“In the Soviet army it takes more courage to retreat than advance.” – Joseph Stalin
I thought about these words as I watched Daniel O’Reilly, whose comedy stage name is Dapper Laughs, solemnly apologize before a browbeating Emily Maitlis on Newsnight after his show had been cancelled by ITV due to feminist pressure.
I also thought back to the events in recent weeks, including:
1. Julien Blanc’s Australian visa being revoked, his visa for the U.K. being denied, his apology on CNN, and RSD’s all-around pathetic PR response to the situation.
2. Matt Taylor breaking down and apologising for a shirt he wore while doing media for the Rosetta comet landing
Joseph Stalin’s earlier words were in reference to Order 227, a brutal but necessary order that contained the line, “Not One Step Back!” which became a slogan of Soviet resistance during the fight against Germany in WWII. The order was made because ill-disciplined Soviet troops kept retreating and deserting without putting up a fight.
Order 227 dictated that no commander had the right to retreat without an order. It called for the creation of penal battalions where poorly disciplined men were sent. These penal battallions were put at the front lines and often ordered to clear minefields by running through them on foot. The order also called for blocking units, whose job it was to shoot any soldiers attempting to retreat without an order to do so.
So what does a brutal measure like Order 227 have to do with these recent events?
Simple. Every time a man gets on TV and apologises for that which owes no apology, he emboldens and encourages Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) to attack more men. If these injustices are ever going to stop, men pressured to apologize by feminist SJWs must fear the backlash from red pill men more than the media frenzy from SJWs. In some instances this may result in a few men becoming double victims. This is regrettable but necessary.
Here’s why…
Because, the real enemy of men today isn’t a feminist woman. It’s the cowardly male that sells us out
It’s the politician who signs in a law like “Yes Means Yes,” which turns every Californian male into a potential criminal at the whim of a woman.
It’s the comedian who apologises for a rape joke said in jest on stage.
It’s the corporate suit who kneels to feminist hysteria and propaganda by pulling advertising dollars, censoring speech through the closure of accounts, and firing male employees and thereby endangering their future for such heinous crimes as telling a joke or having an opinion.
Men’s basic legal and working rights are suffering death by a thousand cuts on what is now a daily basis.
For that reason, we can no longer excuse men who apologise to the feminist mob in an attempt to save themselves, while repeatedly dooming their fellow man
In addition, there is no longer any reason for a man to act ignorant of the threats posed by feminism and SJWs just so he can excuse his inaction and cowardice. The issues are now staring him in the face every time he turns on the TV, checks the news, or browses through his social media feeds.
We can no longer sit back, feign disgust and shrug our shoulders at “those crazy feminists,” then pretend like there’s nothing we can do, and head off to work for the day. If we’re going to stop the rot, we have to be ruthless with the four sources of power that enable SJWs to hurt us most. This means publicly outing, shaming, and besmirching the reputation of the following types of men:
• Corporate executives that bow to feminist pressure
• Politicians and public officials that placate feminists at the expense of men’s rights
• Entertainers that apologize for doing their jobs, thereby encouraging further censorship
• Journalists who lie, distort, and destroy the reputation of men so they can garner more money and fame by appealing to the feminazi mob that will inflate their page views and shares
The inverse of this should also be paid attention to. That means supporting in any way possible the corporate executives, politicians, entertainers, and journalists that don’t bow to feminazi pressure. So how can you best be of service? Here are five ways:
1. Inform
If you have any honest and concrete information that would be useful in discrediting one of those four sources of feminazi power, disseminate it through an email to a writer, write about it yourself, or post it to a forum where other members can assist you in getting the word out. Don’t sit on it.
Every time the feminazi mob gets up in arms about an issue, which is almost every week, they are ruthless about encouraging informants to come forward and even offering financial incentives to do so. Don’t expect that from our side. Inform from a pure heart and a desire to maintain your freedom and the freedom of others.
2. Participate in boycotts and be vocal
Any time one of those four sources of power kowtows to the SJW mob, we need to be heard just as loudly, both with voices and money.
3. Single out and shame away
Shaming a faceless corporation or group has no power. Single out the men responsible for bowing to a feminazi mob, and let them know their actions toward their fellow man has negative social consequences.
Tech entrepreneur Jason Calacanis perfectly demonstrating the techniques of soliciting for informants, and singling out and shaming in the SJW’s war against Gurbaksh Chahal and RadiumOne
4. Write
The more people that write about these issues, the more men will not only learn about them, but also realize that they are not in a powerless minority, but rather a powerful majority. Do not worry about competition or divvying up a small pie. Focus on growing the pie. The SJW mob has thousands upon thousands of tumblrs, Blogger blogs, Facebook groups, and media outlets that all work together. We can do the same.
5. Comment, link, and share wherever you feel compelled to do so
Every time you hold back from posting a link, sharing an article, or posting a comment about a men’s issue you care about, you are robbing yourself of your voice as well as the voice of other men.
By doing these 5 things you give men with power more than one choice
When men face a SJW mob and the media frenzy that surrounds it, they should be faced with two choices instead of just one. They can stand and fight with us. Or, they can bow to the enemy and feel our wrath. It’s about time that the men standing in the middle of these two choices heard the phrase…
“Don’t fear the enemy. Fear your own.”
Don’t Miss Future Articles Like This: Follow Us On Twitter
These cowardly men are known as manginas and henpecked simps.
They are a disgrace to society and are most likely raised by single mothers or were brought up in an environment with too much female influence.
The state of today’s “man” is the epitome of feminists corrupting and contributing greatly towards the decline of our society. The fact that the traditional gender roles have been reversed where the female is now the breadwinner and the male is the trophy husband, goes to show you that the West is in great decline.
Men have become emasculated and effiminised in their ways. The way they dress such as wearing skinny jeans and chinos, not maintaining their appearance, is bad enough and proof that they have become cowards. But to make things worse, they actually allow their women to decide how to dress.
Ridiculous. A man who allows a women to be put on a pedestal and accepts the idea of a woman bossing him around, clearly shows that he has no dignity and self respect, and will not be able progress well in life. Look at what today’s man has become- complete jackasses and enjoys to be treated like one by a women.
“they actually allow their women to decide how to dress up.”
Are you from a radical Islamic country or something?
No. I am an observer of the freakshow known as civilzation.
I will NEVER allow a women to tell me how to dress up.
*A woman. Women is plural.
It sounded like you were saying that it’s preposterous for a woman to decide how to dress on her own, rather than having a man dictate it to her.
No. What I meant was that men today allow women to decide what (men) need to wear.
How the hell did you take that meaning from his comment? Why don’t you read before automatically assuming misogyny?
I’m banging a couple of girls who are roommates. I do sometimes take their fashion advice if it’s not retarded (i.e. no skinny jeans or crocs or whatever. Not that they’d ever suggested those. The holes in Crocs are so your dignity can leak out.)
Of course, when I tell them to “dress sexy for me”*, they do. *shrugs*
À bientôt,
Mistral
*They, correctly, understand this to mean “heels, stockings, garter, demi-cup bra and a smile.”
Nice….and true.
Whenever I see these “men” dressing similar to their girlfriends or wives (i.e. matching shirts, sweaters, etc…) I just shake my fucking head. I have told countless women (no matter how hot) that they’ll never get me to dress in ‘matching outfits’.
No, that shit is simply not happening here.
Crocs…if I see anyone wearing them then I do not consider that person a man at all.
That person is one step away from a matching purse.
It’s her Marxist programming. AC power plugs are misogynist as well for oppressing power strips all these years. Power strips should at least be given the right to choose whether they would like to power our appliances or not.
P.S. sMaSh tHe pAtRiArChY
Got to give the gay people credit – they don’t wear that shit (crocs) it’s usually obese retards with no sense of the offensiveness of their own appearance.
She’s baaaaaaaaack – and falsifying quotes this time.
I think I was thinking more about the skinny jeans. And because “Not very masculine Mistral” just doesn’t roll off the tongue.
Mistral
Why do you keep posting here? No one here is listening to your misstatements, and inaccuracies you try to pass off as arguments. But yet you keep coming here and posting all the time. Do you really need attention that bad?
I could say the same to you. You’ll notice that I quoted his original comment in my statement:”they actually allow their women to decide how to dress up.”
He didn’t make it clear that he was referring to women dressing men, so it looks like “can you believe they let women choose what they want to wear?!?”
Since then he changed the bit in his comment to: “But to make things even worse, they actually allow their wife/girlfriend to decide how the husband/boyfriend should dress up” to be more obvious.
