Black Lives Matter Protesters Shut Down Milo Yiannopoulos’ Speech In Chicago (UPDATE)

This past Tuesday, Breitbart’s Milo Yiannopoulos was slated to speak at Chicago’s DePaul University as part of his Dangerous Faggot Tour. Unfortunately, angry SJWs and #BlackLivesMatter activists invaded the event and shut it down, threatening Milo with violence and attacking and harassing attendees (yours truly being one of them). Their success was enabled by the DePaul administration’s refusal to allow security and police to eject the disrupters from Milo’s speech, as well as the political connections of one of the rioters.

For the past year, Milo has been touring the U.S., giving talks at college campuses where he espouses his conservative, anti-PC ideas. The Dangerous Faggot Tour has been met with consternation and outrage across the nation, as hypersensitive left-wing crybabies throw hissy fits at the thought of someone to the right of Karl Marx being in their vicinity. Students have been driven to “tears” by Milo’s speeches at universities from Pitt to Michigan, and one particularly upset—and obese—protester at his UMass Amherst talk was dubbed “Trigglypuff” by the Internet due to her epic meltdown.

The cancellation of Milo’s DePaul talk is the first time that his whiny, triggered enemies have succeeded in shutting one of his events down. However, while the petty partisans of #BlackLivesMatter may have won a battle, their success in depriving a gay man of his First Amendment rights—as well as DePaul’s support and encouragement of them—have hurt them in the overall war. Much in the same way that the leftist-instigated riot at Donald Trump’s Chicago rally helped propel him to victory, Milo’s loss in the Windy City benefits opponents of the left.

Timeline Of A Mass Temper Tantrum

20160524_1847581-1024x576

I attended Milo’s speech with some of my friends, and it began normally enough, with the man himself being introduced by the DePaul College Republicans. However, 15 minutes into the speech, a pair of black rioters—one male, one female—stormed the stage and took control of the mics. They’ve since been identified as church minister Edward Ward and DePaul student Kayla Johnson; the latter’s mother is the Chicago Police Department’s Director of Administration. Additionally, the protest was organized by S.T.R.O.N.G., a radical black leftist group:

For the next half-hour, Ward, Johnson, and a few other accomplices took over the room, blowing whistles and heckling the audience with chants of “FEEL THE BERN!” and “DUMP THE TRUMP!” while the audience jeered them back. One of the event organizers called both DePaul security and the Chicago police, both of whom refused to eject the protesters, having been ordered by school administrators to hang back (and the latter probably influenced by Johnson’s mommy being a high-ranking public official).

The police’s inaction was even more insulting considering that several days before, DePaul had attempted to shake down the College Republicans for more money for security. They were forced to pony up an extra $1,000 for increased security under threat of cancellation, which Breitbart paid for. Said security did nothing as a pair of leftist radicals hijacked an event that had been paid for and physically threatened Milo on multiple occasions.

After attempting to wrest control back from the protesters, Milo announced that he would be heading over to the president’s office to get some answers as to why security weren’t doing their jobs. Both his fans and hecklers followed him outside, where a horde of social justice warriors had assembled, chanting “RACIST, SEXIST, ANTI-GAY, MILO GO AWAY!” and other hackneyed slogans:

We followed Milo down the street, as he occasionally climbed onto a bench or terrace to guide us. Along the way, I watched leftists physically attack Milo’s fans. One of my friends also reported that the SJWs were stealing Trump hats from people who were wearing them:

A few minutes later, one of the protesters, a fat redhead (UPDATE: the woman has since been identified, see the update at the end of this article), assaulted me and tried to steal my phone after I jokingly told her she needed to drop a few pounds (the second clip in this montage was provided by Daniel Duerst):

After we reached the next building, Milo vanished. I later found out that he’d tried to reenter the room where his speech was supposed to be taking place, but was denied by Rico Tyler, the Associate Vice President of Diversity, Empowerment and Inclusion. Afterwards, fearing for his safety, Milo left the scene in a car. After returning to the student union, my friends and I left for a nearby bar.

Meltdown In The Windy City

milo-attack-1

Following the end of the event, Milo’s fans and free speech activists took to the Internet, leaving negative reviews of DePaul on the college’s Facebook page and contacting the school’s donors. DePaul President Dennis Holtschneider issued a half-hearted apology the day after in which he sided with the protesters and effectively told Milo he was asking for it. While none of the leftist protesters were arrested, Chicago police arrested conservative journalist Jeremy Segal (aka Rebel Pundit) at the behest of one of the school’s administrators. Both Breitbart and the College Republicans are demanding to be refunded for the money they spent on the event.

Put simply, the leftist attack on Milo was a massive disaster, both for the protesters and DePaul University itself. Free speech activists have been working overtime to expose the corruption at the heart of American leftism, and with leftist rioters having attacked a Trump rally in Albuquerque on the same night as Milo’s speech, America is getting to see what these ambassadors of peace and tolerance are truly like.

UPDATE (5/26/2016)

katie-o-reilly-6

The woman who assaulted me has been identified as Katie O’Reilly, a DePaul student, left-wing activist and contributor to feminist site Feministing.

katie-o-reilly-11

I have filed charges against O’Reilly with the Chicago Police Department and will be obtaining a warrant for her arrest tomorrow. Anyone with more information about her is encouraged to contact them or me.

Read More: University Of Manchester Bans Breitbart’s Milo Yiannopoulos From Debate On Censorship

400 thoughts on “Black Lives Matter Protesters Shut Down Milo Yiannopoulos’ Speech In Chicago (UPDATE)”

  1. Just have to love how the champions of “First Amendment/Free Speech” are the first ones to do any and every thing they can to make sure anyone with a view that’s remotely contrary to theirs’ can’t get that viewpoint out.

    1. “But it’s hate speech, so it shouldn’t be protected the same as free speech!” /Derp.
      What these fucktards don’t understand is that it is ALWAYS the unpopular speech that needs protection. No one is ever going to try to shut down the speech everyone agrees with. The only reason to have the first amendment is so that you can say controversial or infuriating things.
      Again, take careful note of what a college education gets you these days….

        1. These days it’s more like “crippling debt and a few life-ruining false rape allegations.”

        1. That’s right. I hate it when a feminist opens her mouth to utter a single word, so by their own definition, it’s hate speech.

        2. The fact that they can be yelling/foaming at the mouth while accusing someone else of “hate speech” is truly amazing.

        3. The Left is trying to redefine “Hate speech” to mean disagreeing with them. It’s the modern analogue of committing blasphemy. “Hate Speech Laws” are the modern “Anti-Blasphemy Laws.” Different word, exact same thing.

        4. Blasphemy laws come from religion. Many atheists blame “religion” for blasphemy laws. We are seeing that their theory is disproved. Secularists are just as driven to commit purges, crusades, and persecution in the name of their ideology. Their ideology and their behavior becomes indistinguishable from what atheists blame religion for.

        5. It really IS like a religion in that any contradictory point of view is “evil”. I hate it.

        6. This.
          One hundred times over.
          People dont realize that the problem is with the types of people and not the vehicle they use to push an agenda.

        7. 1984 is the Leftist Playbook. They re-define everything to make it fit their agenda. “Our hate is speech; your speech is hate…” is straight Ministry of Truth.
          Kind of like how you can’t be racist against white men, and how a refugee can never rape a white woman. It’s just a “temporary suspension of privilege.”

        8. I’m a skeptic and I agree. That’s why my philosophy is in the realm of Libertarianism. I just want to leave people alone, and be left alone. I believe in the right to self rule, and think large governments only exist to force others against their will. Most atheists are deep down authoritarians. The most oppressive governments tend to be atheist or Islamic.

        1. “my room mate Lori Is getting paid on the internet $98/hr”…..!ti130ur

          two days ago grey McLaren. P1 I bought after earning 18,512 Dollars..it was my previous month’s payout..just a little over.17k Dollars Last month..3-5 hours job a day…with weekly payouts..it’s realy the simplest. job I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months. ago. and now making over hourly. 87 Dollars…Learn. More right Here !ti130u:➽:➽:.➽.➽.➽.➽ http://GlobalSuperJobsReportsEmploymentsMachineGetPay$98Hour…. .★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★::::::!ti130o….,…

      1. Nein. Fighting now is what the Jew wants, what they have been trying to kick off. They want an excuse to bring martial law into play. To deploy military troops against the citizenry that threatens them.
        You will see ever increasing violence in the months to come. Every single police action will be trumpeted by the Jewish media as “rayciss” to encourage more blacks to attack white. A massive BLM riot, a full Category III Chimpout, is planned to surround the RNC in Cleveland. They are demanding blood, trying to goad us into acting while they still control overwhelming military force. But now is not the time to give them what they want.
        Soon. Trump is the last champion of free men, and the last chance for a peaceful end to liberalism.
        Should the Jew succeed in having Donald Trump assassinated – and men like George Soros will stop at nothing to make this happen – then we purge the nation with fire and blood.

        1. Their “violence” and “protests” amount to nothing. They are weak and cowards without a flag to rally around.
          Remember a couple of months ago? “the biggest day of protest in the last 100 years march on Trumpo Tower”- A few hundred went on a march, took some selfies and then went home for dinner.

        2. The Bern Victims and BlackLootersMatter mercenaries under the hire of George Soros are but a minor threat individually. They’re fodder, intended to catch bullets that should be aimed at their masters. The real threat are the ones that pull the strings, control the media, and pick and choose what topics get ignored and which ones their obedient masses get angry over.
          Lives can be ended by a single stroke of the pen when the left calls in the order through propaganda and lies.
          Those “nothing” protests are still fully capable of shutting down political speeches and private events through violence and intimidation. The leftists are so deep into power they can prevent even the police from responding. Just ask Milo how “powerless” these people are.
          It is far past time to start executing people on the street… but as I said… now is not the time. It’s what they want. We will give them the death they deserve… but not yet. That comes later.

    2. Historically, this is business as usual for communist/leftist agitators. They proclaim free speech and right of expression as they trash gatherings of other political groups, but cry hate speech, discrimination, and demand gov’t laws against people who call THEM out.

      1. I have heard the black protesters are using what could be called Maoist techniques.

        1. Thats because students with an IQ under 89 are naturally drawn to stupid shit. Like socialism.

        2. IQ measures ability to focus on small things so I’d argue the opposite or your calling natural conservatives (blacks) stupid

    3. You’re decades behind if you think these scum care about “free speech” or “tolerance.”

    4. This isn’t about free speech. It never was. Its about power and the blacks are winning.

      1. It’s not blacks, but rather sjws that are winning. All you need a a vehicle for x or y group to relate to and you can drive people to do what you want them to do.
        This has been happening for ever.

      2. The Jew is winning. The blacks have been nothing more than puppets and shock-troops for decades.
        The negro has been weaponized.

  2. The “Associate Vice President of Diversity, Empowerment and Inclusion”
    Are you kidding me man?

    1. Just be glad it’s not yet the “Unquestionable Emperor of Diversity, Empowerment and Inclusion.” Because that’s what these fucks want.

    2. six figure salary with benefits you private sector hacks can only dream of…
      As a former University employee let me just throw these out:
      2 hour lunch breaks
      22 paid vacation days per year
      12 sick days per year
      14 paid holidays per year
      full medical insurance (daughters stay in NICU cost me $200)
      8% of my gross salary was automatically put into a 401k by the state at no cost to me. I matched it with 7%. Fully vested immediately.
      There were so many 6 figure people in admin, associate directors, assistant directors of this bullshit or that. Every public university has to make its payroll available. Check the salaries of people at your local public university if you don’t believe me.

