Politics

4 Lies The Deep State Wants You To Believe

47 Comments

People typically find the premises and practices of religions they don’t believe in to be preposterous. However, their own faith is familiar; they understand the deeper meanings of (or can hand-wave) all the mummery. Hebrew hardtack, Popery’s infallibility, Mohammedan ninja suits, Mormon magic underwear, and anything about Scientology—either it seems absurd, or it makes perfect sense, all according to one’s own beliefs. The exceptions are atheists, who consider all religions different flavors of baloney.

It’s like that with politics, too. Today’s globalist regime has zero justification for rule, but its mythology is about as weird as anything dreamed up by L. Ron Hubbard’s fertile imagination. Here are some examples.

1. The Russians hacked the election

Before the 2016 US Presidential election, the MSM was crowing about Hillary’s certain victory. According to some talking heads, The Donald ‘s odds were merely 1%. Oops! Democrats were weeping, and the sour grapes became a fine whine. The Deep State crowd’s champagne turned to vinegar; for the first time in decades, someone who wasn’t an anointed proxy got nominated and elected.

So the next fallback was pooping in the punch bowl: attacking Trump’s legitimacy by spreading a fairy tale about Russians hacking the election. There’s no actual evidence beyond alphabet soup agencies speculating, “Well, that’s just the sort of thing the Russkies would try!” Still, the MSM dished out this thin gruel, generating liberal outrage. Meanwhile, the Democrats aren’t boasting much about their own campaign’s dirty tricks!

In concept, paperless balloting actually is a potential risk. Could someone fudge the numbers behind the scenes? That would be pretty foul, but anyone with the right password can manipulate databases, and who would know? Further, it’s an unnecessary gimmick. For over two centuries, the USA did without it. Liberals once sneered at these concerns as tinfoil hat stuff.

Most troubling, there are no more ballots that voters can check, or that election officials can tabulate in case of technical difficulties or disputed results. Easy solution: voting machines could include small printers, meanwhile storing results in memory. The technology exists now. The nation’s cash registers process millions of transactions daily, updating servers instantaneously and then printing receipts.

What’s unspoken: If they believe someone overseas can hack an election, why aren’t they trying to fix the problem? The Democrats blustered about Russian tampering (despite zero evidence), so why aren’t their Congressmen demanding safeguards—like what’s described above—before Vladimir Putin “steals” the USA’s 2020 election too?

2. The security state makes everyone safer

The Utah Data Center is designed to store exabytes of information and “is alleged to be able to process “all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Internet searches, as well as all types of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, and bookstore purchases”

This tall tale is a big hit with the neoconservatives. During Bush the Younger’s years, we got the War on Terror, more federal agencies, and two spit-in-your-eye wars. Obama campaigned promising to dismantle the security state, but did bupkiss about it for eight years. Instead, The Lightworker kicked a few more anthills during the Arab Spring. I certainly won’t shed a tear for Libya’s Gadhafi. However, Syria’s Assad is probably the best asshole dictator that can be expected. In both cases, the end results made it easier for the Soros outfits to colonize Europe with “migrants”.

Perhaps all that seemed like a good idea then. However, the implementation was horribly ineffective. What did we get for all the extra trillions spent on alphabet soup agencies and making the military-industrial complex wealthier? Further, domestic spying is pretty troubling. Although Americans are monitored more thoroughly than Soviet citizens were, terrorism is far from over despite all the security theater. Mass surveillance grotesquely violates the Fourth Amendment; court-issued warrants are needed for prying into just one citizen’s life. However, legal mumbo jumbo works around that, and the unaccountable agencies are out of control.

What’s unspoken: With a cost/benefit ratio as lousy as that, it’s time to rethink strategy. As Benjamin Franklin put it:

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

This watchword captured the spirit of the times, but today things are a little different. The ultimate image of security is a baby in a crib, wrapped in a blanket, sucking a pacifier, and under Mommy’s watchful gaze. That’s fine for infants, but not free adult citizens.