Or you know, just maybe, he worded the original comment(which I quoted for your benefit) poorly, and corrected it by the time you saw it.
Come at me with evidence of my
“misstatements” and “inaccuracies”, then let’s talk.
I don’t need to. These are pointed out every single time you post. Just like a few hours ago. It was pretty obvious to anyone that “they allow their women to decide how to dress up” meant that a lot of men were allowing women to pick out their clothes. Since the entire comment was about how so many men these days are being dominated and controlled by their wives and girlfriends it was pretty obvious that was what he meant. You need to actually look at the context of something you read before you jump to a conclusion. But then again if you had these basic reasoning abilities you wouldn’t be a feminist in the first place.
The rest of his comment holds an equally irritated tone and hints of more than minor dislike towards females(I know this probably seems like the “right” attitude to you, but bear with me):
“They are a disgrace to society and are most likely raised by single mothers or were brought up in an environment with too much female influence.” Men who don’t fit his(and this general community’s) conceived ideal of masculinity are “disgraces to society” and, most likely, corrupted due to excessive “female influence”. Now before you jump, I know that part of that reasoning is just coming from believing that children(especially boys) do better with stable fathers growing up. I get that. But the way he phrases it, combined with a line up of other shots towards feminists and women in general, build up to make his statement that I originally quoted easily misinterpreted.
“The state of today’s “man” is the epitome of feminists corrupting and contributing greatly towards the decline of our society. The fact that the traditional gender roles have been reversed where the female is now the breadwinner and the male is the trophy husband, goes to show you that the West is in great decline.”
This sounds like:”Women are bad, women trying to “act like men” are bad, hence these women are tearing society apart.”
Sorry I haven’t accepted the rhetoric of this site, but I don’t see the difficulty in interpreting misogyny in the original statement, especially when combined with the rest of it.
If he did anything, it was to placate the grammar police.
Mods: Are we not banning radical feminist trolls anymore?
Or maybe you’re just backtracking to save yourself some embarrassment. Which isn’t working.
“Now before you jump, I know that part of that reasoning is just coming from believing that children(especially boys) do better with stable fathers growing up.”
Are you saying they don’t?
This.
You are the man. I want to be like you when I grow up.
There are downsides. After sex, there are *two* girls in the room saying, “So…..what are you thinking?”
Mistral
Yeah I read your post. Contextually it still makes no sense. The theme of his post was the pussification of men and their subservience to women. Him talking about women dressing themselves would make no sense with regard to the context of the paragraph. And don’t even try and flip the misogynist card on me just cause I called you out on your bs.
“Nothing”
“But you must be thinking something”
“Nope”
“Oh come on, everyone thinks of something”
“Everyone except me”
“Its me, isn’t it?”
“what?”
“You just want me for sex don’t you? You don’t love me at all!”
“huh?”
“I hate you!” *door slams*
“peace at last.”
There is something “rapey” about power plugs. The way they move around the room, “penetrating” any defenseless socket they want.
What happened to banning idiots who reply to them?
Beer bottles, for example. Phallic, highly misogynist.
Heard the term but I’m glad I still don’t know what Crocs are.
No, it’s more like “feminists are bad, feminists are trying to act like men, hence feminism is tearing society apart”.
Secondly, no one is asking you to interpret this in the first place. What you’re doing is a fine example of women twisting language to suit whatever argument they are spewing at the moment; but unlike the rest of society, we don’t give a shit whether you misinterpret it or not. Somehow, we all understand that he’s not saying ‘all women bad’, but is critiquing instead a feminized culture.
If you think the state of society is just dandy, than you are living,walking proof of man’s superior cognitive functions
“I thought about it”
Roosh why aren’t y’all blocking these bitches look at what a mess she has made of this thread? Wtf? If all we did was banter with feminists the comments section would not worth reading in my opinion
Just like a woman eh?
She didn’t make a mess of the threat, the people debating with her did. The best way to handle an argumentative woman is just nod, say “yes dear” and carry on.
The correct answer is to roll the first one who asks over and fuck ‘er again.
LOL. No worries; some of these are jokes that I’m doing.
The girls are both foreign-born, so they don’t have a lot of the bad habits that I’d have to contend with if they were Proud, Strong, Independent* American Women so (a) they don’t have to talk all the time, (b) about themselves, and (c) they’re happy that I LEAD and they FOLLOW, so I get shown a lot of appreciation for how good life is for them when we’re together. One of them mentioned the other night, randomly, that she really liked how I “know everything, and can handle every situation that comes up.”
With age comes wisdom, I suppose.
À bientôt,
Mistral
*Until things get the teensiest bit difficult.
Fallen by the wayside. I just flag trolls and invoke male privilege when responding.
My slaves are American-Born, but they were ‘trained’ out of their birth cultural assumptions decades ago. One by me, one by her prior master, so I totally understand where you are coming from. I find it Ironic that one has to go to a generally sick and twisted american subculture, like the bdsm scene, to find girls who are NOT mentally damaged.
Not really surprising — submissive women are not fighting biology and nature. Among my past lovers are women who, in public, were “Loud and Proud” feminists but who, behind closed doors, were submissive little kittens. I would point out what frauds they were, tell them to imagine if their friends and co-workers could see them as they were, kneeling at the feet of a man, serving him, which would, of course, arouse them to no end. *shrugs*
À bientôt,
Mistral
“This sounds like:”Women are bad, women trying to “act like men” are bad, hence these women are tearing society apart.”
“but I don’t see the difficulty in interpreting misogyny in the original statement, especially when combined with the rest of it.”
In your efforts to defend yourself, you are using exactly the sort of illogic of which you were accused—-silly goose.
No one has said that all women are bad. We are saying that women who simultaneously try to act like men (good luck. You can’t take a good punch in the mouth without whining about it. You can’t even fix flat tire on a bicycle. Real men, you are.) while trying to make men act like women (dress the way we tell you, talk the way we tell you, be ashamed of your traits when we make degrading comments—to which we increasingly reply, “Blow me, fat ass.”) are:
1. Weakening the very social institutions (family, economy, education) that make it possible for women NOT to have to spend their time making mud huts and walking 5 miles to get water, but to run around demeaning men. (talk about a bunch of self-entitled leeches).
2. Dangerous to children. The girls become copies of their harpy mothers and the boys become wienies, who marry the harpy girls.
3. And this of course is not good.
The proper response to such “women” is to despise them. Let’s call it “justified misogyny.”
And of you don’t like it, go build your own house.
Are you going to f%$#ing drop it, already?
Yammer yammer yammer. Typical “female” compulsion to have the last word.
Do you not get that we do not give a shit?
Do you not hear the subtext? Which is, we no longer care to discuss $hit with femigoobers. You make no sense. You are not as smart as we are. You can’t do more than 2 pull-ups. We are better cooks than you. And when you do get into formerly male careers, you are still second class. Your main contribution to the government education (since you infest the field) is to remove all joy from it, and to make it as irrational, complicated, and unstable as your own minds.
So, buy yourselves flannel shirts. Glue on some fake mustaches, and take a f%$#ing hike.
You have come to believe your own press releases.
Good luck behaving civilly to the other half of the population, brah. Your tone shows promising signs.
If women who are fulfilled by careers and hardwork the way men are are really so horrid and dangerous in your eyes, why not move to the Middle East? It sounds like you’d appreciate the rich culture of Sharia Law.
I’m sure they’re aware of my presence; I’ve been commenting here for at least a few weeks now. Chill and let the admins do their job.
The state of society is never going to be “just dandy”, but it’s adjusting. Yes, there are big issues, such as rises in divorce and single parent homes, but you don’t solve this by trying to convince every person to adopt the same mental dogma as yourself, and try to squeeze present society back to the 50s method(get married young, have a million kids, never divorce), but instead judging people for merit rather than genitalia(you get a job because you’re qualified, not because you have a penis/vagina/are black/white/other).
But whining about every little thing women don’t do perfectly in your eyes isn’t going to improve society; it’s going to make more women disgusted with the types of men who follow advice from this site and view women as expiring meat bags. Hence even fewer women will see the appeal of marriage if they’re led to believe all guys are more or less like this, hence fewer children and children with two parents, etc. Dehumanization of half the world’s population doesn’t fix shit.
It’s not my fault you didn’t see the original comment.
He corrected his statement to be clearer. It wasn’t worded well originally.
Let’s take a gander at some of my “radfem” beliefs, dear Helmuth:
* Females and males should get equal and fair consideration for child custody depending on the individual situation, not their genitalia(ex. if the father makes a better income and has less history with psychological issues, he should be given higher consideration).
