334 thoughts on “Why Modern Leftists Are Fascists”

1. spot on

2. They named it the National Socialist German Workers’ Party for a reason.

   1. Yes, because at the time the word socialist had a positive connotation, as it still does in many parts of the world. Both Hitler and Stalin used the word to gain support, especially among disenfranchised workers. It’s too bad for your historical revisionism that Hitler’s first act in power was to get rid of trade unions. Sounds hell socialist to me. Unbelievable. The cognitive dissonance is mind blowing.

      1. Trade unions in the Soviet Union that did not accept Party administrators were banned.
         Tell us all again how much communists like unions?

         1. The Soviet Union wanted to maintain control of said unions. There is also significant differences between Stalin and modern advocates of communism, and even between the various strains of communism. Modern communism is founded upon the power of trade unions. You should learn about your opponents. I mean, I read that Atlas Shrugged crap.

         2. Modern communism led inevitably to the biggest shark in the tank taking over and murdering millions.
            Get back to us when an anarchist is able to successfully prevent state capitalism ( socialism ) from forming.

3. Leftists constantly call people are arn’t left leaning Nazis, the hypocrisy of their insult is completely lost on them. We are entering a new dark ages of fear an repression in the West, I can see elements if both 1984 an Animal Farm at work in out society.

   1. 1984 and Animal Farm were written by a super far leftist. Are you aware of that?

      1. Yes but that’s part of the hypocrisy, leftists point to conservative politics as repressing but their own philosophies are even more repressing. Animal farm was also a criticism of communism which is a leftist philosophy.

         1. That’s over simplified. You can attack Stalinism while still being left wing. You can criticise authoritarian communism as Orwell did and still be left-wing.

         2. I get thay Animal farm was more a crticism of the abuse of power an corruption by the leaders rather than the philosophy itself but the main point still stands. Leftists criticize not non leftists as being oppressive but leftists are the ones doing the oppressing an creating a nightmare state that they claim they are against.

      2. George Orwell left Marxism after a Russian political commissar tried to execute him during the Spanish Civil War for being politically unreliable.
         The commissar shot him in the head and left him for dead. After he survived that he realized just how dangerous and bankrupt the left was. He called the dystopian government in 1984 IngSoc for a reason.

         1. Where did you get that information from? Orwell was an anti-Stalinist but a staunch socialist. He fought for and was inspired by the anarchists in the Spanish Civil War. 1984 and Animal Farm serve as warnings against authoritarianism and critiques on Stalinism. I hate it when people try to make it seem like Orwell was some right-winger.

         2. I’m sure you would like to claim him as a fellow anarchist.

4. I’ve worked in both state and federal government and witnessed the mediocrity, ineptitude and waste in both. I’m not too worried about a state take-over.

   1. wow…was it hell being a state/fed worker?? What is the deal about not being able to hire good help for the guvment

5. ” . . . “American” Fascism echoes European Fascism and is rooted in this very ideology.”
   I spent some time living under a nominally fascist European government (late Franco). It’s a lot worse here now than it was there then.

   1. Haha, really? Is your per capita income under 2000 dollars a year? Are your children forced to attend catholic schools? Is criticizing the falangist massacres of civilians a criminal offense?

      1. “Is your per capita income under 2000 dollars a year?”
         As a matter of fact, I’ve spent the last year largely working on some projects that have required me to live off of capital, so, yes.
         Yes, I am aware that that answers the spirit of your question in the negative, as I have obviously been able to acquire such capital.
         On the other hand I have lived in slums here worse than anything I encountered in Spain, and the trains don’t run on time.
         “Are your children forced to attend catholic schools?”
         No, but I was taken into armed military custody for not being Catholic.
         Here I have been taken into armed civil custody for annoying a woman.
         “Is criticizing the falangist massacres of civilians a criminal offense?”
         No, but here (and I should note that for me “here” is the northeastistan) criticising certain dogmas of the SJW crowd may be, and even more is prosecuted as if it were.
         If it makes you feel better, it’s still a damned sight better here than it was behind the iron curtain. Here I only have to play peekaboo with the secret police on the odd day.
         Addendum:
         Question – did you live there yourself?

         1. Hollaback is a marxist troll. No need to take him seriously.

   2. Could you be more specific?

      1. There, woe betide you if you crossed certain lines, but if you were a good boy and stayed within those lines you were essentially free. More importantly, the lines were stable. The rules were the rules were the rules.
         Here, woe betide you if you cross certain lines, but you can longer tell where the lines are, not that it matters as the lines are rather shifty things and I might well go to prison simply for possessing something I bought at the Kmart down the street in years past.
         There I never actually saw fascist troops marching down the middle of a quiet, middle class residential street chanting, “Issue me an M-16. Now I am a shooting machine.”
         Whereas over the past several years that has become routine here. That’s after they were told to tone it down a hair. Initially their chants were translations from the original German. In Germanic meter. The first time they did it I honestly thought a Neo-Nazi rally was heading my way.

   3. “It’s a lot worse here now than it was there then.”
      Do tell.

6. The left rails against fascism. The right rails against socialism. What they’re really both against is authoritarianism – forcing others to do as they want. Worrying about what their neighbor is doing, and trying to control it. The struggle continues.

   1. A history professor once explained to me how fascism and socialists are actually very similar. I learned that the conventional left-right scale is garbage. There are three characteristics for far-left: atheism, sophistry, and criminality.

   2. “The left rails against fascism.”
      No the left uses the word “fascism” out of ignorance or spite and is at no time in an effort to clarify. Fascism is to the left of socialism. Read Golberg’s book.

7. Welp, way to jump the shark. Should we really consider it critical thinking if all you’re doing is repeating talking points from The National Review and The American Enterprise Institute? Can you name a single “leftist” in elected office that’s nationalized anything? If this is the end goal, why are both parties (and the thinktanks and magazines that peddle these ideas) getting funded primarily by banking and corporate interests?
   But answering those questions would require facts, and why do that when you can plagiarize the same article that’s already been written a hundred times before? What we’ve got here is an easy to manipulate follower blindly attemping to move the overton window for the gain others, exactly the kind of person Rothbard, Mises, Hayek, etc. warned about.

   1. Obama and the democratic congress. They coopted the health care industry into the ACA, and the way it is set up, the lot of them will be forced to seek “protection” under the government before this is all over.
      Unless we can take this vile act out behind the Capitol, and shoot it.

8. Liberalism was always about maintaining the defeatist and self entitlement mentality. Modern day liberals are radical fascists and promote a dangerous form of modern day leftist bigotry.
   -They have created the welfare state by destroying more businesses and pushing more people into unemployment. It also supports the expansion of bigger government.
   -They have created radical feminism which in turn, has deprived more men from work and pushing an aggressive drive towards having more women in the workforce and pushing more men out. Rather than promoting responsibility and accountability, it promotes special privelages and entitlements.
   -They have destroyed religious and moral values, while at the same time, pushing the gay and homosexual agenda into our faces.
   -They have destroyed the nuclear family, reversed the traditional gender roles and continue to corrupt the family courts, the media and every other element in our society in order to attack masculinity.
   -They have created the “everyone’s a winner” mentality and are responsible for corrupting the public education system and colleges, by indoctrinating people with radical leftist ideologies and corrupt values, while promoting laziness and not a strong work ethic.
   All of the wrong values of our society can be primarilly associated with liberalism.

   1. I think American Liberalism is different than liberalism in the rest of the world. I know liberalism to be about pro free markets, individual freedoms etc.
      I also know neo-liberalism is just the extreme version of liberalism, unrestricted capitalism.

      1. The progressives in America in the early 20th century were exposed in the late 30’s by their affiliation with & support for the fascist & communist movements in Europe so ducked for cover behind the moniker ‘liberal’. In recent years, they are again calling themselves ‘progressives’. They are divisive, duplicitous, statist control freaks; not liberal in the sense that Thomas Jefferson or Ben Franklin were…quite the opposite.

      2. The left in america co-opted the term Liberalism, because its easier to promote their agenda that way. Makes them sound more mainstream. They support big government intervening in peoples private lives in order to protect individual liberties, kind of an oxymoron.

         1. Wrong, read a textbook.
            ‘They support big government intervening in peoples private lives in order to protect individual liberties’
            Examples? Hypocrite.

         2. Telling a baker who he can work for. Making someone cough up tax to feed rotters. Fucktard.

         3. Did I hurt your little feelings?

         4. textbook =/= ultimate truth, nor necessarily any resemblance of reality. Observation shows his viewpoint to be true.
            And you clearly are unsure of the meaning of the word “hypocrite”

         5. Just dishing back the same crap you offered us.

         6. A little late to the party, but people like you always like to use this little cute phrase: “Read a textbook”. At least you didn’t send us to search for it on Google, bravo!
            The Left wants the government to control our lives in order to accomplish this beloved “equality”.
            People like you are truly disgusting. They are trying to fuck you in the ass, and instead of trying to fight back, you just allow them to fuck you like a worthless slut.
            Here in my country we have a special disgust and “healthy hate” for communists and leftists individuals.

         7. Do you actually pay attention towhat’s going on?

   2. Soon it won’t even be called liberalism anymore. Liberalism requires a certain amount of freedom. What we are seeing is against freedom.

      1. This is how leftists survive long enough to take power: they steal ideas and twist them.
         Liberals are anti-liberty.
         “Gays” have nothing to do with happy people.
         Social Justice is anti-justice and pro-slavery.
         These parasites feed off the goodwill we have toward certain ideas and organizations while killing their hosts.

         1. It is true. Conservatives are much more tolerant of liberals and degenerates. Every monarchy was overthrown rather easily. The Bastille was empty. The junta lacked the will do do enough violence. There are non-leftists that will do some violence but it is not widespread, and their bloodlust is usually very limited.
            With leftists there is no limit to their bloodlust. There is no mercy. No reasoning. They kill their own people by the millions capriciously as an offensive measure.

   3. The hypocrisy and idiocy you display is astounding. I’ll start by saying that I am not a liberal and in general, I do not like liberals. However, I also don’t like bullshit and I am on the left.
      Modern day liberals promote a modern day form of leftist bigotry? Are you serious? You’re the bigots! You’re the people who hate gays for no reason, hate women, hate minorities, hate everyone with a different opinion, who want to take rights away from others and tell them how to live! Conservatives are famous for being bigots. The left wants equal rights. How is that bigotry?
      – Last time I checked, business in America has more money than ever before. Profits are at record highs. Business virtually controls the entire society. The US is a corporate state, wherein workers have very few rights. Unemployment is beneficial to business because it lowers wages and makes people more desperate, fearful, and easier to control. Also, this big and small government deal is a false dichotomy. For one, not everyone on the left wants a ‘bigger government’. They want the priorities of the government to shift from supporting the rich to supporting everyone else. They don’t just arbitrarily want some ‘bigger government’. Oh, the right pushes for more military spending and more police.
      – How is the right of women to work aggressive? Maybe if you could spell words like ‘privileges’ you wouldn’t be sad, fat and unskilled. If men are better than women, why can’t they compete with them for the same jobs?
      – People just aren’t stupid enough to believe in your fairy tales anymore. Get over it. Liberals didn’t destroy your 12th century religious values; common sense did. Actually, what am I saying? The US is still extremely religious, to a remarkable level. What gay agenda? The push for the right to get married? Oh boo hoo, people want the same rights. Have a cry about it, bigot.
      – Liberals don’t care about masculinity. They really don’t. They don’t see it like you do. To you it’s a huge paradigm, to other people it isn’t. To some people, the gap between the rich and the poor is the paradigm, to others, its between the lazy and the hard-working, and so on. Reasonable people don’t know what you’re talking about.
      – What ‘everyone’s a winner’ mentality? No evidence for this is ever given. The public education system and colleges indoctrinate people with radical leftist ideology? Most people, even well educated ones, couldn’t tell you crap about radical leftist ideology. Radical leftist ideology is stuff like Kropotkin’s work, Bob Black and so on. Modern liberals are not radical leftists, and in comparison to the rest of the world, American liberals are not super left wing. You don’t even have universal health care or mandated vacation time. Promoting laziness? Why? How?
      – ‘Wrong values’? Values cannot be right or wrong. They are subjective and different people have different values. Maybe the problem isn’t liberals, its that there are too many people like you running around who never learned how to think. Corporate capitalism and a state backed plutocracy are causing the problems, not some dumbass liberals.

      1. If you want to see leftist bigotry, watch one confront a black Republican. The Democratic Party is the party of the Klu Klux Klan. Look it up.
         All that money companies have today is nearly worthless, due to leftist created inflation. And why the fuck should government and never do wells have a fucking dime. You want money? Earn it, fucktard.
         Female supremacy is aggressive. If a woman wants to compete, fine. But affirmative action, and lowering standards to force the military and companies to hire women is government aggression.
         I’m an atheist, but the length you leftist retards go to suppress religion makes me ashamed to use the term. What right do you have to tell a bakery who they can do business with, or whom a private church can marry?
         And yes, pajama boy, leftists are absolutely not masculine. This is one thing we agree on.
         The left is all about equalizing outcomes. If accurately describing it as “Everyone is a winner” bothers you, I’ll use the term as well. As for mandatory healthcare and vacation time, we all know you want it here. So fuck you and the horse you rode in on.
         And some values are always right and wrong for civilized and honorable people, even atheists. You don’t harm others who are not harming you. You don’t steal other people’s stuff. Leftists have no qualms about forcing people to march in their chosen political lockstep at government gun point, and like enslaving people through un-needed taxation to pay for their hobbyhorses. Since you have the morality of a looting barbarian, your demand for moral relativism is unsurprising.

         1. – The Democratic Party and the left have little in common. Political scientists generally classify the Democratic Party as a centre-right one. Looking at the Dems from an outside perspective, they are just another corporate party. Republicans are often racist, and republicans in general have no concern for minorities. A black republican is therefore paradoxical.
            – Oh ok, ‘leftists created inflation’. How’s that? What didn’t leftists do? Leftists made cancer, Genghis Khan was a leftist, whatever. Wages are stagnant yet the left created inflation. Here’s some knowledge for you: the economy generates inflation. Governments provide benefits for a number of reasons, mainly to placate the populace and lower the crime rate. Furthermore, there are literally more unemployed people than jobs. It’s mathematically impossible for everyone to be employed. Countries without government welfare systems are empirically worse. Funny how all the countries that follow left-wing policies are the best on the planet, and countries with right-wing policies are abject shitholes. Case in point, the US: the most right-wing country by far and also the worst Western country to live in.
            – Ok I’ll agree with those points.
            – This argument won’t go anywhere. What right does a business or church have to arbitrarily discriminate against someone? Religion is stupid and people who are religious are as well. You have the right to believe whatever you want but ridiculous bible dribble should not lead to real world discrimination.
            – Moronic comment.
            – I don’t think so. Maybe that’s your perspective, and there are probably people on the left who are all about equalising outcomes. The left is about humanitarianism and treating people equally. Obviously not everybody is equal in ability, but that’s no reason to let people suffer. Universal healthcare and employers giving workers reasonable time off are hallmarks of civilised societies. This is partially why the US is a corporate shithole. People like you would rather defend giant, disinterested corporations who have no loyalty to you or the country, rather than defend your own interests and your neighbour’s interests.
            – Even a value like don’t steal is not universal. I think stealing from the wealthy in a capitalist society is legitimate. Other people agree and other people disagree.
            With the gunpoint thing,neither does the right. Unless the society is purely an anarchist one, a state exists and would be supporting some sort of status quo, even if that status quo was libertarian. That requires that some people are coerced. If the US were untaxed, the society would crumble very quickly. Taxes are used to maintain relative harmony and keep the wealthy protected. There’s a reason big business likes big government. Interesting that you consider providing people with healthcare to be a ‘hobbyhorse’ then attack my morality.

         2. “What gay agenda? The push for the right to get married? Oh boo hoo, people want the same rights. Have a cry about it, bigot.”
            – Ironic, calling someone a bigot for holding an opinion other than your own. Unless you’re saying that being a homosexual is an opinion?
            “Religion is stupid and people who are religious are as well.”
            – Here you outed your own self as a bigot, so it really holds little weight when you try to fling that word around in your arguments. Not to mention how demonstrably false this statement is. The majority of great scientists throughout history, not to mention the people with the highest IQs today, have almost unanimously been either religious or spiritual. Not that that means religious people are all intelligent. But they certainly aren’t all stupid.

