293 thoughts on “Why The World Would Not Be A Better Place If Women Ruled”

1. If women ruled the world, “feelings” would take precedence over evidence. A woman’s word would be given greater value than a man’s word, who are demonized.
   Just a small nitpick…

   Christianity would take this love of order and spread it all over Europe.

   I disagree with this. If anyone spread order it was the Roman Empire, and they were pagan. By the time Rome officially adopted Christianity as the state religion, in the 380s CE, it had long been in decline. One-hundred years later the empire fell (~476 CE). The Pax Romana was pure paganism. Also, barbarians weren’t nearly as uncivilized as the stereotypes are. Our sources on the barbarians are the Romans themselves (coughbiasedcough), but archaeological evidence paints a different picture.

2. I understand what this article is positing, yet the state of the patriarchal world is allowing this non sense to happen.
   feminists, homosexuals, comic book geeks, ufc, sports addicted persons, etc. etc.
   The people that are so far gone into the “rabbit hole” … there is just no bringing them back. I believe this has been promoted by the elite who have tremendous influence over the markets and government.
   It is done for it allows for an easier sale, easier taxation, easier manipulation.. and totally fragmented societies.
   This all equals little to no resistance.
   No unity.
   I have tremendous respect for what the American Constitution, and their independence was all about. None of that would have been possible without intelligence, cooperation, unity.
   Now a days, the level of unity we have is to constantly lust after each other.
   God help us.

   1. Now here’s a classic example of what you’re describing:
      
      When even the normally polite Japanese laugh in your face, you have seriously failed.

3. I’m so sad you guys didn’t cite this article:
   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html

   1. I think everyone has noticed this in their respective workplaces. Women seem to have more respect for male leaders than they do for female leaders. I wish someone would do a scientific study on that.

      1. The author of the article, Samantha Brick, accuses her respective industry of misogyny by insisting that it operates with “on old boys’ network” (i.e., the imaginary glass ceiling feminists fancifully complain about) yet freely admits the failure of ‘girl power’ by her confessions. She even insists that men have an easy ride (suggesting that men rise simply due to their sex as opposed to hard work) Even more interesting, she proceeds to state, ” if I were to do it again, I’d definitely employ men. In fact, I’d probably employ only men.”
         Her cognitive dissonance is rather obvious. One can easily see the conflict raging within her as her brainwashed feminist head and the honesty of her experiences battle it out in the article.

         1. not to mention her massive censorship of comments.

      2. “Women seem to have more respect for male leaders than they do for female leaders.”
         As much as feminists will rant and rave against it the above is true for one very simple reason:
         Women are calmed and soothed by submitting to a man in charge, whether it be at work or at home.

   2. That goes with this one.
      http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-10-16/women-dislike-having-female-bosses-more-than-men-do
      In the 60 years that Gallup has conducted this survey, women have never preferred a female boss.

      1. Women HATE making decisions (as we all know). Female bosses tend to ask subordinate male workers to make decisions for them, from what I can tell.

   3. And what a rack on Ms. Brick! With a rack like that I’m sure she gets a lot of attention from men, freeing her up to actually view them with something less than hate and with some modicum of reality. She seems to have been an early feminist but tried her experiment, saw that (imagine) women have flaws too and now she’s happy to come back to reality where her rack gets her what she wants. Only a thoroughly hideous feminist would be able to hamster away this disaster of a company. It’s an entire staff of HR bitches! What else could it be? Last one to be fired (or re-hired by themselves) wins!

      1. The first thing I noticed in the article was her tits hanging out of her dress. Typical British moll.

4. There’s an excellent Polish movie about this, it’s called “Sex Mission” (Polish: Seksmisja).
   Maks and Albert agree to take part in a scientific experiment involving hibernation. The experiment is only supposed to last a couple of years; but after getting defrosted, they find themselves in a society they can’t begin to understand. They gradually discover that the world has gone to hell and there are only women left on the planet, living in a humongous underground “Vault” (like in the game Fallout, only a lot larger 😉 and ruled by the radical Women’s League, which was barely even established in their day.
   The League has developed a thorough system of propaganda, human control and changed history, which focuses mainly on how “males” used to be absolutely evil (at one point when Maks and Albert are trying to defend men, they are told that “Einstein was a woman” and that “one man named Cain invented murder and tested it on his sister Abel”). However, they manage to instill doubt in one woman and with her help discover that not everything – if anything – is as it seems…
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSkU1IWciTo
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexmission

   1. There was an Outer Limits episode with a similar story.

   2. The only problem is that they don’t portray the rampant lesbianism that results from absence of males.

5. Women are desperate to be like men. That is why they have been trying to replicate our lifestyle in every manner under the guise of “equality” when really, they do not have the capacity or skills to be like men. Hence, why you have feminism.
   I look at the world with disgust, and see what it has turned into, because of the destruction that feminism has done to our society. From more women being in the labor market than men, to creating the illusion that women are now able to replace the father figure, it makes me shake my head with great disgust.
   The way the world is currently shaped, in regards to everything having to be in favour of women, rather than actual genuine equality, is proof that women are truly delusional. They are also very dangerous and self destructive in their behaviour and nature, and will do everything in their power to ensure, that all men are taken down by their low life actions. Be it in the corrupt family courts by taking everythign away from the man, or by the increasing rape laws such as “yes means yes” and “rape by fraud” to destroy innocent men, women have only themselves to blame when they cannot find any good men in their lives.
   The world is burning down, and I choose to remain seperate from it to the best of my ability, by always protecting myself first. I urge all men to do the same.

   1. Women hate women.

      1. No. They just hate beta/omega males.

         1. Uh, yes they do.

         2. It’s true. I’ve seen it in the faces of women as they regard other women they envy. But it’s beyond envy; it’s hate

         3. They hate alpha males that dump them to the side as well.. but only when it’s made clear they don’t have a 2nd chance in hell to reignite the fling.
            The hate is widespread and knows no boundaries.

         4. Trust me dude… I just left my science lab a month ago (I was the last male and now it is ALL chicks) and I’m already hearing stories about how the girls hate each other.
            For some reason they’re all picking on the new girl.
            When I was the new guy… I would not have made it if the guys higher up didn’t help me out along the way.
            The natural hierarchy is good. I had respect for people that knew more than I did. This girl better hope the prof secretly wants to fuck her, or else she is on her own.

         5. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.

         6. I’ve dealt with that situation too many times. Women often come together when there’s a male threat, but still won’t hesitate to attack one another regarding the most frivolous bs. Worst jobs you can have is working with a group of women.

         7. Ironically these women are usually close friends.

         8. How many times have you seen women act like best friends, then shit talking about their “friend” when she isn’t around? I’ve lost count on how often I’ve seen this happen.

         9. Women despise hierarchies; they cannot compete, so must demand everyone be brought down to their level

         10. They’re called “frenemies” for a reason.
             Bitches just need rough sex, nothing makes them mellow out quite like it.

         11. That word always makes me laugh.

         12. …My mom, my sister, ex gfs. All frequently talked about the women they hate at their jobs. The insanity of seeing them smile in each others face or call one another on a daily basis knowing they can’t stand each other….

         13. Hell Hath no fury like a woman in a position of power over men.

   2. “The world is burning down, and I choose to remain seperate from it to the best of my ability, by always protecting myself first.”
      I do this by refusing to acknowledge, show any respect for, or to surely not stick my dick in an HPV infected, nasty, manly, Anglo-American female’s wet hole.
      The level to which these females have been corrupted, drunk on their own power, is obvious to anyone with an open mind and the means to step foot outside the Anglo-American Matrix.

      1. Yeah what is up with all this fucking HPV? Shit’s everywhere

         1. It’s spread primarily by women, especially those that ride the carousel a lot.

   3. Women long ago realized they can’t compete with men, so they are throwing a tantrum that will destroy civilization as revenge. We lift them up, they tear everything down. It’s sick and sad

6. If women were capable of running a civilization they already would be running one somewhere.
   Mother Nature is harsh, but does not discriminate in any way. Any idea, no matter how stupid it sounds, is given room to flourish with one caveat; it must be successful and actually work. There is no affirmative action in nature.
   The reason there are no successful societies where women run things is not because Mother Nature is a misogynist, it’s because they don’t work.

   1. Quite frankly, nature, and therefore biology, is simply not conducive to the idea of equality [of outcome] regardless of how much futile effort is spent in attempting to deny reality.

      1. Equality does not exist in nature. Therefore, an unequal outcome is not evidence of discrimination. I’ll scream this to the grave.

         1. Indeed.

         2. Nature by it’s very nature is not Socialist.

      2. You are 100% correct; yet this plain truth is incongruous to the minds of modern americans.
         This is why democracy doesn’t work. It’s a pretty ideal, but whence a nation becomes successful, any idiotic idea can take root and bring ruin to the very nation that birthed it. Most people are idiots, and can’t be trusted to self-govern. Especially a society made up of the dregs of every other society in the world, like america. We are a nation of peasants, and thus are guided by superstitions.
         As Plato said, only an enlightened monarchy can hope to lead man from the darkness

   2. Feminism can only exist within a rich civilization. It’s a byproduct of luxury. The richer the country, the more likely you’ll find things like feminism. The poorer the country, the more likely you’ll find traditional gender roles. Why? Because traditional gender roles actually work. In a rich society you have the ability to waste time and energy on novelties, much like a rich man can afford to flush money down a toilet.

      1. This is absolutely true, and it’s just about the most damning evidence against feminism. The results show that when you need shit done, get men to do it.

         1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Curie
            Really? Because a woman chemist made the most important discoveries regarding nuclear energy …If we went with male research we’d all be dead or born with third eyes.

         2. You do know that madam curie had significant help from her husband right? She also died of radiation poisoning….So yeaaaaah.

         3. You dumb little cunt, Marie Curie is absolutely the worst example you can muster, Pierre Curie did all of the work.
            That dumb little bitch died of radiation poisoning, truly a great mind

         4. Guess the Nobel committee was completely wrong in awarding her prize. Thanks for educating us, Sam.

         5. And he was helped by her. Her poisoning came from carrying the isotopes in her pockets onto battlefields. Science is not a place for egos.

         6. Science is full of egos. I implied teamwork, I don’t understand the point of your comment other than to show the madam maxe a few extremely unwise decisions in hiw to transport hazardous materials

         7. Yeah, the Nobel folks have been leftists forever, you may have noticed the Obama and Arafat Peace prize, but equally deserving???? In what universe? If they had one for aviation they would have given it to Earhart for crashing.