* Males and females entering the workforce should be judged on their abilities pertaining to the job, not their genitalia(ex. no affirmative action). If a woman is stronger than a man applying to a job relying largely on weightlifting abilities, she should get the job. If a guy has better social skills/empathy than a woman applying for a counseling position, he should get it.
* Marry who you want, when you want, as long as you’re both of legal age. If you’re a 40-something year old bachelor who decides to settle down with a 20-something year old woman, good for you. But don’t demand that women bow to your every whim and marry off young, because not only will it be ineffective, it’s not the dream of every woman. You don’t know every woman, so don’t pretend to.
* Some form of notarized documentation should be signed by males prior to potential impregnation with a certain female if she wishes to ensure that she receives alimony from him, should he impregnate her. In the hypothetical scenario that this was a real law, alimony couldn’t be collected unless it had been signed.
* Abortion and birth control should be in ready access for women unprepared for motherhood, whether they were raped or for whatever reason didn’t use birth control/it didn’t work. This lowers the amount of mouthes to be fed by the government(meaning less tax money from you!), fewer children being raised with a feeling of deprivation and likelihood to develop psychological problems, and hence, fewer potential criminals in the population.
But yes, because I give a shit about women’s issues I MUST think that men are all bitter piss heads, or that PIV sex = rape. Obviously. No middle ground can *possibly* exist =P
No. That is provided “stable” means psychologically healthy, caring, and willfully monogamous, rather than an alpha douche that decides to jump ship the second his wife isn’t “hot enough” for him, or takes out his rage on his son.
First and foremost, no one inquired or cares about your beliefs; Your narcissism offends me. Secondly, what does your non sequitur have to do with you being a radical or more importantly, why is it that Feminists are the only ones ignorant of the reality that their ideology is ironically sexist and firmly rooted in Marxism? Lastly, explain how one gains equality between the sexes by focusing solely on the issues of one of them? The last two were legitimate questions.
You care enough to respond; that says enough. I’m not going to sit back and let you mislabel me for the benefit of silencing someone who disagrees with you.
“why is it that Feminists are the only ones ignorant of the reality that their ideology is ironically sexist and firmly rooted in Marxism?” You’re only looking at one, narrow brand of feminism because, from your eyes, they make up a collective group that’s only out to tax you and “take away” your masculinity, whilst conveniently ignoring any feminist who holds different beliefs. I don’t care what you do in terms of expressing your masculinity, as long as you’re not harming others(want to get into a fight with someone else? If both of you agree, go ahead).
“explain how one gains equality between the sexes by focusing solely on the issues of one of them?” You’re displaying your lack of knowledge of feminism, which you’ve replaced with embittered, selective experiences. Feminism isn’t just about women; it’s focused on women. There’s no way to officially test the majority(as with any ideology) but I most often notice other feminists(including myself) making a point to talk about the fact that men and boys can be raped by women, that it’s okay for men to express their emotions and qualities(ex. cooking and crying when they feel the need to). Feminists tend to view the world and society at large as slanted in favor of men, hence the focus on women. Some radfems want women to dominate society, but generally feminists are seeking to fill the imbalance of societal favor towards men over women by focusing on women’s issues more.
You’re not gaining any credibility with such comments. No one asked you bloviate about your belief system for several paragraphs; You did that to ratify your own fragile ego.
Further, in regards to ” You’re only looking at one, narrow brand of feminism,” you have no idea what I’ve bought into; You’re simply making attribution errors. I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again: Feminism regardless of its ideology is subversive, has nothing to do with “equality” and everything to do with destroying the middle class. You subconsciously admit to advocate Marx’s class conflict when you claim Feminists generally seek to “fill the imbalance of societal favor.” It’s pretty comical actually. Were you versed in anything beyond Feminism and “equality” you’d know better. You’re simply a useful idiot of the more virulent avant-garde of your movement.
“No one asked you bloviate about your belief system for several paragraphs; You did that to ratify your own fragile ego” I did it to illustrate your overgeneralized perceptions of feminists. I want men and women to have equal standing in life as much as possible for the benefit of humanity; I’m not a “radfem”.
‘you have no idea what I’ve bought into” when you claim that I’m a “radfem” merely for stating beliefs opposing your own, not even attacking men, it shows your lack of understanding of what a “radfem”, which is often also at least somewhat a misandrist, is.
“Feminism regardless of its ideology is subversive, has nothing to do with “equality” and everything to do with destroying the middle class” if you only pay attention to government actions that you don’t agree with/don’t benefit you, it can appear that way. However the “destroying the middle class” bit and similar “tearing down the traditional family structure” accusations are the goals of radical feminists and socialists. I don’t have a problem with straight couples sticking together and raising children the traditional way, nor do any of the non-radical feminists I know(I only definitely know one radical in real life, and I don’t associate with her). What I advocate is that you have the CHOICE to raise your family the way you wish. No, I don’t think the government should give single moms tax incentives to continue the cycle, but I also think that they should be free to make the choice if they’re psychologically and financially capable parents.
“You subconsciously admit to advocate Marx’s class conflict when you claim Feminists generally seek to “fill the imbalance of societal favor.”
Yes, but I don’t see affirmative action or benefits by gender as permanent solutions to this. They served a purpose in the beginning, when certain fields and the workplace in general were incredibly more oppressive towards women, but as the situation has lessened, I think it’s time to gradually detach from affirmative action and try to(as much as possible) judge job applicants(and people in general) based on their merits for the task in question, and not by their genitalia.
great secret among women. They are not happy when they are forced to make decisions.
It’s only frustrated beta men who take their rage out on their sons. Or daughters for that matter. Alphas have even less incentive now to marry than they ever did. But “psychologically healthy” as defined by a feminist is about as far from stable as you can get, so again, you fail.
I was going to respond to this person’s silliness, but I see that you have done a finer job than I was going to. Hats off to you.
No, there really isn’t any middle ground in a conflict. Obviously, you’ve never been in one. But, go ahead, wear a uniform halfway between each side, grab an ambiguous rifle, and stand between two sides in a conventional fight. LOL.
It’s rather simple. Feminists are retarded, and their movement has been entirely destructive. Also, no one is “equal,” so “equal treatment” is impossible. I can treat you “equally” on a drill field and it will probably kill you.
I mean, is anyone even home over there? Is a man going to “equally” give birth, too? Or is this rainbows, leprechauns, fairies, and unicorns goal of yours a tad IMPOSSIBLE?
Come on, and get with the program. I am sick to death of people that fantasize about half-measures anyway, like this shit about birth control.
Instead of killing children conceived by whores, why not remove the whores? I like you put the blame and the death penalty on unborn children for whoring. So moderate. How can ANYONE disagree with you?
“One narrow brand of feminism.” Which of the brands are you talking about? Fuck ’em all? Do you think I am to inquire about which brand put me in a cell? Or did the same to millions of other men just because we’re male?
Should those of us who lost our livelihoods ask “now, which BRAND did this?”
That’s just fucking delusional.
Here you go: “which BRAND of rape did you get?” LOLOLOL, we would never hear that shit.
Yup. They can almost be on par with the weakest and most inferior men, by trying to be male. Almost.
Why are YOU still here?
Take your opinions, retorts and misrepresentations of fact somewhere else.
I thought women were keen to subtleties. This is a less than subtle way of me telling you to get off the board.
Thanks. Have a nice day.
If you are not interested in Lilac’s opininons, just simply ignore her. Its called no reinforcement and it works.
The nuclear option to use against any woman, irl or online, is indifference. Don’t give them the attention they’re looking for, starve the parasitic hamster.
Sorry bruh. There’s this little thing called freedom of speech that kind of allows me to say whatever the fuck I want. The mods know I’m here, they can remove me whenever they feel like it. Until then, stop rustling your jimmies and take a chill pill.
You ain’t rustling shit, bruh. You’re starting shit. And you know it. Don’t play anyone here as dumb, Bruh.
Your as welcome here as HIV.
I love a good fight
Freedom of speech. Only on those “woman hating sites.” I also see more freedom of speech on so-called “White supremacist sites.”
Yet there is no freedom of speech around feminists or marxists. Oy fucking vey.
I was thinking how attractive you were when you were silent.
Go to the Middle East; you’ll find more appealing brides.
I used to be
And America would benefit greatly if that brand of patriarchy was copied over here
Barik’Allah, Kaku! 😉
Yes, that area of the world sounds like a nice, happy place to live, doesn’t it?
It may be that some “men” kneel because they care too much about their jobs (and too little about their souls) and/or do not know or have not practiced the proper aggressive response.
1. “Are you going to wear THAT shirt?”
