As the new season of the HBO series Game of Thrones got underway, I noticed that all of the Social Justice Warriors on my social media were really excited about the new season. It seems like an odd fit given that Game of Thrones seems to stand for almost the exact opposite of what SJWs profess to believe. What does their fondness for the series tell us about their real beliefs?
Monarchy
Joffrey Baratheon—The SJW as King
The story of Game of Thrones takes place in a medieval-like fantasy world. As the title of the series suggests, it is about the cloak and dagger political machinations that take place as various noble families vie to gain control of the throne of the fictional country of Westeros.
SJWs profess to be staunch defenders of democracy so it is strange that they love a show that is all about royalty. For SJWs, the popular will trumps all authority. They are constantly at work trying to expand the voting franchise when it comes to people who will vote for their candidates. For example, the Democrat governor of Virginia Terry McAuliffe recently signed an order which will give felons the right to vote—perhaps because he believes that the criminals will recognize Hillary as one of their own and vote for her in November.
But their love of Game of Thrones reveals that SJWs really love the pomp and circumstance that accompanies monarchy. This is what is behind their incessant praise of Obama’s vaunted intellect, Michelle’s great beauty, and how the Obamas have brought “class” (an undemocratic concept) to DC.
SJW might give democracy lip service but not even the biggest left winger can get excited about the will of ignorant people whose philosophy boils down to YOLO (you only live once).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEIGl8LP278
Aristocracy
Game of Thrones is almost exclusively about the nobility. In the books on which the series is based, the common people are called “small folk.” The are a few characters who are of low birth, but they play relatively small roles.
Again, SJWs profess to be against any sort of hereditary aristocracy. On paper, they oppose class distinctions and celebrate “the poor.” In practice though, they are very class conscious and if they are already in the upper class, they take steps to ensure that their children remain there.
SJWs do this in several ways. They support progressive taxation that prevents others from bettering their station. While wealthy SJWs celebrate single motherhood and deviant relationships for the lower classes, they themselves engage in traditional marriage. They always try to marry upward. They send their children to private schools attended by children of the upper class. Meanwhile, they take action to ensure that your children will attend school with children from the lower class.
By taking these actions, SJWs have created a new aristocracy in everything but name. The only difference is that it is an aristocracy of the worst rather than best elements of society.
Violence
Game of Thrones is notorious for its violent scenes. In the infamous “red wedding” scene of a couple of seasons ago, the young king Rob Stark and his mother are tricked into attending a wedding of a professed ally, Lord Walder Frey. But Lord Frey has allied himself with the Starks’ enemy and the wedding is just a ruse to get the Starks to drop their guard. The wedding ends with Rob Stark being shot through with arrows and his mother’s throat being slit—all graphically portrayed, of course.
In the Game of Thrones universe, violence is how things get done. The series has been filled with wars and murder. It is fair to say the philosophy of the series can be boiled down to the 48 Laws of Power maxim: “Crush your enemy totally.”
The violence of Game of Thrones stands in contrast to SJWs’ stated goal of making the country less violent. SJWs push for gun control. They lobby for special laws that protect only certain groups such as the “Violence Against Women Act.” SJWs claim to be anti-war.
SJWs may be “personally opposed” to violence but they have no problem with using the government, which they control, to violently crush anyone who the SJWs don’t like. One SJW acquaintance expressed glee in the hope that the recent Ammon Bundy stand off in Oregon would end in a Waco-like slaughter of the protestors because they were conservative white men.
When it comes to ruthlessness, no one exceeds SJWs. Traditional men want the punishment to fit the crime, but SJWs are willing to use even outrageously excessive measures to remove their enemies. If that means wholesale slaughter of their perceived enemies, SJWs are willing to do it.
Faith
The Game of Thrones fantasy world is, like the Middle Ages, dominated by faith. Unlike the Middle Ages, most of the ruling elite in Game of Thrones are atheists. Like many GOP politicians, they only use religion as a tool to fool their subjects.
SJWs identify with the ruling class in Game of Thrones. SJWs view religion as something that is backward and only suitable for simpletons, the emotionally weak, and the uneducated. Meanwhile, SJWs see themselves as being too intelligent to subscribe to what they believe to be fables. Rather, they worship at the altar of Science. It doesn’t seem to bother them that the extent of their scientific knowledge comes from watching the Daily Show.
Homogeneity
On the surface there is a conflict between the diversity that SJWs champion, and the homogeneity of the world of Game of Thrones. The land of Westeros is almost entirely white. All the nonwhites live in the free cities that can only be reached by sea. Still, there are some characters that cater to the SJW diversity fetish.
One of these characters is Daenerys Targaryen, the white haired princess of Westeros who lives in a foreign land. Daenerys becomes the ruler of these lands by freeing the slaves of that land, which in HBO’s interpretation are mostly nonwhite. In one cloying scene, the grateful ex-slaves adore Daenerys by carrying her aloft and chanting “Mhysa” or “mother.”
Every racial group has its share of SJWs, but most SJWs are white people who live in largely white enclaves. True, they may have a token nonwhite friend but for the most part SJWs resemble the all-white cast of Girls or the staff of liberal news site Vox. By favoring maternalistic welfare programs, SJWs see themselves as Daenerys, ruling the nonwhite masses from a lofty perch
.
Conclusion
There’s a reason that the ultra-liberal HBO network produced the Game of Thrones series—it is a perfect mirror into how SJWs view themselves. They are engaged in a ruthless game of strategy in a quest for unadulterated power. For too long, traditional men have been as “innocent as doves.” It is time that we become “as wise as serpents” and begin thinking strategically as well.
Read More: What Game of Thrones Says About Morality And Necessity
Because it’s a perverted mythos of the glory that was Medieval Europe
he’s said it was substantially based upon intrigue amongst medieval French noble families.
I thought it was mostly based on the war of the roses between the houses of Lancaster and York.
Not entirely sure of the details, but I believe it was set during that time. French and English noble families were closely intertwined in the middle ages. Martin based a lot of it on a novel called the Iron King by a Maurice Druon. I tried to read it, but could get past the first chapter. I think it was French focused though
big war of the roses influence. Of course other things come into play both from history and from his imagination, but in many places GRRM sites the war of the roses as a major jumping off point for the plot.
But what about zwiebacks ?
DEATH TO THE ZWEIBACKS! (wait, was that my position or was it long live the zwiebacks?) anyway, whichever my former position was, I redouble on my enthusiasm.
I never quite understand you guy’s animosity towards a type of bread….
You always were and always will be, a hardcore anti-zwiebackist. Some have accused you of anti-Frenchbaguettism, but you’ve always denied it. You have been seen however, frequenting the underground anti-croissant movement.
There is a fierce power struggle between these castes of bread. A game of toasts.
anti-frenchbaguettism? of course no! Without Frenchbaguettism we would never get the saucisson sec sandwich where the Count d’Beurre invented putting butter on a sausage sandwich defeating the Earl of Sandwich in the first Condiment War which was, as everyone knows, when the earl of sandwich invaded the Frenchbaugettists with the Non-Dijon Mustard Army backed by the Mayonnaise Navy. He was eventually beaten back by the Count d’Beurre when he slathered the shores of the Frenchbaguettists with Saucisson Sec and butter proving the supremacy of the French over the English in the war to end all lunch
I think you are both right, it is both. It is a mythos made in mockery of what Europe really was like. It was written in large part so that self hating SJW’s could tell themselves: look at how evil white men have always been. Indeed most of these types falsely attribute GOT as a realistic portrait of how the middle ages really played out.
It was only after the Zweiback Loyalist blitzkrieg of paris supported by the Semolina Family and, from the far east, the barbaric Rice Fryers, that the Baguettists lost their stronghold.
In a move that proved a double edge sword, the American’s crushed the zwieback empire and ended their occupation but rather than a resurgence of the Frenchbaguettisms they left their legacy of the Macdonald’s
I doubt anyone with any real thinking going on in the old brain box is imagining that this is how things actually played out (at least I hope not). I am sure the influences, like I said, come from pretty much every source that GRRM could get his hands on. It is an enormous book with thousands of characters, all with fully developed story archs which all looks like it resolves itself in an interesting way.
That it is a mockery I do not agree….the show maybe, but not the books. I think that GRRM takes his historical fiction as well as his fantasy world creation very seriously and is heavily invested (both in time and emotion) in the world that he has created as well as the historical truths as well as fictions that inspired him in that creation.
As for the show, it started strong. However, once it proved popular it was, predictably, hijacked by the interests of the very vocal minority.
This is a very precise and accurate depiction of the Great Condiment Wars. I’m impressed. Made me remember of the Battle of the Brie, when the baguettist nobility was defead by the use of pickles in the melee.
A crucial point of this conflict is also the Great Retreat in Bliniland.