         3. I still think you have the best ROK article:

            Stop Being Such A Fucking Faggot

         4. You are so wrong it’s not even funny.
            The primary driver for creating inflation in this country has been government deficit spending, financed by a certain central bank, glamorized by a certain national media, and enforced by the IRS.
            Who run Bartertown?
            if you’re afraid to say it, then you too are a victim of political correctness and the destruction of our cherished Bill of Rights.
            So, the first step in pushing back against statists is to speak the truth and fuck their ridiculous and illogical attempts at silencing us.
            A man should have courage and conviction in his beliefs. Putting on a facade to fit in is the biggest mistake men make in America.
            No more bullshit. Tell it like it is even if it hurts the feelings of SJWs like Karl here.
            If you ask me this society is sick and unsustainable. It needs to crumble and the useful idiots like the person above me need to get a taste of reality — not the government propaganda or social justice farces.

         5. Oh here we go. Pretending the Democratic party of today is the same party that supported the KKK. History much? I have found that those who bemoan liberalism in general are not that bright or informed. The same that goes for those who use the word retard in a negative way. You are a mindless idiot.
            You need to research neoliberalism as opposed to classical liberalism. Learn something instead of spreading right wing Libertarian fascism.

      2. I had to argue with people like you. Your are a dick sucker of the left. All the things he said is true multiculturalism, diversity and global warming are just ideas from the left. I am a college student majoring in IT and I see this as well. Also the gay lifestyle is unnatural because they can’t procreate, period. All of global warming policies had killed jobs and manufacturing capacity greatly lowered. Obamacare is also a job killer policy. “Everyone is a winner” mentality is also real. How? If a guy who worked hard in a test and got an A+ throughout the semester, he gets rewarded. Also in order to hurt the feeling of the “C” student, he also gets a reward. Not all schools are like this, but some of them are starting to do this. Diversity, I got nothing against it but because of this, companies have implemented affirmative action and policies that workers should tought to be politically correct and sensitive.
         This is reality my friend and if you want to suck cock of the left, feel free to do so. 🙂

         1. The celibate lifestyle also “can’t procreate, period.” Does that make people who just don’t give a damn about sex “unnatural”?
            As for your claim that global warming is an idea from the left? No, it’s just science. The fact that you don’t want it to be true is immaterial. Reality isn’t determined by what you want to be true.
            Nor is there any factual basis to your “job killer” claims. At all.

         2. wrong. Those men who choose do be celibate is because they choose not to breed at all, but they have the natural capacity breed with the opposite sex: A man and a Women. Gay people don’t have the capacity. In regards of Global Warming, now it has changed to climate change. New Flash climate change is just a huge hoax, the climate is always changing.

         3. Nobody is required to breed. Get over it.
            And no, global warming has not “changed to climate change.” The only hoax is the denial of global warming.

      3. #Liberals don’t care about masculinity. They really don’t. They don’t see it like you do.”
         Women care. Alot. Any man who intends on being in any type of sexual relationship with a woman should care. This is why the OP brought it up in regards to the fascist machine currently ruling over our existence. As long as men are blind to the importance of masculinity and females ignorant to the importance of femininity, gender relations will be strained and that benefits daddy government.
         There has been an intentional agenda to keep that information from us. How else could a guy like you go his whole life without knowing how key it is to your survival?

         1. The sad part is that the media is spouting this “gender doesn’t matter” BS

      4. No one hates gays, women, blacks etc. Or at least if they do it’s not relevant. They hate them being pandered to as a voting block that lean “left” and vote against the interests of other groups such as white men or the middle class. When gays, women and blacks can organise and support policies that revolve around taking money from those who produce, high earning males, a large proportion of which are white males, that’s an example of them not simply getting on with their lives and being harmless. THEY are tying to tell the middle class and white males how to live. And I think you know full well the lifestyle of many of these groups is not viable without the ability to steal from white men. But yes, the problem is not that they are allowed to be gay, black or female. It is that they can vote. No one wants to tell them how to live, they simply want to end all government funded programs that help them live that lifestyle, and remove from them the right to vote in certain ways and for certain things simply because that is the liberal thing to do, or because it is against white male interests. And by the way In the private sector, business, and high earning jobs, men are competing with women just fine. You are on the wrong site to preach that shit FAGGOT. people get sued for racial or sexual discrimination which infringes private property rights, freedom of association and assembly, hate speech laws infringe freedom of speech etc. People can live how they want but get your hands off my rights and my money.

         1. So you consider it “pandering” to demand that all Americans have the same legal rights?

         2. piss off faggot
            this is from 8 months ago
            And yeah, fuck blacks, women, fags etc. and fuck you too

         3. Homosexuals have always had the same right to marry someone of the opposite sex as heterosexuals have. Marrying someone of the same sex, however, is a creation of something new, and bastardizes the entire concept of marriage, which is about the creation and rearing of children, rather than romantic love.

         4. …and it is a seal of approval from mainstream society for behaviour that will bring about lowered birth rates in areas where the birth rate is already too low..

         5. Karl seems to be a decent leftist, and has debated different points with at least a modicum of respect and objectivity (albeit with maybe a few typical leftist appeals to emotion). ‘neomasculinism’ tends to go towards conservatism, but objective discussion of the merits of different ideals really is the domain of gentlemen. So credit to him if he wants to learn, as even conservatives can always broaden their understandings.

      5. Actually the left wants “forced” equal rights. I believe that “rights” and “freedoms” are like apples and oranges. We’re given “rights” like meals at a homeless shelter and we believe we’re free.
         Equal rights is BS when one group is put down in order for the others to reach a certain level of “equal”. It’s like telling the fastest runner at a track meet that he has to start 5 seconds after everyone so they get a fair shot a winning.
         At the end of the day, I’ll gladly call myself a black, straight male bigot who refuses to stand beside a group that forces equality by using Nazi germany style propaganda. Soon it’ll be a crime to simply dislike someone because “we’re all equal”.

      6. The left invents a new “right” then demand it the name of fairness and equality. It’s almost as if they really can’t remember the last ten, twenty, or two hundred years of history.
         Upsetting the apple cart is always justified in the name of something they claim is a good, no matter the actual outcome.

      7. Go away fag.

      8. Equality and liberty cannot coexist in the leftist paradigm. Government enforced equality steps on liberty every time. True equality of gender would not involve police and IRS creating special legal privileges for women.The leftist always screams for peace and tolerance while hiding behind a cop and his gun, prodding the system to do violence to anyone that doesn’t accept “equality”. Equality does not exist. I don’t believe in equality! I already have a religion and yours sucks.

         1. Very well said…and 100% correct!

      9. You’re just a leftist faggot, no amount of reasoning will do you any good

      10. That entire rant was so wrong, on so many levels, oh, never mind…unbelievable!

   4. You summed it up really well

   5. They certainly have shoved gays and transgenders in our faces and I am royally sick of it!

9. There is very little difference in the ideology of authoritarianism, fascism, and communism.
   Note that this isn’t a new phenomenon on the left, which embraced the communism of Lenin and the fascism of Mussolini and Hitler.
   These quotes prove it.
   Lenin:
   HG Wells said of Lenin, “He is the great hope of reform and progressivism.”
   The New York Times said of Lenin, ” He is a visionary leader with progressive ideas and a practical plan.”
    
   The Washington Post said of Lenin, “The world owes him a debt of gratitude for his farsighted perspective of the issues of the day.”
   Mussolini:
   George Benard Shaw,”He is a marvelous reformer and a great progressive.”
   Ghandi, “He is a superman, the model for all we hope to accomplish in India.”
   The Archbishop of Canterbury, “He is the one great figure in all of Europe. His ideas are sound, his principles are solid, and his virtues are evident to all.”
   FDR, (Governor of New York at the time.) “If we were countrymen, I am sure I would have been with him from beginning to end.”
   Hitler:
   Andre Gide: “He is a genuine genius, even those who oppose him must admire him.
   Arnold Toynbee, “He is surely a man of peace. Everyone can see that.”
   James Blanton, the president of Hunter College at the time said, “He is destined to go down in history as one of our greatest reformers.”
   The president of Columbia college in New York City said, ” He has a clear economic plan that should prove to be the model for progressive reform around the world.”
   The New York Times said, “At last a leader with courage who can move the world toward progressive reform in a sane and sensible fashion. Surely his enemies will be shamed in the future and surely even the oppressed masses of the world will look to him as their liberator. ”
   There is something that should stand out here.  In the minds of the liberals at the beginning of the 20th century, there was no substantial difference between the programs of the Communists and the Fascists.
   We are led to believe that fascism and communism are ideological, political, and philosophical opposites with one being a right wing heresy, and the other a left wing heresy. The liberal progressives of the time saw these 3 men as essentially the same.
   This is why Himmler said as late as 1944, “There is no essential difference between the programs of the communists and the programs of the fascists for world domination.”
   After the war in East Germany, 90 out of the top 100 officials who made up the upper echelons of the East German communist government had been nazi leaders.
     Hitler in 1922 said, “The Reds and the Browns, we are brothers in the revolution for the liberation of the world. We stand with our comrades in the western world who push for progressive liberal reform and we stand for all eternity.”

   1. Winston Churchill: “What a man! I have lost my heart!… Fascism has rendered a service to the entire world… If I were Italian, I am sure I would have been with you entirely from the beginning of your victorious struggle against the bestial appetites and passion of Leninism.”
      So in your world Winston Churchill was a secret fascist liberal socialist? Your perspective is incoherent and most of your quotes are made up. Liberalism, Communism, and Fascism are three distinct traditions, all with points of contact and broad diversions. As Nietzsche said: “The similar appear to be the same only to those with weak eyesight.”

      1. Nice try.
         Every single one of those quotes can be sourced.
         Whether you like them or not is up to you.

         1. So following the logic, was Churchill was a communist?

         2. What are you talking about? Of course Churchill was a communist. He was one of the greatest villains the British Isles ever hatched.

         3. You’re being sarcastic, right?

         4. No.

         5. And how was he a communist then?

   2. You should focus on what they did and not what they said. Is the Democratic Republic of North Korea a democracy? Ludicrous reasoning and completely nonsensical. Go back to school.

      1. Were all of the People’s Democratic Republics of the last century democratic?
         If not, then why are you espousing their collectivist policies? Or did they just do it wrong? Why the fuck should any sane man believe a socialist when he promises he won’t murder millions again if he is given power again?

         1. I think you’re missing my point. Having socialist or democratic or whatever in the name is irrelevant. You should look at the actual policies.
            Also, I’m an anarcho-syndicalist, not some big gubment socialist trying to take your guns and stop you banging your buck-toothed sister and lynching blacks.

         2. Ah, more insults. About your speed.
            How is that general strike strategy working out for you?

10. Living in the UK I couldn’t agree with you more – the left disgusts me in its disgusting hypocrisy – supporting the non-muslim hating/killing fascist, bigoted, and disgusting country of Saudi Arabia whilst campaigning against men spreading their legs on the london tube!!

    1. The man spreading is pathetic. I’ve seen cunts on mass transit use two seats by sitting in the outside one and putting bag in the other.
       It strikes me the man spreading BS is due to women upset men are no longer getting up and giving female the seat.
       You see … in the age of equality, women — conviently — still expect guys to engage in old traditions which were of benefit to them. Unless a woman is pregnant, I will never get up and give a female my seat.

       1. Pregnant or very old.

          1. But how do you know lil’ preggers isn’t carrying Thugspawn (TM)?

          2. I don’t. not without pushing her down the stairs or punching her in the stomach.

       2. Your comment got me thinking. Is fat shaming women that take up two seats a valid response? If SJW’s are going to argue that she is accommodating her lard ass and something she cannot immediately control then I would tell them to walk around in hot weather with an organ in need of constant ventilation.

          1. Yes. Yes it is.

          2. To be fair, some manspreading is looks more like an interpretive dance. I can see still SJWs bitching whenever my legs form a 45 degree angle.

       3. “It strikes me the man spreading BS is due to women upset men are no longer getting up and giving female the seat.”
          The really sad part….these same women will not give up their seats for an elderly person or someone with a disability. It’s all about them (bubble).
          As far as equality goes…they only want “selective equality” (turn it on and off as needed).

       4. This idea/policy of “manspreading” may be even more sinister as sitting relaxed with open legs is a power pose, raising testosterone (slightly). If you sit like a woman you diminish your T, hence your power and masculinity.

    2. The state has complete control over everyone in the UK.

11. Self-righteous people tend to have very authoritarian personalities and nobody on planet earth is more self-righteous than secular humanist marxist the far left(Tumblur SJW’s, Feminist, atheistkult, university professors, the LGTB community, the diversity/multicultural cult, the New Age cult, ect..).

    1. Well said.

    2. Fuck the New Age cult, seriously. And uh, all those other groups you mentioned.

    3. Couldn’t have said it better myself. Self righteous SJW’S perceive themselves as Superior Moral Guardians who are heavenly ordained to supervise the backwards traditionalist proles atop the moral high horse. They preach free speech but ironically suppress anyone who have the guile and guts to give opposing views.
       Yes it’s an Orwellian nightmare. But it’s very easy to annihilate these pesky SJW rodents. Strong, unshakeable brotherhood between red pillers.
       United we stand, divided we fall.

       1. the amazing part is, they try to simultaneously embrace moral relativism.
          The Hamster is split in twain.

          1. Which leads to cognitive dissonance.

       2. roosh v blocks people who disagree him, people on the right are not different on that issue than people on the left

          1. Actually, he doesn’t. ROK only blocks trolls. You’ll often find disagreeing posts in the comment section. Usually they’re on older articles simply because the person finds the article in Google. The people who agree with the website are subscribed to the blog, and are usually the first to post.

          2. Unfortunately they do occasionally shadow ban people simply for disagreeing. By its very nature I can’t say anything about how often it happens, but I know for a fact that it does.

       3. No enemies to our right. No friends to our left.

       4. And on campus if they can’t suppress them they demand Safe Spaces.

       5. They also claim to champion individuality yet actively oppress anyone that doesn’t fit the leftist mold.

    4. Nothing is more hypocritical than a self-righteous moral relativist.

    5. The problem with your reasoning though is that all civilisation is built on authoritarian thinking.
       Even property rights are authoritarian.
       The very concept of rights is authoritarian when you get down to it.
       And lets face it. Many of the people here who are quite happy to point out the many sins of the modern left, exhibit those same sins themselves.
       That same self-righteousness and moral posturing.
       “My enemy is not human, my enemy is less than human. I am the one in the right” throughout history this has been the battle cry of both sides in every conflict. From the very first tribal conflicts through to the march of the Roman legions on the barbarians of gaul to the modern day ideological arguments on the internet. We all claim moral superiority over our foes.

       1. Human rights in America are based on Nature and Natures God. Natural Law. Not authoritarianism. God is not an authoritarian, and natural law is a process of systematic reasoning and philosophy. Participating in the traditional American religion, Protestantism, is not authoritarian like the Roman Catholics.
          Property rights are derived from Natural Law and are therefore not authoritarian. However, the ruling of all laws whether rational or not does come down to granting authority to some justice system to exercise violence. Violence is not authoritarianism. Criminal justice based on Natural Law is not authoritarianism.

          1. The very concept of natural law and natural rights is insane.
             Who enforces them? There is no third party “natural enforcer” of natural rights.
             All rights are the product of society. Enough people came together and said “This is how we’re doing things” and then enforced it.

          2. So you’re a moral relativist?

          3. Hardly.
             We define morality ourselves which is why it’s important we do it properly, recognise it is us that has done so and then thoroughly and vigorously enforce said morality.

          4. https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailykos.com%2Fstory%2F2016%2F1%2F31%2F1476239%2F-How-to-really-make-America-great-again-Get-rid-of-the-dumbest-idea-in-the-world&h=CAQHZ97QS&hc_location=ufi

       2. So what?
          That does not mean there was no difference between 40’s Nazi Germany and 40’s USA.
          All governments, civilizations, empires are authoritarian, that is true, but that does not mean that all are equal or evil.
          Some are better and some are worse. It’s about choosing what is better.
          And clearly self destruction that is promoted by modern left is not good system. Sooner it’s changed to something more sane the better.