         8. Yeah, a lot of people don’t realize that the vast majority of Marie’s work was actually Pierre’s, published under Marie’s name in order to evoke ‘dancing bear’* recognition among the scientific community.
            Marie was a face and a bottle washer.
            *Dancing bear- it doesn’t matter how well the bear dances, the amazing thing is that a bear dances at all.

         9. The Nobel Committee awarded Obama a prize for ‘Not being George Bush’.
            Yeah. sure. It’s a real competent organization.

         10. she carried dangerous radium around in her front pocket. not to mention she also established an industry of radium refineries and factories that went on for over half a century irradiating workers and the public. she was a dum dum compared to pretty much any male scientist/inventor of note

         11. You are confusing the science Nobel with the non-science/humanities.

         12. Not at all. I am calling into question the appointments to the nobel committees. all of them. I have seen several nobel prizes go to climatologists and environmental scientists, who have since been proven ridiculous. I have seen them go to psychobiologists that claimed humans were all the same mentally, I have seen them go to anthropologists who were taken in by propaganda and were the primary support behind scams (think Bonobo chimp fiasco)
             The Nobel committee has debased and discredited itself thoroughly.

      2. Nah. The kurds for example are poor yet they harbor feminists. This is evident in the beliefs that many of them have in gender equality.

         1. Their “feminists” are not the same as our hypocritical pampered parasitical feminists.
            The kurdish women actually take guns and go die head-on in battle. That’s a stupid strategy in terms of reproduction, but it’s at least a honorable version of feminism.

         2. That’s true. Yet it is still feminism as you admit,still dedicated to the abolition of patriarchy. And proper sexually dimorphic roles.

         3. In addition modern technology nullifies the physical advantage men have over women. As it is of no relevance to firepower other than the ability to pull the trigger. Only reaction time, the ability to aim and being able to pull the trigger matters. Hence bringing women into greater equality with men in terms of fighting power.

         4. Agreed. I’ll take the Kurdish women anyday over the spoilt entitled western feminists princesses. These Kurdish women are willing to die side by side with their men folk and are not afraid of hardship and a potentially violent death at the hands of jihadists. They remind me strongly of the warrior women of ancient societies who gladly rode into battle to support their husbands.

         5. Hence bringing women into greater equality with men in terms of fighting power.

            Nope. Women, in general, lack the visuospatial skills that men have. In other words, women are not as good at visually and accurately estimating distances and angles. Women also lack the testosterone needed to sustain fighting aggression. Not to mention they are generally at a disadvantage when it comes to carrying all that heavy equipment. Women are not naturally built for warfare, which is why they aren’t sent.

         6. I’m not familiar with Kurdish culture, but I’d say either they probably aren’t all that poor, or their “feminism” isn’t the same as our feminism.

         7. what?
            feminism is dedicated to petty female supremacist selfishness. period. the deep, insidious ingenuity of the child’s “mine” leads them to spout whatever they can to (1) take and (2) give nothing back. the asperger child screams that the sun revolves around them and seeks in blind violent selfishness to change all the rules to their advantage or they’ll refuse to play. thus there can never be any female justice as they are utterly incapable of seeing anything beyond the terrible toddler’s “mine”. as soon as the rules say ‘play fair’, the feminist, the equal female, seeks to change the definition of fairness. every single time. how can those who never pay, never innovate, never build, never defend, never go beyond the first form of learning – imitation – ever develop that deep sense required for justice? how can magical thinking ever lead to justice?
            that “abolition of patriarchy” falls under taking: anything to change the rules, say some shit doesn’t count, so they get to do XYZ -and- no one else can take the way they get to. that abolition of “dimorphic roles” falls under giving nothing back, by deamonizing the sexual and femininity payment to men so as to void/nullify exchange via hollow claims of divine moral supremacy. equality of kurdish gender roles, if it does exist, is both taking and not giving back, just like it is everywhere. none of this is justice. all of this defies justice.
            what the fuck are you actually arguing?

         8. all feminism has western elements in it and will manifest like ours has. hell could be worse when it gets in their hands…like some feminist sharia or something

         9. RedPill Army
            ”Women also lack the testosterone needed to sustain fighting aggression”
            Why then is it that even with the option to withdraw that kurdish women fighters do not?
            ”Women are not naturally built for warfare, which is why they aren’t sent.”
            Yet the Kurds send them to fight on the frontlines and assad:
            http://www.timesofisrael.com/kurdish-women-fighting-in-syria/
            http://www.dw.de/women-join-the-kurdish-fight-in-syria/a-17442218
            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/25/women-fighting-isis_n_6046408.html

         10. Fixed.

         11. @disqus_UbpBiBWNLI:disqus
             Well I don’t think they are any better:
             http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/10/06/iraq.pkk/
             Other than their honor and willingness to risk it all.

         12. That’s not the same thing. The Kurds embrace leftist ideology as a means against the majority Turks.
             It’s the same reason minorities embrace equalism everywhere. Because it supports their interests while sticking it to the majority. It doesn’t not actually mean they would turn equalism loose on their own people.

         13. The role of testosterone makes men better fighters.
             http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/testosterone-promotes-agression-aut-12-06-09/
             http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-athletes-way/201310/testosterone-fuels-both-competition-and-protectiveness
             I didn’t say that women are incapable of fighting. We have prisons with female murderers, but they tend to be more rare. Overall, the example is anecdotal, and doesn’t actually prove your point about equality in fighting power. We could also put children and elderly men on the front lines, but that doesn’t make them equally good at warfare.
             Further, it wouldn’t surprise me if these Left-leaning sources are biased. Given that women are the bottlenecks in human reproduction, losing your women in warfare can spell reproductive disaster. Mathematically, losing too many women in warfare will cause a population crash in the subsequent generation. Men instinctively know this, and have an evolved bias to protect women, so I have no doubt that whatever role Kurdish women play in battle it is being exaggerated by Western media.

         14. The PKK was founded by a Kurd who ripped off Mao’s ‘little red book’. It’s a descendant of Communism. It has nothing to do with Kurdish culture. If the Kurds’ ancestors could see what they have now become they would be appaled that women are sent off to the front line as a matter of principle.
             PKK fighters worship a weird pseudo-communist founder and send women to fight because this one guy said they should do so based on Mao’s theories.
             In terms of effectiveness, Kurds are quite numerous and have relatively prosperous expat communities around the world but have yet to establish a proper country despite decades of armed conflict and terrorist action.

         15. …which is why the kurdish army won’t be conquering the world any time soon. Those women are certainly courageous, but far from the rule, and further from effective soldiers

         16. There are African countries that sent children to fight as well..it doesn’t mean they did well.

         17. Women are hopeless fighters.
             You would only have them on the front-lines out of complete desperation or out of political expediency. Do the Kurds strike you as a force that can afford female fighters as a luxury?

         18. Titan is a feminist clown.

         19. Mate, women can’t even play Call of Duty as well as men. Stop now with your clownish arguments.

         20. coorectamundo. Was going to make this comment nearly 1 to 1. Thanks for handling it so well.
             You can dress the women folk up in fatigues and teach them how to shoot (which might be good as last line of defense rather than cowering in a bunker…especially if you are kurdish and your bunker is made mostly of mud and branches) but they aren’t charging into battle the way the news wants us to believe they are.
             It takes such an insanely wealthy and spoiled people to use their military as a vehicle for social change.

         21. sending them to be shields isn’t the same as sending them to fight.
             You woudln’t say that the “Palestinians” are teaching their children to fight when they lay them on a roof to defer a more civilized enemy from bombing them would you?

         22. Have you noticed who is in the police front lines in Fergusson?

         23. Good points. I think this is why plural marriages work in places with high causality low tech conflicts such as the middle east. You can rub out two thirds of all of the young men, and in 15 to 20 years, it doesn’t matter. The same can not be said if you were to rub out two thirds of all of the young women.

         24. I’m not talking shields I’m talking children with AKs

         25. I understand, I just think that it is a small enough difference to be practically the same thing.

         26. I noticed. But they are not as fully infected by Marxist ideology quite like the PKK,YPG and the Pershmerga which allow women to serve in the front lines.

         27. If it is desperation why would they send them on an offensive against Assad?

         28. That’s true. They are probably seriously deluded. But Kobane isn’t falling anytime soon. And it seems the majority of casualties are on the ISIS side.

         29. Mainstream media outlets meanwhile:
             http://edition.cnn.com/2014/10/29/world/us-newest-allies-syrian-kurds/index.html
             http://kickerdaily.com/woman-leads-kurdish-troop-vs-isis-in-kobane/

         30. Have a read and see for youself:
             http://www.wsj.com/articles/kurdish-women-fight-on-front-line-against-islamic-state-1413580188
             http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-nazand-begikhani/kurdish-women-rights-fight_b_6205076.html
             http://www.inquisitr.com/1426645/kurdish-women-soldiers-take-on-isis-forces-in-move-to-humiliate-terrorists-being-hailed-as-heroes/
             Even RT acknowledges this:
             http://rt.com/news/193972-kurdish-women-fighters-isis/
             I agree with the impending demographic disaster that will ensue if this continues but all indications show that their society is in the throes of equality delusion.

         31. That’s true yet according to a quote from a news source:
             ”Nerzin says: “So many, many times our victories have been won by women. They even motivate the men to be stronger and tougher fighters. In every fight, women prove their true strength and ability – they proved that it is a lie that women cannot fight.”
             Nerzin Female commander of the Kurds in Kobani
             Read more at http://www.mamamia.com.au/news/kurdish-female-fighters-isis/#04wOZ8zbHW8IKMsG.99

         32. I just killed my first ten point buck a month ago….None of the men on our 10 people hunting expedition killed anything. I did. hah. Used a sexy 12 gauge, which was also the biggest gun out of our group …I weigh 103 pounds. I was hunting with them for 5 days straight with my 35 pounds gun, I did fine. Better than them 🙂

         33. My gunman skills are better than anyone I know. I also just completed my 5th marathon last week….I’m 103 pounds.

         34. Now do it with a 80 bag on your back. Welcome to the infantry

         35. Yeah everyone on here has better gun skills than everyone else. How are your hand to hand skills?

         36. With someone with the same training shooting back at you.

         37. Yes we should. They are full of shit.

         38. Very true. I remember the case where a grunt killed an insurgent by bashing his head ito the concrete. It’s innately physical.

