Katie B. Nelson, Sometimes Homeless Drug User, Has Been Identified As Roosh’s Montreal Assaulter

At last, the other woman who assaulted Roosh in Montreal, Katie B. Nelson, has been identified. The literal partner-in-crime of Jessica Lelièvre (now strangely a law student) has desperately tried to avoid being outed for her anti-social, criminal behavior in August of last year. She saw the very adverse reactions towards Lelièvre, who was forced to go underground away from social media and now faces the likelihood of having prospective employers permanently associate her name with the organizing of an attempted lynch mob.

Nelson was the first woman to throw a beer on Roosh in this video:

After Roosh’s World Tour, Nelson has been finally banned from Twitter for harassing multiple people. These people have included purported Roosh supporters whom she has stalked online and tried to stir up offline violence against. Inasmuch as we welcome her banning, Twitter was extremely slow to act appropriately when Nelson’s nefarious intentions became clear. Many complaints of doxxing were made against her before she was suspended indefinitely. By contrast, Milo Yiannopoulos’ legitimate investigative journalism about college graduate fraudster (and transgender person) Brianna Wu was immediately shut down by Twitter.

You can find Nelson’s remaining social media pages, where she has an ironic penchant for objectifying herself well beyond her natural appearance, here: Facebook and Instagram. Most disgustingly, we also have a snapshot of her unabashed anti-Semitism and support for the tunnels used by terrorist group Hamas to murder Jewish-Israeli civilians. And Roosh is supposedly an anti-Semite?

Katie B. Nelson’s may actually just be Caitlin Nelson, based on her 2013 arrest. Nelson is probably well aware of the professional consequences she might face in the future for her deplorable past, so it’s possible that the “B.” is either a complete ruse or a legal initial she uses on and off to separate her different activities, like with her appropriation of both Katie and Caitlin as first names.

In Montreal, after hitting Roosh with their drinks (a crime in Canada, as multiple court decisions prove), Lelièvre and Katie B. Nelson duly slip behind their slavish white knights but continue trying to fan the flames to create more dangerous levels of physical violence. The men, followed by the “brave” women, proceed to force Roosh and his smaller entourage down the street, on pain of risking being maimed or even killed.

Why Roosh didn’t press charges

Roosh gave much more than a middle finger to his enemies in Montreal and wider Canada. He schooled them in how to beat a mass of leftists frothing at the mouth for blood.

Roosh’s recollection of “Jennifer,” the name Katie B. Nelson gave herself, is as follows: “I approached her on the street and then I moved into the bar. There she was making cow eyes on me and rubbed her legs against me to distract me until her white knights could get there. Her act was quite believable (I felt foolish afterwards).”

In terms of why he didn’t press charges, Roosh said, “A detective from the Montreal SPVM police force contacted me and said that I should expect to also be charged with assault because I allegedly threw my water at Katie’s face after she attacked me first. If I did such a thing, it was a self-defense reflex to fend off my attackers. The last thing I wanted to do was return to Canada for a trial, so I didn’t pursue charges. I had to assume that a Canadian judge would throw the book at me while giving leniency to the girls after they turned on the water works in the courtroom. This shows that if you want a woman to go to jail for assault, you better not try to defend yourself.”

“It’s only mean or violent when the patriarchy does it!”

Isn’t the idea of ambulance-chasing to do up the velcro strap of your neck brace? Katie B. Nelson/Caitlin Nelson is presently suing the Montreal Police for alleged brutality. Makes perfectly sense that an anarchist would use an “illegitimate” capitalist court system in this way, right?

Proving that feminist complaints about being doxxed never apply to those who criticize them, Lelièvre and Katie B. Nelson were instrumental, along with Sara Parker-Toulson the Hutt, in disseminating Roosh’s alleged Montreal address. The intention here was to have people show up to render Roosh unconscious, beat him to within an inch of his life or, again, end his life. Yet do not take my word for it; the evidence is both linked to my articles and across the broader internet.

In the biggest irony of the whole saga, it was feminist-anarchist Katie B. Nelson (or Caitlin Nelson, take your pick) whose actions helped bolster the already very heavily supported proposition that rape culture is not just a myth but also a deliberate SJW fiction. Women can and do lie when it suits them during flirting, courtship, and sex. Knowing exactly who Roosh was, Nelson pretended to be unaware and sexually propositioned him, entirely for the purposes of soon attacking him and unleashing the assembled sheep-like mob.