          1. There is a difference between 1940s Germany and the USA in the 40s.
             Germany was the better place to live.

          2. https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailykos.com%2Fstory%2F2016%2F1%2F31%2F1476239%2F-How-to-really-make-America-great-again-Get-rid-of-the-dumbest-idea-in-the-world&h=CAQHZ97QS&hc_location=ufi…

       3. I disagree. The left specifically confuses their morality with their political beliefs. Just going against their political beliefs is, to them, doing something clearly on the side of wrong. Very self righteous.

    6. It’s all about control. All these movements and the people that use them have once objective: controlling others.
       And they will use whatever means necessary to have that control. Their whole sense of self-worth depends on their ability to control others. They don’t worry about how to improve themselves, they just want to “improve” others. Flaws for thee, none for me.

       1. They want to obtain moral superiority, because the people with moral superiority are more likely to obtain the right to lead. So yes, it is about power and control.

          1. One thing I’ve noticed about leftists: They have a diminished capacity for self-criticism. Denouncing other people is inexpensive and it’s fun, but criticizing oneself requires a more austere cast of mind. More conservative, more traditional. Sometimes the red pill is a bitter pill.

    7. Fourteen Defining
       Characteristics Of Fascism
       By Dr. Lawrence Britt
       Source Free Inquiry.co
       5-28-3
       Dr. Lawrence Britt has examined the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia) and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each:
       1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism – Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
       2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights – Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of “need.” The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.
       3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause – The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
       4. Supremacy of the Military – Even when there are widespread
       domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.
       5. Rampant Sexism – The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.
       6. Controlled Mass Media – Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.
       7. Obsession with National Security – Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.
       8. Religion and Government are Intertwined – Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government’s policies or actions.
       9. Corporate Power is Protected – The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
       10. Labor Power is Suppressed – Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.
       11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts – Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.
       12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment – Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.
       13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption – Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.
       14. Fraudulent Elections – Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.
       From Liberty Forum

       1. What a self serving and wildly inaccurate characterization. only a Left Wing Fascist would buy that drivel

          1. Wow, are YOU ever Ignorant??? http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2015/12/23/Trump-s-Tax-Cuts-Would-Add-245-Trillion-Debt

          2. Like I said….

          3. Hey, T-Rumper, can YOU Read? Your Guy is Just About as Dumb as YOU!
             http://fortune.com/2015/08/20/donald-trump-index-funds/

          4. Yes. can you comprehend the political drivel you’re being fed? apparently not.

          5. I don’t believe you!

          6. Of course you don’t. Dunning and Kruger were absolutely correct about you.

          7. I don’t believe YOU can Read, Dip Shit!
             http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/what-will-trump-presidency-look-rise-nazis-pretty-good-guide
             http://www.alternet.org/story/156234/exposing_how_donald_trump_really_made_his_fortune%3A_inheritance_from_dad_and_the_government%27s_protection_mostly_did_the_trick
             http://www.economist.com/blogs/lexington/2010/10/estate_tax_and_founding_fathers
             http://www.salon.com/2016/03/11/trumps_not_hitler_hes_mussolini_how_gop_anti_intellectualism_created_a_modern_fascist_movement_in_america/

    8. The adults who work at Whole Foods…

    9. While I don’t disagree with you that they are bad, I find the same self righteous satisfaction in loads of other people…usually stupid ones…
       It is the exact same bs you see from terrorists and the good-ole boys as well as a lot of stero-typoical lolitalians.
       While I do see this douchebaggery in exactly the people you say, I have seen it in all sorts of people with all sorts of different beliefs…atheists and believers, left and right, SJW and Nazi.

12. The socialist dictators of the 20th century cause the death of over 100 million people. Mostly of the deaths were inflicted on their own countryman.

13. Fascism is often just nationalist, whereas communism is often internationalist.
    National socialism is also often a response to internationals socialism.
    Because leftists like to hate one another when they lack a common enemy.

    1. It’s simpler than that. Leftists want power over other people. National socialism reduces the number of competitors seeking to be el supremo.

14. Within 5 years we will have exo cortex’s that increase our iq’s by 30 points and combine with holographic realities, youll be able to augment physical objects in your environment to look however custom you want. like your piece of junk car will be augmented to look good(your fat wife will be augmented to look pretty)
    along with realistic VR
    Good luck capturing anyone’s attention with your PC garbage once this is available, technology will render social idealists a laughing stock when we look back from year 2020-2025 at what a joke it was
    those pc days are history! we will all be creating our own reality, and buying “skins” to augment our world, also, we will be able to teleport to realistic custom designed environments
    can you handle the real freedom thats coming?
    once our iq’s are enhanced by 30 points… we will be smart enough to extend exo cortex capacities by another 30 points, this will increase exponentially
    until each one of us has an iq of 500 by year 2045, we will also be immortal
    the future is good

    1. yeah, and we will be sailing around the galaxy with telekinesis and everyone will be telepathic and money will be obsolete.
       So much for red pill, eh? Keep dreaming of your future fantasy state, slave.

       1. Yes, there are people working on putting cameras in space, which we then view through “vr headsets” essentially, we will be “in space” with presence , there will be a lot of $ to be made with “moon vision” essentially live cams on the moon, then eventually Mars and so on
          Also, most games coming out are space sims with VR support, one company raised hundreds of millions to build a literal universe,
          Money is kind of obsolete, when it the last time you paid for something in cash?
          “Keep dreaming of your future fantasy”
          the present is fantastic(compared to 50 years ago! or even just compared to 5 years ago!)
          the fact the future will be better is just a bonus

          1. The present is the same as 50 years ago only with more crappy toys. You are talking about a world revolution, and not even the internet has the power to inspire the way putting a man on the moon did.
             You can keep your crappy toys, humanity needs to EXPAND, not sit masturbating wearing VR gear in a tube like some kind of escapist banana slug.

       2. Your beta demoralization mind-set is just an excuse to do nothing, you convince yourself it’s all hopeless, in order to justify doing nothing, part of you knows its a lie.
          a classic case of “mean world syndrome”
          our brains focus on awful things 10 times more than positive, because existential threats are a survival priority and we have a reptilian hindbrain, but it causes mean-world syndrome, and the news is making serious bank on suckers like yourself who are convinced we are all doomed
          “slave”
          technology and information has FREED US
          think how stupid folks were when there was a lack of information, a cunning priest could convince the masses of religion and other malarky, the fact is, technology IS freedom,

          1. Dude, go back to huffpo with the other leftist tools. You are convinced technology can change human nature, Humans are born with a moral sense, and santa clause and the easter bunny have brunch at Scatty’s every Sunday.
             No matter what intentions you have for them, those damned humans just keep on being human. It’s sickos like you that keep trying to force them into the ‘high tech’ mold, when all it really is is a thin, pretty veneer painted on a species of WARRIORS.
             It has nothing to do with ‘the news’. it has everything to do with the fact that anyone that would want Humans to be other than what they are, especially some busybody that dreams of turning us into twisted cyborgs, is someone I would happily beat with a hammer until I see all the shiny wires coming out of your head.
             Keep your sick little powerslave Utopia. I would rather focus on what we REALLy need… the stars. and those, are within reach.

    2. Back in the 70s and 80s they were saying similar things about life after the year 2000. Not much has materialised.

       1. compare todays computers, automobiles, film technology with those from the 70’s
          “not much has materialised”
          lol! look at the technological timeline for what has been achieved, you aren’t giving enough credit to your fellow man

          1. Space exploration was far more active before 90s and recent technology has taken a turn to satisfy mainly the need of women for socialisation.

    3. Sure along with the Jet Packs….quit watching the Jetson’s man…

       1. Jet packs are stupid, but we do have them, do a quick youtube search, MAn sized drones are better though…. Self-flying man-sized drones to be exact
          we also have flying cars…. one company is trying to do a “self flying” module sort of like self driving cars, the cabin will shortly thereafter be like a living room with wings, where you can dial in your destination, have a nap, plug into a virtual reality while your flying, and than wake up somewhere else, auto-pilot to the next level(imagine a craft which automatically flies you and drives you to your destination)autodriving cars aren’t going to stay cars. they will become airbound hybrids with vertical landing technology so you get to work on a helipad type of rig
          In the 1800’s it took weeks in order to travel 500 miles, Today it takes only hours
          Exponential increase
          intercontinental travel took years, or didn’t happen for thousands of years, today a private jet can make it happen in 3 hours
          Now, we got pretty far with our 100 IQ’s working in networks together, took billions of years of evolution, but now we are starting to take control of the evolution process itself
          imagine what is going to happen once we have the exo cortex? When every average 100 iq’er has got the intellectual capacity of only our smartest members like 1 in 30 has a 130 iq
          and if the exo cortex can increase intellectual capacities by 30 points, there is no reason it couldn’t increase it by 300 points, than 900 and so on..
          stupid people will be a relic. When i read an author from the 1800’s and i see how smart they are, it shocks me that these fellas were more intelligent than most folks that exist today, hence their writings survived centuries, but that will change
          Ugly people will also be a relic, advances in cosmetic techniques will make the ugliest of women look great, which means the SMV will be re-balanced , technology will solve ugliness and stupidity, technology is the fruit which the human race produces,
          it will continue

15. Contrary to this article, many leftists like to call us conservatives fascist. Conservatives are similar to fascists in that they tend to be more nationalistic, but that is about where the similarities end.
    In the vast majority of other areas, as the article notes, modern liberalism is much closer to fascism that modern conservatism.

    1. Theyre all leftist scum.

    2. The difference between right wing fascism and left wing fascism is that right wing fascism occasionally works. Empires are forged if even only for a short time.
       The leftist vision, even if fully realized, is still a shithole where people are only equal.

       1. I’ve always viewed fascism similarly to Franco. It’s a powerful (and dangerous) tool and occasionally a necessary evil, but not per se a complete philosophy. It is as sinister or as benign as the interest group at the helm.

    3. Fascism is of the left, by the left. It’s not some interchangeable term, like an insult or something. It’s their thing, period.

       1. Wrong. Virtually all fascist governments have been extremely conservative, and conservative organisations in the past have supported fascism. Only now that fascism is a dirty word have they tried to shed their association with it. The left absolutely hates fascists. Read a book you lying dirtbag.

          1. What do you define as “conservative”? Are going off the 1-d left-center-right political line? What version of the line are you using (left=collectivist, right=individualist; left=anarchy, right=totalitarian)? What about the 2-d political map, with authoritarians-libertarians on opposing sides of the y-axis, and collectivism-individualism on opposing sides of the x-axis?
             Not defining your terms and insulting people are a surefire way of people not taking you seriously.

          2. Bullshit. Even as the Russian Army was surrounding Berln, Goebels was writing demands to the Reich’s finance ministers that they make taxes even more progressive. Goering bragged at Nuremburg about putting rich people to death for trying to flee the country with assets. He was actually proud of it.
             The Nazis really meant the Socialist part of National Socialism.
             And that really galls you. Watching you put your fingers in your ears and shout “La la la la” when someone points this out is amusing.

          3. Is this a serious comment? You have to be trolling.

          4. Ok fair play. Fascist governments are typified by state corporatism, a strong love of tradition, hierarchy, order, and nationalism. All conservative traits.

          5. You are forgetting something very important. ALL Communist and Socialist regimes are very conservative, patriotic (in the case of USSR, China, N Korea, The Eastern Block, DDR and Yugoslavia – Nationalistic) and CLOSED.
             Internationalism in action meant – diplomatic and economic relationships with other countries part from COMINTERNA (the Communist International).
             “Real Internationalism” as open borders, welfare for the non-natives is practiced only from rich, first world capitalist countries.
             What’s the difference between a commie from DDR or USSR than a modern day neo-nazi?
             Both want socialist economy (I am myself a neo-nazi, i don’t want Capitalism)
             Both have negative views toward homosexuality (In all commie regimes, Homesexuality is perceived as sickness. And in USSR Homosexuality was seen as product of the West)
             Both have negative attitude toward Christianity (the far-right/neo-nazi groups from Eastern Europe are burning churches:
             https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_52lzqpwc64)
             Both support closed borders. USSR was made up from many different Republics, the borders were guarded.
             YOU from other hand, western hipster leftists are indeed completely seperate thing from real Communism.

          6. I’m a clinical bibliophile you stupid cunt. 100 books a year. Call me a liar in 3,2,1…I don’t give a shit.
             “Read a book,” he says to a bibliophile.
             Here’s a book for you;
             http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascism-American-Mussolini-Politics/dp/0767917189/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1427593654&sr=8-3&keywords=jonah+goldberg
             You couldn’t be more wrong. You’re viewing life through image prisms instead of logic. MEDIOCRE. And you’re the exact kind of stooge that the left runs over so easily So some dictator from 70 years ago in a three-piece suit is ‘conservative’ to you because of how you see the world through image-based prisms. Meanwhile a liberal with his goatee and free-flowing mane of hair is very image of freedom for your infantile, TV-saturated brainstem. You’ve mistaken fashion for political ideology. You’ve mistaken ‘legalizing pot’ as the very hallmark of ‘freedom’ but it’s just an issue meant to deflect the attention of dummies like you from the growing tyranny.
             Here’s another book, TV man;
             http://www.amazon.com/Amusing-Ourselves-Death-Discourse-Business/dp/014303653X/ref=la_B000AQ1U26_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1427593862&sr=1-1
             Read them both you big reader you.

          7. He defines ‘conservative’ by a snap impression he makes of their photo. If they have short hair and a necktie on then they’re conservative to big brain Karl here.

          8. Jonah Goldberg. Go to Amazon right now.

          9. Your logic surrender and failure to rebut my examples is noted.

          10. No, he actually believes the nonsense he posts.

16. What do red pillers want as a form of government. Part of me tells me that giving those modern liberals, feminists and SJW retards a voice was a huge mistake considering the damage they have done. I would have picked a red pilled form of fascism.

    1. ” . . . giving those modern liberals, feminists and SJW retards a voice was a huge mistake considering the damage they have done.”
       The rantings of the village idiot do me no harm, so I have need to oppress him into silence.
       Now, if I were to listen to him carefully and heed his advice I might well live to regret it, but would curse only myself as the idiot.

    2. Other than undoing the damage of feminism, red pill theory isn’t that political. Its more about gender dynamics.

    3. Social Justice Warriors are based on the US Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution. They are the heirs of Jefferson, Washington and Lincoln.