3. The media is balanced and accurately informs the public

A free and independent mass media—dispassionately informing the public and telling both sides of the story—long has been lauded as a pillar of democracy. The press is free from government censorship, but how independent is the “Fourth Estate”? Thirty five years ago, 90% of the USA’s media outlets were in the hands of fifty companies. Even then, they were generally concentrated in New York City (with similar ownership characteristics) and had a liberal bias, allowing for selective information blackouts.

Because of deregulation—thanks, Congress!—it’s now merely six mega-conglomerates owning the TV networks, Hollyweird studios, newspapers, magazines (even comic books), radio stations—and also some ISPs. Of these, five have toxically leftist corporate cultures, but hide the full extent fairly effectively. That’s why the news is bullshit and today’s entertainment is pozzed-out with cultural Marxism. The other one has a neocon angle, representing the “controlled opposition” opinion.

Journalistic integrity, balance, and objectivity are as mythical lately as the Easter Bunny. Most presstitutes are little better than Social Justice Warriors. Some are even directly in cahoots with politicians. Because of their routine “advocacy journalism”, important issues get a highly biased presentation, or are never discussed. The neocon news outlets have a longer leash, but they still won’t touch many vital topics. The public’s confidence in the MSM is falling steadily. Even liberals are catching on. That’s bad news for the Lügenpresse.

What’s unspoken: Corporate abuse of monopoly power to propagandize the public is little better than government censorship. To believe otherwise is the libertarian fallacy of “something is bad only if the state does it to you.”

4. “Bomb the world, invite the world” will spread global peace and democracy

The security state myth has a deadly synergy with the diversity myth. This afflicts most Western countries. For example, several years back, the Germans were beginning to realize that you can’t have both freedom and mass immigration. Not long after, Angela Merkel exemplified the “double down on a failed strategy” shtick, becoming the worst German political figure since the Weimar Republic.

The nation-wrecking cycle goes:

  • Invade a country that the neocons don’t like. If another spit-in-your-eye war is politically unpalatable, then destabilize it by giving lots of money and weapons to crazy militants who later will bite the hand that fed them.
  • Let in millions of refugees displaced by the chaos, opportunists claiming to be, and other hard-luck cases, all against the public’s wishes. Whether they’ll fit into their host cultures, not consume welfare, prefer “liberal democracy” over theocracy, or are intelligent and peaceful—these are no concerns for the politicians, because they’re not serving the public.
  • When problems inevitably happen from this imported underclass, give the security apparatus more money and expanded powers.
  • Instead of using this power to control the unwanted pests colonizing their nations, crack down on critics of these population replacement policies. Team up with like-minded social media billionaires to squash dissent.
  • Repeat.

What’s unspoken: The unassimilable migrants have a well-deserved reputation as troublemakers. However, the globalists who instigate this nonsense are worse pests and also deserve deportation. After several rounds of spreading democracy one bomb at a time, their good intentions are becoming questionable.

Conclusion

Atheists can mock religion incessantly without facing heresy charges. However, dissidents against the globalist regime and its strange beliefs can be censored or face retaliation. Still, pointing out the absurdity relentlessly is important. They can’t shut up everybody, once a critical mass of the public becomes aware. Then we can get the globalists and their toadies off the gravy train and start fixing the problems they’ve caused. Apathy is no solution; some people don’t follow politics, but politics follows everyone.

Read More: What Is The Hegelian Dialectic?

47 thoughts on “4 Lies The Deep State Wants You To Believe”

  1. Russia still has a central bank that operates like the one in USA.
    Yes, Putin’s still a puppet of Rothchild/Rockefeller

    2. The lies reach such a point that even the WSJ is editing the audio from Trump. You can compare the audios from the official WhiteHouse release with the one released by the Wall Street Journal, both linked here:
      https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/01/sarah-sanders-provides-proof-trump-was-misquoted-by-the-wall-street-journal/
      If you isolate the section when he says “and I’d pro” (the first syllable from “probably”), you can notice waveform corresponding to the ‘d in the official release… that has magically vanished from the WSJ audio.
      https://ibb.co/jZiD7R
      (If you don’t believe me, get audacity or any other audio editor and check it yourself)

    3. having a central bank does not mean its controlled by out side people. other countries central bamks are just gvt departments there are no external shareholders

      1. The problem with the article you posted is I dont see the Chinese, or the Russians building up military around the USA. The idea that Russia could interfere in American elections is laughable at best.

