For those of you who have been keeping an eye on Gamergate for the past year, perhaps there are a few names you have come to recognize, one of which is Sarah Nyberg. For those of you unfamiliar, Sarah Nyberg has been one of the loudest opponents of Gamergate.
What might be surprising is that Sarah Nyberg is a transsexual who was given the birth name Nicolas Nyberg. Sarah-Nicolas is also an admitted pedophile. Nyberg had admitted to being a pedophile in a series of uncovered chat logs from the website FF Shrine.
Even with the chat logs, Sarah’s supporters have been either been in denial or have outright stated that they support de-stigmatization of pedophiles. While many of Sarah’s followers maintain that the chat logs were fabricated or taken out of context, thanks to some handy work by Milo Yiannopoulos, we can safely confirm that Sarah Nyberg is in fact a pedophile.
Back in 2005 Nyberg had a sexual fixation on his-her cousin. The chat logs go into great details about Sarah’s admiration for the little girl, even detailing the fact that the parents of the little girl knew something was up with Sarah. While the chat logs had long since been common knowledge among Gamergate, it wasn’t until Milo’s article hit that the parent’s of the little girl had corroborated the story.
Of course the fact that Sarah had filed a DMCA claim against a website that hosted a copy of the chat logs didn’t help his-her case. The logs themselves are easily attainable.
A conversation about pedophilia
Photo Credit: Brietbart; This is just a small sampling of the chat logs.
With all that’s been said about Sarah Nyberg, this is a good time to discuss the possible impact that the social justice movement could have on pedophiles. In the last couple of years there have been efforts by the APA to de-stigmatize pedophilia, defining it as disorder in the DSM-V.
Pedophilia is now classified under the category of paraphilic disorders; with these types of disorders a person must: A) feel personal distress about their about their sexual interest, and B) their sexual desire involves the harm of others or inability or unwillingness of an individual. The first prong in that definition is key to understanding the DSM’s definition of pedaphillic disorder. That in iself would indicate there is a level of self awareness and desire for some pedophiles to exercise control over their impulses and desires.
I would, however, also note that there are pedophiles who don’t quite fall under that definition. Based on the chat logs, Sarah seems to feel no personal distress about the sexual attraction to his-her cousin. In fact, Nyberg believes that pedophilia is a sexual orientation rather than a disorder.
Keeping in mind that the chat logs are 10 years old, it is unknown if Sarah Nyberg feels any kind of personal distress about his-her attraction to children. If not, I would argue that Sarah is more dangerous than the kind of pedophile that is described in the DSM.
Will SJWs Support Pedophiles?
The idea that SJWs could support pedophiles isn’t all that far fetched. If they subscribe to idea that pedophilia is an orientation than we can expect a big push in pedophile rights within the next 10 to 20 years. While the idea of a pedophile advocacy groups is hardly new (see MBLA), the widespread acceptance of pedophiles is something that society should prepare for.
Such a movement would have to mirror the LGBT movement in order to gain traction. While it may seem that such a movement would never take off, there were many people who said that about gay marriage 10 to 15 years ago.
This is not going to be an easy subject to grapple with. There are a great deal of moral questions, both legal and ethical, to take into account. While at least here in the United States, people can expect certain civil liberties to be protected under the law, do these protections undermine public safety?
It is also nearly impossible to discuss this topic without discussing age of consent laws. Age of consent is its own topic with numerous grey areas, but it will come up as long as the people entertain the idea of pedophilia acceptance.
As someone who could be fathering kids within the next 10 years, I would not want them to live in a world where pedophilia is accepted by the masses. To know there is a boundary of acceptance that people won’t cross gives me some sense of optimism. Of course this scenario is what I would describe as the bottom of the slippery slope.
A few parting words
As for the people who have supported Nicolas “Sarah Butts” Nyberg: Chris Kluwe, Jay Allen, Margret Pless, Randi Harper, Kathrine Cross, Tauriq Moosa, Dan Olsen, David S. Gallant, Veerender Jubbal and Arthur Chu, if Sarah Nyberg has harmed any children, including her cousin, or any other children in the past, present, and future, I hope that weighs on your conscience.
Read More: Why Gamergate Could Be A Turning Point In The Culture War
“Ageplay”? “Penisgirls”?!? What the fuck is wrong with this thing (actually, what the fuck is RIGHT with it is the better question)? Impromptu inventing idiotic vocabulary to sound “hip” and “chique”? Apparently that’s how you try to sound sophisticated (read: pretentious) online now, by making a word salad!
Just so you are aware, don’t type furry, yiffy, or futanari into Google either.
All the proof I needed that the inmates do in fact run the asylum.
Further advisory: Do not look these SJWs up on Encyclopedia Dramatica.
I’ve…. seen things oO
Just did, couldn’t resist. Go figure, it’s all supported by the same kind of bottom-of-the-barrel pathetic anime and video gaming betas who love anything and everything simply for being from Japan. How telling!
It gets worse. Anal-vore
oh god no
Nothing like wanting all of civilization to burn to the ground, eh? C’mon, let the desire flow through you, young Jedi. Visualize that purging, cleansing fire..
Who the fuck gets off on drawings and graphics in the first place? I’d question anything on a screen and not in the flesh in the same room with you as is, but at least fucking watch porn with real human beings if you must! For Christ’s sake, some of these weirdos are simply beyond reproach!
I am happy to say that I fought off the very compelling urge to do a search on that. There are some things I really just don’t want to know.
Best decision.
You see there the results of
– porn at too young an age requiring more and more weirdness to have an effect coupled with
– ADHD and anti-depressant drugs that young boys are forced on by the education system and crap mothers and
– aspergers (possibly but with teenagers it’s now hard to tell if they were born with it or if it was induced) plus
– no men around to say “hey kid, that’s some fucked up shit”.
Hashtag-truth!
and also, perhaps, the underlying attempt to sexualize children at an early developmental stage? Not like we have beauty pageants doing that already though.
Agreed. I see very young girls out on the street wearing things far too age-inappropriate. I want to give their parents a verbal lashing for allowing their daughter to be seen in public like that.
And these are the same parents some would say to trust to safe-guard them from predators? They put them out there like a buffet for a starving creature, but they’ll “do the right thing” in the end? Because.
Children under 18 should see porn the right way:
1.) scrambled skinimax channels
2.) stolen magazines from the quicky-mart
3.) finding your dad’s cache from the 70’s (women today and their razors! *shakes fist at sky.)
I see girls all the time under the age of 7 with WAY too revealing clothes (booty shorts and tank top shits). What goes through the parents’ minds to rationalize this as ok must be scary.
That was the first indication to myself that I was no longer young; when a niece showed up to a family beach outing in a bunch of strings and a few small patches of material. I objected loudly and her mother (my sister) said, “Let her enjoy it. It is the only time in her life she will be able wear something like that.” When you start looking a scantily clad young girls and can only respond with, “How could their parents let them out of the house dressed like that?” you know you are past the fog of testosterone.