“When did you first think that I hired you as a consultant?”
2. “What you said was (not funny, offensive, sexist).”
“Excellent!” OR, “Blow me.” Or, “When did you first begin to believe that I give a shit?”
3. “I may report you.”
“I have a simple rule. Anyone who threatens my livelihood is treated as if she were attacking me with an axe. Guess how it ends up.”
4. “My girlfriends say that you….”
“Your girlfriends can blow me.”
5. “How dare you!”
“Now stamp your little foot and make a pout.” Or, “Down, girl. Down, I say. Sit. Stayyyy.”
6. “I hate you.”
“Yes, now make me a sammich.”
7. “If you think you’re getting away with this, you are mistaken!”
“You want to eat my what?” Or, “You are having a bad hair day. Wash it.”
8. “Some of your co-workers say that you have made offensive remarks.”
“Some of my co-workers are full of crap. However, since you are the type that thinks I give a shit about what you think and what you think you can do, you go right ahead and get the ball rolling to get me fired, but understand that anyone who threatens my livelihood is threating my life. How do you think I’ll respond that that? I’ve been shot at, Lady. I’m still here, and the guys who shot at me are no longer among the living. You and your procedures really don’t much scare me.”
“Are you threatening me?”
“Do you expect me to answer that stupid question?…. Do what you want. Remember what I said.”
One thing I have learned at work is this. Never apologize. It makes you r look weak.
Your best tactic is to go on the offensive. Attack your accusers (make stuff up if necessary) and make them defend themselves.
The second Bush Administration did this to amazing effect.
They also got that bitch lap dog Tony Blair on board to amazing effect.
Yeah… I think you missed the point.
There’s no point apologizing to a leftist anyway because they have no sense of honor
Apologizing for virtually anything to a woman is blood in the water for sure, stirs those sharks in a frenzy before they go for the kill.
Speaking of sharks and women…
I learned a few years ago, through two things: 1) a witch hunt at work, which I survived; and 2) an initially nasty divorce (where you have even LESS leverage), the following: WHENEVER YOU ARE ATTACKED, absolutely COUNTER-ATTACK with painful, socially, personally and professionally damaging counter-allegations, against not only your accuser, but the process. There may be a fine line between effecting a McCarthy-esque “conspiracy” against your company, or govt organization, but WALK THAT LINE, even if you temporarily look crazy or to otherwise rational actors that would be on your side, like you’ve “gone too far”, it doesn’t matter…it’s too late to expect a life raft. ABSOLUTELY fight back using whatever tools you have. I have brutally accused a few select people (who deserved it and fucked with me) of being Islamophobic. In those situations, they were liberal blue pillers that go around making PC accusations against everyone anyhow, so I had ZERO guilt in counter-accusing them…and oddly enough, they shut the fuck up and/or were admonished…ANTI-FRAGILE baby. I came back stronger. And ya, I’m sufi, but I’m not super devout…but I will NOT FUCK AROUND with SJWs any longer.
Well done. It sounds like you used the “counter-attack” tactic to good effect. Ken Livingstone also did this when he was attack for being “anti-Semitic”. He absolutely wasn’t and he refused to apologise. I don’t like his politics but I was with him on that one.
Sadly, this is my experience as well.
The two faced nature of the workplace is like a place where everyone has their own Japanese cutlery shop located firmly in their back.
That’s true and it applies to racial and sexual issues the same, and pretty much anything else. You can’t win a war without attacking at some point.
Threatening people with firearms is not an effective tactic for anything other than digging a deeper hole.
Chinos are bad? I thought they were just a slightly dressier alternative to jeans.
One reason to go MGTOW:
Not wanting to let a woman control my life. Having her picking my outfit is very childish. Only little boys are dressed up by their mothers. Being a man is about being independent.
Next time I hear a guy use the word creepy:
Apologizing is negotiating with terrorists.
A-FUCKING-MEN.
This:
If only we could hog tie them throw them in a burlap sack and beat em
Insulting to hogs 🙂
Comparing a military order to shoot retreating soldiers to posting on the internet. Yea.
Tell that to the legions of men who’ve killed themselves because of the evil that women do, and the men who failed to step in on their behalf.
It’s no different a rhetorical device then calling folks nazis. It just announces that a point must be valid because it’s being compared to something awful. It’s silly and juvenile.
I don’t think the suicide of men as a direct result of feminism’s influence is terribly silly and juvenile. Do you?
I concur, feminist men are the worst.
Faggots and Mangians are a product of disgenics(allowing the genetically inferior to bred) and single motherhood. These emasculated Beta and Omega males who make themselves slaves of women in order gain favor of them while throwing their own gender under the bus. They are parisites and a drain on the population. They are hated by both real men and women alike because their weakness just makes them dead weight. In the past natural culling mechanism would have ensured that they were never born in the first place and if they were born then the harsh reality of the past would have force them to become actually men or they would die and never reproduce. These pathetic female ass kissers are the reason feminism ever got off the ground. Women should never let them bred under any circumstance and men should never befriend them.
I’m always fascinated by this viewpoint(in a good way) because at least to me it makes a lot of sense that post-industrial Western society not only legally fucks traditionalist minded men over but also allows tons of people to go through a meager existence that would have died or not existed earlier. I despise the ass-kissers now more than even the feminists. They are in the purest sense the white-knight enablers that have allowed so many terrible laws, social changes, and destruction of the family. Fuck anyone who says the worst victim of this destruction of the nuclear family is the woman. They’re fucking wrong. The biggest victims are the men and the children, the women get to sit on a pedestal and tell us how they’re oppressed. I don’t think so. I’m just so tired of the endless white-knighting especially on the internet, I just want to go to these people and say, “You realize that the people you are supporting fucking hate you, you dumb motherfucker.” They hate your identity and very existence, so stop being a slave to these masters. Rant over.
Your right. White Knights and Manginas are worst than feminist.
Why must we fight-shame & boycott cowardly men?
Simple answer. Because it works to check the downslide in quality among men.
And it’s gonna have to be the Brotherhood that does the dirty work.
No female is gonna get the surgical gloves on & scalpel remove the infected units from our tribe.
Granted, i’ll probably attribute the recent upsurge in reported incidents as lined out in the article partly to social conditioning (feminist appropriated education system & media influence) of the said males in question. Another thing would be ignorance. Closely related to the social conditioning i mentioned really.
Heck, i knew next to nothing about Red Pill concepts & ideas until some months ago. I had some instinctive understanding of not accepting shit from either weak men or women (Dad’s influence) but it was nothing structured or conscious.
Until stumbling over to this space.
People generally don’t change until they have stand to lose something significant. As the saying goes, having skin in the game creates the possibility of pain.
So shame away.
But teach, with compassion, when the humbled have dropped their Fem-vision lenses & are willing to learn.
“Never regret, never apologize, never explain”
–Benjamin Jowett
Seriously. I have no respect for guys who, beset by the evil little SJW cockroaches, come out and do a retarded little “shame dance” insincere apology that involves cringing, and perhaps a tear before the subject ritually de-balls himself. I wish, just once, one of them would say, “My agent is trying to force me to come before you and apologize. Here is my apology: FUCK. YOU.”
SJWs and other liberal morons
À bientôt,
Mistral
and that is the sad reality, today. Many men have to come out and apologize because their livelihood depends on it.
Could you imagine a female having to come out and apologize to the public for her remarks towards a man or men (or she could lose her job, money, etc…)?
Funny how equality works….it doesn’t
” . . . their livelihood depends on it.”
I fooled them, Grandma. I don’t have a livelihood. At least not in any conventional sense that can be attacked by conventional means.
The worst they can do to me now is attack me with my reputation, but I created that reputation long ago, knowing full well what I was doing. It could be said that I’ve paid for it, but I think of it as having paid for what I got.
My freedom.
It’s happened in my work place, so yeah. I can imagine it. Usually, they have to apologize for a slightly different type of un-PC shit, but they do it or get fired.
Women apologize? Bullshit.
I’ve seen it. Sorry you haven’t.
If she didn’t have to apologize to a white male (or any male) then it is bullshit.
You’d quicker get a check for your white privilege. This world is becoming quite a fucked up place
A woman might apologize to another woman or a gay male. But apologize to a straight-male? Lol! You’re smokin some strong stuff there dude!
Yea, I was so disappointed when that space shuttle guy apologized for his shirt. He showed a complete lack of balls, and is now a cog in the feminist machine. Had he stood up for himself, men and sane women everywhere would have rallied to his defense
Exactly. If the guy’s name was “Michelle Taylor” instead of “Michael Taylor” and there was commentary on “her” attire, the bitter feminists would be in Full Florid Bloom of Venomous Fury over it. Instead there’s a bunch of “cartoon women” on a shirt have a chilling effect on a bunch of women who will *never* work at the ESA or NASA anyway.
a couple of comedians have done that. surprisingly enough, even Gilbert Gottfried.