        1. Obviously you dont see it because USA doesnt have borders with those countries. What you will see is them building up their military and constant sabre rattling around USA partner countries both in and outside NATO, which, surely, should be disregarded as threat to USA and the whole world because “leave them be” just the way it happened with two pricks before WW2.

    5. Just because Russia has a central bank, doesn’t mean Putin is a puppet, no more than our FED means Trump is a puppet. And the fact that the terrorists in the House of Saud have been controlled, means there is hope for getting ahold of the Rothschilds. Just read Lynn Roths tweets, she sounds more and more desperate every day.

      1. Stop dreaming, Russia is neither cradle of civilization, nor the savior of one.
        Its still filthy, corrupted, rotten state ran by thieves, thugs that have pushed its own population into poverty, corruption and anti-west mania.
        Oh and plenty of high ranked folks there with jewish ancestry, just hiding it out of the eyes of public, because average Joe in Russia hates on them as much as everywhere else in the world.

        2. Underdog – have you met or at least read opinions of educated, non-corrupted, sane minded people about whats going on in that country?
          While I cant say for americans(aside from pop cultures terrible quality, or lack of to be exact) I can say a bit about Russia and russians(never been there and not russian myself) since I do think that I know a bit about that country and russians as a nation – you are still better off in USA than in Russia, dont glorify one shithole over another by glancing over superficial shit that media wants you to be believe in.

        3. ”Its still filthy, corrupted, rotten state ran by thieves, thugs that have pushed its own population into poverty, corruption and anti-Russian mania.”
          thats your JewSA

  2. The first paragraph was some hardcore fedora-tipping and totally unnecessary (and completely ignorant of how religious people actually think and view other religions).

    1. Not really. And it’s ironic how ROK views most atheists as fedora-wearing fatties when the exact same can be said for most Christians.

      1. Most atheists think all Christians are pedophiles thanks to the Catholic Church allowing homosexuals to be priests. I think you can handle a fedora joke.

        1. The reason fags were allowed into the priesthood was do the fact that the discernment offices at Chanceries around the country were populated my feminist nuns.
          Fags can more easily be persuaded to adopt Modernist (pro-feminist) theology then Traditional Catholicism. It’s all part of the Devil’s plan to destroy the Church from within.
          Get women off the altar; get them back in the pew and on their knees where they belong.
          And get rid of Eucharistic Ministers. Only consecrated hands may touch the Host.

        3. @ roman, no, fags and pedo’s were introduced to destroy the religion in the mind’s of the people. It’s a psy-op. And an effective one too.

      2. HAHAA no, the fedora thing is a stereotype, a meme from 4chan mocking a trend of Omega/beta nice guys in fedora that were usually atheist and claim to respect women, that was 10 years ago. that´s where the “Muh lady” (tips fedora) comes from. We shame hem into extinction

    2. My intention was not to irritate anyone with that. The point was merely this: what some consider sacred, others usually find at least a little odd, or even incomprehensible. Fortunately, people can hold whatever religious views they want and incur relatively little risk of facing serious pressure to conform.
      Politics is a different matter,. There are some powerful interests out there that want everyone to believe things their way, or at least shut up about it. Unfortunately, what they’re pushing is about as weird as anything the Comet Cult had to offer.

    1. Say what you want about Putin, but in oder to get power in post-soviet Russia you essentially had to be a hardass. The dudes a nationalists who gives two fucks about political correctness, he went in and saved Syria’s ass, he probably prevented and Islamic Caliphate from forming in the middle east, Russia is a country that has banned GMO crops, Russia has also labeled Feminist groups as terrorists. Did it ever occur to you that having a pair of balls might be necessary to preserving your nation? So you stopped reading because you got triggered?

