The sexual marketplace need not suck all the time. Plenty of men have laid out the path for you, often initially shacking up with the women they felt they deserved and then moving onto greener, hotter pastures. If you’re in doubt, take a look at the following men who saw the light and found themselves a better-looking woman.
1. Nathan Lyon
An Australian cricketer, which means virtually none of you will know him, Lyon had had two children with his ex before moving onto a smokin’ blonde he apparently remains with.
First this:
Now this:
For a man who was once regarded as the dorkiest guy in his team (and most likely still is), he’s done well for himself—finally.
2. Robert Rodriguez
Rodriguez, a filmmaker, is proof that you can start badly and finish up pretty good, even if rebounding. When he was just past 30, he made the mistake of marrying a woman who was already hitting 40.
He thankfully improved his lot with pre-mental Rose McGowan, a little bit before she went batshit crazy and hit the wall (or hit the wall and went batshit crazy, take your pick).
Rodriguez split with McGowan before her fall into madness and he can probably say that he was the last man to bed her in a bangable state. Hooray.
3. Jason Aldean
Aldean is not really a household name, which makes his upgrade all the better; he cannot rely on the megastar status of others. The country singer left his wife, who in many photos looks old enough to be his mother.
His current wife wins out by a full fifty miles:
Aldean is to be commended. Many men get much older before deciding to take the plunge and abandon a post-wall woman.
4. Henry Bolton
The current leader of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), Bolton realized that Eastern European women, despite being better overall than Anglo-Saxon/West European women, also have an expiry date.
He’s now with a 25-year-old model named Jo Marney:
We’ll see how this relationship pans out, but we can be sure that Bolton enjoys his sex life a lot more recently.
5. John Copsey
A conservative mayor in the UK, Copsey ended his marriage for a 19-year-old farm girl. Hilariously, his sexagenarian wife called him “nuts” for opting for a nubile girl over a post-wall geriatric.
Whilst his new flame isn’t a perfect 10, I’d still rather give her the keys to my city:
The solution to marital misery for a man is only one late teenage or 20-something woman away.
Have you got the courage to find someone better?
If your relationship with a woman honestly works, all power to you. For many men, however, things are not so rosy. In a number of cases, these guys will be much better off by cutting their losses and finding someone they not only think but know is better. Are you one of those men who might need to make a change? Think it over.
Read More: Women Only Hate Female Objectification When They Can No Longer Profit From It
Then there are the men who married thin women who turned into land whales and yet stay. Pierce Brosnan’s broad comes to mind. Google her if you dare.
and Hugh Jackman – wtf? beard?
@Sir Lee it has to be a beard or some other seriously fucked up psychological issues.
yea.
Pierce Brosnan – just saw him in the “Foreigner” – great movie – he is becoming like Sean Connery – if he can act it – surely he can be it in real life? and bang cheerleaders???
what man wouldn’t want this?
Paul Hogan himself, how old was he in Crocodile when he traded in his plain wife to shackup with perfect 10 co-star Linda kozlowski? https://goo.gl/images/wCYvLZ
Had the best twenty years of her life to the point she was about to lose that cougar-milf appeal, and traded in again!
MICK
Paul Hogan was 46 in 1985 when the film was lensed.
“Because of her age, we started [trying to have a baby] straightaway when we were together,” says the Australian actor, 49, who wed Furness in 1996 when he was 27 and she was 40.
What a friggin’ cuck. Life’s up and wifes up with a newly middle aged wall victim right at the prime of a man’s life for racking up notches with early 20’s women.
some men insist on marrying their “moms”…(shiver)
talk about taking it to extremes.
No question marks required. I met him, he hit on me. End of story.
Hugh Jackman and her wife have been together 24 years and they have been able to have a healthy, happy, and solid dynamic. She doesn’t have the looks but they are good for each other.
They adopted kids because she was/is an infertile old wench.
He failed the game of evolution and remains barren like the hagged creature he married.
“He’s now with a 25-year-old model named Jo Marney”
They’ve split up after she said she didn’t like black people.
Even if you’re the leader of a pro-white party in the UK, you have to pretend to like blacks.
Bloody madness.
Seriously doubt that. A young woman fucking a guy that old doesn’t give a shit about principles. That’s why you never listen to what they say, follow their actions.
Good grief!
And then losers say, “See, Bond likes fat chicks. Why do you think you’re too good for them?”
Agree 100% If you can get a hot, young girl, go for it!
Dump the old bag like yesterday’s garbage.
And for those of us who can’t get a hot young girlfriend, nothing wrong with using our hard earned money to rent escorts or get sugar babies. What else are we going to do with our $$$? Leave it to ungrateful nephews and nieces? To hell with that!
I agree with AutomaticSlim.
there is a reason – and is called tradition, and also called wedding googles.
If the relationship is sound – I am of the opinion you stay with same dedicated, reliable, useful, complimentary women as she ages. I would.
These days not so common…as she can and will get bored. Nuke the raltionship, destory the finances, and repuation of the man – “zero out” as Rational Male calls it…
So better to rent.