Same old, same old

The only thing Katie B. Nelson doesn’t want to liberate is her drug-affected “intellect.”

Katie B. Nelson comes across as a most unsurprising ultra-leftist figure: “former” homeless drug addict; feminist-anarchist whose political activism depends on living in a tolerant, productive First World Western country; street radical who cries “Police brutality!” at every corner; and someone with a phenomenally maladjusted background and childhood. Some people overcome their past, whereas people like Nelson let theirs consume them and deliberately play it up for attention and “street cred.”

Let’s take a look at Nelson’s own “story.” In a narrative that’s par for the course with self-obsessed SJWs, Nelson claims she had to “leave behind one of the most amazing children I have ever met.” Whether this means she very stupidly and recklessly had a son or daughter she gave up, or just wants to make her life sound dramatic and so involves a child who isn’t hers, remains to be seen.

She additionally assists in vindicating the basis of so many ROK articles, including my recent one about how women reward violent men with sex and relationships. I, like many of you, do not find Nelson aesthetically-pleasing, but the general principle of a damaged female’s preference for anti-social men works well in her case. She very explicitly references a habit of “getting into relationships with abusive piece-of-shit boyfriends.”

The commonalities between Katie B. Nelson and her ideological bosom buddies, like Jessica Lelièvre, are the ones you have come to expect from the most opportunistic feminist attention-seekers. Naturally, there’s that obsession with enhancing their appearances well beyond what nature gave them. Nelson is the same girl who will rally against patriarchy and unrealistic physical expectations on women in one breath, and then plaster herself with copious layers of make-up and digital filters in the next. These hypocritical actions are merely shortcuts for propping up her flagging self-esteem. A girl’s gotta do what a girl’s gotta do.

She advocates for bank robberies and equates Israeli polices with the Holocaust

No doubt, Katie B. Nelson/Caitlin Nelson will claim the tweet above was a joke or a “thought experiment.” SJWs always do when their future employment prospects are limited because of statements that would blacklist a non-leftist for eternity. How strange then that such a comment still fits within her putrid overall ideology, including not merely an unfavorable comparison of Israel with Nazi Germany but rather saying Israel is Nazi Germany:

Then there’s her wonderful encouragement of Hamas wilfully murdering Israeli civilians, mentioned earlier. All in all, we are left with an impression of a virulently unhappy and mentally unstable “woman” (more like a child), who lashes out with calls for violence, requests for other people’s money (see below) and presenting herself, almost schizophrenically, as a target of continuous police harassment.

Katie B. Nelson also lives off suspicious crowdfunding drives

Prostitution is more much honest than Katie B. Nelson’s crowdfunding efforts.

Before we address her shameless profiteering and refusal to get a job able to fully support her activism, there’s the tricky question of why an anarchist would try to get a payday via the civil, capitalist court system. This is exactly what Katie B. Nelson/Caitlin Nelson has been doing and is the main reason ROK became aware of who she was. She claims she was “pushed” at a rally by an undercover police officer and is suing the Montreal Police. This continues her multiyear obsession with portraying herself as a victim of “police brutality.” Of all the sick SJWs in Canada, she’s miraculously the one being “targeted.” In psychiatric terms, this would be called epic and never-ending narcissism and paranoia.

She has raised, for her at least, substantial “legal fees” funds online, including on GoFundMe (archive) and Generosity (archive). For someone with the gall to make a name for herself pretty much only through “combating” police, surely she could muster the discipline to parlay her “skills” in getting a decent job to fund her extremism. And as a social justice warrior who believes in the power of Montreal’s anarchist collectivity, she has a quaint habit of making herself the sole public standard-bearer for the cause.

These funding drives intersect with other serious questions about Nelson’s finances. She repeatedly shares her long history of drugs and being homeless, yet has the time and money to study at Concordia University, the alma mater of Jessica Lelièvre. Comparable to Lelièvre, Nelson might have an affluent family in her home province of Alberta. The suggestion is that she hails from Edmonton, a not-so-bad city that benefited from a contemporary boom from oil and other resources. But unless she has resorted to living off white knight men, actual prostitution, or her family, how she bankrolls herself with all these legal entanglements is very murky indeed.

There is just not enough room for more facts about Katie B. Nelson

“E.T. phone home… for money.”

