere. Seriously, just go to a walk in clinic at a pharmacy and you can get it. No need to maim people. And insurance companies are required by law to pay for it.
doesn’t work on men
A shout out to the gay men here crying like little hating bitches: GAY MEN HAVE HPV AND PERFORM ORAL DICK SEX! With that being said, you pass HPV TOO!! Yes! Into your throats that are infected with HPV. But, the difference is that woman have Pap smears to clear HPV so it won’t develope into Cervical Cancer while man DON’T. They don’t have the clinical option to KNOW WTF they have in their penises.
HPV IS ASYMPTOMATIC.
HPV IS INVISIBLE.
YOU PROBABLY HAVE IT IN YOUR DICKS ALREADY AND INFECT WOMAN.
Are you gay, a woman or Stefania who upvoted your comment?
The upper case typo is suspicious.
I don’t speak your language. You sound like you play to many video games. There is nothing wrong with that, I like video games but there is a limit. Do you even go outside, bro?
Good article… But I wish I read it after breakfast.
Why you eat pussy for breakfast? lol
Hey guys, here’s a bright idea: stop going down on women. Simple. You don’t get hpv throat cancer. You might get hpv on your dick, but that’s laughably trivial. The worst that can happen is that you give some slut you like fucking cervical cancer, but she probably wouldn’t commit to you long enough for her early death to limit how much you fuck her anyways!
I will take that advice.
Just outlaw cunnilingus, like how anal sex is outlawed in certain states. Let no women have the privilege of having a man go down on her.
As a traditional women, I have thoroughly supported ROK. However, the comments on this article are really disappointing. Why bash female genitalia?
Being traditional doesn’t change the fact that women’s cunts have diseases in them. Female circumcision is also a tradition. A traditional woman would support female circumcision thus.
As a traditional woman you have supported ROK??? Since when constantly talking about banging sluts became socially conservative, or you don’t read this blog very often? Wake up and smell the coffee….you better not be a Christian, people who believe in God should not be visiting this site again and again.
I totally agree on the smegma part. Women – especially white and asian women – exude and hide a lot of smegma in their genitalia. Dirtiest are the sluts, or women who don’t shave or use water to clean themselves after urinating or shower immediately after sex. With black women, it has to do more with their skin composition than to do with their lifestyle, you can’t blame them for the odor. With white women, you can never be sure because appearances are deceptive.
The cleanest women I’ve experienced when it comes to female hygiene have been middle eastern, persian or moslem women(irrespective of race) – maybe because their religion compels them to use water when it comes to genital hygiene after using the loo, as well as they have to religiously shave every month. So no stinky cunts. But again that’s not an excuse to go down on them, if you ever happen to seduce them. Cunnilingus is always a no-no. No woman deserves it. It’s actually a mental sickness promoted by modern feminism and porn – just like how analingus or rimming is promoted today. Sticking your tongue in a woman’s private orifices is simply gross. That’s porn depravity.
Fellatio is what has been practiced since antiquity. Screw those sex manuals which talk about female pleasure through cunnilingus. You can make a woman cum too if you tongue her breast’s nipple areola and finger her G-spot or digitally stimulate her clit gently.
Cunnilingus doesn’t make a woman adore a man; she may praise him on his face but in her mind he’s already lowered yourself for sticking his mouth in her filthiest orifices. It’s all about frame control.
Hey guy, I’m sorry some woman(en) ruined your life and you’re a bitter asshole to all females now… but how about fighting for men’s rights, ex. Anti-circumcision movement, instead of being a fucking idiot? I am a mom and an intactivist… catchy, right? Stop blaming your mom, ex-girlfriends, ex-classmates, ex-roomate for your shitty existence and start making something BETTER of yourself. You’re capable of doing better than this, find some inspiration and ditch those inner demons. Hate also hurts you, not just those you’re aiming for.
“Stop blaming your mom, ex-girlfriends, ex-classmates, ex-roomate for
your shitty existence and start making something BETTER of yourself. You’re capable of doing better than this, find some inspiration and ditch those inner demons. Hate also hurts you, not just those you’re aiming for.”
– Well Michael Douglas blamed his ex wife for getting HPV. What should he have done, blame himself for loving to lick? Women are evil, and you personify that. So much for your ‘intact’ivism.
Women always ruin a man’s life. Right from the time of Adam. God created evil first in Satan, and second – in the creature with a vagina and womb called woman. Both to test man. We are all taught to hate Satan in religion. So shouldn’t woman be treated like Satan too? Let me tell you one thing. If women didn’t have sexual use for men, they would be useless. USELESS. That’s the fucking and brutal truth. A woman who has no sexual use for a man is a fucking liability and a torture to bear. But the fucking part is now men have to suffer for the sake of sex ..(oral sex). Women don’t deserve respect, love or concern. Hating women doesn’t hurt men; it liberates them from the lies women purport to seduce and subjugate men. Unless you hate the enemy, you cannot win the war, and neither can you protect yourself. Else you’ll commit harakiri (suicide). Men here are wise to know that women want us to do that. Female circumcision should be done and mandated. Every woman, in every fucking part of this fucking world. Find the cunts, and circumcise them.