17. This will be long but read it:
    Although I said I wasn’t going to comment for a while, I have to say this article is fantastic and really gets to the heart of political truths. Fascism and communism really have their origins in the progressive movements of purity over 400 years ago in the USA and Great Britain. They always say that fascism is the merger of state and corporate power which I find to be a curiously false mischaracterization. It is the merger of state and corporate power in the same sense that Soviet Union was the “merger” of state and corporate power. In that the State absorbed the businesses, yea some “merger” that is, it’s like saying if one day Apple went bankrupt and Microsoft bought it out, it would be a “merger”. Technically, but not really.
    Ultimately delving into the heart of fascist economics you enter into a profoundly left-wing system where the State says what businesses survive and thrive, and which will fail. All businesses had to be contributing either monetarily or physically to the strength of the State in an immense way. Say anything that goes against fascist rhetoric and see yourself out of a job, possibly persecuted. Sounds like leftism right? Everyone should be entitled to their beliefs right? Hah! What a joke.
    Again like I said since western secular democracy is a mutant of Calvinist, theological, deterministic doctrine in an earlier comment, it remains. You are absolutely correct that these political ideologies of fascism, communism(and it’s cousin socialism), and Western secular democracy have caused infinitely more death, suffering, destruction, and hardship worldwide then any religion has ever done, especially in the last two centuries. Although it is foolish to judge the merits of a political system based on body bags, it is imperative to never support the sheer ruthlessness of progressives. We in the West can no longer rely on Christianity (as if we would trust a group of people that’s been cowardly and stabbed us in the back at every opportunity by not adamantly fighting things like no-fault divorce, alimony, child support, etc.) so we looked towards these “Political Religions”. The state is the God and its will is law. However all of these moves towards violence, censorship, and repression are at least obvious to people looking at fascist and communist countries. In the West progressive fury remains a sinister and silent tyranny that has slowly infected and taken over everything, one that may be even worse than some of the worst abuses in human history.
    It’s hard to say what government I support, but fascism, communism, and Western secular democracy all lead to the same Orwellian future. Obviously these doctrines need to be scrapped and replaced immediately if we are to save the world from utter annihilation. The realistic best system(at least I can think of now) would be a strong technocracy that places a huge emphasis on morals, work ethic, gender roles, and everything else. Unfortunately most technocrats lean towards progressive policies so that might have to be scrapped. Instead perhaps we need to re-visit religious systems (I can’t believe I’m saying this as an atheist though) because the people need some visible moral fabric.
    This running around where everyone figures out their moral compass is entirely absurd, particularly in a progressive society that always moves the goalposts. The idea that every intelligent and moral man between the ages of 16-25 goes through a existential crisis when without realizing that the progressive nature itself is the cause of the problem is absurd. In a high functioning society men wouldn’t be worried about these issues, it would be solved for him, taught by parents, and he would be able to focus on job skills, career attributes, gaining wealth, and learning about the world. Not in some post-modern shithole, immoral, working in a cubicle, eating unhealthy food, laying around, addicted to tv/phone/internet, a bitch in every way, and I would even say learning game in that theoretical society would be an unbelievable waste of time. Why? Most women would be chaste until marriage spare for prostitutes to gain some experience. I mean think about it, kingdoms in Europe, Asia, middle east, the native Americans, and even some other parts lasted for millennium. These new political religions have existed for a few centuries and already they are teetering dangerously on the brink of failure every day. Not to mention that none of these would be possible without massive increases in resource use and environmental degradation. In a low-resource economy feudalism or kingdoms makes a lot more sense because the need for a central economy is non-existent. In this theoretical society would also have to thoroughly reject all high-minded, egalitarian ideals as the basis for governance and remain stringent. It would be Machiavellian down to a tee and fairly once and for all recognize that progressive governments do 10x more damage(or more) than that government ever would.
    So what governments currently are the best in this model?
    For non-religious ones I guess Singapore and maybe Hong Kong.
    For religious ones probably Saudi Arabia and Iran. Of course I’ll get shit for this but think about it, why do these countries get so much shit? Simple answer? Because they reject progressive dogma. Learning about the actual life of Mohammed is fascinating, a merchant and a warrior, married an older woman for money and power before marrying an extremely young one. Of course every retarded moron calls him a “pedophile murderer”, ignoring the fact that most women had sex at the time they had their periods. They didn’t have the medical privileges to wait until they were 35 to start popping out children especially considering many of them would die. Murder is a bullshit word too, what religion doesn’t have blood on its hands? Ignoring the people who were also murdered for practicing Islam in the 600s, apparently the pagan Arabian rulers their didn’t like this fledgling religion. I’d take Mohammed any day as a religious leader over Jesus, who was a magic trick peddling loser performing embarrassingly small miracles(instead of let’s say turning the desert into arable farm land? No? Oh okay I guess feeding 500 people is okay). The Iranian Revolution of 1979 is a fascinating case study of a conservative, reactionary, and religious movement (three wonderful things) throwing out the secular, progressive, and US-Britain backed Shah. You can read about all of the damaging socially left policies that Shah imposed on the people. Saudi Arabia is the same reasoning, always getting shit on for supposedly being “backward and violent”. As opposed to the “enlightened”, “progressive”, and “forward” dogmas of Western secular democracy, fascism, and communism? Right. Let that sink in. If Saudi Arabia ever replaced their government with a corrupt democracy it would probably kill more of it’s own people in 5 years than the kingdom did in several decades, maybe in even less time.

    1. “The state is the God and its will is law.”
       I have been pointing out for about 20 years that the left is simply the New Calvinism. However, as I have written in these very pages, the state is not the God. History is the name of God.
       The state is only The Church. Of course it is the The Church that speaks for God and enforces God’s Law. How conveeeeenient.

       1. I had the epiphany while reading some wonderful things about the Dark Enlightenment, I was sick of sexual strategy, I needed more answers and I found them. They made perfect sense with reality but they were disheartening to say the least. I say the state is God simply because they want the State to do everything, be an entity beyond judgement(so long as it supports progressive doctrine), and be used a tool to threaten those who disobey. Your not going to hell for your thought crimes but you will be ostracized, destroyed, and ruined.

          1. Mine came when dealing, as a conservationist and ecologist (remember that quaint, old fashioned word?), with the rise of the Environmentalists in the mid 90’s.
             I had already come to the realization that Marxism was a religion (History is a supernatural force prosecuting a plan; i.e., a god), but the environmentalists had this as the central tenet of their dogma:
             That man is a special, inherently and uniquely debased creation.
             And with that tenet in place the dogma of the left became indistinguishable from Calvinism. They’ve changed the proper nouns and redressed the stage, but anyone familiar with story structure can see that the dogma is just a Western done over as a Space Opera.

       2. Yep the Left have become the NeoPuritans in a lot of ways. The secular Left worship the state. It’s their religion and their clergy are the bureaucrats and their pulpits the cubicle.

    2. You’ve made many solid points, and I agree with most of this. But while your head’s in the right place, I believe admiring the theocracies of Iran and Saudi Arabia as state models is off-base here, given the overwhelming negatives involved. Hey, I’m with you on rejecting progressive dogma, but any totalitarian system so intrinsic to forcing a body of thought upon its populace can’t be the answer.
       Particularly if you’re an atheist (who admittedly sees the value in various aspects of religion), I can’t see how you’d feel comfortable living in the bold reality of either country. Islam may not be a religion of “compulsion,” but living under Sharia law in such a state is. There’s a reason why twenty five countries have populations well over 90% Muslim — core Islamic teachings are intolerant towards other groups and preach subjegation.
       I’m surprised that you’ve studied the life of Mohammed and come away with such a positive picture. Yes, all religions may have blood on their hands, but none were founded by a leader who abandoned messages of peace to practice war mongering, slave trading and torture. The root of the problem we have with all jihadists is that they’re simply following their example of the Prophet, their idealization of the perfect man. Is it any wonder the endless militant groups out to re-establish and expand “the caliphate” do so with such zeal, and come from such diverse backgrounds? Who would travel around the world, leaving so-called comfort behind, to join in such savagry? There may be many motivating factors involved but at the core they’re blinded by an ideology rooted in violence. The theocratic states of Iran, Saudi Arabia, and others of their ilk are just the more organized extensions.
       Not saying I have the answers here, and I can appreciate the bulk of your arguments, but I had to strongly dissent on these particular points.

       1. Overwhelming negatives? I mean the Western media has done a great job demonizing these Middle Eastern states to believe that. Any society is going to have negatives, the question is do those negatives destroy the society, or has it gone on for hundreds if not thousands of years? We can pretend that we could live in a peaceful world with the progressives but you would have to ignore the last 4-5 centuries of history. What these countries established was a way of life that has worked for thousands of years and it not nearly as “backward” and “savage” as the media portrays. I mean I think in the West that child support is pretty backward and savagely enforced by the state, does that make the West backward? Yes, it does. Because these characterizations of the Middle East are simply based on the modern liberal progressive platform. Since these countries reject progressive dogma (like men and women being equal in every way) they get shit on. If I lived in the Middle East and was conservative there I would probably think the West was backward for enforcing these anti-male laws.

    3. I also with you for most of what you stated until you started going on about Mohammed. I don’t people who call him a pedophile murderer say that just because he was alive in 600AD and that was OK for his time. It is in part unlike let’s say Alexander of Macedon who rape and kill people, most us may only praise him for his military tactics and either ignore the killing, rape and other crimes or criticize it. Mohammed is seen in Islam as the last prophet. Young Muslims are told in the Qur’an that they should emulate Mohammed since he is the prefect Muslim. You are not aloud to criticize God, Mohammed, the Qur’an and other things listed. You cannot draw a picture of Mohammed. Also you can not get not leave the religion that is apostasy and the punishment for apostasy is death. This applys to people who are not muslims or better known as infidels. This is in part why event like the Charlie Hebdo attack happen and the cartoonist is because the terrorist were following the rules and belifes set by the Qur’an and felt rightist to attack those who criticize.

18. Good article. Anyone with just a bit more than a superficial knowledge of fascism knows that it is an ideology of the left, counter to conservative/libertarian philosophy, and describes Obama and his SJW crowd almost perfectly.
    The reason the current tide of Yes We Can fascism has not succeeded is simply because of the momentum of free market capitalism initiated in the 1980’s, combined with high levels of gun ownership, and the bulwark of a military that still takes its oath to protect the Constitution somewhat seriously. But all of these things can change very quickly.
    Obama will not realize his dream of being the new ruler for life. But a millennial jerk-off practicing her SJW vocabulary today might well realize the dream in 20 or so years.

    1. Equalism is a Leftist scourge with the bottomless pit of spending we do to try and make everyone equal and then blaming it on racism when outcomes aren’t equal .

    2. Incredible that you even think Obama is left wing. Also, you want to back up your statements or just spew crap? Conservatism is all about forcing specific values upon society and not letting people do what they want. Goes hand in hand with fascism. The ‘free market capitalism’ in the 80s had nothing to do with actual free market capitalism and a lot to do with crony capitalism. It also began America’s downfall.

       1. Obama was raised by a ditzy white hippie chick, and her communist parents.
          If this means he is somewhat to the right of you, then you apparently stand with the communist fucktards who murdered 120 million people last century chasing their utopian unicorn.
          And I actually agree that American Crapitalism has nothing to to with the free market. My ideas of what constitutes a free market would scare the crap out of you.

          1. You might want to look at what Obama actually does before declaring him left wing. He’s comparable to Bush. He’s supposed to be on the left but he doesn’t implement any such policies. Even Obamacare is just a way to make people buy insurance, not actual universal healthcare.
             I’ve argued with a lot of lolbertarians. I like arguing with them because I know that in reality they’re pasty white dorks with a bad taste in literature, and that their ludicrous philosophy is so patently ridiculous that it will never come to fruition. Free market ideas are absurd.

          2. Mr, only a simon pure anarcho-syndicalist like yourself feels that Obama is a right-wing politician.
             Your kinda out there alone in your small group.

    3. If (and/or when) the policies of the fascists cause a collapse of society and order, don’t be surprised to see the useful idiots dying out first. With no tangible real world skills and being known manipulators, I would not expect the SJW types surviving very long in a situation where jungle law is the norm.

19. I am getting really tired of the Orwellian language used by the SJW nazis… They try to censor everything and constantly lie and contradict themselves.

    1. Agree. Your rebuttal should always be “free speech” (in the U.S., anyways) to any SJW attack or counter when you make your comments or opinion. They hate to hear it and they’ll never have a good comeback (because it’s that exact free speech which has given them a voice).

20. Republican = Democrat = Fascist = Communist
    Same results – different talk.

21. The further right you get, the closer to anarchy (no government) you get. The furthet left, the closer to totilitarianism you get. Libertarianism is the closest you can get while still having a government. Todays RINOs are leftists. They believe in big government just not in the same way as liberals. But its the same result: more government and less freedom. They all need to be killed. Every 15 years, a large number of government officials need to be killed. That is the only way to stop them before they begin.

    1. Wow how do you remember to breathe? I…that’s… jesus christ you’re retarded.

       1. He’s a bit more radical than most. Thomas Jefferson advocated a revolution every 20 years or so.

22. I’ve said it before, the left is far more dangerous than ISIS or any threat from Islamic militant groups. Nations and societies ALWAYS die from within first. The left pushes moral relativism, nihilism, and degeneracy under the banner of justice, equality, and fairness.

    1. Right – always kill the traitor first.

    2. Your closed-mindedness is a bigger problem. Maybe if people like you weren’t so idiotic and uneducated the world would be a better place.

       1. That always works well. Tell people you disagree with that they are all a bunch of cousin-humping redneck retards, and then expect them to agree with you.
          Have you always been this socially retarded, or did it require indoctrination?

          1. Some people’s comments are not worth anything other than an insult.

          2. Truth. Your’s are a good example.

          3. One thing that pisses me off is that it’s perfectly acceptable to criticize whites with terms like redneck, white trash,hillbilly, et al.
             But we cannot ever say certain terms for certain ethnicities, blacks and jews in particular. While in my experience those two groups as a whole are far more conscious of race and aren’t afraid to say it.
             BULL FUCKING SHIT.
             If they call me white trash, then by God I can call them whatever I want.
             I don’t stoop to that initially. Just like I don’t initiate force against others. But when they initiate force against me unprovoked, then I will bring it back to them with every fiber of my being.
             I just want to be left alone. I don’t need their help, and I can succeed or fail on my own merit — especially if they’d take their fucking hands out of my wallet and take the government gun out of my face. I don’t need Affirmative action or a lowered a test score — because I am a white male I don’t get that anyway.
             The time for conformity and compliance is over.
             Speak the truth. Take time to learn things NOT from the TV. Put down your smartphone, close your facebook account, stop watching sports, and stop supporting the machine that is enslaving us with your money.
             Until we do that en masse, we are looking toward a future where we, the white men, are the ones that are destined for the cattle cars and Arbecht Macht Frei.
             Not this white man.
             Thank God for the 2nd Amendment. America’s original Homeland Security.

       2. One of the shaming tactics of the left and enablers of degeneracy. Stand for values and call out leftist trojan horses and your labled “closed minded,” the old relic of a bygone era. Sorry, but not biting. I stand by my proposition.

          1. “Open your mind” sounds like something a cult leader would say…

       3. The world will never be a “better place” that’s the problem. People like you seek out an utopia like someone seeking water in the desert. Remember, Hitler was considered an educated man.
          The truth is that having an open-mind only makes you easier to corrupt, a close-mind is the sign of someone who never wavers to a snake’s silver tounge.
          If I said you should have an open mind about allowing grown men to have sex with children, would you? NO!
          “A man should never open his mind to others because everyone lives to decieve him and term him from his path.” Wise words…

    3. I’m not particularly liberal, and agree that many “relativist” arguments are dangerous, but really? You’re more afraid of democratically elected left wing politicians than you are of a group who put their enemies in cages and set them on fire? Really?

       1. We should worry for the enemy within.
          It is the so called leftists who justify Islamic Terrorism and tolerate immigration from very hostile Islamic countries.
          The moderate leftie part from the Status Quo in the long therm is much more dangerous than the loony muslim from IS

       2. Yes really. The covert talking points and ideology of the left is far more dangerous because it plays on decent men’s natural longing for things like justice and fairness. The policies and ideologies of the left manifest themselves in business, culture, and law according to which the masses hold their beliefs. This is done from a very early age.
          Given enough time, these trojan horses that I just described will cause the spiritual death of millions in this country which will ultimately lead the US to ruin.
          Overt displays of aggression such as bombings and immolation of people are very easily identifiable. Such enemies are separated by geography. There is no possibility of an invasion.
          I’m a firm believer that spiritual deaths of a nation’s people precedes physical death of a nations people, economy, values, and culture. Like AIDS. AIDS doesn’t kill the host, it kills the immune system which is then vulnerable to attacks to benign ailments such as the flu or even a cold.

    4. You’re right, if you look at every major society’s collapse it all started the we have. History will always repeat itself, no one’ll believe until it happens. We’ve more or less enslaved ourselves under the banner of justice and equality.
       Forcing ourselves to accept everything and challenge nothing will only lead us to ruin.