I think it is usually the moms that allow their daughters to dress like “prosti-tots”. They hamsterize this, of course, and are perhaps living through their female children, which is sick and pathetic enough as it is, but letting kids dress like that is really repulsive. Thank god I don’t have daughters, because their moms are generally the major force fucking up the current generation of little girls. Another fallout of narcissistic twits raising kids as “single moms” after blowing up their families again and again to pursue bad boy tingles.
Fortunately I got one of the good women…for all her flaws my wife has always said none of our daughters will ever leave the house looking like a whore. She said they better hope I get to them before she does lol.
The Christian school had to FIGHT with the parents of the girl’s volleyball team, because the school does not let the girls wear the booty shorts that all the other girls volley ball teams wear. Both moms and dads. This is in rural Bible belt.
>”no men around” – what kinda homo watches porn around other men?
>”aspergers” – Where the hell is this coming from?
>”ADHD and anti-depressant drugs” – again, where do you get this from? Is “sexual deviancy” listed among the side-effects?
Darn tootin’! In our day, we had to go out and EARN our smut haha
Yeah, it’s scary. I have young nieces and I really don’t want to see them grow up to become “that.”
But hey, giving women advice to mitigate the risk of rape and sexual assault is victim blaming…somehow.
Yiffy? futunari? Dont tell me, I dont wanna know(wish I didnt know what a “furry” is).
Theres old pedophiles on ask.fm too and they popular with Sjws.
Your problem is to trust Encyclopedia Dramatica, which is nothing more than a joke site. And your suggestion to fap to “porn with real people” is laughable when it’s fake as shit. Might as well get off on a professionally drawn anime-style girl since they at least are appealing.
The problem with pedophilia is the person the pedophile is attracted to can never ever consent (because they are a minor) and even if they could legally consent, it would always be statutorily induced because of the victims non-sexual nature. It would be authority or reward response being exercised over a victim. That is an infringement on the child’s rights and the child must be protected. Perhaps AI robots or virtual reality can give these folks some relief, but it can’t ever be seen as acceptable to allow an adult to seduce a child.
Did you know some US states allow marriages as low as 13 for females and 14 for males?
Yes. But pedophilia is restricted to having sexual attraction to people that are pre-pubescent. That’s different…. I’m not saying its legal to have sex with 13-14 year olds, but at least they are sexual and know what they like or want (not that they should have sex). Being attracted to a mature 14 year old and being attracted to a 5 year old are two totally different things though.
Mohammed marrying a 6 year old and having sex with her 9 is clearly pedophilia. It’s very different from Captain John Paul Jones of the U.S. Navy being caught with a 13 year-old prostitute in Paris.
And now, the argument I would expect:
So, why are we oppressing the feelings of the poor victim who can’t control their desire when we don’t do so with so many others? It’s reverse ageism. Why the arbitrary line? Shouldn’t love be free? Are you prejudice against love? You sound like some Bible-thumping right-wing redneck. Who is the parent (or anyone) to decide who or if the child loves?
Accepting universal arguments leads to universal acceptance, distinctions are fun for justification of one preference over another, but just as easily entryways for further change.
I would prefer to stand against degeneracy in all its forms, and not be accused of cherry-picking when a new “cause” arises.
Assuming the 13 year old was post puberty…. once a “body” is sexually mature attraction can occur and whether it is taboo or not is mostly cultural…. but if a person is attracted to pre-pubescent children that is another thing all together.
did you know the legal age for sex in the majority of US states is 16?
I did, in fact. But laws never change either.
Like you, I will stand against it, but I won’t be surprised when it happens or which arguments win it.
Used to be 14 in Canada.
West Virginia too.
that’s because its so cold…. 😉
haha
60 years ago, your grandfather would have laughed at the notion that sodomites will be allowed to marry under God….
Ten years ago they would have laughed.
This world is being “transformed” at breakneck speed. This is actually a good thing, the reason they got this far was slow incrementalism, but now they feel they can sprint to the finish line and ram every kind of shit down our throats. Lots of people buying guns now. Lots of them. There’s a reason for this, and it isn’t a renewed interest in maintaining marksmanship at the range.
Remember commenting on this on Derek Baroni’s article:
In Nyberg’s case, it not only his own transgender derangement but pedophilia and incest. And for all the pro-gay acceptance people who think this won’t happen because of “age of consent” or any of those words singly, people with affinity for younger partners likely outnumber you 3 or 4 times. And that number is likely higher if you remove the threat of punitive action, not like laws are ever subject to change though.
So let me get this straight…you actually believe that pedophiles outnumber mentally healthy people by 4x? It must be a dark world you live in.
Facts and data are your friends.
GoingSane was only referring the pro-gay acceptance people, not all mentally healthy people, the comment was a bit hard to read there though.
We should sit back and let SJWs support pedophilia.
It’ll make things much easier in the future.
We just need to make sure that if things don’t go well, there is no Cathedral to make the SJWs look like poor sweet innocent victims who were hated and rounded up for no reason.
(or because of a religion, political leanings, sexual orientation, etc. hmmmm a historical pattern is emerging… )
“As for the people who have supported Nicolas “Sarah Butts” Nyberg: Chris Kluwe, Jay Allen, Margret Pless, Randi Harper, Kathrine Cross, Tauriq Moosa, Dan Olsen, David S. Gallant, Veerender Jubbal and Arthur Chu, if Sarah Nyberg has harmed any children, including her cousin, or any other children in the past, present, and future, I hope that weighs on your conscience.”
They don’t have a conscience.
But, but, but they said normalization of faggotry wouldn’t lead to anything else! Pedophiles should be shot at the base of the neck or at the very least be sterilized and made into a eunuch.
Ah yes I recall when I still had the energy to argue with dumbfuck liberal “friends” on my facebook wall they would make fun of the notion that butt pirating would lead to further degeneracy. Not even 5 years later and here we are. Seems that as soon as the gay domino really fell, it didn’t take long for trannyism and pedoism to become the new normal.
WTF are you talking about? Name one organization that is advocating pedophilia. And then prove it. lol. Brainless twat.
Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), a now defunct British organization who basically tried to legalise paedophilia.
North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), American group committed to removing age of consent laws, they are still around.
Vereniging MARTJIN, a Dutch organisation who were dissolved in 2014, they tried to legalise paedophilia as well.
The Catholic Church, well known for harboring paedophiles, hiding their activities, moving them around the world to avoid legal repercussions and not doing anything to try and change their behaviour.
There are a few more that can be found using the power of Google-fu. I encourage you to read more stuff in the manosphere and to be open-minded while doing so, you might just learn a thing or two.
The abolition of the age of consent must stopped.
My, my… someone is getting overly-emotional just like a woman or a homo.
NAMBLA
Nope, lack of functional genitalia will not necessarily stop a pedo from acting out, so the non-lethal option would have to involve permanent isolation from the rest of society.
As long as their are parents who don’t want their children to be raped, it is doubtful that pedophilia will gain social acceptance. With homosexuality, you have two consenting adults doing sexual things with each other. With pedophilia, you have an adult literally raping a child and doing scientifically proven psychological damage.
