In 2012, Doriana Silva tried to sue Avid Life Media, the parent company of recently hacked Ashley Madison, for $20 million. She claimed, spectacularly, that she had developed a repetitive strain injury (RSI) from trying to make 1,000 fake female profiles in mere weeks for the infamous adultery website.
Silva, a Brazilian, may have filed a claim more frivolous than “asked for sex by my boss” Hanna Bouveng. Although Bouveng disgustingly won her lawsuit, at least this Ashley Madison legal action did not hand a woman the exact obscene “reward” she wanted for being a self-entitled princess.
Sadly, we cannot be sure that Silva walked away empty-handed. With the state of Western legal systems so parlous nowadays, women know they can concoct the most ridiculous claims or wholly exaggerate them and be thoroughly set for life. Companies, eager to avoid negative publicity and exorbitant legal fees, including those they often have to subsidize for the opportunistic plaintiffs, tend to make private agreements that garner the female involved nonetheless very impressive “consolation” sums.
What this tells us about Ashley Madison and other dating sites
Like Hanna Bouveng taking Benjamin Wey to the proverbial cleaners, Doriana Silva thought she had the right to name any price she wanted. In a blow to society, Bouveng largely got her sought after treasure.
Dating sites are sausage fests, by and large. That should not be a surprise to anyone. That said, they can net you some quality action from time to time (plus the messages you exchange before can act as a sort of de facto notarized document to undermine false rape claims). So, too, can they provide more discreet channels for satisfying your libido.
The downsides of online dating are arguably more potent. As the article I cited above shows, FBI security experts are indicating that the number of profiles outstrips the number of individuals thought to be creating them. The return on investment can already be lacklustre with online dating. Discretion may be a plus, but logistical issues of gaining a woman’s trust and arranging conducive times to meet can be a drag. This is only exacerbated when you’re trawling through a menagerie of fake profiles, a good proportion of which can be hard to identify as manufactured ones.
Remember, countless business owners, usually fellow men, are quite happy to take your hard-earned currency to finance their next vacation or boat for themselves and their wives. Your private details on these sites, especially your name, are now clearly within the reach of those determined enough to find and publicize them.
So, be warned.
What this tells us about Doriana Silva and opportunistic female ex-employee plaintiffs
You don’t need Gloria Allred to try and get your courtroom-generated fortune as a female ex-employee.
Silva was undone, like countless others, by her boastful social media presence. Photos showing her enjoying herself on holiday, including straddling a jet ski, unearthed how amazingly fraudulent her RSI allegations were. The narcissism and “me, me, me, me” factor of women like this warps their sense of proportion and reality, which makes it easier to spot their lies. But what happens when the woman in question is either more calculated or simply isn’t caught out by investigators handsomely paid for by a civil corporate defendant?
This is a dilemma shared by multiple legal contexts, such as false rape accusations, where convictions do not need anything close to classic “beyond reasonable doubt,” just “he said, she said.” And on the civil side of the law, so long as women can keep their testimony internally coherent and show their medical or emotional “symptoms” somewhat consistently, their cases have a good probability of, at a minimum, an overly generous financial settlement. They can aim for the stratosphere to begin with, demanding millions or tens of millions, and then begrudgingly accept amounts that still equate to years of guaranteed “income.”
Ironically, these manipulative individuals completely appropriate the facade of the infantilized, vulnerable female. Switching between the extremes, assertive, money-hungry plaintiff versus victimized lamb, is not so much a special art anymore because so many women have utilized it.
Hanna Bouveng and Doriana Silva are merely contemporary examples of it. Much of the time, civil defendants have behaved incorrectly (in Silva’s case, however, there is no convincing evidence that Avid Life Media wronged her, only its customers). Yet even unfair behavior towards a plaintiff does not legitimize preposterous outcomes like multimillion-dollar payouts, which can dwarf the financial verdicts provided to people paralyzed because of unmitigated malice or tragic negligence.
The less covered story is still worth pursuing
“I want THIS much, daddy!”