As my very wealthy ex-wife says “if it flies, floats, or fucks – cheaper to rent”….
replied to wrong comment here.
this system sucks so bad…
and so does chateau heatritstes — can never get a post to post…
I can make something better Rooshe – let me know – 95% complete
But you agree with the escorts and sugar babies too? And not leaving money to ungrateful brats? Right? Right???
AutomaticSlim:
“But you agree with the escorts and sugar babies too? And not leaving money to ungrateful brats? Right? Right???”
100% – to both points.
Spending time with family was great – very great – but they are all 100% SJWized – brother nieces/nephews….and not acceptable. they laugh at my ribald travel stories – but cannot deviate from MSM – SJWisms.
And just spent time in paradise – I’ll send you a pic. Only difference between there and here is the price.
I reckon your present setup is good for retirement to Phillipines, and/or Thailand.
My cash flow is low — thinking to get software contracting work – which I can eventually remote – this is true freedom.
All men, with a modicum of game and accomplishments, CAN get hot, young (or younger), women to either add to his harem, or heaven forbid, marry them.
Hypergamy is a two-way street fellas!
‘F’ game.
Getting them with cash is way easier.
Well according to Rollo Tomassi of The Rational Male, hypergamy DOES NOT exist for men. There you go………… Also according to him, men are put upon and victims of hypergamy and never in the world have men left their loyal wives for younger tail – because 70% of divorces are initiated by women.
Quote, unquote.
xxxx, Rollo is sometimes too smart for his own good. I think he is so wrapped up in his thesis that it blinds him. And yeah, sometimes he is just full of shit.
That isn’t really hypergamy, though. Men who trade in for a new model aren’t looking to “move up the ladder” the same way a chick is. They want better sex, less nagging, but though their male buddies might nod in approval, there’s not as much to “gain” economically or socially – in fact sometimes it can be social suicide for them. Any new woman is a liability and an expense for a man that he needs to carefully manage – or else.
For women however, if they make a change it’s for investment reasons. They usually stand to benefit even if it all goes to hell (or they just trade up once again for an even better prospect, which so many do).
“Hypergamy” by definition is marrying or mating “up,” with “up” being defined as someone superior in social standing, caste and/or wealth. For example, a peasant girl marrying a nobleman. The flip side to hypergamy is that it is extremely revolting for a female to marry a man “beneath” her. For example, a female doctor marrying or dating a blue collar construction worker. Also, hypergamy comes into play when a female with a mate feels she can “move up” by dumping him and latching on to a superior male.
Men pursuing young females isn’t “hypergamy.” It’s called “normal.”
Ain’t it funny all the Disney fairytales all have the plain women of society marrying up to the prince, but never to the common man in the kingdom? We are brainwashed to see this as normal.
Even the post wall queen in Snow White was evil…which is funny. Truth that women go batshit crazy after the wall if they don’t have a family of her own.
@Automatic Slim While the thought of dumping your longtime lover for a younger, more attractive woman seems like a good idea, is that always the case? I’ll play the devils advocate here and say that unless you’re ridiculously wealthy or have prominent social status, dumping your wife/longterm girlfriend for a better looking younger girl is downright dumb. For our purposes I’ll assume the existing wife isn’t a complete bag and is still somewhat attractive. First of all, most of these younger women won’t stay with you for long; soon they’ll be looking elsewhere or decide they actually want to start a family with someone who’s sperm is multiple decades younger and healthier than yours. Research has shown that those who live the longest, healthiest lives are those that have the best relationships with lovers and friends. The thought of banging a younger girl is titillating but it’s also being thought of by the head downstairs and not the head upstairs. There is more to life than sex my friend.
This is somewhat true.
Though I could see how sometimes the chick gets too much of an ego and her personality changes too much for you to put up with her crap.
There are definitely women who still look pretty good even into their 60’s.
But on the other hand, if she’s cheated on you or gotten into her head that she’s the queen while she slowly gets to be the size of Jabba, you might want to bail.
my grandpa has been with the same bitch for 50 years what a cuck! lol
Does Grandma do the cooking, cleaning, laundry, baking, ect..? Has she been a nurturing and supportive female who always had your Grandpa’s back?
There are acceptable reasons for remaining loyal to a female. Very rare these days, but they still exist.
I am guessing they are practicing Christians? If not devout?
Common already! Cooking, cleaning, laundry, etc? These are simple chores that a man can hire out to one, or multiple women with much better skills and value for much less money than trying to lock that down that unicorn wife who may have a subset of the requisite domestic skills a man seeks.
Does anyone here really want to marry any girl, even a perfect 10 in her 20’s, simply because she can cook and clean a bit today, only to watcher her 10 years later morph into a wrinkled Housewife of Beverly Hills attention whore? Even if you could keep her for that long, by that time she’ll expect you to hire domestic help to do the things she used to do, but is now too much of an a-trophied wife to do herself.
Why by the cow when you can get a whole herd of heifers to can milk as you please? And, when they stop producing milk, you’re free to ship them to the slaughter house. Why are guys here still trying to buy “the one” perfect cow, which doesn’t exist anyway?