And Michael Richards. You can never give in to the SJW crowd. Never, ever, ever.
À bientôt,
Mistral
“First come I. My name is J-W-TT.
There’s no knowledge but I know it.
I am Master of this College,
What I don’t know isn’t knowledge.”
(from one of the Balliol Rhymes about Benjamin Jowett,
Master of Balliol College, Oxford)
Even those who would satirise Benjamin Jowett gave him grudging admiration.
I have no problem with shaming and boycotting powerful men who, in their cowardice, give in to feminists and sell out other men for their own interests. However, bullying the weak (like Matt Taylor) is counterproductive.
We’ve all read stories of ROK commentors who were lied to, deceived, and robbed of their masculinity while they were still boys, only to have to fight for their masculinity after discovering the red pill. These guys were eventually able to see the errors of their ways, so not all blue pill guys are lost causes. What will bullying accomplish? Red pill men bullying betas and manginas fits right into the feminist narrative of “masculinity is bad,” and pushes them right into the SJW camp.
Remember that a lot of red pill men are converts. To really combat feminazis and SJWs we should show guys like Matt Taylor compassion, a compassion that is masculine and fraternal. SJWs cast him out. We can offer him a place at the table of the House of Roosh. Feminists made him weak and tried to destroy him. We can help him become strong.
Men like Matt Taylor and Dapper Laughs probably would not break down and apologize if they ever felt they had support. We live in a culture that makes men feel isolated, so we must cultivate places of brotherhood to combat the attempts to isolate us.
Excellent point!!! That guy sitting next to Matt Taylor patted Taylor’s shoulder when he broke down. He should have joined him and told the interviewers, “Settle down. Settle down. You’ll strangle in your own twisted knickers. It’s a shirt. Try to say something intelligent…. No…No. Calm yourself. Sadly, we really don’t care about your opinion. Try to live with that.”
I honestly could not have said this better myself.
I was also going to point out that the harsh criticism that Matt Taylor has received from some in the Manosphere was undeserved (but you already have). Mike posted about this in D&P, and it got me thinking. While I completely understand their disappointment in his caving, I do not at all agree with the vitriol that was cast his way.
You have to think about it: His accomplishment was legendary in the scientific community. As accomplishments go, it’s a perfect example of something that every man should aim for in his quest to be the best version of himself. His name should go down in history as one of the greatest scientific minds in modern history given his contribution. Because of his focus on his life’s work, I really don’t think he knew any of what we in the Manosphere know. His only “crime” was just that: not knowing. Like so many of us, he played by the rules that society shoved down his throat for his entire life, believed the lies, towed the [SJW] party line, and we all know what his reward was for his loyalty. His reputation was utterly destroyed, just because the murky puddle of sexually confused filth known as SJWs didn’t like his SHIRT. Never mind his contribution; he was wearing a shirt with naked chicks all over it. After the attacks, he didn’t know how to handle it, and without actual support in his corner, how else was he to respond?
This may earn me a bit of scorn, but it is for that reason that I’m willing to give a pass to guys like Taylor, based solely on his accomplishments in spite of his unfortunate lifelong conditioning. I believe that if he had the knowledge that we are willing to offer him now, he would be unstoppable.
Now as for celebrities, RSD cultitst, politicians et al, these guys know better. By all means, throw THEM into the fire for throwing their supporters under the bus.
We’ve become a nation of apologizers. Think about how many times you hear the word sorry in a day, as opposed to “excuse me” or what have you.
Men are so fearful of ending up in an awkward situation or having enemies that they will kick their dignity to the curb. Someone should tell these “men” who publicly apologize that the SJW’s are going to hate them no matter if they apologize or not.
As for shaming, I absolutely agree. But the problem is that men will never be the loudest voice on the Internet or in the media. The media is way too liberal, and the most mainstream websites cater to women, their target audience. Basically, men do things, women do things and then snapchat/instagram/facebook/tweet about it.
The only way this will reverse is if other women start realizing how retarded SJW’s are and fight back (e.g. “women against feminism”).
The starting point of this is to stop saying sorry if you inconvenience, e.g. get into a lift ahead of, a woman. Say “Excuse me” instead. It requires a rewiring of your habits, but it’s the first step.
Took about 2 months of catching myself and forcing myself to say “excuse me” but now I never say sorry unless I actually fuck up somehow.
Same here. I never say sorry…. if I royally fuck up I’ll say “that shouldn’t have happened” or “I shouldn’t have said that, I apologise”. Sorry isn’t in my vocabulary any longer. And it’s funny how people react to not hearing sorry. If you say nothing they can get pretty pissed and in some instances might even have some respect for you.
It depends. I’ll definitely say “sorry” to my mother or maybe to the wife or girlfriend of one of my closest male friends if the situation calls for it, more out of respect for my friend though.
Then again, my experiences have taught me that my own mother is the only woman to EVER buy flowers or jewelry for just as well!
In addition, I had to change the way I order food in a restaurant. I used to say, “Can I get a (fill in the blank )?” in my blue pill days to “I’ll have a (fill in the blank ).”
Why ask for permission for something you’re paying for? Tell the waitress what you want. Thank her when she takes your order and when she brings it out to you. Always with solid eye contact.
Better to ask for forgiveness than permission.
When I was younger, if my friends and I came across such a cowardly creature, we would grab him, throw him down and beat him within an inch of his miserable, stinking life. Shaming and Boycotting is for women. Modernity demands a return to that brutal Darwinian justice through which one learns one’s place in the hierarchy.
The vast majority of men nowadays are stupid, beta, smiling at the camera for their Facebook photos, posting cute PC feel good stories to impress girls, poorly dressed, believing everything their whore mothers say about being a nice guy, talks with a faggot lisp, obsessed with sports, plebeian, with a shitty haircut, walking around in cargo shorts and t-shirts and sandals, waiting three months for a kiss, white knighting women that a man from the developing country would treat like shit, and just an all around feminine cuckold.
America is a fucking huge disaster for many reasons, but this is one. American men have to be the biggest groups of cuckold lisping faggots on the planet.
Hahah I love this guy and your posts. But be weary, America might not be the biggest country for faggots anymore.
http://www.bbc.com/news/30290532: European Union allows asylum to LGBT third worlders and prevents any sort of tests that would actually prove their gayness.
I guess an attempt to out-gayify America, Europeans have decided to import legions of third world “gays” on the assumption that they’re “gay”. Yea I guess it really is what they say when they claim it is a race to the bottom. So many men are just these dumb, shittily-dressed, nice guy, fat, ugly pube-beards, and that just spurt whatever fucking Leftist columnist tells them.
The funny thing is that they watch porn for like 2 hours a day minimum and probably have a whole host of other disgusting habits and fetishes yet these people believe they are the morally superior ones. None of them know how to start a business, invent a product, or be useful yet they condescend like know-it-all jackasses. And the worst part is when they can’t see how they’re essentially being played by multiple special interest groups, namely Marxists ones, conditioned to be a mangina.
Faggots and pussy whipped men should be shamed out of existence. They’re like a cancer and should be cut out of society. I lived in a small traditional town where you just didn’t see men behave this way then one day a mommas boy hippy fag opened a bar in my town and brought in hipster outsiders, ten years later they’re having dragshows in his bar and gay pride parades. ten years ago if this shit happened in my town these fags wouldn’t be alive today but since it happened so slowly the pp got used to it and its acceptable. If we had put a stop to this shit immediately then my town would still be like mayberry instead of little sanfrancisco. I’m currently purchasing a hundred acres of land in another state near another small town, only this time I’m learning my lesson. When i recognize the changes coming again I will organize and prevent this from happening again. I’m in no way advocating violence as a response but I will be vocal that hipsters and fags aren’t welcome in my peaceful tow. I encourage everyone else to take the same stance.
lets take it a step further and boycott usa. its already sinkin at a newly current 18 trillion dollar debt set to go higher with more degenerates runnin the show. may as well speed it up before it burns the rest of the world.
stop buying their fast food softdrinks liquor crappy electronics cars clothes etc. the only thing we have to buy is their windows operating systems. other then that llets buy local shit or non american goods. above all stop importing their culture and mindset. we import their goods we get their mindset thus influceing our cultures.
” . . . the only thing we have to buy is their windows operating systems.”