Yes the show is way more over the top than the books I agree. The books are actually fairly well done and have a lot of nuance and subtlety, as you said the do capture a lot of the era. Even still the overarching themes of nihilism and distaste (for what I perceive to be) the institutions of Medieval Europe are still very much a part of the books as well. I think these themes do come out more strongly in the latter books compared to the first books as well. “I doubt anyone with any real thinking going on in the old brain box is imagining that this is how things actually played out” -This perfectly describes your average SJW
Crucial indeed. Blini land could have moved west and dominated Europe at one point. However, after the revolution between warm blinists and room temperature blinist followed by the Creme Fraish insurrection they were left devistated and bread became scarce.
Yes General Cornichon won quite a decisive victory at battle of the Brie and during the Camenbert Conflicts which arose afterwards.
Attempting to regain their once colonialist greatness the baguettists did try an Asian incursion and, to this day, the Bahn Mi invasion has left its mark in terms both of the baguettes as well as the Foie Gras
However, after sustaining massive losses to general Pho the baguettists were forced to retreat back to France (retreating back to France from south east Asia also being known as going back to civilization instead of sticking around anfucking jungle)
Fair enough on the sjw.
Actually a girlfriend of mine said to me, with straight face that GOT was historical and even though it had fantasy elements, it was a good depiction of the past…
that doesn’t count. That was a girl. They are all morons lol
Game of Scones
Not all…but I get your point.
Actually I’m pretty sure it’s based on his rape fantasies.
That’s true. Moreover I think the only time you really get the authors own POV is when Ramsay Bolton is on screen
I wonder how many make the connection that Westeros is Washington, DC?
While I normally like Sebastian’s articles, I feel that this would have been better treated by someone with a more thoroughgoing knowledge of Game of Thrones, it’s mythos and the subtle details in it. I am a bit of a nerd though.
As an aside, I am glad to see a GoT article here. I am completely baffled whenever I see people getting interested in non-westerosi politics as if they somehow actually mattered.
Not a fan of fantasy novels, but this guy does have an amazing imagination. He grew up in the projects in Bayonne, NJ. Outside his window, he could see Staten Island, he imagined it a magical, far off kingdom. Only a future fantasy writer could imagine that giant garbage dump as a fantasyland!
For British Sci-Fi/Fantasy author Michael Moorcock it was similar. He claims his earliest memories were in WWII when London was on the receiving end of the German V2 rockets and he would play in the rubble.
Especially after what sandy did the SI
you are a total nerd
you realize that I troll you for my amusement and consider you, your pillowbiting ancestors, your soon to be fat wife, your useless degree, your dead end job and your retarded children to all be sub human. You could have the decency to at least be a little entertaining, but nope…nothing on that score either…with that, lets conclude our discussions.
Hence why I never get in heated argument with lolknee…he simply doesn’t give a shit. Call him the worst names and he just shrugs. That and half the time, he’s trolling you, prodding for weaknesses in your armor. The sly fox.
lol ur a nerd. no one is impressed by your vast knowledge of got.
you’re not a knight bro. ok?
You’re new here, aren’t you?
I said I am finished playing with you.
While I’ve noticed this with other people, for some reason he tends to take me seriously (at least that’s how I see it) and winds down the trolling somewhat, I mean he can’t switch it off – this is lolknee we’re talking about, such a fun asshole.
It’s all how you approach him, but yes…there’s always a little asshole in his responses.
Who else but lolknee?!
A Jim Jefferies quote from when he destroyed a heckler in Edinburgh comes to mind. “DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW GOOD I AM AT THIS, this is like a jedi fighting a quadriplegic.”
IKR? All this contrived strife in the real world, when what we should be concerning ourselves with is whether the Wolfriders and Go-Backs will ever grow as tall as the Sun Folk or Gliders? Will Raistlin ever return to Krynn? Will Ren, Ioz, and Tula ever save Mer? And should people just avoid Sinnissippi Park or are the demons already among us?
Reality is sooo gauche and blasé passé, who wants to live in a world full of fat feminists over Hyboria anyway?
What is best?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PQ6335puOc
Crush your enemies
See them driven before you.
Hearing the lamentation of their women
Ha. I used to have a coffee mug that showed a checklist that said crush your enemies see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of their women and when you poured the coffee in the check marks would slowly appear as if task complete. I wish I knew what happened to that damn cup. I must have lost it in a move or something.
I love his response to the first response…WRONG!
Now I must have that! Heh
Here’s another good one.
I have searched far and wide (read: did at least 5 google searches) and have not found it. The store I bought it in no longer exists and there is no marking on it saying who made it other than made in china. I might need to conquer china.
Then there’s the less impressive (read: a bit groan-inducing), but still apt, expression from the newer Conan who looks suspiciously like that one guy from the show in the article 😉
Arnold should break down the wall of the set to this and beat this guys ass, steal the sword and just walk off.
..
Here comes the French cavalry to the rescue :
http://www.cafepress.co.uk/+conan-barbarian+mugs
this I found, but mine was heat activated checklist…not on cafepress…believe me I looked.
I will find it, even if I have to burn all the internet to the ground to make it come out.
Actually that was based on a speech Conan made in one of his stories written by his creator.
“Let teachers and priests and philosophers
brood over questions of reality and illusion. I know this: if life is an
illusion, then I am no less an illusion, and being thus, the illusion
is real to me. I live, I burn with life, I love, I slay, and I am
content.” — “Queen of the Black Coast”, Robert E. Howard (Creator of
Conan the Barbarian), Weird Tales, May 1934.
He goes from Mr Universe to Mr Action to Mr Pregnant Man(which shoulda wrecked his career) to Governator of Cauliflower, only in murrika…
Yeah, it’s just how Momoa delivers it, everything about his performance just reeks of Mini-Me:
Arnie is only 5’11”; momoa is 6’5″, so if would be pretty hard for him to pack on that kind of muscle…still, momoa would kick his ass in a street fight
I would say that another important issue that shows the hypocrisy of sjw is also the fact that all of these topics are based on the Middle Ages, that, for the “super intelligent” breed a part of these idiots its the worst possible period in History, full of superstition and inequality. They are simple to clever to like Medieval Europe…uppsss, i am sorry, the Dark Ages!
A mere glimpse of how “dark” Medieval civilization was…
maybe SJW’s see the middle ages as fresh and untrampled snow. Like “omg, we could like be the first people to introduce paradigm shifting notions like false gender binaries!”
I think they are so ignorant of that time period, that their small fragile minds cant cope with the sheer magnitude of that era.
The irony is that women had more rights ( women’s rights, not equalists rights) during the middle ages than during the Renaissance, and especially more than after the French Revolution.
I never got the obsession with royalty either. Especially princesses. If only feminists realized that princesses were nothing more than pieces of pussy which their only two purposes were getting swapped for land (example, Burgundy) and bearing heirs. Of course there are notable exceptions, like Elizabeth I of England of Catherine the Great of Russia.
but they had such pretty outfits.
I know! And those princes were so hot! Like totally wanna have their babies!
And everyone catered to their every need!
With men willing to die for them!
yes “honey, you stay here and look pretty with this musician and all my servants while I go out and risk my life for your honor…see you in 3 years”
This is like every fucking woman’s dream
Yep. I’ve been tempted to tell my nephew that if he wants to see what every woman’s fantasy is to just watch Game of Thrones and pay special attention to the women characters.
correction…that is what they want from some men.
From other men they want to be violated, sodomized, spit, have their hair pulled and then left in the fetal position with nothing but their shame and a throbbing pain in their womb.
Heh, that’s covered in the first season believe it or not. The character Drogo rips the clothes off the blonde dragon princess for the first several episodes before banging her so well that’s the only sex she has in the series (so far).
“Shame” is what they seek as they have lost any they had…
they want shame and shame redemption at one and the same time. They need the man to make them ashamed of themselves to also be of high enough quality to absolve them of their sins….if they can’t have it all they will take a little from here and a little from there or if you manage to keep them monogamous will eventually grow to fucking hate you because you either can’t make them feel like dirty enough shit or you can but can’t absolve them of their sins.
She’s been sleeping with that one dude in her court.
weren’t there horse loving rumours about Catherine the Great?
Apparently there were. Apparently Catherine was quite the equestrian enthusiast. Then again, I doubt Elizabeth was a virgin queen. And of course, there is Rasputin and his apparently massive schlong ripping apart Czarina Alexandra, her daughters (including Anastasia) and any wet hole within reach.
yeah, but still a horse.
Was Maria Theresa of Austria getting off with Lippizaner Stallions at wild anything goes Viennese aftershow parties?
Why else would she want a stable full of stallions? Either that, or she would have to bang a Hapsburg and their weird long chins.
exactly. it goes without saying: if a girl has a horse, she’s banging it. No question about it. It can just be safely assumed
they couldn’t get their hands on any dogs
There is an out of left field reference. Well done.
NAHALT
Maybe that explains the Habsburg chin in the first place. Why the long face?
I think with aristocratic women it’s immaterial. It’s all about whether the animal is thoroughlybred
Nice one. The Empress Sarah Jessica Parker II proves the theory
She just rode the cavalry officers, not their horses.
You left out Eleanor of Aquitane…
Here’s this again.
Brilliant!
this is fucking great.