23. Fascism will return, as anti-fascism.
    Winston Churchill

    1. Thats interesting- do you know why and when he said this?

       1. Just Googled it and apparently it’s falsely attributed.
          Shit, sorry

       2. When Fascism comes to America, it will (be in the name of/come under the guise of/be called) anti-Fascism!”
          Attributed to Huey Long in 1935 by various writers in 1938-1943

          1. You right. Most of these people writing about Fascism coming to America in the form of anti-Fascism study their history. The Roman republic was very anti monarchy through most of their history. When Rome become an empire and power went to one man, the title was Emperor not king. The first Emperor Julius Caesar made sure to convice the people he was not a King since the roman republic history was founded after rebelled against the King. This is similar to the founding of USA

24. “The blind leading the blind”
    The leftist/marxist/feminist fascists are most easily recognized by their deliberate perversion of truth and fact. Their newspapers and propaganda carefully cultivate every fissure of disunity, every crack in the common front against fascism.
    If there is ever a leftist/marxist/feminist fascist takeover , it will come not in the form of storm troopers kicking down doors but with lawyers and social workers saying. “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.
    “History always repeats itself.”

25. I see a lot of talk about god and traditional christian values in these comment boards. Ive said it before and I’ll say it again there is NO FUCKING WAY you can claim to be a red piller and be religious. Religion epitomizes groupthink, conformity,coercion and blind sheep blue pill sucker mentallity. You can be alpha and be religious but not red pill. Red pill is discarding all the bullshit institutions that we’ve been fed that have ALL failed us.Grow up,get some balls and realize you’re on your own and move on. By the way there is no Santa Claus or easter bunny.

    1. Translation: religion is too mainstream and I want to be edgy, so I’ll hook up with Dick Dawkins and his boys, since there’s no groupthink happening in the League of Militant Atheists, no siree.

    2. Agreed! Religious belief is the only socially accepted form of psychosis. ‘Believers’ possess unhealthy minds thus should not be looked upon for advice especially in any subject within the ‘red pill’ arena.

    3. I’ll agree that Christian religious institutions today are bastions of betaness and have failed men.
       What about in centuries before? The Crusades, the Inquisition, and other religious wars. Are you telling me the men who fought on either side, Muslim, Jew and Christian, were blue pill suckers? They were willing to die and kill for their beliefs, right or wrong. What are you willing to die for?
       If anything atheists are now mirroring religious institutions in their adherence to dogma. They are no better than religious with their fervour for anti belief. I see atheist “groupthink” salivating over feminism, homosexual rights, and all the other sjw belief systems. They are as much the beta bitches as many Christians.

    4. I disagree. There is strong red pill wisdom in the bible. If you take the book as metaphor, Proverbs alone be the source of 20 ROK articles. When feminists and other cultural marxists call the bible “misogynistic”, they’re actually right.
       I do agree though that many “christians” are beta as fuck and many denominations have a huge blind spot re: feminism. It’s very difficult now to find a patriarchal church that isn’t infected with cultural marxism, but I believe in its purest form, Christianity and the traditional values associated with it were responsible for creating America’s halcyon era (1800s-1960s). Replacing Christianity with race/gender ‘equality’, feminism, welfare checks, free reign hypergamy and technology worship has gotten us to where we are today: Circling the drain and waiting for the final push into societal collapse.

26. The left owns fascism. Most fascist governments of the last 200 years have been left wing. They just don’t own up to their own failures because “muh good intentions”.
    And for good reason. Ideological leftism has never been held by more than a few cranks in any society. They only way they could try to realize their own utopian myths is by fascism

    1. Demonstrably wrong on every account. Virtually all fascist governments have been right-wing. You make a shitty statement, back it the fuck up.
       Ideological leftism, an extremely broad category, makes up the majority of the world’s populations political views. Leftists are also more likely to be more intelligent and better educated. There’ a reason most scientists and professors are left wing and most dipshits are right wing. Also, ironically, the most successful leftist society was an anarchist one, not a fascist one. How is it possible to be so wrong? That’s my question.

       1. Calling Mussolini and Hitler right wing does not erase their history as industry nationalizing socialists. FDR’s National Recovery Act was a deliberate and exact copy of Mussolini’s program, and FDR’s kitchen cabinet thought he was an exemplar … until he sided with Hitler.
          The truth just reveals the depth of your embarrassment.

          1. I don’t know if you’re aware of this, but you’re taking a minority opinion that is so laughable that its not even considered worth debating about. To claim that Hitler was a socialist is like saying a kid is a tiger because one time he had his face painted like one. It’s absolutely absurd and if you said that in public you would literally be laughed at.
             http://europeanhistory.about.com/od/germanyandprussia/fl/Was-Adolf-Hitler-a-Socialist-Debunking-a-Historical-Myth.htm
             You are shameless.

          2. The sources you give are biased. It’s like me giving you a far-right source… would you read them? Would you take them seriously?
             No, right?
             This is your source, written by mushy liberal, anti-NS person
             “(Neil Gregor, Nazism, Oxford, 2000 p 4-5.)”
             Be honest. Do you trust definitions of Marxism written by Anti-Marxists?
             Then why, do you expect – Nationalists to accept descriptions of NS written by Anti-Nazis?
             It doesn’t work that way…

          3. I have said nothing to be ashamed of. And citing some fellow socialist apologist is not a proper cite, just more of the same propaganda.

       2. Stalin, Pol Pot, Tito, Mao, Ceaucescu, Castro, the Kims etc are all right wing? That’s news to me.
          Most of the world would be right wing conservatives by American standards. Academia is usually more intelligent than rural folks, that’s no surprise. Are the leftist academics more intelligent than nationalists or corporatists? Doubtful. These are people who think equality is real, keep in mind.
          And there is no such thing as a successful leftist society – only capitalist ones that lapse into leftism over time. My question is, how is possible to be so butthurt? Read your own comments

          1. Because pointing out the word socialism in “National Socialism”, and providing examples of Hitler’s socialist policies is a great troll for leftists.
             They are so used to using fascist as their favorite slur that they become completely unhinged when you prove their fascism.

          2. Depends on which axis you use. There is a difference between Thatcher and Friedman, but both could be said to be on the right. Same with Pol Pot and Gandhi on the left. Fascism is a specific form of government, not simply a level of totalitarianism.
             Well, yes, if IQ means anything to you, left-wing people are correlated with higher scores and better education. Right-wing people are correlated with fearful, primitive reactions, lower IQ scores and a propensity to believe in the supernatural. In all serious, there are intelligent right-wingers. Several of my friends are. On the whole however, most of them are uneducated and simple minded.
             Nobody believes that everybody is literally equal. That’s a preposterous statement. Even if it were true it couldn’t be quantified. What intelligent people are saying is that people should be treated equally.
             That’s all a matter of definition. For one, even most people in favour of capitalism will concede that there are virtually no truly capitalist societies. Western countries are mixed market social democracies, and third world countries are countries with relatively free markets and no government assurance to their populations. The absolute best countries in the world are countries like Sweden, Australia, Norway, and so on. I’m butthurt because there are so many people who are so incredibly misinformed. Fuck yeah I’m butthurt dealing with dickheads.

          3. >Nobody believes that everybody is literally equal.
             Unfortunately, that is most untrue. Western academia is infatuated with inherent, literal equality. Hence the constant need to diminish any difference as merely social constructs or products of environment, which in turn leads to the assumption that disparate outcomes automatically imply injustice, then misguided attitudes based on that assumption. What you call equal treatment is generally accepted on the right as a form of fairness – the equality in Death to Equality is not equal rights or equal opportunity.
             This site, for example, rejects the notion that gender is merely a performance, and that differences between men and women are at least partially grounded in biology. Does the left in your country accept this? Because it appears to me that despite grudging acknowledgement, everything they say is an attempt to edge public belief closer to absolute, inborn equalism.
             Granted “leftism” outside of the West is mostly worker’s rights and not teenage girls with social justice tumblrs, but still, that shit spreads. It has to be fought.

       3. Pretty much every assertion you just made was completely false! Historical truth is not your strong point, obviously. You seem to have everything about 180° off. Just becouse you wish it were true does not make it so. “There are none so blind as he who will not see”!

       4. The UK Tory party and Labour party are both extremely fascist parties. They are both left wing. If you want to see left wing fascism look at Britain.

27. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrH1Y7Jf59E

    1. That was nice, Joe.
       People watch this one. Some valuable stuff here.

       1. When men married women like you want to die sooner.. Good one.

    2. Rudov caved in to the pressure; he pulled his site down.

    3. Rudov is too intellectually honest. Women hate that.

28. The author can be proved empirically wrong.The best time the US had was between 1940 and 1968.It was the time of the New Deal which means dirigism.The time after 1970 was the time of its downfall and in coincides with the application of liberalism in economics.The author wants a small state ? Well he has a small state already.There are already almost no taxes on the rich.The financial markets are deregulated.Free trade is the rule.The results are deindustrialisation,a large deficit,a shrinking middle class,an unfit work force.wild swings in the markets and huge bubbles of speculation and many more.Switzerland on the contrary is a fully dirigistic state.It has no small government but its population is rich.It has a very high minimum wage,full mandatory healthcare,a regulated market,full social security.If the authors assumption would be right Switzerland would perform worst,Somalia the best.Further more China proves that a middle class can be created with a rather “big” government.The middle class in China not only grows it also gets richer opposite to Europe and the US.Russia under Putin recovered with more regulations and more state opposed to the liberal times of Jelzin when 95% of the population suffered.The author is mixing up cultural marxism with old school communism,socialism,national socialism,facism.What he is seeing in the US today is the result of limitless liberalism.Liberalism is a self defeating ideology in Europe too.Gender science,feminism,low birth rates,mass immigration,cultural pessimism,deindustrialisation,breaking up the family,high crime rates,dysfunctional justice system,educational regression,fast food are all trademarks of liberalism.Decay is liberalism.

    1. ..where to begin

       1. The man has strong point hence why you don’t know where to begin.

    2. Tough to compare Switzerland to the USA.Switzerland a small postage stamp sized country, homogenous population etc. Plus what have the Swiss accomplished? cuckoo clocks, chocolate and Rolexes. Go Switzerland.

    3. These people do not know anything about politics. They are simple minded and use meaningless buzzwords like cultural marxist. I doubt any of them have ever seriously studied politics, or any academic discipline for that matter. People like them work at gas stations.

       1. Translation: “Shut up, peasants”, he explained.
          It would be just too damned bad if all of us peasants wised up to what you so-called “intellectuals” were really up to. The lot of you would end up in exile, at best, in short order.

          1. Truth hurts bro.

          2. Yes. It hurts liars and the self deluded.

    4. Nope. The US was still seriously stuck in FDR’s Keynesian-worsened Depression until WWII. Other countries in Europe that had instituted austerity measures had escaped the depression by 1935. America’s pain dragged on due to FDR’s stupidity.
       America’s greatest growth was after WWII, when the rest of the world was in a shambles, and the US was the last intact industrial power.
       Wages and growth didn’t really take off until Kennedy seriously cut the WWII vintage tax rates.
       The death knell for America was Johnson’s Great Society, and its institutionalization of spendthrift behavior by government.

29. History of leftism:
    1776: the Geneva and the American revolutions.
    Founding documents of leftism:
    – The US Declaration of Independence,
    – The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen.

30. As a fascist I would have to say that your understanding of fascism is a bit half baked.
    Plus using anyone named “Goldberg” as a source suggests you have a pre-existing bias. I mean come on.
    You don’t even understand what fascists mean when they say “the state”
    To a fascist the state incorporates everything. The people, the private companies, the government, the charities, etc. The state is the totality of society.

    1. Lol, and you have an anime avatar. Walking stereotype.

       1. You don’t even have one. If it would make you feel better I have a picture of Hitler eating a melon

          1. Leftist always resort to ad hominem when their lack of logic is exposed.

          2. Oh come now. It’s a tad unfair to say he’s a leftist based on that one comment.
             While it is probable he’s the very living stereotype of a modern neo-liberal I think we should at least give him the opportunity to prove this is the case before we tar him with such a brush.

          3. He thinks Obama is right wing, from his other comments here.
             Q.E.D.

          4. Considering the average level of political ignorance is high these days and that really the modern left and modern right are effectively interchangeable with the only real difference being their lies.
             I would not be surprised to hear people saying such things.
             Although really can Obama be called left wing? He certainly doesn’t fit there either except in the context of a neo-liberal who really shouldn’t be called left wing to begin with.
             ~EDIT~
             Also having perused his comment history only briefly it seems this is his first time commenting online. Bless his dear heart he certainly has thrown himself into it with a gusto.

          5. That’s a common opinion among political scientists. It’s not controversial at all. He’s certainly not a champion of the left.

          6. Sir, I think you’ll find that neo-liberalism refers mostly to laissez-faire capitalism.

          7. Sure it does. But the neo-liberal also pushes the whole “cult of victimhood/SJW thing”

          8. It’s a common opinion amongst anarcho-syndicalists, and Maoist fanatics.
             Calling your small group “political scientists” does not add a lot of credibility.
             Oh, and that logical fallacy is called “appeal to authority”. A very amusing fallacy for an anarchist to fall back on.

31. The modern left is built on narratives. When the narratives fail, “it hasn’t been fully tried yet”.
    Socialism leads to Nationalism. It happened in the Soviet Union as much as Nazi Germany. Its happening right now in Venezuela to gloss over the lack of toilet paper and the lines one must stand in for bread and medicine. Cuba, China, Fascist Italy, Falangist Spain…all are examples of this. The left simply moves the goalposts for their own needs.

    1. All political positions are built on narratives. Moving the goalposts is not an activity solely undertaken by the left.

       1. Conservative-libertarians have a very fixed goal post. Leave people alone. Or else.

32. I disagree with the article.
    Fascism is distinct from communism in that it does not claim to want to spread freedom and rationality throughout the world, it claims that men can be molded through sacrifice and discipline, that material possessions were not the most important thing in life and that myth, faith and symbolism motivated men to fight and achieve great things. National tradition combined with a belief in a nationalistic rebirth mix together to a form society which has a powerful belief in the superiority of its heritage and a drive to regenerate itself from the decadency of liberalism.
    Compare this to a modern liberal who prides himself on his secularism and rationality, who claims to believe in equality, freedom and democracy, who is anti racist, pro gay, pro choice and you can see that fascists and liberals are polar opposites and natural enemies.

    1. This article isn’t about defining Communism and Fascism. It’s just a counter against Liberals comparing the Conservatives to Fascists by grouping the Communism and Fascism together so that Liberals become the ‘Fascist’. Basically, this is all just pseudo-intellectual name calling competition.

    2. “Fascists and liberals are polar opposites” Ha ha. That’s rich. That’s funny.
       Btw, explain how liberals ‘believe in freedom.’ Is it because they’re called ‘liberals’? Do you know what overcompensation is? Do you know what deflection is?

       1. My exact words were that liberals claim “to believe in equality, freedom and democracy”. I refer to political freedom, that can be summed up in the notion that one can do what one wants, free from oppression and coercion. That is the liberal idea of freedom and it is distinctly different from fascism. In any case I am not claiming to be a liberal.

    3. Totally agree with you. I think most of our American friends here are biased towards Germany as they fought against her. Germany at the time was the only hope for the civilised masculine tradition to be preserved and flourished.
       The decline started exactly with the end of WW2.

    4. “Compare this to a modern liberal who prides himself on his secularism and rationality”
       An unthinking secularism that can sometimes trample over the freedom of conscience, that I will grant you. However there is nothing rational about modern liberalism – much of it, especially feminism, prides itself on irrationality; on the belief that human beings and societies can be endlessly changed and reprogrammed due to the intensity of the emotions of the modern left; they routinely refuse to engage with serious study and use of statistics, insist history is irrelevant, ignore academic standards ideas about proof and will just blame everything on conspiracy theory ideas such as “the patriarchy”.

    5. Anti-racist = Hating white men
       Pro-Gay = Pro-perversion/NAMBLA
       Pro-Choice = As any sane far-right winger. Liberals are walking abortions… this shit is on the next level: Euthanasia
       “Liberalism” is simply a Suicide/Cuckold cult for the White “men”.

33. I long for the day when people will drop this bullshit Left-Right paradigm and unite against the government. Really, what does this article even accomplish other than throw around semantics divide people even further?