Pedophilia is a disease and is not “normal.” With homosexuality, you had Matthew Shepard being fag-dragged, creating sympathy for homosexuals.
With pedophilia, you have a child being raped, which is probably the only thing parents fear more than their child being fag dragged. While it is remotely possible that the SJWs will take up pedophiles as a cause, I would consider it highly unlikely.
The fear parents have for the safety of their children is a much bigger hurdle than societal norms against homosexuality.
The fear parents have for their children is what will fuel them to put on brown uniforms and start bashing heads in the street.
You can only push degeneracy so far.
Being new to the manosphere…brown uniforms?
He’s referencing the SA aka Brown Shirts. In other words, it will cause people to lose their civility and start bashing in heads with clubs.
Ah, the precursor to the SS
No. The *competition* to the SS.
I would argue that when you have people (homo/tran)sexualizing kids and pushing degeneracy to the max and being in your face “you can’t do a thing about it”, people of lesser restraint, having less vision of options, will resort to violence.
And given that the people doing the damage would sooner put people like me in camps or criminalize us by vote and have SWAT kill us, I’m not going to do a damned thing when payback time comes.
As my late father would say: “Fuck ’em”.
That’s correct. At a certain point the SA was “in the way” of the more subversive agenda of the Nazis.
The brown shirts (SA) were homosexuals lead by a Captain Röhm and they molested alot of boys along the way. Funny they don’t mention that in high school history class. The book “Pink Swastika” was an eye opening read about the founders of nazism.
More to the point, in any subversion, the most ardent believers must be eiminated once they outlive their usefulness. The SA were the ‘visible’ aspect of NAZI hate, sure. But more importanty, the SA expected to fill positions of power, and they were true believers in The Cause, not Hitler.
Thus, once they did what they were needed for, off with their heads. Stalin did it too. So did every tyrant in history. Tok bad SJWs dont read, or think for themselves.
So this is a good thing then
Unless of course you could diminish the influence of the family. I don’t know, maybe you could make it acceptable to kill unborn children, if you know, their life would be inconvenient. Or have parents selling their kids. Or grow them in vats, or…wait a minute.
And there was evidence of psychological damage for homosexuality (it was classified as a disorder like transsexualism is but won’t be for long). Think desire + influence + profit, then re-evaluate how possible such change might be. Not like parental rights have ever been undermined by the government before or anything.
Love for one’s own child (or at least pretending to care, in the worst cases) transcends the traditional family. It’s an evolutionary trait for parents (even if unmarried and on welfare) to want to protect their children. Humans in general are predisposed to protecting children.
I’m not saying its impossible for SJWs to take up the cause. It is, however, very unlikely for any parent to sanction raping their child once it has been born. There have been exceptions, but even some of the worst parents in history would balk at letting some pedo rape their son or daughter.
What I am saying is that it might not even be a choice the parent is allowed to make. It takes a village to raise a child, don’t you know.
The village is full of idiots. I’d prefer they stay out of my hut.
And the village thing was without even accounting for the number of parents (adoptive or natural) who make up a noteworthy percentage of the people raping children despite laws or pimping them out over networks for others to do so.
I dunno, James, I hope you are correct, yet I fear not .. meet this SJW: http://downtrend.com/vsaxena/rebecca-shuman-scum-mother
These people are psychopaths. (and to a large degree sociopathic, as well.) They have become the very sick, demented, perverts that they claim they are against.
I am saddened by the thought of how completely f**ked up this child’s life is going to be thanks to people like her mother. And thusly, they psychopathy will continue on down another generation.
SJWs already have gone to great lengths to redefine rape, so don’t hold your breath thinking that they can’t redefine it some more, to convince parents that sexual mentoring is good for the kids.
>some of the worst parents in history raped their children themselves.
FTFY.
“It takes a village to raise a child..”
Heh. A false cliche if there ever was one. Takes good parents.
Many states voted against Gay Marriage. The powers that be simply scoffed at us and did it anyway.
TN is trying to pass a marriage protection bill. Will be interesting to see how this turns out.
I’m of the mind that it’s about time we put to rest the notion that SCOTUS determines the Constitutionality of a law. That is false and has always been false, their job as given in the Constitution is to review appellate cases, not determine if they’re “Constitutional”. They gave themselves that power with Marbury v. Madison, and we need to take it back.
A good first step would be doing what you’re suggesting TN is doing, which is openly flipping the bird and saying “Make us”.
Maybe someone can explain to me which law they upheld which granted gay marriage?
Did congress pass a constitutional amendment granting the Federal Government a right previously un-enumerated regarding defining marriage, recognizing it, or having any authority related to it whatsoever? Or did they just self-legislate at the SCOTUS to bypass that pesky 10th Amendment?
10 year term limits, and the ability to impeach Justices with 2/3 Congressional vote or 66% general population vote.
Oh yes, I know. The Constitution grants no explicit power to the FedGov to reign over marriage. That is a state’s rights issue and always has been, just like issuing driver’s licenses. The 14th literally does not apply here. And SCOTUS knows this, they are not stupid, they did this specifically for political popularity reasons.
oklahoma has done a shitton of things that SCOTUS says are ilegal and they simply told the feds to suck a dick andkept doing them
I’m not particularly acquainted with local Oklahoma politics, can you give some examples?
I know that a few states flip the bird to the Fed. Montana and Wyoming, I believe, have statutes on the books that declare that guns made within their respective states are not covered by the Interstate Commerce clause and thus neither state is bound to follow any Federal gun laws with regards to those manufacturers assuming that they sell and stay in state. Ohio passed the “Arm Your Teachers” law which basically flips the bird to the Federal “no gun zone” laws concerning schools. So far none of these have been actioned by the Fed, that I’m aware of anyway.
they have the ten commandments on the state house, they shut down every abortion clinic in the state less one they dont enforce federal gun laws at all ect
Andrew Jackson flipped the bird to the supreme court long ago. The Indian removal act, the one that created the trail of tears while deporting the Cherokee to Oklahoma, was overturned by the SCOTUS. Andrew said, “well, you have made your decision, now enforce it.” Then he went ahead with it.
Don’t forget all the states passing medical marijuana laws and now recreational legalization of marijuana in defiance of the unconstitutional and illegal federal drug laws.
DEMOCRACY! Ha.
Don’t be so sure, there are alarming numbers of people willing to coddle and justify any measure of sickness in order to be in the “progressive” crowd.
It has happened before and it’ll happen again, I remember the 1970’s in Europe where it was considered mighty progressive ( especially among the more well off, educated classes ) to allow the early teens and even preteens join in on the sexual festivities. Make no mistake, there was a time not so long ago that blatant child nudity and even pornography was sold right alongside adult sex magazines. Maybe not in the US but certainly here in Europe.
http://nypost.com/2013/10/28/uncomfortable-truth-behind-matthew-shepards-death/
The left really hates children. With abortion running rampant and now the gaining of support for sick motherfucking paedos…
They hate anything good. They are in all ways, in every shape and form, evil.