All I can say is, I think it would have been nice to expect and attain what our Grandfathers and Great Grandfathers took for granted.
Not a reality in America anymore, unless you are a devout Christian, Mormon, or Amish.
I’m a better cook than any woman I have ever lived with (including my mother). It ain’t that hard, and women ain’t that capable at anything. Laundry is easy, you empty it into the washing machine, then hang it out to dry later.
A woman is for banging, I don’t need a servant.
AS
Nostalgia ain’t real! My grandfather split from his wife (my grandmother) in 1920. My other grandfather died age 45 in 1950, while she lived to age 90. As far as I can tell these situations were entirely normal, the only difference now, is the woman getting all the assets.
If you had a perfect wife who did all of that for several decades – raised kids right, cooked, cleaned, nurtured, etc. – and you still wanted to go for a younger woman, well that’s how it goes. I’m actually fine with a woman getting a divorce payout if she checked all those blocks. Not an ass-rape by a divorce settlement that takes everything, but a reasonable severance is ok if she did well. It’s only natural for a guy to want to move on and maybe start family number two.
Nowadays, Latin American and Eastern European women seem to understand this better than any westernized cunt ever will though. They don’t necessarily like it, but they aren’t utterly shocked or lose their minds when it happens.
LOL!!!!
Men upgrading to younger more nubile women? In every society that was/is the norm. And outside of the West, it was institutionalized. In pre-modern China, a wealthy man could have as many concubines as he could support but his first wife was always on top of the pecking order and couldn’t just be kicked to the curb. And feminists say concubinage is some feudal throwback? It actually afforded much more dignity and rights to the older used-up first wife.
“He’s now with a 25-year-old model named Jo Marney:”
What, like a hand model?
I said that to a female bartender once(who said she relocated to NYC to be a model).
She gave me her number.
It really disgusts me to see old ugly guys with young pretty women
“It really disgusts me to see old ugly guys with young pretty women”
So says every post-Wall woman and loser guy trying to shame the older guys successfully getting younger women. As long as both are mutually attracted to each other, your disgust is meaningless and has no bearing on the relationship.
How exactly is a young attractive female supposed to be interested in an old average-looking or below guy unless she’s into his money or fame?
But than again in this fucked up World there is little that would still surprise me, maybe women are just mentally damaged this way.
“How exactly is a young attractive female supposed to be interested in an old average-looking or below guy unless she’s into his money or fame?”
You just don’t get it, do you? Men are attracted to femininity, which is largely defined by a woman’s youth and beauty. Women on the other hand are attracted to masculinity, which can be defined by a man’s looks, achievements, wealth, social status, etc. etc. A man can develop his masculine traits as he matures.
“But than again in this fucked up World . . .”
No, this situation isn’t “fucked up” and contrary to nature. Women aren’t brainwashed or fooled into going for older more accomplished men. Women have always wanted to be fucked by the tribal chief or the lord of the manor, not the young dumb buck who has nothing to offer her.
women go blind often when they are hunting for resources to capture. once accomplished, their wandering eye and poosey go and gets what it desires having locked down resources…i can understand your disgust, can sympathize with it as i feel it is a natural part of male competition, that can only be successful if ego drives it.
Othmar,
If I were young, I couldn’t have afforded my wife’s purchase price. Where I live that’s always been the way.
Two things. 1. A man is only as old as the woman he feels.
2. Today’s “men” can’t compete in masculinity with the older guys – who are comfortable being a strong male, and f*cking them blind.
@ OTHMAR
I occasionally get a twinge of “WTF Sugardaddy BS” when I see it, but that’s just my ego acting up. Ultimately, I have to respect an older guy’s mojo if he was able to land a good-looking younger woman. Someday, when I’m old, I might aspire to “disgust” every young buck who sees how I can get results and extract a hottie from another generation. I’m Gen X and already my mid-20s millennial nephews are “disgusted” and pissed off when I tell them I’m pulling 8s and 9s directly out of their dating pool…we joke about it but they do fuckin’ hate it, hahahahaaaaa! I’ve been red-pilling my nephews because they a re so damn soft and need to step up.
Sucks to be you!
Weinstein with hot young wannabee starlets – is something we are inured to.
And likely the norm for thousands of years…
Chicks voluntarily fuck for fun and profit…
I can be jealous, but also makes me work harder to be more attractive – Physique/fame/function/finances ,etc… so they will come to me too
Physique and frame are fine, but past a certain age it is finance that will most likely seal the deal. I saw a Russian 9 yesterday. She told me I had a “nice body”. But only after I gave her the required “bouquet of roses”… But, at least I got the weekend special.
Hey, it’s transactional sex…it’s what they know. It’s not the worst, after all.
That cricket man dork is going to get played hard and I’m not talking about his sport.
His offspring will now be raised by a bitter single mother and they will grow to resent him, rebel and be another single parent developed statistic without their biological father in the picture. All for a few memorable pumps with a hottie that will never truly respect or love him nor will he ever feel safe and comfortable with her.