Well, I think genital mutilation without consent at such a young age is wrong for both genders, but the lack of concern for male circumcision and hysteria over female circumcision is ridiculous (the worst version of female circumcision, type 3, constitutes roughly 10% of female circumcision cases worldwide, so don’t tell me how it’s worse).
Although I disagree with the author’s suggestion, he’s no worse than a lot of other people out there supporting male circumcision.
If you’re an intactivist, you would think you’d hold more sympathy.
Oral sex is fine, but only when men are on the receiving end of it – fellatio.
This is a fucking bad joke right? You can’t be serious.
yes, it is a joke, you fucking idiot. it’s called satire.
Why don’t you go fuck yourself.
With all the ‘men’s rights’ bullshit flying around, how is a person always supposed to know? That is why we ask questions, so we get smarter. Fuckin’ douche.
MRAs have more valid complaints than feminists, anyways. Go away.
“Female circumcision would remove all the the genital tissue associated with STD transmission when oral sex is performed on a woman, creating a smooth keratinized surface free from cancer spreading bodily fluids.”
Do any of you realize that fluids don’t come from the clitoris? In fact, no amount of circumcision is going to stop bodily fluids.
It will. Female circumcision will prevent women from whoring about.Lesser smegma.
I’d like a bit more info on what kind of ‘nick’ or ‘cut’ a women could have (if I’m to take this seriously). Because some of the FGM images I’ve seen have removed the clitoris and removed the labia. Where exactly would this cut be?
Also, I am against circumcision. I have never understood why it is so accepted. This article is a mixture of making a point about the double standard, a massive troll to bring out some angry feminists and may have some conceivable points. Im not going to bother researching if the points are conceivable because I don’t have the time right now, but its amazing how many people will fall for your trick looool
Amusing, and great hate bait.
However, realistically, if female circumcision is performed, it greatly impairs the woman’s ability to orgasm, in which case, cunnilingus wouldn’t provide her with much pleasure, hence there’d be no reason to perform it – or have sex with her for any reason other than the man’s pleasure / procreation.
Which is why the Muslims / various African tribes do it…
Ahahahaha. Classic Victorian propaganda.
Visit CleanSexy on YouTube for more info.
No; you’re just a freak and an idiot.
The subject of circumcision tends to bring out those, on all sides.
*checks avatar and sees the Union Jack on the Upper Left of flag I’ve seen for the first time in my life*
Please, continue with your own programming…
the fact that she wouldn’t enjoy cunnilingus was my initial thought behind the author’s proposal of FGM.
Ah. 🙂
Male circumcision greatly impairs my ability to orgasm. Don’t believe me? Prove that it doesn’t.
Did the surgeon botch the job? Because millions of men who’ve been circumcised have still been able to orgasm. Now, as to whether the orgasms are less intense in circumcised men as they are in uncircumcised men, that may well be the case, I don’t doubt that the loss of many nerve endings could diminish sensation. But most circumcised men have not found it entirely kills the ability to orgasm. If it did, circumcision probably would have died out, long ago. 🙂
We’re not talking about millions of men we’re talking about me. I give a shit about them. Prove that it doesn’t impair my ability to orgasm.
This will definitely piss off the feminists for sure, if there is evidence to prove that female circumcision would prevent cancer, then it should be an option like male circumcision should be. I don’t any infant of any sex should have parts of their genitals forcibly removed, that should be a choice of the individual when that person is an adult.
Feminists are also against male circumcision, and were so even before dudes started piping up against it (most American men are still in favor of having it done to their newborn boys). And this article is 100% INCORRECT about female circumcision affecting men’s cancer rates AT ALL.
If you believe the shite they write on this site, you’re not very bright.
{Yeah, I tried to get all Cat in the Hat for you, to make it easy enough to comprehend.}
It’s mimicking the bogus claims of the pro-male circumcision brigade. JEsus. Theyr’e not serious.
And I’ve spoken to loads of feminists online who don’t see circumcision as a big deal. Many of the rest trivialise it. And they always see FGM as worse, even though male circumcision is WAY worse than type 2 FGM, the most common form.
That fat bitch Lindy West mocks MGM victims on Jezebel. Feminists only care about perpetuating the idea that FGM is soooooo much worse than MGM; and, how they’re sooooo sick of hearing people compare the two. That’s what they say EVERY TIME. Always with that “sooooo” bullshit.
That fat bitch Lindy West mocks MGM victims on Jezebel. Feminists only care about perpetuating the idea that FGM is soooooo much worse than MGM; and, how they’re sooooo sick of hearing people compare the two. That’s what they say EVERY TIME. Always with that “sooooo” bullshit.