Have sjw’s gone too far by defending a known pedophile?
If they can defend countless women slaughtering babies in their womb; Sodomites raising children and praising mentally ill trannies. Would it be such a surprise if they defended a pedophile?
Race to the bottom
AND LOOK WHO IS IN THE LEEEAAAD!
Morons.
They’ve already gone to far.
Most grown men and particularly fathers will kill any pedophile that dares harm their child(ren). I know I would and would gladly go to prison if that were to happen if need be. Psychoatric disorder or not, people who act on those sick impulses forfeit their right to remain alive.
most mens daughters already messing with pedos on the net.
You know that how? Rebellious teenagers there has always been, but statistically the girls that tend to get molested are the ones with no father in the household. Slutty moms tend to bring wierdos into the house with no internet needed.
I agree, but theres random teen girls exposing themsleves on the omegale and ask.fm via kik. theres this fat old man on ask.fm people used to troll, he gets likes from teen girls and i think he asks them sexual questions in his same typing style.
Sad.
where the fuck is Lance Christopher? that guy disappeared suddenly a few months ago.
The blatant hypocrisy, surrounding the status of a “fetus,” never ceases to amaze me. Kill a woman and you’ll be charged with one count of homicide. Kill a pregnant woman and you’ll be charged with two counts of homicide; This means the state recognizes the “fetus” as a human being with all the rights accorded to one.
However, if said pregnant woman walks into an abortion “clinic,” suddenly the “fetus” is nothing more than a lump of tissue and the law grants her the legal right kill.
The hypocrisy is staggering.
Its women logic and rules.
This is how pedophile logic will work.
1) Public schools already have sex ed classes. Sex ed already teaches kids that sex is always healthy when consentual. Sex ed already teaches parents that children masturbate as early as infancy. Sex ed currently assumes children will be sexually active before they are 18 and equips them to “explore their sexuality” and so forth.
2) Sex ed is currently taught by teachers and parents as an effort to mentor their children so that they grow up to enjoy a healthy sexuality.
Therefore, since sex is always healthy and never shameful, and kids are going to have a variety of sexual experiences with each other and by themselves anyways, and adults already mentor children to have a healthy sex life, why not let the adults “mentor” the children a little more “hands on”?
Consent doesn’t even have to be an issue. Do children need to consent to sex ed? Do they need to consent to vaccines? Do they need to consent to dinner, healthcare, storytime? No. Because they are all good, healthy things all kids need. Just like sex. Kids need good healthy sex with adults and they will learn to love it.
Many adults will “come out of the closet” and talk about how great their “mentor” was when they were growing up. Society will be told that they should never shame people who come out of the closet like this because it is psychologically harmful.
The only thing holding back healthy adult/child sex is homophobic 1950’s puraitanical retrograde transphobic hateful paedophobic bigotry religious fundies Christian Taliban bigot conservative reactionaries hate bigots.
Love wins!
”Sex ed already teaches parents that children masturbate as early as infancy”
Vomit*
”Sex ed currently assumes children will be sexually active before they
are 18 and equips them to “explore their sexuality” and so forth.”
Maximum promiscuity before marriage. And given the prepubescent nature of this evil they are promoting as well. Major medical and possibly mental issues.
Fuck I wanna puke again.
I can’t believe that the Bible is making more sense by watching modern people. Read Romans 1 and you will see it. Homos hating God and worshipping animals instead. These fags literally have dogs in their man-purses walking around the malls in California. Pretty soon you can expect Temple Prostitution. Women will be declared legally divine and they will use their divinity to improve their whore-market value.
Christ said that things would get worse and worse as His return drew closer, and I find myself offering up words that true Christians will maintain focus in the geo-economic supernova that I expect to happen any given day now.
No he said things would get worse as the end of the age came near. The end of the age was in A.D.70 and he said that his church would grow and prevail on the Earth in this new age we are in. The Church Age.
I have 2 flamers living a few houses down from me, and this morning when I went out to get the paper, they were out and about walking their 2 little toy poodles. It was just so stereotypical. So gay.
See it works like this: the state gives exclusive ‘licence to kill’ to the abortion doctors, but if you yourself kill even a single fetus, say by causing a woman to lose her pregnancy (the term ‘fetucide’ can be charged) you can be charged with killing even if the lady lives.
The problem is that you don’t have exclusive legal licence to kill but the abortionist does. Same as if you’re in the military under orders to kill versus if you’re a one man army going out and tackling the enemies of your fatherland on your own. You’re only licenced to kill while acting as an instrument of the state, otherwise sheeple cannot legally kill.
Or a vigilante whacking a predator that walks free from court versus the hooded guy who works for the state throwing the toggle switch on the electric chair. The state executioner has exclusive authority granted by the state to kill whereas the vigilante does not.
Notice how licence infractions (like killing without the proper licence) are regarded as more serious ‘crimes’ than the actual reprobate actions that the unlicenced actor attempts to rectify.
Take animal rights laws – put down a ‘pet’ animal in your back yard yourself and there’s scrutiny as to how it was done whereas some jurisdictions would require you to ‘humanely’ call the licenced animal cop.
A meat packing plant is licenced to kill as well. Check out a chicken processing plant where 500 chickens are sprayed with water mist and then let out into an electric cage and then zapped with 1000 volts. The employee running the zapper cage has exclusive licence to kill whereas if you were to rig up a 120v extension cord on your front poarch and execute chickens, you might catch the attention of the animal sjw’s. They can be a real headache.
The guy at the chicken plant plays with the toggle switch all day. If there’s a particular ‘chicken little’ survivor that keeps jumping and avoiding the electric motherload, the employee can tease Mr. Superchicken, throwing the switch all he wants. Try that on your poarch and see if you don’t get your picture on the front page for ‘torturing’ animals. Blow a chicken’s beek and feet off with a skinned ‘shocker’ cord or maybe just try a 220v ear to ear lobotamy on it and see if the county cabal doesn’t try and steal your house or take your entire estate.
‘Bureaucracy’ is more than just piles of bullshit duplicative paperwork. The big guns of the state use licencing to replace and override basic rights. The licence/code enforcer and the bureaucrat and the sjw/feminist are one and the same. They are the ilk of humanity.
Good post.
This is a really good post. Highlights how the SJW’s want a state monopoly on all forms of violence. Can’t get into a fight but rape should have the death penalty.
“you’ll be charged with two counts of homicide;”
If you are a man. If you are a woman you will only be charged with one count of homicide. Duh..
The argument isn’t a simple as you’re making it out to be. If you kill a pregnant woman, you are killing two people. But society has decided that a woman should be able to choose whether to bring a child into the world. You may not like it, but it is what it is.
Now, in the case where the man kills both the mother and unborn child, that is clearly double homicide.
You may think that a woman who terminates (kills) her unborn fetus is committing homicide, but the balance of society believes that to be her right within the first 90 days of pregnancy. Should the victim of rape be forced to carry, birth and care for a child she didn’t want, and very likely resents?