      1. Have you been to Russia, Wes? As a Russian man, who was raised in Moscow, I can tell that Putin was the one who flooded his own country with Muslim immigrants, so he is no nationalist. Every fourth children born in, for example, Moscow is from Muslim immigrant family.
        I agree that supporting the legitimate president of Syria was a smart move for him to remain in power.
        As per feminism – I recommend you reading the article about Russian legislation that blatantly discriminates against men…Russia has no feminism, it has the next step – the legislated matriarchy. So locking “Pussy Riot” up was no more than a publicity stunt for Putin.
        Putin still hasn’t nationalized central bank of Russia. And he sells Russian resources for US dollars. That means Rothchild/Rockefeller still run Russian economy using their third party.
        Yes, GMO is partly banned, but Russia still has the highest cancer rates per capita. So it was banned not to help the nation, but for other materialistic reasons to benefit a small group of people.
        I am lucky to be raised in Moscow. But if you travel 100 km away from Moscow you will question yourself: ” how come the country who has the biggest amount of natural resources has the African level of living?!”
        All the wealth is concentrated in hands of hundred of oligarchs who are well protected by Putin.
        It’s a mental trap to think that Putin is a resistance to globalism, just because he is not a part of the West…

        1. There, you said it, yet you have only 10 upvotes(mine included) and 5 downvotes, while Wes The Great’s ignorant bs has been upvoted by idiots/bots more than 30 times.
          Makes me sometimes wonder whether some self proclaimed red-pillers these days are really red-pilled or commie-pilled?

  4. America’s historical success is the most effective, non-tyrannical form of national victory over control freaks (Jesuits, Jews, etc.). Its diplomatic prowess is, want to aknowledge it or not, due to the principles of Protestantism and Republicanism.
    Now, the proof that those two pillars are discarded by the highest authorities in matters of law is that 6 of the members of the Senate are Jews and 3 Catholic. Neither Roman nor Rabinnical principles does suffer Protestantism nor Republicanism.
    That’s why America isn’t great again. Your leaders have corrupted the way of the country into the hands of those enemies of Adams and Lincoln since the oil devils have started to plan the modern feudalism, and, gradually, completely fell helpless into the NWO plots begining with 1913 (FED), the controlled redistribution of power in 1929, and all the way down to hell along state-planned „terrorist” attacks, ending with an almost sure devastating economic collapse from which the big brothers will promise peace and security at the expense of your sons’ anti-private obedience.

    1. Oh yeah, right, America was just founded by FREEMASONS on FREEMASONRY PRINCIPLES AND LIBERALISM. Sooner or later shit was going to hit the fan.

  5. “Atheists can mock religion incessantly without facing heresy charges. However, dissidents against the globalist regime and its strange beliefs can be censored or face retaliation.”
    Notice what DOESN’T happen to libertarians like, say, Ron Paul. Paul can criticize the Federal Reserve all he wants, yet he hasn’t lost jobs, no one has tried to sucker-punch him, no country that I know of has blacklisted him to keep him from traveling there, no one claims he has a small dick and so forth.
    Yet all of these things have happened to white nationalists lately.
    So what accounts for the difference? Clearly the Deep State considers white nationalists a real threat to its power, while it ignores or tolerates libertarians.
    It looks almost as if libertarians exist as a controlled opposition or something, while white nationalists have gotten out of the elites’ ability to restrain and render harmless.

    1. Am not sure who Ron Paul is, but see the same thing in German politics. The FDP is a libertarian party and is more or less accepted by the MSM but the AfD which stands for closed borders, deportation, no gender rubbish, which got 13% of the vote is the perpetual enemy. The elites, with their behind closed doors meetings planning the unannounced policies know that demographics is destiny. They are also confident in the financial realm. They don’t really care about communism or marxism spreading nowadays, but white nationalism can also spread and they worry about it. It’s a critical mass thing..