I thoroughly encourage you to peruse the main forum thread on Katie B. Nelson/Caitlin Nelson. I have no doubt that more about her is out there and this may soon appear, thanks to the contributions of Roosh and ROK supporters. For now, this exposé must regrettably (or thankfully?) come to an end.

I have lost count of the number of times I have mentioned SJWs’ flair for outing themselves. They so desperately believe in their false creed and their broken selves that they cannot help but confirm their mental illnesses, crimes, and other brain-dead positions and activities.

Of any SJW I have ever had the displeasure of covering, from rich daddy’s girl Jessica Lelièvre to the truly awful Anita Sarkeesian, Katie B. Nelson is without a shadow of a doubt the most repulsive and delusional. Enjoy your notoriety, Katie. Once what little of your non-make-up-generated looks have been sapped by your long-term drug abuse, the life of needles and deliberately sought out violent men will be even more familiar to you than it was before.

Read More: Drug Smuggler Turned Canadian MPP Cheri DiNovo Libelously Calls Roosh A Criminal

128 thoughts on “Katie B. Nelson, Sometimes Homeless Drug User, Has Been Identified As Roosh’s Montreal Assaulter”

  1. You were assaulted by a violently insane feminist? (I know, I know: redundancy spotted.) That’s absolutely par for the course.
    Stay staunch, Roosh. They’re losing and they know it. Their behavior is the proof.

  2. She looks like a total street walking crack whore. Once you’ve engaged in that lifestyle there’s no going back. You will always be a quick step away from it especially when you consider the damage already done to your brain etc etc..

    1. She looks like a total winner too…..
      Damn shame that foreign women have a better outlook on life… and look better too.

    2. She looks like a total street walking crack whore.

      Understatement. I wouldn’t fuck her with my worst enemy’s cock. With all due respect Roosh, you were clearly thinking with the wrong head that night. This situation could have easily been avoided had you been no where near that low-life slut.’

      1. I was about to comment on Roosh’s reasoning here. Then again, he hates fucks so many of them. 😀

    3. Just like the rest of Canadian women!
      Any woman with muscular characteristics is a broken woman!

        1. More like pierced themselves. You are correct though, far too many Western women think their SMV is much higher than it actually is.

        1. I think you should have ripped the top off the one on the far right or used a 2liter milk carton instead!

  3. I am a feminist and find Roosh quite repugnant, however, this does not warrant being physically attacked. That girl is an embarrassment.

    1. Maybe. She does represents your movement in every sense. There has been a consistent shifting of roles done by feminists and at the end of the day, it all consistently points to one thing, sexism reversal based on historical treatment of women. She, you, and frankly all feminists, need to step up and start discussing issues like adults, and stop using unprovable statistics and inherent lies to substantiate sexism. We all care about women. Mostly, we care about people. You don’t have to vehemently hate anyone to get a better world.

      1. Please don’t put us all in one box. Never would I condone assaulting someone because they have different views to you, it’s childish and in some cases illegal. I completely agree that issues must be discussed like adults and both women AND men must be included in these discussions. Hate should never be tolerated.

        1. I must include you all in the same box because up until now, feminists haven’t actively done anything to either separate causes or appropriate a unilateral message. It is the same grouping that occurs with groups as extreme as the KKK because they operate as a brand. When you operate as such this is what you represent. Obviously not all members are looking to see men get raped because women were raped. Or drink male tears and tell men to stop men-splaining, but as long as you and your group do nothing to stop these behaviors, you will consistently chase away anyone with sense and respect for people. Not all KKK members were murderers either, but they sure have a lot of criminal activity under their belts.

        2. You can not compare feminism with the KKK. The main aim of the KKK was to make American white again, their fundamental beliefs were racist ones. Whereas, the fundamental beliefs of feminism is equality between the sexes. One is based upon hate, the other is based on basic human rights. Also, it would be fair to say that all members of the KKK had racist ideologies because that’s what their organisation was built on. You cannot say the same for feminism. I don’t expect you to agree with me but I’m just making a point. 🙂

        3. What? You don’t believe in the Western society, it is more advantageous to be a woman than it is a man? Why do you think Bruce Jenner decided to be a woman? He would’ve been sent to jail for manslaughter in his accident so he quickly turned as a woman to draw sympathy. It worked. He’s a “hero” and a woman of the year.
          Equality my ass.