      1. This is why we need to see a serious drop in enrollment in these universities. That kind of perks is unsustainable.

  3. I’m not sure where to stand on this article. Some aspects seem to clearly be cherry picking to illustrate the BLM group as the ignorant aggressors, and while this may be the case, the article gives no reasoning behind the intended aggression. Guess I’ll need to do my own legwork. Free Speech defending is still an oxymoron so I will agree that it clearly was impeded.
    Only been living in Chicago for a few years and have noticed a few things. There are a surplus of women in many of the high paying professions in medicine and law. The city is also a transitory space, so a lot of people treat it like a loving hooker, good for a quick fix and to show off to people who don’t know said hooker, but guaranteed relationship that will end at some point. Think it was the only city to actually decrease its population size in 2015. It also reaks of contradiction to have the BLM group being supported by the police, especially with how adament the group is about police being a threat and the cases involving the police in Chicago this year alone.
    Decent article overall by you Matt, but I’ll try to fill in the blanks. Either way the BLM group has been shooting themselves in the foot and if trends support facts, will not be long before they start saying we are only seeing the bad BLM members not the good ones. Just like the feminists.

    1. The reason is made clear by what was obviously their only goal. To shut down the event. To silence other points of view. When your side has no reasonable argument. The only thing you can do to win, is to intimidate the other side into silence

      1. A good point. These moves by BLM members (good ones or bad ones) is to silence the other side. There is no real debate. They are clearly motivated to enter an area (public or private), interrupt it and cause it to shut down (to silence any other opinion). It’s political terrorism is what it amounts to…you only need to read a little history.
        No debate, no talks…just enter an area, make a lot of noise so no one can speak and disperse the crowd.

        1. But you know what…even criminals in this country have rights. What’s going on here and other schools is just UN-American.

    2. Well. Having watched the full footage of nearly all of his stops on this tour, I can say that the general theme is reasoned debate on ‘inflammatory’ subject matter. He blends jokes and statistics, and his detractors generally just sit in the audience yelling random b.s. about ‘hate speech’ (trigglypuff) or decide to make a more direct disturbance, as in this case.
      I’m not sure which blanks you’re referring to? In what circumstances before have BLM activists been somehow ‘triggered’ or otherwise provoked into storming a podium and ripping the mic out of a speaker’s hands?
      If you mean the other events that attempt to further give credence to the rabidity of the mob, I press you, why?
      I didn’t even pay attention to that part of the article, as its something we’ve seen many times before (did you forget about meetup day?!) and have grown to expect.
      But the blatant restriction of free speech is something that deserves to have the light of day shone on it.

      1. Much like meetup day, I think 99% of the protesters there were completely clueless who or what they were protesting. There is some irony in the fact that mainstream media, the government, the church, the school administrators, modern medicine, corporations, etc. are all distrusted today but these people blindly fall in line when one or two people tell them they need to show up and protest a group of evil racists or a blonde Aryan who wants to end diversity (who knows what they said about Milo) and the kids never investigate themselves or use any critical thinking.
        The scariest part to me is not that these people are necessarily opposed to ideals we believe in like order, strength, unity, but that they are blindly following leaders in the belief that they are acting righteously. That’s a very dangerous trend.

        1. What is wrong with today’s youth? In my day, we would take bingers, pop in Dark Side of the Moon, and watch The Wizard of Oz with the volume turned down

        2. What’s wrong is they were raised in a bubble with minimal negative situations and maximum supervision. This is why many of them can barely tie their shoes but don’t know how to do basic maintenance on their car.

  4. We need to start systematically contacting alumni and using lawfare against universities that allow this. Maybe right wing students can ‘occupy’ (haha) administration buildings.

  5. This is what happens when it becomes a faux pas to slap a ho.

        1. correction: Who had the misfortune of marrying this harlot?

  6. I saw the complete footage via youtube. I dont like Milo because he is a faggot but I must accept that he was the only one there with some balls…..and that is an irony.

    1. Many people need to realize that if one person can be stripped of their rights (free speech) then we all can be stripped of them (speaking as a U.S. citizen). I don’t agree with many people (some at times, others not at all) but they do have rights.
      What we are seeing, today, with this group (BLM) is nothing short of hypocrisy.

      1. It seems mostly like a power-struggle to me to establish a victimization hierarchy among the perpetually offended uber-sensitives.
        We know wealthy white women are at the top of the pyramid, but then who’s next blacks or gays? (Of course, no one outside of women really matters the rest are only a means to an end, but groups like BLM sure as hell aren’t about to give up their excuses for bad behavior, cultural failure, and continual perpetuation of more of the same non-accountability for what they allow in their communities).
        And do those who aren’t in lockstep with the progressive global socialism agenda even count? Looks like a no, so hypocrisy isn’t even a thing so long as it furthers the “cause” for which any atrocity may be overlooked or even later glorified in revisionist history.

        1. I think it’s becoming dangerous when you see black people taking away the right of some one else (anyone else) when they were in that struggle not long ago. We’re seeing a divide among racial lines and Milo is white so he’s on the other side.
          Again, I don’t agree with him (sometimes) and others…but they still have rights (as Americans or U.S. citizens) living in this country.
          Another point: the segregation of schools…because it’s something that this groups wants as well. Again, see the problem that we had in this country 50 years ago…and we’re back to it?

        2. I really think you nailed it there, it’s not that they went after a gay guy, they were going after the white guy that dismantles their flimsy arguments.
          As for segregation, people segregate on various lines naturally. Every culture does it, and it’s just like any other time one tries to legislate behavior, doomed to fail from the start.
          We can say, you can’t prevent someone from coming here or living there, but you can’t force acceptance and you can’t make them live there if they don’t want to. That just breeds resentment on both sides, as it has.

        3. All other groups are allowed to do it…except whites. You have many different cultures, races, etc…in this country and they are all allowed to group in their specific community. But it seems that when whites do it, it’s just wrong or evil.
          Even hiring practices are bad. Whites hiring whites is racist. But I see plenty of other communities doing it and it’s ok (it’s networking or other when they do it). I always thought it’s “who you know” that gives you a leg up….plus talent.

        4. Well, that is due to our white male privilege, we just can’t see it y’know because it’s so cleverly designed as to be invisible in our floating palaces filled with golden bitches, diamond flatware, and kratom swimming pools don’t ya know?.
          Really, I think too many folks buy into “free floating guilt” and that a majority do that because they are well-intentioned and good-hearted (maybe a few are also afraid of going to hell) that we feel having enough or more for ourselves is somehow dishonorable if we aren’t generous to a fault as well or if one of our ancestors did something we now determine as “bad” and think we owe something for that. In a lot of ways we’ve went along with the charade and are too concerned with “being liked.”
          The core problem with it is that it is the first step to unraveling liberty, individualism, and all of our society it would seem.
          “Hey, Government decide for us how we can be free and righteous and what we have to give up for it!”

        5. I agree. If someone has the money to live somewhere, he should not be denied the right to live there if he chooses to do so. However, the government should not be forcing the lowest common denominator of people (of any race, but ghetto blacks are the most prominent) to live somewhere where they simply will not fit in.

        6. They fought against segregation and then they formed BET and BLM, which segregate themselves.

        7. I would start with segregation along sex lines. I find that men (black, white, whatever) quickly develop a fraternity when they are all thrown in together without the influence of women. Then strength, intelligence and skill matters. You see this illustrated in sports in particular.

        8. we have that- its called Catholic school. Surprised they havent forced integration of all the boys n girls yet

        9. That’s true. I’ve had conversations with my younger brother who went to an all boys catholic school. He would tell me that he could only remember there being maybe two fights during his entire four years at school. While at a public high school there are at least two fights almost every week. Women always bring unnecessary drama. Nine times out of Ten, Either they influence they initiation of a fight or they create the situation from which a fight occurs.

      2. It is more than hypocrisy. The US (and Europe as well) are slowly becoming in a dictatorship.
        White male: Im proud to be white and male = racist, let’s throw him to jail.
        Black male: im proud to be black and male, let’s kill all the white people = Barack Obama, ‘President’ of the US.

        1. It’s subtle…but I think it’s been an attack on a couple of different fronts. The media doesn’t help and feminism has done it’s job, too.

        2. The non-white races deep down know they’ve on the path of self-destruction most of the time, the thing is the Powers that Be are using it to make them think they can take down the white race with them… Depopulation agenda goes on.
          Media does what they are paid for, and as for the so called feminism… They’re bent on destroying the female as well as the male. Look behind the curtains.

        3. Hell, I’m white and this song cracks me up, especially while I’m living in Hawaii!

    2. Milo is gay but he is trying to save men from the matriarchal hell these sociopaths are trying to create. I respect him more than most straight men.

        1. A bunch of white upper-class college liberals assaulting a flaming queer that openly announces to the world how much he loves black dick as “racist and anti-gay” is actual comedy. The funny kind, not like when female “”””comedians”””” try to do it.

  7. It’s a shame to watch Black Lives Matter members not give the civil rights (free speech and other rights) to a gay man – the same rights that they fought for (and some died for) back in the 1960s during the civil rights era.
    That’s how far this country has fallen down.

    1. Black Lives MATTER hasn’t fought for anything positive. They want to be above the law

    2. BLM cucks are just a bunch of assholes for the most part…

      1. I agree. I find it funny that many of them are not marching in the ghettos of Baltimore or Chicago (where most black people are dying). They come out to universities to march, complain, disrupt because they know that they’ll get shot in the ghetto with that nonsense.

  8. I’ve said it once before and I’ll say it again. DePaul’s campus culture of Leftism is the state of many American colleges and universities. These colleges and universities train the public school teachers and administrators. Advocate for a federal income tax deduction for the entire cost of private school tuition available to all people regardless of income level. This is one way to take a huge bite out of the SJW-Industrial Complex.

    1. Indeed. Many taxpayers need to hit these schools or the U.S. government in the pocket book to combat this disease. If these schools are only going to teach in a certain manner, then the government needs to remove public funding or give tax payers an alternative. I would never pay for any of my kids to go to one of these colleges (today). They have become large daycare centers for adults.
      Also, I’ve heard that enrollment is down at a couple of these colleges due to this nonsense. There used to be a code of conduct at schools and you were kicked out when you behaved in this manner. It’s gone wild, today, with anything goes at this point.

      1. In my opinion, the best way to combat this virus is to give as many individuals as possible access to k-12 educational options of their own choice. There will be an exodus from the public schools and an increase in alternatives to the standard k-12 public school.
        The colleges, which are already “SJW converged” are using their teacher-ed programs to spread their “hivemind” mentality into the largest socializing institution in American society, the public school. The public schools are a monopoly which socializes nearly everyone in society. If you break this monopoly then, in the long term, you stand a great chance of eliminating the very institution that prepares kids to blindly adopt SJW beliefs and values on the collegiate level.

        1. People will inevitably choose what works best for them. There is a lot of dissatisfaction with the public schools. In low income areas they are violent and full of crime. Administration of these schools promotes this via lax discipline, mind numbing bureaucracies, and the bogus idea that “all kids have a right to an education.” Other problems include trying to have kids of all talent levels and abilities in the same class which only “retards” quality instruction thus achieving the SJW holy grail of “equality” of education for all.
          There are many more issues but they’re too numerous to mention but parents know something is not right. By the way, many of these problems are sourced from the Federal Department of Education. The federal government has it’s claws in the local public school via regulations and mandates.

        2. I’ve told many young people to home school their kids, send them to private and then have them learn a trade. Colleges are infected with nonsense, today. They used to be great places to learn, grow, debate, etc…but now they are large adult daycare centers. Too much money wasted.