Hmm, and the fat bitches on Return of Kings mock FGM victims. Male circumcision is awful, we should be helping feminists abolish it (unlike us, they’ve actually been trying to get American hospitals to stop pushing for medical and religious cutting).
And as awful and as inexcusable as circumcision is, it should in no way, shape, or form be mentioned in the same breath as female genital mutilation. If African nations ONLY damaged little girls as little as we damage little boys, there would be no outcries against it. But their intention is to remove all outer genitalia, as in, they crudely cut away the clit and labia, which would be akin to removing my entire penis and scrotal skin. Oh, and they also sew up little girls’ bloodied holes so that only a straw can fit through it. “Virginity” is thus ensured until they get married off at 12 or 13.
Male and female circumcision are as distinctly different as slicing off your fingerprint versus chopping off an entire finger. If you make the two crimes comparable, you just show what an absolute moron you are.
Here comes the feminist whine-brigade to derail the conversation to make it all the womynz. Why should I care if some dumb bitch wants to cut her slut daughter in some far off African shit-hole? We’re talking about RIC in America. And, you’re ignorant comment demonstrates how incapable you are of thinking beyond your feminist, “women always have it worse” narrative.
“In nearly every place that FGC is performed, it is carried out by women
(rather than by men) who do not typically view it as an expression of patriarchy,
but who instead believe that it is hygienic , as well as beautifying, even empowering,
and as an important rite of passage with high cultural value. (The claim that such women are simply “brainwashed” is a gross
oversimplification.) At the same time, the “rite of passage” ceremonies for boys in these societies are carried out by men; these are done in parallel, under similar conditions, and for similar reasons–and often with similar (or even worse) consequences for health and sexuality.”
http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2014/02/female-genital-mutilation-and-male-circumcision-time-to-confront-the-double-standard/
“When people speak of “FGM” they are (apparently) thinking of the most severe forms of female genital cutting, done in the least sterile environments, with the most
drastic consequences likeliest to follow. This is so, notwithstanding the fact that such
forms are the exception rather than the rule.
When people speak of “male circumcision” (by contrast) they are (apparently) thinking of the least severe forms of male genital cutting, done in the most sterile environments,
with the least drastic consequences
likeliest to follow–because this is the form with which they are culturally familiar. This then leads to the impression that “FGM”
and “male circumcision” are “totally different” with the first being barbaric and crippling, and the latter being benign or even health-conferring ”
Among the Kono there is no cultural obsession with feminine chastity, virginity, or women’s sexual fidelity, perhaps because the role of the biological father is considered marginal and peripheral to the central ‘matricentric unit.’ … Kono culture promulgates a dual-sex ideology … [The] power of Bundu, the women’s secret sodality [i.e., initiation society that manages FGC ceremonies], suggest positive links between excision, women’s religious ideology, their power in domestic relations, and their high profile in the ‘public arena.’
Interview with circumcised women.
…
Great article.
Cutting off a woman’s clitoris will bring her greater gender equality?
Well said. I do hope that the writer of this article will have a daughter someday. Then he will remember what he wrote and feel deeply ashamed.
Indeed. What an incredible main image for the article. A smiling doctor with a victim in the background smiling as she’s about to have her clitoris chopped off. A western doctor would lose their license and possibly be jailed for doing this. “Do no harm”.
Cutting off the male foreskin removes WAY more sexual pleasure and functionality than cutting off the glans clitoris. A woman still has her vaginal canal for pleasure during penetration. For a man, because the glans penis is virtually sexually insensitive, most circumcised men have zero sexual sensation left. If you have no ridged band, no frenular delta and no frenular delta like me, you have no enjoyment, none of the tingly sensations you get from the foreskin, which is the primary sexual tissue.
I know this because I have experienced both. I’ve also studied the subject extensively. You’ve just bought media propaganda.
But, if she does it to a helpless infant she cashes a check. Quit pussy worshiping you fucking simp.
Are you really a dude-bro or are you a bro-dude. I have my doubts.
like my page on fb, nigga
The most common form of FGM is type 2. This is not as damaging as male circumcision. I was cut at 14 and it destroyed my sexual sensation. You’re simply perpetuating media myths. The foreskin is where virtually all sexual sensation comes from. The only reason more men don’t complain is that most were knife-raped at birth and have no point of comparison.
There is no logic behind the ‘FGM is worse’ meme. It’s simply gynecocentrism. In male circumcision, more tissue is excised, more nerves are lost, more dysfunction is caused. Circumcised men are 4-5 times more likely to have ED.
I am not talking about type 2 FGM. Note that I said “chopping off the genitals of a little girl” and not a mere labial nick. I am talking about an almost complete butchering of the entire vagina and it’s being sewn closed … only to be ripped open again during vicious painful sex. The equivalent of this … if it happened to men … would be to have your entire penis cut off minus a 2cm long stump. Puss coming out of your penis for years would be the least of your concerns.