         39. And the ability to withstand the “kick” of the gun? Fail

         40. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwlCM9E4q28

         41. While I consider the documentary full of shit. The video footage shows that the women can fire guns perfectly well provided the proper training:
             https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xww8Snj_dY8

         42. I have no gun skills. Mandatory minimums here in NY. We use bats.

         43. Where I live guns are virtually illegal. But you should still try to learn some skills if you can.

         44. I know which way to point them, but that is about the extent of it. I do throw a mean right cross though.

         45. They make halfway decent urban snipers, though. No load, no hiking, sit quietly in one place and shoot unsuspecting people in the head.
             Well, they do die quickly… and are utterly useless as battle snipers, forward spotters, or scouts.
             But if you absolutely HAVE to protect your city from an invader at all costs, go ahead and put the women, cripples, and children at the windows with rifles. They are likely to do a competent enough job until they are dead.

         46. Run your mouth when you can take just about anyone on the boards in a fight, girl.
             After many years of combat training, I have yet to see a female ‘black belt’ that could even take a male yellow belt when the gear comes off. Most of these ‘martial arts masters’ cannot even take an untrained male fighter, even the ones in their own weight class.

         47. Because they are idiots

         48. Equaltards if you want to be specific.

         49. Oh yeah, well I’m a Navy Seal trained in gorilla warfare with over 300 confirmed kills…

         50. What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.

         51. Because all Kurds, men AND women alike, know that if they surrender to ISIS, they’re fucked. Death in the most unimaginable ways possible will be what awaits the Kurds. Even the word Genocide would not begin to describe it.
             Being a minority confronted by monsters like ISIS, every Kurd knows that there is no choice but to fight. That is among the many reasons why their women do not retreat.
             They’re also not just fighting a war to defend themselves; They’re fighting to prevent their own EXTINCTION.

         52. So this is difference with Stalingrad? Weren’t Russians threatened with the same thing with the Nazi’s

         53. Their belief in Gender Equality is s significant factor contributing to this:
             http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/12/16/us-syria-women-idUSKBN0JU0D020141216
             Else women will stay behind where they live and defend themselves and their children as the last line of defense rather than going on the offensive against ISIS with the men.

         54. The peshmerga are in a similar or the same position. Yet they only use men on the frontlines.

         55. A huge part of combat is hauling about 100 pounds of equipment, ammo, and supplies with you into combat. Women can’t do it. Several women who have tried (and they are in the top 5% of physically capable women even to have achieved the opportunity) state clearly, publically and loudly that they can’t.

         56. Yeah. I admit I could be wrong. Kurdish women in syria is touted as kicking isis ass. When in reality the vast majority of the actual carnage is cause by the kurdish men and airstrikes.

      3. thats a very good point. In fact its part of the phase of an empire in decline, These “womens rights” are part of the decadence phase. They start working, their fertility rates go low and they have to bring in foreigners to work. In the end of rome and Baghdad the natives of these 2 cities were actually minorities to foreigners before their empires collapsed.
         But today its alil more interesting now with technology. For example india is a hotbed for feminism(whom have very western mindset) and all they are doing is killing their fertility rates, increasing spending and debt,starting a shift in more elders then youth before they can even be rich and devolped. A poor nation cannot afford that. They need the youth buldge.
         They are killiing the country before it becomes great. Same story with Iran, their fertility is 1.8 below replacement value and women dominate colleges. They also are gonna have this same problem. Those in power are very worried about this, honestly I dont blame their anti west stance. Cause look at what its doing to them.
         Like who is going to mass emigrate to poor nations and take care of their elderly…no one thats who. Fertility can only afford to drop when a nation is rich. Its like white women here in the west are trying some neo colonalism shit and push their mindset on the locals and ruin them.
         Aside from israel its next to impossible to raise fertility rates. They are all dropping world wide.
         Overpopulation is a myth. Japan makes it work,127 million livin on land 1/3 of the size of British Columbia and using only 15% of the land. Having infrastructure,health care,education and jobs, that young workforce will be ablessing. Elderly populations have no positive aspects to them.
         the way things are going anwhat these people do Im surprised no one hasnt starting jumpin those villians on the street.

         1. I will have to find the source again, but I read ‘somewhere’ that archeologists found a similarity in many collapsed cultures:
            graves from the last decades before the collapse show the novelty of females in high positions of society, e.g. high priests, astronomers, medicinal staff etc…
            of course no conclusion was made…

         2. ahhh, I think I know which youre talking about, but I dont have the source.
            It was ancient persia. 2/3 of the “high caste” seals were women’s tombs. Goes to show when women take an empire over theyll kill it.
            But keep in mind during those days there were more women then men since we are more likley to die from nature, war, disease for them. In fact male infant mortality rates are still higher among boys them girls from the same country, be it first world or 3rd world. The poorer the land the bigger the gap
            What ever club,business,sport,hobby,job or empire we start, the women just cherry pick and demand to have it too….they are like children(this was said by confucious i belive correct me if am wrong).

         3. I don’t know if Confucius said it (he very well might have), but the great philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer did. He had a lot of red pill insights, long before there was an official red pill philosophy

         4. oh cool even a western philosopher has said this. Ive only heard it was eastern mindset. like in pre islamic arabia, women are essentially viewed as factories to make more men due to their incompetence and after following the manosphere, have to agree on this.
            Especially after that danish survivor of men vs women.
            If we were a sexual species, the only women wed find would be in archaeological museums.
            Guys back in the day were red pill in fact it was the original mainstream thought. I think theyd laugh at us for calling it that since its always been like that, we just been brainwashed for the past 50yrs hence we have to name this mindset espically in the west.

         5. Yep, Confucius DID say it: “Women and dishonorable men (eunuchs at that time) are hard to keep” or something like that I think

      4. You can also include stuff like welfare, foreign aid, animal rights, environmentalism, child (theft) protective services, etc as luxuries.

      5. Not a product of a rich civilization but of one in decline.
         Civilizations decline when the ones who built them fade out for whatever reason (physically or psychologically) and the plebeians (read: women) have no authority to keep them in check.
         This is whats happening now

      6. Lol, if it works then why are these poorer countres less educated and wealthy
         ? What do you want for our society then? Do you realize those traditional families in those poorer can’t even feed their kids? If you can’t feed your kids, you are failing, so wrong, the more traditional families don’t work, and also statistically have a higher divorce rate than egalitarian partnerships.

         1. The more traditional families created america and everycurrent successful country.higher divorce rate is because if feminism

         2. ooh, this is where we start getting into race realism arguments.

   3. Yes. This illustrates is why liberalism, and particularly feminism, are so childish.
      Children take things for granted. They seek comfort, and they have abstracted, second-hand accounts of how the real world works. Meanwhile, adults (before socialism) had to roll up their sleeves and do the dirty work necessary for survival.
      Western Civilization is the most successful in the history of the world, and the United States is its crowning achievement. I’m all for building a better society, but to do so we must build upon the foundations which have been so fruitful.

      1. They also both seek out only the emotional payoff as opposed to problem solving or any sense of rational completion. How many children will fantasize about a tree house, cash in on the emotional excitement of it, hammer a few random boards into a tree trunk and then run off to some other fascination once tedious reality hits them? Feminists cash in on the emotional payoff (vibrant rage, energy, self-importance, vengeful hate) of the campus rape crusades but don’t give a crap whatsoever about ending it through practical behavior. (The fact there is no rape epidemic anyway certainly helps their make believe, tree-house skit). I remember how angry Rachel Maddow got when presented with data that the unequal pay thing is just a matter of a mis-calculation. The actual ‘difference’ is beyond negligible. Shouldn’t she have been happy? “You mean it’s equal? Thank God!!!” Of course that wasn’t her reaction. She was angry because she felt that her source of emotion was being threatened. She couldn’t give a crap less about women actually getting equal pay. Her concern was purely about her emotion-rod being maintained.

         1. The good news is that feminist’s efforts to promote the pay-gap narrative are becoming desperate. Slate.com recently published an article* decrying the pay gap at Sony among it’s top earners. (At one point the author notes that two employees’ salaries differed by more than a million dollars).
            Well, the people whose salaries are measured in millions of dollars are a very, very small segment of the population. Furthermore, in high-stakes, high-talent positions, there is a lot of variability because that’s how capitalism works. If they work on the same film together, Leonardo DiCaprio is gonna get paid a helluva lot more than Janeane Garofalo.
            *http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/12/05/sony_pictures_hack_reveals_gender_pay_gap_at_the_entertainment_company_and.html

         2. The mechanics of capitalism are too complex for them. Hell, the mechanics of the steam engine are too complex for them.
            All they care about are the **feels**

      2. It is not a coincidence that far left ideology is primarily founded by ivory tower academics and immature, idealistic college kids. Even I used to be one when I was in college. Thankfully my family pulled me away from the bullshit and back into reality

         1. To my shame, so was I (though I always hated feminism). It says a lot when the only way an ideology can thrive is by appealing to the (silly) sensibilities of disturbed people and children

         2. Leftist ideology seems to only survive in occupations that do not require you to produce anything. In academia, journalism, media, and Hollywood, bad ideas have no consequence for those who propose them. In industry, bad ideas cost you your job.

   4. You have it backwards. Mother Nature discriminates all the time. But there is nothing wrong with this. Discrimination is perfectly rational.

      1. heh, I discriminate against spaghetti when I eat pizza instead.

   5. What was Cleopatra then? She was preceded and followed by men, but not because she failed as a leader.

      1. Oh boy. You just mentioned the one leader that is a graphic example of the failure of feminism.
         Cleopatra didn’t exist as a leader, she was a front for a nation conquered by Rome. Every time she tried to assert egyptian rule, she fucked up ‘royally’.
         Her few accomplishments amounted to selling Egypt down the river. I wouldn’t try to use her as an assertion of female ruler ability if I were you. Someone with a better ancient history education than I have is likely to set you brutally straight.

   6. Well said Bart, Well said indeed.

   7. lol

7. I can imagine the world as it’s going to be in a few years. A lot of men will go beta and thirsty. I’m already thinking about investing in the sexbot industry. With the rate technology is advancing now sexbots (and electric cars) will be a big business in twenty years.

   1. Men have already become beta and thirsty. Thats why you now have an epidemic of manginas, henpecked simps and trophy husbands.

      1. Unfortunately these men with single mothers will create an endless cycle. It hurts my head just thinking about the future generation of young men that are fucked.