Women have such a foolish perspective on what it was like to be a princess. Thank you, Disney.
Bloody Disney, filling girls’ heads with fluff.
The only princess movie with any reasonable lessons I saw as a kid was “The Swan Princess.” She’s a rich gorgeous girl who’s captured by the villain hellbent on seizing her kingdom, pursued by the hero who has terrible oneitis (that nearly kills him), and basically just serves to drive the plot forward. Plus, the prince actually turned oneitis into motivation to become the best fucking archer in the universe, which isn’t a terrible moral lesson for kids.
Plus, John Cleese was in that picture. I like that guy.
It’s funny how every time the subject of princesses and feminism comes up, it inevitably goes back to Disney. And for good reason. I don’t know if this is what Walt Disney himself wanted, but he really set something sinister in motion. And what happened is a distortion of the princess narrative into the ra ra you can do whatever you want and marry the Prince of your dreams crap. Plus, most of those princesses, but especially Ariel and Snow White, look prepubescent as hell. Which, no offense to anyone, but for all the anti pedophilia talk, most Americans seem too obsessive with children one way or another. Then again, Ariel is a mermaid, so it’s safe to assume that she already smells like fish down there.
I don’t recall seeing The Swan Princess, but I’m definitely adding it to my viewing list.
Much of the stuff before Disney’s death is fairly accurate translation of the original stories, and often quite serious in tone.
Snow White was just post-puberty in the original tales, and the moral about feminine jealousy comes through clear as a bell.
Pinocchio is dark as shit.
Song of the South is still locked away in the vaults.
Alice in Wonderland is still a masterpiece.
Old Yeller.
While Disney himself gave us Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty, the true death spiral comes after his death. It ramps up in the late 80’s, and now it’s practically pure cancer.
Walt Disney was about money and knew the perfect demographic to get it from
“Alice in Wonderland is still a masterpiece.”
Not when you take into account what the story is really about.
What was it about? I thought the “appreciate what you have” lesson was very clear
To feminists every princess is a tomboy warrior princess that goes against customs wins a war and gets with Prince Charming
They grok monarchy. If only women are in charge.
I think one of the Reformers opposed Queens as head of state:
http://www.swrb.com/newslett/actualNLs/firblast.htm
The show essentially still caters to the feminine imperative. There is little surprise that the SJWs love it. Still – the author himself added Daenerys as the ultimate super-queen while making most men psychopaths or in some way highly faulty.
In addition the show creators added female characters not put in the books to make it all more feminist – like taking a 6’3 actress and making her defeat almost all men with ease – YOLO. In reality that woman would die a thousand deaths and could never ever wield a sword against the best fighters of the Middle Ages. But hey – all for feminism – heil Feminism!
I think that’s why there hasn’t been any decent TV version of Conan the Barbarian. Sure, there were sword women in the stories but they never lasted long and the others only survived by their wits as con women and mistresses who poisoned or stabbed men in their sleep.
Honestly I’m rather glad that they leave certain things alone. Notice how we got Sword of Truth and Game of Thrones with their homosexual and feminist undertones/subtexts. And they’re trying something similar with Shannara now too (that it’s on MTV was already a big red flag).
I’m certain I don’t want my Dragonlance and Conan filled with prancing men and grrl power.
Guess I’ll stick with the lesser offerings:
Brienne is in the books.. What are you talking about?
Fine – she is in the books, but they made her way more powerful on TV. She bested the Hound, one of the top 5 fighters in the kingdom. Heil Feminism!
In the book does this not happen? That’s quite some poetic license there, HBO.
The strongest female character to me is Arya Stark. She has a lot of potential, is manipulative and cunning, can stab with that thin dagger thing, but isn’t portrayed as physically strong. And oh, the things I would do to her sister Sansa…
The hound was poisoned, ill from fever, and wounded when he fought Brienne in the book. Unless my memory is faulty.
And she does win by throwing him off a cliff. So its kind of like what happened in the HBO TV episode but i think the fact that he was ill and sick is not as obvious.
The Hound never met Brienne. He got stabbed in the inn and was dying of fever when Arya abandoned him.
Funnily enough, in the book she’s described as being extremely ugly and having tons of muscle(maybe she has some sort of hormone/gland problem?). She kills a couple surprised knights and a couple desperate, hungry brigands IIRC. The HBO show’s actress looks like she could have been pulled from a women’s basketball team and she mows down tons of professional soldiers..
People who think women would be great medival warriors must also think that a sword handles just like a lightsabre in Star Wars. In reality, it takes tremendous strenght to wield a real sword or worse, a sword and a shield. A woman like the one in the picture (on the left obviously, the one on the right probably couldn’t even run the whole distance to the enemy line without stopping for a BigMac) would probably break her tiny arms just by lifting those things, let alone charging into an enemy line composed of well-trained male soldiers.
Actually medieval swords are light. The real trouble comes from trying to cut through plate armor with it.
Dany is indeed every pampered upper-middle class princess rebelling against daddy in the name of some random cause that has ever existed. Her social justice dragons are just progressive ponies, but the kind of pony every little girl really wants, that is heavily armed and with the capacity to burn alive anyone who disagrees with them. GOT is actually quite realistic some of the time, in that wherever she goes she generally manages to completely screw up the society in question. Moreover Jorah….has there even been a bigger beta white knight in the history of white knights. She pisses on him on every occasion, ignores him, and exiles him and all he wants is another chance to receive more pain, degradation and probable death with absolutely zero reward, all the time while she plays hot and cold sex games with that other guy. God I hope her dothraki captors put to work in a brothel, and but we all know she’ll be leading them en masse to their destruction within a few episodes
Also the white princess ruling benevolently over brown people (or in this timeline “women of colour” and gays etc) is pretty accurate. That’s why the bizarre resentment based cannibalism of intersectionality exists because it perceives that feminism is actually a system whereby white women at the pinnacle of society, who’ve usually had everything handed to them on a plate (and are are profoundly resentful of the fact) get to milk a system set up exclusively for their advantage.
This shows that there is white privilege, and it belongs to those dumb liberals, like the ones claiming racism is bad but don’t mind gentrification of ethnic neighborhoods.
I’ve long argued that modern feminism is a system whereby middle class women like Emma Watson re-patriate the misery of genuinely exploited women usually in the third world for their own benefit and advancement and with absolutely negative outcomes for the women so exploited.
Emma Watson in a nutshell:
I was a bitter, spoiled brat when I went to grade school, and no one liked me so Feminism.
she gets a lot of attention at the UN for some reason. She’s not going to say no is she?
Buzzwords make the western bureaucrats at the UN moist.
still WB 9/10
Absolutely
I’d say a bit lower. I’ve seen her in central London on the street. She’s quite an ordinary looking girl but the press treat her like she’s Audrey Hepburn
I’ve never seen in person…I thought she was super hot in the first harry potter though.
LOL
That right there earns you a reward:
seriously though, yeah, she may not be all that in person. Don’t have to work to hard to convince me. But from the pictures I am seeing —- ooofffaaa….Engorgio!
that’s my girl! She gets more exemptions from me than any other woman. Age exemption. Pretentious cunt exemption. Children exemption.
Wanking-off-a-rolling-pin exemption…with it silent like that, she’s saying anything you want her to say.
give her to me for a weekend and she will say anything I want her to say
Pretentious – she pronounces “spaghetti” “spa-GHEEEEEEEEEEEE-tee”….pisses me off somethin fierce
Oh I know you, you crafty devil you, you’ll make her watch this on repeat until she gets it, punishing her whenever she can’t quite wrap her tongue around it:
She’d pretty much hit the wall by the second one. Still good if older actresses can get some parts too
Oh man I love that over pronunciation shit. That’s like for play to me
“gaba-ghoul….gola-mod….scun-gheelz…”
I actually have a theory on the lolitalian vowel replacement theory that in a nut shell says that they remove the vowels from the ends of their words and conserve them for when they need to say “aaaaa” “ooooo”
The best gabaghoul(and scallops for that matter) I ever had werent even at an Italian place, they were at a Greek place in Queens…
capicola — let’s be civilized.
I lived in Astoria for nearly 10 years…which greek place is it, I am guessing I’ve been.
oops, meant calamari- my pidgin italian is off. you probably have been there- its on ditmars, all the seafood comes in little pots…amazing, name escapes me
oops, meant calamari, my pidgin italian is off. you probably have been there- its on ditmars, all the seafood comes in little pots…amazing, name escapes me
Amazing greek seafood joint…sounds like Kyklades (spelling?) to me….
yea that must be it- the K-something taverna, next to the red tomatoe supermarket
yup kyklades. amazing joint.
http://www.tavernakyclades.com/
And yet… you get the feeling we’re supposed to be rooting for Dany. Not me, can’t stand the precocious little cunt and I’m sure many others feel the same.
it was all downhill after Drogo. The imdb boards are pretty divided down the middle: you love or hate her. I actually think she’s an incredibly bad advert for social justice warriordom, which is a good thing by and large
Pet theory of mine is I actually think that GRRM is setting her up for a colossal fall. No wait that guy has a neckbeard nevermind.