        4. Good. Do you understand the message it’s trying to convey? How does that compare to the world we live in now.
          You seem reasonable and willing to listen and reason. You can decide for yourself if you still want to consider yourself a feminist.

        5. You missed the point as to why I addressed KKK. The point was the brand not the individual message. The brand of feminism has been equality achieved through naming aspects, whether proven or not, to list inequalities between how the sexes are represented. Not only are these messages not agreed on, the aspect of defense of males, which has been disproven as well, is a poor red herring to make the movement appear as one to be respected. More often, case after case has been brought up showing how feminism has been actually appropriated by women looking to increase power the easy way, by shaming society to believe they are in the wrong.
          Feminism is college rape. Feminism is women need equal pay. Feminism is I drink Male Tears. Feminism is all men are rapists. Feminism is the idea that we need to fight all injustice and there should be no hate. Feminism is the right to say a boy should be raped and women should not be shamed for having STDs. The umbrella gets bigger the more women call themselves feminists. Sadly the biggest aspect of feminism is that it also does tolerate dissension of differing points of views as anything other than sexism, hate, and misogyny. Feminism is the wrong name to a lot of members of society. What feminism has come to mean is a new age society bent on controlling the behaviors of men in a way that makes them more agreeable to women.

        6. Reading this thread all I got out of it was that her box probably smells like red herring.
          I am like 12

        7. Equality between the sexes? Not that is rich. A comparison between feminism and the KKK only differs in that one is applied to sex and the other to race. Nearly every other facet of their ideologies are comparable.

        8. Unless you live in some third world shit hole far far away from the dreaded patriarchy which has oppressively given you “rights” and the nearly limitless technology to incessantly squeal like a stuck pig with a megaphone about all the “injustices” visited upon your much much weaker sex, assault is ALWAYS illegal.

        9. On the other hand, he regrets not going to jail, so he could put his newly acquired ladybits to use.

        10. Prove it by up-voting the top comment which describes her as looking “like a total street walking crack whore”. Go on, you know you want to.

        11. “Whereas, the fundamental beliefs of feminism is equality between the sexes”
          That is true, but only with respect to penis size

        12. Sorry but you lost all credibility at “I am a feminist.” Aside from the fact that White women are the most privileged members of Western society, Feminism has destroyed the traditional family, eviscerated the institution of marriage and permanently poisoned relationships between young men and women. Perhaps it’s time to reevaluate your world views?

        13. “One is based upon hate, the other is based on basic human rights.”
          Take a few pages of feminist literature. Pick some of the Second-Wave Feminists like Gloria Steinem or Germaine Greer, Third-Wave Feminists like Jessica Valenti or any feminist website or blog or any feminist opinion piece by say Marcotte or any one from the Guardian or the Huffington Post.
          Now paste a few pages of it into a word document.
          Next, use the edit and/or replace function to replace all instances of the words “man” or “men” with the words “Blacks” or “Jews” or “Gays.” Any group will do, take your pick.
          Now, read those pages again and try to convince yourself that Feminism is not about hate.

        14. Some of the history supports your narrative, and some does not. This is just a point of logic nit-pickery really, but no it isn’t “fair to say”… It’s arguable at best.
          The KKK originated as an anti-black, anti-Reconstruction movement in the late 1860 and was suppressed by 1871.
          It was reborn as an anti-Catholic and anti-Semitic movement in 1915, and faded away in the 1940s.
          Starting in about 1950 various local anti-civil-rights groups appropriated the Klan brand, without much evidence of national organization.
          I’ll believe that feminism supports equality when the 10:1 disparity between male and female work-related fatalities becomes “problematic” and “requires” “affirmative action”.

        15. Differing opinions to your ilk are “hate” thus you aim to silence free speech..

        16. Hi. I admire your courage for posting here.
          I had a few questions about feminism if you could please help me understand as you seem to be one of the smart, non-militant ones from that movement.
          You are fighting for equality between the sexes. Whom are you fighting? Who is it that has made the sexes unequal? When were the sexes equal to begin with, if ever? Who is financing your movement as a collective and how?
          Thank you in advance.

    2. I am a feminist attorney. This case can be solved easily. Just bring a vagina certificate in court, and cry.

      1. I don’t know where you went to feminist law school, but you forgot that the vagina certificate needs to be notarized. In fact, the more times it has been stamped the better.