   2. A while ago I wrote for ROK an article arguing that the logical conclusion of modern feminism is the rise of sex robots*. Also, Japanese guys are already “marrying” virtual girlfriends**. Enjoy the decline!
      *http://www.returnofkings.com/41767/sex-robots-are-becoming-a-better-option-than-western-women
      **http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/12/16/japan.virtual.wedding/

   3. They’ll ban sexbots, and half the internet soon. Watch.

      1. I was just thinking that today actually…
         You might be interested to know that today some new Canadian laws have passed.
         It is now illegal to buy sex (but still legal to sell it), it is illegal to purchase lap-dances in clubs, and sexy massages are dunzo.
         A Toronto MGTOW thinker made a video about it if you’re interested in more detail.
         I don’t even understand what kind of world these feminists want.. It just seems like such a miserable lonely existence where no one wants to fucking know each other…
         Its a risk to marry, its a risk to have sex with a girl, its now illegal to buy sex… What exactly are men supposed to do???
         

         1. ‘Its a risk to marry, its a risk to have sex with a girl, its now illegal to buy sex… What exactly are men supposed to do???’
            I would recommend wanking, it is definitely cheap and safe. But I suspect that if enough men are ignoring women and wanking themselves happy ever reach a critical mass then da gubmint will invariably criminalize wanking or at least impose a bachelor tax.

         2. invest in skittles.
            dollar tender lies in the realm of the law. thus monetization of sex can be declared unlawful. however, monetization of skittles has been declared lawful. thus, exchange dollars for skittles, and skittles for sex. legal quandary solved.
            of course, you could use marriage, cars, houses, rings, etc. to buy sex. but then you’re doing it wrong. skittles taste better.

         3. think I heard of this law. Its a rip off from the nordic model.
            http://metro.co.uk/2013/03/05/where-women-rule-the-world-matriarchal-communities-from-albania-to-china-3525234/
            check this out, they have congo as the best matriarchal community and yet has the highest rape rate in the world.
            Looks like patriarchy prevents it at abetter rate

         4. Taste the Rainbow.

         5. Been there done that.
            I think for me porn hit its peak when I was 15 and I first saw HeatherIDeepthroat.
            I’m over it, prefer real women now…. No porn video will ever be that good again…. Heather….
            But yeah… its certainly not impossible… I was actually thinking that perhaps the gubmint imposed this law to try and encourage people to marry…. All the while using the feminist narrative to justify it.

         6. Musou Chinese tribe. “Property is handed down through the female line and there’s no stigma in not knowing who a child’s father is.”
            …Well… fuck that… I wonder if the men stay voluntarily or if they just don’t see any way out…
            “Such matriarchal utopia does have drawbacks – curious visitors have descended upon the once-isolated region under the mistaken suggestion Mosuo women offer free sex. Sadly, some of the previously peaceful villages have been overrun with hotels, casinos, karaoke and even a red-light district.”
            Kind leaves the impression that this tribe only works because everyone else sees them as a curiosity. I can’t imagine men joining this maternity… especially if you can knock up these bitches and then let other men raise your kids… plenty of men would be willing to do that.. free children….
            Meghalay, India. “As for the Meghalaya menfolk, a suffragette movement has sprung up, with men’s right groups claiming matrilineal culture is breeding generations of gents who fall short of their potential, subsequently slipping into alcoholism and drug abuse.”
            Well duh… there is nothing for them to do….. I wonder why they don’t just go their own way… Or why they don’t just take power? Is this instituted by the government in some way?
            Thanks for the link… If there ARE functioning matrilineal societies they deserve consideration.

         7. Heather is truly a legend. Smoking hot in a girl next door way and.. Well, unbelievably skilled would be an understatement. This is what we should be teaching women, how to please a man like she obviously did.

         8. The thing about her besides just her incredible skills and incredible body was that you could tell she was actually having a good time.
            She looked straight into the camera with that look of “I know me and my boyfriend are fucking hot… Sex is great isn’t it?”

         9. There already is a bachelor tax.

         10. Lap dances are illegal. LOL! The only safe activity is no activity!

         11. I wonder how absurd things have to get before the average dude pulls his head out if his ass.

         12. Taste the Rainbow indeed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1IJgCSuXhA

         13. Probably when they make masturbation illegal.

      2. They can’t ban human nature. Either there will be a boiling point and it will all go up in flames (not going to happen btw) or there will be some outlet for men (and eventually women to vent their frustrations). I’m betting on vent.

   4. The Land of the Rising Sun’s being doing that for decades, so that ship has long since sailed.

      1. I’m talking about more complex and life like bots. What they have there it’s not so good. Yet.
         Something that can also catch in the west. Maybe sex-bots couple with virtual reality? The first thing i thought when i saw the advancements in virtual reality devices (oculus rift) was it’s sexual applications.

         1. What you said there reminded me of this scene with Stallone and Sandra Bullock in ‘Demolition Man’.
            
            Is this the endgame of Fem-centric policy regarding sex relations between men and women in the west?

         2. Apparently so. Don’t get me wrong most men will still want girlfriend/s, but unable to compete in a market that’s getting more and more stacked against them, will opt for the easy way out -> work, get money, use said money for a top of the line sex-bot/VR sex toy and exit of the market completely -> happy life with the illusion of fulfillment. In time, if the trend keeps going in the same direction, we may see a complete and utter crash of the traditional (as in f/m) sexual relationships.
            Men will still socialize with women, but for the most part, without a sexual component, at the end of the night everyone goes home to their favorite sex-toy. That’s why i think a sex-bot industry is the next or the next next big thing.
            And that movie is wrong. Men won’t be as good looking/macho as Stallone and the sex-bot’s/VR will be much better looking than Bullock.

8. The previous Elites of the country, WASPs, who ruled the country through preferential treatment of one another (and being the supermajority) still ceded this control on principle.
   And yet the country is worse run, more corrupt, and more incompetent now.
   I guess when you are given preferential treatment by someone like you to serve others like you, you feel like you owe them.

9. The very worst fate befell feminism.
   It won.
   And women are utterly clueless as to what to do with their victory.
   As ever, it will be left to men to figure something out.

   1. ”It ‘won’.
      And women are utterly clueless as to what to do with their ‘victory’.”
      And caused the infected nations to commit suicide.

   2. They simply create fictional works of oppression….i.e. the rolling stone article.
      They can’t find real instances of sensational abuse so they have to create them to try and justify their own existence.

      1. Yep – the problem with relying on the victim narrative to get what you want is that eventually it doesn’t work anymore – especially when you have more privileges and prizes than those you say are victimizing you.
         Expect ever more bizarre warping, twisting and outright denying of reality as feminists desperately try to keep women framed as victims of men. Expect to see weak men enable them.
         Expect to see more and more women wake up and realize that in reality they have become the victims of feminism. Expect to see very few of them call the feminists out.
         Expect to see more and more women buying cat litter.
         Expect to see more and more men discover the red pill.
         What happens then is up for debate. But at the very least, stock up on popcorn.
         We live in interesting times.

         1. I dig ur posts man. You get it.

10. Many readers would also bandy about the argument that “Men start all the wars!”
    If women ruled the world….
    [England dials up France]
    England: “Hi, France? This is England. Why am I being invaded?”
    France: “Oh, I think you KNOW WHY!!!”
    À bientôt,
    Mistral

    1. Or perhaps:
       France: “If you don’t know I’m certainly not going to tell you.” 😉

    2. I think Mr. Carey should be given his due credit heh

       1. As I have said before, the art of being original is remembering what you hear but forgetting where you heard it.*
          À bientôt,
          Mistral
          *Laurence Peter said that.

          1. I like that. I will definitely use it somewhere at some point and your name will appear nowhere.

          2. I wouldn’t have it any other way. 😉
             À bientôt,
             Mistral

    3. England (pretending not to know): “What did I do?”
       It was a small remark that England said 8 years ago.

    4. ”If women ruled the world”
       It will be like the Mosuo.

    5. There’s nothing wrong with the occasional war. Conflict is competition, and competition is progress.
       Function should not be measured by the absence of human suffering, this kind of thinking leads to equalism

       1. As Karl “Chuck” Clausewitz would say, “War is the continuation of policy by other means”. Or something like that.
          Mistral

11. Funny how many great women seemed to despise feminism.
    Queen Vic felt it would ruin women. Thatcher called it fashionable rot, even Ayn Rand believed patriarchal institutions (military and presidency by extension) should not be female run.

    1. Queen Victoria was a hypocrite and the supreme feminist, she laid the foundations of feminism, she was the one that ruled that Men of the Victoria era shouldn’t have sex unless they were to have children, even if they were married, mens masculinity and free spirit was also discouraged, unless it served for work or war.

       1. Cite your source.

          1. Wait, you’re an Angle that doesn’t know your own censored history?
             Victorian England made sexually thirsty Englishmen to either JUMP SHIP and spread sexual thirst OR stay and suffer with constant whims of Victorian Englishwomen.
             Oh, never mind how Gwenhwyfar slept with the ENTIRE monastery she got sent to, after your king, Arthur, passed away.

       2. And now her great great grandchildren, often on both sides, want us all dead as the dodo.
          Inbred scum

       3. Did not know that. Ty

12. Pretty much standard Neoreactionary sex realism in this piece. Keep up the good work. The Enlightenment has a 300 year head start, and we have a lot of work ahead of us to deconstruct this damaging social experiment and try to rebuild something functional on what we can salvage from the world.
    We laugh at the crude propaganda coming from Communist shit holes like North Korea about the horrors of previous societies their regimes had destroyed and replaced by allegedly “rational” utopias. But we live with basically the same situation, only on a less obvious level. The Enlightenment started the process of mocking and discrediting traditional societies and replacing them with “rational” social experiments, and we can see the long-term costs of those innovations now, especially with feminism. We have trouble imaging alternatives to these Enlightenment dysfunctions because the wave of revolution starting in the 18th Century made a pretty clean sweep in the West so very few functional patriarchies among our kindred have survived. Yet try to imagine them we must.
    I mean, seriously, if some science fiction writer back in the ’40’s postulated that feminism in the early 21st Century would turn into this abomination that spooked a whole generation of young men from even wanting to talk to young women so that they withdrew from having any contact with them, the premise of the story would have sounded preposterous. Yet that seems to have happened. For example:
    http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/12/04/The-Sexodus-Part-1-The-Men-Giving-Up-On-Women-And-Checking-Out-Of-Society

    1. “We have a 10-80 out here, a truck on fire, we have a man on the lift. We are unable to find the switch to turn the lift off, can’t stop the dancing chickens. Send an electrician, we’re standing by.”
       I know this is obscure, but your comment reminded me of Stroszek–one of my favorite Herzog movies in addition to “Aguirre, the Wrath of God” and “Fitzcarraldo.”
       