Rumors are flying that she dies this season
Here’s hoping….
Dany will die.
No one writes 90k pages of political intrigue to make the ending “and then some cunt with the westerosi equivalent of a-bombs came in and everything was fine”
I actually have detailed theories about what happens, most of it is pretty dark and nihilistic by most standards but, imo, uplifting.
gonna need to watch this at home I feel.
If that’s what’s the book says they will retcon it and keep her for the SJWs
“Moreover Jorah….has there even been a bigger beta white knight in the history of white knights. She pisses on him on every occasion, ignores him, and exiles him and all he wants is another chance to receive more pain, degradation and probable death with absolutely zero reward”
A powerful lesson on how not to deal with women.
I saw clip on this white dyed girl and she seems to have less character than a tree she was boring and when she goes on her SJW stints they’re so uninspiring and boring either she is meant to be a boring character better as a nameless extra or the actress is woefully bad.
You sir have just been proven correct.
Thank you. Those poor dothraki though
I remember a while back I was watching a YouTuber, Teal Deer perhaps, and he was critiquing some feminist video he found on YouTube. Basically, the feminist was prattling on about how she sometimes just had to take breaks from being a feminist so she could watch TV shows and enjoy life without getting offended/triggered/outraged. Let that sink in for a minute and you’ll begin to realize how 1) fucked up feminism/SJW philosophies are and 2) shallow their convictions in those beliefs are.
Teal Deer is pretty awesome as he picks apart all of the feminists beliefs, along with Thunderfoot.
In my view, there are 2 classes of YouTubers that go after feminists/SJW’s; the intellectuals who use studies, statistics, and rational thinking, and then there’s those just ridicule their idiocy. Both a great for different reasons.
Intellectuals:
Teal Deer
Thunderfoot
Vernaculis
Justicar
Sargon of Akkad
Mockers:
Bearing
Undoomed
SpinosaurusKin
To name a few…
This feminist redneck was quite entertaining… I know some girls like this.
If Joy Turner from My Name is Earl went to college.
I saw that video when it came out and being from the South myself, I have a little saying just for her….
“Bless her heart.”
I enjoy Bearing and Undoomed, as Undoomed is a very skilled artist and Bearing has good energy and timing, but Teal Deer and Sargon are my go-to for any kind of analysis.
I have not heard of some of these. I will have to check them out. Thanks, man.
I used to watch a lot of Sargon, but I’ve grown a little bored of him. I prefer Teal Deer and Vernaculis for analytical videos now.
I wonder if, thanks to the internet preserving her rant for posterity, that she will look back on her childish tantrum in a decade after she blows up like a balloon and hits the wall, and beg to have another shot at a man looking at her and thinking “she’s hot”
For her? Maybe. Something tells me there’s still a chance to save her even though she seems to be as dumb as a sack of bricks.
The Taco Bell cunt needs a dick in her mouth. And Joy from My Name is Earl is a good comparison.
They are all great, and that’s not even half of them
As much as Sargon is on a total mission, he’s also amused/bemused by the feminists he takes down, so he gets that hybrid intellectual/mocking style going, back and forth. Nice mix of highbrow-lowbrow attack…let the sparks fly
I agree. He’s not as thorough as someone like teal deer but not as low brow as someone like Undoomed. Like you said, a hybrid
Would stephan molyneux be anywhere on that list? Liberal revolution is excellent, by the way
Not sure…I haven’t watched a whole lot of Stephan but I’d say he leans more on the intellectual side. Never watched lib revolution.
Same logic concerning relationships… It didn’t count because she was drunk…
That’s what makes dealing with these people so difficult.
One might assume that they are debating and arguing in good faith but they are not.
Drunk as an excuse is a serious cop out. Sounds as believable as saying Satan made me do it. Of course even that would be a better excuse because you were the one that made yourswlf drunk in the first place
The fact that you have to take a break from your beliefs for a show that airs weekly or w/e says much about how you never cared to begin with
My sentiments exactly. She openly admitted to faux outrage in order to push her narrative. Disgusting behavior that should be spat upon.
Yeah, right? But then that’s how women deal with most things: Expediency towards self gratification. All the indignation and anger feminists have, I think, is like emotional addiction. If they didn’t have men to hate they’d be destitute alcholics or drug addicts. Definitely doctors say you can be addicted to anger and rage, and people like that invent bullshit things in their heads to be angery at.
ON point! I have heard and witnessed the same thing, multiple times, and they are begging to be dismantled…their convictions are as flimsy as their so-called cause…all about insecurity, narcissism and the vice-like grip of collective stupidity masquerading as a “truth movement.” They think they want to take it as far as is necessary to get a rise out people — irritating people is in and of itself a “win” for these SJWs. Fuck them. Challenge them directly with logic or reason and they collapse like a house of cards. I’m not afraid to make instant enemies out of these women and their insipid white knight hangers-on. Make a hobby out of shredding them verbally, and diminish their presence in the world…one by one.
Are you really that surprised? These aren’t honest revolutionaries. They’re professional revolutionaries. Ones with pensions. They’re doing it for power, and it’s all a game to them.
Honestly, no I’m not that surprised. What surprises me is people like that can be openly honest about it being a fraud and yet people still eat it up.
That’s probably because they’re frauds inside as well, so they let a fraud lead them. They can’t raise their voices against these guys because they’re just as fucked inside.
…they are very class conscious and if they are already in the upper class..
Limousine liberals and champagne socialists.
They are in the very annoying section of the bus. Ha. I am a limousine nihilist and champagne narcissist…that’s still ok right?
Champagne Narcissist…That’s the name for my new emo band.
Oh man, I will play bass.
And we can let our hair grow and cut ourselves and wear beanies out in the summer heat and buy our stuff at Hot Topic.
yeah, and never smile…..it is important that you always look either like you just found out your best friend killed himself or like you are about to take a trip to a place you have never been and start a whole new life….any other facial expressions are totally forbidden
Ok, so here are some song titles from Champagne Narcissist
Whine and Cheese
Cavistar
Mekong King
Dem Feelz
The Liberal Arts: Bad Bets, Worse Debts
You should have come to study in France, with our glorious socialist system. You would’ve just paid 200 bucks a year and done your unholly things to the very slutty French liberal arts students the rest of the time.
I was at the Sorbonne for 18 months. 🙂 and yes, that is pretty much exactly what I did there.
Et jusque les fins de ses vies, les salopes du Sorbonne se manque le meilleur conard, lolknee.
ils semblent tous d’aimer mon —— lolgenou
I would join this discussion, but unfortunately mon francais est tres merde.
mine too. My pronunciation is even worse. The last time I was there they were still using francs and 90% of my current use of French is with 2 brothers from Alsace so they speak their own language with the grace of a german hog.
I wound up speaking to a Parisian girl for all of 2 minutes in French before switching over to English. Her broken English is cute…my broken French not so much.
Some other good names
Champagne Socialist
Triggered
Everything is Problematic
Islamofauxbia
Virtue Signalling
Imagine the short bus…
Game of Thrones actually went full SJW mode in the latest season’s premiere : a 5’2″ little girl kills a large 6’6″ large black dude in one single blow. That was plausible.
And right after that : SPOILER ALERT When the king of Dorne gets murdered by his brother’s mistress, she says that “weak men” will never rule their country again END OF SPOILER
another decade, that 5’2” high female will be crushing that 6’6” high dude’s skull with her bear hands
Not surprising. I haven’t seen the whole series yet but I read that they’ve exceeded the books publication. Now I’m tempted to read the books just to figure out the differences.
I think this season is where the show goes beyond what Martin has written- he still has 2 books to be written
That explains the full retard from the first episode of this season.
Yep, it’s gone just that one step too far, but that’s how Holly Would Do:
Watched it the other night. When the king of Dorne is talking to the mistress about his brother, Oberyn Martell, they talk about his adventures and all the women he slept with. She then interjects with “and men”. So Oberyn, one of the more masculine characters is now a shit stabber. Once I heard this I wasn’t so put out that the mountain crushed his fag head….
They made this apparent from his first appearance on the show lol
Yes they just had to remind everyone that he was a fudge packer…..with a head that exploded like a watermelon…..
Still a bad ass though, he took down the Mountain and would have won if not for his vanity.
Yup, his vanity as a bi bum boy got the better of him…. if he was truly masculine he would have ended it and walked away…..
It was already established he was bi.
Fair enough, from what I believe there are no bottom troublers in the books and the script writers throw these degenerates into the mix to keep up the Fag quota.
Didn’t she stab him?
Right? Not even a fuckin swing. I mean come on dude.
Now I want you to recall the Oberon fight. The monster he was fighting took several blows and stabs and still he took forever to go down.
So true. I thought the same: how on earth can that monster be killed by a small girl like that???
It seems to be a recurrent pattern in this age’s tv series to wrap politically correct propaganda under a constant flow of utlraviolence and pornography.
Hence why I hardly ever watch modern television. If I wish to watch any decent films, I’ll watch something from East Asia.
