201 thoughts on “14 Essential Subjects That We’ll Teach Children At The ROK International School”

1. The “English” section begins with a sentence fragment and is strangely broken up into two paragraphs…

2. “Q. Should the mother be present during the inquiry?
   A: No, since the school’s kitchen will be closed during the father’s interview.”
   Gold!

3. I’d get the girls in on the outdoor activities too. The slight element of danger in activities like rock-climbing conveys that actions have consequences to a young mind and a homemaker could benefit from knowing how to dress wounds, gather herbs/berries, et cetera. Especially in the case of a societal collapse.

4. Go on Men.

5. First subject, the image. Yeah I know, it is “entrepReneur”.

   1. Let me know when you’re taking applications for martial arts instructor.

      1. Dips on the sambo. Which one do you want to apply for?

         1. I actually don’t train (directly at least) in any on your list. I have 16 years experience in Taekwondo, and about a year experience in Aikido, Filipino Kali, and Jeet Kun Do. I’m sure we could work something out.
            Also am an Eagle Scout so I could teach camping/survival skills.

         2. Are you a master of sport ?

         3. National Instructor. Unfortunately, the master sport title is worth nothing, if not obtained in Russia. On the to do list

         4. I was working on master of game but it was expensive traveling from where I am to new york and eventually out to Russia . I would like to train there one day . It’s the only combat art I’ve trained and don’t hold a rank or competed in . Funny because leg locks are my go to subs

         5. One of the reasons why I want to settle in the Former USSR is for their sambo clubs.

6. I agree with most of the article in general.
   “Some are strong partisans of home schooling. I for one have seen the damage caused to children who did not socialize with others. I cannot imagine an education for my progeny without being with their peers.”
   Sorry, but I have to disagree here.
   “Lack of socialization” is the biggest lie the Left always uses to scaremonger parents away from homeschooling their children (and protect their own teachings jobs in the process).
   Compared to a normal public school, consider the many negative social aspects the homeschooled children will be avoiding (bullying, drugs, gangs, Marxism, etc. note: these will probably be much lesser of an issue at a private RoK school). In effect, this will make your job as a parent much easier as you won’t have to deal with any of these difficult problems with your children.
   I know many families that have homeschooled their children successfully and they’ve socialized just fine; I don’t know of any case where the children didn’t. I’m sure they’re out there, but the same is true even for private schools.
   One of the biggest factors to socialize your children well is how many children you decide have. If you have 4 to 6 children (as my wife and I intend to, same as some of my cousins), they will socialize just fine as they will also be talking with other cousins, adults, grandparents, etc. and will be well integrated with the local place of worship.
   The rest really comes down to how much time and effort you’re willing to invest into your children.

   1. Agree. I have 3 girls that my wife and I plan on homeschooling. In addition to the interaction they’ll have with each other, the homeschool group, our church, our martial arts school, and just general interactions out in the real world, I think they’ll end up just fine. Girls are naturally more sociable than men are anyways.
      Also, I always bring up the fact that homeschooling was a general way of life before public schools ever came into existence and those people seemed to get along just fine.

      1. Keep those iPhones, iPads and cable TV away from them.

         1. That’s a given. Our oldest daughter gets to play with our iPad but it’s for educational games and coloring (she’s 3).

         2. I’d still be careful. Those games wire her for flashy images and rapid animations that can affect her attention span.

         3. TV yes but why Devices?

         4. Point well made. My wife and I have noticed an attitude change when our oldest daughter doesn’t get to play with the iPad when she wants to. We’ve started curtailing it before it becomes a huge issue instead of a minor annoyance.

         5. Coloring?!! Color books and crayons, chalk, paint, colored pencils, ink——- the iPad is not real art in any form. You should be the education, not the iPad. P.S. I did computer install in the 80’s and never used an iPad. I also solved unsolved math equations and never used an iPad. It’s a line of bull from people who want to sell you a product that kids shouldn’t have. Some of the smartest people in the world have never used an iPad.

      2. Regarding girls and socializing. My wife laughs that girls are natural sociopaths pretending to be nice and supportive and mean girls the rest of the time. Naturally, girls are more social in that since they focus on being more attractive (fashion and makeup) combined with status, they are more attuned to social goings on than men who put more emphasis on meritocracy.
         But indeed, that is something the school SHOULD focus on would be to teach young men “game” not just at PUA but also in the workplace and society.

      3. Yes. Homeschooling, where the kids lead a normal life of normal interactions with a variety of people, is the proper way to socialize a child.
         Shipping children off to a compound and separating them into groups based only on the criterion of age, is itself unnatural and improper socialization.

   2. Agreed. Homeschooling was the norm for thousands of years and humans did just fine.

      1. true, but people probably lived in larger families. Children need peers of some sort, even if they are only brothers, cousins etc. Two parents, let alone one, probably isn’t enough

         1. That is a problem with homeschooling, but you can sign your child up for soccer teams and the like which will make sure he stays up to date with his peers and social -> Problem solved.

         2. Also homeschool co-ops.
            It helps to split subjects up + you get the benefits of different expertise from other parents.
            They will always do better as teachers too as they have skin in the game and can focus so much more on the individual child rather than a skinnerian unit.

         3. I have a friend who homeschooled her children but that doesn’t mean they were literally at home all the time. Many of the activities listed in the proposed RoK school were available at other venues in the community such as sports at Y, community baseball, boy and girl scouts excursions (yeah, I know the girl scouts are commie now), Judo classes, you get the point.
            Heck, my wife and I are discussing this right now about our daughter to be and we’re concerned about some of the ruffians that are at the local schools. Just as with work, it makes sense to not sh*t where you eat. Get out and broaden your social circle. It should NEVER be just whose at the local school!

         4. That makes sense, although it does depend on the parents in question having the understanding and perhaps the resources to do that. I’m sure what you describe could help produce a well rounded child. Good luck with working something out for your daughter

   3. “Socialize”
      Word derived from “Socialism”.
      Meaning, in todays vernacular: to socialize is to fill ones head with the same shit that everybody else’s head is filled with.
      If we had a just, intelligent society that would be OK perhaps.
      But to socialize with society today?
      That’s like running out during the zombie apocalypse to get bitten on purpose just to join them.
      And that racket can go fuck itself in the ear.
      If I ever have kids, I would anti-socialize them. They would be the kind of people who, when the ship of fools is arguing over something retarded, they steal a lifeboat and leave the fucktards behind for shark food.

      1. “Socialize”
         Word derived from “Socialism”.
         I think it’s probably the other way around, but yes to the rest of your comment. Fit in with a bunch of idiots? No thanks, I’ll just stay unpopular.

      2. i don’t have the inclination to socialize at all. I mean with my experience with it, if you don’t follow with the flow you are the “idiot”, “bigoted”, “closed minded”, “racist”, “sexist”, etc….

      3. And light the sails on fire.

   4. Too much socialization causes egalitarian thinking and leads to pointless validation-seeking in adulthood
      There’s absolutely nothing wrong with a degree of anti-social behavior, the two things are supposed to balance each other out

      1. “Too much socialization causes egalitarian thinking and leads to pointless validation-seeking adulthood
         There’s absolutely nothing wrong with a degree of anti-social behavior, the two things are supposed to balance each other out”
         Both excellent points and 100% agreed.

      2. Or as Ted Kaczynski (the Unabomber) said in his manifesto: oversocialization – in which leftists feel so constrained by societal constraints (ex. political correctedness) that they lash out at those not so strictly constrained with fury (so the red pill) and have all this anger

      3. Kids need time by themselves to make sense of the world. It is why good parents sentence their disbehaving children to their room for a “time out” so the child ponder their innoprpriate behavior in isolation from others.