13. Power is nothing without responsibility and self-control.
    When it comes to power over others, it doesn’t matter if it is a male or a female who wields it (even though men on average embody those qualities better), as long as they are FULLY accountable. In 99% of the cases, women are not.
    Bottom line, without responsibility and self-control, all you got is a corrupted person.

    1. True, and what the supplication to irresponsible behavior has allowed, is for the current men in power to be even less responsible as well, just not clearly against women only, it has to be the masses. In walks Socialism.

15. Bottom line, though, is that power suit woman has no kids and construction worker Joe has three with his wife of 15 years.
    Again, some scores of games in progress:
    Mitt Romney, 25
    Bill Clinton, 1
    Michelle Duggar, 19
    Sandra Fluke, 0
    Any doubts about the ultimate outcome here?

16. All you have to do is go to your nearness black matriacaly getto and you can see that women running the show is not peaceful in the slightest.

    1. “a people which has a woman as leader will never prosper.”…this was said over a 1000yrs ago by the islamic prophet is still true today. Watch sweden go down.
       http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matriarchy
       also looked it up, all matriarchys either died out or the poor nations/regions of the country

    2. Didn’t American black matriarchy learn their stuff from their American WF counterparts?

17. The man falsely accused of raping Lena Dunham has set up a legal fund to sue her for libel
    http://www.gofundme.com/ib59bo
    Donate if you can (or want to)…..you can google many articles outlining how he has a strong case for libel based on the bullshit in her book. I’m completely sick of this shit so I gave $100

18. If women gain power, what will happen is that more and more decisions will be made by the bureaucracy and academic advisors, and the women in power will simply submit obediently to the wishes of these men.
    Most political issues are men’s issues. For example, immigration (legal and illegal) has disproportionately hurt men, who work more in tech and manual labor. Education is more important for men, since boys fall behind worse. War is a bigger risk for men. Family laws are bigger issues for men, for obvious reasons. And even gay acceptance is more irritating for men. I cannot go anywhere with my brother without people thinking we are gay partners.
    Women have little real stake in the political sphere. This is why the vast majority of young women are ignorant about politics, and always say that they do not like talking about politics. Most politically active young women get very focused on on liberal issue to attention whore: “Look at how much I CARE about the sea turtles/gays/n******!!!” Usually women in politics are just attention whoring, in the same way that female sports announcers attention whore. Feminists, Ayn Rand, maybe MT are anomalies.
    Since women have such little stake in political issues, they are not very convicted, so they say they are “middle of the road” 99% of the time on match.com. If they are politicians, they flipflop.
    This is why they will end up just doing whatever the advisors say, and reap the status and money that is attached to the formal political position.

19. You need only look at our closest cousins the Bonobos to know what a matriarchy would be like. The problem is the matriarchy only exists because they live in a place of surplus and lack of external threats(remind you a little of the US or Europe?). Of course that surplus and lack of external surplus was created by our big bad “patriarchies” so watch feminism disappear like a fart in the wind when war or poverty comes.

    1. Nailed it.
       Once society sinks back into the lower levels of the Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, there’ll be a surplus of short haired Western little girl-women who won’t know which end of a shovel to hold or which end of a nail to hit or which end of a terminal to use to wire up a generator.
       Won’t be enough Liberal Art degree scrolls to make toilet paper with.

    2. Greece would agree with your sentiments.

       1. Interesting, what social changes have you seen in Greece as they’ve gone through their troubles?

          1. http://www.theguardian.com/world/greek-election-blog-2012/2012/jun/15/greek-crisis-women-especially-hard
             Notable quotes from the horse’s mouth itself:
             “Austerity-imposed hiring freezes in the female-dominated public sector have hit women hard and led to a contraction in the number of jobs available with maximum maternity cover.”
             “Pantazi says young women are often grilled by potential employers about whether they intend to have a family, and that the wrong answer can lead to a swift – and illegal – about-turn. “In the private sector if you look for a job and you are of reproductive age the first thing you have to do is give your word of honour that you will not get pregnant,” she says.”
             “On top of all this, says Lois Woestman, a Greek American feminist academic, women are still under pressure to conform to the profile of thenikokira – the ever-giving homemaker, whose duties are now growing because of less money for childcare, healthcare and home help. “Many Greek women, even if they’re not losing their jobs, are taking on all of this unpaid work that’s been handed down from cuts in the state,””
             “As jobs become harder to get and the domestic responsibilities pile up, might the crisis cause more young women to ditch thoughts of a career in favour of becoming full-time carers and mothers? Stella Kasdagli, deputy editor of Cosmopolitan Greece and co-founder of Women on Top, a new project designed to connect women with female mentors in their professional field, thinks some women are being tempted down that path when struggling to know or get what they want from work. “There’s a sort of going back in time,” she says. “It’s now … sold as a kind of revelation: ‘I don’t have to work in order to be happy; I can have a baby instead!’ Which is just a way justifying women’s bewilderment [in the workforce].””
             “Then, as austerity started to bite, came the first parents driven by economic necessity. Last year demand doubled, with two-thirds of families saying they could not afford to keep their child. 20% of the cases were single-parent families – and, of those, all were single mothers.”
             “”Even now these cases are women because usually the man in Greece will seek out family [to help],” says Protopapas. Aged between 25 and 32, the single mothers he has seen have “battled” to be with their children, he says. They are desperate, but responsible.”
             “Asked if she identifies as a feminist, Kasdagli, a 30-year-old whose Women on Top project is by women, for women, betrays a telling uncertainty. “Not really,” she says, then pauses. “I mean, yes, I am, in that I believe in equal rights and I believe that what we perceive as differences between the sexes are constructed. But I would say I’m not asserting that; I’m not an aggressive feminist.” Feminism in Greece, she explains, does not have a very appealing image. To many it still smacks still of bra-burning and no makeup. More importantly, she adds: “Nobody talks about feminist policy so I think there is a real gap between our actual problems and what the organised feminists are trying to do.””
             Although the problems regarding austerity in Greece ain’t inclusive to feminists alone, the fact remains that feminism can’t flourish in times of economic hardships, it never does. If America was going through a similar crisis, the SJW crusade would come to an immediate halt.

          2. ” Feminism in Greece, she explains, does not have a very appealing image.
             To many it still smacks still of bra-burning and no makeup.”
             In tuff times, a girl needs her makeup more than ever.
             No joke really. The ever present safety net. Male desire.

          3. Nice one Tusker, this should be its own article.

          4. good article Tusker, Im glad i read through all these comments and found this.

20. It’s a totally theoretical situation, as women will only ever run things for the purpose of softening us up as a society so we can be mass exterminated by the secretive shadow elite who actually run the world.

21. Women have ruled but almost always as monarchs who achieved their position by marriage or inheritance. Thatcher is one of the very few women who ever made it on her own abilities. How many people would even know the name Hillary if wasn’t who thru she married? What gets me is that females now outnumber males at college, and women still get preferential treatment with their own female scholarships that men can’t apply for. Women also get preferential treatment in the hiring process of the job market, even though 50% will drop out to start families. Feminism isn’t about equality, its about asserting feminine privilege.

    1. 95.6% of patent holders are men. For years more women have been graduating college than men, for decades the porportion of men and women has been roughly equal, and yet there is still a scarcity. of female innovation.
       Humanity cannot rely on women for improvement.

       1. …and yet women scream discrimination because they are under-represented in science / engineering… like its somebody else’s fault they like chick lit more than math.

       2. Indeed, despite western females being the most privileged class in history to this point.

       3. Society is getting very little return on our investment in female education
          Indeed.

       4. And of that 4.4%, what percent was invented by a group of people that decided to promote a female as the ‘lead’ for the social justice points? The lack of innovation is so total that it has never even been on the table for a discussion.

22. This idea is clearly rooted in the gender bigotry of feminists. So if you want to know how the world might look if feminists ran it (one could argue they already do), just take a look at societies run by religious bigots (nazis) or racial bigots (kkk, Jim crow). It’s not going to be any better if gender bigots (feminists) run society.
    If our culture recognizes feminists as the bigots that they are and treats them the same way it does the kkk, a lot of problems would be solved.

23. First off, great article woh kavi.
    A fellow Canadian eh? Whereabouts do you reside if you don’t mind my asking? Red-pill men are the exception here not the rule.
    “Feminism isn’t about justice or equality, but a grab for power. It’s incredible how most people still can’t see through the ruse in 2014.”
    – What I immediately thought when I read this is that… our native (especially white) population still doesn’t get this… but I hang around different crowds… and the immigrant cultures absolutely get this… I went to a Russian/Jewish house-party Friday night to catch up with an old friend and maybe meet some new people.
    I got into a conversation with a criminal lawyer who defends murderers/rapists/stalkers/etc. We got on talking about how by the end of 2014, it is going to be illegal to purchase sex across the country (but legal to solicit it). I immediately told him my viewpoints on how I am starting to think that it is basically becoming illegal and culturally incorrect to be a man in the west right now.
    To my surprise.. my comment caught the attention of this group of people… They seemed surprised that a Canadian would say such a thing. It sprung out one of the evening’s topics for discussion. I realized this group is a bunch of intelligent people who live in a “progressive” society, but have made a conscious choice to maintain gender roles as a means to keep their Russian/Jewish collective strong. I was impressed and made friends.
    LAter that evening I met up with some Toronto-raised latina girls to go out drinking and partying and when the same conversation came up I could tell they hated my guts… Mike Brown came up and I realized I became too comfortable talking about my red-pill views… I brought up the idea that perhaps the media is using the Mike Brown story to create racial controversy simply for the ratings, and they somehow misinterpreted what I was saying as “Mike Brown deserved to die…” I never said that but one of these girls insisted to put these ideas into my mouth…
    The good news… Some people actually get it… The bad news… You gotta become a part of an in-group or else you’re on your own.

    1. Clark Kent
       I live in Saskatchewan, part of Canada’s Bible belt. This province is somewhat conservative and there are plenty of whites here that hold politically incorrect beliefs. I used to live in Toronto but decided to move here since Toronto’s economy is in the toilet. I actually like it here quite a bit. Toronto was a very artificial city with no real culture whereas the prairies are still very white and very Protestant.
       As for Mike Brown, my own personal view is that the race issue was drummed up by leftist agitators to distract us from the real issue at hand: the militarization of the US police force and the totalitarian nanny state that looms large over the horizon. It will be women who will usher in this police state as they are willing to sacrifice freedom for security (censoring free speech/demanding State protection from “rape culture”).