Don’t mind me, I’m obviously not even here.
theres a non american os out there that isnt apple windows or linux?
Linux isn’t American and you don’t have to buy it. Its development is fully international, but it originated in Finland.
It also doesn’t depend on a windowing system and one of my computers doesn’t even have one installed. I do happen to be using one right now, but it’s German in origin and based on a Norwegian toolkit.
wow thats awesome and how does it handle? you think its better then windows? If so, then why is it we all just use the same oses?
“wow thats awesome and how does it handle?”
Well enough that I haven’t touched a Windows or Apple OS in years. My over 80 mom uses it no problemo, so it even passes the “Grandma Test.”
“you think its better then windows?”
Better for computing, not as good for gaming. The last time I fired up a Windows box it was just to get an Age of Empires fix. People who do a lot of video production may find Linux problematic, but I run a basic audio studio in Linux just fine.
“If so, then why is it we all just use the same oses?”
Beats hell out of me:
http://staffhome.ecm.uwa.edu.au/~00014742/teach/cos214/misc/autodealers.txt
There’s probably loads of other O/Ss and anyone can make one. It’s generally not cost-effective for a variety of reasons.
Stack Thornehawk likes the idea of fighting back, but why compare it to fucking marxist Stalin, murderer of Christians and empowering agent of the clandestine leftist regime that tore asunder one of the greatest Eurasian empires in history?
By all means, show no mercy to the mangina sellouts. Let them suffer and be emasculated as nature dictates. Don’t stop at calling them out. Break down their gut-bellied balding glasses-wearing genetically-inferior asses on public forums and showcase the world their pathetic nothingness. If law breaks down in the U.S. , I know a few dogs who are going to be enjoying this turn of events on their former sellouts… myself included…
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/12/04/The-Sexodus-Part-1-The-Men-Giving-Up-On-Women-And-Checking-Out-Of-Society
Has anyone read this article as of yet? Apparently it has created quite a pussy firestorm against our feminist brethren unheard of in quite a while.
It’s an excellent article. Well done bringing it more deserved attention.
The enemy today? It’s always been cowardly men selling us out – why does the author think this is some new development?
That lady looks like Marine Le Penn’s evil libtard twin. Much sadness.
May I suggest as a start, shaming every stupid motherfucker who liked this degenerate teenager’s mugshot: http://heavy.com/news/2014/12/alysa-suguro-bathrick-cute-mugshot-girl-xanax-twitter-facebook-account/
18 year old female accused drug dealer with prior conviction for assault and who posted up her mugshot on Facebook. Again, don’t shame her — call out and shame the thirsty fuckheads who gave her free publicity to fuel her narcissism.
Those eyebrows…
Those teeth…
I just watched the Julien Blanc apology. I remember when I started pick up, I learned so much from him and here is his groveling under the media boot, assuming bitch position with a gag in his mouth and taking the media dick.
This could be the most shameful thing I’ve ever seen.
And it inspires me to write. He may have given into the pressure, but we don’t have to. It is a hard path but a man who does not stick to his guns is not worthy of respect.
I have a family and fear being run out of a job for my opinions, but I also have to think about the future in which my child will live.
I remembered watching NFL Red zone one night and saw Tom Brady in an interview and he started crying like a little girl, getting all emotional and shit. Forgot what he was talking about, but how beta was that? He was probably forced to show his feminine side.
Think of all the boys and young men who looked up to him and there he was crying like a pussy. Pathetic indeed
“I have a family and . . .”
. . . they’ve got you by the balls. You’d almost think they planned it that way.
Precisely my friend. If I pissed them off enough, they would come after my livelihood, my reputation, with zero regard for the wife and daughter that I support. Servants of women indeed. Julien Blanc groveling like a dog is sure enough proof of that. This is why I’m busting ass to save and move my family soon. Better to watch the system collapse from the outside, but by the way things are going around the world it may not even do me much good.
I agree that we need to shame cowardly men who back down and apologise but we also need to balance it with a sense of compassion and offer safety to men as well who are forced into this kind of appalling situation. Matt Taylor’s job and career as a scientist was at stake when he was confronted by that feminazi and he had no choice but to apologize. Other men might even have their lives threatened by SJWs and other sickening creatures out there. By offering safety and compassion, we can show that we are better than our enemies morally and even convince fence sitters that we are the ones that should be supported. The shaming part can be privately done afterwards. Always keep in mind that there are other men out there who need to support their families and cannot afford to lose their primary source of income for now and have no choice in the matter.
Well, I agree but to an extent. As in my area of work the company cock-suckers are higher in rank than I am. At first I would take their poor spoken critique and wipe the floor with their language and state of mind. But when they started to badmouth me to the higher-ups where they choke on the company cock, I had to stop to keep the job ( for now ).
When dealing with morons at the work-place, keeping your head-up becomes a problem as you have to become an actor, act like you give a shit to their dumb-ass observations, act like you’re really affected, act like you’re sorry but plan an escape-plan.
Believe it that keeping your self respect sometimes actually does costs you your job.
Faking giving away one thing is hard, but acting the part and keeping your cool is even harder.
If you are in a similar situation, as many normal, rational men are, make a plan and remove yourself from a group of losers that put their job above everything else in their life. Those urban slaves are the result that the elites always wanted : a moron that stays at work over-time, works his as off, comes in the weekends, reports on everyones bullshit, snitches, lies etc.etc. etc.
If you see one, make sure you limit your time with him/her.
Fucked-up, I know, but not many choices to solve this except, make a plan and leave.
God Bless !
It used to be that you could discharge a 2300 Gauss degausser on top of your co-worker adversary’s desktop computer in order to stop wailing and moaning for several weeks …
Now disk drives are just too good — you’d need at least 1.4 Tesla to get the job done now … #BOFH
America is overrun by men who are flatout pussies and pussy hustlers. Send them to Isis.
http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs32/f/2008/200/8/0/The_Goddess_Isis_by_akashanightowl.jpg
Not for nothing did they make a woman the deity of venomous serpents.
Succubus
Yep. Pretty much every ancient culture that rose to greatness–and many of those that didn’t–put what we’d call ‘easter eggs’ into their religious iconography and stories, warning future cultures (or future members of their own culture) not to put women in positions of power. It is unnatural.
I tried explaining this to my little brother, but he is firmly blue pill at this point, along with a quasi-feminist girlfriend (believes feminism is good, but doesn’t partake in the culture wars). He’s a good kid, just hasn’t seen the true depravity of ’empowered women’ for what it is yet. He will learn soon enough though; hopefully, he learns from me, and not some feminist cunt looking to fuck him over.
Modern day feminism is an evil. Einstein said it is not evil we should fear buy when people stand by and do nothing about it. I’ve never produced an offspring but worry about my nephew and the world he will grow up in. We need to encourage young men that they are worth more than some hot chick they might bang, that they are worth more than their place in the economic wheel, that their feelings are important, that they should not be ashamed of their sexuality, that they are not rapists, that fathers have an important role in society and that they should never submit to a woman who is not worthy of them.
WOMEN ARE THE ULTIMATE SHAMERS
SJW women’s advocacy workers get paid off the tax dole to conscript new women into their army of striped mankillers every day. The runaway women’s shelters for the poor and the divorce industry lawyers for the affluent are parts of a judicial cabal that considers itself ‘special’ and untouchable in many cases like the secretive family courts. They can still be shamed. No one is beyond reproach.
Napoleon chopped the heads off AN ENTIRE CASTE CLASS of petty local royalty. No one was immune. In pre Napoleonic France, if you weren’t of the bourgoese elite then you were probably of the servant class. Regardless of race, servants were all basically house niggas. The ‘mauster’ of the house or business could have their way with your spouse or children and you had no recourse because you were just too poor or stupid in their eyes. WOW! Just like the elitist socialists who menace us today.
It is important to note how SJW women’s workers will harshly chastise their own conscripted take-ins (recruits) for backsliding. A woman who has her hand forced or is duped into signing a death warrant on her man gets a party replete with golfers clap from every hag and volunteer at the state funded runaway women’s commune flophouse shelter.
But then for a woman to come to her senses and return to her family or her man, she is considered the ultimate traitor and is dealt with extra harshly by all inter-connected socialist service and judicial departments. Her hand outs get jacked, kids get taken, you name it. They come and cluster fuck a woman like a gang hazing practically when a woman does the unthinkable – RETURN TO HER MAN. They’re all in it together and they are backed up by the cannons of the petty local tyrants (royalty).