      4. Brevity is the soul of wit. Excellent comment.

   5. I know many families that have homeschooled their children successfully and they’ve socialized just fine
      Agreed. I know several homeschoolers right now, one being an actual teacher that quit the system and took her kids with her.
      These kids are very social and have no issues making friends. In fact they hold respectful and well thought out conversations with adults.
      Homeschoolers can find socialization for their kids in Little League, AYSO and other sports and music oriented programs outside of state controlled school systems.

   6. I never went to public or private school. I was home schooled grade 1 through 12. Ask me anything you might be curious about because I’m the only grade 1 through 12 home schooled person I’ve ever met.

      1. How did your parents manage to homeschool you through the later years? I’m from Australia, and I thought (though not 100% sure, could be wrong) that when kids finish primary school at grade 6 and go to high school at grade 7, homeschooling is no longer an option. How did your parents cover exam prep for the purposes of university? And who taught the difficult maths and sciences – calculus, trigonometry, chemistry, physics etc?
         Thanks

         1. The biggest difference that I noticed when I was in later grades was how much more literate I was compared to other kids my age. In Ontario the method used to teach children how to read was drastically changed when I was a child because foreigners were being left behind. The old fashioned way I was taught was through spelling and vocabulary, memorizing the root Latin and Greek, so that when confronted with a word I hadn’t read before it was possible to have an understanding of the meaning if I recognized the root. In public school children were taught purely with phonics and memorization in the new method. They had no understanding of how the word was constructed and therefore couldn’t even hazard a guess at what a word they hadn’t read before might mean nor could they pronounce it properly because they had no grounding in Latin and Greek. Honestly, in high school I was mostly self taught. I had excellent literacy which made learning nearly any subject very easy. Textbooks were sourced based on what some of the very best schools in the world were using. We got an IBM 486 computer when I was young, it was state of the art at the time, and unlike public school children I was doing light programming and learning computer skills long before the public school system figured out that computers might one day be a thing. With dial up internet and literacy I found it no problem at all to get B’s and even a couple of A’s in maths. I was working through problem sets and had exams like any other high school kid would. The advantage was that I had an absolute abundance of free time. Apparently, when you cut out all the progressive bullshit school really doesn’t need to be a 8am to 4pm affair. I had ample time to learn an instrument and explore pencil drawing and cartooning, both of which I still enjoy today. For university applications I took the ACT and did very well using a couple of study guides. Nothing on the ACT is rocket science. My weak point was mathematics, but that was only because I greatly dislike maths and not due to any problem accessing learning materials. I actually found the reading and comprehension part of the ACT laughable. I would say the biggest downside to home schooling was actually having to go to a ‘real’ school eventually. University was an absolute pain for me. I hated it. I felt like everything moved at an absolute snail’s pace. There were whole three hour classes that I felt contained maybe a half hour of actual material. I dropped out of a liberal arts university and went to college to get a degree in business. There was just too much bullshit in the liberal arts. I knew none of it would become anything resembling an employable skill and couldn’t plod on with the feeling that I was wasting so much of my time and money. Hopefully that answers some of your questions.

         2. Thanks for your response Bushido. My wife is currently pregnant and our intention is to home-school: stories about it are always useful.
            I assume you found the ‘red pill’ only after realising the liberal arts were bullshit!

         3. Thank you for your kind words and I wish you the best of luck with your child’s education. At any and every opportunity possible have your child take standardized tests to make sure that they are meeting or exceeding what the other kids are doing. Try not to make things too structured though, that kind of nonsense is for school. If you have a boy be sure to get him involved in a sport or martial art so that he can rough house with other lads. Schools try to squash this behavior in boys but it is only natural and should be encouraged. I would also suggest starting him into light computer programming courses pretty much as soon as he can read. It helped me a lot and with public schools STILL not implementing computer science en masse he will be way ahead of the game. Congrats on the new member of the family.

   7. I was home schooled, and so were my brother’s and the children of several other families in our area. Know what? We turned out fine. This notion that a child who doesn’t spend his days in class will turn into a misfit of some sort was always absurd. Good post.

   8. Good points and some I was going to raise myself. Its impossible to live in society and not socialise to some degree with others. Also, it is a dangerous assumption that having children socialise with random other children in a school is beneficial. They then spend most of their time with immature people who act impulsively. Not sure this is good.
      In any case, a home-schooled child has access to clubs of all kinds when they can socialise with like-minded children in a motivating environment.

   9. I think the point here is to have Male peers and Role models outside the house as most men work 40+ hours a week this makes home schooling a less viable option because women would be doing much of the teaching.
      Maybe women could be taught to home school children from K-4th grade but at grade 5+ interaction with male peers in a competitive environment is paramount . Yes to Uniforms, (ROK emblem would cool on a uniform.) Yes to separate classes for boys/ girls and possibly separate schools, yes to arm guards. No ribbons, trophies, awards, etc for showing up.

      1. You don’t need peers at school. Competition can be had at any Judo school for not much money. Children don’t treat school as competitive anyway, and even if they did the established school system is a leave no child behind institution. Which really means all children are held to the standards of the lowest performers anyways. Home school is valid and superior to all but perhaps the most elite private schools.

   10. You are missing the point of socialisation.
       For the human trash the point is learning its place in life. The lower class area with lower class people who do lower class nonsense and eat lower class junk food.
       For the middle class it is the “higher education” so they can be the most productive version they can possibly be. Work a lot, make a lot of money. They are our worker drones and they should get used to the idea of career.
       Most readers of this blog will be in this box.
       For the upper class it is again their proper place in life. How to lead. How to balance all the good things in life with some form of duty. 16 hour work days are bad but 16 hour no-work days are worse. You have to have some sort of mission. Even if it is only 1 hour a day it is important to have. Money is of no importance here, it is assumed to be there. Social contact, to grow up with the future elite is the key of upper class socialisation.
       Home education is only good for the social outcasts and the few members of the lower class who do not really belong there. Those may benefit from not having their children trained in trashdom or as worker drone. But where would those children fit in? For the upper class they dont have the money nor the contacts. For the middle class they might lack the work&obey mindset that is mandatory for a corporate career. For the lower class they will know too much.
       The life of a social outcast is a hard one. Think long if you want your children to end like that. The pyramid we have, is not going to change. If you try to step outside the system you are on your own. Few can do that. Even fewer would want(!) that.

   11. I have had 4 experiences with homeschooled individuals (one was my ex wife). Out of those, 3 of them came from very fundamental christian faiths. Due to their faith, they believed they were not allowed to socialize with non believers. So they ended up being weird. The 4th was a kid who came from a family that just didn’t like the school system. He socialized normally, and did plenty of activities with other kids outside of school, and ended up just fine. So my theory has been, if there is a weird religion involved with homeschooling, you’re going to have a weird kid. No weird religion, then you’re fine.

       1. Yes, this was what I was going to say. I am a Catholic monk, so I’m not opposed to religion being wholly integrated into one’s life, including the homeschooling experience.
          But many religious home-schoolers, especially eccentric Evangelicals, raise their children with a “bunker mentality” towards the outside world, when they should be raising them with an “I pity the fools” attitude (not so much haughty as genuinely aware of their degraded quality of life). Sometimes these “bunker” children turn out very odd, indeed.

   12. I’ve seen modern schools place so much emphasis on socialization, that the children learn very little else. I believe that a child at 1 year of age should begin to learn their parents language plus two other languages. I also feel, that children should begin to read at the end of their third year. This can be done easily, (I know I have my latest test monkey at home) but not if the mother is on the phone or computer all day. Personally, I would love to toss other women’s phones in the garbage, when I see how much they ignore their children for the phone.