34. In every case, whether far ‘left’ or far ‘right’ or a precarious middle ‘balancing beam’, the goon squads are the same. The ‘snitch’ society within a ‘gitmo’ nation on a ‘prison planet’. The state is power over man, heart body and soul. The state never has been and never will be a respecter of family. Every state has enticed its youth to RAT OUT THEIR OWN blood parents. The state encourages its youth to flush their own parents down the toilet and shed any teachings or wisdom from their own father while force feeding SHIT CAKE FOR IDEOLOGY in the state schools. It is all SHIT CAKE taught in state schools in every land left and right, up and down, great and small. SHIT CAKE, like regular ‘birthday’ cake itself isn’t sufficiently devoid of nutrients, SHIT CAKE is the ultimate unhealthy DEATH DIET!!!

35. classical liberalism, libertarianism, free market economics, all nice and well. Sound like great ideas. But just look how the USA has fallen, and been used as a source of evil and oppression worldwide. Clealy not a perfect system. The difference between fascism and communism, was not only internationalism, but the idea that socialism should work not only for those at the top, but for the people as well. Communism was an evil ideology, that murdered good people and crushed them morally, spiritually, economically to create a dumbed down slave class beholden to the will of a corrupt political elite and foreign capitalists. Bolshevism took good, smart, god fearing people and killed them out of fear of competition. Nazism took them and used them to build fast cars, jet engines, rockets, end debt, end unemployment and create abundance. The communists killed millions in an attempt to spread their sick ideology and area of influence. Hitler killed millions in a death struggle with the communists. Don’t even mention them in the same breath without clarifying that one was a total international genocidal scam, while the other was a reaction to that scam and the closest thing to real popular socialism the world has ever seen. Perhaps there is no perfect system, only a perfect people with a perfect leader(s), acting from a position of (near)perfect morality?

    1. yes, and the winners get to write the history books.

    2. Hitler and pre war Germany is perhaps the most misunderstood episode of human history. I think, the original article is rather confused despite the popular approval here.
       Perhaps there is no perfect system, only a perfect people with a perfect leader(s), acting from a position of (near)perfect morality?
       +1000

       1. Did you too watch “Hitler the greatest story never told” ?

          1. Yes and read few old books from the period.

36. If you want a Society of Punishment and Confusion, Vote Liberal Democrat.

37. There’s plenty of fascism on the right too. Neocons are mostly fascist globalists, who pretend that small businesses are the same as the fortune 500 cartels and central bankers that destroy freedom in coordination with the government. The left has embraced fascism too however, as you say.

    1. Neoconservatism arose as a reaction to the New Left. What it seeks to conserve is the old left. The entire American political spectrum has shifted so far to the left that being a left leaning Classical Liberal gives the illusion of being on the right.

       1. ‘What it seeks to conserve is the old left. The entire American political spectrum has shifted so far to the left…’
          WOW. You can’t be serious. Absolutely incredible. No way people are this ignorant.

          1. You forgot to ask me if it was intended as satire.

          2. Hey, this far left retard thinks Obama is conservative … a man raised by a ditzy white communist hippie chick.
             Anything to the right of conservatives like Karl Marx is incomprehensible to him.

          3. Actually Obama is to the right of Richard Nixon, for example, when it comes to policy. I’m not referring to the New Leftard college brat identity anti-white politics, which Obama is a bigoted champion of.

          4. Exactly.

          5. You lack critical thinking skills. I’m not retarded, and you know it. Obviously I’m hitting a nerve seeing as you’re getting so mad.

          6. Check your past comments. You were the one who started the insults.
             If flamewars are bothersome, don’t start them.

       2. I heartily disagree. If they had anything to do with the old left they would give at least half a shit about working class people. They are free trade globalist zealots, and war mongering zionists, steeped in elitism. Anyone who opposes their hyperglobalist policies they malign as a protectionist or a socialist, and anyone who objects to their perpetual war they malign as an isolationist or an anti Semite. You actually could not be more wrong. I remember medved pulling out all the stops and going down in flames for the z visa amnesty plan. His contempt for his audience really showed that week. Oh and medved says neocons don’t exist.

          1. If you had thrown in “Irish Catholic hating” I would have just won Stereotyping Boston Liberal Bingo.

          2. So no real rebuttal then. Thought not

       3. Well that certainly is a trite and meaningless rebuttal. I don’t do left/right arguments anymore. Neocons are globalist free trade war mongers, who don’t care about the impact their policies have on Americans, whether its putting them out of work because of their free trade fixation or sending them to die for the Zionist cause. They deride any critics as protectionist idiots, socialists or antisemites. They are elitist ideologues who cherish their ideas over people.

38. Do you have the nuts to condemn the horrific reality of privatized prisons and the totalitarian incentive that creates? Do you? Do you?

39. “Net Neutrality”
    You were doing so well up to this point.
    The thing is that net neutrality balances out a near monopoly the state already granted over last mile delivery in the form of utility easements and franchise agreements.

    1. Net Neutrality. You may have a point but It still provides the “foot in the door ” for the Feds to mess with and fuck up the internet.

       1. “Feds to mess with and fuck up the internet.”
          They already do, beyond the limits of law.
          Net neutrality simply codifies that the businesses don’t get to do for profit the same shit the NSA already does for “war on terrorism”.

40. There are a lot of good points in this article and I like it very much. However, I don’t think it was properly titled. The “why” in the title signaled, to me at least, a different type of investigation….You have, I believe, successfully (and eloquently) made your point THAT they are, but I do not think you have really hit the root of “why” they are.
    I do not have an answer to that question. I think you should consider another article along, a part II if you will, where you try to uncover the reasons.
    Plato famously believed that no one intended to be evil they just didn’t fully understand the good. I am sure Fems and Liberals and, for that matter, racists, are doing what they think is right. Maybe if we could understand why they think this insanity is right, really understand it, we could begin to undercut it at a very fundamental level.

    1. its by no means accounts for the whole of the pathology but the totalitarianism of the left has a lot to do with the tendency to take a ‘end justifies the means’ approach, which enables them to ride roughshod over any conscientious resistance they meet along the road to utopia. Revolution is and always has been violent or at least coercive rather than democratic. We can thank marx for that.

41. Well if concisely put. Apropos of which, Jonah Goldberg’s book Liberal Fascism is both readable and compelling on this subject.
    It should be a matter of common knowledge that every state identified as fascist by historians has practiced socialist economics while it denied the individual any rights whatsoever. Unfortunately, our educational institutions are so thoroughly colonized by the Left that that bit of information is never made available to our young folks.

    1. Like privatization of public property, destruction of unions and low wages?

       1. Well the last part certainly doesn’t jive with history. Prior to the war the German workers were the best paid in Europe.

42. What an annoying, condescending tone this author takes. Does he really think we are all sipping soy lattes?

43. You’re against net neutrality? Anti-capitalist. Lol. Ok guy.

    1. Anybody who actually has looked into it is against it.

       1. Lol.

44. The problem with the above narrative is two things: (1) it’s jewish and therefore a lie, and (2) National Socialism is not the same thing as fascism (another jewish lie).

45. This is painfully bad history.

46. Who is this faggot/chick/jew that goes by the name Karl?

47. Im honestly convinced the only working form of socialism/fascism with hitlers national socialism. At the least, they protected true masculinity and kept women to their traditional feminine roots, as nurturers and wives, compare that to the allies, who sent their women to the factories, which propelled feminism forward with the delusional idea that working in a factory was liberating compared to being a housewife.

    1. It wasn’t a “working form” I’m afraid.

48. Leftism is a mental disease. There is no cure.

49. There is also a book that explains that the Nazis were mostly homosexuals and pedophiles both actually related to one another especially the elites.

50. You are 100% right in this article, but don’t think you’re the first person to have noticed it. Daniel hannan, who I believe is emerging to be one of the greatest thinkers in the world, wrote about it over 2 years ago.
    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100203076/so-total-is-the-lefts-cultural-ascendancy-that-we-dare-not-mention-the-socialist-roots-of-fascism/

51. Not many people know that this is all by design. “The Third World War must be fomented by
    taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur”
    of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the
    leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such
    a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political
    Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.
    Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue
    will be constrained to fight to the point of complete
    physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We
    shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall
    provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its
    horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of
    absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody
    turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend
    themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries,
    will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the
    multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic
    spirits will from that moment be without compass or
    direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where
    to render its adoration, will receive the true light through
    the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer,
    brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation
    will result from the general reactionary movement which will
    follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both
    conquered and exterminated at the same time.” -Albert Pike (KKK founder i.e. freemason satanist, and original member of the communist party)

52. I’ve long understood fascism and communism both to be on the left side of the spectrum. On the extreme end of the opposite side is anarchy.

53. Actually modern leftist are much more associated with communism, In Spanish, and German fascism women were expected to be mothers and wives, sadly communism and it’s social Marxism it brings put women in work places and pushed for them to embrace feminism like it is now. it shows how tough the Slavic people were to endure so much communism and still be traditional

54. goldberg is just another kike scum rat, jewish neocons like him want to destroy America with WWIII.
    We live under jewish supremacism, the mass Media, Finance are under their control.
    They’re pushing for WWIII with Russia and Iran, no one cares for your political ideology along you look to the jewmedia.

55. If should the author added neo-nazies to his description,I `d aggree.For example: Stormfront`s people also hate the capitalism.Extremes meet.

56. Fascism is identical to modern American conservatism.

    1. Good boy. You get a lolly now 🙂

    2. “Fascism is identical to modern American conservatism.”
       No. That is a lie perpetuated by the American left. American conservativism holds to the USC and the Bill of rights… big one is the 2nd Amendment. An American conservative view is smaller central government, state rights and less federal intervention on local matters. Fascism is completely opposite. Obama is a fascist with his EO dictates as there is on Congressional approval… but that won*t stop the fascist American left.

       1. American conservatism has never actually been about smaller government at all. That’s just a catchphrase used to justify tax cuts for the rich. American conservatism has consistently infringed on the Constitution. But you would never understand that, would you Randroid?

57. Bull Shit!!
    Fourteen Defining
    Characteristics Of Fascism
    By Dr. Lawrence Britt
    Source Free Inquiry.co
    5-28-3
    From Liberty Forum 14. Fraudulent Elections – Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections. 13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption – Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders. 12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment – Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations. 11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts – Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked. 10. Labor Power is Suppressed – Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed. 9. Corporate Power is Protected – The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite. 8. Religion and Government are Intertwined – Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government’s policies or actions. 7. Obsession with National Security – Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses. 6. Controlled Mass Media – Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common. 5. Rampant Sexism – The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution. domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized. 4. Supremacy of the Military – Even when there are widespread 3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause – The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc. 2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights – Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of “need.” The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc. 1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism – Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays. Dr. Lawrence Britt has examined the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia) and several Latin American regimes. Britt found 14 defining characteristics common to each:

58. 1) There is nothing classical liberal about the american conservative right. They treated Ron Paul (the only high profile classical liberal in the last couple decades or more) far worse than Trump who plays the part of a would-be fascist leader well. (if he is or would be isn’t the question, it’s the role he’s playing at the moment)
    2) The USA has been economically fascist since FDR in the 1930s. Since back when fascism was cool.

    1. Don’t confuse the American conservative right with the leadershit (deliberate spelling) of the establishment Republican party.
       Just. Don’t.

59. Correct. It’s all pretty obvious but it’s great that you spelt it out for the minions and morons who think a traditional masculin family man is a facist.

60. Yet again it is obvious when you look at the definitions of words and motivation for fascism and nazi movements.
    Just look at the full name of Nazi party:

    The National Socialist German Workers’ Party (German: About this sound Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (help·info), abbreviated NSDAP)

    You cannot get more obvious than that.

61. Cue the shit posters with cries of, “But but but the Nazis were right wingers and so is fascism and there’s never been any real Communism, you guys!”
    Communism is Socialism is Fascism is the real takeaway. Deal with it. Suck it up, buttercup.

62. This piece reads like the author is a college Republican activist whining about being called a Nazi. Fascism was in fact far more collaborative than most left-leaning historians will let on. The premier book on the subject (Mussolini’s Italy) is full of ignorant misrepresentations that are easily debunked through proper research. Read My Rise and Fall, Italian Foreign Policy Under Mussolini, and From Socialism to Fascism.
    Remember that the fascists restricted the proliferation of homosexuality, protected animal welfare (how is this a bad thing?), and stood firmly against communism. Churchill wanted to ally with the Nazis to destroy the Soviet Union, which was far a above a worse and more devastating regime than any of the fascists combined.
    But they were actually liberal progressive meanies!

63. Fascism is the step in between a “mixed” economy and a command economy (socialism).

64. There is almost no way this terrible fate can be avoided. Trump is the only one who MIGHT be able to stop it but even then it’s a long shot. I fear at best he can only buy us some time. We can only build strong bonds with red pill people and network if we want to make this survivable. Gun ownership and sensible planning will also help.

65. Leftist liberals have a delusional belief that religion (christianity mainly) oppresses people and that we’d be living in a utopian society if God and religion didn’t exist. Leftist want to go do their drugs, have kids out of wedlock, and make someone else pay for everything they do. They have no clue that it was family & marriage and christian morals that created America and shielded people from the state with a decentralized way of living. Only being responsible for yourself and your family. Back in early American times with no government intrusion in people’s lives, you were perfectly free to go do all the drugs you wanted and have as many kids out of wedlock as you wanted if you could. BUT YOU were RESPONSIBLE for ALL OF IT. No welfare, no child support, no affirmative action or EEO laws. 100 years ago, if you wanted to go sit in some corner outside and snort your drugs, you could. But society wasn’t going to pay for it.
    Conservatism is about the individual being responsible for themselves and any choices they make.
    Liberalism is about making others pay for your lifestyle choices and spreading one’s immoral destructive behavior across a “collective society”. It’s about taking from those that work hard, and then redistributing money to those that do nothing so they can go to law school or med school for free since they aren’t white males. It’s about taking money from hard working people, so someone else can reproduce and raise their bastard offspring with someone elses money and not having to work a day in their lives. Liberalism is THIEVERY. Liberalism is about rejecting natural law. What is natural law? Men are more powerful than women because we are naturally made that way. Liberalism seeks to use government, laws, and fiat financing to tie men’s hands behind their backs and allow women to artificially prosper way beyond what they are truly capable of. If a man starts a company and wants to hire 100% men because he believes that’s what would make his company the most competitive, then that SHOULD be his RIGHT to do so. Not today. He would be sued for not hiring females. He would also be sued for not promoting any females to the top of his company with top salary as well.
    These days won’t last forever. Just like the Soviet Union, it will all eventually crash and then men can retain their rights under natural law, shove women out of our way, and then prosper and build an advanced society where men rule and where christians rule. If women want to go off on their own to start their own “super society”, then by all means they can. But they CANT because women as a whole are completely incapable of doing so. The only way females can be made to look successful is to pepper females in amongst men. With any corporation today, if all the men were to walk out and quit working, the corporation would collapse. IF all women were to talk out of that corporation and quit working, the corporation would not collapse and in fact would become more successful because the dynamic of the work environment would improve without women around. Those days will end soon, and you won’t believe the backlash that will result. If society collapses and there are food riots, and some female wants to take the last bag of rice because she thinks she is “equal” to me and can physically overcome me, she’s going to get body slammed and have her teeth kicked in. I’ll then take the last bag of rice and remind the stupid cunt that it’s payback for what women have done to men by taking advantage of cultural marxist laws to take away my natural rights granted to me by God. Amen.

    1. Excellent post ! Bravo

66. The “life can never be perfect” quote is the crux of most issues, imo. From a Christian perspective, it’s obvious, and perhaps that’s why so many liberals and other retards are so vehemently anti-Christian. Life is flawed by design, it’s a test, and our basic purpose here to is to do what we can to a) spread the truth and b) empathize and/or mitigate the suffering that is the by-product of a flawed world and an even more flawed mankind.
    All these people who think the world can reach utopia through the actions of man are simply ignorant and blundering about in the dark.

67. “One should think of fascism not as the complete opposite of socialism and communism, but yet another kindred spirit in extreme leftist political ideologies that were competing for the hearts and minds of the populous” Dear Little Adolf, much beloved by certain posters is Orwell’s Big Brother jack boot stamping on a human face. I think the Adolf Hitler appreciation society needs to be expunged and this article does a good job at analyzing the common and mutated DNA between the Utopian ideals of the left and right. Although, Nazism was a peculiar mutation in that its ideals were tied into ancient Norse/Germanic mythology while its day-to-day mechanical system of ever “greater German successes” were built on the cult for “progress, order and rational administration” combined with an idolatry for “machines” which is of course the Marxist technique par excellence. This article is a good critique of similarity despite superficial differences.