I take your point but the “No Retreat on Pain of Death” order by Stalin requires some context. The Soviets were retreating in the early part of the war against Germany because they had been taken by surprise and were strategically disadvantaged. The rational action was a tactical retreat. But politically, giving up ground was unacceptable therefore the “no retreat” order was given. The result, predictably, was that the First Echelon of the Soviet Army was cut off, surrounded and annihilated. If not for the Second Echelon, the Soviet Union would have been defeated.
Failing to learn from this, when the Second Echelon began pushing the German Army backwards, Hitler made the same “no retreat” order to his own army with the same result. The German Army was cut off, surrounded and annihilated. But sadly for the Germans, they did not have a Second Echelon.
The moral of the story – never let a politician be your General.
Am I the only one whom knows not to reply back to theses attention whore feminists posting on ROK? Theyre so far beneath us we shouldn’t dignify them with a response.
Most of these comments are great but they are buried many pages below the attention seeking female and the inane arguing with her.
Whatever happened to people who reply to women will be banned?
All I want to see is the greasy spots left from [comment deleted]
[ahem]
It’s important to keep in mind that the average equalist is just a teenage girl (or of
similar maturity) who can’t really do anything important in real life – In a one to one matchup they can barely keep themselves alive
Virtually everything they have is given to them by people with power who pitied them or caved in to their whining.
The way to deal with witch hunts is to just overwhelm them – there should be so many ‘misogynists’ that they don’t have enough time to even blog about them, until it becomes a cultural norm
It’s actually the same thing the eaters do themselves. If one worker strikes, he’ll get fired. If he gets a ton of workers to strike, then the enemy negotiates – collective bargaining works
Don’t give the equalists what they want, but force them to submit to us
In the last ten years or so I’ve seen a countless number of men who have been physically and mentally abused by their women. Its done with no remorse or repercussion for their actions and almost no attention is brought to this but if a man so much as pushes a woman out of his way in defense, its ran on the news nonstop as another evil man assaulting women. I actually witnessed a young woman chase her bf into his bedroom and stab a butcher knife through his door. I’ve seen young women with no self control pick up weapons and beat their bfs until they were out of breath but not a word spoken of it. Men are just expected to take this abuse and if they defend themselves they’re called abusers, if they complain they’re told by women to man up. We’ve allowed these overgrown children to put us in this position and no one is there to speak up for us so we must do this ourselves. As long as were silent they will continue to to do this kind of disrespectful shit then turn around and claim victimhood. I and everyone else on ROK should point out their hypocrisy every chance we get.
I just read something on Chris Rock and a new bit he’s been trying out in his act.
This is part of what he had to say about it and the Ray Rice incident:
“People say there’s no reason to ever hit a woman. No—there’s no reason to ever hit a woman first. You can hit a woman back—shit, if Oprah hit me I’d knock her the fuck out! “No one ever asked the question ‘Who hit first?’ Best journalists in the world, not one asked the question. ‘It’s not important.’ Yes, it is! It’s the most important question on earth.
I get your point and fully support it, but the whole war rhetoric I see pop up on this site as analogy to fighting SJW’s or feminists is bullshit and disrespectful. You cannot compare the fear of a russian soldier running into his sure death under the tyranny of Stalin with sending out a funny meme on twitter mocking a feminist.
We should also look at some of the men who haven’t apologized to the SJW’s. Once it’s evident to all the tiger is paper, and no amount of their shaming, hatemail, and boycotts have any affect, we can once again be confident to speak freely in a public forum. When Daniel Tosh made his rape jokes awhile back he caught a lot of criticism but I don’t remember him apologizing.
Edit- Bill Maher I don’t think apologized for criticizing Islam and even used it as an opportunity to expose the hypocrisy of the Berkeley student body attacking him.
Very good article. If the manosphere focussed ALL its firepower on male quislings and collaborators it would probably be more effective than directly ‘fighting with girls’. After all no man ever came out of a fight with a girl looking better for it, however necessary it may sometimes be.
The Soviet references also remind me of the Roman technique of decimation, which could be a very effective means of discipline
I incorporate these ideas it into my daily life. I’m not an internet media focused type of person.
I think we need to reach out to the male traitors and inspire them to grow a spine.
The Russian tactic had the negative karmic effect of strengthening their Communism because there weren’t any more men around to fight against it.
America didn’t do that and look at who is way more powerful today.
Use your heads guys. When we succeed, we can use our other heads to relieve stress and celebrate victory.
The Matt Taylor thing was so fucking ridiculous. He was a part of an amazing achievement that most men could only dream of and all they pussy media could comment on was his shirt. That little story is very telling of the state of affairs. He should’ve come on TV waving his cock and balls around like a boss and slapped anyone in face who uttered the word “misogyny”.
Per the article’s suggestion to shame manginas, a great place to start is at the link below. The article is fantastic, but the comments section has no small amount of sneering mangina white knights.
Paging Lance. Paging Englishbob. Paging Quintus. Paging C.Contrary Paging everybody else.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/12/04/The-Sexodus-Part-1-The-Men-Giving-Up-On-Women-And-Checking-Out-Of-Society
This is great Ghost. If I could I would upvote it 100 times. Thanks for posting.
Its an interesting quandary I have. I actually want a wife and kids and I have no trouble getting women. The trouble is, I then have to make a rational decision. What is the risk versus reward for marriage? Shockingly bad.
You are essentially left with no choice other than either to a) check out as per the article or b) pump and dump every woman you meet!
I know, and it’s a damned shame. We need more actual masculine men reproducing and passing the *correct* torch forward, but there’s little recourse left for any man with eyes to find.
Great article. Seems most commenters (from what I’ve been able to read so far) agree with the writer; the few delerious cunts who don’t are being educated by myself and many others
Agree with many points.
Men are the main drivers of feminism. Both in the elite and in the general populace. Without men who sellout, there’d be no feminism.
I agree that apologizing for wearing a shirt is craven but I doubt social protest will influence a sovereign states decision to grant a visa to someone who breaks their laws.
We should refrain from calling men who support feminazis white knights as it lends them a certain air of manliness. I propose quislings or traitors.
Beta bitches?
Call them myn. They’re halfway to being womyn anyways.
I am glad someone has finally written an article addressing the real culprits responsible for this ideology gone astray. The line has to be drawn for those for who aid feminism as the real traitors that they are – the rich cowards at the top who care only to maintain their positions and money flowing in and the losers at the bottom who are too afraid to stand up for anything. One way or another they will be defeated, even if it comes down to the bitter desperate end physical superiority is on the side of men.
Author is right that the problem of feminism isn’t even the feminism but the (weak) male supporters of feminism.
He’s wrong that they can be shamed. Women have been shaming them their entire life. They are better at it than us. It’s part of what made these men weak in the first place.
Cont’d
The feminist allies come in two stripes: white knights, who are merely blue pill men, and Manginas who are legitimately weak.
The Manginas hate stronger men, but wouldn’t do anything about this. They don’t respond to logic or shame either. But, they don’t do much to help feminism either other than other than to help feminism innovate.
Years before there was an Anita Sarkessian, there were cis trans weirdos complaining about the same tropes on Kotaku. Anita was just the first feminist to run with this.
But feminists hate hate hate these omega males. They hate having to deal with these low status men. The way to deal with these omegas
Contd
The way to deal with omega Manginas is to make an example out of them. Show women what Men feminism attracts, and show men the awful lives of Manginas.
Our real problem is white knights. These white knights are real men, and come in both the liberal and conservative Christian varieties.
And you can’t just say white knighting is wrong either. White knighting is an inbread reaction in all men. And if we were to create a more just unfeminist society, we will need white knights to enforce the new cultural norms.
Regarding white knights…..we just need to show these men that there are no more “ladies” in today’s time (so there is no need for knights). There are only these free women who are, now, choosing to be sluts and they don’t want to be saved.
Yes, these women will never tell you that (because of the shame). You’ll never hear one say (or seen it posted on a dating site) how much they appreciate the freedom to “bang away”. Why?
Because they know it will chase men away and they will feel bad. It’s all right there and it’s all true but women will never admit it.
White knights are men however, and I think they can be reasoned with and given red pills.
What All men need to understand about white knighting is that white knighting isn’t attractive to women.
Bruce Willis staying in that Nakatomi tower to save his wife. This is not an attractive act (and it is an unattractive act if his wife thinks that she can control him afterwards. She will detest him). The white knight hero slays the dragon and gets the girl stories are all bullshit. Anybody who doesn’t believe this can rewatch the video of the guy who leaped in front of a car to save a girl’s life and got stuck in the friend zone after.
Women are human beings, they can make their own choices and suffer the consequences of their decisions. White knighting for a women to get out of her own bad choices is always going to be a mistake.