7. Children are calibrated by parental example. Unless you want to isolate your children from their social environment (which is hazardous), they should probably still be exposed to schools (preferably as many as possible) – but strictly and only for the academic purpose of understanding social and power dynamics. They must learn the social system without becoming a part of it.

   1. For social reasons, one can sign up the children for sports teams, Scouts, summer camps, and the like

   2. People always bring this up, forgetting the fact that herding all the children off to a compound where they are rigidly separated by age, regardless of interest or ability, is itself a completely unnatural and anti-social act.

8. Another thing you might add to your list. Not entirely sure where it would fall though: Homesteading. Has elements of some other areas you already covered.

9. Pole dancing fitness should be sport for girls.

   1. Squats should be mandatory for each and every girl.

10. This is wonderful.
    But seriously, if this were a real program, I’m 100% on board to teach Mathematics, Economics, Econometrics, Astronomy, Statistics, basic Aerospace Engineering, as well as helping as a legal resource from the administration side.
    I plan to homeschool my future kids (I’m hoping for her first positive pregnancy test in the next couple months), but I’m not at ALL attached to homeschooling. I will do so out of necessity with the feminist/Marxist influence infecting schools. The best option by far, though, is putting my children in a small Red-Pilled school taught by other men of character.
    Homeschooling is not as bad as it sounds, but I have observed that some children will either over-adsorb or over-reject personality traits of their homeschooling parents. This can easily lead to weird beta-tendencies or weird social defects in homeschooled children, since their only regular influence is a parent. Girls need a range of feminine women to emulate and boys need a range of alpha males to emulate.

11. C’est rigolo comme article. Mais je crois que ça va pas être de la tarte à mettre en place… Peut-être quand la télé sera devenue de l’histoire ancienne.

12. Hang on, why no mention of lgbt awareness? Are you sure you’ve thought this through?

    1. “It was at that moment that the other commenters fell upon Michael Mobius, and slew him with great fury; nor was any part of him left whole.”

       1. Just standing up for the silent minority.
          Now school uniform wise ….leather chaps, acceptable on a hot day?

          1. I’m getting off Disqus before I turn into a pillar of salt.

          2. don’t look back at those leather chapped arses . I’m confident you can resist the urge

    2. One look at Bruce Jenner provides enough awareness.

       1. you mean when Bruce turns up on career day to provide an inspirational example for the young ‘uns

    3. As in aware that LGBT are mentally ill?

       1. it would be an interesting class

          1. Probably fall under “Developmental Psychology”. I could probably teach that segment, discussing schemas and Erickson’s hierarchy of needs. Wish I didn’t sell my textbooks now.

          2. That’s interesting stuff. Wasn’t that maslow? Erickson is really interesting though as he explains how we can fuck up our lives even after childhood – his stages seem a bit rigid but they’re probably on the right lines.

          3. Right. Erickson had developmental states. Maslow had the heigharchy, and Harlow abused monkeys. I was multi-tasking (making a 3d model of a train & station), so I got them a bit confused.
             Psychology won’t find the fly in the room, but it will allow you to hear it buzzing.

          4. Cool. Harlow was a right cunt wasn’t he. What was it cloth mummies or something? That’s almost worse than being brought up by a single mother

          5. Yeah, Harlow had cloth surrogates and [email protected] machines. Ironically he was trying to find the psychological roots for (maternal?) love, if I remember right.

          6. Rape machines? I think I might have blocked that bit out from my memory
             Damn it I’m scared to research that one, in case I accidentally stumble upon some monkey snuff porn or whatever

          7. It was waaay back in the early 60s -ish, so they didn’t photograph that aspect of it. Just the hilarious surrogate mommy monkeys: https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2c5fb00afad6328db7d8f064ce04d6f7d18a9ca54920ba18df74a51e26c7f19e.jpg

          8. Cloth mummy’s got a sexy smile – quality monkey MILF
             I do hate what he did though, even if we learned something

13. Soccer should be included, but not the lib soccer mom variety. It should be more of the hardcore street soccer variety that most of us who either lived in ethnic enclaves in America or didn’t grow up here played and appreciated. The other idea that can help is, while team sports should be encouraged and a coach should always be in charge, I suggest that every now and then let the students take charge of the teams. And let’s try not to emphasize participation too much on age categories. Instead, kids as young as 12 should be encouraged to participate with the older kids. I know it’s crazy but hear me out. For one, it helps the younger kids gain confidence by playing with the older kids. Plus it’s helps the older kids gain leadership skills by imposing discipline on the young ones.
    And yes, school uniforms all around lest you want incidents like this:
    http://www.vice.com/read/high-school-crop-top-dress-codes-send-the-message-that-school-is-for-boys

14. Should we include a Kratom course in the mix, for the older kids, of course?

    1. And courses in how to balance electrolytes.
       It’s what they need.

       1. It’s what they crave.

15. Why can’t girls go abroad?

    1. They already are a broad.

       1. I meant why can’t they go overseas

          1. They can go over Cs if they work hard at their feminine courses.

          2. LOL Ethan and Marcus 😛
             Taryn

    2. The idea is to raise a girl to delight in home-making, in her husband and children. Girl study trips abroad do not advance this idea; there is a big chance the girl will be seduced by some foreigner, by the illusion of space and freedom and abandon the program, becoming an unhappy woman forever searching for something she lost and can never find again instead of a happy and fulfilled wife.
       The good and healty need for adventure and excitement must be carefully directed in different directions for boys and girls.

       1. Thank you for responding — it is an interesting perspective.

       2. I guess it depends on what year they spend abroad. If they stayed with a host family at 13/14 would be better than if it was 16/17. The older you are though the more you would appreciate it. While she might hook up with a local boy/s, I don’t think too many girls are going to drop out of school and live in the foreign country with no resources or family,
          “unhappy woman forever searching for something she lost and can never find again instead of a happy and fulfilled wife.”
          I think a year abroad with a host family that approves of the principles of the school would be less threat to the above than modern TV shows, movies, celebrity lifestyles, emotive marketing, influence of friends from other schools, then the influence of university life back in her home country.

16. “Should our teachers use corporal punishment?”
    Only as a last resort. Chances are, the students attending this school wouldn’t be the sort so unruly where this ends up being a needed option.
    “Should there be an uniform?”
    How individualist do you want these students to be? Uniforms aren’t for individualist minds and personalities. If there isn’t to be a uniform, a dress code may be a recommended option.
    “Should girls be able to attend the school at all?”
    The article more or less answers that question.
    “Should they have common classes with the boys?”
    I’d have to defer to expert studies on what would yield the best results. Some classes may demand gender integration at certain points in time.
    “Should we aim at awarding a diploma that complies with international standards?”
    We may have to if it we want it to be recognized by any institution, academic or not.
    “How close should it be to the Prussian Education system?”
    There was an ROK article about that. Just saying.
    “Who among our eminent writers should teach and which subjects?”
    I’ll defer to others.
    “Should the school be guarded by armed security? (Our program would
    make more than one feminist froth to the mouth and create more enemies
    that we already have.)”
    Yes. I’d also consider adding firearm usage to the curriculum.

17. it’s a fantastic idea…. as long as employers etc aren’t allowed to discriminate against the graduates of the school.

    1. colleges are the ones who would discriminate against a high school. We need a RoK-U too. Or RoK trade school, to teach advanced skills in the fields they will already be familiar with if that suits them.

18. A very lovely thought. But it will never happen. The powers that be will make damn sure that anything even remotely like this is shut down immediately.

19. Hey Roosh, why the hell would you put sth like this up in Africa?
    Of the cuff, I can identify South Africa, Kenya and Nigeria. In any case, I think most Africans are conservative anyway.
    I’ll say, keep it in North America and Europe. Unless, of course you’ll be running it as a Franchise in those territories. Again remember the Rule of Law in Texas is not the same as in Timbuktu.