I agree with you. But in the pro cricket world its common for average and below men to get smoking hot wags. Lyon was the odd man out because he must have got married very young.
It seems is ok to keep on a woman as she ages – and is complimentary to the household.
But, a man can bring in Newer Nubiles, if he can afford it…a harem … they all share the tasks of house, home, business, man, and kids.
Feminism has destroyed this, and reversed it.
Women can take on new men, and keep the funds(past, present and future) of previous lovers/men.
by force of government.
I like posts like this.
I was 26 when I got dumped by a girl that I was deeply in love with. She was 19 back then. 4 years later I am dating a girl who is 18, while my ex already looks post-wall at the age of 23. We’re all gonna make it.
Good for you Jeffreyj!
Awesome!
When I was young I had sex with a 33 year old woman who was the sugar baby of a wealthy older man.
The reality is that women see older men as a paycheck and a job and young goodlooking man as a cock.
“The reality is that women see older men as a paycheck and a job and young goodlooking man as a cock”
mostly true
I’m 55 – with not much sugar.
Banged a 33 year old chick recently.
She has a 22 year old surfer dude boyfriend…
they definatly have a huge playing field available…
@ Dirk
I can understand a rich or well off older guy BANGING a 33 year old, but keeping her as a sugar baby??? That old guy needed to have his head examined! If you’re gonna pay, go YOUNG or don’t go at all. Plenty of desperate post 35 y/os on Match who will bang guys 50+ for free. I still don’t want ’em, though.
D was a career stripper who looked pretty good for 33 and had been dancing in New York all nude when she married a 60 year old Swiss inventor.
He was a rich drunk and could not get it up.
She owned an apartment complex he bought for her.
I banged her but she had an on-off coke addiction. She got into crack, I moved on.
Old guys who know what they are doing can ruin girls for other men. They call young men little squirts for a reason.
I’ll probably get flack for this, but personally I believe if you’re married you should aim to take your vows seriously if at all you can, whether you’re male or female. I’m never been married so what the hell do I know, but a world that has degenerated into fleeting hook-ups and relationships ….. isn’t that precisely what the decline is? If you end up hating your spouse, then you probably should call it a day but for the most part things have value because they endure.
Why would you take flack?
Sure , if married, both parties should take it seriously. The male should honor, provide, and protect, and the female should love, honor, and obey.
But if the female does not hold up her end of the bargain, including staying thin, then why be miserable? Of course, with the US divorce laws being draconian for males, you will be miserable even if you leave. Unless you can sustain a 50% hit on your assets.
“But if the female does not hold up her end of the bargain, including staying thin, then why be miserable?”
Brilliant, I guess we need to change the wording of the marriage vows: ‘in sickness and in health, but not clinical obesity and health’
I get the joke, but, would you want to be tied down with a land whale?
I agree for the most part, but in cases where one person is clearly not making any effort at keeping up appearances, I can understand why the other person leaves. Think about the resentment that person must have for their partner. Maybe I’m superficial, but I can’t imagine living with a girl I’m not attracted to at all.
MikeMobius
We aren’t all Christians, I married in a Buddhist country, my wedding vows were to provide for her, her wedding vows were to serve me.
I thought that Rodriguez guy was with his mother. Holy Shit! She doesn’t even try! Cheap polyester wrinkly dress, zero style and the midget doesn’t look like she goes to the gym. If you are with a younger guy it is essentially to up the style and fitness game.
As for Rose, well, the meds didn’t work. Why women shave off their hair and masculinize themselves is beyond me.
Sugar Baby
D had been a world-class stripper when a Swiss industrialist plucked her out of a high-class joint in Manhattan.
He set her up in Ontario where I was a student and swinger. I began banging her. This was a mistake. He sent some motorcycle guys to intimidate me.
I fucked off.
Anyhow, most women instinctively want both shelter and a fuck but in this techno-industrial age often they cannot have both. So they will have the money man and the dick on the side.
Actually I was the sugar baby, in my twenties then and letting her buy men shit.
But like most strippers she was into cocaine, which I don’t do, and I faded away.
Women hate the upgrades. After you ghost her, she will check your email with the password she previously stole while you were dating. She will become an FBI agent until she finds out who the new chick is then spread rumors that you were cheating. SOP.
I don’t get it, you push for patriarchy values yet you advocate to dump the mother of your children when she gets past her prime. Old patriarchs rarely did that
Old patriarchs had a system that actually respected their rights and effort. This system destroys your business, takes your kids, and throws you into a cage at the whim of a woman who will be fucking bikers in a house that you are not allowed to walk into even while you are forced at gunpoint to pay the mortgage for.
And if one of those kids is proven to be the child of another man you will STILL have to pay child support.
So no, no one cares anymore. Don’t like it? Well, you have a choice, either fight for the right of men to OWN women (that is actually what marriage is), or enjoy the fruits of “equality”.
Just the opposite. Old patriarchs often had a virtual harem, and it was understood. Kept discrete of course and rarely spoken of, but practiced nonetheless.
In the old days, men used hookers. This kept families intact and gave employment to poor women.
I use hookers.