And women do play games (Games: being insincere to provoke a specific response).
These games are so common that they have names. Damsel in distress is one game. Let’s you and him fight is the name of another game. Read up on these games, first year psychology students (mostly women) will.
Don’t become a woman’s pawn (who is unattractive to her because she wants the king for herself) by falling for games.
White knights need to learn to be more selfish, because users exist.
I would be content with “purple pills” — they could go half blue, half red, and simply stay out of the bloody way instead of doing the full Pasty Don Quixote Mantard routine …
Dont answer women or feminist posts on here. Moderators ought to ban them via IP.
Unfortunately, boys/men are still raised as if it is still the 1950s: protect and support women as “the weaker sex”; even defer to them. However, girls/women are raised to compete with men, give them nothing, and if the opportunity arises, take ’em for everything they’ve got. We need to reach these boys/men to show them the total disconnect is not just in their imagination. The difficulty lies in the fact that, besides homeschoolers, they are a captive audience to radical feminists from pre-school through college. It is tough to break through that wall.
I’ve read a lot of threads for men but this one takes the cake. It’s well worth your time to read:
I’m going to be blunt in saying that any man who gets married whether he thinks the woman is of quality or not is a fucking fool. Eg: George Clooney. Just because she was your unicorn princess when you married doesn’t mean she won’t be a scathing bitch 5,10 or even 15 years down the line. Marriage is a life long investment and you don’t have a crystal ball. Women are great at the whole permanent personality switch thing. The branch swinging hypergamy upgrade thing. And the whole “switch sides because it suits me to do so thing.” They also need constant maintenance. If they’re not haaaaaaaaaaaaaapppy then you’re a shit man and they’re off. Fuck the fact you have to work hard, concentrate on yourself, look after your kids and do other shit. No. A woman’s responsibilities are domestic/kids and usually any part time job she has. You have kids, full time job AND THEN HER. She is probably the most mentally draining thing out of all of those things.
Women lean towards neuroticism (all bitches are crazy, some just less so than others) and thus they are incredibly temperamental. The older they get the more pronounced any latent psycho-neurotic tendency will become. Depression (post natal or otherwise), schizophrenia and all that dysfunctional bad shit which basically makes a woman a no-go as a hard option increases as she ages. Think I sound crazy? Google mental illness, it’s more prevalent in women, specifically, OLDER WOMEN. They have a natural predisposition to general batshittery. Definitely worth digging deep into a prospective woman’s family dirt to see what her mother, grandmother, sisters and all the rest are like. If there’s any, even A SNIFF of mental illness, nope the fuck out of there. You don’t want those genes in your kids, either. It’s your responsibility as a man to check for all this shit. If you bring a little sadistic boy or girl into the world because your wife’s X chromosomes contain dysfunctional DNA, that’s on you.
Some women actually stabilise around/after menopause which is a blessing in disguise, I guess. But most women are long past fuckable once they reach that stage and any kids you had would be grown up so you would have survived the bulk part of your marriage. That’s the beginning of the home stretch of your marriage, entering the early twilight years, not the hard part of having a hot young woman bear your kids and managing her swinging emotions, wants, needs, whining, hypergamy and negative social influences that hijack her personality via the hegemony of the female groupthink mentality and turn her into a cunt (EG: slutty friends, media, a bitter venomous mother-in-law etc.)
I rather risk money on the stock market than risk my family/heart/money on a legal contract with a woman who has the power to rape everything. We live in a culture where a woman’s feels have more legal reach than justice, common sense and logic. I see guys hamster a lot “why marriage is necessary” it isn’t. You just want it because you were inculcated to desire it. In light of that you have a very weak logical basis for “why marriage is good.” Kids need two parents, not a marriage contract. Fuck marriage. Tell the bitch if she wants a man as high SMV as yourself that she accepts your terms or you will nope the fuck out. Call her bluff, if she calls yours, follow through. If she begs for you back, excellent. If not? You’ve just avoided playing a game of Russian roulette where your net worth, emotions and family are ripped away from you by a woman who has fallen out of love, gone crazy or just lost her shit and wants to make you pay. Because all her problems are your fault. Even if they’re not.
I’ve had this conversation with guys before. Some guys are dumb enough to think getting rich and just paying her off is worth it for a 5-10 year marriage and then fucking up your kids when they become teenagers/pre-teens with a divorce. I think they’re fucking chumps. That’s just pure hopeless romanticism. It’s a poor as shit strategy whichever way you cut it. Most women are not worth what they get in a divorce. They get way in excess of what can be deemed reasonable, especially if you are successful. If you don’t have more power/control than her, your marriage will inevitably fail. It’s not a matter of IF, but a matter of when. Exceptions are dark triad men who have learnt to manage their woman’s emotions and play her like a fiddle. Doesn’t sound healthy I know but at least the whole fucking thing actually lasts. Women believe that shit to be “true love” but when you word it consciously like this it’s “creepy as fuck.” Good luck with marriage, it’s Russian roulette except 5 out of the 6 chambers have a bullet inside. Here’s hoping you hit that 1/6.
Marriage takes your one card away that gives you any measure of power over a woman. Your ability to walk away. You need to be able to withdraw your commitment at any time and be able to imply that you can actionably do that via dread game without a massive nuke going off. Even your ability to affect dread is weakened once you’re married. A woman is inclined to think “he won’t leave, he can’t afford to leave” and so she carries on acting like a cunt ruining everything you’ve built “BECAUSE OF HOW I FEEL!” You don’t need to be chaining up your nutsack like that, don’t chain your fate to a woman’s emotional whims. If I was emotional, I’d probably cringe every time I hear a guy say “you need marriage to raise kids.” That’s dumb as fuck. The divorce will fuck them up, I’ve seen it happen again and again. In fact I knew a dude whose parents divorcing red pilled the shit out of him and changed his whole view of women when he saw how his own mother was. A really rough way to become red pilled, let me tell you.
Thanks for reading. Check out my blog for more articles, ramblings and other rp/male related shit: http://illimitablemen.com/
“Batshittery”…..nice word play….. I always say to guys in relation to marriage today…..” would you bet 50% of your assets on the flip of a coin? Cause that’s what you’re doing by marrying that ladyeeeee…….”
The USA wants to put a man on Mars by 2050. The treatment of Matt Taylor ensures that this will not happen in our lifetimes. No young man of any intelligence will go anywhere near astronomy or space exploration for a generation.
Where’s Doctor Evil when you need him?
Absolutely correct. Name-shame, isolate and condemn these white knights, cowards and feminist collaborators.
There is no alternative beside a unified front. You are a man or you are not.
Buy them a copy of one of these novels by John Norman: http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss/184-3508061-5227058?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=gor
This unlike Jay Z and rap is true red pill medicine for the modern browbeaten man. I can’t praise it enough.
Sorry, but I’m not up with the fashion stuff these days.What do people mean by “skinny jeans”? I assume they mean baggy is better, but if I’m not a gangster rapper in the 90s, isn’t that kind of silly looking? Also, aren’t chinos sort of like dress pants? If you’re only wearing jeans every single day, you’re probably not very successful unless you’re a rock star or something.
J. Brown is one of the worst people to have ever lived imo.
“Simple. Every time a man gets on TV and apologises for that which owes
no apology, he emboldens and encourages Social Justice Warriors (SJWs)
to attack more men. If these injustices are ever going to stop, men
pressured to apologize by feminist SJWs must fear the backlash from red
pill men more than the media frenzy from SJWs.”
Best thing I read all week
Queue angry MRA losers in even.. We.. Q
Cue angry MRA losers in 3…2…1…
“but Imma nice guy!!!!!!!!! “*puts on fedora hat*
There is not a single MRA who promote being nice guy to women.
And as for the fedoras… it is reserved only for the betas.
Well, Julien Blanc is an exception in that he needed to apologize. This guy has some issues he needs to work on. It takes a real man to admit he is wrong. Grow some balls!
Yes blame these men. . Men by nature are bigger stronger and smarter than women. . The only way we get to this point of beta emasculated men and men suffering is if men give up which most have or if the small group of men at the top form hierarchies to control. And exploit other men. . Women are hypergamous sluts who only want alpha cock and want to use men for money. . However no women ever started a company or won a battle or invented anything of value. The blame goes to the men who control the world and shit on 80% of men. .
In days of old men like this might be executed. The masculine spirit is under attack In truth because of these honorless eunuchs.They apologize for things they did not do and champion causes that are opposed to their own existence. I’d love it if nature did away with these “creatures” but until then we’ll have to deal out verbal beheadings.