20. History and Geography are inseparable. It horrifies me that people know “Hannibal was from Carthage”, yet have no idea where Carthage IS!
    One of my students asked why The Schlieffen Plan took the coastal route and was astonished to discover that the Southern route would involve something called “Alps”.
    Students watching “The Patriot” were baffled by the my mirth over the “sunset” on the South Carolina coast. I was dismayed that they could not name the ocean on the same coast.
    Few, if any wars have been won by commanders who did not know where they were.
    Geography wins.

    1. Correct. Consider, for instance, that England’s geographical location has helped it not be invaded since 1066. Yet at the same time being an island with limited resources forced its inhabitants to go out and become a naval power. Or the difficulty the Marines had in dislodging the Japanese from Iwo Jima due to them using the island’s natural geography to their advantage. And so on. Plus, combining the two should make the process more interesting.

    2. “Few, if any wars have been won by commanders who did not know where they were.”
       That could be ancient chinese proverb

       1. Confucius say, “He who stands on toilet, gets high on pot.”

          1. that’s very true. And knowing the layout of the bathroom is the key to a successful shit

          2. Don’t forget the Squatty Potty.

          3. Foundation training for every future battle

          4. Hah! Ehhh…thank goodness it’s almost Friday. My brain is about finished for the week.

          5. yeah, weekend is good

    3. But combining them into one course lowers the quality for both subjects

       1. I have to disagree with you on that point! I found that combining the two actually INCREASED the value and learning experience of both subjects.
          Students of Geography & History often asked “Why do we have to .. ?” When the lessons were included in History lessons, the answers were obviated.
          I also included Geography in Economics lessons. Alfred Thayer Mahan’s “Choke Point” theory was quite apposite in macroeconomics. It only took about fifteen minutes out of a class, but increased curiosity about both subjects. Satisfying curiosity is (at least) one of the major functions education.

          1. Well seeing as you have hands-on experience perhaps you’re right

    4. I always found geography a lot easier to learn and memorize simply by studying a country’s history. Give me a map and every time they mention cities or landscapes, I would just look at the map and eventually know the area

21. So it’s basically an updated version of the Spartan agoge, but presumably without the severe beatings, starvation, and pederasty, and more focus on a well-rounded education, and hopefully segregated by sex?
    I can get on board with it. Personally I’d stress more maths and science, but then, I have two degrees in maths, so I would say that.
    As far as religion goes: teach the basics of Judaism, Christianity, and optionally Hinduism/Buddhism/Shinto. Islam is not a religion, it’s a political ideology dressed up as a very nasty Christian heresy and should be treated as such.
    The oral eloquence component should stress “Laconic wit”. The Spartans really knew how to come up with great insults.
    Corporal punishment? Not totally a’gin it, but not crazy about the idea either.
    Uniforms? Absolutely required.
    Armed security? Duh, of course.
    An international diploma? As long as this can be done without compromising standards, why not?

    1. please don’t say Judaism. it is just as bad as islam if not worse

       1. Rabbinic/Talmudic Judaism, is indeed a rather perverse thing – but it should still be presented. The tenets of authentic, pre-Christian Judaism, while “primitive” by modern standards, are significantly more humane than the later, anti-Hellenic schools of Islam.

          1. i think i mostly agree with you but i would like to point out the large difference between modern day judaism (by modern i mean since the Babylonian Talmud to today) and the religion that moses started.

          2. Yes, that’s what I’m saying.

          3. oh, I guess I didnt understand your first post there

22. Should the sex ed for boys also include instruction about escorts?

    1. In that case, classes about birth control should be a given, if only so they don’t get the clap from some shady hooker.

23. Look to the Greeks and Romans: young men should be instructed in arms and letters. This is what makes leaders.

24. I had discussions with a close circle of friends about setting up a private school that touches on the above points. Glad others out there are thinking along the same lines.
    You could expand the subjects and go in depth with a quite a few: economics (especially the roll of central banking), IT, classic literature, basic military instruction, philosophy, etc… Give the older students responsibilities for tutoring and security of the younger students.

25. <— that one right there will be one of the first students. i send him to a catholic school just to stay out of the public school cesspool.

    1. You’re not alone. I read awhile back the half the students at catholic schools these days are not catholic.

    2. God bless you and yours!
       I’m a Catholic myself, and I gotta say: make sure that Catholic school actually upholds the standards you expect. Some of them now are rather leftist, and I think all the diocesan schools (or most of them?) have adapted the Common Core standards. God save us.

       1. as far as i know the only school around here that doesnt use common core standards is a secular private school that is waaaaaaaay out of my price range. i keep a very close eye on what he brings home and wouldnt hesitate to inform the school that he wouldnt be taking part in works that goes against our morals and values.

26. Sign me up as a teacher. I’ve given little kids an adult level of focus, effort and work ethic.
    As for corporal punishment: I used to be very much for this, but after having my hands tied around my back for years I’ve found other mental work arounds that get the job done. Stefan Molyneaux makes a good argument about using violence against children and what it does is it sends a message to the kid that “because Im bigger than you I have the final say” which robs the child of thinking critically.
    However, if there is corporal punishment, the decision to do it must be delegated to someone outside the room. Kids can do shit to make you nuts and though I’ve seen everything, every once in a while they get under my skin, therefor I dont trust myself to properly dole out corporal punishment to my own student.

    1. If you hit a child simply because you’re frustrated that he isn’t cooperating with your wishes, then it sends that message.
       But if a child is hit in response to a clear breach of morals/justice on his part, in a spirit of charitable and corrective justice, it teaches hierarchy, respect for legitimate authority, cognizance of consequences, and the association of iniquitous behavior with both the physical pain of punishment, and the psychological pain of disappointing his respected elders.
       I understand about the temper. A character flaw with my temperament, is to have a very long fuse… but, when the fuse runs out, I can literally shake with anger. I always feared that this would be my greatest weakness as a father; the struggle to control my temper and not be too harsh on my sons.

       1. I disagree with just about everything you said ace. not because I’m some sort of child protector, but because I see a huge upside in not whacking the kid and having him or her follow you for your intelligence and consistently positive results from your advice or commands. it took me years to get this good and a lot of nonviolent fuck ups along the way.
          before I ever started teaching, I just knew that if I ever had kids I would be violently abusive to them. nice most of the time, but when things get thick I would do physical harm which would in turn harm their behavior and relationship with their father.
          I’m not saying never hit your kids, but you’ve got some work to do.

          1. You’re not saying to never hit your kids, so, where do we really disagree? I said a child should not be hit as a first resort, or for light matters, but I said physical discipline had its place for serious infractions. I also think very young children will only really respond to the very concrete nature of physical discipline… though, obviously, physical discipline should be light corresponding to their size and innocence. I disagree with Molyneaux’s assessment that this causes children to think “I’m bigger than you” equals “I get the final say,” especially if they find that they are disciplined for lording their larger size over littler siblings/playmates. It is just as likely to reinforce that the “final say” goes with having greater authority, responsibility, intelligence and even love, if administered correctly.
             Molyneaux’s view is obviously consonant with his Libertarian prejudices against authority, “the initiation of violence,” etc., which I find erroneous.
             What “work do I have to do?” This all seems very uncontroversial.

27. How could the curriculum omit Music and a mandatory course on the appreciation of good whiskey and fine wine?

    1. Senior honors course?

28. Two suggestions:
    Under athletics add swimming.
    Outdoors for female children to include basics of growing things, weather, climate, animal husbandry, identifying plants of medicinal use.