        3. Bang on.
          “…trying to have kids of all talent levels and
          abilities in the same class which only “retards” quality instruction for all thus achieving the SJW holy grail of “equality” of education for
          all.”
          And then the resentment. The kids being held back blame the system and the other kids and the kids being shown their inferiority everyday blame the other kids and the system and it just goes on repeat. Only as adults they then become activists over the fictionalized “systemic inequality” that made them “feel” bad because their shortcomings were right there and undeniable for so long and shit goes full retard.

        4. Theres a clip on u tube featuring the director of Detroit’s school system. He is functionally illiterate. He might be gone by now, the vid is six years old

  9. Since she physically assaulted a gay man…that makes her actions a hate crime. 😉

        1. I think it is. Adult Swim has been shit for so long I’m surprised that anyone watches it anymore.

        2. That thing with the meatball was kinda funny its first season. Or maybe I was just really young and laughed at a talking meatball with a funny voice.

        3. Adult Swim already denied the rights for a final season for that show, which pisses many of the fans (including myself) off to no end.

        4. Yeah, that was a decent show the first season but after a while it got repetitive in it’s inability to be funny.

        5. All those shows you mentioned are forms of degenerate entertainment. They exist to make low grade, vulgar “comedy” which demeans the human mind and soul.
          Yet even smart people still choose to fill their minds with this bile.

        6. No argument here. I recognize them as a vice and minimize the amount of time I spend watching TV in general. Just like smoking and drinking, I am mindful not to become an addict. Typically I watch maybe less than an hour a day after everything else is taken care of and I’m winding down before bed. Mythbusters has been my go-to show lately.

        7. I remember friends telling me about how funny that show “family guy” was/is and I saw a little bit of it only to cringe at the deconstruction of morality,tradition and utter vulgarity of it.
          I loathe to see otherwise good men poison themselves. It is very subtle how it works its way into your mind. Before you know it you are regurgitating it’s subliminal messages and thinking you are funny like the characters on the show.

        8. Futurama created their own maths equation for one of the episodes. The writers consist of professors in STEM fields. I’m going to have to dis agree with you on the vulgar comedy remark.

        9. Because one show has one episode that has a math equation, suddenly modern television with stations like comedy central are not overwhelmingly vulgar comparatively to just 30 yrs ago?

        10. Futurama isn’t a modern show.
          I hate modern TV but I’ve watched every episode of futurama and I consider it to be funny, whitty and clever show.
          You don’t have to like it, that’s your choice but i suspect you haven’t watched many episodes.

  10. I hope I’m not the only one who think Milo is only a poser and a tool. Seriously, why would a fag like him be a Republican alt-righter other than to gain political traction or be a token minority to be used for whatever the higher-ups in the alternative right want him for.

    1. Because there is more than one issue in this world. And that one isle that gays so loved. They won. The fact that most gay men see the idea of marriage as a joke, can now be noted. The few who have marred, almost all of them have marriages that are so open they are a joke

      1. Oh please. Ever heard the fact Milo uses an army of interns to write his articles? The man’s a tool. Plain and simple. He’s the token minority and gives legitimacy to the gay agenda.
        Marriage today in itself is a joke. You’d best accept that fact.

        1. Cunt trophies all round then. I understand your point. You have a gay, british born half greek half ethnic jewish, religiously christian, right-wing republican espousing your viewpoints, openly proclaiming to be against everything you’re against and that’s uncomfortable. So you declare him a charlatan and a poser because nothing about him makes any sense. You may be right. I see him more as a spectacle than anything else. But you must admit he fucking pisses the shit out of our enemies.

        2. That’s particularly ironic when he’s by far the most vocal and proud gay man in the public sphere.

        3. marriage in pagan religion meant the marriage between the conscious and unconscious minds within each individual psyche. The conscious is the male principle, the unconscious is the female principle. To co-depend with another was never the original idea of ‘marriage’. Then came the overlords and twisted the ‘marriage’ into today’s farce. From psychological unity to psychopathic prison. From self-realization to becoming property (man becomes property of the state, woman the property of man and thus the state).

        4. Him pissing off the enemy is great. The fact he’s likely a lying piece of shit that writes nothing his name is attached to and gives legitimacy to the homosexual agenda pisses me off, royally.

        5. Well if marriage today is a joke then why do you care that a bunch of hedonistic woofers have turned it into a bigger one? On social issues the only reason that Milo is not my world’s greatest enemy. He admits that it’s not about making an all-inclusive culture. He is the first to say that he’s a degenerate. If all gay men were so honest we wouldn’t have a problem.

        6. When he first appeared on the scene the left just kind of sat their dumbfounded completely unable to react, but they’ve defaulted to simply not thinking about it and using their usual modus operandi. Its just particularly silly given who he is this time.

        7. I doubt he believes what he says. Hence why I assume he’s a tool.

        8. He’s somewhat of a paradox in that regard. He seems to be pushing the old homosexual agenda. The one they enjoyed relatively impunitively before the AIDS epidemic where it was just a cock buffet. But the new one of gay marriage and all this other shit he’s against. While I do not like the gays and the left faggot agenda pisses me off to no end, what would be the best way to treat these people in your eyes? Sterilization? Incarceration? Institutionalization? Mandatory Pray away the gay church camps? I just don’t see it happening. Its all well and good to acknowledge the ideal – that these people shouldn’t exist, but what is logistically possible at this point?

        9. Christian marriage was originally based on the need to make children rather than the Judeo- Islamic propertarian model.

        10. He writes nothing which carries his name. He’s pro-gay even though most of us are against that. Please.

        11. That’s always been the catch 22 here, the humanity of it, the “fairness” the “equality” (which is why I side with Terry Xu on egalitarianism), especially since homosexuality was removed from the rolls of mental disorders and states stopped enforcing their sodomy laws.
          Whenever whether something is discriminatory or not becomes the default prism the outcome will always be relativistic, morally, socially, or otherwise.

        12. people had kids way before Christian version of marriage came about. Vatican sure does have plenty of real estate, and we all know what they do to kids… Then again, so do Jews and Muslims. (Institutionalized) Religion was invented so that people never find ‘god’ within.

        13. Do yourself a favor and read some of the Ayn Rand’s literature. Then realize that she was a hedonistic slut, how was open and proud of it. You’re asummie a purity of thought that one must hold on all issues or you are not real. I’m sorry it just isn’t that way in the real world

        14. The gay issue is what holds the alt-right together. Homosexuals are the left’s stormtroopers, and anyone gay who says the contrary is lying.

        15. I don’t know what causes homosexuality and I don’t really care. What I do know is that homosexuality is one of the centerpieces of degenerate leftist philosophy.

        16. I disagree. Christianity believes the Holy Spirit is God’s voice. and it’s within.

        17. Ayn Rand is one of the main promoters of degenerate, “do-whatever-you-heart-leads-you-to-do” life choices that plague the western world. I’m not a libertarian, if that’s where you’re going.

        18. I don’t disagree, you’re just not very solution-oriented in your thinking. A little too much rhetoric, not enough logistical pragmatism.

        19. the Holy Spirit used to be known as Virgin Womb or Mary… the Unconscious Mind.

        20. She’s not known for her promotion of an immoral lifestyle. her Legacy is her promotio of a libertarian political philosophy. Milo is not promoting himself as the voice of morality or immorality Milo is talking about other political issues

        21. Libertarianism and the “do-whatever-you-damn-please” attitude is what is destroying the west.

        22. Sadly I think you’re mistaking the moral from the political points of view on libertarianism . that is unless you’re into totalitarianism. In which case I doubt me and you agree on much of anything.

        23. Not Solution Oriented.. Bingo. I couldn’t quite put my finger on a term for what he is saying. Reminds me of arguing with a woman.

    2. It doesn’t matter…the man has rights in this country. You don’t have to believe him or like him. But if we start shutting him “down” or up, then who is next?
      This group has no idea how much damage they are doing. If they get their way, then they may be next…marching off to their doom.

      1. The fact we have a gay man touting our agenda gives legitimacy to the fags, which is the left’s prized heffer. Plain and simple. There’s no way around it.

        1. You’ve missed the most important part of my point. He has rights (in the U.S.)…doesn’t matter if he’s a criminal….he still has rights.

        2. He has all the rights he wants. I’m just pointing out that we have rights to and should exclude him for speaking on our behalf.

        3. What he preaches isn’t important. The fact we allow gays to run around gives the gays legitimacy, which in turns strengthens the left.

        4. You can exclude him….by not attending a private event…that is your right. If he’s speaking in public, then you have the right (or not) to stand there and listen…that’s how it works.

        5. He can say all he wants whenever he wants it. The alt-right should not be giving a degenerate the right to speak on our behalf.
          Go ahead, go to his events. You’re legitimizing homosexuality in the process.

        6. Fine. I just suggest the alt-right should not attend his events as it gives fags legitimacy.

        7. I’m personally not hung up on his sexuality nor do I plan to go to any of these events simply because they do not interest me. By supporting him, I support the freedom of speech, plain and simple. I even support the freedom of speech for the leftists as vehemently as I disagree with them. It’s their Constitutional right and they are entitled to it.

        8. The fact the right of free speech allows degenerates to spread their lifestyle makes me long for a theocracy in a weird kind of way.

        9. To each their own. A theocracy is only as good as the people running it and we all know the saying about absolute power.
          I’d prefer a decentralization of the USA with the States regaining all the power they originally had and not being constantly coerced by the federal government.

        10. Agreed.
          I have recently been watching a Youtube channel run by one Teal Deer, I am not wholly in agreement with his stances on equality for instance, but that doesn’t mean I don’t appreciate what he is doing or the way he takes down SJW/feminist bs. And the same with Milo or Rekt Feminism, or Red Pill Philosophy.

        11. If we let an enemy soldier willingly take one of our bombs and detonate it at the heart of our enemy for us…. I fail to see what you are objecting here man. He isn’t trying to Fuck you, is he? Lets say he succeeds in his quest. Then Gays go back into the shadows like they have been for 1000s of years. If your goal is to eliminate fags all together, I hate to tell you that is a futile enterprise.. If this dude wants to do the heavy lifting for us in the absence of our own successful voice. WTF, let him.

    3. I personally wish he wouldn’t talk about oral sex with black men either. But I like the non-gay stuff he talks about. What ya gonna do? I don’t like it when Cameron Diaz stars in movies but doesn’t do a titty scene. Doesn’t mean I boycott the movie. Let’s not be control freaks here.

        1. So talk about it. We’ll be happy to welcome and laud your contributions.
          Or, instead, isolate yourself in a dark corner and bitch that nobody gives us any legitimate coverage because we ‘espouse ideals promoting racism, misogyny and homophobia.’
          Seriously, think over what you’re complaining about and ask yourself if a gay man who carries a privileged-victim card stamped by the left to shield him from rebuke is someone you should be unwilling to listen to or support, even when he advocates for all of the same things you do, but does it in a manner that will allow him to spread the message sans-corporate-media-censorship.

        2. Noone is having him talk about it. He is just the one out there doing it. If one would like to Usurp him, they need to get up and do so.

    4. He’s a flaming degenerate but he’s getting out there and doing more for the anti-liberal cause than virtually anyone else at the moment. You’ve got to give him props for that, nothing is stopping any of us from doing the same as him.
      And it’s my opinion that his flamboyant personality is intentionally exaggerated for marketing/image purposes.

        1. Dude is Trolling the leftists. Its like DMX having a whole track on his album be a prayer. People with no willingness to listen to reasonable thoughts and ideas sometimes need to be trolled into such.