24. ”Female solipsism prevents the fairer sex from adequately grasping the principles of justice and fairness.”
    And so one of the reformers even go so far as to ban women from ruling:
    http://www.swrb.com/newslett/actualNLs/firblast.htm

25. Wonder Woman’s creator was William Moulton Marston, a Harvard-educated psychologist
    Frankly, Wonder Woman is psychological propaganda for the new type of woman who should, I believe, rule the world. Marston believed that submission to “loving authority” was the key to overcoming mankind’s violent urges, and that strong, self-realized women were the hope for a better future.
    http://goodstuffsworld.blogspot.com/2012/10/bonding-with-wonder-woman_10.html

    1. Women are just as violent as men, they’re just not as good at it.

26. Just goes to show how much hard work still needs to go in defeating feminism. A female lead society achieves nothing; Australia’s own Julia Gillard was useless during her time in power, and the one man she sought to discredit and destroy is the man who won the election against her.
    The constant antifeminist humor is what ultimately defeated her so keep up the good work men. It’s working.

27. ‘If women ruled…’ I’m not sure women could ‘rule’ in the way we know it, as the average woman can’t make up her mind about anything, can’t come to a decision without consulting everyone she knows, and then changes her mind about it the next day anyway. Even historically, women ‘rulers’ had male counsellors and male advisors pretty much pulling the strings.
    Look, even women would admit they are not natural aggressors, so making the bold and decisive decisions needed to be a ‘ruler’ is just not their forte. They are also terrible at taking any responsibility for the decisions they do make, that backfire. So unless the definition of ‘rule’ is changed to mean ‘get together in a group-think situation and discuss our feelings until everyone has expressed themselves and felt adequately validated, and then hug it out’ then no, I don’t think they can ‘rule.’

28. “To Valenti however, it is better that 10 innocent men be jailed on a false rape accusation then for one guilty rapist to go free.”
    I would like to change that;
    To Valenti however, it is better that 10 innocent men be jailed on a false rape accusations every day than for her to have to spend one single minute acknowledging that her country has been extremely good to her gender and that she must simply accept that she is mediocre-minded and will sometimes have to endure moments of simple, dull life without the crutch of synthetic emotions/meaning-making/manufactured, groundless crusades/and false wars which energize her and fill her hollowness while allowing her to simultaneously project away and overcompensate for her own sexist hostility.
    It is better that 10 innocent men be jailed every day than for feminists to begin to acknowledge how hateful and war-like they have become, all in response to how spoiled and empty they are due to the feminist movement which promised them that they are always entitled to feel however they wish to feel in any situation regardless of anything.

    1. In the name of The Mother, The Daughter, and the Holy Gaia.
       Amen.

29. A woman leading is like putting a trigger-happy roided cop in the ghetto, it won’t end well.

30. If women led the first thing they’d do is kill any man who doesn’t look like David Gandy. Real talk.
    Just look at how Asian women treat Asian men in the face of their availability to relative “alphas” (i.e., white men). They simply don’t care. They would rather they be dead.

    1. I’d rather many of them be dead, too.

31. “If women ruled the world, we’d still be living in caves just with really nice curtains.” – (i think) small dead animals

32. Interesting post. I’ve often considered this “what if..?” future and come to the same conclusions as the author. It’s not a world anyone, be they man, woman or beast, would care to live in.
    As the illustrious Mr. Schopenhauer put it:
    “Nature has made it the calling of the young, strong, and handsome men to look after the propagation of the human race; so that the species may not degenerate. This is the firm will of Nature, and it finds its expression in the passions of women. This law surpasses all others in both age and power. Woe then to the man who sets up rights and interests in such a way as to make them stand in the way of it; for whatever he may do or say, they will, at the first significant onset, be unmercifully annihilated. For the secret, unformulated, nay, unconscious but innate moral of woman is: We are justified in deceiving those who, because they care a little for us,—that is to say for the individual,—imagine they have obtained rights over the species. The constitution, and consequently the welfare of the species, have been put into our hands and entrusted to our care through the medium of the next generation which proceeds from us; let us fulfil our duties conscientiously.”
    Reading the above quotation along with the following from the post…
    “Feminism succeeded in the west because men (guided by the principles of justice) voluntarily sacrificed their power on a matter of principle.”
    Can we now say that Western men, by allowing feminism to take a foothold in the West and become mainstream, have done a greater injustice to humanity and posterity than disallowing feminism ever could have?
    Do we as men owe it to future generations, out of our inner principles of justice, to quash feminism in all its forms and allow the justice of gender roles as Nature always intended to resume?
    I say, yes. Yes indeed we do.

    1. I say yes too…very much so.
       “Feminism succeeded in the west because men (guided by the principles of justice) voluntarily sacrificed their power on a matter of principle.”
       “Do we as men owe it to future generations…to quash feminism”
       So, putting those two statements together I certainly agree that a long time ago men brought about feminism. However, as we begin to undue this huge mistake I think we need to appeal to men that whatever “justice” we may have thought we were evoking has led to injustices and these new injustices are being exacted on men.
       That’s why I think the red pill community and the manosphere needs to constantly highlight, underscore, emphasize…for God’s sake scream to other men that they now have it worse then before! You can only be a blue piller for so long as things deteriorate and feminism is doing their part by making their treachery more apparent with each passing day. The manosphere will be meeting boys and men halfway by affirming their suspicions or doubts…it’s happening right now, as nascent, as this movement may seem. To sum up, we’ll quash this, and the first step is telling all men – hey, you got fucked, and have it worse, life could be so much better, you’re oppressed.

       1. I even catch myself sometimes making the intellectual mistakes feminism has inserted subliminally into our collective psyche….
          Above I used the term “gender roles”. I should have said “sex roles”.
          Gender has become the mainstream construct of sexuality for the feminist because as they see it, your identity shouldn’t be based on how you were born but how you feeeeeeeeeeeeel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender
          Sex = what’s between your legs? (that’s your role)
          Gender = what do you think is between your legs? Do you feel it is correct or did nature screw this one up? (that’s your role)
          I’ll have to remain more conscious of these errors.
          Here’s a thought: Analogy –> Feminism is humanity’s own attempt at self-performed sexual reassignment surgery? Nature gave us the patriarchy, the natural order. We, that is the species, have given feminist women the scalpel and men have hopped up on the operating table willingly. Now we see the results of this mutilation. There has been no “gender reassignment”, no change in thinking, no re-identity. Just a collection of confused, disappointed, anger fueled freaks.”
          Much like the poor bastard born a man who convinces a doctor to make him a woman. Everyone except him knows such a procedure is folly and self-destructive.
          The red-pill is there so future men do not going willingly onto that operating table. RESIST.

          1. Outstanding. This is exactly what the young generation of men need to here.

33. “The court has now ordered the police to follow a nine-point checklist before arresting anyone on a dowry complaint…And if the police make an arrest, a magistrate must approve further detention of the accused, the court ruled.”
    Im glad finally this is being put forth…Indian women are crazy. Do a racial count after white women, indian women seem to be the most common feminists. Had this feeling before finding the manosphere and after seeing them now from tweets articles,youtube videos and posts, its been confirmed sadly. Hope the red pill spreads to india, they are gonna need it, befre they wind up like us or worse like scandinavia or some feminist sharia law shit.
    Hell rape there now in india has the death penatlty and all the woman has to do is accuse you(thanks western feminism), false rape there can get you killed there. This law only came 2 yrs ago after local feminists pounced on the delhi rape as launching pad for thier agenda, using bullshit data and “surveys” that make anything you do as abuse like yelling, even though Indias rape rate is 1.8 tied with canada.
    Fact manipulation is what they do. Theyll make a broad range for abuse, but will not give details on convictions. Like 3/4 wont be prosecuted, but leave out that they were innocent. Its scary if they mange to influence government figures, and I belive some have.
    feminists are just disgusting people. Especially the leaders of those movements, since they fool the masses and get dumb useful idiot grunts to parrot their message and propagandas to acheive their goals.
    its good to know about what feminism is doing around the world not just here. Last thing you want is inida being super power in 50yrs and influence us with their style of feminism too.
    Makes me wonder how east asia and eastern europe are keeping them out?
    ANy idea on the state of feminism in Latin america?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics

    1. come to think of it. I think I know why they allowed the death penalty for rape in india, not in terms of pressure but in terms of politics.
       India has a massive population, with a huge gendar gap(biggest in the world), so it make sense that wanna cut down on them since criminals are likely to come from a poor background and could be a burden on society.
       But in the end this law is fucked up, when they start using it for false accusations.

34. If women ruled the world, theyd use slave labour of poor people to thier own selfish ends…sounds like a typical woman dont it.
    feminists exploiting feminists…so mush for sisterhood

35. Comedian Sam Kennison circa 1986 on ‘why we can never have a woman president’:
    ”Reason WHY we can never have a woman president? Because can you imagine every month, right on schedule the sirens and bullhorns would swamp the front lawn announcing: ”MISSES PRESIDENT. . PLEASE GET OFF THE ROOF OF THE WHITE HOUSE. . PUT DOWN THE ROCKET LAUNCHER. .WE CAN NEGOTIATE THE TREATY. . HUSSEIN IS ON THE TELEPHONE. .HE WISHES YOU A HAPPY MOTHERS DAY. .HE IS SENDING YOU SOME CHOCOLATES”

36. I’m 31 now. My strategy will simply be to date & enjoy women without getting any of them prego. Then when i’m about 40 or 41, I want to cash-in on a 24/25 year old EE girl. That is the game plan.
    Too many guys complaining about these filthy Yankee & Angelo Saxon women here. Seriously…expand your horizons & look overseas. Take advantage of technology & turn your back to feminism by seeking temporary or long-term companionship in a country where tattooed, chubby, feminist women do not exist. You’ll be much happier this way. I am.

    1. Im 27, I stopped drinking specifically so I don’t age as badly….so I can date 19 yr old girls as long as possible

       1. It scales. Men age like wine along with diet & exercise. Especially black men.
          I love young white women. But I see the extreme differences from a 23yo girl & a 33yo girl. On Tinder as you swipe through all the local girls, i see extreme differences between a 23yo & even a 27yo.
          Time & nature are not so kind to females.
          Women mature mentally but also physically faster than men. So it is perfectly normal for men to date women 5-15 years younger.
          Then take into account that the nastiest people on Earth are women ages 30-35 … They become angry at the world that their beauty fades & think they should be treated as though they’re 21
          My current range is 19-29…I cannot stand how mean women 30-35 are in the USA

37. Some scientists believe that Neanderthals went extinct because it was a matriarchal society and as a result, they were unable to extract resources to survive and died out. I came across this on wikipedia but see the Spearhead wrote an article about it too….http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/01/10/were-neanderthal-women-gender-equalists/
    So basically, neanderthal special snowflakes wanted in on man stuff like hunting and fucked it up and they all died as a result lol.