29. Fantastic article going to sticky this. I’d also add engineering which though inferior to the hard sciences, is still very practically useful nonetheless.
    Scientists [proper ones] create and envision a new system.
    Engineers fix our piece of shit current one so it runs okay.
    Both are necessary.

30. My kids go to similar schools/kidergardens to the one described. The difference between them and regular schools is incredible.
    Another value that is important to teach and is missing from the article is nationalism. The feeling of belonging to one`s nation and culture, identifying with it’s past and future and commitment to improve the present.
    *Should our teachers use corporal punishment?
    That’s the parent’s (important) job. Corporal punishment must be administered out of love and the kid must feel that. Otherwise it becomes just an exercise in pain resistence with no lesson actually learned.
    *Should there be an uniform?
    Absolutely, it promotes discipline. Self discipline is one of the biggest traits one must aquire and the ritual of getting (properly) dressed is part of that.
    *Should girls be able to attend the school at all?
    There must be separate schools for boys and girls because of the different curricula, different way of learning and thinking between boys and girs, the imperative to prevent physical relationships between them (which are detrimental to learning and damaging). Such are my kids schools and if I wasn’t completely convinced before about the necesity of separation, once I got to know them from inside I was won 100%.
    *Should we aim at awarding a diploma that complies with international standards?
    Yes, even though most likely the leftist establishment would refuse to recognise the school even if the students would excel at international standards (and they will excel)

    1. Nationalism is very important but rather difficult to teach at an ‘International’ School.
       Unless it would operate in a few countries and each school would emphasize that nation’s history, identity, and culture.

31. Good luck getting fathers to send their daughters to your school while the boys are taught game. I agree with most of the article but I would only send a son there.

32. Oh my ! Oh my ! If all children go to your school, I just have one question. Where are we going to get the sluts, like in your top photo, from ???

33. Missed a biggie.
    Want to have something to do that your son thinks is cool. Cuz face it, a teen never thinks his parents are cool. Teens think their parents are the biggest retards and most oppressive and loathesome creatures on earth. Don’t idealize.
    You missed the only thing. GUNS. !!!! Take your son hunting or to the shooting range. COllect guns together. I started with that when he was a teen. That was the only thing he really wanted to do with dad. But even today, years later, we constantly email each other about prepping, guns, etc.
    His major original talent, fortunately,was mentioned above. Foreign language. He made sure he learned decent Japanese, the language of his mother. But even there, no thanks during teen years for the trouble. It is only now when he is on scholarship in Japan that he is thankful. Before it was always, “My childhood was ruined because I had to learn Japanese.”
    But back to guns. Just make sure you keep them locked up. Some kids will try to take them out with their buddies in the woods.
    Forget leaving guns handy for self-defense while you have kids at home. Lock them in a safe.

    1. Fixing cars would fit into that

       1. My shooting range buddy is also a car-fixer-upper. He and his son have rebuilt three cars with junkyard parts. Ukranian father. He grew up under communism. Had to do things himself as state repair people took 6 months to show up.
          I think the only thing I have on him is gardening and permaculture. They are a smart damn family. I am a little envious at times.
          But our sons also like shooting together, so we all go together.
          I hope Roosh can get his men’s group into something like the 19 century Men’s Lodge. I would sponsor, but I work in a very public sector PC job. I would be a sitting duck for feminazi doxxers.
          Stuff like that will be on my retirement plan.

    2. I think a large part of the reason why teens have this view towards their parents, now, is because egalitarianism, hedonism, rebellion and a generally contrarian spirit are corrupting morals (in addition to social atomization and the breakdown of family ties). Youth have not always felt this way towards their parents; but we now pander to youth with “youth culture,” and raise them up to think that they are already sufficient unto themselves, morally, culturally, philosophically, etc.; thus, they do not look to their parents and to adult culture as something which they should be eager to enter with as much decorum and grace as possible. We can restore such a culture (with difficulty).
       Also, it is unnatural for youth to live as children until 18; our school system helps to foment this problem. Not that long ago, young men (and also women) were held to nearly adult standards, and given nearly adult responsibilities and trust, as they entered adolescence.
       That said, of course they should grow up with guns!

       1. The genetic program includes some rebelliousness naturally. And it can be channelled into the son looking for better ways of doing things than the father. I am pleased that my son, knowing I was enlisted, wants to be an officer. Another example was my uncle, critical of my grandfather’s lack of mechanical ability in the 1940’s, became a tinkerer and improved the operation of my grandfathers backward way of doing certain things on his dairy farm..
          But pop culture encourages the rebelliousness and self-righteousness with nothing to back it up. For example, my son was critical of my old beat up car and our moderately priced house.
          Now he understands that it is these sacrifices on our part that allow him to go to college without debt. But I really had to take a lot of crap over the years as I was the one who said no when the family wanted to spend money.
          Funny. We never paid interest on credit cards as we paid off all at the end of the month. If you man up and so no, then when you are older, you actually have a some money to spend. Just pay off that mortgage when you are young if possible. Eat at home !!!
          My wife can now depart from our hinterland “backward city” and go see an occasional Broadway play. And I can buy a couple of firearms a year for my collection.
          Not much, but I do not worry about debt when I put my head on my pillow at night.

          1. Debt-free is one of the best freedoms you can have. Debt and theft are the bases of the modern economy.

       2. Basically kids aren’t allowed to grow up

          1. That’s exactly it. We don’t prepare them for adult expectations in their early teens, and we have a society that fosters their dependence until the mid-twenties at least. Perpetual adolescence is the result.

34. To add: courses in formal logic and rhetoric.

    1. That’s number 2) Oratorical arts and eloquence

       1. Technically, oratory is different than rhetoric. The former deals with presentation while the latter deals with constructing an argument for maximum persuasion with minimum logical fallacy. Closely related, but not exactly the same. For example, many would say that Obama can be eloquent as an orator, but his rhetoric is unpersuasive to anyone who thinks critically.

          1. I see what you mean – they do mention “how to establish an argumentation based on facts” which can be expanded into rhetoric then.

          2. True, probably a minor quibble on my part.

    2. I always thought rhetoric was the oratory skill of persuation that would include ignoring facts (truth) in order to win the discussion. In fact, I recall reading the lamentation of the death of philosophy (the persuit of truth) when it was over taken by rhetoric (learning to win the arguement) even in ancient Greece.

       1. I think that you could ignore facts in rhetoric, so long as this does not result in logical fallacy.
          For example, suppose I’m trying to prove that your car ran through the stop light, hit me, and it’s your fault. I may be able to ignore lots of factual truths: the color of the trees, how many pedestrians were there, etc… because they are irrelevant. Good rhetoric would not include these details because you would lose the narrative.
          I also may even be able to ignore some relevant truths. For example, if I was distracted because I was playing with my radio, and I may have otherwise been able to avoid the accident, I still may be able to ignore this and persuade if my burden is to show only that you ran the red light and I can actually show that (also assuming that my act of inattention wouldn’t be a defense for you here).
          What wouldn’t be proper is to ignore that I had a red light and ran it, and your light was actually green (presumably I might be able to say this because you would have said that you didn’t know what color the light is). Even if I could win by ignoring this fact, technically, my argument is based on a logical fallacy (affirming the consequent fallacy – if you run the red light, then you would hit me; you hit me, therefore you ran the red light – fallacious because it’s possible that you hit me because I ran the red light).

       2. I should also add, our concepts of what these things are has likely shifted over time since ancient Greece. I’m not the authority on these matters and have no power to proclaim what is or is not within any of these categories. I’m just a guy who makes his living using oratory, rhetoric and logic, and conceptually I have always understood, and been taught, that they are different things with different purposes that should all be combined. You may be correct about how the Greeks saw it.