  11. I am curious what these Trust Fund kids will be doing after they graduate in…lessee..”African and Black Diaspora Studies”. Is there a marketplace with someone that has such skills? Will there be an entry level position opening up where they can gain on-the-job training and quick promotions? Their student loans must be astronomical.
    Milo is crazy. But i believe he does it intentionally with a purpose and…just like RooshV’s news conference you gain insight as to who the real ass holes are.

    1. “I am curious what these Trust Fund kids will be doing after they graduate in…lessee..”African and Black Diaspora Studies”. Is there a marketplace with someone that has such skills?”
      Professors that teach African and Black Diaspora Studies
      Social Workers
      HR
      Welfare leeches

      1. And with Social Work and HR they would need to further their education.
        I wonder if they will apply for the entry level “professional protestor” positions. Or as you said, Welfare.

  12. “Both his fans and hecklers followed him outside, where a horde of social justice warriors had assembled, chanting “RACIST, SEXIST, ANTI-GAY, MILO GO AWAY!” and other hackneyed slogans:”
    They are screaming this at a self-proclaimed fag? I think we’ve exposed these charlatans for the frauds they truly are (no surprise). “Privilege” is just a cover. They will turn on anyone who speaks a message contrary to them. What if we had a black lesbian out there spreading the exact same message as Milo? They would turn on her just as fast chanting “RACIST, SEXIST, ANTI-GAY, LAKEESHA GO AWAY!” while not realizing the irony of it all.

        1. I’ll just leave this 4 minute clip from ABQ NM Trump rally last night.
          See any racism and hate?
          I do.

        2. The ignorant, unwashed masses protesting a guy who wants to bring jobs back to the USA from Mexico and China. So THEY can possibly have a job. Are these paid protesters?

        3. The guy doing the yelling and waving the Mex Flag has a tee-shirt that says -“Straight Out of Sinaloa” As in the Sinaloa cartel. Just Great!

    1. A white college liberal will argue with a black man that actually lived through segregation and insist that they understand racism better than they do because Professor Goldberg explained it to them in the mandatory “Anti-White History” class they needed to take for their $200,000 Feminist Arts Degree.
      If the black man denies it, the liberal will show an open contempt for the “dumb uncle tom nigger that is voting against their best interest…”
      There is a reason we consider liberals mentally ill.

      “You will never reach the same pinnacle as a white person like me because you are black! Also, I’m not actually racist. Vote for LBJ! We love you uppity niggers as long as you vote correctly!”

  13. LOL…. so Matt Forney, white guy, told a white girl to lose some weight? And she responded by screaming YOU RACIST?!? hahhaa.. man I want to troll some of these people now

    1. It’s just a reflex for leftoids. Similar to when a doctor bangs your knee with a hammer and your leg shoots up, when a libtard is confronted on their views, the words racist/sexist/misogynist start spewing out of their mouth through a thick white foam.

      1. That’s when you know you’ve hit the jackpot and they’re paying out.

      2. I saw a girl in the club years ago and leaned over and said to my buddy, “Look at this slut here. Here ass is hanging out the back of her pants.” She turned around and said, “Do you have a problem with me being here with this black guy? You racist asshole,” and poured a beer on me. Luckily, when she tried to have security through me out, I got her thrown out. They know they can always yell racist no matter what you’ve actually said. Well, usually anyway.

        1. Sure, but you got a beer poured over your head in front of your buddy, was that really worth making your dumbass comment?

        2. After a good night of drinking I’ve got beer on me anyway. Seeing an uppity cunt get ejected and seeing her entire world shattered when she realizes her pussy pass was just rejected would definitely be worth a load of laundry.

    2. Color of skin = race
      Religion = race
      Who you identify as = race
      What country you were born in = race
      What race you look like = race
      What your parent are = race
      What gender you are = race?
      Your body shape = race?

    3. Wait a second. Matt Forney told someone to lose weight?! Now that’s chutzpah–and irony.

  14. For those of you unaware, Milo Yiannopoulos is the antithesis to Globalism, Feminism, Gov’t sanctioned racism, and censorship of free speech.
    He is a gay man who is a general opponent to gay marriage, advocates for reform of primary education systems that are damaging boys, fiercely refutes made-up first-world ‘epidemics’ like rape culture and the so-called ‘wage gap’ and entirely abhors the social justice movement.
    I’ve watched videos of most of the debates, speeches and interruptions on his Dangerous Faggot tour and must vehemently offer my support to his message and mission.
    The enemy of my enemy is my friend. And Milo just happens to be the arch-superweapon in the battle against the SJW tide of evil.

    1. We used to call that “common sense” – back when. But, you are right. Most importantly, it’s his opinion and he is entitled to it. By shutting this tour down and continuing with this tactic these SJWs or BLM members have no idea how this can turn on them as well.
      They can be stripped of their rights as well.

      1. Exactly. I’ve said this a hundred times but it bears repeating. The SJW’s and leftists are setting the precedent that will be the standard for the next few decades of forcefully shutting down people’s freedom of speech. When the power shifts to the right, I wonder how they will like their own medicine.

        1. Indeed. But my point here is that his message bears many direct parallels to our own creed – for those who cannot be bothered to research for themselves.
          That being said, yes, I too would relish the news of their mobs succumbing to the wicked trap they’ve laid for themselves. But if that were ever to occur, it would mean that the war had been lost.
          Such an odd conflict that their enemies are actually the ones generally advocating for their own right to bark at all.

        2. It IS a wicked snare they’ve set, isn’t it? Even if they lose, Marxism still wins. In order to emerge from this unscathed, we must utterly destroy the principles of socialism and Marxism without also destroying our First Amendment in the process. A fine line to walk indeed.

        3. The real irony is the police and security standing off to the side..not ejecting these people. Here is what happens next: no more Milo shows coming to your school so now it will be this group and security (with police) left.
          Who do you think police are going to go after if Milo’s tour is gone?

        4. He’s been no-platformed before, which is exactly what prompted this tour.
          But yes, it is an uncanny bit of opportunism for an anti-police group to shield themselves using the police.
          Wacky world…

        5. I should say that the First Amendment alone is a bastion of protection against Marxism itself. Their voices need not be silenced, but refuted and debased again and again.
          Their stranglehold on the availability of information is how they got to their pulpit in the first place. The more we speak, the more others will see how they have been led astray.
          Its no secret that the majority cannot or will not think independently. I, myself, led a very unhappy early life thinking I was alone in my views. I must’ve been the only sane man in the world or something. Then I stumbled across this very site one day and everything changed…

        6. It really bothers me that “peacefull” BLM protesters will STEAL the microphone from Milo and says “It all good” or some such poor English, a language they can barely speak properly.

        7. And HERE IS WHY Seinfeld et al will not perform on college campuses.

        8. Yeah, though I sometimes code-switch into such vernaculars (as they were what I grew up with) I currently question just how insane it is that a cultural phenomenon has led to a methodical butchering of the language by certain demographics in what I can only recognize as an attempt to distance themselves from white people.

        9. The 2nd protects the 1st. Just start killing these people. When they block the highway, you drive through them. When they assault you physically, you dump two rounds into their belly so they have time to think about what they did wrong as they’re dying of sepsis.
          When the liberal judges deny your self defense claim despite there being a dozen cell phone videos showing you were assaulted, two others step forward and kill the judge.
          If there are just a hundred men left in every leftist hive willing to repeat this process the problem will work itself out in just a few months.
          Cancer cannot be reasoned with. It must be removed with a knife.
          This is where blacks have real power and whites are dying out. The “black community” will defend their own for any reason whatsoever. (Because they gudboys, “he dindu nuffin wrang… he jus shot a cop!”)
          Blacks will burn down an entire city (and steal all the malt liquor and air jordan’s in a five mile radius) and threaten to execute every cop in the city because of the slightest perceived offense, or because George Soros paid them to do it.
          Whites won’t even help a fellow countryman being robbed or raped on the street because “it’s not my problem.”
          It’s time to make it our problem again. Nothing is going to get better until leftists are hanging from the lampposts of town square like decorations on Christmas morning.

        10. >Their voices need not be silenced, but refuted and debased again and again.
          The left has been refuted thousands of times. They learn nothing, because they are immune to logic. They are a cult that relies entirely on emotion and feelings.
          If the simple application of logic could defeat religion there would be no religion.

    2. Milo has also aligned himself with Roosh on a few occasions previously

        1. I didn’t mean to suggest anything official (or recent). I haven’t heard Milo say anything about Roosh since the meet-up furore back in February, but I know that last year there were times on Twitter etc when they were quite supportive of the other, and I would say Milo clearly implied common ground in some of his tweets. I’m choosing my words carefully both because you’ve asked for details and I can’t remember really remember any, but I remember thinking at the time that it was a good example of what Roosh had referred to as the need to make alliances with people who were broadly on the same ‘side’. I wouldn’t go further than that though

        2. Fair enough. I’m a conscientious objector to social media, so I wouldn’t have seen those exchanges.
          That aside, I absolutely believe that the different sects of our general area of belief should unite whenever possible. Our differences are so few, and our opposition great.

        3. absolutely. Roosh and Milo are both shrewd operators. They both know the need for alliances, taking pragmatic positions etc. I have great respect for both of them

        4. Two sides to the same coin, really. Both professional provocateurs interested in getting a message out.
          I listen to other speakers as well, and I find it so remarkably ridiculous that some of them can throw their support behind Milo, yet ascribe blindly to the media-pushed belief that RV is just out to hurt women…

        5. yeah, that annoyed me too. AVFM were particularly egregious. They smelt a take-down and disappeared into the woodwork, which is bad form, and arguably bad tactics too, not least because the media storm damaged ‘the media’ and all those who kowtowed before he spirit of cucked journalism, more than it did Roosh

    3. Milo understands that the freedom he has as a gay person is the result of Western values. He also understands the rise and fall of civilizations (he studies a broad range of humanities after all). Lefty gays and imitators don’t have that kind of broad perspective; in fact they prevent such knowledge with their censorship campaign.
      If you kill all traditional Western values, and only allow the most leftist liberal values to remain, the society will eventually lead to inefficiency, strife, and chaos. This will lead, through necessity and a zeitgeist of frustration, right back to the kind of authoritarianism that rejects anti-family personal freedoms (e.g., being openly gay).
      Being a faggot ultimately cannot exist in the kind of society that SJW ideas will lead to. Milo therefore has as much incentive to prevent this slide to regressive leftism as we do.

      1. Excellent vetting. He’s hardly a Trojan Horse.
        Interestingly enough, I believe in personal liberty.
        I don’t condone gay marriage or open bathrooms, but neither do I harbor animosity toward those who are gay or gender-confused.
        The same way I’m a patriot who would defend someone’s right to burn a flag, even if I’d wish ’em struck dead by lightning for doing so.
        Free speech and open exchange of ideas are imperative causes for all men, causes that are entirely vital to our own breed of masculinity.
        And I’ll call friend anyone who stands brazenly in the face of our universal oppressors flying the middle finger and openly declaring war on the narrative, even with that goofy-ass haircut.

        1. Well said! I feel EXACTLY the same way (as a retired AF member). Unpopular “hate” speech is the speech that is most in need of protecting. The 1st Amendment is about Unpopular free speech and Ideas. This amendment is then protected by the 2nd. Everyone wearing a US military uniform knows this.