And I wrote this in response to a stupid article which is claiming that FGM could be a good thing (as though it’s no different than male circumcision). While hard core FGM is not as common as simple nicks (which are still nasty) there is no country where even a small amount of boys get almost their entire set of genitals cut off … even if it was only a small percentage of “circumcisions”.
I am not biased by the media. What I have seen about full out girl vagina butchering and studied about male and female genital mutilation makes images and reports in the news seem like a happy fairy tale.
All genital mutilation is child abuse and all of it should be condemned. Especially written in stupid infantile garbage crud articles like this one.
Does it even matter which one is worse? It’s ultimately not a competition but a case of lots of people losing. Go fight genital mutilation in general for both boys and girls…we all know there is not enough activism against it. In the mean time I focus on full out genital removal which is one of the worst things that can ever happen to anyone let alone a little child.
That is the worst form of FGM, which only makes up 10% of the worldwide FGMs, which would be about 15 million worldwide. Compare this to over 1 billion mutilated men.
The type 3 FGM you refer to actually prevents the woman having sex, so is objectively worse, but remember, male circumcision removed more sex nerves.
It obviously does matter to you which is worse since your’e getting so angry about this comparison.
This article is a parody of the pro-circumcision brigade. They come out with spurious reasons to cut boys, e.g. lowers cervical cancer risk in female partners.
You’re missing the point.
It’s hard to understand the point of just about anything on this website.
I cannot believe what I have just read! You must be joking, right? First of all: oral sex is not something you HAVE to perform. Second; I have never heard of women ridiculing men for wanting to use protection when performin oral sex. I would not do that either.
The best solution is to go to tests when you meet a new partner. You BOTH go to them, and if doctors say everything is OK, then proceed.
Or then you can just be really, really safe and never have any kind of sex with a living creature. 🙂
You guys realize this is a joke right? He’s making fun of Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal”.
sometimes i cannot tell if it is satire or reality.
I write a fair bit of parody / satyr and I didn’t pick up on the groove of this site until now. Of course it is very subjective but many of the articles barely come across as parody to me.
Clearly this piece is “tounge-in-cheek” pun intended. But the HPV vaccine can prevent the cancer in males and females and often aid in curing it in some cases. Less messy than genital surgery and more effective.
how about…. nobody cuts anybody’s genitals???? how does that sound you insufferable dickwads
That was the point. It’s satire.
Good, now the rabbis can suck clit as well as cock.
Fact about female circumcision: Females can’t orgasm with it, which
means they can’t squeeze your dick cuz they can’t cum. Who wants to fuck
a dry, loose, unenthusiastic pussy? Not me.
Fact about
cunnilingus: A faithful, healthy vagina tastes like key lime pie, a
slutty vagina tastes like rotten fish. If she’s only getting 1 dick on
the regular, the pussy ecosystem gets used to it, rebalances, and starts
to taste like a citrus-y virgin pussy. If she’s getting it from
whoever’s around, the pussy biology can’t re-equilibrate. Good pussy is
actually delicious, bad fish pussy is easy sick pussy.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17970975
Most circumcised men can’t orgasm since the most sensitive tissue is cut off. They can only ejaculate. There’s a difference.
WTF? Are you like a woman trying to understand male orgasm? I can’t take this seriously.
Nope. I can’t.
If it’s satire it’s not only not funny, it’s not even understandable.
No, I’m a man who was circumcised after experiencing his foreskin, who knows how devastating circumcision is.
And you’re saying those of us who were circumsized as babies don’t have orgasms?
If my orgasms were any more intense, man, I’d be dead! I don’t know WTF you can be talking about. Are you sure they only cut off your foreskin and not your whole penis?
You do realize they’re only supposed to cut off the overhanging skin, right? Not the whole dick?
If circumcision took away orgasms men would have no problem being celibate or faithful. Which is why they mutilate women by cutting the whole clit off. So she can’t enjoy sex.
“And you’re saying those of us who were circumsized as babies don’t have orgasms?”
If you have no ridged band and frenular delta, that’s exactly what I’m saying. These are the parts with the nerves to induce a proper orgasm.
“If my orgasms were any more intense, man, I’d be dead!”
This is what most men cut at birth say. Anything to rationalise what was done to them and to show they’re unharmed.
“You do realize they’re only supposed to cut off the overhanging skin, right? Not the whole dick?”
They cut off my foreskin. The foreskin contains all the erogenous nerves. Join the dots.
“If circumcision took away orgasms men would have no problem being celibate or faithful.”
It doesn’t work like that. Circumcision doesn’t remove your attraction to women or your , generally your ability to ejaculate. It does remove most if not all of the sexual sensation, though.