       3. Yes, and some of the Church Fathers also had trouble with the concept of rhetoric. St. Augustine was a teacher of rhetoric, and famously left it behind in disgust at one point.
          However, the Church had a reconciliation with it, refined and elevated as a part of the Christian trivium. First one learns on the level of grammar – the basic, building blocks of information, which have to simply be memorized. Then, one learns on the level of logic – being able to think about the basic elements of knowledge, to analyze them and to apply them to original and abstract thought. Finally, one learns on the level of rhetoric – being able to explain truth and reason in an effective and appealing way. So long as one did not separate rhetoric from truth and reason, it remained authentic rhetoric. But, to speak persuasively from a position of ignorance, this was condemned as shameful.

          1. Thanks for the reply. I always enjoy your ingsights.
             I have seen rhetoric being used in the lecture hall that simply was not based on fact and simply dismissed it as a manipulation tool to gudgeon the audience.

          2. Yup. That’s pretty much how Plato/the Fathers viewed it.

35. Excellent idea – I wish I had gone through this school instead of the awful sedentary prison we call our public education system.
    Seriously, this is an idea worth developing.
    Religion: Though I personally would want a Christian perspective, not all neomasculine men are Christian and we should respect that decision.
    I suppose optional theological classes is a good solution.

36. On corporal punishment, I have no problem with it, but creative teachers would seldom need it. If you have a trouble maker, pick the biggest, meanest kid in the class and send them both to the boxing ring for some extra lessons. Bonus: this teaches men how to get others to do their dirty work if needed.

    1. You are right. For boys.
       For girls corporal punishment is very important. It teaches them that in marriage and in life men aren’t gonna take their shit without punishment.

37. Going into university this fall for a classics major and maybe more-> in 3-4 years I could teach history with a focus on Antiquity. I’m very qualified but I’m sure the Board will be the judge of that.

38. Maybe include a “Right of Passage” as well, give the young Man a Gun and have him return with a Lion Fang, or send him off to live in a Remote area and have him survive on his own for awhile. Something that will be a Pivotal Point where the Young Man accomplishes something and Immediately Recognizes himself as a Man and other’s Recognize him as a Man.

    1. This would need some drone monitoring, but otherwise, a good point.

39. “Girls will not be allowed to travel abroad.” Gave me a good laugh, good call.

40. This is great in theory. Hockey and Lacrosse should also be sports that are encouraged, good team work, individual finesse, and strength are all rewarded. Lots of physical contact, brings out the man in men.
    I personally went to a boarding school and it completely changed the way I thought and forced me to grow up much quicker. No parents around to wipe your ass, do your laundry, make you do homework etc. It was a sports based school so if your homework wasn’t finished, no hockey that night. Also, rooms were to be clean, beds made etc. If someone pissed in the hallway, the whole dorm would be doing pushups at 2am in the cold until somebody confessed.
    Great ideas men.

41. I’d be more than happy to teach shooting and outdoor activities. Sign me up my friend.

    1. Bring ’em muskets, Donovan.

    2. I’d love to take a shooting course, and to renew my bushcrafting skills. I was in boy scouts, and was always winning the fire-building, knot-tying, tent-raising, etc., competitions, but now I remember so little of it.
       I still build a good fire; lights the first time, every time. Now, if only I could remember all my lashing, knot-tying, tracking, etc… those really were the days, and looking back on them I often reflect on the saying that “youth is wasted on the young.”

42. Can we teach there too?

43. Why would they not offer cooking, art, or sowing to males? Can you name one famous female chef? Cooking is a male profession! Art is also most certainly a male profession. Name one famous female artist (and no, female pop stars aren’t, because none of them can write their own music, let alone good music). Tailoring is also a male profession. Dressing like a retarded slobs is part of the ways feminists try to bring down men…
    Where is Philosophy, Military Strategy, Music (oh wait, art isn’t for boys according to return to the middle ages), etc.?
    Lastly, this better have forensics. And no, not CSI forensics, I am talking about Speech and Debate Forensics…

44. Personally I don’t think girls need to be educated past grade 8.
    Many girls start riding the cock carousel starting in high school, so the best thing to do is to remove them and have them exclusively home schooled by their mothers in feminine values. Or have them attend school exclusively for feminine values, home economics and female sports (gymnastics, squats etc.)
    There really isn’t much reason for any girl to know trigonometry. Fact is that girls start their dreams of having a career and therefore destroying society in high school.

    1. Amish have it right

    2. Most men don’t need to be educated past grade eight. Neither my great-grandfather nor my grandfather were, and they were both very sharp, very literate, very competent and very successful men.

       1. Disagree. Times are different now. Every man should know a little Calculus, economics and basic programming.

          1. Economics and programming, I agree with you; and the fact is that my ancestors managed to go from living in a dirt-floor tent, with no running water or electricity, to managing five separate farms and establishing a trust fund with a few million dollars for their children over the span of 50 years. They knew how to manage money and assets well, despite ending their educations in grade school. Also, to be clear: I’m talking about a system that raises standards back to what they were, then – when the average fifth grader could write more elegantly, and with a more varied vocabulary, than most college graduates of today.
             You can easily teach kids basic economics and programming by grade eight. As with my grandfather and great-grandfather, many of the most important lessons about money and work are learned in “real life,” not necessarily in the classroom.
             Calculus, not at all; I’ve never used anything beyond basic algebra, and can’t envision having to know anything more than basic trigonometry, if I manage to successfully acquire the funds to build my own house/hermitage. Men with the talent and desire to pursue a career in something more specialized, can go on to study higher math, specific sciences, particular arts, etc. Most people will never really use anything beyond the tools of a basic education – reading, writing, arithmetic – and we need to move away from a society that requires everyone to spend 16 years in school (with increasingly diminishing results).

          2. I partially agree. I did all my advanced math classes (Calculus I, II, linear algebra) in an enriched program, where we covered double the material, just out of pure enjoyment. I always loved the elegance of mathematical problem solving. Got top grades. Did extra homework to the point that the teacher once asked me if I was preparing for a contest.
             Do I use it now ? Nothing besides the high school basic algebra. What is even more scary, over 15 years later, I do not remember any of it. However, it probably helped me to develop a mental work rigor that I would not have acquired otherwise and the confidence that I am able to understand complex concepts if I put my mind to it.

          3. Oh, I wouldn’t say a word against the benefits of doing higher math. But many men are actually incapable of understanding it well, or temperamentally are not suited to it; the problem with requiring it, is that you force a bunch of people who don’t want/need to be there, to be there. I think all men need arithmetic and basic algebra; past that, I’m happy to reserve it to the men with ability and interest. I’d even encourage men to challenge themselves, need it or not; but I wouldn’t require them to take it.

45. Learning a second language should start at a young age. My cousin’s daughter in Romania is 5 years old and she speaks Romanian very clear and is already learning how to speak English. By the time she reaches 7th grade, she will get to choose which language she wants to learn as her 3rd one. In America, second languages are barely even taught. It’s a damn shame

    1. Music and languages should both happen early; and, if they do, math will be much easier, later on.

46. Dude, I want to learn a lot of this. I´m 33 and will probably have to spend my own time and money to learn a lot of this. I would join a university in a heartbeat!

47. Dude, I want to learn a this too and I´m 33! I will probably have to spend my own time and money to learn a lot of this curriculum.I would join a university course in a heartbeat!

48. Hahahahahahahahahaha! I can think of several ways the state can bleed this project with a thousand cuts. They won’t quash it outright as it would be too obvious. But bleeding it with a thousand cuts? …….Hmmmmmm!