    1. Hitler’s debt to socialism / marxism has been (deliberately?) overlooked as the left has obviously wanted to disown him and blame his racist on the (far-right). Here’s a quote from the independent newspaper:
       http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/hitler-and-the-socialist-dream-1186455.html
       Hitler’s] private conversations, however, though they do not overturn his
       reputation as an anti-Communist, qualify it heavily. Hermann Rauschning,
       for example, a Danzig Nazi who knew Hitler before and after his
       accession to power in 1933, tells how in private Hitler acknowledged his
       profound debt to the Marxian tradition. “I have learned a great deal
       from Marxism” he once remarked, “as I do not hesitate to admit”. He was
       proud of a knowledge of Marxist texts acquired in his student days
       before the First World War and later in a Bavarian prison, in 1924,
       after the failure of the Munich putsch. The trouble with Weimar Republic
       politicians, he told Otto Wagener at much the same time, was that “they
       had never even read Marx”, implying that no one who had failed to read
       so important an author could even begin to understand the modern world;
       in consequence, he went on, they imagined that the October revolution in
       1917 had been “a private Russian affair”, whereas in fact it had
       changed the whole course of human history! His differences with the
       communists, he explained, were less ideological than tactical. German
       communists he had known before he took power, he told Rauschning,
       thought politics meant talking and writing. They were mere pamphleteers,
       whereas “I have put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers
       have timidly begun”, adding revealingly that “the whole of National
       Socialism” was based on Marx.

68. Have been meaning to read Liberal Fascism for ages, as it seems very much on the ball. When I’ve read books on the nazis or fascism in the past one of the things that has often struck me is the apparent difficulty many historians seem to have with defining fascism clearly. I always assumed it was because the concept was slippy. Now I’m inclined to think it may have been because the authors in question (I can’t remember any longer which works, but I know one of the books I was thinking of was a biography of Hitler) wanted to portray it as essentially right-wing and racist i.e. as what the nazi party was supposed to have been i.e. obviously the latter was racist but the idea that it was right-wing completely overlooks the socialist aspect present in the very name of the party. If that’s the case I actually find it quite worrying that we live in a world where historians are so willing to vitiate their own work in order to keep to the party line.
    One can distinguish fascism from communism with respect to the nationalist versus internationalist specification – except of course Soviet Russia ceased to be internationalist the moment Stalin took power and Trotsky was chased off.
    Some have moreover seen fascism and socialism as equivalent ‘nationalist’ stages on the inexorable historical road to world communism (obviously Hitler would have disagreed but by this view his thousand year reich would always have failed). What fascism and socialism had in common – at least back in the thirties – was the fact they both amounted to state capitalism, where control of the means of production / productive forces were taken out of the hands of the private capitalist / bourgeois (or were to some limited extent) and concentrated in the hands of the state. Clearly though the super-capitalists were never subject to this kind of expropriation by the state (which probably only really advanced in Russia etc). In practice your super-capitalists, major banks etc, seem to function above the level of the state rather than below it.

69. The right needs to be purged of “natsoc” faggots too.

70. It is hard as hell. Working for the man, as I do and most do, is the path do slavery. Yes, I am pleased with my little garden, permaculture, and chickens, and token self-sufficiency, but true democracy is not really about voting so much as economic self-reliance.
    I am not complaining. My paycheck allows me to live. But that is not where I want to be.
    Power of the state is the problem

71. Yet another retard who doesn’t know what fascism is…

72. Truly one of the most uneducated and ignorant articles I’ve ever seen. What else do you want me to say?

    1. A compelling and thoroughly thought out counter-argument containing FACTS and (maybe) some statistics that debunk the thesis of the article, instead of the textbook liberal play call consisting of childish name calling of anyone whose ideologies don’t mesh with theirs.

73. What the words “Fascism” and “National Socialism” (based strictly on the principle of private property and having nothing whatsoever to do with Marxism) have come to mean in the post-WWII years bears little resemblance to what they meant before the war.
    The main difference between Fascism/National-Socialism and Marxism is that Fascism is anti-usury, anti-legalized-counterfeiting (fractional reserve banking), anti-freemasonry, anti-Jesuit and Pro-Gun. Germany never had an income tax rate of more than 13.7% even for the richest German citizens, so how can it be “socialism” when the extortion-rate in the USA today is sometimes over 50%? Even the serfs of old only gave up 1/3 of the crop they grew and harvested to the land-owner. So, relatively speaking, people are actually bigger slaves today than even under serfdom.
    The main difference between Mussolini’s system and Hitler’s system was that Hitler made citizenship racial whereas Mussolin only passed racial laws in 1937 after he saw Germany over-take everyone else in the world in a matter of 6 years as an economic powerhouse, inventing in a few short years: the helicopter, nuclear fission, rockets, 3-D 35mm film, the First Programmable Computer, the first Binary Calculator, the autobahn, the most popular car model of all time, the VW bug, night vision technology, magnetic tape, stealth bombers, synthetics, etc.
    300,000 patents and copyrights were stolen by Stalin’s allies from defeated Germany without compensation.
    What does that tell you ?
    Which stifling collectivist tyranny has ever produced that much creativity?
    Does a retarded country of oppressed ‘slaves’ produce this?
    Mercedez-Benz W125 Rekordwagen
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/da/MHV_MB_12_Zyl_Record_Car_1938.jpg
    Engine: MD 25 DAB/3 60 Degree V12
    • Engine Position: Front Longitudinal
    • Aspiration: Twin Rootes superchargers
    • Valvetrain: DOHC 4 valves per cylinder
    • Displacement: 5,576.75 cc / 340.31 in³ (82.0 x 88.0 mm)
    • Compression: 9.17:1
    • Power: 541 kW (736 PS; 725 hp) @ 5800 rpm
    • Power/displacement 131.97 PS (97.06 kW; 130.16 hp) per litre
    • Power/weight: 621.1 PS (456.8 kW; 612.6 hp) per tonne
    • Transmission: 4-speed manual
    [edit] The record
    Rudolf Caracciola’s record of 432.7 km/h (268 mph) over the flying kilometre on 28 January 1938, still remains the fastest ever officially timed speed on a public road as of 2010. It also was the fastest speed ever recorded in Germany until Rico Anthes bettered it with a Top Fuel Dragster on the Hockenheimring drag strip
    http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=1246&p=2375595&hilit=mussolini#p2375595
    http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=1235&p=2380443&hilit=mussolini#p2380443
    Fascism is best described by Ezra Pound as “the surgical knife of Fascism.” It’s surgery to save a dying civilization, it’s not necessarily constant surgery as a way of life.
    Just like you have surgeons in the hospital for emergencies, so you have Fascism in your political arsenal for cultural emergencies.
    You also have 19th-century (not yet co-opted by the usual suspects) Libertarianism and Anarchism, when the patient has recovered sufficiently. However, you still keep your surgical knife in your drawer ready for immediate use should it be needed.
    Capiche?
    Not that complicated is it? lol
    And no need to make it confusing.
    https://archive.org/details/MyAutobiography
    http://www.lysanderspooner.org/
    http://www.clausewitz.com/
    Here’s an original poster from Mussolini’s Italy that makes it clear in the simplest visual terms who it was that the Fascists were fighting against:
    http://k002.kiwi6.com/hotlink/h4kdt819k0/musso_defendilo.jpg
    As far as the National Socialists and Hitler are concerned, the very CENTRAL TENET of their political philosophy as laid down in the 25 Points of the NSDAP way back in 1920 (before the imposed hyper-inflation) was:
    THE COMMON INTEREST BEFORE SELF-INTEREST – THAT IS THE SPIRIT OF THE PROGRAM. BREAKING OF THE THRALDOM OF INTEREST – THAT IS THE KERNEL OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM
    and although called “socialist,” they were strictly based on the principle of private property.
    “Since the NSDAP is fundamentally based on the principle of private property, it is obvious that the expression ‘confiscation without compensation’ refers merely to the creation of possible legal means of confiscating when necessary, land illegally acquired, or not administered in accordance with the national welfare. It is therefore directed in the first instance against the Jewish companies which speculate in land.”
    http://k003.kiwi6.com/hotlink/w5i1k2iii2/25_Points_of_the_NSDAP_Programme_01.pdf
    and only had a MAXIMUM of 13.7% income tax which was not increased during the war. Even the usual disinfo site which is Wiki admits this fact: “Unlike most other governments, the National Socialists did not increase direct and personal taxes by any significant amount in order to fund the war.[citation needed] The top personal income tax rate in 1941 was 13.7% in Germany as opposed to 23.7% in Great Britain”
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany
    “We want tore-establish the value of personality as an eternal priority; that is, the creative genius of the individual. In this way, we want to sever ties with any appearance of a listless democracy. We want to replace it with the timeless awareness that everything great can only spring from the force of the individual personality, and that everything destined to last must again be entrusted to the abilities of the individual personality.” — Adolf Hitler, Berlin Speech, February 1933 Max Domarus, Hitler Reden und Proklamationen, p. 206; Translation quoted from Richard Tedor’s book “Hitler’s Revolution.”
    http://www.amazon.com/Hitlers-revolution-Richard-Tedor/dp/0988368226/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1457255964&sr=1-1&keywords=richard+tedor
    As far as the big “taboo” which is punishable by up to 5 years in prison to even question in 19 countries, including now Vatican Italy and Putin’s Russia, here’s all the information you’ll ever need to debunk it completely and definitively collected in one place, (post #75):
    http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1062219378#post1062219378
    Officially published nude books that would never have been published in the censored U.S.A. of the 1930’s era:
    Third Reich Nude Books:
    http://www.od43.com/Schoenh_Leib_He.html http://www.od43.com/Z38.html
    http://www.od43.com/Der_schoene_Mensch_1940.html
    http://www.od43.com/Nude_Sonnenzauber_1944.html
    http://www.od43.com/Reichert_Leibeszucht.html
    http://www.od43.com/Nude_Aryans_1939.html
    http://www.od43.com/Suren_Atemgymnastik.html
    http://www.amazon.com/Mensch-Sonne-Arisch-Olympischer-Aryan-Olympic-Spirit/dp/B000ZDK3MW/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1348185558&sr=1-1&keywords=hans+suren
    “The authority of the State can never be an end in itself; for, if that were so, any kind of tyranny would be inviolable and sacred. If a government uses the instruments of power in its hands for the purpose of leading a people to ruin, then rebellion is not only the right but also the duty of every individual citizen.” ~Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
    http://k007.kiwi6.com/hotlink/wgv3537gpr/hitler_and_happy_girls.png
    http://k003.kiwi6.com/hotlink/y2mpvco1wf/German_Beauty.jpg
    http://justice4germans.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/j4g-logo-small.gif?w=200&h=154
    http://k003.kiwi6.com/hotlink/b9phjh4ech/hitler_blows_trumpet_zpst22bqfa3.gif

74. For decades now the Left has used the word “Fascist” to describe anyone they don’t like. Now some people on the Right are using “Fascist” to describe anyone they don’t like. For me this universalized usage of that word makes it nearly meaningless. For me personally nothing is as important as preserving my own European gene pool from extinction, and eventually improving that gene pool through eugenics so that we can eventually evolve ever-higher as Ubermenschen and colonize the universe. I am an Anarchist by nature because I can’t stand to be told what to do by people I don’t respect (and I respect almost no one ). But I am also an Authoritarian by nature because I have little patience remaining for explaining things to people and I would prefer that they simply do what I tell them to do. Modern people in the West are so effeminized and infantilized that they are no longer capable of running their own affairs, and therefore they no longer deserve freedom. They need to be organized in a totalitarian, centralized, militarized state that is also a Patriarchy. Call that “Fascism ” if you wish – I’m not afraid of that very masculine word and I am ready to own it proudly.

75. The most significant difference that I can see between Fascism and Communism is that under Fascism, ownership of private property is retained by the individual, but control of that property is retained by the State.
    But, if you don’t control something, you really don’t own it…
    Everything else is quibbling details… not really enough of a difference between National Socialism and straight up Communism to bother with. Least, for me anyways…
    Just condemn them both as leftist ass-hattery and move on…

    1. Your fantasy “black & white” world of “easy solutions” does not exist.
       “…the only simplicity to be trusted is the simplicity to be found on the far side of complexity.” ~ Alfred North Whitehead
       You can be ignorant and pretend that “communism” and “fascism” are both the same simply because they’re both “of the left,” (regardless of the fact that Hitler’s government had no usury and less income tax than any “right wing” or “conservative-Republican” American government since FDR) and achieve some temporary “bliss” that way, but you can never avoid the consequences of ignorance. “Condemning” without proper inquiry, investigation and understanding and without the integrity to stick to the t-root or first principles (foundational) of what you have found, no matter what pressure is heaped on your head, will only insure that your dogma will never outrun your karma in the longer term
       http://i.imgur.com/YXDMY.jpg
       P.S. I’m not a National Socialist or Fascist or a “racialist” or “tribalist” of any kind. I am a Lysander Spooner Anarchist and a Nietzschean cultural elitist. However, just because I’m not an advocate of those systems today in full doesn’t mean that I’m not an advocate of the many honorable and positive things about those political systems and their revolutionary nature. These positive aspects have to be integrated into all righteous politics which can only be called “moral” or “righteous” to the degree that they keep the real power-base of all civilized societies, its tiny cadre of creative individuals, from being oppressed into mediocrity by the envious and much more numerous hordes of the tribe. Then these win-win-dialectic creative individuals have to learn not to give their inventions and power over to their own worst enemies who will always pretend to be their friends in order to con them out of the power-of-creativity they, as win-lose parasites, do not possess, but lust after.
       “Every idea that is a true idea has a form, and is capable of many forms. The variety of forms of which it is capable determines the value of the idea. So by way of ideas, and your mastery of them in relation to what you are doing, will come your value as an architect to your society and future.” – “Idea and Essence” September 7, 1958 ― Frank Lloyd Wright
       “I have listened with great interest to discussions regarding decentralization and centralization and I have thought that the question of whether it is valid to decentralize or centralize is unanswerable because it deals with one one-way sign in two-way traffic. It is a static question in a dynamic universe.
       Man was invented a mobile device and process. He has survived through his ability to advance or retreat as his mortal requirements have dictated. Of his two primary faculties, quickness is of great importance but intellect is first.
       He recognizes that vital quickness may be momentary reflex but that satisfactory continuities are proportional to his degree of comprehension of the consequence of his initiative. Degree of comprehension he measures in the terms of the complex integration of all individuals’ all-time experience, as processed by intellectual integrity. His quickness would be a spontaneous servant to that integrity.
       Despite intermittent submissiveness to runaway momentums of residual ignorance, man guards most dearly and secretly his freedom of thought and initiative. Therefrom emanates the social-industrial relay, from self starter to group starters.
       Out of this freedom alone understanding may be generated. Man recognizes understanding as an activated circuit of mutual comprehension by individual minds. Understanding must be plural. However, because individual experience is unique, understanding can be developed only in principle out of the compounding significance of plurality of experience. Thus, man knows that the voluntary interactions of understanding dealing in fundamental principles will always master involuntary mass actions, and that individual freedom ever anticipates and ultimately masters mutual emergency.”
       ~ from “Ideas and Integrities” by Richard Buckminster Fuller (1963)
       “There is an invincible taste for prostitution in the heart of man, from which comes his horror of solitude. He wants to be ‘two’. The man of genius wants to be ‘one’… It is this horror of solitude, the need to lose oneself in the external flesh, that man nobly calls ‘the need to love’. ” ~ Charles Baudelaire
       “People talk a lot nowadays about the dignity of work and about the need for it. But it’s a fraud. There is dignity in work only when it is work freely accepted. Only idleness has a moral value because it can serve as a criterion by which to judge men. It is fatal only to the second rate. That is its lesson and its greatness. Work, on the other hand, crushes everyone down to the same level. It provides no basis for judging men. It brings into action a metaphysics of humiliation. Under the form of slavery which the society of right-thinking people now give it, the best men cannot survive its effects… “ — Albert Camus, Journals
       “It is a notorious fact that the morality of society as a whole is in inverse ratio to its size; for the greater the aggregation of individuals, the more the individual factors are blotted out, and with them morality, which rests entirely on the moral sense of the individual and the freedom necessary for this. Hence, every man is, in a certain sense, unconsciously a worse man when he is in society than when acting alone; for he is carried by society and to that extent relieved of his individual responsibility. . . . Any large company composed of wholly admirable persons has the morality and intelligence of an unwieldy, stupid, and violent animal. The bigger the organization, the more unavoidable is its immorality and blind stupidity. Society, by automatically stressing all the collective qualities in its individual representatives, puts a premium on mediocrity, on everything that settles down to vegetate in an easy, irresponsible way. Individuality will inevitable be driven to the wall. This process begins in school, continues at the university, and rules all departments in which the State has a hand. In a small social body, the individuality of its members is better safeguarded; and the greater is their relative freedom and the possibility of conscious responsibility. Without freedom there can be no morality.” ~ Carl Jung (from The Relations Between the Ego and the Unconscious, p.169)
       “The trick is simple. Whenever the Rothschild and other gents in the gold business have gold to sell, they raise the price. The public is fooled by propagandizing the devaluation of the dollar, or other monetary unit according to the country chosen to be victimized. The argument is that the high price of the monetary unit is injurious to the nation’s commerce. But when the nation, that is, the people of that nation own the gold and the financiers own the dollars or other monetary units, the gold standard is restored. This raises the value of the dollar and the citizens of ‘rich’ nations, as well as citizens of other nations, are diddled.” ~ Ezra Pound
       [audio src="https://ia801305.us.archive.org/21/items/NegentropicChronicles09_201512/Negentropic%20Chronicles%2009.mp3" /]
       https://archive.org/details/NegentropicChronicles08
       http://k003.kiwi6.com/hotlink/ufkcao93cd/kirk_me_so_horny.jpeg
       http://k003.kiwi6.com/hotlink/5lpd4y37on/In_94f4fa_5432177An_Arab_slave_dealer_in_British_custody..jpg
       An Arab slave-dealer in British custody
       http://k003.kiwi6.com/hotlink/sk55gh44aq/A_British_blacksmith_removing_the_leg_irons_off_a_Oman_slave_who_had_worn_those_iron_shackles_for_t.jpg
       A British blacksmith removing the leg irons off an Oman slave
       http://k003.kiwi6.com/hotlink/m42dct3x2o/A_motel_manager_pouring_acid_in_the_water_when_black_protesters_swam_in_his_white-only_pool_1964..j.jpg
       A motel manager pouring acid in the water when black protesters swam in his “whites only” pool, 1964
       http://k003.kiwi6.com/hotlink/k0bqzcdztt/kayla_proud_mother.jpg