“Which is why they mutilate women by cutting the whole clit off. So she can’t enjoy sex.”
There are lots of justifications given for female circumcision, and all of them have been given for male circumcision–they are the same thing. By the way, I’m not aware of any neurological evidence which shows a woman can’t enjoy sex without a glans clitoris. A woman has a lot more going on than just the clit.
You do realise circumcision was adopted to sexually suppress males , right? You do realise FGM was known as female circumcision until the 90s, right? Hello! Is anyone in!
“This is what most men cut at birth say. Anything to rationalise what was done to them and to show they’re unharmed.”
Amazing. So you’re saying, “Who are you going to believe, me or your lying dick?”
No, it’s worse than that. You’re saying I KNOW I don’t really ENJOY my orgasms, but I’m lying to myself and to the world (whom I’ve never given a thought to before now because I didn’t know I was supposed to be lying to them) because I was circumsized as a baby. And not just me, but every circumsized man is PRETENDING to enjoy orgasming really, REALLY good, just to “rationalize” being circumsized.
First, its a misuse of this word “rationalize”. When one rationalizes one argues against a truth one subconsciously knows is true. Your actually accusing me and every circumsized man of being out of actual contact with his own body! You’re saying we are all psychotic!
All of us! But not you.
I don’t even know where to begin to unwrap the solipsism in that statement.
Wouldn’t it be far easier for you to believe that you were so traumatized by YOUR later circumcision that you can no longer feel the pleasure of orgasming than to believe that circumsized men everywhere are PATHOLOGICALLY MENTALLY ILL?
Of course not, says the solipsist. I’m right and everyone else in the world is wrong!
I knew the anti-circumcism brigade was fanatical, but I never knew just how fanatical until now.
Seek help. What is wrong with you is no little thing. If you can’t enjoy your orgasms anymore you are damaged and need help.
You do realise it’s been proven that all the erogenous nerves are in the foreskin, right? You can’t argue with hard science.
http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/cold-mcgrath/
“The rhesus monkey has fewer corpuscular receptors in the prepuce and more corpuscular receptors in the glans. In humans, however, the glans penis has few corpuscular receptors and predominant free nerve endings,19-20 consistent with protopathic sensibility. Protopathic simply refers to a low order of sensibility (consciousness of sensation), such as to deep pressure and pain, that is poorly localised. The cornea of the eye is also protopathic, since it can react to a very minute stimulus, such as a hair under the eyelid, but it can only localise which eye is affected and not the exact location of the hair within the conjunctival sac. As a result, the human glans penis has virtually no fine touch sensation and can only sense deep pressure and pain at a high threshold. This was first reported by the inventor of the aesthesiometer,21 and led Sir Henry Head to make his famous comparison with the back of the heel.22 While the human glans penis is protopathic, the prepuce contains a high concentration of touch receptors in the ridged band. In addition, intraepithelial nerves are identified in the common fused prepuce/glans penis epithelium of the three-month old rhesus monkey. In the female, the prepuce/glans clitoridis interface contains many corpuscular receptors in both humans and rhesus monkeys.”
You’re arguing from a position of ignorance. You were never allowed to feel what your foreskin felt like during sex/masturbation. You have to believe you weren’t harmed and you’re not sexually dysfunctional, because it would be too hard to cope with if you came out of your circumcision coma.
The only fanatics are the people who want to chop off healthy erogenous tissue from babies’ penises.
“Wouldn’t it be far easier for you to believe that you were so traumatized by YOUR later circumcision that you can no longer feel the pleasure of orgasming than to believe that circumsized men everywhere are PATHOLOGICALLY MENTALLY ILL?”
I didn’t say they were mentally ill. They are physically harmed and use coping mechanism to deal with it. I was traumatised because I experienced before and after. You’re not traumatised (at least not on a daily basis and not in the same way as me) because you were mutilated at birth and never got to know what was stolen from you. Why do you think they’re so desperate to do it to babies?
Project much? Cause that’s what a solipsist does. They say what is true for me is true for everyone.
You said circumsized men don’t feel pleasure during sex but they don’t know they aren’t feeling pleasure so they LIE and say they do because they were neonatally traumatized and now must deceive themselves so that. . . I’m sorry. Why am I rationalizing? Who am I protecting with my psychosis? WHY do I need this psychosis?
You know, the first time I ate macaroni and cheese I HATED it. No one could make me eat it. But my Catholic mother served it every Friday growing up. Guess what? I NEVER gave in! Why not? Because I KNEW I didn’t LIKE macaroni and cheese.
And you know, the first time I played with my dick – I LIKED IT! And I continued playing with it. All the time. No matter what my religion or my parents or society said about it, I kept touching it.
Why?
Because it felt GOOD! Better than any other feeling I could feel.
And guess what? At my age it still feels good and I’m gonna keep getting it touched and touching it in all the ways it feels good. And your solipsistic insanity will have no effect on me.