49. There should not need to be armed security. A basic level.of military training (armed and unarmed combat, close order drill and basic squad level tactics) will be part of the curriculum, as all men should be prepared to take up arms in thr namen of their country.
    High school Juniors and Seniors will have acquired sufficient martial training to protect the students in event of an active shooter scenario. Additionally, the military instructors teaching these skills will be combat veterans, who can respond to situations.

50. Really need someone to explain why ROK has such an issue with females working. I guess none of you have daughters. Is anyone here really OK with their daughters having to rely on a population full of femenine/gay/roid-raging/gamer/stonner “men” for food?

    1. Because contrary to popular feminist belief, you cannot really “Have It All!(tm)”. Take a career, you have to at least to a certain level neglect the family. With one parent doing this you can get by, with both it’s a recipe for having your kids raised by others and turning into horrible human beings as a result. That’s why.

       1. Just because they are educated doesn’t necessarily mean they have to take on a career. Her having the option of a career can be good if her husband/baby daddy/whatever runs off or dies or she can go to work after the children are raised.

    2. I have yet to understand it either and I’m about as old school as you get. While it would be better for one parent(wife) to stay home with kids the modern world is what is, I would rather have daughters who aren’t convenience store clerks or waitresses on the night shift at Waffle House. Even if the plan all along is for them to stay home it is still better for them to be educated instead of being ignorant heathens. They may wind up being educated heathens but if they got knocked up by some of these so called “alpha” males, with proper education they could look after themselves.

       1. The problem is that you can’t just get an “education” these days. There are a slough of things that go along with it, overwhelmingly negatives.
          If you could simply send your daughter to get an education, given modern circumstances, I’d say I’m not absolutely opposed to the idea. But, you have to consider: 1) no “education,” is occurring; only “credentialing,” and we should be working overtime to undermine and abolish the current establishment of accreditation; 2) college is far more about the most vulgar kinds of hedonism, nowadays; your daughter will probably learn more about alcohol poisoning and gonorrhea than she will about any particular, academic field; 3) she will spend her prime years for begetting children, doing something else – perhaps something that will even damage her fertility and permanently damage her ability to pair-bond.
          I could go on, but you get the idea. I agree, men need to be raising competent sons worthy of decent women. There’s no point complaining about feminism if you’re not helping to provide the alternative… but, that’s obviously an uphill battle in this degenerate culture.

          1. Everything is an uphill battle in this degenerate culture.
             While I understand and somewhat agree with your point, this ain’t Afghanistan, they aren’t going to get married after 6th grade. There’s no way to control all the choices of daughters but, there’s no point in growing them up to be ignorant. All that can be done at the present time is to raise them the best you can and send them on their way.

          2. I hear what you’re saying; I just don’t agree that this is all we can do. Traditional folk can network and make better arrangements.

51. I have a degree in history. Always wanted to teach, but hated the liberal academic nature.

52. I disagree with the curriculum that girls shouldn’t study aborad. My wife and I plan to send our daughter abroad for pretty much the same reason RoK encourages doing this for men. It helps to empower them to see all the flaws in the USA that the media/brainwashing teaches them to ignore and also enriches them with a respect for traditional culture.
    This could be accomplished by what is known as reciprocal exchange. A student in an RoK school in Poland would come to the USA and vice versa. As useful as these schools can be, the fact is that much like Homeschooling that the author decries as not socializing kids, a school can’t totally isolate children from the culture around them. They’re going to have to leave and do battle. They should at least be aware that there are OTHER cultures out there before taking that beast on by themselves.

    1. Please – don’t. Sending your daughter thousands of miles away will bear a huge risk. She will want to experiment and will possibly ride on a cock carousel like many western women do regardless of what their parents tell them. Also, why does she need higher education anyway? Shouldn’t you as a true red piller prepare her for traditional life as a mother and wife? Education will only get in the way.

       1. I agree with this with these caveats.
          Unfortunatley, in an ideal world, we should do things one way but in the present world, we have to be flexible.
          One idea I had is that with existing reverse discrimination against whites and males, a woman with a reasonable education (hear me out) could be used as a “beard” for her husband to qualify for women and minority contracts. She could, if she has the skillset, open a “minority woman” owned company and hire her husband as a contractor and get him work he couldn’t otherwise get. I wish I had done this with my wife.
          Another minimum educational requirement, sadly, is that I don’t want my daughter waiting tables or working as a clerk for minimum wage while career ho’s get a lot of money for BS work. This doesn’t mean she should buy into the whole career woman paradigm but in the present culture, she could become qualified to do something that would provide meaningful, spiritual work. For example: A small animal veterinarian. Dental assistant. Nursing.
          Keep in mind that even as we’re red pillers, there are many men who are scum out there, or beta male wimps who are unreliable, etc. I don’t want her to hitch her wagon to an unsure thing but that doesn’t mean she need jump all the way into feminist career woman mode either.
          Regarding remote education: I don’t mean a woman going to west germany or Italy and slutting it out at a disco with Syrian refugees. I mean going to a traditional Polish or Ukrainian secondary school and absorbing that culture to help resist westernization.

          1. Sorry, I don’t follow. By putting your girl out in to the world like that you are exposing her to all the BS that our modern culture has. There is a huge risk that she is gonna be poisoned by that culture. Sending a young girl thousands of miles away is as irresponsible as it can get. You wont be able to control her. Trust me, I fucked many expats, a lot of them from traditional estern european families. Needless to say that many of them dropped their pants on the first date. Don’t treat your girl like she is an exception to the rule – most likely she isn’t, because she is still just a little stupid girl. Women must be controlled. Never let them off leash.

          2. This begs the question: If you could get Eastern European girls to drop their pants with you on the first date (even a few), do you look down upon them? Did you contribute to the net decline in culture? This is a paradox I often see on RoK: PUA advice and marriage/relationship advice in conflict with each other. Of course, I know that there are ways of managing the conflict but still, doesn’t this seem to be a conflict?
             I thought about this when reading some other blogs with more mainstream content and men saying they wouldn’t want a sexually experienced woman. My own experience has been that the more experienced women tended to be better adjusted than the “virgins”, so to speak: Career women or ambivalent women who had waited until their late 20’s or 30’s to think about starting a family and had a LOT of hangups about men and sex. Women can get “blueballs” too, so to speak. NOTHING was worse than dating a woman in her early 30’s who had almost never gotten laid. Really.
             Another factor to consider is upbringing BEFORE letting them loose on the disco scene. I’d like to send her overseas to a Ukrainian school in her tweens (even in Ukraine, it’s rare for young girls to get started that early) and under supervision of grandparents. Give them exposure to a different culture but in carefully controlled doses. Compare and contrast to the American way which is to keep kids in the same schools and regions and at home and the first taste of a “foreign” experience they get is when they go to college. It’s much like sending children out into the forest to fend for themselves and look for gingerbread houses for food.
             I personally don’t mind my daughter having sex with a boyfriend before marriage provided she’s being treated with respect, she feels emotionally secure, and she’s safe (uses condoms, careful about her security, etc.) Oh, and of course, the boyfriend shouldn’t be some PUA out for a BS pump and dump, of course. But generally, such people are easy to spot because they don’t want to meet the parents and spend time with them.

          3. To answer you first question: no, I didn’t look down on them at that time, but right now, as my red pill philosophy gets stronger, I kinda do. Because, let’s face it – a virtuous woman would never sleep with a man on the first date.
             If you want to send your daughters to Ukraine for a little while – then do it. I don’t see how this will benefit them though. They will still graduate in America. And we both know what colleges in the States have become – a breeding ground for SJWs. You really want to take that risk?