        2. You mean, hearkening back to the very birth of our nation through the means of promoting unpopular ideas under threat of death!?
          Yes, the free exchange of ideas and debate between them should expose those points of view that are found wanting to scrutiny and ensure that the truly unjust, evil, or downright idiotic are ultimately discarded.
          There is no other form of liberty.

        3. The thing I love about Milo is that he can tackle certain issues like sexism and feminism etc where any other straight white male would just be called out for being sexist or a women hater, but because Milo is openly gay he immune from this. It’s like he has a get out of jail free gay card, and is surrounded buy a gay defense field.

        4. 010110010110010101110011 = yes
          At first I thought your code was the Machine Language Time Code, but that is actually “001100010010011110100001101101110011”

    4. Well said. 100% agree. I work in higher ed and I am so thanful that I work for a private University where ALL speech is not just “allowed” but actually encouraged. The faculty and staff would probably riot if anyone were to ask for a “safe space” to hide from “triggering” opinions. The up side of this is that the left has finally unmasked itself. Their idea of free speech is little different than NewSpeak. ThoughtCrime is alive and well on the left as well. Put these people in charge much longer and we will all begin hearing doors being kicked in at night….

      1. We’re so far removed now from real consequence. If and when these types of things occur we view them from a computer monitor and write them off as nasty things that thankfully didn’t happen right here. The elites think they have everything under control, and that a breakout of violence, –whether by their own hands or of their opponents’ — can be contained.
        But there is little reason to believe that it can. I believe human nature is as it always has been and the half of the world that lies outside the West is proof positive of this. The zealotry will eventually throw some over the line.
        What good will their bread and circuses be then?

      2. doors being kicked in at night….
        Indeed. The government has created the conditions we are starting to see in America – especially with this new “See something, say something” from Homeland Security. They are bringing in many of these “refugees” that are not vetted properly so in a sense we are now importing terrorists. This reminds me of how neighbors used to report each other to the KGB in the former Soviet Union.
        The same could be said about the conditions at these colleges.

  15. whats super funny about this is that Milo is ironically very adamant that blacks have had it rough..

    1. They did at one time…but so did many white people and others in this country.

      1. I’ve always pointed out that every ethnic group has had it rough in varying degrees in the U.S. Unsurprisingly many don’t believe when all they have to do is open a history book.

        1. I think that’s a bit of a stretch… I’m half Mick and I personally believe that human history as a whole has been one of barbarism and deplorable action.
          But. That is simply the result of human nature and the process of natural selection… All creatures fight for survival — man was just way too damn good at it.

        2. Agreed. Blacks in America act like they were the only ones who have experienced hard times. Fact of the matter is EVERY civilization from EVERY corner of the world faced hardships and were the victims of barbarism and slavery. They aren’t special; just more recent.

        3. Which is the elephant in the room. Point out historically what’s happened at every corner of the world, and suddenly it’s a battle royal of who’s had it worse. While I’m willing to concede that some civilizations would have been better off being left alone, I doubt many of them would have advanced that much further. One need only look at the natives of Australia, Siberia, Sub-Saharan Africa, parts of the the Americas and realize that had there not been explorers who stepped foot in their territory, they’d still be in their primitive living conditions.

        4. That’s exactly where it comes from. It is the most contemporary example, and the most able to be linked to a still-existing group of oppressors. Think of how funny it would look to see a group of Jews sue Egypt for reparations.
          The part that really gets me is that black slaves didn’t start a revolution and fight to win their emancipation. The civil rights movement didn’t wrest equal rights from white people.
          White people looked at what was going on and decided to make these changes. Some agreed, and some opposed.
          Yes, the black individuals involved in these movements were brave and fought adversity to be heard (ahem. enduring-violence-to-exercise-free-speech. ahem.) but to act like all white people should feel guilt and shame for the sins of dead men, when MOST white people made the conscious decision that these changes had to be made, and so allowed them to occur at all, is sheer lunacy.

        5. They would also still be cannibals as well due to lack of food or bad growing years.

        6. “Blacks in America act like they were the only ones who have experienced hard times”
          Correction. Some of their ancestors may have experienced hard times like every ethnic group. They themselves have NEVER experienced hard times.

      2. Right, but the point is, he makes a caveat to his anti-SJW railings to say that something (something other than what’s being done now) should be done for the black community. He says that it has endured obvious damage and that there must be some form of relief for it.
        Edit: Which makes it ludicrous to call him a homophobe and a racist.

  16. the Associate Vice President of Diversity, Empowerment and Inclusion must need an extra-long business card to fit all those words on it

        1. Lol, thanks.
          Are you insinuating that Milo shouldn’t have been allowed to speak, or that his speech should’ve been protected?

        2. I can’t imagine how you could reach either of those conclusions. From what I’ve read, he was invited to speak on political topics, not as an evangelist for homosexuality. Inasmuch as “protected speech” implies a variety that’s not protected, I tend to dismiss the notion. I believe in complete freedom of expression.

        3. My confusion was in the questioning of how the university allowed “it.”
          And as per my question, I meant to inquire as to whether you believed Milo’s right to freedom of expression should’ve been upheld – whether his First Amendment rights should’ve been protected.

        4. Ah. I understand now. The thing is, as Robert A. Heinlein has written “There is free speech, but there is no free lunch.” Since DePaul is a private institution, had the DePaul administration objected to Milo’s speech, it would have had the right to refuse to host him, though I would have deplored it as a cowardly move.
          Freedom of speech is precious. So is the freedom to choose whether or not to listen. And though I’m sure you understand and would uphold both freedoms, there are many — such as the BLM types! — who wouldn’t. Some of them wouldn’t even grasp the distinction. It’s a sad old world.

        5. Of course they wouldn’t. Hijacking a platform to deny free speech and thus subvert an event’s message in order to force attendees to listen is practically the only tactic they’ve yet utilized.
          Desperation being motivation to act in such a manner, as no one is listening to them otherwise… Or maybe it really is just plain ignorance.

        6. For the great majority of them, I’d posit malice plus desperation. I’m a bit weary of giving thugs the benefit of the doubt. Jesus said “Father forgive them, for they know not what they do,” but He knew He’d be back in three days. Besides, the real “last word” would be His.

        7. Malice built upon a platform of ignorance. I do not believe that they are ignorant of wrongdoing, nor is that a viable defense, but that they are ignorant of the idiocy in approaching their battle in the manner they’ve selected.

        8. A good parent would have taught her that interrupting a speaker on a public platform is rude and unacceptable. Swift disciplinary action would ensue. These demonstrations and emotional outbursts show a lack of discipline.

        9. Apathetic parenting leaving a gaping void then filled by corrupted hiphop-culture groupthink and dangerous progressive diatribe.

  17. I remember, back when Martin Luther King was revered, non-violent
    protesting was promoted. Now, violent protesting is the way to go.
    That said, it is important that the unpopular people (i.e. us) maintain our non-violent stance in the face of these thugs.
    We are the weaker party and cannot win going to toe to toe. In time, after violent episodes like this, it will become apparent who the evil people are.

    1. No it won’t. This has been going on for 50 years, and the only thing that has happened is that the left has grown emboldened and the law has grown cucked.
      We either fight these people using the rules that they are using, or we continue to lose.
      Additionally, I seriously doubt we are the weaker party. Many of us carry, and frankly there are probably more conservatives and red pillers across America than there are liberal whackjobs. They exist because we’re allowing them to.

      1. Without a leader or any organization, how many like-minded men will risk everything to start a physical fight?
        It has been going on for 50 years and the power we lack is in that of a voice. That is beginning to change now.
        Go ahead and occupy a nature preserve or shoot up a church… You’ll help us all loads.

        1. You’re completely retarded. I would never shoot up a church or shoot anyone who wasn’t actively threatening my life. But sitting back and letting two people dictate an event that hundreds paid for is asinine and the epitome of the beta male behavior that this site seeks to educate against.

        2. No, but violence escalates like an avalanche. I know you weren’t advocating for murder, but I believe Mr. Yiannopoulos’ response to the given situation was the best course of action.
          Now the court of public opinion – the one that consistently tars our cause – will see clearly another example of our opponents’ madness.
          I’m armed myself, but believe in certain principles of restraint over foolish talk and reckless action. Maybe its the retard in me.

        3. It’s not the retard in you.
          Nor is it the coward in you.
          It’s the copycat in you.
          MLK and Ghandi type “Look! I’m victim!” strategies only work when
          A: you’re opponents can be easily made to appear the ‘strong ones’.
          B: there are others out there (not of your kind) that might feel sorry for you.
          In our case the left has long ago cornered the market on victimology.
          And there’s no other group (outside our kind) that’s sympathetic.
          Beyond a handful of outliers, white men basically stand alone.
          We can’t win as underdogs.
          But as top dogs we have a shot.
          It’s a matter of rolling back slave morality and returning to hero morality.

        4. Coward. Haha yeah whatever man.
          Copycat? I disagree heartily.
          One more example of something that is entirely unprecedented in the entirety of our species’ history due to the presence of the device that’s even allowing us to speak right now.
          Do you really think that, right now, if you were to take up arms and start a militia’s occupation, that news wouldn’t spread like wildfire and have your position completely surrounded by the feds? Do you think if you were to get 2 or 3 other localities’ militias together in a coordinated operation, you wouldn’t then be snuffed out by a larger force?
          The time isn’t right.
          And a HERO knows better than to shed blood wantonly.
          Judging by your very basic lack of reflection before calling others to action, I’m sure you’ll never be called one.
          Hooah.

      2. Nah man. Look at them. Would you shoot a kid throwing a temper tantrum. It feels wrong. The only way out is for a majority to wake up, not a minority shooting up idiots. Why? Cause unconscious people will just choose other idiots.

        1. I wouldn’t shoot anyone unless I was forced to defend my life or the life of my family. But had I been at that event, I would have gone onto that stage and grappled with that motherfucker until he was either off the stage or the police handcuffed me.
          Either way, he would be gone and the event could have continued. And more importantly, leftists would think twice about pulling this shit.

      3. Maybe the solution at these events is have a soundboard and TWO mics….switch off the mic they steal and give the guy the OTHER mic….

  18. So why didn’t the Dangerous Faggot defend his position and take the microphone back from the interlopers. Instead he mimics Bernie Sanders when the Bern was overtaken by lawless negroes during a campaign speech. Sitting there and taking it is NOT the correct response.

    1. He ain’t a fighter dude. He’s a flamboyant gay man. His weapon is words. Also, this is excellent publicity for his message.

      1. I agree. The best thing he can do is sit there and let the world see how his rights are being trampled over. Bernie might have come across as weak when this happened to him, but the BLM movement didn’t win any brownie points with that stunt either.

      2. Any physical defense would be twisted as a racial attack to these sick fuckers. Don’t give them any ammo.

        1. Exactly.
          I won’t say turn the other cheek, if they started choking him or something, I’m sure security would’ve stepped in. But every time a right-leaning individual steps a toe over the line the progressive media eats the hell out of it.

        2. “But every time a right-leaning individual steps a toe over the line the progressive media eats the hell out of it.”
          ——————————-
          And what raceless, sexless, mass of people that still (after all this time!) have no dog in this fight one way or another would care?
          Do you think that when a woman cuts the balls off a man, when he’s asleep, and throws them in a garbage disposal that feminists say to themselves “Gee, this feminist thing has gone too far!” or does she say to herself “Gee, that woman went too far. But (not-all-women-are-like-that) so it’s all good. Carry on.” or the equally repulsive “Gee, that woman went too far. But that’s not wut REE-AAAL femsism ish all about anyway. So carry on.”
          [frankly if it were actually possible to read minds we’d likely find that the average woman (let alone feminist) thinks “YESSS!” when she hears of such an occurrence.]
          Likewise, when the average black man hears of a white senior citizen beaten to death by a black gang to avenge the death of a two bit thug shot by a cop wanabee in self defense do you honestly think he’s thinking “Gee, this BLM stuff is gettin’ out of hand!”
          Or is he thinking “Well, I didn’t really want it to be like this but if such overkill is what it takes to fully turn the tide then… carry on.”
          Why then would you expect the average white man who has had, by now, more than enough leftoid shit thrown his way to give two cents what happens to a few snarky SJWs or a few loudmouth monkeys?