We don’t live in a perfect world. Not too long ago, even in this country, a man could kill his wife and unborn child with little, if any, consequence.
Legal in America for a man to murder his pregnant wife… yeah… right.
So if a man kills a pregnant woman he is killing two people but if the same woman were to have an abortion (before being murdered) then it’s not murder? If that’s true then women have more rights than men in deciding the fate of an unborn child. For instance, if a man doesn’t want to support a child because of his financial situation or personal choice then his opinion means nothing, he has no right to terminate the pregnancy, only the woman does. But a woman in the same situation does have the right to terminate it, even if the man wanted to keep the baby the woman could still get an abortion and he would ultimately have no power in the decision. All of this happening in a society where men supposedly have more power than women.
It’s as if abortion clinics are foreign embassies with diplomatic immunity.
My Lord what an abomination. Throw this “thing” in the ovens or something.
Yupp…Agree… SJW are piece of shits equal to sodomites pedophiles, psycho serial killers……BTW Norman Bates was a very well known SJW, so was Ted Bundy…
I just want to point out that our granddads used to marry our grandmas very young, sometimes as early as 14. Were they pedos?
Kill all sjws.
You have to be careful there though, most of them have clown hair. I wouldn’t want to see actual circus clowns get hurt, they are a national treasure.
you really are on a roll
I’m not sure what’s gotten into me today. Probably that Kratom load I did earlier this morning. With Phenibut. It does a body good.
Your electrolytes are balanced. That’s the real reason. It’s what you needed.
I’ll admit, it’s what I craved.
We need a shibboleth.
Finish this sentence: Check your _________.
If they say “fly”, “oil”, “self” they get a pass.
If the say “privilege”, well….
…pot roast. Man home soon.
The real clowns will be the ones laughing.
LAUGH CLOWN LAUGH!!!!
Sorry, couldn’t help it.
SJW’s can’t laugh, they have too much internal hatred. It always sounds more like a coughing fit or screeching. Good way of telling them apart.
That’s the puddin bowl haircut effect.
I enjoyed this a little too much.
Pick your clown. Ready, aim,…….
“The father of Newtown Connecticut school shooter Adam Lanza is Peter Lanza who is a VP and Tax Director at GE Financial. The father of Aurora Colorado movie theater shooter James Holmes is Robert Holmes, the lead scientist for the credit score company FICO. Both men were to testify before the US Sentate in the ongoing LIBOR scandal.”
The other one is just a harmless trans-black whom people are strangely intolerant of.
Intolerant of? Let’s just call it mental illness and move on with our lives.
Like most trans, it’s just mental illness.
I was being ironic. I thought she was gaming the system. Wasn’t she?
This is just the beginning.
This picture sums it up.
https://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/2532/7433/original.jpg?w=600&h
Honestly its the liberals plus sjws and white people with white-guilt.
Steps are going the wrong direction.
ROK readers should keep in mind that most Marxist Jews are anti-Zionist.
Even if what you said were true – and I see little to back it up – Jews are Jews are Jews. Nothing they do is good for the White man. Conservative White countries = bad news for the international Jew.
‘Nothing they do is good for the White man.’
Albert Einstein, Niels Bohr, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Karl Popper, Milton Friedman and all these Nobel Prize winners were bad for the White race? Seriously?
And don’t get me started on authors like Neil Strauss or Ben Shapiro influenced the manosphere in so many ways.
I think it’s safe to say that Jews will be much better off in a country with traditiinal Judeo-Christian morals than in a Muslim one.
Noone has historically wanted the Jews living amongst them due to their own behaviour, hence 109 expulsions in history, not a single ‘host nation’ who haven’t eventually snapped and kicked them out.
Funny part is they attribute it to everyone else being racist. Jews are like the original SJW’s. Although there are Jews who are against SJW’s, in fact, most Jews really aren’t THAT bad. Just a lot of Jewish SJW’s, media manipulators, bankers and so on that make people hate them.
Racial marriage is a normal thing that always existed why is that up there?
I think he means marriage between White and Black.
White marrying Asians is probably no big deal for him.
Why? It’s been happening for a very long time; Before the 1700’s there wasn’t even a term for it.
Interracial marriage USED to be illegal between whites and blacks, not in all countries.
Prior to the 1700’s yes, but before then it wasn’t even a term.
No restraint. That’s what they are all about. If they feel restraint they resist it as “oppression”. What happens when they run out of stuff to rebel against?
It will then become trendy to become restrained and modest.
Cenobites.
I am reminded of the mice plague in Australia a few years back, it got ugly when the food ran out and then the population crashed.
Final Liberation. Self-annihilation.
Or, with less brevity:
“If morality is a form of repression, then reason is repressive, and if reason is repressive, then man can become free only by becoming irrational, but once he becomes irrational, the only thing that drives him to act is his appetites, his impulses, and his passions. But once man is driven by his passions, he loses all control of his actions. Thus freedom of this sort, as the ancients rightly saw, becomes a form of slavery. Those who advocate freedom of this sort are promoting, whether they understand it or not, a form of social control because the motive for action which previously lay in reason has now been replaced by the stimulation of passion. Those who control the stimuli now control the stimulated. The purpose of transgressive imagery [ i.e., pornography] is social control. Those who relinquish reason are controlled by their passions, which are exploited financially and politically by those who control the flow of transgressive imagery. The people who profit financially and politically from promoting the imagery contribute to the election of those who will protect it politically, and so a form of political control evolves from a system of financial exploitation… Either a man imposes self-control on himself by adhering to the moral order, which is reason applied to behavior, or he submits himself to his passions, which means he submits to control from outside, either to the passion itself or to the people who exploit the passion for their own benefit, either economic or political… If a horse gallops off toward a cliff with a man on his back, it is only in some analogous of the word to say that the man is riding the horse. The horse is in charge and will bring both itself and its ‘rider‘ to their deaths unless the man reasserts control. The same is true of unbridled passions, which also tend toward death as their ultimate end. Appetites belong to man only if he asserts rational control over them. If the opposite holds true the man belongs to his appetites.”
~ E. Michael Jones (Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control (pp 265-266)
https://ajmacdonaldjr.wordpress.com/2013/09/03/libido-dominandi-sexual-liberation-and-political-control/
Thanks for this.
Romans Chapter 1. Paul nailed it…..
Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them. vs 32
Approval is seen in the same light as actually practicing it. How said it is to see such blindness in people these days.
A simple counter to SJWs defending pedophilia is to simply say they are rape apologists. Remember that children cannot consent and any person who wants to have sex with children is a rape apologist.
Easy rhetoric to employ. And the dumb masses might actually agree with it.
The problem with that is that according to SJWs, everything they fight against and denounce is no big deal when they are doing it themselves.
But they will drum up a bunch of kids that consent to pedophilia. They will push the narrative that sex is not harmful and kids can consent. They will explain that kids already consent to so many things, why not let them consent to something that is harmless? Do you need a kid’s consent to vaccinate them? They will say child sex is like a vaccination: helpful, healthy, good, required.