38. The Prophet Muhammad S.A.W said:
    “No people will ever prosper who appoint a woman in charge of them.” 
    Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 4163. 

39. Disorder is not sent down by Heaven, it is produced by women.

40. I urge every man here to check out J.D. Unwins book Sex and Culture, an anthropological study he made where he compared six civilizations and 80 primitive cultures. His main conclusion was this:
    “In human records there is no instance of a society
    retaining its energy after a complete new generation has inherited a
    tradition which does not insist on pre-nuptial and post-nuptial
    continence.”
    Or in other words, civilizations flourish when sexual restraint is practiced and decline when these mores are loosened. He also noted that the changes in sexual morality can’t be undone. When restraint is practiced, the creative energies of men are channeled into more productive ventures that create culture, progress and civilization.
    The whole book is available here on different formats:
    https://archive.org/details/b20442580

    1. His following book Houposia: The Sexual and Economic Foundations of a New Society is even more enlightening as he offers a solution.
       The sexual restrain required to generate energy is to be made acceptable by the institution of two distinct types of marriages, an alpha-marriage, strictly monogamous and preceded by prenuptial continence; and a beta-marriage, terminable at will and for which prenuptial continence is not a necessity.
       People will be free to choose either type of marriage.
       Those who prefer intellectual satisfaction and political responsibility to emotional excitement and the pleasure of the senses will choose an alpha-marriage, with its stringent restrictions as well as all its advantages.
       Those who are NOT interested in social position and things of the mind, will conduct their sexual behaviour according to the beta plan. There will be no compulsion; and a circulatory movement of young betas opting for an alpha status, young alphas choosing the easier beta way, will go incessantly.
       From time immemorial, moralists have recognised that men and women must make a choice between addictions on the one hand and the possessions and the social position on the other.

    2. Fantastic comment. Thanks for posting this.

41. There are some women out there who probably COULD run a pretty good society – take Margaret Thatcher, for example. She did a pretty good job.
    It’s the crazy man hating left wing feminists of the western world today who would probably run their societies to the ground. Slowly but surely, because for all these people (both male and female) one thing is very clear:
    2 + 2 = 5

42. Hey Gents just remember…first off, so some “artist” depicted a female and male in a certain way…and we live in an era where slapping paint on a canvas like a monkey and menstrual blood is considered “art”. Second, and its worth repeating, “women” are all affirmative action, quotas and whining. At least in the u.s. we live under the most “liberal” administration ever…ever! So, this is to be expected and, once again, this “accession” ONLY comes from more state intervention. Women, at large, aren’t really doing this, rather, “they” go around find out were the “status” or money is and ask “why aren’t there more women in, for example, 3D Printing? G, I don’t know maybe because they didn’t innovate 3D printing or just aren’t up to this sort of thing…is the answer you and I all know is the real truth. Oh and as far as barry potus being the most liberal potus ever, his is the most dysfunctional administration ever! women aren’t going to run the world…they can’t. Regardless of whether the republicans are currently toothless cowards, the mid terms just showed all of us that the real world rejects barry whole cloth…and that not only means his scandals, lawlessness, tyranny, but, the progressive agenda to include feminism.

43. I have never seen any female exclusive organization that was functional without being modelled entirely after a male counterpart
    Even the capable women are quickly sucked into a vortex of oversocialization, and the group spends the rest of its time discussing what is or isn’t “acceptable”, making up new restrictions to prevent offending each other, etc

44. One other point about Queen Victoria. She was not a ruler.

45. if women ruled the world it would look something like this:
    70% of men would be enslaved as worker drones and treated as sexless eunuchs by women because they consider these men beneath them
    30% of men would get treated as male harems by women.
    Technology would stagnate, no progress of science or other areas of society because women are too self absorbed to look at them.

    1. progress of technology? heh. it wouldn’t stagnate, it would decline.
       And it’s frankly impossible. without men to back them up, women could not rule. period.

46. If women ruled the world we’d never look up and in front of us from our smartphones. Not only texting Betatard after Betatard and dickteasing them with “Maybe” as they desperately and pathetically try over and over to makes plans with us, but also ridiculous Instagrams and Snapchats of our lunch with innumerable hashtags invented on the fly like “#lunch”, “#food” “#foodie” “#noms” “#omnomnom” “#protein” “#fitgirl” “#fitandfabulous” #skinnygirl” “#gymjunkie” and other psychobabble nonsense poisoning our modern vernacular.
    When did something as idiotic as posting a photo of something you’re about to consume become such a thing? Curse the day you were puked out of somebody’s brain, Instagram!

47. Rather than feminism we need to return to individualism. If a person, whoever they are, can do something let thembut don’t artificially prop up people who can’t. –therein lies a vast waste of resources. Individualism maximizes productivity and use of wealth and resources.

48. There is an example I wanna set, I recently lost my grandfather, my mother is dealing with depression as she was extremely fond of him, as I was, he was the victim of feminism, my grandmother, who raised and look after me since I was a child, control his life to the point where he never could have an opinion on anything, a 40+ years old marriage, he was an smart working businessman, he founded one of the most popular repair shops in my city which we still own. anyways, my mother told she saw how my grandfather was forced to sell his brand-new mercedes 30 years ago, imagine a 45 years old man, handsome as he was, ignited the jealousy of my grandmother, she never let him buy a new house in a better neighborhood, because she wanted to be closed to her parasitic nieces, so when I was born, we were still living in what became an insecure shithole, with minorities moving in. 25 years ago, my grandfather had the equivalent wealth of a million dollars, he planned back then to invest in some properties that could serve as assets for their old age, she forced him to put everything on the bank and don’t invest the money, turns out the bank had mortgage collapse and he fully lost the money, caused him to suffer a heart attack, this happened long before I was born.
    Later on, he manage to acquire part of his lost money with hard work after his bankruptcy, when things started to look better, she (my grandmother), forced him once ag

    1. ain to give all the money to one of my uncles, which he never repaid when he started his own business, never had a chance to ask his money back as he was my grandmother`s favorite kid, my grandfather spent his last days in poverty, and I couldn`t do anything to improve his situation given my condition as a freshman, he went through a slippery slope of physical decay very quickly, totally depressed and dissatisfied with his life, and my grandmother didn`t care at all, my mom does`t speak to her anymore, as she blames her for how things turned out to be.
       Anyways, never let a woman control your life, respect her, but never be her slave.

       1. Women are either at your throat or at your feet(or alternatively, on their knees). Equality doesn’t exist.

49. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_India
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Dance-trainers-dog-bite-selfie-blows-up-into-rape-allegation-against-him/articleshow/45081025.cms
    check it out, a step away from a feminists wet dream come true. Where she can falsely accuse a man(anonymously) and have him executed.
    Its like the south park episode where they make the adults disappear with the magic “m” word. Now men in India and perhaps here one day will die with the magic “r” word.

    1. In the long long ago…we must appease the Provider at carousel

50. This article is kind of Quintus Curtius written.
    I like. It’s sophisticated.

51. I’m a female and I know this is true, I can’t run anything

52. Had a female co-worker once who stated, “It would be a wonderful world if women ran it.” I replied, “No, it wouldn’t.” She got huffy and kept insisting it would be great because women know how to make peace without resorting to violence. Seeing this was no debate and she was going to sit on that delusion I dropped the issue.
    Told my mom about it later and my mom said, “If women ran the world it would be world War III in a day.”
    My dad said, “Nah, an hour. They’d all be tearing each other apart to be the top female”.
    From what I’ve seen of females (one myself) all they do is live in delusions and in all their fantasies of being in charge, all females ASSUME they are the leader. In their mind it is not possible to conceive that another female could have that role. Not that is not even acceptable. It doesn’t matter if that female would be a superior leader. The point is they ARE the ones who should be in charge.
    Hence, female leadership would just be some woman going, “uh… um…” as she searches for someone to pin the blame on. All she knows how to do is get rid of the other females to get her position. Once there she doesn’t know what to actually do with it.

53. Your commentary on the differences between male and female fantasy was brilliant, and something I really think I’ve never seen explored before. Did you base that on anything else or did the insight just strike you?

    1. The insight struck me when I began pondering the solipsism of the female mind. I realized that male fantasies are like rooms that we enter and exist at will. The female fantasy is a lens through which women view the world and often cannot separate reality from the distortion produced by the lens.
       @ Dom Suda
       High praise, thank you.
       @ Clark Kent
       I live in Saskatchewan, a very white and very Protestant province. It’s a great change from the artificial multi-cult ‘culture’ of Toronto where I used to reside.

54. Change the word ‘women’ in the heading to ‘children.’

    1. huh? why?

    2. Ahhh!…. there it is, that ‘eureka’ moment where it all makes perfect sense.

55. Does anyone remember that article on ROK about matriarchal societies? I think there was a tribe in China that followed this model and had little violence in it’s culture but also lacked writing and many of the basic advances made by other cultures thousands of years ago.

56. Assuming feminists are marxists is quite a leap.
    While many modern feminists rely on the appropriation of Marx’s theory of class privilige, it would be foolish to actually label them marxists.
    This would imply a basic level of human decency that involves at least some concern for other humans and at the very least a basic understanding of the economic theories which formed one of the main parts of Marx’s work.
    We all know feminists lack both of those.
    They’re the very definition of the modern neo-liberal. Obsessed with feeling good about themselves.

    1. Agreed. However, I think feminists have taken the idea of the bourgeoisie and proletariat and applied it to men as the oppressor class (patriarchy) and women as the oppressed. Their basic belief is that men oppress women for their own benefit. While I agree that feminist generally have little understanding of economics, their basic belief is in taking from men and redistributing to women.

       1. Exactly they’ve taken the concept of class privilige and applied it to things it was never intended for. It goes beyond mere sex and into often bizarre realms (cisprivilige for example)
          The sad thing though is that Marx was superior to them in an economic context. His belief was that the workers should seize the means of production from the capitalists and live in worker communes. In effect he proposed an industrialised anarchist society.
          Feminists meanwhile think that those they take from are a never ending fountain of wealth. That they can take everything they have one day then expect to get it again tomorrow.