Germany, Russia and Japan has been coming with some interesting movies etc, but even in the decadent west some good stuff is produced, I mean it wasn’t entirely historically correct, but the John Adams mini-series is good stuff for example, strangely enough from HBO. Russia came out with Admiral, Germany The Red Baron (he is a pacifist in that movie though lol)…still decent though, Japan came out with Oba: The Last Samurai, etc etc.
Yeah, Adams was an excellent mini-series. One film from Korea that struck me as very good was The Admiral: Roaring Currents and it was about what many consider the 300 of naval warfare, the Battle of Myeongnyang. Another film from there that I found very good was Flu that was about a mutation of Bird Flu. Two German films I enjoyed was Lore and The Wave.
Thanks for the recommendations, I’ll have to look those up.
Btw, I realize there is many movies called Admiral etc, it was this one I meant: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1101026/
If you are interested in something else from the West and English speaking, I would recommend Birdsong, it’s a modern novel so once again not that correct, and all the action is in the second episode mostly. (I meant the adaption on television from the novel).
There has also been a lot of good stuff historically made, the Jeremy Brett Sherlock Holmes adaption is great for example, many of the Poirot episodes are good as well. Gods and Generals and Gettysburg (1993 version), are also good stuff. I mean, I can probably give a thousand examples of good stuff from the West.
I don’t know what you think of movies like “A good year”, I mean there are so many different genres.
Whatever you think of fantasy, I think the original Lord of the Rings trilogy is one of the best things that have come out of cinema in recent years, and that’s even with all the added feminism like Arwen going to get the hobbits (in the books it’s Glorfindel, like Elrond would send his only daughter lol).
Oh….Master and Commander was a movie I never expected…..if you haven’t seen that one you should.
Does it have dicks all over the place?
I ask because
1) It’s HBO
2) Even the BBC is putting wangs in
No, John Adams even tells his son to keep his dick in his pants (he had been running naked at university or something, something that is not shown).
If you understand Russian you can watch the series Admiral online, from which the movie was cut. Much better than the movie.
I don’t understand Russian though =P, didn’t know there was a series.
That is also what I do. I got tired of people constantly trying to brainwash me.
I have watched extremely little traditional tv in 9 months. Televised soccer, yes, regularly, but other than that, YouTube material from ‘alt right’ sources, clips of riots, etc. I like a bit of entertainment, so recently perused a bit of traditional fare tv/movies. The Simpsons, which I normally am a fan of, left me cold with one of their new episodes, and i couldn’t bear to watch more than a few minutes of jake gyllenhall The Boxer or Fighter (which had good reviews) and Deadpool (which a friend recommended). It’s quite clear to me that Hollywood are churning out iq lowering, depraved race cuck, rhetoric, and morons are being conditioned to enjoy it. Soccer or maybe a few other sort of sports, is about all there is left on screen that hasn’t been thoroughly pozzed. I’m glad to have been steered clear of game of thrones.
Addendum : The better call saul series was ok: not too dark and has decent elements, and of course movies can still be semi decent, with moral messages like No Country for Old Men. A lot of Oscar calibre movies at least aren’t an insult to your intelligence (not counting schindlers list)
It is true. I will watch the show because it is on on sundays, I really like the books and it has moments where it can be fun…I also like pointing out subtle plot holes and shit..whatever, it’s fun. But the increasing level of SJW influence has been really annoying and will, at some point, out weight the good of the show and drive me off.
There was a really big outcry from the femicunts and they were calling for blood when there was something perceived to be rape (Jamie and Cersei…plot spoiler, it wasn’t) and ever since it seems they have been sacrificing to the gods of the feminists.
I’ve noticed the SJW influence making it’s way subtly and not-so subtly into various shows over the years. Two recent examples are The Walking Dead and Sons of Anarchy but I recall it even back in The Sopranos. Remember the plotline when they made the one wise guy a faq? One season he’s some badass wise guy busting knee caps and the next season he’s some gentle misunderstood homo blowing his construction site security guard lover and wandering the quaint streets of Providence RI looking at antiques. The minute they introduce that crap is the minute the stories gets too contrived and inauthentic with the shows effectively going to sh-t for me.
I have always thought about the Sopranos when they made a guy a fag. I could never tell if it was bowing to SJW influence or if it was just an excuse to make a whole lot of fag jokes (many of which were fucking hilarious). I mean, from the moment that guy was outed as a fag (wearing the leather biker outfit which itself was pretty funny) there was a serious part of each show were paulie would make about a dozen fag jokes
True. Never thought of it that way. Still, the fact that Tony supported him struck me as weird. He claimed it was because he was still his best earner. Stuck me as incongruous. If he’s running his organization like a well functioning army, he’d know that having an openly queer wise guy would fu-k up morale and team dynamics. You know, the same way the U.S. Army brass stood it’s ground on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. Oh wait.
Good ol JohnnyCakes- whatta blast from the past. Bada-bing!
yeah, struck me as odd too. Like I said, I think it could go either way. they could just have had tony support him to open up dialogue with paulie so he could say his hilarious fag lines. I would lol every time he said “secret fag” and the scene where the reveal that he isn’t just a fag but that he receives rather than gives and paulie goes totally batshit is priceless.
That said, it is also plenty possible that they were feeding breadcrumbs to SJWs
Hard to say.
It struck me as pretty legit. In a group that big there’s bound to be a fag. And they harassed him relentlessly for it. I don’t think there was anyone who really accepted it. Not even Big Pussy!
yeah. And the scenes where they are all sitting around the butcher shop trying to make sense of it and talk it through. I swear, that show made me laugh so fucking hard.
was there a little pussy character? I dont remember…
I need to dust off the DVDs and check out that season again. I do recall some classic and hilarious dialogue. Maybe I have my SJW antenna wired too tight. If they hadn’t turned him into the stereotypical gentle, misunderstood and persecuted fag it wouldn’t have bothered me so much.
I totally understand your feelings here, but sometimes it is good just to turn it off and have a laugh. Never being able to turn it off is what gives feminists that sour cunt expression on their face. Well, that and being a sour cunt.
Wise words
I think I would get a lot more out of that show if I rewatched from the beginning. Uncle Pauly was a hoot. Christopher was one of those guys on the verge of discovering the redpill but always letting his weaknesses and a shitty woman fuck him up.
Apparently he only appeared in the pilot episode.
http://sopranos.wikia.com/wiki/Gennaro_Malanga
also, his brother in law from the New York Gang who gets pissed about his sisters honor is fucking hilarious too. ANd then when the son turns all emo goth and tony tries to man him up. Yeah, so much funny shit.
Good observation
Just rewatched the whole series myself. There’s many redpill moments that his son started to pick up on. At least the boy figured it out when he was younger.
Perhaps my favorite line from that series is when the cunty daughter is complaining about not being able to go out and slut it up at some party. “Dad its 2003”. Tony: “The fuck it is. Out there, it’s 2003. In here, it’s 1953.”
a classic!
I love that after all her rebellious shit for season after season she eventually winds up just being a total daddies girl which validates all of his old world alpha parenting tactics.
Oh yeah. It was great to see that happen.
Yeah, especially when they had that part about Jumior eating pussy, and all the shame and stigma. That was to highlight how image is everything and could cost you your life. Which I thought was to help set up future drama. But then they had the gay come out, and the other more interesting stuff got swept under the rug. It kind of ruined some potential in the series.
Sir, you certainly are stronger than me. I left the show after the Red Wedding. SJW messages were too much…
I guess I watch the show through the filter of the books which is, imo, incredibly red pilled. I can’t deny that the show sucks the big sjw dong harder and deeper every season, but I enjoy it if for no other reason it gives me something to gripe about while I wait for the next book.
I bet you enjoyed the season opener about as much as I did then. Dorne: the feminist paradise.
Sexy, thin warrior girls left and right that can take down a seven foot monster of a body guard without him putting up even a little fight, and the best part, they assassinated the patriarch! Gurl power !!!
it was fucking terrible. Dorne was absurd. Not only that but it made no fucking sense whatsoever. In order to avenge Doran Martell she does what? Ends the entire line of Martell. She kills Marcella which sets dorne to be in a war with the crown and casterly rock while simultaneously ending the line of the ruling family pretty much ensuring a dornish civil war.
One bitch kills a 6 foot thick aero hotath with a knife more suited to cleaning his toe nails.
smh.
Meanwhile, at no point did Jamie Lannister, the king slayer, the lord commander of the kingsguard, upon the death of his daughter/neice by dornish conspiracy, have the son of the prince of dorne arrested…rather he leaves him on a boat with some servants.
And where did the sandsnakes come from? were they following unseen for weeks in a stealth row boat? And this despite the fact that Dorne is fiercely anti-nautical by a point of honor (Princess Nymeria burned all Dorne’s ships and vowed dorne would never be a sea faring nation)?
Ok, and even if dispatching people to follow a fully stocked royal galley was a good idea, how did they know or why would they think that the second Marcella died they wouldn’t at best arrest trystane and more than likely just fucking kill him given that Jamie tends to act on emotion.