Is it surprising? No, not at all. That’s what they do.
Stop calling these creatures by their chosen titles. That’s how they win.
The stone has finally begun to roll, and will shake itself free of moss.
Absolutely. Nicholas, he is a pedo.
No end to the hypocrisy. I’m not a religious person, but when bible thumpers call out all the gross shit SJW’s hold sacred (fags, dykes, transwhatever), they love to point out that the catholic church is filled with pedophiles, and that they are the real freaks. Do they realize they will be losing a straw man because of this? I’m sure they can ‘rationalize’ a way to defend a pedo that is a shemale or ladyboy but not a catholic pedo.
Liberals espouse all perversions just some they publicly embrace while being quiet for now about the rest.
This thing doesn’t fit the first part of the DSM’s description (feeling bad about their feelings) because this thing could give a shit about how his cousin may feel when he tries to rape her. That just makes him a fucked-up monster. I too worry about the encroaching movement to legitimize pedophilia, BUT, I think that is going to go too far. At present, the lgtdisddahabdwasdsds is already losing ground because its now obvious that they are the bullies. Elsewhere, the recent revelation on planned parenthood is working to change opinion on abortion. Whats that got to do with this? Well, you could say that roe vs wade was the first step in the cultural degradation that we’ve had to endure for the past several decades. And even if that’s never overturned, nonetheless, the change in public opinion could be a start of a sea change that leads us right. Roosh’s recent video on the narrative and his piece about how the Patriarchy can be restored also touches on many cultural trends running counter to this leftist twisted sexual bullshit.
In Europe, there are already openly pedophile people in far-left groups.
The problem with criticizing pedophilia is that the term itself has been taken over by SJWs. If you are attracted to what clearly are teenage girls (not children), even if they are practically 18, you’re still considered a pedophile despite the definition not being applicable.
Real pedophilia involves sexual attraction to children (people aged 11 or younger) but that in itself is harmless. People who have sex with children should of course be punished since they are taking advantage of an individual who is not physically and psychologically able to consent properly. There is, however, inconclusive scientific research that suggests that the perceived harm may not be as severe (or exist at all): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy
As to lolicon, no one in their right mind should be feel bothered by it. If you’re unable to distinguish reality from fantasy, then you obviously are as delusional as the SJWs.
The issue with criticizing pedophilia is that the term itself has been taken over by SJWs. If you are attracted to what clearly are teenage girls (not children), even if they are practically 18, you’re still considered a pedophile despite the definition not being applicable.
Real pedophilia involves sexual attraction to children (people aged 11 or younger) but that in itself is harmless. People who have sex with children should of course be punished since they are taking advantage of an individual who is not physically and psychologically able to consent properly. There is, however, inconclusive scientific research that suggests that the perceived harm may not be as severe (or exist at all): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy
As to lolicon, no one in their right mind should be feel bothered by it. If you’re unable to distinguish reality from fantasy, then you obviously are as delusional as the SJWs.
It will be necessary to distinguish the difference between pedophilia and hepophillia. That’s where this topic get’s ugly, especially for those who are still teenagers but legally adults.
By “hepophilia”, do you mean hebephilia? I don’t think that’s even a legitimate concept. Don’t forget of the fact that the world doesn’t agree on what the “age of consent” is so it just adds to the complexity in finding answers to this.
Please die.
You come for my teenage relative then you better have your ducks in a row and expect a shotgun wedding.
Spoken like a true pedophile.
Be careful with those edges, m8. I’ve heard they’re sharp.
“People who have sex with children should of course be punished since they are taking advantage of an individual who is not physically and psychologically able to consent properly. There is, however, inconclusive scientific research that suggests that the perceived harm may not be as severe (or exist at all)”
You fucking retarded piece of shit.
Fuckin pedo and your pedo cartoon threat
And these are the same people who say two equally drunk adults having sex is rape. Yeah, they have gone so far off the rails the forgot what a track looks like.
But this is precisely why pedophilia will never be mainstream. It does cause irreversible damage. It’s completely different from homosexuality. The only people homosexuality harms is bigots (beta-males) who get their panties all in a bunch about it..and who gives a fuck about them?
Wow, the dumb is just scurrying out of the woodworks these days. Homosexuality destroys culture and brings down civilizations.
I had a girlfriend that had been sexually abused as a kid. She was REALLY fucked in the head.
Im quite a big lad and she is a petite little cutie, but she fucking scared me.
this is what all the “homophobic” people were saying would happen once you opened the floodgate of homos.
They immediately brought tranny shit into the mainstream. Now on campus I keep hearing the term transphobia.
And as the homophobes predicted, pedophilia, bestiality, polygamy will all be brought into the mainstream.
Then ill be called a pedophobic, beastiphobic, polygaphobic person.
Hahah man what I would give to watch these stupid people who not only practise but support it, reap what they have sown.
I’ll lock up the cat and dog.
Except that none of that will happen. The vast majority of the population are inherently hostile toward pedophilia and bestiality. It will never be mainstream. The vast majority of us are hardwired to abhor such behavior.
People are more tolerant of homosexuality because it doesn’t harm anyone else. Really, if your neighbor is gay, you shouldn’t give a fuck. And if you have an issue with it, that says more about you than them. Well adjusted guys don’t have issues with homosexuals.
BTW: did you know that being turned on by shit is a thing? I suppose you would think that will be mainstream too.
Most of the population was also inherently hostile towards homosexuals, just wait a couple of decades and pedophilia will get it’s movement up again (they had one in the 70’s or 80’s trying to legalise it it Britain). Conservatives were saying that gay marriage would lead to pedophilia and bestiality being legal, I used to think they were crazy but now they sound pretty dead on to me. Also furries will become a mainstream movement trying to get people to recognise them as ‘animals trapped in human bodies’ and all other kinds of silly shit.
Don’t waste your time arguing with Tom. I’m not sure if he is a troll, a gay, or what, but he doesn’t appear to belong here amongst real men who trying to have a conversation without emotional, P.C. bullshit.
SJWS TO THE RESCUE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDKYhkyL58Q
These are the same SJW’s who, four months ago, were screaming about the small minority of conservatives defending Josh Duggar. Such hypocrisy.
-berg. Yep.
Many SJW’s are medicated; psychiatrically, recreationally, or both. And many psycho-meds cause obesity. Many psychiatrists are predatory sex perverts. Many psychiatrists are Jewish. Many psychiatrists are both. And psychiatric drugs are now poisoning our waters. Psychiatry is an evil Judeo-Satanic cult, at war with human dignity and human nature. Psychiatrists created SJW’s as weapons in their war on truth goodness and beauty. Psychiatrists deserve a special kind of punishment for their crimes against humanity. And it shall surely come to pass.