Enough media commentators and “experts” will be pillorying Ashley Madison and its executives for months to come. Users were clearly deceived about what was going on with both the website and their personal information. Nevertheless, this does not excuse the depravity of a Doriana Silva. Women of her caliber are a growing trend in society, steadily taught by feminism, despite not often “being” feminists themselves, that a perceived slight should be met with total vengeance and force a lifetime’s worth of “apologies,” typically made out of dollar signs.
The next time you hear about an astronomical lawsuit by a young woman complaining about “sexual harassment” or a “medical condition,” check to see if she’s walking. If so, it’s a very good wager that the claims are probably fabricated or grossly exaggerated.
How is the court system so rigged against men?
Feminism! How’s that for “equality”?
How can you even ask that? Have you never lived in a western “cunt-ry”? Of course it is that rigged against men and even more so than this case would indicate.
She is a bad, bad naughty girl and needs to be put over my knee and spanked. Bad Zoot! Bad naughty Zoot! Heh
I doubt she’ll win. I know the legal system is fucked, but there’s no conceivable way to twist this into a payout. She’s asking to sue somebody because she was fulfilling her non-harmful, legal, assigned job duties. That’s just silly.
The enemy is silly, which is why they are dangerous.
“She is a bad, bad naughty girl and needs to be put over my knee and spanked.”
You know, you’re kidding but some of these brats could actually use one.
Can’t disagree with that.
Justice seen is justice done. They should bring back corporal punishment and then have a pay-per view service that goes to government coffers to off set income taxes.
Ashley madison was the grail beacon. Lol
But can’t i have a little peril?
Ha “Castle Anthrax”…..nice Monty Python reference…
I would think that RSI is covered under workers comp which specifically forbids employees from suing employers. There are no punitive damages: they get therapy and something like 85% of their wages until they can transition back to work. Now, if she is living in Brazil and/or was an independent contractor, then maybe WC does not apply.
I would love to know how much compensation women in aggregate have received from suing their employers, as well as how that compares to the figure for men who have done the same. Compensation payment should probably be counted as a part of womens’ aggregate wages (although that’s unfair on women who don’t play that game). Compensation payments etc are all part of a murky black economy which the women (and men to a less extent) of least character benefit from.
Awarding her any compensation sets a bad precedent for others to do the same thing. More and more will follow for the easy money and soon no one in their right mind would go into business. Everyone suffers except the ones with money who will just watch from the sidelines.
Dating sites.
Come for the tacos, left with a sausage. Its the wurst.
I am upvoting this because, despite trying really hard not to dignify it with a laugh, I laughed anyway.
Groan.
heyyyyyyoooooo
He’ll be here all weekend folks. Try the veal.
There is a chain called Taco del Mar, or “taco of the sea”. That’s right, fish taco. Hopefully it tastes like chicken. Aren’t feminists trying to ban tacos or are they lining up to eat them at every opportunity?
I’ve been watching CSI:NY and playing the drinking game whenever they make a bad pun…I feel like this comment warrants another drink even though it wasn’t on the show.
It’s the worst sausage fest I’ve ever seen.
A while back I created two OKCupid profiles. One was a fairly average young man: neither tall nor short, neither fat nor skinny, with fairly fashionable clothes and a normal job. The other was a slightly below-average woman: a thin face with wide eyes, plastic-looking hair and a fake tan doing a duckface to the camera. She had no job and was not studying. She wanted to “do something fashion-related some day”. Both lived in the same general area.
The man’s profile was viewed a handful of times in two weeks, but only because I didn’t know that people you viewed would get a link to your profile. He was neither messaged nor liked by anyone.
The woman’s profile was viewed and liked hundreds of times within the first few hours. She was bombarded with all sorts of messages: men asking her how her day had been, men telling her how beautiful she was, and men simply asking for sex. It was fascinating to see this disparity from the other side of the divide for once, I suppose, in the same way that seeing the aftermath of a nuclear attack is probably beautiful.
Conchita Wurst ???
unrelated to this article but i just read some comedian (whom i’ve never heard of) named nicole arbour, is being chastised for making fun of fat people (and she says she won’t apologize). lol! but… but… she’s a woman! the heads of SJW’s must be spinning! love it!