Meanwhile, why didn’t they just kiss Trystane goodbye with the same fucking poison? Easier by a lot. Or, for that matter, assume that the lannisters would kill him.
More holes in this plot than in amadu Diallo eating swiss cheese on a golf course.
edit: avenge obryn martell
Agreed on every point. Especially the body guard. Come on man. It would take several men of average size and skill with a weapon to take down someone as big as that based on his size alone.
Factor in how well he can swing that spear around and it gets more complicated
even if they poisoned him with the quickest acting poison known in that world, the stuff the faceless men use, he still would have had enough time to turn around and kill that bitch before he fell down. The faceless men give it to an old frail man and he is able to carry on a short conversation before he dies and he takes the poison willingly
and notice how there is only one male protagonist? The rest have been killed off.
I just wonder if the writers of these shows ever stop to think that the characters they create is total nonsense and unrealistic, no more like pathetic.
That is part of the writing and marketing process. A lot of the long-running shows like GOT try to build characters that viewers can develop like, unhealthy psychotic relationships with so they’ll watch the show week after week. One thing I like about GOT is that they’ll do that, but then unexpectedly kill off the characters they built up for the viewers. Every time I imagine these fantasy freaks, emos, whatever who’re into the show, totally having breakdowns and crying.
you’re exactly right man, it’s the old bait and switch.
Y a-t-il tromperie dans l’ordre de l’univers?
They still have strong empowered womyn in the show and the show is a good story. Therefore it doesn’t stand for everything they are against as long as women are the queens and nobles.
That’s why they love it.
And always under the modus operandi of Panem et circenses.
The SJW liberal mentality is based on envy. So no surprise they actually like aristocracy and violence. I turned it off after season 2. Unbearable.
Yeah in game of thrones, most of all the important male characters were killed : think about ned stark, stannis baratheon, tywin lannister and the list goes on. In contrast, there were not as much relevant female characters killed. It reduce the credibility of the show that there’s no longer powerful, relevant male characters…
SJWs are double-faced hypocrites, most of them are. I know it from my personal experience. ‘Do like I say, not like I do” is their modus operanti. But we already know that. When we gonna start punching their smug faces? I will thoroughly enjoy the process.
Hypocrisy is a trait of narcissism so it’s no surprise that most SJWs are narcissists.
I’ve seen a couple of videos of anti-Trump protesters and the poster made the point of halting the video right at certain points to highlight the expressions on their faces. They all had that same sadistic cunt face shit eating grin of someone who is so pleased at what they’re doing.
I thought it was a show about homosexuals.
Not full blown AIDS but not far off…..
Full blown AIDS….pun intended?
Always intended…..
OT, but I just saw the greatest comment on a sports site: “Why is Dwight Howard always the escape goat?” I want an escape goat, could come in handy against a fire-breathing dragon
Do you carry it on your back like a parachute?
you havent lived until youve seen an escape goat running thru the fields at 90 MPH…
I took the red pill at middle age and after being stuck in a wheelchair and I’ve come to see that disabled men are nothing but cannon fodder for the SJW aristocracy. What they promise is accessibility and adaptive technology funded by taxes and social programs, but they would rather just assign all of us to “rest homes” so that we’re not a burden on their freedom to eat, pray, and love. And disabled men who work and manage to support themselves are not exempt from paying those upper tax brackets.
If it doesn’t look aesthetisically pleasing it’s not in the liberal imperative hence its ironic that the very thing that oppresses women of body image is fashion designers who are homosexuals and other women nnot pretty enough to been models and are bitter about it
Don’t you read a bit much into enjoying a tv show?
if picking fantasy tv shows, books and movies apart to the most minute minutia and reapplying it to the world at large is “too much” then what the hell are we doing with an intertubes?
Clearly frequenting sketchy irc channels to obtain cheese pizza, geez, you’re missing out.
funny thing: I had to google irc and I am still not sure exactly what it is.
it’s a chat protocol.
In simple terms its just a real-time communication tool which uses its own non-browser based protocol. However in its current form its largely used for anonymous secure file sharing that’s quite difficult to trace. If Usenet is the ancestor of the internet forum, then IRC is the ancestor of all real time chat programs.
We don’t call this series “Game of Chairs” for a reason.
Despite 200 years of propaganda since the Enlightenment about democracy, equality, diversity, feminism, social justice and random breeding as the wave of the future, our fantasy lives, which reflect how the human mind really works, show that we still understand that humans flourish in tribal, hierarchical, aristocratic, patriarchal, traditional and monarchical societies.
here is one point where you and I have absolute agreement on.
Well said.
SJWs love democracy. That’s why they have no issue voting in Hillary, who will be the second Clinton in office, or voting in Trudeau, the son of a former prime minister. Oh wait a second, this sounds like a monarchy. Hmmmmm…..
Look how fast they were to elevate the Kennedy family to royal status.
very good case and point in how much the structure of monarchy is craved inversely proportionately to those who don’t have it. The feral hippies loved Kennedy because they were basically street urchin.
Even the ultra pathetic occupy wall street people tried to structure (as best as their incompetent shit for brains could) because deep in everyone’s soul there is a desire for strict structure and monarchy.
Actually a lot of SJW “in theory” aren’t watching it anymore. While the violence rolls of them like water off a duck’s back, have a couple of instances where it looks like it might be rape and you get the “I’m not watching it anymore!”
The great thing about the show is we apply modern value system to the characters and then when they act medieval viewers are surprised. To the modern viewer, Ned’s honor seems laudable and it gets him killed. Go back and rewatch the events leading up to his execution and you see it coming. Great nuance, but SJW check your values at the door.
Apparently the nerds have taken over Hollywood. Setting aside the fantasy shows, every year now we see big budget movies based on comic books, and we have several TV series of the same: Supergirl, Arrow, The Flash, Legends of Tomorrow, Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., Agent Carter, and probably some others I’ve overlooked.
The only thing that runs Hollywood is money. In 10 years, Superhero shows and movies will be a depressed market, and some other trend will arise.
The comic book movies aren’t for nerds…it’s worse..the comic book movies are for SJW’s to indulge in their pretty boy superhero / bad boy troubled wet dreams while still being able to complain there is nothing out there for them.
The last 2 generations (x and millennials) have been generations of man children. Superheroes are for children, but they are all being marketed to adults now.
The only ‘fantasy’ figure worth a shit is Conan the Cimmerian; now that’s a hero with balls although I do like Frank Castle too for his brutality and visceral approach to life.
Kind of rings true to a similar dynamic observable among the communists and socialists. They once condemned the former caste system of nobles and aristocracy. In fact, the most compelling part of this ideology is the notion that by backing the revolution would ensure a commoner would never bow or salute to some other person ever again. Yet, the most passionate advocates of this idea are the ones, again as demonstrated throughout its short history, to create an even more oppressive, rigid and hierarchical system once they are in power. And once again the commoner is bowing, saluting and groveling at the feet of another person, who feeds them bullshit that because they are superior to them they must endure the sacrifice of supreme leadership, which includes comfy Kremlin apartments, luxuries and plenty of food. Meanwhile the rank and file dope starves in plain sight.
After last season I kinda lost interest in it but still watched the new episode and was very dissapointed by it. Weak show slowly dying away like Better Call Saul or Walking Dead. It’s gonna be shit in the next few episodes, I’ll guarantee you that.
The books are definitely Purple Pill(Burgundy Pill?) despite George RR Martin’s Leftist politics.
Martin definitely seems to understand female hamster thinking. Many of the female characters have beta orbiters and go for the “bad boy”, for instance. Dowagers tend to get up to no good.
Daenerys’ rule seems to criticize the Liberals vs Neoconservatives dynamic in the United States. She alternates between being incredibly brutal(mass crucifixions) and ridiculously merciful, catering to hordes of helpless people following her army around looking for handouts. With both these approaches to ruling she’s mucking around and wasting resources in foreign countries. Her attempts at social engineering fail and her subjects remain ingrateful and atavistic. Cultures need to be left to evolve on their own, after all. At the very end of the most recent book, she has a vision of her ancestors telling her to go seek out and rule her own tribe. Now that’s radical.
Chalk the strong warrior-women up to the fantasy element, I guess. I’ll accept them. Despite the feminist idea of the guy wanting his wife “pregnant and barefoot in the kitchen”, many of us daydream about a strong, assertive equal partner to hold down the fort with, though most guys will end up with a mostly-loyal cheerleader at best. Even the really patriarchal societies of the past had legends of female warriors and goddesses.
Catelyn is def archetype of wife.
The women who are strong (books) are all strong in very feminine ways and the ones who try to be strong in masculine ways wind up getting themselves killed, raped or rescued by men.
HBO obvs has to bend over and take the sjw dong often and hard, but I find the books to be incredibly red pill.
Other than that, your analysis is pretty much dead on right here.