Shut it down
Shrinks are the ‘meter maid’ or ‘traffic cop’ arm of the thought police who write you tickets (perscriptions) for thought infractions like thought speeding (thinking ahead of the borg), or thought crashing (causing thought mishaps by going against the pc grain and influencing others to break out with free thought). All thought crime meets the end of the road with the thought cops BUDDY!! Like the beat cop palm smacks and twirls his billy club, the thought cop can also twirl his big syringe like nun-chakas at the end of the fluorescent lit white concrete hallway. Read the writing in the school and media programming. And hear this: IF YOU THINK YOU’RE GONNA THINK TOO FAST, OR THINK OUTSIDE OF THE HERD, well you know boy that ’round these parts, the thought cops is gonna GETCHA!!!
Pedophilia is already here. Terry Bean, a member of the Democratic National Committee, just made a sodomy/pedophila charge go away (he picked up a boy on the Internet and fucked him). The media didn’t bat an eyelash and he continues to be good buddies with Barack Obama and a member of the DNC. The boy’s parents seem to have sided with Bean in the case. Also, Bill Clinton is known to have travelled to an island in the Caribbean (I can’t remember who owns it) that was basically a place to go have sex with underage girls and again the media said nothing. Not to mention the continuous stream of female pedophile teachers that are in California that people laugh at. Hell, last week I was at a beach and saw an obviously-lesbian babysitter rubbing the vagina of a girl who was maybe 12 or 13 years old. It was sort-of discrete, but also very obvious. Pedophilia isn’t next, it’s here. All that’s left is for Obama to appoint a pedophile as a cabinet secretary.
More femtard shit from GaGa. Read my comments and leave one of your own.—Dr Benway
Heh…..
I used to lurk FF Shrine as a pre-teen, but it was pretty fucking gay.
This explains everything. HA!
Actually, somes states have been mullying about executing repeated convicted pedos. I hope to see that implemented every where.
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/legislative-activity-south-carolina
Never happen. Until this civilization collapses, these freaks will be supported. That’s part of the collapse after all. Weakness, sloth, pedophiles, feminism, it all will fall to stronger tides, but first, it has to collapse, or at least fall to a stronger culture. And I believe that will be Islam in the European countries first (brilliant deduction, they’re being over run as we speak and observe). Hopefully, the Brits and French hand over their nukes and missiles before they’re overtaken by Islam in another couple of years. It is inevitable. Germany, Sweden and the Swiss are first up. It’s happening now. It’s ON.
Maybe. If you are content waiting. If you are getting no justice in the courts, you go get it yourself.
Note: The DA never brought charges against the father who pulled the trigger as he knew a jury would not prosecute him.
For starters, STOP referring to these freaks as SHE. If they started out life with a prick, they’re HE. It isn’t a choice and we shouldn’t confer the title. Shit, all a guy has to do is declare “she” and the world bows to that. We now have an openly gay Sec-Army (although we’ll see if he gets confirmed, I suspect “he” will). Soon, a dwarf transsexual “lesbian” Secretary of the Marine Corps, just because Obama can and no one of Capitol Hill will raise a word against it. And so, pedophiles will get their way. It filters down, drop-by-drop until the police, the judges, shrinks, all will have to “respect” the rights of pedophiles one day instead of treating them like the criminal freaks they are.
Gents, give up broads for 8 weeks, go get a vasectomy and bang away in the knowledge that your child won’t be born into this fucked up world. There’s no end to it. The slide down is well under way and there is NO stopping it. It’s all over but the collapse. Don’t bring your children into it. One day, Christian/Catholic Hispanics and Islamic imports will rule over and maybe even fight over the spoils of what’s left of Western Civilization in the United States. This, after Islam finishes off Western Civilization in Europe (it’s all done but the breeding). Amazingly, the process is speeding up in the flow from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq and Turkey, Yemen and the rest. Europe is FINISHED.
In five years (“America Alone” predicted by 2050), the White, PC, feminist-ruled nations of Europe will fall to Islam and will start in here. It sounds awful, but I’m enjoying, in a weird way, the fall of these societies that my Pop and his Greatest Generation defended and saved from the Nazis. They will fall into a culture that’s even worse. These are societies that hated the United States for decades after WW2, even as we saved them and have now branded the white descendants of those men as the enemy. Good luck ever getting a response similar to WW2 from the USA ever again, Europe. You wanted the Muslims, you’re going to get them. I didn’t realize they would migrate them by the tens of millions directly into their midst, however. The Islamic takeover of Europe is now ON and the European women of Germany, of France, of Great Britain are falling right into bed with them.
If it’s any comfort, the transsexual set will surely be the first destroyed when a traditional religion-based government asserts a moral framework to follow once again and feminism and transsexualism and the shrinks and lawmakers and judges and media that support the freak 1% will be first to go. “Strong” women and the tranny-crew will see the folly of their surrender into sloth and weakness in the fall to Islam. I used to try to defend the Western way of life, but now I wonder why I bothered. They’ll keep a few white guys around to invent, maintain and build, but the rest? It’s all theirs for the taking.
Try to enjoy the decline.
What’s with the his-her nonsense? Nyberg is 100% a he, mental illness/a desire to enjoy the softer sentences female pedophiles enjoy doesn’t change that.
I don’t think you’d have to worry about this kind of thing gaining traction in society. If it does, then you’ll have plenty taking the law into their own hands (no courts, no juries)..just old fashion justice.
Once we get to this point in our society, then respect for the courts, laws, etc… is out the window.
Would you mind stopping saying “she”? It’s a man.
I’m all for calling these creatures “it.”
No. Don’t play their game. It’s a man with delusions.
Defend pedophiles and promote fatties.
I hate to promote anything on Huffpo. But if you want to see the ugly damn fat models the left is promoting, check out this. Scroll down and see the freaks !
They promote in all seriousness more extreme fatties than RooshV ridicules. Truly amazing display of the grotesque held up as a new standard of beauty. New standards of queer perv sex naturally go with distorted view of natural forms in nature.
There are a couple of fairly plump beauties, but there are also massive tattooed hideous blobs.
Huffpo calls them “curvy”. You be the judge.
I usually avoid that rag as I do not even want to reward them with a click. But this shit is just too much !
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/diversity-nyfw_55fb139ae4b00310edf640e9
Dude, archive the link so we can laugh at the BS, yet deny them clicks: https://archive.is/6mv92
This pedophile’s defenders are still saying the chatlogs were doctored, that’s just how desperate they are to support anyone toeing their line.
What evidence do you have that they aren’t? The entire site could have been a honey pot for actual pedos for all you know.
Is there reason to believe they were? GamerGate should be assumed innocent until proven guilty, while people who propagate equality should be assumed guilty until proven innocent.
Now the archive.is logs has been deleted.
SJW heaven really is just native culture. Indians accept both pedofilia and homosexuality (talked to a social worker who worked in an indian reservation, and he couldnt believe the rates of incest, pedofilia etc). He also asked..is there a pretty female indian?? Thus the SJW comparison is complete.