If it’s the one I’m thinking about, she’s also rather easy on the eyes as well. Which is just icing on the cake.
http://bite-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/nicole_photo5-580×773.jpg
http://img4.hotnessrater.com/get-picture/22199/nicole-arbour/4000/6000/nicole-arbour
And a Canadian. Apparently there is an allegation floating about her threatening suicide to keep her man in line.
ashley madison, the biggest scam of this year, with nearly all fake female profiles and men who pay just for a fantasy..
This case proves only one thing – how pussified today’s men are. Hiring a hitman is a lot cheaper than $20 million. I would seriously consider it in such situation. Having two or three women killed like that should fix things up.
Edit: Pardon me, I meant “a hitperson”.
..
Ashley Madison’s female profiles were faked? hmmm then the “Life is Short – Have an Affair” hack seems more like a sting set up / extortion racket than a legitimate dating site. The hack was part of a black mail operation from the beginning. Brilliant!
You have to admire the genius and elegance of such a setup, eh?
ya – sort of like how child support payments are extorted from ignorant beta men who believed in ‘equality’ – Ashley Madison duped the same betas into believing in anonymity – ha!
most of the time either causing that divorce once some idiot didn’t clear his browser history or feeding off the misery in the wake of the divorce.
It really is a beautiful scam. The fact that they prided themselves on discretion made it so they could fight tooth and nail against anyone looking too deeply under the general rubric of defending the very thing that underpins their business.
Technically I cannot support hacking and criminal activities. But it’s really, really difficult to suppress laughter sometimes.
Agreed. But it is a touch of poetic justice. I just saw an add for another one of these sites called cougar something . Com which has seemingly popped up out of no where to announce “unlike other dating sites for married people….” About how they are the real deal with no bots etc.
If these guys also get rich I officially can’t even consider this a crime….no more than picking he apples off of Mr. Tomossini’s tree
There are plenty of sites jumping on that particular bandwagon at the moment. “At least we won’t sell your details!” is one that I have even encountered in my country.
But I suspect, given the general demographics of pretty much every dating site (except perhaps one for lesbians), that all of them are inevitably sausage fests. Any woman who’s worth half a damn can get laid without creeping on people’s profiles.
Know thy enemy….
What Ashely Madison should be sued for is fraud and deceptive trade practices with this little tart as leading witness. Hell, gather together all the men that got burned by the hacking revelations and form a class action and burn ’em good.
Class actions are useless. One of the first things you learn how to do as a fraudulent business is hide your assets from seizure.
If you want to burn a crook, try nailing the door of their mansion shut and setting it in fire while their family is still inside.
The purpose is not to “burn” AM, but to control them through injunctions, and find out what they know through the discovery process. Fishing time! And, Class actions do have their purposes.
Now, once you’ve got the bull by the legal balls, go to work and discover how fake they are and how they’re using deception to make their money.
AM is a HUGE target, and you’ll find a judiciary ready willing and able o assist you in nailing these guys. I mean, the lead state attorney in my own district got ratted out for having an AM account. He ended up public apologizing to his wife and family, taxpayers, blah blah blah. Of course, he should have resigned as only someone as incompetent as him could have lost the Casey Anthony case. You think he’d help your case on the criminal side? You betcha! I bet there are some judges — state and federal — that got exposed by this whole fiasco. You’ll know for sure once you do your discovery. Then you’ll find some judges who will certainly help your case along.
Then go get your judgment. Then sell that bitch of a company off and get paid. If you can, go after a few higher-ups with criminal charges. There’s plenty a class action suit can do. But stop with the tough-guy arson/murder talk. It only provide ammo to the detractors that scour these sites.
I’ve thought the same thing from the beginning.
There’s even thirst-traps being set with imaginary tramps as the bait.. this is a new low..
Just now figuring that out?
If the company created fake female profiles to lure men on their site, that’s false advertising. I smell a class action suit.