        1. Feminist law school- the same one all the prosecutors on Law & Order went to- what a horrendous tv show

    3. You don’t have to like him, neither he has to like you. There will be people who likes you, and people who doesn’t. That’s life, and it’s not really that important.
      What matters is that liking or disliking are secondary face to the rule of law, which means: our personal preferences, phobias or philias are not that important. Western system has evolved to a system where the law (including free speech, civil rights, presumption of innocence, and so) is the common ground, a common ground we should all defend no matter we like or we dislike each other.
      I live in a mediterranean country where those personal preferences are often more important than the rule of law. And believe me, that doesn’t end well.

    1. The Army should study this video, how a Man can overpower a woman. Might give the Army some common sense…. Maybe have to wait till the next Potus.

  4. … Isn’t she a commie instead of an anarchist, though? Communism and anarchism are pretty much polar opposites.

  5. An unstable woman full of hatred, needing scapegoat for her miserable existence. She is the very embodiment of feminism.

  6. I am going to cut and paste the title of this article to Google and see if I can help to make Katie’s name associated with this. JOIN ME!!!!!!

  7. LelI ever can afford to do dumb shit. She’s rich and connected. his idiot, however, is gonna pay the price with the only thing she has. Time…

  8. On the farm, we would put a ring in a pig’s nose to keep it from rooting and doing damage to the grounds. That usually worked, but with these SJWs it appears to have the opposite effect.

    1. Condition from being brow beaten by the chief constantly badgered by lawyers.

    2. Montreal’s police force, like most government agencies in Quebec, is a make-work scheme for otherwise unemployable French Canadians too lazy or stupid to learn English and GTFO.

      1. What type of bread is that it looks good but al looks like some sort of cake which is bad?

        1. I believe it’s like a marbled rye. But trust me, non of their sandwiches taste like you’re hoping they do.

      2. I imagined something more like McDonald’s processed cheese painfully oozing out between the beef flaps.

    1. don’t google distended anus or rectal prolapse….but if you did…that’s her…but don’t, really.

      1. It looks like a worm trying to get out of someone’s ass. #AnalWormLookingThingsLivesMatter

  9. This is what happens to crazy people with shady pasts. Whether going to fight for ISIS, become hardcore fundamentalist Christians, or anarchists, or feminists, there is no middle ground. They just want to belong and be seen and loved and admired.

  10. No one of great significance really. You are giving this child too much attention, which is probably what she craves the most in her empty existence. She’s just another lost soul among millions.

  11. Roosh isn’t an anti-semite
    At one point he reviewed a book which documents what Jews (in media and academia) do and in fact his conclusion was admiration for their in-group preference and capacity to take us Westerners for a ride.

  12. man she got that “1000 cock stare”.
    probably been used and abused so many times.

    1. $10 a shot goes quick when you’re a crack whore so you might be a bit conservative on the #’s. Add a “0” my boy and you’ll be there!

  13. At first glance I thought I wouldn’t touch that chick with Roosh’s dick. And questioned, with his prowess, why he woyld stoop to that level. Especially after sampling the buffet of beauties from eastern europe. But that last pic. The one with the bull ring. If you took out the peircing, she’s fuckable. Yeah, she still has that glazed over look that says “I take my coffee with a side of dick”. But still, for a pump and dump, she’ll do. Which brings me to the point. MOST gurls can do something to their appearance to catch a cad’s eye. Women are natural liars. I bet she put on her best to try and trap our intrepid hero. And take the bait he did. Folks, it’s the same if you are semi famous like Roosh or a software engineer in Cleveland with his shit together. Bitches. Trap. Men. Keep a sharp eye, rely on your skills, stick to your gut. And stay the freak frosty.

  14. Now that this article is front and center, a la #1, on a Google search of her name I have a questions for our sullied flower which I’m sure she will read:
    How many STD’s did you contract while working the streets?
    What future do you think you have now that your past is all over the internet, or is welfare and methadone “forever” your plan?

    1. My first thought when I saw the featured image was “methadone” too.
      Everything about this bitch signals “chaos.” She has a long and horrible life ahead of her.

    2. Why do you think she’s in Montreal? No anglophones move to Quebec except to enjoy the perks of its lush welfare state or life in mom’s basement. Any who can leave do.