      3. This reminds of when the late Pim Fortuyn was debating a psyho Muslim cleric on national television and flaunted his homosexuality baiting said cleric who exploded and denounced Fortun in strong anti-gay terms. Fortuyn calmly turned to camera and addressing the viewers directly told them that was the Trojan Horse of intolerance The Netherlands was importing into their society all for the sake of multiculturalism. Same here-the behaviour of those animals has only validated Yiannopoulos’ views.

  19. If the security won’t remove these faggots from the stage, the college Republicans should do it themselves, then the security would get involved.

    1. I’m in partial agreement. We are constantly seeing police/security watching from the sidelines refusing to do their job. What would happen if people started taking law enforcement into their own hands in instances like this? What if the Ferguson community cleared out the looters/rioters themselves and thumbed their noses at the mayor and police?

      1. It is *ONLY* the litigiousness of our society which prevents this. I don’t *need* police to do the majority of the (very light) minor enforcement of rules. I need them to go after hard core criminals, thieves, murderers, rapists, etc. In most situations, such as the above, it’s quite easy to maintain order. The problem is our sue-happy society, where even touching another person in public can be considered a crime. Hell, look at what they did to the reporter who just observed/filmed what went on? He ended up in a cage for 8 hours. It’s absolutely sick.

        1. That’s the thing. People on our side have to be willing to spend a night in jail or whatever if that’s what it takes. Leftists do it all the time, I remember dozens of people being led away from a Trump protest in handcuffs because they were blocking traffic. Why does the right lack similar balls?
          The leftists are only going to grow bolder and more numerous as we sit back and hope for the truth to win out.

        2. The reason many of them lack balls and don’t want to go to jail is they don’t want to have a blemished record for when they run for office in their later years. It could be argued that they don’t want to anger mom and dad at home, but I don’t find that argument that convincing.

        3. Yeah, I just don’t buy or care about that line of thinking. Given the way things are going, do they think there’s actually going to be an office to run for in ten years?
          I went to jail once when I was in college, but unfortunately it was because I was just being an idiot instead of taking a stand for what’s right.
          Is it still on my record? I don’t know or care, because I’ve made myself successful enough to where I don’t have to. It’s time to fight back against these people. It’s past time, really.

        4. The cops do not protect your freedom. And neither does the military.

        5. “Leftists do it all the time, I remember dozens of people being led away from a Trump protest in handcuffs because they were blocking traffic. Why does the right lack similar balls?”
          —————-
          Well, part of it is that they have friends in high places and they know it.
          And another part of it is that leftism recruits arrogant, self important people.
          It’s the reason you feel that you could just assume shoot them as look at them.
          Think about it. Who else but an arrogant little prick would think they could get away with blocking traffic or disrupting events like that?
          In fact, it isn’t really the leftist’s bad ideas you hate (although they have quite a few stinkers) rather it’s the way they sell it.
          Imagine an extremely pushy, rude, unkept, smelly, foul mouthed door-to-door salesmen that beats down your door and tries to COMMAND you to pay through the nose for their (shitty, inferior to what you already own) wares.
          That’s at the heart of it, alright!
          And they ALWAYS justify it all on the grounds that they couldn’t make quota any other way.
          Do they seriously believe that anti-racist/sexist messaging that is controlling or domineering reduce racism and sexism instead of perpetuating it!?
          Do they honestly believe that gasoline is a perfectly good substitute for water when there’s a fire?!
          Or is it that they’re using these issues to vent their jealousy and hatred of all things smart, strong and beautiful? Or all that is white or male?
          It takes a supreme amount of smug arrogance (the likes of which should be stripped and flogged till the flesh falls off) to think that the alleged suffering of people (who’s bones aren’t even around anymore) merits a special place for YOU or the misery of the alleged descendants of their perpetrators.

      2. What if white folk started allying themselves with the BLM crowd instead????

      3. Ask yourself why this is so. Look at what has happened to police officers around the country that get in life threatening struggles with Blacks. They either get killed; in which case the legal system may try and convict the murderers, or they kill them in self defense and get pilloried and hounded if not imprisoned.

  20. I watched the livestream on BB, and I was appalled at the passivity of the conservatives in the crowd. Not one of them had the stones to go on the stage and remove two protesters or even take the mic back from that one cunt, effectively allowing a tiny minority to ruin the event for hundreds of people.
    People will say that’s what BLM wants, and maybe that’s true. But the reality is that there is a double standard, and conservatives have been allowing themselves to be walked over for 50 years. That’s why the country is in the state that it’s in: because we keep bringing knives to gunfights and taking the metaphorical high road instead of trying to defeat the enemy.
    It’s time to wake up. These people are dangerous, and they need to be put down by the larger group of rational citizens in this country. If it takes spending a night a jail to get the ball rolling or whatever, I’d be willing to do it. This insanity has to stop.

    1. I agree. Its stupid to say that we are winning this war, because we are not. If someone at the audience had the balls to go on stage and begin some fist fight, i can assure you things would change.

      1. It wouldn’t even necessarily devolve into a fistfight. If five or six of the guys wearing Trump hats in the audience had surrounded Edward Ward on the stage, what could he have done?
        Then they could have taken the mic back from the Johnson cunt, handed it to the college republican host that she stole it from, and the event could have preceded.
        It just takes some people on the right to sack up. I understand putting your career or your family first, not wanting to blemish your record, etc. But at some point you need to realize that all of that shit is going to be destroyed anyway if you continue to let stuff like this happen.

        1. “But at some point you need to realize that all of that shit is going to be destroyed anyway if you continue to let stuff like this happen.”
          This is the key every “right wing” person needs to get through their fucking skulls. You want to maintain your pretty little fuckboy image to people and be on “good terms” with an establishment that actively and vocally promotes YOUR FUCKING DESTRUCTION.
          This is no longer about being civil. This is about your survival and the survival of your children. Doing nothing, YOU are part of the fucking problem!

        2. “But at some point you need to realize that all of that shit is going to be destroyed anyway if you continue to let stuff like this happen.”
          ————–
          When the cost of not being a racist exceeds the cost of being a racist.

        3. This reminds me of this joke:
          Two Jews in Nazi Germany are arrested, tortured, found guilty, and sentenced to death by firing squad. While they are waiting their turn a non-Jewish German is offered a cigarette and a blind fold then shot. When their turn comes They are offered neither. the first Jew starts screaming that it is unfair and he wants the same treatment a s the non-Jews got. The second says, “Be quiet, you don’t want to get us in trouble.”

      1. Maybe so, but so would some more conservatives. Instead we’re all just here lying to ourselves about how we somehow “won” an event that two leftists shut down by themselves, lol.

    2. Because Republicans/Conservatives are in anything for one thing and one thing only…the money. Same reason why cops/military look on as freedom after freedom is eroded…the money. They would not dare lash back against those that pay their salaries/pensions. Especially those military/police parasites who lap oh so well at the creamy sperm of the public trough.

    3. Whites are afraid of black people…they are a protected species of human….look, the administration did nothing, even they are afraid…imagine if this was vice versa, a bunch of white conservatives taking the mic from a BLM speaker? There would be people in the hospital and no charges against the thugs that put them there.

  21. Always amusing to see communists reveal their true colors: that of being homophobic agitators who tried to lynch a gay man.

  22. I am not a fan of violence, but the left is bringing it upon themselves. If a bunch of students cleared out the protesters with bats and chains I would not feel bad about it. In fact, in the one video a student legally assaulted the speaker. If violence is what they want, then that is what they will get in return. It will not end well though for left wing losers. But if they want to bring it on, then bring it on.

    1. This will be the logical conclusion. When they push certain groups too far there will be a massive push back. We already know they could not handle any pushing done against themselves.
      It is obvious to anyone that the law or the ruling powers are on their side through negligence or outright collusion. Everyone who opposes them are too scared to do anything because they still feel like they have too much to lose. This is changing and everyone needs to realize what is at stake here.
      Do nothing and they won’t stop at your schools. They will come to your very homes and push your bitch ass around.

      1. Which brings a very interesting point regarding our tribe we’re creating; personal, tribal, and community protection. If Ferguson style riots were to break out in our area, I would want the manpower to push them back if the police and mayor don’t have the stones to do it themselves.

      2. That is how the Nazis ended up with the brown shirts and later the SS. It has happened to countless other political movements.

        1. A case study in projection and irony it would seem. The imaginary demons they have conjured up and “fight” against are the very things they nurture to create. This in turn ends up destroying them.

        2. You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.

  23. That is the definition of corruption when a politically connected person can openly break the law. Those parents of power using their position to violate the rights of others shoild lose those positions. The Chicago police department should be ashamed of themselves and deserve what ever they get.

    1. Watch the video of him, Steven Crowder, and Christina Hoff-Sommers speaking at UMass (where Trigglypuff was spawned)

      There are many opportunity-driven allies out there. And Milo’s tour is as entertaining as it is ideologically valid.

      1. There are also some good interviews of him with Dave Ruben on, I think it’s called the Ruben Report. (Also interviews with Ben Shapiro and Christina Hoff Sommers)

  24. These aren’t black people… they’re overgrown apes. Hopefully they’ll suffer some consequences for their behavior after the fact.
    What needs to happen in an instance like this… is for the crowd to physically remove the monkeys. Grab this woman by her hair and drag her out… assault anyone who’s come on stage. Basically a mass backlash of violence will stop this sort of thing out real quick.

    1. Imagine if it was Obama giving a speech and she came up on stage. The secret service (security) would’ve hauled her ass off and out of there so fast.

  25. I’m a fan of John Ringo and Tom Kratman. This clusterfuck reminds me of a scene in “Watch on the Rhine” (Read “A Hymn Before Battle” first).
    A massive alien invasion was coming but alien allies had supplied us with technology allowing us to rejuvenate old folks back into 20-year-olds. Germany got desperate enough to even rejuvenate and re-form the Waffen SS. SJWs went nuts and tried to storm their base and attack the now young again WWII Waffen SS vets standing in formation in front of the gates with clubs. You can imagine exactly how it went.

    1. If white men over 60 (everywhere) could somehow be rejuvenated a lot of ass kicking would commence.
      No doubts there.

  26. The reason lefties can get away with it is because there are too many of them for the establishment to process.
    Even so, video evidence is enough to get an assault charge. Might need to get a good lawyer though, and even then trial by media is more influential than the law itself.

  27. What is funny is how Milo just sat there and trolled them. Then after a while they realized they were being filmed and wanted security to do something… but nope… Then it got uncomfortable but they could not just leave. Now we have the perfect depiction of rich black homophobic racists showing their true colors to the world. While security not doing anything might have looked bad at the time I think it hurts them in the long run. With no cops roughing them up and no evil Republicans touching them they just look like babies throwing a temper tantrum.

    1. The cops/security told the Huffington Post that administrators had told them to do nothing.

      1. And the administrators collected extra fees for additional security and purposely hindered that service. That’s outright fraud.