+1 for hookers
++1 for hookers
Hookers in the old west took the money men like you handed to them and proceeded to buy everything the men worked their asses off for, including the local politicians. And the first thing they turned their scheming little squirrel brains to was to push feminism down the throats of the rest of society.
They did this because the one thing women care about more than anything else is their precious precious ego, and a filthy disgusting whore will feel less horrible about her worthless garbage life if she can manage to make all the other women whores just like her.
Which is EXACTLY what they did.
I’m not heartless, unlike the faggot puritans, I understand the needs of a man. My issue with you is that you are taking a weakness and pretending it is a virtue.
This is the purpose of hookers. Hugh Jackman wants young hot pussy, he pays a hooker who is sex and nothing more.
Pretty sure Rodriguez married his first wife to help him w his film career financially. These ppl use one another. What’s good about it?
I wouldnt brag too much about Rose. Even Marilyn Manson’s been in there.
VR
Marilyn Manson is a wealthy, educated and intelligent guy. Don’t confuse his stage show with reality.
Rose in her prime tops the list in hotness though.
Lmao @ oldcel copers
Marital bliss is just a teenager away. Until she plays your simp ass. She won’t be attracted to you the way she would be to a young stud.
I don’t know why you don’t just buy escorts instead of deluding yourself that your unofficial rental broad actually likes “muh masculinity and SMV that went up due to age”. These old fuckers are the easiest ones to play.
What can a broke young buck offer her? Stamina in bed. Not throwing his back out. Being handsome.
Just LOL @ old fat bald guys who feel entitled to younger women. It’s fine. Go ahead and actually marry these broads and see how blissful your life is.
If your first wife got fat and haggard this one will too. Because you’re a chump. Then you’ll come back and say “but I will upgrade her again”. Yeah cool because paying for divorce multiple times over your life is a smart idea.
Your young broads fantasize about other men when in bed with you and they can easily cuck you. Why? Because you are of the mindset that women are the prize and are worth buying over and over.
Just end it already old man. Or buy hookers or sugar babies. But this marrying some young broad because you think she actually is attracted sexually to you is cringe af. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.
P.s. this one will gain a ton of weight too because she doesn’t respect you.
Old guy here.
I don’t give a damn if they are attracted to me as long as I get want I want from them. And no, I would never get married. I’m not that stupid.
But I absolutely agree with the short term rental model. Been applying it since I was 20, out of necessity.
AS,
I’m over 60 now, any woman I get is a short-term deal, even if I stay with them for the rest of my life.
@Fitz
BTW, do you realize your post is a bit naive?
Yes, the young girl will most likely desire a muscle-stud. But if the muscle head yells at her or bosses her around too much, don’t you think she’ll cheat on him with some other jerk or thug just to get even? Maybe even with one of his idiot friends? Bottom line, never trust females, whether you are a rich old guy or a musclebound young guy. Never trust them.
I never said that won’t happen. But I see no purpose in throwing out a good and loyal woman because you think you deserve better. If you did deserve better why couldn’t you have gotten it earlier? If a woman loves me when my “SMV” is low then why wouldn’t I reward her with loyalty myself? The reason lots of your wives get fat and haggard looking is because they don’t respect you as a man. But what got them to be this way in the beginning? Every subsequent woman you find will treat you the same way and you’re still putting rings on them. Put simply if women don’t feel the need to STAY attractive for you then you are doing something wrong. If you always attribute it to the woman you will run into the same problem with every young thot you treat as a prize.
And I don’t believe hypergamy is a two way street. The sexual market and biology makes women hypergamous. We men instead desire loyalty, feminine qualities, and someone who is yin to our yang. If you treat women as the prize you will always be a chump. Women can and will always be hypergamous but good employing that same strategy because the second a woman knows she is better than you she WILL cuck you hard and you won’t see it coming. Let my woman he hypergamous. It makes her rely on me because I am better.
Now if the women you chase are all hotter than you because you’re ugly AND you are not willing to pay for them, then you will always fight uphill battles. Men cannot be hypergamous. Evolution doesn’t work that way. Hypergamous men end up single and miserable. Biology isn’t on your side. BUT if money is the equalizer then the sugar daddy, sugar baby dynamic is the way to fix this.
Just don’t go marrying them for fucks sake. If you’re loaded you can have all the sugar babies you want and not be bound to them by law. Essentially that is what Hugh Hefner did when he paid each bunny 8k a month to be in his harem. No shame in that. But marriage? Just lol
If you have a loyal wife who has been there since you were nobody and you decide to dump her because NOW you think you “deserve better ” (could simply be out of jealousy for other men) then you deserve everything bad that happens to you when a hot girl cucks you and takes your shit.
If you felt strongly about not throwing out a good and loyal woman then you should have said that to begin with.
Instead your original argument centered around telling older men that they are too pathetic to get the absolute devotion of a hot young woman.
So from the start you are being disingenuous. You cannot build a structure on a foundation of dishonesty and emotional manipulation. That way inevitably leads to holiness spiraling and chaos, as we see all around us.