       1. What the blue fcuk?
          I read where you tell me what my position is, then attempt to demolish your own construct, and when I clicked on “see more”, there’s just PAGES AND PAGES of shit!
          I ain’t got time for this shit… I have to take my son to the doctor’s office…
          Will wade through the foetid pools of whatever all THAT ^ is when I get back… maybe…
          BBL…

       2. Okay… back from the doc’s office… let’s wade through this cluster-fcuk of assness you posted…
          Blah, blah, insults, blah… Yes, you smart very good! You much more smarty than me! Everyone must be made to know all the smart that ever was belongs to you!
          Jesus Christ, dude! You need to un-clench your ass cheeks so a Proctologist with a miner’s helmet and a pair of channellocks can remove that gigantic STICK you have wedged up there… it’s probably right next to your head.
          And here I thought I took myself too seriously! Holy fcuk…
          Apparently, you were too busy erecting the monument to your own overwhelming stickitude to notice where I said “not really enough of a difference between National Socialism and straight up Communism to bother with. Least, for me anyways..”
          Know what that means? It means I don’t give a fcuk. Really. It is as it says: not enough of a difference for me to give a shit about. If one is the others’ retarded second cousin, well, so what? Anyone who buys into any of it is a moron.
          And my world is most definitely made up of good/evil, black/white, right/wrong… it works for me, and that’s all I care about. What you think? Not so much…
          “P.S. I’m not a National Socialist or Fascist or a “racialist” or “tribalist” of any kind. I am a Lysander Spooner Anarchist and a Nietzschean cultural elitist. However, just because I’m not an advocate of…”
          Oh for FCUK’S SAKE! I do not care what you self-identify as! Really. You can call yourself a Neo-Fundamentalist Retro-Zarathustrian Economic Marxist, sacrifice goats by the light of the moon and wear a Swami Hat the size of a fcuking beach ball for all I care so long as you mind your own business..
          https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a52aa2e8bba944aafd39cce3758b1412e5eeea9b7320076f80d3c2e3be5f3a29.jpg
          And I have no clue – nor care – why you posted all that hot garbage ranging from Captain Kirk to some skank’s fat ass… it has Jack Shit to do with the topic. And Jack left town…
          Perhaps in your addlepated brain, they’re somehow all connected.
          But please – DO NOT MISCONSTRUE THAT REMARK AS A REQUEST FOR YOU TO EXPLAIN!!! I DO NOT WANT TO KNOW! REALLY! I’D RATHER TAKE TWO SHARP NO. 2 PENCILS, STICK THEM IN MY EARS AND PUSH TILL THEY TOUCHED IN THE MIDDLE THAN HAVE YOU EXPLAIN!!
          Going to eat dinner now… hope the smell of Crazy eventually washes out of your clothing…
          Ta!

76. This article is beyond assinine. A simple Google search will explain that facism is indeed on the far right of the political spectrum and therefore diametrically opposite socialism in every conceivable theoretical way. Get a clue fuckboys of rok. You people are truly delusional.

77. The recently proposed connection between left communism and historical fascist nationalsocialist movements and regimes are of liberalist origin. The same liberal western “democracies” who actively promote feminism multiculturalism, LGBT righties, degeneracy, anti traditionalism, etc. What is the meaning of parroting the liberal mantra, I can not guess. The truth is that both left and capitalist liberalism is of the same materialistic political origin, the anti Christian forces of French Revolution, and the Marxist offshoot.

78. The crazies are taking over previously useful sites and using them for their political machinations. Duolingo used to be a great language-learning website, but unfortunately it is getting dumbed-down as of late and it is also rapidly becoming a cesspit for left-wing activism. They even prioritized German and Swedish courses for Arabic speakers at the expense of other requested and interesting languages from Europe, like Finnish or Icelandic. If you are interested in a great and free language-learning experience, make sure to join, do a few lessons, enter the forums and downvote to hell the following topic, apparently made by the United Nations High Commission for Refugees office based in Stockholm:
    Word of the Day: Help Refugees Integrate

79. Monday, September 5, 2011
    What Is Fascism?
    .
    Political radicals often shout, “Fascist!”, “Fascist!” at anyone who doesn’t agree with their views. The term is especially popular among college students. But do such people actually know what Fascism is? Have they studied it?
    Unfortunately, Fascism has an undeserved bad reputation. Regardless of this reputation, Fascism is a very sensible economic and social ideology. There are a few different “flavors” of Fascism, but basically they all come down to the following.
    First and foremost, Fascism is an economic system in which a nation’s government plays a central role in monitoring all banking, trade, production, and labor activity which takes place within the nation. Such monitoring is done for the sole purpose of safeguarding & advancing the nation and its people. Under Fascism, the government will not approve of any business activity unless that business has a positive impact on the nation as a whole and the people of the nation – this is the axiom which determines everything within the economic aspect of Fascism.
    In other words, the government asks, “Is XYZ Enterprises good for our nation and our people?” If yes, it’s approved. If no, it’s not approved. When they ask, “Is it good?”, they mean, “Is XYZ Enterprises good for the workers, do they pay a fair wage, do they produce a product or provide a service which advances our nation & our people technologically, morally, spiritually, health-wise, etc???” For example, a pornography company would not be allowed because pornography corrupts people generally and exploits & degrades women particularly. Also, “free” trade agreements (such as what the U.S. has with China) would never be allowed because such trade agreements result in companies sending jobs overseas (where labor is dirt cheap). Such an activity, of course, would undermine a nation’s labor class. This is entirely unacceptable and thus not allowed under a Fascist economic model.
    Fascism is based on free enterprise – but with constraints (the primary constraint being, “Is the particular economic activity in question good for our nation/people?”). Also, a businessman can become wealthy in a Fascist country, and the government has no objection to this (this is in stark contrast to Communism). Fascism also encourages private ownership of property (again, in stark contrast to Communism where private property is not allowed).
    In a nutshell, Fascism basically tells entrepreneurs, “Go ahead and start a business, earn a lot of money, be successful, but don’t produce any products or services which damage our nation and our nation’s people… and make sure you treat your workers fair and pay them a living wage. If you don’t follow these rules, we’ll shut you down.”
    With regard to banking, usury is not allowed under Fascism. The government tightly controls all aspects of monetary policy, including terms of lending. The government issues/prints money and lends it interest free, as needed, to grow the economy and ultimately serve the citizens.
    The above is the economic aspect of Fascism. There is also a cultural/social aspect to Fascism as well. Under Fascism, government plays a key role in monitoring: film, theatre, art, literature, music, education, etc in order to maintain a high moral standard, keep things clean and respectable, promote a strong sense of patriotism and honor, and prevent the dissemination of depraved filth which corrupts society.
    With regard to political legislation introduced by a Fascist government, the same criteria is applied – “Will this proposed law benefit the nation as a whole and the people of our nation?”
    A few other things to mention. Fascism encourages respect for the environment as Fascists understand that nature is the giver of life and thus must be preserved. Contrast this environmental philosophy with that of Capitalism which too often takes the short term view with regard to natural resources and foolishly believes that pollution is a necessary byproduct of profit. Also, and somewhat related to environmental issues, Fascism holds very progressive views with regard to animal rights.
    Also, under Fascism, if a person doesn’t like things, he/she can leave the country. Contrast this with Communism where if you don’t like things, you better keep your mouth shut. And, of course, there is no option to leave the country. You will submit or else be sent to a re-education camp where you’ll be brainwashed to accept the Communist system. And if you still resist, you’ll probably be killed. Again, there is no leaving. Submit or suffer the consequences.
    Further, Fascism holds women in very high regard. Women are the carriers of new life. They are expected to be educated, worldly, and well read. Women are encouraged to pursue their interests and have a career but only if a career won’t interfere with their family’s needs; family comes first, always. Women are encouraged to be strong yet feminine. Consistent with these ideas, Fascist art often portrays women as heroic and even goddess-like.
    In short, Fascism is a form of government & social system which authentically serves the interests of the people and nation as a whole. The word “Fascism” comes from the Italian word “fascio” meaning “the group” or more specifically, “in consideration of the group.” Fascism is rooted in the notion that people must stay true to two mental concepts throughout their lives: 1) the individual’s needs (themselves) and, 2) the group’s needs (their nation)… always evaluating how their individual actions affect the group. Thus Fascism rejects the self-centered “me me me” mentality so common under Capitalism. For example, in a Fascist nation each person is expected to maintain a healthy diet & lifestyle. For if not, they may become seriously ill and thus require expensive health care; this would negatively impact the group (i.e., they’d become a financial burden on the nation).
    Continuing this line of thought, under Fascism all people of one’s ethnicity are considered the greater family of that person. Hence, a Fascist nation is thought of as one giant family of several million people. Therefore, just as one mustn’t do anything to hurt their brother or sister in their immediate family, under Fascism one mustn’t do anything which would hurt the nation/group (i.e., the greater family). This is the essence of Fascism – a strong consideration of the group balanced with individualism.
    During the German Third Reich, the NSDAP (i.e., “Nazis”) followed all aspects of the above described Fascist system.
    ASIDE: Although the economic aspect of Fascism is free-market based, Fascism is NOT Capitalism. Many on the political left wrongly equate Fascism with Capitalism. Again, Fascism is NOT Capitalism. Allow me to briefly explain: the primary goal of Capitalism is profit. On the other hand, the primary goal of Fascism is the well being of a nation’s citizens and well being of the nation as a whole. In a purist-type Capitalist country (i.e., Super-Capitalism) almost nothing can interfere with maximizing profits – not workers, not the environment… almost nothing.
    Even when a Capitalist country starts out with tight government regulations, it invariably moves towards Laissez-faire economics (i.e., Super-Capitalism) by way of less and less government regulation. Human greed drives this transformation and ultimately the working class suffer via lower wages or loss of employment altogether if their job is, say, transferred overseas (e.g., to China) where labor is dirt cheap. Capitalists believe that immense wealth at the top will “trickle down” to the masses i.e., that everything will magically work itself out. A certain amount of wealth does “trickle down” but, too often, the worker and environment suffer. As just one example, tens of millions of American manufacturing jobs have been shipped overseas during the past two decades (Capitalist so-called “free” trade policies have allowed for such outsourcing of jobs). Of course then, just as Fascists reject Communism, they also reject Capitalism.
    -Dr. James Miller, PhD

80. Wow. Ya pretty much painted me a Nazi AND a soy latte drinker in the same sentence. Seeing as this was directed at my lefty-minded, Obama worshiping self, I felt a need to respond (and get attacked by the other commenting horde of brainwashed followers here. See? I can make broad assumptions too!).
    “’What!!’ you say as you spit out your soy latte.
    “’Fascism is reserved only for evil white conservative men who spout evil fascist rhetoric like small government, individualism, self-reliance, capitalism, less dependency on government, traditionalism, and self-responsibility with strong ties to self-sustaining autonomous Christian family units!!!’
    “Slow down, Che, put down the vegan burger and let me explain…”
    Oy… So, let’s count the tropes: Soy latte, Vegan burger (by the way, yuck), Fascism is white, conservative, small government, idividualism… and I’m going to stop right there. Plenty of fascists in Africa and South America (aka, not white), and, with the exception of considering modern Christianity and traditionalism as being potentially part of the problem, every one of those things you think I consider fascism… well, I don’t. I actually respect the concept of individualism, self-reliance. Capitalism I have some issues with, as, without oversight (aka big government) greed tends to make people do stupid and unethical things.
    I mean, come on here. Do you really think that all of us liberals are sitting in circle-jerks, talking about how great it would be if we were all colorless, mindless robots, beholden to the system of conformity under Fearless Leader Barack Obama? You do, don’t you? *sighs*
    Ya know, the fact that you wrote this in a mocking and insulting manner shows me how little you want to actually talk to me and more want to show all your readers how tough you are on liberalism and reinforce the stereotype about how WE’RE the fascists, not you!
    Know what I find fascist about the Right? Your willingness to go along out of a sense of patriotism. When President Bush talked everyone up for war in Iraq, you didn’t seem to question it. Instead, you questioned me for questioning it. You said I was a traitor and that I was un-American for not obeying Fearless Leader George Bush. When I noticed Halliburton was making bank over the war, you called me a traitor for not supporting American capitalism, even though Fearless Leader’s right hand man was Halliburton’s CEO for twelve years prior to his new job as VP.
    Ya know, liberals disagree with Obama sometimes. I’m sure conservatives back then weren’t all that happy with Gee-Dubya, what with the overspending, attempted amnesty of illegals and the way gas prices skyrocketed. We’re not the goose-stepping morons you seem to think we are, and I’m sure you’re not really the xenophobic morons we paint you to be. But, until you start writing pieces directed at liberals that aren’t just ways to masturbate with your fan base about how stupid we are, we aren’t going to ever get to learn that about each other.
    I await the criticism of your fan base.

81. But muh degeneracy!

82. “In all leftist extremes, be it communism, Nazism, socialism, or Fascism;
    murder, violence, and censorship are sure to be the eventual outcome of
    huge government.”
    Oy vey! Government! Government very bad! Government destroyed Jerusalem and the 6 trillion!

83. Wait, wait… you think Obama is a leftist? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!

84. How can we organize against liberal fascists? I see them as one of the biggest threats to our freedom. Anybody have any ideas?

Comments are closed.