  28. I admire Milo for his calm demeanor and debating power. He just sits there and looks on while the fatties go wild. That girl in the audience with a dead animal on her head was insane. I could not remain calm in that situation. I would laugh too hard.

  29. If black radicals keep this up, white people will start to wonder if black lives really do matter that much.

    1. Ah…geez…there’s an old saying…it’s on the tip of my tongue…..something about judging people by the content of their character, not by the color of their skin? Can someone look this up and maybe send it to the BLM group? They might discover that black lives do matter…just not theirs.

      1. The problem is, the black community (and others by contact) is dominated by the giants of hiphop culture – music, fashion and the like.
        The same people who want records sold and Jordans on every foot have done a dynamite job of imposing a strict standard of compliance on said populations.
        If you don’t to A, B, and C then you are not in line with the group and should be shunned. These same robber-barons are ultimately invested in the proliferation of cultural attitudes that place minority (and many low-income white) communities at odds with anything that could possibly promote any positive change therein. Crime pays, overt consumerism gets you laid, and fuck everybody that has any single thing that you want and don’t have now.
        All aided, and artificially reinforced, by the Divine Inter-connectivus.

      2. That’s just it, it’s nothing to do with their skin color it’s to do with the way the conduct themselves both individually and collectively.

    2. If they really believed that Black Lives Matter they would have shut down the planned parenthood clinics that are in every predominately black neighborhood.

        1. Man, I’ll tell you what’s ironic.
          That the only thing that can stop socialism these days is an uprising by the proletariat!

      1. If black lives mattered to blacks, black men would stop pumping and dumping women and leaving the next generation of fatherless lawless bastards to blame whitey for their self-created, self-sustaining problems.

        1. Bill Cosby himself said “be a real father” to these inner city pump and dumpers.

  30. Red Guards will stop only if Milo files a court case, both civil and criminal

  31. Idk what needs to be done next playing by their rules isn’t working, it may need to start getting violent

    1. The Republican establishment has been wrought asunder, the Progressive candidate is fiercely maligned. In Europe, Nationalism is also on the rise.
      That we even exist in this coalition here serves to herald an imminent backlash.
      The response has been delayed by our enemies’ best efforts, but it is coming.

    2. Invoking violence only boosts their victim image. I don’t recommend it until we change that view.

      1. It’s a step that can only be made when its consequences are well measured and won’t backfire at those making it.
        Anyway, if “they” suspect the thing, they will use false flag ops. In Eastern Europe, there are illegal immigrants (“refugees”, according to the media) who dress as neonazis and burn their own living places as a “marketing” operation.

      2. Have mixed feelings on this myself.
        Not sure if Martin Luther King style tactics work on our side.
        The problem is that ours is NOT a ‘victim’ movement.
        Trump and all the rest is about strength seen winning.
        I’m not altogether sure that a rightist beatdown of protesters would necessarily hurt anything.
        It might just mean that the media wouldn’t have to work as hard.
        The opposition are bullies. Strong and dominant around the shy and timid. But cowering and supplicating in the presence of ineluctable force.
        Consider these Muslims after a riot in Russia (now keep in mind these are Muslim dudes NOT the far tamer SJW and BLM crowd).
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2a6-1UD1kI
        Now imagine these guys are SJW and BLM.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKIQjOS_9C4
        Absolutely
        bad
        asses!
        And note not a gun in sight either.

        1. The problem we have here in the US is ambulance chasing lawyers and the judges that allow cases to go through. Americans are sue happy and would see this type of police conduct as a winning lottery ticket.

      3. I think having multiple microphones and a soundboard in a locked room could solve this problem.

  32. I will be attending the event tonight at UCSB, and next Tuesday at UCLA. Triggering SJW’s is always a good time.

  33. A lot of coverage about this over at Breitbarts (breitbart.com tech section.
    There’s also an article in the Huntington Post quoting the security officers as saying they were ordered by the administration to do nothing.

  34. We are now seeing first hand the effects of affirmative action and special incentives to provide financial aid to af-ams. Colleges are overrun with students that aren’t there for an education. They’re there for song and dance and performance art (aka protesting everything).

    1. And soon to launch the greatest wave of useless bachelor’s degrees the world has ever seen. Between these fools and the proliferation of web-only Diploma Mills, mainstream college education has been watered down by mediocrity and lowered standards, and doesn’t hold the same cred that it used to just 10+ years ago…

      1. As far as I know, 4 times as much, especially Berlin and Hamburg cities.

  35. Milo must have known this would happen. There could be no other outcome. So he got what he wanted; easy martyrdom and exposing SJWs as super intolerant. Well played.

    1. I had the same feeling…he can let the SJWs do some of the work on his behalf, but it requires a Zen level of patience to execute properly. Not an easy gig!

  36. I encourage you guys to go to Black Lives Matter website, read the mission statement. Its not about black lives at all. Which gives it an evil genius troll type of vibe. Milo is just returning the favor it seems.

    1. “go to Black Lives Matter website”. It has cooties, man!
      Now seriously, my patience to read SJWs is not that abundant these days. It’s like eating nails.

      1. Hence me not putting the link. But is important to understand ones enemy. By assuming that blacks are the source of their fight we are engaging them incorrectly. Blacks are their foot soldiers by way of association thru the name. The blacks themselves don’t even realize what BLM is really about because it seems self explanatory, But its there in black and white. maybe quoting it is better not to expose my fellow commenters to the cooties I’ve already endured by visiting the site. lol

        1. You are absolutely right.
          “It is important to understand ones enemy.” The sad thing is they are just a bunch of idiot puppets in the hands of Soros. Coherence and even literacy I will not expect from them, no, sir.

        2. “Blacks are their foot soldiers”
          —————————
          Low IQ savages make great useful idiots.

      2. But I like eating snails. the garlic butter is delicious. What do you have against eating sna….
        What? Nails not Snails?
        Oh, never mind.

  37. And on a related note, why is the alt.right/NPI crowd ridden with homosexuals and metrosexuals with faggy undercut hairdos? Inquiring minds want to know.

    1. Milo Yiannopoulos is a homosexual and Jew, he is trying to co-opt the alt.right. He appears to have some serous mental health issues. He has a black man fetish and sells tee shirts that say I love BBC.

      1. Milo takes down feminists all the time. The fact that he’s guy or indeed Jewish is irrelevant. He’s fighting hard against the SJWs. And his sexual preferences are irrelevant you bigot.

        1. He does not make a good representative of those opposed to SJW’s. I don’t think I said anything bigoted I was stating facts. He’s a gay, Jew, who sells tee shirts that say I love BBC. He is a sick man. Triggering SJW’s may be entertaining but how do you expect heterosexual men to want to be part of the alt.right or come to ROK when you have guys like Milo out there.

      2. I would suggest that you join the opposition.
        Modern leftists are doing more to promote anti-Semitism than any neo Nazi ever dreamed possible.

        Do you still believe that it’s the Joos behind all this stuff?
        Seriously?
        Just cuz Soros is Jewish doesn’t mean that the Jooos are behind everything.

    2. Alt right is not completely the same as tribalism. Tribalism requires a working dick and a smart dick at that. A little head with at least half a brain knows that a shit hole doesn’t produce civilization. Shit comes out of there. Kings know that future kings come out of a pussy hole. Any tribe that has a good hold of its dick and that protects its balls knows that.
      The alt right can be in some cases reactionary and not exactly right on the money and not true to the core tribal and natural truth. To be reactionary would be like to throw a big rock into water. The water atomizes and splashes about and is disperses. A reactive process is taking place. Pure tribalism would be more like to take the rock and set it in position and slap mortar around it. Try and get Yiannopulos to grasp tribalism or preach tribalism. He’s lacking something mentally.

  38. wow they really seriously say “check your privilege”… i always thought it’s some kind of a joke from internet memes.

    1. It just shows how they swallowed that Internet meme whole without applying any critical thinking whatsoever. This is how empty-headed weaklings come up with “narrative.”

  39. You can take chimps outta the jungle but you can’t the the jungle outta the chimps…
    #nigglypuff

    1. Nigglypuff?
      I like it!
      Should be used as code word for SJWs and BLM the way that ‘Charlie’ once referred to NVA and Vietcong.
      e.g. “Nigglypuff came out of nowhere that night and a fight broke out.”,
      “If that spot on the map is Nigglypuff”s point then we should take this route instead”, “We had Nigglypuff up one side us and down the other.” “Someone yelled, Nigglypuff in the light!”etc.
      You get the picture.
      And just wait till they overhear it being used that way.
      ….
      Oh, and when Nigglypuff appears at Trump rallys play “Ride of the Valkries” while pepper spraying their butts.

      1. Haha nice. It was a take on the infamous #trigglypuff but referring to that black female looking thing dancing around during the Milo speech.

  40. I really think the smartest thing to do at these things is what I saw at a Trump rally. Carry pepper spray. Be ready… and the first time one of these children takes a swing at you… spray the fuck out of them. Everyone has a plan… till you get sprayed in the face. Then just watch the tears roll.

    1. As long as that is deemed reasonable defensive force I think it might be deemed self-defense.

  41. Honestly, it’s like watching a building full of mentally-ill children go ape. Every other word is “F this” and “F that” because they don’t even have a single cogent thought in their heads. Psychotic outbreaks are not empowerment. This faux PC, far-leftist loser movement must be crushed. It cannot be allowed to metastasize anymore.

  42. Hot damn, I miss all the fun. Milo’s next closest speaking engagement to me is Cleveland, I gotsta be there. Hey, any of you RoK people in the Detroit area, get at me. [email protected], find me on FB or find my site Savagehippie.

  43. I lean left, and I do not identify with this a bit.
    These people are really destroying everything good that the left has to offer. Roosevelt and JFK-esque.

    1. Uh… FDR used these kinds of tactics with the NRA (National Recovery Administration not the gun guys).
      JFK cut taxes and killed commies (although half-hardheartedly in Cuba). He would be a conservative Republican now.

        1. Taxpayers. But it has produced multiple times more wealth than it consumed, Silicon Valley etc.
          Keynesian economics at it’s finest.

      1. “Uh… FDR used these kinds of tactics with the NRA (National Recovery Administration not the gun guys).” Please elaborate…
        “JFK cut taxes” His 1963 proposal changed the income tax range from 20-91% to 14-65%. Modern US conservatives would have an aneurysm’s at the idea of someone paying 65% in income tax…

  44. Those sjw’s are very territorial. I’ve literally heard them scream things like ”this is OUR campus”. When removed from the shitlib zones, they go about appearing and dressing like they disagree in spirit with the conservative codes. They’ll snitch and be the worst purveyors of excess code enforcement when they’re in a neighborhood of right minded people. They’re always doing their little bit to unravel the thread and cause discord whenever they’re surrounded by trad culture. They stop up the commodes, make un necessary complaints and basically do anything they can to cause a little headache for those who live by western tradition and who don’t subscribe to the lefty collective.
    But watch out on campus. They think they own the place. That’s where they fly their colors.
    If you know them for who they are, nab them back in their bedrock communities where they’re pitching chips at good traditional families and people. They won’t reveal that they’re a radical marxist anti family collectivist shitlib when they’re your next door neighbor. No, they’ll have you written up for twenty code violations at the henhouse meeting of homeowners association biddies. The marx lefties are taught to do this. They could see you on a bus with a trump cap or other RW logo and anonymously flag you or report you for something or make a frivolous complaint to the driver. They’re always picking shit fights but won’t say why. Especially family members that are shitlib. They don’t have to declare their platform. They just start shit fights out of the blue. Half of dumb bitch instigated shit fights are because the dumb bitch has been feminized and primed to ‘fight the man’ in the same way. Feminization is like a soft core version of the psychotic screaming full blown marxist sjw protester.
    When you’re in an area they claim as ‘theirs’ like at a student union or at home with a single mom shitlib is when their tyranny goes full bloom. I did a maintenance service call to a house once where the single mom had her toddler son crying up in the windowsill. He had used the ‘b’ word. I said ”what’s that?” She thought the three year old had called her a bitch. The shaming and manbreaking starts young with the fem shitlib. I said ”maybe you should have respected the man. Where’s the daddy?” What’s she gonna do when I’m the guy fixing her shit?
    Also older shitlibs police hard on the talk allowed in their peer groups. They get down right dirty enforcing the okay lefty drivel vs the ‘uncool’ right wing talk. There’s always an instigator or leader among them and a few psycho trashers ready to wreck some place unless they’re distracted with their doodling.