          1. I’m not sure they even understand what wealth is or where it comes from. I don’t think they think beyond today and their immediate wants.
             The problem is men are very uncomfortable doing anything that makes a women unhappy. Men will destroy many men to make one woman happy.
             The other problem is women have an in group bias toward other women. Women will watch their sons being destroyed and do nothing to change the system.

          2. Its a tad more complex than that.
             Women are typically a lot more short sighted and impatient. Most of them at best you’ll get medium term thinking out of (a few years). It’s the very rare woman who can handle genuine long term thinking (decades plus) but then men who can manage it are fairly rare too.
             Mostly this is because from a biological standpoint the womans concerns are more immediate concerns. When she needs something she needs it now. She needs to find a good mate right now before her prime years are up. When pregnant she can’t go hungry today to ensure a better meal tomorrow. She needs whatever she can get at any point she can get it. At the same time she needs someone to look after her right now not in a few days.
             This biologically driven impatience extends into all their thinking even if the woman in question never gets pregnant in her life.
             Men you are quite right generally don’t want to see women unhappy. We generally want to look after them.
             But I don’t think women are happy to see their sons ruined.
             I think the problem is more they don’t realise they’re harming their sons. They think they’re protecting them and looking after them but in reality they are robbing them of crucial life experience and chances for development. How many fathers have told their wives to stop being overprotective of the children? If history is any indicator then most.
             Personally I think the children will be the best way to defeat modern feminism. We are on track for a ruined generation or two. Gen Y’s failures can be laid at the foot of many factors but the milennials can only point to their shitty parents and the culture that made them.

          3. I agree. However, I know several mothers with sons who are fully aware of what society is doing to their sons. They attempt to protect their sons by limiting what they see on the TV. However, they don’t seem to have the same instincts to turn this into a movement like other women have done with feminism, anti-slavery, and prohibition. There seems to be something different about this situation even though many women understand their personal consequences to be greater.
             I also agree with your analysis concerning why women focus so strongly on immediate needs. I’ve come to that same conclusion, and suspect this is the reason spas almost exclusively serve women.

          4. A spa that caters to men would be ultimately pointless in the modern era as men rarely enjoy that kind of pampering and there’s no social compulsion to convince them to enjoy it.
             And did you ever stop to think that it’s not women who do the organising?
             Don’t forget that FEMEN was set up and financed by a male Israeli banker until recently.

          5. I’ve realized that. I have an anarchist feminist friend, and he’s a complete idiot. I often wondered what he thought he was going to get out of feminism. Feminism works against him in every possible way. I think he’s trying to create an alliance between radical groups to push leftist policies. I think that on one level, many men support all leftist groups to further push leftist ideology. On another level, some men are using these groups as exclusive dating pools or at least that’s what they think they’re going to get out of them.

          6. The left is hardly a homogenous allied group.
             It’s more that these people have fallen into the progressive trap.
             Neo-liberals especially are vulnerable to this with their obsession with “feeling good about themselves”
             Progressive embody the slippery slope concept. In their case it is not a fallacy, it’s their platform.
             They have to keep looking for a new taboo to destroy. If they don’t and decide enough is enough then they become conservatives, which they don’t want.
             Hence why the left has frequently flirted with the concept of pedosexual rights.
             The German Green party even associates with people who ran hard left schools for young children where they tried to encourage the children to have sex with each other and their teachers.

          7. You’re right. I’ve often said that no leftist will ever be heard saying “with this change, my work is done!”. In a society with resources, few push back, and the left will continue to push the boundaries.
             I also agree that the left is not a homogenous group. However, I see many using the term “intersectionality”, which I presume is their attempt to find common ground and direction.

          8. Not that the modern right are much better.
             This sort of shit is why I’m a fascist.

          9. The right is a non-entity as far as I’m concerned. They have no viable ideology or seemingly any sense of what is happening to the western democracies.

          10. Well the main problem they have is that there isn’t a modern right wing. They just sort of petered out of existence.

    2. Ouch. I didn’t know where you were going with that and then, you said that a Marxist society would be more humane than a feminist society. HA! I love it!

57. Matriarchal societies get conquered easily. .

58. I think a further explanation for war is required. All wars are primarily over resources. This goes all the way back to the origins of our species. EO Wilson’s theory of “multilevel selection” states that our evolution and large brains were the result of both individual fitness and group survival. EO Wilsons states that all social animals evolved to defend areas with resources (nests or campsites). Cooperation requires complex social interactions (i.e. large brains) and eusocial behavior. The groups with these traits were able to rub out other groups without these traits and survive attack.
    In addition, it was men who defended the group. Men have a biological impulse that remains to this day to protect and provide for women and children. This is true in all primitive societies. Women have a biological in group preference for other women. Feminists have hacked into these impulses to create the post modern world, and decline of the western democracies.
    In traditional societies, men earn valor through the eyes of women. Once you realize this, you begin to see it in historical accounts of women shaming men for not going to war (white feather girls during WWI) or American Indian accounts of what women were doing during battles. For example, there are accounts of women during the battle of the little big horn near the front lines shaming men who did not fight the solders and praising those who did. And for the Iroquois, it was women who motivated young men to go to war.
    Shaming seems to have remained as a primary way women control men’s behavior even in the post modern world. Watch how women respond to men who go against the idea that men need to primarily serve and protect women. Another tactic is a statement of fearfulness or being uncomfortable. These statements are effective in changing men’s behavior. Men respond to this stuff.
    I suspect the reason that the media has become so overwhelmingly liberal and feminist is for this reason. Male journalists don’t questions feminist and liberal ideas for fear of making female journalists uncomfortable, and female journalists are primarily interested in female security. Feminism and liberalism provides the idea of female security. After a while, these ideas become the norm. These ideas also are what will destroy the western democracies as more and more men drop out of work.
    What feminists don’t seem to understand is that their policies can exist only if men put more into the system than they receive. Men are net tax producers and women are net tax consumers, and men are net income earners and women are net dollar spenders. As feminists destroy young men, they also destroy society’s ability to fund feminist and liberal supported ideas. They are not only going to destroy themselves, but also society as we know it.

    1. Excellent points here. Shaming techniques are the tried and true method of the feminine. Why?? Because they almost always work unless you recognize it as just shaming language born from their own fears. It’s typically their own projections. An example, and one of my favorites, is “you’re going to die alone!” when you don’t conform to their frame in relationships. Women are deathly afraid of ending up alone once they’ve past their prime.

       1. Interesting thoughts! I think you may be right. Shaming is so powerful, and also so resistant to the red pill. I’ve been trying to understand why so many men will actively ignore shaming language, and not see it for what it is. What are your thoughts on this?

          1. Well I’d gather these are very blue pill men still so thirsty for poon they’ll do anything to keep the girl. Not to mention most shaming langauge has heavy support from not only other women but those white knight men. Even your own parents tend to get in on this action. My friend’s mom just sent him a text the other day when he announced he was quitting his horrid job and didn’t have anything lined up yet. Her first reaction was “how will you get married and support a child?” You’ll end up alone”. He doesn’t even have a serious LTR right now but she jumped right to that level.

          2. It is easy to ignore shaming language because once you become used to what it is and how often it is tried on red-pill men, you could care less what they say.

          3. I agree. I’ve noticed that women often shift shaming language around probing for weakness. This happens so fast, I don’t think they’re conscience of what their doing. Women seem to instinctively understand that most men define themselves through women’s opinions. They seems to start with some form of statement about how real men serve women’s needs or they make a statement about how their target can’t get a real woman.
             What surprises me is how few men understand this, and how resistant men are to see it for what it is. Once you understand shaming language, it has no power. Maybe blue pill men are resistant to this knowledge because they have no other means of identity besides that of how women define them.

59. Maybe a Sheryl Sanderberg inspired painting. Who didn’t build the thing she inspires so many women about. Built by a man, who later placed her there.
    But even with any props to give her for being able to head it, not sure the legacy will hold up to not being over shadowed by people in the future being perplexed at the obsession with facebook. Will she be as notable as whoever ran Myspace?

60. On the first topic of the article, that of women and justice, I think it overanalyzes things and looks for explanations much deeper than necessary. If contemporary women are more arbitrary than men, it might just be because of feeelinnggssss: She thinks she has a moral sense, but what she does is simply hamsterize a rationalization for what her feelings tell her is right, which tends to be whatever she wants to be true.
    Granted, tendency to engage in this kind of backwards-rationalized “morality” is rather universal, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it turned out women are particularly prone to it. Especially if they’ve been raised on notions of their feelings being sacrosanct.

61. I hate this site with a passion for perpetuating conflict and grouping individuals into categories to try and simplify them. It didn’t work with the Nazis it wont work now and your mortal attempts to limit consciousness is admirable but mistaken.

    1. This site hates you too.

       1. Perhaps hate is too strong of a word, I just have the mindset that we are supposed to transcend our physical imperfections and this permanent site of submission and surrender to our mortal existence just seems like the wrong path. Please enlighten me as I have come to a conclusion similar to the tenants this website stands for over time as well yet not without a self loathing of my submission to this mortal condition.

62. “The world would be so much better if run by women…” Uh, what makes them think they haven’t been running things for the better part of a century in the Western world, with more raw numbers of votes than men? Ever since they got the vote and politicians reacted by marketing themselves to the hamster, the fallacious argument of women not being in charge has zero merit.

63. Apparently this idiot forgot all about Ursula LeGuin, Anne McAffrey, Robin Hobb, J.K. Rowling, and Leigh Eddings

64. There were civilizations run only by women, they were called amazonians and they were known for being violent savage butchers who pranced around in their underwear killing men all day.

65. “Feminism isn’t about justice or equality, but a grab for power.”
    I’ve been telling others this for Years. Thank you for making this known on a world-wide basis!

66. I’m rather upset that your only sources are a Utopian discussion of a perfect society and the fantastical, hyper-masculine bible. I was looking for an argument that I could quote but this holds no standing. I do appreciate your insight on divorce and victimization in modern America. I also would like to start using the term “fruitcake” when describing ignorant people.

67. How’s this? Even though women may have been restricted from power throughout the ages, men still sacrificed their lives and freedom to keep them save and secure. The same isn’t being guaranteed for the men who can’t find work. Everyone uses the term, “Deadbeat dad” but no one says, “Deadbeat mom.” That is how I know a world ruled by women – being the more selfish at times, would be a total disaster.

Comments are closed.