As far as looks go, there are plenty, plenty, plenty of counterexamples of men with ugly looks getting hot women. Plenty of men with no money who get hot women, plenty of physically weak men that get hot women.
But the reverse of such scenarios, ugly fat woman with good looking man only exists when the man has a serious character defect. ie, he is a homosexual, or pathetic.
It’s like the song says. The secret to life is: : faster horses, younger women,
Older whiskey, and more money
Hey Thunderchicken, Happy Michael King Day!
good stuff
The commercial or the wine.
I’ve had the wine.
It turns your tongue black.
God only knows what type of chemicals & artificial flavors they put in it.
Generals tend to lament getting married when they’re lieutenants.
I’ve met numerous, attractive girls around my age that have shown keen interest in marrying me but I try to keep the above in mind. I always tell people that my wife probably hasn’t graduated high school yet.
I told that joke in the office, my former coworker cucks hate it, then call me a pedophile for expressing normal heterosexual behavior, I told them that they hypocritically lust after young and nubile singers and Hollywood actress and idolize them the difference is that I will have sex with young and nubile girls instead of fapping to images of them in front a computer monitor. So they lust after young famous women like Jenifer Lawrence, Emma Watson, Selena Gomez. That was like 5 or 6 years ago, when those women I mentioned were in the 21-24 range, but If a date or express interest in the 21 years old starbuck´s barista suddenly she is too young for me. Come on, the people more concern and more vocal against it are usually the more perverts about it, is obvious, they are ashamed for their hetero desires that they need to flog themselves for it. The new puritans. That´s why those guy are big cockblocker, motivated by pure envy. They wish to be in your place but can publicly accept it. With the #metoo campaing farce, now every men wanting to date young women is a Harvey Weinstein.
Tiberius,
I married my wife before she started high school, she used to take our baby to school with her. That was a few years back, she’s recently finished her second year at University.
JOHN
You married a Thai woman THAT young? What did you do, comb Issan country schools?
So, if a woman aborts a pregnancy, fuck her, she kills a life, she’s an asshole. If a man leaves behind a family and his small kids to fend for themselves, hooray, he’s a champ.
This is why you deserve to die alone.
If she cooks, cleans, does the laundry and the grocery shopping, is a obedient & dutiful wife, stays thin, and looks the other way when the husband discretely fools around a little with a younger girl, then he won’t leave her. What’s so hard to understand about that? Pre-1960’s America was the absolute correct model for male/female relationships. It never should have changed. As far as relationships and other social/societal matters go, everything was ruined by the 60s. Only technology and medicine has improved.
4 downvotes???
What is it with you guys?
Speak!
AS
You forgot cheap international travel. Very expensive before the 00s, now I can fly to China for under $100.
i am not against abortion, i am against it being the womans choice rather than her father or husband
A woman’s duty in marriage is to please the man, when she fails to do so, she has failed to be a wife. So, one can understand why she should be thrown away like the garbage she is.
However the reverse; when a woman leaves a man. The man always has done his duty as a husband, to provide, to protect and be a good husband. She just leaves due to evil reasons.
In other words the man is always right and the woman is always wrong.
Something to keep in mind.
If you married relatively young and (more importantly) married the right lady, chances are you are not going to feel the need to leave your wife of many years -the mother of your children- behind for the sake of a younger woman.
However, I do appreciate that in these days when divorce rates are higher than ever – after a divorce you have no choice but to find someone else – and that is likely to be someone younger.
Its all about the 3 Cs : Chaste, Character, Cooking
* Maybe only make babies with some chick in a country where she has low agency, like Eastern Europe or some other third world like Central/South America, South Pacific, just anywhere that is NOT America or Europe, Australia, New Zealand, etc.
* Do NOT take her to America, Europe, etc., get her a green card or anything like that….BUT definitely take your kids there and documented as citizens.
* If she sucks and fucks and otherwise acts wifely and is good to the kids, keep her.
* If not, dump her ass in her third-world shithole, relocate with your kids, and hunt anew for younger-hotter-tighter.
BURNER
You will never get your kids away from a woman from a Third World country under their court system.
Forget it.
Where is ??
I, ____, take you, ____, to be my lawfully wedded (husband/wife), to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health, until death do us part.
Now it’s until I get rich & upgrade to a younger model ??
The SOCIETY is becoming a Shit Hole !
Mr Reynard,
Less than 15% of the world are Christians, why do imagine Christian wedding vows are the norm?
My wedding vow, to provide for her ….. her wedding vow, to serve me.
Sorry Reynard, marriage as you envision it does not currently exist. It did once, and you had my support then. What we have now is a piece of paper that can get you thrown into a cage and does nothing to protect your interests.
The whole tone of this article is really bad. Yes we live in a fucked up world, men and women seem to be constantly fucking each others lives up.
To celebrate dumping your partner is just poor form, regardless of which sex does it.
The mistake everyone of these guys made was getting married in the first place. No marriage is not inherently bad, but these guys(can just as easily be a girl) aren’t going into it for the right reasons in the first place. Its been quite a while since you pretty much needed to get married before a woman would agree to have sex with you, otherwise she feared of being an unwed mother.