  15. Katie B. Nelson came to Montreal in March of 2012. She was in charge of the public relations with Occupy Edmontont until then :
    https://www.facebook.com/OccupyEdmonton/posts/327517963959790 (Screen capture included below.)
    http://globalnews.ca/news/206539/occupy-edmonton-attempts-to-occupy-university-of-alberta/ (Also another screen capture included below.)
    She is probably financed, at least indirectly, by CANVAS, an organization that get money from George Soros. CANVAS is based in Belgrade and it played a role in the fall of Slobodan Milosevic.
    Katie B. Nelson also worked in cooperation with the Muslim Brotherhood in 2013, in protests against Syria, in Montreal.

  16. Hate to judge a book by its cover, but damn. That photo above is not doing Ms. Nelson any favors.

  17. Revenez-nous, Marc Lépine. Montréal vous a besoin.
    Come back, Marc Lépine. Montreal needs you.

  18. Never met a feminist or BLM that wasn’t one of two things: 1. An absolute loser who wants society to compensate them for their life’s failings, or 2. A rich kid who’s parents have protected, paid for and propped them up for their entire life.

    1. #2 makes me think of Millenials. Their families usually aren’t rich, but they have the attitude that I’ve seen in spoiled rich kids.

  19. “Women can and do lie when it suits them during flirting, courtship, and sex”
    MGTOW fo lyfe!!!

  20. This gang of anarchists in Montreal is small but causes a shit-ton of trouble. They protest like twice a week for every cause you can think of. It’s always the same people. As you can see from the picture above, they enjoy using violence against the police then cry victims if cops strike back, but that doesn’t happen that much. Cops frequently let them use violence and destroy property without intervening. The anarchists always sue them. I was threatened with violence by anarchists before and it’s probably the same gang. Here is one of their leaders : http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/2-montreal-police-officers-ordered-to-pay-15-000-to-activist-jaggi-singh-1.3205040

  21. Crack whores for Bernie….People with no ambition for Bernie…..People with low IQ’s for Bernie….people who think success based on hard work and intelligence is unfair for Bernie.

  22. Her Instagram page talks about “killing men”, besides including 5000 selfies. Nice.

  23. Good! These people are damaged, and there’s nothing worse than an unstable person with a political agenda.

  24. Another ROK commentator once suggested that we stop using “noble” and “valorous” titles for these cucks and cunts. Instead of white “knight”, use white cunt or knave; instead of social justice “warrior”, use “wacko”. Even though it doesn’t catch on, when used in conversation, people will know what you mean. It definitely will be much more of an interesting conversation when people ask why you use those nouns instead of the known words; in reply you say, those words denote titles of honor, manliness, and courage. Of which none of those smelly cucks and cunts have.

    1. Her facial features are good, but she has that look that screams crazy +nose ring.
      That’s my limit, I don’t date girls with nose rings.

  25. I think that little A with a circle stands for assault. These pathetic clowns are an insult to real black flag.

  26. They are so fond of writing doggeral (bad poetry) so I have some here: could be a great metal tune!
    She’s got bright blue hair,
    Black painted lips,
    The blood of beta men on her finger tips…
    She can put a beer can through the gauge in her ear,
    She’s got tattoos on her face,
    and tattoos on her rear,
    She has got methods,
    She got plans,
    She put a man in a cage,
    That he built with his own hands…
    She’s a feminazi!
    She’s a social vampire through and through,
    She’s a feminazi!
    And she’s coming for you, what you gonna do?
    — ok folks, you add your own verses.

  27. While endorsing HAMAS is one thing, criticism of Israel is quite legitimate.
    Israel has plenty of simmilarities with Nazi Germany. They both limited citizenship to only one ethnicity, they use eugenics program, with blacks coming to Israel being sterilized against their will, and they deploy White Phosphorus on Palestinians, doesn’t that remind you of Zyklon B ?
    While I disagree with her on most things, she is right about one thing, Israel is a criminal state.

  28. That’s the way to deal with feminist crap. Unlike many MRA’s, men like Roosh go straight to the problem. A well-earned public shaming in this case.

  29. I understand his reasons, but i regret that Roosh V didn’t press charges.
    He his wealthy enough and known enough to make it count.
    Not eveybody can have an article like this to strike back, and if we don’t convince our fellow men to press charge ‘en masse’ toward deviant behaviors, there are few chances that anything changes into SJW behaviors…
    Even corruped judges can’t drop hundred of accusations the same way they can put one or two Under the carpet…

Comments are closed.