Like I said, you’re projecting. Get HELP.
Bu-bye!
I await your neurological evidence circumcision isn’t damaging. I am waiting.
You are full of shit! There is no loss! Circumcision perfects the imperfect!
“The man with experience is never at the mercy of the man with an argument”
You argue just like a feminist. In fact, given your projecting, you sound like a SJW. But I repeat myself.
Rule 3: SJWs Always Project (from Vox Day’s new book, SJWs Always Lie)
No need to answer you. You are just too damaged to argue with. You lost the ability to enjoy your orgasms? Man, you have my sympathy. But you seem to have also lost the ability to think rationally. Are you sure you weren’t born a female Hermaphrodite and you just THOUGHT they were circumcising you when really they were trying to make you more like the women you were born to be. Could be.
I’m still waiting on neurological evidence I’m wrong.
Like cutting off the eyelids perfects the imperfect? lol
Dude you are mentally ill! The foreskin is only good to make anti-wrinkle cream from! It does nothing for sex! It has been proven over and over again that their is no loss!! You only lose a useless flap of unsightly skin!
You began this thread asserting:
“Most circuncised men can’t orgasm…”
It is THAT ridiculous assertion that needs evidence and you have provided NONE. No one has ever asserted there are no nerves in the foreskin. Of course there are. That’s why babies cry and doctors now use anastesia.
Your special brand of psychosis is to assert that circumcised men CAN’T orgasm! THAT is the nonsense I have been wasting my time responding to.
As I said before, you are one wounded puppy. Get help.
It’s not something I can prove, just as nobody can prove most FGM victims can’t orgasm. Unfortunately the difference between an ejaculation and an orgasm can’t be quantified or qualified at present. What we do know for sure is that circumcision is sexually devastating because it strips the penis of erogenous nerves.
The reason I know the difference between orgasm and ejaculation is because I was circumcised as a teenager after experiencing my foreskin. If you hadn’t been knife-raped as a child before experiencing sex/masturbation as nature intended it, you’d understand.
That’s right, call me mentally ill. That’ll work. Because when circumcised men complain and tell the truth, they are told there’s a problem with them, not a problem with what was done to them. If a woman told you circumcised women can’t orgasm, you’d believe it immediately.
http://www.nocirc.org/touch-test/bju_6685.pdf
“CONCLUSIONS
The glans of the circumcised penis is less
sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the
uncircumcised penis. The transitional region
from the external to the internal prepuce
is the most sensitive region of the
uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than
the most sensitive region of the circumcised
penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive
parts of the penis.”
Are you calling intact man liars? How do you know if you’ve never had a foreskin?
“It’s not something I can prove. . .”
Thank you! Now if you’d only started with that I wouldn’t have had to spank your little bottom. I could have just ignored you as I do all the other anti-circumsion fanatics. Your compulsion to commit the dialectical fallacy (I believe it’s called. No time to check it) to make the argument simple derailed your rational mind.
WTF?
Which you once again commit before you can shut your ignorant mouth!
It’s like a compulsion with you, isn’t it?
You are capable of seeing your self–contradictions, right? They are right there but I can’t be bothered to cut and paste them for you. I’m writing this with my phone, after all. Just slowly re-read what you wrote and I think you’ll see it.
I’m afraid I am compulsively helpful to any troll who shows the slightest degree of intellectual insight, as you did with your opening statement here. But then your hamster got spinning and you were off to the races once more!
It’s possible you are not mentally ill but you should take a course in classical logic. But without personal insight that might only confirm you in your solipsism.
Good luck and God’s Best.
The reason I said it prevents you from orgasming is because I had an average circumcision after experiencing my foreskin so know what it does. The fact I can’t prove it via studies because they’ve not been done, doesn’t disprove what I’m saying.
You also can’t deny all the erogenous nerves are in the foreskin as it’s been proven, so you have to ask yourself, if all the erogenous nerves are in the foreskin, isn’t it likely Lawrence is correct?
Rule 2: SJWs always double-down.”
You said I COULD NOT disagree with you because scientific studies PROVED you were right. Now you say:
“The fact I can’t prove it via studies because they’ve not been done, doesn’t disprove what I’m saying.”
So the fact that the studies you were relying on as PROOF I was wrong HAVEN’T BEEN DONE doesn’t disprove your point?
That’s like saying, because we haven’t tested the WHOLE MOON for cheese, doesn’t disprove that the moon is made of cheese! If only someone would just go back there and test the DARKS side this time. I’m sure we’d find cheese!
And of course, you can’t admit defeat. Why not? Because Rule 2: SJWs ALWAYS double-down!
The studies do prove all the erogenous nerves are in the foreskin. How are you meant to orgasm without erogenous nerves? Yup. Critical thinking not your strong suit.
ALL the erogenous nerves? Really? ALL of them? Check your sources. They did not say ALL of them.