As far as I can tell none of these men, got cucked, sexually or financially or had any other justifiable reason, they just traded up for a better opportunity. It reflects poorly on their character as men. I wouldn’t trust them as far as I could through them. If they can behave like that to someone whom they professed to love, maybe had children with, made a social and legal commitment to. How do you think they would deal with anyone else? If this type of guy was running for political office would you vote for them? If you disagree, give reasons?
I know all of us guys on here whinge about 2nd and 3rd world women coming over to first world countries to get married, get their citizenship/residency visa, then divorce the guy, take at least half his assets and fuck up his life. How is what these guys have done any different to those woman.
Also more fool the woman who breaks up a marriage, they can expect the same kind of trust paid back to them one way or another.
Even if you disagree with me and believe what these guys did was ethical, they are not good examples for the everyday guy to follow as emulating their behavior is probably not going to work well for you. These guys have a social profile, and money which most of us don’t have.
Awaiting the downvotes you faggots.
i would agree with your sentiments. whats left of a man and his masculinity if he compromises on the front side of relationshit , his word and sense of honor and his honesty. in doing so he is no better than the women who do the very same thing. female hypergamy is a biological drive but thet take it to the extreme with the greed and the power drunk sadism. what are we as people to sick to that level. yeah i have been burned bad by two different exes, the one screwed my kids up bad, but i have done my best to be the better example to be a better person over all despite the trials. we as men we cannot be the betters if we stoop to the same shitty end attitude and actions. what makes us better men is proving our tenacity and determinations and actions of a higher moral path and a superior example ..to be leaders among men not just alpha men.
Not only is the OP not in poor form, what he is advocating is the only thing that can possibly return civilization to a state where marriage is honored.
I don’t think anyone here disagrees that a loyal wife should never be dumped. AutomaticSlim said it best above
“If she cooks, cleans, does the laundry and the grocery shopping, is a obedient & dutiful wife, stays thin, and looks the other way when the husband discretely fools around a little with a younger girl, then he won’t leave her.”
Not that he shouldn’t, rather he won’t. Because leaving someone like that is idiotic.
But in the current environment not only are there ZERO consequences to bad female behavior, but there is an army of white knights who desperately offer her every incentive in the world to denounce you so that they can have a socially acceptable excuse to beat you to within an inch of your life and take all your shit.
In sexual terms, this is the equivalent of communist russia where no one was allowed to own anything and you’re labor was determined by the state. In that kind of an environment it is not honor, but blind ego to support such a system.
Women are a resource. They are meant to be possessed, they are meant to be owned. When you abolish your males from having the right to own women, the women go crazy trying to find a male capable of mastering them. When you disrespect male property rights with regards to women, land, money, or anything else, you end up with devastation in that particular area.
Unfortunately people need to learn this the hard way.
So basically, a woman’s only fault is that she grew older? Giving several years of her youth and children to the man counts for absolutely nothing when she ages? Gee, and you dorks wonder why feminism exists.
Real bunch of Einsteins here!
the fruits of gynocracy and feminism… eat up your bitter rotten harvest. you brought this crap on your sadistic conniving selves.
Feminism exists for two reasons
1. Men obsessing pleasuring their penis
2. Men disrespecting the property rights of their brother males.
Specifically, the property right to own women.
Women are inferior to men in every respect save one, her ability to reproduce and nurture a child under the guidance of a strong dominant male that owns her. Women not under the dominance of a strong male are inferior at raising children. Women in lesbian “relationships” are actually the absolute worst at raising children, coming behind unowned (single) mothers and homosexual males.
I will repeat that last bit for emphasis. Homosexual males, who are notorious for pedophilia with small children are superior at raising children than women in sexual relationships with other women.
If you are a woman, I encourage you to read more into this, even tho you are only a woman, you do have agency albeit to a lesser degree than men, and you can effect some degree of change, especially if you have the ability to find a male who will know how to tame and train you properly. But you need to know what to look for and how to encourage him.
If you are a male, I encourage you to lift weights, do martial arts, eat better, meditate and study the old sacred texts while trying to stay away from anything that even resembles pedestalization of females.
A woman should cook, clean, stay thin, buy groceries, pop kids out by the dozen (and still stay thin), obey her man, suck him, fuck him, never deny his sexual advances, not have a career hence no financial security, continue to stay thin, not use social media or mobile phones, bake, be faithful, never speak up, still stay thin….
AND SHE IS STILL SUPPOSED TO LOOK THE OTHER WAY WHEN HER MAN HAS A FEW “DISCREET AFFAIRS WITH A YOUNGER WOMAN” JUST BECAUSE SHE IS “STILL AT THE TOP OF THE PECKING ORDER”
Really? You people talk about the decline of society and this is what you have to offer? These are your arguments in favor of patriarchy? I doff my hats to the astronomical levels of delusion on this site.
A woman who has the ability to deny her owner his sexual advances is a like a cow denying a farmer the right to milk her.