Adult male on boy pedophilia turns boys into fags which in turn advances the population control agenda upon the target group. In the past, the state allowed the witch hunt mob mentality to prevail against both homos and pedos and it effectively curbed the practice of both. It’s amazing how lame the witch hunt mob gets when the witch hunting is officially declared illegal. Right now there’s still a witch hunt mentality allowed by the state against pedo’s to some degree, but the witch hunters must realise that when the state pulls the plug and endorses more population control pedo lifestyle tolerance, then the witch hunt party is over, or at least it’s over for the non indipendent thinkers, the brown nosers and niggaz of the state.
What is a ‘nigga’ or ‘bitch’ of the state? I guess that can be defined best by describing what is NOT a bitch of their state. The founding fathers were NOT the king’s bitches by any stretch. Anders Breivek was NOT a bitch of any state authority, not even his own home state of Norway. He only got a mere 20 years for his massacre. Obviously his strain of independent thinking, balls against the wall grandstanding runs strong in the Norse people, even in their state and juries. Cuckservatives in the US would have roasted him like they did with the famous patsy McVeigh. Sweden, eeh . . no room or time here. Consider Sweden a loss, like a major white ovarian-egg factory that got sjw bombed. It’s right up there with Dresden.
Until the late 1800’s, statutory ages were low for Adult male unions with younger females, (below 18 and above 13), and normal hetero family formation was high. And as for fag unions back then? Are you kidding? Homo and bestiality were shunned alike and their practitioners withered on the vine and died like unfit runts. Or they crawled into holes or died in the barn.
During PAX CAUCASIANA (500BC-1900AD), reproduction was highest with wives being married and becoming serial reproducers right after puberty. Family tree tracing shows the big producer females (12 or even more offspring) were married at 13 or 14 years of age. The 13-14 standard goes back officially 600 years to 1275 when Sir Edward Coke passed the first age of consent law in England based on the ‘old enough to bleed/breed’ principle.
Beginning in 1875, first wave feminists lobbied to raise statutory ages to allow for formal education of females to continue and supercede their prime reproductive peak years. Statutory ages across the west were 13.5 years for 600 years (1275-1875). Rome was actually lower by a year. I guess our ancestors realised that that’s about as emotionally mature as a woman is ever gonna get. Don’t call me names, for the sjw’s & fems, go read your history. Wanna burn all the evil white history . . eeh?
I though that 20 years was the maximum sentence you could get in Norway, their jails are super cushy as well. Although that will probably change if they accept a bunch of Syrians into their society. Great comment though, shame that things had to change so much, we wouldn’t have any feminism (because they would all be married with kids before learning about it) and homosexuals or paedophiles (they would get lynched).
Doesn’t matter if its pedophilia or pederasty its an abomination simply by virtue of it being homosexuality.
SJWs went too far a long time ago. They are vile people.
Most transsexualism is really a sex fetish known as autogynephilia; before the ‘sex change’ they were not at all effeminate, but attracted to the opposite sex as Butts is to little girls. Autogynephilia is when men are sexually attracted to the thought of becoming the object of their sexual desire, in case you are wondering.
Autogynephiles also are the subtype of transsexual with an abnormal BSTc region in their brain – a trait its known they share with offending paedophiles & some other criminals.
Thanks for that, good to see people putting out facts.
I can’t wait for the day when these cretins have to actually go get a real job and their prospective employer looks them up on Google and sees that they vehemently defended a self-confessed paedophile.
I notice that even a more ‘moderate’ SJW like Rebecca Watson has kept her distance from the lunatic fringe inhabited by the likes of Brianna Wu and Arthur Chu. But that drunken piece of garbage Leigh Alexander has doubled-down, and she was the person publishing this monster’s articles.
But we shouldn’t be too surprised. Leftists adore Muslims, so they probably wholeheartedly approve of their common practice of dressing little boys up like girls with dresses and make-up then sodomizing them.
A common Muslim creed goes ‘Girls are for children, boys are for pleasure’.
I can’t decide if you’re a moron or a genius. Making a site like this that appeals to the people it appeals to…you must make a ton of money.
As to the article itself..pedophilia will never be an accepted, mainstream practice.
SJW already promoted Pedophilia for around 20 years, from the 60s to the 80s and, for instance, supported NAMBLA, the “North American Man/Boy Love Association”. There were similiar organizations throughout the Western world, always associated with Green Parties, gay and feminist groups.
Then there was a little backlash in the 80s and the SJW had to go a bit more undercover (“We just want tolerance but will leave you alone”), but since too many 80s conservatives turned out to be cuckservatives who only cared about Israel and lower taxes for banksters and multinational corporations, the SJW could win again. I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if they would continue to promote Pedophilia soon.
Besides, SJW already turn six year old(!) boys into trannies and let them dance half-naked on Gay Parades. And if you don’t have a problem with promoting the destruction of little boys with pills, hormons and preparing them for sex “change” operations. Well…
Unfortunately I just watched an episode of new show-I am Cait, to see what all the hype was about.
This episode was about Caitlin and her/ his t ranny friends (who just made the transition)
About 6 of them, who went on this transition retreat somewhere near Napa Valley. Okay, so one of the scenes was getting over the fear of going in the pool w a bikini for the first time.
About 7 or so new trannys were all shy about revealing themselves. I noticed that there were also hamburgers and hot dogs sizzling on the grill at the pool party, now, the burgers I get, but, newly transformed Transgenders all together eating wieners? Wouldn’t that be kinda symbolic?
Also, since they were all (men) after the meal, would they all bond by ripping loud farts, and laughing and bonding like most men do, or would that not be lady like? or would they fart in the pool, making stinky bubbles, and would all their farts be strong and smelly like men, or would their farts be toned down from the hormone pills? Also some of the trannys were fat, would they still have sweaty stinky feet like men?
Point one is that Gamergate is separate from pedophilia. Trying to link one to the other is basically ad hominim. Still, we can all have a chortle to consider who is on which side, and what sort of arguments and defenses they make.
.
If these people are the same SJWs who give me heartache about dating women half my age, then WTF?
The only support for the lower age of consent laws is in historical precedent where the ages of adulthood were also likewise lower than in the US and much of the modern world in the pre-industrial era:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/200703/trashing-teens
Even in the Judeo-Christian tradition:
http://www.answering-islam.org/Shamoun/marriage_age.htm
Yet few or no functioning civilizations in the ancient world even accepted actual pedophilia as legitimate or good and even when such practices occurs there are ample critics.
Perhaps not even hunter-gatherers conceived of such notions or practiced them.
The irony being that “pedophile” (along with misogynist, neck beard, basement dweller, pathetic loner, etc) is one of the standard epithets levelled by feminists/SJWs against anyone in the manosphere. A quick read of NOWs charter is very instructive. But then no one ever accused SJWs of being hypocrites…… LOLZ
all homosexuals and perverts should be forced to register as sex offenders. WIll be easier to find them for removal once we take this country back.
It’s so contradictory and moronic that, yeah, they’ll jump to defend them.
The site makes it a point to dogmatically defend institutionalized Christianism and priesthood, yet suddenly has a problem with pedophilia. Could this get any cuter.
So you don’t have a problem with having sex with children, is that the takeaway?