This is why I think you are mentally impaired. Your entire argument is, “Well who are you going to believe? Me or your lying dick?” LOL!!
I’d believe just about any dick over you! And definitely my own! Hahaha!
Look, I am so so sorry you can’t feel your orgasms any more. And I know you truly believe no one else can. But your position is just rridiculous.
Let’s do a survey. Right here.
Any circumcised man who has bothered to read this thread, ATTENTION!!
Please reply below to this simple question:
Are you able to FEEL pleasure when you ejaculate? Simple Yes or No.
Let’s see what the results are. OK?
I’ll vote first.
YES!
Basically all, yes. There’s nothing significantly erogenous about the glans. It’s like the eyeball. Just because it has a scattering of fine touch receptors, doesn’t change the fact all the pleasure comes from the foreskin. 95% of the surfaced of the glans is composed of crude free nerves.
“Any circumcised man who has bothered to read this thread, ATTENTION!!
Please reply below to this simple question:
Are you able to FEEL pleasure when you ejaculate? Simple Yes or No.”
Men have egos. Men cut at birth will often defend their mutilation. FGM victims will say the same. The neurology says … the glans is non-erogenous. Deal with it.
“The fact I can’t prove it via studies because they’ve not been done, doesn’t disprove what I’m saying.”
How does that stand up to your “Basically all, yes.”
And,
“. . .ALL the pleasure comes from the foreskin.”
Or this soon-to-a-classic, “The [penis] is like an eye…]!!
LOL 8 (that’s to infinity)!!
Your position is absurd. It consists of telling every circumcised man he doesn’t know what he is experiencing physically. That is what is known as “gas lighting”, from the movie of the same name. However, you should know that it doesn’t work with most men. You are certainly not going to convince any red pill man to distrust his dick! It may work with lower betas, deltas, and probably with gammas and omegas, but not with any red pill men.
Now go away. You significant other is calling you.
The “basically all, yes” is true on the subject of erogenous nerves, as I’ve proven via histological studies. The only part of the glans with a light scattering of erogenous nerves is the corona but the density is so low as to not be significantly erogenous. The foreskin contains as near as damn it all. On a technical level not ALL, but then if even one erogenous nerve was on the glans you couldn’t technically say ALL , could you. But that edoesn’t change the fact one erogenous nerve doesn’t make any significant contribution to sexual pleasure when all but one are in the foreskin.
“Or this soon-to-a-classic, “The [penis] is like an eye…]!!”
The surface of the glans outwith the corona IS exactly like the ye–crude free nerves which sense pain and pressure.
“Your position is absurd. It consists of telling every circumcised man he doesn’t know what he is experiencing physically.”
Every? No, I didn’t say that. Not ever circumcised man was cut at birth or in prepubescence and has no point of comparison. Not every circumcised man is ignorant and lives in denial. Many circumcised men recognise the glans is non-erogenous. But they will never know what they lost if they never experienced it.
IT’s not gaslighting, it’s simply very good critical thinking and having an insight from personal experience of before and after.
“However, you should know that it doesn’t work with most men.”
Most circumcised men will get defensive and pretend they are not victims and they’r edick is just fine. It’s called ego and coping mechanism. FGM victims say FGM doesn’t lower sexual pleasure.
“. You are certainly not going to convince any red pill man to distrust his dick! ”
MEn like you are blue-pillers because you live a life of pretence, pretending you have a functional penis, when it’s wholly dysfunctional.
You’re a fucking simp. Learn to read between the lines dumbass.
Well, I guess we are done here. Female circumcision? Give me a break.
I have a friend who worked as a high $$$ escort for Exotica-2000 before they got busted under the RICO Act. In her personal life she NEVER permitted guys to go down on her, she absolutely hated it. Was not allowed, wouldn’t go for it, even drunk, hell no.
Then she started escorting for $2500 an hour (starting pay, only went up from there). Her thoughts were that no guy paying four or five figures would waste his $$ eating pussy, but boy was she wrong! Every last dude went down on her and some of them did it for most of the hour. She got one line over and over from the clients: My wife just hates oral and won’t let me go down on her!
If only Michael Douglas’ plight had come out sooner, she could’ve tried to save herself the disgust of faking orgasm after orgasm while being eaten out against [most of] her will.
I thought that this site was against male circumcision?
soon as you cut off your fucking dicks.
I feel male or female circumcision should be a choice made by adults. Its up to them.
This is obviously pathetic satire(MGM and FGM suck; I don’t know any feminists that are in favor of MGM, but generalize all you want), but aside from using the excuse of “comedy” to make a mockery of women’s bodies yet again, it doesn’t make the faintest sense:
FGM is designed to decrease or, at best, eliminate sexual pleasure in women. Why would a woman who couldn’t get off from it want a guy to give her cunnilingus? Why would the guy want to put in the effort for something that wouldn’t get a positive reaction?