Every dating site is full of fake ads
Yeah but it is assumed they are created by spammers and scammers. This was done by the company.
Sure, but are they created by the company themselves, or even contracted out? That’s fraudulent as fuck.
I hope Ashley Madison killed online “dating”. Millions of men paid hard earned money to talk to computer code. If these married men just wanted no strings sex, it would’ve been far cheaper and efficient to throw $200 at a 20-something trying to pay her way through college. It is sad that so many men are engaged in the AM scam.
yup….a pair of red bottoms will pretty much get you as much tail as you want from a very attractive 20 something and talking her into talking her friend into it as well won’t be that hard.
I paid Lavalife for phone services before they went online and met lots of women. The online version was reasonably cost-efficient but then I moved to POF, which was free. POF has tonnes of dead profiles that never get deleted, no workable matching system nor any bells and whistles to help you connect to someone, and generally low quality women from what I can tell, I met a few there and then went to OKCupid. OKC is free, has a good matching system, personality tests, blogs, tinder-style I-like-you/you-like-me matching and seems to have a good mix of women anywhere they speak English. I’ve met lots of women off there, many of whom were quite hot. Hard to say how many profiles are fake, but who cares as it is as free as a cold approach to message one and no more time consuming.
.
As far as hookers are concerned, most men want someone to talk to, hang out with and have a “relationship” with. Just about any prostitute will say that lots of guys chit chat with them while they are on the clock. High end ones even end up playing therapist.
Another one of those underprivileged oppressed women who are awarded millions just for the talent of being able to cry in public.
The oldest profession in the world.
Creating dating site profiles for a website?
Dang, internet be around way longer than I knows, boss!
Why yes, it has.
-Al Gore.
Where do I apply, I can start tomorrow.
I really don’t know which horse to root for in this race…selfish jezebel playing the victim card against a scumbag website based on destroying values & filled with fraud.
Pick the website.
At least they were honest about being shady and disreputable, if you’ll pardon the non sequitur there.
A pox on all their houses!
Ok she’s an obvious despicable bim, but the one question that begs to be asked that hasn’t been so far is…
WOULD YOU BANG?
My answer is: Most definitely. She is deserving of no more than a pump and dump though…and an anonymous one at that.
Yes, definitely bangable. But women like her can’t forget the rules: her value is based on her bangability, not her injury. She’d be wise to hide her alleged injury as such repetitive stress injury would lower her ability to give hand jobs, and thus decrease her value.
Agreed. Females like this are especially treacherous which is why i said one should bang them anonymously. Give them as little factual information as possible because they are the type who would scream RAPE!! even if no actual rape occurred and not bat an eyelash over it.
Oh and in case anyone was curious, AM is countersuing this conniving bim.
They’ve got some balls at least. I hope they win.
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/world/ashley-madison-countersuing-ex-employee-doriana-silva-who-she-was-forced-to-type-hundreds-of-fake-profiles
At least Ellen Pao lost her discrimination case.
http://www.wired.com/2015/09/ellen-pao-ends-lawsuit-kleiner-perkins/
Feminism in Toronto continues its development towards a fever pitch…
Check out this article to read about death threats to women at University of Toronto. Elliot Rodger type claims made online to female students and the university is on a security freeze-out.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/violent-online-threats-against-women-put-university-of-toronto-police-on-alert-1.3223590
All headlines I’ve seen basically read “We need more feminism because men want to kill women and feminists”. I obviously don’t condone this kind of violence, but journalists (and the general public) don’t seem to acknowledge that feminism might correlate with (or outright cause) some of the economic situations that lead men to go crazy and act out. In the past men with no incentives to live would just kill themselves, but in the West feminists have been painting a big giant bullseye on themselves for years.
in their defense, due to obesity in the feminists’ camp, the bullseyes have to be giant.
all the mandatory gender quotas in academia and the workforce are displacing men and reducing opportunities for them, even though women work less hours and often quit the workforce altogether once they’re married and have kids. It doesn’t cross their mind the instability of putting men out of work
Yeah I’m not sure how sustainable it is…
Are men such white knights that they’re going to accept this new role in society as pushers of strollers? Will this displacement of men from the workforce have economic/social implications?