    2. Well, I imagine fathers must loving hearing unsolicited advice on how to raise their daughters, so here goes:
       A woman really should not be unchaperoned in her own town during her period of highest impulsivity, fertility and susceptibility to peer pressure… let alone left to her own recognizance on another continent. I would urge you to find a more controlled method of exposing her to cultures – arrange for her to stay at a convent with some supervision, or take a longish vacation with her, etc.
       I understand what you’re saying about battle, but that’s truer for men than it is for women. We should strengthen our daughters as much as we can, but we shouldn’t ask them to stand and fight like men, because they aren’t men. American men, especially, have the idea of the competent, frontierswoman wife; but women will rise to their circumstances. If your daughter was a frontierswoman, there’s a good chance she could be raised to stand tough in that way. Send her to the back country of Peru, if you want her that way! But if you send her to Amsterdam, don’t be surprised if she comes back stinking of Amsterdam. She’s not a man; don’t ask her to fight the battles that even many men fail to win.

       1. Oh, I agree with you that Amsterdam, or France or Britain, would be a terrible idea. What I see now with friends is that they send their daughters and sons to Russia and the East even before they hit puberty to spend time with grandparents and relatives. They become exposed to a different culture that teaches them an important lesson that is the first lesson of red-pillism: That the gynocentric USA and Western Europe is not universal.
          I find it shocking that in the states, a lot of parents send their kids to EXTREMELY expensive local summer schools hosted by universities to try to get resume candy for college admissions (it’s a waste.) Instead, send them for the summer with trusted relatives to see how real people live outside of the western welfare state.

53. A solid list. You may want to add a music course or two, with classical piano and/or guitar lessons. Learning the guitar as a kid was one of my favorite things and there are proven benefits to the brain of those who learn instruments.

    1. I second this. A good list for sure, but the musical arts would be a great addition.

54. Something must be done to break the 19th Century model of education we’re condemning our children to. The entire system is now corrupt, and higher education is even more corrupt. Why do we employ an educational system that is antiquated in a 21st Century world?

55. The big joke is that this type of curriculum was standard in many western countries, especially the UK, until the 70s. Britain used to be an empire, which they achieved by teaching traditional and masculine values to their kids. Now they have gay rights and have to fight to keep Scotland in the Union.

56. This is so pathetic. A bunch of nerds, virgins and basement dwellers that want to bring back patriarchy and suppress women, because they can’t handle the modern world and don’t know how to deal with women who are not submissive and obedient.
    Probably the same type of losers that go after Asian girls, because they are submissive and hate on white women, because they are big fat losers who can’t handle a woman like that.
    I’m pro masculinity, but this is just pathetic.

    1. >I’m pro masculinity
       >oppression
       >patriarchy
       >ad hominem ad hominem ad hominem
       >you men just can’t handle a strong independent woman
       Step up.

       1. Given there is no significant IQ difference between men and women, is there any need to completely suppress career options for girls? There seems to be this idea that traditionally women never worked, but this is a clear myth – in low to medium income families, the necessity is that the woman works. I support traditional gender roles, but my grandmother and mother both worked to supplement the family income, finishing in time to pick my sister and I up from school. I had a very traditional upbringing nonetheless. If there is no significant education for girls, you teach them to be lazy hangers-on, much like a member of my family who recently said her life plan was to ‘find a rich man.’ By exercising variety through the workplace, there’s no need to exercise variety with affairs and toxic friendships with their galpals.

    2. You’re pro-masculine, but you find the idea of men organizing to return to higher standards of education pathetic?
       A man would also have taken the time to explain exactly what about the article involves “suppressing women,” or evinces our inability “to handle the modern world,” rather than lazily asserting it amidst a flurry of purely emotive insults… as a woman might do.
       If you find the site so pathetic, imagine how much more pathetic it seems, to waste your time reading it and complaining about it.

57. I’m an elementary school teacher. Where can I submit my application?

58. I sincerely hope this project can eventually come to fruition, I for one would jump at the chance to send my future children to a school like this one.

59. This article is so thought-provoking, I may have to write an article in response to it.

    1. Go for it. The subject was so vast that I had to remove some chunks for the article. We should to dig into this.

60. Boys need to be taught dancing too. Dancing instills extremely important leadership values. … When you say “dancing”, you ARE talking about ballroom dancing, right?
    Math should go up to basic Algebra. The central principal of algebra is about how to work with something complicated by breaking it down into simple components. Don’t you dare think you can get away with not teaching that.
    Lastly, you seem to be writing off extracurricular clubs as “not my problem”. Don’t be such a wuss.

61. Restricted Internet access? Why limit something they’re going to use a lot

62. If this ever gets off the ground (And I get in better shape in the coming years and get the necessary degree) I’d like to teach American History and show some of the Red Pill men involved (William Bradford, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, etc).

63. girls love art class. all of them do for some reason. I fuckin hated it

64. I would like to apply for a teaching/teaching support position. I have a background in law, martial arts, military, history, english, philosophy and ethics.
    That and I’ve had to fight for everything I have in my life at the minute. Real life lessons to pass down.

65. I’ll happily sign on as a teacher at this school. Qualifications and references from teaching in traditional schools available. Enquire through private message or email.

66. Boys will learn the game and play sport and girls will serve them…sure you wish

    1. girls will all be serving men in Europe soon when the muslims take over.
       that’s what happens when you destroy the white Christian family unit

       1. again only in your wet dreams, open your eyes women are not slaves anymore

67. I wish this school was real and around when my daughters was younger. Instead I taught them myself, with my wife dealing the feminine aspects, but had I had access to any school with such values, I’d have sent them.
    But looking at schools, I had a tendency to find the head teachers too stupid and the ideals useless.

68. Uniform no, strong dress code yes. Solid game requires some expression, but limits should be had. Solid color uniform polo-style shirts with a front pocket (preferably in the school’s colors of course), solid blue (or black) jeans, since hands on skills classes tend to be rough on dress slacks. Perhaps a changing room near the hands on skill classes to get into more courser wear.
    Also, while the girls need to be taught to be feminine, boys should be taught to put family security first and not to be fucking around or abusing their wives, as this disrupts family security. Is the bedroom boring? Work on making it better, not fucking your secretary or other mistress (unless your single of course, then hit it and quit it!)
    Girls should be taught household & financial management, basic home & auto repair, computer safety & usage, how to manage retirement savings, first aid, in addition to other useful skills around the home. The man of the house, after all, will be at work or performing other important tasks and shouldn’t have to shoulder all the simple repair duties for things like a light bulb or killing a spider.
    Subjects should be broken up into core classes and career path; core classes should include English, basic math (up to Algebra) and science (A&P, basic physical sciences), various hands on skills like auto repair and home maintenance, proper behavior for men, and PE.
    Career path courses can be broken up based on desired field: Mechanical, Biological, Technological, Financial, etc… as prep work for real college careers.

69. Note that most of the subjects, excepting foreign language and game, were considered proper education in ancient Greece and Rome. Back when men were men (Well, except for Rome around 100ad.) The rest of the article I didn’t get through.

70. Arts?

71. Interesting article! Unfortunately there is no legal way for Germans to school at home except to go abroad but – if affordable – a private school like this model would be very attractive for some parents. It saddens me that so few parents that I know even consider taking their kids in a private school, let alone consider the value system that their child is being imbued with in the state funded schooling system.
    It is time to dismantle some of the anti-homeschooling arguments.
    Personally I’m pro-uniform for schools, as children shouldn’t be distracted by provocative outfits and obsessions about wearing the most expensive, latest hipster clothes.
    I find this topic most interesting and I wish to see more (positive) articles on education. For example how homeschooling can look like and what was good in the Prussian Education system.

72. This .. is kind of stupid. Dystopian.

73. No thanks. Homeschooling is fine!

74. The cooking photo is so cute! Haha.
    It looks good. I’m excited.

Comments are closed.