MGM is designed to decrease sexual pleasure in men. Fact.
Yup, MGM is reducing male sexual pleasure.
“In
cases of masturbation we must, I believe, break the habit by inducing
such a condition of the parts as will cause too much local suffering
to allow of the practice being continued. For this purpose, if the
prepuce is long, we may circumcise the male patient with present and
probably with future advantage; the operation, too, should not be
performed under chloroform, so that the pain experienced may be
associated with the habit we wish to eradicate.” Athol A. W.
Johnson, On An Injurious Habit Occasionally Met with in Infancy and
Early Childhood, The Lancet, vol. 1 (7 April 1860): pp. 344-345.
Or
how about this?
“In
all cases of masturbation circumcision is undoubtedly the physicians’
closest friend and ally … To obtain the best results one must cut
away enough skin and mucous membrane to rather put it on the stretch
when erections come later. There must be no play in the skin after
the wound has thoroughly healed, but it must fit tightly over the
penis, for should there be any play the patient will be found to
readily resume his practice, not begrudging the time and extra energy
required to produce the orgasm. It is true, however, that the longer
it takes to have an orgasm, the less frequently it will be attempted,
consequently the greater the benefit gained … The younger the
patient operated upon the more pronounced the benefit, though
occasionally we find patients who were circumcised before puberty
that require a resection of the skin, as it has grown loose and
pliant after that epoch.” E. J. Spratling, Masturbation in the
Adult, Medical Record, vol. 24 (1895): pp. 442-443
Some cultures consider it a hygienic measure…however much it may shock some others. Most females anyway are not promiscuous lesbians masturbating huge clits from evening to dawn. They have better things to do, in and out of bed. A lot of the fight against what is called “FGM” by Western standards now (which wasn’t the case until quite recently) has to do with the lack of medicalisation of the procedure. In several countries outlawing the practice has produced terrible results – forcing it underground and resulting in a worse situations, forcing intelligent governments to backtrack on such a policy. Numerous studies have proven women in circumcising cultures do not see themselves as “mutilated” and clearly resent Western feminist intervention in their environment. If they change, it will be at their own pace and on their own terms.
They are objectively mutilated whether they see themselves as mutilated or not. The same goes for victims of MGM.
My HIV virus that was cured by a great spell caster. Since last 7 months i was having the virus. last 5 weeks I was in a great pain so I told one of my friends about it he told me that there is a great spell caster that can cure HIV and so many diseases and he also help people in getting pregnant and bringing back EX. I asked her if she had the contact so i could give it a try, she gave me the email [email protected] , I emailed him he talked to me and he perform the necessary rituals and he told me that after few day I should go for a test. Which I did, when the doctor told me that am now a HIV negative I couldn’t believe myself I went to see another doctor the result was still the same i couldn’t keep this to myself so i decided to let it out on this page that if anyone one here need help in curing his/her HIV virus or trying to conceive should also give this a try
Satire or not, there are good points. I have been saying this for several years now. Something along the lines of a clitoridotomy and/or labiaplasty. You know, equal rights and all. Because shouldn’t every child (M & F) have the right to body autonomy taken from them by their parent(s)?
Except that HIV rates increased with female genital cutting in Kenya.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19607733
While this Kenyan study suggests the exact opposite: http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/iph_theses/98/
I’m actually a feminist and I appreciate this well written comparison between female and male circumcision even if it is satire. Sometimes you have to approach touchy subjects sarcastically. Male and female circumcision are basically the same procedure and I feel sickened that millions of baby boys are subjected to this torture. It isn’t fair. So thanks for the well written, well researched article. I shared it.
All this talk about performing cunnilingus for the woman’s pleaure reminds me of the old joke:
Guy 1: Man, she was fantastic! The sex was off the hook! The stuff she did to me? Fantastic! Drained my balls three times!
Guy 2: Did she cum?
Guy 1: Who?
Hi. Good to see sensible Western men. Can you please help with the funding for a campaign to help educate people about the benefits of female circumcision?
Please read Dr. Fuambai Sia Ahmadu articles on her own circumcision and why she is advocating it for women.
https://www.gofundme.com/7jsnenf8
So good to see that there are enlightened Western men who understand the benefits of female circumcision. Please read about Dr. Fuambai Sia Ahmadu’s own circumcision and why she advocates it for women. Please help with her funding to educate people about the its benefits and help stop the socalled feminists and purveyors of ignorance and prejudice. You can donate here: https://www.gofundme.com/7jsnenf8
These points are so accurate in comparison to male circumcision proponents arguements that it’s incredibly scary! Someone who does not value or understand the component of a right to bodily autonomy or someone who feels that consent is subjective would surely be convinced of FGMS relevance ( especially towards a parents right to choose this at birth). Scary! Well written but let’s hope it stays “a modest proposal” and not a reality.