Definitely. Catelyn’s interesting in how she seems like a great first mate for Eddard but when he’s away she does impulsive things like kidnapping Tyrion and tries to meddle in her son’s reign.
right…which is lesson one…if you have a good wife don’t leave her alone without your dominant presence because no matter how good she is she is still a woman and prone to doing emotion driven and stupid things without your leadership. A good lesson.
Martin is a blue pill mangina. But even he isn’t stupid enough to deny nature and reality. In his books, one handed Jaime defeated Brienne, the hound defeats Brienne, etc, etc…
I dont watch that show anymore.. tried to. cant do it.. One thing I noticed: Lots of bad shit happens to male characters in the show, rape, vicious killings… etc etc..nobody says anything about it except how badass it was.. then the same shit happens to female characters.. and WW3 starts online!!!
I only watched “Game of Thrones” for (literally) a brief moment. Something about the camera-work made me want to throw up.
And fanboys gushing about it don’t help in convincing me to watch it:
It’s really good. I don’t own a tv but go out of my way to watch it. But I enjoy sci-fi / fantasy stuff. And anything HBO does is first rate (note: I have never watched an episode of “Girls” but have seen basically every other series they have done).
It’s a little confusing / difficult to get into because there are a ton of characters, but it’s pretty entertaining, and has some cool characters. I’d say the #1 reason stuff like this is popular with SJWs is because frumpy SJWs sit around watching a bunch of tv, and most tv is crap, so yeah, they will really love a well done series they can watch repeatedly / blog about / dress up like.
I enjoy being confused about the things I watch, because then I have to think about it and figure it out. I don’t like the concept of being similar to SJWs though (even though most of my coworkers are).
Some truths about the roles of the sexes are self-evident and present even in the most bluepill bs, if you know (and want to) look for it. But until then, my attitude towards SJWs is:
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2c83828723015e6996ff3d67caa6ce39861c472279a15b5e14b0d8b722ba6c62.jpg
What is this “TV” you speak of?
To me, GoT is clearly a woman’s show. If you pay attention, the women are the ones that have all the power. The men are just a bunch of barbaric war mongers. Sansa and Arya are gearing up to be powerful figures while Melisadnre and Daenerys have been doing their thing for a while. Cerci had a lot of power and hit what seemed to be rock bottom and is about to make a comeback. Even the fiercest warrior on the show, Brienne, is a woman.
Sure there’s gratuitous sex scenes but HBO wouldn’t get their ratings without it. Then there’s the whole “gay quota.” If you have watched even a handfull of HBO series over the last two decades you probably noticed that there is some sort of requirement to introduce a gay character even in the pilot. Even in GoT there were no gay characters in the book but HBO had to meet their gay quota. They throw in some gay scenes that have nothing to do with anything and have no bearing on any other story lines.
They are fulfilling their SJW requirements for sure. It’s the themes listed in this article that are being subtly, and not so subtly undermined.
It’s basically a porn soap opera hybrid with lots of violence…
There was a conference (comic con?) where the cast was up for q&a with the audience, and yes, you guessed it – two fat, sloppy, dropping, blue haired, jowl hanging slobs femicunts asked the cast, the significance of how violence against women in the show is commentary on “real” life rape culture and domestic violence etc…
Maisey Williams (Arya Stark) and another cast member (female too) immediately replied almost to the point of cutting the hairy wildebeest off by saying, “men are suffering too…” And almost more so than the women.
I would say in that instance even the cast members are not buying into this sjw nuclear waste.
I read about that. There was another one though where the actor who played Drogo was asked how he liked getting into his character. And he said something like “being a powerful warrior and killing men with my bare hands and raping women is exciting and it feel powerful to play the character”
Whatever it was it seemed like an honest answer from an actor about playing a bad ass barbarian type. Nothing different than I bet Arnold would have said.
I am sure you can all assume perfectly well what the response was. If his character wasn’t already dead I am pretty sure they would have had to kill him off. Shit, after all the fuckery going on with bowing to the fem lords HBO is doing, I am shocked that they don’t resurrect him and then have him raped to death by a bunch of women with strapons.
Oh they just might…
Thoros bring Drogo back and he identifies as a woman. Totally Jenners the dothraki
shhh….. they’re reading this!!!
When I discovered that a lot of my shitty values and perspectives on life were influenced by TV, I turned to reading instead, and I never looked back.
The first season of the show was very good, but by the second season the show was filled with nothing but delusional women and faggotry. Yeah, on the show faggots all are given horrible deaths and their deviancy leads to their downfall, but HBO is still desensitizing everyone by showing the gratuitous gayness on tv.
by the way, at the absolute most the faggotry is hinted at in the book and imo isn’t really there at all.
For instance, Renly Baratheon in the books is described as liking fancy clothes and fancy parties and fancy dinners in stark contrast to his brother Robert who is more war like and stannis who is more serious.
You can easily see them as the eldest brother who is the warrior, the middle brother who winds up being in his shadow, and the youngest brother who has no real responsibility and just enjoys fucking off.
His sexuality is never once mentioned.
However, in the show he is sucking cock.
That is an absurd choice in my opinion. I think that both the reality of the world as well as the reality of the universe would suggest that Renly wasn’t a fag, he was just a child of privilege who had his battles fought for him in contrast to his older brothers who had more responsibilities.
The show really faggots the whole thing up.
Your absolutly right. The books only hint about gayness. HBO pushes the limit and shows naked men laying in bed, petting each other, and/or making love.
This is the plan of the SJWs. To showly introduce the material so that years into the show, you begin to accept unprecedented levels of gayness.People were disgusted with the debauchery in the second season of the show. But by the forth season, those viewers that stuck around fell in love with and accepted the most popular character of the season, oberyn martel, a raging deviant.
Yup, this is absolutely right. Also, with the hinted gayness in the book…that King Robert thought his younger brother was a fairy doesn’t make him gay. It means Robert is the toughest guy in the planet and lead a rebellion and killed all these guys and renly is a rich spoiled brat who has never been to war.
I have read all of the ASOIAF books several times over and never got that Renly was a homosexual. I got that Renly was seen by his warrior brothers as never having proven himself in battle and that his fine raiment and lavish lifestyle are somewhat effeminate to the thinking of tougher more battle hardened men. I am sure Ghost of Jefferson probably feels this way about me lol and he might even be right to a degree.
Oberyn is said to feast big. Drink deep. Fuck hard. Kill women. He wants everything. If this means he fucks boys as well as girls it is def something like the Roman legion or a Sodom and Gomorrah type..but again, I think his ass piracy could have been read into his general promiscuity and thirst for new experience. I would have to go back to the books, but I don’t recall Oberyn butt banging anyone.
Even fucking loras in the books…he is described as an amazing tourney jouster who it is mentioned is untested in battle. Like Renly he is a third son and too young to have seen any of the hard times in westeros. Just another young noble born knight who is very wealthy and has lived only through times of prosper and as such is described as basically being “mr fancy pants” with his fancy clothes and fancy armor….totally natural for a young spoiled brat.
I have always read the conflict of those who have earned and those who have been given in these books and it is an amazing and complex conflict. It isn’t just the poor peasants and the rich nobles. It is the mighty balon grayjoy who is pissed at his son theon for wearing jewelry he purchased rather than took from an enemy. It is King Robert who wins the crown and renly who is constantly talks down to. It is how the girls all love Loras but Oberyn is snarky and says he may be good in tournaments but in a real battle he would be totally killed.
Every single instance of faggotry has been put there by HBO
Wait, you like fancy clothes and fancy dinners…;)
I absolutely do
I see. Shall I have the squire ready your escape goat?
lol
Exactly, it’s blatantly obvious. In comparison with the books what leftist changes I see:
– the mentioned excessive faggotry
– an excessive use of strong female leads (in the case of Dorne it’s just too obvious and fake)
– poor vocabulary choice that shows how stupid the show writers are (ex. “You want the good girl but you need the bad pussy” – pussy only began being used as a word in the 19th/20th centuries, in medieval times and in the books words like “cunt” were used)
Feminist Laci Grenn and her tits (which is the only part of her that make sense) once said that she had to take a break from feminism to enjoy music, movies, TV series, etc… This should tell us that feminsm isn’t a philosophy designed to make the self better, it’s designed to attain power and oppress others. If you’re a stoicist, you don’t take a break from stoicism to live a normal life. Stoicism is just something that works in the background to make yourself better. Feminism however is like a sword with which you attack others by calling them sexists for liking GoT for example or for “believing” in biology… Since it’s normal to believe in biology and like GoT, feminists (who still remain humans even if they do their best to hide it) know they can’t turn the sword on themselves so sometimes they simply drop in and go on about their day doing things they would chastise people for doing.
I hate this show. I’ve seen a few episodes and it’s mostly just snarky British people bantering in poorly lit rooms. But at least people have a new Harry Potter but with tits.
It’s a little depressing that Aurelius’ latest article gets 20 comments and this one has over 200 (though a third of them are by one fucking person).
Absolutely love this show. John Snow trying to be the noble hero like his adopted father only to get killed for doing the right thing is symbolic of the white knights or men used by women and elitists. John got red pilled with his red blood. Now he will come back not as a hero but as something more. Armed with his new awareness he will be an avenging warrior with a cause to do what he has to do.