    2. Indeed, that’s quite interesting. In principle, at least, libertarians would upset a lot of apple carts if they got things their way. 90% of Washington bureaucrats would be out of work, no more public assistance, no more corporate welfare, downsized military, no more bloated weapons sales contracts, etc. However, despite their open advocacy of that, they’re treated as harmless eccentrics. It would be interesting to see how fast that attitude would change if enough of the power brokers developed the slightest fear that they could pull it off. I figure that part of what protects the libertarians is that they’re okay with open borders, monopolies, and massive deregulation.
      As for the “deplorables”, there are more points of major disagreement with the ruling ideology. There are other factors about them which drive some of the highly-placed interests absolutely bananas, of course.

      1. Don’t libertarians want FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT? You would’ve been swamped by africans and muslims even faster than these days.

  8. Good job on the 4 lies. Total agreement regarding the deep state.
    Regarding faith/religion I’m an atheist. I don’t want or need an imaginary friend.

    1. by being atheist you’re undermining your own culture, Christian Europe was able to fight back the muslim tide for 1400 years, atheist Europe has been invaded by 50 million muslims in 50 years. You’re part of the problem.

  9. Great article.
    Sadly, though, “conservatives” still aren’t ready to take up arms and revolt, which is the only thing that will defeat leftists, globalism, and the deep state. We didn’t kick the British out of the colonies by voting, we killed the enemy.

  10. What i don’t understand is why we have a
    Department Of Homoland Security but no
    Department Of Constitution Protection to
    protect against unconstitutional actions
    by lawmakers, judges, district attorneys,
    or law enforcement. With the power to
    immediately rescind their authority and
    with the force to detain them or worse
    until a full Congressional Review,
    Supreme Court Ruling, Executive
    Order, or Secretary of Constitutional
    Protection’s Committee ruling.

    1. It’s my understanding all your military, law enforcement, government officials swear to uphold and protect your constitution?

  13. If I recalled correctly, Alabama had the legal authority to erase the electronic votes after the Roy Moore election. Why? After Doug Jones won, Democrats want to destroy any evidence of voter fraud.

  14. Many Americans feel powerless to do anything about the expanding police state, but they can still fight back.
    What if Americans just dropped out and stopped supporting US wars, debt, and tyranny?
    What if everyone became stateless?
    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article40469.htm
    https://www.fourflagsjournal.com/how-to-get-a-travel-document-when-you-are-stateless/
    https://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/stateless-fear-an-asylum-story/Content?oid=7271045
    https://www.indiatoday.in/mail-today/story/bsf-turns-blind-eye-to-porous-india-bangladesh-border-321049-2016-05-02
    What if everyone stopped using their name?
    http://losethename.com/birth-certificate-fraud/
    What if everyone stopped using banks and started buying gold, bartering, and hiding cash?
    http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/nation_world/the-amish-largely-untouched-by-u-s-financial-crisis/article_6c41d7ea-ec84-11e0-99a6-001cc4c03286.html
    What if everyone bought farms using anonymous private shell corporations?
    https://boldanddetermined.com/how-own-your-house-car-anonymously/
    What if everyone stopped driving cars and getting driver licenses?
    http://amishamerica.com/why-do-the-amish-drive-buggies/
    What if everyone stopped using phones and the Internet?
    http://amish.qth.com/amish-life-faqs/
    What if everyone stopped flying?
    http://amishamerica.com/can-amish-fly/
    What if everyone stopped paying taxes?
    http://nwtrcc.org/war-tax-resistance-resources/pamphlets/practical-war-tax-resistance-1-controlling-federal-income-tax-withholding/
    What if everyone stopped joining the military?
    http://amishamerica.com/why-dont-amish-serve-in-the-military/
    What if everyone stopped voting?
    http://www.amish365.com/amish-voting/
    What if everyone avoided being photographed?
    https://www.photo.net/discuss/threads/photographing-the-amish.420557/
    What if everyone took responsibility for themselves and refused to sign up for Obamacare instead of relying on the government?
    https://www.nbcnews.com/health/u-s-struggles-health-reform-amish-go-their-own-way-8C11345954
    Maybe the elites want everyone to give up, but at at least we won’t be paying them.

Comments are closed.