In other words, unowned. Since the female has an instinctive deep need to be owned, unowned women go insane trying to find a male that can properly possess them. Hence the popularity of the imbecilic “50 shades of grey” and the equally moronic “twilight series” about invulnerable vampires and a completely blank girl with no personality.
Women without financial security encourages male ownership, which encourages stable marriages. If she has no means of alternative income than she will be more inclined to obey her master. When she is younger she can concentrate her time and energy on more important pursuits such as raising his young, taking care of his property, and looking after her appearance so as to be attractive to him. When she is older and her children are out of the house, she can make use of her vast network of contacts to establish herself in some sort of productive field so that she is not idle.
In regards to your all caps statement “SHE IS STILL SUPPOSED TO LOOK THE OTHER WAY WHEN HER MAN HAS A FEW “DISCREET AFFAIRS WITH A YOUNGER WOMAN” JUST BECAUSE SHE IS “STILL AT THE TOP OF THE PECKING ORDER””
No, she must look the other way when her man has a few discreet affairs with a younger woman because for social organization reasons we do not have the means to provide him with a second younger wife once she passes her fertile age. But if we did have that, then of course, we would insist that he takes on a second (and even a third) younger wife so that he can continue meeting his sexual needs in a way that promotes social order and stability.
Also, I object to your language “fuck him”. It is immoral to say that a woman should fuck a man, just as it is unnatural for a horse to ride a man. Rather, it is for the man to fuck his woman.
#1’s new girl is definitely prettier. The ex is overweight; but I feel badly for the children. Hopefully he’ll find a way to remain close to them.
#4 recently broke up with his model girlfriend because she tweeted something racist and drew negative attention, or something like that.
#5 is gross. He’s fat, and the new girl could pass for his granddaughter.
If the father is to remain close to his children, then that is up to the ex-wife overcoming her own bitterness and spite, not up to the father, who actually should have been given custody of his children as is his natural right. But for the fact that we live in a completely unnatural social order that forces the father at gunpoint to obey the whims of the mother.
In a natural environment, the mother would not have been allowed to leave with the children, even in those societies that did allow women to choose another mate. And we can see that such is the natural order of things from the superior strength and power of the male.
No way a normal 20 year old woman is atracted to a 60 year old… They are gold diggers or mentally insane. Both problems. If you just want sex at that age better get a professional. And I would say leaving a good wife for someone younger is a very poor man behavior. I would not be proud if I ever did that.
For men who have the money to support multiple women and children it’s one thing. These men are rich and famous. For men who have an average job, then I can’t see how this could be done without withdrawing resources from at least one woman. That’s not exactly trad…
Men’s unwillingness to remain true to their vows justifies every underhanded feminist maneuver to get back at men. A culture which does not take marriage seriously in the spiritual or institutional senses will always be a misandrist, gynocentric, gynocratic culture. Protect marriage, and you protect male authority.
This website ought to make up its mind which side its on.
“Justifies every underhanded feminist maneuver” ? That’s White Knight Gibberish. This is the sort of article that makes this website great. Its message to women is ‘Keep on your toes, or you get replaced’. It’s message to men is ‘Choose wisely and marry a significantly younger woman, and only when you’re established’.
Damn this article would trigger some types of women so much they would die.
Has ROK been Blue Pilled Brigaded? WTF’s up with these comments?
Just don’t get married then you can always upgrade if you have cash.
No matter what you get tied down to, eventually the signs of age will show on her before they do on you (assuming you’ve got your shit together).
Guys shouldn’t even consider getting married before 36.
If you get married at 25 to someone the same age or older, by the time you’re coming into your actual maturity, have a bankroll, and have spent 10 years taking care of yourself through exercise and nutrition, that 9 or 10 you married 10 years ago will be a 6 at best (4 if you discount the emotional connection).
I can’t imagine the torture of being married to an American woman so my advice would be to keep that door well oiled and revolving until your late 20s, early 30s, and then take a soul(mate)-searching journey. Spend a year or two overseas, find a girl at least 12 years younger, and mold her into wife material.
This is a much better path than marrying a 9 that becomes a 4 and sleeping around with 7-8s to remind you of how good your wife used to make you feel.
I don’t approve of adultery especially if there are kids in the marriage. That said, that’s also why I tell any young guys who will listen to not even think of getting married until they hit 40 and then only if she’s at least 10 years younger.
Not sure if anyone mentioned her, but Nasty Woman Ashley Judd had a good-looking hotshot race car driver husband until a couple of years or so ago. After ten years, he divorced her, found a gorgeous 25 year old and started making babies. They were in Washington for the inauguration last January and the very MORNING of the PussyHatter’s march the Style section of the Washington Post ran a piece on the two of him, his new multi-year, multi-million dollar racing contract, his new wife and two new babies, full page, pictures, the works. Ashley ain’t worked much in years, so seeing him making lots of money for another woman and children must have really pissed her off. A few hours later, fueled by unused eggs and feminist been-dumped-for-a-better-woman rage, Ashley made the Nasty Woman Pussyhatter speech that will forever mark HER descent into madness and feminist cuntery and notoriety.