Remember that it is a gay guy that wrote it and the bitchy blond white queen who saved all the slaves and controls dragons is likely to win it all, stinks of uber SJW,
I can’t hear the opening theme without singing along “Weiner weiner” in my head anymore.
Saw one episode of this show, that was enough. I have no qualms against anybody watching and enjoying it–and the accompanying brouhaha–just don’t make me.
It’s quite simple.. SJWs love this pseudo-medieval adventure because, deep down, they have a fetish for seeing men being slaughtered, mutilated and cast down en-masse. But look at the feminist shitstorm caused by one off-camera rape scene.
As we’re on the subject of parody this is fucking hilarious……..
That is funny!
A friend of mine DVRed the first season for me. I started watching and never finished it, and don’t really care.
I don’t see that any one discusses Brienne of Tarth, the Joan of Arc clone. The character Dianna Rigg (LadyMargaery?) plays recognizes her as ‘singular’. Let them call me Beta for admiring the one human who actually strives after knighthood, when all around ignore it, and welcome, I have no fear of it. But what Frenchman in France in the 15th century, not wand to follow Joan.? Brienne is the classic Virago admired by Virgil and Spenser alike.
Never read the book, ,and know the series only from clips, so additional information welcome.
The only things in common between Brienne of Tarth and Joan of Arc are that they both wore armour and they’re both largely if not wholly fictional characters.
Historians can’t even decide whether Joan of Arc ever actually swung a sword in battle, given her own letters say her armies were always directly commanded by a man, that she far preferred carrying her banner to a sword, and that she never killed anyone — which kind of doesn’t fit with the whole “military saviour of France” thing.
Brienne of Tarth is “singular” because she’s freakishly big and strong for a woman, which are the only things that allow her to last more than five seconds in a duel with a man. The only reason she hasn’t yet come to the same end as other honourable characters like Ned Stark is because she has no power and therefore threatens nobody of consequence
Same reason they enjoy listening to rap songs with misogynistic and sexist lyrics.
I believe there is another simple explanation. They know deep down that a patriarchal monarchy is the best form of government. It really gets their engines going too, but the only way they can express that is in a fantasy senario.
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES and YES.
Always wanted to know the answer to this one: Manliness, strength, pride in one’s heritage, faith, honour, all of these are utterly opposed to feminism & SJWism, yet there seems to be a disturbing trend of these ingrates “appropriating” (sorry to use their buzzword but it isn’t entirely inappropriate in this context) Game of Thrones as if it somehow supports their worldview. The number of times I’ve wanted to turn my laptop screen into a bracelet for anger at seeing a Game of Thrones article from Buzzfeed of all places doing the rounds on Facebook is starting to move into the realm of the uncountable.
They love shows like GOT because deep down they all want to be captured and made some mans helpless whore. I could be wrong but I don’t think so haha.
Could also be the bitter & baser nature of GoT characters is in the heart of all SJWs.
Uhhhh, so why was 50 shades of abuse me so popular? Do as I say not as I do………
Can’t believe you forgot to mention the excessive mention of penis and castration possibly the fantasy of feminists and cuck beta males
There’s eunuchs under command of that daenarys
Oh and it’s excessive use of scat behavior such as literally peeing and shitting on your enemies sometging homosexuals are fond of as well as every bloodthirsty libtard that describes their hatred for a Christian or non liberal
Just like Shades of Grey, Game of Thrones show the true nature of libtards
I’m not a Traditionalist, I read Evola and Guenon sometimes and I agree with a couple (literally, only 2) of their positions.
What I do not like of Traditionalists is that they are confused most of the time, they are like a Templar Knight in a Walmart in New Orleans. Take Guenon for example, he is literally navigating the sea of Traditions (with capital T, as they say….-sarcasm-) with no compass nor port. Evola was navigating as well, not as lost as Guenon, and he stopped in a couple or importarnt ports, but he was very confused as well.
I agree with a lot of things Michael Sebastian has said in previous articles, I think he is a young and decent man; but with this article he is is showing how confused he is, and that means he is a good traditionalist (with no capital T…horror!).
Do you really think that GoT stands for monarchy, aristocracy, faith and homogeneity? are you fucking high while watching this show? Really?
GoT if filthiness, decadence and cheap softcore with nice wardobre, that is what it is. And that is why the SJW’s love it so much.
It doesn’t promote Monarchy and Aristocracy, in fact it shows that they are outdated, morally corrupt and mentally sick. Im only giving you an example, and that is the incestuous twin brothers.
Faith? It shows religion like an old and corrupt institution (Faith of the Seven) or as a superstitious pseudochristianity (God of the Light).
Homogeneity? do you remember that fake blonde fucking the mystery meat in order to obtain an army?
All good points which the author seems to have missed out on. It shows a world steeped in religion, monarchy, aristocracy, patriarchy and critiques them rather than holding up those things as models and virtues.
Just because a show takes place in a more “backward” (according to the current feminist and liberal worldview anyway) time and place, doesn’t mean the show celebrates those aspects about it.
tried to read the first song of fire and ice book and thought the writing was terrible, so i’ve never given game of thrones a try. i’m a tolkien man, myself. old school traditional masculine devout christian WW1 veteran polyglot beats morbidly obese monolingual atheist feminist* every time.
*am assuming the monolingual atheist feminist part about george r martin (that’s his name, isn’t it?) but i feel pretty confident.
Lord Dunsany is even better and I think if you’re into more ‘fantasy’ writing the quintessential red pill author is Robert E Howard.
Same. Read the first book. Thought it was ok, though a bit too gratuitous for my taste. Read half of the second book and I had had enough. Nothing wrong with sex and violence if done tastefully, but GOT just does it too much.
Quote:Why Do SJWs Like Game Of Thrones ??
Answer: Because they are addicted to wet dreams ??
Game of Thrones is a fascinating series and a decent show. What appeals to me most is the medieval setting – I love history and that time period. And beyond the death and sex there are some interesting insights.
There will never be a convincing argument for how progressive taxation keeps people from advancing. When you state things as fact when they are not you do what sjw do.
Short answer is because they are deranged, hypocritical freaks! Game of Thrones still rocks by the way.
The show is actually medi-evil SJW fantasy where they can immerse themselves as the hero’s and sexual deviants in HBO’s propaganda universe of corrupt Monarchy, patriarchalism, aristocracy and evil religions.
This is the conclusion I’ve come to, also. On the surface, it appears like a conservative barbaric world worthy of masculinity. Yet you don’t have to look very far to see the creator George Martin supports the most depraved egalitarian fantasies in his writing and is deliberately catering to feminists and such.
Certainly meets the criteria for Time warner’s HBO programming to the great unwashed. Now they have complete reign of the story and direction so I’m expecting much worse.
SJWs are unintelligent miscreants. This doesn’t surprise me.
“When it comes to ruthlessness, no one exceeds SJWs. Traditional men want
the punishment to fit the crime, but SJWs are willing to use even
outrageously excessive measures to remove their enemies. If that means
wholesale slaughter of their perceived enemies, SJWs are willing to do
it.”
Which is why we, the living (to borrow a phrase) should have no compassion for them, they worse than a rabid dog, who was at least once upon a time, a worthy being. They need to be dealt with in the same way as a rabid dog.
SJW’s hate GoT. Are you guys even paying attention?
Because feminism and social justice are massive, giant shit tests that men are collectively failing.
Because they aren’t against it. They just aren’t in the upper echelons of power where they can get away with that behavior and haven’t the personal qualities (like intelligence) it takes to approach that level. They don’t even see that they are pawns of such people, more so than most of us.
I like GoT because it’s a fucking good show, and nothing is going to stop me from enjoying it. SJW’s are stupid if they argue against a show which is set in a fictional fantasy land with allusions to the Middle Ages. Focus on something more important.
Lookit. It is really easy… SJWs crave the power & wickedness that goes on in GoT.
Check USSR, Communist China, Nazi regime et al. They (SJW) crave that…Ultimate power over all the rest of us.
I prefer AMC – TWD is watchable to say the least. The whole world will become like that very VERY soon – no assistance from the dead needed.
And SJWs will be the first to die (at least)
It doesn’t matter if you are a SJW or not, we all love blonde’s tits with blood all over it, even if you’re not a man.
This show has turned into the ultimate place for alpha females, beta, dick-less males and white knight douchebags.
When traditional men become as wise as serpents, not all of them will stay traditional. That’s when they start backing movements like the Protestants, the Enlightenment, Progressivism-movements that destroyed traditionalism in the West-all in the name of power. You think those movements succeeded because they were just? Hardly. Most of the people who supported these movements did so out of a desire for power. Nobles and kings supported the Protestants to control the Church easier. Politicians and agitators who supported the Enlightenment wound up with comfy jobs at the new governments. Progressives get rich from exploiting the situation of the poor. They’re just like the Caudillos and would-be Emperors who claim that they will help the oppressed and the just, only to turn their whole efforts to self-interest.