Toronto is heading in the direction of a place with no native population. Just a place for poor immigrants, old money, and wealthy foreigners to go to school and buy property.
No point in calling it your home pretty soon.
The real news here is that there are people who take online threats seriously.
The guy making the threats is a minor problem, the social sensitivity at colleges is a much bigger problem.
This story is hilarious. That script to create the accounts for her could have been done in mere hours
Most women’s profiles are so vacuous and beta males so clueless that it would set the lowest possible bar for the Turing Test. Which gets me thinking. . . .
Most likely she was expecting a settlement out of the suit to avoid the embarrassment of a public record documenting that ALM paid workers to create false female profiles. The merits of the RSI would be totally irrelevant.
Also, don’t know if anyone has pointed out; John McAfee (cybersecurity expert, inventor of McAfee AV products) did a nice writeup that between the technical details of the ALM leak and the social engineering aspects embedded, that the leak was almost certainly an inside job by a female former employee:
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/john-mcafee-ashley-madison-database-stolen-by-lone-female-who-worked-avid-life-media-1516833
Makes a lot of sense
That is what I was thinking.
If the only thing she wanted was a settlement, she could have just said it was ‘from work’. The very more damaging aspect of the lawsuit, and why I think it was more blackmail, is that she is telling everyone in the open that the profiles are fake.
Does she look bright (or diligent) enough to pull off this scheme on her own? What are the odds that this Doriana Silva was actually a cat’s paw, acting under the direction of a dark triad alpha male lover, lawyer or programmer, who went nuclear with the retaliatory hack when the lawsuit didn’t pan out, divulging all the lovelorn users’ identities out of spite?
Clearly she was just trying to shake down her con artist employer. Shocker there is no honor among thieves.
Get carpal tunnel -> sue for $20 million
This is what female entitlement looks like.
I still can’t believe guys pay for stuff like this.
If a guy is gonna pay hundreds of dollars, sheesh buy a hooker.
Ok quick question. Are you angry with the girl for working “the system”, which given her age is all she knows, has witnessed and been taught (not saying blameless or innocent, by the way)? Or are you angry with “the system” set up for women, by men, paid for by men?
(I’m actually angry at both, more so the system than her. If we had a less girl friendly system, she, and others, would not waste the time of the legal system.)
You forgot to bring in the people who taught her, namely her parents or guardian or family. These are the people that teach her morals. If they did and she still plays the system, then she’s to blame.
The system provides for LEGITIMATE cases. Her abuse of the system makes everyone who does have a case suffer.
It’s no different than the false rape accusers making it difficult for the real rape victims.
Ok. Thank you
Most hamsters ‘deserve’ compensation from repetitive strain injuries and vertigo/disorientation/impaired balance as consequences of extreme spinning.
That’s how much women need a man who can blow such rodents up in smoke at will.
youtube ; Bill burr, epidemic of gold digging whores.
Most younger women have been put on a pedestal for so long they no longer have any sense of humility. The ironic thing to me is the fathers, many of them friends of mine, that were total cvnt hounds in high school and college that now have a daughter and wear those shirts saying “She’s my princess not your conquest” or “Dad’s Against Daughter’s Dating”
Seriously dude, after all of the shat you’ve done? I secretly hope his little princess has a libido that would make Hugh Hefner proud.
They often do.
I don’t man, I got RSI on the job once. I’d wake up and I literally could not feel or move my arms (like they were paralyzed) until I shook them out and the blood flow returned. It was because of this that I discovered how hard it is to move around without arms, because you use them to balance yourself and shift your weight around, so getting out of bed to shake the blood back into my arms was a feat in and of itself. It was pretty fucking scary. RSI is no joke.
A male programmer would have just written a script to create thousands of fake profiles and saved himself RSI and saved the employer tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees fighting off the Vampiric Jew.
But remember women are just as valuable employees as men, guize! That’s why they deserve to be paid more in every position you’re forced to diversity-hire them into! :^)