    1. What happens when they get out of the SJW incubator and have to get a real job?

      1. They’ll realize their degrees are worthless. Some will wise up and conform to the real world. Others will double down and get a masters degree or triple down for the full PhD.

    2. “He had used the ‘b’ word. I said ”what’s that?” She thought the three year old had called her a bitch.”
      ————–
      I’d have said “What sort of a cunt did he learn that word from?”

      1. Oh yeah, they probably twisted it to make Forney look like the wrongdoer.

  45. I find it a bit ironic that Matt Forney tells the female farm animal to lose a few pounds when he’s a porker too.

  46. Sad to read this article. I like breitbart and Milo. He is the kind of person I would like to meet in person. It is very difficult for me to meet true friends. He seems like a good genuine person and I agree with his views. The leftists are actively working to stop people from forming new bonds/friendships/business associates. They kill everything they touch. Milo, Roosh and others are ressurecting the world. Making men better and iñ turn women, having free speech, discussing idea’s and issues. Leftists would rather die than eat some humble pie.

  47. Hahahaahaha
    ‘you need to lose a few pounds honey’ – ‘Fuck you, you racist’
    The prospect these future brain surgeons have are without bounds – especially if you’re an ugly fat mess

  48. Free Speech doesn’t exist… never has. Don’t get upset when the respect and voice you gave to one isn’t given to you in return.

    1. Quite right.
      Everyone SAYS they believe in free speech….
      …until someone says something that pisses THEM royally off.

      1. Fuckin wish it was only things that pisses people off that eliminates free speech in society. If you like a song that someone else doesn’t like, it could be as small as that now adays.

  49. He may be conservative but the guy is still a homosexual which I do not like

      1. I understand what you are saying but the guy should go to a psychiatrist or conversion camp. Real men are not fags.

        1. At the moment, his sexual orientation is allowing the “message” into places we cant get in to. Imagine him to be a double agent. He is afforded time and space to talk that we can not get. He provides perspective to those who only hear noise when we talk. If he does it long enough, he may convert himself. who knows?

        2. Makes sense but…wrong is still wrong. I for one do not approve of fags in churches for example. A line needs to be drawn.

  50. You are aware that the notion of “free speech” only applies in context to the government, correct? A “right” to expression is only granted as a protection from Congress suppressing it. It doesn’t, in any way, mean that people, in general, must be allowed to say whatever they wish, wherever and whenever they desire to do so.
    For instance, you are perfectly free to censor these words I type, because you’re not a government official acting in that capacity and this isn’t a public space paid for by tax dollars.

    1. Yet everyone has the right to say what they want without violent aggression upon them because of what they say. This is the essence of why the first amendment exists. The government is an apparatus of violent force. Free speech is about not beeing violently aggressed against for the mere fact of speaking words, regardless of their offensiveness to others. Free speech isn’t about protection from “government” per se, but protection from violence that is inherent in government.

      1. I remember the text reads, ‘or the right of the people peaceably to assemble’.
        Those who assemble in violence are clearly not protected from government violence.

        1. Of course, violence must be defended against and violently if necessary. But I was talking about merely the act of speaking. The words said causing violent retribution because they are contrarian. Everyone has the right to say what they want without violence upon them regardless of who they are, regardless of what they said, and regardless of who is offended, government, private citizen, or collection/combonation of one or the other.
          Now, actions are totally different. You are right, violent assembly is not protected by government. But I wasn’t talking about actions.

    2. Explains why leftists aren’t that tight with the government.
      If they were then they’d more often be in violation.

  51. “I have filed charges against O’Reilly with the Chicago Police Department and will be obtaining a warrant for her arrest tomorrow.”
    ^this

  52. geez my life. Look a stampede of SJW’s/Leftists!!!!!! I really hope people see my post, I am laughing so hard here.

  53. We should be doing our best to identify people making legitimate threats of violence and committing violent acts and reporting them to the police. If the police aren’t doing their jobs due to corruption and the like, we should be contacting the FBI to rip them a new asshole

  54. Watching those videos and others like it, it’s becoming clear the real reason liberals want to ban guns.
    So they can get in everyone’s face without having to worry about starring down the business end of a 357 magnum.

    1. To be honest it’d be a waste of lead-and it’s more gratifying to have my knuckles rearrange their simian-like features.

  55. the final three paragraphs of the breitbart article are spot on –
    “The reactions of students over a non-compulsory and extracurricular event featuring a gay journalist expressing a difference of opinion are a worrying sign that academia is failing. These are students who are legal adults and on the cusp of entering the real world, yet they’re in tears over the fact that someone, who they need not even listen to, disagreed with them.
    University is no longer a place for new ideas, discussion, and intellectual debate. It is a place of safe spaces, no platforming, and trigger warnings. Students are taught to believe and agree with a single narrative and doctrine, turning them into narrow-minded and unchallenged pawns, with any form of resistance or difference of thought being classified as hate speech.
    Pittsburgh may be the steel city, but it appears its students are made of softer stuff.”
    these uni-fags should hang their heads in shame

  56. The amount of hypocrisy in these people leaves me speechless. Either they are such idiots that they don’t even realize their behavior is directly in opposition to the very principles they claim to uphold, or they do realize it and they are willingly malicious.
    Either way they are a social cancer
    I wish that these kind of events would take place on a private property in a county where it’s legal to shoot trespasser to death. If they are so keen in brute-forcing their agenda I’d like to see how they’ll fare against it, for a change.

    1. You, my friend, are k-selected and the reaction you wish would happen, which you describe (shooting them on private property) is a righteous k-selected response. It is also my response. When the k’s decide to go to war the r-selecteds die in the millions. For more info on this phenomenon, check out r vs k selected at anonymous conservative’s blog. He’s broken this shit down into an actual biological science.

  57. It’s great to see DePaul’s rating has crashed on Facebook, as thousands of people leave negative comments, including a lot of alums. Yes I know, Farcebook.. but it demonstrates that people aren’t standing for this kind of leftist thuggery anymore.

  58. I am going to cackle with laughter when that bloated blob is destroyed by the system they otherwise abuse to peddle their sick and demented ideology. Go for the jugular and do not relinquish.

  59. Also-it’s incredible how The Simpsons predicted the rise of the insane Socialist Jihadi Wankers.

  60. The BLM movement should thank their lucky stars that a police department was protecting their violent behaviour.
    There is no doubt that in the absence of police a Posse comitatus would have been organised to secure Mr Yiannopoulos 1st amendment rights and deal with BLM decisively and with deadly force if necessary.
    Freedom of speech does deserve the right of arms to protect.

  61. Glad to see assault charges filed for Ms. full-of-herself and kudos to Milo for not taking the emtional bait with the man-children chimping out. Hope there is reseach with an attorney to sue DePaul and the adiminstators personally as well as contacting DePaul’s donors on what the Institution has become. Hit them in the pocket books— it is all they understand.
    Having a open and civil debate is next to impossible with the left as they cannot endure it for long as the exposure kills them. Threats of violence and disruption is all they have left and even then it is in controlled, lefty enclaves (universities). I hope the dem convention is a blood bath as I plan to have popcorn on hand.

  62. hey matt can you not put 4 videos in a row? 4 times your thumbnail hurt eyes, besides you look narcissist doing that

  63. Dude…her getting into peoples’ faces is assault, right there. If they’re in your personal space, fucking jack them up. The beta male that sat there and let that hussy come out and snatch the mic should’ve backhanded the shit out of her or literally drop-kicked her off the stage. The organizers of this thing should’ve certainly provided security to prevent idiots like this from getting into the building.

  64. There’s a practical solution to these outbursts.
    They should have each talkers mic on a separate amp.
    That way if they get hijacked they can simply turn off the mic that’s been commandeered.
    Now wouldn’t that be a hoot!
    Imagine the frustration when leftoid attention whores can’t reach the audience but our side can still speak clearly and loudly.

  65. Amygdale triggered! It should be common knowledge that these r-selected (lower life form) types have inferior (smaller) amygdale. Hence they trigger like a mo fo. That is, quite easily. Check out anonymous conservative’s blog to learn more about this.

  66. “my room mate Lori Is getting paid on the internet $98/hr”…..!ti130ur

    two days ago grey McLaren. P1 I bought after earning 18,512 Dollars..it was my previous month’s payout..just a little over.17k Dollars Last month..3-5 hours job a day…with weekly payouts..it’s realy the simplest. job I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months. ago. and now making over hourly. 87 Dollars…Learn. More right Here !ti130u:➽:➽:.➽.➽.➽.➽ http://GlobalSuperJobsReportsEmploymentsMachineGetPay$98Hour…. .★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★::::::!ti130o….,..

  67. BLM is them arguing that black people want to commit crime freely and not be bothered by cops. That’s it. About personal accountability: When you have asthma and hear disease, it’s basic sense that you’re not going to put yourself in a position where you’re going to run from cops, and then struggle with them when you’re caught. Basic Darwinism.
    At the time of emancipation, there were like 3,000,000 blacks freed. Ok, today the number is around 40,000,000. With no new genes coming in the country and little inbreeding with other races. So what we’ve got now is a situation of extreme inbreeding with all the physical and mental effects that it causes. Low IQ, inability to adapt to language, prone to violence, inability to care/support themselves.
    I don’t know where this is all going to end up. American blacks can’t be trusted to raise their young, they can’t provide for themselves, all that. And yet they’re crying out for all these rights that normal people have. It’s not working.
    And I guarantee you that none of the white BLM people even know any black people. They know if they went into the “hood” they’d get robbed and killed.

  68. The champions of “tolerance” and “diversity” make their true colors known once more. They are worthless excuses for human beings.

  69. Now, I happen to like Milo Yiannopoulos…..he’s absolutely correct in what he says and the left is FULL of SJW hypocrites like this.

  70. The problem with American academia is telling; and it’ snot new. You can revisit Alan Bloom’s Closing of the American Mind for a primer. Colleges and universities are the last place you can find free speech. You find only sanctioned speech.

  71. “We guud” “Was ju gota say” – Was that a college student??? – must be either Women’s or Ethnic studies.

  72. Aren’t those lefties just a bastion of love ,inclusion, peace, acceptance and tolerance.

  73. Milo is either A) brave or B) stupid with a death wish. These “humans” or “animals” I prefer to call them are not interested in a debate or addressing issues that affects all of us (ie terrorism). But rather, to fulfill their addiction to drama and violence.

  74. While yelling, “check your privilege,” she hits a man. Leave it up to a raging femenist to contradict herself in less than one second. You were actually being nice by saying she needed to lose “some” weight. Her shrieking voice reminiscent of a pig being slaughtered.

  75. Watching that video clip might officially make me hate Abraham Lincoln more than obama…

Comments are closed.